Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Solar maximum

Solar maximum is the peak phase of the Sun's approximately 11-year solar cycle, during which solar activity reaches its highest levels, marked by the maximum number of sunspots on the solar surface and a surge in phenomena such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs).^[1]^[2] This period typically lasts about one year, with the Sun's magnetic field undergoing a complete reversal as activity builds from the preceding solar minimum.^[1] The solar cycle, driven by the Sun's dynamo-generated magnetic field, alternates between minima and maxima, with sunspot counts serving as a primary indicator of activity; during maximum, these dark, magnetically active regions can number over 100 per month, compared to fewer than 10 at minimum.^[2] Solar flares, sudden bursts of radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum, and CMEs, massive expulsions of plasma and magnetic fields, become far more frequent and intense, potentially releasing energy equivalent to billions of hydrogen bombs.^[1] These events can disrupt Earth's technological infrastructure, including satellite operations, GPS signals, power grids, and radio communications, while also enhancing the visibility of auroras at lower latitudes.^[2]^[3] For Solar Cycle 25, which began in December 2019, NASA and NOAA announced in October 2024 that the Sun had entered its maximum phase. The smoothed sunspot number peaked at approximately 161 in October 2024, significantly exceeding initial predictions of around 115 in July 2025.^[1]^[3]^[4] Notable events include a severe geomagnetic storm in May 2024 triggered by multiple CMEs, producing widespread auroras, the cycle's strongest flare to date, an X9.0-class event on October 3, 2024, and an X5.1 flare in November 2025 that caused radio blackouts and auroras as far south as Florida.^[1]^[5]^[6] As of November 2025, the maximum phase is declining but remains active, having persisted through much of 2025 and provided opportunities for scientific study via missions like NASA's Parker Solar Probe, which conducted its closest approach to the Sun in December 2024.^[1]

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Solar maximum is the phase of the Sun's approximately 11-year solar cycle during which magnetic activity and associated phenomena reach their peak, characterized by the highest levels of sunspot numbers and solar activity. This period typically features increased frequency of solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and enhanced solar radiation output compared to other phases of the cycle. In contrast, solar minimum represents the opposite phase of diminished solar activity, with fewer sunspots and reduced eruptive events.^[2] The transition between these phases underscores the cyclic nature of the Sun's magnetic dynamo.^[9] Solar maximum is identified primarily through the 13-month smoothed sunspot number (SSN), which quantifies overall activity and signals the peak when it reaches its cycle maximum, often exceeding 100 for moderate to strong cycles; the relative sunspot number (Ri), a standardized measure derived from observations, serves as a closely related indicator.^[3] This peak phase generally endures for 1 to 2 years, embedded within the larger 11-year cycle framework.^[1]

Key Characteristics

During solar maximum, the Sun exhibits a marked increase in the frequency and size of sunspots, which are dark, cooler regions on the photosphere caused by intense magnetic activity, often forming complex groups that can span thousands of kilometers. Faculae, bright patches of magnetic field concentrations in the solar atmosphere, also become more numerous and prominent, contributing to the overall heightened visibility of solar features. Additionally, prominences—dense, plasma loops extending from the chromosphere into the corona—grow larger and more frequent, sometimes lasting for days and arching over sunspot regions. These phenomena peak in activity, with sunspot numbers typically reaching 100 to 250 per month, as observed in cycles like Solar Cycle 24. Solar flares, sudden bursts of radiation and particles from the Sun's atmosphere, intensify during this phase, with a surge in M-class (moderate) and X-class (powerful) events that can release energy equivalent to billions of atomic bombs. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs), massive expulsions of plasma and magnetic fields from the corona, also become more prevalent, occurring several times per day compared to once every few days at solar minimum; these ejections can carry up to 10^32 ergs of energy and propagate at speeds of 250 to 3,000 km/s. Such heightened eruptive activity underscores the dynamic instability of the Sun's magnetic field at maximum. Total solar irradiance rises by approximately 0.1% above levels at solar minimum, resulting in a subtle but measurable increase in the Sun's radiant output, primarily due to the covering and uncovering effects of sunspots and faculae on the photosphere. This variation, while small, influences the solar constant, which averages about 1,366 W/m² at 1 AU. The Sun's global magnetic dipole field undergoes a reversal around the time of maximum, shifting from a predominantly dipolar configuration to one of greater complexity with multiple poles, marking a transition in the solar cycle's magnetic polarity. Solar maxima exhibit variability across cycles, with some displaying broad, prolonged peaks spanning several years—such as the extended maximum of Solar Cycle 24 from 2011 to 2014—while others feature sharper, more intense crests, like the rapid rise in Cycle 19 during the 1950s. This irregularity reflects underlying fluctuations in the solar dynamo, leading to differences in peak sunspot numbers and activity levels that can deviate by up to 50% between cycles.

Solar Cycle Context

The 11-Year Solar Cycle

The 11-year solar cycle, also known as the Schwabe cycle, was discovered in 1843 by German astronomer Heinrich Schwabe through his meticulous observations of sunspot numbers over nearly two decades. Schwabe noted a periodic variation in sunspot activity, with peaks and troughs occurring approximately every 11 years, marking the first recognition of this fundamental rhythm in solar behavior.^[10] This cycle typically lasts about 11 years, measured from one solar minimum to the next, during which the Sun's magnetic activity waxes and wanes in a predictable pattern. The cycle encompasses four main phases: the rising or waxing phase, where sunspot numbers increase from minimum levels; the maximum phase, characterized by peak activity; the declining or waning phase, with sunspot numbers decreasing; and the minimum phase, a period of low activity that transitions into the next cycle. Additionally, the 11-year sunspot cycle is embedded within a longer 22-year Hale cycle, during which the Sun's global magnetic field reverses polarity twice, returning to its original orientation after two full sunspot cycles.^[11]^[2]^[9] Solar cycles are numbered sequentially starting from Solar Cycle 1, which began in 1755 following the reliable establishment of sunspot records. This numbering system continues to the present, with Solar Cycle 25 commencing in December 2019 after the minimum of Cycle 24. Solar Cycle 25 reached its smoothed maximum in October 2024 with an international sunspot number of 163.9, exceeding initial predictions of a peak around 115 in July 2025; as of November 2025, it is in the early declining phase following maximum, with ongoing elevated activity including strong X-class flares.^[12]^[13]^[14] The amplitude of these cycles, measured by the maximum smoothed sunspot number, varies significantly across cycles, influencing the intensity of solar activity. For instance, Cycles 5 and 6 (circa 1800–1823) were notably weak, occurring during the Dalton Minimum—a period of reduced solar output linked to cooler terrestrial climate. In contrast, Cycle 19 (1954–1964) was one of the strongest on record, reaching a peak smoothed sunspot number of 201, far exceeding the average and driving heightened solar phenomena. These variations highlight the dynamic nature of the solar dynamo, with cycle strengths showing a secular increase since the Maunder Minimum before gradually declining in recent decades.^[15]^[16]

Role in the Cycle

The solar maximum marks the culmination of the rising phase of the solar cycle, during which sunspot emergence accelerates as magnetic activity intensifies, leading to a peak in overall solar output. This transition is characterized by a rapid increase in the number and complexity of sunspots, driven by the strengthening of the Sun's global magnetic field, which concentrates flux into active regions. The acceleration in sunspot formation typically spans several years, with the rate of increase often correlating with the eventual peak intensity, as observed in cycles where faster rises precede stronger maxima.^[17] A notable feature of solar maximum is the hemispheric asymmetry in activity, where the northern and southern solar hemispheres often reach their individual peaks 1-2 years apart. This lag arises from differences in the timing of magnetic flux emergence and transport in each hemisphere, contributing to an uneven distribution of sunspots and flares during the overall cycle peak. Such asymmetry is a persistent characteristic across multiple cycles, influencing the global progression of solar activity without altering the approximate 11-year periodicity.^[18]^[19] During solar maximum, the Sun's polar magnetic fields weaken significantly and undergo reversal, a critical process that signals the shift toward the declining phase. The reversal typically occurs within a year of the sunspot maximum, as opposing magnetic polarities from emerging active regions migrate poleward and overpower the existing fields. This event resets the Sun's dipole moment, transitioning the magnetic configuration from one cycle to the next.^[20]^[21]^[22] The intensity of solar maximum plays a key role in seeding the subsequent cycle through the remnant magnetic flux that persists into the minimum phase. Following the polar reversal, the strength of the newly established polar fields—derived from the net flux transported during maximum—directly influences the amplitude and rise of the next cycle's activity. Stronger maxima generally produce more robust polar fields, leading to enhanced flux available for the following minimum and a more vigorous subsequent rise.^[20]^[23] Furthermore, the peak intensity at solar maximum modulates the character of the declining phase, often resulting in a prolonged period of elevated activity for stronger cycles, while weaker maxima lead to a more abrupt drop-off. This modulation affects the overall cycle length and the persistence of high-energy events into the decline, linking the maximum's vigor to the timing and intensity of the transition back to minimum.^[1]^[24]

