Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics

Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is a meshless, Lagrangian computational method used to simulate the dynamics of fluids and solids by discretizing the continuum into a set of particles, each carrying properties such as mass, position, and velocity, which evolve according to the hydrodynamic equations approximated via kernel-based interpolation.^[1] Developed independently in 1977 by Robert A. Gingold and Joseph J. Monaghan for modeling non-spherical stars in astrophysics, and by Leon B. Lucy for similar purposes, SPH originated from statistical kernel estimation techniques to provide numerical solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations without a fixed grid.^[2] The core principle of SPH involves smoothing field variables, such as density and pressure, over neighboring particles using a kernel function—typically a cubic spline or Gaussian—that decays with distance, ensuring local approximations while conserving total mass, momentum, and energy through symmetric formulations.^[1] This approach naturally handles extreme deformations, free surfaces, and multi-phase interactions without mesh distortion issues common in grid-based methods, though it requires artificial viscosity terms to capture shocks and prevent particle clustering.^[1] SPH has found wide applications across disciplines, including astrophysics for simulating star formation, planetary collisions, and supernova explosions; engineering for free-surface flows like dam breaks and sloshing; and solid mechanics for fracture and impact problems, with extensions to magnetohydrodynamics, relativity, and high-strain-rate phenomena.^[1] Notable advancements include variable-resolution techniques for adaptive refinement (introduced in 1982) and improved formulations for better conservation and accuracy, making SPH a versatile tool in computational physics despite ongoing challenges like tensile instability.^[1]

Introduction

History and Development

Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) was independently developed in 1977 by Robert A. Gingold and Joseph J. Monaghan at the Australian National University, as well as by Leon B. Lucy at Kitt Peak National Observatory, primarily for simulating the dynamics of non-spherical stars and testing the fission hypothesis in stellar evolution. Gingold and Monaghan's formulation introduced a meshless, Lagrangian method using particles to approximate continuum equations, enabling the modeling of non-axisymmetric problems without fixed grids. Lucy's contemporaneous work emphasized numerical testing of fission hypotheses in stellar contexts, laying foundational groundwork for particle-based interpolation in hydrodynamics. These efforts, rooted in addressing limitations of traditional Eulerian codes for complex geometries, marked SPH's debut as a versatile computational tool.^[3] In the early 1980s, Monaghan and collaborators expanded SPH's scope beyond astrophysics to general fluid dynamics, adapting it for hydrodynamic simulations including free-surface flows and shock propagation.^[3] This shift was driven by the method's natural handling of large deformations and interfaces, with early applications demonstrating its efficacy in problems like binary star interactions and planetary impacts. By the late 1980s, research groups, including those at Monash University under Monaghan's influence, refined SPH for broader continuum mechanics, establishing it as a standard for multi-dimensional fluid problems.^[3] The 1990s saw significant methodological advancements, including the development of weakly compressible SPH (WCSPH) by Monaghan in 1994, which incorporated an artificial equation of state to stabilize simulations of low-Mach-number flows while mitigating tensile instabilities. This was complemented by the introduction of incompressible SPH (ISPH) in 1999 by Cummins and Rudman, employing a projection method to enforce divergence-free velocity fields via a pressure Poisson equation, enabling accurate modeling of truly incompressible regimes.^[4] In the 2000s, SPH integrated with solid mechanics through total Lagrangian formulations, pioneered by researchers like Vignjevic and others around 2006, which referenced initial configurations to improve conservation properties and handle elastic-plastic deformations in solids. Recent developments from 2020 to 2025 have focused on multi-scale and hybrid extensions. In 2020, Yang et al. proposed the pairwise-force SPH (PF-SPH) model for simulating preferential flow in fractured porous media, coupling matrix and fracture dynamics through efficient particle interactions to capture multi-scale transport.^[5] By 2025, Campbell et al. advanced hybrid SPH-molecular dynamics frameworks for quantum plasmas in warm dense matter, combining continuum hydrodynamics with quantum-corrected particle simulations to model high-energy-density regimes like inertial confinement fusion. These innovations, building on foundational contributions from Gingold, Monaghan, and Lucy, underscore SPH's ongoing evolution across disciplines.^[6]

Core Principles and Overview

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is a meshfree, Lagrangian computational method used to simulate the behavior of continuous media, such as fluids and solids, by representing them as a collection of discrete particles. Each particle carries essential properties including mass, position, and velocity, which collectively approximate the continuum fields without relying on a fixed computational grid. This particle-based approach allows for flexible discretization that adapts to the simulation domain, making SPH particularly suited for problems involving complex geometries and dynamic boundaries.^[7] In SPH, particles interact through a smoothing kernel, a localized weighting function that enables the interpolation of field variables from neighboring particles. The extent of each particle's influence is governed by a smoothing length h, which defines the radius over which interactions occur and controls the resolution of the approximation. The Lagrangian framework means that particles move with the material flow, automatically advecting properties like density and momentum, in contrast to Eulerian grid-based methods such as finite volume approaches, where material properties must be explicitly tracked across a stationary mesh. This inherent material-following nature simplifies the handling of advection-dominated phenomena.^[7] The typical workflow in SPH begins with initializing a set of particles distributed throughout the domain, assigning initial masses, positions, and velocities. Densities and pressures are then estimated at each particle by summing contributions from nearby neighbors within the smoothing length. The system's evolution proceeds by computing momentum changes due to inter-particle forces, updating velocities accordingly, and advancing particle positions to the next time step. Conceptually, SPH offers advantages in naturally accommodating large deformations and free surfaces, as the absence of a mesh prevents issues like tangling or distortion that plague grid methods in such scenarios.^[7] Originally developed in the late 1970s for astrophysical simulations of non-spherical stars, SPH has since expanded to diverse applications in engineering and physics.^[2]

Mathematical Formulation

Kernel Functions and Interpolation

In smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH), the kernel approximation serves as the foundational interpolation mechanism for estimating field variables, such as density or velocity, at any point in the domain. A continuous function A(\mathbf{r}) is approximated by convolving it with a smoothing kernel W, yielding

