Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Social practice

Social practice is a genre of in which artists collaborate with communities to create participatory projects that engage social, political, or , often emphasizing interpersonal interactions, ethical considerations, and over the creation of discrete objects. Emerging from precedents in the 1960s such as events, , and community-based initiatives, social practice gained conceptual coherence in the 1990s through frameworks like relational aesthetics—coined by curator to describe art fostering human relations—and "new genre public art" advanced by Suzanne Lacy, which integrated and into artistic practice. Central characteristics include artists functioning as facilitators rather than sole authors, projects yielding relational outcomes like community dialogues or temporary interventions rather than commodifiable works, and a focus on addressing inequalities through sustained engagement, as exemplified by Mierle Laderman Ukeles's "Touch Sanitation" project (1979–1980), in which she shook hands with over 8,500 sanitation workers to acknowledge their labor. Notable achievements encompass fostering long-term community transformations, such as Rick Lowe's Project Row Houses in , which converted abandoned properties into artist residencies and since 1993, yet the practice faces controversies over its , with critics arguing that many projects produce ephemeral effects without measurable, enduring social impact and risk being instrumentalized by institutions for reputational enhancement rather than genuine disruption.

Conceptual Foundations

Definitions and Core Concepts

Social practices constitute the primary site of social analysis in , representing routinized patterns of human activity that integrate individual actions with collective structures. Unlike individualist approaches that prioritize subjective intentions or structuralist views emphasizing systemic constraints, posits social practices as nexuses of interconnected doings and sayings that generate and sustain through repetition and coordination. A core definition frames a social practice as "a routinized type of behaviour which consists of several elements, interconnected to one another: forms of bodily activities, forms of mental activities, ‘things’ and their use, a background in the form of understanding, know-how, states of and motivational knowledge." Complementary formulations describe practices as "organized nexuses of doings and sayings," structured by shared practical understandings (tacit know-how enabling coordinated action), explicit or implicit rules (guidelines shaping correctness), and teleoaffective structures (ends-oriented goals infused with emotional commitments). These elements—bodily movements, cognitive and emotional orientations, material artifacts, and collective background —must cohere for a practice to persist, as disruption in one can unravel the ensemble, such as altered tool use transforming cooking routines. Additional conceptualizations, such as those emphasizing materials (physical objects), competences (skills and abilities), and meanings (cultural understandings), highlight the dynamic assembly of practices, where stability arises from the recursive linkage of performances rather than fixed essences. Routinization emerges as a pivotal process, wherein repeated enactments embed practices in social life, rendering them habitual and resistant to change unless elements realign through or external pressures. This framework underscores that manifests through dispersed, materially mediated activities, challenging reductions to mental states or discursive norms by foregrounding embodied, interdependent conduct as the causal substrate of societal patterns.

Historical Origins and Evolution

The modern conceptualization of social practices in emerged as a response to the limitations of and , emphasizing the situated, embodied activities through which social life is enacted and reproduced. Antecedents lie in early 20th-century philosophy, particularly Martin Heidegger's (1927), which prioritized practical engagement with the world (Zuhandenheit) over abstract representation, portraying human existence as inherently embedded in everyday coping practices. Ludwig Wittgenstein's later works, such as (1953), further shifted focus to rule-following as embedded in "language games" and forms of life, rejecting decontextualized mentalism in favor of communal practices as the site of meaning. In the social sciences, these ideas gained traction amid critiques of Claude Lévi-Strauss's , which privileged static mental structures over dynamic . Pierre Bourdieu's Outline of a of Practice (1972, originally Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique in French, 1972) formalized an early framework, introducing habitus as durable, transposable dispositions generated through practical experience, enabling agents to improvise within structured fields without reducing to mechanical rule-following or . This work synthesized ethnographic insights from Bourdieu's Algerian studies (1950s–1960s) with Marxist , arguing that occurs through the dialectical interplay of schemes of perception and objective conditions in practice. The 1980s marked a pivotal evolution with the explicit articulation of "practice theory" as a paradigm. Sherry Ortner's 1984 essay "Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties" coined the term, framing it as a synthesis countering both cultural idealism and materialism by centering agency in culturally constituted practices. Concurrently, Anthony Giddens's structuration theory in The Constitution of Society (1984) posited the "duality of structure," where practices recursively constitute and are constituted by structural properties, drawing on ethnomethodology and phenomenology to resolve agency-structure dualism. These developments influenced anthropology and sociology, with Jean Lave's Cognition in Practice (1988) extending the approach to learning as situated participation rather than abstract representation. By the 1990s–2000s, proliferated across disciplines, incorporating material and teleoaffective dimensions as outlined by Theodore Schatzki in Social Practices (1996), which defined practices as nexuses of sayings, doings, and tasks oriented by ends and norms. Andreas Reckwitz's 2002 synthesis emphasized practices as routinized bodily performances linking entities, contrasting with actor-network theory's focus on networks. This evolution reflected a broader "practice turn," integrating philosophical roots with empirical scrutiny of how practices sustain inequalities and enable change, as seen in applications to and environmental by scholars like Elizabeth Shove (2003 onward). Despite critiques of overemphasizing stability at the expense of contingency, the approach has endured for its causal emphasis on observable, materially embedded routines over reified abstractions.

Theoretical Frameworks

Bourdieu's Practice Theory and Habitus

Pierre Bourdieu's posits that arises neither from mechanical rule-following nor from rational calculation, but from the interplay of embodied dispositions and objective social conditions. In Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977), Bourdieu critiques structuralist determinism and subjectivist voluntarism, arguing instead that practices are generated through a "practical sense" or sens pratique that agents acquire via in specific social fields. This approach emphasizes the temporal and historical embeddedness of action, where past experiences shape present behaviors without requiring conscious deliberation. Bourdieu's framework thus bridges individual agency and structural constraints, viewing social practices as improvised responses attuned to the logic of the social world. Central to this theory is the concept of habitus, which Bourdieu defines as a of lasting, transposable dispositions that function as principles of generation and organization of practices and representations. Habitus emerges from the of structures—such as class positions and cultural norms—through repeated exposure during upbringing and life experiences, rendering it durable yet adaptable. These dispositions incline individuals toward certain perceptions, appreciations, and actions that align implicitly with their conditions, producing practices that appear spontaneous and objectively regulated. For instance, working-class habitus might generate practical, immediate-oriented strategies in labor fields, while dominant-class habitus fosters abstracted, long-term orientations in cultural or economic arenas. Habitus operates in conjunction with fields—structured social spaces of positions defined by specific stakes and forms of (economic, cultural, , symbolic)—to produce social practices. Practices are thus neither fully determined by external rules nor freely chosen, but dialectically generated: habitus structures perceptions of the field, prompting actions that reproduce or challenge field relations through strategies of distinction or conformity. Bourdieu highlights , the unquestioned assumptions shared within a field, as reinforcing this by masking imbalances, leading to practices that sustain under the guise of natural necessity. Empirical analyses, such as those in Bourdieu's Kabyle fieldwork, illustrate how habitus enables agents to improvise effectively within constraints, as seen in gift exchange rituals where timing and reciprocity follow unspoken practical logics rather than codified norms. Critics have noted potential deterministic undertones in habitus, arguing it underplays deliberate or rapid change, though Bourdieu counters with concepts like —mismatches between habitus and transformations that enable crises and innovation. In applications to social practices, the theory underscores causal pathways from embodied history to observable behaviors, such as class-based consumption patterns in Distinction (), where habitus translates into lifestyle choices that signal social position. This relational prioritizes empirical observation of practice over abstract theorizing, influencing studies in , where habitus explains persistent inequalities despite formal of opportunity.

