Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Environmental change

Environmental change refers to the dynamic alterations in Earth's physical, chemical, and biological systems, including shifts in climate patterns, ecosystem structures, biogeochemical cycles, and land configurations, driven by both natural forcings such as volcanic activity, solar irradiance variations, and orbital mechanics, as well as anthropogenic factors like habitat conversion and greenhouse gas emissions.^[1]^[2] Over geological timescales, these transformations have manifested in major events like the Pleistocene glacial-interglacial cycles, during which global temperatures fluctuated by 4–7°C over tens of thousands of years, accompanied by sea-level changes exceeding 100 meters.^[3] In the modern era, empirical observations document a global temperature rise of approximately 1.1°C since the late 19th century, alongside accelerated land-use changes that have reduced natural habitats by about 75% in some biomes since the Industrial Revolution.^[3] Land and sea use modifications remain the predominant direct drivers of recent biodiversity declines, surpassing climate-related impacts in many assessments.^[4] A core controversy in environmental change research concerns the relative contributions of natural versus human influences, with data indicating that natural sources account for roughly 45% of total greenhouse gas emissions by mass, challenging narratives of overwhelming anthropogenic dominance.^[5] While peer-reviewed reconstructions confirm unprecedented rates of certain changes—such as atmospheric CO₂ increase—relative to the Holocene epoch, historical geological records reveal larger-magnitude swings, like Phanerozoic temperature variations spanning 25°C, underscoring the planet's inherent variability.^[6] Attribution studies, often reliant on climate models, face scrutiny for potential overestimation of human-induced extremes due to assumptions about baseline variability and incomplete accounting of natural forcings like solar cycles or ocean oscillations.^[7] These debates highlight systemic challenges in source credibility, as institutional emphases in academia and funding bodies may prioritize anthropogenic explanations, potentially sidelining empirical discrepancies between modeled projections and satellite-observed trends. Notable achievements include advances in paleoclimate proxies, such as ice-core and sediment analyses, which provide robust baselines for gauging contemporary shifts, though policy responses remain contested amid uncertainties in long-term forecasts.^[8]

Definition and Scope

Core Definition

Environmental change refers to significant alterations in the physical, chemical, and biological components of Earth's ecosystems and planetary systems, driven by natural processes or human activities. These alterations include shifts in climate patterns, biodiversity composition, soil and water quality, atmospheric gas concentrations, and land cover, occurring across timescales from decades to millennia and spatial scales from local habitats to global biomes.^[9]^[10] At its core, environmental change manifests through measurable indicators such as rising global temperatures, documented at an average rate of 0.2°C per decade since 1980 based on surface station data; declining species populations, with the IUCN Red List reporting over 44,000 species threatened as of 2024; and transformations in land use, where approximately 75% of ice-free land surface has been significantly altered by human actions since the 1500s. Natural precedents include orbital forcings like Milankovitch cycles, which have driven ice age cycles over 100,000-year periods, while contemporary changes show amplified rates exceeding paleoclimate baselines in proxy records from ice cores and sediment layers.^[3]^[11] Distinguishing environmental change from transient weather variability requires empirical attribution, often via modeling and observational datasets like those from NOAA's Global Historical Climatology Network, which integrate satellite, buoy, and proxy evidence to quantify deviations from pre-industrial baselines. This framework underscores causal realism, prioritizing verifiable mechanisms—such as radiative forcing from greenhouse gases or ecological feedbacks—over unsubstantiated narratives, with peer-reviewed syntheses confirming that while natural variability persists, post-1950 accelerations align with anthropogenic emissions exceeding 2,500 gigatons of CO2 equivalent since 1850.^[12]^[13]

Types and Scales

Environmental changes are broadly classified into abiotic and biotic types, with abiotic encompassing alterations to physical and chemical components of the Earth system, such as shifts in atmospheric composition (e.g., rising CO₂ levels from 280 ppm pre-industrial to 421 ppm in 2023), temperature anomalies, precipitation variability, and hydrological modifications like sea-level rise averaging 3.7 mm per year since 2006. Biotic types involve transformations in living systems, including species range shifts (e.g., poleward migrations averaging 17.2 km per decade for terrestrial species), population declines, and ecosystem restructuring, often driven by interactions with abiotic factors. These categories overlap, as seen in ocean acidification reducing aragonite saturation states by 0.002 per year since the 1980s, impacting calcifying organisms.^[14]^[15] Spatial scales of environmental change range from microhabitats (e.g., topography influencing local temperature variations by up to 10°C over meters) to global extents (e.g., planetary warming of 1.1°C since pre-industrial times affecting biome distributions). Local scales include urban heat islands elevating temperatures by 1-3°C in cities compared to rural areas, while regional scales manifest in phenomena like the Sahel's greening from 1982-2015 due to increased vegetation cover spanning millions of square kilometers. Global scales involve synchronous changes, such as stratospheric ozone depletion peaking at 3-6% per decade in the 1980s before recovery under the Montreal Protocol. Scale mismatches, where local observations fail to capture regional feedbacks, complicate predictions, as experimental plots (often <10 m²) underestimate landscape-level responses.^[16]^[17]^[15] Temporal scales span diurnal fluctuations (e.g., daily temperature swings influencing pollinator activity) to millennial cycles (e.g., glacial-interglacial transitions shifting ecosystems over 10,000 years). Short-term scales include interannual events like El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phases, which alter global precipitation by 10-20% and vegetation productivity, while decadal to centennial scales capture anthropogenic trends, such as a 0.2°C per decade warming rate since 1970. Long-term scales reveal geological precedents, like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (55 million years ago) with 5-8°C warming over 20,000 years, but current rates exceed these by factors of 10 or more. Understanding requires integrating data across scales, as nonlinear responses (e.g., tipping points in permafrost thaw releasing 1.5 Gt carbon annually by 2100 under high-emission scenarios) emerge differently at varying durations.^[17]^[18]^[15]

Historical Context

Geological Perspective

From a geological perspective, environmental change encompasses the profound transformations in Earth's climate, ocean chemistry, and landforms over its approximately 4.54 billion-year history, primarily driven by endogenous processes such as plate tectonics and atmospheric composition shifts.^[19] These changes have included alternations between extreme "hothouse" states with minimal polar ice and global temperatures 8–15°C above modern averages, and "icehouse" regimes featuring widespread glaciations, as evidenced by tillites and dropstones in Precambrian and Paleozoic strata.^[20]^[21] Over the Phanerozoic Eon (541 million years ago to present), mean surface temperatures have varied between 11°C and 36°C, with Mesozoic greenhouse conditions supporting reef-building in high latitudes and no permanent ice sheets, punctuated by brief hyperthermals like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) around 56 million years ago.^[6] The PETM involved a 5–8°C global warming over 10,000–20,000 years, linked to rapid carbon injections exceeding 3,000 gigatons of CO2 equivalent, possibly from North Atlantic volcanism or hydrate destabilization, resulting in benthic foraminiferal extinctions and latitudinal species migrations but limited terrestrial impacts.^[22]^[23] In contrast, the late Paleozoic ice age (330–260 million years ago) coincided with Pangea assembly, low CO2 from extensive carbon burial in coal swamps, and equatorial glaciation evidenced by Gondwanan glacial deposits.^[24] The Cenozoic Era (66 million years ago to present) marked a transition from Paleogene warmth to Neogene–Quaternary cooling, with Antarctic glaciation initiating ~34 million years ago due to Drake Passage opening, which reconfigured ocean circulation, and declining CO2 levels from intensified silicate weathering amid tectonic uplifts like the Himalayas.^[25] This cooling, averaging 4–5°C over millions of years, fostered bipolar ice sheets and amplified orbital-driven Pleistocene cycles, as recorded in deep-sea oxygen isotope records showing δ¹⁸O shifts indicative of ice volume growth.^[26]^[27] Key drivers operate on multimillion-year scales: plate tectonics regulates long-term CO2 via arc volcanism and subduction recycling, with supercontinent cycles (~300–500 million-year periodicity) enhancing weathering during assembly (cooling via CO2 drawdown) and promoting volcanism during breakup (warming via greenhouse gas release).^[28]^[29] Large igneous provinces, such as the Siberian Traps ~252 million years ago, released volatiles triggering end-Permian warming and ocean anoxia.^[30] Solar luminosity increases (~30% since formation) and geomagnetic reversals play secondary roles, but geological data affirm CO2 as the dominant greenhouse control, with concentrations historically ranging from <200 ppm during ice ages to >4,000 ppm in hothouses.^[30]^[31] Proxy evidence—sedimentary facies, fossil assemblages (e.g., tropical flora in Arctic sediments during Eocene), and geochemical indicators like boron isotopes for pCO2 or magnesium/calcium ratios for seawater temperature—substantiates these dynamics, revealing environmental shifts orders of magnitude larger than Holocene variability, often tied to biodiversity crises or radiations without human mediation.^[32]^[33] Such records highlight the resilience and volatility of Earth's systems to natural forcings, informing assessments of attribution in contemporary contexts.^[30]

Pre-20th Century Changes

The Holocene epoch, commencing around 11,700 years ago at the end of the Pleistocene glaciation, exhibited marked climate variability driven by natural forcings including Milankovitch orbital cycles, solar irradiance fluctuations, and volcanic aerosol injections. Proxy records from ice cores, lake sediments, and pollen analyses indicate an early Holocene thermal maximum between approximately 9,000 and 5,000 years before present, with Northern Hemisphere temperatures 1–2°C warmer than the late 20th-century baseline in many mid-latitude regions, accompanied by expanded monsoon activity and higher sea levels up to 2–3 meters above present. This period facilitated the spread of broadleaf forests into higher latitudes and supported early human agricultural expansions, though aridity intensified in parts of the subtropics.^[34]^[35] Subsequent cooling trends through the mid-Holocene, punctuated by Bond events—abrupt cold snaps every 1,500 years linked to North Atlantic ocean circulation disruptions—culminated in neoglacial advances around 4,000–3,000 years ago, with alpine glaciers expanding and contributing to megadroughts in the Mediterranean and Americas that influenced ancient civilizations such as the Maya and Akkadians. Tree-ring and speleothem data reconstruct these shifts as regionally coherent but varying in intensity, with solar minima and freshwater pulses into the Atlantic as primary causal mechanisms rather than uniform global drivers. By the late Holocene, environmental changes manifested in shifted biomes, such as the retreat of savannas in Africa and increased dust deposition in ocean sediments signaling drier conditions in source regions.^[36]^[37] In the Common Era, the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), spanning roughly 950–1250 CE, featured elevated temperatures across the North Atlantic and parts of Eurasia, with proxy reconstructions from tree rings and corals indicating summer maxima 0.5–1°C above the subsequent Little Ice Age average in Scandinavia and the British Isles, enabling Viking settlements in Greenland and expanded viticulture in England. This warmth, while not synchronous globally—southern Hemisphere records show muted or opposing trends—was attributed to heightened solar activity and reduced volcanism, distinct from modern anthropogenic forcing patterns.^[38]^[39] The Little Ice Age (LIA), from approximately 1300–1850 CE, represented the coldest interval of the last 1,000 years in the Northern Hemisphere, with multi-decadal temperature drops of 0.6–1°C relative to the MWP, evidenced by widespread glacier advances in the European Alps (e.g., the Aletsch Glacier doubling in length), frozen harbors in the Netherlands, and Thames River fairs documented in historical accounts. Instrumental records from the 17th–19th centuries, corroborated by dendrochronology and ice-core oxygen isotopes, confirm harsher winters, reduced growing seasons, and crop failures leading to famines, such as the 1690s European crisis. Causal factors included low solar output during the Spörer (1460–1550 CE) and Maunder (1645–1715 CE) minima, elevated volcanic eruptions (e.g., Huaynaputina in 1600 CE injecting sulfates into the stratosphere), and Atlantic meridional overturning circulation slowdowns triggered by Arctic ice export surges around 1300 CE. These natural variabilities underscore the LIA's termination around 1850 as a rebound from compounded forcings, preceding 20th-century anthropogenic influences.^[40]^[41]^[42]