A(\mathbf{r}) \approx \int A(\mathbf{r}') W(\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}', h) \, dV',

where h is the smoothing length that controls the extent of influence. This formulation derives from the idea of reproducing the function through a weighted average of its values over space, with the kernel acting as a localized weighting function that peaks at the evaluation point and decays with distance. The approximation introduces an error of order O(h^2), which decreases as h is refined, assuming sufficient smoothness in A. The kernel function W(\mathbf{r}, h) must satisfy key mathematical properties to ensure accurate and stable interpolations. First, normalization requires \int W(\mathbf{r}, h) \, dV = 1, guaranteeing that constant functions are exactly reproduced. Second, it approximates the Dirac delta distribution in the limit \lim_{h \to 0} W(\mathbf{r}, h) = \delta(\mathbf{r}), allowing the kernel to localize the interpolation as resolution increases. Third, positivity W(\mathbf{r}, h) \geq 0 is desirable to preserve physical quantities like densities from becoming negative, though higher-order kernels may violate this for improved accuracy. Additionally, the kernel is typically symmetric, W(\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}', h) = W(\mathbf{r}' - \mathbf{r}, h), which supports antisymmetric gradient forms essential for conservation. Several kernel functions have been developed and widely adopted in SPH simulations, balancing accuracy, computational efficiency, and stability. The cubic spline kernel, introduced early in SPH's development, is one of the most common due to its compact support limited to $2h, enabling efficient neighbor searches; it is defined piecewise as a cubic polynomial in the scaled distance q = |\mathbf{r}| / h, ensuring C^2 continuity for second-order accuracy. The Gaussian kernel, W(\mathbf{r}, h) \propto \exp(-|\mathbf{r}|^2 / h^2), offers excellent theoretical properties with infinite support but is computationally prohibitive as it requires evaluating contributions from all particles. For higher-order approximations, Wendland kernels provide compact support, positive definiteness, and reduced truncation errors up to O(h^4), making them suitable for simulations demanding greater precision without excessive cost.^[8] The smoothing length h plays a critical role in determining spatial resolution and numerical cost, as it defines the kernel's width and thus the number of interacting particles, typically 20–100 neighbors for stability. In uniform distributions, h is often set to about 1.3 times the mean inter-particle spacing to achieve this neighbor count. Fixed h values simplify implementation but fail in regions of varying density, leading to under- or over-resolution. Adaptive h, which varies per particle based on local density (e.g., h_i \propto \rho_i^{-1/3}), maintains consistent resolution across the domain, enhancing accuracy in astrophysical or free-surface flows at the expense of added complexity in derivative calculations. Gradients of functions, necessary for deriving forces or fluxes, are obtained by differentiating the kernel approximation:

\nabla A(\mathbf{r}) \approx \int A(\mathbf{r}') \nabla W(\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}', h) \, dV'.

The kernel gradient \nabla W is radially symmetric and decays rapidly, facilitating pairwise computations in particle interactions. This symmetry ensures that the force between two particles is equal and opposite, promoting linear and angular momentum conservation when discretized appropriately. In practice, the continuous integral is replaced by a summation over discrete particles, but the kernel's properties underpin the method's ability to approximate derivatives accurately. In low-density or boundary regions, incomplete sampling can cause the discrete kernel sum to deviate from unity, introducing errors in interpolated quantities. Shepard's normalization addresses this by applying a corrective filter, where the effective kernel for a particle i at position \mathbf{r} is \tilde{W}_i(\mathbf{r}) = W_i(\mathbf{r}) / \sum_j W_j(\mathbf{r}), ensuring the sum approximates 1 and restoring consistency for constants. This method, while increasing computational overhead, is particularly useful in inhomogeneous distributions to mitigate inaccuracies without altering the core kernel.

Discretization of Continuum Equations

Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) discretizes the partial differential equations (PDEs) of continuum fluid dynamics into a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for discrete particles, each representing a fluid parcel with fixed mass m_i. This Lagrangian approach follows the particles as they move, approximating field quantities like density \rho, velocity \mathbf{v}, and pressure P through kernel interpolation over neighboring particles. The resulting ODEs govern the evolution of these quantities, transforming the continuum problem into a particle summation problem. The continuity equation, which ensures mass conservation, is discretized as

\frac{d\rho_i}{dt} = \sum_j m_j (\mathbf{v}_i - \mathbf{v}_j) \cdot \nabla_i W_{ij},

where \mathbf{v}_i is the velocity of particle i, \nabla_i W_{ij} is the gradient of the kernel function W_{ij} with respect to the position of particle i, and the sum is over neighboring particles j. This form evolves the density \rho_i at each particle based on relative velocities and kernel gradients, preserving total mass since particle masses are constant. The momentum equation, describing the acceleration due to forces, takes the form

\frac{d\mathbf{v}_i}{dt} = -\sum_j m_j \left( \frac{P_i}{\rho_i^2} + \frac{P_j}{\rho_j^2} + \Pi_{ij} \right) \nabla_i W_{ij},

where P_i and P_j are the pressures, and \Pi_{ij} represents a viscous or artificial viscosity term to handle shocks and prevent particle interpenetration. The symmetric pressure contribution \frac{P_i}{\rho_i^2} + \frac{P_j}{\rho_j^2} ensures antisymmetry in the force pairs between particles i and j, leading to exact linear momentum conservation for symmetric kernels. For the internal energy equation, the evolution of specific internal energy u_i is given by

\frac{du_i}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} \sum_j m_j \left( \frac{P_i}{\rho_i^2} + \frac{P_j}{\rho_j^2} \right) (\mathbf{v}_i - \mathbf{v}_j) \cdot \nabla_i W_{ij},

which accounts for the work done by pressure forces in a symmetric manner consistent with the momentum equation. This formulation, derived from the first law of thermodynamics, conserves total energy when paired with the symmetric momentum discretization and appropriate boundary conditions. Angular momentum is also conserved under symmetric kernels and constant smoothing lengths. Mass conservation is inherent, as it relies solely on unchanging particle masses. These discretizations apply primarily to compressible flows, where density evolves freely via the continuity equation and an equation of state relates pressure to internal energy and density. Incompressible formulations, which maintain constant density, are approximated in SPH by using a stiff equation of state with high sound speed, though they require additional modifications for accuracy, as detailed in later sections.

Summation and Normalization Conventions

In smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH), the core interpolation of a physical quantity A(\mathbf{r}) at position \mathbf{r}_i of particle i is performed via a discrete summation over neighboring particles, weighted by the kernel function:

A_i = \sum_j \frac{m_j}{\rho_j} A_j W(|\mathbf{r}_i - \mathbf{r}_j|, h),

where m_j is the mass of particle j, \rho_j its density, and W the smoothing kernel with smoothing length h.^[9] This mass-based formulation arises from the original SPH development, ensuring conservation properties when applied to continuum equations. Density estimation in SPH can be approached in two primary ways, each with distinct numerical characteristics. The direct summation method computes density as \rho_i = \sum_j m_j W_{ij}, where W_{ij} = W(|\mathbf{r}_i - \mathbf{r}_j|, h), providing a robust estimate that incorporates all neighbors within the kernel support but can introduce noise, particularly in low-density regions.^[9] Alternatively, density evolution via the discretized continuity equation, \frac{d\rho_i}{dt} = \sum_j m_j (\mathbf{v}_i - \mathbf{v}_j) \cdot \nabla_i W_{ij}, yields smoother profiles by integrating the velocity divergence over time, though it requires careful initialization and is common in weakly compressible SPH variants to avoid summation instabilities.^[10] These methods trade off between spatial accuracy and temporal stability, with the continuity approach often preferred for its conservation of mass in evolving flows.^[11] To address inconsistencies from irregular particle distributions or varying resolution, normalization corrects the kernel summation. The normalized interpolant for a quantity A_i becomes A_i = \frac{\sum_j \frac{m_j}{\rho_j} A_j W_{ij}}{\sum_j \frac{m_j}{\rho_j} W_{ij}}, ensuring the discrete approximation reproduces constants exactly by dividing by the kernel normalization factor \sum_j V_j W_{ij} \approx 1, where V_j = m_j / \rho_j is the particle volume.^[11] This Shepard-like correction mitigates errors near variable-density interfaces and improves first-order accuracy without altering the underlying kernel properties. For formulations with variable smoothing lengths h_i, the kernel is evaluated as W_{ij}(h_{ij}) with h_{ij} = (h_i + h_j)/2, and normalization extends similarly to maintain consistency, often updating h_i = \sigma (m_i / \rho_i)^{1/3} where \sigma \approx 1.3 in three dimensions to adapt resolution locally.^[9] Efficient computation of summations relies on neighbor search structures to identify particles within the kernel support (typically \leq 2h), avoiding the O(N^2) cost of pairwise evaluation for N particles. Linked-list algorithms divide the domain into cells of size $2h and link particles within, enabling O(N) scaling by querying only adjacent cells.^[12] Tree-based methods, such as KD-trees or octrees, achieve O(N \log N) complexity and handle adaptive h better, though they incur higher overhead for construction; these are widely adopted in large-scale simulations for their balance of speed and accuracy in dynamic distributions.^[13] Resolution in SPH is governed by the smoothing length h and the number of neighbors, typically 40–100 particles per kernel support for stability and convergence in three dimensions, as fewer lead to undersampling and noise while excess increases computational cost without proportional accuracy gains.^[14] The relation h \approx (m / \rho)^{1/3} ties resolution to local particle spacing, ensuring the kernel encompasses sufficient neighbors for second-order accuracy when h scales appropriately with density variations.^[15]

Numerical Methods

Time Integration Schemes

In smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH), time integration schemes are essential for advancing the positions and velocities of particles while solving the discretized equations of motion, ensuring numerical stability and accuracy in dynamic simulations. Explicit methods dominate due to their simplicity and efficiency for non-stiff systems, with the leapfrog integrator—also known as the velocity Verlet scheme—being particularly prevalent for its second-order accuracy and suitability to the Hamiltonian structure of SPH formulations. This scheme alternates updates between velocities and positions, leveraging the symplectic nature of SPH to maintain long-term stability in conservative systems like collisionless dynamics or ideal hydrodynamics. The leapfrog method proceeds by first predicting particle positions using current velocities, then computing accelerations (forces) at these predicted positions, and finally correcting both velocities and positions to complete the timestep. This staggered approach minimizes phase errors and is computationally efficient, as force evaluations occur only once per full step. Stability in explicit schemes requires adherence to the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) condition, typically limiting the timestep to \Delta t < 0.25 \frac{h}{c_s + |\mathbf{v}|}, where h is the smoothing length, c_s is the speed of sound, and \mathbf{v} is the particle velocity, preventing particles from traversing more than a kernel support in one step. For stiff problems, such as those involving incompressibility or high viscosities, implicit methods offer superior stability by allowing larger timesteps without violating CFL constraints. These often employ predictor-corrector frameworks or matrix-free iterative solvers, like the implicit midpoint rule, which solve the coupled system of momentum and continuity equations simultaneously. In incompressible SPH, fully implicit integration has demonstrated numerical stability for timesteps up to ten times larger than explicit ones, reducing dissipation in long-term simulations like vortex flows. Variable timestepping enhances efficiency in SPH by adapting \Delta t dynamically to local conditions, such as particle accelerations, viscous forces, or Courant limits, often using the minimum over all particles to ensure global stability. This approach is crucial for multi-physics simulations, where disparate timescales (e.g., hydrodynamics versus self-gravity) necessitate multi-rate integration, allowing slower components to use larger steps while fast ones advance individually. In practice, the timestep is computed as \Delta t = \min(\Delta t_{\text{CFL}}, \Delta t_{\text{visc}}, \Delta t_{\text{force}}), with \Delta t_{\text{visc}} \propto h^2 / \nu for viscosity \nu, enabling simulations spanning vast dynamic ranges without excessive computation.^[16] Symplectic integrators like leapfrog excel in preserving energy and other invariants over extended periods, outperforming general explicit methods such as Runge-Kutta schemes, which introduce secular energy drift in Hamiltonian SPH systems.

Boundary Treatment Techniques

In smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH), boundary treatment is essential to prevent particle penetration or leakage through domain edges, ensuring accurate enforcement of physical conditions such as no-slip or free-slip while maintaining numerical stability. Early approaches focused on simple repulsive mechanisms, but subsequent developments have introduced more sophisticated particle-based and integral methods to handle complex geometries and flow types. These techniques adapt the Lagrangian nature of SPH, where boundaries are often represented implicitly without a fixed mesh, to achieve reliable simulations of confined or open flows.^[17] Repulsive boundary methods employ potential-based forces to deter fluid particles from crossing solid walls, mimicking short-range interactions in molecular dynamics. A common implementation uses Lennard-Jones-type potentials, where a repulsive force activates when fluid particles approach within a cutoff distance, scaling inversely with distance to push particles away without introducing artificial viscosity. Alternatively, dummy particles—fixed or stationary entities placed along the boundary—can generate repulsive forces based on high-density assignments or simplified pairwise interactions, providing a computationally efficient barrier for rigid walls. These methods are particularly suited for weakly compressible SPH simulations of high-speed impacts or free-surface flows, though they may require tuning to avoid unphysical oscillations near the boundary.^[18]^[19]^[20] Ghost particle techniques address boundary conditions by virtually extending the fluid domain across the wall, creating fictitious particles that mirror or extrapolate properties from interior fluid particles. For no-slip boundaries, ghost particles are generated by reflecting real particles symmetrically across the wall, assigning mirrored velocities and interpolated densities to enforce zero relative velocity at the surface; free-slip conditions, conversely, negate only the normal velocity component while preserving tangential motion. This approach ensures full kernel support near boundaries, improving interpolation accuracy, and is widely adopted in incompressible SPH for simulating flows around obstacles. Ghost particles are dynamically created at each timestep based on proximity to the boundary, making the method adaptable to moving walls, though it increases computational cost for irregular geometries.^[21]^[18]^[17] For open domains with inflow and outflow, boundary treatments involve dynamic particle management to inject or remove particles while prescribing velocities, densities, or pressures. Inflow regions generate new particles with specified inlet properties, often using a buffer zone to smoothly integrate them into the simulation via relaxation toward target values; outflow boundaries detect and delete particles beyond a threshold, sometimes replacing them with dummy particles carrying extrapolated flow data to prevent reflections. These methods are critical for simulating channel flows or jets, with robust implementations avoiding mass conservation errors through divergence-free projections in incompressible variants.^[22]^[23]^[24] Normalization at boundaries mitigates truncation errors in kernel summation by renormalizing the smoothing function, ensuring the approximation reproduces constant fields accurately even near edges. The Shepard correction, for instance, divides the standard SPH interpolant by a normalization factor computed from the incomplete kernel support, restoring first-order consistency without additional particles. This is especially vital in regions with sparse sampling due to boundaries, enhancing pressure and density estimates in free-surface or confined flows.^[17]^[11] Recent advances from 2020 to 2025 have refined boundary treatments for multiphase flows, with fluid extension methods such as improved pressure extrapolation enabling accurate modeling of complex geometries like bridge piers in river flows, where virtual fluid layers extend the domain to capture scour and turbulence without explicit meshing. These developments leverage GPU acceleration for efficiency in 3D cases, demonstrating superior stability over traditional ghost or repulsive schemes in high-Reynolds-number multiphase scenarios.^[25]^[26]^[20]