Giddens' Structuration and Duality of Structure

developed the theory of structuration as a to reconcile and in , articulated primarily in his 1984 work The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. The theory posits that systems emerge from ongoing processes of structuration, defined as the recursive interplay between human actions and the structural properties that enable and constrain them. Unlike traditional dualisms that treat as an external constraint on or as independent of , emphasizes their mutual through practical consciousness in daily conduct. Central to this theory is the concept of the duality of structure, which Giddens defines as the principle that "social structures are both constituted by human agency, and yet at the same time are the very medium of this same human agency." Structures, comprising rules (normative and interpretive guidelines) and resources (allocative, like material objects, and authoritative, like power relations), do not exist independently but are instantiated in social practices. Agents draw upon these elements reflexively in their activities, knowledgeable of the conditions of their action without necessarily being fully aware of the broader systemic implications. This duality underscores that practices simultaneously reproduce structures—through habitual compliance—and enable potential transformation when agents innovate or deviate under changing conditions. In relation to social practices, frames them as the primary site of and change, bridging micro-level interactions and macro-level patterns. Practices involve the knowledgeable application of structural properties in time-space contexts, where agents monitor their conduct and that of others, adapting to that can alter resource distributions or rule interpretations. For instance, routine organizational behaviors, such as workplace hierarchies, rely on authoritative resources that agents invoke to coordinate actions, yet disruptions—like technological shifts—can recursively reshape those hierarchies through altered practices. This approach critiques deterministic views, insisting on empirical examination of how specific practices embed and evolve structural duality, with implications for understanding stability in institutions amid agentic variability.

Other Key Perspectives

Theodore Schatzki's emphasizes a Wittgensteinian where life is organized through nexuses of practices, defined as arrays of sayings, doings, and relatings connected by teleoaffective structures—ends, projects, and emotions—that guide actions without deterministic rules. Practices constitute the primary site of the , rendering and structures emergent from interconnected activities rather than prior entities, as evidenced in his of how practices bundle into complexes that explain societal phenomena like . This approach critiques representationalist views by positing a "flat " where practices, not minds or texts, form the basic units, supported by empirical observations of routine human activity. Andreas Reckwitz advances a culturalist framing of , portraying practices as routinized ensembles of bodily movements, mental routines, "things" (objects and artifacts), and background knowledge that cohere through performative stabilization rather than individual or alone. In his 2002 formulation, practices emerge as alternatives to mentalist or textual paradigms, with change arising from the recombination of elements when routines destabilize, as seen in shifts toward aestheticized lifestyles in modern societies. Reckwitz's perspective integrates empirical by examining how practices "culturalize" domains like expertise and , though it has been critiqued for underemphasizing power dynamics compared to Bourdieu. Elizabeth Shove, alongside collaborators, develops a dynamics-oriented view focusing on the elemental composition of practices—meanings, materials, and competences—that drive their recruitment, persistence, or defection in everyday contexts like or heating. Her 2012 model posits that occurs through the circulation and linkage of these elements across practices, empirically demonstrated in studies of comfort norms evolving from 19th-century fires to 21st-century , where material innovations co-evolve with shifting competences and symbolic attachments. This framework prioritizes observable transitions over habitus or structuration, applying to policy-relevant behaviors such as use reduction via practice reconfiguration rather than attitudinal .

Components of Social Practices

Routines, Norms, and Material Elements

In social practice theory, routines refer to the habitual and repeated performances of coordinated actions that constitute and sustain practices over time. These routines are not merely individual habits but collective patterns embedded in , such as daily or , which reproduce social structures through their recurrence. Practices become routinized when elements align consistently, allowing for stability amid variability in contexts, as seen in studies of where routines like showering persist through infrastructural support. Norms function within the meanings element of practices, encompassing shared expectations, conventions, and symbolic significances that guide and legitimize actions without relying solely on individual or enforcement. Unlike traditional views emphasizing norms as rigid rules, social practice approaches integrate them as dynamic interpretations that evolve with performances, such as cultural understandings of influencing hygiene routines. Norms contribute to practice coherence by providing motivational and evaluative frameworks, yet they are challenged or reinforced through material and competent engagements rather than top-down imposition. Material elements include tangible objects, technologies, bodies, and infrastructures that enable or constrain practice enactment, forming the physical substrate for routines and norms. Examples range from tools like smartphones facilitating communication practices to built environments shaping mobility routines, as in urban planning studies where infrastructure alters habitual travel. These elements interact dynamically; for instance, the introduction of electric vehicles in 2010s sustainability initiatives disrupted established driving routines by altering material affordances and normative expectations around environmental responsibility. The integration of routines, norms, and material elements underscores practices as emergent configurations rather than isolated factors. Routines stabilize when materials provide reliable cues, competences ensure execution, and norms supply interpretive coherence, as evidenced in interventions where tools (materials) and skills align with normative shifts toward self-management. Disruptions, such as technological innovations or cultural changes, can unlink these, leading to practice transformation; empirical analyses of laundering show how detergents and washing machines (materials) redefined norms of and routinized machine-based cycles by the mid-20th century. This interplay highlights causal realism in practice persistence, prioritizing empirical interconnections over attitudinal .

Interplay of Agency and Social Structure

In social practice theory, the interplay of and manifests through practices as the primary medium of , where individual agents reflexively draw on structural rules and resources to perform routines that simultaneously constrain and enable further action. This implies that structures—defined as patterned distributions of resources and normative expectations—do not exist independently but are instantiated and potentially transformed via agents' competent, knowledgeable conduct within everyday practices. Agents exercise not as unfettered but as situated capacity, involving reflexive monitoring of actions and tacit adherence to or deviation from structural properties, which can lead to structural reproduction in stable contexts or incremental change through or deliberate . Anthony Giddens' formalizes this duality, positing that "structure is both the medium and outcome of the practices which it recursively organizes," such that time-space distanciation in practices allows local actions to link micro-level with macro-level structures. For instance, in organizational settings, agents utilize hierarchical resource allocations (structures) to enact practices, which in turn solidify or challenge those hierarchies based on agents' interpretive schemes and sanctions. Empirical analyses applying this framework, such as in information systems research, demonstrate how users' adaptive practices co-constitute technological structures, revealing in rule-following that occasionally generates novel configurations. Pierre Bourdieu's framework introduces habitus as the embodied mechanism bridging , comprising internalized dispositions shaped by prior structural conditions that generate practices aligned with objective social fields, yet permitting strategic improvisation when habitus-field congruence falters. Habitus thus ensures practical mastery over structures without full , as agents "feel out" probable actions, reproducing inequalities—evident in class-specific consumption practices where constraints habitus formation—while emerges in hysteresis effects, where outdated dispositions prompt adaptive shifts. Studies of educational trajectories illustrate this: students from disadvantaged structures internalize habitus limiting aspirational practices, yet rare agentic overrides, like leveraging , can disrupt reproduction. Critics of these approaches argue that practice theory risks conflating and , underplaying causal asymmetries where structures exert disproportionate constraint on agents, as seen in quantitative analyses of mobility data showing persistent intergenerational correlations in outcomes despite nominal . Conversely, relational perspectives in emphasize nexuses of elements—bodies, artifacts, know-how—where operates collectively through rather than heroic , supported by ethnographic evidence from workplace practices revealing co-dependence on structures for agentic efficacy. This interplay underscores practices as sites of causal , where empirical regularities in action patterns validate structural influences without negating agentic variability.

