Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Signal Foundation

The Signal Foundation is an non-profit organization founded in February 2018 by software engineer and WhatsApp co-founder to develop open-source privacy technologies that protect free expression and enable secure global communication. Its primary product is the Signal messaging application, a cross-platform tool for end-to-end encrypted , voice and video calls, and , built on the open-source that uses double-ratchet algorithms and prekeys to ensure and resistance to key compromise. The foundation operates independently without ties to major tech corporations, rejecting advertising, trackers, or data monetization to prioritize user privacy over commercial incentives. Initially funded by a $50 million investment from Acton, the organization now relies primarily on user donations to cover operational costs, including server infrastructure and development, reporting revenues of approximately $35.8 million in 2023 from contributions and program services. Signal's adoption has grown significantly among privacy-conscious users, including journalists and activists, due to its verifiable encryption and minimal metadata collection, though it has faced operational challenges such as a 2022 phishing incident affecting its phone verification provider Twilio, which did not compromise end-to-end encrypted content.

History

Origins and Pre-Foundation Development

The development of what would become the Signal messaging service began with Whisper Systems, a startup founded in 2010 by security researcher (pseudonym for Matthew Rosenfeld) and roboticist Stuart Anderson. The company focused on mobile security, releasing —an open-source app enabling encrypted messaging over —and RedPhone, which provided end-to-end encrypted voice calls via VoIP. These tools addressed vulnerabilities in standard mobile communications, prioritizing user privacy through cryptographic protections. On November 28, 2011, Twitter acquired Whisper Systems to enhance its platform's amid rapid user growth and associated risks. Following the acquisition, departed Twitter in early 2013 and open-sourced the Whisper Systems code, enabling continued independent development. In 2013, founded (OWS) as a non-profit entity to sustain and expand these efforts through open-source collaboration. OWS initiated the that year, a double-ratchet cryptographic standard co-developed with Trevor Perrin for and deniability in . The group released the first version of Signal in 2014 for secure calls, followed by an Android alpha in July 2014, with messaging integration building on . By March 2015, OWS unified and RedPhone into a single Android app named Signal, streamlining secure text, voice, and video features. Funding came primarily from grants, including over $2.9 million from the between 2013 and later years, supporting development without commercial dependencies. Through the mid-2010s, OWS maintained Signal as a volunteer-driven , iterating on protocol adoption—later licensed to apps like —and desktop clients, such as a 2015 Chrome version evolving into standalone software by 2017. This period emphasized resistance to pressures, with minimal collection to limit legal disclosures, as demonstrated in a 2016 yielding only a user's date of account creation.

Founding and Initial Launch

The Signal Foundation, officially the Signal Technology Foundation, was founded on February 21, 2018, by security researcher (pseudonym for Matthew Rosenfeld) and , co-founder of . The organization was established as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit to support the development and operation of the Signal Messenger application, which Marlinspike had previously advanced through his project. Acton committed $50 million of his personal funds as seed capital, enabling the Foundation to operate independently without reliance on advertising or data collection for revenue. Marlinspike, who had led the cryptographic development of Signal's protocol since 2013, assumed the role of president, while Acton joined as executive chairman. The initial launch focused on formalizing Signal's non-commercial structure under the Foundation's umbrella, including the creation of Signal Messenger LLC as a wholly owned subsidiary to handle day-to-day operations and user services. This transition aimed to preserve the app's commitment to open-source code and user privacy, free from corporate acquisition risks, as Acton had experienced after WhatsApp's sale to . By early 2018, Signal already had millions of users, but the Foundation's formation provided long-term sustainability through donor funding rather than . The announcement emphasized expanding beyond Signal to potential future privacy tools, with a mission to "develop privacy technology that protects free expression and enables secure global communication." Initial activities prioritized enhancing Signal's infrastructure, including server scaling and refinements, to handle growing adoption without compromising security guarantees. This nonprofit model contrasted with for-profit messaging services, positioning the Foundation to prioritize technical integrity over user data monetization.

Post-Founding Expansion and Transitions

Following its 2018 founding, the Signal Foundation oversaw rapid expansion of the Signal app's user base, driven by heightened public awareness of privacy risks in competing services. In January 2021, WhatsApp's announcement of a policy update permitting greater data sharing with its parent company Meta led to a sharp influx of users to Signal, with over 7.5 million downloads recorded between January 6 and 10 alone, propelling the app to the top of major app stores worldwide. This growth continued, reaching over 40 million users by early 2022 and approximately 70 million monthly active users by 2024, reflecting sustained adoption amid ongoing privacy concerns. The organization also scaled its operations to support this expansion, growing from a small team to about 50 full-time employees focused on , , and by the mid-2020s. Annual operating costs rose accordingly, exceeding tens of millions of dollars by 2023 to maintain reliable service for the expanding user base, including server and enhancements. Key leadership transitions marked this period. On January 10, 2022, co-founder resigned as president and CEO after over 13 years developing the underlying technology, stating it was an opportune time for a successor amid the app's maturation; he retained a board seat. co-founder , the Foundation's executive chair and primary funder, assumed interim leadership. In September 2022, —a veteran technologist with prior roles at and the AI Now Institute, known for advocating against surveillance risks in AI—succeeded as president, bringing expertise in ethical tech to steer ongoing .

Organizational Structure

Governance and Leadership

The Signal Foundation operates as a 501(c)(3) , with primarily directed by its , which oversees strategic decisions, , and alignment with the mission of developing open-source privacy technologies. The board appoints key executives and ensures operational independence for subsidiaries like Signal Messenger LLC, emphasizing a non-commercial model reliant on donations rather than or data sales. Co-founded in February 2018 by cryptographer (Matthew Rosenfeld) and WhatsApp co-founder , the foundation's early leadership centered on Marlinspike, who served as CEO of Signal Messenger LLC and developed the core for . Acton, who invested $50 million personally to establish the entity, assumed the role of executive chairman and interim CEO following Marlinspike's departure as CEO on January 10, 2022; Marlinspike retained a board position in an emeritus capacity. In September 2022, was appointed president, a newly created executive role focused on strategy, sustainability, and advocacy; Whittaker, a former researcher and AI policy expert, also joined the board in 2020 prior to her elevation. As of the June 2023 board refresh, the directors include: (chair, former CEO with experience in tech policy and ); ; Amba Kak (tech policy lawyer and AI Now Institute director); Jay Sullivan (former and executive); ; and . This composition blends technical expertise, policy acumen, and operational experience, though critics have questioned the addition of figures like Maher—whose prior roles involved U.S. government advisory and nonprofit leadership potentially misaligned with absolute absolutism—potentially influencing governance toward broader institutional engagements. The board's structure prioritizes consensus-driven decisions without external shareholders, reflecting the foundation's commitment to independence amid growing user base and operational costs exceeding $50 million annually by 2023.

Subsidiaries and Operational Entities

The Signal Foundation maintains a streamlined organizational structure centered on its wholly owned subsidiary, Signal Messenger LLC, established concurrently with the foundation on February 21, 2018. This for-profit limited liability company functions as the primary operational entity responsible for the technical development, deployment, and maintenance of the Signal messaging application, including its open-source clients for mobile and desktop platforms, server infrastructure, and the underlying for . Signal Messenger LLC operates under the foundation's oversight to ensure alignment with its non-profit mission of advancing privacy-preserving technologies, while providing legal and operational separation for activities such as software engineering, user data handling (minimal and anonymized), and compliance with global regulations. As a single-member LLC owned by the , it is treated as a disregarded entity for U.S. tax purposes, allowing seamless integration of operations without independent fundraising or profit motives. No additional subsidiaries or independent operational entities have been publicly announced or documented as of 2025, reflecting the foundation's focused approach to resource allocation primarily through Signal Messenger LLC for core privacy tools, with potential future expansion envisioned for related projects under the parent entity's direction.

Funding and Financial Model

Initial Funding and Major Donors

The Signal Foundation was established on February 21, 2018, with initial funding of $50 million provided by , co-founder of , who had departed from in 2017 following disagreements over privacy policies. This capital injection supported the transition of Signal's development from the prior entity, founded by in 2013, into a dedicated non-profit structure aimed at expanding privacy-focused technology. Acton assumed the role of executive chairman, leveraging his resources to ensure operational independence without reliance on advertising or data sales. No other major donors contributed to the foundation's inception; the $50 million from Acton constituted the entirety of seed capital, enabling initial team expansion and infrastructure scaling. Subsequent financial sustainability has drawn from user donations, but initial establishment hinged solely on Acton's commitment, reflecting his prioritization of amid concerns over commercial tech giants' data practices.

Ongoing Revenue Sources and Sustainability

The Signal Foundation sustains its operations primarily through user donations, which form the core of its ongoing as a non-profit organization dedicated to privacy-focused communication technology. In 2023, total revenue reached approximately $35.75 million, with the majority derived from contributions including individual and institutional donations. These funds support server infrastructure, , , and operational costs without reliance on , data monetization, or subscription fees for core messaging services. Small recurring donations, such as $3 one-time or $5 monthly pledges made directly through the Signal app, are emphasized as a sustainable mechanism, fostering accountability to users rather than corporate interests. An initial $50 million endowment from co-founder in 2018 provided seed capital, supplemented by investment income from these assets, which contributed a smaller portion of revenue (e.g., around 1-2% in earlier filings). Program service revenue, such as from limited ancillary services, remains marginal at under 2% of total inflows. The foundation has occasionally received grants from privacy advocacy groups, though these are not the primary ongoing source. Sustainability challenges arise from escalating operational expenses, projected to reach $50 million annually by the mid-2020s, driven by $14 million in , over $4 million in , and staff costs amid exceeding 40 million monthly . In 2023, expenses closely matched revenue at $35.81 million, maintaining net assets around $37.4 million but highlighting the need for consistent to offset demands without compromising the ad-free, open-source model. The foundation's prioritizes broad-based over large donors to mitigate risks of or depletion, though critics note potential long-term vulnerabilities if contributions lag behind . This approach has enabled operational stability since 2018, with no reported deficits in recent IRS filings.

