Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

First island chain

The First Island Chain is a geopolitical construct denoting the arc of major archipelagos in the Western Pacific Ocean extending from the Kuril Islands southward through the Japanese archipelago, Taiwan, the Philippines, and the Indonesian archipelago to Borneo, which collectively forms a natural maritime barrier between the East Asian continental shelf and the open Pacific.^[1]^[2] This chain delineates a strategic perimeter approximately 1,200 miles in length, enclosing the East and South China Seas while providing chokepoints for naval transit and potential basing for anti-access/area-denial operations.^[3]^[4] Originating in U.S. strategic doctrine during the early Cold War period of the 1950s, the concept was developed to contain the expansion of Soviet and Chinese communist influence by leveraging allied territories and forward bases along the chain for surveillance, blockade, and power projection.^[2]^[5] Building on earlier rimland theories emphasizing control of maritime fringes, it enabled the U.S. to establish mutual defense treaties with Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines, embedding American forces within the chain to deter aggression.^[6] In the post-Cold War era, the First Island Chain has regained prominence amid intensifying U.S.-China competition, serving as a forward defensive line where American and allied capabilities— including submarine warfare, air superiority, and missile defenses—aim to complicate Chinese breakout into the broader Pacific.^[4]^[6] China, viewing the chain as an encircling constraint on its maritime ambitions, has invested heavily in asymmetric capabilities such as hypersonic missiles, carrier-killer anti-ship weapons, and artificial island fortifications in disputed South China Sea features to erode U.S. dominance and secure sea lines of communication beyond the perimeter.^[3]^[1]^[5] Key flashpoints, including tensions over Taiwan and freedom-of-navigation operations, underscore the chain's role in potential conflict scenarios, where control of its straits and airspace could determine outcomes in high-intensity naval warfare.^[4]^[5]

Geographical and Definitional Aspects

Extent and Component Islands

The First Island Chain comprises a series of archipelagos and islands extending roughly 4,800 kilometers from the Kuril Islands in the north to Borneo in the south, forming an elongated barrier that separates the marginal seas adjacent to East Asia—the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and northern South China Sea—from the open western Pacific Ocean.^[3] This configuration creates a natural chokepoint for maritime transit, with the chain's eastern edge aligning closely with the 180th meridian in some conceptualizations but primarily defined by the outermost island arcs.^[7] The chain's extent was originally delineated during the Cold War to constrain Soviet naval expansion but has since been adapted to address regional dynamics involving China.^[8] Key components include the Kuril Islands, a volcanic archipelago of about 56 islands stretching 1,300 kilometers from Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula to Hokkaido, Japan; these islands, disputed between Russia and Japan, form the northern anchor.^[7] Southward, the Japanese archipelago—encompassing Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu, with a total land area exceeding 377,000 square kilometers—provides the primary mid-chain segment, supported by the Ryukyu Islands chain, which includes Okinawa and extends over 1,200 kilometers toward Taiwan.^[3] Taiwan, an island of approximately 36,000 square kilometers, serves as a critical central node due to its position astride major sea lanes.^[8] The southern extent incorporates the Philippine archipelago, consisting of over 7,600 islands with Luzon and Mindanao as the largest, spanning about 300,000 square kilometers and linking to the northern Indonesian islands, including Borneo, which at 743,000 square kilometers is the third-largest island globally and shared among Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei.^[9] This southern linkage, particularly via Palawan and the Sulu Archipelago, completes the chain's perimeter, enclosing contested areas like the Spratly Islands within its influence.^[10] While variations in definitions occasionally exclude Borneo or emphasize only the core arc from Japan to the Philippines, the inclusive extent underscores the chain's role in bounding China's near seas.^[3]^[8]

Maritime and Topographical Features

The First Island Chain forms an extended archipelago spanning roughly 2,500 kilometers from the Kuril Islands southward along the Japanese archipelago, Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan, the northern Philippines, and toward Borneo, creating a natural barrier between the continental shelves of East Asia and the open Pacific Ocean.^[8] The islands are primarily volcanic in origin, resulting from subduction along the Ryukyu and Luzon trenches, with rugged topographies dominated by steep mountains and limited coastal plains; for instance, the Ryukyu chain features volcanic cores rising sharply from the sea, interspersed with coral formations on peripheral islets.^[11] Key maritime passages punctuate the chain, functioning as strategic chokepoints including the Osumi Strait, Miyako Strait, Taiwan Strait, and Bashi Channel within the Luzon Strait.^[12] The Miyako Strait offers deep-water transit exceeding typical coastal depths, enabling access from the relatively shallow East China Sea—where shelf waters average under 150 meters—to the deeper Philippine Sea.^[13]^[14] The Luzon Strait, encompassing the Bashi Channel, reaches depths of up to 5,248 meters, facilitating passage for large naval vessels while exposing them to surveillance from adjacent landmasses.^[15] These features contrast sharply with the enclosed marginal seas, which exhibit continental shelf bathymetry conducive to acoustic propagation but vulnerable to mining and denial operations.^[16]

Historical Origins and Evolution

Conception During the Cold War

The concept of the first island chain emerged in the immediate post-World War II period as part of U.S. strategic planning to counter Soviet expansion in the Pacific. An early explicit reference appeared in a 1948 Joint Chiefs of Staff study, which outlined a defensive perimeter extending from the Aleutian Islands through Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines to form a barrier against potential communist advances.^[17] This perimeter aimed to leverage archipelagic geography for forward basing, enabling U.S. forces to project sea and air power while denying adversaries access to open ocean approaches.^[18] General Douglas MacArthur played a pivotal role in shaping the strategy, advocating for a U.S. "striking force" positioned along a U-shaped island arc to dominate Asian ports from Vladivostok to Singapore and prevent hostile forces from threatening the Americas.^[17] In his 1950 "Message on Formosa" and 1951 farewell address to Congress, MacArthur emphasized the Ryukyu chain south of latitude 29° as critical for control, reflecting a shift from WWII island-hopping to a containment-oriented posture.^[19] This vision integrated the islands into a broader "offshore island arcs" framework, drawing on pre-war geopolitical ideas but adapted for Cold War realities of bipolar confrontation.^[18] Secretary of State Dean Acheson's January 12, 1950, speech at the National Press Club further delineated the defensive perimeter, running from the Aleutians to Japan, the Ryukyus, and the Philippines, positioning these islands as the primary line of U.S. defense in Asia.^[20] Although initially excluding Taiwan and Korea—prompting debates that influenced the Korean War—the perimeter effectively mapped the first island chain's core components, prioritizing naval and air dominance to contain Soviet naval threats.^[21] Acheson and MacArthur, as architects of post-WWII Pacific security, invoked the island chains to establish mutual support between ground, air, and sea operations, ensuring strategic depth against Eurasian land powers.^[18] This framework evolved amid rising tensions with communist China, solidifying the chain's role in forward defense doctrines.^[22]

Post-Cold War Adaptations and Shifts

Following the Soviet Union's dissolution in December 1991, the First Island Chain's primary role in containing communist expansion waned, prompting the U.S. to draw down forces in the Western Pacific, including partial base closures in the Philippines after the 1992 termination of U.S. leases at Subic Bay and Clark Air Base.^[9] However, China's accelerating military modernization—evident in its 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait missile tests and subsequent buildup of over 2,000 ballistic missiles by 2000—necessitated a strategic pivot, reframing the chain as a barrier against Beijing's anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities aimed at dominating adjacent seas.^[23] U.S. doctrine adapted by emphasizing resilient forward presence, with the 1996 deployment of two aircraft carrier battle groups east of Taiwan during the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis demonstrating the chain's operational value in signaling resolve without direct mainland strikes.^[13] The 2010 AirSea Battle concept marked a doctrinal shift, integrating U.S. Air Force and Navy operations to counter Chinese A2/AD within the chain by targeting command nodes, missile batteries, and airfields on the mainland, while preserving allied bases in Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines as staging points.^[24] This evolved into the 2015 Joint Concept for Access and Maneuver in the Global Commons (JAM-GC), prioritizing distributed lethality and mobile forces to operate amid saturation attacks from China's DF-21D and DF-26 "carrier killer" missiles, which by 2018 numbered over 1,000 in inventory.^[4] Concurrently, alliance enhancements solidified the chain: the U.S.-Japan security guidelines revised in 2015 expanded roles for Japanese forces in regional contingencies, while the 2014 U.S.-Philippines Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) granted rotational U.S. access to five bases—later expanded to nine in 2023—bolstering the southern flank against South China Sea encroachments.^[25]^[26] China's countermeasures have tested these adaptations, including artificial island construction on seven Spratly features since 2013, equipping them with anti-ship missiles and radars to erode the chain's denial function, alongside naval expansion to 370 warships by 2023, surpassing U.S. fleet size.^[27] U.S. responses incorporated freedom of navigation operations, with 14 conducted in the South China Sea by 2020, and multilateral frameworks like the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue's revival in 2017, integrating Australia, India, and Japan for joint exercises within chain vicinities.^[28] The 2018 U.S. National Defense Strategy formalized China as the pacing threat, directing investments in long-range precision strike and hypersonic defenses to sustain chain integrity amid Beijing's efforts to project power beyond it.^[29] These shifts reflect a causal emphasis on empirical threat assessments over post-Cold War complacency, prioritizing empirical basing resilience against observable Chinese capabilities rather than abstract deterrence models.