Methodological and Empirical Dimensions

Social Practice as Analytical Inquiry

Social practice theory positions practices themselves—understood as routinized ensembles of bodily movements, objects, know-how, and shared understandings—as the central unit of analysis in social inquiry, rather than individuals, attitudes, or disembodied structures. This ontological shift directs researchers to examine how social phenomena emerge from the performance, linkage, and transformation of these practices, revealing causal dynamics through their material, competent, and meaningful interconnections. Unlike paradigms that prioritize cognitive or structural explanations, analytical via social practices employs a "transitive" that traces the flow and bundling of doings across sites and scales, avoiding reduction to micro-intentions or macro-forces. functions as an integrated package of theory, method, and vocabulary, sensitizing analysts to four key strategies: dissecting the situated accomplishment of action sequences; reconstructing their historical formation; tracking the and of singular practices; and mapping co-evolutions, conflicts, or interferences among multiple practices. Method selection remains pragmatic, tied to specific questions about practice persistence or change rather than prescriptive techniques, with no autonomous "practice methodologies" existing apart from these analytic orientations. Qualitative approaches predominate, including ethnographic of practitioner routines, in-depth interviews to unpack competences and meanings, and multi-modal (e.g., fidelity checklists alongside narratives) to model element recombinations in . Quantitative elements, such as time-use surveys or analysis of practice linkages, may complement these to quantify bundles or trajectories, though integration demands caution against overlooking contextual specificity. In applied settings, this operationalizes practices by following their enactment in environments, as in process evaluations of interventions where to core elements (e.g., materials like exercise tools, competences like skills) is assessed against adaptive tailoring to reveal causal pathways for outcomes. Such inquiries afford thicker empirical accounts of social textures but risk localism—overemphasizing singular sites—or reifying practices as static entities, necessitating reflexive scaling to broader assemblages.

Key Empirical Studies and Evidence

Empirical investigations into social practices frequently utilize qualitative approaches, including , in-depth interviews, and time-use diaries, to dissect the elements—materials, competences, and meanings—that constitute and sustain routines such as personal and household chores. A seminal study by Hand, Shove, and Southerton (2005) examined showering in the through interviews and observations, revealing that daily showering emerged in the late 20th century not primarily from imperatives but from evolving conventions of bodily freshness and , intertwined with material affordances like efficient showerheads and hot water systems. The research documented a shift from occasional to routine showering, with frequency increasing from an average of 2-3 times per week in the 1970s to daily by the 2000s, attributing this to the bundling of showering with morning routines and its via media and peer expectations, thereby providing evidence that practices co-evolve through of new carriers rather than isolated individual decisions. In household and consumption domains, social practice theory has yielded findings that challenge attitude-behavior models by demonstrating how practices persist despite awareness of environmental costs. For instance, analyses of practices by Mylan and Southerton (2018) drew on diary data and interviews from households, identifying how temporal coordination with work schedules and family needs, combined with competences in and material reliance on detergents and machines, locks in high-frequency cycles—often 5-7 loads weekly per household—independent of pro-environmental intentions. This study evidenced that disruptions, such as policy incentives for cold-water , succeed only when they reconfigure practice elements, as evidenced by modest reductions in use (up to 20% in pilot groups) when machines and norms aligned toward , underscoring the theory's utility in explaining resistance to change in resource-intensive routines. Broader applications in sustainability transitions, as synthesized in Shove, Pantzar, and Watson's framework (2012), integrate multiple empirical cases—from Norwegian adoption to comfort practices—showing that practice diffusion occurs via circulation of elements across sites, with quantitative data from consumption surveys indicating that aggregate energy demands (e.g., 15-20% of household tied to laundering and showering in ) stem from interconnected practice complexes rather than discrete choices. These findings, corroborated in reviews of over 80 technology-related studies, highlight SPT's explanatory power for why interventions targeting alone yield negligible shifts (e.g., less than 5% change in energy trials), while those altering materials or competences—such as smart appliances fostering new competences—achieve measurable reconfiguration, though scalability remains limited by contextual variability. Such evidence supports the view that social practices operate as distributed entities, with empirical patterns revealing path dependencies that individual agency navigates but rarely originates.

Applications in Diverse Fields

In Sociology and Daily Life Behaviors

Social practice theory in reframes daily life behaviors as interconnected bundles of routinized activities, emphasizing their collective reproduction over individual agency or psychological motives. Practices such as , meal preparation, or personal are analyzed as configurations of materials (e.g., vehicles, ingredients, fixtures), competences (e.g., driving skills, cooking techniques), and meanings (e.g., norms of , , or ), which stabilize through repetition and social coordination. Elizabeth Shove, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson outline in their 2012 that these elements integrate during enactment, enabling practices to persist, evolve, or decline as societal conditions shift, such as infrastructural developments influencing the of daily use in post-World War II Europe. This approach highlights how behaviors like consumption emerged in the mid-20th century not primarily from consumer preferences but from alignments in technology, preservation methods, and shifting expectations of domestic efficiency. Empirical investigations in employ methods like multi-day time-diary surveys to map the temporal and spatial interconnections of these practices, revealing their role in structuring everyday stability. A 2017 study using time-use data identified repetitive sequences—such as sequential bundling of work, childcare, and leisure—as core to reproducing , with deviations often tied to disruptions like illness or policy changes rather than personal volition. Similarly, analyses of mobility practices demonstrate how routines like daily walking or entangle with material environments (e.g., layouts) and social relations, as evidenced in post-pandemic shifts where altered patterns, reducing average daily travel by 20-30% in areas by 2022. These studies underscore SPT's utility in explaining behavioral persistence, such as entrenched hygiene routines post-19th-century reforms, which elevated showering frequency from occasional to near-daily in industrialized nations by the late 20th century. In broader sociological applications, SPT informs understandings of reproduction through everyday practices, where access to enabling materials or competences stratifies participation; for instance, low-income households exhibit constrained meal practices due to limited appliances and time, perpetuating nutritional disparities documented in longitudinal surveys from the . This perspective contrasts with behaviorist models by prioritizing socio-material dynamics, as in health sociology where practices like adherence emerge from routinized integrations rather than isolated decisions, with evidence from 2015 ethnographic work showing clinic visits bundled with transport and work schedules. Overall, SPT reveals daily behaviors as sites of social coordination, offering tools for dissecting how mundane routines sustain or challenge structures like roles in household divisions, evidenced by persistent asymmetries in unpaid care practices averaging 2-3 hours more daily for women in countries as of 2020 data.

In Psychology and Behavioral Routines

In psychology, social practice theory conceptualizes behavioral routines as collective performances of interconnected elements—competences (skills and know-how), materials (tools and infrastructures), and meanings (norms and understandings)—rather than isolated individual habits driven by cognition or repetition. This framework critiques mainstream psychological models, such as those rooted in social learning or planned behavior theories, for overemphasizing personal agency and underestimating how routines emerge from and reproduce social structures. Routines like daily hygiene or consumption are thus antecedent to deliberate choice, embedded in normative expectations and material affordances that guide enactment without constant reflection. Empirical investigations support this by demonstrating the interplay of elements in sustaining routines. A multivariate analysis of the 2016 Household Energy Demand Survey (n=5,015) examined routinized behaviors, such as showering and clothes washing/drying, revealing that competences (e.g., of efficient techniques) and meanings (e.g., personal norms favoring low use) explain variations, but materials like tumble dryers exert strong inertial effects on persistence. In health-related domains, habits exhibit socioeconomic patterning: lower-status groups show higher prevalence of routines like , interpreted not as failures of willpower but as pragmatic adaptations to environmental stressors, with interventions like smoke-free policies disrupting these via contextual shifts rather than motivational appeals. Applications to behavior change prioritize transforming practice configurations over individual attitudes. Welch (2017) identifies strategies including re-crafting elements (e.g., altering materials and norms to habitualize turning off lights, as in Hargreaves' study of a energy program) and substituting s (e.g., replacing high-water-use routines with low-flow alternatives via infrastructural tweaks). Such approaches yield evidence of systemic change, as in Browne et al.'s (2013) analysis of domestic , where targeting interlocked elements proved more effective than value-based in reducing consumption. This causal emphasis on social-material dynamics informs psychological interventions by revealing how disrupting routine "bundles" can cascade into broader habit reconfiguration.

