Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Somatic cell count

Somatic cell count (SCC) refers to the concentration of somatic cells, primarily leukocytes such as macrophages, lymphocytes, and polymorphonuclear neutrophils, along with fewer epithelial cells from the , measured in cells per milliliter of in dairy animals. These cells are naturally present in low numbers in healthy but increase significantly in response to intramammary infections, serving as a key indicator of udder health and overall quality. Elevated SCC levels are closely associated with , an inflammatory condition of the often caused by bacterial pathogens, which triggers an influx of immune cells as a defense mechanism. In dairy production, SCC is monitored through bulk tank testing or individual cow samples via methods like Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) programs, Mastitis Test (CMT), or Wisconsin Mastitis Test (WMT), providing an indirect measure of subclinical infections that may not show clinical symptoms. Standard thresholds define quality: counts below 200,000 cells/mL are generally considered normal and indicative of good udder health, while levels above this suggest abnormality, with subclinical often starting at around 200,000 cells/mL. Legally, in the United States, Grade A must have an SCC below 750,000 cells/mL to be marketable, and processors often offer premiums for bulk tank SCC under 300,000 cells/mL. The economic and implications of SCC are substantial, as high counts reduce yield—potentially by up to 11% at levels exceeding 1,000,000 cells/mL—and degrade processing qualities like cheese yield due to elevated and activity from somatic cells. For instance, lowering average herd SCC from 600,000 to 200,000 cells/mL can prevent significant loss, equivalent to about 600 pounds per cow annually, and generate premiums that boost farm revenue. Factors influencing SCC include stage of , , frequency, and practices such as teat dipping and , with diurnal variations causing counts to peak during strippings. Effective control strategies emphasize prevention through , nutrition (e.g., adequate and ), and timely of chronically infected cows to maintain low SCC and ensure high-quality dairy products.

Definition and Composition

Definition

Somatic cell count (SCC) refers to the total number of somatic cells present per milliliter of , serving as a key indicator in science for assessing milk quality. These somatic cells are primarily leukocytes, or , originating from the of the lactating animal, such as cows in dairy production. The metric focuses exclusively on host-derived eukaryotic cells, distinguishing it from total cell counts that might include microbial elements like , thereby providing a targeted evaluation of the animal's physiological state rather than overall contamination. The standard units for SCC are cells per milliliter (cells/mL) or equivalently cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm³), reflecting the concentration in raw or bulk samples. This measurement practice evolved significantly in the mid-20th century, transitioning from labor-intensive manual microscopic evaluations to more efficient automated methods, which improved accuracy and scalability in dairy herd management. Physiologically, these cells arise as part of the innate in the , where epithelial cells and recruited leukocytes migrate into the milk ducts during periods of stress or minor irritation, with counts naturally fluctuating based on factors like stage. While low SCC levels indicate healthy mammary tissue, elevations often signal an inflammatory response, such as that associated with , though detailed health linkages extend beyond this foundational metric.

Types of Somatic Cells in Milk

Somatic cells in bovine milk consist primarily of leukocytes and mammary epithelial cells. The leukocytes include polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), macrophages, and lymphocytes, while epithelial cells originate from the shedding of the lining. These cell types contribute to the total somatic cell count (SCC), which aggregates their numbers in milk. In healthy, uninfected bovine milk, somatic cells consist of 75–85% leukocytes and 15–25% epithelial cells. Among leukocytes, macrophages predominate (50–70% of total somatic cells), followed by lymphocytes (10–20%) and PMNs (0–10%). During mammary , the composition shifts dramatically, with PMNs increasing to over 90% of the total, while the proportions of macrophages, lymphocytes, and epithelial cells decrease correspondingly. This PMN influx reflects the acute to pathogens. Epithelial cell numbers can also rise in infected states due to increased shedding from damaged tissue. Each cell type serves distinct functions within the . Macrophages act as , engulfing and digesting pathogens while providing immune surveillance in uninfected conditions. PMNs specialize in rapid bacterial killing through and release of agents during active . Lymphocytes, including B- and T-cells, contribute to adaptive immunity by producing antibodies and coordinating long-term responses. Epithelial cells, derived from the secretory tissue, indicate normal tissue turnover but increase with gland damage, signaling potential structural compromise. While the focus here is on bovine milk, somatic cell compositions vary across species. In goats, PMNs predominate even in healthy milk at about 79%, unlike the macrophage dominance in cows. Sheep milk shows a profile similar to bovines, with macrophages at around 57%, whereas buffaloes have higher lymphocyte proportions at 46% in healthy states. These differences influence baseline SCC interpretations in non-bovine dairy species.