20th-21st Century Observations

Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, measured continuously at the Mauna Loa Observatory since 1958, increased from an annual average of approximately 315 parts per million (ppm) to 424.61 ppm by 2024, with the longest direct record showing a consistent upward trend driven primarily by fossil fuel emissions and land use changes.^[43] This rise exhibits a seasonal cycle superimposed on the long-term increase, with annual growth rates accelerating in recent decades, reaching 3.36 ppm in 2023.^[43] Global surface air temperature anomalies, reconstructed from weather stations, ships, and buoys, show an overall warming of about 1.1°C from the late 19th century to 2023 relative to the 1951-1980 baseline, with the 20th century featuring periods of warming (early 1900s and post-1970s) interspersed with mid-century cooling.^[44] NASA's GISTEMP dataset indicates 2023 as the warmest year on record at +1.18°C above the 20th-century average, though adjustments for urban heat islands and data homogenization in surface records remain points of methodological debate among researchers.^[44] Satellite microwave sounding unit (MSU) records from the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH), measuring lower tropospheric temperatures since December 1978, report a more modest linear trend of +0.14°C per decade through 2023, less influenced by surface-specific effects like land use changes.^[45] These datasets diverge notably in the tropics and during events like the 1998 and 2016 El Niño peaks, highlighting uncertainties in vertical temperature profile attribution.^[46] Global mean sea level, estimated from tide gauge records and satellite altimetry, rose by approximately 16-21 cm over the 20th century at an average rate of 1.5-1.9 mm per year, with acceleration to 3.7 mm per year over the satellite era (1993-2023).^[47] ^[48] Tide gauge reconstructions suggest non-linear changes, including a slowdown in the early 20th century followed by faster rise post-1920, influenced by ocean thermal expansion and land ice melt, though regional variability (e.g., subsidence in some areas) complicates global attribution.^[49] Satellite data from TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason missions confirm the recent rate but indicate spatial heterogeneity, with faster rises in the western Pacific and slower in the eastern basins due to gravitational and steric effects.^[50] Arctic sea ice extent, monitored via passive microwave satellite imagery since 1979 by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), has declined markedly in summer minima, from an average of about 7 million km² in the 1980s to 4.23 million km² in September 2023, representing a 12.5% per decade reduction relative to the 1981-2010 mean.^[51] This trend includes record lows in 2007, 2012, and 2020, though 2023 ranked sixth lowest, with multiyear ice fractions also diminishing; natural oscillations like the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation contribute to variability alongside thermodynamic forcing.^[52] Antarctic sea ice shows less consistent decline, with extents fluctuating and occasionally exceeding averages in the 2010s before recent drops.^[52] Glacier mass balance observations worldwide, compiled from frontal position changes and mass budget measurements since the late 19th century, document widespread retreat, with cumulative length losses exceeding 15 km for many alpine glaciers by 2020.^[53] In Greenland, peripheral glacier retreat rates doubled from the 20th to 21st century, accelerating to over 200 m per year in some sectors by 2020, linked to rising air temperatures and reduced snowfall accumulation.^[54] Global glacier volume has decreased by an estimated 20-30% since 1900, with peer-reviewed inventories confirming non-uniform responses: tropical and mid-latitude glaciers retreating fastest, while some high-elevation or maritime glaciers exhibit stability or advance due to increased precipitation.^[55] These changes reflect a combination of warming-induced ablation exceeding accumulation, though historical data pre-1940s indicate earlier retreats possibly tied to natural recovery from the Little Ice Age.^[53]

Causes of Change

Natural Drivers

Natural drivers of environmental change encompass variations in solar radiation, volcanic eruptions, Earth's orbital parameters, and internal oscillations within the climate system, which have influenced global temperatures, precipitation patterns, and ecosystems over diverse timescales. These factors operate independently of human activities and have produced measurable shifts in Earth's climate throughout geological history, often dominating long-term variability.^[56] Solar variability arises from fluctuations in total solar irradiance, primarily through the 11-year sunspot cycle, with changes of less than 0.1% in energy output reaching Earth. These variations can modestly affect global temperatures, as evidenced by satellite measurements since the 1970s showing no net increase in solar energy despite rising surface temperatures. Historically, the Maunder Minimum (1645–1715), a period of reduced sunspot activity, correlated with cooling of up to 0.3°C in parts of Europe, though volcanic and oceanic influences contributed significantly.^[57] Volcanic eruptions drive short-term cooling by injecting sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, where it forms reflective aerosols that reduce incoming solar radiation by 1–2% for 1–3 years. The 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption caused a global temperature drop of approximately 0.5°C, while the 1815 Tambora eruption led to the "year without summer" in 1816, with widespread crop failures and temperature anomalies of –1°C to –3°C in the Northern Hemisphere. Over longer periods, volcanic CO2 emissions contribute negligibly to greenhouse forcing, totaling less than 1% of annual human outputs.^[58] Milankovitch cycles, arising from periodic changes in Earth's orbit and axial tilt, alter the distribution and intensity of solar insolation on millennial scales. These include eccentricity (cycle ~100,000 years, varying orbital shape), obliquity (cycle ~41,000 years, axial tilt from 22.1° to 24.5°), and precession (cycle ~23,000 years, wobbling axis affecting seasonal contrasts). Such variations have paced glacial-interglacial transitions, with ice ages recurring every 41,000–100,000 years by modulating high-latitude summer insolation by up to 10%; currently, orbital forcing points toward a gradual cooling trend over thousands of years.^[59] Internal climate oscillations, such as the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO, 2–7 year cycle), Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO, 20–30 years), and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO, 60–80 years), redistribute heat via ocean-atmosphere interactions, producing transient global temperature anomalies of ±0.1–0.2°C without net long-term forcing. ENSO events, for instance, warm the tropical Pacific during El Niño phases, enhancing precipitation in the Americas while inducing droughts in Australia and Indonesia, as seen in the 1997–1998 event that disrupted global fisheries. PDO and AMO phases similarly modulate regional precipitation and North American temperatures, with the PDO's positive phase (1977–1999) linked to warmer Northeast Pacific waters. These modes explain decadal-scale variability but average to zero over centuries.^[60]

Anthropogenic Factors

Human activities, particularly the combustion of fossil fuels for energy and transportation, have led to a substantial increase in atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO₂), the primary anthropogenic greenhouse gas. Pre-industrial CO₂ levels, reconstructed from ice core data, averaged approximately 280 parts per million (ppm), but direct measurements from the Mauna Loa Observatory since 1958 show a rise to 421 ppm by 2024, with an annual growth rate of 3.75 ppm in that year alone.^[43] This escalation correlates directly with cumulative anthropogenic emissions, which grew from near zero in 1750 to about 36 billion metric tons of CO₂ in 2022, predominantly from coal (44%), oil (32%), and natural gas (22%) combustion.^[61] ^[62] Attribution studies, incorporating isotopic analysis of atmospheric CO₂ (depleted in ¹³C due to fossil fuel origins), confirm that over 100% of the observed post-1950 warming cannot be explained by natural variability alone, with models excluding solar or volcanic forcings reproducing observed trends only when anthropogenic emissions are included.^[63] Land-use changes, including deforestation and agricultural expansion, contribute roughly 10-15% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions through CO₂ release from biomass and soil carbon stocks, while also reducing terrestrial carbon sinks. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reports a global deforestation rate of approximately 10.9 million hectares per year over the past decade (2015-2025), down from 16 million hectares annually in the 1990s, with primary drivers being commercial agriculture (e.g., soy and palm oil plantations) and logging in tropical regions like the Amazon and Southeast Asia.^[64] ^[65] These activities not only emit stored carbon—equivalent to about 1.5 billion tons of CO₂ annually—but also diminish forest albedo and evapotranspiration, amplifying local warming and altering regional hydrology.^[66] Agriculture and industrial processes further exacerbate environmental change via non-CO₂ gases like methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O), which have radiative forcings 28-34 times and 265-298 times greater than CO₂ per unit mass over 100 years, respectively. Methane emissions, at 17.9% of total anthropogenic greenhouse gases in 2024, stem largely from livestock enteric fermentation (32% of CH₄) and rice cultivation, while N₂O (4% of total) arises from fertilizer use and manure management.^[67] Industrial sectors, including cement production and chemical manufacturing, account for 25% of global CO₂ emissions through process reactions and energy use, with additional effects from aerosols and persistent pollutants like black carbon that deposit on ice surfaces, accelerating melt.^[68] While attribution debates persist regarding exact partitioning of forcings—due to model sensitivities to cloud feedbacks and historical data gaps—empirical fingerprints, such as stratospheric cooling and tropospheric warming patterns, align predominantly with anthropogenic rather than natural drivers.^[69]