In Education and Learning Processes

Social practice theory frames education as embedded in participatory activities where learners acquire through engagement in communal routines, rather than isolated cognitive processes. In this view, learning emerges from legitimate peripheral participation, progressing from novice observation to expert involvement within shared practices. This approach, rooted in ethnographic studies of apprenticeships, emphasizes how educational settings replicate real-world social interactions to foster skill development. Central to this application is the concept of communities of practice, where groups coalesce around mutual concerns, generating collective learning through iterative interactions. Empirical research on apprenticeships, such as Jean Lave's 1990s observations of tailors and weavers in , demonstrates that novices learn complex competencies—like pattern-making or operation—not via formal but through scaffolded participation in daily tasks, yielding higher retention and adaptability than didactic methods. In formal , this translates to structures promoting collaborative problem-solving, as seen in programs where student-teachers co-develop curricula through shared deliberation, enhancing pedagogical innovation over traditional lectures. Studies in apply social practice lenses to routines like group discourse on proofs, revealing that such practices cultivate deeper conceptual understanding; for instance, a of South African found participants improved problem-framing abilities by 25-30% when norms emphasized justification over rote . Similarly, in literacy development, viewing reading as a social routine—evident in peer-led clubs—correlates with sustained engagement, as longitudinal from elementary settings show participants exhibiting 15-20% greater text comprehension when practices integrate cultural artifacts and . These implementations underscore causal links between structured social engagements and measurable learning gains, though outcomes vary by contextual alignment with learners' prior experiences. Critiques highlight potential overreliance on , which may undervalue individual cognitive variances or innate aptitudes, as evidenced in reviews questioning the theory's explanatory power for divergent learner trajectories in standardized assessments. Nonetheless, empirical integrations in hybrid learning environments, such as post-2020 blended models, affirm social practices' role in mitigating , with data from cohorts indicating 10-15% uplifts in retention via virtual communities mimicking trajectories.

In Arts and Socially Engaged Initiatives

Social practice theory informs artistic endeavors by framing collaborative interventions that target and reshape entrenched routines, norms, and material elements of daily social life, often through community-based projects that prioritize process over product. In this domain, artists act as catalysts for collective agency, embedding aesthetic inquiry within lived practices to challenge or reinforce social structures, as seen in the emergence of social practice art since the 1960s. These initiatives draw on empirical observations of how shared activities—such as communal labor or dialogue—generate causal chains of behavioral adaptation, distinct from individualistic artistic expression. Historical precedents include performances and in the 1960s, which disrupted conventional social interactions, evolving into Mierle Laderman Ukeles' Maintenance Art manifesto of , which reconceptualized and caregiving routines as performative practices warranting public recognition. By 1991, Suzanne Lacy formalized "new genre " to encompass dialogic projects addressing urban norms, while Nicolas Bourriaud's 1998 relational further emphasized interpersonal exchanges as artistic material. These developments reflect a shift toward practices that empirically document and intervene in , such as economic disparities or community cohesion, rather than isolated artworks. Prominent examples illustrate targeted applications: Ukeles' Touch Sanitation (1979–1980) involved handshakes with 8,500 sanitation workers, ritualizing their overlooked labor to alter perceptions of essential routines and fostering momentary . Rick Lowe's Project Row Houses, founded on July 5, 1993, in Houston's Third Ward, repurposes historic shotgun houses for rotating installations alongside and maternal support programs, empirically sustaining cultural preservation and neighborhood stability over three decades through iterative community cycles. Tania Bruguera's Immigrant Movement International (2010–2015) in , , convened immigrants for advocacy workshops and services, embedding political practices within immigrant daily lives to build resilience against exclusionary norms. Evidence on efficacy draws from targeted studies, with a 2024 analysis linking participation—including socially engaged forms—to measurable gains in social connectedness, correlating with reduced in community settings per U.S. advisories on epidemic . However, longitudinal data remains sparse; a 2022 protocol for modeling of social arts projects highlights potential for behavioral shifts but underscores the need for rigorous metrics on facilitators and participants. Critiques note frequent short-term outcomes, where projects dissolve post-funding without embedding lasting practice changes, potentially exacerbating dependencies rather than causal reforms.

In Sustainability, Consumption, and Policy

Social practice theory frames challenges as transformations of everyday practices, such as heating homes or laundering clothes, rather than isolated individual behaviors or technological fixes. These practices comprise interconnected elements—materials like appliances and , meanings encompassing cultural norms of comfort and , and competences involving skills for their performance—whose reconfiguration drives shifts toward lower resource use. This perspective critiques models emphasizing personal attitudes, arguing they overlook how practices co-evolve with socio-technical systems, leading to phenomena like effects where efficiency gains spur increased . In , the analyzes patterns as emergent from bundled routines embedded in contexts, moving beyond the value-action gap to examine how meanings (e.g., status from ownership) and materials (e.g., norms) sustain high-volume habits like frequent purchases or meat-heavy diets. thus requires disrupting these circuits, such as by altering provisioning systems that normalize disposability, with studies showing influences: women often exhibit stronger green leanings due to caregiving roles linking to environmental meanings, while men prioritize material competences. Empirical inquiries reveal consumption lock-ins, as in mobility practices favoring cars due to urban designs and routine competences, hindering alternatives like despite availability. Policy applications draw on these dynamics to target practice elements over behavioral nudges alone, advocating provision of low-carbon materials (e.g., heat pumps), competence-building via training, and meaning shifts through campaigns challenging excess norms. The ENERGISE project (2018–2019), spanning 306 households in eight European countries, tested such interventions, yielding a 1°C drop in temperatures and one fewer laundry cycle weekly; follow-ups in the and through 2023 confirmed partial persistence, underscoring the role of collective recruitment in sustaining changes. Frameworks integrating SPT with multi-level models recommend policies fostering "disruptive" practices, like reduced laundering frequencies, to counter lock-ins in fields such as and eating, though implementation faces resistance from entrenched infrastructures.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Limitations

Challenges to Social Determinism

Social determinism, within social practice theory, posits that recurring practices emerge solely from interlocking social structures, interactions, and material arrangements, rendering individual or exogenous influences epiphenomenal. This perspective, evident in Bourdieu's habitus as a mechanism for structural reproduction, faces critiques for its inability to adequately account for discontinuities and unpredictability in practice evolution. Empirical observations of rapid social shifts, such as the swift adoption of digital communication norms during the 2020 , reveal variances not fully reducible to prior social configurations, challenging the theory's predictive closure. Logically, strict social determinism incurs self-referential paradoxes: if all cognitive and behavioral dispositions are exhaustively products of social forces, the theory's formulation and acceptance must likewise stem from such forces, eroding its aspirational status as a neutral analytical tool. This undermines claims of explanatory superiority over rival frameworks, as truth-seeking presupposes some from contingent social causation. Historical instances of paradigm-shifting practices, including the Protestant Reformation's disruption of medieval European routines initiated by figures like in 1517, illustrate resistances that exceed deterministic social scripting. Methodologically, social practice analyses often prioritize holistic mappings of practice complexes over falsifiable hypotheses, complicating verification against counterevidence. For example, quantitative assessments of routine behaviors in diverse cohorts show residual variances attributable to non-social covariates, as in longitudinal data where identical social exposures yield divergent practice trajectories among genetically similar individuals. Twin studies, controlling for shared environments, consistently estimate heritability for behavioral dispositions underpinning practices—such as extraversion at 40-60%—indicating causal pluralism beyond social determinism's monocausal emphasis. Critics further contend that social determinism conflates correlation with causation in practice bundling, overlooking how exogenous shocks (e.g., technological innovations like the smartphone's 2007 introduction) introduce exogenous vectors altering practice teleologies without antecedent social mediation. This renders the framework heuristically limited for policy applications, where overreliance on deterministic models has forecasted stasis in areas like patterns, contradicted by observed pivots toward post-2015 .

Neglect of Individual Agency and Biological Factors

Critics of social practice theory argue that its emphasis on routinized, socially constituted practices as the fundamental units of social analysis tends to subordinate individual to collective structures, portraying human action as largely habitual and reproductive rather than innovative or volitional. In Pierre Bourdieu's influential formulation, the habitus—a set of internalized dispositions—guides behavior in ways that align with social fields, but this mechanism has been faulted for implying excessive , where individual reflexivity and deliberate choice appear as exceptions rather than core drivers of change. Bernard Lahire's critique extends this concern, proposing a "plural actor" model that highlights intra-individual inconsistencies and context-specific activations of dispositions, thereby restoring greater scope for personal and variability beyond the theory's structural constraints. Empirical observations of entrepreneurial or social movements, such as the rapid adoption of digital practices during the starting in March 2020, underscore instances where individual initiative disrupts entrenched routines, challenging the theory's explanatory primacy of over . The theory's relative neglect of biological factors further limits its causal , as it prioritizes sociocultural elements in formation while downplaying innate predispositions, genetic variances, and evolutionary adaptations that shape behavioral capacities. Mainstream practice-theoretic accounts, rooted in phenomenological and structurationist traditions, rarely incorporate neurobiological or endocrinological influences, such as how testosterone levels correlate with risk-taking behaviors integral to certain economic practices (e.g., coefficients of 0.2-0.4 in meta-analyses). This oversight contrasts with evidence from behavioral , including twin studies showing estimates of 40-60% for traits like and , which underpin practice performance independently of . Joseph Rouse addresses this gap by reframing social practices as biological niche construction, where activities modify evolutionary environments, but such integrations remain peripheral, reflecting a broader academic reluctance—potentially influenced by ideological commitments to —to engage robustly with causal data from . These limitations risk rendering social practice theory descriptively rich but explanatorily incomplete, particularly for phenomena involving high-stakes decisions or variances attributable to physiological differences, such as sex-based divergences in competitive practices (e.g., advantages in upper-body strength averaging 50-100% in athletic metrics). Integrating and could enhance the framework's empirical fidelity, as advocated in interdisciplinary critiques that urge hybrid models combining practice ontology with evidentially grounded individual-level mechanisms.

Ideological Applications and Political Critiques

Social practice theory (SPT), particularly in the formulation of Pierre Bourdieu's habitus, has been ideologically deployed to underscore the reproduction of inequalities through embodied dispositions, framing behaviors as products of structures rather than autonomous choices. This approach aligns with Marxist-influenced critiques of , where practices are seen as mechanisms perpetuating dominance without invoking explicit intent, as Bourdieu argued in his analysis of distinguishing elite tastes from working-class necessities. Such applications support narratives in leftist scholarship that attribute outcomes to systemic power imbalances, influencing policy advocacy for redistributive measures to disrupt entrenched practices. In contemporary domains like , SPT ideologically reframes patterns as socio-technical ensembles, shifting from individuals to collective reconfiguration, as seen in efforts to decarbonize via in the UK. This has implications for progressive environmentalism, where habitual practices are targeted for transformation through and norms rather than , potentially embedding ideological priors that prioritize state or communal interventions. However, these applications often occur within academic contexts exhibiting systemic left-leaning biases, which favor structural and underrepresent countervailing evidence from biological or market-based explanations of . Politically, SPT faces critiques for fostering a form of soft that erodes individual , portraying routines as overdetermined by social fields and thereby excusing personal in domains like or criminality. Margaret Archer's morphogenetic theory, for instance, challenges Bourdieu's habitus as insufficiently reflexive, arguing it conflates in a co-deterministic stasis that hinders analysis of transformative individual action. This limitation is politically salient, as it can underpin ideologies skeptical of liberal individualism, implying behaviors are ineluctably shaped by inherited practices and justifying expansive regulatory frameworks over voluntarist reforms. Conservative and liberal commentators further critique SPT's applications for aligning with collectivist agendas that naturalize as practice-embedded while neglecting incentives or innate differences, as evidenced in Bourdieu's where working-class preferences are depicted as adaptive necessities rather than potential preferences unbound by . In risk and behavior research, SPT's emphasis on embedded doings is faulted for broadening interpretive frames at the expense of causal accountability, potentially diluting focus on agentic interventions like ' nudges. These critiques highlight SPT's vulnerability to ideological capture, where its rejection of serves narrative ends over empirical .

Recent Developments

The profoundly disrupted established social practices worldwide, accelerating shifts toward hygiene routines and remote interactions that persisted into the mid-. Norms around strengthened significantly following the outbreak's emergence in early , with empirical studies documenting sustained increases in perceived obligation and frequency compared to pre-pandemic baselines. and masking behaviors, initially enforced through lockdowns from March onward, evolved into habitual precautions for vulnerable populations, contributing to reduced in-person , particularly among older adults in , culture, and activities. These changes reflected a broader reconfiguration of daily routines, where enforced initially heightened disconnection but later stabilized into hybrid patterns of family and peer engagement. Digitalization emerged as a dominant trend, embedding practices into social behaviors amid restrictions and subsequent technological adoption. By 2020, over 3.8 billion individuals engaged with platforms, a figure that expanded with hyperscale video services reshaping content consumption and by 2025. routines, adopted rapidly from 2020, persisted for a substantial segment, altering professional through tools like video conferencing and fostering asynchronous norms. This shift extended to , with online and community-building supplanting some physical gatherings, driven by factors such as (22% of global users) and boredom (53%). Sustainability-oriented practices gained traction, influenced by pandemic-induced reductions in and that highlighted potential for enduring low-carbon routines. Quantitative analyses of COVID-era shifts revealed decreased material and in domains like provisioning and , with some households retaining these efficiencies post-restrictions due to of . By the early , corporate and individual adoption of digital tools for ethical —termed Corporate Digital Responsibility—advanced sustainable practices, aligning business operations with reduced waste norms. These trends intersected with policy responses, such as the UN's 2030 Agenda progress reports, emphasizing integrated social practices for against global disruptions. Methodological advancements in studying social practices incorporated computational tools and , enabling finer-grained analysis of evolving norms. From 2020 onward, sociologists increasingly employed and modeling to track practice diffusion, revealing how global events like the pandemic propagated localized behavioral adaptations. This approach underscored causal links between structural shocks and routine recalibrations, with ongoing research highlighting power dynamics in practice transformation.

