Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Wikimedia Foundation

The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization founded on June 20, 2003, by in , and now headquartered in , . It operates as the primary host and steward for the Wikimedia free knowledge projects, including —the collaboratively edited online encyclopedia with over six billion monthly visits—and sister sites such as , , and , all maintained by a global community of volunteer editors. The Foundation's mission is to enable every human to freely share in the sum of all knowledge, providing technical infrastructure, legal advocacy, and operational support without exerting editorial control over content, which remains the domain of independent volunteers bound by policies like neutrality. Funded almost entirely by public donations averaging around $11 per gift and eschewing or paywalls, it reported $185 million in revenue for 2023–2024, with expenses focused on , grants, and personnel amid a staff of approximately 550. While celebrated for democratizing access to information and achieving top-10 status among nonprofit-run websites, the Foundation has faced scrutiny over systemic biases in 's content, including documented coordinated campaigns introducing anti-Israel and antisemitic narratives that undermine claimed neutrality, prompting investigations by U.S. lawmakers and reports from organizations like the .

History

Founding and Early Development (2003–2010)

The Wikimedia Foundation was established on June 20, 2003, by in , as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization to oversee the operation, funding, and legal protection of and emerging sister projects like . Initially structured with a small board including Wales, the foundation assumed responsibility for server hosting, domain management, and trademark holdings previously handled informally, enabling the volunteer-led projects to scale amid rapid growth in 's article count from approximately 20,000 English articles in early 2003 to over 1 million by 2006. In its first years, the foundation operated with minimal staff and funding derived primarily from small individual donations and personal contributions from , totaling under $100,000 annually by 2004, which supported basic technical infrastructure amid increasing traffic demands. Key early hires included software developers Tim Starling and Brion Vibber in 2003–2004 to maintain the software and address scalability issues, as Wikipedia's daily page views surged from millions to tens of millions. The organization focused on enabling project expansion, such as the launch of in 2004 for multimedia hosting and support for language versions, while adhering to principles of open licensing under . By 2007, with Wikipedia exceeding 2 million English articles and global edits reaching billions cumulatively, the foundation employed about six full-time staff and announced its relocation from to to access a larger pool of software engineers and proximity to Silicon Valley's infrastructure. The move, completed by early into leased offices, marked a shift toward institutionalization, with annual revenues growing to around $2 million by through expanded donation appeals and initial , funding server upgrades and legal defenses against content disputes. This period solidified the foundation's role in sustaining volunteer communities without direct editorial control, though early challenges included volunteer frustrations over opaque decision-making and reliance on ad-hoc funding.

Growth and Institutionalization (2011–2020)

In early 2011, the Wikimedia Foundation completed its relocation of headquarters from St. Petersburg, Florida, to San Francisco, California, occupying space at 149 New Montgomery Street to accommodate expanding operations and proximity to technology talent. This move supported a period of rapid staff expansion, with employee numbers growing from approximately 100 in 2011 to over 400 by fiscal year 2020, reflecting professionalization in engineering, fundraising, and administrative roles. Financially, the Foundation experienced substantial growth during this decade, with annual revenues increasing from $24.5 million in 2011 to $129.2 million in 2020, driven primarily by expanded online donation campaigns targeting readers in and . Expenses rose correspondingly, reaching $124.6 million by 2020, with significant allocations to personnel costs, which accounted for roughly 50% of expenditures, and technology infrastructure to handle surging traffic following mobile optimization efforts. Leadership transitioned amid this scaling. Sue Gardner, who had led since 2008, announced her departure on March 27, 2013, citing burnout and strategic differences after overseeing the 2012 SOPA/PIPA protest blackout that boosted visibility. succeeded her in May 2014, emphasizing technical innovation, but resigned on February 25, 2016, following community backlash over the proposed "Knowledge Engine" search project perceived as a departure from principles. assumed the role of interim in March 2016 and was appointed permanently in June, shifting focus toward diversity initiatives and global outreach. Institutionalization manifested in formalized support for Wikimedia chapters and affiliates, with grants totaling millions annually to over 50 organizations by mid-decade, fostering localized activities while centralizing technical development at the . However, this professional expansion drew criticism from volunteer editors for increasing and perceived disconnects, exemplified by disputes over content policies and resource allocation favoring paid staff over editor retention efforts. By 2020, the Foundation had established more robust , including board expansions and processes initiated in to align global communities, though empirical editor decline persisted despite infrastructural advances. ![Wikimedia All Hands 2019 Group Photo.jpg][center] The decade closed with the Foundation navigating institutional maturity, boasting net assets exceeding $100 million and an endowment, yet facing scrutiny over editorial neutrality amid growing staff influence on platform policies.

Recent Evolution and Challenges (2021–Present)

In 2021, the Wikimedia Foundation underwent a leadership transition when CEO announced her departure effective April 2021, after serving since 2016 and citing a "natural " for the organization's growth. succeeded her, appointed in September 2021 and assuming the role on January 5, 2022; Iskander brought experience from roles including CEO of Youth Employment Accelerator and COO of , with an emphasis on global knowledge equity and expanding volunteer participation amid rising concerns. By May 2025, Iskander announced plans to step down by January 2026, prompting a global search for her successor led by the Board of Trustees. Staff numbers expanded from around 500 in 2021 to approximately 650 by 2025, supporting operations across technology, grants, and policy. The Foundation advanced implementation of the Wikimedia Movement Strategy, formalized in 2021 toward 2030 goals of positioning Wikimedia projects as essential free knowledge infrastructure. Key efforts spanned clusters including (e.g., diversified funding models), improvements (e.g., editing enhancements and dark mode rollout in 2025), safety and inclusion (e.g., Universal Code of Conduct enforcement), and equity in decision-making (e.g., regional hubs and Movement Charter development). Financially, revenue grew to $185.4 million in 2024 from $167.9 million in 2022, driven by donations, services ($3.4 million in FY 2023-2024), and , though expenses reached $178.6 million amid flattening budget growth limited to 3-5% annually due to global economic instability, inflation, and declining page views in regions like the . The 2023-2024 plan included $8 million in expense reductions, prioritizing Movement while trimming personnel and non-personnel costs. Challenges intensified around legal pressures and internal criticisms. The Foundation challenged the UK's Online Safety Act regulations in 2025, arguing they threatened volunteer privacy by classifying Wikipedia as a high-risk service; the High Court dismissed the case on August 11, 2025, and no appeal followed, with the organization opting to monitor implementation instead. Similar resistance emerged against an Indian government content takedown order in March 2025, which the Foundation deemed erroneous and chilling to free speech. Persistent critiques focused on perceived systemic left-leaning bias in content, with co-founder Larry Sanger attributing it in October 2025 to "ideological capture" by anonymous editors favoring globalist, academic, secular, and progressive viewpoints, manifested in source blacklists excluding conservative outlets like OpIndia while permitting state media such as China Daily, and underrepresentation of dissenting conservative positions on topics like socialism. Sanger advocated Foundation intervention to enforce neutrality, end consensus-driven exclusions, and diversify sourcing, highlighting how volunteer dynamics amplify institutional biases in academia and media that prioritize progressive narratives over empirical balance. These issues compounded operational strains from economic volatility and competition from AI-driven knowledge tools.

Mission, Governance, and Editorial Independence

Core Mission and Principles

The Wikimedia Foundation's is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a or in the , and to disseminate it effectively and globally. This entails providing the technical infrastructure, legal protections, and operational support necessary for volunteer-driven projects like , ensuring that information remains freely accessible in perpetuity without charge. Complementing the mission is the foundation's vision of a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. This vision underscores a commitment to universal access, prioritizing open dissemination over proprietary control, and aligns with the non-profit's role in hosting multilingual, collaborative platforms that aggregate verifiable knowledge from global contributors. In 2013, the Board of Trustees adopted a set of nine guiding principles to direct the foundation's activities, distinct from the broader Wikimedia 's practices and intended to reflect both current operations and future aspirations. These principles emphasize:
  • Freedom and : All content and software must be freely shareable, supporting derivatives, forks, and bulk access to promote free culture.
  • Serving every human being: for all users and contributors, with a focus on reliability and barrier removal.
  • : Public disclosure of policies, finances, and metrics, barring exceptions.
  • : Responsibility to donors, editors, and readers, including prudent fund management and equitable compensation.
  • : Careful oversight of movement assets like trademarks and endowments for benefit.
  • Shared power: Collaborative decision-making with volunteers, such as in grant allocation.
  • Internationalism: Support for global, multilingual initiatives and diverse staffing.
  • Free speech: Defense of information access against , compliant only with legal mandates.
  • : Reliance on diverse, primarily small-donor funding to avoid or external influences that could compromise .
These principles, approved unanimously on May 30, 2013, serve as internal benchmarks rather than enforceable rules, guiding strategic decisions amid the foundation's growth from a small entity in 2003 to managing billions of monthly page views by 2025.

Board of Trustees and Leadership

The Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees comprises 12 members who provide strategic oversight, ensure fiduciary accountability, and guide the organization's alignment with its mission to support free knowledge projects. The board's structure includes one permanent founder seat held by , five appointed seats filled by individuals selected for specialized expertise in areas such as , , and , and six seats allocated through selection processes involving Wikimedia communities and affiliates to represent volunteer editor perspectives. Trustees serve staggered terms typically lasting three years, with elections or appointments occurring periodically to maintain continuity and diversity of input. As of October 2025, the board is chaired by Nataliia Tymkiv, an appointed trustee with experience in Wikimedia activities, whose term as chair extends through November 1, 2025. Vice chairs include Kathy Collins (appointed, focusing on oversight) and Lorenzo Losa (community-selected, emphasizing product and ). Recent additions reflect efforts to bolster expertise in areas like AI ethics and global affiliate representation, including Mayree Clark (appointed in August 2025 for her background), Christel Steigenberger (community-selected in December 2024), and Maciej Nadzikiewicz (community-selected in December 2024).
Trustee NameSelection TypeKey Role/CommitteeTerm Ends
Nataliia TymkivAppointedChair; Executive Committee ChairNov 1, 2025
FounderChair EmeritusDec 31, 2027
Kathy CollinsAppointedVice Chair; Audit Committee ChairNov 1, 2026
Lorenzo LosaCommunity/AffiliateVice Chair; Product & Tech ChairDec 31, 2027
Shani Evenstein SigalovCommunity/AffiliateCommunity Affairs Committee ChairDec 31, 2025
AppointedGovernance Committee ChairOct 1, 2026
Mayree ClarkAppointedJan 1, 2027
Victoria DoroninaCommunity/AffiliateDec 31, 2027
Christel SteigenbergerCommunity/AffiliateDec 31, 2027
Maciej NadzikiewiczCommunity/AffiliateDec 31, 2027
Mike PeelCommunity/AffiliateDec 31, 2025
Luis Bitencourt-EmilioAppointedJan 1, 2028
The board delegates operational leadership to the executive team, led by Maryana Iskander, who joined in January 2022 after prior roles in nonprofit management and has overseen expansions in technology infrastructure and fundraising amid growing global usage of Wikimedia projects. Iskander announced in May 2025 her plan to depart by January 2026, prompting a search for a successor focused on sustaining movement strategy amid challenges like disputes and . The executive team, reporting to the CEO and board, includes roles such as Chief Product and Technology Officer, Chief Advancement Officer, and Chief People Officer, managing approximately 650 staff across departments handling engineering, legal, and community liaison functions.