Causal Interactions and Attribution Debates

Detection and attribution studies in climate science employ statistical methods, such as optimal fingerprinting, to distinguish observed environmental changes from internal variability and to apportion causes to specific forcings like greenhouse gases (GHGs), aerosols, solar irradiance, and volcanic activity.^[69] These approaches compare observed data against model simulations with and without external forcings, estimating the scaling factors for fingerprints of each driver to match reality within uncertainty bounds.^[70] For instance, multi-model ensembles reveal that anthropogenic forcings explain the majority of global mean surface temperature rise since 1950, with best estimates attributing over 100% of the warming to human activities, implying a slight natural cooling offset.^[71] Causal interactions between natural and anthropogenic drivers complicate attribution, as internal variability—such as El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycles or Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV)—can amplify or dampen forced trends on decadal scales.^[72] Volcanic eruptions, for example, inject sulfate aerosols that temporarily cool the planet, masking GHG warming, while solar minima like the Maunder Minimum historically contributed to cooler periods but show minimal influence on 20th-21st century trends, with total solar irradiance varying by less than 0.1% over recent decades.^[73] In extreme events, such as the 2023 global heat anomalies, anthropogenic warming provided a higher baseline, but positive ENSO phases superimposed variability to push temperatures beyond expectations, illustrating non-linear synergies where natural fluctuations intensify human-induced shifts.^[72] Attribution debates center on uncertainties in modeling internal variability and forcing responses, with critiques arguing that global climate models often underestimate natural oscillations at regional and decadal scales, potentially inflating anthropogenic signals.^[73] Peer-reviewed assessments quantify these uncertainties, finding that expert judgments place a 5-95% confidence interval on anthropogenic contributions to 20th-century warming at 50-90%, reflecting gaps in simulating multidecadal patterns like Pacific Decadal Variability (PDV), which contributed around 15-30% to observed global mean surface air temperature changes from 1880-2017 alongside 70% from GHGs.^[74]^[71] Some analyses question the robustness of event attribution for extremes, noting methodological assumptions—like perfect model physics—may overstate human influence, as evidenced by discrepancies between simulated and observed variability in coupled human-natural systems.^[7]^[75] These debates underscore ongoing challenges in causal realism, where empirical proxies and instrumental records indicate that while anthropogenic GHGs dominate long-term trends (e.g., radiative forcing from CO2 rising 2.16 W/m² since pre-industrial times), unresolved interactions with orbital forcings or cloud feedbacks could alter attribution fractions by 10-20% in future assessments.^[76] High-quality syntheses emphasize that attribution confidence increases with multi-fingerprint approaches but remains limited by data sparsity in pre-1900 records and model tuning biases, prompting calls for improved paleoclimate integrations to better isolate drivers.^[77]^[78]

Evidence and Measurement

Empirical Observational Data

Global surface air temperature measurements, derived from land stations, ship and buoy observations, indicate a warming trend since the late 19th century. According to NASA's GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP v4), the global mean temperature anomaly for 2024 relative to the 1951-1980 baseline reached 1.28°C, marking it as the warmest year in the instrumental record.^[79] NOAA's GlobalTemp dataset corroborates this, showing annual anomalies computed from merged land and ocean data, with recent decades exhibiting the highest values.^[80] Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, measured continuously at the Mauna Loa Observatory since 1958, have risen from approximately 315 ppm to an annual average of 424.61 ppm in 2024.^[43] Monthly peaks, such as the May 2024 value near 427 ppm, reflect seasonal cycles superimposed on the long-term upward trajectory driven by emissions and reduced sinks.^[81] These direct spectroscopic measurements provide the longest unbroken record of a key greenhouse gas.^[82] Satellite altimetry and tide gauge records show global mean sea level has risen by 21-24 cm since 1880, with acceleration in recent decades.^[83] NASA's analysis of 2024 data indicates a yearly rise rate of 0.59 cm, exceeding the prior multi-year average of 0.43 cm due to thermal expansion and land ice melt contributions.^[84] Since 1993, cumulative rise totals about 9.1 cm, as tracked by TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-series missions.^[85] Arctic sea ice extent, monitored via passive microwave satellite imagery by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), reached a minimum of 4.60 million km² on September 10, 2025, ranking among the ten lowest in the 1979-2025 record.^[86] September minima have declined at 12.2% per decade relative to 1981-2010 averages, with multi-year ice fractions diminishing.^[87] Ocean heat content in the upper 2000 meters, quantified using Argo float profiles and ship-based measurements, has increased steadily since 1955, absorbing over 90% of excess Earth system heat.^[88] NOAA's quarterly updates show positive anomalies persisting through 2024, with the uppermost layers (0-700 m) warming fastest, as evidenced by temperature and salinity profiles from the global Argo array.^[89] Glacier mass balance observations from the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS), based on stake networks at reference glaciers worldwide, report cumulatively negative balances exceeding -27 meters water equivalent through 2024.^[90] The 2023-2024 period saw exceptional losses, with global averages continuing a multi-decade retreat trend documented since the 1980s.^[91]

Proxy Records and Modeling

Proxy records serve as indirect indicators of past environmental conditions, derived from natural archives such as ice cores, tree rings, lake sediments, corals, and marine foraminifera. These proxies capture signals like oxygen isotope ratios (δ¹⁸O) in ice cores, which correlate with temperature through fractionation effects, or tree-ring widths influenced by growth-season temperatures.^[92] Geochemical proxies, including Mg/Ca ratios in foraminifera shells and alkenone unsaturation indices in sediments, provide estimates of sea-surface temperatures, while ecological proxies like pollen assemblages reflect vegetation shifts tied to climate.^[92] Such records extend beyond direct instrumental measurements, offering data back thousands of years; for instance, Antarctic ice cores like Vostok reveal CO₂ levels fluctuating between 180 and 300 ppm over glacial-interglacial cycles spanning 800,000 years. Comprehensive databases compile these proxies for global-scale analysis. The Holocene paleotemperature database includes 1,319 records from 679 sites across continents and oceans, encompassing ecological, geochemical, and biophysical types from both terrestrial and marine sources.^[92] Similarly, the NOAA Temperature 12k Database aggregates quality-controlled proxy records spanning 12,000 years, enabling reconstructions of Holocene temperature variability that indicate multi-decadal to millennial fluctuations, such as warmer intervals during the early Holocene thermal maximum around 8,000–6,000 years before present in many Northern Hemisphere regions.^[93] These compilations highlight uneven geographical coverage, with denser sampling in North America and Europe (51% of sites between 60°–30°N) and sparser data in tropical Africa and open oceans, influencing the robustness of hemispheric averages.^[92] Despite their value, proxy records face inherent limitations in reconstructing past temperatures. Proxies often respond to multiple environmental factors beyond temperature, such as precipitation or seasonality, introducing noise and requiring calibration against instrumental data, which can bias results outside calibration periods.^[94] Spatial sparseness and clustering (e.g., few oceanic or interior continental sites) lead to extrapolation errors, while chronological uncertainties from dating methods like radiocarbon can exceed 50 years in sediments, smoothing low-frequency variability.^[94] Reconstruction methods, such as principal component regression, typically underestimate amplitude by 20–50% for low-frequency changes due to signal-to-noise ratios around 0.4 and temporal autocorrelation reducing effective sample sizes.^[94] Climate models integrate proxy data for hindcasting past conditions and validating simulations. General circulation models (GCMs) like those in the CMIP ensemble simulate paleoclimates by inputting reconstructed forcings (e.g., orbital changes, volcanism) and comparing outputs to proxy-inferred temperatures, as in Last Glacial Maximum simulations where proxies indicate 4.6–6.8°C global cooling.^[95] This process tests model physics, such as polar amplification, but reveals discrepancies; for example, models like CESM2 overestimate cooling at the Last Glacial Maximum and underestimate warmth in proxy records from the Miocene and Eocene in regions like the Southern Ocean.^[95] Hindcast performance against observations highlights modeling uncertainties. CMIP5 models projected surface air temperatures warming 16% faster than observed since 1970, attributable partly to overestimated CO₂ trends, underestimated aerosol cooling, and unaccounted natural variability like Pacific Decadal Oscillation phases.^[96] Proxy-based out-of-sample tests, such as constraining equilibrium climate sensitivity using glacial proxies, reduce model spread (e.g., from >5°C to ~4°C in CESM2), underscoring the need for paleodata to mitigate overfitting to recent observations.^[95] Overall, while proxies and models together inform long-term change attribution, persistent gaps in variability capture and regional biases necessitate cautious interpretation of projections.^[94]

Impacts and Effects

Climatic and Weather Patterns

Global average surface temperature has increased by approximately 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1.1°C) since reliable records began in 1850, with the 2014-2023 decade being the warmest on record and 2024 confirmed as the single warmest year.^[97]^[98] This warming exhibits regional disparities, with land areas and the Arctic experiencing faster rises than oceans, contributing to amplified seasonal temperature variability in mid-to-high latitudes.^[99] Since 1950, the frequency and intensity of heat extremes have risen, as documented in surface observations, with human-induced greenhouse gas emissions identified as the primary driver in attribution studies.^[100] Precipitation patterns have shifted, with empirical data showing increases in annual totals over high-latitude land areas and the wet tropics, while subtropical regions like the Mediterranean and southern Africa have seen declines since the mid-20th century.^[101] The proportion of precipitation falling in heavy events (top 1% of daily totals) has grown by about 7-12% over land areas in the 20th century, leading to more intense rainstorms and reduced moderate precipitation days.^[102] These changes align with thermodynamic principles where warmer air holds more moisture, increasing atmospheric water vapor by roughly 7% per 1°C of warming under the Clausius-Clapeyron relation, though regional dynamics like circulation shifts modulate outcomes.^[101] Extreme weather events display mixed trends: U.S. records indicate a rise in billion-dollar disasters from an average of 3.3 per year in the 1980s to 23 in recent years (1980-2024 total of 403 events), driven partly by severe storms, floods, and droughts, though improved detection and exposure growth influence counts.^[103] Tropical cyclone intensity has increased, with a higher proportion reaching Category 4-5 levels since the 1980s, attributable to warmer sea surface temperatures raising potential intensity by 5-10% in observations.^[104] Drought frequency has risen in regions like the southwestern U.S. and southern Europe due to enhanced evaporation outpacing precipitation gains, while no global trend emerges for overall drought extent.^[105] These patterns reflect interactions between mean climate shifts and weather variability, with projections under continued warming anticipating further intensification of wet extremes in monsoon regions and dry extremes in subtropics.^[106]

Ecosystems and Biodiversity

Climate change has driven observable shifts in species distributions, with many terrestrial and marine organisms migrating poleward or to higher elevations in response to warming temperatures. A systematic review of range-shift studies found that 46.60% of documented observations aligned with expected poleward, upslope, or deeper-water movements, though magnitudes varied and not all shifts were unidirectional.^[107] These redistributions alter ecosystem compositions, as evidenced by changes in marine primary production linked to jet stream poleward migration, resulting in a 40% chlorophyll decline in the northwest Mediterranean Sea from 2000 to 2023.^[108] Phenological mismatches, such as earlier spring events in plants and birds, further disrupt trophic interactions, reducing reproductive success in species like European pied flycatchers.^[109] Biodiversity faces elevated extinction risks from these dynamics, particularly in vulnerable habitats. At current global warming of approximately 1.3°C, projections indicate 1.6% of species—equating to around 160,000—are threatened by climate change alone, based on assessments of thermal tolerances and habitat suitability.^[110] Empirical surveys reveal climate-related local extinctions in 47% of 976 assessed plant and animal species across multiple taxa, with hotspots in montane and polar regions.^[111] In the United States, climate change has emerged as the primary driver for species listed under the Endangered Species Act, surpassing habitat loss in recent analyses of imperiled taxa.^[112] However, global extinction rates remain debated, as direct attribution requires isolating climate from co-factors like land-use change, with observed extinctions often involving synergistic stressors.^[113] Marine ecosystems, especially coral reefs, exhibit acute sensitivity, with mass bleaching events eroding biodiversity. From January 2023 to September 2025, bleaching-level heat stress affected 84.4% of global reef area, impacting 82 countries and territories, as tracked by satellite-derived degree heating weeks.^[114] Coral cover declined by 14% worldwide between 2009 and 2018, correlating with at least 63% reductions in associated biodiversity, including fish abundance drops of 60%.^[115]^[116] These losses impair ecosystem services like coastal protection and fisheries support, with thresholds identified at annual bleaching exceeding 7.9% leading to irreversible degradation under moderate emission scenarios.^[117] Terrestrial forests experience dieback episodes tied to drought and heat extremes, reshaping community structures. In drought-prone regions, climate-induced dieback has triggered compositional shifts mimicking natural succession but accelerating toward less diverse states, as observed in long-term monitoring of temperate and boreal stands.^[118] Such events reduce carbon storage capacity, with biodiversity declines potentially causing global losses of 7.44 to 103.14 PgC under varying sustainability scenarios.^[119] Empirical studies link these patterns to compounded stressors, including altered precipitation and pest outbreaks amplified by warming, though recovery varies by species resilience and management interventions.^[120] Overall, these ecosystem alterations underscore cascading effects on biodiversity, where loss of keystone species amplifies vulnerability to further environmental pressures.^[121]

Human Health, Economy, and Society

Empirical analyses of temperature-related mortality reveal that non-optimal temperatures account for approximately 9.4% of global deaths annually, with cold temperatures linked to 8.5% and heat to 0.9%, indicating cold poses a far greater risk.00081-4/fulltext) From 2000 to 2019, global warming contributed to a net decline in excess temperature-related deaths, as reductions in cold-related mortality exceeded increases in heat-related ones.^[122] Heat-related mortality among those over 65 rose by about 85% between 2000–2004 and 2017–2021, though this represents a small fraction of total deaths and is mitigated by air conditioning and behavioral adaptations in many regions.^[123] Projections for future net mortality vary by region and adaptation levels; in colder areas, warmer temperatures may yield net health benefits by curbing cold snaps, while tropical zones face heightened heat risks.^[124] Economic assessments of environmental change impacts yield a range of estimates, reflecting uncertainties in modeling adaptation, technological progress, and regional differentials. Meta-analyses of integrated assessment models project global income losses of 1.4–1.9% under 2.5°C warming, escalating to 4.2–5.2% at 5°C, comparable to impacts from weather variability rather than catastrophic disruption.^[125] U.S. Congressional Budget Office projections indicate a 4% average GDP reduction by 2100 from temperature rises, with a 5% probability of at least 21% loss under high-emission paths, primarily via agriculture, labor productivity, and extreme events.^[126] Some studies estimate committed losses of 19% in global income within 26 years irrespective of emissions, driven by historical warming, though these rely on assumptions about damage functions that may overestimate by neglecting CO2 fertilization effects on crops or sea-level rise benefits in navigation.^[127] Adaptation investments, such as resilient infrastructure, have historically offset much of the projected costs in developed economies. Societal effects, including migration and conflict, show limited direct causation from environmental change, with economic and political factors dominating drivers. Environmental degradation influences migration indirectly by altering livelihoods, such as through reduced agricultural yields, but empirical evidence indicates most movements stem from opportunity-seeking rather than climate alone; for instance, international flows respond more to baseline climate and economic baselines than acute events.^[128] ^[129] Projections of "climate refugees" reaching hundreds of millions by 2050 lack robust support, as adaptation like irrigation and urban planning curtails displacement, and historical data from events like droughts show temporary, localized patterns.^[130] Links to violent conflict exist under specific conditions, such as resource scarcity in fragile states, but meta-reviews find no consistent global causation, with governance and inequality as stronger predictors; substantial evidence attributes only marginal risk increases to climate variability.^[131] Overall, societal resilience through policy and technology has enabled populations to adapt to past changes without systemic upheaval.

Responses and Adaptations

Policy Frameworks and Agreements

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), established in 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, serves as the foundational international treaty for addressing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and climate variability, with 198 parties committing to stabilize atmospheric concentrations at levels preventing dangerous interference with the climate system.^[132] The convention distinguishes between Annex I countries (primarily developed nations) obligated to report emissions and provide financial support, and non-Annex I countries (developing nations) with fewer immediate requirements, reflecting principles of common but differentiated responsibilities.^[132] Annual Conference of the Parties (COP) meetings under the UNFCCC have driven subsequent protocols, though enforcement mechanisms remain limited, relying on voluntary compliance and periodic reviews.^[133] The Kyoto Protocol, adopted in 1997 and entering into force in 2005, introduced binding emission reduction targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European Union, aiming for an average 5% cut below 1990 levels during the 2008–2012 commitment period through mechanisms like emissions trading, clean development, and joint implementation.^[134] Participating developed nations achieved a 22% average annual reduction in the second commitment period (2013–2020) relative to base years, attributed partly to economic shifts such as deindustrialization in Eastern Europe and policy measures.^[135] However, the protocol exempted major developing emitters like China and India, resulting in no net decline in global emissions, which rose 32% from 1990 to 2010 despite ratification by 192 parties.^[136] Critics note its rigid structure failed to incentivize broad participation, with non-ratification by the United States and withdrawals like Canada's in 2011 underscoring implementation challenges.^[136] The Paris Agreement, adopted at COP21 in 2015 and ratified by 195 parties, shifted to nationally determined contributions (NDCs) for all countries, targeting a global temperature rise limit of well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, with efforts to cap it at 1.5°C, alongside goals for emission peaks before 2025 and 43% reductions by 2030 relative to 2010 for 1.5°C pathways.^[137] Unlike Kyoto, it emphasizes universal participation without differentiated legal obligations, incorporating transparency frameworks for biennial reporting and stocktakes, such as the 2023 global stocktake highlighting insufficient progress.^[137] Global energy-related CO2 emissions reached a record 37.8 Gt in 2024, up 0.8% from prior years, with developing economies accounting for 95% of increases over the past decade due to energy demands.^[138] ^[139] Even if current NDCs are met, projections indicate emissions 17% below 2030 baselines but insufficient for Paris goals, prompting calls for enhanced ambition amid debates over economic costs and enforcement gaps.^[140] Regional frameworks, such as the European Union's Emissions Trading System established in 2005, complement these by imposing domestic caps and trade, achieving a 37% reduction in EU emissions from 1990 to 2022, though global impacts remain marginal.^[136]

Technological and Economic Strategies

Technological strategies for addressing environmental change emphasize scalable, low-emission energy sources and carbon management technologies. Nuclear power generates baseload electricity with near-zero operational greenhouse gas emissions, contributing approximately 30% of global low-carbon electricity as of 2022 and avoiding significant CO2 emissions equivalent to the power sector's output.^[141] Its levelized cost of electricity remains competitive with fossil fuels when factoring in low fuel expenses and long plant lifespans exceeding 60 years, though upfront capital costs and regulatory delays pose barriers to expansion.^[142] Modeling indicates nuclear's role in decarbonization hinges on policy support for cost reductions, potentially providing firm power to complement intermittent renewables in net-zero scenarios.^[143] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) enables continued use of fossil fuels in hard-to-abate sectors like cement and steel by capturing up to 90% of CO2 emissions for underground sequestration. As of 2025, 77 CCS facilities operate globally, capturing over 50 million tonnes of CO2 annually, with 47 more under construction amid a pipeline growth driven by policy incentives.^[144] ^[145] Deployment has accelerated, with announced capture capacity for 2030 rising 35% in 2023, though high costs—often exceeding $50 per tonne—and infrastructure needs limit scalability without subsidies.^[146] Empirical assessments show CCS can achieve negative emissions when paired with bioenergy, but real-world projects frequently face delays and cost overruns.^[147] Solar radiation management (SRM), a form of geoengineering, proposes injecting aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and rapidly cool the planet, potentially reducing temperatures more quickly than emissions cuts alone. Climate models suggest moderated SRM could mitigate heat-related mortality and extreme weather risks, with benefits skewed toward hotter regions.^[148] However, risks include stratospheric ozone depletion, altered precipitation patterns disrupting agriculture, and ecosystem disruptions, with termination of SRM potentially causing abrupt warming.^[149] No large-scale deployment exists, and studies underscore the need for governance to avoid unilateral actions exacerbating geopolitical tensions.^[150] Economic strategies center on market-based incentives to internalize emissions costs and spur innovation. Carbon pricing mechanisms, including emissions trading systems (ETS) and taxes, have demonstrated emissions reductions; a meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations found pricing cuts emissions by 5-21% on average, with taxes outperforming ETS due to fewer exemptions.^[151] ^[152] In ETS implementations, a $1 per tonne carbon price increase correlates with 1.69% lower CO2 emissions and modest GDP gains from efficiency shifts.^[153] Effectiveness varies by design: comprehensive coverage and tightening caps enhance reductions, but leakage to uncapped regions and revenue recycling for rebates mitigate economic burdens.^[154] Studies attribute ETS success to fostering low-carbon technology adoption, though global coverage remains below 25% of emissions, limiting aggregate impact.^[155]

Adaptation vs. Mitigation Trade-offs

Mitigation strategies seek to limit the extent of environmental changes, particularly climate warming, by curtailing greenhouse gas emissions through measures such as carbon pricing and renewable energy transitions, with global costs to stabilize temperatures at around 2°C estimated at 1.3% to 2.7% of GDP by 2050.^[156] Adaptation, in contrast, involves reactive and proactive adjustments like sea wall construction, drought-resistant crops, and improved water management to reduce vulnerability to ongoing changes, with annual costs for developing countries projected at $300 billion in the 2020s and funding gaps of $187-359 billion.^[157]^[158] These approaches compete for scarce fiscal resources, as budgets allocated to emission reductions—often front-loaded and internationally coordinated—divert funds from immediate adaptation needs in vulnerable regions, where residual damages persist even under aggressive mitigation.^[159] Economic models highlight trade-offs in resource allocation, where mitigation's long-term damage aversion must be weighed against adaptation's nearer-term resilience gains; for instance, integrated assessments like the FUND model show that optimal policy equates marginal abatement costs with marginal adaptation benefits, but overemphasis on mitigation can crowd out economic growth essential for adaptive capacity.^[160] In developing economies, stringent mitigation targets akin to the Kyoto Protocol could indirectly increase climate-related health burdens, such as a 4% rise in malaria deaths in Africa due to slowed development aid and growth.^[160] Adaptation typically accounts for 7-25% of total projected damages under doubled CO2 scenarios, equating to 0.1-0.5% of GDP, making it less resource-intensive short-term but insufficient alone against escalating risks without mitigation.^[160]^[159] Empirical analyses indicate that while synergies exist—such as green infrastructure serving both goals—genuine trade-offs dominate in practice, particularly for low-income nations prioritizing development over abatement, as $1 per ton of carbon reduced proves less effective at mitigating impacts like hunger than equivalent development investments.^[160] Recent modeling underscores complementary portfolios yielding net benefits, with adaptation addressing committed changes (e.g., 19% income reduction already locked in from past emissions) while mitigation targets avoidable future damages, though uncertain discount rates and regional vulnerabilities complicate universal optima.^[161]^[127] Policymakers thus face decisions balancing these, often favoring mitigation in high-emission advanced economies and adaptation in exposed developing ones, amid critiques that mitigation's high upfront costs (1-3% GDP by 2030 per Stern Review) may undermine global equity if not paired with technology transfers.^[159]