Stabilization and Artificial Terms

In smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), numerical instabilities such as particle clustering, oscillations, and unphysical penetration can arise due to the meshless discretization, particularly in simulations involving shocks, high strains, or low densities. To mitigate these, various artificial terms are introduced into the governing equations, primarily the momentum equation, where dissipative forces counteract erroneous behaviors without altering the underlying physics significantly. These stabilization techniques enhance the robustness of SPH for complex flow problems.^[25] A cornerstone of SPH stabilization is artificial viscosity, which prevents particle interpenetration and captures shocks by adding a dissipative term to the momentum equation. The widely adopted formulation by Monaghan and Gingold introduces a pairwise viscosity \Pi_{ij} given by

\Pi_{ij} = \frac{ -\alpha \mu_{ij} \bar{c}_{ij} + \beta \mu_{ij}^2 }{ \bar{\rho}_{ij} },

where \mu_{ij} = \frac{h (\mathbf{v}_i - \mathbf{v}_j) \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij} }{ r_{ij}^2 + \eta h^2 }, \bar{c}_{ij} is the average sound speed, \bar{\rho}_{ij} the average density, h the smoothing length, and \eta a small constant to avoid divergence. Typical parameters are \alpha \approx 1 for linear viscosity and \beta \approx 2 for quadratic terms, enabling effective shock capturing while minimizing post-shock oscillations. This approach has been foundational in astrophysical and hydrodynamic simulations since its inception. To reduce tensile oscillations and improve particle motion stability, the XSPH correction modifies the particle velocity before advection, blending the standard velocity with a smoothed neighbor average. The corrected velocity is

\mathbf{v}_i' = \mathbf{v}_i - \epsilon \sum_j m_j \frac{ \mathbf{v}_j - \mathbf{v}_i }{ \rho_i } W_{ij},

where \epsilon is typically set between 0.5 and 1, and W_{ij} is the kernel function. This damping reduces erratic displacements in shear flows and free surfaces, enhancing overall numerical stability without introducing excessive diffusion. The method was originally proposed to address dispersion errors in early SPH implementations. Tensile instability, characterized by unphysical clustering under negative pressures, is another challenge in SPH, especially in ductile fracture or high-strain simulations. Monaghan's artificial stress remedy counters this by modifying the pressure term in the momentum equation with a correction that activates in tensile regimes, effectively introducing a repulsive force proportional to the tensile stress magnitude. This kernel-based adjustment prevents particle bunching while preserving conservation properties, proving effective in impact and fragmentation problems.^[27] In low-density regions, SPH can suffer from noisy density estimates leading to erratic pressures; density diffusion addresses this by adding a diffusive term to the continuity equation, smoothing fluctuations without violating mass conservation. The \delta-SPH variant introduces a term \delta_i = \sum_j m_j (\tilde{\rho}_j - \tilde{\rho}_i) \tilde{c}_{ij} \frac{ |\mathbf{r}_{ij}| }{ \rho_{ij} } \nabla_i W_{ij} / \rho_i, where \tilde{\rho} denotes a corrected density and \delta \approx 0.1 controls the diffusion strength. This technique significantly reduces noise in weakly compressible flows, improving accuracy in dilute or multiphase scenarios. Recent advancements in 2025 have focused on enhancing artificial viscosity for compressible aerospace flows at high Mach numbers, incorporating adaptive switching between Monaghan-style terms and Riemann-based solvers to better handle extreme compressions and shocks. These modifications, often integrated with reproducing kernel corrections, yield more accurate predictions of shock structures and vorticity in hypersonic applications, as demonstrated in simulations of re-entry vehicles.^[28]

Advantages and Limitations

Key Advantages

One of the primary strengths of smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is its meshless formulation, which provides inherent flexibility in handling large deformations, free surfaces, and topology changes without requiring remeshing or connectivity definitions. This adaptability arises from the particle-based discretization, where particles naturally move with the flow, avoiding the distortions and computational overhead associated with mesh-based methods in scenarios like droplet impacts or material fracturing.^[17] The Lagrangian framework of SPH further enhances its utility by tracking material particles directly, ensuring exact mass conservation since each particle carries a fixed mass that remains invariant. This approach simplifies advection processes by eliminating numerical diffusion errors common in Eulerian methods, as properties are transported naturally with the particles.^[29] SPH's particle representation also enables straightforward implementation of complex physics, particularly at multi-material interfaces and under high-strain rates, where the absence of a fixed grid allows seamless incorporation of varying material properties without interpolation artifacts. Local particle interactions facilitate the modeling of such interfaces, making SPH well-suited for problems involving diverse physical behaviors.^[17]^[29] The method's reliance on local kernel-based interactions supports efficient parallelization, especially on modern architectures like GPUs, achieving speedups of up to two orders of magnitude through domain decomposition. Computational scaling is typically O(N) with the aid of tree structures or neighbor lists, enabling simulations of large particle counts.^[17]^[29] In extreme conditions, such as those in astrophysics, SPH excels at managing large density contrasts, such as those exceeding 10^6 in cosmological simulations, due to its adaptive resolution, where particle clustering automatically refines local detail in dense regions without predefined grids.^[30]