Mission, Activities, and Technical Focus

Core Mission and Privacy Advocacy

The Signal Foundation's core mission centers on developing open-source privacy technologies to safeguard free expression and facilitate secure global communication. Established in , the organization prioritizes (E2EE) as the foundational mechanism for this goal, implementing the —which ensures that messages, calls, and media are accessible only to intended recipients—across its flagship Signal Messenger application. This approach stems from a commitment to minimal , with Signal designed to collect no sensitive user information beyond what is strictly necessary for service operation, such as phone numbers for registration and basic for routing. In pursuit of its mission, the Foundation maintains a nonprofit structure that eschews advertising, data monetization, or dependencies, enabling a singular focus on enhancements without commercial pressures. It has pioneered cryptographic innovations, including sealed sender systems to obscure and encrypted user profiles, while open-sourcing all code for independent audits by researchers. These efforts extend beyond the to broader protocol adoption, as the has been integrated into platforms used by billions, underscoring the Foundation's role in elevating industry-wide encryption standards. The Foundation actively advocates against policies that threaten integrity, positioning as indispensable for individual autonomy and resistance to . It has publicly opposed legislative proposals mandating backdoors, such as the UK's (2023), which sought scanning capabilities incompatible with E2EE; Signal argued that no verifiable method exists to provide targeted access without systemic vulnerabilities exploitable by adversaries. Similar stances include threats to exit markets like (2025), (2025), and (amid 2025 chat control debates) if compelled decryption is required, asserting that such laws would necessitate abandoning core protections rather than compromising them. President has amplified this advocacy, critiquing capitalism and government overreach as existential threats to , while emphasizing that weakened fails to enhance safety and instead amplifies risks from state actors and cybercriminals.

Development of Key Technologies

The , the core end-to-end encryption framework underpinning Signal's messaging, voice, and video communications, was initially developed in 2013 by and Trevor Perrin under , the predecessor organization to the Signal Foundation. This protocol integrated innovations such as the , which provides and post-compromise security by combining symmetric-key ratcheting with Diffie-Hellman key exchanges to ensure that session keys evolve independently for each message. Earlier precursors emerged from Whisper Systems, founded in 2010 by Marlinspike and Stuart Anderson, which released (for encrypted texting) and RedPhone (for encrypted calls); these merged into the unified Signal app by 2015, incorporating the protocol's asynchronous encryption suitable for unreliable networks. Following the Signal Foundation's establishment in 2018, development emphasized minimizing exposure and enhancing usability without compromising security. A key advancement was the introduction of Sealed Sender in October 2018, which encrypts sender identities in messages to prevent servers from linking communications to users, thereby reducing traceable while relying on recipient trust for mitigation. The protocol's open-source nature facilitated external audits and adoption, with formal specifications published to enable implementations in other services, though the Foundation maintained primary stewardship for Signal's version. Recent efforts have addressed emerging threats like . In September 2023, the Foundation deployed PQXDH, a hybrid combining X3DH with post-quantum elements like to enable quantum-resistant initial key exchanges without disrupting existing sessions. Building on this, the October 2023 rollout of the Sparse Post-Quantum Ratchet (SPQR) extended quantum resistance to ongoing message , using repeated encapsulations sparingly to balance security against computational overhead, as detailed in the protocol's specifications. These updates reflect iterative cryptographic research, prioritizing empirical resistance testing over theoretical ideals, with the Foundation's non-profit model enabling sustained investment in such refinements independent of commercial pressures.

Controversies and Criticisms

Internal Debates on Features and Moderation

In late 2020, as Signal prepared to launch features aimed at enhancing usability amid anticipated growth, internal discussions highlighted tensions between expanding functionality and mitigating potential misuse. Employees, including those with expertise in trust and safety, expressed concerns during a September 29, 2020, all-hands meeting that features like shareable group links—subsequently released on October 28, 2020—could enable extremists, such as members of the , to rapidly organize violent activities without adequate safeguards. Similar worries extended to planned usernames and display names, which might facilitate impersonation, and exploratory payments integrations, such as with , potentially attracting illicit actors absent a comprehensive . Founder and CEO defended a hands-off approach, arguing that inherently prevents Signal from accessing message content for moderation, rendering server-side interventions infeasible without compromising the app's core privacy guarantees. He maintained that preemptively addressing hypothetical abuses was unproductive, stating that proactive policies would only be considered once specific harms materialized, prioritizing the nonprofit's mission to foster over assuming a "media company" role with content controls. This stance drew internal criticism for lacking even basic policy frameworks, with one former employee noting the absence of strategies amounted to "hoping things don’t go bad" rather than structured . In response to these debates, pledged to hire dedicated personnel and to monitor features like group links, with readiness to disable them if widespread occurred. However, the company resisted broader mechanisms, viewing them as antithetical to protecting users—particularly marginalized groups—from , even at the cost of forgoing aggressive growth tactics. These discussions underscored a philosophical divide: employees advocated for features tempered by proactive prevention, while executives emphasized encryption's limitations and the need for —targeting 100 million users for donation-based —without diluting . No major policy overhauls resulted immediately, though the episode reflected ongoing balancing of technical integrity against operational risks amplified by the app's January 2021 user surge.

