Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Subi Reef

Subi Reef is a low-tide elevation in the of the , situated at coordinates 10° 55' 25" N, 114° 5' 5" E, approximately 26 km southwest of . It has been occupied by the since 1988 and transformed through into an spanning 976 acres, equipped with military infrastructure including an airstrip, radar systems, and port facilities. The feature is claimed by the , , and , contributing to ongoing territorial disputes in the region. China's extensive and on Subi Reef, initiated around 2014-2015 as part of broader island-building in the Spratlys, have created over 3,200 acres of new land across multiple features, enhancing its strategic projection capabilities amid contested maritime claims. Under the Convention on the (UNCLOS), low-tide elevations like Subi Reef generate no territorial sea or unless situated within 12 nautical miles of another state's , a status affirmed in the 2016 arbitral award in the , which has rejected. The militarization of the site, including deployments of advanced surveillance and defense systems, has intensified regional tensions, particularly with the , whose forces maintain presence on nearby . Subi Reef's proximity to key shipping lanes and hydrocarbon-rich areas underscores its geopolitical significance, with China's control enabling dominance over surrounding waters despite international legal challenges to its assertions. Empirical satellite monitoring reveals ongoing expansions, such as enhanced wharves and helipads, supporting Beijing's enforcement of claims through and naval patrols. These developments highlight causal dynamics of via engineered geography, bypassing natural limitations of submerged reefs to assert influence in a vital theater.

Geography and Natural Features

Location and Geological Formation

Subi Reef is situated at approximately 10°55′N 114°04′E within the of the , forming part of the Thitu Reefs subgroup and positioned as one of the southernmost features in this chain. The reef structure is C-shaped, enclosing a roughly 5.5 kilometers in diameter, characteristic of formations in the region. Geologically, Subi Reef originated as a atoll developed through the accumulation of skeletons on a submerged tectonic platform amid the Dangerous Ground area of the , where bathymetric surveys indicate surrounding depths ranging from 20 to 50 meters adjacent to the reef crest before descending into deeper basins. This formation aligns with typical evolution on platforms influenced by and sea-level changes over geological timescales. In its natural state prior to 2013, Subi Reef qualified as a , with portions of the reef flat emerging above water at but submerging entirely at high tide, as confirmed by pre-development and observations distinguishing it from permanently emergent high-tide features.

Topography and Pre-Development Characteristics


Subi Reef, prior to significant , formed a roughly diamond-shaped approximately 3.7 nautical miles along its longer east-northeast axis, encompassing a central fringed by heads and a reef flat. The structure measured about 5.75 km by 3.25 km overall, with the reaching depths of 24 meters and lacking natural passes for access. As a , the feature exhibited limited natural emergence, primarily in the form of transient cays visible at , while historical from 1911 depict negligible permanent land above mean high water. Ecological surveys conducted in the documented diverse coral assemblages across zones, with the reef flat averaging 15% live cover and outer reefs showing 40-50% coverage as of 2009-2010. floors had 28-35% live in 2007 assessments, supporting such as Pocillopora verrucosa amid recovery from localized disturbances like shell . A 2007 survey identified 74 of stony corals, contributing to habitats for reef-associated that utilized the reef flat as a juvenile . Benthic diversity included 314 macrobenthic , with 130 molluscs and 110 crustaceans recorded in a 2002 study. Hydrographic conditions featured restricted water exchange in the enclosed , fostering fine, easily resuspended subject to currents and minor natural accretion processes. These dynamics maintained balance with limited buildup, as evidenced by the absence of substantial dry land in pre-20th-century charts, underscoring the reef's reliance on coral growth for vertical accretion rather than extensive horizontal expansion.

Historical Context and Occupation

Pre-Modern References and Early Claims

Pre-modern references to Subi Reef (: Zhubi Jiao) are exceedingly sparse, with navigational records from the (960–1279) mentioning vague features like "Qianli Changsha" (Thousand Li Stretch of Sands), interpreted by some PRC scholars as encompassing the , including remote atolls such as Subi. However, these descriptions lack specificity to Subi Reef's location or features, serving primarily as warnings of navigational hazards rather than territorial assertions, and no equivalent records exist in pre-colonial Philippine or archives, underscoring the reef's isolation—over 400 km from nearest landmasses—and submersion at high , which limited access to seasonal fishing expeditions by Hainan-based fishermen using it sporadically for shelter. Claims of (1368–1644) cartographic inclusion, such as in Eastern and Western Oceans navigation maps, similarly reference southern sea dangers without naming or mapping Subi distinctly, reflecting first discovery by proximity to routes but absent continuous use or administration required for historical under norms. Empirical evidence indicates no fixed settlements or over Subi Reef prior to the ; regional actors, predominantly fishermen from , engaged in intermittent harvesting of marine resources around Nansha (Spratly) features, including Zhubi Jiao, as noted in later fishermen's manuals, but technological constraints—wooden junks, seasonal monsoons, and lack of refrigeration—prevented sustained presence, with visits causal to temporary refuge rather than control. reference Paracel (Hoang Sa) detachments for salvage from the , but Spratly-specific claims, including Subi, emerge only post-colonial, while Philippine groups had no documented reach to such distances pre-Spanish . Early 20th-century surveys marked the transition to formalized awareness without occupation. authorities conducted hydrographic expeditions in the 1920s, charting Spratly atolls including Subi Reef as part of Cochinchina's maritime domain, culminating in the 1933 avis (notice) claiming sovereignty over features beyond Paracels, justified by scientific enumeration rather than prior habitation. British Admiralty charts from 1911 depicted Subi alongside Thitu Reefs, establishing positional data for global navigation, yet neither power pursued installations, leaving the reef unadministered amid rising interests. These efforts prioritized empirical over territorial , with no protests from until the 1930s, highlighting the modern genesis of competing claims absent pre-existing effective control.