Relationship with Volunteer Communities and Editorial Control

The Wikimedia Foundation supports volunteer communities by hosting the technical infrastructure for projects like , providing legal defenses against lawsuits, and funding tools to facilitate editing, while asserting no direct over or modification. Editorial decisions rest with volunteer editors operating through consensus-driven processes, including discussions, actions, and committees that enforce guidelines on neutrality, reliable sourcing, and verifiability. This decentralized model positions the Foundation as a rather than a , with volunteers numbering in the millions contributing edits daily across language editions. Despite this separation, the Foundation retains overriding powers via its Office Actions policy, enabling interventions for legal obligations, such as compliance with court orders or protection against imminent harm like child exploitation material, when community mechanisms prove inadequate or untimely. Such actions occur rarely but underscore the Foundation's ultimate platform control, as it owns the servers and can enforce terms of use globally. The policy emphasizes minimal interference, prioritizing community , yet has fueled perceptions of top-down overreach in cases where Foundation staff judgments diverge from editor consensus. Notable frictions emerged in 2015–2016 over the "Knowledge Engine" initiative, a proposed internal search tool funded by a $250,000 grant, which volunteers decried as secretive and resource-diverting from core maintenance. The project's opacity, revealed through leaked communications, eroded trust and contributed to Lila Tretikov's on , 2016, amid accusations that Foundation leadership undervalued volunteer priorities in favor of strategic expansions. Community backlash highlighted a recurring dynamic: while the Foundation funds growth—its exceeding $100 million annually by 2016—volunteers often resist perceived mission drift toward commercialization or technological pivots not rooted in empirical editing needs. Further strains involve handling paid editing and external pressures; the Foundation prohibits undisclosed conflicts of interest but relies on community enforcement, occasionally stepping in amid scandals like undisclosed corporate influence campaigns. In 2019, a high-profile administrator ban by Foundation trust-and-safety staff, citing harassment patterns overlooked by local processes, provoked debate over procedural fairness and the wisdom of circumventing elected volunteer overseers. These episodes reveal causal tensions from mismatched incentives: volunteers prioritize content integrity via first-principles scrutiny of sources, while Foundation operations, influenced by donor expectations and regulatory demands, sometimes necessitate swift, unilateral measures that communities view as undermining autonomy. Ongoing dialogues, such as through Wikimedia chapters and annual conferences, aim to reconcile these, though critics argue institutional bloat—staff numbers surpassing 500 by 2020—amplifies disconnects from grassroots editing realities.

Projects and Initiatives

Core Wikimedia Projects

The core Wikimedia projects consist of and its sister projects, which are , collaborative online resources developed and maintained primarily by volunteer editors worldwide. These projects operate under open licenses, enabling and modification, and collectively aim to compile and disseminate knowledge in various formats. Hosted on the software, they emphasize verifiability, neutrality, and community governance, though content quality varies across languages and topics. Wikipedia serves as the flagship project, a multilingual encyclopedia launched in January 2001 with the English edition, now encompassing over 300 language versions containing millions of articles. It attracts billions of monthly page views across all editions, with approximately 11 billion recorded in December 2024, though recent trends indicate an 8% year-over-year decline in human traffic attributed partly to AI-generated summaries in search engines. Complementing Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons functions as a central repository for freely licensed media files, including over 114 million images, videos, and audio recordings as of 2025, supporting visual content across all Wikimedia sites. , established in 2012, provides a structured database with more than 110 million items, enabling machine-readable data integration for infoboxes, queries, and external applications. Other sister projects include , a multilingual covering over 170 languages with definitions, etymologies, and linguistic data; , which hosts open textbooks and manuals; , aggregating sourced quotations in more than 75 languages; , a of texts; , offering citizen-sourced news articles; and Wikiversity, facilitating educational resources and research activities. These projects, varying in scale and activity, collectively extend the foundation's knowledge-sharing mission beyond encyclopedic articles.

Commercial and Enterprise Efforts

The Wikimedia Foundation, through its subsidiary , introduced in October 2021 as an opt-in commercial service targeted at high-volume reusers of content from and other Wikimedia projects. This product provides enterprise-grade , bulk data feeds, and real-time delivery options for over 100 million pages across more than 850 projects and languages, featuring machine-readable formats, dedicated support, and agreements (SLAs). Unlike freely available public and datasets, which remain accessible to all users, Wikimedia Enterprise caters to organizations requiring enhanced reliability, speed, and customization for applications in search engines, training, and graphs. The initiative, first announced in March 2021, aims to diversify the Foundation's streams beyond individual donations while sustaining the free knowledge ecosystem, though it is projected to constitute a minor fraction of overall funding. Early adopters included and the , announced on June 21, 2022, enabling these entities to access up-to-date Wikimedia content more efficiently for integration into their services. By the end of 2022, the service had generated approximately $3.1 million in , with $1.9 million capitalized as costs, of which $380,000 was amortized. Wikimedia Enterprise does not alter the open licensing of Wikimedia content, which remains under attributions, but offers value-added features such as low-latency queries and structured data to meet commercial scalability needs without imposing restrictions on non-enterprise users. This approach addresses long-standing disparities where large technology firms benefited extensively from volunteer-contributed data without direct financial contribution, marking a shift toward compensated for heavy commercial utilization.

Global Affiliates and Events

The Wikimedia Foundation recognizes three primary models of movement affiliates: chapters, which are independent non-profit organizations focused on specific geographic regions; thematic organizations, centered on particular topics or themes; and user groups, consisting of open-membership volunteer collectives with defined projects. Affiliates are formally recognized by the Foundation's Board of Trustees based on recommendations from the Affiliations Committee, ensuring alignment with the of advancing free knowledge. As of 2025, there are over 170 active affiliates worldwide, including approximately 40 chapters operating on every inhabited continent, such as , Wikimedia Deutschland, and Wikimedia Polska. These affiliates promote Wikimedia projects through localized activities like drives, , and partnerships, while remaining legally and operationally independent from the . The Foundation provides support via for initiatives including programs, , and , with over 900 such awards disbursed in the preceding fiscal year to bolster global community efforts. This framework has facilitated growth, with affiliate numbers tripling from 50 in 2014 to over 150 by 2019, reflecting expanded international engagement. In parallel, the Foundation organizes and funds key global events to foster collaboration and knowledge sharing. , the flagship annual conference, convenes contributors, developers, and advocates for sessions on project improvements, open-source tools, and movement strategy, typically drawing thousands from diverse regions. The 2024 event occurred in , , from August 7 to 10, emphasizing volunteer contributions and scientific collaboration in the European City of Science. The 2025 edition in Nairobi, , from August 6 to 9, attracted more than 2,300 attendees, highlighting intergenerational and cross-movement participation. Beyond , the Foundation partners with affiliates on campaigns such as (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums) initiatives and editathons aimed at addressing content gaps in underrepresented topics and languages. These events underscore the Foundation's role in coordinating decentralized efforts to sustain and expand the of free knowledge projects.

Knowledge Equity and Movement Strategy Initiatives

The Wikimedia Movement Strategy, initiated in 2017 as a participatory process involving thousands of volunteers and organizations, culminated in the 2030 strategy framework released in 2021, outlining 10 recommendations to guide structural and cultural changes for the movement's sustainability and expansion. This strategy emphasizes principles such as improving , ensuring and , and promoting in , with implementation tracked through specific initiatives aimed at achieving outcomes by 2030, including positioning Wikimedia as essential for free knowledge ecosystems. Knowledge equity, a core pillar of the 2030 strategy, seeks to address systemic gaps in content representation by prioritizing contributions from underrepresented communities, languages, and perspectives, countering the dominance of knowledge from certain geographic and demographic sources. The Wikimedia Foundation launched the Knowledge Equity Fund in 2020 with $4.5 million allocated for grants to external organizations producing knowledge outside traditional Wikimedia channels, focusing on topics like histories and marginalized narratives to bridge these gaps. By October 2024, the fund had awarded grants to 13 organizations across 10 countries in its latest round, supporting projects to create and disseminate new content addressing identified knowledge asymmetries. Complementing these efforts, the "Open the Knowledge" campaign promotes radical knowledge equity through content campaigns, inclusive product design, and research into barriers for contributors from the Global South and underrepresented groups. Additional programs include the Wikimedia and Equity Fellowship, a one-year initiative exploring intersections of racial , open , and , with fellows producing resources on these themes since its inception. Implementation of strategy initiatives, such as regional hubs and documentation cultures, continues as of 2025, with progress reports highlighting increased movement awareness but ongoing challenges in equitable resource allocation across affiliates.

Technology and Operations

Software Ecosystem and MediaWiki

MediaWiki is the open-source that powers the Wikimedia Foundation's projects, including , and is utilized by tens of thousands of websites worldwide. Developed initially for 's needs, it emphasizes extensibility, multilingual support, and reliability to handle massive scale, serving over 6,000 page views per second across Wikimedia sites. The Foundation maintains as a collaborative effort between its engineering staff and a global volunteer developer community, with more than 50% of commits originating from volunteers supported through , programs, and events like hackathons. Originating in 2002 as a custom phase II engine for under developer , the software transitioned from earlier tools like UseModWiki and was formally named in June 2003, aligning with the Wikimedia Foundation's establishment to oversee its infrastructure and operations. Early development focused on enabling collaborative content creation without requiring knowledge, evolving through systems from CVS to SVN and by the 2010s, with modern contributions managed via Gerrit for code review. The Foundation's involvement intensified post-2003, funding core enhancements like parser improvements and security features while preserving its open-source nature under the GNU GPL license. Architecturally, operates as a PHP-based interfacing with a such as or , typically deployed on (, , , ) or similar stacks with for high-traffic optimization. It employs a where the core handles page rendering, revision tracking, and user permissions, augmented by hooks for custom functionality. Releases follow a branching model with stable versions for production wikis and development branches for new features, ensuring to minimize disruptions for the Foundation's 1.5 billion monthly unique devices. The broader software ecosystem extends beyond the core through thousands of community-maintained extensions, which integrate specialized capabilities like structured via Wikibase (powering since 2012), WYSIWYG editing with , and API-driven automation. Bots and tools, contributing to over 36% of edits across Wikimedia wikis as of 2022, rely on frameworks like Pywikibot for programmatic tasks, while Foundation-developed services such as ORES use to flag potentially disruptive edits in . This ecosystem supports scalability challenges inherent to hypergrowth sites but requires ongoing investment in security—evidenced by frequent patches—and , as volunteer-driven extensions can introduce compatibility issues if not rigorously tested. The Foundation prioritizes human oversight in integrations like AI-assisted editing tools, as outlined in its 2025 strategy emphasizing volunteer primacy over automation.

Infrastructure, Hardware, and Scalability

The Wikimedia Foundation maintains a distributed infrastructure comprising multiple data centers to support the high-traffic Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia, which receives over 15 billion monthly views. Primary application data centers include Equinix in Ashburn, Virginia (eqiad); CyrusOne in Carrollton, Texas (codfw); EvoSwitch in Amsterdam (esams); and Magrú in São Paulo, Brazil, with the latter established to enhance access in South America during the 2023-2024 fiscal year. Additional caching proxies are deployed in locations such as San Francisco, Singapore, and Marseille to reduce latency by serving static content closer to users. The system's architecture relies on a stack adapted for scale, utilizing as the operating system, software primarily in , for databases, and for indexing. Load balancing is handled via (LVS) with PyBal for dynamic failover, while caching employs and Traffic Server. Media storage uses object storage, and asynchronous operations leverage Kafka-based job queues introduced in 2017 to enable replication across data centers. Specific hardware details, such as server counts or models, are not publicly detailed in recent , reflecting a focus on operational reliability over vendor-specific disclosures; however, the infrastructure supports energy consumption of approximately 358.8 kW as of 2021, equivalent to 3.143 GWh annually. Scalability has evolved from a single data center in St. Petersburg, Florida in 2004 to a multi-datacenter model, with a secondary application site added in for rapid recovery and full multi-region support achieved by 2022. Traffic management employs HTTP verb routing, directing read requests (GET) to the nearest via Lua scripts on Apache Traffic Server while routing writes (POST) to the primary site, complemented by WANObjectCache with mcrouter for distributed in-memory caching. Annual full-site switchovers and partial maintenance failovers test this setup, ensuring minimal downtime; in the 2023-2024 period, $3.1 million was allocated to internet hosting within a broader comprising nearly half of the $178.4 million total expenses. This approach enables handling of global traffic surges without reliance on third-party content delivery networks, prioritizing cost efficiency and control.

Emerging Technologies and AI Integration

The Wikimedia Foundation has integrated technologies into its operations since 2015, primarily through the Objective Revision Evaluation Service (ORES), an open system that scores Wikipedia edits in real-time for factors such as damage potential and using supervised models trained on historical edit data. ORES employs participatory , where community feedback refines model accuracy, enabling automated flagging of or low-quality changes to assist volunteer patrollers without overriding human review. This approach has processed millions of revisions, reducing manual oversight burdens while maintaining editorial control. In April 2025, the Foundation outlined a three-year AI strategy (2025–2028) emphasizing human-centered deployment to enhance volunteer efficiency rather than automate content creation. Core goals include automating repetitive moderation tasks, improving content discoverability, facilitating multilingual adaptations for localized knowledge, and providing guided onboarding for new editors via generative AI tools. Guiding principles prioritize human agency, open-source and open-weight models, transparency in algorithms, and equity across languages, with commitments to community consultation before major implementations. Specific initiatives target AI-assisted workflows for patrollers and automated translation systems to support non-English projects, aiming to scale participation without eroding consensus-based decision-making. A September 2025 Human Rights Impact Assessment, commissioned from external researchers, evaluated and machine learning's effects on Wikimedia projects, highlighting opportunities like vandalism detection tools that bolster freedom of expression and access to since their inception around 2010. It identified risks including amplification from training data skewed toward dominant languages or demographics, potential from generative outputs, and concerns from external models scraping Wikimedia content for training. Recommendations urge ongoing risk monitoring, bias mitigation through diverse datasets, and deeper volunteer involvement in AI policy to align technologies with the Foundation's non-profit mission of equitable knowledge production. Beyond AI, the Foundation's engagement with other emerging technologies remains limited; exploratory efforts in areas like for donations yielded negligible returns by 2022, leading to discontinued acceptance of contributions due to volatility and administrative costs. No substantial integrations of , , or similar paradigms have been pursued, with focus instead channeled toward scalable, open-source AI infrastructure to support MediaWiki's core editing ecosystem. The Foundation maintains model cards for production systems to document performance metrics and limitations, fostering accountability in deployments.

Finances and Funding

Revenue Streams and Fundraising Practices

The Wikimedia Foundation's primary consists of individual donations, which accounted for 94% of its of $185.4 million in 2023–2024 (July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024). These funds derived from $170.5 million in 17.4 million donations across over 8 million unique donors worldwide, with an average gift of $10.58. Donations originated from more than 200 countries, predominantly ($106.5 million) and ($49.4 million), reflecting the Foundation's centralized online model that targets users and expands via multilingual efforts. Fundraising practices emphasize grassroots appeals without permanent advertising or corporate sponsorships on Wikimedia sites. Key methods include temporary on-wiki banners displayed during annual drives in 33 countries and 18 languages, which generated 35% of ; personalized campaigns to prior donors, contributing 18.6%; and solicitations via Wikipedia's page, mobile apps (using and ), and recurring programs, which grew 17% year-over-year. Major gifts from approximately 2,000 donors exceeding $1,000 each totaled $19.1 million, supplemented by giving programs yielding over 80,000 contributions. In countries with robust local chapters (e.g., , ), the Foundation collaborates on affiliate-led efforts, while centralizing operations elsewhere to streamline global collection. Cash contributions specifically reached $168.2 million, with minor nonfinancial in-kind services at $263,000. Secondary streams include Wikimedia Enterprise, a API service launched in 2022 for high-volume data reusers (e.g., structured content in format), which produced $3.4 million in revenue—1.8% of the Foundation's total—despite a $400,000 operating loss from development and contract timing. Grants from philanthropic entities such as , the , and the provide additional support, though exact figures remain aggregated within contributions. Investment income netted $5.1 million, and other sources added $5.6 million, including foreign currency gains. These practices have faced scrutiny for perceived aggressiveness, with critics noting frequent banner interruptions and messaging that portrays ongoing financial precarity despite net assets surpassing $286 million as of fiscal year-end 2023. Community disputes have arisen over banner deployment on , challenging the Foundation's authority amid ample reserves.

Expenditures, Audits, and Budget Allocation

The Wikimedia Foundation reported total expenses of $178.5 million for fiscal year 2023–2024, a 5.5% increase from $169.1 million in the prior year. This growth slightly exceeded the organization's 5% target, driven primarily by investments in personnel and operations. Salaries and benefits accounted for $106.8 million, comprising 60% of total expenses, while awards and grants reached $26.8 million and fundraising costs $7.5 million. Independent audits by affirmed the fairness of these in accordance with U.S. generally accepted principles, issuing an unqualified opinion—the 19th consecutive clean audit for the . No material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal controls were identified. The files annual IRS returns, detailing program service expenses, management costs, and fundraising allocations, which are publicly available for . For fiscal year 2024–2025, the approved annual plan sets a total of $188.7 million, with programmatic expenses at $145.1 million, at $21.2 million, and general/administrative at $22.4 million. Allocations emphasize at $92.8 million (49.2%), at $44.7 million (23.7%), initiatives at $32.8 million (17.4%), and / at $18.5 million (9.8%). Approximately half of supports positions, reflecting a personnel-heavy approach across categories.
CategoryAmount (millions USD)Percentage
Infrastructure92.849.2%
Effectiveness44.723.7%
Equity32.817.4%
Safety & Integrity18.59.8%
Total188.7100%

Wikimedia Endowment and Long-Term Financial Strategy

The Wikimedia Endowment, established in January 2016 to mark the 15th anniversary of Wikipedia, functions as a perpetual fund designed to generate ongoing income for the Wikimedia projects without relying on the principal. Structured initially as a donor-advised fund through the Tides Foundation, it transitioned to an independent 501(c)(3) organization headquartered in the United States, focusing on conservative investment strategies to preserve and grow assets over time. Donations to the Endowment are invested, with earnings allocated annually for grants supporting technical development, operations, and mission-aligned initiatives, such as $4.5 million disbursed in 2023, including $3.2 million for project innovations and $1.3 million to the Wikimedia Foundation. Targeting $100 million in assets within a , the Endowment achieved this goal by September 2021 through contributions from individual donors and planned giving programs. By June 30, 2024, net assets reached $144.3 million, consisting of $20.1 million in cash and $123.4 million in investments, reflecting steady growth amid market conditions. Grants are limited to investment returns to ensure longevity, with programmatic expenses for 2023-2024 totaling $3.1 million, primarily directed toward Wikimedia project funding. The Endowment forms a core element of the Wikimedia Foundation's long-term financial strategy, which emphasizes resilience against volatile donation-based revenues—primarily from public appeals via website banners and email campaigns—by diversifying into permanent capital. Multi-year planning, outlined in annual budgets approved with community input, integrates Endowment grants to offset potential shortfalls in operating funds, projected at $180 million for fiscal year 2025-2026, while prioritizing investments in infrastructure (47% of budget) and volunteer tools. This model adapts to trends like digital giving shifts and economic pressures through trend monitoring and scenario-based forecasting, aiming for self-sustaining growth without commercial dependencies. Transparency is maintained via audited statements and public disclosures, though critics have questioned the pace of Endowment utilization relative to Foundation reserves exceeding $200 million in net assets.

Scrutiny of Financial Efficiency and Transparency

Critics have questioned the Wikimedia Foundation's financial , arguing that a large share of its supports administrative and personnel costs rather than core operational needs like , given the low marginal costs of hosting volunteer-driven content platforms. Analyses indicate that hosting and expenses have hovered around $2.5 million per year since 2009, comprising a diminishing fraction of total outlays as overall spending escalated to $168 million in fiscal year 2022. In contrast, salaries and benefits have risen to approximately 50% of expenses in recent years, with reports citing $100 million allocated to personnel out of roughly $170 million total in one audited period. Fundraising campaigns have drawn particular scrutiny for employing urgent, scarcity-evoking appeals that imply existential financial threats, despite substantial reserves; for example, 2021 disclosures revealed net assets sufficient to sustain server operations for 75 years at prevailing costs. Detractors, including public commentators, contend this approach misleads donors, as only a minority of funds—around 43% in some estimates—directly supports site operations, with the balance directed toward staff, grants, and other initiatives. Transparency efforts, while including annual Form 990 filings and audited reports, face criticism for insufficient granularity on certain allocations, particularly those tied to non-core priorities like (DEI) programs. For fiscal year 2023-2024, the Foundation allocated nearly 30% of its $177 million budget—equating to over $50 million—to DEI-related efforts, prompting figures like to label the organization "Wokepedia" and advise against donations until priorities realign with encyclopedic neutrality. Although evaluators like assign a high program of 76.7%, skeptics argue this metric masks inefficiencies, as volunteer labor handles while paid expenditures prioritize organizational over platform .

Organizational Structure and Human Resources

Staff Composition and Departmental Evolution

The Wikimedia Foundation commenced operations with a minimal staff following its incorporation on , 2003, initially comprising just a handful of individuals focused on basic technical support and coordination for the volunteer-driven Wikipedia project. Early growth was modest, with the organization relying primarily on volunteer contributions for content and operations, while paid staff handled essential infrastructure tasks. By 2012, staff numbers had expanded to approximately 140 employees, coinciding with rising donation revenues that enabled professionalization of core functions such as and server management. This figure doubled to around 280 by 2016, reflecting a strategic shift toward scaling technical and administrative capabilities to support increasing site traffic and project diversification. Departmental structure evolved from a lean, tech-centric model to a more layered organization with specialized units. In its formative years, emphasis was placed on engineering and information technology departments to maintain software and hosting infrastructure. Legal and finance teams were established in the mid-2000s to address issues, compliance, and financial oversight amid growing liabilities and grants. By the , new departments emerged for (Advancement), communications, and liaison roles, driven by the need to cultivate donor relationships and engage volunteers. The addition of and trust & safety teams in subsequent years addressed enhancements and challenges, while functions expanded under designations like "People & Culture" to manage recruitment and retention in a distributed workforce. As of 2024, the Foundation reports nearly 650 staff members distributed across global offices, with a under CEO (appointed January 2022) featuring key departments including , Product, Legal, and Administration, Communications, and Advancement. Staff composition reflects a professional skew toward technical and administrative roles, with comprising a significant portion alongside growth in and equity-focused positions. Demographic data from self-reported figures indicate efforts to increase representation, such as 53% female new hires in the U.S. in 2019 and elevated hiring from underrepresented groups, though overall staff remains majority male and U.S.-based. This evolution parallels revenue growth, enabling a transition from volunteer augmentation to a robust, salaried operation supporting the Wikimedia ecosystem's expansion.

Volunteer Editor Dynamics and Conflicts

Volunteer editors form the core of Wikimedia projects, self-organizing through consensus-driven processes to create and maintain , yet this model fosters frequent disputes over article neutrality and factual accuracy. Edit wars, defined as repeated reversions of contributions by disagreeing parties, represent a primary conflict mechanism, with studies analyzing their temporal patterns revealing cycles of escalation and de-escalation influenced by editor persistence and intervention. Such dynamics often stem from differing interpretations of reliable sourcing and neutrality policies, leading to prolonged standoffs on politically charged topics. Ideological imbalances among editors exacerbate tensions, as the volunteer base exhibits systemic participation biases favoring certain demographics, resulting in skewed coverage. Quantitative analyses indicate a mild to moderate tendency to portray right-leaning public figures with more negative sentiment compared to left-leaning counterparts, attributed to the predominance of editors from , educated, and progressively inclined backgrounds. In contentious areas like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, coordinated groups of approximately 30 editors have been documented circumventing neutrality guidelines to insert biased narratives, prompting rare topic bans for eight editors from opposing sides in January 2025 due to disruptive behavior. Toxicity in discussions further erodes editor retention, with showing that exposure to hostile comments correlates with reduced activity among volunteers, as a small subset of highly users generates disproportionate abuse—up to 9% from a handful of accounts. Administrators, elected from veteran editors, wield tools like blocks and page protections to resolve disputes, but criticisms persist regarding and power abuses, including hasty blocks of new users perceived as misaligned with prevailing views. Conflict-of-interest , such as undisclosed paid advocacy, adds another layer, exemplified by the Wikimedia Foundation's 2013 cease-and-desist action against WikiPR for undisclosed promotional edits. Resolution mechanisms include talk page discussions, mediation, and arbitration committees, though unresolved disputes can persist indefinitely, with MIT analysis revealing that simpler voting fails to capture nuanced consensus. Legal entanglements occasionally arise, as in the 2018 dismissal of a Greek lawsuit against a Wikipedia administrator for content moderation. These dynamics underscore the tension between open collaboration and enforced standards, where volunteer autonomy clashes with the need for impartial governance, occasionally spilling into real-world threats like the armed intrusion at a 2025 editor conference.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Ideological Bias and Neutrality Failures

Co-founder Larry Sanger has repeatedly alleged that Wikipedia exhibits a systemic left-wing bias, stating in a 2021 blog post that the site is "badly biased" in favor of liberal viewpoints and lacks an effective neutrality policy. Sanger, who left the project in 2002, argued in 2025 interviews that this bias stems from the dominance of progressive editors who enforce ideological conformity through administrative controls and article framing. He cited examples such as skewed coverage of politically charged topics, where conservative perspectives are marginalized or labeled as fringe, while left-leaning narratives receive preferential sourcing. Empirical analyses support claims of ideological skew. A 2024 Manhattan Institute report, employing AI-driven on thousands of articles, found that the platform's political language leans approximately 9-11% more leftward compared to Britannica's entries on similar topics. The study quantified this through computational metrics of wording patterns, revealing overrepresentation of progressive framing in biographies and policy discussions, such as emphasis on themes over economic . Similarly, a framework applied to 1,399 political articles in 2024 identified patterns where right-leaning viewpoints faced higher reversal rates and stricter sourcing demands, attributing this to editor demographics skewed toward urban, educated liberals. Wikipedia's reliable sources guidelines have drawn criticism for disproportionately blacklisting conservative media outlets. As of 2025, sources like Breitbart, , Epoch Times, , , and The Federalist are deprecated or fully blacklisted for use in citations, deemed unreliable due to perceived editorial slant, while only one left-leaning outlet faces equivalent restrictions. Critics, including Sanger, contend this creates a feedback loop reinforcing bias, as articles on conservative figures or events rely on a narrower pool of approved (often mainstream left-leaning) sources, leading to incomplete or adversarial portrayals. Allegations intensified in 2025 with U.S. congressional probes. Senator Ted Cruz's October letter to the Wikimedia Foundation highlighted coordinated editing campaigns promoting left-wing narratives and questioned the neutrality of . Republicans, led by Representatives Comer and , launched an in August into organized , referencing ADL reports on imbalances in coverage of and that favored critical perspectives. These efforts underscore broader concerns that volunteer editor self-selection—predominantly from left-leaning demographics in and tech—undermines the neutral point of view (NPOV) , despite Wikimedia's assertions of safeguards against .

Disputes Over Spending, DEI Initiatives, and Fundraising Tactics

Critics of the Wikimedia Foundation have highlighted discrepancies between its spending priorities and the portrayal of financial necessity in public appeals. In 2023-2024, personnel costs constituted a significant portion of expenses, with drawing particular scrutiny; for instance, former CEO Katherine received $789,500, while former Janeen Uzzell earned a comparable high figure, amid a of $185.4 million and expenses of $178.6 million. Such allocations have fueled arguments that administrative bloat diverts funds from core infrastructure, especially as hosting and operations costs have declined to roughly 2% of total expenses over time, despite reliance on volunteer-driven . The Foundation's (DEI) initiatives have intensified disputes, with an estimated $50 million allocated in the 2023-2024 budget toward programs aimed at diversifying content and contributor demographics. Detractors, including , contend these expenditures promote ideological conformity over neutral knowledge dissemination, labeling the approach as fostering "reverse " and contributing to perceived left-leaning biases in practices. Community discussions, such as on , echo concerns that substantial DEI funding—potentially a large share of non-technical budgets—prioritizes frameworks like "knowledge equity" at the expense of empirical content improvements, though Foundation officials frame these as essential for inclusive open-source development. Fundraising tactics have similarly provoked backlash for allegedly misleading donors about the organization's fiscal health. Pop-up banners and emails urging contributions to "keep Wikipedia ad-free and independent" have been deemed deceptive by volunteers and analysts, as the Foundation maintained substantial net assets and reported surpluses, with unrestricted funds exceeding operational needs despite annual appeals. In September 2022, editors overwhelmingly voted 45-3 that fundraising communications misrepresented financial urgency, prompting calls for greater transparency in how proceeds—largely from small grassroots donations averaging $10.58—support expansive programs rather than imminent survival. These practices persist amid critiques that they exploit user goodwill, even as revenue hit $174.7 million from donations in 2023-2024, underscoring tensions between the Foundation's nonprofit model and perceptions of inefficiency. In 2016, Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director resigned after less than two years in the role, amid internal tensions and uproar over a proposed internal project dubbed the "Knowledge Engine," intended as an alternative search tool to reduce reliance on external engines like . Leaked documents revealed plans for user data collection without consultation, prompting accusations of secrecy and overreach by foundation staff; the board accepted her resignation on , citing mutual disagreements on substance and style. This episode highlighted governance frictions between the foundation's professional staff and volunteer editors, who prioritize decentralized decision-making. Katherine Maher, who served as CEO from April 2021 to June 2024, drew internal and external criticism for policy positions perceived as conflicting with Wikipedia's commitment to neutral, verifiable knowledge. In public statements, including a 2021 talk, Maher argued that Wikipedia's "free and open" model rests on an assumption of objective truth that does not always hold, advocating instead for adaptive approaches to combat perceived even if it meant prioritizing certain narratives over unrestricted . Wikipedia co-founder publicly condemned her views as antithetical to the project's foundational principles of evidence-based , warning they risked institutionalizing under the guise of . These critiques, echoed in community forums, underscored ongoing governance debates over the foundation's shift toward advocacy on issues like , contrasting with editors' resistance to top-down interventions. Policy disputes have also arisen over the foundation's authority to intervene in content decisions, as outlined in its , which allows rare staff overrides of community consensus for legal or safety reasons. Such actions, while infrequent—numbering in the low dozens annually—have sparked accusations of eroding volunteer autonomy, particularly when involving politically sensitive topics. In 2022, community members challenged the foundation's exclusive control over banners on sites, arguing it bypassed affiliate chapters and risked misleading donors about fund allocation; the dispute led to temporary halts and revised protocols but exposed rifts in movement-wide . Legally, the foundation has faced and initiated conflicts testing its commitment to unmoderated knowledge dissemination. In Wikimedia Foundation v. (filed March 2013), it sued over the NSA's "Upstream" surveillance program, alleging unconstitutional mass scanning of traffic affecting millions of non-U.S. users; courts partially dismissed claims in 2015 and 2021, citing lack of standing, though the case advanced arguments on First Amendment impacts. A 2019 court ruling compelled removal of specific historical revisions from a article on a , citing laws; the foundation complied but appealed, warning of broader threats to edit histories essential for . imposed a nationwide block from April 2017 to December 2020 after the foundation refused to censor articles on sensitive political matters, resolved only after content adjustments and legal reforms. More recently, in 2025, a challenge to UK requirements for proactive content scanning was dismissed on August 11, prompting concerns over compliance burdens potentially favoring larger platforms. These cases reflect causal tensions between national regulatory demands and the foundation's global, borderless model, often resulting in partial concessions that volunteers view as policy dilutions.

Responses to Criticisms and Reform Efforts

The Wikimedia Foundation has responded to allegations of ideological primarily by emphasizing the volunteer-driven nature of Wikipedia's and enforcement of neutrality policies. In October 2025, following a letter from U.S. Senator questioning left-wing and coordinated editing campaigns, the Foundation issued a asserting that Wikipedia's processes prevent through community consensus, reliable sourcing standards, and transparency in edit histories, while rejecting claims of systemic ideological skew as misrepresentations of volunteer dynamics. The highlighted that content decisions rest with global editors, not Foundation staff, and cited ongoing volunteer discussions on source reliability, such as the 2024 debate over the Anti-Defamation League's use in articles. To address neutrality concerns, the Foundation established a in March 2025 aimed at standardizing "neutral point of view" (NPOV) policies across Wikimedia projects, seeking to enhance consistency in representing viewpoints and supporting volunteer efforts against perceived imbalances. This initiative responds to criticisms from figures like Wikipedia co-founder , who has argued since 2021 that neutrality has eroded due to dominant editor demographics favoring progressive perspectives, though the Foundation maintains that such policies evolve through community input rather than top-down mandates. Regarding criticisms of spending priorities, including (DEI) initiatives comprising approximately 29% of the 2023-2024 budget (around $51.7 million out of $177 million), the Foundation has not issued direct rebuttals to detractors like , who in December 2024 labeled it "Wokepedia" and urged withholding donations. Instead, it publishes detailed annual financial breakdowns and frames such allocations as investments in equitable technology access and editor to broaden content representation, aligning with a framework for inclusive open-source development. reports underscore that funds support global outreach, though empirical critiques, such as those questioning amid rising administrative costs, have prompted no announced reallocations or audits beyond standard practices. On governance and internal conflicts, the Foundation enforces conflict-of-interest policies for board members and executives, updated as of November 2024, requiring disclosure of potential biases in . In response to volunteer disputes, such as or editor , it issued a 2020 Community Culture Statement establishing standards for inclusivity and intervening selectively, as in the 2021 case where administrative rights were revoked amid political editing concerns. Community-led reform petitions, including a 2025 call for board restructuring to better align with volunteer interests over duties, have not yielded Foundation-endorsed changes, with officials prioritizing legal and operational . These efforts reflect a pattern of reinforcement rather than structural overhauls, amid ongoing from congressional probes into risks.

Impact and Legacy

Achievements in Open Knowledge Dissemination

The Wikimedia Foundation has facilitated the creation and maintenance of Wikipedia, which as of October 2025 comprises more than 65 million articles across nearly 300 language editions, making it the largest collection of free, collaboratively edited encyclopedic content available online. This vast repository is accessible without subscription fees or advertising, relying on volunteer contributions and reader donations to sustain operations. The open licensing under Creative Commons BY-SA enables widespread reuse and adaptation, promoting knowledge dissemination beyond the platform itself into education, research, and media worldwide. Wikipedia alone attracts over 15 billion monthly page views, serving as a primary information resource for users globally, particularly in regions with limited access to databases. The Foundation's investments in scalable infrastructure, including content delivery networks and mobile-optimized interfaces, have expanded reach to low-bandwidth environments and non-English speakers, with hundreds of thousands of volunteer editors adding and refining content continuously. These efforts have democratized access, evidenced by the platform's integration into educational curricula where students contribute articles, enhancing both learning outcomes and content depth. Technological advancements under the Foundation's purview, such as multilingual search improvements and services, support programmatic access for developers and institutions, further amplifying dissemination through embeddings in apps, search engines, and offline tools. Independent studies affirm Wikipedia's role in elevating baseline knowledge levels among readers, with showing improved comprehension of complex topics post-engagement. By prioritizing empirical verifiability and community governance over commercial incentives, the Foundation has achieved unprecedented scale in sharing, though sustained growth depends on addressing emerging challenges like automated traffic shifts.

Criticisms of Content Quality, Accessibility, and Cultural Influence

Critics have highlighted systemic biases in Wikipedia's , stemming from the demographic skew of its editor base, which is predominantly , , educated, and , leading to underrepresentation of topics related to women, non-Western cultures, and conservative viewpoints. For instance, as of 2023, women constituted only about 19% of Wikipedia editors, resulting in fewer articles on female subjects and social sciences topics authored by women, which perpetuates knowledge gaps. Political bias allegations intensified in 2025 when U.S. Senator questioned the platform's reliance on sources perceived as left-leaning, such as outlets, arguing that this skews coverage on contentious issues like elections and cultural debates. Accuracy concerns persist despite volunteer oversight, with studies and user reports noting factual errors, omissions, and reliance on secondary sources that introduce interpretive slants over primary data. A 2019 analysis found that Wikipedia's open-editing model allows persistent inaccuracies in high-traffic articles, as corrections often face resistance from entrenched editor groups enforcing subjective neutrality interpretations. These issues are exacerbated by the absence of professional , contrasting with traditional encyclopedias, and have led to criticisms that the content's collaborative nature prioritizes over empirical rigor. Accessibility critiques focus on coverage disparities rather than technical barriers, as Wikipedia's free model ensures broad digital reach but fails to equitably represent global knowledge. In regions with censorship, such as select countries analyzed in 2017, blocks on Wikipedia editions limit access to information, though the Foundation has advocated against such restrictions. Domestically, systemic undercoverage of non-English or minority perspectives creates de facto knowledge inaccessibility for non-dominant groups, with editor demographics mirroring urban elites and sidelining rural or topics. The Wikimedia Foundation's cultural influence draws scrutiny for amplifying biases through Wikipedia's role as a primary reference in , search algorithms, and training datasets. When models exclude Wikipedia data, their output reliability declines, per 2025 Foundation research, yet this underscores how embedded biases propagate at scale. Critics argue that the platform's , revised in 2025 to emphasize , overlooks cultural and political influences on sourcing, potentially entrenching progressive viewpoints in public discourse. This has fueled broader concerns, including 2025 Republican investigations into organized bias, positing that shapes societal narratives on issues like identity and history in ways that disadvantage dissenting perspectives.

Broader Societal and Political Ramifications

The Wikimedia Foundation's projects, particularly , serve as a primary for billions of users annually, shaping public understanding of historical, scientific, and political events in ways that extend to electoral processes and policy formation. Studies indicate that Wikipedia page views correlate with voter information-seeking behaviors, potentially influencing election outcomes by amplifying certain narratives during campaign periods. For instance, analyses of Wikipedia traffic during U.S. elections have shown spikes in searches for political figures and issues, suggesting the platform's role in directing public discourse ahead of voting. This influence is compounded by Wikipedia's integration into results and educational curricula, where it often functions as a first-stop for factual grounding, thereby embedding platform-generated framings into broader societal knowledge bases. Empirical assessments of Wikipedia's content reveal systematic ideological skews, with computational analyses detecting higher negative sentiment toward right-leaning political terms and concepts compared to left-leaning equivalents, undermining claims of strict neutrality. A 2024 Manhattan Institute study of over 1,000 articles found that entries on conservative-associated topics exhibited disproportionately adverse language, a pattern attributed to editor demographics and moderation practices favoring viewpoints. Such biases have political ramifications, as evidenced by co-founder Sanger's 2025 assertion that Wikipedia's left-leaning tilt distorts coverage of contentious issues like election integrity and cultural debates, potentially eroding trust in institutions among conservative audiences. Critics, including U.S. Senator , have highlighted how this asymmetry affects policy debates, with skewed articles cited in legislative research or media, perpetuating one-sided causal narratives on topics like climate policy or . The Foundation's advocacy efforts, including lobbying against content moderation laws perceived as threats to free expression, position it as a player in global policy arenas, yet these actions intersect with domestic political divides. In , Wikimedia opposed the UK's for interfering with community-driven edits, framing it as a defense of , but detractors argue such stances mask tolerance for biased content suppression of dissenting views. Ramifications extend to artificial intelligence development, where Wikipedia's datasets train models, risking propagation of embedded biases into tools used in and hiring. Moreover, post-election edit wars documented on the platform illustrate how volunteer dynamics exacerbate partisan conflicts, delaying neutral resolutions and influencing real-time public perceptions during pivotal events. Overall, while the Foundation promotes knowledge equity, its unaddressed biases contribute to polarized information ecosystems, where reliance on as an authoritative source may entrench ideological divides, affecting and policy consensus in democracies. Conservative outlets have long contended this dynamic disadvantages right-leaning perspectives, with empirical sentiment disparities lending credence to claims of systemic partiality over .

References

  1. [1]
    Wikimedia Foundation - aVenture Company Research
    The Wikimedia Foundation, founded on June 20, 2003, by Jimmy Wales in St. Petersburg, Florida, is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization headquartered ...
  2. [2]
    Memory:Timeline - Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
    October: Wikimedia Foundation relocates to its current (as of June 2023) headquarters within One Montgomery Tower in San Francisco, California, United States.
  3. [3]
    Who we are – Wikimedia Foundation
    Since our founding in 2003, we have supported the hundreds of thousands of volunteer editors who edit, expand and curate the Wikimedia projects.
  4. [4]
    20 years of the nonprofit behind Wikipedia - Wikimedia Foundation
    Jun 20, 2023 · Jimmy Wales created the Wikimedia Foundation in 2003, two years after he founded Wikipedia. Since then, we have carried forward the same ...
  5. [5]
    Wikimedia Foundation Org - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica
    The Wikimedia Foundation is a 501(c)(3) educational nonprofit. In 2024, it had $185,418,243 revenue and $178,588,294 expenses. CEO Maryana Iskander's ...
  6. [6]
    Editing for Hate: How Anti-Israel and Anti-Jewish Bias Undermines ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · ADL has found clear evidence that a group of at least 30 editors circumvent Wikipedia's policies in concert to introduce antisemitic narratives, anti-Israel ...
  7. [7]
    Ted Cruz presses Wikipedia on bias and funding concerns - The Hill
    Oct 6, 2025 · In a letter to Wikimedia Foundation CEO Maryana Iskander, Cruz voiced concerns about potential left-wing bias within the widely used platform. “ ...
  8. [8]
    Ten years of supporting free knowledge - Wikimedia Foundation
    Jun 20, 2013 · Ten years ago today, on June 20, 2003, Jimmy Wales announced the founding of the Wikimedia Foundation. He entrusted the new nonprofit with the operation of ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  9. [9]
    Wikimedia Foundation Moving To San Francisco | WIRED
    Oct 10, 2007 · Roughly half of Wikimedia's six staff are planning to move to the Bay Area and the company says it expects to see its overall headcount rise.
  10. [10]
    20 years of the nonprofit behind Wikipedia | by Wikimedia - Medium
    Jun 19, 2023 · These dynamics drove the early but slow growth of the Wikimedia Foundation, which eventually employed people like Starling and Vibber. In thanks ...
  11. [11]
    Wikipedia moves to San Francisco | Reuters
    Oct 11, 2007 · The foundation has six full time employees in St. Petersburg. Others will be hired after the move to San Francisco, the company statement said.
  12. [12]
    Wikimedia abandons Florida for San Francisco - SFGATE
    Oct 10, 2007 · Wikimedia plans to move out of its office by the end of January, though not all of its employees will make the trip to San Francisco, Wales said ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Wikimedia Foundation
    Nov 1, 2005 · We are the non-profit, 501(c)3 charitable foundation that operates. Wikipedia and other free knowledge projects. The Foundation was.
  14. [14]
    Financials - Wikimedia Foundation
    We have about 400 staff and contractors to support a wide variety of projects, making each donation a great investment in a highly-efficient not-for-profit ...Missing: 2011-2020 | Show results with:2011-2020
  15. [15]
    Head of Wikipedia's Foundation Stepping Down
    Mar 28, 2013 · Wikimedia Foundation executive director Sue Gardner announced her resignation Wednesday, saying she wants to focus her energies on ...
  16. [16]
    Leadership transition for the Wikimedia Foundation – Diff
    Feb 25, 2016 · On Thursday, February 25, Lila Tretikov announced she will step down from her role as Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation.
  17. [17]
    Wikimedia Foundation/Chief Executive Officer/History - Meta-Wiki
    On 10 March 2016, the Foundation announced the appointment of Katherine Maher as interim Executive Director, effective 14 March 2016: Wikimedia Foundation ...
  18. [18]
    Wikimedia Foundation - InfluenceWatch
    As Wikipedia rapidly supplanted Nupedia, Wales closed down Nupedia. In 2003, Wales founded the Wikimedia Foundation to house Wikipedia. Activities. The ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Wikimedia Foundation CEO Katherine Maher to Step Down in April ...
    Feb 4, 2021 · Wikimedia Foundation CEO Katherine Maher to Step Down in April 2021 ... Until the new CEO is in place, the Board Transition Committee will ...Missing: present | Show results with:present
  20. [20]
    Wikimedia Foundation Appoints Maryana Iskander as Chief ...
    Sep 14, 2021 · The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation announced the appointment of Maryana Iskander as the organization's new CEO.Missing: changes present
  21. [21]
    Marking a transition at the Wikimedia Foundation – Diff
    May 6, 2025 · The Wikimedia Foundation is searching for a new CEO, with the current CEO staying until a successor is found, hopefully by January 2026. The ...Missing: changes present
  22. [22]
    The Humans behind our knowledge - Wikimedia Foundation
    The Humans behind our knowledge. The Wikimedia Foundation is made up of nearly 650 staff from around the world, who protect and support Wikipedia and other ...Missing: size 2021-2025
  23. [23]
    Movement Strategy/Implementation projects - Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
    May 15, 2025 · 1 Increase the Sustainability of Our Movement · 2 Improve User Experience · 3 Provide for Safety and Inclusion · 4 Ensure Equity in Decision-Making ...
  24. [24]
    Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 19 – Diff
    Oct 14, 2025 · Mobile Editing: Insights on mobile web editing on Wikipedia in 2025 are now available. · Dark Mode: Dark Mode user interface will be rolled out ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Wikimedia Enterprise Financial Report: Fiscal Year 2023 – 2024 – Diff
    Nov 7, 2024 · For fiscal year 2023-2024, Wikimedia Enterprise had $3.4M revenue, $3.8M expenses, and a $400k net operating loss. Since 2022, the net loss is ...
  26. [26]
    Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2023-2024/Finances - Meta-Wiki
    As of January 2023, Enterprise has $3.2 million in annual recurring revenue. Detailed budget. edit. Budget numbers. edit. Growth of the Wikimedia Foundation's ...
  27. [27]
    Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations
    Sep 12, 2025 · UPDATE – 12 September 2025: The Wikimedia Foundation will not appeal the UK High Court's decision to dismiss our challenge to the UK's Online ...Missing: 2021-2025 | Show results with:2021-2025
  28. [28]
    Wikimedia challenges India content takedown, warns of chilling ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · Wikimedia challenges India content takedown, warns of chilling effect on free speech · Wikimedia says removal order is erroneous- legal document ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  29. [29]
    Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger exposes ideological ... - Fox News
    Oct 9, 2025 · Wikipedia's co-founder on anonymous editors, why the site is biased against conservatives and how to fix it.Missing: present | Show results with:present
  30. [30]
    Wikimedia Foundation Mission
    The mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in ...
  31. [31]
    Wikimedia vision
    Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment. Help expand human knowledge.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Resolution:Wikimedia Foundation Guiding Principles
    Jul 14, 2025 · 1 Freedom and open source · 2 Serving every human being · 3 Transparency · 4 Accountability · 5 Stewardship · 6 Shared power · 7 Internationalism · 8 ...
  33. [33]
    Wikimedia Foundation/Board of Trustees - Meta-Wiki
    Current members ; Christel Steigenberger (User:Kritzolina), Community/Affiliate ; Maciej Nadzikiewicz (User:Nadzik), Community/Affiliate ; Jimmy Wales (User:Jimbo ...
  34. [34]
    Legal:Wikimedia Foundation Board Handbook
    Transparency is one of the Wikimedia Foundation's core values. The Board is committed to maximizing transparency, including by making as much information as ...
  35. [35]
    Wikimedia Foundation welcomes incoming Board Trustee Mayree ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · With Mayree's appointment, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees has 12 members: a Community Founder, six community-and-affiliate-selected ...
  36. [36]
    The Wikimedia Foundation welcomes community-and-affiliate ...
    Dec 19, 2024 · Today, the Wikimedia Foundation announced that two new members have joined its Board of Trustees: Maciej Artur Nadzikiewicz and Christel
  37. [37]
    Wikimedia Foundation/Chief Executive Officer - Meta-Wiki
    Maryana Iskander became the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Wikimedia Foundation in January 2022. Maryana joined the Wikimedia Foundation after a decade as ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Who Should Run Wikipedia Next? - The Wikipedian
    Jun 22, 2025 · Lila Tretikov, a technologist, was tapped to improve its tech stack. Katherine Maher, a communications officer, was promoted when Tretikov's ...
  39. [39]
    Wikimedia Foundation/Executive and Leadership teams - Meta-Wiki
    As of May 2025, the Wikimedia Foundation Executive team includes: Image, Name, Position, Department(s). Maryana Iskander, Chief Executive Officer, Office of the ...
  40. [40]
    Reflections on 2025 from the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Team
    Jan 29, 2025 · Hi, I am Courtney Bass Sherizen, Chief People Officer, the newest addition to the executive team. My first day on the job was at Wikimania 2023 ...
  41. [41]
    Wikimedia Foundation responds to questions about how Wikipedia ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · Neutrality is one of Wikipedia's most fundamental and bedrock policies. Information must be written as far as possible without editorial bias.
  42. [42]
    Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use
    This means that editorial control is in the hands of you and your fellow users who create and manage the content. The community – the network of users who ...
  43. [43]
    Wikimedia Foundation statement on volunteer processes on reliable ...
    Jun 26, 2024 · This independent relationship is crucial to ensuring Wikipedia remains neutral and free from institutional bias.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Policy:Wikimedia Foundation Office Actions Policy
    The office actions policy is a set of guidelines and procedures regarding official changes to or removals of content on the Wikimedia projects.
  45. [45]
    Wikimedia head resigns over 'search engine' row - BBC News
    Feb 26, 2016 · A leaked memo suggesting the Foundation was looking at creating a "commerce-free" search engine had upset the volunteer Wikimedia community.
  46. [46]
    Wikimedia Foundation director resigns after uproar over “Knowledge ...
    Feb 29, 2016 · Following that resignation, a second uproar arose over a $250,000 grant from the Knight Foundation to help Wikimedia Foundation create a “ ...
  47. [47]
    Reluctant Wikipedia lifts lid on $2.5m internet search engine project
    Feb 12, 2016 · The Wikimedia Foundation has finally disclosed details of its controversial Knowledge Engine grant – and it confirms that Wikipedia is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Requests for content alteration and takedown - Wikimedia Foundation
    We received a request in November 2019 from a government in the Americas that wanted to control articles about its First Lady on English and Spanish Wikipedia.
  49. [49]
    Wikimedia Projects
    The Wikimedia Foundation supports hundreds of thousands of people around the world in creating the largest free knowledge projects in history.
  50. [50]
    Latest Wikipedia Statistics in 2025 (Downloadable) | StatsUp
    Jan 7, 2025 · Wikipedia received 11 billion total page views in December 2024, showing a 1.38% decrease from November and a 13.51% decrease from the previous ...
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Wikimedia Foundation launches Wikimedia Enterprise: the new, opt ...
    Oct 25, 2021 · October 25, 2021, San Francisco, CA, USA ― The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that operates Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Wikimedia Enterprise - APIs for AI, Search & Knowledge Graphs
    Enterprise grade APIs for Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects, fully machine-readable formats with added features and dedicated support with SLAs.Wikimedia Enterprise · Wikimedia Enterprise Help... · Sign up · APIs
  55. [55]
    Introducing the Wikimedia Enterprise API – Diff
    Mar 16, 2021 · The Wikimedia Enterprise API packages existing, public data from Wikimedia projects in a way that makes it easier for commercial companies to reuse it for ...
  56. [56]
    Wikimedia Enterprise announces Google and Internet Archive as its ...
    Jun 21, 2022 · Wikimedia Enterprise, a first-of-its-kind commercial product designed for companies that reuse and source Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects at a high volume,
  57. [57]
    Wikimedia Enterprise Financial report & Product update – Diff
    Feb 7, 2023 · The amount capitalized for Wikimedia Enterprise was about $1.9 million at the end of 2022, of which $380,000 has been amortized (depreciated) so ...
  58. [58]
    Wikimedia Enterprise APIs and Data Products breakdown
    Access Wikimedia project data for over 100M pages across 850+ projects & languages with on-demand APIs, bulk data feeds, and real-time delivery.
  59. [59]
    Wikipedia Is Finally Asking Big Tech to Pay Up - WIRED
    Mar 16, 2021 · With the launch of Wikimedia Enterprise, the volunteer project will change that—and possibly itself too.
  60. [60]
    Wikimedia movement affiliates - Meta-Wiki
    Sep 10, 2025 · The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees recognizes models of affiliation within the Wikimedia movement – chapters, thematic organizations, and user groups.
  61. [61]
    Participate - Wikimedia Foundation
    Wikimedia projects are made by volunteers. Like you. Editors contribute new articles and improve current articles. Developers write and debug the code that ...
  62. [62]
    Wikimedia chapters - Meta-Wiki
    This page lists current and planned chapters. Please see the step-by-step chapter creation guide and the movement affiliates FAQ for more information. The ...
  63. [63]
    Community Resources and Partnerships - Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
    Oct 10, 2025 · The Community Resources subteam supports the Affiliates and contributors of the Wikimedia Movement by offering institutional and individual funding.
  64. [64]
    What we do - Wikimedia Foundation
    Oct 10, 2025 · Last year we awarded over 9 million USD in grants to Wikimedia community members, affiliates and nonprofit organizations. We fund editathons, ...Missing: early 2003-2010
  65. [65]
    A growing Wikimedia movement, with training and learning at its core