Emerging Interdisciplinary Integrations

Recent scholarship has integrated social practice theory (SPT) with to model and simulate the dynamics of everyday routines using agent-based approaches. For instance, agent-based models incorporating SPT elements enable the prediction of how individual practices aggregate into larger social patterns, such as or consumption behaviors, by representing agents as carriers of interconnected practices rather than isolated decision-makers. This integration leverages large-scale digital data from sources like mobile tracking or online interactions to empirically validate and refine practice formations, addressing limitations in traditional qualitative SPT analyses. In technology studies, SPT is increasingly applied to analyze digital transformation's impact on practices, such as how platforms and algorithms mediate communication or work routines. A of 80 studies highlights SPT's utility in examining adoption not as individual choices but as bundled material, competence, and meaning elements evolving through socio-technical infrastructures. This approach reveals how digital tools stabilize or disrupt practices, for example, in remote where video conferencing reconfigures temporal and spatial elements of professional routines. Emerging fusions with challenge SPT's anti-individualist stance by hybridizing practice-oriented explanations with cognitive and incentive-based models, particularly in and policy s. Studies contrast SPT's emphasis on habitual bundling with economic nudges, proposing integrated frameworks that account for both structural embeddings and micro-level deviations to enhance efficacy. Additionally, tentative to social neuroscience explore how predictive processes underpin practice stabilization during social interactions, suggesting neural mechanisms for the reproduction of shared routines amid environmental changes. These integrations, prominent since , underscore SPT's adaptability to data-driven and neuro-cognitive paradigms while cautioning against over-reductionism that neglects contextual embeddings.