Significance in Milk Quality

Relation to Udder Health and Mastitis

Mastitis is defined as an inflammation of the mammary gland in dairy cows, most commonly triggered by bacterial pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and various Streptococcus species, which invade the udder and provoke an inflammatory response leading to elevated somatic cell counts (SCC) in milk. This condition manifests in two primary forms: clinical mastitis, characterized by visible signs including udder swelling, abnormal milk secretion, and reduced milk yield; and subclinical mastitis, which lacks overt symptoms but is detectable through increased SCC without apparent physiological changes. The elevation in SCC during reflects the bovine immune system's first line of defense, primarily an influx of leukocytes—predominantly polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs)—recruited to the to combat the infection. This cellular migration, driven by inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, increases and directs immune cells into the , where PMNs often comprise over 90% of somatic cells during early . In response to minor pathogens, SCC typically rises two- to threefold above baseline levels in uninfected (under 200,000 cells/), while major pathogens can cause dramatic increases, often several-fold higher, peaking rapidly during acute phases. Subclinical mastitis, which accounts for the majority of cases, is particularly reliant on SCC for detection, as it produces no visible alterations in or appearance but still involves this leukocyte-mediated response. In contrast, clinical amplifies these immune dynamics, resulting in more pronounced SCC elevations alongside systemic effects. The recognition of SCC as a reliable indicator dates to the early 20th century, with foundational work in the 1930s linking leukocyte counts to infections, and key studies in the 1950s—such as the development of the California Mastitis Test in 1957—establishing its practical correlation for on-farm diagnosis.

Economic and Production Impacts

High counts (SCC) in are primarily driven by , leading to substantial reductions in that directly impact . Research indicates that for every 100,000 cells/mL increase in SCC above a baseline of 200,000 cells/mL, individual cow decreases by approximately 0.5 to 1 kg per day, depending on and stage. At an SCC of 500,000 cells/mL, this can result in a 3-5% overall drop in compared to herds maintaining lower counts, equating to hundreds of kilograms lost per cow over a period. These losses arise from impaired function and inflammatory responses that divert energy away from synthesis. Beyond yield reductions, elevated SCC imposes quality penalties that erode farm revenues through discounted pricing and processing inefficiencies. Dairy processors often apply price deductions of up to $2 per for exceeding SCC thresholds in regions like the Midwest, due to perceived quality risks. High SCC also disrupts cheese production by altering composition, particularly reducing the proportion of in true protein by ~3 points and increasing soluble fractions, which lowers cheese yield by several percent and extends clotting times. These compositional changes, including elevated proteolysis of micelles, result in softer curds and higher fat losses in , further diminishing the economic value of high-SCC for value-added products. Mastitis management associated with high SCC adds direct financial burdens through treatment and herd expenses. Subclinical cases contribute indirectly via premature , with costs averaging $2,000-2,500 per cow as of the early , exacerbated by reduced and in affected herds. These per-case costs compound across farms, where high SCC herds experience elevated turnover rates. On an industry scale, high SCC and related generate billions in annual losses for major dairy-producing regions. In the United States, subclinical costs exceed $1 billion yearly. Globally, these effects scale to $20-30 billion, underscoring the pervasive drag on sector profitability and .

Regulatory Standards and Limits

International Variations

Regulatory standards for somatic cell count (SCC) in milk vary significantly across countries, reflecting differences in national dairy policies, industry practices, and international trade considerations. , the federal standard set by the (FDA) limits bulk tank SCC to ≤750,000 cells/mL for Grade A , a threshold established in the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance since the 1990s. Some states impose stricter limits; for example, enforces a maximum of 600,000 cells/mL for market under state regulations. In contrast, the () and adopt more stringent geometric mean limits of ≤400,000 cells/mL, calculated over a rolling three-month period for bulk milk. This standard is codified in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004, which applies to intended for processing and emphasizes consistent quality across member states. aligns with this level to facilitate trade within and with the . Similar limits of ≤400,000 cells/mL are enforced in , , and , supporting their export-oriented sectors. permits a higher threshold of ≤500,000 cells/mL, accommodating regional variations in herd management and incidence. These variations stem from differences in prevalence, advancements in , and requirements of agreements. Countries with high volumes, such as those in the and , impose stricter limits to meet global quality benchmarks and protect consumer health through reduced microbial risks, whereas regions with emerging industries allow higher thresholds to balance economic viability with basic safety standards.