External Critiques on Privacy Absolutism

External critiques of the Signal Foundation's privacy absolutism, characterized by its unwavering commitment to without provisions for lawful access, have primarily emanated from and entities concerned that such policies impede criminal investigations. An internal FBI training document from 2021 details that Signal provides the least amount of user among major encrypted messaging apps, offering only the account creation via and the last connection via or , with no access to message content, contacts, or other . This limitation, critics argue, creates a "going dark" problem where investigators cannot obtain critical evidence even with judicial warrants, as evidenced in cases like the prosecution of for the , 2021, U.S. Capitol riot, where Signal messages were recovered only through device seizures rather than server . Law enforcement officials, including representatives from the FBI and , have highlighted how Signal's design facilitates evasion by serious criminals, such as drug traffickers, terrorists, and , by shielding communications from oversight. In one instance, law enforcement in January 2023 advised parents to delete Signal and similar apps, citing their role in concealing material from detection. A 2022 New York Times opinion piece by former prosecutor Jason M. Bresler contended that Signal's absolutist approach prioritizes individual over societal , enabling "impenetrable closed doors" for illegal coordination and questioning whether warrant-based phone tapping precedents should extend to encrypted apps amid public debate. National security experts have further criticized the stance for exacerbating risks in and probes, where absolute allegedly empowers adversaries while offering no compromise for verified legal processes. U.S. officials have historically portrayed apps like Signal as tools of criminals and threats to security, advocating for "lawful access" mechanisms that would enable encrypted data decryption under — a position Signal rejects outright, prompting accusations that its policies hinder proactive threat mitigation without sufficient safeguards against abuse. These critiques underscore a tension between and evidentiary needs, with proponents of reform arguing that absolutism, while technically robust, overlooks real-world investigative imperatives supported by .

Government Use and National Security Concerns

Various government officials, including members of the administration such as Secretary , have utilized Signal for communications involving sensitive military operations, such as planning strikes against Houthi targets in . In March 2025, a group chat on the app inadvertently included journalist , who was accidentally added by Hegseth, resulting in the leak of operational details including target lists and timelines; this incident highlighted operational security lapses rather than cryptographic failures in Signal itself. Despite its , Signal has not been approved for official use by the (DoD) or for handling , with advisories explicitly cautioning against its deployment even for unclassified matters due to identified vulnerabilities. In February 2025, the (NSA) issued a bulletin warning of Russian state-sponsored hackers attempting to compromise Signal conversations through and other tactics targeting users' devices. A subsequent DoD-wide on March 18, 2025, reiterated these risks, emphasizing that Signal lacks the compliance with federal standards required for government networks. National security concerns stem primarily from Signal's design, which minimizes retention and resists intermediary access, complicating lawful efforts by agencies like the NSA or FBI; when compelled by court orders, Signal discloses only limited account creation dates and last connection times, as publicly documented on its website. This privacy absolutism raises tensions with intelligence requirements under laws like the , potentially hindering threat detection in operations where encrypted apps have been used by adversaries. Experts have noted that while Signal's is robust against passive , its use on personal devices for official purposes evades record-keeping mandates under the Federal Records Act and risks Espionage Act violations through unmonitored dissemination. Internationally, authoritarian regimes including , , and have intermittently blocked Signal to curb secure communications by dissidents, citing threats from unmonitored channels. In democratic contexts, Australia's 2025 proposals to mandate decryption access for underscore ongoing debates over balancing with public safety, though Signal's non-compliance with such backdoor requests aligns with its foundational resistance to weakening security for any entity. These dynamics illustrate a causal tension: Signal's efficacy in protecting user directly impedes oversight, prompting fragmented adoption policies where utility for secure internal coordination outweighs formal prohibitions in practice.