Principal Limitations

Despite its versatility, smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) suffers from tensile instability, a numerical artifact that causes unphysical clumping or pairing of particles under tensile stress, leading to erroneous fracture or fragmentation in simulations. This instability arises from the mismatch between the kernel function and the stress state, particularly in regions of negative pressures, resulting in short-wavelength perturbations that amplify over time. Seminal analyses have shown that this phenomenon severely limits the method's reliability for problems involving material failure or high-strain deformations. Recent advancements, such as adaptive algorithms, have been developed to mitigate tensile instability.^[31] Boundary deficiencies represent another core challenge, where the truncated kernel support near solid walls or interfaces leads to poor accuracy in enforcing boundary conditions, often causing particle penetration or inaccurate pressure gradients. Standard SPH formulations require auxiliary "ghost" or boundary particles to approximate these regions, but this approach is inefficient and can introduce errors in momentum transfer, especially for complex geometries.^[32] Resolution dependence exacerbates these issues, as the smoothing length h must be sufficiently small to resolve the smallest physical scales; under-resolved regions exhibit noisy derivatives and reduced convergence rates, typically limited to first-order accuracy without advanced corrections.^[32] Computational demands further constrain SPH's applicability, with neighbor searches and kernel summations scaling as O(N^2) in naive implementations, making simulations with large particle counts (N > 10^6) prohibitively expensive without tree-based optimizations or parallelization.^[32] Conservation properties are also imperfect: while linear momentum and mass are inherently conserved, angular momentum is not exactly preserved in standard formulations due to non-symmetric discretizations, and energy can drift in prolonged simulations, particularly in astrophysical contexts.

Applications

Astrophysics and Cosmology

Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) originated as a method for astrophysical applications, particularly suited to simulating self-gravitating fluids in cosmic environments where Lagrangian tracking of mass elements is beneficial. In these contexts, SPH naturally adapts to expanding structures like the universe, avoiding fixed grids that distort under Hubble flow. Its particle-based formulation facilitates seamless coupling with N-body techniques for dark matter and stellar components, enabling multi-scale modeling from individual stellar events to cosmic large-scale structure.^[33] In galaxy formation and N-body simulations, SPH models the hydrodynamic evolution of gas within dark matter halos, capturing the hierarchical assembly of galaxies through mergers and accretion. Dark matter is represented as collisionless particles, while baryonic gas undergoes cooling, heating, and collapse to form rotationally supported disks. Star formation is implemented via sink particles, which accrete surrounding gas once densities exceed a threshold (typically ~10^6 cm^{-3}), allowing unresolved protostellar cores to influence dynamics without excessive computational cost; this approach has been refined to include accretion luminosity and feedback to prevent over-clumping.^[34] These simulations reveal how feedback from supernovae and active galactic nuclei regulates halo gas, shaping galaxy luminosity functions and morphologies observed in surveys like SDSS.^[35] For supernova explosions and stellar dynamics, SPH excels at handling extreme density contrasts, such as those in core-collapse events where central densities reach 10^{14} g cm^{-3} while ejecta expand into tenuous circumstellar media. Radiative cooling is integrated via cooling functions (e.g., metal-line cooling below 10^4 K) to model shock propagation and remnant evolution, often coupled with supernova feedback that injects thermal energy (~10^{51} erg) to drive outflows and enrich the interstellar medium with metals.^[36] In stellar cluster simulations, SPH tracks dynamical interactions in dense environments, incorporating self-gravity to simulate binary formation and mass segregation.^[37] Cosmological structure formation leverages SPH in parallel codes like GADGET, which employ hierarchical tree algorithms for gravitational interactions, efficiently computing potentials for systems with up to 10^9 particles across volumes spanning hundreds of megaparsecs. These simulations trace the growth of cosmic web filaments, voids, and clusters from initial density fluctuations at z ~ 1000, incorporating hydrodynamics, radiative processes, and dark energy to match observations of baryon acoustic oscillations and galaxy clustering.^[38] Self-gravity is solved using particle-particle summation for nearby forces (within ~4h, where h is the smoothing length) and tree-based approximations for distant contributions, achieving O(N log N) scaling and accuracy comparable to direct solvers in periodic boxes.^[39]^[40]

Hydrodynamics and Free-Surface Flows

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) has been widely applied to simulate hydrodynamics, particularly incompressible and multiphase fluid flows involving free surfaces, due to its Lagrangian nature that naturally handles complex interface evolution without mesh distortions. In these contexts, SPH particles represent fluid elements, allowing seamless tracking of free surfaces through particle separation and motion. This capability makes SPH suitable for modeling phenomena such as wave propagation, sloshing in tanks, and wave breaking, where traditional grid-based methods struggle with large deformations.^[41] Free-surface modeling in SPH exploits the method's particle-based framework, where the free surface emerges naturally as particles move apart without requiring explicit boundary tracking. This approach has been validated through benchmarks like the dam-break problem, where a column of water collapses and propagates over a dry or wet bed, demonstrating accurate capture of front velocities and run-up heights compared to experimental data. For instance, simulations of dam-break flows have shown good agreement with analytical solutions for wave speed and height, with errors typically below 5% in well-resolved cases. Viscosity is incorporated via artificial or physical terms to stabilize the flow, but the focus remains on the free-surface dynamics. Recent extensions have applied this to sloshing and breaking waves, highlighting SPH's robustness for violent free-surface flows.^[41]^[42]^[43] For near-incompressible flows, weakly compressible SPH (WCSPH) approximates incompressibility using an artificial equation of state, defined as

P = c^2 (\rho - \rho_0),

where P is pressure, \rho is density, \rho_0 is reference density, and c is the speed of sound, typically set to about 10 times the maximum flow velocity (c \approx 10 v_{\max}) to minimize density variations below 1%. This formulation enables efficient simulation of free-surface hydrodynamics while avoiding the computational cost of fully incompressible solvers, as demonstrated in early applications to water entry and wave impacts. WCSPH has been shown to reproduce experimental dam-break profiles with front positions accurate to within 2-3% of observed values.^[41]^[44]^[45] In contrast, incompressible SPH (ISPH) strictly enforces the divergence-free condition \nabla \cdot \mathbf{v} = 0 using a projection method, where an intermediate velocity field is first advanced, then corrected by solving a Poisson equation for pressure to project the velocity onto a solenoidal field. This approach, introduced in seminal work, improves accuracy for low-Mach-number flows by eliminating compressibility errors, achieving density fluctuations under 0.1% in benchmarks like lid-driven cavity flows. ISPH has been effectively used for free-surface problems, such as droplet impacts, where it captures pressure fields more stably than WCSPH, though at higher computational expense due to the iterative Poisson solve.^[4]^[46]^[47] Multiphase flows in SPH incorporate interfaces between fluids of different densities using models that handle sharp density jumps, often resolved at sub-particle scales to maintain stability. Surface tension is typically modeled via the continuum surface force (CSF) approach, which distributes the force as a body force proportional to surface curvature, enabling accurate simulation of phenomena like droplet coalescence and bubble rise. This method has been validated against experiments for rising bubbles, reproducing terminal velocities within 5% error and interface shapes faithfully. Density discontinuities are managed by conservative formulations that prevent particle clustering at interfaces, allowing simulations of multiphase free-surface interactions such as water-air waves.^[48]^[49]^[50] As of 2025, SPH applications in hydrodynamics have advanced to practical engineering scenarios, including river flows past bridges, where WCSPH models capture scour and turbulence around structures with good agreement to measured velocities (errors <10%). In coastal engineering, SPH simulates wave interactions with porous media interfaces, such as breakwaters, using coupled formulations that resolve infiltration and transmission coefficients accurately against lab data. Additionally, SPH has been employed for laser melting pools, modeling multiphase melt dynamics in additive manufacturing, where it predicts pool depths and flow patterns under high heat fluxes with validation against high-speed imaging. These developments underscore SPH's growing role in terrestrial hydrodynamics.^[26]^[51]^[52]