    Jul 2, 2019 · Between 2014 and 2019, Wikimedia movement affiliates tripled: we went from having 50 affiliates to over 150 (and we keep growing!). It grew more ...
  66. [66]
    Wikimania – Wikimedia Foundation
    Apr 8, 2025 · The annual global conference is an opportunity for free knowledge enthusiasts from all over the world to connect, learn, exchange ideas, and build new networks.
  67. [67]
    Wikimania 2024 in Poland celebrates global volunteers who make ...
    Jul 31, 2024 · The nineteenth edition of the global event will take place in Katowice, Poland (the 2024 European City of Science), from 7 - 10 August.
  68. [68]
    Wikimania 2025 brought together people from across the Wikimedia ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · Wikimania 2025 brought together people from across the Wikimedia movement and across generations. More than 2,300 people attended the ...
  69. [69]
    Events Team Portal/Community Events - Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
    The Wikimedia Foundation partners with affiliates, user-groups, volunteers, and mission-aligned organizations to organize events across the world.
  70. [70]
    Wikimedia campaigns
    Every year, dozens of volunteer- and partner-led campaigns take place around the world to strengthen Wikipedia and other free knowledge projects.Take Photos, Illustrate... · Close Cultural Content Gaps · Improve Representation...<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Movement Strategy - Meta-Wiki - Wikimedia.org
    Aug 7, 2025 · Currently, Movement Strategy is being implemented with goals set for 2030. Anyone can contribute to the Movement Strategy, from a comment to ...
  72. [72]
    Movement Strategy/Recommendations - Meta-Wiki - Wikimedia.org
    Apr 23, 2025 · 1. Increase the Sustainability of Our Movement 2. Improve User Experience 3. Provide for Safety and Inclusion 4. Ensure Equity in Decision-making
  73. [73]
    Wikimedia 2030: participatory strategy for a global movement
    I was a Lead Architect for Wikimedia 2030, a global, participatory strategy process involving dozens of movement organizations and thousands of individuals.<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Achieve knowledge equity - Wikimedia Foundation
    Feb 3, 2023 · To achieve our vision, we need to realize knowledge equity, a central pillar of the Wikimedia movement's 2030 strategy. Knowledge equity calls ...
  75. [75]
    Knowledge Equity Fund - Meta-Wiki - Wikimedia.org
    Sep 14, 2024 · A US$4.5 million fund created by the Wikimedia Foundation in 2020, to provide grants to external organizations that support knowledge equity.
  76. [76]
    Announcing the newest round of Knowledge Equity Fund grantees
    Oct 9, 2024 · We will be giving grants to 13 organizations in 10 countries, supporting work to address knowledge gaps and create and share new knowledge.
  77. [77]
    Open the Knowledge - Wikimedia Foundation
    “Open the Knowledge” is our call to everyone to promote radical knowledge equity, creating a living record of history, stories, and contexts for and by all ...
  78. [78]
    Wikimedia Race and Knowledge Equity Fellowship
    A one-year fellowship designed to explore the intersection of racial equity, free knowledge, and the intellectual property ecosystem.
  79. [79]
    Increase the Sustainability of our Movement: a strategy ...
    Aug 2, 2023 · 3. Increased awareness about the Wikimedia movement. Implementing this initiative requires promoting the Wikimedia movement to readers, ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  80. [80]
    Movement Strategy/Initiatives - Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
    Sep 20, 2025 · This is a simplified version of the list of initiatives (those being: the key outcomes, changes or actions) embedded in the Wikimedia 2030 Movement Strategy ...
  81. [81]
    MediaWiki
    ### Summary of MediaWiki
  82. [82]
    Technology - Wikimedia Foundation
    Wikimedia Enterprise. For organizations that reuse Wikimedia content: Wikimedia Enterprise is a commercial product that meets a range of high volume content ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    MediaWiki history
    MediaWiki is free software originally (since 2001–2002) written for Wikipedia (later, Wikimedia projects) by its own community.
  84. [84]
    History of MediaWiki version control
    MediaWiki's source code has been hosted by a number of tools and technologies over the years. Contents. 1 CVS; 2 SVN; 3 git; 4 See also ...
  85. [85]
    Manual:MediaWiki architecture
    Apr 27, 2025 · From the start, MediaWiki was developed specifically to be Wikipedia's software. Developers have worked to facilitate reuse by third-party ...
  86. [86]
    New Developers/Introduction to the Wikimedia Technical Ecosystem ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · The Wikimedia technical community has added many key features to MediaWiki and built a large ecosystem of extensions to the core software.
  87. [87]
    What is Wikibase?
    Wikibase is a free, customizable, open-source software suite for creating interoperable knowledge bases, and it drives Wikidata.
  88. [88]
    How Wikipedia helps keep the internet open | Opensource.com
    Mar 6, 2023 · As of May 2022, bots and tools contribute 36.6% of edits made to 870 Wikimedia wikis, demonstrating their significant impact on the ecosystem.
  89. [89]
    Manual:Developing extensions - MediaWiki
    Sep 4, 2025 · Extension development for MediaWiki includes setup, implementation, localisation, and publication. Browse existing extensions first.
  90. [90]
    Our new AI strategy puts Wikipedia's humans first
    Apr 30, 2025 · Our new AI strategy doubles down on the volunteers behind Wikipedia. We will use AI to build features that remove technical barriers.
  91. [91]
    Annual Report 2023-2024 - Wikimedia Foundation
    Support and revenue, 2024 (USD), 2023 (USD). Contributions of cash and other financial assets, 168,212,977, 164,121,185. Contributions of nonfinancial assets ...
  92. [92]
    Wikimedia infrastructure - Wikitech
    Sep 24, 2025 · Data centers · Data center locations: eqiad data center (Ashburn, USA); codfw data center (Dallas, USA); esams data center (Amsterdam, NL) ...
  93. [93]
    Wikimedia servers - Meta-Wiki
    Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects are run from server racks located in several data centres. Contents. 1 System architecture.
  94. [94]
    How Wikipedia became a multi-datacenter deployment
    May 8, 2023 · Wikimedia Foundation began operating a secondary data center in 2014, as contingency to facilitate a quick and full recovery within minutes in ...<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    Artificial intelligence service "ORES" gives Wikipedians X-ray specs ...
    Nov 30, 2015 · This service empowers Wikipedia editors by helping them discover damaging edits and can be used to immediately “score” the quality of any Wikipedia article.How It Works · A Feminist Inspiration · Who's Using Revision Scores
  96. [96]
    ORES - Wikitech
    Nov 17, 2023 · A tool that runs on Toolforge, that listens to revision-create events and calls ORES for goodfaith and damaging scores for every revision id.
  97. [97]
  98. [98]
    Strategy/Multigenerational/Artificial intelligence for editors - Meta-Wiki
    This strategy brief was published in April 2025 and was authored by Chris Albon and Leila Zia from the Wikimedia Foundation.
  99. [99]
    AI For Good - Wikimedia Foundation
    Wikimedia is creating AI-related software and tools that are open source, transparent in operation, and in dialogue with a community that tells us what works ...Missing: initiatives | Show results with:initiatives
  100. [100]
    Making sure AI serves people and knowledge stays human
    Sep 30, 2025 · The Foundation commissioned it to identify and analyze the impacts, opportunities, and risks emanating from the use of AI and ML technologies in ...
  101. [101]
    Wikimedia Foundation Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · Wikimedia Foundation Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Human Rights Impact Assessment.
  102. [102]
    The Wikimedia Foundation's acceptance of cryptocurrency donations
    Jan 30, 2022 · The Wikimedia Foundation's acceptance of cryptocurrency donations has had minimal returns, and no longer accepting them is unlikely to have a major impact.Missing: emerging | Show results with:emerging<|control11|><|separator|>
  103. [103]
    Machine learning models - Meta-Wiki - Wikimedia
    Sep 16, 2024 · ORES data, models, and model training performances ... machine learning model cards for models that are hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.Production models · Planned model cards
  104. [104]
    Takeaways from the Wikimedia Foundation's Form 990 for fiscal ...
    Apr 29, 2025 · This post explains the Form 990 for the Wikimedia Foundation for fiscal year 2023-2024, which ran from July 2023 – June 2024.
  105. [105]
    Fundraising/2023-24 Report - Meta-Wiki
    Dec 11, 2024 · The Wikimedia Foundation is sustained by our unique grassroots fundraising model, with over 8 million donors giving an average donation of $10.58 in the 2023- ...Key Stats · Banners: A Chance To Learn... · Wikimedia EndowmentMissing: practices | Show results with:practices
  106. [106]
    The next time Wikipedia asks for a donation, ignore it - UnHerd
    Oct 12, 2022 · Today, the Wikimedia Foundation has five times as much money, and the fundraising messages still make people think that they are struggling ...
  107. [107]
    The great Wikipedia fundraising controversy.
    Dec 2, 2022 · “The wiki community is challenging the Wikimedia Foundation's right or ability to run fundraising ads on English Wikipedia,” said Lane Rasberry, ...
  108. [108]
    Highlights from the fiscal year 2023-2024 Wikimedia Foundation ...
    Nov 7, 2024 · During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Foundation's total revenue was $185.4M, of which $174.7M came from donations. This total number represents not ...
  109. [109]
    Financial Reports - Wikimedia Foundation
    The Wikimedia Foundation provides financial reports including annual reports, audit reports, annual plans, and Form 990s.
  110. [110]
    Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2024-2025/Budget Details
    We had 644 total Foundation staff on 31 December 2023. This number includes employees at the Foundation, at Employers of Record, and fixed-term contractors ...Missing: size 2021-2025
  111. [111]
    Endowment - Wikimedia Foundation
    When Wikipedia turned 15, the Foundation announced the start of the Wikimedia Endowment, a permanent, separately held, and invested fund that would support the ...
  112. [112]
    Wikimedia Endowment - Meta-Wiki
    About the Wikimedia Endowment​​ The Endowment was launched in January 2016 on the 15th anniversary of Wikipedia as a Collective Action Fund with the Tides ...About the Wikimedia Endowment · Wikimedia Endowment Board...
  113. [113]
    Wikimedia Endowment Financial Reports
    In 2023, the Endowment made $4.5 million in grants including $3.2 million to support technical innovation of the Wikimedia projects and a $1.3 millon grant to ...
  114. [114]
    Wikimedia Foundation reaches $100 million Endowment goal as ...
    Sep 22, 2021 · The Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment Board have also announced plans to move the Wikimedia Endowment, currently managed by the Tides ...
  115. [115]
    Sharing the Wikimedia Endowment's Form 990 for fiscal year 2023
    Jul 14, 2025 · Following the publication of the Foundation's fiscal year 2023 – 2024 Form 990, we have now published the Wikimedia Endowment's first ...
  116. [116]
    Annual Report 2023-2024 - Wikimedia Endowment
    and that the vast majority of our revenue came from the generosity of donors. Read More.
  117. [117]
    Building a secure financial future for Wikipedia | by Lisa Seitz Gruwell
    Jun 29, 2021 · 1. Encourage support from individuals to build resiliency · 2. Invest in future growth and plan for the long-term · 3. Spot trends early and adapt ...
  118. [118]
    Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2025-2026/Budget Overview
    Jul 2, 2025 · We will continue to prioritize growing direct funding for the movement. Wikimedia Foundation budget by goal for fiscal year 2025–26. Budget by ...Missing: chapter cuts
  119. [119]
    Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2025-2026/Financial Model
    Jul 24, 2025 · Wikimedia's financial model is a central topic for multi-year strategic planning. This relates to priorities in fundraising, financial management, and a ...
  120. [120]
    Wikimedia Fundraising: Where Is Your Money Going?
    The actual hosting and bandwidth charges to keep Wikipedia and its allied projects online have been roughly constant since 2009, at about $2.5 million.
  121. [121]
    Wikipedia spends way too much money and need to cut their ...
    Dec 9, 2023 · If you look at their last published audit report, their annual expense is $170M of which $100M is accounted for salaries and benefits.The controversial D.E.I budget and your opinion on it? : r/wikipediaWikipedia never had a yearly loss and has created a $100m ... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  122. [122]
    Wikipedia's Deep Ties to Big Tech
    Apr 5, 2021 · Wikimedia sends $5 million per year to the Tides Foundation for the endowment with the funds marked as grants in disclosure statements. It also ...
  123. [123]
    Why does Wikipedia need donations despite its massive popularity?
    Oct 4, 2023 · Given its considerable net worth, many have criticised the website for the doomsday-esque tone it adopts in its call for donations. Asked about ...
  124. [124]
    Ask HN: Why is the Wikipedia Foundation's begging tolerated?
    Dec 23, 2022 · Wikipedia's donation banners are questioned as they imply urgent need despite having $300m, with only 43% of donations going to operations, and ...
  125. [125]
    Wikipedia at Elon Musk's crosshairs, slams its $50 million DEI ...
    Dec 27, 2024 · Wikimedia Foundation announced that nearly 30% of its $177 million budget for the 2023-24 fiscal year would be directed towards DEI efforts ...
  126. [126]
    Elon Musk urges supporters not to donate to Wikipedia over DEI
    Dec 25, 2024 · Elon Musk urged his supporters not to donate to the nonprofit that runs Wikipedia after the organization budgeted more than $50 million to spend on ...
  127. [127]
    Rating for Wikimedia Foundation - Charity Navigator
    Rating 4/4 · Review by Charity NavigatorTotal Revenue and Expenses - Data Available. This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as ...
  128. [128]
    Wikipedia:Wikimedia Foundation
    In 2016, there were approximately 280 employees, and in 2020, there were approximately 450 employees and contractors.Missing: 2021-2025 | Show results with:2021-2025
  129. [129]
    Wikimedia Foundation organigram - Meta-Wiki
    This page has been moved from Organization chart, merged with suggested position descriptions from Official position (ca. May 2005). Wikimedia Board of Trustees.
  130. [130]
  131. [131]
    Building a Global Staff Community at the Wikimedia Foundation – Diff