Reception, Impact, and Legacy

Achievements in Privacy Technology

The , developed by the Signal Foundation, introduced the , which combines symmetric-key ratcheting with Diffie-Hellman key exchange to provide and post-compromise security in end-to-end encrypted messaging. This innovation ensures that past messages remain secure even if long-term keys are compromised, and it has been formalized in open-source specifications since 2013, enabling verifiable cryptographic protections without reliance on centralized trust. Sealed Sender, implemented in Signal Messenger in 2018, enhances privacy by allowing senders to prove authenticity without revealing their identity or recipient lists to the server, thereby minimizing exposure of communication patterns that could be exploited for surveillance. This feature operates atop the , encrypting envelope information to prevent server-side logging of who messages whom, while preserving deniability and spam resistance through blinded authentication. In response to emerging quantum computing threats, the Foundation upgraded the protocol with PQXDH in September 2023, integrating post-quantum key encapsulation mechanisms like alongside classical for hybrid resistance against harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks. Building on this, the Sparse Post Quantum Ratchet () was announced on October 2, 2025, optimizing efficiency in group chats and long-term sessions by sparsely applying quantum-secure ratchets, maintaining low computational overhead while bolstering security against future adversaries. These advancements position Signal as a leader in proactive cryptographic evolution, with the protocol's adoption in applications serving billions—such as and —demonstrating its scalability and influence on industry standards. The Foundation's commitment to open-source development has facilitated independent audits and , ensuring transparency and tamper-proof verification of privacy claims, as evidenced by third-party analyses confirming minimal beyond phone numbers for registration. Innovations like Sender Keys for efficient further reduce overhead, enabling secure scalability without compromising per-message protections.

Broader Societal and Industry Influence

The , developed by the Signal Foundation, has established itself as the for in private messaging, influencing major industry players to integrate similar technologies. WhatsApp completed its full adoption of the protocol on April 5, 2016, enabling for over a billion users at the time, a move that addressed prior criticisms of collection and partial . Other platforms, including and Facebook Messenger, have similarly incorporated variants or elements of the protocol, elevating baseline privacy expectations across the sector and pressuring for-profit competitors to prioritize cryptographic rigor over data monetization. This shift has compelled companies like to justify their practices amid user migrations to Signal during privacy scandals, such as the 2021 WhatsApp policy backlash. On a societal level, Signal's emphasis on minimal and open-source code has empowered dissidents, journalists, and whistleblowers in repressive regimes, fostering channels that bypass . Post-Edward revelations in , Signal's user base surged among privacy-conscious individuals and professionals, contributing to broader awareness of 's role in resisting . Its nonprofit structure, funded primarily by donations rather than advertising, models an alternative to surveillance capitalism, inspiring groups and users to demand transparency from dominant platforms. However, this absolutist approach has amplified debates on the trade-offs between unbreakable privacy and law enforcement access, with Signal's leadership publicly opposing proposals for encryption backdoors. In policy arenas, the Foundation has shaped discussions on , with President advocating for robust protections against state-mandated weakening of standards. Signal's resistance to with requests—storing no —has influenced legislative pushes in and elsewhere, exemplified by its February 2025 threat to exit over proposed laws enabling government decryption access. This stance underscores causal tensions between technological privacy innovations and imperatives, prompting governments to refine frameworks while highlighting institutional biases toward expanded access in circles. Such influence extends to global standards, where Signal's post-quantum enhancements in 2023 have preempted emerging threats, setting precedents for resilient amid advances.

Balanced Assessment of Limitations

Despite its emphasis on and minimal , Signal requires users to register with a phone number, which links the account to a potentially identifiable real-world identifier and exposes it to Signal's servers, undermining for users seeking to avoid or correlation attacks. This requirement persists even for use, as the app ties verification to mobile numbers, creating a where phone number portability or carrier data could deanonymize users. Signal's user base, estimated at around 100 million monthly as of 2025, remains significantly smaller than competitors like WhatsApp's over 2 billion, limiting its network effects and practical utility for broad communication, as users often revert to less secure apps to reach non-Signal contacts. Messages sent to non-users fall back to unencrypted or , exposing content to interception by carriers or intermediaries, which contradicts the app's promises for mixed networks. While the secures message contents, —such as communication patterns, timestamps, and recipient identities—remains visible to Signal's servers and potentially accessible via legal demands or , as the centralized architecture does not employ advanced obfuscation techniques like those in alternatives. Audits have confirmed protocol robustness, but app-level vulnerabilities, including local access to unencrypted attachments on compromised devices, highlight that depends heavily on user endpoint protection rather than inherent app isolation. As a non-profit reliant on donations, the Signal Foundation faces operational constraints, spending tens of millions annually on infrastructure without a scalable , which risks underinvestment in features, rapid bug fixes, or global expansion amid rising server costs from privacy-preserving designs that avoid data monetization. This model, while ideologically pure, has drawn critiques for lacking long-term sustainability, potentially exposing the service to shortfalls or donor influence over development priorities.

