Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Exclusive economic zone

The exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is a maritime zone defined under Part V of the 1982 Convention on the (UNCLOS), extending seaward from a coastal state's territorial sea baseline up to a maximum of 200 nautical miles, wherein the coastal state holds sovereign rights for exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources, both living and non-living, in the , , and subsoil, as well as jurisdiction over marine scientific research and measures. This regime balances coastal state resource control with high seas freedoms for other nations, including , overflight, and laying of cables and pipelines, without prejudice to those rights. Adopted in and entering into force in , UNCLOS codified the EEZ concept that emerged from earlier negotiations to resolve tensions over offshore fisheries and resource claims, with 169 sovereign states and the having ratified it as of 2024, though notable non-parties like the recognize the EEZ as despite withholding ratification due to concerns over deep provisions and perceived limitations. EEZs collectively encompass over 90% of global marine and vast reserves, enabling coastal states to assert economic interests amid growing demand for seafood, oil, gas, and renewable ocean energy, while fostering obligations for to prevent overexploitation. Significant controversies arise from overlapping EEZ claims, particularly where continental shelves extend beyond 200 nautical miles or baselines are disputed, as in the , where China's expansive "" assertions conflict with EEZs claimed by , the , , , and , leading to militarized standoffs, resource competition, and a 2016 ruling—under UNCLOS auspices—that invalidated China's claims for exceeding treaty limits and harming environmental protections, a decision rejected. Similar tensions persist in the between , , and over resource-rich areas, and in the , where melting ice amplifies competing extended submissions, underscoring EEZ delimitation's role in geopolitical friction despite UNCLOS mechanisms for equitable boundary agreements. These disputes highlight causal realities of resource scarcity driving assertive national policies, often prioritizing empirical territorial evidence over multilateral concessions, with enforcement relying on naval capabilities rather than uniform treaty adherence.

Legal Framework

Core Definition and Sovereign Rights

The exclusive economic zone (EEZ) constitutes a maritime area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea, subject to a distinct legal regime under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), wherein the coastal state holds specified sovereign rights and jurisdictions while other states retain certain high seas freedoms. This zone extends seaward from the baselines used to measure the territorial sea, with a maximum breadth of 200 nautical miles. Unlike the territorial sea, where coastal states exercise full sovereignty akin to land territory, the EEZ establishes a functional regime of sovereign rights focused on resource management rather than comprehensive territorial control. In the EEZ, the coastal state possesses sovereign rights primarily for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources, encompassing both living (e.g., ) and non-living (e.g., minerals) resources in the , subsoil, and superjacent waters. These rights extend to associated economic activities, including the production of energy from water currents, winds, or other renewable sources within the zone. Additionally, the coastal state exercises over the establishment and use of artificial islands, installations, and structures; the conduct of marine scientific research; and measures for the protection and preservation of the marine environment. Such jurisdictions must be applied with due regard to the rights of other states, ensuring compatibility with UNCLOS provisions to balance economic interests against navigational freedoms. These sovereign rights are exercisable exclusively by the coastal state with respect to the relevant resources in the , subsoil, and waters, distinguishing the EEZ from the high seas beyond, where resource exploitation remains open to all states under the principle of . The regime underscores a causal prioritization of coastal state incentives for , as empirical data on and in unregulated areas historically informed the of these delimited rights to prevent commons tragedies. As of , over 160 states have declared EEZs covering approximately 36% of the global surface, reflecting widespread adoption of this framework for resource governance.

Delimitation and Boundary Principles

The outer limit of an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) extends up to 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured, as established in Article 57 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). These baselines typically follow the low-water line along the coast for normal circumstances under Article 5, but may employ straight baselines for deeply indented coastlines, fjords, or fringing islands under Article 7 to account for geographical realities that would otherwise fragment maritime claims. Archipelagic baselines apply to states qualifying as archipelagos per Article 47, ensuring coherent measurement from enclosing lines around island groups. Delimitation of EEZ boundaries between states with opposite or adjacent coasts is governed by Article 74 of UNCLOS, which mandates that such boundaries be effected by agreement, applying international law principles referenced in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to achieve an equitable solution. Absent agreement, states must make every effort to enter into provisional arrangements of a practical nature and refrain from actions that jeopardize or hamper reaching final delimitation, as per Article 74(3), preserving stability in overlapping claim areas. This framework prioritizes negotiation but defers methodological specifics to customary international law, often invoked through judicial proceedings. In practice, international courts and tribunals, including the ICJ, apply a methodology derived from to ensure equity, typically involving a three-stage process: drawing a provisional equidistance or median line based on , adjusting it for relevant circumstances such as coastline configuration, island presence, or resource concentrations, and verifying the result does not lead to disproportionate outcomes relative to coastal lengths. This approach, refined in cases like the Continental Shelf (1969) and / (1985), extends to EEZ delimitations, emphasizing objective criteria over subjective equity to mitigate , though the absence of a rigid formula in UNCLOS sustains disputes where geographical disparities challenge equidistance. Single maritime boundaries often delimit both EEZ and concurrently when claims overlap, streamlining enforcement under Articles 74 and 83. Challenges arise from the equitable solution's interpretive flexibility, prompting over 20 delimitation disputes submitted to the ICJ or since UNCLOS in 1994, with outcomes varying by case-specific factors like concavity in coastlines or historic rights claims. States frequently resort to bilateral treaties for precise boundaries, as seen in over 300 maritime agreements registered with the by 2023, reflecting pragmatic adherence to UNCLOS principles amid geopolitical tensions.

Integration with Territorial Sea and Continental Shelf

The exclusive economic zone adjoins the territorial sea and extends seaward from its outer limit, measured from the same baselines used to determine the breadth of the territorial sea, which is normally up to 12 nautical miles. Unlike the territorial sea, where the coastal state exercises complete sovereignty over the sea surface, , subsoil, and superjacent —subject only to the right of for foreign vessels—the EEZ regime grants the coastal state sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources in the , , and subsoil, as well as over marine scientific research and . Other states retain high seas freedoms of navigation and overflight in the EEZ, alongside the laying of cables and pipelines, ensuring the EEZ does not infringe on these navigational rights beyond the territorial sea's restrictions. The continental shelf, defined as the seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas adjacent to the territorial sea throughout the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin or a distance of 200 nautical miles where the margin does not extend that far, integrates with the EEZ in overlapping zones up to 200 nautical miles from the . Within this overlap, the coastal state's sovereign rights over the continental shelf—existing and for exploration and exploitation of its natural resources—are exercised concurrently with and subsumed under the broader EEZ , which encompasses both the and resources. Article 78 of UNCLOS specifies that shelf rights do not affect the legal status of the superjacent waters or , preserving the EEZ's distinct for the while allowing unified management of resources within 200 nautical miles. Beyond 200 nautical miles, where a coastal state submits geological and geomorphological evidence to the Commission on the Limits of the for an extended shelf under Article 76—potentially reaching up to 350 nautical miles or more—the integration diverges: shelf rights apply solely to the and subsoil, independent of any EEZ, while the overlying reverts to high seas status, open to all states for and absent an adjacent EEZ claim. Delimitation between states for the territorial sea follows a or equidistance line unless otherwise agreed (Article 15), whereas EEZ and continental shelf boundaries require agreement or equitable principles (Articles 74 and 83), often leading to provisional arrangements in overlapping claims to avoid prejudicing final outcomes. This framework ensures compatibility, with the EEZ enhancing but not supplanting territorial sea sovereignty or extending shelf rights into the .

Historical Development

Early Maritime Zone Concepts

The concept of maritime zones originated in , where coastal states asserted over adjacent waters primarily for defense, limited to the range of shore-based , approximately 3 nautical miles (nm). This "cannon-shot rule," articulated in Dutch jurist Cornelius van Bynkershoek's 1702 treatise De dominio maris, reflected practical control rather than abstract territorial extension, with high seas beyond remaining open to free under Hugo Grotius's 1609 doctrine of . Empirical observations of naval capabilities drove this limit, as states lacked the means to enforce broader claims amid prevailing freedoms of and fishing. Post-World War II resource nationalism marked a pivotal shift, as technological advances in offshore extraction highlighted untapped seabed minerals and fisheries. On September 28, 1945, U.S. President issued Proclamation 2667, asserting U.S. and control over the natural resources of the subsoil and of the continental shelf contiguous to its coasts but beneath the high seas, prioritizing conservation and development of these fixed assets without interfering with high seas navigation. This unilateral claim, motivated by emerging oil drilling technologies and geological surveys confirming shelf continuity, departed from traditional high seas freedoms by linking landmass adjacency to resource rights, influencing subsequent international practice. A companion policy on fisheries conservation zones further extended U.S. regulatory authority over migratory to prevent depletion, underscoring causal links between and technological expansion. Latin American states amplified these ideas amid regional overfishing concerns, culminating in the Santiago Declaration of August 18, 1952, where , , and proclaimed a 200 nm maritime of over the , , and subsoil adjacent to their coasts for and purposes. Driven by empirical on industrial incursions depleting and stocks, the declaration rejected distant-water fishing by non-coastal states, applying the to island coasts and prioritizing national economic needs over unrestricted high seas access. This broader claim, exceeding continental shelf geology, prefigured resource-focused jurisdictions by integrating with territorial assertions, though it faced opposition from traditional maritime powers for encroaching on navigational freedoms. The 1958 partially codified shelf rights—defining the continental shelf as adjacent to coasts up to 200 meters depth or exploitable resources—and introduced a contiguous up to 12 nm for and , but failed to resolve territorial breadth, highlighting persistent tensions between coastal resource claims and principles.

UNCLOS Negotiations and Adoption

The negotiations leading to the adoption of the Convention on the (UNCLOS), which formalized the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), were precipitated by Maltese Ambassador Pardo's address to the UN on November 1, 1967, advocating an international regime for resources beyond national as the "common heritage of mankind." This initiative prompted the establishment of the UN Seabed Committee in December 1967, which conducted preparatory work until 1973, synthesizing views on maritime zones including early proposals for expanded coastal state over fisheries and resources. By 1970, UN 2750 (XXV) resolved to convene the Third UN Conference on the (UNCLOS III), building on prior conferences in 1958 and 1960 that had failed to resolve disputes over continental shelves and fishery limits. The EEZ concept drew from unilateral declarations, such as the U.S. Proclamation of September 28, 1945, asserting over the continental shelf, and Latin American claims like the 200-nautical-mile zones proclaimed by on June 23, 1947, and on August 1, 1947, which evolved into collective statements such as the Declaration of August 18, 1952. UNCLOS III commenced with its first session from December 3 to 15, 1973, in , involving 160 states and employing consensus-based methods through informal consultations rather than traditional voting to forge a "package deal." The Second Committee addressed the EEZ, where debates pitted coastal states seeking sovereign resource against maritime powers emphasizing navigation freedoms; key proposals included Kenya's 1972 draft articles to the Seabed Committee advocating a 200-nautical-mile EEZ, supported by African declarations like in June 1972 and on July 2, 1973. Informal groups, such as the Evensen Group chaired by Norwegian diplomat Jens Evensen, facilitated compromises reflected in the 1974 "Main Trends" document identifying territorialist, preferentialist, and zonist approaches, leading to the Single Negotiating Text (SNT) in 1975 that outlined the EEZ as a hybrid granting coastal states for and of resources while preserving high seas freedoms for other states subject to "due regard." Subsequent sessions in (1974), (1975), and refined these provisions amid tensions over the breadth of jurisdiction, with the developing nations pushing for expansive coastal control as part of a . The convention, incorporating the EEZ in Part V (Articles 55–75), was adopted on April 30, 1982, at the eleventh session in by a recorded vote of 130 in favor, with four against and 17 abstentions, marking the culmination of nine years of negotiations. It was opened for signature on December 10, 1982, in , , by 117 states and other entities, requiring 60 ratifications for , which occurred on November 16, 1994. The EEZ provisions represented a pragmatic balance, accommodating over 70 coastal states that had already declared 200-nautical-mile zones by the mid-1980s, while including safeguards like rights for land-locked states (Articles 69–70) and dispute settlement mechanisms (Article 297).

Ratification, Amendments, and Evolving Interpretations

The Convention on the (UNCLOS) was opened for signature on December 10, 1982, following its adoption at the Third Conference on the , and entered into force on November 16, 1994, after became the 60th state to ratify it, meeting the threshold required by Article 308. As of January 2025, UNCLOS counts 170 parties, encompassing 167 UN member states, the , , and the as a regional . Notable non-parties include the , which signed the convention in 1982 but has withheld ratification due to objections primarily over deep provisions in Part XI; nonetheless, the U.S. adheres to the EEZ concept as reflective of , having proclaimed its own 200-nautical-mile EEZ in 1983. acceded on September 20, 2025, further expanding adherence. UNCLOS has never been formally amended under the procedures outlined in Part XVII, which require proposals by states parties, adoption by two-thirds majority at a conference, and ratification by the specified threshold of parties for entry into force. The 1994 Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of UNCLOS, adopted to resolve disputes over seabed mining in international waters, effectively modified the original deep seabed regime by introducing profit-sharing adjustments and institutional reforms via interpretive resolutions rather than textual changes to the convention itself; this agreement does not directly impact EEZ provisions in Part V but has facilitated broader acceptance of UNCLOS. Subsequent instruments, such as the 2023 Agreement on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ), function as implementation agreements under UNCLOS Articles 312 and 314 but address high seas and the Area beyond EEZs, leaving the core EEZ framework unaltered. Interpretations of the EEZ regime have evolved through state practice, bilateral agreements, and adjudication by bodies like the (ICJ), International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), and arbitral tribunals, refining concepts such as boundary delimitation and jurisdictional balances without formal treaty changes. Tribunals have standardized a three-stage delimitation for overlapping EEZs and continental shelves: establishing a provisional equidistance/relevant circumstances line from coastlines, adjusting it for equitable factors like concavity or islands, and checking for disproportionality in coastal lengths versus allocated areas. Landmark rulings include the ICJ's case (Romania v. , 2009), which applied this approach to adjust for Ukraine's Serpents' Island without granting it full effect as a significant feature; ITLOS's case ( v. , 2012), emphasizing angle bisectors in complex geometries; and the ICJ's v. judgment (2021), rejecting unilateral agreements and prioritizing equidistance despite historical conduct. Further evolution addresses residual high seas freedoms in EEZs, such as navigation and overflight, while upholding coastal states' sovereign rights over resources; the 2016 (Philippines v. ) clarified that UNCLOS EEZ entitlements supersede vague historic rights, invalidating 's nine-dash line claims within the ' EEZ. Emerging challenges include sea-level rise potentially eroding fixed baselines under Article 5, prompting debates on whether baselines or equitable reapportionments should apply, though no exists and tribunals have deferred to state practice over reinterpretation. These developments underscore the EEZ's status as binding even non-parties, with tribunals drawing on UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83 for equitable solutions amid resource pressures.