Underlying Mechanisms

Solar Dynamo Theory

The solar dynamo theory posits that the Sun's magnetic field is generated and sustained through the interaction of convective motions, rotation, and magnetic fields within the solar interior, leading to periodic cycles of activity that peak at solar maximum. This process operates primarily in the convection zone, where turbulent plasma flows amplify weak seed fields into the strong fields observed as sunspots and flares. Seminal kinematic models, such as those developed by Babcock and Leighton, describe a cyclic regeneration of poloidal and toroidal magnetic field components, with differential rotation stretching poloidal fields into toroidal ones (the ω-effect) and subsequent buoyant rise and twisting of flux tubes regenerating the poloidal field.^[25] In the Babcock-Leighton model, differential rotation—faster at the equator than the poles—winds up the weak poloidal field lines into strong toroidal fields beneath the surface, concentrating them into flux tubes that rise through the convection zone due to buoyancy. These emerging flux tubes, observed as bipolar sunspot groups, are tilted by the Coriolis force, with leading spots closer to the equator exhibiting opposite polarity to trailing spots, facilitating the diffusion and cancellation of toroidal flux at the surface while opposite-polarity flux migrates poleward to reverse the polar fields. This mechanism, reliant on near-surface processes, explains the transport of magnetic flux and the reversal of the Sun's global dipole field near the cycle maximum. Convection plays a key role by enabling the α-effect, where helical turbulent motions—induced by the Coriolis force acting on rising parcels in the rotating convection zone—systematically twist and shear field lines, converting toroidal fields back into poloidal ones.^[26]^[27] The tachocline, a thin shear layer at the base of the convection zone approximately 0.05 solar radii thick, is crucial for field amplification, as its strong radial and latitudinal differential rotation provides the primary site for the ω-effect, storing and strengthening toroidal fields before their buoyant emergence. This interface between the rigidly rotating radiative interior and the differentially rotating convection zone confines the dynamo action, preventing excessive spreading of magnetic fields. The resulting latitudinal migration of magnetic activity bands, as depicted in the butterfly diagram, illustrates equatorward propagation of sunspot latitudes over the 11-year cycle, driven by the dynamo wave's interaction with rotational shear; activity begins at mid-latitudes (~30–40°) near cycle minimum and shifts equatorward, peaking near the equator at maximum. This pattern, first charted by Maunder, aligns with the Parker-Yoshimura sign rule for wave direction, ensuring the observed antisymmetric field reversals across hemispheres.^[27] Recent global simulations suggest that the solar dynamo may operate primarily as a near-surface phenomenon, with cycle propagation driven by shallow shear layers and Rossby waves rather than solely deep tachocline dynamics.^[28]

Sunspot and Activity Generation

During solar maximum, enhanced solar activity arises from the emergence of magnetic flux tubes from the solar interior. These flux tubes, originating from dynamo processes in the tachocline, become buoyant due to reduced density compared to surrounding plasma and rise through the convection zone as twisted, Ω-shaped loops.^[29] Upon intersecting the photosphere, the apex of the loop breaks the surface, forming pairs of sunspots with opposite magnetic polarities that mark the footpoints of the emerging structure.^[29] This emergence process concentrates magnetic fields into compact regions, driving the increased sunspot numbers and associated phenomena observed at maximum.^[11] The polarity configuration of these emerging sunspot pairs follows Hale's law, which dictates systematic orientations based on hemisphere and solar cycle phase. In the northern hemisphere during an even-numbered cycle (such as Cycle 24), the leading sunspot (the one closer to the equator) exhibits negative polarity, while the trailing sunspot has positive polarity; these roles reverse in the southern hemisphere, with leading spots positive and trailing negative.^[30] Polarity reverses between consecutive 11-year cycles, ensuring a 22-year full cycle for the magnetic pattern.^[30] This hemispheric asymmetry arises from the underlying toroidal field orientation generated by differential rotation.^[31] Emerging bipolar regions also exhibit a characteristic tilt governed by Joy's law, where the angle between the line connecting the leading and trailing sunspots and the east-west direction increases with heliographic latitude. At low latitudes near the equator, typical during early maximum phases, the tilt is small (around 3°–7°), aligning regions nearly east-west, but it rises to about 0.5 times the latitude (e.g., ~15° at 30° latitude) at higher latitudes.^[32] This latitudinal dependence results from the Coriolis force acting on rising flux tubes, twisting them during ascent and promoting separation of polarities with the leading spot equatorward.^[32] The law holds across cycles, though slight variations occur with flux emergence phase, with maximum tilt observed at full flux emergence.^[32] Groups of these bipolar sunspot pairs evolve into active regions, extensive complexes spanning tens of thousands of kilometers where magnetic fields are intensified up to 1000 times the quiet-Sun average.^[33] Active regions serve as primary sites for explosive energy release, producing solar flares through magnetic reconnection and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) via flux rope eruptions, with activity peaking as sunspot coverage reaches 0.5%–1% of the solar disk during maximum.^[33] These regions often contain multiple sunspot umbrae and penumbrae, interconnected by filaments and loops that channel plasma flows and store free magnetic energy. A key structural feature distinguishing sunspot components is the Wilson effect, which reveals depth differences between the umbra and penumbra through limb-side foreshortening. The umbra, the darkest central region with field strengths exceeding 2000 G, appears depressed relative to the surrounding penumbra (fields ~1000 G) and quiet photosphere, typically by 300–600 km at optical depth unity (τ=1).^[34] This depression arises from magnetohydrostatic equilibrium, where magnetic pressure support reduces gas pressure and temperature (umbra ~4000 K vs. penumbra ~5500 K), lowering opacity and elevating the τ=1 surface.^[34] The height difference Δh can be approximated by balancing magnetic and gravitational forces:

\Delta h \approx \frac{B^2}{8\pi \rho g}

where B is the vertical magnetic field component, ρ is plasma density (~3×10^{-7} g cm^{-3} at photosphere), and g is solar surface gravity (~2.7×10^4 cm s^{-2}); stronger fields in the umbra yield greater depressions compared to the penumbra.^[34] Observations confirm the effect intensifies toward the limb, with umbral width contracting more than penumbral, underscoring the geometric and thermal stratification.^[34]

Historical Observations

Early Records

The earliest indications of solar maxima come from naked-eye observations in ancient Chinese and Japanese records, which occasionally described unusual solar phenomena during eclipses that may correlate with heightened solar activity. Similarly, the solar eclipse of May 1, 1185, prompted the first known description of solar prominences—fiery red extensions from the Sun's edge—recorded in East Asian annals as "red vapors" or "crimson birds," suggesting a period of elevated solar activity consistent with a maximum phase.^[35]^[36] The advent of telescopic observations revolutionized solar recording, beginning with Galileo Galilei's discovery of sunspots in late 1610. Using a rudimentary telescope, Galileo documented transient dark patches on the Sun's surface, publishing detailed sketches in 1613 that captured their motion and variability, marking the onset of systematic telescopic monitoring. These observations aligned with solar cycle -4, culminating in the first identified maximum around 1615, when French astronomer Jean Tarde reported numerous sunspots on August 25, signaling peak activity.^[37] A stark contrast appeared during the Maunder Minimum from 1645 to 1715, a grand minimum characterized by the near-total absence of sunspots and thus no discernible maxima, as evidenced by sparse European records showing only isolated spots over decades. This prolonged low-activity period, later quantified through archival analysis, highlighted irregularities in solar cycles before the modern era.^[38] In the 18th and 19th centuries, amateur astronomers advanced cycle documentation through detailed charts. Johann Caspar Staudacher produced over 500 sunspot drawings from 1749 to 1799, illustrating latitudinal migration patterns that foreshadowed cycle progression. Building on this, Samuel Heinrich Schwabe's meticulous records from 1825 to 1867—comprising 8,486 sketches—revealed the approximate 11-year periodicity of solar activity, establishing the regularity of maxima and minima. A notable event during this era was the Carrington Event of September 1–2, 1859, a massive solar flare observed by Richard Carrington amid the maximum of solar cycle 10 (peaking around 1860), which produced widespread geomagnetic disturbances.^[37]^[39]

