Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sustainable Development Goal 11

Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG 11), titled "Sustainable Cities and Communities," is one of seventeen global objectives adopted by the in 2015 through the 2030 Agenda for , with the aim of making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable amid rapid urbanization. The goal encompasses ten targets measured by fifteen indicators, focusing on ensuring access to adequate housing and (target 11.1), affordable (11.2), inclusive (11.3), protection of cultural and (11.4), reduction of disaster impacts (11.5), minimization of urban environmental effects (11.6), access to green spaces (11.7), support for in sustainable building (11.c), and integrated policies for inclusion and resilience (11.a and 11.b). Progress toward SDG 11 has been uneven, with global accelerating—reaching 57 percent of the world's by 2022—but key metrics showing stagnation or reversal despite the goal's . The proportion of urban residents in s dipped slightly to 24.8 percent in 2022 from 25 percent in 2015, yet the absolute swelled to 1.12 billion, an increase of 130 million since 2015, reversing prior declines and highlighting how outpaces improvements driven by economic rather than policy interventions alone. Disaster mortality has declined due to better early and evacuation, but economic losses and damage persist, with limited fiscal impeding local efforts; as of 2024, only 110 countries align local strategies with national plans, covering 73 percent of municipalities on average. Data availability remains a bottleneck, adequate for just four of ten , complicating empirical assessment and revealing gaps in monitoring that undermine causal accountability for outcomes. Critics point to inherent tensions in SDG 11's prescriptions, where ambitions for environmental and often with the economic imperatives fueling , such as demands that top-down regulations may constrain through added costs without proportional gains in affordability or . Empirical reviews of initiatives linked to SDG 11 expose overlaps and contradictions, including governance hurdles that prioritize technological fixes over addressing root causes like property rights and market incentives for slum reduction. Overall, UN assessments confirm the broader 2030 Agenda is off-track, with only 35 percent of targets showing moderate progress or better, underscoring SDG 11's challenges in a context where voluntary national implementations yield inconsistent results amid competing priorities like alleviation and .

Origins and Historical Context

Adoption in the 2030 Agenda

The 2030 Agenda for was unanimously adopted by all 193 member states on 25 September 2015 during the Summit in , formalized through Resolution 70/1, titled "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for ." This outlines a framework comprising 17 (SDGs), 169 targets, and over 230 indicators, succeeding the and aiming to address interconnected global challenges such as , , and by 2030. The agenda emphasizes universal application, integration of economic, social, and environmental dimensions, and partnerships among governments, , and the private sector. Sustainable Development Goal 11, focused on making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable, was integrated as one of the 17 core goals within this agenda, marking the first standalone urban-focused objective in a global development framework. Its inclusion reflects recognition of rapid urbanization's scale—projected to house 68% of the world's population in cities by 2050—and associated risks like proliferation and disaster vulnerability, drawing from empirical data on urban growth patterns. The goal's targets encompass housing affordability, , , protection, and , with indicators tied to measurable outcomes such as the proportion of urban population in slums. The adoption process for SDG 11 built on the proposal, established by Resolution 67/224 in 2013, which submitted its report (A/68/970) in August 2014 outlining 17 goals and 169 targets after consultations involving 193 member states and stakeholders. This OWG framework, largely preserved through eight months of intergovernmental negotiations from January to July 2015, ensured SDG 11's retention with minor refinements for clarity and feasibility, prioritizing evidence-based targets over expansive ambitions amid debates on and measurability. The final avoided dilution of urban-specific commitments, though relies on national ownership and data availability, as custodian agencies like UN-Habitat were designated post-adoption to track progress.

Precedents in Urban Development Policy

The Conference on Human Settlements, known as Habitat I, convened in , , from 31 May to 11 June 1976, marking the initial global policy framework for urban development. The conference produced the Vancouver Declaration, affirming the fundamental right to adequate shelter and a suitable living environment for all, and the Recommendations for National Action Programme, which urged governments to integrate human settlements planning into national development strategies, emphasizing , , and slum prevention. These outcomes highlighted the growing urbanization challenges, with over one billion people in inadequate housing at the time, and established principles of and equitable resource allocation that influenced subsequent urban policies. Building on Habitat I, the second United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (), held in , , from 3 to 14 1996, adopted the Istanbul Declaration and the Habitat Agenda. The agenda committed nations to achieving adequate shelter for all by the year 2000—a target not met, as populations continued to grow—and to fostering sustainable by addressing , , and in cities, where populations had reached 2.8 billion. It promoted integrated policies for , , and disaster mitigation, while recognizing local governments' roles, laying groundwork for monitoring urban indicators and international cooperation on human settlements. The (MDGs), adopted by the UN General Assembly in September 2000, further advanced urban-focused targets under Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability. Specifically, Target 7.D aimed to achieve, by 2020, significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million dwellers through better access to , , and durable , reducing the global population share from 39% in 2000. Progress under this target, tracked via indicators like access to , demonstrated empirical gains—slum improvements benefited over 100 million by 2015—but revealed limitations in scope, as urban populations swelled to 3.9 billion, prompting calls for comprehensive beyond poverty alleviation. SDG 11 directly extended this continuity, broadening to inclusive, safe, and resilient cities while retaining as Target 11.1, with indicators aligned to MDG metrics for overcrowding and services. These precedents collectively shifted urban policy from ad hoc national efforts to coordinated global commitments, emphasizing data-driven targets amid rapid —from 37% urban in 1975 to 54% by —yet faced critiques for uneven , particularly in developing regions where policy gaps persisted despite rhetorical advances.

Objectives, Targets, and Indicators

Detailed Targets

Target 11.1 aims to ensure access for all to adequate, safe, and and basic services, alongside upgrading slums, by 2030. This target addresses the global urban housing deficit, where as of 2022, approximately 1.1 billion resided in slums or slum-like conditions. Target 11.2 seeks to provide access to safe, affordable, accessible, and systems for all by 2030, with improvements in through expanded and attention to vulnerable groups including women, children, persons with disabilities, and older persons. Target 11.3 focuses on enhancing inclusive and sustainable by 2030, building capacity for participatory, integrated, and sustainable planning and management across all countries. This involves promoting urban policies that balance with use and . Target 11.4 calls for strengthened efforts to protect and safeguard the world's cultural and natural heritage from threats like and . Target 11.5 targets a significant reduction by 2030 in deaths, affected populations, and direct economic losses relative to global GDP from disasters, including water-related ones, prioritizing protection for the poor and vulnerable. Target 11.6 aims to reduce the adverse environmental impact of cities by 2030, emphasizing air quality and . Urban areas contribute substantially to global emissions and , necessitating localized interventions. Target 11.7 strives for universal access to safe, , accessible, green, and public spaces by 2030, particularly benefiting women, children, older persons, and persons with disabilities. Target 11.a supports positive economic, social, and environmental linkages between urban, peri-urban, and rural areas via strengthened national and regional development planning. Target 11.b required substantially increasing by 2020 the number of cities and settlements implementing integrated policies for , , and , and disaster resilience, aligned with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Target 11.c involves supporting through financial and technical assistance to build sustainable and resilient structures using local materials.

Measurement Indicators and Custodian Agencies

Sustainable Development 11 is monitored via 15 indicators aligned with its 10 targets, as established in the indicator framework adopted by the on 6 July 2017. These indicators measure progress toward inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable cities and human settlements, with methodologies varying in maturity: Tier I indicators have established methods and regular production, Tier II have methods but limited , and Tier III lack fully developed methodologies. Custodian agencies, designated by the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs), lead the development of standards, from sources, and , often collaborating with statistical offices and other entities. UN-Habitat serves as the primary custodian for nine indicators, reflecting its on issues, while others involve specialized agencies like WHO for air quality or UNDRR for disasters. The indicators are disaggregated where feasible by sex, age, , and location to capture inequities, with data primarily sourced from censuses, surveys, administrative records, and for metrics. Challenges in measurement include data gaps in developing countries, inconsistencies in definitions (e.g., "" households), and the need for geospatial integration, prompting ongoing methodological refinements by custodians as of 2023.
TargetIndicatorDescriptionCustodian Agency(ies)
11.111.1.1Proportion of population living in slums, informal settlements, or inadequate UN-Habitat
11.211.2.1Proportion of population with convenient access to , by sex, age, and persons with disabilitiesUN-Habitat
11.311.3.1Ratio of land consumption rate to rateUN-Habitat,
11.311.3.2Proportion of cities with direct participation of in and managementUN-Habitat
11.411.4.1Total expenditure on the preservation, protection, and conservation of all cultural and , by source of funding and type of heritage, UNEP
11.511.5.1Number of deaths, missing persons, and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 populationUNDRR, WHO
11.511.5.2Direct economic loss in relation to global GDP, damage to , and number of disruptions to basic services attributed to disastersUNDRR,
11.511.5.3(a) Damage to and (b) number of disruptions to basic services, attributed to disastersUNDRR
11.611.6.1Proportion of collected and managed in controlled facilities out of total municipal waste generatedUN-Habitat
11.611.6.2Annual mean levels of fine (e.g., PM2.5 and PM10) in cities (population weighted)WHO
11.711.7.1Average share of the built-up area of cities that is open space for public use for all, by sex, age, and persons with disabilitiesUN-Habitat
11.711.7.2Proportion of persons victim of physical or , by sex, age, disability status, and place of occurrenceUN-Habitat,
11.a11.a.1Number of countries that have national policies or plans that (a) respond to ; (b) ensure balanced territorial development; and (c) increase local fiscal spaceUN-Habitat
11.b11.b.1Number of countries that adopt and implement national strategies in line with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030UNDRR
11.b11.b.2Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local strategies in line with national strategiesUNDRR
11.c11.c.1Amount of (ODA) for in developing countries to support sustainable and resilient building, UN-Habitat

This illustrates trends in Indicator 11.1.1, a key metric for adequacy.

Global Progress and Empirical Assessment

has accelerated, with over 56% of the world's residing in areas as of 2023, projected to reach 68% by 2050, straining and services in many developing regions. Progress toward SDG 11 targets remains uneven, with the reporting that only select indicators show advancement amid persistent challenges like rapid informal settlement growth and inadequate disaster preparedness. In 2022, approximately 1.1 billion people, or 24.8% of the , lived in slums or slum-like conditions, a marginal decline from 25% in 2015 but an increase from 24.2% in 2020, reflecting stalled efforts in upgrading particularly in where over 60% of dwellers reside in such areas. Disaster resilience has improved in terms of mortality rates, with global -related deaths (excluding pandemics) dropping to 0.79 per 100,000 people between 2014 and 2023, nearly half the previous decade's rate of 1.61, attributable to enhanced early warning systems and response capabilities in settings. However, direct economic losses from disasters as a proportion of GDP have not shown consistent decline, with areas in vulnerable regions facing escalating costs due to concentrated assets and variability. Air quality in cities remains a critical concern, as 99% of the global population experiences unhealthy PM2.5 levels, with annual averages often exceeding WHO guidelines by factors of 7-10 in high-density areas of South and . Access to systems has seen some gains, with certain national policies expanding public transit coverage, though global data indicate that over half of populations in low-income countries lack convenient access to affordable options. Municipal serves a growing share of residents, yet treatment and recycling lag, contributing to . Overall, UN assessments highlight that while pockets of exist in policy frameworks and select metrics like , the majority of SDG 11 indicators are off-track for 2030, hampered by insufficient and failures in rapidly urbanizing nations.

Regional and Country-Level Variations

Progress toward SDG 11 exhibits pronounced regional disparities, with developing regions facing greater challenges in adequacy, , and compared to more developed areas. In 2022, over 85 percent of the global population—approximately 1.06 billion people—was concentrated in three regions: Central and Southern (334 million), Eastern and South-Eastern (362 million), and , reflecting higher proportions of dwellers in inadequate in these areas. Globally, the proportion of population in slums stood at 24.8 percent in 2022, but regional figures vary starkly, with and Southern exceeding 40 percent in many estimates, while Northern Africa and have seen reductions through targeted upgrading programs. Access to , measured by indicator 11.2.1, shows similar divides: only 51.6 percent of the global population had convenient in 2022, with more developed regions achieving over 80 percent coverage, whereas averaged below 30 percent. Data from 2,039 cities across 188 countries in 2023 indicate that six out of ten residents worldwide benefit from options, but this masks variations, such as near-universal in European cities versus limited networks in and South Asian centers. At the country level, Nordic nations like and lead in SDG 11 metrics, with low slum rates under 1 percent, extensive systems serving over 90 percent of urban populations, and robust disaster preparedness frameworks, as reflected in their top rankings in the Sustainable Development Report. In contrast, many sub-Saharan African countries, such as those in the , report slum proportions above 60 percent and minimal infrastructure, exacerbated by rapid outpacing capacity. Emerging successes include and the , which have accelerated progress through investments in and resilience measures, narrowing gaps relative to regional peers between 2015 and 2023. However, low-income countries overall lag, with only modest declines in slum populations amid population growth, highlighting the need for localized adaptations beyond uniform global targets.

Implementation Challenges

Technical and Logistical Barriers

One primary technical barrier to SDG 11 implementation is the persistent gap in reliable urban data for monitoring progress on its indicators. Only four of the ten SDG 11 targets possess sufficient data to evaluate advancements as of 2023, complicating evidence-based policymaking and resource allocation in cities worldwide. Over 40% of SDG indicators, including those relevant to urban sustainability, rely on outdated data in OECD countries alone, hindering timely interventions for issues like disaster resilience and air quality under targets 11.5 and 11.6. In developing regions, local governments often lack the digital infrastructure and skilled personnel to collect geospatial and real-time metrics, such as public transport accessibility (indicator 11.2.1), exacerbating inaccuracies in reporting slum populations or waste management coverage. Infrastructure deficits pose another core technical challenge, particularly in rapidly urbanizing areas where expansion outpaces capacity. In , for instance, informal settlements proliferate due to insufficient funding and technical expertise for resilient and transport systems, with many cities unable to upgrade aging grids to support or flood-resistant designs aligned with target 11.b. Developing countries face acute shortages in like spaces and , as unplanned sprawl overwhelms existing networks, leading to heightened vulnerability to under target 11.6. Retrofitting legacy for requires advanced engineering solutions, such as seismic reinforcements or smart monitoring systems, but limited access to and high costs impede adoption, especially in low-income urban settings. Logistically, coordinating and stakeholder alignment remains fraught, as urban planning for SDG 11 demands integrating disparate sectors like , , and . Unplanned urban logistics, including freight congestion and inefficient supply chains for sustainable materials, undermine targets for reduced emissions and safe mobility (11.2), with cities struggling to implement hub-based systems amid space constraints and regulatory silos. In practice, scaling interventions across sprawling metropolises involves complex permitting, land acquisition, and procurement processes, often delayed by bureaucratic fragmentation; for example, achieving target 11.1's requires synchronized public-private logistics that many municipalities cannot manage due to capacity shortfalls. These issues are compounded in high-density contexts, where logistical bottlenecks in material sourcing for —such as recycled aggregates or low-carbon concrete—hinder timely project execution, perpetuating cycles of inefficiency.

Socioeconomic and Political Obstacles

Rapid in developing regions has outpaced development, resulting in persistent growth and deficits that undermine SDG 11 targets. As of 2020, approximately 1.1 billion people resided in s or slum-like conditions globally, an increase of 165 million since 2000, with 90% concentrated in and . This expansion exacerbates socioeconomic inequalities, as the urban poor often lack access to basic services like , with over 90% unserved in slum areas compared to 70% in non-slum urban zones in cities such as and . Income disparities further compound these issues, with the top 10% of earners capturing 52% of global income while the bottom 50% receive only 8.5%, limiting affordability of adequate for low-income groups. Funding shortfalls represent a core socioeconomic barrier, as cities require substantial investments to upgrade slums and expand resilient . Global infrastructure needs are estimated at $4.5 to $5.4 annually through 2030, yet significant gaps persist due to limited local revenues and insufficient public investment, particularly in developing countries where intergovernmental transfers fund up to 90% of municipal budgets in places like and . A housing affordability crisis affects 1.6 billion people lacking adequate , projected to rise to 2 billion by 2030 without scaled-up financing, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities and perpetuating cycles. These gaps hinder progress on targets like safe and disaster resilience, as low-income households face restricted credit access and economic exclusion from formal housing markets. Political obstacles, including weak and , further impede effective implementation of sustainable policies. Only 53% of countries have dedicated ministries for national policies, reflecting limited political prioritization and coordination between national and local levels, which fragments planning efforts. in diverts resources and leads to dysfunctional , with global estimates indicating 10-40% of public budgets lost to corrupt practices, particularly in developing countries where and prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. In , for instance, corrupt land allocation and decisions entrench and , undermining goals for inclusive settlements. Additionally, political and displace millions—82 million in 2020 alone—eroding capacity and increasing vulnerability to disasters in . opposition in wealthier nations also blocks reforms, illustrating how entrenched interests resist policies needed for equitable growth.

Criticisms and Controversies

Doubts on Effectiveness and Causal Impact

Empirical assessments indicate that Sustainable Development Goal 11 has struggled to demonstrate verifiable causal impacts on sustainability outcomes, with many observed trends attributable to broader economic and demographic forces rather than targeted SDG interventions. analyses highlight that in reducing the proportion of in , a key proxy for target 11.1 on adequate , has stagnated or reversed in absolute terms despite global , as slum dwellers numbered approximately 1.1 billion in 2020 with projections showing continued growth absent market-driven improvements. This disconnect arises because rates have accelerated —reaching over 56% of the global in areas by 2020—primarily driven by economic migration and , not SDG-specific policies. A primary stems from severe deficiencies undermining claims of ; only four of SDG 11's ten targets possess sufficient for progress tracking, hampering and enabling potential overstatement in self-reported UN metrics. For instance, indicators on air quality (target 11.6) and mortality (target 11.5) often lack consistent baselines, with reversed trends in urban pollution noted in multiple regions, suggesting that SDG frameworks have not altered underlying causal pathways like industrial expansion or to events. Critiques from governance research emphasize that UN progress reports, reliant on voluntary national submissions, exhibit , as evidenced by the absence of rigorous, independent verification mechanisms that could isolate SDG effects from confounders such as GDP growth or technological adoption. Causal attribution challenges further erode confidence in SDG 11's impact, as econometric studies reveal weak links between adoption and urban outcomes, with improvements more strongly correlated to decentralized market mechanisms than centralized mandates. Research on global goals indicates no robust evidence of transformative effects from SDG 11 despite extensive promotional efforts, attributing limited success to inherent contradictions, such as promoting while targets impose regulatory burdens that deter investment in developing cities. In regions like , where urban challenges are acute, empirical reviews conclude that major policy shifts beyond SDG rhetoric are required to meet targets, implying that the framework has functioned more as aspirational signaling than a driver of tangible change. By , UN assessments themselves acknowledged alarmingly insufficient advancement across SDG 11 indicators, reinforcing skepticism that the goals have causally redirected resources effectively amid competing priorities like and fiscal constraints.

