Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Stellar corona

A stellar corona is the outermost layer of a star's atmosphere, consisting of a hot, tenuous, magnetized plasma with temperatures exceeding 1 million Kelvin (MK), which emits primarily in soft X-rays through thermal bremsstrahlung and line radiation.^[1] This region, analogous to the Sun's corona, is structured by closed magnetic loops that confine the plasma, with loop sizes ranging from 0.1 to over 1 stellar radius depending on the star's activity level.^[1] The corona's high temperature, far exceeding the photosphere's ~6000 K, arises from non-thermal heating mechanisms tied to magnetic reconnection and dynamo-generated fields in convective stars.^[2] Stellar coronae are ubiquitous in low-mass, cool stars on the main sequence and pre-main sequence, with X-ray luminosities spanning 10^{25} to over 10^{33} erg s^{-1}, representing a small fraction (10^{-6} to 10^{-3}) of the star's bolometric luminosity.^[1] Observations via X-ray satellites reveal continuous emission measure distributions peaking at 1–5 MK in quiet phases, rising to 10–30 MK in active regions, and exceeding 100 MK during flares caused by magnetic reconnection.^[1] Coronal properties correlate strongly with surface magnetic flux, following relations like L_X \propto \Phi^{1-2}, where \Phi is the magnetic flux, and activity scales inversely with rotation period as L_X \propto P^{-2} until saturation in rapid rotators.^[3] Activity and coronal heating evolve with stellar parameters: peaking in young, rapidly rotating stars around 1 Myr, then declining with age (e.g., L_X \propto t^{-1.5} for F–G dwarfs), persisting longer in M dwarfs due to deeper convection zones.^[1] In binaries or evolved giants, enhanced activity can lead to brighter, hotter coronae, while winds and dynamo suppression reduce emission in older phases.^[1] These variations, probed through X-ray spectroscopy and Zeeman-Doppler imaging, inform models of magnetic field generation and plasma heating across stellar evolution.^[4]

Overview

Definition and Basic Properties

The stellar corona is the outermost layer of a star's atmosphere, consisting of a hot, tenuous plasma that extends from the top of the chromosphere into interplanetary space. Despite its distance from the stellar core, where temperatures are much higher, the corona reaches temperatures exceeding 1 million Kelvin (MK), often ranging from 1 to 10 MK in solar-like stars, making it significantly hotter than the underlying layers. This plasma envelope is primarily composed of fully ionized hydrogen and helium, with its structure and dynamics dominated by the star's magnetic fields. Key physical properties of the stellar corona include its radial extent, which typically spans several stellar radii—millions of kilometers for Sun-like stars—and a density profile that decreases rapidly outward from the base. At the coronal base, the electron density n_e is approximately $10^8 to $10^9 cm^{-3} for quiet solar-like coronae, corresponding to a mass density of about $10^{-16} g cm^{-3}, while active stars can exhibit higher densities up to $10^{10} cm^{-3} or more.^[5] The temperature structure often shows a multi-thermal distribution, with hotter plasma (up to 20 MK or more during flares) coexisting with cooler components, and in some models, temperature inversely correlates with density due to heating mechanisms. The corona transitions abruptly from the cooler chromosphere (temperatures of $10^4 to $10^5 K) through a thin transition region where the temperature rises sharply over a height of a few thousand kilometers. As a fully ionized, low-density plasma, the coronal gas behaves as an ideal gas, with thermal pressure given by the equation

P = n k T,

where P is the pressure, n is the total particle density (approximately $2 n_e for ionized hydrogen), k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the temperature; at the solar coronal base, this yields pressures on the order of $10^{-2} to $10^{-1} dyn cm^{-2}.^[6] This magnetic dominance confines the plasma against gravitational forces, shaping the corona into loop-like structures and enabling its extreme thermal properties.

Significance in Stellar Astrophysics

Stellar coronae serve as the primary source of mass loss in low-mass stars through mechanisms such as thermal evaporation and magnetic acceleration, where heated plasma in open magnetic field regions expands to form stellar winds analogous to the solar wind.^[7] These winds are driven by the conversion of magnetic energy into kinetic energy via processes like reconnection and wave dissipation, influencing stellar angular momentum loss and rotational evolution over time.^[8] For instance, in rapidly rotating stars, the coronal magnetic topology enhances wind acceleration, leading to spin-down rates that can be parametrized by the fraction of open flux.^[9] The high-energy emissions from stellar coronae, particularly in X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) wavelengths, profoundly affect the atmospheres of orbiting exoplanets, especially close-in hot Jupiters. Coronal radiation ionizes and heats upper planetary atmospheres, driving hydrodynamic escape and erosion that can strip away volatile components over billions of years.^[10] Observations indicate that planets experiencing accumulated X-ray fluxes exceeding 10^{19} erg cm^{-2} show evidence of mass loss, with lower-mass hot Jupiters more susceptible, thereby shrinking habitable zones around active host stars.^[10] This radiation also alters atmospheric chemistry, potentially hindering the development of biosignatures on temperate worlds.^[11] As diagnostic tools, stellar coronae reveal underlying magnetic activity, rotation rates, and dynamo processes through their X-ray luminosities, which scale inversely with rotation period as L_X \propto P^{-2} for unsaturated regimes.^[7] Emission measure distributions and line ratios (e.g., from O VII and Fe XVII) probe plasma temperatures and densities, linking coronal properties to the efficiency of convective dynamos in stellar interiors.^[12] In active systems, these diagnostics highlight how differential rotation and convection sustain magnetic fields, with activity saturating at Rossby numbers below 0.13.^[12] The solar corona acts as an archetype in heliophysics for interpreting stellar analogs, providing insights into space weather phenomena like particle acceleration and coronal mass ejections that propagate through stellar winds.^[7] Similarities in flare dynamics, such as the Neupert effect relating hard X-ray and soft X-ray light curves, extend solar models to other stars, aiding predictions of interstellar environments.^[7] For highly active stars like RS CVn binaries, coronal X-ray emission can contribute up to 0.1% of the total bolometric luminosity (L_X / L_{bol} \sim 10^{-3}), underscoring their role in high-energy astrophysics.^[12]

Historical Development

Early Observations and Discoveries

The earliest observations of the solar corona, serving as the primary model for understanding stellar coronae, occurred during total solar eclipses in the 19th century, revealing a faint, pearly white halo of light surrounding the obscured solar disk.^[13] During the total solar eclipse of July 8, 1842, visible across Europe, numerous astronomers documented this ethereal structure, with descriptions emphasizing its luminous, divergent rays and iridescent tones, contributing to early recognition of its transient visibility only during totality. Further advancements came with the total solar eclipse of July 28, 1851, marking one of the first systematic European efforts to catalog the corona's form amid varying solar activity.^[14] This event also saw the first successful photograph of the corona, taken by Johann Julius Friedrich Berkowski in Königsberg, capturing its irregular, streamer-like features and confirming its gaseous nature beyond the Sun's photosphere.^[15] These eclipse-based sightings established the corona as a dynamic envelope extending several solar radii, varying in shape with the 11-year solar cycle. A pivotal moment arrived with the total solar eclipse of May 29, 1919, organized by Arthur Eddington and Frank Watson Dyson, where measurements of starlight deflection near the solar limb—enabled by the corona's visibility—provided empirical confirmation of general relativity's prediction of gravitational light bending by 1.75 arcseconds.^[16] In the 1930s, spectroscopic analysis during eclipses revealed enigmatic emission lines, including the prominent green line at 5303 Å, first noted in 1869 but unidentified until Walter Grotrian proposed in 1939 that it arose from forbidden transitions in highly ionized atoms.^[17] Bengt Edlén confirmed this in 1943, attributing the line to Fe XIV ions and demonstrating the corona's extreme temperatures exceeding one million Kelvin, far hotter than the underlying photosphere.^[18] Instrumental innovations expanded access beyond rare eclipses; Bernard Lyot developed the coronagraph in 1930 at the Pic du Midi Observatory, using an occulting disk and Lyot stop to suppress direct sunlight and image the white-light corona routinely from the ground.^[19] Complementary ground-based tools, such as spectroheliographs invented by George Ellery Hale around 1903, enabled monochromatic imaging of the low corona and prominences, revealing spectral details without totality.^[20] By the 1940s, radio astronomy transitioned observations to non-optical wavelengths, with James Stanley Hey detecting solar radio bursts in 1942 and subsequent studies in the 1950s revealing coronal scattering of radio waves from distant sources, mapping the plasma's electron density out to several solar radii.^[21]

Evolution of Theoretical Models

Early theoretical models of the solar corona in the 1940s assumed a static structure in hydrostatic equilibrium, where the plasma pressure gradient balanced gravitational forces, as conjectured by Hannes Alfvén to explain the corona's stability near the Sun. These models treated the corona as an isothermal or polytropic gas layer, with temperature estimates around 500,000 K derived from spectral line observations, though they struggled to account for the observed extent and density profiles without additional support mechanisms.^[22] By the late 1950s, Eugene Parker extended these static ideas into dynamic frameworks, proposing that the corona's high temperature (exceeding 1 million K) would drive a continuous outflow of plasma, forming the solar wind and resolving inconsistencies in hydrostatic assumptions at larger distances.^[23] A key paradigm shift occurred in the 1960s with the recognition that magnetic fields play a central role in confining the coronal plasma against thermal expansion, as evidenced by early rocket observations of X-ray emission tracing magnetic structures.^[24] This marked the transition from purely hydrodynamic models to magnetized plasma descriptions, where the corona's topology is shaped by the Sun's photospheric magnetic field extrapolated outward. In the 1970s, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models incorporated Alfvén waves—transverse oscillations propagating along magnetic field lines—as potential carriers of energy from the photosphere to the corona, enabling more realistic simulations of wave-driven dynamics in loop-like structures.^[25] The steady-state momentum balance in these MHD frameworks is given by the equation

\nabla P = -\rho \nabla \Phi + \mathbf{J} \times \mathbf{B},

where P is pressure, \rho is density, \Phi is the gravitational potential, \mathbf{J} is the current density, and \mathbf{B} is the magnetic field; this illustrates how Lorentz forces (\mathbf{J} \times \mathbf{B}) support the plasma against gravity and pressure gradients.^[26] By the 1990s, theories emphasizing magnetic reconnection—rapid reconfiguration of field lines releasing stored magnetic energy—emerged as a dominant mechanism for localized heating and flare initiation, building on earlier kinematic models to explain the corona's non-uniform temperature distribution.^[27] Further milestones in the 1990s and beyond integrated coronal models with solar dynamo theories, linking activity cycles (such as the 11-year sunspot cycle) to variations in magnetic field strength and coronal X-ray brightness, as dynamo-generated fields modulate reconnection rates and wave dissipation efficiency.^[28] These hybrid approaches, validated against cycle observations, extended naturally to stellar coronae, predicting correlated variability in magnetic activity across low-mass stars.^[4]

Extension to Stellar Coronae

The historical understanding of stellar coronae built upon solar models but advanced through space-based X-ray observations starting in the 1970s. The Uhuru satellite, launched in 1970, provided the first detections of X-ray emission from non-solar stars, such as Capella, indicating hot coronal plasmas analogous to the Sun's.^[29] Systematic studies with the Einstein Observatory (1978–1981) mapped coronal X-ray luminosities across the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, revealing ubiquity in cool stars and correlations with activity, establishing stellar coronae as magnetized, X-ray emitting envelopes.^[30]

Observations

Solar Corona: Methods and Instruments

Ground-based observations of the solar corona have traditionally relied on coronagraphs to suppress the Sun's bright disk and reveal the faint outer atmosphere. At the Mauna Loa Solar Observatory (MLSO) in Hawaii, the K-Coronagraph (K-Cor) instrument, part of the Coronal Solar Magnetism Observatory (COSMO), images the corona in white light from 1.05 to 3 solar radii (R⊙), enabling studies of coronal mass ejection (CME) formation and density evolution.^[31] Similarly, the Upgraded Coronal Multi-channel Polarimeter (UCoMP) at MLSO measures coronal polarization to infer magnetic field strengths and plasma dynamics in the low corona.^[32] Total solar eclipses provide unique opportunities for spectroscopy without artificial occultation, capturing emission lines like Fe XI and He I 1083 nm to diagnose plasma temperatures and compositions extending to several R⊙.^[33]^[34] Recent advances in adaptive optics have dramatically improved ground-based resolution of coronal fine structures. In 2025, high-order adaptive optics systems at the 1.6-m Goode Solar Telescope achieved diffraction-limited imaging at 63 km resolution, overcoming atmospheric turbulence to visualize dynamic features such as plasma "raindrops" in prominences and loops near the limb.^[35]^[36] Space-based missions offer continuous, high-fidelity views free from Earth's atmosphere. The Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), launched in 1995, employs the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) for white-light imaging of the corona out to 30 R⊙, tracking CME propagation and heliospheric structures.^[37] The Solar Orbiter, launched in 2020, provides multi-wavelength coronagraphy via the Metis instrument, combining UV and visible light to study coronal heating and wind origins from closer orbits.^[38] Complementing remote sensing, the Parker Solar Probe, launched in 2018, performs in-situ measurements within 20 R⊙, sampling plasma properties, magnetic fields, and waves in the corona's outer extents during perihelion passes. Key instruments across these platforms target specific wavelengths for coronal diagnostics. The X-Ray Telescope (XRT) on Hinode, operational since 2006, images the corona in soft X-rays (0.4–10 keV) to map hot plasma (1–10 million K) in loops and active regions with 1-arcsecond resolution.^[39] The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), launched in 2010, captures extreme ultraviolet (EUV) emissions in multiple passbands (e.g., 171 Å, 193 Å), revealing cooler coronal structures (~0.5–2 million K) with 0.6-arcsecond pixels every 12 seconds.^[40] For radio observations, the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) detects low-frequency (80–240 MHz) emissions from the corona, tracing plasma frequencies and magnetic reconnection events up to 2–3 R⊙.^[41] By 2025, data-assimilative models have enabled real-time coronal evolution forecasts by incorporating photospheric magnetograms from observatories like SDO's Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI). These thermodynamic magnetohydrodynamic simulations assimilate sequential magnetic field data to predict 3D coronal structures, achieving near-real-time updates for events like the April 2024 eclipse.^[42] The Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH) mission, launched in 2025, enhances CME tracking with four microsatellites imaging polarized white-light emissions from 5.5 to 108 R⊙, bridging coronagraphic and heliospheric views.^[43]

Stellar Coronae: Detection Techniques

The detection of stellar coronae relies primarily on indirect methods, as the immense distances to non-solar stars preclude direct imaging akin to solar observations. Instead, astronomers infer coronal properties from multi-wavelength emissions originating from hot, magnetized plasma, with X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) bands being the most direct probes.^[3] These emissions arise mainly from thermal bremsstrahlung and line radiation in plasma heated to millions of Kelvin, allowing characterization of coronal temperature, density, and structure.^[44] X-ray observations form the cornerstone of stellar coronal detection, capturing the thermal bremsstrahlung from hot plasma (typically 1–20 MK) that dominates the corona's emission. Satellites such as Chandra, launched in 1999, and XMM-Newton, also launched in 1999, have revolutionized this field through high-resolution spectroscopy and imaging, resolving coronal structures in nearby stars and enabling flux measurements across thousands of targets.^[45] For instance, these instruments detect X-ray luminosities ranging from 10^{27} to 10^{31} erg s^{-1} in active stars, scaling with magnetic activity levels. EUV observations complement X-rays by probing cooler plasma (0.5–1.5 MK), with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) providing spectroscopic data via instruments like the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS), which reveal transition region and lower coronal emissions in ultraviolet lines.^[46] Spectroscopic techniques exploit emission line ratios to diagnose plasma conditions, offering insights into temperature and density distributions. For example, ratios of iron lines such as Fe XVII to Fe XVIII (formed at ~6–7 MK) yield electron densities of 10^{11}–10^{13} cm^{-3} and temperatures via collisional excitation models, as demonstrated in analyses of active stars like Capella.^[47] Timing analysis of these lines further detects variability from flares, with light curves showing impulsive rises and decays that trace heating events on timescales of minutes to hours.^[48] Indirect probes extend detection to regimes where X-ray/EUV signals are faint. Ultraviolet absorption lines, particularly Lyman-alpha, reveal stellar wind signatures modulated by coronal mass ejections, as seen in high-resolution spectra from HST and the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE), indicating mass-loss rates of 10^{-14} to 10^{-12} M_\sun yr^{-1}.^[49] Radio emissions from gyrosynchrotron processes, observed at centimeter wavelengths with arrays like the Very Large Array, probe non-thermal electrons in magnetic loops, correlating with X-ray flares in stars such as RS CVn binaries.^[50] Challenges in detection stem from the multi-temperature nature of coronae, requiring advanced modeling like differential emission measure (DEM) analysis to reconstruct the plasma's temperature distribution from observed spectra. DEM modeling inverts line intensities to map emission measure (n_e^2 V) versus temperature, revealing structures from isothermal to broadly distributed (log T ~ 0.5–1 dex), though ill-posed inversions demand regularization techniques for accuracy.^[51] Recent advances include all-sky surveys by eROSITA (launched 2019), whose 2023–2025 data releases have identified coronal X-ray sources in active stars, enhancing population studies of rotation-activity relations.^[52] To date, coronae have been detected in approximately 10^5 stars, primarily through X-ray catalogs, with activity saturating at Rossby numbers (rotation period divided by convective turnover time) of 0.1–0.3, filling 10–50% of the parameter space for late-type stars.^[53] These methods benchmark against solar coronal techniques but adapt to unresolved stellar disks via integrated spectroscopy.^[44]

Physical Structure

Active Regions and Loops

Active regions in the stellar corona are localized areas of enhanced magnetic activity where bipolar magnetic fields emerge from the photosphere, confining hot plasma into arch-like structures known as coronal loops. These loops trace semi-circular magnetic field lines that connect opposite-polarity footpoints on the stellar surface, forming closed magnetic flux tubes that dominate the bright X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) emissions in active stellar coronae.^[54] Coronal loops typically extend over lengths ranging from 0.1 to over 1 stellar radius, with lifetimes spanning hours to days, during which they maintain hydrostatic equilibrium against gravity and radiative losses. Plasma within these loops displays a multi-temperature profile, cooler at the chromospheric footpoints and progressively hotter toward the apex, often reaching millions of Kelvin, which reflects the variation in heating and conduction along the field lines.^[54]^[1] In the solar corona, high-resolution EUV and X-ray imaging reveals the dynamic nature of these loops, including siphon flows driven by pressure imbalances between the footpoints, where plasma streams supersonically from the higher-pressure leg to the lower one; similar dynamics are modeled for stellar loops. The equilibrium structure of static loops is governed by the Rosner-Tucker-Vaiana (RTV) scaling laws, derived from balancing heating, radiative cooling, and thermal conduction, yielding a maximum temperature relation:

T_\mathrm{max} \propto (p L)^{1/3},

where p is the base pressure and L is the loop half-length; this provides a fundamental scaling for loop temperatures observed across solar and stellar active regions.^[54]^[55] Specific manifestations include post-flare loops, which emerge as dense, low-lying arcades following magnetic reconnection during flares, condensing and cooling over time as observed in X-ray emissions. Sigmoidal loops, characterized by their twisted S- or inverse-S shapes indicative of sheared magnetic fields, frequently precede coronal eruptions by destabilizing into flux ropes. These structures highlight active regions as primary sites for transient activity, such as flares, in stellar coronae. In active stars, loops are often more compact (L < 0.1 R_*) with higher pressures and densities (~10^{10} cm^{-3}) compared to solar values.^[1]

Coronal Holes and Quiet Regions

Coronal holes represent large-scale, low-density regions in the stellar corona characterized by predominantly open magnetic field lines that extend into interplanetary space, allowing the escape of plasma as the fast stellar wind. These areas appear dimmer in X-ray and EUV observations due to their reduced emission compared to surrounding regions.^[56] Analogous to solar polar coronal holes, they form at high latitudes during periods of low activity and serve as sources of high-speed winds; in the Sun, speeds exceed 500 km/s, typically 700–800 km/s, but vary in other stars. At minimum activity, coronal holes can cover significant fractions of the surface, up to 20–40% in solar-like stars.^[57] Key physical properties of coronal holes include electron densities on the order of 10^7 cm^{-3} at the base in solar-like cases, significantly lower than in denser coronal structures, and temperatures ranging from 1 to 2 MK for electrons, with protons and heavier ions often hotter due to wave heating.^[57]^[56] The open field lines expand superradially, forming flux tubes that channel plasma outward, and the Alfvén surface marks the critical boundary where the stellar wind speed equals the Alfvén speed, transitioning the flow from sub- to super-Alfvénic.^[58] Unlike the closed magnetic loops dominant in active regions, coronal holes exhibit steady, unipolar magnetic connectivity that facilitates continuous wind acceleration; in stars, they are inferred from low X-ray emission and wind properties rather than direct imaging.^[56]^[1] Quiet regions, in contrast, comprise the diffuse, low-activity portions of the corona outside active regions and coronal holes, featuring weakly magnetized or unipolar plasma with uniform emission lacking prominent loop structures. These areas display relatively steady coronal plasma with electron densities around 10^7–10^8 cm^{-3} and temperatures of 1–2 MK in solar-like stars, contributing to the baseline emission. The weak magnetic fields in quiet regions result in minimal dynamic activity, producing a smoother intensity profile in EUV and soft X-ray observations compared to the structured brightness of active regions. In stellar coronae, analogous quiet regions are inferred from uniform X-ray emission in inactive stars, highlighting their role in maintaining the overall coronal energy balance without significant magnetic confinement; properties vary with activity, with cooler plasma (~1-4 MK) in less active stars.^[56]^[1]

Dynamics and Variability

Flares

Solar flares represent sudden, explosive releases of magnetic energy stored in the corona, converting it into thermal and kinetic energy that heats plasma to temperatures of 10–20 million Kelvin and accelerates particles. These events typically liberate between $10^{24} and $10^{32} erg of energy, with the impulsive phase occurring over seconds to minutes as the primary burst of radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum.^[59]^[60] The flare evolution unfolds in three main phases: a pre-flare precursor stage involving gradual magnetic reconfiguration and initial soft X-ray emission; an impulsive flash phase marked by rapid energy deposition and high-energy particle emission; and a decay phase where heated plasma cools over minutes to hours, producing extended soft X-ray glow.^[60] The primary trigger for flares is magnetic reconnection within thin current sheets in the corona, where oppositely directed magnetic fields annihilate and reorganize, releasing stored energy at rates governed by plasma resistivity.^[61] In the Sweet-Parker model of steady-state reconnection, the inflow speed toward the reconnection site scales with the Alfvén speed as v_{\rm in} \sim \left( \frac{B^2}{4\pi \rho} \right)^{1/2}, where B is the magnetic field strength and \rho is the plasma density, though the actual rate is reduced by the square root of the Lundquist number for resistive effects.^[62] This process accelerates electrons and ions to relativistic energies, including protons up to GeV levels, through mechanisms like direct electric field acceleration or shock interactions in the reconnection outflows.^[63] Solar flares are classified by peak soft X-ray flux observed by GOES satellites, ranging from A-class (weakest, ~10^{-8} W/m²) to X-class (most intense, >10^{-4} W/m²), with subclasses indicating order-of-magnitude increases.^[64] A key observational signature is the Neupert effect, where the time derivative of the soft X-ray light curve correlates with the hard X-ray or extreme ultraviolet flux, reflecting the conversion of non-thermal particle energy into thermal plasma heating.^[65] In stellar coronae, analogous flares are more frequent on M-dwarfs due to their strong magnetic activity and convective dynamos, with flaring fractions peaking for mid-M types (effective temperatures ~3000–4000 K).^[66] Analyses of Kepler data reveal super-flares exceeding $10^{34} erg on Sun-like stars, occurring roughly once per century, highlighting the potential for extreme events in mature G-type coronae.^[67]

Coronal Mass Ejections

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large-scale expulsions of magnetized plasma from the solar corona into the heliosphere, typically involving billions of tons of material ejected at speeds ranging from 100 to 3000 km/s.^[68]^[69] These events are classified into types such as flux-rope CMEs, which exhibit a twisted magnetic structure resembling a helical flux tube, and streamer-blowout CMEs, characterized by the disruption and ejection of coronal streamers without a prominent filament core.^[70]^[71] CMEs form through the destabilization of magnetic structures in the corona, often involving the eruption of prominences—dense plasma filaments suspended in magnetic loops—or the evolution of sigmoid-shaped active regions, where twisted magnetic fields undergo catastrophic reconfiguration.^[72]^[73] Their occurrence peaks during solar maximum, with rates increasing to several per day compared to about one per day at solar minimum, reflecting the heightened magnetic activity across the solar cycle.^[74] Solar CMEs are observed remotely via white-light coronagraphs like the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), which frequently detects halo CMEs appearing as expanding rings around the occulting disk when directed toward Earth.^[75] In-situ measurements by spacecraft such as the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) and Wind reveal interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) as magnetic clouds with enhanced magnetic fields and bidirectional electron flows, often preceded by shocks that accelerate particles.^[76] Recent wide-field imaging from the Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH) mission, launched in 2025, has provided stereoscopic views of CME propagation in the inner heliosphere, capturing events from late May to early June 2025 with unprecedented spatial coverage.^[77] When Earth-directed, CMEs drive geomagnetic storms by compressing the magnetosphere and inducing rapid changes in the interplanetary magnetic field, leading to auroral enhancements and disruptions in power grids and satellite operations.^[68] They also pose radiation hazards to astronauts and high-altitude flights through associated solar energetic particle events generated at shocks.^[78] The acceleration of CMEs, particularly via toroidal magnetic fields in flux-rope models, can be approximated by the Alfvén speed, given by

v \approx \left( \frac{B^2}{4\pi \rho} \right)^{1/2},

where B is the magnetic field strength and \rho is the plasma density, highlighting the role of magnetic tension in propelling the ejecta.^[79] Stellar analogs to solar CMEs have been inferred on other stars through extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and ultraviolet (UV) dimming events, where mass loss depletes coronal density, causing temporary reductions in emission lasting hours to days.^[80] In systems hosting exoplanets, such dimming has been detected via transit-time analysis of UV light curves, revealing multi-temperature plasma ejections on active stars like epsilon Eridani, with mass estimates up to 10^{18}-10^{20} g based on dimming depth and duration.^[81]^[82] In November 2025, the first direct detection of a stellar CME was reported from a red dwarf star, observed via radio bursts using the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR) and XMM-Newton, involving a fast and dense ejection capable of stripping atmospheres from closely orbiting planets.^[83]

Physics of Coronal Plasma

Radiation and Emission Processes

The emission from stellar coronae originates from hot, low-density plasmas that are typically optically thin, producing radiation across a broad spectrum from radio waves to X-rays. The primary mechanisms include thermal bremsstrahlung, which generates a continuum spectrum through the deceleration of electrons in the Coulomb field of ions, and line emission arising from bound-bound transitions in highly ionized atoms such as iron and oxygen. Free-bound recombination, where electrons recombine with ions and cascade to lower energy levels, also contributes to the continuum, particularly at energies where line emission is sparse. These processes are most prominent in coronae with temperatures of 1–30 MK, enabling diagnostics of plasma conditions that reveal the underlying magnetic structures. Thermal bremsstrahlung is especially significant for X-ray emission in the 0.1–10 keV range, as observed in high-resolution spectra from telescopes like Chandra, where it forms the underlying continuum beneath prominent lines. The emissivity for this process in coronal plasmas is approximated by

\epsilon \propto n_e n_i \sqrt{T} \, e^{-E / kT},

with n_e and n_i denoting electron and ion densities, T the temperature, E the photon energy, and k Boltzmann's constant; this exponential cutoff shapes the spectrum, making it sensitive to hotter components above 20 MK. In contrast, line emission dominates in the extreme ultraviolet (EUV), with examples including the Fe IX line at 171 Å, which forms at approximately 1 MK and traces cooler coronal loops, and forbidden optical lines such as [Fe XIV] at 5303 Å, which probe densities around 10^8–10^9 cm^{-3} in the inner corona. Radio emission, often at centimeter wavelengths, arises from gyrosynchrotron radiation produced by mildly relativistic, non-thermal electrons spiraling in magnetic fields of 10–1000 G, providing insights into flare-accelerated particles rather than thermal plasma. Key diagnostics leverage these emissions to infer physical properties. Temperature structure is derived from line intensity ratios or differential emission measure (DEM) analysis, where the DEM, defined as Q(T) = n_e n_H \, dV / d \ln T, is reconstructed from multi-band observations to map the distribution of plasma at different temperatures; for instance, DEM peaks around 1–2 MK in quiet solar-type coronae but broadens to 10–30 MK in active stars. Electron densities, typically 10^8–10^{12} cm^{-3}, are estimated from ratios of lines sensitive to collisional effects, such as He-like ion triplets (e.g., O VII), where the forbidden-to-intercombination line ratio decreases above critical densities of ~10^{10} cm^{-3}. For the Sun, coronal emission accounts for roughly 10^{-6} of the bolometric luminosity yet constitutes nearly all X-ray output, highlighting the corona's role in high-energy radiation despite its modest energetic contribution.

Thermal Conduction and Seismology

Thermal conduction plays a crucial role in the energy transport within the stellar corona, particularly along magnetic field lines where the plasma is highly magnetized and collisions are infrequent. In this regime, the thermal conductivity follows Spitzer's law, expressed as \kappa_\parallel \propto T^{5/2}, where \kappa_\parallel is the parallel thermal conductivity and T is the plasma temperature; this dependence arises from the electron mean free path scaling with temperature in a fully ionized plasma.^[84] The heat flux due to conduction is given by the equation

\mathbf{q} = -\kappa \nabla T,

which describes the diffusive transport of thermal energy down temperature gradients, with \kappa incorporating the Spitzer form.^[85] This process is essential for balancing energy inputs in coronal structures, such as loops, where conduction cools the plasma after impulsive heating events by redistributing heat from high-temperature regions to cooler footpoints.^[86] In static coronal loop models, thermal conduction is integrated into energy balance equations alongside heating and radiative losses to predict loop properties. The seminal Rosner-Tucker-Vaiana (RTV) scaling laws, derived from hydrostatic equilibrium, relate loop apex temperature T_m, length L, and base pressure p_0 through relations like T_m \propto (p_0 L)^{1/3}, assuming Spitzer conductivity dominates the downward heat flux at the loop apex.^[87] These models demonstrate that conduction sets the temperature profile, with the conductive flux cooling timescale \tau_c \propto n L^2 / T^{5/2} determining how quickly loops respond to heating variations. Recent extensions to RTV incorporate variable cross-sections and metallicities, but the core role of conduction in achieving thermal equilibrium persists.^[88] Coronal seismology employs magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves to probe the physical properties of the corona noninvasively, leveraging wave propagation and damping to infer parameters like density and magnetic field strength. In the low-\beta coronal plasma, three primary MHD wave modes exist: Alfvén waves, which are incompressible and transverse, and fast and slow magnetoacoustic waves, which couple compression and rarefaction to magnetic perturbations.^[89] Kink modes, a type of fast magnetoacoustic wave in structured flux tubes like coronal loops, manifest as transverse displacements with oscillation periods typically ranging from 1 to 10 minutes, driven by photospheric motions or flares.^[90] Observations from instruments like the Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE) and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) have revealed damped kink oscillations in loops, with damping attributed to resonant absorption in the inhomogeneous boundary layers, providing diagnostics for transport coefficients.^[91] Phase speeds of these waves yield the Alfvén speed v_A, enabling estimates of the magnetic field strength via B \approx \sqrt{4\pi \rho} \, v_A, where \rho is the plasma density; for instance, loop oscillations observed by SDO/AIA have constrained coronal B values to 1–20 G in active regions. These techniques extend to propagating Alfvén waves, whose nonthermal broadening in emission lines indirectly links to conduction-suppressed damping.^[92] By 2025, advanced time-evolving simulations of the corona increasingly incorporate thermal conduction within full MHD frameworks to model dynamic responses, such as during solar maximum when structures evolve rapidly. These models, using implicit solvers for efficiency, simulate conduction's interplay with evolving magnetic fields, reproducing observed loop cooling and wave propagation in real-time predictions for events like eclipses.^[93]

Coronal Heating

Wave Heating Theories

Wave heating theories propose that magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves, excited by turbulent convective motions in the stellar photosphere, propagate along magnetic field lines into the corona, where they dissipate their energy through mechanisms like viscosity and resistivity to maintain the observed high temperatures of millions of kelvins.^[94] These theories apply to both solar and stellar coronae, with wave generation driven by similar dynamo processes across spectral types, though the efficiency depends on the star's magnetic field strength and rotation rate.^[95] The dominant wave modes in these models are Alfvén waves, which are torsional and non-compressive, perturbing the plasma transversely to the magnetic field without significant density changes, allowing them to travel efficiently through the stratified corona.^[96] In contrast, acoustic (p-mode) waves generated in the photosphere are largely reflected or dissipated at the chromosphere-transition region interface due to the rapid increase in sound speed and acoustic cutoff frequency, preventing substantial energy flux into the corona.^[97] Key dissipation processes for Alfvén waves include phase mixing, in which waves propagating along neighboring field lines with slightly different Alfvén speeds accumulate phase differences, leading to fine-scale structures that enhance damping by viscosity and resistivity, as first modeled by Heyvaerts and Priest in 1983.^[98] Another prominent mechanism is resonant absorption, where energy from a global fast kink mode transfers to localized shear Alfvén oscillations at thin resonant layers tuned to the wave frequency, enabling efficient heating even with low resistivity, as developed by Ionson in 1978. These processes are more effective in closed magnetic structures like coronal loops, where waves reflect and accumulate, compared to open field regions such as coronal holes, where undissipated waves can escape to accelerate stellar winds. Similar wave processes are inferred in stellar coronae through X-ray spectroscopy of active stars.^[94] Observational support for wave heating comes from spectroscopic evidence of non-thermal line broadenings and Doppler shifts indicative of Alfvénic wave power in the corona. Hinode/EIS observations reveal persistent Doppler shift oscillations with velocities up to several km/s and periods of minutes, consistent with propagating Alfvén waves contributing to quiet-Sun heating.^[99] A 2023 study of solar flare frequency distributions suggests that nanoflares alone are insufficient to account for coronal temperatures, implying Alfvén waves provide a significant fraction of the required energy input.^[100] As of 2025, ground-based observations with the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) have confirmed the presence of Alfvén waves in the solar corona, supporting their role in heating.^[101] The energy flux carried by Alfvén waves can be estimated as

F_w = \rho v_A \langle \delta v^2 \rangle,

where \rho is the plasma density, v_A is the Alfvén speed, and \langle \delta v^2 \rangle is the mean square velocity perturbation; with photospheric \delta v \approx 1 km/s, this flux matches the \sim 10^5 erg cm^{-2} s^{-1} needed for coronal heating in active stars.^[96]

Magnetic Reconnection and Nanoflares

Magnetic reconnection is a fundamental process in the solar corona where oppositely directed magnetic field lines break and rejoin, converting stored magnetic energy into thermal and kinetic energy of the plasma.^[102] This topology change occurs in current sheets formed by tangled fields, leading to rapid energy release that can heat plasma to millions of degrees.^[102] In 1988, Eugene Parker proposed the nanoflare model to explain coronal heating, suggesting that the corona is maintained by countless small-scale reconnection events, each releasing approximately $10^{24} erg of energy.^[103] These nanoflares arise from the continuous braiding and unbraiding of magnetic fields by photospheric motions, dissipating energy impulsively rather than continuously.^[103] Nanoflares manifest as frequent mini-reconnections, particularly in the quiet Sun, where they produce observable brightenings in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) wavelengths. High-resolution EUV imaging from the Hi-C sounding rocket in 2012 revealed subarcsecond-scale loops in inter-moss regions that brighten and fade rapidly, consistent with nanoflare heating events lasting tens of seconds.^[104] Recent studies from 2023 to 2025 support hybrid models combining nanoflares with wave heating to resolve the coronal heating problem, as pure nanoflare scenarios alone cannot account for all observed temperatures. Additionally, X-ray observations of microflares show correlations with enhanced brightness in moss regions—footpoints of hot coronal loops—indicating that small reconnection events contribute to localized heating in active region structures. As of 2025, Solar Orbiter observations have identified picoflares (10^{20}–10^{24} erg) in the quiet corona, extending the nanoflare paradigm to smaller scales that contribute additional impulsive heating. The energy released in a nanoflare reconnection is approximated by the magnetic energy in the reconnection volume:

E \approx \frac{B^2}{8\pi} V

where B is the magnetic field strength and V \approx 10^{17}–$10^{23} cm³ represents the volume of the reconnecting region, varying with event size and local field.^[103] Nanoflares provide a key impulsive component to the overall energy balance in the quiet corona, as highlighted in post-2020 decadal surveys on solar physics priorities.^[105] Analogous reconnection events are observed in X-ray emitting coronae of cool stars, particularly in young, active systems.

Variations Across Stars

Properties by Spectral Type

Stellar coronal properties exhibit significant variations across main-sequence spectral types, primarily driven by differences in stellar mass, rotation rates, and magnetic field generation mechanisms. In hotter, more massive stars, coronal emission is often dominated by wind-related shocks rather than dynamo-driven activity, leading to weaker and more diffuse coronae. As spectral types cool toward later classes, magnetic activity intensifies, resulting in denser, more luminous coronae with higher filling factors and greater variability. These trends are primarily observed through X-ray emissions, which trace the hot plasma (T > 1 MK) in stellar outer atmospheres.^[106] For O and B-type stars, coronae are generally weak and hot, with X-ray emission arising predominantly from shocks embedded in their fast, radiatively driven stellar winds rather than organized magnetic structures. Temperatures typically range from 1 to 10 MK, though flares or embedded shocks can reach up to 100 MK in young objects. Luminosities are high in absolute terms (∼10^{31}–10^{33} erg s^{-1}) but represent a small fraction of bolometric luminosity (L_X / L_{bol} ∼ 10^{-7} to 10^{-5}), reflecting limited magnetic confinement. A representative example is θ¹ Ori C (O7 V), where Chandra observations reveal wind-shock X-rays with L_X ≈ 10^{33} erg s^{-1} and multi-temperature plasma dominated by hot components. Rotation has a weak influence on activity in these stars, as dynamo processes are suppressed by their radiative cores and rapid spin-down via winds.^[106] In F, G, and K-type stars, coronae resemble the solar archetype, with structured magnetic loops producing thermal X-ray emission from plasmas at 1–40 MK. Activity levels are modulated by stellar cycles, similar to the Sun's 11-year variation, and luminosities span 10^{28}–10^{32} erg s^{-1}, with L_X / L_{bol} reaching saturation at ∼10^{-3} for rapid rotators. The activity-rotation relation follows the Skumanich law, where coronal activity declines as activity ∝ P_{rot}^{-2} for rotation periods P_{rot} > 10 days, linking slower rotation to weaker dynamos and lower heating efficiency. This unsaturated regime dominates in older, solar-like stars, while younger, fast-rotating examples like AB Doradus (K0 V) exhibit enhanced emission with T ≈ 100 MK during flares. Coronal densities are moderate (n_e ∼ 10^{12}–10^{13} cm^{-3}), supporting loop models akin to solar active regions.^[106]^[107] M-type dwarfs, including mid- and late subtypes, host the most intense and persistent coronae among main-sequence stars, characterized by high magnetic activity due to their fully convective interiors and slower rotational evolution. Temperatures often exceed 10 MK, up to 70 MK in flares, with compact loops (∼0.3 R_*) and high plasma densities (n_e ∼ 10^{11}–10^{13} cm^{-3}). L_X / L_{bol} peaks at ∼10^{-3} for mid-M dwarfs in the saturated regime, occasionally surpassing 10^{-2} during outbursts, far exceeding solar values. Activity shows super-saturation at very fast rotations (P_{rot} < 1–2 days), where L_X decreases slightly despite stronger fields, possibly due to enhanced wind losses or field tangling. The flare-active M dwarf AD Leonis (M4.5 V) exemplifies this, with quiescent L_X ∼10^{29} erg s^{-1} flaring to 10^{33} erg s^{-1} and multi-temperature spectra peaking at 5–38 MK. The eROSITA eRASS1 survey data release from 2024 has identified coronal X-ray emission in approximately 1.4 \times 10^5 stars, predominantly low-mass types, enabling statistical mapping of these trends across the Milky Way.^[106]^[108] Overall, coronal temperatures show a tendency to increase toward lower stellar masses (later spectral types), reflecting enhanced heating in magnetically active, cooler stars, while activity levels—measured by L_X / L_{bol}—rise markedly from O/B types to M dwarfs due to efficient dynamos in convective envelopes. This spectral-type dependence underscores the role of rotation and convection in sustaining coronal plasmas, with X-ray observations revealing a continuum from wind-dominated to dynamo-dominated regimes.^[106]

Evolution with Stellar Age and Activity

In the youthful phase of low-mass stars, such as T Tauri stars, coronae exhibit high levels of X-ray emission primarily driven by accretion shocks where infalling material from the protoplanetary disk impacts the stellar surface, heating plasma to coronal temperatures. This activity reaches a saturation level, with the fractional X-ray luminosity typically at \log(L_X / L_{\rm bol}) \approx -3, reflecting the strong magnetic fields generated by rapid rotation in these pre-main-sequence objects. Observations of clusters like the Orion Nebula confirm this saturated regime persists for the first ~10-100 million years, before transitioning as accretion wanes and internal dynamos dominate.^[109] During the main-sequence phase, coronal activity declines progressively as stellar rotation slows due to angular momentum loss via magnetized winds, following the Skumanich law. For FGK-type stars, the X-ray luminosity evolves approximately as \log L_X \propto -\alpha \log \tau + \beta, where \tau is the stellar age and \alpha \approx 0.5-1, indicating a power-law decay that steepens in the unsaturated regime beyond ~100 Myr.^[110] The Sun, at 4.6 Gyr, exemplifies this mature stage with a moderate corona, producing X-ray luminosities around $10^{27} erg/s from a dynamo sustained by differential rotation in its convection zone.^[109] This rotational braking correlates tightly with diminishing coronal heating efficiency, as measured in open clusters spanning ages from 100 Myr to several Gyr. Post-main-sequence evolution often reverses this decline for certain stars, particularly in binary systems where tidal interactions maintain rapid rotation and amplify magnetic activity.^[109] Red giants and supergiants can host enhanced coronae, with X-ray emissions boosted by dynamo regeneration in expanded convective envelopes; RS CVn-type binaries, for instance, show coronal luminosities up to 100 times the solar value due to synchronized orbits that prevent spin-down.^[109] Gyrochronology, traditionally based on rotation periods, has been extended to use coronal X-ray fluxes as an activity proxy for precise age determination in field stars, leveraging the empirical rotation-activity-age relations.^[110]

Current Research and Open Questions

Recent Advances in Modeling and Observations

Recent advances in modeling stellar coronae have emphasized assimilative techniques that integrate real-time observational data into magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations, enabling dynamic predictions of coronal evolution. In 2025, Predictive Science Inc. developed a near-real-time data-assimilative model using the Magnetohydrodynamic Algorithm outside a Sphere (MAS) code on the Expanse supercomputer at the San Diego Supercomputer Center, assimilating photospheric magnetic field observations from instruments like HMI/SDO and PHI/Solar Orbiter at hourly cadences to evolve the 3D coronal plasma state continuously.^[42]^[111] This approach captured time-dependent boundary conditions, including electric fields driving magnetic shear, and produced synthetic observables such as EUV and X-ray emissions, demonstrating its utility in forecasting coronal structures during events like the April 2024 total solar eclipse.^[112] High-resolution MHD simulations have further refined the tracking of large-scale coronal structures and small dipoles in response to photospheric flows, bridging gaps in understanding magnetic evolution across solar and stellar contexts.^[113] Observational breakthroughs since 2023 have enhanced resolution and coverage of coronal features, particularly through advanced instrumentation. A 2025 study utilizing high-order adaptive optics on ground-based solar telescopes achieved unprecedented clarity in imaging the Sun's corona, resolving fine structures smaller than 100 km and revealing details of rapid eruptions and heating processes previously obscured by atmospheric blur.^[35]^[36] Complementing this, NASA's PUNCH mission, operational since its 2025 launch, provided wide-field polarimetric views of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in 2025, capturing their propagation from the Sun's corona into the heliosphere with extended tracking beyond prior limits, as seen in observations from May to June 2025.^[77]^[114] For stellar coronae beyond the Sun, the eROSITA all-sky surveys (eRASS:1 and beyond) have dramatically expanded the database, detecting over 100,000 X-ray sources including thousands of active stars, representing roughly 10 times more detections of non-solar coronal emissions compared to pre-2020 surveys like ROSAT due to improved sensitivity in the 0.2–8 keV band.^[52]^[115] Stellar-focused research has advanced understanding of corona-dynamo interactions and heating mechanisms. The Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (MPS) conducts research on dynamo-corona coupling models, integrating photospheric convection simulations with coronal MHD to explain how subsurface magnetic fields drive outer atmospheric structures in cool stars.^[116] Studies of hybrid heating models combining Alfvén wave dissipation and nanoflare reconnection suggest contributions from both processes in maintaining warm coronal loops, based on multi-wavelength analyses of solar and stellar flares.^[117] A pivotal 2025 confirmation from CNRS researchers used direct surface imaging to verify that coronal heating originates from ascending magnetic flux ropes emerging from the photosphere, resolving long-standing debates on energy transport pathways through observations of impulsive events.^[118] These developments collectively address prior gaps in non-solar coronal studies, shifting emphasis toward diverse stellar populations and providing a richer empirical foundation for validating theoretical models. In late 2025, ESA's Solar Orbiter captured close-up observations of the Sun's magnetic engine in motion, revealing faster-than-expected polar field racing, which may inform dynamo models for coronal heating.^[119]

Unresolved Challenges

One of the central unresolved issues in coronal physics is the heating paradox, where the corona sustains temperatures around 10^6 K despite rapid cooling via thermal conduction to the chromosphere and radiative losses, which occur on timescales of minutes to hours. This requires a continuous energy input of approximately 300 W/m² in quiet-Sun regions to balance the losses and power the solar wind acceleration. The ongoing debate centers on whether wave dissipation or magnetic reconnection events, such as nanoflares, provide the dominant heating mechanism, with observations unable to conclusively favor one over the other despite advances in modeling.^[6]^[120]^[121] Extending beyond the Sun, significant data gaps persist for coronae of low-activity stars, where X-ray and EUV observations are sparse, limiting insights into how reduced magnetic activity affects heating efficiency across stellar types. This scarcity complicates generalizations of solar models to quieter stars like old G and K dwarfs. Similarly, models of exoplanet atmospheric irradiation and mass loss remain uncertain due to the variable and poorly constrained nature of stellar coronal X-ray emissions, which can alter planetary habitability predictions by factors of 2–10 in high-energy flux estimates.^[122]^[123]^[124] Key modeling challenges include capturing the multi-scale nature of coronal processes, from nanoscale reconnection sites to global magnetic field configurations, as current simulations struggle with the vast range of spatial (10^{-6} to 10^6 km) and temporal scales involved. The precise role of non-thermal particles, such as accelerated electrons and ions, in energy transport and deposition remains unclear, with their contributions potentially amplifying heating but lacking direct observational quantification in most stellar contexts. Additionally, the evolution of magnetic helicity—measuring the twist and linkage of coronal field lines—poses difficulties in predicting build-up, injection from the photosphere, and release during eruptions, as helicity conservation complicates long-term dynamical models.^[125]^[126] Recent 2025 reviews underscore the solar-centric bias in much of the existing literature, highlighting incompleteness in addressing coronal diversity across stellar evolution stages and the integration of 2020s observational advances like high-resolution EUV spectroscopy. They emphasize the need for next-generation X-ray missions, such as the proposed Lynx observatory, to achieve sub-arcsecond resolution and detect faint, diffuse emissions essential for resolving heating at small scales. Looking ahead, integrating Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of radio coronae with X-ray data promises to probe non-thermal emissions in stellar outflows, while AI-driven inversions of differential emission measure (DEM) distributions are emerging to automate temperature structure mapping from spectroscopic datasets, potentially accelerating progress on these gaps.^[127]^[128]^[129]

References

[1]
[PDF] X-ray astronomy of stellar coronae
Aug 25, 2004 · X-ray astronomy of stellar coronae studies magnetic coronae with high-temperature plasma, helping understand magnetic fields and plasma ...
[2]
Stellar Coronas as X-ray Sources - The Astrophysics Spectator
What we know of the coronas of stars we know primarily by observing the Sun. The corona of the Sun is a very hot and tenuous wind blowing away from the Sun.
[3]
Stellar coronal X-ray emission and surface magnetic flux
These X-rays are mostly of a thermal nature and originate from stellar coronae due to the high temperatures, well above 1 MK, in their outer atmospheres.
[4]
Stellar activity and coronal heating: an overview of recent results
May 28, 2015 · We discuss how recent studies of stellar magnetic fields and coronae contribute to our understanding of the phenomenon of activity and coronal ...
[5]
The Sun's Vital Statistics - Stanford Solar Center
Interior (center of the Sun). 160 g/cm^3 ; Surface (photosphere). 10^{-9} g/cm^3 ; Chromosphere. 10^{-12} g/cm^3 ; Low corona. 10^{-16} g/cm^3 ; Sea level ...
[6]
None
Below is a merged summary of the stellar coronae information from the provided segments of arXiv:astro-ph/0406661. To retain all details in a dense and organized manner, I will use a combination of narrative text and a table in CSV format for key quantitative data and references. The narrative will cover the overarching themes, while the table will consolidate specific metrics, diagnostics, and citations for clarity and completeness.
[7]
[PDF] Stellar Coronal and Wind Models: Impact on Exoplanets - arXiv
Sep 22, 2017 · Abstract Surface magnetism is believed to be the main driver of coronal heating and stellar wind acceleration. Coronae are believed to be ...
[8]
From solar to stellar corona: the role of wind, rotation and magnetism
Sep 23, 2015 · We recently demonstrated that the impact of coronal magnetic field topology on the rotational braking of a star can be parametrized with a ...
[9]
[PDF] arXiv:1002.1875v2 [astro-ph.SR] 10 Aug 2010
Aug 10, 2010 · ... X-ray flux is consistent with a scenario in which planet atmospheres have suffered the effects of erosion by coronal X-ray and EUV emission.
[10]
Planets of Red Dwarf Stars May Face Oxygen Loss in Habitable Zones
Feb 7, 2017 · New NASA research suggests some planets found in the "habitable zone" of their stars may not be able to support life after all.
[11]
[PDF] Stellar Activity and Coronal Heating: an overview of recent results
Feb 25, 2015 · Observations of the coronae of the Sun and of solar-like stars provide complementary information to advance our understanding of stellar ...
[12]
The Solar Corona – Total Solar Eclipse, 2017 - Digital Collections
The corona is considered one of the most spectacular events during an eclipse and throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries astronomers have worked to ...
[13]
Solar Physics Historical Timeline (1800-1999)
The first useful Daguerrotype of a solar eclipse was secured on 28 July 1851 ... Johann von Lamont (1805–1879) in Germany. This marked the beginning of solar ...
[14]
The Sun Recorded Through History
Naked-eye observations offered the first possibility to distinguish certain structures, eventually called sunspots, on the apparently pure solar surface. In the ...
[15]
IX. A determination of the deflection of light by the sun's gravitational ...
A determination of the deflection of light by the sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919.
[16]
Corona | Encyclopedia MDPI
Nov 8, 2022 · Bengt Edlén, following the work of Grotrian (1939), first identified the coronal spectral lines in 1940 (observed since 1869) as transitions ...
[17]
[PDF] 194 5MNRAS.105. .323E THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE CORONAL ...
THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE CORONAL LINES. {George Darwin Lecture, delivered by Professor Bengt EdUn on 1945 October 12). The coronal emission lines are ...
[18]
The Coronagraph - Archives
The coronagraph designed by Lyot created an artificial solar eclipse by placing a “moon,” or occulting disk, in front of the telescope's objective.
[19]
Solar Eclipse Observations. - Solar Physics at MSU
Scientific observations of TSEs started since 1842 (use of spectroscope). Flash spectra : slit-less spectra at the starting/ending moment of the totality.
[20]
Beginnings of Solar Radio Astronomy, 1944–1945 | SpringerLink
Jan 11, 2023 · Before 1942, no one observed solar radio emissions. In 1942, Hey observed sunspot emission, and Southworth detected thermal radiation from the ...
[21]
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-07916-0_11
[22]
https://oxfordre.com/physics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190871994.001.0001/acrefore-9780190871994-e-10
[23]
Coronal Loops: Observations and Modeling of Confined Plasma
Investigating the Reliability of Coronal Emission Measure Distribution Diagnostics using Three-dimensional Radiative Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations. ... RS CVn ...
[24]
Solar wind models with Alfven waves - NASA ADS
... wave pressure and wave heating on one-fluid models of the solar wind. Solutions are given to the MHD equations for the solar wind which include fluxes of Alfvén ...
[25]
Development of the 3‐D MHD model of the solar corona‐solar wind ...
Jul 31, 2009 · In the 1970s, Levine et al. [1977] presented an idea that addresses a relationship between the coronal magnetic field and the solar wind speed, ...
[26]
Coronal heating by magnetic reconnection - SpringerLink
The theory of magnetic reconnection has advanced substantially over the past few years. There now exists a new generation of fast two-dimensional models ...
[27]
Stellar Activity Cycles | Space Science Reviews
Sep 28, 2023 · The magnetic field of the Sun is generated by internal dynamo process with a cyclic period of 11 years or a 22 year magnetic cycle.
[28]
COSMO K-Coronagraph | High Altitude Observatory
It is specifically designed to study the formation and dynamics of coronal mass ejections and the evolution of the density structure of the low corona.Missing: COR1 | Show results with:COR1
[29]
Exploring the Corona With the Newest Coronagraph at the Mauna ...
Jun 3, 2022 · HAO has successfully deployed the new Upgraded Coronal Multi-Channel Polarimeter (UCoMP) to the Mauna Loa Solar Observatory.Missing: COR1 | Show results with:COR1
[30]
New deep coronal spectra from the 2017 total solar eclipse
Total eclipses permit a deep analysis of both the inner and the outer parts of the corona using the continuum white-light (W-L) radiations from electrons (K- ...
[31]
Detection of “diffuse” coronal He 1 1083 during the April 8 2024 ...
Jan 2, 2025 · Previous eclipse and coronagraphic observations have shown the presence of He 1 1083.0 nm (He 1 1083) atomic line emission in the solar corona, ...
[32]
Observations of fine coronal structures with high-order solar ... - Nature
May 27, 2025 · Enabling adaptive optics corrections for observations of features in the Sun's corona outside the solar disk is a transformative progress.
[33]
New Adaptive Optics Shows Stunning Details of our Star's Atmosphere
May 27, 2025 · Scientists develop new optical system that removes blur over fine-structure in the Sun's corona, revealing clearest images to date.
[34]
SOHO - NASA Science
On a mission to “touch the Sun,” NASA's Parker Solar Probe became the first spacecraft to fly through the corona… Juno. NASA's Juno spacecraft entered orbit ...
[35]
Solar Orbiter/Metis, STEREO-A/COR2, and SOHO/LASCO
The Metis coronagraph on board Solar Orbiter detected a coronal mass ejection (CME) that was moving away from the far side of the Sun (with respect to Solar ...
[36]
[PDF] SolarSoft XRT Analysis Guide
The craft carries three instruments, a Solar Optical Telescope (SOT),. Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) and X-Ray Telescope (XRT); together, they.
[37]
Mapping Solar X-Ray Images from SDO/AIA EUV ... - IOP Science
Jul 13, 2021 · The full-Sun corona is now imaged every 12 s in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) passbands by Solar Dynamics Observatory/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly ( ...
[38]
Frequency–Distance Structure of Solar Radio Sources Observed by ...
Mar 4, 2019 · Low-frequency radio observations make it possible to study the solar corona at distances up to 2–3 R☉. Frequency of plasma emission is a ...
[39]
A near-real-time data-assimilative model of the solar corona | Science
Jun 10, 2025 · We present a model of the corona that evolves continuously in time, by assimilating photospheric magnetic field observations as they become available.
[40]
NASA's PUNCH Releases Its First Images of Huge Eruptions from Sun
Jun 10, 2025 · From late May to early June 2025, PUNCH's three Wide Field Imagers captured views of coronal mass ejections, or CMEs, ...
[41]
X-ray astronomy of stellar coronae (Review) - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · The coronae of solar-type stars are characterized by a temperature of multi-million Kelvin, serving as the place of origin of high-energy ...
[42]
X-rays of stellar coronae with Chandra and XMM-Newton - NASA ADS
... X-rays. The X-ray emission roughly scales with the thermal energy content deposited by the electron beam, whereas the radio/hard X-ray/optical emission ...
[43]
UV and EUV observations of stellar coronal structure and activity
Ultraviolet (HST, FUSE) and extreme-ultraviolet (EUVE) observations of stellar coronae and flare-related activity are reviewed, with particular attention ...
[44]
Spectroscopic diagnostics of stellar transition regions and coronae ...
Abstract. In this paper we review the spectroscopic diagnostic techniques that can be applied to XUV observations of active stars. In particular, we discuss ...
[45]
Fe xviii and Fe xx Forbidden Lines Observed by Solar Orbiter/SPICE
The Fe xviii and Fe xx lines have high signal-to-noise with only a 5 s exposure time, demonstrating that the lines will be valuable for high-cadence flare ...
[46]
[PDF] The status and future of EUV astronomy - arXiv
Despite the wide range of sources that emit in the EUV, the vast majority of objects detected fall in to two categories, hot white dwarfs and stellar coro- nal ...
[47]
Relationship between X-ray and ultraviolet emission of flares from ...
For the first time, a correlation between X-ray and ultraviolet flux for stellar flares has been observed. We find power-law relationships between these two ...Missing: absorption | Show results with:absorption
[48]
ON THE ACCURACY OF THE DIFFERENTIAL EMISSION ...
Differential emission measure (DEM) analysis is a major diagnostic tool for stellar atmospheres. However, both its derivation and its interpretation are ...
[49]
A comprehensive study of X-ray and Ca II IRT fluxes from eROSITA ...
We investigated the correlation between coronal and chromospheric emissions by combining X-ray data from stars detected in the eROSITA all-sky surveys.
[50]
The stellar rotation–activity relationship in fully convective M dwarfs
We measure the power-law slope of the relationship between Rossby number (the ratio of the rotation period to the convective turnover time) and the fractional X ...
[51]
Coronal Loops: Observations and Modeling of Confined Plasma
Coronal loops are the building blocks of the X-ray bright solar corona. They owe their brightness to the dense confined plasma.
[52]
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/05/aa51421-24/aa51421-24.html
[53]
[PDF] Coronal Holes - arXiv
Sep 15, 2009 · Abstract. Coronal holes are the darkest and least active regions of the Sun, as observed both on the solar disk and above the solar limb.
[54]
[PDF] SOLAR WIND ACCELERATION FROM THE UPPER ...
Ne = 10 7 cm -5. 4. /. /. % 3 g. 5. 1. 0. 5. 10 v. (kin s-'). I. 15. Mg +I°: Mg +_ ... Edgar,. J. C. Raymond, and J. L.. Kohl, Plasma properties in coronal holes ...
[55]
Discovering Structure in the Outer Corona - NASA
Jul 18, 2018 · Where does the corona end and the solar wind begin? One definition points to the Alfvén surface, a theoretical boundary where the solar wind ...
[56]
STATISTICAL ANALYSES ON THERMAL ASPECTS OF SOLAR ...
... flare energy range which is from 1024 to 1032 erg. Their frequency distributions can be classified into two categories: one with a power-law index δ less ...
[57]
Overview of Solar Flares - Rhessi - NASA
A solar flare occurs when magnetic energy that has built up in the solar atmosphere is suddenly released. ... There are typically three stages to a solar flare.
[58]
Solar flare accelerates nearly all electrons in a large coronal volume
Jun 8, 2022 · We conclude that the magnetic energy release in the solar flare offers a highly efficient engine for particle acceleration, which is capable of ...
[59]
[PDF] Sweet-Parker reconnection: scaling for reconnection rates
Reconnection rate: My trick for extracting the reconnection rate is to write down the square of the inflow speed using the two relations (from continuity ...
[60]
Prompt emission of relativistic protons up to GeV energies from M6.4 ...
Nov 28, 2023 · We show evidence of particle acceleration at GEV energies associated directly with protons from the prompt emission of a long-duration M6-class solar flare.
[61]
[PDF] User's Guide for GOES-R XRS L2 Products
Jul 9, 2024 · The 1-minute integrated XRS-B irradiance is used for solar flare classifications, and is key to NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) ...
[62]
[PDF] comparison of solar x-ray line emission with microwave ... - NASA ADS
COMPARISON OF SOLAR X-RAY LINE EMISSION WITH. MICROWAVE EMISSION DURING FLARES. Werner M. Neupert. Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.
[63]
Properties of flare events based on light curves from the TESS survey
Flaring star fraction decreases with temperature and mass; flare energy increases with decreasing temperature and mass. M-type stars flare more often. ...<|separator|>
[64]
[PDF] Sequence Star Super-flare Frequency based on Entire Kepler Data
Jul 11, 2023 · A super-flare on G-type dwarfs occurs about every 4360 years. The rate increases from F to M types, and decreases from A to F types.
[65]
Coronal Mass Ejections - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are large expulsions of plasma and magnetic field from the Sun's corona. They can eject billions of tons of coronal material.
[66]
Coronal mass ejection (CME) | Definition & Effects - Britannica
Oct 31, 2025 · The energy of a CME depends on its velocity; CMEs are launched with a wide variety of speeds, from less than 10 km (6 miles) per second to more ...
[67]
[PDF] Streamer Blowout Coronal Mass Ejections - arXiv
ABSTRACT. We present a comprehensive analysis of a particular class of coronal mass ejection. (CME) event, called streamer-blowout CME (SBOs).
[68]
Physics of erupting solar flux ropes: Coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
Aug 22, 2017 · Solar eruptions, observed as flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), are the most energetic visible plasma phenomena in the solar system.<|separator|>
[69]
Solar activity and its evolution across the corona: recent advances
Apr 30, 2013 · Prominence eruptions are one of the associated phenomena to CMEs and the debate on the role of prominences destabilization on CMEs initiation ...
[70]
The source and engine of coronal mass ejections - PMC
May 13, 2019 · Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large-scale expulsions of coronal plasma and magnetic field propagating through the heliosphere.
[71]
The Origin, Early Evolution and Predictability of Solar Eruptions
Feb 7, 2018 · This review discusses the observations and physical mechanisms behind this eruptive activity, with a view to making an assessment of the current capability of ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[72]
[PDF] Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections from the Sun to Earth - arXiv
Oct 6, 2022 · The CMEs observed as front-side halo are impor- tant as they are the key link between solar eruptions and major space weather phenomena. The ...
[73]
Coronal Mass Ejections and Magnetic Flux Ropes in Interplanetary ...
Jan 1, 1990 · Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are important occasional sources of plasma and magnetic field in the solar wind at 1 AU. Formed in the corona ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[74]
PUNCH - NASA SVS
Jun 13, 2025 · From late May to early June 2025, PUNCH's three Wide Field Imagers captured views of coronal mass ejections, or CMEs, traveling out from the Sun ...Missing: halo | Show results with:halo
[75]
Space Weather and Safety
... hazardous effects. If a CMEs arrives at Earth, it can produce a geomagnetic storm, which, in turn, can cause anomalies and disruptions to the modern ...
[76]
Acceleration of coronal mass ejections - AGU Publications - Wiley
If the total toroidal current is denoted by It(t) ≡ 2π∫rJt(r, t) dr, we have Bp(r) = 2It/cr for r > a independently of the form of Jt(r) for r ≤ a. By “flux ...
[77]
Constraining the Physical Properties of Stellar Coronal Mass ...
We present the results of a coronal dimming analysis of Fe xii 1349 Å and Fe xxi 1354 Å emission from epsilon Eridani ( epsilon Eri), a young K2 dwarf.
[78]
Discovery of multi-temperature coronal mass ejection signatures ...
Oct 27, 2025 · During and before a Carrington-class (~1032 erg) flare, warm far-ultraviolet lines (~105 K) exhibited blueshifted emission at 300–550 km s−1, ...
[79]
[2507.21822] Detecting Stellar Coronal Mass Ejections via ... - arXiv
Jul 29, 2025 · Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) emissions are sensitive to both flares and CME-induced coronal dimming. We assess the detectability of stellar CME- ...Missing: transit- | Show results with:transit-
[80]
Reduced Thermal Conduction in Solar Coronal Loops - IOPscience
May 16, 2025 · In standard loop models, the thermal conductivity is given by Spitzer's law, κ∥ = κ0T5/2 (R. S. Cohen et al. 1950; L. Spitzer & R.
[81]
[2205.08846] Modeling the thermal conduction in the solar ... - arXiv
May 18, 2022 · Thermal conductivity is one of the important mechanisms of heat transfer in the solar corona. In the limit of strongly magnetized plasma, it is ...
[82]
Models of thermal conduction and non-local transport of relevance ...
Apr 25, 2023 · Indeed, the observations of wave damping indicate that thermal transport is reduced relative to the Spitzer–Harm conductivity in the solar ...
[83]
Closed coronal structures. II - Generalized hydrostatic model
SCALING LAWS FOR LARGE CORONAL LOOPS The requirement for energy balance in the loop and the condition that the temperature maximum be at the top of the loop ...
[84]
Coronal Loops with Different Metallicities and Generalized RTV ...
Aug 3, 2023 · Stellar metallicity is a critical factor to characterize the stellar coronae because it directly affects the radiative energy loss from the atmosphere.
[85]
“Alfvén” Waves in Corona - IOP Science
In uniform plasmas there are three basic types of MHD waves: Alfvén waves and the fast and slow magnetoacoustic waves. The solar corona is highly structured ...
[86]
Identifying Alfvén wave modes in the solar corona
In a uniform plasma, there are three distinct MHD wave modes: Alfvén, and slow and fast magnetoacoustic waves. ... Furthermore, this would also have powerful ...
[87]
Statistical seismology of transverse waves in the solar corona
We study two types of observations: 1) transverse loops oscillations as seen mainly with TRACE and SDO and 2) running transverse waves seen with the Coronal ...
[88]
Evidence for small-scale torsional Alfvén waves in the solar corona
Oct 24, 2025 · Alfvén waves are a favoured mechanism, and in a plasma composed of inhomogeneous flux tubes, the only pure Alfvén mode is torsional in nature.
[89]
A Time-evolving Coronal Model with an Extended Magnetic Field ...
Jun 10, 2025 · This coronal model effectively captures observational features and performs more than 80 times faster than real-time evolutions using only 192 CPU cores.
[90]
Wave heating of the solar atmosphere - Journals
May 28, 2015 · Wave heating theories remain plausible, but most current models are still too simple to be applicable to the real Sun. Future models should ...Abstract · Introduction · Observed wave activity · Confronting theory and...Missing: stellar | Show results with:stellar
[91]
Heating of the solar and stellar coronae - NASA ADS
The problem of heating of the solar and stellar coronae by acoustic, magnetoacoustic and Alfvén waves and by magnetic energy dissipation has been reviewed. ...
[92]
EVIDENCE FOR WAVE HEATING OF THE QUIET-SUN CORONA
We have measured the energy and dissipation of Alfvénic waves in the quiet Sun. A magnetic field model was used to infer the location and orientation of the ...
[93]
The heating of the solar corona | The Astronomy and Astrophysics ...
This review outlines a range of possible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) coronal heating theories, including MHD wave dissipation and MHD reconnection.Missing: stellar papers
[94]
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2014.0261
[95]
PERSISTENT DOPPLER SHIFT OSCILLATIONS OBSERVED WITH ...
Oct 29, 2012 · In a few cases, there seems to be a π/2 phase shift between the intensity and Doppler shift oscillations, which may suggest the presence of slow ...
[96]
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/111
[97]
Relating magnetic reconnection to coronal heating - PMC - NIH
There is extremely strong evidence that magnetic reconnection is occurring throughout the corona at some rate. The coronal field is connected to photospheric ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
[98]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983A&A...117..220H/abstract
[99]
Detecting Nanoflare Heating Events in Subarcsecond Inter-moss ...
In this paper, we analyze a set of rapidly evolving loops that appear in an inter-moss region. We select six loops that both appear in and fade out of the Hi-C ...Missing: URL | Show results with:URL
[100]
https://aasnova.org/2023/12/27/selections-from-2023-do-waves-or-nanoflares-heat-the-solar-corona/
[101]
Time Scales for Ca II Emission Decay, Rotational Braking, and ...
Time Scales for Ca II Emission Decay, Rotational Braking, and Lithium Depletion. Skumanich, A. Abstract. A comparison of the Ca+ emission luminosity-after ...
[102]
The eROSITA all-sky survey - Stars in X-rays - ADS
In total it contains roughly six million X-ray sources, among them about a million stars. The first survey data was released early 2024 and the eRASS provides ...
[103]
Stellar Activity and Coronal Heating: an overview of recent results
Feb 25, 2015 · We discuss how recent studies of stellar magnetic fields and coronae contribute to our understanding of the phenomenon of activity and coronal heating in late- ...
[104]
Improved Age Estimation for Solar-Type Dwarfs Using Activity ... - arXiv
Jul 10, 2008 · We demonstrate that coronal activity as measured through the fractional X-ray luminosity (R_X = L_X/L_bol) has nearly the same age- and rotation ...
[105]
A Chandra Search for Coronal X Rays from the Cool White Dwarf ...
Sep 20, 2006 · Abstract: We report observations with the Chandra X-ray Observatory of the single, cool, magnetic white dwarf GD 356.
[106]
Predictive Science Inc. Advances Dynamic Solar Corona Modeling
Sep 30, 2025 · Downs emphasized that their data-assimilative time-evolving calculation, which was based on data collected during the April 8, 2024 solar ...
[107]
[PDF] A near-real-time data-assimilative model of the solar corona
Jun 19, 2025 · We used the model to predict coronal structure during the total solar eclipse of 8 April 2024 near the maximum of the solar activity cycle.
[108]
(PDF) MHD Modeling of Solar Coronal Magnetic Evolution Driven by ...
... cells. A time step of 5 minutes and a mesh containing 1.5 M cells can effectively capture the evolution of large-scale coronal structures and small-sized ...
[109]
SwRI-led PUNCH mission images huge solar eruption
As the spacecraft constellation completes commissioning, early PUNCH data showed coronal mass ejections, or CMEs, as they erupted from the Sun ...
[110]
Our deepest view of the X-ray sky - mpe.mpg.de
Jun 19, 2020 · This first complete sky image from eROSITA is about 4 times deeper than the previous all-sky survey by the ROSAT telescope 30 years ago, and has ...Missing: 10x | Show results with:10x
[111]
Solar and Stellar Coronae - MPS
This shows that small-scale magnetic reconnection plays a key role for the energization of coronal loops that is much more prominent than thought before.Missing: basics | Show results with:basics
[112]
Vol. 55, Issue 7 (SPD54 Abstracts) - Bulletin of the AAS
Oct 17, 2023 · Self-Consistent Heating of the Magnetically Closed Corona: Generation of Nanoflares and Response of the Plasma. by Craig Johnston, Lars ...
[113]
Researchers obtain evidence for nanoflares heating coronal loops
Nov 14, 2023 · Theoretically, both wave heating and reconnection-type heating could contribute to the heating of coronal loops, especially the warm loops at ...
[114]
Hottest news from the Sun's corona
Oct 9, 2025 · This long-known paradox is thought to be caused by “magnetic flux ropes” that ascend from the Sun's surface and heat the corona. ... 2025, CNRS.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[115]
Heating mechanisms of the solar corona - PMC - NIH
Feb 10, 2017 · It was Shotaro Miyamoto of Kyoto University in 1943 who for the first time theoretically arrived at the correct temperature of the solar corona.
[116]
The Role of High-frequency Transverse Oscillations in Coronal ...
Jul 24, 2023 · Given the energy losses of roughly 104 W m−2 in ARs, 300 W m−2 in the quiet Sun, and 800 W m−2 in coronal holes (Withbroe & Noyes 1977; Klimchuk ...
[117]
Key aspects of coronal heating - Journals
May 28, 2015 · We highlight 10 key aspects of coronal heating that must be understood before we can consider the problem to be solved.
[118]
Stellar activity and coronal heating: an overview of recent results - NIH
Observations of the coronae of the Sun and of solar-like stars provide complementary information to advance our understanding of stellar magnetic activity, ...
[119]
The Influence of Stellar Chromospheres and Coronae on Exoplanet ...
The two new chromospheric/coronal parameters are its brightness ratio relative to the photosphere, Br, and scale height, H. The chromospheric/coronal model ...
[120]
Exoplanet X-ray irradiation and evaporation rates with eROSITA
We excluded the small number of exoplanets detected by the microlensing method because their stellar distances have large uncertainties of about 50%, which ...<|separator|>
[121]
Global MHD Simulations of the Time-dependent Corona - IOPscience
Dec 8, 2023 · We describe, test, and apply a technique to incorporate full-Sun, surface flux evolution into an MHD model of the global solar corona.
[122]
The global distribution of magnetic helicity in the solar corona - arXiv
Jun 22, 2016 · We find that the field line helicity is non-uniformly distributed, and is highly concentrated in twisted magnetic flux ropes. Eruption of these ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
[123]
Lynx X-ray Observatory
Lynx is a revolutionary X-ray observatory that will transform our understanding of the Cosmos. It is one of the four NASA Strategic Mission concepts under ...Missing: 2025 reviews coronal heating
[124]
Prominence observations with ALMA - Frontiers
This review comes at the time when ALMA successfully obtained the first regular observations of both a prominence and a filament.
[125]
A deep learning virtual instrument for monitoring extreme UV solar ...
Oct 2, 2019 · In this paper, we show how to learn a mapping from EUV narrowband images to spectral irradiance measurements using data from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory.