Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Signal-to-interference ratio

The signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), also known as the carrier-to-interference ratio (CIR), is a fundamental metric in telecommunications engineering that quantifies the ratio of the power of a desired received signal to the power of unwanted interfering signals from other sources, such as co-channel transmissions or adjacent channels.^[1] In wireless communication systems, SIR is critical for assessing signal quality and determining the minimum threshold required to achieve acceptable reception performance, often expressed in decibels (dB) and influencing factors like bit error rate (BER) and overall system capacity.^[2] Unlike the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), which incorporates thermal noise, SIR focuses solely on interference, making it particularly relevant in interference-limited environments such as cellular networks where noise is negligible compared to interference from nearby cells.^[1] In standards like those from 3GPP for UMTS, SIR is specifically defined as the ratio of the received signal code power (RSCP) to the interference signal code power (ISCP), measured at the antenna connector to evaluate downlink performance in code-division multiple access (CDMA) systems.^[3] Key applications include optimizing frequency reuse, beamforming, and interference mitigation techniques in mobile networks, where maintaining a high SIR—typically above 10-20 dB depending on modulation schemes—ensures reliable data rates and voice quality.^[4] Emerging advancements in 5G and beyond leverage SIR analysis for dense heterogeneous networks, incorporating machine learning to predict and enhance interference management.^[5]

Fundamentals

Definition

The signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) is a key performance metric in signal processing and telecommunications, defined as the ratio of the power of the desired signal to the average power of interfering signals at the receiver.^[6] Higher SIR values signify improved signal quality relative to interference, with thresholds typically ranging from 10 to 20 dB required to enable reliable demodulation in interference-dominated scenarios. In contrast to random thermal noise, interference originates from other deliberate transmitted signals, such as those produced by co-channel users operating on the same frequency.^[7] SIR serves as a core component of the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), which extends the metric by incorporating additive noise effects.^[8]

Mathematical Formulation

The signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) is mathematically defined as the ratio of the received power of the desired signal to the total received power from all interfering sources. Formally,

\SIR = \frac{P_\signal}{P_\interference},

where P_\signal denotes the power of the desired signal and P_\interference denotes the aggregate interference power.^[1] The interference term P_\interference is modeled as the sum of powers from discrete interfering sources, expressed as

P_\interference = \sum_i P_i,

with P_i representing the power contributed by the i-th interferer.^[9] This summation assumes multiple concurrent transmitters generating interference, common in multi-user wireless environments. The formulation applies to either instantaneous powers, capturing short-term fluctuations, or average powers, which incorporate statistical effects like fading over time; average power is prevalent in system-level analyses to reflect long-term performance.^[1] For practical use in system design and analysis, SIR is frequently converted to a logarithmic scale in decibels (dB), facilitating the additive combination of ratios across cascaded components or links. The dB expression derives from the standard power ratio conversion:

\SIR_\dB = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{P_\signal}{P_\interference} \right).

This scale normalizes the ratio relative to unity (0 dB), with positive values indicating signal dominance and negative values indicating interference dominance.^[10] As a numerical illustration, consider a scenario with P_\signal = 1 mW and P_\interference = 0.1 mW. The linear SIR is $10, and in dB, \SIR_\dB = 10 \log_{10}(10) = 10 dB, signifying the signal is ten times stronger than the interference.^[10]

Comparison with Signal-to-Noise Ratio

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is defined as the ratio of the power of a desired signal to the average power of background noise, such as thermal noise arising from random electron motion or shot noise from discrete charge carriers.^[11] This metric assumes the noise is uncorrelated and random, making SNR particularly suitable for evaluating performance in low-interference settings where additive white Gaussian noise dominates.^[12] In contrast, the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) quantifies the desired signal power relative to the power of interfering signals from other transmitters, which may exhibit deterministic patterns or semi-random characteristics, such as co-channel or adjacent-channel interference.^[13] Unlike SNR, which focuses on inherent receiver noise, SIR targets structured interference that correlates with system activity, often becoming the primary performance limiter in multi-user environments like dense wireless deployments where interference power significantly outweighs noise.^[14] For instance, in urban cellular networks, interference can exceed noise levels by more than 10 dB, rendering SIR a more critical measure than SNR for assessing link quality.^[15] Despite these differences, SIR and SNR share fundamental similarities as dimensionless power ratios, typically expressed in decibels for logarithmic scaling, and both directly influence bit error rates and achievable data rates through analogous information-theoretic bounds, such as the Shannon capacity approximation C \approx B \log_2(1 + \text{[ratio](/page/Ratio)}), where B is bandwidth. This conceptual overlap facilitates unified analysis in communication systems, though SIR's emphasis on interference makes it preferable in interference-limited scenarios. An extension combining both is the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), which accounts for their joint effects.^[12]

Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio

The Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) serves as a generalized metric for evaluating the quality of a received signal by accounting for total impairment from both interference and noise sources. It is defined as the ratio of the desired signal power to the sum of interference power and noise power, expressed mathematically as

\text{SINR} = \frac{P_{\text{signal}}}{P_{\text{interference}} + P_{\text{noise}}}

This measure determines the feasibility of successful signal decoding, such as in packet reception, when the SINR exceeds a predefined threshold.^[16] SINR extends the SIR by incorporating noise, making it essential in scenarios where noise significantly contributes to degradation, such as low-interference but noisy environments like satellite links, where thermal noise predominates over co-channel interference. In these conditions, SINR provides a more complete assessment for calculating channel capacity and predicting error rates, whereas SIR alone would overlook noise-induced losses. It builds briefly on the basic SIR concept by adding the noise term to capture realistic impairments.^[1]^[16] When noise power is negligible compared to interference (P_{\text{noise}} \ll P_{\text{interference}}), SINR approximates SIR, simplifying analysis in interference-dominated systems. Historically, SINR gained prominence with the adoption of third-generation standards like UMTS around 2000, where it was used to model performance in wideband CDMA networks that experience both multi-user interference and thermal noise.^[16] In system design, SINR plays a key role in link budget calculations, ensuring that engineers account for combined degradation effects; using SIR exclusively in noisy scenarios can underestimate overall performance limits and lead to inadequate margin allocations.^[16]

Carrier-to-Noise-and-Interference Ratio

The carrier-to-noise-and-interference ratio (CNIR) is defined as the ratio of the carrier power P_c to the sum of the noise power P_n and interference power P_i, expressed as \text{CNIR} = \frac{P_c}{P_n + P_i}. This metric is particularly tailored for systems employing analog or digital modulation schemes, where the carrier power represents the modulated signal's core strength essential for demodulation integrity.^[17] CNIR emphasizes the preservation of modulated signal quality in environments combining thermal noise and external interference, making it a key performance indicator in satellite and broadcast standards. It has been incorporated into International Telecommunication Union (ITU) recommendations since the 1980s, such as those in the BO series for satellite delivery systems, to ensure reliable reception in direct broadcasting satellite (DBS) applications. For instance, in frequency modulation (FM) radio broadcasting, a typical CNIR threshold of 20 dB is required to achieve acceptable audio quieting (20 dB quieting) and suppress distortion from combined noise and interference effects.^[18]^[19] Unlike the general signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), which quantifies the desired signal power relative to interference power (ignoring noise), CNIR specifically isolates the carrier against the aggregate of noise and interference, providing a more holistic assessment for carrier-based systems where noise floor significantly impacts threshold performance. This focus on carrier power distinguishes it by prioritizing demodulation thresholds over broadband signal metrics. Historically, CNIR evolved from the carrier-to-interference ratio (CIR) used in early mobile radio systems of the mid-20th century, expanding to include noise components for a comprehensive evaluation in increasingly complex interference-prone environments like satellite links.^[20]