Ideological and Economic Critiques

Critics of Sustainable Development Goal 11 argue that its emphasis on integrated national and for areas promotes intervention, which historically leads to misallocation of resources and stifles by overriding decentralized . Such approaches, as outlined in targets like 11.3 for enhancing participatory and 11.a for strengthening planning links between and rural areas, assume planners can anticipate needs better than individuals responding to price signals, a premise undermined by from economic and historical examples like Soviet projects where top-down directives resulted in chronic shortages and inefficiencies. Ideologically, SDG 11 reflects a collectivist framework that prioritizes state-orchestrated sustainability over property rights and personal liberty, potentially enabling expansive regulatory powers that encroach on private land use and consumer preferences for suburban or low-density living. For instance, policies inspired by SDG 11's resilience and inclusivity targets often advocate densification and reduced automobile dependence, dismissing sprawl as unsustainable despite data showing that lower-density U.S. metros like Houston exhibit higher housing affordability and lower per-capita emissions through market-driven efficiencies rather than mandates. This orientation aligns with broader UN sustainable development agendas criticized for embedding interventionist biases that favor equality metrics over growth-enabling freedoms, as higher economic freedom scores correlate with improved urban outcomes in prosperity, safety, and environmental quality. Economically, SDG 11's goals impose substantial fiscal burdens through subsidized and initiatives, diverting funds from productive investments while failing to address root causes like regulatory barriers to supply. Implementation efforts, such as those targeting slum reduction (11.1) or (11.2), often rely on public spending that crowds out dynamism; for example, government-led in high-regulation areas has driven U.S. costs up by restricting supply, with median home prices in planned coastal cities exceeding $800,000 as of 2023 compared to under $300,000 in freer markets like . Moreover, the goal's vague metrics, such as "substantially increasing" proportions, encourage symbolic policies over evidence-based reforms, perpetuating dependency rather than fostering self-reliance through and market incentives. These critiques highlight how SDG 11, like the broader SDGs, measures symptoms of urban ills—such as or —without tackling underlying incentives distorted by .

Alternative Perspectives and Market-Oriented Approaches

Free-Market Mechanisms for Urban Improvement

Free-market mechanisms for urban improvement prioritize , secure property rights, and incentives over centralized to enhance supply, efficiency, and in cities. These approaches rely on price signals to reflect and , enabling decentralized that adapts to local needs and technological advances, potentially outperforming rigid government mandates in achieving resilient, affordable urban environments. suggests that excessive distorts markets, while reforms aligning with property-based incentives foster and density conducive to . Secure form the foundation for efficient by incentivizing owners to develop or improve assets to maximize value, reducing underutilization and sprawl. A 2024 global analysis of indices revealed that stronger legal protections correlate with higher efficiency, as owners face incentives to avoid holding vacant land and instead in productive developments like high-density housing or mixed-use projects. In contexts with weak , such as informal settlements, titling programs have increased formal and access, though outcomes vary by quality. This contrasts with state-controlled land allocation, which often leads to bureaucratic delays and misallocation, as clarify and facilitate voluntary exchanges for urban upgrades. Deregulating zoning and land-use restrictions exemplifies a market-oriented that boosts supply and affordability, key to SDG 11's aims of inclusive . Studies attribute 30-50% of price premiums in high-cost U.S. metros to barriers that limit and supply responsiveness to . Reforms allowing multi-family units in single-family zones, as analyzed in recent empirical work, have increased permits and moderated rents without significant negative externalities. For example, easing height and limits promotes vertical growth, conserving land and reducing per-capita emissions compared to low- sprawl perpetuated by regulations. Such changes empower developers to respond to market signals, yielding diverse options and curbing formation through competitive supply. Private incentives and public-private partnerships (PPPs) introduce market discipline to infrastructure, often delivering projects faster and at lower cost than pure public procurement. Theoretical and case-based evidence highlights PPP advantages in bundling design, finance, and operation, aligning private profits with long-term efficiency and innovation in areas like transport and utilities. In urban settings, these mechanisms have funded resilient infrastructure, such as toll roads and smart grids, where private operators optimize maintenance via user fees rather than subsidies. However, success depends on clear contracts to mitigate risks of opportunism, with empirical reviews showing reduced delays but mixed fiscal impacts. Overall, these tools leverage entrepreneurial risk-taking to address urban bottlenecks, promoting sustainable outcomes through voluntary coordination over coercive planning.

Decentralized vs. Centralized Planning Debates

Centralized planning for , as often embedded in SDG 11's emphasis on coordinated and regional strategies, seeks to impose uniform policies for , , and disaster to address inequities and externalities. Proponents argue it enables large-scale infrastructure deployment, such as integrated public transit systems, which decentralized approaches might underprovide due to coordination failures. However, this model grapples with Friedrich Hayek's problem, where central authorities cannot aggregate the dispersed, tacit local essential for efficient in dynamic environments. Empirical reviews of literature indicate mixed but often positive associations with outcomes, contrasting with centralized systems' tendencies toward misallocation and inefficiency. Decentralized planning, by contrast, relies on local governance, market signals, and private initiative to adapt to site-specific conditions, fostering innovation in areas like and . Urban theorist critiqued centralized projects of the mid-20th century—such as ' highway-dominated interventions in —for destroying organic neighborhood fabrics and ignoring residents' practical knowledge, leading to social and economic decline. A study of Chinese cities found that fiscal , by empowering local fiscal autonomy, significantly boosted high-quality urban development metrics, including indicators aligned with SDG 11 targets like reduced populations and improved environmental quality, while financial decentralization showed similar but context-dependent effects. In , decentralized land management has sustained urban commons like community forests amid rapid growth, though political capture undermines full efficacy. High-profile centralized initiatives underscore risks: Brazil's , designed top-down in the 1950s, resulted in sprawling, car-dependent layouts with persistent affordability issues and underused public spaces, exemplifying how imposed visions falter without iterative feedback. Similarly, "" projects like India's (halted in 2018 amid environmental and financial scandals) and Portugal's PlanIT Valley (abandoned by 2015 due to unattainable tech-centric goals) failed to deliver sustainable outcomes, burdened by centralized overreach disconnected from economic viability. These cases highlight causal pitfalls, including and innovation stifling, prevalent in top-down models despite SDG 11's advocacy for integrated . Decentralized alternatives, such as Houston's minimal since the 1940s, have enabled denser, market-responsive growth, averting some affordability crises seen in rigidly planned peers, though not without externalities like sprawl. Critics of centralized SDG 11 implementation note institutional biases toward top-down metrics, potentially overlooking how harnesses price mechanisms for causal realism in —e.g., incentivizing private retrofits for over mandated standards prone to evasion. A review of effects on environmental found decentralized structures outperforming centralized ones in adaptive , reducing without uniform rigidity. Yet, pure decentralization risks uneven equity; hybrid models, informed by empirical monitoring rather than prescriptive global targets, may balance local experimentation with minimal central safeguards, as evidenced by positive decentralization impacts in shrinking areas where flexibility mitigates decline. Ultimately, tilts toward decentralization's superior alignment with complexity, challenging SDG 11's centralized ethos for more emergent, evidence-based paths to resilient cities.

Interconnections with Other SDGs

Synergies and Trade-Offs

Sustainable Development Goal 11, focusing on sustainable cities and communities, exhibits synergies with several other SDGs through shared advancements in and services. For instance, improvements in and under SDG 11 can enhance access to affordable (SDG 7) by promoting efficient public systems and renewable integration in cities, as evidenced by reduced energy demand in densely planned urban areas. Similarly, resilient urban contributes to outcomes (SDG 3) by lowering exposure to pollutants and improving , with studies showing correlations between better urban air quality targets and reduced respiratory diseases. Synergies also extend to economic and social goals, such as SDG 8 ( and ), where compact urban development fosters job creation in and services, and SDG 9 (, , and ), via integrated resilient systems that support industrial efficiency. Global analyses indicate SDG 11 is most strongly linked to SDG 17 (partnerships for the goals), reflecting collaborative urban initiatives that amplify progress across multiple targets, and to SDG 13 () when cities adopt low-emission strategies. These interactions often prevail in aggregated data from 2000–2016, where advancements in one goal positively reinforce others over time. However, trade-offs arise prominently with environmental SDGs, particularly SDG 13, as rapid expansion increases and , undermining climate mitigation efforts. For example, pursuing development targets like (SDG 11.1) can lead to sprawl that exacerbates (SDG 15) and resource strain, with empirical reviews highlighting tensions between economic- priorities and preservation. In developing regions, where rates exceed sustainable capacities, these conflicts manifest as higher vulnerabilities conflicting with SDG 11's aims while pressuring SDG 12 (responsible ). Such trade-offs are not merely theoretical; from trends show that unchecked for SDG 11 progress often contradicts reductions needed for SDG 13, necessitating prioritized policy sequencing.

Case Studies

Notable Successes Driven by Policy and Markets

Global death rates from have declined significantly since the mid-20th century, with decadal averages dropping due to policy interventions such as improved early warning systems and stricter building codes. In , cyclone-related deaths fell from approximately 300,000 in 1970 to just 26 during in 2020, attributed to national policies enhancing forecasting, evacuation protocols, and cyclone shelters. Similarly, weather-related disaster fatalities worldwide decreased nearly threefold between 1970 and 2019, driven by these resilience-building measures in vulnerable urban areas. In Curitiba, Brazil, a master urban plan adopted in 1966 has sustained successes in sustainable transport and waste management through policy incentives for bus rapid transit (BRT) and recycling programs. The BRT system, operational since the 1970s, now serves over 2.3 million passengers daily on dedicated lanes, reducing congestion and emissions while integrating land-use planning to curb sprawl. Market elements, including public-private partnerships for route efficiency, have supported economic growth alongside environmental gains, positioning Curitiba as a model for integrated urban mobility. Medellín, , achieved urban transformation via social urbanism policies from 2004 onward, including escalators and cable cars connecting informal hillside settlements to the city core. These interventions, combined with public libraries and parks in underserved areas, correlated with a rate decline from 2002 to 2010 and reductions exceeding 80% by 2013, fostering social inclusion and . Policy-driven investments in equitable , rather than , upgraded slums without , enhancing and . Singapore's policies, managed by the since 1960, have housed over 80% of residents in high-density yet livable developments, integrating green spaces and transit-oriented design. Long-term and density controls have minimized sprawl while supporting market-responsive affordability, contributing to low slum prevalence and high urban sustainability indices. Market mechanisms have driven building retrofits in , , through the 1200 Buildings Program launched in 2010, utilizing Environmental Upgrade Agreements for low-interest financing. By 2020, this initiative mobilized over $17.2 million in private investment, installing 5.4 MW of solar capacity and cutting annual by 18,000 tonnes across commercial properties. Such financing models leverage market incentives to align actions with targets. In , , the Bairro Legal Programme, initiated in the post-1980s era, secured for millions in favelas, enabling infrastructure upgrades and without mass relocation. This policy approach created a comprehensive urban database for targeted development, demonstrating scalable prevention through legal and participatory reforms.

Examples of Shortfalls and Lessons Learned

Global progress toward SDG 11 has faltered, with nearly half of its targets off track as of 2023, including persistent challenges in housing, disaster resilience, and . Urban populations reached over 1.1 billion in 2020, marking a 165 million increase since 2000 despite a slight decline in the proportion of urban dwellers in slums from 31% to 24%. This growth underscores shortfalls in target 11.1 for adequate, safe, and , exacerbated by rapid outpacing development in low-income regions. Similarly, the number of affected by disasters per 100,000 rose from 1,198 in 2005–2015 to 2,113 in 2012–2021, with economic losses totaling $80 billion in 2021 alone, highlighting vulnerabilities under target 11.5. Specific case studies illustrate implementation pitfalls. in the , launched in 2008 as a zero-carbon urban model aligned with SDG 11's sustainability aims, incurred costs exceeding $18 billion but achieved low occupancy rates below 5% by 2023 due to high living expenses, isolation from established urban centers, and reliance on fossil fuel backups contradicting its carbon-neutral goals. International Business District in , a $40 billion project initiated in 2003 to promote resilient and inclusive settlements, resulted in underutilized public spaces and social fragmentation, as sensor-driven infrastructure prioritized elite expatriates over broad community needs, leading to visible inequalities and reduced . In , cities like exemplify planning shortfalls, where informal settlements such as expanded amid outdated zoning laws and service gaps, with over 90% of residents lacking basic compared to 70% in formal areas. Lessons from these shortfalls emphasize the limits of top-down, technology-heavy interventions without economic grounding. Ambitious eco-city visions often overlook human-scale factors like affordability and local incentives, resulting in ghost developments or elite enclaves rather than ; empirical data from and show that projected energy savings failed to materialize amid high upfront costs and behavioral resistance. In contrast, evidence from informal settlement upgrades indicates that securing property rights and enabling incremental private investments reduce formation more effectively than mandated , as seen in slower sprawl where land markets function. Effective requires prioritizing maintenance funding—neglected in many cases, escalating small-scale costs—and data-driven monitoring, given gaps in SDG 11 indicators for only four of ten targets. Policymakers must integrate causal economic analyses over ideological blueprints to avoid widening urban divides, as global crises like amplified pre-existing vulnerabilities in under-resourced areas.

References

  1. [1]
    Goal 11 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs
    Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.Sustainable transport · Sustainable cities and human... · Disaster risk reduction
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Table 1. SDG 11 targets and indicators - UN-Habitat
    SDG 11 targets and indicators. Targets. Current Indicators. SDG Target 11.1. By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic.
  3. [3]
    Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
    Jul 18, 2023 · The UN has defined 10 targets and 16 indicators for SDG 11. Targets specify the goals and indicators represent the metrics by which the ...
  4. [4]
    SDG Goals - United Nations Statistics Division
    The total slum population was 1.12 billion in 2022, 130 million more than in 2015, marking a reversal from the consistent decrease observed from 2000 to 2020.
  5. [5]
    SDG Goals - United Nations Statistics Division
    As of 2024, 110 countries report local disaster risk reduction strategies aligned with national plans, with an average of 73 per cent of municipalities ...
  6. [6]
    Data drought: The struggle to achieve SDG 11's vision for inclusive ...
    Sep 21, 2023 · The data needed to assess progress on SDG 11 are in short supply: only four of the 10 targets have adequate data to assess progress.Missing: disaster | Show results with:disaster
  7. [7]
    Module 1.3 Discussion (Critiquing the UN's SDGs)
    Mar 24, 2020 · The main issue with the UN's SDG's are the contradictions between its ecological and economical goals. In Dr. Jason Hickel's review of the ...
  8. [8]
    SDG-11 and smart cities: Contradictions and overlaps between ...
    Nov 29, 2022 · This paper focuses specifically on SDG-11 “Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” and how cities are increasingly ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025
    This year's Sustainable Development Goals Report finds that only 35 per cent of SDG targets are on track or making moderate progress. Nearly half are moving too ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A/RES/70/1 Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for ... - UN.org.
    Oct 21, 2015 · Preamble. This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom.
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Conferences | Habitat | United Nations
    Habitat I was the first United Nations Conference on Human Settlements. It took place in Vancouver, Canada, from 31 May-11 June 1976.
  14. [14]
    Habitat III and the New Urban Agenda: Growing Cities and ... - UN.org.
    The goal of the Habitat III conference is to focus on the implementation of the 'New Urban Agenda', building on the agenda of Habitat II in Istanbul in 1996 ...
  15. [15]
    United Nations Millennium Development Goals
    Target 7.A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources.Missing: 11 | Show results with:11
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Metadata on SDGs Indicator 11.1.1 Indicator category: Tier I
    When this indicator got operationalized during the MDG 7 Target. 7.D's tracking, overcrowding was fixed at a maximum of three people per habitable room (' ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 11 - Local 2030
    goal that will promote more transformative, productive, inclusive and resilient urban development for the long term. This standard definition will be ...
  18. [18]
    Cities - United Nations Sustainable Development Action 2015
    Goal 11 targets · 11.1 By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums · 11.2 · 11.3 · 11.4 · 11.5 · 11.6 ...
  19. [19]
    SDG Indicators — SDG Indicators
    ### SDG 11 Targets and Indicators Summary
  20. [20]
    Sustainable Development Goals - UN-Habitat
    As the UN focal point for sustainable urbanization and human settlements, UN-Habitat is the custodian agency for 9 of the 15 indicators under SDG 11 and ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Housing, Slums and Informal Settlements - Urban Indicators Database
    Housing, slums and informal settlements Version: May 2024 ... Data Digest Series) The Global Housing Affordability Challenge (Urban Data Digest Series)<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024 - — SDG Indicators
    Jun 28, 2024 · The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024 is the only UN official report that monitors global progress on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.Goal 11 · UN SDG 3 Report · SDG progress by target · SDG Goals
  24. [24]
    SDG Goals - United Nations Statistics Division
    Between 2014 and 2023, disaster-related mortality (excluding COVID-19) nearly halved to 0.79 per 100,000 people, down from 1.61 in the previous decade.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] soga-2024-report_0.pdf - State of Global Air
    99% of the world's population lives in places with unhealthy levels of PM2. 5 pollution. 34% lives in areas that exceed even the least stringent WHO interim ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] A progress report on SDG 11.2 - UN-Habitat
    By enhancing access to urban opportunities, public transport can play a critical role in ending poverty (SDG 1); ending hunger (SDG 2); promoting healthy ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Rescuing SDG 11 for a Resilient Urban Planet - UN-Habitat
    Perhaps the most notable area of progress for SDG 11 at the global level has been of the significant improvements in data production and monitoring progress, ...
  28. [28]
    The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025 - — SDG Indicators
    Jul 14, 2025 · The report calls for action in six priority areas: food systems, energy access, digital transformation, education, jobs and social protection, ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2024 - UN.org.
    Significant improvements in preparedness, including early warning systems and evacuation measures, have reduced disaster mortality, however, long-term ...
  30. [30]
    SDG Goals - United Nations Statistics Division
    Approximately 1.1 billion people currently live in slums or slum-like conditions in cities, with 2 billion more expected in the next 30 years.
  31. [31]
    Sustainable Development Report 2024
    Jun 17, 2024 · On average, only 16 percent of the SDG targets are on track to be met globally by 2030, with the remaining 84 percent showing limited progress ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Evaluating the Realities of SDG 11 in Africa: Achieving Urban ...
    Africa faces significant economic difficulties developing livable towns and cities to attain SDG 11 ('Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, ...
  33. [33]
    The SDG Index and Dashboards - Sustainable Development Report
    The SDG Index and Dashboards provides an annual assessment of SDG progress covering all 193 UN member states. This year's SDG Index incorporates 126 ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024
    Significant regional variations were evident, and despite a near doubling of coverage from 4.5 per cent in 2015 to 8.7 per cent in 2023, low-income countries ...
  35. [35]
    Full Report: Mind the SDG data gaps | OECD
    Sep 19, 2025 · Over 40% of SDG indicators in OECD countries rely on outdated data, hampering real-time responses in key areas such as climate action (SDG 13), ...
  36. [36]
    SDGs - Urban Indicators Database - UN-Habitat
    11.5: By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses relative to ...
  37. [37]
    Charting sustainable urban development through a systematic ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · The dominant themes are affordable housing (SDG11.1), urban transport (SDG11.2), policy and governance (SDG11.3) and access to public spaces ( ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    The prospects and challenges of developing more inclusive, safe ...
    Challenges include rapid urbanization, inadequate funding and insecurity. •. It recommends key policies for scaling up efforts towards achieving SDG11 targets.
  39. [39]
    Towards sustainable urban logistics: Exploring the implementation ...
    The urban logistics system causes negative externalities, such as pollution, noise and congestion. This study focuses on city hubs as a concept to reduce ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] SUSTAINABLE CITIES DIALOGUE - Local 2030
    Urban governance is the cornerstone of effective and sustainable implementation of SDG 11 and the link between the urban targets. 2. Exchanges showed the on- ...
  41. [41]
    What is Urban Logistics? Definition, Challenges, and Strategies
    Jun 16, 2024 · It addresses the significant challenges of traffic congestion, limited warehousing space, and environmental concerns. Through innovative ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] FOR A BETTER URBAN FUTURE - UN-Habitat
    Jul 13, 2023 · In 2020, the absolute slum population passed 1 billion, 165 million more slum dwellers have emerged globally over the past two decades.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Rescuing SDG 11 for a Resilient Urban Planet - UN-Habitat
    This report discusses rescuing SDG 11 for a resilient urban planet, addressing if we are failing, the urban divide, and a call to action.
  44. [44]
    A deep dive into how city governments can meet the infrastructure ...
    Apr 11, 2024 · Urban infrastructure investment needs are projected at $4.5 to $5.4 trillion annually through 2030, with a portion of this (10–25%) related to ...
  45. [45]
    Slum populations are set to surge as the housing crisis bites
    Jun 14, 2023 · The UN estimates that 1.6 billion people do not have access to adequate housing and that this number is expected to grow to 2 billion by 2030.<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Strengthening integrity within the urban planning profession to ...
    Globally, between 10 and 40 percent of public budgets are estimated to be regularly lost due to various forms of corruption, while an average of one in three ...
  47. [47]
    Africa's urban planners face huge corruption pressures: some answers
    May 24, 2022 · Corruption in urban development can lead to dysfunctional infrastructure that does not meet public needs. It also hardwires injustice into city systems for ...
  48. [48]
    Corruption in Urban Planning: A Guide for Professional and Trainee…
    Apr 6, 2023 · Corruption in Urban Planning: A Guide for Professional and Trainee Planners · Addressing land corruption in Africa: Recommendations based on the ...
  49. [49]
    some of the implications of not achieving the SDGs - PubMed Central
    Sep 4, 2020 · This paper outlines the relevance of the SDGs, the barriers currently seen in respect of their implementation and outlines what is at stake, if they are not ...
  50. [50]
    SDGs failing to have meaningful impact, finds Global Goals research ...
    SDGs failing to have meaningful impact, finds Global Goals research project ... Despite extensive PR campaigns surrounding the goals, “we see no strong evidence ...
  51. [51]
    Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable ... - Nature
    Jun 20, 2022 · Some studies, however, warn of 'SDG washing' by corporate actors, selective implementation of SDGs and political risks linked to private ...
  52. [52]
    2024 SDG Report: Global Progress Alarmingly Insufficient - Unsdg
    Jun 28, 2024 · The latest Sustainable Development Goals Report reveals a concerning lack of progress and urges for urgent action to address poverty, hunger, climate change, ...Missing: skepticism | Show results with:skepticism
  53. [53]
    Reducing Livability: How Sustainability Planning Threatens the ...
    Oct 28, 2013 · In many if not most cases, this planning seeks to reshape urban areas to reduce the amount of driving people do.Missing: SDG | Show results with:SDG<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Why Government Planning Always Fails | Cato Institute
    Sep 29, 2007 · Instead of long-range planning, cities and counties should solve problems using markets and user fees. Public or private toll roads can relieve ...Missing: SDG | Show results with:SDG
  55. [55]
    'Sustainable Planning' Is Not So Sustainable | Cato Institute
    Oct 31, 2011 · The idea of “sustainable communities” is that planners can socially engineer people into changing their travel behavior by redesigning cities to ...Missing: SDG critique
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The Myth of the Compact City - Cato Institute
    Nov 18, 2009 · Proponents of compact development argue that rebuilding American urban areas to higher densities is vital for reducing greenhouse gas emis-.Missing: SDG critique
  57. [57]
    The United Nations' Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable ...
    Jan 31, 2023 · According to data in The Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom, economic freedom is positively related to many of the goals and ...
  58. [58]
    The U.N. Sustainable Development Goals Are Beyond Saving
    Sep 26, 2023 · The SDGs are replete with imprecise goals and targets such as “substantially reduc[ing] corruption and bribery in all their forms.”
  59. [59]
    U.N. Repeating Past Mistakes in New Sustainable Development Goals
    Jul 23, 2014 · The SDGs as a whole focus on too many tangential metrics or measure the symptoms of poverty rather than the causes.
  60. [60]
    How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with ...
    Especially the apparent contradiction between the goals on economic growth and environmental sustainability has evoked criticism (Eisenmenger et al., 2020; ...
  61. [61]
    Zoning, Land-Use Planning, and Housing Affordability | Cato Institute
    Oct 18, 2017 · This study reviews evidence on the effects of zoning and land-use regulation in three related areas: housing supply, housing affordability, and economic growth.Zoning, Land-Use Planning... · Background · Effects Of Land-Use...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Global property rights and land use efficiency - Nature
    Oct 2, 2024 · A well-established title ensures stable taxation while imposing taxes on vacant land increases holding costs for inefficient use of land. Strong ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Land rights – unlocking land for urban development
    The legal definition of private rights over land also enables a fair and transparent process of establishing public rights over land. The ability of.Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  64. [64]
    Effects of land use plans on urban development: A property rights ...
    Property rights are the powers to consume, obtain income from, and alienate the assets over which the owners have the rights (Barzel, 1991). Thus, the property ...
  65. [65]
    The Impact of Zoning on Housing Affordability
    The bulk of the evidence examined indicates that zoning and other land use controls are responsible for prices in high cost areas of the country. This indicates ...
  66. [66]
    Zoning and affordability: A reply to Rodríguez-Pose and Storper - PMC
    The evidence suggests that increasing allowable housing densities is an important part of housing affordability in expensive regions.
  67. [67]
    The effects of residential zoning in U.S. housing markets
    A growing body of empirical literature finds that local zoning laws increase housing prices and intensify residential segregation (Glaeser and Ward, 2009, Kok ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] When and How to Use Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure
    Seven efficiency claims are advanced to prefer PPPs over public provision: narrow focus and dedicated management, the advantages of bundling, fewer delays in ...
  69. [69]
    Urban & Cities Public Private Partnership - World Bank PPP
    By investing in urban infrastructure, national and local governments can shape urban growth, expand opportunity, and drive inclusive, long-term development.
  70. [70]
    Understanding Hybrid Public-Private Partnerships: A Model for ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · Hybrid Public-Private Partnerships represent a powerful approach to addressing infrastructure challenges in developing countries.
  71. [71]
    The Use of Knowledge in Urban Development - FEE.org
    Hayek's work shows us that even if city planners have the best of intentions, they are incapable of accessing the information that would guide land and ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Decentralization and development Outcomes:...........
    This article critically reviews the empirical literature on decentralization and its relationship with de- velopment outcomes. The analysis suggests that ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Who Plans?: Jane Jacobs' Hayekian critique of urban planning
    Feb 21, 2016 · Hayek and Jacobs defended the importance of local knowledge, illustrated the power of decentralized planning, and celebrated the sublime ...
  74. [74]
    Economic Decentralization and High-Quality Urban Development
    The findings indicate that fiscal and financial decentralization exert a positive influence on urban high-quality development. However, the two forms of ...
  75. [75]
    Sustaining the urban commons in Ghana through decentralized ...
    May 4, 2023 · Decentralized urban planning can help sustain the urban commons, but it is operationalized in an unfavorable political environment.
  76. [76]
    Centralization or decentralization? A review on the effects of ...
    The results also indicate that most studies have been focused on the decentralization (42%) and dual effects (33%) impacts, some emphasize on centralization ...
  77. [77]
    Smart cities that failed along the way
    Nov 25, 2020 · An example of this are the Smart Cities that failed along the way, some leaving painful scars on the map.Lavasa (India), PlanIT Valley (Portugal) ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Why the Luster on Once-Vaunted 'Smart Cities' Is Fading - Yale E360
    Dec 1, 2021 · “Smart cities” built from scratch have so far failed to live up to their much-hyped promise. Some critics argue that rather than grafting a new city onto the ...
  79. [79]
    Centralization or decentralization? the impact of different ...
    Our research compares the effects of centralized and decentralized governance on the efficiency of environmental regulation.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Understanding the role of centralization processes for cities - Sci-Hub
    The general trend of shrinking urban areas shows a slowing down of decentralization in favor of centralized decline. Fig. 4 shows that the inten- sity ...
  81. [81]
    Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals
    Meanwhile, the air pollutant emissions reductions (part of SDG 3 and SDG 11) ... Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development ...Missing: interconnections | Show results with:interconnections
  82. [82]
    How Is SDG 11 Linked with Other SDGs? Evidence from the United ...
    Aug 23, 2024 · Developed countries associated SDG 11 more strongly with natural resources, environmental sustainability, and economic production. These ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Synergies and Trade-Offs in Reaching the Sustainable ...
    Oct 21, 2020 · Based on global data 2000–2016, our results indicate that synergies between and within the SDGs prevail, both in terms of levels and over time ...
  84. [84]
    Trade‐Offs Among SDGs: How the Pursuit of Economic, Food, and ...
    Jun 30, 2025 · ... (SDG 11) may exacerbate climate change and environmental degradation (SDGs 13–15) while also reinforcing social inequalities (SDGs 6, 10).Missing: interconnections | Show results with:interconnections
  85. [85]
    [PDF] How Is SDG 11 Linked with Other SDGs? Evidence from the United ...
    Aug 23, 2024 · Quite likely, developing countries face more pressing needs for their limited urban sustainability resources than addressing ocean pollution and ...
  86. [86]
    Trade-Offs Among SDGs: How the Pursuit of Economic, Food, and ...
    Jun 30, 2025 · Findings indicate significant trade-offs between economic growth and environmental sustainability, alongside previously underexamined tensions ...
  87. [87]
    The world has become more resilient to disasters, but investment is ...
    May 20, 2024 · Deaths from disasters have fallen, but we need to build even more resilience to ensure this progress doesn't reverse. By: Hannah Ritchie.<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Brazil's Curitiba has been following its master plan for 60 years - ASCE
    Jul 1, 2025 · The city of Curitiba adopted a master plan six decades ago that has made it a modern leader in urban development, sustainable living, and the fight against ...
  89. [89]
    Sustainable Urban Planning (Curitiba City)
    Brazilian Curitiba city has implemented several innovative systems to create jobs, improve public transportation accessibility, promote housing development, ...
  90. [90]
    Building the Future: How Medellín's Social Urbanism Is Blueprinting ...
    Mar 3, 2025 · Since then, however, visionary design and policy changes have transformed Medellin into a model city. In 2002-2010, the poverty rate declined by ...
  91. [91]
    Medellín's Integrated Urban Projects - Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
    This case study examines Medellín's experiments to improve social equity and human security via comprehensive planning instruments.
  92. [92]
    “But what about Singapore?” Lessons from the best public housing ...
    Jan 31, 2018 · 1. The importance of neighborhoods. · 2. The smart use of urban density. · 3. An integrated approach to housing— from planning and design, through ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Smart at Scale: Cities to Watch 25 Case Studies
    Given the diverse applications of city “smartness”, this paper compiles examples of successful smart city solutions in the following key themes: governance and ...
  94. [94]
    Examples of Slum Upgrading Projects - Cities Alliance
    Instead of focusing solely on housing for slum residents, the Upgrading for Growth approach involves providing opportunities for economic growth that meet the ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023 [PDF]
    Progress on more than 50 per cent of targets of the SDGs is weak and insufficient; on 30 per cent, it has stalled or gone into reverse.
  96. [96]
    A Flawed Green City of the Future Holds a Secret to Taming Heat
    Dec 5, 2023 · Welcome to Masdar City, a futuristic urban development zone on the outskirts of Abu Dhabi that by almost any measure has failed to live up ...
  97. [97]
    The world's first zero-carbon city is a big failure - Grist.org
    Feb 17, 2016 · A decade after it was conceived, the global economic slowdown interfered with the developers' ambitious vision, and Masdar is now more failed ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Songdo: A Case Study of Underutilized Public Spaces
    May 27, 2024 · The emphasis on smart city initiatives and sustainability positions Songdo as a prototype for future urban development. However, challenges ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  99. [99]
    Lessons from Failed Sustainable Initiatives - Circular Blogs
    The critical lesson from failure is that future efforts should ... The greatest cause of failures in sustainability is disengagement by the community.Lessons From Failed... · Overambitious Targets · Lack Of Good Financial...