Modern Era Developments

The advent of systematic magnetographic observations at Mount Wilson Observatory marked a significant advancement in monitoring solar magnetic fields during maxima. Beginning in early 1917 and continuing until 1985, these daily magnetograms provided detailed measurements of sunspot field strengths and polarities, enabling reconstructions of the Sun's photospheric magnetic activity across multiple cycles, including peaks in cycles 18 through 21.^[40] Solar Cycle 19, spanning from April 1954 to October 1964 with its maximum occurring in March 1958, stands as the strongest recorded solar maximum to date, achieving a smoothed sunspot number (SSN) of 201.3. This peak, observed through ground-based telescopes like those at Mount Wilson, highlighted unprecedented levels of sunspot activity and associated phenomena, such as enhanced radio emissions and auroral displays, surpassing all prior cycles in intensity.^[41] The launch of space-based observatories revolutionized observations of solar maxima starting in the late 20th century. The Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), operational since December 1995, has imaged the solar corona via its Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) and probed the Sun's interior through helioseismology with the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI), capturing dynamics during the maxima of cycles 23 (peaking in 2001), 24, and 25. Complementing SOHO, the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), launched in February 2010, employs the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) to map magnetic fields and the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) for high-resolution multi-wavelength imaging of the corona and transition region, providing continuous data on cycles 24 and 25 maxima.^[42]^[43] A notable terrestrial impact from a Cycle 22 maximum event occurred on March 13, 1989, when a coronal mass ejection (CME) triggered the most intense geomagnetic storm of the 20th century, causing a widespread blackout of the Hydro-Québec power grid that affected six million people for up to nine hours. This event, stemming from an X15-class flare in early March 1989 during Solar Cycle 22 (which peaked in November 1989 with a smoothed SSN of 158.5), underscored the vulnerability of modern infrastructure to solar maxima-induced space weather.^[44] In contrast, Solar Cycle 24 (December 2008 to December 2019) exhibited a notably weaker and atypical maximum, with a smoothed SSN of 81.8—the lowest since Cycle 14—and a distinctive double-peaked structure, featuring rises in activity in 2012 and 2014. Observations from SOHO and SDO revealed reduced coronal mass ejections and solar energetic particle events compared to prior cycles, reflecting diminished overall magnetic activity during this prolonged maximum phase.^[45]^[46] Solar Cycle 25, beginning in December 2019, reached its maximum phase as announced by NASA and NOAA in October 2024, with a smoothed sunspot number exceeding initial predictions and peaking around 160 in late 2024. Observations from SDO and NASA's Parker Solar Probe have captured intense activity, including an X9.0-class flare on October 3, 2024, and a severe geomagnetic storm in May 2024, continuing to advance understanding of solar maxima dynamics as of November 2025.^[1]^[3]

Measurement and Monitoring

Observational Techniques

Observational techniques for solar maxima encompass a range of ground-based, space-based, and proxy methods designed to capture heightened solar activity, including sunspots, flares, and coronal emissions, during these cycle peaks. Ground-based instruments have long provided foundational data through direct imaging and spectroscopy. The International Sunspot Number, provided by the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC)/World Data Center for the Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations (SILSO) and based on the historical Zürich relative sunspot number established since 1749, quantifies solar activity by counting sunspot groups and individual spots observed visually or photographically, serving as a primary index for tracking maxima with daily records compiled from multiple stations.^[47]^[48]^[49] Spectroheliographs, which scan the solar disk to produce monochromatic images in the H-alpha line at 656.3 nm, enable detailed monitoring of chromospheric flares and prominences that intensify during solar maxima, revealing dynamic plasma motions in the lower atmosphere.^[50]^[51] Space-based observatories offer uninterrupted, high-resolution views free from atmospheric distortion, focusing on emissions across the electromagnetic spectrum. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES), operated by NOAA, measure solar X-ray flux in the 1-8 Å and 0.5-4 Å bands using soft X-ray detectors, detecting flares that spike during maxima and providing real-time data for activity classification.^[52] NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), launched in 2010 and operational as of 2025, employs the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) to analyze Doppler shifts in solar absorption lines for helioseismology, probing internal convection zone dynamics that accelerate toward solar maxima, and the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) to image the Sun in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) bands such as 171 Å and 195 Å, capturing loop structures and heating events in the transition region and corona that proliferate during maxima.^[53]^[54] Proxy data extend observations to historical maxima beyond direct records, relying on indirect tracers preserved in natural archives. Cosmogenic isotopes such as beryllium-10 (¹⁰Be) and carbon-14 (¹⁴C), produced by galactic cosmic rays modulated by solar activity, are measured in polar ice cores; elevated solar maxima suppress these isotopes by strengthening the heliospheric magnetic field, allowing reconstructions of past cycles over millennia.^[55]^[56] Multi-wavelength approaches combine observations to map activity across layers of the solar atmosphere. Ground-based radio arrays, including the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR) and Nançay Decameter Array, detect solar radio bursts—such as type II and III emissions from shock waves and electron beams—in the decameter to meter wavelength range, tracing particle acceleration associated with flare activity.^[57]^[58] Real-time global networks ensure comprehensive coverage for time-sensitive monitoring. The Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG), consisting of six identical ground-based telescopes distributed worldwide, provides near-continuous full-disk Doppler velocity and intensity imaging at 676.8 nm and 656.3 nm, supporting helioseismology and synoptic mapping of surface activity throughout the solar cycle.^[59]^[60]

Data Analysis Methods

Data analysis methods for solar maxima involve processing raw observational data from ground- and space-based instruments to quantify solar activity peaks, emphasizing standardized indices and statistical techniques to filter noise and reveal cycle characteristics.^[61] The smoothed sunspot number serves as a primary metric for defining solar cycle peaks, calculated using a 13-month running mean to reduce short-term fluctuations and highlight the underlying 11-year periodicity. This smoothing applies a tapered-boxcar filter, where the central 11 months receive full weight and the first and last months receive half-weight, expressed as SSN_smoothed(t) = (0.5 SSN(t-6) + SSN(t-5) + ... + SSN(t+5) + 0.5 SSN(t+6)) / 12, effectively averaging over 13 months while normalizing the total weight to unity. The maximum of this smoothed series marks the solar maximum, providing a robust indicator of cycle amplitude that correlates with heightened magnetic activity.^[61]^[62] The Wolf sunspot number, a foundational index for activity monitoring, is computed daily from visual observations as Ri = k (10g + f), where g represents the number of sunspot groups, f the total number of individual spots, and k a normalization factor accounting for observer and instrumental variations, typically around 1 for standardized telescopes. Monthly and annual averages of this index form the basis for long-term cycle analysis, with solar maxima identified by peaks exceeding baseline levels, such as above 100 in recent cycles. This formula weights groups more heavily to reflect their larger magnetic complexity, ensuring consistency across datasets.^[63]^[64] Harmonic analysis employs Fourier decomposition to break down sunspot number time series into sinusoidal components, isolating the fundamental 11-year cycle and higher harmonics to determine amplitude variations and phase shifts associated with solar maxima. By applying the discrete Fourier transform to detrended waveforms, researchers extract dominant frequencies, revealing how non-linear interactions modulate peak intensities, as seen in third-harmonic contributions that sharpen maximum profiles. This method aids in characterizing cycle asymmetry, where the rising phase to maximum often differs from the decline.^[65]^[66] The F10.7 cm solar radio flux index acts as a key proxy for overall solar activity, measuring emission at 2.8 GHz to capture chromospheric and coronal contributions that peak concurrently with sunspot maxima. Expressed in solar flux units (sfu), values typically rise from ~70 sfu at minima to over 150 sfu at maxima, providing a complementary metric less affected by visual biases in sunspot counts. Its daily measurements enable real-time tracking of maximum onset, with smoothed versions aligning closely to Wolf number peaks.^[67]^[68] Uncertainty in these analyses arises from observational inconsistencies across multiple sites, addressed by merging datasets with statistical weighting and propagating errors to generate confidence intervals. Error bars on sunspot numbers, often 5-10% of the value, incorporate Poisson counting statistics for spots and groups, plus systematic offsets calibrated via inter-observatory comparisons, ensuring reliable maxima identification even with sparse historical data. Advanced models quantify these uncertainties multiplicatively, separating measurement noise from calibration drifts to refine peak timings within months.^[69]