Solid Mechanics and Interactions

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) has been extended to solid mechanics to simulate deformable bodies under large deformations, incorporating continuum mechanics principles such as stress tensors and constitutive relations. In these formulations, particles represent material points carrying properties like position, velocity, deformation gradient, and stress, with the momentum equation updated using interparticle forces derived from spatial derivatives of the stress tensor. This approach is particularly suited for problems involving extreme deformations where traditional mesh-based methods suffer from distortion. Total Lagrangian SPH addresses large deformations by referencing all quantities to the initial undeformed configuration, avoiding issues like tensile instability that plague Eulerian or updated Lagrangian variants. In this method, the deformation gradient and Green-Lagrange strain tensor are computed using the initial positions, enabling accurate tracking of material behavior even under severe stretching or compression. To ensure objectivity in rotating frames, the Jaumann co-rotational rate is employed for the stress tensor, providing a frame-invariant description of material response. This formulation has been applied to impact problems and crack propagation, demonstrating stability for simulations where particles remain neighbors throughout deformation unless failure occurs. Elastoplasticity in SPH is modeled by integrating yield criteria and flow rules into the stress update, where the deviatoric stress contributes to plastic strain accumulation via the momentum equation. The Johnson-Cook model, which accounts for strain hardening, strain-rate sensitivity, and thermal softening, is commonly implemented for metals under high-speed loading, with plastic work converted to heat for coupled thermo-mechanical effects. For geomaterials like soils or concrete, the Drucker-Prager yield criterion captures pressure-dependent plasticity, using a conical yield surface to distinguish shear and dilatational failure modes, and is incorporated through return mapping algorithms at each particle. These models allow SPH to simulate penetration, extrusion, and soil-structure interactions with realistic post-yield behavior. Fracture in SPH solids is typically handled through damage mechanics, where a scalar damage variable evolves based on accumulated tensile stress or strain energy, leading to stress reduction or complete failure. When damage reaches a threshold, particles may be split to represent crack branching or deleted to model material removal, preserving mass and momentum conservation by redistributing properties to neighbors. This approach effectively captures dynamic crack propagation in brittle materials like rock or glass, with validation against experimental fracture toughness data. Tensile instability is mitigated in Total Lagrangian variants by avoiding kernel gradient singularities near cracks. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) in SPH enables two-way coupling between fluids and deformable solids through shared particle interfaces, where forces are exchanged bidirectionally to enforce kinematic and dynamic continuity. Partitioned schemes solve fluid and solid equations sequentially with iterative sub-cycling for convergence, offering modularity but requiring under-relaxation for stability in stiff problems, while monolithic approaches solve the coupled system simultaneously for better accuracy in nonlinear cases. Boundary techniques, such as ghost particles, facilitate the solid-fluid interface without explicit meshing. Recent applications include tsunami impacts on coastal structures, where SPH-FSI simulates hydroelastic responses of bridges and seawalls under wave and debris loading.

Extensions and Variants

Multi-Physics and Multiphase Formulations

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) has been extended to multi-physics formulations by incorporating additional governing equations for phenomena such as heat transfer, chemical reactions, and porous media interactions, enabling simulations of coupled fluid-solid-thermal systems without mesh distortions. These extensions typically involve discretizing auxiliary equations using the same Lagrangian particle framework as core SPH hydrodynamics, ensuring conservation properties across phases and fields. For instance, the base energy equation provides a foundation for thermal coupling, where temperature evolution is tied to mechanical work and heat sources.^[53] Thermal coupling in SPH addresses heat conduction and convection in fluid-solid interactions by solving the heat equation in a particle-based manner. This approach has been integrated into strong coupling schemes for problems like conjugate heat transfer across interfaces, demonstrating stability in simulations of fluid-solid thermal problems.^[53]^[54] Multiphase formulations with phase change extend SPH to handle melting, solidification, and evaporation by employing conservative schemes that track interfaces and latent heat. Conservative level-set methods or enthalpy-based approaches preserve mass and energy during transitions, as in weakly compressible SPH models that incorporate heat conduction and phase change criteria based on temperature thresholds. These have been applied to thermo-capillary problems, such as droplet solidification or laser-induced melting in additive manufacturing processes around 2025, where surface tension and evaporation are coupled via particle shifting to maintain resolution at moving fronts.^[55]^[56] Porous media flows in SPH integrate Darcy's law to model drag forces on fluid particles within solid matrices, representing permeability effects through source terms in the momentum equation. This allows simulation of seepage and filtration, with multi-scale approaches like pairwise-force SPH (PF-SPH) resolving fractures at pore levels while upscaling to continuum behavior. The 2020 PF-SPH formulation captures preferential flow in fractured porous media by treating fractures as high-permeability zones, validated against experimental saturation dynamics. Recent 2025 reviews highlight its adoption in hydraulic engineering for coastal and ocean porous structures, addressing gaps in wave-porous interactions.^[57]^[5]^[51] Reactive flows incorporate species transport equations alongside hydrodynamics, using Arrhenius kinetics for reaction rates in combustion models. SPH discretizes diffusion and source terms for scalar fields like fuel mass fractions, enabling detonation or premixed flame simulations where heat release couples back to fluid motion. For example, 2024 models apply Arrhenius rates to gas mixture detonations, achieving accurate shock propagation and ignition delays in meshless frameworks. Emerging hybrids, such as 2024 molecular dynamics-SPH couplings for quantum plasmas, fill gaps in dense matter reactive simulations by incorporating quantum corrections to classical kinetics.^[58]^[59]