20th-Century Developments and 1988 Chinese Occupation

Following , the Republic of asserted sovereignty over the , including Subi Reef (known as Huayang Jiao to ), based on the and 1945 Potsdam Proclamation, which required to return territories like the Spratlys to after its wartime occupation. The , upon its establishment in 1949, inherited and reaffirmed these claims through official maps incorporating the Spratlys within its maritime boundaries, though it maintained no physical presence on Subi Reef during the mid-20th century. In contrast, the formalized claims to portions of the Spratlys, including areas encompassing Subi Reef, via Presidential Decree No. 1596 on June 11, 1978, which established the Kalayaan Island Group as a under province, justified by geographic proximity and potential resources. , following its 1975 unification, expanded occupations across approximately 20 Spratly features by the late 1970s and early 1980s, asserting historical rights and administrative control without initially contesting Subi Reef directly. These paper assertions by multiple claimants lacked effective enforcement until naval capabilities determined on-site presence, as proclamations alone failed to deter rivals amid rising resource interests and strategic patrols. Tensions escalated in early 1988 when transport ships attempted to occupy additional Spratly reefs, prompting a confrontation with vessels at nearby on March 14, resulting in Vietnamese casualties and control of that site. Approximately ten days later, around , forces extended operations to unoccupied Subi Reef, planting flags and erecting initial markers to establish an outpost amid expansion efforts. By mid-1988, this physical occupation—secured through superior naval enforcement rather than diplomatic assertion—solidified China's control, with basic structures persisting as the foundation for later developments.

Land Reclamation and Infrastructure Development

Initiation of Dredging Operations (2013–2015)

China commenced operations at Subi Reef in July 2014, utilizing to extract sand from floor and deposit it via hydraulic fill techniques to expand the . These operations involved pumping sediment through pipelines onto the reef, contained by initial perimeter seawalls constructed from rock and concrete to prevent and facilitate further infilling. The pre-reclamation land area, limited to a small of approximately 0.04 square kilometers, served as the base for this expansion. Satellite imagery captured initial dredging disturbances in late 2014, with visible sediment plumes and early fill material accumulation confirming the onset of activities. By June 2015, reclamation had progressed to cover 3.95 million square meters, transforming much of the 1.6 by 1.2 kilometer lagoon into viable land through systematic infilling from the southern, western, and northern edges. Dredgers operated continuously north and south of the reef, achieving an average daily expansion rate that enabled near-complete lagoon enclosure by late 2015, reaching approximately 4 square kilometers in total land area. Landsat and high-resolution commercial satellite observations documented the chronological milestones, including the cutting of an access channel to the and the establishment of temporary cement mixing facilities to support reinforcement by mid-2015. This phase prioritized the engineering conversion of the low-tide elevation into a stable platform, with empirical metrics from Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative monitoring verifying the scale and pace of the hydraulic reclamation process.

Key Facilities Constructed and Operational Timeline

at Subi Reef commenced in late 2014, with significant operations expanding the feature into an of approximately 976 acres by mid-2015, enabling subsequent development. By September 2015, preparations for a 3,000-meter were underway, including subgrading over 2,200 meters along the western rim. Construction progressed rapidly, with the runway's base layer completed by November 2015 and nearing operational readiness by January 2016, facilitating access for military and civilian . Port facilities, including an access channel 230 meters wide and multiple temporary loading piers, were established concurrently with reclamation efforts in 2015, allowing berthing for large vessels and supporting logistical self-sufficiency in the remote location. Administrative structures and hangars followed, with construction of two medium and two hangars at the runway's southern end visible by mid-2016, alongside initial buildings for personnel housing and operations. By 2017, additional building activity covered about 24 acres, including multi-story administrative complexes, contributing to a total of nearly 400 structures by 2018 that enhanced operational endurance through features like solar-paneled roofs for energy generation. The runway saw its first confirmed aircraft landing, a transport, in April 2018, marking full operational status after ongoing upgrades, while port and support facilities had supported since 2015 and continued expansions into the via satellite-observed enhancements for sustained presence.

Territorial Claims and Disputes

Positions of Claimant States

The asserts sovereignty over Subi Reef, designated as Zi Ni Jiao, as an integral part of the Nansha Qundao (), grounded in historical discovery, naming, and effective administration by Chinese fishermen and officials dating to the , with continuous usage evidenced in official maps and records through the imperial era. This position was formalized post-World War II via the of China's 1947 eleven-dash line map, later adjusted to nine dashes by the , enclosing the reef within claimed maritime boundaries as inherent territory rather than merely generating limited zones under . The Republic of China (Taiwan) maintains a parallel claim to Subi Reef, known as Tsui-ni Chiao, as sovereign territory within the Nansha Islands, inheriting historical title from assertions and the 1947 map, emphasizing long-standing Chinese administrative control over the features predating competing modern claims. Taiwan's stance aligns closely with that of the in scope but is articulated through its own administrative framework, including patrols and resource surveys to affirm effective jurisdiction. The designates Subi Reef as Banco Zamora and incorporates it within the Kalayaan Island Group, proclaimed under Presidential Decree No. 1596 on June 11, 1978, which asserts sovereignty over a polygonal area of approximately 64 islands, reefs, and waters in the eastern Spratlys based on geographic proximity to (about 220 nautical miles southeast) and the principle of occupation of features not previously claimed by any state. This claim prioritizes the reef's location within the ' archipelagic baselines and potential for generating maritime entitlements from nearby high-tide features like . Vietnam claims Subi Reef, called Bãi Subi, as an inseparable component of the Hoang Sa (Paracel) and Truong Sa (Spratly) archipelagos under its sovereignty, supported by historical evidence of discovery and exploitation by Vietnamese subjects since the , including Nguyen Dynasty edicts for , harvesting, and of administrative teams to the islands as early as 1816. Vietnam's extends administrative over the entire Spratly chain, viewing the reef as generating full maritime zones from its claimed high-tide elevations in the group. Malaysia does not assert direct over Subi Reef but claims overlapping and encompassing the feature, derived from 1979 proclamations extending its seabed jurisdiction 200 nautical miles from and baselines under the 1969 law, positioning the reef within projected shelf limits based on geomorphological continuity from the Malaysian mainland. This maritime entitlement claim conflicts with island assertions by others, focusing instead on resource without physical occupation of the itself. No claimant except exercises physical presence or effective control over Subi Reef, which remains under exclusive Chinese administration since its 1988 occupation with outposts and subsequent infrastructure, underscoring the role of on-site dominance in sustaining amid diplomatic assertions by .

Specific Incidents and Confrontations Near Subi Reef

In May 2025, Chinese Coast Guard vessels used water cannons against two Philippine Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources ships approaching Sandy Cay, a low-tide elevation approximately 8 nautical miles from Subi Reef, during a mission to aid Filipino fishermen; the Philippine government described the action as aggressive interference, while claimed the vessels had illegally entered its and attempted unauthorized landings. In October 2025, Chinese vessels rammed a ship near Sandy Cay in the Thitu Reefs complex adjacent to Subi Reef, escalating tensions amid mutual accusations of provocation; Philippine officials reported the collision damaged their vessel, whereas asserted the Philippine ships had intruded without permission. These events followed a pattern of Chinese shadowing of Philippine resupply missions to nearby (), where Chinese naval and assets have routinely monitored and challenged Filipino operations since 2016, correlating with reports of diminished foreign activity in the vicinity due to increased patrols. United States freedom-of-navigation operations (FONOPs) have transited within 12 nautical miles of Subi Reef's baseline since 2015, asserting that the artificial island does not generate territorial seas under international law; the first such operation occurred on October 27, 2015, when the destroyer USS Lassen sailed near Subi, prompting China to deploy fighter jets and warships for close monitoring and verbal protests but resulting in no physical contact. Subsequent FONOPs, including those by destroyers in May 2019 within 12 nautical miles of Subi and other Chinese features, elicited similar Chinese responses of surveillance flights, ship deployments, and diplomatic objections, framed by Beijing as violations of its sovereignty; U.S. operations continued without kinetic escalation, highlighting China's preference for non-lethal countermeasures to contest perceived challenges. These incidents reflect incremental enforcement tactics, with Chinese presence at Subi enabling rapid responses to nearby activities, as evidenced by patrol data linking heightened monitoring to restricted access for non-Chinese vessels in the surrounding exclusive economic zone areas.

Legal and International Dimensions

Application of UNCLOS and Maritime Entitlements

The Convention on the (UNCLOS), which entered into force on November 16, 1994, establishes maritime entitlements primarily based on the verifiable geographical and bathymetric characteristics of features, distinguishing between low-tide elevations, rocks, and islands. Article 13 defines a low-tide as a naturally formed area of land surrounded by water, above water at low tide but submerged at high tide; such features generate no territorial or other zones unless located within 12 nautical miles of the baseline of an island or mainland coast, in which case they may serve as base points for measuring that territorial . Article 121(1) further classifies an island as a naturally formed area of land above water at high tide, entitled to a 12-nautical-mile territorial , while paragraph 121(3) denies an (EEZ) or to rocks incapable of sustaining human habitation or an independent economic life. Subi Reef, situated approximately 26 kilometers northwest of in the , exhibits the traits of a low-tide elevation based on pre-reclamation bathymetric data and nautical surveys, which indicate partial exposure at amid surrounding structures but submergence at high tide due to depths typically exceeding mean high water levels. Historical charts, such as British Admiralty surveys from the early , depict Subi Reef as a drying with no persistent high-tide land formation, corroborated by satellite observations showing negligible natural elevation prior to dredging operations commencing in 2014. This empirical classification precludes Subi Reef from qualifying as an island or even a rock under Article 121, as it lacks any natural emersion at high tide, thereby entitling it to no inherent maritime zones beyond potential enclosure within adjacent baselines. China signed UNCLOS on December 10, 1982, and ratified it on June 7, 1996, subject to declarations that emphasize the primacy of territorial and historic over disputed features, including those in the , rather than deriving entitlements solely from post-ratification geographical interpretations. These declarations assert that UNCLOS provisions on maritime delimitation do not prejudice existing claims, positioning historical —such as 's structures on Subi Reef since 1988—as a basis for control independent of zonal generation from the feature's . Bathymetric thus underscores that Subi Reef's entitlements on proximity to qualifying baselines rather than intrinsic , aligning with UNCLOS's textual emphasis on conditions over engineered alterations.

2016 Arbitration Ruling and China's Response

On July 12, 2016, an arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) issued its award in the dispute initiated by the Philippines against China. The tribunal ruled that China's "nine-dash line" claim lacked legal basis under UNCLOS, as it exceeded the maritime zones generated by land features and could not be sustained by historic rights. Specifically regarding Subi Reef (known as Zamora Reef to the Philippines), the tribunal classified it as a low-tide elevation—a feature submerged at high tide but above water at low tide—that generated no entitlement to a territorial sea, exclusive economic zone (EEZ), or continental shelf when located beyond 12 nautical miles from a qualifying high-tide feature. The award emphasized that such elevations could only produce effects if within the territorial sea of another feature, a condition not met at Subi Reef. China did not participate in the proceedings, having notified the tribunal in 2014 of its rejection of compulsory arbitration under UNCLOS Article 298, which allows states to exclude disputes involving maritime boundary delimitations. Beijing dismissed the tribunal's jurisdiction as an overreach into sovereignty issues outside UNCLOS scope, asserting that the award violated China's sovereign rights and had no binding effect. Chinese officials described the ruling as a "piece of waste paper" predicated on fabricated facts and politically motivated interpretations, prioritizing historical evidence and domestic law over what they viewed as externally imposed adjudication. This stance reflected a broader causal reality: international tribunals lack inherent enforcement powers, rendering outcomes dependent on state compliance amid power asymmetries. In practice, the ruling prompted no territorial concessions or operational halts by at Subi Reef, where and infrastructure development—initiated prior to the award—continued unabated, including the completion of a 3,000-meter runway by 2017. , under subsequent administrations, pursued bilateral negotiations rather than unilateral enforcement, underscoring the award's limited efficacy without coercive mechanisms or aligned great-power support. Empirical continuity in Chinese control highlighted the primacy of possession over legal pronouncements in contested maritime domains.

Militarization and Strategic Significance

Military Installations and Capabilities

China completed land reclamation at Subi Reef by late 2015, enabling the subsequent installation of military hardware. In April 2018, and intelligence reports confirmed the deployment of HQ-9B (SAM) batteries and YJ-12B anti-ship (ASCM) launchers to the outpost, providing air defense coverage up to approximately 200 kilometers and anti-surface strike capability extending over 500 kilometers. These systems, transported via (PLAN) vessels, were positioned alongside arrays for and fire control. The 3,000-meter , operational by 2016, supports operations, including potential deployments of J-11 fighters for air superiority missions, though confirmed flights have primarily involved such as the as of 2018. Adjacent hangars, constructed to accommodate fighter-sized jets, underwent expansions visible in through 2020, with capacity for over a dozen . A deep-water port, capable of berthing frigates and replenishment ships, facilitates PLAN logistics and sustainment, enabling extended naval presence without reliance on distant mainland bases. Recent upgrades include advanced installations, with photos from October 2024 revealing of a counter-stealth array designed to detect low-observable and enhance awareness over surrounding sea lanes. These open-source intelligence-derived assessments, primarily from commercial providers and corroborated by analyses, indicate the outpost's role in , though fixed emplacements remain susceptible to precision strikes in high-intensity conflict scenarios. No verified nuclear-capable assets have been observed, limiting capabilities to conventional deterrence and functions.

Role in Regional Power Dynamics and Security

Subi Reef functions as a forward outpost in China's anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) strategy within the , extending the reach of integrated air and missile defenses southward to complicate potential U.S. naval operations, including groups transiting toward the region. By hosting and systems, it contributes to a layered denial network that integrates with nearby outposts like and , enabling coordinated tracking and engagement of aerial and maritime threats across the . This networked defense enhances China's ability to contest sea and air control within the , shifting the operational baseline farther from mainland bases and imposing higher risks on intervening forces. In contingencies such as a conflict, Subi Reef's positioning supports auxiliary roles in air refueling, surveillance, and logistics sustainment for operations, as evidenced by simulations indicating that southern outposts bolster defensive depth despite vulnerability to early strikes. Its proximity to vital sea lanes linking the to the Strait—through which over 80% of China's energy imports pass—amplifies leverage over chokepoint access, potentially deterring blockades or enabling of adversarial shipping in escalated scenarios. Analysts from think tanks like CSIS note that while these bases face attrition in high-intensity exchanges, their persistence provides contested utility for extending operational tempo. Debates persist on whether Subi Reef's primarily deters or heightens risks; Chinese officials assert it stabilizes the region by curbing unregulated fishing and through enforced patrols, claiming reductions in illegal activities within claimed waters. However, empirical data from tracking reveal persistent standoffs with Philippine and vessels, suggesting patrols enforce exclusive access more than neutralize transnational threats like , which remains low in the area regardless. From a causal perspective, the outpost's capabilities credibly signal resolve in defense, potentially discouraging adventurism by weaker claimants while prompting U.S.-led freedom-of-navigation operations that test resolve without direct confrontation. Critics, including U.S. strategists, warn of miscalculation spirals, yet historical patterns show calibrated gray-zone assertions rather than overt , aligning with over expansionist inevitability.

Environmental Impacts

Direct Effects of Reclamation on Marine Ecosystems

China's at Subi Reef, commencing in early 2015, employed hydraulic cutter-suction to pump seabed sediments onto the reef flat and , directly burying benthic habitats under layers of fill material. This process eliminated structures and associated communities across the newly created , which expanded by approximately 4 square kilometers by mid-2016, representing a near-total loss in those zones through physical overlay and compaction. Suspended sediments from operations generated extensive , smothering surviving and by clogging feeding and respiratory mechanisms, with plumes enveloping the entire due to its enclosed nature and limited flushing. Pre-reclamation surveys indicated 28-35% live coral cover in the lagoon, but post- assessments documented near-complete mortality in proximate areas, including no viable corals within 80 meters of sites and reductions to 3-10% on outer slopes from burial and loading. Turbidity levels spiked concurrently, as captured by Landsat and MODIS from 2013 to 2015, with plumes extending over thousands of square kilometers and persisting for weeks to months, reducing and exacerbating stress on light-dependent organisms. These effects, directly attributable to volumes exceeding 10 million cubic meters across Spratly sites including Subi, outpaced natural rates by orders of magnitude, overwhelming clearance capacities documented in resilience studies. Up to 60% of shallow reef at Subi suffered permanent destruction from these combined mechanisms, with recovery timelines extending decades to centuries given the scale of structural loss and inhibited larval settlement under chronic .

Long-Term Biodiversity and Fisheries Consequences

Reclamation at Subi Reef and adjacent Spratly features has accelerated , contributing to projected long-term losses through reduced cover and associated . Ecological assessments indicate that such alterations disrupt trophic webs, potentially leading to shifts where ecosystems transition to dominance by or turf species due to diminished populations and persistent sediment plumes. This shift, observed in analogous disturbed reefs, could diminish for reef-dependent and , with models forecasting multidecadal recovery timelines exceeding centuries absent restoration. Fisheries yields in the have stagnated or declined amid these changes, with reconstructed catch data revealing peaks near 10 million tonnes annually in the early 1990s followed by plateaus despite rising effort, attributable in part to reef habitat loss alongside . across the region have fallen to 5-30% of 1950s levels, with catch per unit effort dropping 66-75% in recent decades; Spratly-specific alterations, including Subi, compound this by eliminating nursery grounds for commercially vital like groupers and snappers. While artificial structures from reclamation may function as inadvertent fish aggregating devices, attracting pelagic species in localized areas per general reef studies, empirical evidence from the Spratlys points to net negative effects, including heightened vulnerability to overharvest around militarized sites. China's intensified patrols and detentions of foreign vessels for illegal —numbering dozens annually in the —have curbed some poaching, potentially aiding stock stabilization by enforcing exclusive access, though persistent domestic overcapacity undermines broader recovery. These enforcement gains, however, do not offset habitat-driven irreversibilities, as peer-reviewed analyses emphasize reclamation's role in amplifying fisheries collapse risks over human security trade-offs like reduced illegal incursions.

References

  1. [1]
    Subi Reef | Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative - CSIS
    Occupied by: China ; Legal Status: Low-tide elevation ; GPS: 10° 55' 25" N, 114° 5' 5" E ; Total area of reclamation: 976 acres.
  2. [2]
    China Island Tracker - Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative - CSIS
    Since 2013, China has engaged in unprecedented dredging and artificial island-building in the Spratlys, creating 3,200 acres of new land, along with a ...Subi Reef · Cuarteron Reef · Mischief Reef · Fiery Cross Reef
  3. [3]
    The South China Sea: Conflicting Claims
    Total area reclaimed​​ Subi Reef was occupied by mainland China in 1988 and has been its northernmost outpost in the Spratly Island grouping since then. In its ...
  4. [4]
    Satellite Images Show China's Expansion in the South China Sea
    May 2, 2025 · Subi Reef is another one of China's artificial islands outfitted with a military base. "It is illegally occupied unless China can claim the ...
  5. [5]
    New photos show China's artificial islands are highly ... - Benar News
    Oct 31, 2022 · New images have emerged showing airfields and structures on some of China's artificial islands in the South China Sea that have become fully militarized.
  6. [6]
    GPS coordinates of Subi Reef, China. Latitude: 10.9133 Longitude
    Subi Reef (10°54′48″N114°03′43″E), also known as Zhubi Reef (Chinese: 渚碧礁; pinyin: Zhǔbì Jiāo; Tagalog: Zamora; Vietnamese: đá Xu Bi) is a reef in the ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  7. [7]
    Marine Gazetteer Placedetails - Subi Reef (Reef) - Marine Regions
    Nov 26, 2014 · PlaceType, Reef ; Latitude, 10° 55' 0" N (10.916667°) ; Longitude, 114° 10' 0" E (114.166667°).Missing: exact coordinates
  8. [8]
    https://www.chicagoquantum.com/subi-reef-spratly-islands.html
  9. [9]
    Coral reef geomorphology of the Spratly Islands: A simple method ...
    ... The atoll features a lagoon with a maximum depth of 20 m, a shallow reef with a depth range of 0.4-3.5 m, and the outer reefs have a steep slope of 1.5 km ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    South China Sea - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The north part is shallow with water depth of 600–800 m, and the south part is deep with a water depth of more than 2400 m, the maximum depth being 2719 m, ...
  11. [11]
    Imagery shows China still building on Subi Reef in South China Sea
    May 10, 2022 · In its natural state, Subi is what is known as a low-tide elevation and an international tribunal in 2016 ruled that as it is submerged at high ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] MARITIME BRIEFING - Durham University
    Oct 30, 1988 · The northern edge of the western reef measures about 9nm, while the southern edge which does not dry measures 6nm.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Assessment of the potential environmental consequences of ...
    Oct 14, 2015 · Fiery Cross Reef is an open spindle-shaped atoll ... Mischief Reef, and Subi Reef; beyond the pre-existing damage to reefs that resulted.
  14. [14]
    Spratly Islands - Wikipedia
    Named after the 19th-century British whaling captain Richard Spratly who sighted Spratly Island in 1843, the islands contain less than 200 ha (500 acres) of ...Disputed · Subi Reef · Philippines and the Spratly... · Louisa ReefMissing: bathymetry | Show results with:bathymetry
  15. [15]
    [PDF] early voyaging in the south china sea: implications on territorial claims
    According to some modern scholars (Li and Tan 2014), one of the early Chinese references to the Paracels is the Chu Fan Chi, a 13th century book, translated ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Geographer: China's Claim to South China Sea Not Rooted in History
    Sep 23, 2016 · The two only naturally habitable islands in the Paracel and Spratly chain were returned to China from Japan with our help at the end of WWII.
  17. [17]
    Chinese Maps-CHINA NANHAI
    A color navigation map drawn during the Ming Dynasty (1610-1620) for the Eastern and Western oceans.Missing: Huayang | Show results with:Huayang
  18. [18]
    The Modern Origins of China's South China Sea Claims - jstor
    It argues that a collective Chinese belief in a “historic claim” to the reefs and rocks therein emerged in distinct episodes during the first half of the ...
  19. [19]
    Ancient fishermen's manuals as historical evidence of China's ...
    Dec 23, 2024 · The Meiji Jiao and Zhubi Jiao, two major reefs of China's Nansha Qundao (Nansha Islands) in the South China Sea, were familiar destinations for ...Missing: references | Show results with:references
  20. [20]
    China's “Historical Evidence”: Vietnam's Position on South China Sea
    Actually, in the Manchu or Qing dynasty maps, it is Hainan Island, not the Paracel and Spratly Islands, that is depicted as China's southern-most border.Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ISLANDS OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA - CIA
    1. France. The French surveyed the islands in the 1920's. In 1937 an expedition took soundings and erected a lighthouse on Pattle Island.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Islands and reef of the Spratly Islands - Geo-ref.net
    Subi Reef. China. 10°54'53"N. 114°04'00"E. 3,50 x x. Swallow Reef. Malaysia. 07°22 ... Zengmu Ansha. Beting Serupai. Johnson Patch. Changjun Ansha. Bai Vung May.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Spratly Islands and U.S. Interests and Approaches - DTIC
    Dec 16, 2013 · ... French treaty in which all islands east of a delimitation line belonged to China. Both the Spratly and Paracel Islands lie east of this line ...
  24. [24]
    Timeline: China's Maritime Disputes - Council on Foreign Relations
    Disputes between China and its neighbors, including the Philippines and Vietnam, in the South China Sea have intensified in recent decades.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] The Spratly Islands Dispute - Loc
    The People's Republic of China, Vietnam, The Republic of China (Taiwan), Malaysia, Brunei, and the Philippines claim sovereignty over the Spratly Islands, ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] The Spratly Islands Dispute: China Defines the New Millennium
    There has been a continual political tug- of-war between Brunei, China/Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam over control and ownership of the islands.Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  27. [27]
    Johnson South commemoration signals apparent shift in Vietnam ...
    Mar 13, 2023 · Ten days later, China occupied another feature in the South China Sea – Subi Reef – and by the end of 1988, it took possession of six atolls and ...
  28. [28]
    Johnson South commemoration signals apparent shift in Vietnam ...
    Mar 13, 2023 · Ten days later, China occupied another feature in the South China Sea -- Subi Reef – and by the end of 1988, it took possession of six atolls ...
  29. [29]
    Why China invaded Vietnam's Gac Ma Reef in 1988 - VietNamNet
    Mar 17, 2016 · In early 1988, China illegally occupied the reefs of Chu Thap (Fiery Cross), Chau Vien (Cuarteron Reef), Gaven, Subi, and Huy go (Hughes) in ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Full article: China's land reclamation in the South China Sea
    Subi Reef, which was occupied by China in 1998, is the country's northernmost outpost in the Spratlys. Land reclamation began there in July 2014, and it is ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Chinese Land Reclamation in the South China Sea
    Jun 18, 2015 · Since September 2013, China has undertaken extensive reclamation and construction on several reefs in the Spratly Island chain in the South ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  32. [32]
    Diplomacy Changes, Construction Continues: New Images of ...
    Jun 18, 2015 · AMTI assesses that 3,950,000 square meters of land have been reclaimed at Subi Reef as of June 10, 2015. Subi Reef. June 5, 2015.
  33. [33]
    South China Sea: Satellite Images Show Pace of China's Subi Reef ...
    Jun 19, 2015 · Satellite imagery from June 5, 2015 shows China has expanded its land fill of Subi Reef by 74 percent in less than two months, adding an average of eight acres ...
  34. [34]
    Spratly Airstrip Update: Is Mischief Reef Next?
    Sep 15, 2015 · China is still dredging in the South China Sea. Satellite imagery of Subi Reef taken in early September shows dredgers pumping sediment onto ...
  35. [35]
    Airstrips Near Completion | Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative
    Jan 14, 2016 · In early September 2015, AMTI released images showing that China had effectively completed construction of its first Spratly Islands ...Missing: 2015-2023 satellite
  36. [36]
    Runway Construction at Subi Reef—China Building 2nd
    Sep 7, 2015 · China initiated construction in early 1988, with a two-story cement structure appearing in 1990. ... China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in ...Missing: pre- modern references
  37. [37]
    Build It and They Will Come - Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative
    Aug 1, 2016 · Subi Reef. Most of the hangars are being constructed at the southern end of the runway, with a few small hangars at the northern end. All the ...Missing: administrative solar farm timeline
  38. [38]
    A Constructive Year for Chinese Base Building
    Dec 14, 2017 · These facilities account for about 72 acres, or 290,000 square meters, of new real estate at Fiery Cross, Subi, and Mischief Reefs in the ...Missing: comparison timeline
  39. [39]
    China Built 400 Buildings on One South China Sea Island
    May 23, 2018 · Satellite imagery shows that China has put nearly 400 buildings on Subi Reef in the South China Sea. Data shows that the number of buildings ...Missing: administrative solar<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    An Accounting of China's Deployments to the Spratly Islands
    May 9, 2018 · Satellite imagery from April 28 reveals the first image of a military aircraft, a Shaanxi Y-8, deployed to China's base at Subi Reef in the Spratly Islands.Missing: infrastructure 2015-2023
  41. [41]
    The South China Sea: Historical and legal background
    Sep 11, 2024 · In December 1946, Chinese officials landed in the Spratly Islands for the first time and formally claimed them, shortly after France had renewed ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  42. [42]
    South China Sea: Where Did China Get Its Nine-Dash Line? | TIME
    Jul 19, 2016 · The line, first inscribed on a Chinese map in 1947, had “no legal basis” for maritime claims, deemed the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague.
  43. [43]
    Taiwan's Delicate Balancing Act in the South China Sea
    Jul 15, 2020 · Taiwan's government has argued that the ROC laid claims over the vast expanse of islands, reefs, cays, and banks in the South China Sea long ...
  44. [44]
    Taiwan reaffirms sovereignty amid PRC plans for South China Sea ...
    Sep 14, 2025 · Taiwan's sovereignty claim in the South China Sea will not be affected by the PRC's unilateral decision, MOFA said. Taiwan is willing to work ...
  45. [45]
    PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1596 - DECLARING CERTAIN AREA ...
    Such area is hereby constituted as a distinct and separate municipality of the Province of Palawan and shall be known as "Kalayaan."Missing: Subi Reef
  46. [46]
    Philippines | The National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR)
    The Philippines claims the Kalayaan Island Group on the assumption that ... June 1978: Presidential Decree 1596 proclaimed a polygonal boundary limit for the ...Missing: Subi | Show results with:Subi
  47. [47]
    China's militarization in the South China Sea violates Vietnam's ...
    8 Apr 2022 · “Vietnam has full legal grounds and historical evidence to assert sovereignty over the Spratly and Paracel islands, and sovereign rights and ...
  48. [48]
    Challenges for Vietnam in protecting South China Sea sovereignty ...
    For a long time, the Vietnamese people have discovered the Hoang Sa (Paracel) and Truong Sa (Spratly) Archipelagos, which at that time were named “Cat Vang” ( ...
  49. [49]
    Malaysia and Brunei: An Analysis of their Claims in the South China ...
    Aug 1, 2014 · Malaysia's involvement the Spratlys was the result of its continental shelf claim of 1979, followed in December of that year by publication of a ...Missing: Subi | Show results with:Subi
  50. [50]
    Malaysia | The National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR)
    Malaysia's claims to certain maritime features in the South China Sea are based on its corresponding claim to a continental shelf, as defined by a 1966 law, a ...Missing: Subi | Show results with:Subi
  51. [51]
    Massive Island-Building and International Law
    Jun 15, 2015 · By all accounts, Mischief Reef is an area of EEZ under dispute, while Subi Reef could be an area of EEZ or extended continental shelf under ...
  52. [52]
    China deploys water cannon in Spratlys clash with Philippines over ...
    May 23, 2025 · Chinese coastguard and Philippine fisheries vessels collide in latest encounter over disputed South China Sea reef.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  53. [53]
    Philippines condemns Chinese coast guard's use of water cannon ...
    May 23, 2025 · Philippine officials on Thursday condemned the Chinese coast guard for using what they say was a powerful water cannon to target one of two Philippine fishing ...
  54. [54]
    Philippines, China trade accusations over South China Sea vessel ...
    Oct 12, 2025 · China's coast guard said two Philippine government vessels "illegally entered" waters near Sandy Cay, a coral reef in the northern Thitu Reefs ...Missing: resupply missions shadowing 2016-2018
  55. [55]
    Chinese Navy Persistently Shadowing US Ally's Missions, Official Says
    Feb 7, 2024 · China's maritime forces are monitoring all of the Philippines' resupply missions to Manila-held territory in the South China Sea.Missing: Thitu 2016-2018
  56. [56]
    The Filipinos Living in the Shadow of China's Military Might
    Aug 12, 2024 · Chinese ships regularly chase, shadow and drive away Filipino fishermen near Thitu and other parts of the South China Sea.Missing: missions | Show results with:missions
  57. [57]
    The U.S. Asserts Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea
    Oct 27, 2015 · The guided missile destroyer USS Lassen transited within 12 nautical miles of Subi Reef, one of China's artificially-built features in the South China Sea.Missing: response | Show results with:response
  58. [58]
    Why the US Navy sails past disputed artificial islands claimed by ...
    May 6, 2019 · Two US Navy destroyers sailed within 12 miles of Chinese-claimed artificial islands in the South China Sea on Monday, and, as expected, the operation drew ...
  59. [59]
    US Freedom of Navigation Operations in the South China Sea
    May 29, 2017 · China ramped up dredging operations to turn two reefs, Subi and Mischief, in the Spratly Islands into artificial islands. While the reefs have ...
  60. [60]
    The State of the South China Sea: Coercion at Sea, Slow Progress ...
    Jan 27, 2025 · In 2024, China markedly stepped up its intimidation, harassment, and coercion against Philippine Navy, Philippine Coast Guard (PCG), and ...
  61. [61]
    The U.S. Navy's Freedom of Navigation Operation around Subi Reef
    Nov 6, 2015 · Subi Reef is located within 12 nautical miles of Sandy Cay (not to be confused with Sand Cay, which is occupied by Vietnam and does not lie ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    What Makes an Island? Land Reclamation and the South China Sea ...
    Jul 15, 2015 · Today, there are 3.9 million square meters of reclaimed land above water at high tide on Subi Reef, and it is home to a pair of wooden barracks, ...
  63. [63]
    Flying Too Low? - Völkerrechtsblog
    Sep 24, 2025 · Subi Reef is a low-tide elevation on the high seas that China has transformed into a large military base with runways, radar, and missile ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  64. [64]
    South China Sea Arbitration - Cases | PCA-CPA
    The arbitration concerned the role of historic rights and the source of maritime entitlements in the South China Sea.
  65. [65]
    South China Sea Arbitration Ruling: What Happened and What's ...
    On July 12, 2016, the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the Philippines' case against China in the South China Sea ruled overwhelmingly in favor of the ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study
    4) Mischief Reef, Second Thomas Shoal and Subi Reef are low-tide elevations that do not generate entitlement to a territorial sea, exclusive economic zone or ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] before - AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER ANNEX VI
    Jul 12, 2016 · ... Award of 12 July 2016. 4. Annex VII, shall be bound by any award the Tribunal issues. The situation of a non-participating Party, however ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Analyzing China's Rejection of the South China Sea Arbitration
    Nov 19, 2017 · Beijing went further than simply ignoring the procedure by denying the standing and jurisdiction of the arbitral body to render binding ...
  69. [69]
    Statement of the Spokesperson of the Chinese Embassy in the ...
    Jul 13, 2024 · The arbitral tribunal in the South China Sea Arbitration exercised its jurisdiction ultra vires and made an illegitimate ruling. The award thus ...
  70. [70]
    Foreign Ministry Spokesperson's Remarks on the Philippines ...
    Jul 12, 2025 · A: China's position on the “2016 Arbitral Award on the South China Sea” is consistent and clear. The “award” is nothing but a piece of waste ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  71. [71]
    Chinese Views on the South China Sea Arbitration Case Between ...
    Aug 24, 2016 · Authoritative sources consistently indicate that China rejects the arbitration and views its verdict as detrimental to vital Chinese interests.
  72. [72]
    Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea | Global Conflict Tracker
    Sep 17, 2024 · In July 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled on a claim brought against China by the Philippines under UNCLOS, ruling in ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    China Installs Missile Systems in Spratly Islands
    May 4, 2018 · Reports indicate the YJ-12B ASCM and HQ-9B SAM were moved to Fiery Cross Reef, Subi Reef, and Mischief Reef within the last 30 days. A ...
  74. [74]
    SAMs And Anti-Ship Missiles Are Now Guarding China's Man-Made ...
    May 3, 2018 · ... HQ-9B surface-to-air missiles and YJ-12B anti-ship cruise missiles on Fiery Cross Reef, Mischief Reef, and Subi Reef. China first began ...
  75. [75]
    Chinese Power Projection Capabilities in the South China Sea
    SAM and cruise missile ranges are based on the HQ-9, YJ-62, and YJ-12B systems that have been deployed across Woody Island, Fiery Cross Reef, Mischief Reef, and ...
  76. [76]
    Satellite Photos Show Chinese Military Outpost in South China Sea
    Sep 12, 2025 · China first occupied Subi Reef in 1988. Land reclamation began in 2014 during Beijing's ambitious dredging campaign in the Spratlys, which ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  77. [77]
    China building 'counter-stealth' radar on disputed South China Sea ...
    Oct 25, 2024 · China building 'counter-stealth' radar on disputed South China Sea reef, satellite pictures suggest. This article is more than 1 year old.
  78. [78]
    [PDF] In-Depth Subi Reef Counter-Stealth Radar - Johns Hopkins APL
    VHF-band radar typically suffer from ground clutter, multipath interference, poor angular resolution, and an inability to reliably determine target elevation.13 ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  79. [79]
    How effective is China's A2/AD in the South China Sea - 9DashLine
    Jun 9, 2020 · China's new bases at Fiery Cross, Subi and Mischief Reefs which are approaching a similar levels of capability as Woody could also provide air ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] China's Activities in the South China Sea
    Apr 1, 2025 · Since 2014, China has pressed ahead with rapid and large-scale land reclamation works in 7 features in the Spratlys. By the late-2015 when ...
  81. [81]
    The First Battle of the Next War: Wargaming a Chinese Invasion of ...
    Jan 9, 2023 · CSIS developed a wargame for a Chinese amphibious invasion of Taiwan and ran it 24 times. In most scenarios, the United States/Taiwan/Japan defeated a ...Missing: Subi Reef
  82. [82]
    [PDF] The Political Geography of the South China Sea Disputes | RAND
    The ROC government drew up plans to “garrison” its forces throughout the Spratly and Paracel islands, but the Com- munist victory in the Chinese Civil War and ...
  83. [83]
    The Ebb and Flow of Beijing's South China Sea Militia
    Nov 9, 2022 · Analysis of satellite imagery from the past year shows that hundreds of Chinese militia vessels continue to operate in the Spratly Islands on a daily basis.
  84. [84]
    China's Artificial Islands Are Bigger (And a Bigger Deal) Than You ...
    Sep 21, 2016 · Subi Reef is almost 50 percent larger again in area, and contains a massive enclosed deep-water harbor over two miles wide. A visual comparison ...Missing: geological atoll
  85. [85]
    China's Stealthy Area Denial - Asian Military Review
    Mar 14, 2023 · China based its A2/AD concept on the 'Sea Denial' or 'Bastion Strategy' favoured by the Russians, using very long-range land, air and sea-based ...
  86. [86]
    Dredging in the Spratly Islands: Gaining Land but Losing Reefs - PMC
    Mar 31, 2016 · Reclamation leads to gains of land in return for losses of coral reefs: A case example of China's recent reclamation in the Spratly Islands. Fig ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  87. [87]
    [PDF] before - AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER ANNEX VI
    Jul 12, 2016 · Harm to areas affected by smothering of sediments and increased turbidity, which includes most of the lagoons at Mischief and Subi Reefs and ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Island building in the South China Sea: detection of turbidity plumes ...
    Sep 15, 2016 · Plumes were manually delineated using data from January 2013 to December 2015 for Mischief, Subi, and Fiery Cross reefs (turbidity plumes ...
  89. [89]
    (PDF) Coral-algal phase shifts on coral reefs: Ecological and ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This paper briefly reviews coral–algal phase shifts on coral reefs, with particular regard to summarizing the exogenous and endogenous factors.
  90. [90]
    [PDF] The fisheries of the South China Sea - Amazon S3
    Jul 2, 2019 · Following a rapid increase in the 1980s and early 1990s, catches from the SCS reached about 10 million tonnes per year, then stagnated despite ...
  91. [91]
    Militarized Commons: How Territorial Competition is Weaponizing ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · Militarized fishing fleets and territorial competition are destroying the South China Sea's ecosystems and threatening global supply chains.Missing: piracy evidence
  92. [92]
    (PDF) Offshore Coral Reef Damage, Overfishing, and Paths to ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Offshore coral reefs of the South China Sea are subject to complex overlapping sovereignty claims by up to six regional nations.
  93. [93]
    Artificial Reefs, Fish Aggregating Devices, and Benthic Changes
    Nov 15, 2017 · Artificial reefs are used to enhance the marine environment and benefit organisms, such as by attracting reef-associated fish.Missing: Spratly Islands
  94. [94]
    CCG: Foreign fishing vessels detained for poaching in South China ...
    Jan 26, 2025 · The China Coast Guard (CCG) has increased efforts to combat illegal fishing and poaching of endangered species, especially in the South China Sea.
  95. [95]
    Improving China's maritime law enforcement operations against ...
    Apr 15, 2025 · Based on a comparison with the Indonesian law enforcement system against IUU fishing, the paper proposes a path for China to improve its fishery law ...
  96. [96]
    The Rising Environmental Toll of China's Offshore Island Grab
    Oct 10, 2016 · Scientists say the activities are destroying key coral reef ecosystems and will heighten the risks of a fisheries collapse in the region.Missing: formation | Show results with:formation