References

  1. [1]
    Signal Foundation
    Feb 21, 2018 · The Signal Foundation's mission is to develop open source privacy technology that protects free expression and enables secure global communication.Missing: overview | Show results with:overview
  2. [2]
    Signal Foundation
    Brian Acton​​ In February of 2018, Acton invested $50 million of his own money to start the Signal Foundation alongside Moxie Marlinspike. Signal Foundation is a ...Afrikaans · Azərbaycanca · Bosanski · Catal
  3. [3]
    Signal >> Home
    Free for Everyone. Signal is an independent nonprofit. We're not tied to any major tech companies, and we can never be acquired by one either.Protocol · Download · Blog · Download Signal for Windows
  4. [4]
    Technology preview: Sealed sender for Signal
    Oct 29, 2018 · As a reminder, Signal Profiles are end-to-end encrypted, and the profile keys are exchanged via the same Signal Protocol messaging channel that ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
  5. [5]
    Signal Technology Foundation - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica
    $$13,749,527. Notable Sources of Revenue, Percent of Total Revenue. Contributions, $9,911,613. 77.6%. Program Services, $203,590. 1.6%. Investment Income ...
  6. [6]
    Signal >> Donate to Signal Private Messenger
    Signal is a nonprofit built for you. No ads, no trackers, no surveillance. Donating to Signal helps pay for the servers, bandwidth, and ongoing development.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  7. [7]
    Twilio Incident: What Signal Users Need to Know
    In the summer of 2022, Twilio, the company that provides Signal with phone number verification services, suffered a phishing attack.Missing: Foundation controversies credible sources
  8. [8]
    The story of Signal – Increment: Security
    In February 2018, Marlinspike and WhatsApp cofounder Brian Acton officially launched the nonprofit Signal Foundation with a $50 million investment from Acton.
  9. [9]
    Twitter Acquires Moxie Marlinspike's Encryption Startup Whisper ...
    Nov 28, 2011 · Whisper Systems announced Monday that it's been acquired by Twitter, though Twitter hasn't confirmed the deal or offered any information ...
  10. [10]
    Signal (Open Whisper Systems) | OTF - Open Technology Fund
    Open Whisper Systems (OWS) produces the leading encrypted mobile ... Funding to date. $2,955,000. 2012$0 12 months. 2013$455,000 18 months. 2014 ...
  11. [11]
    Signal expands into the Signal Foundation with $50M ... - TechCrunch
    Feb 21, 2018 · But $50 million from WhatsApp co-founder Brian Acton should help secure the app's future, through the newly founded Signal Foundation nonprofit.
  12. [12]
    WhatsApp Co-Founder Puts $50M Into Signal To ... - WIRED
    Feb 21, 2018 · On Wednesday, the creators of Signal announced the launch of the Signal Foundation, which will build and maintain Signal and potentially ...
  13. [13]
    Signal's Brian Acton talks about exploding growth, monetization and ...
    Jan 12, 2021 · In 2018, Acton invested $50 million in Signal Foundation, a check that he said helped get the ball rolling. But how does the messaging app plan ...
  14. [14]
    Signal Revenue & Usage Statistics (2025) - Business of Apps
    Jan 22, 2025 · Signal had 70 million active users in 2024. Quite a lot of users shifted to Signal in 2022 after WhatsApp privacy update.Missing: 2018 | Show results with:2018
  15. [15]
    Signal User Statistics: How Many People Use Signal? - Backlinko
    Jun 23, 2025 · Signal has 70-100 million monthly active users. · Signal app downloads reached 193.8 million as of early June 2025. · Signal has 50 full-time ...Missing: 2018 | Show results with:2018
  16. [16]
    Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
    Nov 16, 2023 · Because everything in Signal is end-to-end encrypted, we can rent server infrastructure from a variety of providers like Amazon AWS, Google ...
  17. [17]
    Signal >> Blog >> New year, new CEO
    Jan 10, 2022 · Signal is now an amazing group of 30 people: a mix of wonderful engineers, super talented designers, gifted and unflappable support staff, and a very ...
  18. [18]
    Moxie Marlinspike leaves encrypted-messaging app Signal - BBC
    Jan 11, 2022 · Mr Marlinspike remains a board member of the Signal Foundation, while the board's executive chair, Brian Acton, becomes interim chief executive.
  19. [19]
    A Day in the Life of Meredith Whittaker, the President of Signal
    Oct 13, 2025 · When Signal became its own foundation in 2018, I joined the board and became its president in September 2022. Here's what a typical day looks ...Missing: CEO | Show results with:CEO
  20. [20]
    Signal >> Blog >> A Message from Signal's New President
    Sep 6, 2022 · Signal has existed since 2014. Its open Signal Protocol represents a significant contribution to the field of cryptography, and has been vetted ...
  21. [21]
    Signal's Katherine Maher Problem - City Journal
    May 6, 2024 · The other potential problem is the Signal Foundation's current chairman of the board, Katherine Maher, who started her career as a U.S.-backed ...Missing: governance | Show results with:governance
  22. [22]
    Running Signal Will Soon Cost $50 Million a Year | WIRED
    Nov 16, 2023 · When the Signal Foundation was created in 2018 and WhatsApp cofounder Brian Acton left Facebook to become its president, he donated $50 million.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  23. [23]
    Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - Signal
    Signal is designed to never collect or store any sensitive information. Signal messages and calls cannot be accessed by us or other third parties.Terms Of Service · Disclaimers And Limitations · Privacy PolicyMissing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