Advanced Hybrid and Reproducing Methods

The Reproducing Kernel Particle Method (RKPM) addresses limitations in standard SPH kernels by constructing corrected kernel functions that exactly reproduce polynomials up to a specified order, thereby improving consistency and accuracy for fields like linear variations. Introduced by Liu, Jun, and Zhang in 1995, RKPM modifies the kernel through a reproducing equation involving a moment matrix, ensuring higher-order completeness without altering the particle-based discretization. This approach enhances SPH's performance in problems requiring precise reproduction of constant and linear fields, such as stress analysis in solids, while maintaining computational efficiency comparable to traditional SPH.^[60] In incompressible SPH variants, the SPH-MLS method integrates moving least squares (MLS) approximations to achieve higher-order accuracy in pressure projections and gradient computations, mitigating tensile instabilities common in ISPH formulations. Developed as an extension of MLS reproducing kernels, SPH-MLS fits local polynomials to particle data within support domains, enabling second- or higher-order convergence for free-surface flows under the projection step. For instance, in simulations of violent sloshing, SPH-MLS reduces numerical diffusion compared to standard cubic spline kernels, as demonstrated in validations against analytical solutions.^[61]^[62] Hybrid SPH-FEM methods couple SPH's strengths in handling large deformations and fluids with FEM's accuracy in structured solid regions, using interface mapping techniques to transfer momentum and forces across domains. In such hybrids, SPH particles interact with FEM nodes via ghost particles or penalty-based coupling at the interface, ensuring conservation of mass and energy during fluid-structure interactions. A foundational implementation by Fourey et al. in 2010 applied this to slamming problems, where SPH modeled the fluid impact and FEM the elastic response, achieving stable simulations with reduced computational cost over pure FEM. Multi-resolution SPH employs adaptive refinement to vary particle spacing dynamically, combined with particle shifting to prevent clustering and gaps without violating incompressibility. Refinement splits particles in high-gradient regions, while shifting—based on diffusion-like algorithms—repositions particles toward uniform distributions, preserving kernel support overlaps. Lind et al.'s 2012 technique, using Fickian diffusion for shifting, has been integrated into multi-resolution frameworks to simulate multiphase flows with resolution ratios up to 8:1, improving efficiency by 50% in benchmark dam-break tests compared to uniform particle setups.^[63] Recent advancements include compressible SPH variants incorporating Godunov-type Riemann solvers, applied to aerospace problems such as hypersonic re-entry flows. These resolve shocks with second-order accuracy and minimal oscillations, as demonstrated in 2025 studies achieving up to 10x computational speedup through adaptive refinement.^[64]