Testing Requirements

In the dairy industry, testing for somatic cell count (SCC) evolved from voluntary practices in the mid-20th century to mandatory regulatory frameworks post-1980s, driven by growing concerns over milk safety, udder health, and consumer protection amid rising mastitis incidences and technological advancements like infrared analyzers integrated into Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) programs. By the early 1990s, the United States formalized a national SCC limit of 750,000 cells/mL in the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO), marking a shift to enforced bulk tank monitoring to ensure consistent milk quality. Bulk tank testing represents the primary mandatory framework for SCC assessment in dairy operations worldwide, typically conducted by cooperatives, processors, or regulatory agencies on collected from farm storage tanks before shipment. In the United States, the PMO requires official sampling and SCC analysis at least four times during each consecutive six-month period, often aligning with monthly or bi-weekly intervals in practice to detect elevations promptly and comply with the 750,000 cells/mL threshold. In , provincial dairy boards under the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) mandate monthly bulk tank SCC testing as part of programs, with samples analyzed to enforce limits such as 400,000 cells/mL for cow's milk. Similar routines prevail internationally, where national dairy authorities require monthly submissions in regions like the to align with varying limits, such as 400,000 cells/mL, ensuring and early intervention for herd-level issues. Individual cow SCC testing supplements bulk tank monitoring but is generally optional for routine farm use, often facilitated through portable on-farm devices for rapid screening during . However, it becomes required in targeted s for herds exceeding bulk tank thresholds; for instance, , the USDA-supported DHI mandates individual cow sampling and for high-SCC herds to identify infected animals and support control, typically on a monthly basis during . These tests, weighted by yield to compute averages, enable precise management without universal enforcement across all operations. Oversight for SCC testing is provided by national and regional authorities to enforce compliance and protect public health. In the United States, the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) administer PMO guidelines, monitoring bulk tank data from Federal Milk Marketing Orders to track national trends and intervene in non-compliant cases. In Canada, the CFIA collaborates with provincial bodies like Dairy Farmers of Ontario to oversee testing protocols and quality assurance. Elsewhere, national dairy boards handle enforcement, adapting to local standards. Non-compliance, such as repeated bulk tank exceedances (e.g., three out of five tests above limits in the US), results in quarantine of milk shipments, financial penalties, or depooling from cooperatives, incentivizing adherence to reduce economic losses.

Measurement Techniques

Direct Microscopic Methods

Direct microscopic methods for enumerating counts (SCC) in rely on visual identification and quantification of individual cells or their nuclei, serving as reference techniques for accuracy in quality assessment. These approaches involve samples to highlight cells, primarily leukocytes, followed by microscopic examination to count cells within a defined volume. They provide high specificity by distinguishing cells from other particulates, making them essential for validating automated systems and ensuring . The manual microscopic count, also known as the direct microscopic somatic cell count (DMSCC), is the traditional gold standard method outlined in standards such as ISO 13366-1. In this procedure, a small volume of milk (typically 10 µL) is heated to approximately 40°C, spread onto a treated glass slide, fixed with ethanol, and stained with a reagent like Newman-Lampert stain for 15 minutes to selectively dye cell nuclei. The slide is then examined under a microscope at high magnification (e.g., 1000x with oil immersion), where analysts count somatic cells across multiple fields or strips, extrapolating to cells per milliliter using a dilution factor (e.g., N = n × W, where n is the observed count and W is the work coefficient based on volume). This labor-intensive process, requiring skilled operators to avoid bias from visual fatigue, is typically used for low-throughput validation or reference purposes rather than routine testing. The Fossomatic method represents an automated evolution of direct microscopic counting, introduced by in the early and now in its seventh generation (Fossomatic 7). It employs combined with : samples are stained with a fluorescent that binds to in nuclei, passing through a flow where a excites the nuclei, and photodetectors count individual fluorescent pulses to determine SCC. Capable of processing up to 600 samples per hour, this method maintains direct cell identification while automating enumeration, with accuracy achieving less than 10% relative mean difference compared to DMSCC across a typical range of 50,000 to 1,500,000 cells/mL. It complies with international standards like ISO 13366-2 and is widely adopted as the reference for routine laboratory and regulatory testing. Direct microscopic methods offer key advantages, including superior specificity for confirming somatic cell identity—distinguishing them from debris or bacteria—and serving as a traceable reference for method validation, which is critical for udder health diagnostics. However, they are inherently slow (manual counts can take 20-30 minutes per sample) and operator-dependent, with variability arising from subjective identification and the need for fresh or preserved samples (e.g., with bronopol to prevent cell degradation). Automated variants like Fossomatic mitigate some speed issues but require costly equipment (often exceeding $50,000) and regular maintenance to sustain precision. Sample preservation is essential across both, as freezing or prolonged storage can alter counts by up to 20% without proper stabilizers. Calibration of direct microscopic methods relies on with known SCC values, such as the European Commission's ERM-BD001 spray-dried milk powder, with certified values (e.g., low ~50,000 and high ~300,000 cells/mL when reconstituted) for verifying instrument or analyst performance. Laboratories use these standards periodically—often weekly—for , ensuring results align within ±5-10% of assigned values to maintain under ISO 17025 or ICAR guidelines. This process anchors SCC measurements to a unified reference, minimizing inter-laboratory discrepancies reported at up to 15% in uncalibrated systems.

Indirect Chemical and Automated Methods

Indirect chemical and automated methods for estimating somatic cell count (SCC) in milk rely on proxies such as DNA content, cell lysis, or fluorescence signals rather than direct visualization, enabling rapid screening in on-farm or laboratory settings. These approaches are particularly valuable for their speed and scalability, allowing processors to handle large volumes of samples efficiently while providing estimates that correlate strongly with gold-standard microscopic counts. The California Mastitis Test (CMT) is a widely used on-farm chemical method that involves mixing milk with a detergent-based reagent, which lyses somatic cell membranes and causes DNA and proteins to precipitate, forming a gel whose viscosity indicates cell concentration. The test is scored visually from 0 (no reaction, corresponding to <200,000 cells/mL) to 3 (distinct gel formation, corresponding to >5,000,000 cells/mL), providing a quick qualitative estimate suitable for identifying high-SCC quarters at the cow-side. Validation studies show CMT scores correlate well with direct SCC measurements, with coefficients often exceeding r = 0.85, making it a cost-effective tool for initial mastitis screening despite some variability due to cell type composition. Automated represents a high-throughput and on-farm option, where samples are stained with DNA-specific fluorescent dyes like propidium iodide, then passed through a flow system where lasers excite the dye to detect individual based on integrity and content. Devices such as the Cell Counter employ portable optical detection to process samples in under one minute, achieving throughputs of over 50 samples per hour, while larger systems like the SomaCount FC handle 100+ samples per hour in bulk tank analysis. These instruments provide quantitative SCC results with high precision, validated against microscopic methods showing r² values greater than 0.95, and are favored for their automation and minimal operator bias in routine . The Somaticell test is another indirect photometric method designed for on-farm use, involving the addition of a DNA-specific to followed by colorimetric in a portable reader to estimate SCC based on light proportional to nucleic acids. It delivers results in seconds for quarter or composite samples, with strong linear correlations (r > 0.90) to electronic counts, positioning it as an accessible alternative for bulk estimation in resource-limited settings. Overall, these indirect techniques are validated across studies for their reliability in SCC screening, offering economic advantages over direct methods by reducing labor and time while maintaining diagnostic accuracy for health monitoring.

Interpretation and Management

Threshold Levels and Interpretation

Somatic cell counts (SCC) in milk serve as a key indicator of udder health in dairy cows, with thresholds used to classify status and overall . For individual cows, an SCC below 100,000 cells/mL is generally considered indicative of an uninfected , reflecting optimal health without significant subclinical . Levels between 100,000 and 200,000 cells/mL may suggest minor physiological variations but still align with healthy ranges for uninfected animals. An SCC in the range of 200,000 to 400,000 cells/mL often signals early stress or the onset of subclinical , warranting closer monitoring. Elevated SCC levels provide clearer warnings of udder compromise. A count exceeding 250,000 cells/mL is widely recognized as a for increased risk of intramammary infection and subclinical , as it correlates with elevated presence in . Levels above 800,000 cells/mL typically indicate severe , chronic infections, or significant hygiene issues, often accompanied by substantial production losses and requiring immediate intervention. Interpretation differs between individual cow and bulk tank SCC, which aggregates milk from the entire . Bulk tank SCC represents an average of , where values below 200,000 cells/mL suggest good overall , but spikes can arise from just a few infected animals skewing the total. As of , the national average Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) test-day SCC was approximately 181,000 cells/mL. In contrast, an individual cow SCC exceeding 200,000 cells/mL prompts targeted actions such as or to prevent -wide spread. Several physiological factors influence baseline SCC levels, complicating direct comparisons. SCC tends to be higher during early (first 100 days) and the dry period due to increased epithelial cell shedding and immune activity post-calving. also plays a role, with multiparous cows (higher lactation numbers) exhibiting elevated SCC compared to primiparous ones, likely from cumulative susceptibility. variations exist as well, attributed to differences in yield and .

Strategies for Reducing SCC

Reducing somatic cell count (SCC) in herds requires a multifaceted approach focusing on prevention, , and ongoing to minimize intramammary infections. practices form the of SCC control by limiting bacterial entry into the . Proper procedures, such as pre-dipping teats for at least 30 seconds with an effective germicidal product, drying teats thoroughly with individual clean towels, and discarding the first streams of milk (fore-stripping), significantly reduce the spread of contagious pathogens like . Post-milking teat dipping with a barrier provides additional protection, while maintaining clean, dry bedding—such as or lime-treated materials changed frequently—prevents environmental from contaminating teat ends. These practices can lower bulk tank SCC by up to 70,000 cells/mL in herds implementing teat dipping compared to those that do not. Nutrition plays a supportive role in enhancing udder health and immune function, thereby indirectly reducing SCC. Balanced diets supplemented with and are particularly effective, as these antioxidants work synergistically to bolster defenses against . Studies in cows have shown that such supplementation can reduce SCC during high-risk periods like early . also contributes to long-term SCC improvement, given the low to moderate of SCC traits (estimated at 0.05-0.15 across breeds and parities), allowing for genetic selection of sires with low-SCC daughters to gradually lower herd averages. Treatment protocols target existing infections to clear subclinical mastitis and prevent recurrence. For clinical cases, intramammary infusions—guided by culture results to select appropriate agents like pirlimycin for —are administered promptly to affected quarters, often resolving in 70-90% of responsive cases. Dry cow therapy (DCT) is a critical at the end of , where long-acting antibiotics are infused into all quarters to eliminate persistent subclinical ; blanket DCT treats every cow, while selective DCT targets only those with elevated last-lactation SCC (>200,000 cells/mL) or history, reducing antibiotic use by over 50% without compromising efficacy in low-SCC herds (<250,000 cells/mL bulk tank average). Internal teat sealants, applied alongside DCT, physically block bacterial ascent during the dry period, further lowering new rates by 50-70%. Effective monitoring programs enable timely interventions and herd-level improvements. Regular individual cow SCC testing through Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) programs or on-farm tools like the California Mastitis Test allows identification of high-SCC animals (>200,000 cells/mL on two consecutive tests), with chronic offenders to prevent contagion—removing just 5% of high-SCC cows can drop bulk tank levels substantially. Herd goals typically aim for an average SCC below 200,000 cells/mL, achieved through monthly bulk tank monitoring and quarterly individual assessments to track trends and adjust practices. Culturing milk from high-SCC cows helps differentiate contagious from environmental sources, informing targeted or segregation strategies.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] SOMATIC CELL COUNTS: A PRIMER Robert J. Harmon University ...
    Since cell numbers in milk are closely associated with inflammation and udder health, these somatic cell counts (SCC) are accepted as the international standard ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    [PDF] How low can you go? Understanding somatic cell count.
    An SCC of 100,000 cells/mL in cow's milk is considered low and indicates good udder health. However, it is important to note that SCC can fluctuate over time ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Reducing Somatic Cell Count in Dairy Cattle
    Somatic cell count (SCC) is the total number of cells per milliliter in milk. Primarily, SCC is composed of leukocytes, or white blood cells, that are produced ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Milk somatic cells, factors influencing their release, future prospects ...
    Milk somatic cells (SCs) are a mixture of milk-producing cells and immune cells. These cells are secreted in milk during the normal course of milking.
  5. [5]
    Role of somatic cells on dairy processes and products: a review - NIH
    In healthy bovine and ovine milk, macrophages are generally the predominant cells, while in both healthy and unhealthy goat milks, PMNs are predominant (Dulin ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Relationship of Somatic Cell Count and Mastitis: An Overview
    Somatic cells are indicators of both resistance and susceptibility of cows to mastitis and can be used to monitor the level or occurrence of subclinical ...
  7. [7]
    Mastitis in Cattle - Reproductive System - Merck Veterinary Manual
    Detection of subclinical mastitis is best done by testing milk for somatic cell counts (SCCs; predominantly leukocytes) using either the California Mastitis ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Calculated milk production losses associated with elevated somatic ...
    At test-day level, the average trend was a loss of 0.4 kg of milk in primiparous cows and 0.6 kg in multiparous, by each 2-fold increase of SCC above 50,000 ...Missing: per | Show results with:per
  10. [10]
    Estimating milk loss based on somatic cell count at the cow and herd ...
    There is a direct relationship between elevated somatic cell count (SCC) in an individual cow milk production and milk loss. This relationship has been used ...
  11. [11]
    Effect of Increased Somatic Cell Count on Herd Level Yield of Milk ...
    An increase in somatic cell count (SCC) results in a decrease in milk production, thus resulting in financial loss to the farm.
  12. [12]
    Lowering somatic cell counts in milk | UMN Extension
    In Minnesota, dairies can receive penalties up to $2.00 per hundredweight for high cell counts. In a time when farmers can't afford to take any reduction in ...
  13. [13]
    Influence of Milk Somatic Cell Count and Milk Age on Cheese Yield
    Milk casein as a percentage of true protein (C%TP) and cheese yield efficiency were lower when milk SCC was high and when milk was 5 d old. Fat and protein ...
  14. [14]
    Influence of elevated somatic cell count on casein distribution and ...
    Jun 1, 2009 · Rennet clotting time, losses of fat in whey, curd moisture, and losses in curd yield and rigidity were all greater the higher the somatic count.
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Somatic cell count impacts everything | Zoetis US
    Somatic cell count impacts milk production, pregnancy rates, death losses, and overall animal husbandry, affecting nearly every part of a dairy operation.
  17. [17]
    How Much is Mastitis Costing Your Dairy Farm?
    Jun 24, 2022 · Mastitis costs the global dairy industry $19.7B–32B annually. Clinical mastitis costs $444 per case in the first 30 days, with milk production ...
  18. [18]
    An economic analysis of high milk somatic cell counts in dairy cattle ...
    Nov 4, 2022 · The large economic loss shows that high SCC and mastitis have an impact on dairy farms and cooperatives and could have a detrimental impact ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Determining U.S. Milk Quality Using Bulk-Tank Somatic Cell Counts ...
    Maximum BTSCC levels for other countries include. 400,000 cells/mL in the European Union (EU),9. Australia,10 New Zealand,10 and Canada.11 The maximum. BTSCC ...Missing: Switzerland India
  20. [20]
    Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 3, § 625 - Somatic Cell Counts | State Regulations
    (b) The maximum somatic cell count in market milk is 600,000 cells per milliliter (ml) for cow milk and 1,500,000 cells per ml for goat milk.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) AMS Dairy Program European ...
    The regulatory limit for somatic cell counts in the. EU is 400,000 cell/ml. Milk with a rolling mean somatic cell count greater than 400,000 cells/mL cannot ...Missing: Canada Australia Brazil India
  22. [22]
    [PDF] The importance of somatic cell count in dairy technology
    Somatic cell count is the main monitoring variable used in milk quality and safety assessment. This review especially focuses on the effect of SCs on milk as ...
  23. [23]
    How far off are we from global somatic cell count standards?
    Sep 30, 2016 · The often-cited SCC difference is that the U.S. allows milk with up to 750,000 somatic cells per milliliter where the other major global dairy ...Missing: regulatory Brazil Switzerland India
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    A QUICK HISTORY ON MILK QUALITY CONTROL - Arizona DHIA
    Nov 20, 2013 · SCC tests have been a popular feature of DHIA since milk labs started using infrared machines in the US in the middle 1980's. Interest ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Understanding the Changes in Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Count ...
    The US Pasteurized Milk Ordinance mandates that milk samples from all farms are officially tested at least 4 times in each 6 month period. Under the current ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Raw Milk Quality Program Policies - Dairy Farmers of Ontario
    Oct 1, 2023 · c) Monthly milk statement. 2.2.2 Somatic cell count. Each bulk tank sample will be scheduled for SCC testing. Milk must contain less than ...
  28. [28]
    Winning the Battle of Subclinical Mastitis Detection
    Oct 10, 2025 · A quarter with an SCC exceeding 200,000 cells/mL is often considered evidence of subclinical mastitis (M. Shafeeq, 2021). Routine individual cow ...
  29. [29]
    Somatic Cell Count Benchmarks | CAES Field Report - UGA
    The cells found in milk consist of about 75 percent white blood cells or leucocytes and about 25 percent epithelial cells. Leucocyte numbers increase in ...Introduction · Methods of Evaluating Somatic... · High and Low Somatic Cell...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Determining U.S. Milk Quality Using Bulk-Tank Somatic Cell Counts ...
    8 In the United States,. 750,000 cells/mL is the legal maximum BTSCC for Grade. A milk shipments. United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  31. [31]
    Consequence of alternative standards for bulk tank somatic cell ...
    A herd was noncompliant for the current US BTSCC standard after 3 of 5 consecutive monthly BTSCC shipments (frequency method) were >750,000 cells/mL.
  32. [32]
    Herd-Level Mastitis-Associated Costs on Canadian Dairy Farms - NIH
    May 14, 2018 · Nevertheless, among our respondents, 3 producers reported paying penalties (one of 100 CAD, one of 500 CAD, and the last one 5,000 CAD) within ...
  33. [33]
    The Accurate and Exclusive Quantification of Somatic Cells in Raw ...
    Sep 12, 2024 · The somatic cell count (SCC) refers to the number of somatic cells present in each milliliter of raw milk and serves as a crucial indicator ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    (PDF) Direct Microscopic Somatic Cell Count - ResearchGate
    To calculate the somatic cells in 1 ml of milk, the equation N = n × W was used, where n is the number of counted somatic cells and W is the work coefficient.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] DIRECT MICROSCOPIC SOMATIC CELL COUNT GUIDELINE
    This guideline can be used to help properly identify and count somatic cells in milk and should facilitate standardization of analysts performing the DMSCC ...
  36. [36]
    Fossomatic™ 7 - 7th generation world renowned somatic cell count ...
    Based on proven FOSS technology, the Fossomatic™ 7 counts somatic cells in raw milk in seconds. Rapid somatic cell count allows farmers to take fast action on ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Report for the certification of Fossomatic 7 - ICAR
    Fossomatic TM 7 can measure the total somatic cell count in fresh or preserved raw milk. The instrument is mainly applied in central milk testing and dairy ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  38. [38]
    FOSS somatic cell count method approved by Microval and NCIMS ...
    Dec 2, 2016 · FOSS was the first to develop the Fossomatic somatic count method in the early 1980's and the introduction of routine testing as part of dairy ...
  39. [39]
    Direct Microscopic Counts- Principle, Procedure, Uses - Microbe Notes
    Feb 14, 2022 · Although rapid, a direct count has the disadvantages that both living and dead cells are counted. Only dense suspensions can be counted (>107 ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] ERM®-BD001 - JRC Publications Repository
    The materials are intended for the calibration of methods for enumeration of somatic cells using fluoro-opto-electronic cell counters according to ISO. 13366-2: ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Guidance on application of EC JRC Certified Reference Material for ...
    Applying CRM ERM®-BD001 for calibration of routine methods means a change in the anchoring of somatic cell counting in milk. This might come with a ...
  42. [42]
    Evaluation of an on-farm test to estimate somatic cell count
    The Somaticell test correctly determined the SCC in fresh quarter milk samples. Correlation between Somaticell and electronic enumeration of somatic cells was ...
  43. [43]
    California Mastitis Test - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The reagent causes lysis of cell membranes and precipitation of the cell DNA and proteins resulting in change in viscosity of the reagent when added to milk.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] California Mastitis Test and Milk Quality
    Subclinical mastitis occurs when both milk and mammary gland appear normal but Somatic. Cell Counts (SCC) are elevated to a level above 200,000 cells/mL. It ...
  45. [45]
    Use of somatic cell counts and California mastitis test results from ...
    Feb 1, 2004 · Mastitis history,. California mastitis test, and somatic cell counts for identifying cows for treatment in a selective dry cow therapy program.
  46. [46]
    Somacount FCM | Bentley Instruments Inc
    The Somacount flow cytometer, provides an accurate count of the somatic cells in a raw milk sample (cow, sheep, goat, camel, buffalo etc.). After first being ...
  47. [47]
    Evaluation of the overall accuracy of the DeLaval cell counter for ...
    Abstract. The DeLaval cell counter (DCC) is a portable device designed for on-farm somatic cell count (SCC) analysis in bovine milk.Missing: mechanism laser detection<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    evaluation of an on-farm test to estimate somatic cell count - PubMed
    The Somaticell test correctly determined the SCC in fresh quarter milk samples. Correlation between Somaticell and electronic enumeration of somatic cells was ...
  49. [49]
    use of Somaticell®, California mastitis test and somatic cell count
    The negative score (score 0) of CMT was considered to be the best cut-off point at all times. Moreover, the values found using the Somaticell® test should not ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Guidelines on Normal and Abnormal Raw Milk Based on Somatic ...
    The PMN are a small proportion of the cells in milk from uninfected glands but become the predominant cell type in milk from infected glands (8, 9). Page 2 ...
  51. [51]
    Somatic cell count: An indicator of milk quality - AHDB
    Somatic cell count (SCC) is a main indicator of milk quality, with lower counts indicating better animal health and milk quality. Farmers are rewarded for low ...
  52. [52]
    Use and interpretation of somatic cell counts in the dairy cow
    Aug 5, 2025 · The composite SCC above a threshold value of 200,000 cells/mL has been considered as occurrence of udder infection (Bradley and Green, 2005) .
  53. [53]
    Somatic cell count as an indicator of subclinical mastitis and ... - NIH
    Aug 27, 2024 · Thus, an SCC of ≥250,000 cells mL−1 in human breast milk could potentially be used as a diagnostic tool for subclinical mastitis.
  54. [54]
    Differential Somatic Cell Count: Value for Udder Health Management
    Dec 23, 2020 · Severe mastitis and SCC between 100,000 and 400,000 cells/ml ... Flow cytometry, 32, 16, 52. SCC >800,000 cells/ml, Flow cytometry, 49, 18, 33. ( ...
  55. [55]
    Using DHI SCC to Manage Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Counts
    DHI SCC is an inexpensive, accurate method for monitoring individual cow somatic cell counts, which helps manage bulk tank somatic cell counts.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The Value and Use of Dairy Herd Improvement Somatic Cell Count
    Somatic cell counts (SCC) indicate mastitis status, with higher counts linked to milk production losses. DHI reports SCC and uses a somatic cell score (SCS).
  57. [57]
    Herd and animal factors affect the variability of total and differential ...
    All the somatic cell traits increased across number of parities, possibly because older cows may have increased susceptibility to intramammary infections.
  58. [58]
    A comparison between Holstein-Friesian and Jersey dairy cows and ...
    Harmon (1994) cited parity and stage of lactation as major factors that influence SCC. Reneau et al. (1986) and Kelly (2009) reported that monthly SCC is ...
  59. [59]
    Survey of Milking Hygiene Practices and Their Relationships to ...
    Herds using a teat dip had counts 70,300 cells/ml lower than those not teat dipping, and herds drying udders had counts 44,000 cells/ml lower than those not ...
  60. [60]
    Feeding and Nutritional Factors That Affect Somatic Cell Counts in ...
    Jul 11, 2023 · The purpose of this quantitative review is to highlight the effects of feeding strategies using some mineral, vitamin, marine oil, and vegetable essential oil ...
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    Heritability and genetic correlations of total and differential somatic ...
    Heritability was low for SCS (0.06), DSCC (0.08), and DSCS (0.06) and comparable with the estimates previously reported in Holstein dairy cattle (Bobbo et al., ...
  63. [63]
    Selective dry cow therapy | UMN Extension
    A selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) program treats some cows at dry off with an antibiotic. · SDCT can reduce antibiotic use and costs for dairy farms. · All cows ...
  64. [64]
    8 Ways to Reduce Somatic Cell Counts in Your Dairy Cows
    Aug 7, 2023 · In general, an SCC of under 200,000 cells/mL indicates a healthy dairy cow. When SCCs are above 200,000 cells/mL, a subclinical or clinical ...