Controversies and Alternative Views

Skepticism on Anthropogenic Dominance

Skeptics of anthropogenic dominance in environmental change, particularly climate variability, contend that natural forcings and internal variability account for a substantial portion of observed 20th and 21st century warming, with human influences overstated due to methodological uncertainties and model limitations.^[162] Climate scientist Judith Curry has testified that natural variability, including multidecadal ocean oscillations like the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), explains much of the warming trend since the mid-20th century, rendering attribution to greenhouse gases less certain than claimed by consensus reports.^[163] These cycles, with periods of 60-80 years, aligned with the post-1970s warming phase following cooler mid-century conditions, suggesting recovery from natural lows rather than solely CO2-driven acceleration.^[164] Satellite-based measurements of lower tropospheric temperatures, such as the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) dataset, record a global warming trend of +0.14°C per decade from 1979 to 2012, and approximately +0.13°C per decade through 2023, which is lower than the +0.16°C per decade in adjusted surface records over the same period.^[165] ^[166] This discrepancy arises because satellites measure bulk atmospheric temperatures less prone to urban heat island effects and station siting biases that inflate surface data, with skeptics like Roy Spencer arguing that unadjusted rural surface stations align more closely with satellite trends.^[167] Moreover, climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) have projected surface warming rates about 16% faster than observed since 1970, indicating over-sensitivity to CO2 forcings and underestimation of negative feedbacks.^[96] Feedback mechanisms, such as Richard Lindzen's proposed "iris effect," posit that increased tropical convection leads to reduced high cirrus cloud cover, enhancing outgoing longwave radiation and thereby limiting warming amplification from water vapor—a negative feedback supported by satellite observations of cloud behavior, though contested in mainstream modeling.^[168] Attribution studies exhibit wide uncertainties, with estimates of transient climate response (the warming from doubled CO2 over decades) ranging from 1.0°C to 4.0°C or more, influenced by assumptions about aerosols, natural forcings, and internal variability that detection-attribution methods struggle to disentangle.^[169] Critics, including Lindzen, note that institutional pressures in academia—where funding and publication favor alarmist narratives—may bias toward higher sensitivity estimates, sidelining empirical evidence for lower values around 1-2°C.^[170] Historical proxy records reveal warm intervals like the Medieval Warm Period (circa 900-1300 CE) and Roman Warm Period (circa 250 BCE-400 CE) with global temperatures comparable to or exceeding late 20th-century levels absent industrial emissions, underscoring the climate system's natural excursions driven by solar variability and ocean dynamics.^[162] Recent analyses of solar total irradiance reconstructions show correlations with temperature anomalies over centuries, with some studies estimating solar contributions to 20th-century warming at 0.1-0.3°C, comparable to anthropogenic fingerprints when uncertainties in cosmic ray-cloud links are considered.^[171] These elements collectively suggest that while human emissions contribute, claims of near-total dominance overlook robust natural drivers, with over-reliance on models tuned to historical data inflating projected risks.^[7]

Criticisms of Alarmism and Policy Responses

Critics of environmental alarmism argue that projections of imminent catastrophe have repeatedly failed to materialize, eroding confidence in alarmist narratives. For instance, around the first Earth Day in 1970, prominent predictions included widespread famines by 1980, the death of the oceans by 1980 due to resource depletion, and an ice age by the mid-1990s, none of which occurred.^[172] Similarly, a 1989 prediction by a senior UN official warned of entire nations wiped off the map by rising seas if global warming was not reversed by 2000, yet observed sea level rise has remained gradual at approximately 3.3 mm per year without such apocalyptic submersion.^[173] These historical misses, documented in compilations of over 50 failed eco-predictions since the 1960s, highlight a pattern where alarmist forecasts overestimate severity to spur action, often prioritizing advocacy over empirical validation.^[173] Empirical data further challenges alarmist claims by showing discrepancies between climate model projections and observations. Over the past 50 years, the observed rate of global warming has been weaker than predicted by nearly all major computerized climate models, with models forecasting up to 2.2 times more warming than recorded from 1998 to 2014.^[174] Independent analyses, such as those by physicist John Christy, reveal that 102 climate models tested against satellite data since 1979 overestimate tropospheric warming by an average of 92% for the tropical belt.^[175] Even accounting for adjustments, surface temperature trends since 1970 have warmed about 16% slower than ensemble model averages, partly due to unmodeled factors like natural variability.^[96] Critics like Roy Spencer attribute this to models' excessive sensitivity to CO2 forcing, leading to inflated equilibrium climate sensitivity estimates that drive alarmist scenarios.^[176] Countervailing benefits of elevated atmospheric CO2 levels undermine narratives of unmitigated harm. Satellite observations from NASA indicate that a quarter to half of Earth's vegetated lands have greened significantly over the last 35 years, with CO2 fertilization explaining 70% of this effect through enhanced photosynthesis and water-use efficiency in plants.^[177] This "global greening" has increased vegetation cover equivalent to twice the size of the continental United States since 1982, contributing to higher crop yields and a partial offset of warming via biophysical cooling effects estimated at -0.018 K per decade.^[178]^[179] Such data, derived from peer-reviewed analyses of MODIS and AVHRR satellite imagery, suggest CO2 acts as a net fertilizer rather than solely a pollutant, a perspective often downplayed in alarmist discourse despite its empirical basis. Policy responses to alleged climate crises, particularly aggressive net-zero emissions targets, face scrutiny for disproportionate economic burdens relative to benefits. Achieving net-zero CO2 emissions in the United States by 2050 would require annual investments in the trillions, with policy costs escalating to approximately $6,700 per worker by 2030 and $8,000 by 2050, according to macroeconomic modeling.^[180] Critics, including economist Bjorn Lomborg, contend that the social cost of carbon—often inflated in alarmist estimates—is closer to $4-7 per ton than the $50+ used to justify policies, rendering interventions like carbon taxes inefficient when adaptation yields higher returns for vulnerable populations.^[181] Multi-model assessments highlight equity issues, as net-zero transitions disproportionately impact lower-income households through higher energy prices, with limited evidence that co-benefits like reduced air pollution fully offset these costs in developing economies.^[182] Proponents of cost-benefit analysis argue that redirecting funds from mitigation to resilience—such as sea walls or agricultural innovation—addresses real risks more effectively than pursuing unattainable zero-emission ideals amid ongoing technological and geopolitical constraints.^[183]

References

[1]
Global environmental change: local perceptions, understandings ...
Sep 28, 2016 · Global environmental change (GEC) is an increasingly discussed phenomenon in the scientific literature as evidence of its presence and ...
[2]
Global Environmental Change: Understanding the Human Dimensions
This book examines what is known about the human dimensions of global environmental change, identifies the major immediate needs for knowledge,
[3]
Evidence - NASA Science
Oct 23, 2024 · There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss
Nov 9, 2022 · We show that land/sea use change has been the dominant direct driver of recent biodiversity loss worldwide.
[5]
Contributions of natural systems and human activity to greenhouse ...
The amounts of natural and anthropogenic GHGs emissions are roughly of the same order of magnitude. Anthropogenic emissions account for approximately 55.46% of ...
[6]
A 485-million-year history of Earth's surface temperature | Science
Sep 20, 2024 · PhanDA indicates that Earth's temperature has varied between 11° and 36°C over the past 485 million years. This range is larger than previous reconstructions.
[7]
Overstating the effects of anthropogenic climate change? A critical ...
Feb 8, 2023 · In this paper, we explore two research questions. First, whether the storyline approach necessarily overstates the effects of anthropogenic ...
[8]
what the geological record tells us about our present and future ...
Dec 28, 2020 · The geological record shows current CO2 levels are high, and the current rate of CO2 change is unprecedented, though the magnitude of recent ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[9]
Global Environmental Change - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Global environmental change refers to alterations in the physical and biogeochemical environment, which can occur naturally or as a result of human activities ...
[10]
Environmental Change Definition - Consensus
Environmental change refers to significant alterations in the environment, which can be driven by both natural processes and human activities.
[11]
Climate change: evidence and causes | Royal Society
Greenhouse gases affect Earth's energy balance and climate · Human activities have added greenhouse gases to the atmosphere · Climate records show a warming trend.Greenhouse Gases Affect... · Human Activities Have Added... · Climate Records Show A...
[12]
Global change ecology: Science to heal a damaged planet - PMC
Dec 11, 2023 · Arguably synonymous with the term global change biology that studies the responses of species to environmental change, global change ecology ...
[13]
Empirical evidence that humans are causing global warming
Direct observations find that CO2 is rising sharply due to human activity. Satellite and surface measurements find less energy is escaping to space at CO2 ...
[14]
[PDF] CLIMATE CHANGE 2023
The IPCC's Climate Change 2023 report summarizes climate change knowledge, impacts, risks, mitigation, and adaptation, integrating the Sixth Assessment Report.
[15]
The spatial and temporal domains of modern ecology - Nature
Apr 2, 2018 · To understand ecological phenomena, it is necessary to observe their behaviour across multiple spatial and temporal scales.
[16]
biophysical mechanisms define scales of climate change impacts
Aug 13, 2019 · The topography of an organism's microhabitat can strongly influence the environmental conditions that it experiences.
[17]
Temporal and Spatial Scaling: An Ecological Perspective - NCBI - NIH
A wide array of investigations aimed at understanding the ecological consequences of climatic changes occurring over different temporal and spatial scales.
[18]
Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis
The novel AR6 WGI Interactive Atlas allows for a flexible spatial and temporal analysis of both data-driven climate change information and assessment findings.IPCC Sixth Assessment Report · Summary for Policymakers · Press · Fact Sheets<|separator|>
[19]
How old is the Earth? | The Planetary Society
The Earth is thought to be about 4.54 billion years old. Along with other planets, the Earth was born in the early days of the Solar System.
[20]
Climate Science Investigations South Florida - Temperature Over Time
Throughout much of Earth's geologic history, the global mean temperature was between 8°C and 15°C warmer than it is today with polar areas free of ice.<|separator|>
[21]
Climate change through time - British Geological Survey
Earth's climate has changed throughout the billions of years of our planet's geological history. Evidence for past climate, including the extreme conditions ...
[22]
Paleocene/Eocene carbon feedbacks triggered by volcanic activity
Aug 31, 2021 · The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) was a period of geologically-rapid carbon release and global warming ~56 million years ago.
[23]
Extreme warming of tropical waters during the Paleocene–Eocene ...
Sep 1, 2014 · The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), ca. 56 Ma, was a major global environmental perturbation attributed to a rapid rise in the ...
[24]
15 Global Climate Change – An Introduction to Geology
Earth's climate has changed over geologic time with periods of major glaciations. There was a high temperature period in the Mesozoic shown by fossils in ...Global Climate Change · Earth's Temperature · Prehistoric Climate Change
[25]
Tectonic forcing of late Cenozoic climate - Nature
Sep 10, 1992 · Global cooling in the Cenozoic, which led to the growth of large continental ice sheets in both hemispheres, may have been caused by the uplift of the Tibetan ...
[26]
Cenozoic Climatic Change and its Cause - SpringerLink
The late Miocene and Pliocene deterioration of climates probably was caused primarily by the increasing altitudes of continents and mountains throughout most of ...
[27]
[PDF] Cenozoic climatic change and its cause
Woeldwtde cooling in middle latitedes appears to be indicated during the past 15 milliom years or yo. As has beta generally inferred, this cooling of ...
[28]
The supercontinent cycle and Earth's long‐term climate - PMC
Earth's long‐term climate has been profoundly influenced by the episodic assembly and breakup of supercontinents at intervals of ca. 500 my<|separator|>
[29]
The Supercontinent Cycle: Patterns and Impacts - GeoExpro
Apr 18, 2021 · Supercontinent breakups and ocean-floor spreading are associated with intense volcanic activities, which emit large quantities of carbon dioxide ...
[30]
[PDF] what the geological record tells us about our present and future ...
Feb 8, 2021 · The geological record provides powerful evidence that atmospheric. CO2 concentrations drive climate change, and supports multiple lines of ...
[31]
[PDF] Climate change: evidence from the geological record
Major volcanic eruptions eject gas and dust high into the atmosphere, causing temporary cooling. Changes in the abundance in the atmosphere of gases such as ...
[32]
Paleoclimate Research | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Paleoclimate data show how past ecosystems responded to a range of climate and environmental changes and provide an overview of their resilience. The resulting ...
[33]
Deep‐Time Paleoclimate Proxies - Macdonald - 2020 - AGU Journals
Sep 11, 2020 · To reconstruct episodes of extreme climate change and evaluate hypothesized geological and biogeochemical drivers, we need to go back much ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[34]
Holocene climate variability - ScienceDirect.com
Most of the climate change events in these globally distributed records are characterized by polar cooling, tropical aridity, and major atmospheric circulation ...
[35]
(PDF) Natural Climate Variability During the Holocene - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The causes of natural climate variation are discussed. Changes of the galactic cosmic ray intensity may play a key role as the causal ...
[36]
Patterns and drivers of Holocene moisture variability in mid-latitude ...
Apr 15, 2025 · Here we present a proxy–modeling synthesis for Holocene climates in the eastern North American mid-latitudes, including machine-learning-based water balance ...
[37]
drivers, rhythms, and spatial patterns of Holocene climate change
The main drivers of Holocene climate change include external forcings (orbital forcing, solar variability, and volcanic activity), internal variability.
[38]
Were medieval warm-season temperatures in Jämtland, central ...
The reconstruction suggests that, on average, the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA, 950–1250 CE) was only slightly warmer than the Little Ice Age (LIA, 1450–1900 ...
[39]
The Medieval Warm Period redux: Where and when was it warm?
900-1300 AD, albeit with important differences regarding the timing and spatial extent. The participants also stressed that a Northern Hemisphere or global mean ...
[40]
Little Ice Age abruptly triggered by intrusion of Atlantic waters into ...
Dec 15, 2021 · There is evidence that this period was caused by increased Arctic sea ice export that led to cooling in the North Atlantic (2, 3).
[41]
(PDF) Little Ice Age - ResearchGate
Proposed causes include volcanic activity and aerosol emissions, changes in solar output and sunspot activity, and changes in ocean currents, ...
[42]
Split westerlies over Europe in the early Little Ice Age - Nature
Aug 20, 2022 · We show that in the early LIA (1470–1610 CE), increased atmospheric ridging over northern Europe split the climatological westerlies away from central and ...
[43]
Trends in CO2 - NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory
Sep 5, 2025 · The graphs show monthly mean carbon dioxide measured at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. The carbon dioxide data on Mauna Loa constitute the longest record of ...Data · Last 1 Year · Last Month · Global
[44]
Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP v4) - NASA
The GISS Surface Temperature Analysis version 4 (GISTEMP v4) is an estimate of global surface temperature change. Graphs and tables are updated about the 10th ...Missing: 20th century
[45]
Global Temperature Report :: The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Map Data Available for 1978 - 2005. QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS REPORT? For web related issues - Jennifer Geary For content - alabama.climate@nsstc.uah.edu. We try ...Missing: 1979-2023 | Show results with:1979-2023
[46]
Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD
Latest Global Average Tropospheric Temperatures. Since 1979, NOAA satellites have been carrying instruments which measure the natural microwave thermal ...
[47]
Reassessment of 20th century global mean sea level rise - PNAS
May 22, 2017 · Here we present a 20th-century GMSL reconstruction computed using an area-weighting technique for averaging tide gauge records.
[48]
Tracking 30 Years of Sea Level Rise - NASA Earth Observatory
Aug 10, 2022 · Over the past 140 years, satellites and tide gauges together show that global sea level has risen 21 to 24 centimeters (8 to 9 inches). Starting ...
[49]
A 20th century acceleration in global sea‐level rise - AGU Journals
Jan 6, 2006 · For the 20th century, the rise is about 160 mm and the linear least-squares trend is 1.7 ± 0.3 mm yr−1 (95% confidence limits).Introduction · Reconstructing Monthly Sea... · Global-Mean Sea Level From...
[50]
By the Numbers | Understanding Sea Level
Estimates for global mean sea level rates for two different time periods: 1) the era of satellite observations, and 2) the 20th century.
[51]
Arctic sea ice minimum at sixth lowest extent on record
The overall, downward trend in the minimum extent from 1979 to 2023 is 12.5 percent per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average. The loss of sea ice is ...
[52]
Sea Ice Index Daily and Monthly Image Viewer
It is a source for consistently processed ice extent and concentration images and data values since 1979. Monthly images show sea ice extent with an outline ...Data Archive · Compare & Animate · FAQ
[53]
Glaciers - Copernicus Climate Change
Apr 15, 2025 · Data on the position of glacier front variations, which started being collected in 1535, show global glacier retreat over the last century.
[54]
Greenland-wide accelerated retreat of peripheral glaciers in ... - Nature
Nov 9, 2023 · Of the GICs studied here (with at least two observations, one in each century), the highest rate of retreat on record occurred within the twenty ...
[55]
Global glacier change in the 21st century: Every increase ... - Science
Jan 5, 2023 · Glaciers are projected to lose 26 ± 6% (+1.5°C) to 41 ± 11% (+4°C) of their mass by 2100, relative to 2015, for global temperature change scenarios.
[56]
[PDF] TEACHER BACKGROUND: NATURAL CLIMATE CHANGE
The earth's climate is influenced and changed through natural causes like volcanic eruptions, ocean currents, the Earth's orbital changes, solar variations and.
[57]
What Is the Sun's Role in Climate Change? - NASA Science
Sep 6, 2019 · The Sun powers life on Earth; it helps keep the planet warm enough for us to survive. It also influences Earth's climate.
[58]
What do volcanoes have to do with climate change? - NASA Science
Oct 23, 2024 · Volcanic eruptions are often discussed in the context of climate change because they release CO2 and other gases into our atmosphere.
[59]
Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles and Their Role in Earth's Climate
Feb 27, 2020 · The small changes set in motion by Milankovitch cycles operate separately and together to influence Earth's climate over very long timespans, ...
[60]
El Niño & Other Oscillations - Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
ENSO is just one of many oscillations in Earth's ocean and atmosphere that occur naturally over different time and geographic scales.
[61]
Global anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide, 1750-2022
Jun 9, 2025 · Anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions increased from about 9,000 kilotons in 1750 to approximately 36 million tons in 2022—a 4,000-fold ...
[62]
https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy-data-explorer
[63]
[PDF] Detection of Climate Change and Attribution of Causes
Nonetheless, all recent studies reject natural forcing and internal variability alone as a possible explanation of recent climate change. Analyses based on ...
[64]
State of the World's Forests 2020
Between 2015 and 2020, the rate of deforestation was estimated at 10 million hectares per year, down from 16 million hectares per year in the 1990s. The area of ...
[65]
https://www.globalissues.org/news/2025/10/21/41383
[66]
Deforestation and Forest Loss - Our World in Data
The UN FAO estimates that 10 million hectares of forest are cut down each year. This interactive map shows deforestation rates across the world. Read more about ...
[67]
GHG emissions of all world countries - 2025 Report
In 2024, the majority of GHG emissions consisted of fossil CO2 accounting for 74.5% of total emissions, while CH4 contributed for 17.9% to the total, N2O for 4 ...
[68]
Climate Risks in the Industrials Sector - UNEP FI
The industrials sector emits 25% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Including construction inputs such as cement, steel and iron, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[69]
Foundations of attribution in climate-change science - IOPscience
Aug 25, 2023 · For anthropogenic climate change (ACC), the central causal factor is evidently ACC itself, and one of the primary tools used to reveal ACC is ...
[70]
[PDF] Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional
Formal climate change attribution studies are carried out using controlled experiments with climate ... closed (within uncertainties), and there were few studies ...
[71]
New insights into natural variability and anthropogenic forcing of ...
Jun 11, 2019 · We show that the observed GMSAT changes from 1880 to 2017 on multi-decadal or longer timescales receive contributions of about 70% from GHGs, while AMV and PDV ...Results · Contribution Of Ghgs And... · Methods
[72]
Internal variability effect doped by climate change drove the 2023 ...
Apr 16, 2025 · Evidence is provided that 2023 should be interpreted as an extreme event in a warmer world because of superimposed internal variability on top of human forcing.
[73]
Detection, attribution, and modeling of climate change: Key open ...
May 13, 2025 · This paper discusses a number of key open issues in climate science. It argues that global climate models still fail on natural variability at all scales.
[74]
EXPERT ASSESSMENT OF UNCERTAINTIES IN DETECTION AND ...
This study outlines some of the major uncer- tainties in detection and attribution, uses expert judgements to quantify them, and gives an overall quantitative ...
[75]
Detection and attribution of climate change impacts in coupled ...
Apr 23, 2025 · Overall, we found that anthropogenic influence in the climate has had at least a minor role in the observed changes in natural and human systems ...
[76]
Detection and Attribution of Climate Change Using a Neural Network
Oct 12, 2023 · Detection aims to compare climate change with internal variability. A change is detected if it exceeds the anomalies generated by the internal ...Introduction · Model and Data · Methods · Attribution Performances
[77]
A Review of Climate Change Attribution Studies - ResearchGate
Oct 27, 2018 · This paper reviews recent progress in climate change attribution studies. The focus is on the attribution of observed long-term changes in surface temperature, ...
[78]
[PDF] Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change
Most detection and attribution studies use climate models to determine both the expected 'fingerprint' of climate change and the uncertainty in the estimated ...<|separator|>
[79]
Global Temperature Anomalies from 1880 to 2024 - NASA SVS
Jan 10, 2025 · This color-coded map in Robinson projection displays a progression of changing global surface temperature anomalies.
[80]
Climate at a Glance - National Centers for Environmental Information
The NOAAGlobalTemp dataset is used to compute the global temperature anomalies. The land surface component is from the Global Historical Climate Network-Monthly ...
[81]
Graph-Dashboard: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide | NOAA Climate.gov
At Mauna Loa, the highest monthly value each year occurs in May. In May 2024, carbon dioxide hit just under 427 ppm—a new record. NOAA Climate.gov image, based ...<|separator|>
[82]
The Keeling Curve
The Keeling Curve is the record of atmospheric CO2 from the Mauna Loa Observatory, starting in 1958. Scripps CO2 measurements at Mauna Loa are currently ...
[83]
Climate Change: Global Sea Level
Global mean sea level has risen about 8–9 inches (21–24 centimeters) since 1880. The rising water level is mostly due to a combination of melt water from ...Missing: observations | Show results with:observations
[84]
NASA Analysis Shows Unexpected Amount of Sea Level Rise in 2024
Mar 13, 2025 · According to a NASA-led analysis, last year's rate of rise was 0.23 inches (0.59 centimeters) per year, compared to the expected rate of 0.17 ...
[85]
Sea Level - Earth Indicator - NASA Science
Sep 25, 2025 · Satellite measurements have shown that the global sea level has risen around 3.6 inches (91 millimeters) since 1993. Latest Measurement. 91 (± ...
[86]
2025 Arctic sea ice minimum squeezes into the ten lowest minimums
Sep 17, 2025 · On September 10, Arctic sea ice likely reached its annual minimum extent of 4.60 million square kilometers (1.78 million square miles).
[87]
Arctic Sea Ice Minimum Extent - Earth Indicator - NASA Science
The measurements have shown that September Arctic sea ice is shrinking at a rate of 12.2% per decade, compared to its average extent during the period from 1981 ...
[88]
Ocean Warming - Earth Indicator - NASA Science
Sep 25, 2025 · The graph shows the rise in heat for the top 2,000 meters of the ocean since 1955, when modern recordkeeping began, as tracked by NOAA. The ...
[89]
Global Ocean Heat and Salt Content - Seasonal, Yearly ... - NOAA
Temperature and salinity anomaly fields for depths 0-2000m, heat content and steric sea level (thermosteric, halosteric, total) are updated quarterly.
[90]
Graph-Dashboard: Glacier Mass Balance (Yearly) | NOAA Climate.gov
Through 2024, these glaciers have lost more than 27 meters of water equivalent, which is roughly the same as slicing a 98-foot slab off the top of each glacier ...
[91]
latest glacier mass balance data - World Glacier Monitoring Service
Oct 8, 2024 · The average mass balance of the glaciers with available long-term observation series around the world continues to be very negative.
[92]
A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records - Nature
Apr 14, 2020 · Few global datasets have been compiled based on evidence from a wide variety of proxy types, including ecological, geochemical and biophysical ...
[93]
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=noaa-recon-27330
[94]
Challenges and perspectives for large‐scale temperature ...
Dec 13, 2016 · Here we critically assess some of the many challenges related to large-scale multiproxy temperature reconstructions.
[95]
Increasingly Sophisticated Climate Models Need the Out‐Of ... - NIH
Dec 18, 2022 · For example, climate models tend to underestimate the amount of warmth reconstructed in proxy records in the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic ...
[96]
Analysis: How well have climate models projected global warming?
Oct 5, 2017 · Global surface air temperatures in CMIP5 models have warmed about 16% faster than observations since 1970. About 40% of this difference is due ...
[97]
Climate change: global temperature
May 29, 2025 · Earth's temperature has risen by an average of 0.11° Fahrenheit (0.06° Celsius) per decade since 1850, or about 2° F in total.Images and Media: 2024... · Global-surface-temperature...
[98]
Global Temperature - Earth Indicator - NASA Science
Sep 25, 2025 · The data are primarily collected from sources on Earth's surface, including weather stations, ships, and ocean buoys. NASA's analysis generally ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
[99]
Climate at a Glance | Global Time Series
Coordinate temperature anomalies are with respect to the 1991-2020 average. All other regional temperature anomalies are with respect to the 1910-2000 average.Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
[100]
Extreme Weather Graphic Full Text - NASA Science
Oct 23, 2024 · Since 1950, the frequency and intensity of heat extremes have increased primarily due to human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases. This ...
[101]
Chapter 11: Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing ...
The patterns of projected changes in mean precipitation are consistent with the changes in the drought duration, but they are not consistent with the ...
[102]
[PDF] CHAPTER 2. Observed Changes in Weather and Climate Extremes ...
precipitation falling in the heaviest. 1% of rain events increased by 20% during the 20th century, while total precipitation increased by 7%. Figure 2.8 ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
[103]
Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters
The US sustained 403 weather and climate disasters from 1980–2024 where overall damages/costs reached or exceeded $1 billion (including CPI adjustment to 2024).Events · Summary Stats · Time Series · Disaster Mapping
[104]
Extreme Weather and Climate Change - NASA Science
Oct 23, 2024 · As the climate changes, the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events are increasing. As Earth's climate changes, it is impacting ...
[105]
The Effects of Climate Change - NASA Science
Oct 23, 2024 · The magnitude and rate of climate change and associated risks depend strongly on near-term mitigation and adaptation actions, and projected ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[106]
Climate change widespread, rapid, and intensifying – IPCC
Aug 9, 2021 · Climate change is affecting rainfall patterns. In high latitudes, precipitation is likely to increase, while it is projected to decrease over ...
[107]
Climate change and the global redistribution of biodiversity
Apr 11, 2023 · Here, we evaluate the impact of anthropogenic climate change (specifically, changes in temperature and precipitation) on species' ranges, and ...
[108]
Jet stream poleward migration leads to marine primary production ...
40% decline in chlorophyll in the NW Mediterranean Sea over the 2000-2023 period associated to the northward shift of the jet stream.
[109]
Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystems | US EPA
Aug 8, 2025 · Climate change affects ecosystems in many ways. Climate controls how plants grow, how animals behave, which organisms thrive, and how they all interact with ...Missing: empirical 2020-2025
[110]
Climate change extinctions | Science
Dec 5, 2024 · At current warming levels of ~1.3°C, 1.6% of species are projected to be threatened with extinction from climate change, translating into 160, ...
[111]
Climate-Related Local Extinctions Are Already Widespread among ...
The results show that climate-related local extinctions have already occurred in hundreds of species, including 47% of the 976 species surveyed.
[112]
US Imperiled species and the five drivers of biodiversity loss
Apr 24, 2025 · Our results are the first in which climate change has been identified as the leading threat to species listed under the ESA. We found that ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[113]
How does climate change cause extinction? - PMC - PubMed Central
Anthropogenic climate change is predicted to be a major cause of species extinctions in the next 100 years. But what will actually cause these extinctions?
[114]
Current Global Bleaching: Status Update & Data Submission
Sep 12, 2025 · From 1 January 2023 to 11 September 2025, bleaching-level heat stress has impacted 84.4% of the world's coral reef area and mass coral bleaching ...Missing: biodiversity | Show results with:biodiversity
[115]
Visual Feature | Status of Coral Reefs of the World - UNEP
Its findings show that between 2009 and 2018 there was a progressive loss of about 14 per cent of the coral from the world's coral reefs primarily caused by ...
[116]
Over half of coral reef cover across the world has been lost since 1950
Sep 26, 2021 · The biodiversity of reefs was found to have declined by 63%, while the abundance of fish species fell by 60%. In many cases, the exact extent of ...Missing: data | Show results with:data
[117]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02790-4
[118]
Climate-induced forest dieback drives compositional changes in ...
Jan 18, 2022 · We conclude that forest dieback drives changes in species assemblages that mimic natural forest succession, and markedly increases the risk of catastrophic ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[119]
Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage - Nature
May 22, 2024 · We find that biodiversity declines from climate and land use change could lead to a global loss of between 7.44-103.14 PgC (global sustainability scenario) and ...Results · Discussion · Methods
[120]
Different ways to die in a changing world: Consequences of climate ...
The occurrence of extreme weather events will prompt profound changes in several plant communities, resulting in massive forest dieback events that can trigger ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[121]
Review Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems ...
Sep 1, 2020 · We present the most up-to-date assessment of climate change impacts on biodiversity, ecosystems, and ecosystem services in the US and implications for natural ...Review · 2. Individuals, Populations... · 6. Implications For Natural...<|separator|>
[122]
Human Deaths from Hot and Cold… - The Breakthrough Institute
Dec 1, 2022 · It has been estimated that warming from 2000 to 2019 has resulted in a net decline in excess deaths globally (a larger decrease in cold deaths ...
[123]
Heat and health - World Health Organization (WHO)
May 28, 2024 · Heat-related mortality for people over 65 years of age increased by approximately 85% between 2000–2004 and 2017–2021 (1).
[124]
[PDF] Impact of Climate Change on Cold-related Mortality - SOA
Climate change may reduce cold-related deaths, with some colder areas potentially seeing a short-term mortality benefit, though this is not necessarily global.
[125]
A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change
The impact on economic growth implied by studies of the impact of climate change is close to the growth impact estimated as a function of weather shocks.
[126]
[PDF] The Effects of Climate Change on GDP in the 21st Century
Feb 2, 2025 · On average, future temperature increases will cause GDP to be 4 percent lower in 2100, but there is a 5% chance it will be at least 21% lower.
[127]
The economic commitment of climate change | Nature
Apr 17, 2024 · We find that the world economy is committed to an income reduction of 19% within the next 26 years independent of future emission choices.
[128]
Evidence of climate and economic drivers affecting migration in an ...
Oct 1, 2025 · This study assesses the sensitivity of international migration to climate change across 160 countries and regions, focusing on temperature- ...Results · The Role Of Climate Baseline... · Methods
[129]
Article: Climate Migration 101: An Explainer | migrationpolicy.org
Nov 16, 2023 · Since climate change often interacts with other drivers of migration—including economic factors, political unrest, and conflict—a broad swath of ...
[130]
The effect of environmental change on human migration
Environmental change also affects migration indirectly, in particular through economic drivers, by changing livelihoods for example, and political drivers, ...
[131]
The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk - PubMed Central
Nov 11, 2024 · While some debate remains, substantial evidence shows that climate change increases conflict risk under specific conditions. We examine four key ...
[132]
History of the Convention - UNFCCC
The 2015 Paris Agreement, adopted in Paris on 12 December 2015, marks the latest step in the evolution of the UN climate change regime and builds on the work ...
[133]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change | UNFCCC
The UNFCCC borrowed a very important line from one of the most successful multilateral environmental treaties in history (the Montreal Protocol, in 1987): ...
[134]
The Kyoto Protocol | UNFCCC
The Kyoto Protocol was adopted on 11 December 1997. Owing to a complex ratification process, it entered into force on 16 February 2005.Paris Agreement · Languages · Clean Development · The Doha Amendment
[135]
Emission Reductions under the Kyoto Protocol Pave the Way for ...
Jul 19, 2024 · Developed countries participating in the Kyoto Protocol's second commitment period (2013–2020) achieved an average annual emissions reduction of 22% compared ...
[136]
Global Climate Agreements: Successes and Failures
Through the Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement, countries agreed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere keeps ...Introduction · What are the most important... · What progress have countries...
[137]
The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC
The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It was adopted by 195 Parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) ...Paris Agreement Work · Nationally Determined · The Katowice climate package
[138]
CO2 Emissions – Global Energy Review 2025 – Analysis - IEA
Natural gas and coal drove the increase in emissions. Natural gas emissions rose by around 2.5% (180 Mt CO₂) in 2024, making it the largest contributor to ...Energy Sector Carbon... · Carbon Emissions Trends... · Co2 Per Capita Emissions By...
[139]
Emissions Growth in the Developing World
Jun 20, 2024 · Developing countries contributed 95% of global emissions increases over the last decade and accounted for 75% (44 GT) of global emissions in 2023.Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness<|separator|>
[140]
Emissions Gap Report 2023 | UNEP - UN Environment Programme
Nov 20, 2023 · However, predicted 2030 greenhouse gas emissions still must fall by 28 per cent for the Paris Agreement 2°C pathway and 42 per cent for the 1.5° ...Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
[141]
What is the role of nuclear in the energy mix and in reducing ... - LSE
Dec 2, 2022 · Nuclear power can therefore contribute to the decarbonisation of the global energy system. Nuclear currently provides almost 30% of the world's low-carbon ...
[142]
Economics of Nuclear Power
Sep 29, 2023 · Low fuel costs have from the outset given nuclear energy an advantage compared with coal and gas-fired plants. Uranium, however, has to be ...
[143]
Modeling nuclear energy's future role in decarbonized energy systems
Jan 9, 2023 · Nuclear energy's role depends on emissions policies, cost reductions, and other tech constraints. It can provide firm, zero-emission power, but ...
[144]
Global Status Of CCS 2025: Industry Stays The Course Toward ...
Oct 10, 2025 · The Global Status Of CCS 2025 report reveals that 77 CCS projects are now operational, with 47 more under construction, marking another record ...
[145]
Major Developments And Challenges In Carbon Capture & Storage ...
Jul 3, 2025 · The global CCS landscape has expanded dramatically, with operational capacity reaching just over 50 million tonnes of CO2 annually by early 2025 ...Economic Landscape... · Regional Hubs Emerge As... · Sobering Failures Provide...
[146]
Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage - Energy System - IEA
In 2023, announced capture capacity for 2030 increased by 35%, while announced storage capacity rose by 70%. This brings the total amount of CO2 that could be ...Carbon Capture Utilisation... · Tracking Carbon Capture... · Co2 Capture<|separator|>
[147]
Feasible deployment of carbon capture and storage and the ...
Sep 25, 2024 · Formative phase: up to a 45% failure rate and a doubling of planned CCS capacity by 2025. ... Global Status of CCS 2022. Global CCS Institute ...
[148]
New study compares the benefits and risks of solar geoengineering
Dec 17, 2024 · Solar geoengineering reduces heat-induced mortality, but risks include air pollution and ozone loss. Benefits are larger in hotter regions, but ...Missing: radiation management
[149]
Solar Geoengineering To Cool the Planet: Is It Worth the Risks?
Apr 24, 2024 · Studies show that SAI could weaken the stratospheric ozone layer, alter precipitation patterns and affect agriculture, ecosystem services, ...
[150]
Geoengineering: Assessing Risks in the Era of Planetary Security
Jul 16, 2025 · But these methods risk creating new ecological and security threats, undermining urgent systemic transitions. PDF.<|control11|><|separator|>
[151]
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the ...
May 16, 2024 · Here we assess the effectiveness of carbon pricing in reducing emissions using a rigorous, machine-learning assisted systematic review and meta-analysis.
[152]
Which one is more effective in reducing carbon emissions?—A meta ...
Oct 15, 2024 · The results show that both carbon taxes and ETSs reduce carbon emissions but that the effect of the carbon taxes is stronger than that of ETSs.
[153]
Assessing the effectiveness of emissions trading schemes: evidence ...
Specifically, an increase of $1 in the carbon price reduced CO2 emissions by 1.69% and increased the per capita GDP by $286. The carbon price primarily achieved ...
[154]
[PDF] Carbon pricing design: Effectiveness, efficiency and feasibility (EN)
This paper considers how the design of carbon pricing instruments affects their effectiveness, efficiency and feasibility. Design choices matter both for taxes ...
[155]
The impact of emissions trading systems on technological ...
1. Technological innovation for climate change mitigation (TICCM) has advanced substantially in recent years (Blanco et al., 2022).2. Methodology · 3. Results · 3.2. Impact Of Etss On Ticcm
[156]
How much will it cost to cut global greenhouse gas emissions? - LSE
Sep 2, 2022 · Putting in place mitigation measures to reduce emissions enough to limit probable warming to 2°C entail losses to global GDP of between 1.3% and 2.7% in 2050.
[157]
Can the private sector plug the adaptation finance gap?
Jun 10, 2025 · Current estimates of adaptation needs in developing countries stand at around $300 billion per year – a figure that is rising rapidly as ...
[158]
Adaptation Finance – United Nations Environment - UNEP FI
However, financing is a major barrier to climate adaptation; UNEP's 2024 Adaptation Gap Report estimates that the adaptation finance gap is US$187-359 billion ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[159]
[PDF] 17 — Economics of Adaptation
An important concern is determining the balance between spending on adaptation versus that on other investments—mitigation and non-climate endeavors. Economics ...<|separator|>
[160]
[PDF] ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION
Sep 16, 2003 · Section 5 looks at the trade-off between mitigation and facilitative adaptation. Section 6 concludes. 2. Impacts and adaptation. One cannot ...
[161]
Near-term benefits from investment in climate adaptation ... - Nature
Jan 9, 2025 · Our results provide evidence of greater net benefit with complementary investments in abatement reducing long-term climate damage and investments in adaptation ...
[162]
Long-term natural variability and 20th century climate change - PNAS
Delineating the relative role of anthropogenic forcing, natural forcing, and long-term natural variability in 20th century climate change presents a significant ...<|separator|>
[163]
[PDF] Curry – Testimony on Rational Discussion of Climate Change
Nov 17, 2010 · I thank the Chairman and the Committee for the opportunity to offer testimony today on "Rational. Discussion of Climate Change.<|separator|>
[164]
Natural Drivers of Global Warming: Ocean Cycles, Anthropogenic ...
Feb 14, 2025 · There is a widespread policy assumption that anthropogenic greenhouse gases are the main driver of the observed 1 °C rise in global surface air ...
[165]
[PDF] 34 years of satellite temperature data show global warming is ... - UAH
34 years of satellite data shows global warming is on a plateau, with a +0.14 C per decade trend since 1978, and a plateau since 2002.
[166]
Explainer: how surface and satellite temperature records compare
Feb 1, 2016 · A rundown of what surface and satellite temperature records can and can't tell us about global temperature rise and climate change.
[167]
UAH atmospheric temperatures prove climate models and/or surface ...
The surface temperature estimates are biased high, showing more warming than is actually occurring. The TLT estimates are biased low, showing less warming than ...
[168]
Does the Earth Have an Adaptive Infrared Iris? in - AMS Journals
This new mechanism would, in effect, constitute an adaptive infrared iris that opens and closes in order to control the Outgoing Longwave Radiation.
[169]
Uncertainties in the attribution of greenhouse gas warming and ...
Jun 13, 2016 · The 2.5–97.5% uncertainty ranges in TCR are estimated from the variability in 20 year means separated by 70 years in each model's piControl. The ...Introduction · Data · Climate Response Patterns... · Results of an Optimal...<|separator|>
[170]
[PDF] GLOBAL WARMING NARRATIVE - Richard Lindzen
One negative feedback for which there is substantial evidence is the so-called iris effect, wherein upper-level thin cir- rus clouds (which are powerful ...
[171]
Empirical assessment of the role of the Sun in climate change using ...
Changes in solar activity could affect the climate system through several correlated mechanisms, including TSI forcing, UV forcing, cosmic ray forcing, solar ...
[172]
18 Spectacularly Wrong Predictions Were Made Around the Time of ...
Apr 21, 2022 · Here are 18 examples of the spectacularly wrong predictions made around 1970 when the “green holy day” (aka Earth Day) started.
[173]
Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
Sep 18, 2019 · Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic ...
[174]
Global Warming: Observations vs. Climate Models
Jan 24, 2024 · The observed rate of global warming over the past 50 years has been weaker than that predicted by almost all computerized climate models.
[175]
Flawed Climate Models - Hoover Institution
Apr 5, 2017 · Climate models as a group have been “running hot,” predicting about 2.2 times as much warming as actually occurred over 1998–2014. Of course, ...
[176]
Are Climate Models Overpredicting Global Warming? - Cato Institute
Jan 31, 2019 · Many recent climate models have been predicting dire global changes. The problem is climate forecasters currently ignore decades of scientific best‐ practices.
[177]
CO2 is making Earth greenerâ€”for now - NASA Science
Apr 26, 2016 · A quarter to half of Earth's vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
[178]
Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds - NASA
Apr 26, 2016 · Results showed that carbon dioxide fertilization explains 70 percent of the greening effect, said co-author Ranga Myneni, a professor in the ...
[179]
Biophysical impacts of earth greening can substantially mitigate ...
Jan 9, 2023 · Combined with the observed greening trend, we find a global cooling of −0.018 K/decade, which slows down 4.6 ± 3.2% of the global warming.
[180]
Reality check—net-zero is neither affordable nor attainable
Jan 31, 2025 · The economic cost of the policies reaches about $6,700 per worker by 2030, then continues rising to about $8,000 per worker by 2050.
[181]
More misinformation and nonsense on climate from Lomborg and Tol
Mar 22, 2024 · He writes: “A new peer-reviewed study of all the scientific estimates of climate-change effects shows the most likely cost of global warming ...
[182]
Equity implications of net-zero emissions: A multi-model analysis of ...
This paper examines the distributional dimensions of technology transitions and net-zero policies with a focus on welfare impacts across household incomes.<|separator|>
[183]
The net-zero transition: What it would cost, what it could bring
This McKinsey report offers a detailed look at the economic and societal impact of the transition to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.