References

[1]
[PDF] Smoothed particle hydrodynamics - University of Toronto
Jul 5, 2005 · Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is a method for obtaining approximate numerical solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics by ...
[2]
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non ...
A new hydrodynamic code applicable to a space of an arbitrary number of dimensions is discussed and applied to a variety of polytropic stellar models.
[3]
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics - IOPscience
Jul 5, 2005 · In this review the theory and application of Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) since its inception in 1977 are discussed.Missing: original paper
[4]
An SPH Projection Method - ScienceDirect.com
The SPH projection method enforces incompressibility by projecting the velocity field onto a divergence-free space using a pressure Poisson equation. It uses a ...
[5]
Multiscale Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model Development ...
Dec 17, 2020 · We present our new multiscale pairwise-force smoothed particle hydrodynamics (PF-SPH) model for the characterization of flow in fractured porous media.
[6]
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023286
[7]
Improving convergence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics ...
Our analysis also shows that at low NH the quartic spline kernel with NH ≈ 60 obtains much better convergence than the standard cubic spline. hydrodynamics, ...
[8]
None
Summary of each segment:
[9]
[PDF] Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics
The original paper by Phillips and Monaghan [76] proposed a simple fix involving a prior sweep over the particles to find the maximum (negative) stress ...
[10]
The Mathematics of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH ...
In this paper, an overview of the mathematical aspects of the SPH consistency is presented with a focus on the most recent developments.Missing: core seminal
[11]
[PDF] Simple and Efficient Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search using ...
For each step, we have two passes: a traditional linear sort is done on each row, and then another pass, where a linear sort is performed on each column of the.
[12]
Finding Neighbors in a Forest: A b-tree for Smoothed Particle ... - arXiv
Oct 7, 2019 · We also present the proposed tree structure as well as the algorithms to build it and to find the exact close neighbors of all particles. We ...
[13]
[PDF] Numerical Convergence in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
As the number of neighbors increases, the distribution slowly approaches a Gaussian like distri- bution peaked at ρ = 1. This behavior shows the trade-off ...
[14]
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics with particle splitting, applied to ...
We describe and demonstrate a method for increasing the resolution locally in a Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic (SPH) simulation, by splitting particles.
[15]
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/330/1/129/1018860
[16]
The role of time integration in energy conservation in Smoothed ...
Oct 22, 2022 · Abstract:The choice of a time integration scheme is a crucial aspect of any transient fluid simulation, and Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics ...
[17]
Review of smoothed particle hydrodynamics: towards converged ...
Sep 9, 2020 · This paper presents a review of the progress of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) towards high-order converged simulations.Basic smoothed particle... · Density diffusion schemes in... · Smoothed particle...
[18]
A simplified technique to enforce solid boundary conditions in SPH
Summarizing, these latter can be divided in the following categories: (i) repulsive forces, (ii) normal-flux approaches, (iii) boundary integrals, (iv) dummy ...
[19]
Robust solid boundary treatment for compressible smoothed particle ...
Aug 22, 2024 · Based on these, robust and widely applicable boundary treatment methods for compressible SPH are proposed. These are accompanied by a novel ...
[20]
Generalized and efficient wall boundary condition treatment in GPU ...
This paper presents a generalized and efficient wall boundary treatment in the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method for 3-D complex and arbitrary ...
[21]
(PDF) Evaluation of the Solid Boundary Treatment Methods in SPH
This paper presents two commonly used methods for simulating a solid boundary in SPH simulations. Emphasis is placed on the description of the methods, ...
[22]
Inflow/outflow pressure boundary conditions for smoothed particle ...
Dec 15, 2017 · The boundary condition treatment is one of the main issues in the SPH method. Peculiar difficulties are encountered when considering inflow ...
[23]
An innovative open boundary treatment for incompressible SPH
Jul 3, 2015 · An innovative inflow/outflow boundary treatment has been proposed to be used in smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH).
[24]
Robust boundary treatment for open-channel flows in divergence ...
This study proposes a robust divergence-free incompressible SPH model for simulating specified inflow/outflow boundary conditions. Inflow/outflow boundary ...
[25]
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for free-surface and multiphase ...
Feb 11, 2025 · The present review article covers the last 25 years of development of the method to simulate such flows, discussing the related specific features of the method.Missing: P_j / | Show results with:P_j /
[26]
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modelling of river flows past bridges
Oct 8, 2025 · In this work, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) is assessed for the modelling of flow past bridges. An improved pressure extrapolation ...
[27]
SPH without a Tensile Instability - ScienceDirect.com
Apr 10, 2000 · In this paper it is shown how the instability can be removed by using an artificial stress which, in the case of fluids, is an artificial pressure.
[28]
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for compressible aerospace ...
May 30, 2025 · Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) is not widely used in aerospace engineering applications that involve compressible flows.
[29]
[2205.03074] Review on Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
May 6, 2022 · The paper presents a concise review on latest developments and achievements of the SPH method, including (1) brief review of theory and fundamental with kernel ...
[30]
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130914
[31]
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05960
[32]
SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS - Annual Reviews
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) was invented to simulate nonaxisymmetric phenomena in astrophysics (Lucy 1977, Gingold. & Monaghan 1977).
[33]
improved sink particle algorithm for SPH simulations
Abstract. Numerical simulations of star formation frequently rely on the implementation of sink particles: (a) to avoid expending computational resource on.
[34]
Star formation and feedback in smoothed particle hydrodynamic ...
We present an analysis of star formation and feedback recipes appropriate for galactic smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations.
[35]
energy and momentum input of supernova explosions in structured ...
In Section 2, we describe the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code seren including the treatment of ionizing radiation, SN explosions, and radiative ...
[36]
Star Formation and Feedback in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic ...
We examine the effect of mass and force resolution on a specific star formation (SF) recipe using a set of N-body/smooth particle hydrodynamic simulations ...
[37]
[PDF] The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2 - MPA Garching
The principal structure of GADGET-2 is that of a TreeSPH code (Hernquist & Katz 1989), where gravitational interactions are com- puted with a hierarchical ...
[38]
Simulating cosmic structure formation with the gadget-4 code
Here, we discuss recent methodological progress in the gadget code, which has been widely applied in cosmic structure formation over the past two decades.
[39]
[PDF] Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics in Astrophysics
May 24, 2010 · Abstract. This review discusses smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) in the astro- physical context, with a focus on inviscid gas dynamics.
[40]
Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations ...
We perform simulations of giant impacts on to the young Uranus using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with over 100 million particles.Missing: warm matter
[41]
Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH - ADS
The SPH (smoothed particle hydrodynamics) method is extended to deal with free surface incompressible flows. The method is easy to use, and examples will be ...Missing: benchmark seminal
[42]
Three SPH Novel Benchmark Test Cases for free surface flows
Benchmark Test Cases have been used by SPHERIC interest group members for the validation of SPH models and their corresponding computer implementations.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[43]
[PDF] Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Simulations of Dam-Break Flows ...
In this paper, 3D weakly compressible and incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (WCSPH & ISPH) models are used to study dam-break flows impacting ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[44]
(PDF) Weakly Compressible SPH for Free Surface Flows
We present a weakly compressible form of the Smoothed Particle Hydrody namics method (SPH) for fluid flow based on the Tait equation.
[45]
[PDF] On the maximum time step in weakly compressible SPH - HAL
Feb 14, 2014 · Weakly Compressible SPH approach (here referred to as WCSPH, see Monaghan,. 1994 and Morris et al., 1997). We also neglect self-gravitation ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[46]
Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the ...
Oct 1, 2009 · Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach · Abstract · Keywords · Access to Document.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[47]
An Incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (ISPH) Model ...
The SPH approach relying on the projection method for solving the equations governing incompressible fluid flow belongs to the incompressible SPH (ISPH) methods ...
[48]
Simulating surface tension with smoothed particle hydrodynamics
Jun 15, 2000 · A method for simulating two-phase flows including surface tension is presented. The approach is based upon smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH).
[49]
Simulation of surface tension in 2D and 3D with smoothed particle ...
Sep 20, 2010 · Morris [17] developed the SPH formulation for the CSF model. The ... An improved continuum surface tension model in SPH for simulating free- ...
[50]
A smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for two-phase ...
Oct 18, 2024 · To ensure incompressibility in the SPH method, fluid density must remain constant. For this purpose, we define the particle number density ψ ...
[51]
Review of smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of fluid flows ...
Feb 14, 2025 · A comprehensive review is conducted on the application of Lagrangian mesh-free methods for simulating flows in various types of porous media.
[52]
A novel smooth particle hydrodynamics framework for modelling ...
Jul 16, 2025 · The proposed SPH scheme can offer an accurate numerical framework for modelling melting pool dynamics for a wide range of laser material processing ...
[53]
An integrative SPH method for heat transfer problems involving fluid ...
Sep 30, 2022 · In this paper, an integrated smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) solver with strong coupling scheme at the material interface is introduced to investigate ...
[54]
Heat transfer simulation of window frames with SPHinXsys - arXiv
Jan 15, 2025 · Smoothed particle hydrodynamics(SPH) is a fully Lagrangian method ... transfer problems, which ensures further development of thermal coupling ...Missing: conduction | Show results with:conduction
[55]
A weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics framework ...
Feb 22, 2022 · The multiphase smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) framework is proposed to simulate multiphase flows with heat conduction and phase change.
[56]
https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/138768.2/2012.08788.pdf
[57]
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Simulations of Porous Medium ...
In this paper, the method of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) is used to numerically study the flow field across a rectangular channel partially filled ...
[58]
(PDF) Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method for Gas Mixture ...
Jan 1, 2024 · Meshless smoothed particle hydrodynamics metodology is apllied for governing equations discretization. Reaction velocity is defined by Arrenius ...
[59]
A molecular dynamics framework coupled with smoothed particle ...
Aug 7, 2024 · We present a novel scheme for modelling quantum plasmas in the warm dense matter (WDM) regime via a hybrid smoothed particle hydrodynamic - molecular dynamic ...
[60]
Reproducing kernel particle methods - Liu - Wiley Online Library
May 15, 1995 · A new continuous reproducing kernel interpolation function which explores the attractive features of the flexible time-frequency and space-wave number ...
[61]
Moving least squares simulation of free surface flows - ScienceDirect
In this paper a Moving Least Squares method (MLS) for the simulation of 2D free surface flows is presented. The emphasis is on the governing equations, ...
[62]
Least squares moving particle semi-implicit method
Jul 11, 2014 · LSMPS is a meshfree Lagrangian method for incompressible flow with free surfaces, using high-order discretization and consistent time ...
[63]
An adaptive multi-resolution SPH approach for three-dimensional ...
This paper presents a new adaptive multi-resolution smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) approach for simulating three-dimensional free surface flows with ...
[64]
Adaptive Compressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
Adaptive Compressible SPH uses volume-based refinement, local and solution adaptivity, and shock-aware particle shifting to improve accuracy and efficiency in ...