Impacts and Effects

Terrestrial Consequences

During solar maximum, heightened solar activity, including frequent coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar flares, triggers geomagnetic storms that profoundly influence Earth's upper atmosphere and technological systems.^[70] These storms enhance auroral displays by energizing particles in the magnetosphere, expanding the auroral oval equatorward and making the northern lights visible at lower latitudes, such as the northern United States and southern Europe during intense events with Kp indices of 7-9.^[70] For instance, strong CMEs, which can travel at speeds up to several million miles per hour (over 3000 km/s), deposit energy into the magnetosphere, accelerating electrons that collide with atmospheric gases to produce vivid auroras far beyond typical high-latitude zones.^[70]^[71] Solar flares during solar maximum also induce significant ionospheric disturbances by emitting intense X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) radiation, which ionizes the D-layer of the ionosphere on Earth's sunlit side.^[72] This enhanced ionization increases electron density in the D-layer (50-90 km altitude), leading to greater absorption of high-frequency (HF) radio signals through collisions with neutral particles, often causing blackouts lasting tens of minutes for X-class flares.^[72] Additionally, these disturbances generate plasma irregularities that result in GPS signal scintillation, where rapid fluctuations in signal amplitude and phase degrade navigation accuracy, particularly in equatorial and high-latitude regions during post-sunset hours following geomagnetic storms.^[73] Such scintillation can lead to loss of signal lock in GPS receivers, affecting aviation and precise positioning services, with severity increasing during solar maximum due to more frequent flare and storm activity.^[73] Radiation exposure at high altitudes varies with solar cycle phase, as solar maximum modulates cosmic rays and introduces sporadic enhancements from solar events. Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), primarily protons and heavy ions from supernovae, reach peak flux during solar minimum but decline toward solar maximum due to the intensified solar magnetic field, which deflects these high-energy particles.^[74] However, solar energetic particles (SEPs) from flares and CMEs—more prevalent near solar maximum—increase radiation doses temporarily, especially in polar regions where they penetrate the atmosphere more easily.^[74] For high-altitude flights, such as those on polar routes, this results in elevated exposure risks during SEP events, up to about 0.1 mSv per hour (100 μSv/h), though overall background radiation from GCRs is lower than at solar minimum.^[74]^[75] Particle precipitation from solar proton events (SPEs) during solar maximum contributes to atmospheric chemistry changes, notably ozone depletion through enhanced NOx production. Energetic protons ionize the middle atmosphere, producing nitrogen oxides (NOx) via reactions with molecular nitrogen and oxygen, which catalytically destroy ozone (O3) in the stratosphere and mesosphere.^[76] Below about 50 km, NOx-driven cycles dominate, leading to depletions of up to 30% in the polar middle stratosphere during intense SPEs, with recovery taking months due to NOx's long lifetime in winter conditions.^[76] Above 50 km, HOx from precipitation complements this, but NOx remains the primary depleter in the lower regions, with interhemispheric differences arising from sunlight availability—northern polar depletions are more persistent than southern ones.^[76] A prominent historical example of these terrestrial consequences occurred during the Halloween solar storms of October-November 2003, near the peak of Solar Cycle 23, when a series of X-class flares and CMEs from active region AR 0486 caused widespread disruptions.^[77] Over half of Earth-orbiting satellites experienced issues, including permanent damage to several spacecraft like the SOHO solar observatory, which lost contact temporarily, and the ACE satellite, which suffered operational anomalies.^[77] These events also triggered severe geomagnetic storms (Kp up to 9), leading to GPS inaccuracies, airline communication blackouts, and a power grid failure in Sweden, underscoring the vulnerability of modern technology to solar maximum conditions.^[78] More recently, during the Solar Cycle 25 maximum, a G5 geomagnetic storm on May 10-11, 2024, triggered by multiple CMEs, produced auroras visible as far south as Mexico and disrupted satellite operations and radio communications, highlighting ongoing risks as of 2025.^[79]

Space Weather Implications

During solar maximum, the increased frequency and intensity of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) significantly amplify space weather risks throughout the heliosphere. These eruptions of magnetized plasma from the Sun's corona can propagate at speeds ranging from hundreds to over 3000 km/s, with some reaching speeds over 3000 km/s during intense solar activity.^[80]^[71] When CMEs exceed the ambient solar wind speed of about 400 km/s, they drive shock waves that accelerate charged particles and compress the interplanetary medium, potentially disrupting satellite operations and navigation systems far beyond Earth's orbit.^[81]^[82] A key aspect of CME propagation is estimating their transit time to 1 AU, the average Earth-Sun distance of approximately 150 million km. The basic transit time can be approximated by the equation t = \frac{d}{v} where d = 1 AU and v is the CME's average speed; for typical speeds of 400–800 km/s, this yields transit times of 2–4 days, though faster events can arrive in under 24 hours.^[83] These shocks contribute to broader heliospheric disturbances, enhancing particle fluxes that pose hazards to deep-space missions.^[84] Solar energetic particles (SEPs), primarily high-energy protons accelerated by solar flares and CME-driven shocks, represent another critical threat during solar maximum, when such events peak. SEP events can deliver radiation doses exceeding 1 Gy to unshielded astronauts, risking acute radiation syndrome or increased cancer incidence on missions beyond low-Earth orbit.^[85]^[86] For instance, protons with energies above 10 MeV can penetrate spacecraft hulls, necessitating rapid shielding protocols to mitigate exposure.^[87] Upon reaching Earth, CMEs and associated SEPs trigger geomagnetic storms, measurable via indices like the planetary Kp index, which quantifies magnetospheric disturbances on a scale of 0–9. During major storms linked to solar maximum activity, Kp values often exceed 7, indicating severe ring current enhancements that can degrade high-frequency radio communications and induce currents in spacecraft power systems.^[88]^[70] To address these risks, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) employs standardized scales for forecasting and response. The G-scale classifies geomagnetic storms from G1 (minor, Kp=5) to G5 (extreme, Kp=9), guiding satellite operators on potential orbit decays or attitude control issues.^[89] Complementarily, the S-scale assesses solar radiation storms from S1 (minor) to S5 (extreme), based on proton flux levels above 10 MeV, alerting mission planners to SEP hazards for crewed and uncrewed assets.^[89] These tools enable proactive measures, such as powering down sensitive instruments, to safeguard space infrastructure during heightened solar maximum conditions.^[90]

Predictions and Forecasting

Prediction Models

Prediction models for solar maxima primarily fall into three categories: precursor methods, dynamical models, and statistical approaches, each leveraging different aspects of solar activity data to forecast the amplitude and timing of upcoming cycles. These models aim to anticipate the peak sunspot number (SSN) and occurrence of solar maximum based on observed patterns in the Sun's magnetic field and activity history. Ensemble techniques further enhance reliability by integrating outputs from multiple models to generate probabilistic forecasts.^[91] Precursor methods use observables near solar minimum to predict the subsequent maximum, with the strength of the polar magnetic field serving as a key indicator. The polar field, which reaches its peak amplitude around cycle minima, correlates strongly with the SSN at the next maximum, as the field's intensity reflects the poloidal component generated from the decay of the previous cycle's toroidal field. This relationship arises from dynamo theory, where the polar field seeds the toroidal field for the following cycle via differential rotation. Historical data show a Pearson correlation coefficient of approximately 0.84 between polar flux at minimum and cycle amplitude, enabling predictions years in advance.^[92]^[93]^[92] An empirical linear relation often approximates this precursor:

\text{SSN}_{\max} \approx a \cdot (\text{polar field strength})_{\min} + b,

where a and b are fitted coefficients derived from regression on past cycles, typically yielding a \approx 0.2–$0.3 when the field is in units of gauss or normalized flux. For instance, weaker polar fields at minimum, as observed in recent cycles, forecast moderate SSN maxima around 100–120. This method has successfully anticipated the amplitudes of cycles 21–24 when applied near minimum.^[23]^[94]^[91] Dynamical models simulate the solar dynamo process to evolve magnetic fields forward in time, incorporating physical mechanisms like convection and flows. Flux-transport dynamo models, a prominent class, treat the meridional circulation—poleward flow at the surface and equatorward return at the base of the convection zone—as the primary transporter of poloidal flux, which regenerates the toroidal field responsible for sunspots. These simulations use observed surface fluxes and flow speeds to predict cycle amplitudes, often reproducing observed irregularities like the Waldmeier effect (faster rise times for stronger cycles). Early applications forecasted Solar Cycle 24's SSN maximum between 80 and 180, highlighting the models' sensitivity to meridional flow variations.^[95]^[96]^[97] Statistical approaches apply regression techniques to historical cycle parameters, such as relating SSN maximum to the rise time from minimum to maximum, which shows an anti-correlation: shorter rise times precede stronger peaks. Linear or nonlinear regressions on datasets spanning multiple cycles (e.g., SSN versus rise duration or previous cycle length) provide baseline forecasts, often as simple as averaging past amplitudes adjusted for trends. These methods excel in capturing empirical patterns without assuming underlying physics, though they rely on the stationarity of cycle statistics. For example, regressing SSN_max against rise time for cycles 1–24 yields predictive equations with root-mean-square errors around 20–30 SSN units.^[98]^[93] Ensemble forecasting combines predictions from precursor, dynamical, and statistical models to produce probability distributions for SSN maximum and timing, reducing biases from individual approaches. By weighting or averaging outputs—such as polar field estimates with dynamo simulations—ensembles generate uncertainty ranges, often forecasting Cycle 25's peak at 130–160 SSN around 2024. This method, adopted by panels like NOAA's, leverages diverse model strengths for more robust space weather planning.^[92]^[94]^[100]

Accuracy and Challenges

The historical accuracy of solar maximum predictions has varied, with notable discrepancies in recent cycles. For Solar Cycle 24, the official NOAA/NASA panel consensus in 2008 forecasted a maximum smoothed sunspot number (SSN) of 90 ± 10, peaking around August 2012.^[101] However, observations confirmed a lower peak of approximately 81.8 in April 2014, representing an overestimate of about 10% by the panel, though broader prediction ensembles averaged higher values around 106 with standard deviations up to 31, leading to errors exceeding 30% in some cases.^[102]^[103] Such variances highlight the limitations in forecasting cycle amplitude, where precursor-based methods like polar field measurements achieved the highest skill scores (around 0.73) compared to climatological approaches (skill score -0.37).^[103] Key challenges in predicting solar maxima stem from the inherent complexities of solar dynamics. The convection zone's chaotic behavior, driven by turbulent plasma motions and the nonlinear solar dynamo, introduces significant unpredictability in magnetic field evolution and flux emergence.^[91] Additionally, hemispheric asymmetries in sunspot activity—such as differing cycle progressions between northern and southern hemispheres—further complicate models, as these imbalances can alter overall cycle strength and timing in non-linear ways.^[100] These factors contribute to the apparent randomness in solar activity patterns, limiting long-term forecast reliability beyond 1-2 years into a cycle.^[100] Validation through hindcasting provides a measure of model performance, where modern techniques applied retrospectively to past cycles demonstrate correlations around 0.7-0.8 with observed data.^[92] For instance, dynamo and precursor models hindcast Cycle 24 amplitude with root-mean-square errors within 20-30% when using early-cycle data, underscoring their utility for short-term refinements but revealing persistent gaps in capturing full variability.^[100]^[104] Recent improvements leverage advanced data integration and collaborative frameworks. Machine learning algorithms applied to helioseismic observations—such as acoustic wave patterns from global helioseismology—enhance predictions by detecting subsurface magnetic changes preceding surface activity, achieving skill scores up to 0.8 in flare and cycle onset forecasting.^[105] International efforts, including the NOAA/NASA/ISES Solar Cycle Prediction Panels, standardize predictions through ensemble methods and real-time data sharing, reducing biases seen in isolated models.^[100] In the current context, Solar Cycle 25's maximum was predicted by the 2019 NOAA/NASA/ISES panel to occur between 2024 and 2025 with a moderate SSN peak of 115, similar to Cycle 24's strength; a December 2023 NOAA update revised this to 137-173 between January and October 2024.^[17]^[106] However, as of November 2025, provisional observations from SILSO indicate a smoothed SSN maximum of 160.9 in October 2024, exceeding initial estimates.^[107]

Long-Term Variations

Grand Solar Maxima

A grand solar maximum is defined as an extended epoch of elevated solar activity lasting typically 50 to 100 years, during which the smoothed sunspot number exceeds 50 for at least two consecutive decades, significantly surpassing the long-term average of solar cycles.^[108] These periods represent rare peaks in the Sun's magnetic dynamo activity, occurring about 16% of the time over the past 8,000 years based on proxy reconstructions.^[109] Characteristics of grand solar maxima include stronger peaks in individual 11-year solar cycles, with sunspot numbers often exceeding 100, alongside shallower minima that reduce the amplitude between cycles, leading to persistently high overall activity.^[108] This results in elevated open solar flux, increased solar wind speeds, and more frequent solar flares and coronal mass ejections compared to average conditions.^[110] The durations follow an exponential distribution, with some maxima lasting up to 200 years, driven by stochastic processes in the solar dynamo.^[108] Identification of grand solar maxima relies on cosmogenic isotope proxies such as carbon-14 (¹⁴C) in tree rings and beryllium-10 (¹⁰Be) in ice cores, which record low production rates during these epochs due to enhanced solar modulation of galactic cosmic rays.^[109] Reconstructions apply physics-based models to these data, using thresholds like solar modulation potential exceeding +1.35σ for ¹⁰Be or +1.41σ for ¹⁴C over durations longer than two solar cycles (about 22 years), allowing robust detection of past events.^[109] A prominent historical example is the Medieval Grand Solar Maximum, spanning approximately 1100 to 1250 CE during the Medieval Warm Period, characterized by sunspot numbers averaging above the cycle norm and bounded by the Oort and Wolf grand minima.^[108] The modern Grand Solar Maximum, encompassing solar cycles 15 through 24 from roughly 1920 onward, peaked in the mid-20th century with cycle means rising above 80 sunspot numbers for several decades, and concluded around 2007–2009 as activity declined in Cycles 23 and 24.^[110] These epochs amplify space weather effects over centuries, with heightened solar output leading to more intense geomagnetic storms, increased radiation exposure for astronauts and high-altitude flights, and greater risks to satellite electronics and power grids from frequent coronal mass ejections.^[110] In contrast to grand solar minima, which feature suppressed activity and reduced space weather, maxima demand enhanced monitoring and mitigation strategies for long-term technological resilience.^[109]