Strategic Framework for Containment

Core Concept of Maritime Denial

Maritime denial, within the framework of the First Island Chain, constitutes a defensive posture designed to preclude an adversary—principally the People's Republic of China—from attaining operational freedom in contested maritime domains beyond the chain's confines. This approach leverages the chain's archipelagic geography, encompassing the Japanese archipelago, Taiwan, the Philippines, and interconnecting straits such as the Miyako, Bashi, and Luzon channels, to impose prohibitive costs on adversary naval maneuvers and power projection. By concentrating forces and capabilities within or adjacent to these littoral zones, proponents argue for exploiting terrain advantages, including shallow waters conducive to minefields and submarine ambushes, over expansive blue-water engagements where numerical disparities in platforms like surface combatants could prove disadvantageous.^[30]^[31] The conceptual core emphasizes asymmetric denial over symmetric attrition, prioritizing sea control negation through integrated systems of anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), cruise missiles, submarines, and unmanned systems rather than sustained carrier strike group offensives. This shift reflects empirical assessments of China's maturing anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) envelope, which, by 2019, encompassed hypersonic weapons like the DF-21D and DF-26 with ranges exceeding 1,500 kilometers, capable of threatening U.S. assets within the first 1,000 kilometers of the Chinese coast. Maritime denial thus inverts the A2/AD paradigm against Beijing, aiming to bottle up the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) within the semi-enclosed seas (Yellow, East, and South China Seas) spanning approximately 3 million square kilometers, where geographic bottlenecks amplify the efficacy of fixed defenses and forward-deployed allied assets.^[4]^[32] Causal dynamics underpin the strategy's viability: the chain's linear extent, roughly 3,800 kilometers from Japan's northern tip to Indonesia's Natuna Islands, creates natural chokepoints with widths as narrow as 130 kilometers (e.g., Taiwan Strait), facilitating layered interdiction that causal realism posits as more resource-efficient than dispersed oceanic patrols. Empirical data from simulations, such as those referenced in 2015 analyses, indicate that denial-focused operations could degrade PLAN sortie rates by 50-70% in initial conflict phases through preemptive strikes on ports and airfields accommodating over 300 combat aircraft along China's eastern seaboard. Critics, however, note implementation challenges, including vulnerability to saturation attacks from China's 2,000+ ballistic missiles stockpiled by 2020, underscoring the need for resilient, distributed basing.^[31]^[33] In essence, maritime denial reframes the First Island Chain not as a static barrier but as a dynamic contestation zone, where U.S.-allied interoperability—evident in exercises like Talisman Sabre integrating Australian and Japanese forces since 2011—seeks to enforce a "forward denial defense" confining hostilities and deterring escalation beyond regional theaters. This paradigm aligns with post-2010 doctrinal evolutions, prioritizing endurance over expeditionary dominance to counter Beijing's serial production of Type 055 destroyers (eight commissioned by 2023) and carrier groups, which numerical superiority alone (PLAN's 370+ ships versus U.S. Navy's 290 as of 2024) cannot negate without geographic leverage.^[4]^[30]

Role in US-Allied Forward Defense

The first island chain functions as a critical forward defensive line in U.S.-allied strategy to counter Chinese military expansion in the Western Pacific, enabling denial of Beijing's access to blue-water operations beyond the chain's perimeter. This approach emphasizes positioning allied forces proximate to potential flashpoints, such as the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, to impose costs on People's Liberation Army (PLA) advances through preemptive strikes, surveillance, and area denial tactics rather than conceding initiative by withdrawing to distant bases like Guam.^[4]^[13] By leveraging the chain's archipelagic barriers, U.S. forces and allies can exploit chokepoints like the Miyako Strait and Luzon Strait to bottleneck PLA naval sorties, thereby maintaining operational tempo inside contested zones.^[29] U.S. forward posture relies on integrated basing infrastructure along the chain, including permanent installations in Japan and rotational access agreements with the Philippines, to sustain logistics and rapid reinforcement amid Chinese anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) threats. For instance, enhanced defense cooperation under the U.S.-Philippines Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) has expanded access to nine sites since 2023, facilitating prepositioned munitions and agile combat employment to disperse forces and mitigate vulnerability to PLA missile salvos.^[34] In a contingency, this distributed network supports multi-domain operations, integrating air, sea, and land assets to attrit invading forces before they achieve sea control, as outlined in U.S. Indo-Pacific Command assessments of PLA capabilities designed to exclude U.S. operations within the first island chain.^[35]^[36] Allied contributions amplify this forward denial paradigm, with Japan's southwestern islands serving as forward-operating nodes for missile defenses and surveillance, while South Korea's geographic position anchors the northern flank against potential PLA diversions. This architecture deters aggression by raising the risk of escalation for China, as U.S. carrier strike groups and submarines operating within or adjacent to the chain can interdict supply lines and command nodes, per analyses of geostrategic basing dynamics.^[37]^[6] Fortification of these positions yields asymmetric advantages, allowing relatively modest investments in allied capacities to contest China's numerical superiority in regional missile inventories and surface combatants.^[38]

Perspectives of Involved Powers

United States' Forward Posture

The United States maintains a forward military posture in the First Island Chain to deter Chinese expansionism and ensure regional stability, emphasizing deterrence by denial through prepositioned forces and alliances. This strategy involves positioning combat-credible assets within the chain to complicate potential Chinese aggression, particularly in scenarios involving Taiwan or the South China Sea, as articulated in the Department of Defense's focus on strengthening deterrence against China.^[39]^[40] The Pacific Deterrence Initiative allocates resources to enhance this posture, prioritizing forces in the Western Pacific to deny adversaries territorial gains.^[41] In Japan, the cornerstone of U.S. forward presence, approximately 55,000 military personnel are stationed, with a significant concentration on Okinawa hosting key bases for Marine Corps and Air Force operations.^[42] Under the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty, these forces enable rapid response capabilities, though a 2012 agreement relocates about 9,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam and rotational deployments in Australia to alleviate local burdens while preserving operational reach.^[43]^[44] Okinawa's strategic bases support Marine Expeditionary Forces aligned abreast within the chain for distributed operations against anti-access threats.^[45] The Philippines serves as a southeastern anchor, bolstered by the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), which grants U.S. access to nine bases for rotational troops, prepositioned equipment, and infrastructure upgrades as of 2023.^[25] These sites, including strategic locations near the South China Sea like Balabac Island, facilitate logistics and power projection to counter coercion in contested waters.^[46] The U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty underpins this access, positioning the archipelago as a frontline element in denying Chinese dominance within the chain.^[26] Naval and air assets, including the forward-deployed U.S. 7th Fleet in Yokosuka, Japan, project power across the chain, supported by submarine screening and expeditionary advanced basing to mitigate area-denial challenges from Chinese missiles.^[47] This distributed posture integrates allied contributions, such as Japan's archipelagic defenses, to create layered deterrence, rejecting unilateral changes to the status quo by force.^[48]

Japan's Archipelagic Contributions

Japan's archipelago constitutes the northern segment of the first island chain, extending from the Kuril Islands southward through the main islands to the Ryukyu chain, including Okinawa, thereby anchoring the strategic perimeter enclosing the East and South China Seas.^[49] This positioning enables surveillance and rapid response capabilities over key maritime approaches, leveraging the islands' proximity to potential adversary naval movements from the Sea of Japan to the Philippine Sea.^[50] The presence of United States military installations in Japan, particularly on Okinawa, significantly bolsters the chain's defensive posture, with bases such as Kadena Air Base and Marine Corps installations hosting approximately 54,000 U.S. personnel and enabling power projection across the western Pacific.^[51] Okinawa alone accounts for about 70% of U.S. bases in Japan by area, facilitating air, naval, and amphibious operations critical to denying access within the chain.^[52] These facilities support joint U.S.-Japan exercises focused on island defense and anti-submarine warfare, enhancing interoperability amid rising tensions.^[50] Japan's own military contributions have intensified through modernization efforts, including the 2022 National Security Strategy that authorized counterstrike capabilities and elevated defense spending to 2% of GDP by fiscal year 2027.^[53] The Japan Self-Defense Forces (JSDF) have deployed Type 12 surface-to-ship missiles and integrated U.S. Tomahawk systems across the southwestern islands, forming an indigenous anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) network to complicate adversary advances.^[54] The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) operates advanced Aegis-equipped destroyers and submarines, patrolling chokepoints like the Miyako Strait to monitor People's Liberation Army Navy transits.^[55] Control over the Senkaku Islands, administered by Japan but claimed by China, underscores Tokyo's role in maintaining chain integrity, with Japan Coast Guard vessels routinely asserting presence against Chinese incursions that numbered over 300 in 2021 alone.^[56] Recent policy shifts permit JSDF involvement in Senkaku defense if coast guard capacity is overwhelmed, signaling a departure from strict law enforcement paradigms toward integrated deterrence.^[57] These measures, coupled with bilateral enhancements like the 2024 U.S.-Japan command-and-control upgrades, position Japan as a pivotal contributor to forward denial strategies.^[34]

Taiwan's Pivotal Position

Taiwan occupies the geographic center of the first island chain, linking the Japanese archipelago to the north with the Philippine archipelago to the south, thereby forming a continuous barrier that restricts China's direct access to the open Pacific Ocean.^[58] This positioning astride the Luzon Strait and the Bashi Channel positions Taiwan as the linchpin for maintaining the chain's integrity, as its control would enable the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) to project power beyond the chain into the Philippine Sea and threaten second island chain assets.^[59] The Taiwan Strait, approximately 110 miles wide at its narrowest point, serves as a critical maritime chokepoint through which over half of global container shipping passes annually, amplifying Taiwan's role in securing sea lines of communication vital to U.S. allies like Japan and South Korea.^[60] From a U.S. strategic perspective, Taiwan's location enables forward basing and surveillance operations that complicate China's anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, allowing allied forces to interdict PLAN movements early in potential conflicts.^[4] General Douglas MacArthur described Taiwan in 1950 as an "unsinkable aircraft carrier," underscoring its inherent military value for air and naval operations that could deny China uncontested dominance over the western Pacific.^[1] Taiwan's defense capabilities, including its asymmetric warfare assets like anti-ship missiles and mobile artillery, further bolster the chain by imposing high costs on amphibious invasions across the strait, which historical analyses indicate would require overwhelming logistical superiority for success.^[61] Chinese military doctrine views Taiwan's seizure as essential to shattering the first island chain, thereby expanding operational space for blue-water naval ambitions and reducing vulnerabilities to encirclement by U.S.-aligned forces.^[62] Beijing's repeated incursions into Taiwan's air defense identification zone—over 1,700 instances in 2022 alone—demonstrate ongoing efforts to erode deterrence and normalize control over adjacent waters.^[63] While some realist assessments question Taiwan's absolute indispensability to U.S. security given alternative basing options in Japan and the Philippines, its loss would demonstrably degrade the chain's defensive coherence, facilitating PLAN submarine and carrier deployments that challenge U.S. naval supremacy in the Indo-Pacific.^[6]^[63]

Philippines and Southeast Anchors

The Philippines constitutes a central pillar of the first island chain, its extensive archipelago—comprising more than 7,000 islands—bridging the gap between Taiwan to the north and Indonesia to the south, thereby enabling forward positioning for surveillance, logistics, and potential interdiction of naval forces transiting the Luzon Strait or South China Sea.^[26] ^[6] Key features include Luzon, which overlooks approaches to the Taiwan Strait, and Palawan province, positioned adjacent to contested Spratly Islands features where Philippine claims overlap with those of China, Vietnam, and Malaysia.^[26] This configuration allows the archipelago to function as a natural barrier, complicating adversary power projection while supporting allied resupply routes and anti-submarine warfare operations.^[64] The U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951 obligates mutual defense against armed attack in the Pacific, a commitment reinforced by the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), which permits rotational U.S. troop access to Philippine bases for joint training, prepositioning of equipment, and humanitarian assistance.^[65] In February 2023, Manila designated four additional EDCA sites—Naval Base Camilo Osias in Cagayan, Camp Melchor Dela Cruz in Isabela, Balabac Island in Palawan, and Lal-lo Airport in Cagayan—bringing the total to nine locations strategically arrayed to cover northern approaches to Taiwan and southern flanks near the South China Sea.^[66] These sites facilitate rapid U.S. force deployment, with Balabac specifically enhancing monitoring of Malacca Strait chokepoints and Spratly access lanes.^[46] In October 2025, Philippine marines and navy units rehearsed island defense maneuvers on Balabac, emphasizing anti-access capabilities amid heightened Chinese maritime militia activity.^[46] Since assuming office in June 2022, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has pivoted Philippine policy toward firmer assertion of exclusive economic zone (EEZ) rights, departing from the accommodationist approach of his predecessor Rodrigo Duterte, who prioritized economic ties with Beijing.^[67] This shift manifested in repeated confrontations at Second Thomas Shoal (Ayungin Shoal), where Chinese Coast Guard vessels employed water cannons and ramming tactics against Philippine resupply missions starting in 2023, resulting in injuries to Filipino personnel and damage to vessels on multiple occasions through 2025.^[68] ^[69] Marcos has invoked the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling rejecting China's nine-dash line claims, while expanding military modernization under the Comprehensive Archipelagic Defense Concept to bolster deterrence without direct combat reliance on U.S. forces.^[64] Despite these measures, Manila maintains diplomatic channels with Beijing, with Marcos stating in September 2025 that South China Sea differences should not overshadow bilateral economic relations.^[70] Further south, Indonesia's Natuna Islands anchor the first island chain's southeastern extremity, straddling the southern South China Sea where Jakarta's EEZ intersects China's expansive claims, prompting routine Indonesian naval patrols and air surveillance since the 2019-2020 incursions by Chinese fishing fleets escorted by coast guard ships.^[71] Indonesia renamed the area the North Natuna Sea in 2017 to assert sovereignty, rejecting the nine-dash line while developing offshore gas fields like East Natuna to demonstrate resource control, though it avoids formal alliances or U.S. basing to preserve non-aligned status.^[72] Recent incidents, including Chinese vessel detections in October 2024, have prompted intensified patrols but no escalation, reflecting Jakarta's preference for ASEAN multilateralism over unilateral confrontation.^[73] This posture indirectly supports chain integrity by constraining Chinese freedom of maneuver in southern approaches to the Malacca Strait, though lacking integrated defense ties limits its alignment with U.S.-led strategies.^[71]

China's Expansionist Counter-Strategies

China employs anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities as a primary mechanism to neutralize the First Island Chain's role in restricting its maritime access and power projection, focusing on missile systems, submarines, and integrated air defenses to target U.S. and allied forces entering the Western Pacific theater.^[74] This approach integrates land-based ballistic missiles like the DF-21D and DF-26, dubbed "carrier killers" for their hypersonic glide vehicles and ranges exceeding 1,500 kilometers, designed to threaten naval assets beyond coastal waters.^[75] Submarine forces, including quiet Type 039A Yuan-class diesel-electric boats equipped with anti-ship cruise missiles, further enable underwater threats to sealines of communication and block exits from the chain.^[76] In the South China Sea segment of the chain, China has pursued territorial expansion through large-scale dredging and artificial island construction since 2013, reclaiming approximately 3,200 acres across seven Spratly features and equipping them with military infrastructure such as 3-kilometer runways, radar arrays, and anti-ship/anti-air missile batteries.^[77] By 2022, at least three islands—Subi Reef, Mischief Reef, and Fiery Cross Reef—had been fully militarized with fighter jet deployments and surface-to-air systems, extending operational reach and creating forward operating bases that challenge Philippine and Vietnamese claims while complicating U.S. freedom of navigation.^[78] These bases support persistent surveillance via hydroacoustic sensors and electronic warfare assets, enabling real-time targeting data for mainland missile forces.^[79] Naval expansion forms another pillar, with the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) growing to over 370 hulls by 2024, including three operational aircraft carriers (Liaoning, Shandong, and Fujian) and plans for more to conduct sustained operations beyond the chain.^[1] In June 2025, China deployed two carrier groups simultaneously outside the First Island Chain for the first time, demonstrating blue-water coordination with escorts including Type 055 destroyers armed with YJ-18 anti-ship missiles, aimed at normalizing power projection into the Philippine Sea.^[80] Layered "cabbage" tactics utilize maritime militia vessels, coast guard cutters, and fishing fleets to assert de facto control over disputed features without escalating to open warfare, incrementally eroding chain integrity through persistent presence and coercion, as seen in repeated incursions near Scarborough Shoal since 2012.^[4] These non-kinetic measures, combined with diplomatic pressure on chain states via economic leverage, seek to fracture alliances and create exploitable gaps, though their efficacy remains constrained by geographic chokepoints like the Luzon Strait.^[81]

Military Dynamics and Capabilities

Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) Realities

China's anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) strategy in the First Island Chain focuses on integrating missile, submarine, mining, and air defense systems to deter or degrade U.S. and allied power projection, particularly in scenarios involving Taiwan or the South China Sea. This approach leverages geographic proximity to create a layered defensive envelope, emphasizing precision strikes against high-value targets like aircraft carriers and forward bases to impose prohibitive costs on intervention. As of 2024, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has deployed capabilities robust enough to cover the chain, with exercises like Joint Sword-2024A demonstrating coordinated targeting of maritime assets in the Taiwan Strait.^[40]^[75] Central to this strategy are anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), including the DF-21D medium-range system with a range of approximately 1,000–1,500 km and the DF-26 intermediate-range variant extending to 3,000–4,000 km, capable of striking carriers beyond the chain's eastern edge, such as near Guam. The PLA Rocket Force maintains around 300 DF-21D launchers with 1,300 missiles and 250 DF-26 launchers with 500 missiles, supported by 11 brigades in the Eastern Theater Command. Submarines, numbering over 60 including quiet Yuan-class diesel-electric and Shang-class nuclear-attack types equipped with YJ-18 anti-ship cruise missiles, enable undersea denial, while sea mines facilitate rapid littoral closure in chokepoints like the Taiwan Strait. Integrated air defenses, featuring HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles (range up to 200 km) and S-400 systems deployed on mainland bases and South China Sea outposts, further complicate air operations.^[40]^[82] U.S. assessments highlight the strategy's potential to delay U.S. forces within the chain but underscore inherent limitations, including reliance on vulnerable command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) networks for over-the-horizon targeting of mobile naval assets. PLA systems depend heavily on satellites and sensors susceptible to disruption, with limited deep-water anti-submarine warfare capabilities and unproven joint operations in contested environments. Logistical sustainment for prolonged denial remains challenging due to extended supply lines and lack of combat experience, potentially eroding effectiveness against U.S. countermeasures like stealth platforms, standoff munitions, and allied basing dispersion. While A2/AD imposes high attrition risks—potentially cratering runways at forward bases in Japan and Guam—empirical modeling suggests it does not preclude U.S. intervention but shifts emphasis to distributed, resilient operations beyond initial salvos.^[40]^[83]^[84]

Naval Power Projection Challenges

China's development of anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities, including anti-ship ballistic missiles such as the DF-21D and DF-26, poses acute risks to U.S. aircraft carriers operating within or near the First Island Chain, necessitating standoff distances that diminish sortie generation rates and operational flexibility.^[85]^[86] These systems, integrated with over-the-horizon radars and satellite reconnaissance, create a layered threat envelope extending up to 1,000 nautical miles from China's coast, complicating carrier strike group maneuvers in support of Taiwan or Philippine contingencies.^[74] Empirical assessments, including U.S. Department of Defense analyses, indicate that such weapons could achieve high-confidence hits against moving naval targets, forcing U.S. forces to allocate significant resources to suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) missions before effective power projection.^[87] Geographic constraints amplify these vulnerabilities: the chain's archipelagic terrain funnels naval traffic through chokepoints like the Miyako Strait and Luzon Strait, where Chinese submarines and land-based aviation can concentrate fires, eroding the U.S. Navy's traditional advantages in open-ocean maneuverability.^[4] U.S. carrier operations in the Philippine Sea or east of Taiwan would face intensified attrition from hypersonic glide vehicles and long-range cruise missiles launched from mobile platforms, as demonstrated in simulated scenarios where forward-deployed assets sustain losses exceeding 20% in initial phases of conflict.^[74] This dynamic shifts the burden toward distributed maritime operations, relying on smaller, unmanned, or allied surface vessels for sustained presence, though integration challenges persist due to interoperability gaps with partners like Japan and the Philippines.^[30] Logistical sustainment further compounds projection difficulties, as U.S. forces must transit vulnerable undersea and air routes for fuel, munitions, and repairs amid contested sea lanes dominated by People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) submarines equipped with advanced quieting technologies.^[88] Forward basing in Japan and Guam offers partial mitigation but exposes infrastructure to preemptive strikes, with China's precision-guided munitions capable of degrading runways and ports within hours of hostilities commencing.^[89] Consequently, power projection efficacy hinges on resilient supply chains, yet current U.S. inventories of long-range strike munitions, such as the LRASM, remain insufficient for prolonged campaigns against fortified A2/AD networks, per congressional assessments.^[90] Conversely, China's own naval power projection faces inherent limitations within the chain, constrained by immature carrier capabilities and vulnerability to U.S. submarine interdiction, which could sever PLAN logistics in a multi-domain fight.^[91] The PLAN's three operational carriers as of 2025 lack the experience and defensive escorts for sustained blue-water operations against peer adversaries, relying instead on land-based power amplification that falters beyond shore-based missile ranges.^[86] This asymmetry underscores a contested balance, where U.S. qualitative edges in stealth and networking must counter quantitative Chinese missile salvos to enable decisive intervention.^[30]

Basing Infrastructure and Logistics

United States military basing in the First Island Chain relies heavily on host-nation agreements, with Japan providing the most extensive infrastructure footprint. Okinawa Prefecture hosts over half of U.S. forces in Japan, including Kadena Air Base, which supports air operations with extensive runways and fuel storage managed by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy Okinawa, ensuring steady supply for aviation and ground missions as of July 2025.^[92] Additional facilities include U.S. Army Garrison Okinawa at Torii Station for logistics and communications, and Naha Military Port for maritime sustainment.^[93] A new DLA operations center on Kadena's Chibana Compound, established in March 2025, enhances centralized supply coordination.^[94] The Philippines anchors the southern segment through the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), expanded in February 2023 to include nine sites for U.S. rotational access, prepositioned equipment, and infrastructure upgrades without permanent bases.^[95] New locations announced in April 2023—Naval Base Camilo Osias in Cagayan, Camp Melchor Dela Cruz in Isabela, Balabac Island in Palawan, and Lal-lo Airport—position forces closer to Taiwan and the South China Sea, facilitating rapid deployment and joint exercises like Balikatan 2025, which incorporated cyber defense and multinational logistics training.^[96] These sites support airfield expansions, such as the ongoing military runway construction on Balabac Island as of October 2025, aimed at bolstering air logistics in contested areas.^[97] Logistics in the chain face acute challenges from geographic scale and adversarial threats. The Indo-Pacific's "tyrannies" of distance, water, time, and scale demand resilient supply lines, with U.S. forces requiring prepositioned stocks and dispersed operations to counter Chinese missile strikes that could crater runways at forward bases like those in Japan and the Philippines, as modeled in December 2024 assessments showing potential closure of key infrastructure.^[98]^[83] Complex terrain, including Philippine archipelagic dispersal, complicates intra-chain movement, necessitating agile sustainment via partnerships and exercises to address limited infrastructure and maritime vulnerabilities.^[99]^[100] Recent shifts, such as the December 2024 relocation of approximately 100 III Marine Expeditionary Force logistics personnel from Okinawa to Guam, reflect efforts to harden second-chain resilience while maintaining first-chain forward posture.^[101]

Controversies and Critical Debates

Viability Against China's Military Modernization

China's rapid military modernization has intensified scrutiny over the first island chain's defensive viability, primarily through enhanced anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities that threaten U.S. and allied forward bases. The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) maintains an inventory exceeding 1,000 short- and medium-range ballistic missiles and hundreds of ground-launched cruise missiles, enabling saturation strikes on airfields and ports across Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines.^[40] These systems, including the DF-21D and DF-26 "carrier killer" missiles with ranges up to 4,000 kilometers, create a layered threat environment that could crater runways and overwhelm defenses in the event of conflict.^[83] The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has expanded its surface and subsurface fleets, commissioning its third aircraft carrier, Fujian, in 2024, alongside over 370 ships and submarines as of mid-2024, surpassing the U.S. Navy in hull numbers.^[40] This growth supports operations beyond the first island chain, with dual-carrier formations tested in 2023-2024, yet the PLAN's blue-water ambitions remain constrained by limited combat experience and reliance on unproven integrated command systems.^[102] Integrated air defenses, bolstered by S-400 systems and indigenous HQ-9 variants, further complicate allied power projection, forming an A2/AD bubble that extends across the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.^[82] U.S. Department of Defense assessments indicate that while China's capabilities have eroded traditional U.S. dominance within the chain, vulnerabilities persist in PLA logistics and sustainment, particularly for prolonged campaigns.^[40] Strategies like the U.S. Marine Corps' Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO) aim to distribute forces across smaller, mobile sites in the chain, leveraging allies' archipelagic terrain for resilient denial operations against Chinese incursions.^[103] Wargame simulations by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, incorporating 2023-2024 data, demonstrate that defending Taiwan remains feasible but at high cost, requiring rapid reinforcement and allied interoperability to counter initial missile barrages.^[47] Debates persist among analysts regarding long-term viability, with some arguing that unchecked PLA modernization—projected to yield over 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030—could render fixed chain positions untenable without escalated U.S. investments in hypersonic defenses and long-range precision fires.^[40] Others emphasize causal factors like China's internal challenges, including corruption in procurement and untested joint operations, which may limit effective execution despite quantitative edges.^[104] Official U.S. reports, while data-rich, reflect strategic incentives to highlight threats, underscoring the need for empirical validation through exercises rather than projections alone.^[40]

Escalation Risks and Deterrence Failures

China's employment of gray-zone tactics, such as maritime militia incursions and coast guard harassment in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, heightens escalation risks within the First Island Chain by blurring the threshold between peacetime coercion and armed conflict, potentially compelling U.S. or allied responses that spiral into broader hostilities.^[105]^[106] These actions, observed in over 200 Philippine-China maritime incidents in 2024 alone, test deterrence without overt aggression, exploiting ambiguities in international law and alliance commitments to normalize control over disputed features like the Second Thomas Shoal.^[68] Analysts at the RAND Corporation note that such tactics erode U.S. forward presence credibility, as failure to counter them incrementally could embolden further advances, while forceful pushback risks kinetic clashes involving naval assets concentrated in the chain's chokepoints.^[105] Deterrence failures in this theater often stem from miscalculations over resolve, as evidenced by historical precedents like the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis, where U.S. non-intervention to China's missile tests signaled restraint, potentially encouraging subsequent gray-zone escalations.^[107] In a Taiwan contingency, U.S. intervention faces acute risks of nuclear escalation due to China's expanding arsenal—now exceeding 500 warheads as of 2024—and anti-access/area-denial systems that could sink carrier strike groups early, prompting desperate measures.^[108]^[109] The Center for Strategic and International Studies warns that rushing to implement denial strategies in the strait could provoke preemptive Chinese strikes, undermining extended deterrence if allies perceive U.S. commitments as hollow amid domestic political constraints.^[110] Alliance dynamics amplify these vulnerabilities; for instance, Japan's basing access under the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty could draw Tokyo into a Taiwan conflict, but coordination delays or Philippine hesitancy in invoking mutual defense pacts—stemming from economic dependencies on China—might fracture unified responses.^[4] Hypothetical scenarios modeled by the International Institute for Strategic Studies illustrate deterrence collapse via phased blockades or amphibious feints, where initial U.S. restraint to avoid escalation cedes initiative, allowing China to consolidate gains before full mobilization.^[111] Empirical data from wargames, including those simulating 2026-2030 timelines, indicate high probabilities of rapid escalation to theater-wide war if deterrence signals—such as freedom of navigation operations—are inconsistent, with China's risk tolerance evolving toward bolder probes since 2022.^[112]^[113]

Alliance Reliability Amid Internal Turmoil

South Korea's political crisis, initiated by President Yoon Suk Yeol's declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, exposed deep divisions within its government and military, prompting immediate backlash from the National Assembly and public protests that reversed the order within hours.^[114] This event, followed by Yoon's impeachment proceedings and a snap presidential election on June 3, 2025, resulted in the victory of progressive Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung, whose platform emphasized pragmatic engagement with North Korea and economic ties with China, raising concerns among US policymakers about Seoul's alignment in countering Beijing's influence.^[115]^[116] Lee's administration has pursued "deal-making" with the US under President Trump, including increased defense contributions, yet underlying partisan tensions—evident in ongoing investigations into Yoon-era officials—could constrain long-term commitments to joint exercises and basing rights critical for First Island Chain deterrence.^[117] In Japan, frequent leadership turnover within the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), including the 2024 electoral setbacks and subsequent prime ministerial transitions to figures like Shigeru Ishiba and Sanae Takaichi, has introduced policy continuity risks despite sustained public support for the US alliance, with over 90% of defense acquisitions sourced from American suppliers as of 2025.^[118]^[119] These domestic challenges, compounded by economic pressures from US tariffs under Trump 2.0, have prompted Tokyo to diversify partnerships—such as enhanced trilateral cooperation with Australia and India—but have not yet eroded core security pacts like the 1960 mutual defense treaty; however, LDP vulnerabilities could slow defense spending increases beyond the 2% GDP target pledged in 2023.^[120]^[121] The Philippines faces alliance uncertainties tied to dynastic politics, where President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s pro-US pivot since 2022—evidenced by expanded Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement sites—contrasts with the lingering influence of the Duterte family, whose potential 2028 return could revive accommodationist policies toward China, as seen during Rodrigo Duterte's 2016-2022 tenure when Manila downplayed South China Sea disputes.^[122]^[123] Internal elite rivalries, including corruption allegations and midterm election dynamics, further complicate sustained basing access for US forces, essential for projecting power into the chain's southeastern anchors, though Marcos's administration has reaffirmed the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty amid 2025 maritime incidents.^[124] Taiwan's post-2024 legislative divisions, where the Democratic Progressive Party lost its majority to a Kuomintang-led opposition favoring cross-strait economic ties, have hampered defense reforms and US arms integration, fostering perceptions of internal fragility that Beijing exploits through gray-zone tactics.^[125] This partisan gridlock delays mandatory service extensions and budget allocations, undermining the reliability of Taiwan as the chain's central node, even as US-Taiwan economic interdependence—rooted in semiconductor supply chains—bolsters informal security ties under the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act.^[126] US domestic politics under the second Trump administration have amplified alliance strains through demands for higher burden-sharing and tariffs on allies' exports, leading Indo-Pacific partners to question Washington's long-term credibility in defending the chain against Chinese expansion, as evidenced by 2025 bilateral summits emphasizing transactional deals over unconditional commitments.^[127]^[128] Such pressures, amid partisan debates over Indo-Pacific prioritization, risk eroding deterrence cohesion, with China observing these fissures as opportunities to peel away peripherals through economic inducements.^[129]

Recent Geopolitical Developments

Political Instability in Chain Littorals

In Japan, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)-Komeito coalition governing since 1999 collapsed on October 10, 2025, when Komeito withdrew support following electoral setbacks, plunging the country into a political crisis marked by repeated leadership changes and voter dissatisfaction.^[130] Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's decision to call snap elections in October 2025 after assuming office failed to stabilize the government, as the LDP lost its parliamentary majority amid scandals and economic pressures, exacerbating fiscal indiscipline risks.^[131] Japan's political stability index declined to 0.95 in 2023 from 1.03 the prior year, reflecting ongoing turbulence with four prime ministers since 2021.^[132] The Philippines has seen acute internal divisions, with a public feud between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and Vice President Sara Duterte intensifying by mid-2025, including Duterte's impeachment and mutual accusations that fueled threats of assassination and military coups as reported in November 2024.^[133] Political violence targeting local officials surged in late 2024 ahead of the May 2025 mid-term elections, where voters rejected many Marcos allies, upending expectations and highlighting elite factionalism.^[134]^[135] This instability, compounded by corruption perceptions, has been rated as medium risk, contributing to a 61.9% drop in foreign direct investment in early 2025 and broader economic threats.^[136]^[137] The country's political stability percentile rank stood at 23.7% in 2023, among the lowest regionally.^[138] Taiwan under President Lai Ching-te has navigated testy domestic politics since his 2024 inauguration, with the opposition-controlled legislature blocking key initiatives and amplifying partisan gridlock amid external pressures.^[139] Despite fears of internal erosion exploited by China, no widespread chaos has materialized, as evidenced by the failure of recall efforts against officials and sustained institutional resilience.^[140] Cross-strait tensions have heightened strategic uncertainty, but Taiwan's governance has avoided the acute turmoil seen in neighbors.^[141] In Indonesia, political stability around the Natuna Islands—part of the chain's southern extent—has held under President Prabowo Subianto since his 2024 election, though criticized maritime pacts with China in November 2024 raised sovereignty concerns without triggering domestic upheaval.^[142] Ongoing Chinese intrusions near Natuna persist, but internal politics remain focused on economic priorities rather than factional crises.^[143] This wave of turmoil across chain states, including parallel disarray in South Korea, has drawn Beijing's attention as a potential weakening of U.S. alliances, with empirical data showing correlated drops in regional stability metrics since 2023.^[129] Such instability undermines coordinated deterrence, as leadership vacuums delay defense investments and policy consistency against expansionist pressures.^[144]

US Strategic Realignments and Fortifications

In response to China's expanding military capabilities, the United States has pursued strategic realignments emphasizing distributed basing and enhanced forward presence within the first island chain, shifting from centralized hubs to resilient, dispersed operations to improve survivability against anti-access/area-denial threats.^[44] This includes reallocating assets from legacy Middle East commitments toward the Indo-Pacific, with the Department of Defense integrating East Asian basing into a broader deterrence framework that prioritizes denial strategies over direct power projection.^[6]^[145] A key element involves expanded access in the Philippines under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), originally signed in 2014 and augmented in February 2023 with four additional sites, bringing the total to nine.^[95] These include Naval Base Camilo Osias and Lal-lo Airport in Cagayan province (northern Luzon, proximate to Taiwan), Camp Melchor Dela Cruz in Isabela, and Balabac Island in Palawan (facing the South China Sea).^[146] The agreement enables U.S. troop rotations, equipment prepositioning, and joint infrastructure upgrades without permanent basing, with Philippine forces leading construction such as runway extensions at Balabac, completed by October 2025, to support rapid response to regional contingencies.^[147]^[97] In Japan, realignments focus on bolstering U.S. and allied missile defenses and strike capabilities along the Ryukyu Islands, which form a critical segment of the chain. The U.S. Air Force announced in 2024 the deployment of 48 F-35A aircraft to Misawa Air Base, enhancing air superiority and integration with Japanese forces.^[44] Japan has integrated U.S. bases for potential counterstrike missiles, including Tomahawk and hypersonic systems, capable of targeting coastal threats, with sites like those in Okinawa providing proximity to Taiwan and the East China Sea.^[54]^[148] These enhancements address vulnerabilities to Chinese missile salvos, incorporating hardened facilities and dispersal tactics.^[83] Supporting these forward positions, fortifications at Guam—while outside the first chain—anchor logistics and reinforcement flows, with investments exceeding $8 billion by 2025 for Marine Corps Camp Blaz expansion, submarine maintenance yards, and Andersen Air Force Base upgrades to sustain operations amid gray-zone pressures.^[149]^[150] This distributed approach aims to complicate Chinese advances by leveraging allied territories for agile basing, though challenges persist in funding and local opposition.^[34]

References

[1]
What is the US' island chain strategy and what does it mean for China?
Jun 16, 2025 · The first island chain runs along East Asia's coastline, from the Kuril Islands through Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines down to Borneo. This ...
[2]
China in the Indo-Pacific: Alfred Mahan and the Island Chains
Aug 16, 2024 · The “island chain” term takes its roots in 1950s US strategic thought of practical containment of Soviet and Chinese communism in the West ...
[3]
China's Reach Has Grown; So Should the Island Chains
Oct 22, 2018 · The island chain is a geographical security concept used to illustrate a defensive or offensive perimeter by linking islands and other larger ...
[4]
A Forward Denial Defense: Inside the First Island Chain | Proceedings
China's militia—its “fishing” fleet—is a vital enabling capability for the seizure of key maritime terrain, not to mention the sovereign territory and economic ...
[5]
Crises and challenges in the First Island Chain: A British response
Oct 16, 2024 · The First Island Chain is the frontline for geopolitical contestation in the Indo-Pacific and thus warrants particular attention as Britain ...
[6]
Geostrategic competition and overseas basing in East Asia and the ...
... U.S. force posture to surmount evolving challenges within China's so-called first island chain.1 For long-term geostrategic competition with China, U.S. ...
[7]
[PDF] China Conceptualizes the Pacific Island Chains - DTIC
Jan 21, 2016 · Island, the Philippine Islands, and the Indonesian Islands of the first island chain; the second island chain stretches from the islands of ...
[8]
Opening of Demise (The Beginning of the End) | Hudson Institute
Jan 5, 2022 · The First Island Chain is principally comprised of the Kuril Islands, the Japanese Archipelago, the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan, the northern ...
[9]
[PDF] The Pacific Pivot: - The Heritage Foundation
Oct 1, 2024 · First Island Chain. SOLOMON. ISLANDS. PAPUA NEW. GUINEA. GUAM. (US) ... and objectives in the Pacific Islands first while prioritizing engagement ...
[10]
[PDF] the strategic importance of the pacific islands hearing
Oct 20, 2021 · The first island chain, roughly, stretches down Japan including Okinawa through Taiwan and the Philippines and is known as the first island ...
[11]
Plate convergence between the Philippines and the Ryukyu islands
The marine geology of the area east and north of Luzon indicates that the Luzon arc extends northward beyond the south end of Taiwan and has collided with the ...
[12]
China Conceptualizes the Pacific "Island Chains" - jstor
Jan 21, 2016 · The report also argued that the addition of attack submarines and other assets was designed to achieve sea denial within the First Island Chain ...
[13]
Defend the First Island Chain | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
The islands of the Western Pacific offer a perimeter-defense opportunity, while history provides some instructive templates.
[14]
[PDF] Regional Climatology East Asian Seas: An Introduction
2.1 EAST CHINA SEA The East China Sea area is 752,000 km2 (Belkin, 2002a). The sea is mostly shallow: continental shelf with depths less than 150 m occupies ...<|separator|>
[15]
[PDF] On Maritime Strategic Access Foreign Military Thought - Air University
Feb 12, 2024 · ... wide and 5,248 meters deep, and it is the deepest strait in the ... Strait and Miyako Strait in the Ryukyu Islands, and the Taiwan Strait.
[16]
Strategic Geography of Chinese Sea Power I - War History
Dec 14, 2024 · The term “first island chain” refers to the offshore archipelago that envelops Eurasia's eastern seaboard in its entirety. While Western ...
[17]
The Enduring Significance of the Pacific “Island Chains”
Feb 5, 2016 · The Western Pacific “island chains” are a persistent feature of Asia's maritime geography. While their underlying fundaments remain constant, their specific ...
[18]
[PDF] The Second Island Cloud: A Deeper and Broader Concept for ...
Leading architects of the post–World War II Pacific security archi- tecture, including Douglas MacArthur and Dean Acheson, also invoked the island chains.
[19]
[PDF] An Old Soldier's View of the Early Cold War, 1949-1953 - ISU ReD
complete control over “the Ryukyu [island] chain south of Latitude 29.”50. One year later in March 1949, in a press interview, MacArthur publicly stated for.
[20]
[PDF] Speech on the Far East - CIA
The defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes to the Ryukyus. We hold important defense positions in the Ryukyu Islands, and those we ...Missing: chain | Show results with:chain
[21]
Dean Acheson's 'Perimeter Speech' on Asia (1950) - Alpha History
The defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes to the Ryukyus [south of Japan]. We hold important defence positions in the Ryukyu ...Missing: chain | Show results with:chain
[22]
The 1950 Crises and America's Changing Posture of Defence ...
May 23, 2024 · ... Dean Acheson rejected the proposal. Acheson believed that 'the resources on Formosa are adequate to enable them to obtain the items which ...
[23]
[PDF] The Maritime Basis of American Security in East Asia
located in a key position on the “first island chain,” running down the East Asian littoral. Farther offshore, China and other regional states contest the ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[24]
AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept - CSBA
May 18, 2010 · ... island chain, which extends as far as Guam and New Guinea. Unless ... An AirSea Battle concept first and foremost must address high-end military ...
[25]
US-Philippines Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement Revived
Jun 14, 2023 · The EDCA's revival represents a renewed commitment by the Philippines and the United States to each other's interests and to strengthening deterrence in ...
[26]
The U.S.-Philippine Alliance in 2025
Mar 3, 2025 · Second, the Philippines stands as a significant part of the first island chain that is on the frontlines of Chinese coercion. The significant ...
[27]
Island Chains: Can the US's Cold War Strategy Still Contain China?
Apr 1, 2025 · The strategic aim of China in the longer term will be projecting what he called "persistent sea control power" beyond the First Island Chain, ...
[28]
Is the US over-militarizing its China strategy? - Atlantic Council
Feb 3, 2023 · This Mobile Maritime strategy would confine the PLA to the first island chain running from Japan through Taiwan to Indonesia, the Philippines, ...
[29]
Losing the Initiative in the First Island Chain - Marine Corps University
This article surveys the strategic environment and the features of the current military strategies, detailing how such a conflict might be waged.Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
[30]
A Strategy of Denial for the Western Pacific - U.S. Naval Institute
If Beijing could take Taiwan, it would break out of the first island chain that currently constrains its military power projection. As the recent Congressional ...
[31]
[PDF] TIGHTENING THE CHAIN - CSBA
May 6, 2019 · Complexes,25 AirSeaLand Battle,26 Maritime Denial,27 Archipelagic Defense,28 Active Denial,29 ... First Island Chain, a geographic area that holds ...
[32]
[PDF] Beyond Air-Sea Battle: The Debate over US Military Strategy in Asia ...
Dec 3, 2015 · along the first island chain (pp 27–28) . Friedberg describes this all ... what he calls “maritime denial” (pp 104,. 116–17) He again ...
[33]
[PDF] Countering Anti-ACCess/ AreA DeniAl ChAllenges
Apr 23, 2018 · maritime exclusion zone in the first island chain.43 Critics of maritime-denial strategies, however, questioned the implementation and ...
[34]
How the US is reinforcing the 'first island chain' to deter China
Apr 24, 2025 · The chain is part of a US containment strategy to restrict Chinese military access to the Pacific Ocean, an approach that the United States has ...
[35]
[PDF] statement of admiral samuel j. paparo commander, us indo-pacific ...
access/area denial capabilities are designed to prevent U.S. forces from operating. 13 within the first and second island chains. China is outpacing the U.S. ...<|separator|>
[36]
Increasing Operational Access: A Strategy for the Western Pacific
Jul 15, 2025 · Of note in figure 1 is the increase of rotational forces in the South Pacific, arraying from Australia north into the First Island Chain through ...
[37]
South Korea is the ideal anchor for the first island chain
Jul 10, 2025 · Discussion of the first island chain largely overlooks South Korea, an ideal "anchor" that could prove decisive in a US-China conflict ...
[38]
[PDF] Based, Multi-Domain Anti-Access/Area Denial Forces Play ... - RAND
Aug 29, 2016 · Allies provide the forward defense of U.S. inter- ests and remain ... operating past the first island chain has grown more common.9 Chi ...
[39]
Army Works to Deter Chinese Threats While Supporting Joint Force ...
Jun 27, 2025 · The first island chain comprises islands and land from Japan to Southeast Asia, much of which lies adjacent to waters illegally claimed by China ...
[40]
[PDF] Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic ...
Dec 18, 2024 · ... First Island Chain (FIC) by conducting the first extended area deployment of its new YUSHEN-class amphibious assault ship and three ...
[41]
[PDF] PACIFIC DETERRENCE INITIATIVE
Jun 12, 2025 · The Department is focused on deterring China by prioritizing combat credible military forces postured in the Western Pacific to deter by denial, ...
[42]
U.S.-Japan Alliance Increasingly Strengthened Since End of WWII
Aug 14, 2020 · The depth of the U.S. commitment to the U.S.-Japan alliance is evidenced by the nearly 55,000 U.S. military personnel stationed in Japan, and ...Missing: presence | Show results with:presence
[43]
Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee - State.gov
Apr 26, 2012 · The Ministers confirmed that a total of approximately 9,000 U.S. Marines, along with their associated dependents, are to be relocated from ...Missing: troop | Show results with:troop
[44]
Reinforcement and redistribution: evolving US posture in the Indo ...
Mar 27, 2025 · As per a 2012 agreement with Japan, the US has begun relocating 9,000 marines from Okinawa, either to be rotationally deployed to Australia or ...
[45]
Two Dangerous Assumptions in U.S. Defense Planning and How to ...
Oct 15, 2025 · The latter strategy calls for two Marine expeditionary forces (I and III Marine Expeditionary Force) “abreast” within the first island chain.
[46]
https://news.usni.org/2025/10/22/philippine-forces-practice-defending-strategic-island-near-south-china-sea
[47]
The Next Offset: Winning the Fight Before It Starts - CSIS
Sep 16, 2025 · Submarines are also needed to screen against Chinese submarines exiting the first island chain.32. The United States should also prioritize ...
[48]
Remarks by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the 2025 Shangri ...
May 31, 2025 · And any unilateral attempt to change the status quo in the South China Sea and the First Island Chain by force or coercion is unacceptable.
[49]
Introduction: Evaluating Japan's New Grand Strategy
May 30, 2025 · Since the Cold War, Japan has also formed the northern part of the first island chain, which runs from Japan via Taiwan, past the Philippines ...
[50]
The Case for Japanese Land Power in the First Island Chain
the Japanese archipelago that ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
[51]
Japan: Why Okinawa is strategically crucial for US military - DW
Nov 20, 2023 · The first island chain refers to the area that runs from Japan through Taiwan, the Philippines and on to Borneo, enclosing China's coastal seas.
[52]
Base-related Data | Information Portal of Military Bases on Okinawa ...
Okinawa is second to Hokkaido at 19.2％ in terms of the ratio of facilities and areas of USFJ, including facilities that are shared by both the USFJ and JSDF.
[53]
2025 Defense of Japan Report - USNI News - U.S. Naval Institute
Oct 10, 2025 · China has been swiftly increasing its national defense expenditures, thereby extensively and rapidly enhancing its military capability in a ...Missing: shifts | Show results with:shifts
[54]
Map Shows US Ally's Bases Where New Counterstrike Missiles ...
Jul 30, 2025 · Under a U.S. defensive island chain strategy, Japan forms part of the first island chain—alongside Taiwan and the Philippines to its south—which ...
[55]
How Japan Can Help Save Taiwan: Securing the First Island Chain
Mar 23, 2022 · Expeditionary advanced base operations are expected to be a countermeasure against the PLA's anti-access/area denial threat in the first island ...Missing: modernization | Show results with:modernization
[56]
Situation of the Senkaku Islands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
Japan has consistently maintained that there has never been any agreement with China to “shelve” issues regarding the Senkaku Islands. This is made clear by ...
[57]
Japan's Strategy of “Proactive Restraint” in Defending the Senkaku ...
Jul 1, 2025 · At the heart of this strategy is the JCG's law enforcement role, which underpins Japan's continued control of the Senkaku Islands. Nevertheless ...
[58]
[PDF] TAIWAN: THE KEY TO CONTAINING CHINA IN THE INDO-PACIFIC
For three important reasons, Taiwan is the linchpin in the US frontline defense in the first island chain. First, it sits in the geographic center of the ...
[59]
[PDF] The Strategic Importance of Taiwan to the United States and Its Allies
May 19, 2023 · This island chain is a convenient geographic defensive containment line against an ever-aggressive PLA Navy (PLAN).<|separator|>
[60]
Chinese Views of Taiwan's Geostrategic Value | SPF China Observer
Dec 4, 2023 · It sits at the midpoint of the first island chain, the transnational archipelago running south from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines. To ...
[61]
Why Defending Taiwan is Difficult: American Credibility and ...
Aug 19, 2025 · Most limit themselves to the geostrategic consequences of the puncturing of the first island chain, with perhaps a reference to MacArthur's ...
[62]
PacNet #16 – Taiwan's true regional and existential importance ...
Mar 17, 2025 · Taiwan represents an unbroken defensive line, the first island chain, which gives Japan, the US, Indonesia, and the Philippines a naval ...<|separator|>
[63]
Taiwan: An Important but Non-Vital U.S. Interest - Quincy Institute
Sep 25, 2025 · ... Taiwan had become strategically important as a critical location along the first island chain stretching from the Kuril Islands to Southeast ...
[64]
Filling up the gap at the southern flank of the first island chain
Sep 17, 2025 · This requires the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) to create a credible defensive posture to build the country's deterrent capabilities in ...
[65]
U.S. Security Cooperation with the Philippines - State Department
Jan 20, 2025 · EDCA authorizes U.S. forces access to agreed locations in the Philippines on a rotational basis, for security cooperation exercises, joint and ...
[66]
Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) Fact Sheet
Mar 20, 2023 · Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) Fact Sheet - U.S. Embassy in the Philippines.
[67]
The Philippines navigates shifting political currents in the South ...
Apr 25, 2025 · Marcos Jr has adopted a firmer stance on China, departing from former president Rodrigo Duterte's more conciliatory approach. Amid South China ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[68]
Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea | Global Conflict Tracker
Sep 17, 2024 · Chinese Coast Guard vessels began to employ dangerous tactics to harass Philippine resupply missions in 2023, leading to heightened clashes.
[69]
Web of Deterrence: How the Philippines Is Reframing Security ...
Oct 16, 2025 · The escalating tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have compelled Manila to redefine its security cooperation ...
[70]
Philippine president says differences over South China Sea should ...
Sep 25, 2025 · Philippine president says differences over South China Sea should not define Manila's ties with Beijing. 'Considering how difficult the ...
[71]
Indonesia moving to keep China at bay in Natuna Sea - Asia Times
Jan 23, 2023 · Indonesia developing East Natuna gas block to show China it views contested outer island region as a front porch and not a backyard.
[72]
South China Sea: Indonesia renames part of maritime economic ...
Jul 14, 2017 · Indonesia has renamed the northern reaches of its exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea as the North Natuna Sea.Missing: anchors | Show results with:anchors
[73]
Latest Natuna Islands incident hints at change in Indonesia's ... - CNA
Oct 27, 2024 · News has broken in recent days about China's latest intrusion in Indonesian waters around the Natuna Islands, only to be confronted by vessels from the ...
[74]
[PDF] Countering China's Military Strategy in the Indo-Pacific Region - RAND
Mar 21, 2024 · Bases hosting land-based fighters in the first and second island chains would be subject to heavy and sustained missile attacks. Long-range ...
[75]
China's Anti-Access/Area-Denial Strategy
Feb 9, 2023 · The PRC's leadership has successfully pushed its A2/AD system to cover the First Island Chain, aiming to limit foreign access to the region.
[76]
[PDF] Anti-Access Strategies in the Pacific: The United States and China
Jan 25, 2018 · If the United States establishes an A2/AD posture in the first or second island chain, much of the US anti-access campaign will fall to the Army ...
[77]
China Island Tracker - Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative - CSIS
Since 2013, China has engaged in unprecedented dredging and artificial island-building in the Spratlys, creating 3,200 acres of new land, along with a ...
[78]
China has fully militarized three islands in South China Sea, US ...
Mar 21, 2022 · China has fully militarized at least three of several islands it built in the disputed South China Sea, arming them with anti-ship and anti- ...
[79]
Chinese Power Projection Capabilities in the South China Sea
China has substantially expanded its ability to monitor and project power throughout the South China Sea via the construction of dual civilian-military bases.
[80]
Sending two carrier groups through First Island Chain shows ...
Jun 12, 2025 · China's recent deployment of two aircraft carriers with escorts outside the First Island Chain represents a strategic step forward in Beijing's ability to ...
[81]
China's Quest for Strategic Space in the Pacific Islands
Jan 16, 2024 · 1. To counter encirclement by penetrating the first island chain. 2. To expand the PRC's strategic space beyond the second island chain by ...
[82]
China's anti-access area denial architecture is reshaping power in ...
Oct 17, 2025 · A durable A2/AD network across the first island chain and able to track targets beyond the second reshapes deterrence in the Indo-Pacific.
[83]
Cratering Effects: Chinese Missile Threats to US Air Bases in the ...
Dec 12, 2024 · This report finds that Chinese missiles attacks could close the runways and taxiways at US forward air bases in Japan, Guam, and other Pacific locations.<|control11|><|separator|>
[84]
[PDF] China's Evolving A2/AD Strategy from Defence to Coercion
Sustainment operations represent critical vulnerability under China's A2/AD architecture. Denial frameworks seek to exploit the extended logistics tails of ...
[85]
U.S. Navy aircraft carriers face a 'ride or die moment'
Nov 10, 2024 · Rapid Chinese advancements in anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) technology mean carriers now face significant vulnerabilities in the Taiwan Strait ...
[86]
Report to Congress on Chinese Naval Modernization - USNI News
May 1, 2025 · Observers believe China wants its navy to be capable of acting as part of an anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) force—a force that can deter U.S. ...Missing: projection | Show results with:projection
[87]
[PDF] China Naval Modernization: Implications for US Navy Capabilities ...
Jul 28, 2015 · China is building a modern and regionally powerful navy with a limited but growing capability for conducting operations beyond China's ...
[88]
[PDF] Challenges for the PLAN in the Western Pacific
The PLAN has enhanced its A2/AD capability up to the first island chain by introducing modern hardware such as the new YJ-18 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile ...Missing: modernization | Show results with:modernization
[89]
China's Evolving Counter Intervention Capabilities and Implications ...
Mar 21, 2024 · U.S. alliances in the Indo-Pacific represent a foundational strength for the United States, and a strategic advantage that China lacks.
[90]
Report on China Naval Modernization and Implications for the U.S. ...
Sep 6, 2019 · China's navy is viewed as posing a major challenge to the U.S. Navy's ability to achieve and maintain wartime control of blue-water ocean areas ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[91]
Challenges to Chinese blue-water operations - Defense Priorities
Apr 30, 2024 · Not only are Chinese forces blocked by the First Island Chain, but they are at a massive disadvantage to U.S. forces in terms of logistics and ...
[92]
Fueling the Mission: DLA Energy Okinawa keeps forces moving
Jul 2, 2025 · At U.S. military bases across Okinawa, every successful mission depends on one critical resource: fuel. Ensuring that steady supply is the ...
[93]
[PDF] Changes in U.S. Indo-Pacific Military Strategy and U.S. Bases in ...
U.S. Army Garrison Okinawa consists of Torii Station, Naha Military Port, and some smaller logistics and communications installations. Key units include the.
[94]
Japan Engineer District stands up new Okinawa DLA Facility
Mar 12, 2025 · Located on Kadena Air Base's Chibana Compound, this facility will soon serve as the new operations center for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA).
[95]
U.S., Philippines Add Four More Sites to EDCA Military Basing ...
Feb 2, 2023 · The United States and the Philippines have designated four additional bases for US troops to operate from as both countries agreed to accelerate the full ...
[96]
Philippines, U.S. Announce Locations of Four New EDCA Sites
Apr 3, 2023 · In addition to the five existing sites, these new locations will strengthen the interoperability of the U.S. and Philippine Armed Forces and ...
[97]
U.S.-PH Edca Sites is completing its LONGEST Military Runway and ...
Oct 14, 2025 · The Philippine government is completing the construction of the military runway in Balabac Island near the disputed West Philippine Sea.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
[98]
The Four Tyrannies of Logistical Deterrence - Stimson Center
Nov 8, 2023 · The four “tyrannies”— distance, water, time, and scale —complicate logistics, and when combined, undermine deterrence in the Indo-Pacific.
[99]
[PDF] Žs Plans for Contested Logistics Against China
Oct 21, 2024 · Additionally, the complex terrain of the first island chain poses challenges for moving among dispersed sites. For instance, the Philippines ...
[100]
Sustainment Challenges in the Indo-Pacific Theater | Article - Army.mil
Jul 18, 2024 · The US Indo-Pacific theater possesses many unique sustainment challenges as a maritime environment, including tyranny of distance, limited infrastructure, and ...
[101]
USMC/MOD Joint Statement - Commencement of Force Flow
Dec 14, 2024 · A small detachment of approximately 100 logistics support Marines from III Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF) has started to relocate from Okinawa to Guam.<|control11|><|separator|>
[102]
The PLA Navy's Evolving Posture Beyond the First Island Chain
Jul 31, 2025 · ... anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) operations against potential U.S. interventions. The deployment, which breached the First Island Chain ...
[103]
The Marine Corps' Radical Shift toward China - CSIS
Mar 25, 2020 · ” Thus, small Marine forces would deploy around the islands of the first island chain and the South China Sea, each element having the ...
[104]
China's Military in 10 Charts - CSIS
Sep 2, 2025 · CSIS explores the progress and challenges of China's military modernization ... first island chain is “modest but growing as it gains more ...Missing: viability | Show results with:viability
[105]
[PDF] Understanding and Countering China's Maritime Gray Zone ... - RAND
Nov 20, 2024 · In this review, we sought to map out Chinese gray zone tactics and strategies and highlight the threat that such efforts pose to U.S. joint ...
[106]
China's Evolving Risk Tolerance and Gray-Zone Operations
Sep 9, 2024 · China's multifaceted maritime actions follow a familiar trajectory of probing, cooption, coercion, and new status quo–setting behavior.
[107]
[PDF] Crisis Deterrence in the Taiwan Strait - DTIC
U.S. failure to respond vigorously to China's missile diplomacy sent the message to Beijing that the United States wouldn't get involved. That, at least, was ...<|separator|>
[108]
Target Taiwan: Challenges for a U.S. intervention - Defense Priorities
Because U.S. Navy surface forces, including aircraft carrier battle groups, are vulnerable to China's A2/AD systems, combat in a Taiwan scenario would likely be ...
[109]
Rethinking the Threat: Why China is Unlikely to Invade Taiwan
Sep 3, 2025 · Escalation Risk. China and the United States both have nuclear weapons. A confrontation over Taiwan risks nuclear escalation. Political Gamble.
[110]
The Risks of Rushing to Denial in the Taiwan Strait - CSIS
Mar 24, 2025 · The Taiwan Strait is the most likely place for U.S.-China competition to boil over into outright conflict. To avoid this, both nations have long ...<|separator|>
[111]
[PDF] Deterrence Failure in a Cross- Strait Conflict: The Role of Alliances ...
In order to better understand some of these fac- tors, three hypothetical scenarios of deterrence fail- ... Taiwanese defences are paralysed and the US fails to.
[112]
[PDF] Closing the Deterrence Gap in the Taiwan Strait - Air University
If deterrence fails, a full- scale conflict in Taiwan would include mass ... blockading the South China Sea, taking counter- space actions, and other.
[113]
[PDF] China's Evolving Risk Tolerance and Gray-Zone Operations
Sep 9, 2024 · China's actions since 2022 indicate it may be preparing for a new phase of grey-zone strategies in the South and Central Pacific. EAST CHINA SEA.
[114]
South Korea's Political Turmoil and Its Ripple Effects on U.S.–ROK ...
On December 3, 2024, at 10:27 p.m. Korea Standard Time (KST), South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol announced martial law in a televised address. He justified ...
[115]
What South Korea's presidential election means for the US-Korea ...
Jun 3, 2025 · On June 3, South Koreans elected Lee Jae-myung of the progressive Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) as their next president.
[116]
The U.S. Alliance with Seoul Could Go South
Sep 14, 2025 · 10). Unfortunately, an additional risk to the U.S.-ROK alliance now emanates from Seoul. President Lee Jae Myung, elected in June, comes from ...
[117]
South Korea's Response to U.S. Demands: Minimize Risk, Maximize ...
Oct 6, 2025 · South Korea has contended with changes under President Trump not by resisting, but by embracing them with a "let's make a deal" attitude, ...
[118]
Japan's Leadership Transition: Implications for Japan and the ...
Oct 1, 2025 · The LDP's electoral struggles threaten to damage the US-Japan alliance, which is essential to maintaining regional security and countering ...
[119]
U.S. Security Cooperation With Japan - State Department
Jan 20, 2025 · Decades of U.S. security cooperation served to bolster Japan's self-defense capabilities. Japan acquires more than 90 percent of its defense ...
[120]
Japan's Response to Trump 2.0: Sustaining U.S. Ties, Strengthening ...
Oct 6, 2025 · Close relations with Japan are crucial to the security and prosperity of the United States. Despite the challenges of the past nine months, ...
[121]
The US-Japan alliance – its past, present and unclear future
May 23, 2025 · As Trump's aggressive trade agenda collides with Japan's strategic anxieties, the future of East Asia's most vital relationship hangs in the balance.
[122]
Riding Unruly Waves: The Philippines' Military Modernisation Effort
Aug 12, 2025 · The U.S.-Philippine Alliance. 1. Mutual defence treaty. The central pillar of the U.S.-Philippines alliance is the 1951 mutual defence treaty.
[123]
Why Political Change in the Philippines May Mean Trouble for the U.S.
Aug 28, 2024 · If the Dutertes win next year, and Duterte-Carpio becomes President in 2028, continued support for the U.S. military presence is not assured.Missing: internal | Show results with:internal
[124]
Can the Philippines 'Trump-proof' its US alliance to deter China?
Sep 14, 2025 · A new report warns that the Philippines still lacks the tools to counter China without a dependable US defence partner.Missing: internal defense
[125]
Three Domestic Implications of Taiwan's 2024 Presidential and ...
Jan 24, 2024 · Last of all, Taiwan's divided government will prominently feature two main opposition parties interested in increasing engagement with Beijing.
[126]
Can the US and Taiwan advance a shared vision? | Brookings
May 12, 2025 · The combination of Taiwan's domestic political divisions and perceptions of American unreliability is creating fertile ground for China to ...
[127]
Trump has key allies in Asia guessing on trade and security - NPR
Mar 22, 2025 · A trade war that punishes US partners in the region threatens to weaken ties with Asian allies, possibly forcing them to reassess the reliability of US ...
[128]
US Indo-Pacific allies are unhappy about Trump's defence demands ...
Jul 14, 2025 · America's commitment to its Indo-Pacific allies now comes with higher costs, more demands, and inconsistent conditions. The administration is ...
[129]
China Is Watching the Political Disarray in Nations Along the First ...
Dec 11, 2024 · From China's perspective, the first island chain is a line of strategic containment near to its shore. China must break out of this island chain ...
[130]
Japan's governing coalition collapses - Le Monde
Oct 10, 2025 · But Komeito's decision to end the alliance that has governed Japan almost uninterrupted for 25 years sank Japan into a new political crisis.
[131]
Japan's Rising Political Instability Will Undermine Fiscal Discipline
Jul 22, 2025 · LDP-Komeito lost its upper house majority. PM Ishiba may stay for US tariff talks, but instability could prompt a leadership change.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
[132]
Japan Political stability - data, chart | TheGlobalEconomy.com
Japan: Political stability index (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong): The latest value from 2023 is 0.95 points, a decline from 1.03 points in 2022.
[133]
Philippine political crisis: Threats of assassination, military coup, and ...
Nov 27, 2024 · 27 November 2024. An immense crisis grips the Philippines—a political war between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and Vice President Sara Duterte ...<|separator|>
[134]
World Report 2025: Philippines | Human Rights Watch
With mid-term elections slated for 2025, political violence targeting local officials increased in the second half of 2024.
[135]
A Look at the 2025 Philippine Midterm Elections | Asia Society
Jun 26, 2025 · Upended expectations rippled through Philippine politics on May 12, 2025, when voters dealt a stunning blow to President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.Missing: instability | Show results with:instability
[136]
Political Stability in the Philippines and Its Impact on Foreign Direct ...
Oct 3, 2025 · - Philippines rated "medium risk" in 2025 ECGI, with political instability and corruption hindering FDI growth. - FDI plummeted 61.9% in early ...
[137]
Corruption, political jitters threaten Philippine economic momentum
Aug 14, 2025 · Political instability is another red flag. The public feud between Mr. Marcos and Vice President Sara Duterte, Leather said, has underscored the ...
[138]
Political Stability And Absence Of Violence/Terrorism: Percentile Rank
Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Percentile Rank in Philippines was reported at 23.7 % in 2023, according to the World Bank collection ...
[139]
Taiwan President Lai's three big challenges in 2025 | Brookings
Feb 12, 2025 · Taiwan President Lai Ching-te has three challenges: testy domestic politics; Chinese pressure; and international uncertainty.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
[140]
Taiwan Will Not Descend into Chaos, Leading to China's Takeover ...
Aug 11, 2025 · After Taiwan's Great Recall vote, the Financial Times explained to Western readers "Why Taiwanese fear China could take over from within."
[141]
Taiwan's Security Uncertainty and Response Strategy Under the ...
Jul 16, 2025 · This study analyzes Taiwan's strategic responses amid growing US–China tensions and increasing cross-Strait instability.
[142]
Indonesia's Natuna Islands China pact slammed as 'grave mistake ...
Nov 11, 2024 · Indonesia's recent agreement with China to jointly develop maritime resources near the Natuna Islands is being criticised as a “grave mistake”.
[143]
Prabowo's China challenge around the Natuna Islands - Lowy Institute
Oct 25, 2024 · News has broken in recent days about China's latest intrusion in Indonesian waters around the Natuna Islands, only to be confronted by vessels from the ...
[144]
Japan's ruling party is in crisis as dissatisfied voters swing to right ...
Oct 2, 2025 · Japan's ruling party is in trouble, and it knows it. The country is rife with political instability, having cycled through four prime ministers ...
[145]
[PDF] U.S. Denial Strategy against China and Operational Concepts in the ...
Aug 4, 2025 · The US denial strategy aims to deter aggression by preventing adversaries from achieving their goals, using distributed operations in contested ...<|separator|>
[146]
New EDCA Sites Named in the Philippines - War.gov
Apr 3, 2023 · The four new sites are Naval Base Camilo Osias in Santa Ana, Cagayan; Camp Melchor Dela Cruz in Gamu, Isabela; Balabac Island in Palawan; and ...
[147]
More Than Meets the Eye: Philippine Upgrades at EDCA Sites
Oct 12, 2023 · In 2016, five Philippine military installations were designated as EDCA sites: Basa Air Base in Pampanga, Fort Magsaysay in Nueva Ecija, Antonio ...
[148]
U.S. Defense Infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific - Congress.gov
Jun 6, 2023 · Summary. The Indo-Pacific occupies a central role in U.S. national strategy and hosts a large number of U.S. military forces.<|control11|><|separator|>
[149]
https://www.wsj.com/world/fortifying-americas-pacific-front-line-is-getting-expensive-and-difficult-8ea597b1
[150]
US investing in Guam to counter 'gray zone' activities - Taipei Times
Oct 17, 2025 · Developments on Guam include the new Camp Blaz marine base, a navy maintenance facility for submarines and upgrades to Anderson Air Force Base, ...