Rights, Obligations, and Jurisdictions

Resource Exploitation and Economic Activities

In the exclusive economic zone, coastal states exercise sovereign rights for exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources, encompassing both living organisms in the and non-living resources in the and subsoil, as well as over associated economic activities such as from , currents, and winds. These rights enable exclusive control over resource extraction without infringing on high seas freedoms like and overflight enjoyed by other states. Coastal states must ensure exploitation aligns with conservation duties to prevent overexploitation, though enforcement varies by national capacity and international agreements. Living resources, primarily fisheries, represent the dominant form of in EEZs, where coastal states determine total allowable catches, vessels, and implement management measures to sustain stocks. Over 95% of global fish catch occurs within EEZs, underscoring their centrality to worldwide production valued at tens of billions annually. For instance, nations like and leverage EEZ fisheries for substantial export revenues, with 's sector generating approximately $12 billion in 2023 from , , and other species managed through quotas and vessel tracking. , including offshore , has expanded as a complementary activity, particularly in EEZs of and , contributing to global production exceeding 50 million tons in 2022. Non-living resources focus on hydrocarbons and minerals, with and gas extraction forming a cornerstone of EEZ economies in regions like the and . Approximately 30% of global production derives from fields, the majority situated within EEZs on shelves, yielding daily outputs equivalent to 28 million barrels as of recent estimates and supporting for producer s. minerals, such as sands, gravels, and potentially polymetallics on extended shelves, see limited but growing ; for example, the U.S. Atlantic EEZ holds untapped potential in heavy sands used for . These activities require coastal for installations and pipelines, balancing revenue—often billions in leases and royalties—with environmental safeguards. Emerging economic activities include development, such as offshore wind farms, which utilize EEZ for installations and grid connections. By , global offshore wind capacity reached over 50 gigawatts, predominantly in EEZs of European states like the and , where projects generate revenue through power sales and contribute to decarbonization goals. Other pursuits, like marine biotechnology and cable laying for , fall under coastal state regulatory oversight, though disputes arise when activities encroach on navigational freedoms. Overall, EEZ exploitation drives ocean economies valued in trillions, with fisheries and hydrocarbons alone accounting for significant GDP shares in coastal nations, though hinges on effective amid overlapping claims.

Environmental Protection and Conservation Duties

Coastal states exercise jurisdiction in their exclusive economic zones (EEZs) for the protection and preservation of the marine environment, as established under Article 56(1)(b) of the Convention on the (UNCLOS). This jurisdiction encompasses measures to prevent , conserve living resources, and mitigate environmental harm from resource exploitation activities, such as , hydrocarbon extraction, and . These duties integrate with broader UNCLOS obligations in Part XII, requiring states to protect and preserve the marine environment while exercising sovereign rights to exploit resources. For living resources, coastal states must determine allowable catches based on the best scientific evidence available and implement conservation measures to prevent over-exploitation and ensure stocks are maintained at levels supporting maximum sustainable yield, as per Article 61. This includes promoting optimal utilization of resources while cooperating with other states on transboundary stocks, such as highly migratory species under Article 64, to avoid depletion. Failure to adhere to these evidence-based standards has led to documented overfishing incidents; for instance, in the northwest Atlantic, cod stocks in Canada's EEZ collapsed in the early 1990s due to inadequate conservation despite scientific warnings of unsustainable harvests exceeding 800,000 metric tons annually by 1980. Broader environmental preservation duties mandate coastal states to prevent, reduce, and control from land-based sources, activities, and vessels within the EEZ, pursuant to 194. States must adopt laws and regulations for from activities connected to and , ensuring minimal harm to ecosystems, as outlined in 208. These obligations apply without prejudice to the right to exploit resources, but activities must align with environmental policies that prioritize preservation, per 193. In practice, this has prompted measures like the establishment of marine protected areas within EEZs; , for example, designated over 10% of its EEZ as protected in 2006 to safeguard amid oil pressures. Coastal states must also exercise due regard for the of other states in the EEZ, balancing environmental duties with freedoms like and overflight, as required by Article 56(2). Enforcement mechanisms include inspections and sanctions against vessels dumping waste or emitting pollutants, though over foreign vessels in the EEZ is more limited than in territorial seas, focusing on immediate threats under Article 220. Non-compliance can result in international liability for environmental damage, reinforcing the causal link between unchecked and degradation, as evidenced by persistent coral reef losses in Southeast Asian EEZs from and chemical runoff tied to coastal development since the .

Marine Scientific Research and Technology Transfer

Coastal states exercise jurisdiction over marine scientific (MSR) conducted within their exclusive economic zones (EEZs), granting them the authority to regulate, authorize, and conduct such activities in accordance with Article 246 of the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This provision establishes that MSR in the EEZ requires the express consent of the coastal state, subject to conditions it may impose, reflecting the balance between resource and scientific cooperation. Consent must not be unreasonably delayed or withheld for projects undertaken by other states or competent organizations, provided the research is peaceful, does not interfere with the coastal state's or obligations, shares results with the coastal state, respects its decisions on resource release for commercial purposes, and avoids data interference—criteria outlined in Article 246(3). For resource-related or applied research, or if conducted by vessels, coastal states retain broader discretion to withhold consent, enabling protection of economic interests such as fisheries or . The consent regime under Article 246 applies distinctly to the EEZ and beyond , distinguishing MSR from hydrographic surveys or , which fall outside this framework and align more closely with freedoms of . Sponsoring states bear obligations to ensure compliance, including providing advance details on objectives, vessels, and personnel, as per Article 248, while coastal states may participate or receive training under Article 249 conditions. In practice, this has led to varied implementation; for instance, developing coastal states, particularly (SIDS), frequently impose stringent requirements to build local capacity, though empirical reviews indicate inconsistent application, with some denials attributed to capacity limitations rather than unreasonable motives. Violations, such as unauthorized research, may trigger or termination under Article 253, underscoring enforcement challenges in overlapping or disputed EEZs. UNCLOS Part XIV complements MSR provisions by mandating the promotion of marine technology development and transfer, particularly to developing states, to enhance participation in EEZ-related activities. Article 266 requires states to cooperate in creating favorable economic and legal conditions for equitable technology transfer on fair and reasonable commercial terms, without mandating compulsory gratis provision, while prioritizing access for land-locked and geographically disadvantaged states. In the EEZ context, coastal states may integrate technology transfer into MSR consent conditions, such as requiring training of local personnel or sharing equipment, as facilitated by Article 251's general cooperation imperative and sector-specific duties like fisheries access under Article 62(j). Implementation remains aspirational; assessments highlight limited tangible transfers, with obligations often fulfilled through bilateral agreements or international programs rather than systematic EEZ enforcement, reflecting causal barriers like intellectual property protections and commercial incentives over multilateral compulsion. Despite these gaps, the framework has supported capacity-building in regions like the Caribbean SIDS, where MSR approvals increasingly condition tech dissemination to align with sustainable resource management.

Geographical and Technical Aspects

Baselines, Breadth, and Measurement

The baselines for measuring the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) are identical to those used for determining the breadth of the territorial sea, ensuring consistency in maritime zone delineation. Under normal circumstances, these follow the low-water line of the coast, as charted on official maps recognized by the coastal State, excluding any internal bays or harbors unless enclosed by straight closing lines. This ambulatory baseline adjusts with , accretion, or sea-level changes, reflecting the dynamic nature of shorelines. For States featuring deeply indented coastlines, fjords, or chains of fringing islands close to the shore, straight s may substitute the normal , connecting appropriate points along the coast to approximate the general direction of the seaboard. Such baselines must not deviate appreciably from the coast's overall trend, must generate areas of water on the landward side suitable for economic use by local populations, and should enclose bays or mouths of rivers only where justified by geographical realities. Archipelagic States, in turn, apply archipelagic linking the outermost points of their outermost islands and drying reefs, provided the water-to-land ratio within the falls between 1:1 and 9:1. These provisions prevent artificial extension of zones through excessive baseline manipulation, though disputes arise when States interpret "deeply indented" or "fringing" expansively, as seen in international rulings emphasizing objective geographical criteria. The EEZ's maximum breadth is 200 nautical miles, measured seaward from the baselines, beyond which high seas freedoms apply unless continental shelf rights extend further. This limit, codified in UNCLOS Article 57, balances coastal resource with navigational rights of other States. Where adjacent or opposite States' potential zones overlap, provisional equidistance lines serve as starting points for delimitation, adjustable for equitable factors like coastline length or resource distribution, but the 200-nautical-mile cap remains absolute. Measurement employs standard , with distances calculated perpendicular to baselines or along great-circle paths, using coordinates from official nautical charts. The , the unit specified throughout UNCLOS, equals exactly 1,852 meters, derived from the Earth's mean latitude and formalized by international agreement in and reaffirmed in 1954. Coordinates for EEZ outer limits must be deposited with the UN Secretary-General, employing the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) or equivalent datum to ensure precision and interoperability. This technical framework supports verifiable claims, mitigating disputes through empirical boundary data.

Overlapping Claims and Equitable Principles

Overlapping exclusive economic zones occur when the 200-nautical-mile entitlements of coastal states with adjacent or opposite coastlines intersect, necessitating delimitation to allocate resource rights without prejudice to territorial sovereignty. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) addresses this in Article 74(1), mandating that such delimitations "shall be effected by agreement on the basis of international law, as referred to in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in order to achieve an equitable solution." Article 83(1) imposes an identical obligation for overlapping continental shelf claims, reflecting a unified approach to maritime boundary resolution beyond territorial seas. The equitable solution principle, originating from the 1969 North Sea Continental Shelf cases, prioritizes objective criteria over strict geometric divisions like equidistance lines, adjusting for relevant circumstances such as coastline length, concavity, baselines, islands, and distribution to prevent disproportionate outcomes. International courts and tribunals, including the (ICJ), have refined this into a three-stage : first, constructing a provisional equidistance/ line from relevant coastal points; second, evaluating and adjusting for relevant circumstances to ensure fairness; and third, verifying that the result does not yield disproportionate or area allocation relative to coastal frontages. This process, applied in cases like the 2021 Somalia v. judgment, rejects automatic equidistance in favor of customized equity, as rigid application could disadvantage states with irregular geographies. Pending final delimitation, Articles 74(3) and 83(3) require states to "make every effort to enter into provisional arrangements of a practical nature" and refrain from actions that jeopardize or hamper reaching an , promoting stability in disputed areas. These obligations, interpreted by bodies like the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, prohibit unilateral resource exploitation or infrastructure development that prejudices the eventual boundary, though they permit activities not altering the , such as exploratory surveys with notification. Failure to comply can escalate tensions, as evidenced in provisional measures orders emphasizing mutual restraint. Equitable principles thus balance sovereign resource interests with cooperative imperatives, grounded in rather than subjective equity.

Extended Continental Shelf Delineations

The extended continental shelf refers to the portion of a coastal state's continental shelf extending beyond 200 nautical miles from its baselines, where the shelf qualifies under geological and geomorphological criteria as the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin. Article 76 of the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) establishes the legal framework, defining the continental shelf as comprising the seabed and subsoil of submarine areas adjacent to the coast but outside . This provision allows qualifying states sovereign rights over non-living resources and sedentary species, distinct from the water column rights in the exclusive economic zone. Delineation of the outer limits requires application of specific tests outlined in Article 76, paragraphs 4 through 7. The primary criterion identifies the foot of the continental slope using either a line along its deepest points or the point of maximum change in , followed by extensions such as 60 nautical miles seaward or application of the sediment thickness (a line where thickness is at least 1% of the shortest distance from the foot). No outer limit point may exceed 350 nautical miles from the territorial sea baselines or 100 nautical miles from the foot of the slope, whichever permits the greater extent while meeting natural prolongation requirements. Coastal states must support claims with bathymetric, seismic, and geological data demonstrating continuity of the continental margin. Coastal states submit scientific and technical data on proposed outer limits to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS), a body of 21 elected experts established under UNCLOS Article 76(8), for review and recommendations. Submissions must occur within 10 years of UNCLOS ratification, though deadlines have been extended multiple times by the states parties' meetings; as of September 2025, the CLCS has received over 80 submissions and issued recommendations on approximately 30, with processes involving subcommission reviews and potential revisions based on data adequacy. The CLCS does not delimit boundaries between states or resolve disputes but assesses scientific validity; coastal states establish final limits based on these non-binding recommendations, which then become final and binding internationally. Notable delineations include Russia's 2001 Arctic submission, the first to the CLCS, which received partial recommendations in 2009 prompting revisions, and Australia's 2004 claims in the and South Pacific, approved with modifications in 2008 extending up to 350 nautical miles in areas like the Lord Howe Rise. New Zealand's 2006 Kermadec and Plateau submission yielded recommendations in 2017 confirming extensions beyond 200 nautical miles based on and slope criteria. Non-UNCLOS parties, such as the , have delineated extended shelves unilaterally—announcing limits in December 2023 covering over 1 million square kilometers in the , Atlantic, Pacific, and —invoking Article 76 as without CLCS submission. These processes underscore reliance on empirical geophysical evidence, with CLCS guidelines emphasizing data quality to prevent unsubstantiated claims.

Economic and Resource Impacts

Fisheries Management and Harvesting

Under Articles 61 and 62 of the Convention on the (UNCLOS), coastal states hold sovereign rights to determine the total allowable catch of living resources in their exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and to implement conservation and management measures based on the best scientific evidence available, aiming to maintain or restore populations at levels yielding as qualified by relevant environmental and economic factors. These states must promote optimum utilization of fisheries resources, and if their capacity to harvest the allowable catch is insufficient, they are required to grant access to nationals of other states under determined conditions, such as licensing, joint ventures, or preferential terms favoring developing land-locked or geographically disadvantaged states. Non-coastal states retain high seas freedoms like but must comply with coastal state conservation measures and refrain from activities undermining EEZ management. Fisheries management within EEZs typically involves setting quotas, seasonal restrictions, gear limitations, and closed areas to prevent , with many states employing and observer programs for real-time data collection. In 2022, global capture fisheries production reached 92.3 million tonnes, with marine fisheries—predominantly occurring within or adjacent to EEZs—accounting for the vast majority, as high seas harvests represent only a fraction of total output due to the concentration of productive stocks in coastal zones. Access agreements often include economic payments or resource-sharing arrangements; for instance, distant-water fishing nations negotiate bilateral deals with coastal states to operate in their EEZs, contributing fees estimated in billions annually to host economies while bound by catch limits and reporting requirements. For straddling stocks—those spanning multiple EEZs or extending into the high seas—and highly migratory like , UNCLOS Articles 63 and 64 mandate , frequently channeled through regional organizations (RFMOs) that establish binding harvest controls, stock assessments, and compliance mechanisms. Examples include the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, which oversees tuna stocks across multiple EEZs and high seas, setting total allowable catches based on scientific advice to sustain yields amid pressures like climate-driven shifts projected to displace 37% of straddling stocks between EEZs and high seas by 2030. RFMOs enforce decisions via measures against non-members, though effectiveness varies due to inconsistent participation and capacity among members. Enforcement challenges persist, particularly from illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, which circumvents quotas and depletes , with global estimates indicating losses to economies and in tens of billions of dollars annually through undermined and revenue evasion. Coastal states may board, inspect, and arrest foreign vessels for fisheries violations under Article 73, but prompt release upon bond is required, limiting deterrence against repeat offenders from flag states with lax oversight. in EEZs has led to widespread stock declines, prompting measures like marine protected areas within zones to rebuild , though empirical data show recovery depends on strict quota adherence and reduced , as seen in cases where TAC reductions restored populations in managed demersal fisheries.