Grand Solar Minima

Grand solar minima are prolonged epochs of significantly suppressed solar activity, typically spanning 50 years or more, during which the amplitudes of multiple 11-year sunspot cycles are markedly reduced compared to the long-term average. These periods represent a distinct dynamical state of the solar dynamo, characterized by weakened magnetic field generation and minimal sunspot emergence. A canonical example is the Maunder Minimum, which lasted from approximately 1645 to 1715 and featured an average annual sunspot number (SSN) of less than 5, with many years exhibiting virtually no observable sunspots.^[38]^[111] Key characteristics of grand solar minima include a scarcity of sunspots and active regions on the solar surface, leading to diminished solar magnetic activity overall. This suppression results in a weakened heliospheric magnetic field, which reduces the modulation of galactic cosmic rays entering the inner solar system, thereby increasing cosmic ray flux at Earth.^[112] Such conditions contrast with grand solar maxima, which involve heightened activity and stronger heliospheric shielding. Proxies for these minima, such as elevated concentrations of cosmogenic isotopes like carbon-14 (¹⁴C) in tree rings, provide evidence of low solar output; during minima, the reduced solar shielding allows more cosmic rays to produce ¹⁴C in Earth's atmosphere, which is then incorporated into annual tree rings.^[113] The Dalton Minimum, occurring from about 1790 to 1830, exemplifies a less extreme but still notable grand minimum, with sunspot numbers averaging around 20–30 during cycle peaks, well below typical values. This period coincided with regional climate cooling, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, contributing to harsher winters and agricultural challenges amid the tail end of the Little Ice Age, though volcanic activity also played a role in the observed temperature anomalies.^[114]^[115] Ongoing research debates the likelihood of an impending grand solar minimum. As of November 2025, Solar Cycle 25 reached its maximum phase in late 2024, with a smoothed sunspot number peak of approximately 157, exceeding initial predictions of 115 and indicating relatively strong activity.^[1]^[116] Earlier models, such as one from 2020 predicting a decline starting that year, have not materialized, while others from 2015 suggest a possible multi-decadal decline beginning in the 2030s with SSN reductions of up to 50% and associated global cooling of 0.5–1.0°C. However, current observations and analyses indicate that a grand solar minimum is unlikely in the near term.^[117]^[118]^[119]

References

[1]
NASA, NOAA: Sun Reaches Maximum Phase in 11-Year Solar Cycle
Oct 15, 2024 · During the most active part of the cycle, known as solar maximum, the Sun can unleash immense explosions of light, energy, and solar radiation — ...
[2]
What Is the Solar Cycle? - NASA Space Place
The middle of the solar cycle is the solar maximum, or when the Sun has the most sunspots. As the cycle ends, it fades back to the solar minimum and then a new ...
[3]
Solar Cycle Progression - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
7cm. A higher solar maximum decreases satellite life and a lower solar maximum extends satellite life. Also, the prediction gives a rough idea of the frequency ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
What is Solar Maximum? - NASA SVS
Oct 15, 2024 · During the most active part of the cycle, known as solar maximum, the Sun can unleash immense explosions of light, energy, and solar radiation ...
[5]
Sunspots/Solar Cycle | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
The peak of sunspot activity is known as solar maximum and the lull is known as solar minimum. Solar cycles started being assigned consecutive numbers.
[6]
The Solar Cycle - NASA SVS
Oct 27, 2011 · The solar cycle is an approximately 11-year cycle of sunspot increases, linked to solar activity, and a 22-year cycle due to pole reversal.
[7]
Spots, Waves and Wind: A Solar Science Timeline | Full Text - NASA
Feb 3, 2020 · Instead, in 1843 he discovers the sunspot cycle: The average number of sunspots increases and then decreases with a period that Schwabe ...
[8]
[PDF] Chapter 3 - Studying the Sun - Space Weather Prediction Center
Hale also discovered that the 11-year sunspot cycle is part of a 22-year solar magnetic cycle. He found that sunspots usually come in pairs, with the leader ...
[9]
2020 AGU Roundtable: What will we learn from Solar Cycle 25?
Dec 15, 2020 · An illustration of the numbered Solar Cycles, starting with Solar Cycle 1 in 1755. We are now in the beginning of Solar Cycle 25. The time ...
[10]
Solar Cycle 25 Is Here. NASA, NOAA Scientists Explain What That ...
Sep 15, 2020 · December 2019 marks the beginning of Solar Cycle 25, and the Sun's activity will once again ramp up until solar maximum, predicted for 2025.
[11]
[PDF] An Estimate of the Size and Shape of Sunspot Cycle 24 Based on Its ...
At present, cycle 24 is in its rising phase towards maximum amplitude, which for the modern era sunspot cycles has followed minimum amplitude by 3–5 yr ...
[12]
The Dawn of a New Solar Cycle - NASA Earth Observatory
Jan 16, 2008 · Solar Cycle 19 (second peak from left), which began in 1954 and peaked in 1957, is the record holder for most active solar cycle, with 201 ...
[13]
Hello Solar Cycle 25 - National Weather Service
Solar maximum is expected in July 2025, with a peak of 115 sunspots. “How quickly solar activity rises is an indicator on how strong the solar cycle will be,” ...
[14]
Predicting the amplitude and hemispheric asymmetry of solar cycle ...
Nov 14, 2016 · Sunspot cycle 14 (1901–1913) was similar in amplitude, shape, and hemispheric asymmetry (dominant north early in the cycle and dominant south ...<|separator|>
[15]
N-S Asymmetry and Periodicity of Solar Activity from Solar Cycles 21
Mar 19, 2025 · The continued dominance indicates a persistent hemispheric asymmetry in this solar cycle, but with slightly improved balance. The northern ...
[16]
The Sun's Polar Magnetic Field will Soon Flip - And GONG is Watching
Aug 3, 2023 · The Sun's polar field reversal is the major hallmark event that signals the end of a solar cycle's Maximum period and ushers in the transition to Minimum.
[17]
Magnetic field of the Sun in a state of turmoil
Jun 11, 2025 · The global magnetic field reverses its polarity during the Sun's maximum activity, approximately every eleven years.
[18]
Solar polar fields
Aug 17, 2025 · Polar field reversals typically occur within a year of sunspot maximum. It is not uncommon for the northern and southern polar fields to have ...
[19]
Solar Cycle Precursors and the Outlook for Cycle 25 - AGU Journals
Sep 7, 2023 · 0. While the polar field measurements do indeed appear to be indicative of the strength of the next cycle, they only provide three solar cycles ...<|separator|>
[20]
Geomagnetic Storm Occurrence and Their Relation With Solar Cycle ...
Aug 18, 2021 · ... smoothed sunspot number values, SC19, the most active of time series ... solar maximum. This connection may be useful to make ...
[21]
https://www.mpg.de/24862748/solar-orbiter-first-images-of-the-suns-south-pole
[22]
https://solen.info/solar/polarfields/polar.html
[23]
NASA The Solar Dynamo
The Alpha Effect. Twisting of the magnetic field lines is caused by the effects of the Sun's rotation. This is called the alpha-effect after the Greek letter ...
[24]
Magnetic flux emergence in the Sun - Archontis - AGU Journals - Wiley
Jan 12, 2008 · As the buoyant flux system rises, the top of the Ω-loop structure intersects the photosphere and creates sunspots in bipolar regions. Finally, ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[25]
Hale's Sunspot Polarity Law | High Altitude Observatory
Apr 18, 1995 · Hale's Polarity Law is evidence for large-scale order underlying what would otherwise seem to be a purely stochastic phenomena.
[26]
A Systematic Study of Hale and Anti-Hale Sunspot Physical ...
Near the equator, the leading polarities of sunspot pairs annihilate with their counterparts on the opposite hemisphere. At the same time, the trailing ...
[27]
The Dependence of Joy's Law and Mean Tilt as a Function of Flux ...
Nov 12, 2024 · On average, bipolar sunspot pairs are oriented such that the leading sunspot ... bipolar active regions on the solar surface (R. H. Cameron et al ...
[28]
Sunspots and Active Regions - NSO - National Solar Observatory
Sunspots are generally where flares and CMEs originate from. They are therefore used as marker of solar activity. Lots of sunspots generally means lots of solar ...
[29]
Connecting the Wilson depression to the magnetic field of sunspots
We find that the Wilson depression becomes larger for spots with a stronger magnetic field, but not as much as one would expect from the increased magnetic ...
[30]
Solar Physics Historical Timeline (0 - 1599) | High Altitude Observatory
The solar corona is the hot, extended outer atmosphere of the Sun. It is far too faint to be seen against the blinding brightness of the solar disk itself, but ...
[31]
Ancient Chinese Observations of Physical Phenomena Attending ...
Also it is impossible to see either the corona or prominences with the naked eye without a solar eclipse. The identity of these `red birds' is still unclear.Missing: 1054 1185 maximum
[32]
Historical sunspot records | Living Reviews in Solar Physics
Feb 26, 2020 · Galileo had observed sunspots probably since late 1610, and published detailed drawings in Galilei (1613). The full-disk drawings cover dates ...
[33]
The Maunder minimum (1645–1715) was indeed a grand minimum
... absence of sunspots. For example, based on a report by G. D. Cassini, a sunspot observed in 1671 (Oldenburg 1671b) was described in detail, and it was noted ...
[34]
Sunspot positions and sizes for 1825–1867 from the observations by ...
Samuel Heinrich Schwabe made 8486 drawings of the solar disc with sunspots in the period from 1825 November 5 to 1867 December 29.
[35]
Reconstructing solar magnetic fields from historical observations
Systematic observations of magnetic field strength and polarity in sunspots began at Mount Wilson Observatory (MWO), USA in early 1917. Except for a few brief ...
[36]
Probable Values of Current Solar Cycle Peak - Silbergleit - 2012
Feb 9, 2012 · This disturbed solar activity often occurs near sunspots. Cycle 19 was the largest in recorded history (with 201.3 smoothed sunspot number ...
[37]
SOHO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) - eoPortal
SOHO is the longest-lived heliophysics mission still operating and has provided a nearly continuous record of solar and heliospheric phenomena over a full 23- ...
[38]
NASA, NOAA Announce That the Sun Has Reached the Solar ...
Oct 15, 2024 · On October 3, 2024, the Sun emitted a strong solar flare. As of this date, this solar flare is the largest of Solar Cycle 25 and is classified ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[39]
A 21st Century View of the March 1989 Magnetic Storm - Boteler
Oct 10, 2019 · On 13 March 1989, the largest magnetic storm of the last century caused widespread effects on power systems including a blackout of the Hydro-Québec system.
[40]
Diminishing activity of recent solar cycles (22–24) and their impact ...
Jan 9, 2019 · This reduction is 37% from SCs 22 to 23 and 51% from SCs 23 to 24, which indicates substantial weakening of Sun's magnetic field for SC 24. Also ...
[41]
[PDF] CMEs during the Two Activity Peaks in Cycle 24 and their Space ...
Sep 15, 2015 · number (SSN) during solar cycle 24. The two SSN peaks occurred in ... Note that the double-peak structure is not observed in cycle 23, while.
[42]
Sunspot Number Data | NCEI - NOAA
The provisional daily Zurich relative sunspot numbers, Rz, were based upon observations made at Zurich and its two branch stations in Arosa and Locarno and ...
[43]
Recalibration of the Sunspot-Number: Status Report | Solar Physics
Mar 20, 2023 · The Zürich sunspot number produced by Wolf and his successors from 1700 – 1980 is based on three types of data: (1) the raw counts from the Zü ...
[44]
Optical instrumentation for chromospheric monitoring during solar ...
The Spectroheliograph is dedicated to long-term, low- cadence observations of the chromosphere and now delivers. (x, y, k) datacubes of Ha, CaII H and K ...
[45]
Solar Filament Eruptions in H α Doppler Velocity - IOPscience
This study uses a novel spectroheliograph to investigate filament rise and CMEs, showing that Hα line profile can detect eruption precursors and estimate CME ...
[46]
GOES X-ray Flux | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
The GOES X-ray plots shown here are used to track solar activity and solar flares. Large solar X-ray flares can change the Earth's ionosphere.Missing: based SOHO MDI helioseismology
[47]
SOHO/MDI Investigates Solar Flows Under Sunspots - NASA SVS
SOHO/MDI performs a 'sonogram' of the sun, revealing the subsurface temperature profile around a sunspot. Red isosurfaces denote regions where the sound ...
[48]
9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and ...
Here we combine different 10 Be ice core records from Greenland and Antarctica with the global 14 C tree ring record using principal component analysis.
[49]
Reconstruction of solar activity for the last millennium using Be data
We have reconstructed the concentration of the cosmogenic 10 Be isotope in ice cores from the measured sunspot numbers by using physical models.Missing: C- | Show results with:C-
[50]
TRACE (Transition Region and Coronal Explorer) - eoPortal
Jun 18, 2012 · Observations: The TRACE instrument FOV observes about 1/10th of the solar disk at a time. TRACE is best suited for continually monitoring ...
[51]
Low-frequency solar radiophysics with LOFAR and FASR
Two new ground-based instruments will provide critical new low-frequency observations: the low-frequency array (LOFAR) and the frequency agile solar ...Low-Frequency Solar... · Introduction · Solar Radio Emission At Low...<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
Observations of successive CMEs and their successive Type II solar ...
Oct 1, 2025 · The present study reports the two successive type II radio bursts occurred in sequence on 02 May 2021 observed by the Nancay Decameter Array ( ...
[53]
Global Oscillations Network Group - NSO - National Solar Observatory
The Global Oscillation Network Group, or GONG Network is a worldwide network of six identical telescopes, designed to have 24/7 observations of the Sun.
[54]
https://hmi.stanford.edu/
[55]
The Solar Cycle | Living Reviews in Solar Physics
The standard smoothing is a 13-month running mean centered on the month in question and using half weights for the months at the start and end. Solar cycle ...
[56]
The Solar Cycle - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
... Solar Maximum Mission (SMM) ACRIM-I from February 1980 to June 1989; the ... The smoothed sunspot number (scaled to fit on the figure) is shown with ...
[57]
wolf number - parhelio
R = k ( 10 g + f ) where R is the Wolf number (also called "relative number of sunspots"), k is a factor for standardization, g is the number of groups and f ...Missing: 10g + explanation
[58]
[PDF] Revisiting the Sunspot Number - arXiv
The number of observations available each day typically varies between 10 and 30. In order to mark this change of method, the resulting index was renamed to “ ...
[59]
Sunspot number series envelope and phase - NASA ADS
Third Harmonic Fourier analysis of the standard sunspot number series R( t) reveals numerous harmonics of the 11-year fundamental and many other non ...
[60]
Application of Fourier and Wavelet Transform for analysing 300 ...
Sep 21, 2021 · In this paper Fourier Transform and Wavelet Transform are applied in case of recent 300 years of sunspot numbers to explain the solar cycles ...
[61]
The 10.7 cm solar radio flux (F10.7) - Tapping - 2013 - AGU Journals
Jun 14, 2013 · Its applications include use as a simple activity level indicator, as a proxy for other solar emissions or quantities which are more difficult ...
[62]
F10.7 cm Radio Emissions - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
The solar radio flux at 10.7 cm (2800 MHz) is an excellent indicator of solar activity. Often called the F10.7 index, it is one of the longest running records ...
[63]
Assessment of sunspot number cross-calibration approaches
With the aim of incorporating the earliest available sunspot data and lift uncertainties in the counts of indi- vidual sunspots, Hoyt&Schatten (1998) proposed ...
[64]
Aurora Tutorial | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
The aurora is one manifestation of geomagnetic activity or geomagnetic storms. As the solar wind increases in speed and the interplanetary magnetic field ...
[65]
Solar Flares (Radio Blackouts) - Space Weather Prediction Center
The D-RAP (D-Region Absorption Prediction) product correlates flare intensity to D-layer absorption strength and spread. Solar flares usually take place in ...
[66]
None
### Summary of Ionospheric Disturbances During Solar Maximum (GPS Scintillation)
[67]
Space Radiation Source: SEP - Solar Energetic Particle - Events
The flux peaks during Solar Minimum and declines toward Solar Maximum. GCRGalactic Cosmic Rays are the main source of daily radiation to astronauts outside of ...
[68]
[PDF] Ozone depletion during the solar proton events of October ... - EPIC
Nov 6, 2003 · NOx is depleted faster through photolysis (see equation (3)) above about 50 km, which also intensifies the recovery of ozone.
[69]
Remembering the Great Halloween Solar Storms | News
Oct 31, 2023 · The storms affected over half of all Earth-orbiting spacecrafts, intermittently disrupting satellite TV and radio services, also while damaging ...
[70]
NASA Goddard's Heliophysics Science Division
2003 Halloween Storms Disrupted GPS, satellites, airline communications, and caused a blackout in Sweden. Some satellites suffered permanent damage, and ISS ...
[71]
Carrington Class Coronal Mass Ejection - ENLIL Simulation of A ...
Aug 7, 2025 · These ejections range in speed between 200 km/s to up to 3000 km/s. At the highest speeds, these CMEs can travel faster than the background ...Missing: maximum | Show results with:maximum
[72]
The fastest CME of Cycle 23 overtakes another fast CME - NASA SVS
May 23, 2004 · The fastest CME overtook the previous one within 2 hours and produced a spectacular radio radiation detected by the Wind, Ulysses and Cassini spacecraft.
[73]
Coronal Mass Ejections - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
CMEs travelling faster than the background solar wind speed can generate a shock wave. These shock waves can accelerate charged particles ahead of them – ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
[74]
CME propagation through the heliosphere: Status and future of ...
Jul 5, 2023 · As noted above, when traveling faster than the background solar wind speed, a CME can generate a shock wave. Particles accelerated by CME-driven ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
[75]
ESTIMATING THE ARRIVAL TIME OF EARTH-DIRECTED ...
Various models have been developed to forecast the CME arrival time at 1 AU, based on an empirical relationship between measured projected speeds and ...
[76]
CME Evolution in the Structured Heliosphere and Effects at Earth ...
Sep 19, 2022 · In this paper, we report analysis of the origin, evolution, and heliospheric impact of a series of solar transient events that took place during ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
[77]
[PDF] Solar Particle Events and Radiation Exposure in Space. Hu S. - NASA
Mar 31, 2017 · An overview of three solar cycles shows the relationship between the sunspot cycle, galactic cosmic rays, and the state of our near-space ...
[78]
[PDF] Solar Energetic Particles and Space Weather
SEPs can blind the very systems that warn us against both SEP events and magnetic storms. However, the most insidious risk is to the health, and, in fact, to ...
[79]
[PDF] The Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) Radiation Hazard | NASA Science
Apr 7, 2015 · Compared to Solar Cycles 22 & 23, the SEP radiation hazard is reduced in Solar Cycle 24, at least over the first 7 years of the cycles:
[80]
Planetary K-index | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
The K-index, and by extension the Planetary K-index, are used to characterize the magnitude of geomagnetic storms. Kp is an excellent indicator of disturbances ...
[81]
NOAA Space Weather Scales
The scales describe the environmental disturbances for three event types: geomagnetic storms, solar radiation storms, and radio blackouts.
[82]
[PDF] NOAA Space Weather Scales
Dec 11, 2023 · *. Flux levels are 5 minute averages. Flux in particles·s-1·ster-1·cm-2 Based on this measure, but other physical measures are also considered.
[83]
[PDF] Solar Cycle Predictions - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
This limits the sampling to the last five sunspot cycles and means the magnetic field data covers only the above average cycles from 20–23. If the goal becomes ...Missing: weak | Show results with:weak
[84]
Prediction of the strength and timing of sunspot cycle 25 ... - Nature
Dec 6, 2018 · Our ensemble forecast indicates cycle 25 would be similar or slightly stronger than the current cycle and peak around 2024.
[85]
Solar Cycle Prediction - PMC - NIH
Prediction methods form three main groups. Precursor methods rely on the value of some measure of solar activity or magnetism at a specified time to predict the ...
[86]
Lessons learned from predictions of Solar Cycle 24
Dec 7, 2020 · We have learned much about predicting solar activity in Solar Cycle 24, especially with the data provided by SDO and STEREO.
[87]
Predicting the strength of solar cycle 24 using a flux‐transport ...
Mar 3, 2006 · Here we propose and test a new method, based on a flux transport dynamo model that has already been demonstrated to reproduce many solar cycle ...
[88]
Mean Field Models of Flux Transport Dynamo and Meridional ...
Jul 13, 2023 · We provide a broad review of mean field theories for solar magnetic fields and flows, the flux transport dynamo modelling paradigm and highlight some of their ...
[89]
Simulating and Predicting Solar Cycles Using a Flux-Transport ...
We construct a predictive tool based on a Babcock-Leighton-type flux-transport dynamo model of a solar cycle, run the model by updating the surface magnetic ...
[90]
Solar Cycle Prediction | Living Reviews in Solar Physics
A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24.Missing: 201.3 | Show results with:201.3
[91]
Solar Cycle Prediction at NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center
Jun 11, 2025 · The consensus prediction for the sunspot number was 160 30, which would have made it about the same as Cycle 22 (Joselyn et al., 1997). This was ...
[92]
None
### Official Prediction for Solar Cycle 24 Sunspot Number Maximum
[93]
2014 : maximum year for solar cycle 24 | SIDC
The maximum of solar cycle 24 was reached in April 2014, with a maximum of the 13-month smoothed sunspot number at 81.8.
[94]
Predictions of Solar Cycle 24: How are we doing? - AGU Journals
Dec 16, 2015 · A set of predictions of the amplitude of Solar Cycle 24 accumulated in 2008 ranged from zero to unprecedented levels of solar activity.Missing: double- | Show results with:double-
[95]
Lessons learned from predictions of Solar Cycle 24
Most of the predictions, individually and categorized, did not produce an accurate forecast of Solar Cycle 24.
[96]
NASA@SC24: Forecasting Space Weather Using Machine Learning
Nov 16, 2024 · Machine learning models have proven capable of capturing those changes in solar photospheric dynamics that signal the emergence and evolution of ...
[97]
Grand minima and maxima of solar activity - Astronomy & Astrophysics
The duration of grand maxima follows an exponential distribution, suggesting that the duration of a grand maximum is determined by a random process. Conclusions ...
[98]
Grand solar minima and maxima deduced from 10Be and 14C
This study provides more robust identification of past grand solar minima and maxima periods, which may improve our understanding of the physical processes ...
[99]
THE RISE AND FALL OF OPEN SOLAR FLUX DURING THE ...
Jul 7, 2009 · THE RISE AND FALL OF OPEN SOLAR FLUX DURING THE CURRENT GRAND SOLAR MAXIMUM ... Solanki S. K., Usoskin I. G., Kromer B., Schüssler M. and ...
[100]
The 8‐Year Solar Cycle During the Maunder Minimum - AGU Journals
Oct 3, 2023 · The Maunder Minimum (1645–1715 AD) is a representative grand solar minimum. The cyclic variation of solar activity, especially the cycle length ...
[101]
Heliospheric modulation of galactic cosmic rays during grand solar ...
Oct 5, 2012 · Heliospheric modulation potential, Φ, during grand solar minima is investigated using an open solar flux (OSF) model with OSF source based on ...
[102]
Solar activity over nine millennia: A consistent multi-proxy ...
Such proxies are, for example, concentrations of cosmogenic radionuclides radiocarbon (14C), beryllium-10 (10Be), or chlorine-36 (36Cl) that are measured in ...
[103]
Impact of solar versus volcanic activity variations on tropospheric ...
The aim of this work is to elucidate the impact of changes in solar irradiance and energetic particles versus volcanic eruptions on tropospheric global climate ...
[104]
The Dalton Minimum and John Dalton's Auroral Observations
Feb 18, 2021 · In this paper, we review how these prolonged solar activity minima have been identified. In particular, we focus on the Dalton Minimum, which is named after ...
[105]
Modern Grand Solar Minimum will lead to terrestrial cooling - PMC
Aug 4, 2020 · Currently, the Sun has completed solar cycle 24 – the weakest cycle of the past 100+ years – and in 2020, has started cycle 25. During the ...Missing: 15-24 | Show results with:15-24<|control11|><|separator|>
[106]
The Approaching New Grand Solar Minimum and Little Ice Age ...
By about 2030-2040, the Sun will experience a new grand solar minimum. This is evident from multiple studies of quite different characteristics.Missing: Potential | Show results with:Potential