References

  1. [1]
    Social Practice Art Movement Overview - The Art Story
    Feb 1, 2024 · All Social Practice artworks converge on a similar ethos: a commitment to making positive social contributions while placing people at the core of each project.
  2. [2]
    Socially engaged practice - Tate
    ... Social Cooperation, social practice is 'art that's socially engaged, where the social interaction is at some level the art.' Social practice and activism.
  3. [3]
    Social Practice – Understanding New Media Art
    What is Social Practice Art? Social Practice Art, also called Relational Aesthetics by the French curator Nicholas Bourriaud, has its origins in the mid 1990s, ...
  4. [4]
    Social Practice Art and the Problem of Efficacy
    Concretely, we seek to investigate the controversial questions of “scope”, “usefulness,” and “impact” of what is broadly denominated as “social practice art.” ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    A critique of social practice art - International Socialist Review
    Art to change the world “Social practice” as a genre has been around in one form or another for a long time, though it hasn't always had that label, or been ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Social Theory European Journal of
    This article works out the main characteristics of 'practice theory', a type of social theory which has been sketched by such authors as Bourdieu, Giddens,.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory
    within the frame of a classical conception of social practice. 'Social practice' designates a model of human behavior which is congruent with the ...
  8. [8]
    Shove et al.'s three-element Social Practice Framework.
    Those three elements connect to form a practice (Shove et al., 2012). The three-element model is popular in sustainable consumption research due to its easy ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  9. [9]
    Social Practice Theory and the Historical Production of Persons
    Working collaboratively, we and others have developed a historical, material theory of social practice that integrates the study of persons, local practice, ...
  10. [10]
    The “Social Science of Practice”: An Introductory Summary and ...
    Mar 15, 2023 · The “Theory of Practice” was created mainly to attempt to rise above the usual either/or binary opposition between the subjective and the ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] A Social Practice Theory of Learning and Becoming Across Contexts ...
    Social practice theory views learning as people pursuing diverse concerns, becoming aware of new possibilities, and adjusting to fit demands and structures of ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  12. [12]
    Generating Social Practices - JASSS
    The social practice constitutes a situation that captures individuals in a specific behaviour which adds to the reproduction of this practice across space and ...
  13. [13]
    Outline of a Theory of Practice
    Outline of a Theory of Practice. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Outline of a ... With his central concept of the habitus, the principle which ...
  14. [14]
    (PDF) Pierre Bourdieu's 'Theory of Practice' - ResearchGate
    Outline of a theory of practice (Cambridge studies in social anthropology). (Vol. 16). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972). Bourdieu, P.
  15. [15]
    (PDF) Understanding Bourdieu - Cultural Capital and Habitus
    Aug 7, 2019 · Habitus is a key concept in the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and plays an organizing role in his classic study Distinction where tastes are ...
  16. [16]
    Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in the explanation ...
    Habitus is the learned set of preferences or dispositions by which a person orients to the social world. It is a system of durable, transposable, cognitive ' ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Bourdieu's Class Theory - Berkeley Sociology
    There are four central concepts in Bourdieu's sociology: capital, habitus, fields, and symbolic power. Capital refers to resources. Bourdieu identifies three ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Pierre Bourdieu on social transformation, with particular reference to ...
    Feb 6, 2020 · Bourdieu consistently claimed to offer a theory of social transformation as well as accounting for continuities of power.
  19. [19]
    Bourdieu on Education and Social and Cultural Reproduction - jstor
    Bourdieu's theory does, therefore, and contrary to the views of certain critics, recognise the school as the productive locus of a particular habitus which ...
  20. [20]
    The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration
    A particular feature is Giddens's concern to connect abstract problems of theory to an interpretation of the nature of empirical method in the social sciences.
  21. [21]
    Giddens Structuration Theory - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Giddens' structuration theory is defined as a theoretical framework that emphasizes the dual relationship between social structures and social practices, ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] anthony giddens's theory of structuration
    Says. Giddens: "By the duality of structure I mean that social structures are both constituted by human agency, and yet at the same time are the very medium of.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Constitution of Society - Communication Cache
    Structure, Structuration. Let me now move to the core of structuration theory: the concepts of 'structure', 'system' and 'duality of structure'. The notion ...
  24. [24]
    The Constitution of Society by Anthony Giddens - Paper
    Table of Contents · 1 Elements of the Theory of Structuradon The Agent, Agency Agency and Power Structure, Structuration The Duality of Structure · 2 ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] The-Theory-of-Structuration-The-Constitution-of-Society-Outline-of ...
    Giddens terms this the "duality of structure" since, in using rules and resources of structure, agents reproduce these very rules and resources that mediate ...
  26. [26]
    Structuration theory | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Giddens' structuration theory places the focus of sociological emphasis on social practices that involve both individual decisions and shared social structures ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Anthony Giddens and structuration theory - VU Research Portal
    Structuration theory per se forms a relatively small part of his voluminous output but firmly established Giddens' reputation; it is the focus of this chapter.
  28. [28]
    Structuration Theory – Problem Solving in Teams and Groups
    Giddens uses “the duality of structure” (i.e. material/ideational, micro/macro) to emphasize structure's nature as both medium and outcome. Structures exist ...Missing: scholarly sources
  29. [29]
    A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation - jstor
    It is no accident that Giddens calls his theory "the theory of structuration," indicating by this neologism that "structure" must be regarded as a process, not.
  30. [30]
    Social Practices - Cambridge University Press & Assessment
    This book addresses key topics in social theory such as the basic structures of social life, the character of human activity, and the nature of ...
  31. [31]
    ‪Theodore Schatzki‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬
    Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social ... Practice theory as flat ontology. T Schatzki. Practice theory and research, 44 ...
  32. [32]
    Toward a Theory of Social Practices - Andreas Reckwitz, 2002
    This article works out the main characteristics of practice theory, a type of social theory which has been sketched by such authors as Bourdieu, Giddens, ...
  33. [33]
    Toward a Theory of Social Practice - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · Thus, this study will analyze five elements of social practice, namely skills, meaning, materials, rules, and agents. ... Reckwitz (2002) , ...
  34. [34]
    The Dynamics of Social Practice | SAGE Publications Ltd
    Everyday life is defined and characterised by the rise, transformation and fall of social practices. ... Elizabeth Shove is Professor of Sociology at Lancaster ...
  35. [35]
    The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes
    E aqueles que partem da perspectiva shoveniana (Shove et al., 2012) prestam atenção especial aos significados, competências e ao material. ... ... Sua ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Social Practice Theory - Elizabeth Shove - Lancaster University
    The task of understanding how social arrangements come to be as they are, how they develop, is core business for sociology, for disciplines like history, ...
  37. [37]
    Full article: The utility of social practice theory in risk research
    Social practice theory draws our attention to how individuals through their everyday practices also deal with many risks, often unreflexively, with the use of ...
  38. [38]
    Informing a social practice theory framework with social ...
    A main finding was that routines evolve in an interplay of technology, social norms, and everyday life. ... material elements of practice. We. Sample. The study ...
  39. [39]
    The value of social practice theory for implementation science - NIH
    Jul 6, 2020 · Practices have 3 elements: 1) Materials including technologies, tangible, physical entities, and the stuff of which objects are made; 2) ...
  40. [40]
    Practice Theory - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Practice theories challenge the view of social behavior as fundamentally ordered by rules and norms, which is evident in many formal and certain ...
  41. [41]
    The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes
    The three components of SPT are meaning, material and competence (Shove, Pantzar, and Watson 2012) . The elements of meaning and material are particularly ...
  42. [42]
    Review Essay: The Theory of Structuration - jstor
    Giddens terms this the. "duality of structure" since, in using rules and resources of structure, agents reproduce these very rules and resources that mediate ...
  43. [43]
    The Theory of Structuration: Prospects and Problems - jstor
    A recurrent theme in Giddens's work is that of the duality of structures. By this he means that rules and resources both constrain and enable action. The.<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research
    Duality of structure Structure and agency are mutually Structure is inseparable from agency constitutive. Structure is a "virtual order of Rules and ...
  45. [45]
    Bourdieu and 'habitus' - Powercube.net
    Bourdieu sees power as culturally and symbolically created, and constantly re-legitimised through an interplay of agency and structure.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] The interplay between structure and agency: How Academic
    This study explores and seeks to explain the ways in which a group of Academic. Development Programme (ADP) students 'made their way' through their studies in.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Agency-Structure Relation in Social Sciences - Semantic Scholar
    Dec 29, 2013 · The agency-structure relation focuses on autonomy and control. Agents can exert control over structures, and agency is the capacity to act ...Missing: interplay | Show results with:interplay
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Interplay of Structure and Agency in Social Change
    The interplay between structure and agency involves how individual actions and social structures influence each other, with individuals both navigating and ...
  49. [49]
    Practice Theory as a Package of Theory, Method and Vocabulary
    In this article, I argue that practice theory should be mainly conceived as a theoretical orientation towards the study of the social where the methodological ...
  50. [50]
    Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories
    This volume presents a comprehensive overview of methodological issues and empirical methods of practice-oriented research. It examines questions regarding ...
  51. [51]
    Elizabeth Shove – Practice theory methodologies do not exist
    Feb 15, 2017 · ... social practice theory'. I think this is 'code' or shorthand for ... Again it is important to be clear about the relation between theory, analytic ...Missing: inquiry | Show results with:inquiry
  52. [52]
    Explaining Showering: A Discussion of the Material, Conventional ...
    Explaining Showering: A Discussion of the Material, Conventional, and Temporal Dimensions of Practice. Martin Hand, Elizabeth Shove, and Dale SouthertonView all ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Explaining Showering - Sociological Research Online
    practice as a whole (Hand and Shove, 2004). 6.8 In conclusion, we have used the case of showering to explore the possibilities and the potential of a.Missing: Watson | Show results with:Watson
  54. [54]
    The Social Ordering of an Everyday Practice: The Case of Laundry
    Exploring the Practice of Laundry​​ Laundry is a useful empirical probe for exploring the relationship between practices as performances (as observed at the ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The Social Ordering of an Everyday Practice: The Case of Laundry
    While social practice theories variously discuss 'cultural understandings' or 'skills and competence', 'materiality' and 'temporality', this analysis provides ...
  56. [56]
    Exploring the application of Social Practice Theory in technology ...
    Social Practice Theory has emerged as an important framework within the social sciences, offering nuanced insights into the dynamics of human behavior ...Missing: inquiry | Show results with:inquiry
  57. [57]
    The Dynamics of Social Practice Everyday Life and how it Changes
    6-day deliveryThe Dynamics of Social Practice. Everyday Life and how it Changes. Elizabeth Shove - University of Lancaster, UK; Mika Pantzar - National Consumer Research ...
  58. [58]
    The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes
    The book provides discussion of real world examples such as the history of car driving and the emergence of frozen food, bringing abstract concepts to life and ...
  59. [59]
    Exploring the stable practices of everyday life: A multi-day time-diary ...
    Jan 25, 2017 · In what follows we outline the concept of everyday life, how it fits within practice theory and how studying social practices helps us ...
  60. [60]
    Like clockwork? (Re)imagining rhythms and routines when living ...
    Aug 5, 2022 · Walking his dog Bertie is part and parcel of his everyday routine ... social practices with bodies and social routines, and their entanglements, ...
  61. [61]
    The interconnected dynamics of social practices and their ...
    Social practice theory understands social life as a web of temporarily and spatially interconnected activities which hang together to form practice “bundles ...
  62. [62]
    Time use surveys, social practice theory, and activity connections
    Dec 30, 2023 · Social practice theory (SPT) represents a growing body of research that takes the 'doings and sayings' (social practices) of everyday life ...Abstract · TIME USE SURVEYS, TIME... · A SOCIAL PRACTICE... · CONCLUSION<|control11|><|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Understanding health through social practices - PubMed
    This article uses social practice theories to understand health, distinguishing practice performance from persistent entities and emphasizing the materiality ...
  64. [64]
    (PDF) Social practices and behaviour change: "Key issues ...
    9,13,14 Practice Theory emerged in the mid-twentieth century in the works of social theorists such as Bourdieu, Giddens, and Foucault and has since generated a ...Missing: besides | Show results with:besides
  65. [65]
    Habits and the socioeconomic patterning of health-related behaviour
    Nov 2, 2023 · The social practices approach points out how smoking, drinking and eating should not be seen merely as single behaviours, but rather as parts of ...
  66. [66]
    Lave and Wenger on Situated Learning - New Learning Online
    Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger argue that learning is necessarily situated, a process of participation in communities of practice.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Social practice theory and mathematics teacher education: - NCM
    Social practice theory, particularly Lave's approach, is used to increase participation in communities of practice, focusing on teacher education and " ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Literacy as a Social Practice: Exploring Teacher Representations
    Feb 6, 2024 · The findings reveal that teachers often emphasize foundational writing skills and view literacy through a lens of deficiency, which shapes ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    (PDF) A Social Practice Theory of Learning and Becoming Across ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · This theory posits that learning occurs within a social context, where various factors interact to foster individual development and skill ...
  70. [70]
    A critique of the practice-based learning theory - ScienceDirect
    The aim of the present paper is to assess the contribution of Lave and Wenger's (1991) practice theory for educational and other learning social settings.
  71. [71]
    A Critical Review of the Use of Wenger's Community of Practice ...
    Mar 21, 2017 · This paper reviews extant empirical work grounded in this framework to investigate online/blended learning in higher education and in professional development.
  72. [72]
    The Poetry of Everyday Life: An Interview with Project Row Houses ...
    Nov 7, 2017 · Founded in 1993 by African-American artists and activists who wanted to enact a positive, creative presence in their community, Project Row ...
  73. [73]
    Round 55 - Project Row Houses
    As we kickoff this milestone occasion, it has been 30 years since Project Row Houses founding on July 5, 1993. Historic and groundbreaking in its goal, we are ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  74. [74]
    New Research Explores Arts Engagement and Social Connectedness
    Oct 31, 2024 · The findings about the arts' positive links to social connectedness are especially promising in light of a 2023 Surgeon General's advisory about ...
  75. [75]
    Creating an empirically-based model of social arts as a public health ...
    Oct 12, 2022 · This paper presents a research protocol designed to examine a tripartite empirically-based model of SA that will cover a wide range of SA training programs.
  76. [76]
    Assessing Socially Engaged Art - jstor
    but a critical assessment of socially engaged art should include comparisons with such nonart enterprises and an empirical assessment of the work's impact ...
  77. [77]
    Social Practice Theories and Sustainability Transitions Studies
    Social practice theories (SPT) focus on collective patterns of human activity, viewing practices as the core of social life, rather than individual behavior.
  78. [78]
    Social practice theories and research on sustainable consumption in
    Dec 18, 2015 · Social practice theories are the subject of much discussion among those who study sustainability. Using social practice theories to analyze ...
  79. [79]
    Linking social practice theories to the perceptions of green ...
    This paper reviews the perceptions and practices of green consumption through the viewpoint of social practice theories, with an emphasis on gender dynamics.
  80. [80]
    Crossovers between Sustainability Transitions Research and Social ...
    Social practice theory is an approach consisting of several interrelated theoretical bodies of literature that uses practices as units of analysis (Hargreaves ...
  81. [81]
    Bourdieu, Practice and Change: Beyond the criticism of determinism
    Nov 27, 2013 · Although not particularly successfully, Bourdieu strongly rejects the criticism of determinism, charging that this is based on a superficial and ...
  82. [82]
    The “Ism” That Isn't (Why Social Determinism Cannot Mean What it ...
    Dec 19, 1996 · Even as a theory steeped in empirical research, social determinism fares poorly. For example, psychological and sociological studies have been ...
  83. [83]
    Beyond Heritability: Twin Studies in Behavioral Research - PMC - NIH
    The heritability of human behavioral traits is now well established, due in large measure to classical twin studies. We see little need for further studies ...
  84. [84]
    A 'Practical' Critique of the Habitus - jstor
    Although. Bourdieu believes that the habitus is compatible with his practical theory and over- comes the impasse of objectivism and subjectivism in social ...
  85. [85]
    Fields and individuals: From Bourdieu to Lahire and back again
    May 20, 2020 · Bernard Lahire's critique of Pierre Bourdieu's sociology aims to establish a 'dispositionalist-contextualist' vision of human agency capable of fully ...
  86. [86]
    (PDF) ”Practice theory”: A critique - ResearchGate
    Feb 14, 2018 · The aim of this chapter is to subject this body of theory to critical scrutiny. In so doing, the argument draws on Wittgenstein's analysis of normative ...
  87. [87]
    “Practice Theory”: A Critique | Socio-Informatics - Oxford Academic
    The aim of this chapter is to subject this body of theory to critical scrutiny. In so doing, the argument draws on Wittgenstein's analysis of normative ...
  88. [88]
    Social Practices as Biological Niche Construction, Rouse
    Social Practices and Biological Niche Construction shows how the characteristic plasticity, plurality, and critical contestation of human ways of life can best ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  89. [89]
  90. [90]
    Culture, choice, necessity: A political critique of Bourdieu's aesthetic
    This paper takes Bourdieu's account of the working-class choice of the necessary as a strategic route into a set of theoretical and methodological shortcomings.
  91. [91]
    Policy implementation as practice? Using social practice theory to ...
    Policy implementation as practice? Using social practice theory to examine multi-level governance efforts to decarbonise transport in the United Kingdom.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  92. [92]
    How Do Unsustainable Practices Remain Dominant ... - Sage Journals
    Jul 16, 2023 · Hargreaves T (2011) Practice-ing behavior change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer ...
  93. [93]
    A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency
    This article presents a relational criticism of the “morphogenetic theory” of M. Archer. This theory is founded and representative of the most influential ...
  94. [94]
    Behavioural economics vs social practice theory: Perspectives from ...
    Shove's deliberately provocative writings have led to much debate on the interaction between social theory and policy, including an exchange which became ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  95. [95]
    Changes in social norms during the early stages of the COVID-19 ...
    Feb 16, 2024 · We find evidence that, after the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, hand washing norms increased while tightness and punishing frequency slightly decreased.
  96. [96]
    Altered place engagement since COVID-19: A multi-method study of ...
    The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted community participation. Older adults decreased their engagement with arts, culture, and recreation amenities.
  97. [97]
    US trends in social isolation, social engagement, and ... - NIH
    Dec 25, 2022 · This study finds that, nationally, social isolation increased, social engagement with family, friends, and 'others' (roommates, neighbors, acquaintances, ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  98. [98]
    Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview - DataReportal
    Jan 30, 2020 · More than 4.5 billion people are using the internet at the start of 2020, while social media users have passed the 3.8 billion mark.
  99. [99]
    2025 Digital Media Trends | Deloitte Insights
    Mar 25, 2025 · Hyperscale social video platforms are shaping digital media trends, challenging traditional media and redefining content consumption.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  100. [100]
    Knock the rust off your social skills after pandemic setbacks | BCM
    Nov 13, 2023 · For some people, the pandemic may have permanently changed some personal interactions, such as those who shifted to fully remote or hybrid work.
  101. [101]
    Social Media Trends: Who Engages the Most Globally? - Adobe
    Digital engagement around the world · Boredom (53%) · FOMO, aka fear of missing out (22%) · Loneliness (14%) · Restlessness (13%).
  102. [102]
    From locked-down to locked-in? COVID-induced social practice ...
    We apply a practice-based approach to a quantitative study of COVID-driven practice changes in the domains of food, material consumption, housing, and mobility.
  103. [103]
    8 sustainability trends to watch out for in 2020 - IMD Business School
    This year will see the emergence of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) – the use of digital technologies to promote ethical and sustainable business ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  104. [104]
    [PDF] The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020
    The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was launched in. 2015 to end poverty and set the world on a path of peace, prosperity.
  105. [105]
    New Methodological Trends in Sociology: An Assessment of Recent ...
    May 17, 2025 · Purpose: This study examines recent methodological trends in sociology, focusing on the increasing role of digitalization, computational methods ...
  106. [106]
    The Journal of Practice Theory - Lancaster University
    Mar 1, 2025 · The Journal of Practice Theory invites contributions for a special section on Practice Theory and Power: Politics, Conflict, Transformation.
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Simulating Human Routines Integrating Social Practice Theory in ...
    Simulating Human Routines: Integrating Social Practice Theory in Agent-Based ... Wiley Interdisciplinary. Reviews: Climate Change, 6(1):113–128, 11 2015. ISSN ...
  108. [108]
    Studying social networks in the age of computational social science
    Dec 19, 2023 · CSS involves a multidisciplinary effort with “the development and application of computational methods to complex, typically large-scale, human ...
  109. [109]
    Digital transformation and social change: Leadership strategies for ...
    This study explores the experiences of managers from innovative start-ups in Italy, focusing on their strategies for responsible innovation.
  110. [110]
    Behavioural economics vs social practice theory: Perspectives from ...
    Beyond behaviour change: practical applications of social practice theory in behaviour change programmes. Y. Strengers, C. Maller (Eds.), Soc. Pract. Interv ...<|separator|>
  111. [111]
    The brain, self and society: a social-neuroscience model of ...
    This paper presents a hypothesis about how social interactions shape and influence predictive processing in the brain.
  112. [112]
    [PDF] Towards a Better Understanding of Social Acceptability - arXiv
    Diagramming Social Practice Theory: An Interdisciplinary. Experiment Exploring Practices As Networks. Indoor and Built Environment 24,. 7 (2015), 950–969 ...