Non-Living Resources: Hydrocarbons and Minerals

Coastal states hold sovereign rights under the Convention on the (UNCLOS) to explore, exploit, conserve, and manage non-living resources in their exclusive economic zones (EEZs), encompassing hydrocarbons in the subsoil and minerals on or beneath the . These rights extend to the , , and subsoil up to 200 nautical miles from baselines, distinct from the high seas regime governed by the for areas beyond national jurisdiction. Non-living resources exclude living marine but include sedimentary deposits and energy-bearing formations critical to global energy and industrial supply chains. Hydrocarbons, primarily and , represent the most extensively exploited non-living resources in EEZs, underpinning a substantial portion of global production. operations, predominantly within EEZs, accounted for approximately 28% of worldwide crude output in forecasts for , with following similar patterns due to subsoil extraction technologies like rigs and subsea completions. Major fields illustrate this: Egypt's Zohr gas field, discovered in 2015 within its Mediterranean EEZ, holds estimated reserves of 30 trillion cubic feet (tcf), enabling production exceeding 2 billion cubic feet per day by 2019 and transforming regional energy dynamics. Similarly, Norway's EEZ fields, such as and Johan Sverdrup, contribute over 2 million barrels of equivalent per day, representing about 20% of Europe's gas supply as of 2023. In the , the U.S. EEZ yields around 14.6% of national crude and 2.3% of gas annually, with deepwater fields like Perdido holding reserves exceeding 1 billion barrels. These extractions drive economic revenues—Norway's EEZ hydrocarbons generated $100 billion in 2022 alone—but require balancing against environmental risks like spills, regulated nationally under UNCLOS obligations. Seabed minerals in EEZs, including sands, gravels, phosphorites, and polymetallic deposits, lag behind hydrocarbons in scale but hold potential for critical materials like , , and rare earths. Coastal states retain full jurisdiction over exploitation, unlike the shared regime in the international Area, enabling activities such as for construction aggregates or for heavy minerals. Examples include Namibia's diamond placers in its Atlantic EEZ, yielding 500,000 carats annually via mining vessels since the , and Japan's exploration of cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts in its Pacific EEZ, targeting deposits estimated at millions of tons for metals. At least 11 nations, including , , and , actively pursue subsea mineral development in their EEZs, often through national licensing to assess polymetallic nodules or sulfides viable for green technologies. However, exploitation remains limited by technological hurdles, high costs, and ecological concerns, with global output dominated by shallow-water aggregates rather than deep-sea ventures; U.S. EEZ assessments identify phosphorites and nodules but note minimal recovery to date. Emerging frameworks emphasize environmental baselines to mitigate impacts during extraction.

Emerging Sectors: Renewables and Seabed Mining

Under the Convention on the (UNCLOS), coastal states hold sovereign rights in their exclusive economic zones (EEZs) to explore and exploit energy resources derived from water, currents, and winds, facilitating the rapid expansion of offshore renewable energy installations. Global offshore wind capacity, predominantly situated within EEZs, reached 83 gigawatts () by the end of , with 8 newly connected to grids that year, marking a slowdown from prior growth but underscoring EEZs as primary deployment zones for fixed-bottom and floating turbines. leads with over 30 operational, including Germany's targets for 30 by 2030 and 70 by 2045, while China's contributions include 40 MW of floating wind in , reflecting technological advances enabling exploitation in deeper EEZ waters beyond traditional shallow sites. Other renewables, such as wave and tidal energy, remain nascent within EEZs but benefit from analogous UNCLOS provisions, with pilot projects demonstrating feasibility; for instance, advancements in floating offshore wind have expanded viable EEZ areas, projecting 100 GW more awards in 2025-2026 across Asia, Europe, and emerging markets like the United States. These developments prioritize EEZ jurisdiction to secure national energy independence, though they necessitate balancing with freedoms of navigation under UNCLOS Article 58. Seabed mining in EEZs, encompassing extraction of non-living resources like polymetallic nodules and sulfides from continental shelves within 200 nautical miles, falls under exclusive coastal state authority per UNCLOS Article 56, distinct from international seabed area regulations by the International Seabed Authority. Emerging projects target critical minerals essential for batteries and electronics, with explorations underway in EEZs of Papua New Guinea, Fiji, the Cook Islands, and Nauru, where domestic permits have been issued despite environmental risks to deep-sea ecosystems. Regulations vary by state, often incorporating environmental impact assessments and alignment with international standards to mitigate biodiversity loss, as seen in recent frameworks emphasizing precautionary approaches amid global demand for cobalt, nickel, and rare earths. Commercial viability hinges on technological maturity, with EEZ-based operations advancing faster than high-seas counterparts due to ; for example, U.S. policies under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act authorize exploration by citizens, though primary jurisdiction in EEZs resides with coastal states, prompting calls for streamlined permitting to harness untapped reserves estimated in billions of tons. Challenges include overlapping claims in contested EEZs and potential transboundary , underscoring the need for robust domestic enforcement to prevent irreversible damage from plumes and noise.

Geopolitical and Security Dimensions

Freedom of Navigation and Military Operations

Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Article 58 grants all states the freedoms of navigation and overflight in a coastal state's exclusive economic zone (EEZ), equivalent to those on the high seas as outlined in Article 87, subject to due regard for the coastal state's resource-related rights and compliance with applicable international law. These freedoms explicitly include passage by ships and aircraft without coastal state interference, provided activities do not infringe on the coastal state's sovereign rights to explore, exploit, conserve, and manage natural resources or its jurisdiction over marine scientific research and environmental protection. UNCLOS does not authorize coastal states to regulate or prohibit foreign navigation, overflight, or unrelated uses of the sea in the EEZ, distinguishing it from territorial seas where innocent passage applies with stricter limitations. Military operations, including , gathering, military surveys, and weapons exercises, fall within these navigational freedoms, as UNCLOS contains no provisions explicitly restricting such activities in EEZs beyond general "due regard" obligations. The maintains that foreign warships and enjoy full high seas freedoms in EEZs, rejecting claims requiring prior notification or approval for military transit, which it views as incompatible with UNCLOS. This position has been operationalized through the U.S. (FON) Program, established in 1979, which conducts operational assertions—typically by U.S. or vessels—to challenge excessive claims, including those imposing restrictions in EEZs; in 2020, the program addressed 28 such EEZ-related claims globally. For instance, on May 10, 2024, the USS Halsey (DDG-97) conducted a FON operation near the in the , asserting navigational rights within China's claimed EEZ without prior approval. Disputes arise from divergent interpretations, particularly where coastal states assert regulatory authority over military activities deemed threatening to security or incompatible with EEZ jurisdiction. , for example, requires foreign military vessels and aircraft to seek prior permission for operations in its EEZ, characterizing U.S. surveillance flights and FONOPs as violations of its rights and potential threats to peace, a stance rooted in domestic legislation like the 1992 Territorial Sea Law and subsequent practices. This has led to confrontations, such as Chinese interference with U.S. operations near its coast, which the U.S. defends as lawful under Article 58. Approximately 26 countries, including , , and , impose similar EEZ restrictions on military activities, often requiring authorization for exercises or maneuvers, claims the U.S. contests as exceeding UNCLOS limits. These tensions underscore a broader interpretive gap: while UNCLOS prioritizes navigational freedoms to prevent coastal state overreach into , some states prioritize security concerns, potentially eroding global maritime norms without binding .

Strategic Resource Control and National Interests

Exclusive economic zones enable coastal states to exercise sovereign rights over the exploration and exploitation of natural resources, including hydrocarbons, minerals, and living , thereby advancing national interests in , food supply stability, and economic . This control extends to regulating foreign activities within the zone to prevent unauthorized extraction, which could undermine domestic resource bases critical for long-term national resilience. For resource-dependent nations, EEZ directly supports strategic objectives by securing access to oil and gas reserves estimated to constitute significant portions of global undiscovered supplies, reducing reliance on imports and bolstering geopolitical leverage. In regions like the , EEZ delineations facilitate claims over deposits, with the area holding approximately 90 billion barrels of undiscovered —13% of the global total—and 30% of undiscovered , positioning states such as to treat these as strategic reserves for future energy needs amid fluctuating global markets. 's Arctic strategy emphasizes developing these resources to enhance and export capabilities, integrating EEZ control into broader infrastructure plans for seaport exports that minimize transit vulnerabilities. Similarly, in the , overlapping EEZ claims drive competition for and gas fields, where underexplored reserves near contested areas motivate assertive patrols to safeguard potential yields vital for claimant states' . Fisheries within EEZs represent a core element of , allowing states to manage stocks against overexploitation by foreign fleets, as seen in disputes where erodes sustainable harvests essential for domestic protein supplies. In the , rich fishing grounds underpin national interests for littoral states, with territorial assertions often framed as defenses against that could exacerbate shortages in densely populated regions. Effective EEZ thus aligns with causal imperatives of population sustenance, where unchecked access by distant-water fleets directly threatens caloric self-sufficiency. National interests extend to leveraging EEZ resources for broader strategic positioning, including economic competitiveness through regulated extraction that funds capabilities and technological advancement. In contested zones, this control incentivizes investments in and to deter encroachments, reflecting a realist of resource sovereignty over multilateral concessions that might dilute exclusive benefits. Such dynamics underscore how EEZ regimes, while promoting resource stewardship, amplify tensions when vital assets like seabed minerals or potentials intersect with competing sovereign claims.

Militarization Risks in Contested Zones

Overlapping exclusive economic zone (EEZ) claims heighten militarization risks by incentivizing states to deploy naval forces, conduct patrols, and construct fortifications to assert resource control and deter rivals, potentially leading to inadvertent escalation through miscalculation or aggressive posturing. In contested maritime areas, such activities challenge the UNCLOS framework, which permits military operations like and exercises in foreign EEZs provided they do not impair coastal state rights, yet persistent disputes erode mutual restraint. Empirical data from incident logs show a rise in dangerous encounters, including vessel collisions and laser targeting, which amplify the probability of kinetic conflict absent robust mechanisms. The exemplifies these risks, where construction of militarized artificial islands in the Spratly chain since 2013—equipped with airstrips, radar, missile systems, and naval facilities—has transformed disputed reefs into forward bases, enabling sustained air and sea dominance over overlapping EEZs claimed by the , , and others. Specific incidents underscore the volatility: on June 17, 2024, a vessel collided with a Philippine supply ship near , resulting in mutual blame and physical damage, while earlier 2023 events involved attacks and boarding attempts by coast guard units. These actions, often framed by as defensive, have prompted counter-deployments by the U.S. and allies, fostering an dynamic that threatens regional stability and global trade routes carrying over $3 trillion annually. Analysts attribute heightened tensions to rejection of the 2016 arbitral ruling invalidating its claims, which prioritizes territorial assertion over EEZ resource-sharing norms. In the , the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands dispute between and drives similar risks, with Beijing's 2013 establishment of an (ADIZ) overlapping Tokyo's EEZ prompting frequent incursions by Chinese patrol vessels and aircraft, logged at over 100 annual entries since 2012. 's bolstered defense posture, including missile deployments, responds to these gray-zone tactics, raising fears of aerial or naval clashes that could invoke U.S. treaty obligations under Article 5 of the 1960 security pact. Resource stakes, including reserves estimated at 100 million barrels of oil equivalent, fuel militarized fishing enforcement and seabed surveys, eroding diplomatic off-ramps. Arctic EEZ contests, particularly Russia's extended continental shelf claims overlapping those of Canada and Denmark, witness creeping militarization amid melting ice opening new shipping lanes and untapped oil/gas fields holding up to 13% of global undiscovered reserves. Moscow's post-2014 investments in 20 new airfields, 10 radar stations, and submarine capabilities signal intent to control the , while NATO's Cold Response exercises, involving troops in , counterbalance this without direct confrontation. Risks stem from dual-use infrastructure enabling rapid force projection, potentially spilling over from Ukraine-related tensions into inadvertent Arctic incidents. Mitigating these risks requires adherence to UNCLOS dispute resolution, bilateral hotlines, and transparency in military exercises, though enforcement gaps persist due to non-ratification by key actors like the U.S. and assertive interpretations by claimants. Failure to de-militarize contested zones could cascade into broader conflicts, undermining the EEZ regime's balance between sovereign rights and high seas freedoms.

Disputes and Resolutions

Major Unresolved Conflicts

The features overlapping EEZ claims among , the , , , , and , primarily centered on the and , where China's "" encompasses approximately 90% of the sea, conflicting with UNCLOS-based entitlements of neighboring states. In 2016, the ruled in favor of the , invalidating China's historical claims and affirming that features like generate only territorial seas, not EEZs, yet rejected the decision and continued island-building and militarization, leading to persistent incidents such as vessel collisions in 2025 near . Tensions escalated with gray-zone tactics, including use and ramming, amid estimated $3.3 trillion in annual trade passing through the area, heightening risks to navigation and resource access. In the , the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands dispute between and involves uninhabited islets administered by Japan since 1972, generating potential EEZs rich in fisheries and hydrocarbons, with overlapping claims extending to the median line boundary. asserts sovereignty based on historical use, rejecting Japan's incorporation as invalid under the 1951 San Francisco Treaty, while Japan maintains effective control and contests Chinese patrols and fishing incursions, which numbered over 300 vessels in recent years. No bilateral agreement exists, and unilateral resource development moratoriums have lapsed, exacerbating risks of escalation amid broader Sino-Japanese strategic rivalry. The hosts EEZ conflicts, notably between and , where challenges the full 200-nautical-mile zones from islands like , advocating equitable delimitation favoring mainland coastlines and signing a 2019 memorandum with that overlaps and claims. , supported by and others via a 2020 counter-agreement, insists on UNCLOS proportionality, leading to naval standoffs and seismic surveys in disputed blocks since 2019. Greece-Libya talks commenced in September 2025 to demarcate boundaries, but 's non-ratification of UNCLOS and rejection of third-party sustain impasse, complicating gas exploration in fields like and . These disputes underscore tensions between island-generated entitlements and primacy, with no comprehensive resolution framework in place.

Arbitrated and Resolved Cases

The arbitration between and , initiated by Barbados in 2004 under Annex VII of the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), addressed the delimitation of their overlapping exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and continental shelves in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast. The (PCA) tribunal, in its award of April 11, 2006, rejected Trinidad and Tobago's arguments for a based on historic fishing rights and acquiescence, instead applying a modified equidistance/relevant circumstances method under UNCLOS Article 74. It drew a boundary line starting from agreed territorial points, extending seaward with adjustments for the concavity of Barbados's coast, granting Barbados access to resources beyond the initial equidistance line. Both states accepted the binding award without reservation, facilitating subsequent bilateral cooperation on shared resources. In the Guyana-Suriname arbitration, commenced in 2004 under UNCLOS Annex VII, the resolved a dispute over the between and in the Atlantic Ocean, encompassing EEZ and claims amid interests. The 2007 award dismissed Suriname's contention of an established boundary through to a river-mouth closing line, instead establishing a provisional equidistance line from the coast, adjusted minimally for and resource equity. The also found Suriname liable for breaching UNCLOS obligations by using force against Guyanese vessels in 2000, ordering compensation. Both parties complied with the delimitation, enabling Guyana's subsequent offshore oil discoveries and joint development discussions. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) addressed the Bangladesh-Myanmar dispute in 2009 under UNCLOS Annex VII, focusing on delimitation of territorial seas, EEZs, and continental shelves in the northern , complicated by Bangladesh's concave coastline and sediment deposition. The 2012 judgment applied a three-stage methodology—provisional equidistance, adjustment for relevant circumstances like , and proportionality check—resulting in a single favoring Bangladesh's claims to the east due to coastal geography. accepted the ruling, which clarified overlapping entitlements and supported Bangladesh's subsequent continental shelf submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. A parallel PCA arbitration between and in 2014 under UNCLOS Annex VII delimited their boundary using similar equitable principles, adjusting the equidistance line for India's larger coastline; both states implemented the award, resolving long-standing tensions and enabling . The (ICJ) in the 1993 Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute ( v. Honduras; intervening) and related proceedings delimited maritime zones including EEZs in the , affirming a trilateral over certain waters while drawing EEZ boundaries based on equidistance and historic usage. and accepted the binding 1992 and 1993 judgments, which resolved overlapping claims despite initial sovereignty disputes, promoting cooperative . These cases demonstrate the efficacy of UNCLOS-mandated processes in achieving delimited EEZs when states submit to compulsory dispute settlement, contrasting with non-compliance scenarios elsewhere.

International Mechanisms and Enforcement Challenges

The primary international mechanism governing exclusive economic zones (EEZs) is the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), adopted on December 10, 1982, and entered into force on November 16, 1994, which establishes sovereign rights for coastal states over living and non-living resources in areas up to 200 nautical miles from their baselines in Part V (Articles 55–75). Under UNCLOS Article 56, coastal states bear primary responsibility for enforcement, including the adoption of laws and regulations for , , and of resources, as well as the conduct of marine scientific research, while ensuring due regard for the rights of other states, such as and overflight freedoms. Article 73 further authorizes coastal states to board, inspect, arrest, and prosecute foreign vessels violating EEZ regulations, with penalties limited to fines or vessel confiscation in most cases, though prompt release upon bond payment is required. Dispute settlement mechanisms for EEZ-related conflicts are outlined in UNCLOS Part XV, mandating peaceful resolution through , enquiry, , , or compulsory procedures entailing binding decisions, applicable to disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention unless parties . States parties may select forums such as the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), the (ICJ), or arbitration under Annex VII, with ITLOS serving as a default for prompt release cases under Article 292. ITLOS, established in 1996 and headquartered in , , holds jurisdiction over EEZ disputes involving resource rights, , and jurisdictional conflicts, as demonstrated in cases like the 2015 advisory opinion on flag state duties to prevent in the EEZ, which clarified obligations under Articles 58 and 94 for in monitoring vessels. Enforcement challenges persist due to the vast scale of EEZs—collectively spanning over 130 million square kilometers globally—and limited capabilities, particularly for developing coastal states lacking advanced vessels, monitoring, or aerial assets, enabling widespread illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) that accounts for up to 30% of global catches in some regions. Non-ratification by major powers, such as the , which recognizes EEZ rights customary under but rejects UNCLOS compulsory dispute settlement, undermines uniform application and creates enforcement asymmetries, as non-parties may disregard rulings without formal obligations. Opt-out declarations under Article 298, invoked by over 20 states including and for delimitations or military activities, further restrict compulsory jurisdiction, complicating resolution of overlapping EEZ claims. Additional hurdles include flag state primacy over vessels on the high seas transitioning into EEZs, where coastal enforcement relies on bilateral cooperation often hindered by differing national interests, and the absence of a centralized UNCLOS enforcement body, leaving compliance to voluntary reporting and ad hoc international fisheries organizations with limited binding authority. Geopolitical tensions exacerbate these issues, as powerful states may prioritize strategic interests over UNCLOS obligations, leading to de facto non-enforcement in contested areas, though empirical data from ITLOS proceedings indicate that binding decisions have occasionally prompted compliance, such as partial delimitations influencing bilateral negotiations. Capacity-building initiatives, like those under the UN for Affairs and the , aim to address technical gaps through training and technology transfers, but resource constraints and uneven implementation persist as core barriers to effective regime-wide enforcement.

Criticisms, Debates, and Reforms

Legal Vagueness and Compliance Issues

The Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) establishes the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) regime under Articles 55–75, granting coastal states sovereign rights over natural resources and certain jurisdictions while preserving high seas freedoms for other states, yet provisions contain notable ambiguities that complicate uniform application. For instance, UNCLOS remains silent on the legality of foreign military activities within another state's EEZ, lacking explicit definitions of permissible operations beyond general navigational freedoms, which has led to divergent interpretations by states asserting security-related restrictions. Similarly, Article 74's requirement for EEZ delimitation through "agreement...on the basis of ...to achieve an equitable solution" introduces vagueness, as "equitable" lacks precise criteria, fostering prolonged disputes over boundary lines where overlapping claims exist. These ambiguities extend to unattributed rights and jurisdictions in the EEZ, where state practice reveals inconsistencies in whether subjects like marine scientific research or fall under coastal control or remain open to other states' freedoms, with scholarly analyses highlighting unresolved tensions between resource exploitation duties and navigational . Overflight above artificial islands or installations in the EEZ further exemplify legal gaps, as UNCLOS does not clarify whether such activities infringe on coastal jurisdictions, permitting varied approaches that prioritize over treaty text. Compliance with EEZ provisions faces systemic enforcement challenges, as UNCLOS lacks a centralized compulsory mechanism, relying instead on coastal states' domestic implementation and optional dispute settlement under Annexes VI–VIII, which states may evade through non-ratification or rejection of rulings. Non-parties like the assert EEZ rights mirroring UNCLOS but highlight deviations by others, such as excessive claims to security jurisdiction or resource over-exploitation inconsistent with Articles 61–62 conservation obligations. State practice often deviates from EEZ norms, with documented instances of incorrect baselines extending EEZ limits beyond 200 nautical miles or unilateral assertions of control over living resources without equitable sharing, undermining the regime's balance between coastal sovereignty and global commons access. In contested areas, such as the , non-compliance manifests in interference with foreign fishing or exploration within recognized EEZs, as adjudicated in 2016 arbitral proceedings where China's actions violated ' rights under UNCLOS Articles 56 and 77, yet enforcement remains elusive absent multilateral pressure. Overall, these issues stem from UNCLOS's framework as a consensus-based without robust verification or sanctions, allowing powerful coastal states to exploit interpretive leeway, as evidenced by persistent excessive maritime claims cataloged in diplomatic digests since 1982, which erode predictability and incentivize over cooperative delimitation.

Environmental and Sustainability Critiques

Critiques of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) regime highlight how the allocation of resource to coastal states under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) can prioritize economic extraction over long-term health, effectively privatizing formerly open-access oceanic areas at the expense of environmental safeguards. This shift incentivizes rapid exploitation of fisheries, hydrocarbons, and seabed minerals within the 200-nautical-mile zones, often leading to without sufficient international oversight, as coastal states balance domestic economic pressures against mandates. A primary concern is , where EEZ jurisdiction enables coastal states to expand fleets and quotas beyond sustainable levels, exacerbating global stock declines; for instance, analyses of fisheries from 1950 to 2001 indicate substantial economic losses from overcapacity and within EEZs, particularly in regions like the North Atlantic. Approximately 40% of assessed and stocks in waters remain overfished as of 2024, driven by habitat degradation and within EEZs, which disrupt food webs and reduce resilience to stressors like variability. While EEZs reduce unauthorized foreign incursions—showing an 81% drop in illegal fishing just inside boundaries compared to outside—their establishment has not universally curbed domestic overharvesting, as evidenced by persistent transboundary exploitation affecting 67.5% of analyzed marine taxa across EEZ borders. Resource extraction activities, including offshore oil drilling and emerging , pose additional risks through and ; oil spills and discharges from platforms can render fisheries unusable and alter marine food chains, with transboundary effects documented in EEZ operations. Deep-sea mining in national EEZs circumvents stricter regulations applicable to , potentially fragmenting environmental standards and threatening fragile benthic ecosystems, as seen in exploratory activities off small island states where sediment plumes could smother biodiversity hotspots. UNCLOS mandates , yet coastal states' limited enforcement over foreign vessels and scientific often results in inadequate monitoring, amplifying cumulative impacts like on EEZ-dependent species. Broader sustainability challenges include marine biodiversity erosion, where intensified EEZ harvesting impairs ecosystem services such as and ; studies project that ongoing losses could halve the ocean's capacity for these functions by impairing species interactions. Critics argue this reflects a causal mismatch: national incentives favor immediate rents over , with weaker institutional enforcement in developing coastal states compounding vulnerabilities to climate-driven shifts in fish distributions across EEZs. Reforms proposed include enhanced transboundary cooperation and binding metrics, though implementation lags due to assertions.

Sovereignty Expansion vs. Global Commons Erosion

The establishment of exclusive economic zones (EEZs) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which entered into force on November 16, 1994, extended coastal states' sovereign rights beyond the traditional 12-nautical-mile territorial sea to a 200-nautical-mile maritime zone for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources, including fisheries, hydrocarbons, and seabed minerals. This regime, codified in Part V of UNCLOS, represents a significant expansion of national jurisdiction over marine areas previously treated as high seas commons, where freedom of fishing and navigation applied without restriction to any state. By 2023, over 140 coastal states had declared EEZs, collectively encompassing zones that contain approximately 90% of global fisheries production and 87% of known offshore hydrocarbon reserves. Proponents of EEZ expansion argue that it enhances national sovereignty by assigning clear responsibility for resource stewardship, mitigating the "tragedy of the commons" associated with unregulated open-access exploitation on the high seas. For developing coastal nations, EEZs have facilitated through secured access to offshore oil and gas—such as Nigeria's EEZ contributions to its GDP via fields like , operational since 2005—and , reducing distant-water fishing fleet overharvesting that plagued pre-UNCLOS eras. This jurisdictional extension also bolsters , enabling states to enforce monitoring against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, which accounted for an estimated 11-26% of global catches in the early before EEZ enforcement intensified. Empirical data indicate that EEZ implementation has correlated with localized improvements in stock sustainability, as seen in Iceland's post-1970s EEZ declaration, which rebuilt through quota systems. Conversely, the EEZ framework has eroded the conceptual and practical extent of global ocean commons, transforming roughly 36% of the world's ocean surface—previously high seas—from areas of shared access to zones of predominantly national control, leaving only about 64% as true high seas beyond national jurisdiction. This "territorialization" encloses migratory species and transboundary resources within bilateral or unilateral management, often exacerbating disputes rather than fostering collective governance, as evidenced by overlapping claims in the covering 3.5 million square kilometers. Critics contend that while freedoms persist under UNCLOS Article 58, the resource exclusivity incentivizes enclosure-like behaviors, potentially undermining incentives for international cooperation on shared challenges like climate-driven migration of or deep-sea preservation. For instance, the of EEZ-adjacent areas has shifted risks from global to national scales, with some states failing to enforce sustainable limits, as in the case of overfished stocks in Argentina's EEZ hake , depleted by 90% since the 1990s due to inadequate quotas. This dynamic has prompted calls for reforms, such as expanded high seas marine protected areas under the 2023 , to counteract the progressive nationalization of oceanic domains.

Transboundary and Cooperative Frameworks

Shared Stocks and Joint Management

Under Article 63(1) of the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), coastal states whose exclusive economic zones (EEZs) contain the same or associated species of are required to seek, directly or through subregional or regional organizations, agreements to coordinate and management measures. This obligation recognizes the migratory or distributed nature of transboundary , which can span adjacent EEZs and risk without harmonized quotas, fishing effort limits, and scientific assessments. The provision emphasizes cooperation without mandating specific outcomes, allowing flexibility in bilateral or multilateral arrangements while prioritizing over unilateral claims. Successful joint management often involves joint scientific committees for stock assessments and annual quota negotiations based on total allowable catches (TACs). For instance, in the , and have managed shared (Gadus morhua) and (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) stocks since the 1975 , which established the Joint Norwegian-Russian Fisheries Commission to allocate quotas proportionally to stock distribution and estimates. This has sustained yields, with the 2025 cod TAC set at 566,784 tonnes—20% below 2022 levels to account for declining —demonstrating resilience amid geopolitical strains like Russia's 2022 invasion of . Joint research surveys since the 1970s underpin these decisions, reducing uncertainty in recruitment and environmental impacts. In the North Sea, the 1980 EU-Norway Fisheries Agreement facilitates joint management of shared stocks such as herring (Clupea harengus) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus), with annual consultations determining TACs and quota exchanges. The agreement integrates EU member states' fleets with Norway's, covering overlaps in EEZs and ensuring reciprocal access while aligning on ecosystem-based approaches. Similar bilateral frameworks exist elsewhere, including the 1989 Agreement between Denmark (for Greenland), Iceland, and Norway on capelin (Mallotus villosus) stocks in waters between Greenland, Iceland, and Jan Mayen, which sets harvest controls based on shared acoustic surveys.
AgreementPartiesKey Stocks ManagedEstablishment YearKey Features
Barents Sea Framework, , 1975Joint ; proportional quotas; annual TACs from shared science
North Sea FisheriesEU, , , others1980TAC negotiations; quota swaps; reciprocal access
Capelin Stocks/, , 1989Harvest shares; joint surveys for
These arrangements highlight how empirical data on stock dynamics drives allocations, often achieving where unilateral would fail due to spillover effects. However, implementation relies on verifiable compliance monitoring, as non-binding elements in UNCLOS can lead to disputes if cooperation falters.

Bilateral and Multilateral Agreements

Bilateral agreements form the cornerstone of EEZ delimitation, as required by Articles 74 and 83 of the Convention on the (UNCLOS), which mandate that states with opposite or adjacent coasts effect such delimitations by agreement in accordance with . These pacts often employ methods like equidistance lines or equitable principles to resolve overlaps, frequently incorporating provisions for resource sharing or joint development to avert disputes. A prominent example is the 2010 between and the Russian Federation concerning maritime delimitation in the and , signed on September 15, 2010, and ratified in 2011, which drew a single boundary line for both EEZs and continental shelves across 1,750 kilometers, equally dividing the disputed 175,000 square kilometers area and enabling cooperative . Other bilateral accords address regional tensions, such as the August 6, 2020, agreement between and delimiting partial EEZ and boundaries in the via an equidistance line from to , spanning approximately 12,000 square kilometers for , amid broader disputes with . In , and concluded an EEZ delimitation on December 22, 2022, after 12 years of talks, defining coordinates in the overlapping southern region—covering 5,034 square nautical miles—to affirm UNCLOS-based sovereignty against extraneous claims like China's , though ratification remains pending as of 2025. Multilateral agreements for EEZ matters are less prevalent for outright delimitation, given coordination challenges among multiple states, but they proliferate for managing transboundary resources like fisheries and hydrocarbons through joint zones or frameworks. Joint development zones, often bilateral but extensible in principle, exemplify provisional ; the 2001 Nigeria-São Tomé and Príncipe treaty created a 34,540 square kilometer zone for shared oil and gas exploitation in overlapping EEZ areas, administered by a joint authority with revenue splits of 60% to and 40% to based on geological assessments. Broader multilateral instruments, such as the 1995 UN Agreement on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, compel coastal states to cooperate on stocks traversing EEZs, establishing principles for compatible conservation measures and data-sharing via regional fisheries bodies like the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, which coordinates among 27 members including EEZ states for management. These frameworks underscore a pragmatic shift toward provisional arrangements when full delimitation stalls, prioritizing resource access over rigid assertions, though enforcement varies with state compliance and geopolitical stability.

Recent Developments in Cooperation and Delimitation

In July 2023, the ruled in the dispute between and that established exclusive economic zone (EEZ) boundaries within 200 nautical miles prevail over competing claims to extended continental shelves beyond that limit, reinforcing the three-stage delimitation methodology of provisional equidistance, adjustment for relevant circumstances, and disproportionality checks. This decision, grounded in under the United Nations Convention on the (UNCLOS), clarified that outer continental shelf entitlements do not encroach on delimited EEZs, influencing future overlapping claims in regions like the . On December 18, 2023, the forwarded bilateral maritime boundary treaties with and to the for ratification, defining EEZ limits and boundaries in the and , respectively; these agreements resolve long-standing overlaps by applying equidistance principles adjusted for historical rights and baselines. The treaties emphasize cooperative resource management, including shared and stocks, while the U.S. also published updated EEZ outer limits effective December 21, 2023, based on geodesic coordinates from baseline points. Indonesia and Vietnam signed an EEZ delimitation agreement in December 2023, delineating boundaries in the southern overlapping with China's claims; as of October 2025, ratification remains pending in 's parliament, with proponents arguing it upholds UNCLOS Article 74's obligation for equitable solutions and deters unilateral assertions by affirming bilateral sovereignty over resources like fisheries and potential hydrocarbons. In April 2025, proclaimed its first unilateral EEZ in the , extending from to Cape Tainaron and covering approximately 153,000 square kilometers, prompting notifications to and for potential delimitations under UNCLOS; this move, enabled by marine spatial planning legislation, facilitates and initiatives while inviting cooperative frameworks for transboundary stocks. Similarly, advanced legislation in 2024-2025 to establish its EEZ, focusing on sustainable fisheries and , with boundaries subject to negotiations with and to address overlaps. These developments reflect a trend toward provisional bilateral delimitations amid stalled multilateral talks in contested areas, though enforcement challenges persist due to non-ratification risks and third-party objections, as seen in Greece's drawing Italian reservations over equitable criteria. elements, such as joint commissions in the U.S.-Mexico for , underscore efforts to mitigate disputes over migratory and climate-impacted resources, aligning with UNCLOS Article 74(3)'s provisional arrangements mandate.

Major National Implementations

Asia-Pacific Powers

Australia proclaimed its exclusive economic zone on August 1, 1994, extending 200 nautical miles from its baselines, encompassing approximately 8.2 million square kilometers adjacent to the mainland and an additional 2 million square kilometers around external territories such as Christmas Island and the Cocos (Keeling) Islands. This zone supports significant fisheries, offshore oil and gas extraction, and marine conservation efforts, with the Australian government enforcing resource rights through the Australian Fisheries Management Authority and naval patrols. Delimitations with neighboring states, including Indonesia and Papua New Guinea, have been resolved via treaties, such as the 1979 Australia-Indonesia maritime boundary agreement, minimizing overlaps while prioritizing equitable resource sharing. Japan's EEZ, formalized under the 1996 Law on the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf, covers about 4.5 million square kilometers, bolstered by claims around remote islands including the (administered by but disputed by ). The Senkaku dispute complicates delimitation, where applies the median line principle per UNCLOS Article 74, rejecting 's assertions of extended rights based on the Okinawa Trough. enforces its EEZ through interdictions of foreign vessels, as seen in repeated Chinese incursions near Senkaku since 2008, and bilateral fisheries agreements with neighbors like to manage shared stocks. China declared its EEZ in 1998, claiming jurisdiction over vast maritime areas including the , , and , where its "" encompasses roughly 80% of the sea despite lacking precise coordinates or UNCLOS-compliant baselines. The 2016 ruling invalidated China's claims to historic rights within the and ruled that features like generate no EEZ, affirming overlapping entitlements for the within its 200-nautical-mile zone from . China rejects the ruling, continuing island-building and deployments to assert control, leading to confrontations such as the 2024 incidents at . In Southeast Asia, the Philippines' EEZ, extending from Luzon and Palawan, overlaps Chinese claims in the Spratly Islands (termed West Philippine Sea domestically), with Manila reinforcing its position via the 2016 arbitration and recent UN submissions for extended continental shelf in July 2024. Vietnam asserts an EEZ from its mainland and Paracel/Spratly occupations, filing a similar shelf extension claim in August 2024, while protesting Chinese and Philippine activities at disputed reefs like Vanguard Bank. Indonesia maintains its Natuna Islands EEZ, rejecting overlaps with China's nine-dash line and renaming the area the North Natuna Sea in 2017; a November 2024 China-Indonesia joint statement referencing "overlapping claims" drew domestic criticism but Jakarta clarified no sovereignty concession. These powers enforce claims through naval assertions and multilateral diplomacy, though China's non-compliance with UNCLOS rulings, as noted by U.S. assessments, undermines delimited boundaries.

European and Mediterranean States

European coastal states, including those in the Nordic region and around the , have implemented exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in accordance with the Convention on the (UNCLOS), which grants rights over natural resources up to 200 nautical miles from baselines. established its EEZ by royal decree on June 17, 1977, encompassing approximately 873,577 square kilometers in the , , and , with management focused on fisheries and under the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. The Norwegian EEZ includes zones around overseas territories like , though the Svalbard EEZ's application of rights remains contested by , which argues it conflicts with the 1920 granting equal access to resources. , through its control of , maintains an EEZ extending 200 nautical miles around the island's coast, covering over 2.1 million square kilometers and emphasizing sustainable via the Greenlandic government in cooperation with the . In the Atlantic approaches, France's metropolitan EEZ spans about 413,000 square kilometers, primarily in the and western , where it exercises rights over fisheries and offshore energy, delimited bilaterally with neighboring states like and the through agreements ratified in the and updated post-Brexit. The declared its EEZ under the Merchant Shipping Act 1995, covering roughly 773,676 square kilometers around the , with post-2016 adjustments to account for Brexit-related fisheries negotiations, granting exclusive rights to seabed resources while allowing . These implementations prioritize resource conservation, as evidenced by common fisheries policies binding member states, which impose total allowable catches based on scientific assessments from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Mediterranean states face more constrained EEZs due to the sea's semi-enclosed nature, leading to overlapping claims and reliance on equidistance principles under UNCLOS Article 74 for delimitation. Italy's EEZ, declared in 1988, extends modestly in the Adriatic, Tyrrhenian, and Ionian Seas, focusing on hydrocarbon concessions amid bilateral agreements with and resolved via in 2017. has pursued EEZ declarations through agreements, such as the 2020 delimitation with using median lines and the 2020 pact with excluding disputed areas, but faces ongoing challenges from , which rejects full EEZ entitlements for islands near its coast, arguing equitable principles over strict equidistance given geographical disparities. , not a UNCLOS signatory, contests these claims in the Aegean and , asserting that island-generated zones should not enclose continental Turkish access to resources, a position leading to seismic surveys and naval standoffs in 2020 without mutual recognition of boundaries. Spain maintains EEZs around the and Canary archipelago, totaling about 1.3 million square kilometers including Atlantic claims, with fisheries enforcement via the and EU quotas, though Canary waters see tensions with over shared sardine stocks resolved through periodic bilateral pacts. These disputes underscore causal factors like resource scarcity in enclosed seas, where empirical seismic data on gas fields drives non-compliance risks absent binding .

Americas and Atlantic Powers

The United States proclaimed its exclusive economic zone on March 10, 1983, via Presidential Proclamation 5030, asserting sovereign rights over natural resources extending 200 nautical miles from baselines along its Atlantic coast, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean territories, even though the U.S. has not ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. This proclamation facilitated management of fisheries, offshore energy extraction, and marine conservation, with the Atlantic portions supporting major commercial fisheries and hydrocarbon leases. Canada formalized its exclusive economic zone through the Oceans Act, enacted in 1996 and effective from January 31, 1997, delineating an area of approximately 5.75 million square kilometers that includes extensive Atlantic seaboard claims adjacent to , vital for cod and shellfish stocks despite historical overfishing collapses. Prior to this, Canada had declared a 200-nautical-mile exclusive fishing zone on January 1, 1977, reflecting unilateral extensions common before UNCLOS entry into force in 1994. In , extended its maritime jurisdiction to a 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone following of UNCLOS on December 16, 1988, encompassing roughly 3.66 million square kilometers offshore, underpinning the exploitation of deepwater oil reserves in the and Campos basins discovered in the pre-salt layers since 2006. similarly claims a comparable EEZ, proclaimed in alignment with UNCLOS provisions, which bolsters its fishery yielding over 300,000 tons annually but faces delimitation disputes with over extended areas in the South Atlantic, submitted to the UN on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in 2009. Chile, with its elongated Pacific and Atlantic-adjacent coasts via the , enforces a 200-nautical-mile EEZ since ratifying UNCLOS in 1997, emphasizing sustainable amid overlapping claims resolved through bilateral treaties, such as the 1984 Argentina-Chile agreement averting conflict over the . Among Atlantic powers with American interests, the designates an exclusive economic zone around the , spanning 463,897 square kilometers established post-1982 under domestic legislation consistent with UNCLOS, generating revenue from licensed fisheries despite Argentine protests asserting sovereignty over the islands and adjacent seas. France integrates the exclusive economic zone off into its national maritime domain, extending 200 nautical miles into the Atlantic and covering about 374,000 square kilometers, supporting protection and potential while bordering Brazilian and Surinamese zones delimited by 1981 and 2017 treaties respectively.

Other Significant Coastal Nations

South Africa proclaimed its exclusive economic zone in 1977, encompassing approximately 1.07 million square kilometers adjacent to its mainland coastline, extending 370 kilometers offshore and supporting key sectors such as fisheries, , and emerging ocean initiatives. The government has implemented Operation Phakisa, launched in 2014, to accelerate of the "," targeting growth in , marine transport, and offshore oil and gas while enforcing environmental regulations through the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. As of 2024, 41 marine protected areas cover 5.4% of the EEZ, focusing on conservation amid pressures from illegal fishing and climate change impacts on systems vital for and stocks. The Republic of , an nation with 115 islands spanning just 459 square kilometers of land, exercises jurisdiction over an EEZ of 1.37 million square kilometers in the western , making it one of Africa's largest relative to terrestrial area and a hub for fisheries contributing over 20% to GDP. In March 2020, Seychelles designated 30% of its EEZ—approximately 410,000 square kilometers—as marine protected areas under the National Parks and Nature Conservancy Act, dividing it into no-take zones (15% of EEZ) and multiple-use zones to balance conservation with sustainable fishing and tourism, supported by partnerships with and UNDP. This expansion addressed threats, with the government advancing a marine spatial plan to delineate zones for , deep-sea mining exploration, and protection, though enforcement challenges persist due to limited naval capacity. Mauritius, another Indian Ocean island state, claims an EEZ of about 2.3 million square kilometers, including extended continental shelf submissions for the Mascarene Plateau approved by the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in 2021, enabling resource exploration beyond the standard 200-nautical-mile limit for sedentary species like polymetallic nodules. Disputes persist with over Tromelin Island and the regarding the Chagos Archipelago, where Mauritius seeks to incorporate the British Indian Ocean Territory's EEZ following an International Court of Justice advisory opinion in 2019 affirming decolonization obligations. Domestically, Mauritius has prioritized fisheries management through vessel monitoring systems and quotas, generating annual revenues exceeding $1 billion from tuna exports, while pursuing renewable energy projects like offshore wind to diversify from vulnerability to Indian Ocean cyclones. These implementations highlight how small island developing states leverage UNCLOS provisions for economic sovereignty amid overlapping claims and transboundary fish stocks shared with Madagascar and Seychelles.

Comparative Extent and Rankings

Largest EEZs by Area

France possesses the world's largest exclusive economic zone (EEZ), totaling 11,691,000 km², owing to its extensive overseas territories and departments spanning , Pacific, and Indian Oceans, including , , and . This aggregated area exceeds 8% of global EEZ surface, enabling significant resource jurisdiction despite France's modest metropolitan coastline. The United States holds the second-largest EEZ at approximately 11,351,000 km² (equivalent to 3.4 million square nautical miles), encompassing continental shelves, Alaska's vast Bering Sea extent, Hawaiian waters, and insular possessions like Guam and American Samoa. Official U.S. measurements, proclaimed under the 1983 Presidential Proclamation, account for unresolved maritime boundaries with neighboring states, potentially adjusting totals marginally upon delimitation. Australia ranks third with an EEZ of roughly 8,200,000 km², derived from its mainland perimeter, , and external territories such as and the Australian Antarctic Territory (though the latter's EEZ claims are contested under the Antarctic Treaty). Russia's EEZ follows at about 7,600,000 km², bolstered by Arctic and Pacific coastlines including and the , amid ongoing boundary negotiations with and others. Rankings among top EEZs vary slightly across sources due to differences in delineations, of disputed areas, and measurement methodologies (e.g., geodetic versus areas), but federal compilations from agencies consistently prioritize states with dispersed insular holdings. The table below summarizes the top ten by aggregated sovereign area, excluding unratified extended claims beyond 200 nautical miles.
RankCountryEEZ Area (km²)
111,691,000
211,351,000
38,200,000
47,600,000
56,800,000
64,500,000
74,100,000
83,700,000
93,500,000
103,200,000
These figures reflect proclaimed limits under UNCLOS Article 57, with actual exploitable areas influenced by bilateral treaties resolving overlaps, such as U.S.- delimitations in the . Smaller island nations like (3.1 million km²) punch above their weight proportionally, highlighting how EEZ extent correlates more with geographic dispersion than landmass size.

Most Distant or Extended Claims

France asserts some of the most distant EEZ claims through its overseas territories, which extend maritime jurisdiction far beyond . The EEZ around , an archipelago spanning over 2,000 kilometers in the South Pacific and located approximately 15,908 kilometers from mainland , encompasses 4,767,242 km². This claim derives from baselines around the islands, granting resource rights including fisheries and potential seabed minerals within 200 nautical miles, despite the territory's remoteness which complicates enforcement. Similarly, 's EEZ surrounding the in the southern , isolated by over 4,000 kilometers from the nearest continent, contributes significantly to its global maritime extent, though overlapping claims with and require bilateral delimitations. The maintains extended EEZ claims via its overseas territories, notably the Pitcairn Islands group in the South Pacific, which generates an EEZ of 842,000 km² extending 200 nautical miles from the islands' baselines. Positioned over 5,000 kilometers from the nearest significant landmasses like and more than 12,000 kilometers from the UK mainland, this claim underscores historical imperial legacies enabling distant resource control, primarily for fisheries conservation as evidenced by the 2015 Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve covering 99% of the zone. Another UK example is in the South Atlantic, the world's most remote inhabited archipelago at over 2,000 kilometers from continental , supporting an EEZ focused on sustainable amid isolation challenges. These claims face no major disputes but highlight difficulties due to distance. Australia's EEZ extensions via external territories exemplify continental powers leveraging remote islands for oceanic reach. The Cocos (Keeling) Islands, 2,700 kilometers northwest of Perth, and Christmas Island, 2,600 kilometers west, each support 200-nautical-mile zones contributing to Australia's total maritime area, with claims formalized in 1994 and emphasizing biodiversity protection alongside resource potential. These distant assertions, while compliant with UNCLOS, overlap minimally but require monitoring against illegal fishing, as the islands' isolation amplifies vulnerability. Such configurations demonstrate how small, distant land features can project national EEZ boundaries thousands of kilometers offshore, prioritizing empirical sovereignty over proximity.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
    SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23. Article 2. Legal status of the territorial sea, of the air space ...
  2. [2]
    What is the “EEZ”? - NOAA Ocean Exploration
    Jul 29, 2020 · An “exclusive economic zone,” or “EEZ” is an area of the ocean, generally extending 200 nautical miles (230 miles) beyond a nation's ...
  3. [3]
    Status of the Convention and related Agreements - the United Nations
    Apr 9, 2024 · Several States out of 159 original UNCLOS signatories have yet to ratify. A number of States from among 38 States that did not sign UNCLOS ...
  4. [4]
    United States and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the ...
    Although the United States now recognizes the UNCLOS as a codification of customary international law, it has not ratified it. ... To date, 168 countries and the ...History · Debate · References
  5. [5]
    Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea | Global Conflict Tracker
    Sep 17, 2024 · In 1999, the Philippines intentionally grounded a ship to reinforce its territorial claims to the area which it calls the West Philippine Sea.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes ...
    Apr 10, 2017 · This report uses the term EEZ dispute to refer to a dispute principally between China and the United States over whether coastal states have a ...
  7. [7]
    Maritime and Sovereignty Disputes in the East China Sea
    Feb 9, 2021 · China's, South Korea's, and Japan's EEZ and continental shelf claims overlap in the East China Sea. South Korea and China both claim ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Exclusive Economic Zone: Its Development and Future in ...
    The recent conclusion of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,' the 1983 Presidential Proclamation of the United States' exclusive economic zone ...
  9. [9]
    Part V: Exclusive Economic Zone - UN.org.
    The exclusive economic zone is an area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea, subject to the specific legal regime established in this Part.
  10. [10]
    Maritime Zones and Boundaries - NOAA
    Within its EEZ, a coastal State has: (a) sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving and managing natural resources, whether living ...
  11. [11]
    https://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/dundua_0607_georgia.pdf
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Delimitation of maritime boundaries between adjacent States - UN.org.
    States found it convenient and simple to delimit the two different zones (CS and EEZ) by a single maritime boundary.
  13. [13]
    A Critical Analysis of Article 74 of the United Nations Convention on ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · This paper examines legal standards and dispute resolution for EEZ delimitation under Article 74 of UNCLOS, highlighting challenges with equity ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The EEZ Regime: Reflections after 30 Years - UC Berkeley Law
    May 21, 2012 · The key provision in UNCLOS on the EEZ is Article 55. It makes it clear that the. EEZ is a regime that is neither under the sovereignty of the ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    About ECS - United States Department of State
    The continental shelf includes only the seabed and subsoil, whereas the EEZ also includes the water column. In addition, while the maximum extent of the EEZ is ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] On the Rights and Duties of Occupying States in Maritime Areas
    Apr 30, 2024 · 1 Pursu- ant to UNCLOS, coastal States are endowed sovereignty over territorial wa- ters, as well as sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the ...
  17. [17]
    Overview - Convention & Related Agreements - the United Nations
    May 16, 2024 · Coastal States were to exercise dominion over their territorial seas as far as projectiles could be fired from a cannon based on the shore.
  18. [18]
    Chapter 2: Maritime Zones – Law of the Sea - Tufts University
    The LOSC allows a State to conduct economic activities for a distance of 200 nautical miles from the baseline, or the continental margin where it extends beyond ...
  19. [19]
    Proclamation 2667—Policy of the United States With Respect to the ...
    The Government of the United States regards the natural resources of the subsoil and sea bed of the continental shelf beneath the high seas but contiguous to ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Truman Proclamation
    Summary: The Truman Proclamation extends the U.S. claim to submerged lands and offshore resources of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the interest of ...
  21. [21]
    THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
    In this article the author traces the evolution of the concept of the exclusive economic zone from its origins to its final form in the Convention.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Declaration on the maritime zone, 18 August 1952 - the United Nations
    (IV) In the case of island territories, the zone of 200 nautical miles shall apply to the entire coast of the island or group of islands. If an island or group ...
  23. [23]
    Law of the Sea and the UN Conventions: Maritime Zones Under ...
    Mar 17, 2025 · The custom of asserting a 12 nm territorial sea, 24 nm contiguous zone, and 200 nm EEZ was codified in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ( ...
  24. [24]
    United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - Main Page
    These resulted, before the entry into force of the Convention, in the adoption by the General Assembly on 28 July 1994 of an Agreement on the Implementation of ...
  25. [25]
    Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 1973-1982
    The Conference, in which 160 states participated, held eleven sessions between 1973 and 1982. At the first session, the Conference set up a General Committee, ...
  26. [26]
    Conferences on the Law of the Sea - Oxford Public International Law
    At the eleventh session in New York, at the 182nd plenary meeting on 30 April 1982, UNCLOS III adopted the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea on a recorded ...
  27. [27]
    UNCLOS - International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    UNCLOS, opened in 1982 and entered into force in 1994, regulates all ocean space, its uses and resources, and the seabed beyond national jurisdiction.
  28. [28]
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-resolution/331/text
  29. [29]
    S.Res.331 - A resolution calling upon the Senate to give its advice ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · Whereas, as of January 2025, 170 parties have ratified UNCLOS ... (3) recommends the ratification of the UNCLOS remain a top priority ...
  30. [30]
    Chronological lists of ratifications of - UN.org.
    Sep 22, 2025 · Chronological lists of ratifications of, accessions and successions to the Convention and the related Agreements ... Kyrgyzstan (20 September 2025).
  31. [31]
    part xvii. final provisions - the United Nations
    1. Once adopted, amendments to this Convention shall be open for signature by States Parties for 12 months from the date of adoption, at United Nations ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] 2011 - International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    102 Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2009 (hereinafter “Black Sea”), p. . Indeed, it is one in a long line of cases in. 48 ...
  33. [33]
    Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)
    ... case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. ... © International Court of Justice 2017-2025 – All rights reserved. Footer ...Missing: ITLOS | Show results with:ITLOS
  34. [34]
    The impact of sea-level rise on baselines: A question of ... - QIL QDI
    Apr 30, 2022 · The impact of sea-level rise on baselines: A question of interpretation of the UNCLOS or evolution of customary law? by Massimo Starita on ...
  35. [35]
    "Recent Developments in Continental Shelf Jurisprudence" by ...
    The ICJ, in Nicaragua v. Colombia, identified a rule of customary international law that the continental shelf of a State beyond 200 nautical miles may not ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  36. [36]
    Best way to protect ocean fisheries? Let nations profit from them
    Oct 14, 2019 · Today, more than 95 percent of global marine fish catch occurs inside EEZs. The results could have implications for preserving fisheries in the ...
  37. [37]
    Who Gets the Catch? How Conventional Catch Attribution ... - Frontiers
    Mar 8, 2022 · Schiller et al. (2018) estimate that between 2009 and 2014, nearly 96% of global marine catch by volume came from fishing in EEZs.
  38. [38]
    Are unauthorized foreign vessels deterred from fishing inside ...
    Oct 7, 2019 · Foreign vessels fishing in EEZs. Discover the data and impacts of foreign fishing activities in exclusive economic zones.
  39. [39]
    Offshore oil and natural gas - U.S. Energy Information ... - EIA
    Offshore production is energy production in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), 200 miles from the U.S. coastline, managed by federal agencies and leased to ...
  40. [40]
    Offshore Oil and Gas Production - Planète Energies
    Nov 28, 2015 · Offshore production extracts oil and gas from beneath the sea, accounting for 30% of global oil and 27% of gas production. It began in shallow ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Chapter 21 Offshore Hydrocarbon Industries - the United Nations
    Daily global offshore oil production is currently about 28 million barrels (Fig. 3), which is worth between 1.4 billion dollars and 2.8 billion dollars per day ...
  42. [42]
    Mineral resources of the Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone
    Potential mineral resources of the Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone (including the Gulf of Mexico and US Caribbean areas) include petroleum, sand and gravel ...
  43. [43]
    Offshore oil and gas production by scenario, 2016-2040 – Charts - IEA
    Offshore oil and gas production by scenario, 2016-2040 · Total annual supply growth by quarter, 2022-2026 · Global oil balance quarterly changes by component, ...
  44. [44]
    Oil, fisheries and coastal communities: A review of impacts on the ...
    This study provides an extensive review of the effects of oil development in relation to four interconnected themes: 1) the environment, including marine ...
  45. [45]
    part xiii. marine scientific research - UN.org.
    Coastal States, in the exercise of their jurisdiction, have the right to regulate, authorize and conduct marine scientific research in their exclusive economic ...Missing: conservation | Show results with:conservation
  46. [46]
    The law of the sea and current practices of marine scientific research ...
    The consent regime established in Article 246 is applicable to marine scientific research projects conducted in the exclusive economic zone. Although the ...
  47. [47]
    The Practice of the Caribbean SIDS on the Consent Regime for ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · This article examines the practice of the Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS) regarding the consent regime for marine scientific research (MSR).
  48. [48]
    Assessment of the Mechanism for Mining Technology Transfer in the ...
    Jun 22, 2021 · In order to facilitate capacity building for developing States, a regime of technology transfer was set up in Part XIV of and Annex III to the ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Part II Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone - UN.org.
    Rights of protection of the coastal State. 1. The coastal State may take the necessary steps in its territorial sea to prevent passage which is not innocent.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Limits in the Seas - State.gov
    Jul 8, 2014 · Additional provisions of Article 7 state that such baselines shall not depart to any appreciable extent from the general direction of the coast; ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] United States Responses to Excessive National Maritime Claims
    Article 57 defines the breadth of the EEZ to be no more than 200 miles from the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured. Article 58 pertains to the ...
  52. [52]
    Why Nautical Mile and Knot Are The Units Used at Sea?
    Jul 22, 2022 · A nautical mile, a unit of measurement defined as 1,852 metres or 1.852 kilometres, is based on the earth's circumference and is equal to one ...
  53. [53]
    Part VI Continental Shelf - UN.org.
    The coastal State shall delineate the outer limits of its continental shelf, where that shelf extends beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Equitable Considerations in the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf
    Whereas Article 76 of UNCLOS defines the continental shelf, the delimita- tion of the continental shelf between States is regulated by Article 83(1) as follows ...
  55. [55]
    Summary of the Judgment of 12 October 2021
    Oct 12, 2021 · The court found no agreed maritime boundary between Somalia and Kenya, and rejected Kenya's claim of a boundary at the parallel of latitude.
  56. [56]
    Judgment of 13 July 2023 | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
    Jul 13, 2023 · Nicaragua also refers to the two cases concerning delimitation ... exclusive economic zone and continental shelf” (I.C.J. Reports 2012 ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Report on the Obligations of States under Articles 74(3) and 83(3) of ...
    Feb 5, 2016 · Under UNCLOS, states in undelimited areas must make every effort to enter provisional arrangements and not jeopardize final delimitation ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Obligation to exercise self-restraint and cooperate – UNCLOS ...
    Feb 12, 2015 · under Article 298(1)(a) on a dispute arising under Article 74(3) and 83(3) should be resolved in favour of the requesting party. However ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Article 76 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea
    Oct 25, 2022 · Article 76 defines the continental shelf, sets rules for its outer limits, and introduces the CLCS, a body of scientific experts.
  60. [60]
    Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) Purpose ...
    Apr 11, 2024 · The Commission shall make recommendations to coastal States on matters related to the establishment of those limits; its recommendations and ...
  61. [61]
    SUBMISSIONS TO THE CLCS - UN.org.
    Sep 23, 2025 · Submissions are listed in two separate tables below, comprising submissions and revised submissions, made after recommendations were approved.
  62. [62]
    CLCS/11 - UN.org.
    "The coastal State shall delineate the outer limits of its continental shelf, where the shelf extends beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which ...
  63. [63]
    On the legal status of marine fishery resources - NIH
    Apr 6, 2023 · Article 56 (1) (a) of UNCLOS provides that: In the exclusive economic zone, the coastal State has sovereign rights for exploring and exploiting, ...
  64. [64]
    Capture fisheries production - FAO Knowledge Repository
    In 2022, global capture fisheries production reached 92.3 million tonnes, comprising 91.0 million tonnes (live weight equivalent) of aquatic animals and 1.3 ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] EEZ-adjacent distant-water fishing as a global security challenge
    Sep 12, 2022 · If correct, this would mean that the general prohibition of imprisonment for EEZ fisheries offences under Article 73(3) UNCLOS does not apply.
  66. [66]
    International and Regional Fisheries Management Organizations
    Nov 8, 2023 · RFMOs are treaty-based bodies whose objective is to ensure the sustainable conservation and management of shared fish stocks and other living ...
  67. [67]
    Climate change drives shifts in straddling fish stocks in the world's ...
    Jul 30, 2025 · Shared stocks are often managed by Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs). ... stocks straddling between EEZs in each region ...
  68. [68]
    Report on IUU Fishing, Bycatch, and Shark Catch - NOAA Fisheries
    May 2, 2025 · An IUU fishing vessel. Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing is a serious global problem that threatens ocean ecosystems and sustainable ...
  69. [69]
    Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing - Congress.gov
    Oct 8, 2024 · U.S. and international efforts to manage fisheries are weakened by illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. IUU fishing is an ongoing ...
  70. [70]
    https://egyptoil-gas.com/features/overview-of-the-mediterranean-reserves/
  71. [71]
    Overview of the Mediterranean Reserves - Egypt Oil & Gas
    Apr 5, 2018 · The recently discovered Zohr field is, so far, the largest gas field in the Mediterranean, with reserves estimated at 30 tcf. The giant gas ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
  72. [72]
    Oil and Natural Gas In the Eastern Mediterranean Region - EIA
    Sep 3, 2025 · Egypt is the largest liquid fuels producer in the Eastern Mediterranean, producing an average of about 687,000 barrels per day (b/d) from 2015 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Offshore Drilling 101 - NRDC
    Apr 24, 2025 · The vast majority of federal offshore oil and gas wells are in the Gulf of Mexico, accounting for 97 percent of all oil and gas production in ...
  74. [74]
    Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) - Deep Sea Mining
    Jun 6, 2023 · An Exclusive Economic Zone is a sea zone over which a state has special rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources.
  75. [75]
    Seabed Mining in Exclusive Economic Zones: Key Considerations ...
    Jan 8, 2025 · A range of States are increasingly examining the potential benefits of allowing seabed mining within their exclusive economic zones.
  76. [76]
    11 Countries developing Subsea Minerals in their EEZs
    A variety of different countries are exploring for subsea minerals in their Exclusive Economic Zones. This is a list of the 11 most interesting to watch!
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Marine Nonfuel Minerals in the US Exclusive Economic Zone
    For example, the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources. Act (DSHMRA), which governs the allocation of deep seabed explora- tion licenses and recovery permits to ...
  78. [78]
    An Overview of Seabed Mining Including the Current State of ...
    In this review, we explore three broad aspects relating to the exploration and exploitation of seabed mineral resources.
  79. [79]
    Offshore wind installed capacity reaches 83 GW as new report finds ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · At the end of 2024, a total of 278 MW net floating wind was installed globally, of which 101 MW in Norway, 78 MW is in the UK, 40MW in China, ...
  80. [80]
    Global Offshore Wind Report 2025 - Tethys
    Jun 25, 2025 · 8 GW of new offshore wind capacity was grid-connected worldwide last year. New additions were 26% lower than the previous year, making 2024 the ...
  81. [81]
    Global offshore wind: Germany | Latin America - Norton Rose Fulbright
    The current statutory targets in Germany are for offshore wind to reach a cumulative installed capacity of 30 GW in 2030, 40 GW in 2035 and 70 GW in 2045 as per ...
  82. [82]
    Global Offshore Wind Capacity Reaches 83 GW, 100 GW More to Be ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · Global Wind Energy Council's 2024 global offshore wind outlook for total additions in the 2025-2029 period was 156.72 GW, which has now been ...
  83. [83]
    FAQs - International Seabed Authority
    In national waters (within Exclusive Economic Zones or continental shelves), seabed mining may be regulated differently by coastal States. In those zones ...
  84. [84]
    A precautionary tale: Exploring the risks of deep-sea mining
    In EEZs, current deep-sea mining explorations take place in Papua New Guinea, Fiji, The Cook Islands, and Nauru.
  85. [85]
    Seabed Activities | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    Seabed Mining · U.S. statutes and regulations · NOAA Reports to Congress under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act · Other NOAA Documents and Webpages ...
  86. [86]
    Unleashing America's Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources
    Apr 24, 2025 · Vast offshore seabed areas hold critical minerals and energy resources. These resources are key to strengthening our economy, securing our energy future,
  87. [87]
    What We Know About Deep-Sea Mining and What We Don't
    Jul 23, 2025 · Deep-sea mining aims to retrieve valuable mineral deposits found on the ocean's floor, hundreds or even thousands of meters below its surface.
  88. [88]
    Chapter 4: Military Activities in an EEZ – Law of the Sea
    ... Area.” 3 Article 58 recognizes that all States enjoy within the EEZ “the freedoms referred to in Article 87 of navigation and overflight and of the laying ...
  89. [89]
    Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone: East Asia Focus
    All nations have a right under international law to conduct military activities in foreign EEZs. The article discusses the legal bases for conducting these ...
  90. [90]
    U.S. Navy Destroyer Conducts Freedom of Navigation Operation in ...
    May 10, 2024 · On 10 May, USS Halsey (DDG 97) asserted navigational rights and freedoms in the South China Sea near the Paracel Islands, consistent with international Law.
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Military Activities in the EEZ: A U.S.-China Dialogue on Security and ...
    China's claim that the balance of coastal-state jurisdiction and international freedoms for military activities in the EEZ favors the coastal state's right to ...
  92. [92]
    China one of an estimated 26 other countries that are challenging ...
    In addition to maritime territorial disputes in the SCS and ECS, China is involved in a dispute, particularly with the United States, over whether China has ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] U.S. Freedom of Navigation Program
    Prior consent required for military exer- cises or maneuvers in the EEZ. Maldives Prior authorization required for all foreign vessels to enter the EEZ.
  94. [94]
    Exclusive Economic Zone - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Within its EEZ, a coastal state can regulate the use of resources as it finds in its best interest and impose penalties on those who do not abide by these ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] national strategy for mapping,exploring,and characterizing the ...
    Nation's EEZ and ocean resources, enhance our economic competitiveness, strengthen our national security, protect our environment, and preserve continued ...
  96. [96]
    https://www.ndc.nato.int/strategy-of-development-of-the-arctic-zone-of-the-russian-federation-and-the-provision-of-national-security-for-the-period-to-2035/
  97. [97]
    “Strategy of development of the Arctic Zone of the Russian ...
    Jun 25, 2021 · It treats them instead as a “strategic reserve” to be claimed, explored and kept untouched until economic conditions change and prices increase ...<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    South China Sea - EIA
    The South China Sea is underexplored because of territorial disputes. Most discovered oil and natural gas fields are in uncontested areas, close to the ...
  99. [99]
    Militarized Commons: How Territorial Competition is Weaponizing ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · The South China Sea crisis illustrates how competing national interests, resource scarcity, and weak governance can fuel self-reinforcing cycles ...
  100. [100]
    Clashes at Sea: Explaining the Onset, Militarization, and Resolution ...
    Oct 31, 2020 · This paper explores why countries experience diplomatic disagreements over maritime zones, why some maritime claims are militarized, and how countries can ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone: East Asia Focus
    The paper con- cludes that the right to engage in military activities in the EEZ is consistent with international law, both customary and conventional, as well ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Maritime Incidents in the South China Sea: Measures of Law ...
    36 As already noted, China has constructed and militarized artificial islands, equipping them with airstrips, radar installations, missile systems, and naval ...
  103. [103]
    Space, Maritime Security, and Geopolitics in the South China Sea
    Aug 12, 2025 · China's militarization of three artificial islands in the SCS has rightly triggered alarm among US defense planners and regional allies. At ...Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
  104. [104]
    The Legality of Militarization of the South China Sea and Its Legal ...
    This paper aims to examine the legal ground upon which China has claimed its territorial sovereignty to assess whether they have such authority over the region ...
  105. [105]
    Timeline: China's Maritime Disputes - Council on Foreign Relations
    The Chinese navy sinks three Vietnamese vessels, killing seventy-four sailors in one of the most serious military confrontations in the South China Sea. The ...<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    The Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations
    Article 5 of the treaty states that the United States is committed to "meet the common danger" of an armed attack on "the territories under the Administration ...
  107. [107]
    The East China Sea Dispute: China's and Japan's Assertiveness ...
    Nov 14, 2024 · The East China Sea disputes concern territorial sovereignty over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, together with the fisheries resources of the ...
  108. [108]
    How the US & NATO Can Confront Russian Arctic Aggression - CEPA
    Geopolitics and strategic competition mean the Arctic security landscape is changing fast. The US and NATO must deter Russian aggression.
  109. [109]
    NATO's Cold Response and the Implications of Militarization in the ...
    Jun 8, 2022 · The exercise raises questions about how increasing militarization in the Arctic may affect regional cooperation and future relations of NATO members with ...
  110. [110]
    Rising Tensions and Shifting Strategies: The Evolving Dynamics of ...
    Jan 7, 2025 · The US Arctic strategy is shifting amid tensions with Russia and China, aiming to balance security, climate action, and energy interests.
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone
    For example, the use of weapons, the launching of aircraft, espionage, interference with coastal communications, and propaganda aimed at the coastal ...
  112. [112]
    Contest the Gray Zone | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
    The authority to change the status quo of borders, adjust exclusive economic zones, or build military outposts on another country's islands must not come ...Missing: militarization | Show results with:militarization
  113. [113]
    https://fulcrum.sg/the-south-china-sea-in-2025-more-of-the-same-possibly-worse/
  114. [114]
    The South China Sea in 2025: More of the Same, Possibly Worse
    Jan 2, 2025 · The prognosis for tensions in the South China Sea dispute this year is pretty straightforward: what has been and is will continue to be so, ...
  115. [115]
    China continues to militarize the South China Sea – here's what ...
    Apr 25, 2025 · Since 2022, these confrontations have become the norm, as China has illegally claimed sovereignty of over 90% of the South China Sea. This ...<|separator|>
  116. [116]
    Situation of the Senkaku Islands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
    Japan has consistently maintained that there has never been any agreement with China to “shelve” issues regarding the Senkaku Islands. This is made clear by ...
  117. [117]
    Understanding the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute: Diplomatic ...
    Jun 23, 2022 · This chapter discusses the Senkaku/Diaoyu island dispute between Japan and China and analyses it using aspects of territorial and maritime sovereignty.
  118. [118]
    Contested Waters: Turkey's Maritime Disputes and Regional ...
    Jul 17, 2025 · Turkey contends that Greece's maritime claims over its islands unfairly squeeze the country out of access to the sea.
  119. [119]
    Turkey Eyes Breakthrough in Eastern Mediterranean Standoff
    Aug 29, 2025 · Legal challenges in both eastern and western Libya initially blocked the agreement, while Greece and Egypt countered in 2020 with their own pact ...
  120. [120]
    Greece, Libya to Hold Talks on Maritime Zones Dispute
    Sep 18, 2025 · Greece and Libya have agreed to hold talks to resolve a dispute over their respective exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean Sea.
  121. [121]
    Greece and Libya Begin Talks on Exclusive Economic Zone ...
    Sep 21, 2025 · Work has begun on demarcating an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) between Greece and Libya to resolve the two countries' maritime dispute.
  122. [122]
    Maritime law disputes after Ukraine - GIS Reports
    Jun 24, 2022 · Greece, a state party to UNCLOS, claims the 200nm EEZ and continental shelf that it is entitled to under the convention for each island. Turkey, ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
  123. [123]
    Barbados v. Trinidad and Tobago - Cases | PCA-CPA
    The Permanent Court of Arbitration acted as registry in an arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago.
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and ...
    Apr 11, 2006 · The arbitration concerned the delimitation of the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf between Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago, under ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  125. [125]
    Guyana v. Suriname - Cases | PCA-CPA
    This case concerned the delimitation of Guyana's maritime boundary with Suriname and the alleged breaches of international law by Suriname in disputed maritime ...
  126. [126]
    part xv. settlement of disputes - UN.org.
    States Parties shall settle any dispute between them concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention by peaceful means.
  127. [127]
    UNCLOS | PCA-CPA
    Part XV of UNCLOS sets forth rules for the resolution of disputes between State Parties arising out of the interpretation or application of UNCLOS.
  128. [128]
    International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea is an independent judicial body established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.Members · Unclos · Chambers · States Parties
  129. [129]
    ITLOS Advisory Opinion: Coastal and Flag State Duties to Ensure ...
    Apr 16, 2015 · ITLOS is a judicial body established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)[5] to adjudicate disputes and matters ...
  130. [130]
    "Canadian Perspectives on the Future Enforcement of the Exclusive ...
    The outcome of a treaty being still conjectural, it is the purpose of this paper to examine Canada's successes and problems in enforcement of the Exclusive ...
  131. [131]
    Enforcing UNCLOS in Pakistan's Exclusive Economic Zone: A Case ...
    Jan 3, 2025 · This paper explores the implementation of UNCLOS provisions in Pakistan's EEZ, focusing on the fisheries sector as a case study.
  132. [132]
    United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
    UNCLOS recognizes the broad authority of a coastal nation over living resources within its territorial sea and EEZ to a maximum of 200 nautical miles seaward ...<|separator|>
  133. [133]
    International Agreements Conferring Jurisdiction on the Tribunal
    Below is a list of international agreements containing provisions relating to the jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.
  134. [134]
    Settlement of Disputes - UN.org.
    May 14, 2024 · The Charter of the United Nations requires all Members of the Organization to settle their international disputes by peaceful means.
  135. [135]
    The Legality of Foreign Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic ...
    UNCLOS is silent or ambiguous on the legality of military operations in foreign EEZs, with no clear definitions of permissible activity.Missing: vagueness | Show results with:vagueness
  136. [136]
    Resolving Conflicts Regarding Unattributed Rights and Jurisdiction ...
    Jan 17, 2025 · With the establishment of the EEZ, there is an important difference between the legal regimes of the areas within and beyond the 200 NM limit.
  137. [137]
    Flying Too Low? - Völkerrechtsblog
    Sep 24, 2025 · Freedom of overflight, one of the high seas freedoms preserved in the EEZ by Article 58, therefore arguably continues to apply. This ...<|separator|>
  138. [138]
    [PDF] Reexamining the UNCLOS: a Lack of Compliance and Enforceability
    ABSTRACT. The article examines the effeteness of UNCLOS and espouses on why it is not a De Jure legally binding agreement but a De facto non-binding ...<|separator|>
  139. [139]
    Multiple examples of state noncompliance with UNCLOS
    Examples of noncompliance include incorrect baselines, excessive territorial sea breadth, security jurisdiction in contiguous zones, and over-exploitation of ...Missing: practice deviations
  140. [140]
    Beijing's creative compliance and non-compliance in the South ...
    Oct 11, 2021 · Third, the tribunal ruled that Beijing violated its UNCLOS obligations by denying Filipino artisanal fishers their right to engage in ...
  141. [141]
    US-China International Law Disputes in the South China Sea
    Jul 9, 2021 · In 2016, a UN tribunal concluded China violated UNCLOS for operating within the Philippines' EEZ, interfering with fishing and petroleum ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
  142. [142]
    [PDF] Reflecting on UNCLOS Forty Years Later: What Worked, What Failed
    Nov 20, 2022 · UNCLOS benefits include territorial sea breadth, transit passage, and exclusive economic zones. Failures include straight baselines, mid-ocean ...
  143. [143]
    The UNCLOS isn't perfect and it's time we acknowledge that
    Exclusive Economic Zones have encouraged the process of privatising the seas, at the cost of protecting the oceanic environment.
  144. [144]
    Here's why the UN's law of the sea needs an overhaul
    Dec 12, 2022 · But UNCLOS allowed all coastal countries to have Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) as state property 200 nautical miles from their coast. In ...Missing: interpretations | Show results with:interpretations
  145. [145]
    Global fisheries losses at the exclusive economic zone level, 1950 ...
    Overfishing and overcapacity are costing the world's fishery sector dearly, reducing resource rent—the surplus after fishing costs have been subtracted from ...
  146. [146]
    Healthy seas, thriving fisheries: transitioning to an environmentally ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · It argues for an ecosystem-based approach to sustainably exploiting marine resources and moving away from adverse practices. Key messages.
  147. [147]
    EEZs deter unauthorized fishing – but only in high-value fisheries
    A new study finds that unauthorized fishing is 81 percent lower just inside the 200-mile EEZ boundaries compared to just outside them.<|control11|><|separator|>
  148. [148]
    The transboundary nature of the world's exploited marine species
    Oct 21, 2020 · We identified 633 exploited transboundary species worldwide (67.5% of the 938 species analyzed), almost double previous estimates. Between 2005 ...
  149. [149]
    View of The Effectiveness of Environmental Laws in Preventing ...
    Feb 13, 2020 · ... extraction within a sovereign state's exclusive economic zone can cause transboundary pollution.2 The Arctic Circle is estimated to contain ...
  150. [150]
    [PDF] UNCLOS III: Pollution Control in the Exclusive Economic Zone
    Jan 25, 1995 · ' UNCLOS III should permit coastal states to choose the extent to which they regulate pollution in the EEZ.
  151. [151]
    [PDF] Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services - NOAA
    Nov 3, 2006 · We conclude that marine biodiversity loss is increasingly impairing the ocean's capacity to provide food, maintain water quality, and recover ...
  152. [152]
    Marine conservation challenges in an era of economic crisis and ...
    Within an EEZ, the coastal state has sole exploitation rights over all natural resources, but also the responsibility for the conservation and management of the ...
  153. [153]
    7. Environmental Claims over the Exclusive Economic Zone
    This chapter discusses environmental claims over the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The assertion of excessive coastal state or international environmental ...
  154. [154]
    [PDF] UNCLOS: the law of the sea in the 21st century
    Mar 1, 2022 · The state can enforce its laws on some specific matters. (customs, taxation, immigration and pollution). • Exclusive economic zone (EEZ): this ...
  155. [155]
    The exclusive economic zone and economic development in the ...
    The exclusive economic zone (EEZ) became accepted internationally in the 1970s. This transferred resource wealth to the coastal states establishing such zones.
  156. [156]
    What Is an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)? - Windward.AI
    Where Does the Exclusive Economic Zone Apply? The EEZ extends up to 200 nautical miles (370 kilometers) from a coastal state's baseline, typically defined as ...
  157. [157]
    The exclusive economic zone: some perspectives - ScienceDirect
    The role of the EEZ in obtaining improved ocean governance, more sustainable management of the marine resources and control of marine pollution is considered.
  158. [158]
    Taming the Ocean's Wild West - Global Fishing Watch
    Nov 11, 2016 · Those areas are called Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). Beyond those boundaries lie the high seas, encompassing roughly 60 percent of the ...
  159. [159]
    (PDF) The Territorialization of the Global Commons: Evidence from ...
    Jul 1, 2022 · The focus is on exclusive economic zones (EEZ), the extended maritime zones beyond territorial waters. Ocean boundaries delineating EEZs are ...<|separator|>
  160. [160]
    General Conclusions (Chapter 9) - Finding a Balance in the ...
    Jan 17, 2025 · 10 This is because the EEZ reduced a large area from the transnational commons and set the stage for an evolving battle between core economic ...Missing: global | Show results with:global
  161. [161]
    The new High Seas Treaty will not end the tragedy of the global ...
    Mar 15, 2023 · The high seas are vast areas in the world oceans beyond maritime zones controlled by coastal countries—exclusive economic zones and national ...Missing: erosion | Show results with:erosion
  162. [162]
    The scope of obligations in Article 63(1) of UNCLOS on the ...
    Article 63(1) enshrines a general obligation on States sharing fishery resources, which migrate or are distributed between their respective EEZs, 'to seek to ...
  163. [163]
    The Scope of Obligations in Article 63(1) of UNCLOS on the ...
    Article 63(1) enshrines a general obligation on States sharing fishery resources, which migrate or are distributed between their respective EEZs, 'to seek to ...
  164. [164]
    MANAGEMENT OF SHARED FISH STOCKS IN THE BARENTS SEA ...
    Three agreements between Norway and the Soviet Union form the basis of the Barents Sea fisheries regime. A 1975 Framework Agreement provides for the Norwegian- ...
  165. [165]
    Norway and Russia set new fishing quotas for Barents, Norwegian ...
    The Norwegian-Russian Joint Fishery Commission set a quota of 566784 tonnes of cod, 20 percent lower than 2022 levels and the lowest since 2009.
  166. [166]
    The joint Russian-Norwegian fisheries science cooperation in the ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Since the 1970s, a group of Russian and Norwegian scientists have conducted joint research on the fish stocks in the Barents Sea that are ...
  167. [167]
    EU-Norway relations in fisheries: An overview of the northern ...
    Nov 7, 2024 · The 1980 Fisheries Agreement with Norway is particularly important for the joint management of shared stocks and the continuation of long- ...
  168. [168]
    EU and Norway reach an agreement on fishing opportunities for 2025
    Dec 10, 2024 · On 5 December, the EU and Norway concluded negotiations on the management of shared stocks in the Skagerrak and Kattegat, quota exchanges, ...
  169. [169]
    LEGAL ASPECTS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED FISH ...
    Another example is the 1989 Agreement between Denmark, Iceland and Norway concerning the Capelin Stocks in the Waters between Greenland, Iceland and Jan Mayen, ...
  170. [170]
    The conservation and management of shared fish stocks
    The effective management of shared fish stocks stands as one of the great challenges towards achieving long-term sustainable fisheries.
  171. [171]
    Management of transboundary and straddling fish stocks in the ...
    Jun 22, 2020 · Five coastal states, Norway, Russia, Iceland, the Faroe Islands and the EU, agreed to a quota allocation (1996–2002) (Herring Agreement, 1996).
  172. [172]
    Norway and Russia Agree on Maritime Boundary in the Barents Sea ...
    Nov 10, 2010 · Both States agreed to draw a single maritime boundary for the continental shelf and the EEZ, but they still could not agree on the boundary line ...
  173. [173]
    [PDF] Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation ...
    Sep 15, 2010 · The maritime delimitation line between the Parties in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean shall be defined as geodetic lines connecting points ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  174. [174]
    Some Observations on the Agreement between Greece and Egypt ...
    Aug 25, 2020 · Greece and Egypt signed an agreement for the delimitation of the two countries' maritime boundaries in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea on 7 August 2020.
  175. [175]
    [PDF] the greece-egypt maritime agreement - SETA
    Sep 11, 2020 · On August 6, 2020, Greece and Egypt signed an Exclusive Economic Zone. (EEZ) agreement in Cairo delimiting their maritime boundaries in the East ...
  176. [176]
    The Vietnam-Indonesia EEZ agreement upholds UNCLOS
    Feb 16, 2023 · Vietnam and Indonesia agreed to delimit their respective Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) on 22 December 2022 after 12 years of negotiations.
  177. [177]
    Indonesian Parliament to Ratify Vietnam EEZ Agreement This Month
    May 2, 2025 · The two countries finalized the agreement in late 2022, but it has yet to be ratified by either country's legislature. The Indonesian ...
  178. [178]
    [PDF] the joint development zone between nigeria and sao tome and
    Joint Development Zones (JDZ) are provisional arrangements for cooperation on disputed maritime areas when states face deadlocks in delimitation negotiations.
  179. [179]
    MARITIME BOUNDARY/JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
    Nov 14, 2016 · This section includes bilateral as well as multilateral agreements concerning maritime delimitation and joint development.
  180. [180]
    Analysis of the ICJ Judgment in Nicaragua v. Colombia (2023)
    Dec 3, 2024 · The ICJ's decision affirms that EEZ boundaries within the 200-nautical-mile limit are paramount and cannot be overridden by claims to an extended continental ...
  181. [181]
    Outer Limits of the U.S. Extended Continental Shelf - Congress.gov
    Feb 7, 2024 · The CLCS does not approve or grant an ECS to a coastal country but makes recommendations on the outer limits of an ECS based on these data.
  182. [182]
    Exclusive Economic Zone and Maritime Boundaries; Notice of Limits
    Dec 21, 2023 · These limits are in effect as of December 21, 2023. This document is also available in the following formats:
  183. [183]
    Ratifying the Indonesia-Vietnam EEZ maritime delimitation ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Ratification of the EEZ agreement provides a good opportunity for Indonesia to clarify its position by denying the validity of China's Nine-Dash ...
  184. [184]
    Indonesia-Vietnam EEZ deal upholds international law, sends ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · Indonesian and Vietnamese leaders said their countries expect to formally agree in 2025 on exclusive economic zone (EEZ) boundaries.
  185. [185]
    Greece Declares Exclusive Economic Zone in Ionian Sea
    Apr 18, 2025 · Greece has formally declared an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the Ionian Sea, extending from the island of Corfu down to Cape Tainaron in the southern ...Missing: cooperation | Show results with:cooperation
  186. [186]
    Malta gets ready to declare an Exclusive Economic Zone
    Malta has started the legislative process for the establishment of an exclusive economic zone ('EEZ') following the enactment of the Exclusive Economic Zone ...
  187. [187]
    [PDF] A/79/1005 General Assembly
    Sep 3, 2025 · This agreement has been concluded between States with opposite coasts and in full conformity with the relevant provisions of the United. Nations ...
  188. [188]
    Oceans and Seas - Geoscience Australia
    Feb 3, 2022 · This EEZ area is made up of 8.2 million square kilometres off Australia and its remote offshore territories, and 2 million square kilometres ...Missing: extent | Show results with:extent
  189. [189]
    The Australian Fishing Zone - DAFF
    Feb 5, 2021 · Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) extends from 12 nautical miles to 200 nautical miles from its coastline. Within its EEZ, Australia ...Missing: extent | Show results with:extent
  190. [190]
    Exclusive Economic Zone & continental shelf boundaries between ...
    This map shows the boundaries of both the EEZ and the continental shelf. There are two parts to the EEZ boundaries: New Zealand - Australia maritime boundary.<|separator|>
  191. [191]
    How China is bending the rules in the South China Sea
    Feb 17, 2021 · The conventional wisdom is that China claims sovereignty over “virtually all South China Sea islands and their adjacent waters.”Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  192. [192]
    South China Sea Arbitration Ruling: What Happened and What's ...
    On July 12, 2016, the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the Philippines' case against China in the South China Sea ruled overwhelmingly in favor of the ...
  193. [193]
    Manila and Beijing Clarify Select South China Sea Claims - CSIS
    Nov 21, 2024 · In July, the Philippines submitted its extended continental shelf claim in the South China Sea to the UN Commission on the Limits of the ...
  194. [194]
    Vietnam joins Philippines in continental shelf claim, challenging ...
    Aug 14, 2024 · Vietnam filed a claim with the United Nations in mid-July 2024 to extend its continental shelf in the South China Sea, a month after the Philippines made a ...
  195. [195]
    Indonesia says it has no overlapping South China Sea claims with ...
    Nov 11, 2024 · Indonesia's foreign ministry has repeatedly said the country is a non-claimant state in the South China Sea and has no overlapping jurisdiction ...
  196. [196]
    U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea
    Jul 14, 2020 · We are making clear: Beijing's claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are completely unlawful, as is its campaign of bullying to ...
  197. [197]
    [PDF] Limits in the Seas No. 148 Norway Maritime Claims and Boundaries
    Aug 28, 2020 · Part V of the Convention sets forth provisions related to the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which may extend to a maximum of 200 M from the ...
  198. [198]
    Continental shelf – questions and answers - regjeringen.no
    Apr 24, 2025 · Norway and the other countries with claims take the view that sovereign rights connected to the continental shelf do not constitute a new claim, ...
  199. [199]
    French maritime areas
    May 16, 2024 · This page is the reference medium for the State's communication on maritime spaces under French sovereignty or jurisdiction.<|separator|>
  200. [200]
    Maritime disputes in the eastern Mediterranean: Why and why now?
    Oct 23, 2020 · In August 2020, Greek and Turkish frigates collided in the eastern Mediterranean. The Turkish ship had been escorting a Turkish seismic survey vessel.Missing: implementations | Show results with:implementations
  201. [201]
    Background Note on Aegean Dispute
    The dispute concerns the areas of continental shelf to be attributed to Türkiye and Greece beyond the 6 mile territorial sea in the Aegean. Türkiye stands ready ...
  202. [202]
    Exclusive Economic Zone and the Energy Game: Waves in the ...
    Jul 9, 2020 · According to UNCLOS, ships seeking passage through an Exclusive Economic Zone could navigate freely, but the sovereign state can reserve the ...
  203. [203]
    Proclamation 5030 -- Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States ...
    Mar 10, 1983 · The establishment of an Exclusive Economic Zone by the United States will advance the development of ocean resources and promote the protection of the marine ...
  204. [204]
    What is the EEZ? - NOAA's National Ocean Service
    Jun 16, 2024 · The exclusive economic zone is the zone where the U.S. and other coastal nations have jurisdiction over natural resources.
  205. [205]
    Ocean collaboration
    Oct 5, 2023 · The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has three main goals: the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use ...
  206. [206]
    [PDF] CANAD/\S OCEANS ESTATE - Canada.ca
    Canada's EEZ was formally "established" in 1997 when the Oceans Act entered into force and has a surface area of approximately 2.9 million square kilometres. ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  207. [207]
    [PDF] Canada's Unresolved Maritime Boundaries
    On 1 January 1977, Canada declared a 200nm-wide. 'Exclusive Fishing Zone 5' and used an equidistance line based on territorial sea straight baselines as the ...<|separator|>
  208. [208]
    Expanding reserves and conquering new offshore frontiers: Brazil ...
    It was approved by Brazil's Congress in 1987 and the government ratified it the following year. Before it came into force in 1994, Brazil had already adjusted, ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  209. [209]
    Argentina's Popular Exclusive Economic Zone - Payne Institute
    Jul 10, 2020 · Its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is one of the best places for squid fishing on Earth. The EEZ, spanning for 200 nautical miles from any point ...
  210. [210]
    [PDF] EL LÍMITE EXTERIOR DE LA PLATAFORMA CONTINENTAL ...
    Apr 7, 2009 · Argentina has therefore established the outer limit of its continental shelf in compliance with. UNCLOS as adopted in 1982 at Montego Bay and ...
  211. [211]
    ARGENTINA - the United Nations
    Arbitration award relating the Beagle Channel dispute (Argentina, Chile) ... date information available to it at this website. However, it should be ...
  212. [212]
    Falkland Islands - UK Overseas Territories Conservation Forum
    The Falkland Islands marine area (Exclusive Economic Zone – EEZ) is extensive and covers 463,897 km2, from shallow coastal waters to deep-sea of more than 4500 ...
  213. [213]
    French Exclusive Economic Zone (French Guiana) (EEZ)
    PlaceType, EEZ. Latitude, 6° 40' 51.2" N (6.6809°). Longitude, 51° 45' 22.2" W (-51.75618°). Precision, 374381 meter. Min. Lat, 3° 51' 0.7" N (3.8502°).Missing: France key
  214. [214]
    South Africa works to maximize economic benefits from the ocean ...
    Aug 10, 2021 · South Africa is a maritime nation with jurisdiction over one of the largest exclusive economic zones in the world: the mainland EEZ ...<|separator|>
  215. [215]
    Assessing South Africa's marine protected area quality and progress ...
    In South Africa, 41 MPAs currently protect 5.4 % of the country's mainland exclusive economic zone (EEZ), each with varied conservation goals and unique ...
  216. [216]
    Develop a marine spatial plan for Seychelles' Exclusive Economic ...
    The EEZ encompasses 1,374,000 km2 of ocean and 115 islands. The MSP Initiative is a Government-led process, with planning and facilitation managed by The Nature ...
  217. [217]
    Seychelles Designates 30% of its EEZ as Marine Protected Area
    Mar 26, 2020 · A third of Seychelles' ocean territory, an area larger than Germany, will now be declared as protected under the National Parks and Nature Conservancy Act.
  218. [218]
    Map of the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the countries...
    African islands of the western Indian Ocean, however, have been involved in it for more than twenty years through the exploitation of their 'blue gold': tuna.
  219. [219]
    Exclusive economic zone - Wikipedia
    An area of the sea in which a sovereign state has exclusive rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources, including energy production from ...EEZ of Japan · New Zealand waters · United States · Air defense identification zone
  220. [220]
    [PDF] The World's 230 Exclusive Economic Zones From Largest to Smallest
    Total Area of Exclusive Economic Zones. 1 - 5. 6 - 12. 13 - 19. 20 - 28. 29 - 39 ... South Africa. 1 072 679. Argentina. 1 072 053. Gilbert Islands (KIR). 1 053 ...
  221. [221]
    10 Countries With Largest Maritime Boundaries - Marine Insight
    Feb 6, 2025 · 10 Countries With Largest Maritime Boundaries · 1. France · 2. United States · 3. Australia · 4. Russia · 5. Japan · 6. Brazil · 7. Chile · 8. The ...
  222. [222]
    Countries with the Largest Exclusive Economic Zones - World Atlas
    Jun 29, 2018 · Australia has the third largest EEZ, which occupies an area of about 3,283,933 sq mi. Australia claimed an additional 965,255 sq mi of seabed ...Missing: extent | Show results with:extent
  223. [223]
    U.S. Maritime Limits and Boundaries - U.S. Office of Coast Survey
    Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the U.S. extends 200 nautical miles from the territorial sea baseline and is adjacent to ...
  224. [224]
    Maritime Boundaries - Marine Regions
    The total area under NAFO's Convention is 6,551,289 km2. Geographic delineations of the NAFO Convention Area are described in the NAFO Convention and are ...
  225. [225]
    French Polynesia | The United Nations and Decolonization
    Sep 20, 2024 · Basic Facts ; Population · 279,550 ; Land area · 3,600 km ; Exclusive economic zone · 4,767,242 km ...
  226. [226]
    Distance from France to French Polynesia
    Distance from France to French Polynesia is 15,908 kilometers. This air travel distance is equal to 9,885 miles.Missing: EEZ | Show results with:EEZ
  227. [227]
    [OC] Top 50 countries by Exclusive Economic Zone area - Reddit
    Dec 18, 2023 · Mostly, very isolated islands and small archipelagos like Kerguelen, Crozet, Saint-Paul, and Clipperton...Top 12 largest countries by their exclusive economic zone (EEZ)Map: 7 largest exclusive economic zones : r/europe - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  228. [228]
    [PDF] English - General Assembly - the United Nations
    Feb 17, 2023 · Land area: 35.5 km2 (Pitcairn Island: 4.35 km2). Exclusive economic zone (now a maritime protected area): 842,000 km2. Population: 42 (2022); ...<|separator|>
  229. [229]
    The Pitcairn Islands | The Pew Charitable Trusts
    Mar 18, 2015 · Encompassing 99 per cent of Pitcairn's exclusive economic zone, the Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve is about 3½ times the size of the land area ...
  230. [230]
    Map of the Tristan da Cunha (TdC) Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)...
    Tristan da Cunha (TDC), an isolated island group in the South Atlantic, is the most remote inhabited islands in the world, lying over 2000 km from continental ...<|separator|>