  24. [24]
    Standing firm against threats to private and safe communication
    Mar 9, 2023 · Signal exists to provide people everywhere with a tool for real private communication. That's our only goal, and we take it very seriously.Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
  25. [25]
    Signal threatens to leave France if encryption backdoor required
    Mar 20, 2025 · Signal is standing its ground to protect its app's security, threatening on Wednesday to leave France if encryption backdoor requirements are enacted.
  26. [26]
    Signal May Exit Sweden If Government Imposes Encryption Backdoor
    Feb 26, 2025 · The UK government ultimately backed down after Meta joined Signal in threatening to withdraw its services.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] For a future with privacy, not mass surveillance, Germany must stand ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · Instead of having to break the gold-standard Signal encryption protocol to access someone's Signal messages, hackers and hostile nation states ...
  28. [28]
    Under Meredith Whittaker, Signal Is Out to Prove Surveillance ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · Signal's president wants to remind you that the world's most secure communications platform is a nonprofit. It's free. It doesn't track you or serve you ads.
  29. [29]
    Signal >> Specifications >> The Double Ratchet Algorithm
    The Double Ratchet algorithm was designed by Trevor Perrin and Moxie Marlinspike. The concept of a Diffie-Hellman ratchet was taken from the ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  30. [30]
    Signal >> Blog
    Signal's mission and sole focus is private communication. For years, Signal has kept your messages private, your profile information (like your name and profile ...Signal Foundation · Facebook Messenger deploys... · Encrypted profiles · Fall 2023
  31. [31]
    Quantum Resistance and the Signal Protocol
    Sep 19, 2023 · After its publication in 2013, the Signal Protocol was adopted not only by Signal but well beyond. Technical information on the Signal Protocol ...
  32. [32]
    Warning Signal: the messaging app's new features are ... - The Verge
    Jan 25, 2021 · The fast-growing encrypted messaging app is making itself increasingly vulnerable to abuse. Current and former employees are sounding the alarm.
  33. [33]
    Signal Is at the Center of a New Battle Over Content Moderation
    Jan 31, 2021 · Signal employees have internally raised concerns that the app isn't doing enough to stave off abuse, The Verge reported Monday.
  34. [34]
    FBI document shows what data can be obtained from encrypted ...
    Nov 29, 2021 · A recently discovered FBI training document shows that US law enforcement can gain limited access to the content of encrypted messages from secure messaging ...Missing: assessment | Show results with:assessment
  35. [35]
    We Now Know What Information the FBI Can Obtain from Encrypted ...
    Dec 14, 2021 · It shows that despite its “going dark” claims, the FBI can obtain a remarkable amount of user data from messaging apps that collectively have ...
  36. [36]
    The Signal App and the Danger of Privacy at All Costs
    Dec 28, 2022 · Whether law enforcement should tap our phones on the condition that a warrant is obtained is, at the very least, worthy of public discussion. ...
  37. [37]
    Signal - The World Report
    Rating 8.8/10 (653) Apr 20, 2025 · The FBI and Europol argue that Signal's privacy features hinder criminal investigations, allowing drug traffickers, terrorists, and child ...
  38. [38]
    Encryption as Incrimination?: Updating Our View of End-to-End ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · As recently as January 2023, for example, law enforcement officials in North Carolina warned parents to delete Signal and other end-to-end ...Missing: absolutism | Show results with:absolutism
  39. [39]
    Warrant-Proof Encryption and Lawful Access - FBI
    The term "lawful access" refers to law enforcement's ability to obtain evidence and threat information from digital service providers and device ...Missing: Signal | Show results with:Signal
  40. [40]
    U.S. Officials Called Signal a Tool for Criminals. Now They're Using It.
    Mar 25, 2025 · US officials villainized end-to-end encrypted messaging apps like Signal as the domain of criminals and terrorists and a threat to national security.
  41. [41]
    What to know about Signal, the app used by Trump officials to text ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · The Signal app was created more than a decade ago by Marlinspike, an entrepreneur, who was briefly head of product security at Twitter after he ...Missing: history | Show results with:history<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    What to know about Signal, which the Pentagon previously ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · Signal was launched in 2014 for iOS devices by a non-profit group, Open Whisper Systems, which offered users free encrypted calls and, one year ...Missing: overview | Show results with:overview
  43. [43]
    What is the Signal messaging app and how secure is it? - BBC
    Apr 21, 2025 · Signal, like many other messaging apps, allows its users to set messages to disappear after a set period of time.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Days after the Signal leak, the Pentagon warned the app was ... - NPR
    Mar 25, 2025 · A Pentagon-wide advisory that went out one week ago warned against using Signal, the messaging app, even for unclassified information.Missing: 2021 | Show results with:2021<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    NSA warned of vulnerabilities in Signal app a month before Houthi ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · The National Security Agency sent a bulletin in February warning of Russian hackers trying to access encrypted conversations on Signal.