Applications

In Wireless Communications

In wireless communications, the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) plays a critical role in multi-access schemes such as frequency division multiple access (FDMA) and time division multiple access (TDMA), where co-channel interference from frequency reuse patterns limits system capacity and coverage. For instance, in the Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), a cluster size of 7 is commonly employed to mitigate co-channel interference and achieve acceptable SIR levels, balancing spectral efficiency with interference control.^[10] To maintain reliable performance, techniques like frequency planning and power control are essential for ensuring SIR exceeds thresholds such as 18 dB, which supports clear analog voice transmission by adjusting channel assignments and transmitter powers to minimize interference overlap. In GSM systems, handover procedures exemplify this by switching to a stronger serving cell, typically improving SIR by 5-10 dB through reduced distance-related attenuation and better interference isolation.^[10]^[21] Fading and multipath propagation pose significant challenges by amplifying effective interference, as reflected signals create fluctuating interference patterns that degrade SIR beyond nominal predictions. For voice quality, SIR thresholds around 12 dB are required for intelligible digital speech in systems like GSM, below which error rates rise sharply due to these propagation effects.^[22] The role of SIR has evolved from second-generation (2G) cellular systems, reliant on fixed reuse patterns for interference management, to modern Wi-Fi networks, where it guides adaptive techniques like beamforming to achieve signal gains up to 20 dB by directing energy toward intended receivers and suppressing sidelobe interference.^[10]^[23]

In Cellular Networks

In cellular networks, the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) fundamentally determines the cell reuse factor, allowing efficient spectrum utilization by balancing interference against signal strength to maximize capacity. For instance, in code-division multiple access (CDMA) systems, the SIR approximates \frac{G}{K-1} for K simultaneous users under equal power allocation and negligible thermal noise, where G is the processing gain, which underpins soft capacity by permitting user counts beyond orthogonal channel limits through adaptive power control and multiuser detection.^[24] This contrasts with frequency-division multiple access schemes, where stricter SIR requirements necessitate higher reuse factors (e.g., 3 or 7), but CDMA's universal reuse of 1 enables denser deployments while relying on processing gain to maintain acceptable SIR levels. Modern cellular standards leverage SIR optimization to achieve high data rates and reliability. In 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) networks using orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA), the system targets SIR values exceeding approximately 21 dB to enable robust high-order modulation schemes like 64-QAM, supporting peak throughputs while mitigating co-channel interference across subcarriers.^[25] For 5G networks operating in millimeter-wave bands, massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) techniques provide substantial SIR enhancements, often exceeding 30 dB through array gains and precise beamforming, which suppress inter-beam interference in high-density scenarios.^[26] Cellular interference manifests in two primary forms: intra-cell, stemming from resource contention among users served by the same base station, and inter-cell, which intensifies in handover zones where signals from adjacent cells overlap during mobility events.^[27] In urban deployments, unmitigated inter-cell interference can cause SIR to drop to approximately 5 dB, as observed in studies of dense base station layouts where overlapping coverage leads to elevated outage probabilities without coordination mechanisms like fractional frequency reuse.^[28] Emerging trends in 6G cellular systems emphasize AI-based interference cancellation to dynamically optimize SIR, employing machine learning algorithms for real-time prediction and suppression of both intentional jamming and unintentional crosstalk, thereby adapting to spatiotemporal variations for superior spectrum efficiency.^[29]

Measurement and Analysis

Estimation Methods

Theoretical estimation of the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) commonly employs link budget models to predict signal and interference powers based on propagation characteristics. The Okumura-Hata model, an empirical path loss formulation adapted for frequencies between 150 MHz and 1500 MHz in urban, suburban, and rural settings, serves as a foundational tool for these calculations by estimating attenuation that differentially affects desired signals and interferers. This approach integrates factors like transmitter-receiver distance, antenna heights, and environmental corrections to derive SIR values applicable in system planning. Simulation-based methods provide robust platforms for SIR estimation through stochastic modeling. Tools like MATLAB facilitate Monte Carlo simulations, where thousands of iterations incorporate random distributions for fading, shadowing, and interferer positions to generate statistical distributions of SIR. These techniques apply the core mathematical formulations of SIR while accounting for probabilistic channel behaviors, enabling validation of estimation reliability across diverse scenarios.^[30] Hardware measurements offer direct SIR assessment in operational settings. Spectrum analyzers capture the frequency-domain power spectra of signals and interference, allowing computation of SIR by integrating signal power over the desired bandwidth and subtracting or ratioing against interference levels, including peak-to-average metrics for non-stationary interferers. In orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems, pilot signal correlations exploit known training sequences to isolate signal components from interference, with estimators deriving SIR from the covariance of received pilots and long-term averaging to mitigate noise effects.^[31] In 5G New Radio (NR) systems, SIR estimation often relies on reference signals such as Channel State Information Reference Signals (CSI-RS) and Demodulation Reference Signals (DMRS). User equipment (UE) measures the Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) relative to interference, with the Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ)—defined as the ratio of RSRP to total received power in the measurement bandwidth—serving as a proxy for SIR in interference-limited conditions where noise is negligible.^[32] Software-driven approaches leverage machine learning to infer SIR from accessible metrics like received signal strength indicator (RSSI) data, training models such as long short-term memory networks on historical channel traces. Despite their utility, SIR estimation methods face inherent limitations. Many theoretical and simulation models assume isotropic antennas, overlooking real-world directional patterns and polarization mismatches that can introduce biases up to several dB in path loss predictions. In dynamic environments, user mobility exacerbates errors through Doppler shifts and rapid multipath variations, causing SIR estimates to fluctuate significantly and reducing prediction stability without real-time tracking mechanisms.^[33]

Performance Implications

The signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) directly influences bit error rate (BER) and quality of service (QoS) in wireless systems, where low SIR values degrade error performance and increase packet loss. In interference-dominated environments, SIR effectively replaces SNR in error rate calculations; for uncoded QPSK modulation, achieving a BER of 10^{-5} typically requires an SIR of approximately 10 dB, as interference acts analogously to noise in limiting reliable demodulation. When SIR falls below 10 dB, BER rises sharply, thereby compromising QoS metrics like throughput and latency. In interference-limited channels, SIR governs channel capacity according to the Shannon bound, expressed as C = B \log_2(1 + \text{SIR}), where C is the capacity in bits per second and B is the bandwidth in Hz; this formula highlights how higher SIR exponentially increases achievable rates, but interference caps performance even at high transmit powers.^[34] In multi-user scenarios, such as CDMA systems, effective SIR degrades by 3-6 dB due to multiple access interference from concurrent users, reducing overall capacity and necessitating interference mitigation to maintain viable rates.^[35]^[36] Optimization strategies like adaptive coding and forward error correction (FEC) enhance SIR tolerance by providing coding gains that lower the required SIR for target BER. For instance, convolutional or turbo codes can provide gains of several dB through redundancy that corrects interference-induced errors without retransmissions. Real-world deployments illustrate these implications; in heterogeneous networks, adding small cells improves average SIR by 5-10 dB through reduced cell-edge interference, boosting user throughput by up to 50% in dense urban areas while enhancing capacity in interference-limited 4G/5G systems.^[37]^[38]

References

[1]
[PDF] RECOMMENDATION ITU-R V.573-4 - Radiocommunication ...
The minimum value of the signal-to-interference ratio required to obtain a specified reception quality under specified conditions and at a specified point. Note ...<|separator|>
[2]
[PDF] F.240-6 - Signal-to-interference protection ratios for various ... - ITU
Since the determination of protection ratios involves obtaining the minimum signal-to-interference ratio at which a given link quality is maintained for ...
[3]
Signal To Interference Ratio - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The signal-to-interference ratio is (6.12) S I = R B w × E b I 0 where: E b = energy per bit I 0 = interference density In a cell with N u mobile transmitters, ...
[4]
[PDF] 1.Introduction 2. Measurement definitions - 3GPP
Signal to Interference Ratio, defined as the RSCP of a DPCH or PDSCH divided by ISCP of the same timeslot. The reference point for the SIR is the antenna ...
[5]
[PDF] RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.638 - Terms and definitions used in ...
1.1. The audio-frequency (AF) signal-to-interference ratio is the ratio (expressed in dB) between the values of the voltage of the wanted signal and the ...
[6]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4698620/
[7]
Interference Reduction by Beamforming in Cognitive Networks
The beamformer is designed to maximize the cognitive user's signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), defined as the ratio of the received signal power at the ...
[8]
History of Commercial Radio | Federal Communications Commission
February 23, 1927, The Radio Act of 1927 creates the Federal Radio Commission to oversee radio broadcasting, replacing the Department of Commerce in that role.
[9]
Interference-Limited versus Noise-Limited Communication Over ...
The objective of this paper is to analyze the achievable throughput of the network when the data rate of each active link is constrained to be a constant λ > 0.
[10]
[PDF] Link Performance Abstraction for Interference-Aware ... - arXiv
Oct 3, 2013 · Traditionally, signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) is used as a representative output to obtain an instantaneous BLER [10].
[11]
A Matheuristic for Joint Optimal Power and Scheduling Assignment ...
... Signal-to-Interference Ratio (SIR) is above a threshold ϕ > 0 . The SIR is the ratio of the sum of useful powers to the sum of interfering powers [51,52]:. S ...
[12]
[PDF] The Cellular Concept— System Design Fundamentals
Dec 4, 2001 · Using Equation (3.9), the signal-to-noise interference ratio is given by. S/I = (1/6) × (4.583)4 = 75.3 = 18.66 dB. Since this is greater than ...
[13]
Signal to Noise Ratio
Mar 6, 2017 · That is, it shows the variability, as defined by the standard deviation, relative to the mean. This definition of signal to noise ratio should ...
[14]
https://www.dhillon.ece.vt.edu/Downloads/DhiGanAnd_ITA2011.pdf
[15]
Signal-to-interference ratio in wireless networks - Paul Keeler
Jan 30, 2020 · Researchers working on wireless networks study the signal-to-interference ratio, which is usually abbreviated as SIR. Another name for the SIR is carrier-to- ...
[16]
[PDF] A Tractable Framework for Coverage and Outage in Heterogeneous ...
Since self-interference dominates noise in all cellular networks of even modest density, we neglect thermal noise in this work, which further improves ...
[17]
Integrating data traffic into a CDMA cellular voice system
... interference level exceeds the background noise level by 10 dB [1]. It is shown that the introduction of data can be done at little or no increase in the ...
[18]
Signal-to-Interference-Plus-Noise Ratio - an overview - ScienceDirect
A single interfering station is operating at a distance of 20 km from the mobile unit. If the loss factor is 4, calculate the signal-to-interference ratio. 12.5.
[19]
Performance of the DBS Satellite Receiver under the Impact of ...
Sep 8, 2021 · The interference can be estimated concerning the receiving system criteria of the carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio (CNIR) [6]. The Saudi ...
[20]
Satellite delivery - ITU
BO.650. Standards for conventional television systems for satellite broadcasting in the channels defined by Appendix 30 of the Radio Regulations ; BO.651.
[21]
[PDF] Frequency Modulation (FM) Tutorial - Silicon Labs
the total SNR improvement for a mono signal above threshold from FM gain and pre-emphasis and de-emphasis filtering is ≈ 27 dB + 13 dB = 40 dB, assuming an FM ...
[22]
[PDF] Untitled - Pearsoncmg.com
CNIR (carrier-to-noise-and-interference ratio), 407. Cochannel interference. AM broadcasting, 296 cluster size, effect on, 167 definition, 153 predicting, 167 ...
[23]
GSM Handover Optimization Study | PDF | Cellular Network - Scribd
normal operation a threshold (H) of 5-10 dB is used to prevent minor variation in signal. level at different base stations from causing a handover. With ...
[24]
[PDF] ELEMENTS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS - Mustafa El Halabi
... SIR is greater than or equal to 18 dB. Assume a path loss exponent n = 4. Solution: Using equation (1.13): 18 = 10(4/2) log10(3Nmin) − 10 log10(6) ⇒ Nmin ...
[25]
[PDF] On the Performance of Ad Hoc Networks with Beamforming Antennas
ABSTRACT. Beamforming antennas have the potential to provide a funda- mental breakthrough in ad hoc network capacity. We present.
[26]
[PDF] Capacity Analysis of Cellular CDMA Systems (ECE 559 Project ...
To calculate the overall interference seen at the BS, we need to integrate (6) over the area seen by the BS which requires finding r0 and rm for each point in ...
[27]
[PDF] MUTUAL INTERFERENCE MODELS FOR CDMA MOBILE ...
CDMA systems are characterized by very simple fre- quency planning, because several broadband channels are used in every cell (reuse factor K = 1).
[28]
Suggestions for Improvement for LTE Network Coverages in ...
SINR increases from 15,15 decibel (dB) with 'Normal' category to 18.29 dB which belongs to 'Good' category. INTRODUCTION. Nowadays technology doesn't only ...
[29]
[PDF] Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO: The Next Wireless Revolution?
This article outlines the benefits, challenges, and potential solutions associated with cellular networks that incorporate these technologies. MILLIMETER-WAVE ...Missing: SIR | Show results with:SIR
[30]
Cell Interference - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Cell interference is defined as the degradation of signal quality in mobile cellular networks caused by the use of the same or adjacent resources in ...
[31]
Aerial Coverage Analysis of Cellular Systems at LTE and mmWave ...
... decrease up to 5 dB due to inter-cell interference. However, the SINR did not decrease to an extent that the UAVs had no coverage (defined as SINR ≤ −6 dB).
[32]
From 5G to 6G Networks: A Survey on AI-Based Jamming and Interference Detection and Mitigation
**Summary of AI-Based Interference Cancellation in 6G for SIR Optimization:**
[33]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/501493
[34]
https://web.stanford.edu/~dntse/Chapters_PDF/Fundamentals_Wireless_Communication_chapter5.pdf
[35]
[PDF] Wireless Link Quality Estimation Using LSTM Model - arXiv
Oct 22, 2024 · Consequently, recent research has focused on efficiently learning from large datasets and multiple features, including SNR and RSSI, to develop.
[36]
https://jwcn-eurasipjournals.springeropen.com/articles/10.1155/2009/909075
[37]
[PDF] Evaluation of the Effects of Co-Channel Interference on the Bit Error ...
This modulation is much more susceptible to interference than BPSK and QPSK. There is a BER floor for SIR = 9 dB.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[38]
[PDF] Bit Rate Adaptation and Rateless Codes - cs.Princeton
Let's go back to the BER vs SNR graph. – For each modulation: What are the SNRs required for BER < 10-5? • BPSK: 7 dB; QPSK: 12 dB; 16-QAM: 20 dB; 64-QAM: 26 dB ...Missing: SIR | Show results with:SIR
[39]
What is a good RSSI Signal Strength and Can it be Affected by ...
A lower SIR can result in lower data rates, higher packet loss, or dropped connections. Causing frequency or channel overlap, which means that the desired ...
[40]
[PDF] 5 Capacity of wireless channels - Stanford University
C = log 1+SNR h 2 bits/s/Hz. (5.106). Capacity of frequency-selective ... the Shannon limit of −1 59 dB. Hint: a good choice of is when the union ...
[41]
Multiuser detection for DS-CDMA UWB in the home environment
Aug 10, 2025 · We show the adaptive MMSE exhibits only a 6 dB penalty relative to the single user case for the heavy multi-access interference (number of ...
[42]
Multiple CFOs in OFDM-SDMA Uplink: Interference Analysis and ...
In particular, if the SNR is equal to the CFO-induced SIR, we can expect that the transmission experiences a performance degradation of 3 dB compared to the ...
[43]
Understanding FEC and Its Implementation in Cisco Optics
The code uses that data to determine the probability of a bit being a 0 or 1. This approach can yield a coding gain around 3 dB higher than hard-decision FEC.
[44]
Forward Error Correction (FEC): A Primer on the Essential Element ...
FEC is an effective digital signal processing method that improves the bit error rate of communication links by adding redundant information (parity bits) to ...
[45]
[PDF] 1000x: More small cells - Qualcomm
1. Gain in median downlink data rate, 4 small cells of pico type added per macro and 50 % of users dropped in clusters closer to picos (within 40m), ...
[46]
[PDF] Deployment of Indoor Small-Cells for 4G Mobile Broadband
The small-cells increased the throughput and capacity remarkably and additional gains were obtained with the proposed algorithm. The thesis also includes ...