    May 3, 2023 · On wiki and beyond, our staff are also artists, activists, musicians, academics, writers, pilots, photographers, and even yoga instructors. They ...Missing: composition demographics
  132. [132]
    Wikimedia Foundation diversity and inclusion information about our ...
    Oct 1, 2019 · 53% of new hires in the US were women and 30% of new hires were Black/African-American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, or Native American.
  133. [133]
    Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia - PMC - PubMed Central
    WP evolves without the supervision of a pre-selected expert team, its voluntary editors define the rules and maintain the quality. WP has grown beyond other ...
  134. [134]
    (PDF) Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · In this work we study the dynamical features of editorial wars in Wikipedia (WP). Based on our previously established.
  135. [135]
    Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? - by David Rozado
    Jun 20, 2024 · Results show a mild to moderate tendency in Wikipedia articles to associate public figures ideologically aligned right-of-center with more ...
  136. [136]
    The Myth of Wikipedia's Neutrality: Unmasking its Leftist Bias
    Dec 9, 2024 · Wikipedia has a mild to moderate tendency to associate public figures with right-of-center ideological leanings with more negative sentiment ...
  137. [137]
    Edit wars over Israel spur rare ban of 8 Wikipedia editors
    Jan 23, 2025 · Eight Wikipedia editors accused of disruptive behavior have been barred from making changes to articles on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, ...
  138. [138]
    Toxic comments are associated with reduced activity of volunteer ...
    Dec 5, 2023 · Conflict on Wikipedia has already been a subject of numerous studies, with particular attention given to so-called “edit wars” (11, 29, 30).
  139. [139]
    [PDF] Toxic comments reduce the activity of volunteer editors on Wikipedia
    Apr 26, 2023 · Smirnov I, Oprea C, Toxic comments reduce activity of volunteer editors on Wikipedia: Data & Code; 2023. ... Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia.<|separator|>
  140. [140]
    Inauthentic Editing: Changing Wikipedia to Win Elections and ...
    Jan 7, 2021 · Administrative tools like user blocks and temporary page locks helped tackle edit wars. However, more sophisticated edits, like those on ...
  141. [141]
    Wikimedia Foundation sends cease and desist letter to WikiPR
    Nov 19, 2013 · The Wikimedia Foundation sent a cease and desist letter to WikiPR for alleged paid advocacy editing, demanding they stop editing until they ...
  142. [142]
    Why some Wikipedia disputes go unresolved | MIT News
    Nov 6, 2018 · Wikipedia offers several channels to solve editorial disputes, which involve two editors hashing out their problems, putting ideas to a simple ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  143. [143]
    Victory in Greece: Legal case ended against Wikipedia editor
    Apr 18, 2018 · A long-running legal case in Greece has come to an end, with Theodore Katsanevas dropping all claims against the Greek Wikipedia administrator.
  144. [144]
  145. [145]
  146. [146]
    Wikipedia co-founder says site has liberal bias — here's his plan to ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · Larry Sanger's criticisms and proposed reforms for Wikipedia highlight ongoing debates around neutrality, editorial processes and ...
  147. [147]
    Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? - Manhattan Institute
    Jun 20, 2024 · Anecdotally, Larry Sanger, one of Wikipedia's cofounders, has said publicly that he believes that the site has a high degree of political bias ...<|separator|>
  148. [148]
  149. [149]
    Wikipedia accused of blacklisting conservative US media - The Times
    Feb 6, 2025 · Wikipedia has been accused of blacklisting conservative media from being used as source material.
  150. [150]
    MAGA Melts Down Over Wikipedia 'Blacklist' - Yahoo
    Sep 30, 2025 · “The blacklisted sources are Breitbart, Daily Caller, Epoch Times, Fox News, New York Post, The Federalist, so you can't use those as sources on ...
  151. [151]
    Republicans investigate Wikipedia over allegations of organized bias
    Aug 27, 2025 · They referenced a report from the Anti-Defamation League about anti-Israel bias on Wikipedia that detailed a coordinated campaign to manipulate ...
  152. [152]
    Are Wikimedia's exec salaries normal? - The Hustle
    Dec 15, 2023 · Unpacking an internet debate about Wikimedia's executive salaries. ; Former CEO Katherine Maher earned $789.5k. · Former COO Janeen Uzzell pulled ...
  153. [153]
    Why does wikipedia keep asking for money? Are they really ... - Reddit
    Sep 1, 2024 · The Wikimedia Foundation notoriously spends less than half of their money on maintaining their websites. The rest of the funding has very ...
  154. [154]
    Elon Musk urges supporters not to donate to Wikipedia after it spent ...
    Dec 25, 2024 · The Wikimedia Foundation site said that it set a goal of spending $51.7 million in its budget: 17.6% ($31.2 million) on equity, and 11.6% ($20.5 ...
  155. [155]
    Elon Musk Takes Aim at Wikipedia - Newsweek
    Dec 24, 2024 · Elon Musk has urged his followers not to donate to Wikipedia, which he branded "Wokepedia," until "they restore balance to their editing authority."
  156. [156]
    The controversial D.E.I budget and your opinion on it? : r/wikipedia
    Dec 25, 2024 · Today i saw a claim that Wikipedia is allocating a very large part of their budget towards DEI programs in their 2023-2024 budget.
  157. [157]
    The journey to make Wikipedia's technology more equitable
    May 9, 2022 · The Wikimedia Foundation has developed a unique framework for equitable and inclusive open source product development. This is the story behind the framework ...
  158. [158]
    Wikimedia Foundation Inc. is corrupt and bad - Meta-Wiki
    Aug 2, 2025 · Wikimedia Foundation Inc. is corrupt and bad. The organization has bloated to become unwieldy, unaccountable, and it has little to show for the hundreds of ...
  159. [159]
    Head of Wikimedia resigns over search engine plans - The Guardian
    Feb 26, 2016 · Lila Tretikov, the executive director of the organisation that oversees Wikipedia, has quit after a community revolt.
  160. [160]
    Unicorns are a Myth: Lila Tretikov resigns as Wikimedia Foundation ...
    On February 25, 2016, Lila Tretikov announced her resignation as the Wikimedia Foundation's Executive Director. She will stay on until March 31.
  161. [161]
    NPR boss Katherine Maher opposed 'free and open' approach at ...
    Apr 18, 2024 · Maher said Wikipedia's "free and open" ethos was problematic because it was based on 5. Maher said Wikipedia's “free and open” ethos was ...
  162. [162]
    Quotations from Chairman Maher - City Journal
    Apr 17, 2024 · As CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation, Maher made censorship a critical part of her policy, under the guise of fighting “disinformation.” In a ...
  163. [163]
    Wikipedia co-founder 'shocked' by NPR chief Katherine Maher
    Apr 18, 2024 · Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger discusses Katherine Maher and the corruption of the Internet.
  164. [164]
    Wikipedia co-founder blasts successor Katherine Maher, says NPR ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · City Journal's Christopher Rufo has been unearthing comments Maher had made during her tenure as executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation.Missing: present | Show results with:present
  165. [165]
    Katherine Maher's reputation in the Wikimedia community
    Aug 20, 2017 · Katherine Maher is the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation. As the executive director of a global media superpower Katherine is a ...
  166. [166]
    Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA - | Knight First Amendment Institute
    The lawsuit argues that the NSA's Upstream surveillance program is an unprecedented form of surveillance that violates the First Amendment.Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  167. [167]
    Wikimedia v. NSA - Challenge to Upstream Surveillance - ACLU
    The ACLU is challenging the constitutionality of the NSA's mass interception and searching of Americans' international Internet communications.Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  168. [168]
    A German court forced us to remove part of a Wikipedia article's ...
    Apr 11, 2019 · The ruling stems from a previous lawsuit against the Foundation, originally filed in mid-2018. It asserted that a Wikipedia article's claim ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  169. [169]
    The Case of Wikimedia Foundation Inc. and Others
    The main issue before the Court was whether a full blocking of access to the Wikipedia platform pursuant to Article 8/A of the Law no. 5651 violated freedom of ...Missing: disputes lawsuits
  170. [170]
    Strengthening Wikipedia's neutral point of view - Wikimedia Diff
    Mar 27, 2025 · This working group will ask how more common standards for NPOV policies between projects can protect and improve Wikipedia and support volunteers.Missing: reform | Show results with:reform
  171. [171]
    Co-founder says Wikipedia's neutrality 'long gone,' cites leftist bias
    Feb 21, 2021 · “The days of Wikipedia's robust commitment to neutrality are long gone,” Mr. Sanger told Fox News in a new interview. “Wikipedia's ideological ...
  172. [172]
    Policy:Conflict of Interest Policy for Wikimedia Foundation Board ...
    Nov 26, 2024 · Contents · Purpose · Definitions · Identifying Conflicts of Interest · Assessing Conflicts of Interest · Addressing Conflicts of Interest · Policy ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  173. [173]
    Wikimedia Foundation Board announces Community Culture ...
    May 22, 2020 · Today, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees voted to ratify new trust and safety standards for Wikipedia and all other Wikimedia ...Missing: changes 2011-2020
  174. [174]
  175. [175]
    Comer and Mace Investigate Efforts to Manipulate Information on ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · “[The Wikimedia] foundation, which hosts the Wikipedia platform, has acknowledged taking actions responding to misconduct by volunteer editors ...
  176. [176]
    Press contacts - Wikimedia Foundation
    Oct 10, 2025 · Today, Wikipedia exists in nearly 300 languages across more than 65 million articles. ... 22 October 2025 By Wikimedia Foundation · Read more ...Missing: total | Show results with:total
  177. [177]
    Ten years of Wikipedia Education Program – a look back
    Oct 1, 2020 · The resulting study found that Wikipedia-based assignments enhance students' digital literacy and critical research skills, foster their ability ...<|separator|>
  178. [178]
  179. [179]
    Social Scientists Can't Ignore the Power of Wikipedia—or Its ...
    Apr 6, 2023 · Wikipedia itself recognises its systemic biases and is working to address them through initiatives like Women in Red, a group of global editors ...
  180. [180]
    Directly Tackling the Gender Bias of Wikipedia's Social Science ...
    Apr 17, 2023 · Among the most frequent criticisms of Wikipedia is gender bias, which is known as the Wikipedia gender gap. Only 19 percent of Wikipedia ...
  181. [181]
    The Problem with Wikipedia | NAS
    The second reason that open access materials like Wikipedia present difficulties is the tendency of young people from 3-35 to use them exclusively, regardless ...
  182. [182]
    Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?
    Dec 3, 2019 · This article argues that it is high time not only to acknowledge Wikipedia's quality but also to start actively promoting its use and development in academia.
  183. [183]
    Content Quality and Quantity Are the Cause of Wikipedia's Woes
    Recent coverage of Wikipedia has pointed out that the collaborative online encyclopedia is in trouble. What's up? It's all about production.
  184. [184]
    Analyzing Accessibility of Wikipedia Projects Around the World
    May 1, 2017 · The report features results of our data analysis and insights into the state of access to Wikipedia content in 15 select countries. Download ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  185. [185]
    Wikipedia's 'neutrality' has always been complicated. New rules will ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · Because the Wikimedia Foundation has lots of control over research on Wikipedia. It decides who it will work with, who gets funding, whose ...
  186. [186]
    Republicans investigate Wikipedia over allegations of organized bias
    Aug 27, 2025 · Assume for a second that Wikipedia was, in fact, super biased. Assume it is the single most biased website to have ever been published. That ...
  187. [187]
    (PDF) Using Wikipedia to Predict Election Outcomes - ResearchGate
    PDF | This study seeks to improve election forecasting by supplementing polling data with online information-seeking behavior trends as an indicator of.<|control11|><|separator|>
  188. [188]
    Wikipedia: a challenger's best friend? Utilizing information-seeking ...
    The prediction of electoral outcomes is not a new endeavour and has remained a topic of public speculation in the United States since at least the 1880s ...
  189. [189]
    What Wikipedia saw during election week in the U.S., and what we ...
    and waited — for the results to come in, Wikipedia editors across the globe stood ready. As one of the world's most ...
  190. [190]
    New Study Finds Political Bias Embedded in Wikipedia Articles
    Jun 20, 2024 · Findings show that Wikipedia entries are more likely to attach negative sentiment to terms representative of right-leaning political orientation ...Missing: ramifications | Show results with:ramifications
  191. [191]
    Chairman Cruz Sounds Alarm Over Left-Wing Ideological Bias on ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · Additionally, Sen. Cruz highlights concerns over coordinated editing campaigns on Wikipedia that have spread antisemitic narratives and promoted ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  192. [192]
    Wikimedia Foundation calls for protection and fair treatment of ...
    Sep 19, 2023 · In recent months, the Foundation has publicly highlighted how the Bill directly interferes with Wikipedia's community content moderation model, ...
  193. [193]
    Wikipedia:Post-election edit war syndrome
    An election which results in a change of government or other officials has the unexpected byproduct of causing an edit war on Wikipedia which affects multiple ...
  194. [194]
    Wikipedia Is Biased against Conservatives - National Review
    Jun 20, 2024 · A new Manhattan Institute report is giving scholarly credibility to long-held conservative suspicions of bias among Wikipedia editors.Missing: ramifications | Show results with:ramifications
  195. [195]
    Wikipedia co-founder says site has liberal bias — here's his plan to ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger is alleging that the online encyclopedia has a left-leaning bias and “a lot of problems,” and recently ...