  46. [46]
    Inside the hazy, fractured mess of Signal use in the government
    despite warnings about its ...
  47. [47]
    Signal >> Government Communication
    When legally forced to provide information to government or law enforcement agencies, we'll disclose the transcripts of that communication here.Search warrants for Signal... · Search warrant for Signal user...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  48. [48]
    The security vulnerabilities of using Signal to discuss military ... - PBS
    Mar 28, 2025 · The Signal chat among Cabinet members has highlighted a cybersecurity concern, the growing use of personal phones and downloaded apps by public ...
  49. [49]
    Was the Signal Chat Illegal? - FactCheck.org
    Mar 27, 2025 · “Every single one of the government officials on this text chain have now committed a crime – even if accidentally – that would normally involve ...
  50. [50]
    How countries attempt to block Signal Private Messenger App ...
    Oct 21, 2021 · This report shares OONI measurements on the blocking of the Signal Private Messenger app in Iran, China, Cuba, and Uzbekistan.
  51. [51]
    Australian Labor government threatens Signal encrypted messaging ...
    Jul 28, 2025 · The Albanese government's moves are attacking the existence of a vital free, open-source, encrypted communications platform used by millions ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Signal >> Blog >> Reflections: The ecosystem is moving
    May 10, 2016 · The ecosystem is moving. The platform changes out from under it, the networks evolve, security threats and countermeasures are in constant shift.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Signal Protocol and Post-Quantum Ratchets
    Oct 2, 2025 · We are excited to announce a significant advancement in the security of the Signal Protocol: the introduction of the Sparse Post Quantum Ratchet ...The Current State Of The... · Say (or Send) Less · But Let's Still Be EfficientMissing: innovations | Show results with:innovations
  54. [54]
    Why Signal's post-quantum makeover is an amazing engineering ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · As noted earlier, the Signal Protocol received its first post-quantum makeover in 2023. This update added PQXDH—a Signal-specific implementation ...
  55. [55]
    WhatsApp's Signal Protocol integration is now complete
    Apr 5, 2016 · As of today, the integration is fully complete. Users running the most recent versions of WhatsApp on any platform now get full end-to-end encryption.Missing: companies | Show results with:companies
  56. [56]
    What Is Signal And Why Is It Considered So Secure? - Proxidize
    Feb 21, 2025 · Signal is a secure, open-source messaging app using advanced end-to-end encryption, minimizing data collection, and is built on the Signal ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Encrypted Customer Support Is Now Available Via Signal - Edge
    Signal uses the Signal Protocol, a cryptographic protocol so secure it's been adopted by WhatsApp, Google, and Facebook Messenger (though those companies ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    How Signal Grew From Privacy App to Tech Powerhouse | TIME
    Sep 28, 2020 · In 2016, a Virginia grand jury subpoenaed Signal for data about a user, but because it encrypts virtually all its metadata, the only information ...
  59. [59]
    At Signal, A Revolution in Messaging | Lawfare
    Feb 20, 2024 · Signal's nonprofit structure, funding model, and focus on security and privacy has long appealed to tech-savvy individuals, national security ...Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    From WhatsApp to Signal: Why are users making the switch?
    Feb 11, 2025 · Signal is more than just a messaging app, it represents a broader shift in digital communication and growing awareness around data privacy. Its ...
  61. [61]
    Signal's president on the future of data privacy
    Meredith Whittaker, President of Signal. Signal is increasing in popularity in Europe and the US as an alternative to other messaging services.
  62. [62]
    Signal adds quantum-resistant encryption to its protocol - Tech Monitor
    Sep 22, 2023 · Messaging app Signal has added post-quantum cryptography to its underlying encryption protocol. The Signal Protocol is a set of specifications providing end-to ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  63. [63]
    Signal App Review 2025: Privacy, Pros and Cons, Personal Data
    Oct 15, 2025 · Signal's funding comes through donations. These donors tend to remain anonymous, although we know that former WhatsApp co-founder Brian Action ...
  64. [64]
    Signal Review 2025: Secure Messenger (Pros and Cons)
    Signal is a secure, free, and open source messaging application that uses end-to-end encryption to securely send and receive all kinds of communications ...
  65. [65]
    Behind the signal leak: Vulnerabilities in high-security communication
    Apr 15, 2025 · High-security messaging apps like Signal can be compromised, either by human error or cyberattacks. What does this mean for organizations managing sensitive ...
  66. [66]
    Signal isn't infallible, despite being one of the most secure encrypted ...
    Mar 27, 2025 · Signal, the most secure widely available messaging app, has become a go-to resource for journalists, leakers and other people concerned about privacy.Missing: critiques absolutism
  67. [67]
    How Signal Walks the Line Between Anarchism and Pragmatism
    Jul 23, 2023 · Fittingly for an organization formerly led by an anarchist, Signal lacks a sustainable business model, to the point where you might almost call ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations