Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sodium fusion test

The sodium fusion test, also known as Lassaigne's test, is a classical qualitative analytical technique in used to detect the presence of heteroatoms such as , , and (chlorine, , iodine) in organic compounds by converting them into water-soluble sodium salts through high-temperature fusion with metallic sodium. can also be detected using a modified involving . Developed by French chemist Jean-Louis Lassaigne in 1843, the test originally involved fusion with but was modified in 1879 by Jacobsen to use , which improved safety and efficiency while reducing interferences from in detection. This method remains a foundational tool in qualitative organic analysis, particularly in educational and laboratory settings, due to its simplicity and ability to handle small sample sizes despite potential hazards from 's reactivity. Over time, variations in fusion techniques have been proposed to address issues like incomplete reactions or explosions, including controlled heating in ignition tubes or the use of mixtures. The underlying principle relies on the high reactivity of sodium at elevated temperatures (around 300–600°C), which breaks carbon-heteroatom bonds in the and forms ionic species: for example, nitrogen converts to (NaCN), sulfur to (Na₂S), to sodium halides (NaX); for , fusion with forms (Na₃PO₄), or with sodium, (Na₃P) which is oxidized later. The fused product is then extracted in to yield the "sodium fusion extract" or Lassaigne's extract, which is tested using standard inorganic qualitative reagents for confirmatory identification. The test is ineffective for detecting carbon, , or oxygen directly, as these form non-detectable products like , and it may fail with certain compounds lacking carbon (e.g., ) or those prone to decomposition (e.g., diazonium salts). In the standard procedure, a small piece of clean sodium metal (about pea-sized) is placed in a dry ignition tube with the organic sample (50 mg or 2–3 drops), heated gently to initiate reaction, then strongly to dull redness for 2–3 minutes, and the hot tube is plunged into to dissolve the products, followed by boiling and filtration to obtain the clear extract. Specific tests on the extract include: for , addition of sulfate followed by acidification to form precipitate (ferric ferrocyanide); for , sodium yielding a violet color; for , acidification with and producing characteristic precipitates (white for Cl⁻, pale yellow for Br⁻, yellow for I⁻), with further distinction using organic solvents like ; and for , acid with followed by ammonium molybdate to give a canary-yellow precipitate of . While effective for microscale analysis and widely taught, the test requires careful handling to avoid explosions from moisture or oxygen, and interferences (e.g., masking ) can be mitigated by modifications like adding iron wire or sequential testing. Modern alternatives like instrumental methods (e.g., ) have reduced its routine use, but it endures as an accessible entry point for understanding in .

Introduction

Overview and purpose

The sodium fusion test, also known as Lassaigne's test, is a qualitative analytical method employed in to detect the presence of , , (chlorine, , and iodine), and within organic compounds. This fusion-based approach enables the identification of these heteroatoms by transforming them from their covalently bound states in complex organic molecules into detectable forms. The primary purpose of the test is to convert these elements into water-soluble ionic , facilitating their extraction into an aqueous medium for straightforward chemical detection using reagents like those for , , ions, or . By breaking down the matrix through high-temperature with sodium, the method overcomes the challenges of analyzing elements that are otherwise inaccessible due to stable covalent bonds in structures. This technique is particularly applicable to a wide range of organic samples, including natural products and synthetic compounds, where direct proves impractical. Developed by French chemist Lassaigne in , it remains a foundational tool in qualitative organic analysis.

Historical development

The sodium fusion test originated with the work of French chemist Lassaigne, who in developed a fusion method using molten to detect in trace amounts of , as detailed in his publication "Mémoire sur un procédé simple pour constater la présence de l'azote dans des quantités minimes de matière organique." This innovation addressed a key challenge in qualitative organic analysis during the early , building on the foundational techniques for , , and oxygen established by in the 1810s and 1820s, which had highlighted the need for reliable tests for and other non-volatile elements. In 1879, German chemist Oscar Jacobsen modified Lassaigne's procedure by replacing with sodium, enhancing its applicability for detecting , , and , which led to the test's evolution into the sodium fusion variant commonly used today. The method, widely referred to as Lassaigne's test, gained prominence in chemical literature and education throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with its sensitivity validated in studies such as that by Samuel P. Mulliken and C. L. Gabriel at the 1912 International Congress of Applied Chemistry. By the mid-20th century, Lassaigne's test had become a staple in qualitative organic analysis curricula, integrated into standard manuals and textbooks for undergraduate instruction. A 1945 review by S. Horwood Tucker in the Journal of Chemical Education underscored its enduring value while noting a "lost centenary" of underappreciation, prompting renewed instructional focus. In subsequent decades, minor procedural adjustments emphasized safety, such as controlled heating to prevent violent reactions and shielded quenching techniques, reflecting broader advancements in practices without altering the core fusion principle.

Experimental Procedure

Fusion process

The fusion process in the sodium fusion test involves the high-temperature reaction of an with sodium metal to facilitate elemental detection. A small piece of clean, dry sodium metal, approximately 30-50 mg and equivalent to a pea-sized portion or 3-mm cube, is placed at the bottom of a dry ignition tube or small (10 × 75 mm). Approximately 20-50 mg of the solid , or 1-2 drops if , is then added directly to the sodium; for liquids, the sodium may be melted first to allow dropwise addition. This preparation ensures intimate contact between the reactants while minimizing the risk of incomplete fusion. Heating is initiated gently with a microburner or in a , first melting the sodium until vapor rises 1-2 cm in the tube, which typically occurs within 1-2 minutes. The flame is then removed briefly to add the sample if not already incorporated, followed by gradual intensification to achieve dull red heat for 2-3 minutes, allowing any initial distillate to back into the mixture. This controlled protocol promotes complete reaction without excessive volatility or . Safety precautions are essential due to sodium's high reactivity. The procedure requires safety goggles, a , and handling of sodium exclusively with or to prevent skin contact or ignition; the metal must be cut under if stored that way and dried thoroughly before use. Moisture is strictly avoided in the tube and sample to prevent violent explosions, and volatile halogenated solvents like are prohibited as they can cause hazardous reactions. During the fusion, and a vigorous often occur as the sodium reduces the , accompanied by charring of the material; a brief or small controlled may indicate completion, resulting in a fused mass that appears metallic or glassy upon cooling. This step briefly references the formation of ionic salts from the elements present, setting the stage for subsequent extraction.

Preparation of sodium extract

After the fusion process, the red-hot tube containing the fused mass is immediately plunged into 10-20 mL of in a dish or , covering the dish or beaker with for protection, to quench the reaction and dissolve the water-soluble formed during . The contents are stirred vigorously to facilitate , and the mixture is gently boiled for 2-3 minutes to ensure complete of the ionic compounds. The resulting solution is then filtered while hot through Whatman filter paper or a similar medium to separate undissolved carbon particles and other insoluble impurities, producing a clear filtrate that is typically colorless or pale yellow. The filtrate is subsequently diluted with to a total volume of 20-50 mL, which provides an appropriate concentration for qualitative testing. This sodium extract remains stable for short-term use at but should be analyzed promptly to minimize any potential decomposition of the salts. In a variant specific to phosphorus detection, sodium peroxide is added along with sodium during the fusion step to oxidize phosphorus to sodium phosphate, after which the extract is prepared following the standard aqueous extraction and purification procedure.

Theoretical Principles

Elemental conversions

During the sodium fusion test, elements present in organic compounds undergo chemical transformations when heated with sodium metal, resulting in the formation of water-soluble ionic sodium salts that can be extracted and analyzed. Specifically, carbon (C), nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), halogens (X), and phosphorus (P) are converted into species such as sodium cyanide (NaCN) from C and N, sodium sulfide (Na₂S) from S, sodium halides (NaX) from halogens, and sodium phosphate (Na₃PO₄) from P. These conversions occur under the reducing conditions provided by molten sodium at high temperatures, breaking the covalent bonds in the organic matrix. The key reactions for these elemental conversions are as follows. For , carbon from the reacts with and sodium to form : \mathrm{C + N + Na \rightarrow NaCN} This process requires the presence of carbon, as alone does not yield the . For , the reaction produces : \mathrm{S + 2Na \rightarrow Na_2S} (X = Cl, Br, I) directly form sodium halides through simple combination with sodium: \mathrm{Na + X \rightarrow NaX} These transformations ensure the elements are present as anions (CN⁻, S²⁻, or X⁻) in the extract. Carbon plays a crucial role as a in these fusions, particularly for , where it helps generate the (CN⁻) ion by facilitating the reduction and cleavage in the . Without sufficient carbon, the yields of these may be lower. For , the compound is fused with (Na₂O₂) to oxidize to (Na₃PO₄), as the standard sodium fusion would reduce it to , which requires subsequent oxidation for detection. This oxidizing variant ensures the formation of the ion (PO₄³⁻) directly testable in the extract.

Role of sodium in fusion

Sodium functions as a powerful in the fusion process owing to its high reactivity, which arises from its low first of approximately 496 kJ/mol. This property enables sodium to readily donate electrons, effectively breaking the strong covalent carbon-heteroatom (C-X) bonds in organic compounds and converting the bound heteroatoms—such as , , , or —into water-soluble ionic like NaCN, Na₂S, NaX, or Na₃PO₄. The ensures that these elements, originally in non-ionic forms, become detectable through standard qualitative inorganic tests. The physical properties of sodium further support its utility in fusion: its relatively low melting point of 97.72°C allows it to liquefy easily at the typical fusion temperatures of 300–600°C, creating a molten medium that facilitates intimate mixing and thorough reaction with the solid or liquid organic sample without requiring excessively high heat that might decompose sodium prematurely. Additionally, sodium's moderate volatility (boiling point around 883°C) aids in the reaction dynamics by permitting vapor-phase interactions if needed, enhancing the efficiency of bond cleavage and elemental conversion. These attributes make sodium preferable over less reactive metals for achieving complete decomposition in a controlled manner. To optimize the reducing action and prevent side reactions, an excess of sodium is typically used, ensuring all material is fully reduced and minimizing incomplete fusions that could leave unreacted residues. The process is carried out in an air-excluded environment, such as a sealed , to avoid oxidation of sodium to (Na₂O), which would consume reducing capacity and potentially form interfering insoluble compounds. In instances where both and are present, a side reaction can produce (NaSCN), which may interfere with individual elemental detections; this is mitigated by using excess sodium to favor formation of NaCN and Na₂S or by post-fusion treatments like acidification.

Qualitative Detection

Nitrogen detection

The nitrogen detection in the sodium fusion test, also known as Lassaigne's test for nitrogen, involves converting any in the to (NaCN) during the fusion process, followed by a specific colorimetric reaction with iron salts. To perform the test, take approximately 2 mL of the sodium extract (Lassaigne's extract) in a and add a few drops of freshly prepared ferrous sulfate (FeSO₄) solution along with (NaOH) to make the mixture alkaline. Boil the contents for a few minutes to facilitate the reaction, then allow the solution to cool. Subsequently, acidify the cooled solution by adding dilute ferric chloride (FeCl₃) or (H₂SO₄). The formation of a precipitate or intense blue coloration, known as , confirms the presence of . The underlying chemistry relies on the cyanide ions (CN⁻) from NaCN reacting with ferrous ions (Fe²⁺) to form ferrocyanide, which then oxidizes in the presence of ferric ions (Fe³⁺) to produce the insoluble Prussian blue complex, ferric ferrocyanide (Fe₄[Fe(CN)₆]₃). The key initial reaction is: $6 \text{CN}^- + \text{Fe}^{2+} \rightarrow [\text{Fe(CN)}_6]^{4-} This ferrocyanide ion then reacts with Fe³⁺ ions to yield the characteristic blue precipitate: $4 \text{Fe}^{3+} + 3 [\text{Fe(CN)}_6]^{4-} \rightarrow \text{Fe}_4[\text{Fe(CN)}_6]_3 \cdot x\text{H}_2\text{O} \downarrow Note: If sulfur is also present, (NaSCN) may form, interfering with nitrogen detection; modifications such as adding iron wire during fusion can mitigate this. The test is sensitive to nitrogen levels as low as 0.1–0.5% in the sample, producing a distinct intense blue color or precipitate observable even in trace amounts.

Sulfur detection

The presence of sulfur in the organic compound is indicated by sulfide ions (S²⁻) in the sodium extract, formed during the fusion process where sulfur converts to sodium sulfide (Na₂S). A standard confirmatory test for sulfur is the lead acetate test. To perform this, acidify 2 mL of the sodium extract with acetic acid and add a few drops of lead acetate solution; a black precipitate of lead(II) sulfide (PbS) forms if sulfur is present. The reaction proceeds via the generation of hydrogen sulfide in the acidic medium, as follows: \text{Na}_2\text{S} + 2\text{CH}_3\text{COOH} \rightarrow \text{H}_2\text{S} + 2\text{CH}_3\text{COONa} \text{H}_2\text{S} + \text{Pb}(\text{CH}_3\text{COO})_2 \rightarrow \text{PbS} \downarrow + 2\text{CH}_3\text{COOH} This test is specific for sulfide ions under acidic conditions. Another confirmatory method is the sodium nitroprusside test. Add a few drops of freshly prepared sodium nitroprusside solution to 2 mL of the sodium extract; a transient violet color develops due to the formation of the sodium thio-nitroprusside complex, [Fe(CN)₅NOS]⁴⁻. The reaction is: \text{Na}_2\text{S} + \text{Na}_2[\text{Fe}(\text{CN})_5\text{NO}] \rightarrow \text{Na}_4[\text{Fe}(\text{CN})_5\text{NOS}] This color change directly confirms the presence of S²⁻ ions and is performed in neutral or slightly basic conditions. When both nitrogen and sulfur are present in the original compound, sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN) forms in the extract alongside Na₂S and NaCN. For sulfur detection alone, the lead acetate or nitroprusside tests are preferred; however, the combined presence can be verified separately by acidifying a portion of the extract with dilute HCl and adding ferric chloride solution, yielding a blood-red color from the ferric thiocyanate complex, Fe(SCN)₃.

Halogen detection

The detection of halogens (chlorine, bromine, and iodine) in the sodium fusion extract relies on the conversion of organic-bound halogens to sodium halides (NaX, where X = Cl, Br, or I) during the fusion process, followed by precipitation reactions with silver nitrate. To perform the test, take approximately 2 mL of the filtered sodium extract and acidify it with dilute nitric acid (HNO₃). Boil the mixture gently for a few minutes to decompose any interfering cyanide (CN⁻) or sulfide (S²⁻) ions that may arise from nitrogen or sulfur present in the original compound, preventing false positives or colored precipitates. Cool the solution, then add a few drops of 0.1 M silver nitrate (AgNO₃) solution. The formation of a precipitate indicates the presence of a halogen, with the color and solubility characteristics allowing differentiation between chlorine, bromine, and iodine. The chemistry involves the reaction of the sodium halide with silver ions to form the corresponding precipitate: \ce{NaX + AgNO3 -> AgX v + NaNO3} For example, with chloride: \ce{NaCl + AgNO3 -> AgCl v + NaNO3} where the downward arrow (↓) denotes precipitation. yields a white precipitate of (AgCl), which is fully soluble in dilute (NH₄OH) due to the formation of the soluble [Ag(NH₃)₂]⁺. produces a cream or pale yellow precipitate of (AgBr), which is only partially soluble in concentrated NH₄OH. Iodine results in a bright yellow precipitate of (AgI), which is insoluble in even at high concentrations. To confirm, add 2 mL of 6 M NH₄OH to the precipitate and shake vigorously; the solubility behavior provides definitive identification. This test exhibits high sensitivity, capable of detecting at levels as low as 0.1% in the original sample, making it suitable for qualitative of trace elements. The treatment step is crucial for specificity, as it oxidizes NaCN to HCN (which volatilizes) and Na₂S to elemental or , avoiding black or colored interferences that could mask the precipitates. cannot be detected by this method, as silver (AgF) is highly soluble in .

Phosphorus detection

The detection of phosphorus in organic compounds via the sodium fusion test requires a modified fusion process to oxidize phosphorus to . The organic compound is fused with (Na₂O₂) prior to heating, ensuring complete oxidation of phosphorus to (Na₃PO₄). The fused mass is extracted with water to yield the sodium extract containing the . To confirm phosphorus, a portion of the extract is boiled with concentrated (HNO₃) to form (H₃PO₄), followed by the addition of ammonium molybdate solution. This produces a characteristic yellow precipitate of , (NH₄)₃[PMo₁₂O₄₀]. The yellow coloration of the precipitate serves as the confirmatory indicator. The underlying chemistry involves two key steps. Acidification converts the phosphate salt to the free : \ce{Na3PO4 + 3 HNO3 -> H3PO4 + 3 NaNO3} Subsequent reaction with ions under acidic conditions forms the heteropoly complex (simplified): \ce{H3PO4 + 12 MoO4^{2-} + 24 H+ + 3 NH4+ -> (NH4)3PMo12O40 + 12 H2O} This test exhibits high , capable of detecting concentrations of 0.05–0.1% in the original sample.

Applications and Limitations

Practical applications

The sodium fusion test, also known as Lassaigne's test, plays a central role in educational settings as a foundational experiment in undergraduate laboratories. It is routinely employed to teach students the qualitative detection of heteroatoms such as , , , and in compounds, fostering practical skills in through hands-on fusion and subsequent testing procedures. This test is particularly emphasized in curricula for its simplicity and reliability in demonstrating the conversion of covalent bonds to ionic forms, making it an essential component of qualitative courses worldwide. In pharmaceutical education and related laboratory training, the sodium fusion test is integrated into protocols for identifying composition in drug-related samples, aiding in the preliminary of compounds and impurities. It serves as an accessible tool for students and researchers to screen for heteroatomic contaminants before advancing to more sophisticated methods. Historically, prior to the widespread availability of spectroscopic techniques, the test was a primary method for elemental determination in analysis, providing rapid qualitative insights that informed compound identification. In modern research contexts, adaptations of the sodium fusion test have been developed to enhance safety and environmental compatibility, particularly for handling hazardous or complex samples. Sealed tube methods and nonbreakable capsule techniques minimize explosion risks associated with traditional open-tube fusions using metallic sodium, allowing safer application in controlled laboratory environments. Additionally, variants replace sodium metal with fusions, reducing the use of reactive metals while maintaining detection efficacy, as demonstrated in quantitative analyses of and content. These innovations extend the test's utility in contemporary qualitative screening, often as a complementary preliminary step to confirm presence before employing (IR) or () spectroscopy for structural elucidation.

Limitations and interferences

The sodium fusion test, while effective for qualitative detection of heteroatoms in organic compounds, is inherently non-quantitative, providing only presence or absence information rather than concentration levels. It exhibits limited for in samples. Significant safety concerns arise from the use of metallic sodium, which is highly reactive and poses risks of or explosion upon contact with moisture or air, potentially igniting gas evolved during reactions. The process can generate toxic (HCN) gas if is present, necessitating performance in a well-ventilated with appropriate protective equipment. Additionally, exothermic reactions with certain organic compounds and difficulties in sodium disposal exacerbate these hazards, contributing to its declining use in contemporary laboratories. Interferences commonly occur when multiple heteroatoms are present. For instance, can mask detection by forming (Na₂S), which produces a black precipitate of (Ag₂S) with , obscuring the characteristic white, pale yellow, or yellow precipitates from sodium halides. Similarly, the presence of both and leads to the formation of (NaSCN) in the fusion extract, resulting in a blood-red color with ferric (due to ferric ) rather than the expected for alone. The test is unsuitable for samples containing metals or inorganic components, as these may not fuse properly or introduce additional reactivities. Mitigation strategies include performing blank tests on reagents to identify contamination sources and using excess nitric acid to acidify the extract, converting interfering and to volatile H₂S and HCN gases that escape upon boiling, thereby unmasking halides. In modern practice, safer alternatives such as oxygen flask combustion are preferred, as they avoid metallic sodium while achieving comparable qualitative results with reduced risk.

References

  1. [1]
    A review of techniques in the Lassaigne sodium-fusion
    The present article is intended to collect the available methods of the sodium-fusion test with some indication of the most suitable circumstances in which ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Lassaigne's Test – Test for Nitrogen, Sulphur, Halogens - BYJU'S
    Here, a small piece of Na metal is heated in a fusion tube with the organic compound. The principle is that, in doing so, Na converts all the elements present ...
  4. [4]
    How is phosphorus detected in organic compounds? - CK-12
    To detect phosphorus in organic compounds, the Lassaigne's test is commonly used. The process involves several steps as below: Step 1: Preliminary Test.
  5. [5]
    A simple test for the detection of phosphorus in organic compounds
    This simple test for the detection of phosphorus in organic compounds relies on the sodium fusion procedure and filter paper moistened with silver nitrate.
  6. [6]
    Elementary Analysis and the Origins of Physiological Chemistry - jstor
    Berzelius did not make rigorous analyses of these substances, but inferred the greater amount of nitrogen in the fibrin and albumin of a calf from the fact that ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 70 Qualitative Organic Analysis
    Elementary Analysis, Sodium Fusion. This method for detection of nitrogen, sulfur, and halogen in organic compounds depends on the fact that fusion of ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Identification of Organic Compound by Organic Qualitative Analysis
    Sodium Fusion Test (Lassaigne's Test). 1. Take a small piece of dry sodium metal in a fusion tube and heat it gently till the metalmelts or fuses.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A Review of Techniques in the Lassaigne Sodium-Fusion
    The sodium-fusion test forms an es- sential part of most qualitative organic analyses since it represents a rapid method for the detection of the.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] B.Sc. Programme - Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College
    Preparation of sodium fusion extract (Lassaigne's extract). A dry piece of sodium metal is heated in a dry fusion tube till it melts, cooled and a little of ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Chemistry Practical - Telangana Open School Society
    The experiment consists of two stages, (i) preparation of sodium fusion extract and. (ii) to test for individial elements. 1) Preparation of Sodium Fusion ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] chem_lab_manual.pdf - Karnatak Science College Dharwad
    Preparation of Sodium fusion extract(S.E.). Place a piece of dry sodium metal (dried by pressing between folds of the filter paper) in a fusion tube and heat ...
  13. [13]
    Qualitative Analysis of Organic Compounds | CK-12 Foundation
    Sep 30, 2025 · Phosphorus is detected by fusing the organic compound with an oxidising agent like sodium peroxide (Na2O2). During fusion, phosphorus is ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Semimicro Qualitative Organic Analysis Second Edition
    ... Lassaigne test depends on heating the compound with an alkali metal—usually sodium, hence, the test is often designated as sodium fusion. When an organic ...
  15. [15]
    The gravimetric semi-micro determination of phosphorus, as ...
    A gravimetric finish has been applied to the semi-micro determination of phosphorus in organic compounds after fusion with sodium peroxide.Missing: detection Na2O2
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Organic chemistry – sOme Basic PrinciPles and Techniques - NCERT
    compound, the sodium fusion extract is first boiled with concentrated nitric acid to decompose cyanide or sulphide of sodium formed during Lassaigne's test.
  17. [17]
    Lassaigne Test: Principle, Procedure & Identification of Elements
    Rating 4.2 (373,000) This classical technique, also called sodium fusion test, transforms covalently bonded elements into their ionic forms using metallic sodium, so standard ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Detection of Elements: Lassaigne’s Test (Theory)
    This is done by fusing the organic compound with sodium metal. The ionic compounds formed during the fusion are extracted in aqueous solution and can be ...Missing: preparation | Show results with:preparation
  19. [19]
    [PDF] SYSTEMATIC QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS - NCERT
    (d) Test for nitrogen and sulphur when present together. When nitrogen and sulphur both are present in an organic compound, sodium thiocyanate may be formed ...Missing: sulfur | Show results with:sulfur
  20. [20]
    [PDF] SOPs/ INSTRUCTION MANUAL - DSCW
    Test for sulphur. (i) Lead acetate test. Acidified second portion of L.E with dilute acetic acid and added. Lead acetate solution. (ii) Sodium Nitroprusside ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Detection of Elements in Organic Compounds: Backgraound
    Lassaigne's test, also known as sodium fusion test, is used to detect nitrogen, sulfur, and halogens in organic compounds. It involves reacting the compound ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Lab 14: Qualitative Organic Analysis
    ... dry test tube and heat it over a flame, ... If only a faint turbidity is produced, it may be caused by traces of impurities or by incomplete sodium fusion.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Qualitative Analysis of Organic Compounds.
    There is no definite set procedure that can be generally applied to organic qualitative analysis. ... dry test tube, until it liquifies (5 min).* The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Practical Manual of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry - I
    Qualitative Analysis of Organic Compounds. The analysis and identification ... Lassaigne's Sodium Fusion Test. C, H, O, N, S, X → NaX. NaCN. Na2S. NaCNS.
  28. [28]
    Extra elements detection in organic compounds by nonbreakable ...
    Initially, an extra elements detection was initiated by Lassaigne in 1843 (Citation12) with subsequent modification by Jacobsen in 1879 on replacing sodium ...
  29. [29]
    Investigation of the Alternative Green Procedure for Lassaigne's Test ...
    Oct 24, 2019 · Conventionally, metallic sodium is fused with organic compound (containing some heteroatom). This results into formation of sodium salts. Being ...
  30. [30]
    Spectrophotometric Determination of Organic Nitrogen by a Modified ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · The percentage of N was calculated. Lassaigne's Procedure of Sodium Fusion. The procedure should be performed in a hood; wearing. rubbergloves ...
  31. [31]
    Organic qualitative analysis. An improved sodium fusion procedure ...
    A new sodium fusion procedure and a new single reagent test for nitrogen and sulfur.
  32. [32]
    lassaigne's test for nitrogen - sulfur - halogens - AdiChemistry
    Lassaigne's test is used for the detection of elements: Nitrogen (N), Sulfur (S), Chlorine (Cl), Bromine (Br) and Iodine (I). This test involves following two ...Missing: adoption education 20th
  33. [33]
    Organic qualitative analysis: The oxygen flask method as an alternative to sodium fusion
    ### Summary of Sodium Fusion Test Limitations, Safety Hazards, and Oxygen Flask Method Preference