Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Swash

Swash denotes the turbulent uprush and subsequent backwash of water across the face following the breaking of incident waves at the shoreline. This oscillatory motion defines the swash zone, the intermittently inundated region between maximum runup and rundown limits, where supercritical flows prevail with velocities typically ranging from 2 to 5 m/s. The swash zone serves as a critical interface between surf zone hydrodynamics and subaerial beach morphology, governing cross-shore sediment fluxes through bedload sheet flow and suspended load advection. On dissipative beaches, infragravity waves dominate swash energetics, promoting erosion, whereas reflective steep slopes enhance backwash dominance and potential accretion via berm formation. Key parameters, such as the surf similarity parameter \epsilon_b = \frac{4\pi^2 H_b}{2g T^2 \tan^2 \beta}, delineate dissipative (\epsilon_b < 2.5) from reflective (\epsilon_b > 20) regimes, influencing runup extents and sediment transport efficiency. Swash processes drive significant alongshore transport, contributing up to 50% of littoral drift on steep beaches, and underpin features like beach cusps and rhythmic patterns via instabilities in flow-sediment interactions. Empirical models, including runup formulations like R_{2\%} = 1.1 (0.5 \sqrt{H_s L_p (0.563 \beta^2 + 0.004)} + 0.35 \beta \sqrt{H_s L_p}), enable prediction of morphological responses to wave forcing and sea-level variations. These dynamics are pivotal for , as swash-mediated erosion controls shoreline retreat rates during storms.

Hydrodynamics

Uprush and Backwash Mechanics

The swash cycle comprises the uprush, the landward surge of water following wave bore collapse on the beachface, and the backwash, the gravity-driven seaward retreat. Uprush initiates as a thin, turbulent with propagation of the wave tip, decelerating under gravity and bottom friction, while backwash forms shallower flows that accelerate uniformly downslope until friction dominates in thin depths. Field observations indicate free-stream velocities of 2-5 m/s during swash events, with peaks at the onset of uprush and linear decreases through backwash. Uprush depths exceed backwash depths, and uprush durations are typically shorter than backwash durations, contributing to hydrodynamic asymmetry. Laboratory flume experiments on impermeable beaches reveal uprush velocities reaching 1.5-1.7 m/s post-bore arrival, transitioning to depth-uniform profiles, whereas backwash velocities peak at 0.9-1.6 m/s with pronounced near-bed shear on steeper slopes. Boundary layer development differs markedly: during uprush, the layer is thinnest at the seaward edge and thickens landward before vanishing at flow reversal, then regrows in backwash. coefficients range from 0.02 to 0.1, exerting significant in shallow flows. Beach slope modulates these mechanics; milder slopes (e.g., 1:35) yield longer swash cycles (∼17.5 s) and greater uprush asymmetry, while steeper slopes (e.g., 1:10) produce shorter cycles (∼7.6 s), hydraulic jumps in backwash, and enhanced turbulence. Swash-swash interactions, including overtaking of uprush by subsequent bores or collisions of backwash with incoming waves, induce flow reversals and skew velocity moments , influencing overall . remains the primary force, but gradients, infiltration, and wave setup contribute to net cross-shore flows.

Infragravity and Sea-Swell Interactions

Infragravity waves, defined by frequencies lower than 0.05 Hz (periods exceeding 20 seconds), emerge primarily from nonlinear interactions among higher-frequency sea-swell waves during and breaking in the nearshore. These long-period oscillations contrast with sea-swell waves (frequencies above 0.05 Hz), which drive primary processes but saturate through breaking, whereas infragravity energy often amplifies shoreward due to reduced . In the swash zone, infragravity waves contribute significantly to total velocity variance, often exceeding 50% of the signal on dissipative beaches, modulating uprush duration and backwash strength. Sea-swell wave groups generate infragravity waves via two main mechanisms: bound waves, which are phase-locked to the group envelope and release as free waves post-breaking, and breakpoint forcing from turbulent release during sea-swell collapse. Observations indicate weak seaward coupling between infragravity waves and sea-swell groups offshore, but stronger shoreward propagation as free modes that reflect from the shoreline, enhancing patterns in the inner surf and swash. This reflection sustains infragravity energy, with heights reaching meters nearshore even when open-ocean amplitudes are small (centimeters). Interactions intensify in the swash zone, where infragravity motions modulate sea-swell runup by altering instantaneous water depths and breaking thresholds; for instance, infragravity crests can promote sea-swell breaking, while troughs delay it, leading to asymmetric swash envelopes. Numerical models like SWASH reveal steepness controls these transfers: on steeper profiles, nonlinear infragravity-sea-swell exchanges peak in intermediate depths, diminishing in shallow swash due to saturation, whereas gentler slopes sustain bound-mode dominance into the shoreline. Field data from high- events confirm infragravity swash exceeds sea-swell contributions during swell-dominated conditions, correlating with offshore groupiness (correlation coefficients >0.8 with swell ). Such dynamics drive net offshore flux under infragravity asymmetry, distinct from onshore-biased sea-swell .

Flow Reversals and Turbulence

In the swash zone, flow reversal denotes the abrupt transition from onshore-directed uprush to offshore-directed backwash, driven by the imbalance between wave-induced and gravitational on the beachface. This reversal typically occurs within seconds, with near-bed flows reversing prior to those higher in the due to enhanced frictional drag at the . Laboratory experiments indicate that reversal initiates near the bed during the thinning of the swash film, leading to flow attachment and internal circulation cells that persist briefly into the backwash phase. Turbulence during flow reversal intensifies as velocity gradients sharpen, particularly in the , where shear from accelerating backwash generates high turbulent (TKE) levels. Field observations reveal peak near-bed TKE immediately following wave crest passage and during reversal, often exceeding Froude-scaled values by factors linked to bore collapse and interaction. In the uprush , turbulence profiles are relatively uniform vertically, reflecting bore-propagated eddies, whereas backwash becomes bottom-dominated, decaying due to reduced depth and increased roughness. Bore-driven mechanisms contribute significantly to swash , with breaking injecting that persists through and influences subsequent . Numerical simulations confirm that at the swash front enhances production during run-up , releasing bubbles that amplify dissipation rates at the rear. Experimental data from steep show scales following a -5/3 Kolmogorov spectrum during bore development at , transitioning to steeper cascades under strong , underscoring the role of nonlinear -bore interactions. These vary with and , with steeper profiles (tan β > 0.1) exhibiting more pronounced reversal-induced bursts.

Morphology

Beachface Profiles

The beachface constitutes the steep foreshore segment of the intertidal profile, spanning from the crest seaward to the low-tide shoreline, where recurrent swash uprush and backwash govern , accretion, and . Its reflects a between incident wave forcing, grain size, and tidal modulation of the active swash zone width. Typical slopes range from tan β ≈ 0.01–0.05 on dissipative beaches to tan β > 0.1 on reflective ones, with gravel-dominated faces often exceeding tan β = 0.18. Equilibrium beachface profiles approximate Dean's parabolic form, expressed as depth h(y) = A y^{2/3}, where y is the offshore distance from shore and A ≈ 0.1–0.3 m^{1/3} scales with median grain diameter D_{50} via A ∝ D_{50}^{1/3}, yielding steeper nearshore gradients for coarser sediments under constant wave energy dissipation. This model assumes uniform energy flux decay, though field observations reveal deviations, such as planar steep faces on reflective beaches under short-period, high waves. Morphodynamic state hinges on the surf scaling parameter ε_b = \frac{4\pi^2 H_b}{g T^2 \tan^2 \beta}, where H_b denotes breaker height, T peak period, g , and β the face slope; ε_b < 2.5 characterizes dissipative profiles with gentle slopes, wide surf zones, and spilling breakers, while ε_b > 20 defines reflective profiles featuring steep, linear gradients, , and prominent berms. Intermediate states (2.5 < ε_b < 20) exhibit transitional barred or rhythmic features.
Profile TypeSlope (tan β)Key FeaturesWave Conditionsε_b Range
Reflective> 0.05–0.1Steep, planar; berms, cusps; minimal Short T, high H_b; surging breakers> 20
Dissipative< 0.02–0.03Gentle, concave; multiple bars; broad intertidalLong T, low steepness; spilling breakers< 2.5
This classification aligns with Wright and Short's beach states, where reflective systems predominate under oblique high-energy waves and dissipative under persistent swell, influencing cross-shore transport and profile resilience to storms. Empirical datasets, such as Australian surveys spanning 13,200 km of coast, confirm alongshore variability in face slopes every 100 m, underscoring local controls like substrate and fetch. Short-term adjustments occur via swash-induced bed evolution, with numerical models coupling shallow-water equations to Exner sediment continuity predicting face steepening during accretionary phases and flattening under erosion, validated against field laser-scans of coarse-grained sites. Long-term profiles integrate tidal excursions, with macrotidal settings amplifying dissipative tendencies through extended low-energy swash.

Berm, Step, and Cusps

The beach berm is a nearly horizontal, shore-parallel ridge typically located at or near the high-tide swash limit, formed by the deposition of sediment transported landward during swash uprush under moderate wave conditions. Berms accumulate coarser sediment fractions due to selective sorting in the swash zone, where backwash preferentially removes finer particles, leaving a stable platform that delineates the upper beachface. Empirical relations estimate berm elevation Z_{\mathrm{berm}} = 0.125 H_b^{5/8} (g T^2)^{3/8}, where H_b is breaker height, g is gravitational acceleration, and T is wave period, reflecting scaling with wave energy and beach slope. On dissipative sandy beaches, berms develop during accretional phases with low-energy waves, but they erode rapidly under storm surge, migrating seaward as a storm berm. The beach step consists of a steep scarp or low ridge-and-runnel feature at the base of the berm or mid-beachface, generated by swash incision and backwash deposition in gravel or mixed-sediment beaches. Steps form through repeated cycles of uprush erosion carving a near-vertical face, followed by sediment infilling during backwash, with heights scaling as Z_{\mathrm{step}} = \sqrt{H_b T w_s}, incorporating breaker height H_b, wave period T, and sediment fall velocity w_s. Observations indicate steps are more pronounced on falling tides, where reduced water depths enhance swash asymmetry and limit offshore sediment flux, thereby modulating local hydrodynamics and promoting step persistence. Step dynamics influence net sediment transport by trapping material during ebb, contributing to upper beach stability until wave overtopping erodes the feature. Beach cusps are rhythmic, crescentic patterns on the upper beachface, characterized by alternating horns (protruding ridges) and embayments (lunate bays), with spacing \lambda typically 10–50 m on sandy shores. Formation arises from edge-wave templating or self-organization, where subharmonic standing with period $2T (twice the incident wave period) impose alongshore modulation on , eroding bays and accreting horns via convergent-divergent flow patterns. The edge-wave hypothesis predicts cusp wavelength \lambda = \frac{g}{\pi} T^2 \tan \beta, validated by field measurements correlating spacing with wave period and beach slope \beta. Alternative self-organizational models emphasize morphological feedback, where initial perturbations amplify through swash circulation, with horns channeling uprush seaward and bays trapping backwash onshore, independent of edge waves in some dissipative settings. Cusp persistence varies with tide and wave obliquity; they form preferentially on reflective beaches during low-energy conditions and decay under oblique incidence or high tides that flood the features. Empirical data from global sites show spacing scales with offshore wave steepness, with finer sediments yielding smaller cusps due to enhanced diffusive transport smoothing larger patterns.

Rhythmic Patterns and Formation Models

Rhythmic patterns in the swash zone primarily consist of , which are quasi-periodic shoreline features characterized by seaward-protruding horns separated by broader embayments, typically forming on dissipative beaches with steep beachface slopes. These patterns emerge through interactions between swash flows and sediment transport, with alongshore spacings often ranging from 10 to 50 meters, scaling with the surf zone width or swash excursion length. Field observations indicate that cusps develop rapidly during calm wave conditions, with growth involving erosion in embayments and accretion at horns. Two primary formation models explain beach cusp development: edge-wave templating and self-organization via morphodynamic feedback. The edge-wave model posits that standing edge waves, generated by wave breaking, impose a rhythmic template on the beachface, with cusp spacing predicted by \lambda = \frac{g}{\pi} T^{2} \tan \beta, where T is wave period, g is gravity, and \beta is beach slope. However, this mechanism struggles to explain cusp formation in low-energy, dissipative environments where edge-wave energy is minimal, and experiments show cusps persisting without correlated edge-wave modes. In contrast, self-organization models emphasize local feedbacks between swash hydrodynamics and bed topography, independent of external wave forcing templates. Initial bed perturbations cause swash uprush to diverge over horns—reducing erosion there—and converge in bays, accelerating backwash and enhancing erosion, thereby amplifying the pattern through positive feedback. Laboratory and field tests confirm this process, observing time lags in swash motions between bays and horns, uniform spacing emergence without edge waves, and pattern stability under varied forcings. Numerical morphodynamic simulations further support self-organization, reproducing cusp geometries via coupled flow-sediment interactions, with sediment grain size influencing pattern scale and persistence. This mechanism aligns with dissipative structure theory, where energy dissipation in swash drives ordered pattern formation from initial disorder.

Sediment Transport

Cross-Shore Processes

Cross-shore sediment transport in the swash zone refers to the net movement of sand perpendicular to the shoreline, governed by the alternating onshore uprush and offshore backwash phases of wave run-up. Uprush typically entrains and advects sediment landward through bedload and suspended mechanisms, while backwash returns it seaward, often under reduced flow capacity due to infiltration and gravity drainage. Suspended sediment concentrations in the swash can be 3–9 times higher than in the adjacent inner surf zone on dissipative beaches, driven by turbulence from bore collapse and flow acceleration. The net direction of transport is frequently onshore within the swash zone, attributed to asymmetries in wave kinematics: uprush durations and velocities exceed those of backwash owing to short-wave skewness, which generates stronger onshore-directed accelerations, and weaker offshore mean flows during recession. This onshore bias contrasts with offshore transport dominant in the surf zone via undertow, contributing to overall profile equilibrium where sediment converges near the breakpoint. Field observations confirm this pattern across natural beaches, linking it to sandbar migration and morphodynamic responses like berm accretion during calm conditions. Influencing factors include beach morphology, with steeper reflective slopes promoting uprush-dominated transport via partial wave reflection, whereas dissipative profiles rely more on infragravity waves for extended swash excursions and enhanced onshore flux. Groundwater exfiltration reduces backwash sediment load by increasing pore pressure and hindering entrainment, while incident short waves dominate low-energy setups. Grain size affects thresholds: finer sands (<0.2 mm) suspend more readily during uprush, amplifying net landward flux, whereas coarser grains favor bedload on reflective faces. Practical modeling employs empirical formulations, such as intra-swash physics-based equations incorporating bore turbulence for short-term predictions, and swash-averaged parameterizations for longer timescales, though these struggle with upscaling instantaneous hydrodynamics. Equilibrium models assume profile slopes adjust to balance transport gradients, performing well for accretive phases but requiring refinement for wave-sediment interactions; distribution methods excel in erosive scenarios but falter during recovery. Validation against field data highlights limitations in quantifying groundwater effects and long-wave modulation.

Longshore Drift

Longshore drift in the swash zone arises from the oblique incidence of waves on the beach face, imparting a net alongshore component to sediment movement during uprush and backwash cycles. The uprush, driven by wave breaking, transports sediment parallel to the shore at velocities influenced by wave angle and height, while backwash often returns perpendicularly or with reduced longshore velocity due to gravity and infiltration, yielding net transport in the direction of prevailing wave approach. This process is distinct from surf-zone longshore currents but contributes significantly on reflective or estuarine beaches where swash dominates hydrodynamics. Field measurements on eroding estuarine demonstrate that swash accounts for the primary longshore sediment flux, with transport rates scaling with longshore swash velocities (typically 0.1–0.5 m/s), wave heights (0.2–1.0 m), and suspended sediment concentrations (10–100 mg/L). For instance, studies using fluorescent tracers have quantified short-term alongshore displacement, revealing net drift rates of 0.01–0.1 m per wave cycle under oblique incidence angles of 10–30 degrees. On reflective with steep slopes (>1:20), swash-induced transport can comprise 50–80% of total littoral drift, as uprush asymmetry amplifies longshore while minimizing backwash compensation. These contributions are modulated by beach morphometry, with rhythmic features like cusps enhancing local or of drift. Modeling efforts integrate swash hydrodynamics with formulations, such as Bagnold-type or quasi-3D advection-diffusion equations, to predict drift. The STRAND model, for example, simulates longshore swash transport by resolving uprush velocity fields and bedload/ partitioning, validated against field data showing errors <20% for dissipative conditions. Hybrid approaches combining Boussinesq wave propagation with Exner-type morphodynamics highlight swash drift's role in shoreline rotation, where omission leads to underprediction of alongshore diffusion by factors of 2–5. Infragravity modulation further influences drift by altering swash obliquity, with low-frequency waves enhancing net transport during storm events. Empirical predictors, like those linking breaking wave energy to longshore rates, confirm swash contributions scale with the sine of wave angle relative to shore normal, peaking at 20–45 degrees.

Bedload vs. Suspension Dynamics

In the swash zone, bedload transport involves sediment particles moving near the bed through rolling, saltation, or sheet flow driven by bed shear stress, while suspension entails particles lifted into the water column by turbulence and advected by flow velocities. Bedload typically dominates during backwash, where reduced water depth and higher shear stresses promote sheet flow layers with concentrations up to 10 times those in the lower suspension layer, as observed in field measurements on dissipative beaches. This mode contributes substantially to offshore sediment flux, with proportions increasing over the tidal cycle as water levels fall and backwash intensifies. Suspended sediment dynamics peak during uprush initiation, particularly from bore collapse, where turbulence entrains fine grains into the water column, enabling advection onshore before settling during backwash deceleration. Concentrations in suspension can exceed bedload equivalents near the bed during high-energy events, but decay rapidly with height above the bed, with net onshore transport often reliant on this mode due to longer particle residence times in uprush flows. However, the distinction blurs in swash, as sheet flow transitions to suspension under accelerating flows, rendering traditional partitioning less applicable than integrated total load assessments. Factors influencing the balance include beach slope, grain size, and wave forcing; steeper slopes favor bedload via laminar backwash, while gentler profiles enhance suspension through infragravity-driven turbulence. Empirical data from optical and acoustic sensors show suspended loads varying by condition, with bedload comprising 50-80% of total transport in sheet-dominated swash but suspension driving morphodynamic changes like bar migration via differential settling. Models incorporating both, such as those partitioning flux by Rouse number, underscore that ignoring suspension underestimates onshore migration rates by up to 30% in energetic settings.

Environmental and External Influences

Tidal and Wave Variability

Tidal variability modulates swash zone dynamics primarily by shifting the elevation of the mean water level, which alters the beach face exposure and wave-beach interactions. On intermediate beaches, higher tidal stages elevate the , enabling waves to break closer to the shoreline and interact with steeper upper profiles, thereby increasing uprush durations and peak velocities while reducing backwash asymmetry. This tidal translation influences radiation stress gradients through changes in breaking wave heights, enhancing onshore sediment transport during flood tides. In macrotidal environments, large tidal ranges (exceeding 4 m) can dominate swash excursions, reducing the relative contribution of wave runup and shifting morphodynamics toward tide-influenced profiles with diminished swash dominance. Microtidal settings (ranges <2 m) exhibit subtler effects, where tidal cycles primarily affect groundwater table positions, infiltration rates, and subaerial discharge, with higher stages promoting greater sediment suspension via intensified . Spring-neap tidal cycles further introduce variability; spring tides amplify swash energy by aligning peak water levels with higher wave setups, fostering erosion, while neap tides confine swash to lower beach segments, favoring accretion through reduced hydrodynamic forcing. Observations from low-tide terraced beaches indicate that tidal range interacts with foreshore slope to control swash inundation patterns, with significant wave heights seaward of the swash zone correlating to tidal-modulated runup extents. These effects underscore tides' role in cross-shore process shifts, where low-tide exposure of the beach face allows subaerial processes like drainage to dominate, contrasting high-tide immersion that prioritizes hydrodynamic suspension. Wave variability, driven by fluctuations in height, period, and direction, governs swash hydrodynamics through direct control of runup, velocities, and energy dissipation. Higher significant wave heights (e.g., >1.5 m) extend swash lengths and elevate velocities, promoting suspension and net , particularly during storm events when exceeds dissipative thresholds. Shorter wave periods (<10 s) yield reflective swash with pronounced backwash dominance, enhancing bedload , whereas longer periods (>12 s) foster dissipative conditions with prolonged uprush and greater onshore . Directional variability introduces longshore components to swash, with incidence amplifying alongshore currents and rhythmic patterns like cusps. Seasonal wave climate shifts—such as waves with heights up to 3-5 m—intensify swash erosion by increasing runup and , while summer swells reduce variability to favor profile recovery. Empirical formulations link swash flux to wave parameters, with slope and determining thresholds for versus bedload dominance. Combined tidal-wave interactions exacerbate extremes; coincident high and waves (e.g., during nor'easters) can double runup heights, accelerating profile retreat. Such variability highlights swash sensitivity to offshore forcing, with low-energy dissipative beaches showing muted responses compared to reflective steep faces.

Sediment Supply and Beach Type Effects

Sediment supply to the swash zone, primarily through advected from the inner , governs net deposition or patterns on the face. Higher influxes of enhance onshore during uprush phases, counteracting inherent backwash tendencies driven by , and can result in accretion of up to several centimeters per swash event. On coarse-grained , swash infiltration during the uprush phase reduces backwash volume by promoting into the , thereby increasing net onshore and favoring depositional . Beach types, delineated by the dimensionless fall velocity parameter Ω = H_b / (w_s T)—where H_b is breaker , w_s is fall , and T is wave period—exhibit contrasting swash dynamics that modulate efficiency. Reflective beaches (Ω < 1.5) maintain steep profiles with narrow or absent surf zones, where swash is dominated by incident short waves collapsing as bores, yielding high runup velocities (2-5 m/s) and onshore-biased bedload transport due to strong uprush asymmetry. These conditions support stable, low transport gradients, with swash saturation thresholds at beach Iribarren numbers ε_b ≈ 2.5, enabling efficient sediment delivery to the upper beach face and berm formation when supply is adequate. In dissipative beaches (Ω > 6), gentle slopes and wide s lead to energy dissipation via spilling breakers and infragravity wave dominance in swash, producing longer excursions but lower peak velocities and smaller overall transport rates compared to reflective states. Here, offshore undertow in the often generates gradients, partially offset by onshore swash suspension import, resulting in morphodynamic stability under persistent low-energy conditions but vulnerability to if supply diminishes. Intermediate beach states (1.5 < Ω < 6) display heightened variability, with larger cross-shore transport rates and sharp gradients linked to bar-rip topographies, amplifying swash-mediated feedbacks that can shift profiles toward reflective accretion or dissipative erosion based on fluctuating supply. Across types, sediment grain size correlates inversely with slope—coarser in reflective settings—further influencing transport modes, as finer sands in dissipative zones favor suspension and potential offshore loss, while coarser bedloads in reflective swash enhance onshore retention.

Groundwater and Moisture Interactions

In the swash zone, swash flows interact dynamically with the underlying beach groundwater table, inducing rapid fluctuations through infiltration during uprush and exfiltration during backwash. These processes alter the hydraulic gradient and pore pressures within the beach face, influencing both fluid velocities and sediment stability. Infiltration rates depend on beach permeability, swash intensity, and antecedent moisture conditions, with permeable sandy beaches exhibiting higher infiltration capacities governed by models such as . Exfiltration, often prominent near the low-tide swash limit, can elevate pore pressures and reduce boundary layer friction, modifying flow velocities by up to 20-30% in field observations. Infiltration during the uprush phase increases the submerged weight of bed sediment by filling pores, thereby enhancing bed resistance to erosion and promoting net onshore sediment transport. This effect is amplified on steep beaches where swash duration asymmetry—longer uprush relative to backwash—results from partial water retention subsurface, biasing cross-shore transport landward by factors of 1.5-2 in numerical simulations incorporating seepage. Conversely, exfiltration during backwash decreases effective sediment weight, facilitating grain entrainment and potentially offshore flux, though the overall hydrodynamic asymmetry often yields net accretion on the upper beach face. Studies on dissipative beaches report infiltration volumes comprising 10-50% of swash discharge, directly correlating with reduced backwash sediment loads. Moisture dynamics in the swash zone are modulated by these exchanges, creating heterogeneous saturation profiles that control sediment mobility. Swash-induced capillary barriers in mixed-grain sediments trap hotspots subsurface, inhibiting drainage and sustaining elevated pore saturation levels for hours post-event. Higher contents (>5-10% by volume) increase intergranular cohesion via , raising critical shear stresses for entrainment by 20-50% in sands under oscillatory flows, thus limiting mobility during low-energy swash. On unsaturated foreshores, rapid wetting fronts from swash can temporarily enhance erodibility through , but persistent discharge maintains a saturated that suppresses suspension-dominated transport. Field measurements from sandy beaches indicate that gradients drive preferential bedload onshore while restricting aeolian pickup at the swash-backshore interface.

Modeling and Research Advances

Empirical Formulations

Empirical formulations for swash zone processes frequently employ the Iribarren number, defined as \xi_0 = \tan \beta / \sqrt{[H_0](/page/Significant_wave_height) / [L_0](/page/Wavelength)}, where \beta is the beach face slope, H_0 the deep-water , and L_0 = g T^2 / (2\pi) the deep-water with T the wave period. This parameter classifies beach states that govern swash dynamics: dissipative for \xi_0 < 0.5 characterized by turbulent, bore-driven swash; intermediate for $0.5 < \xi_0 < 3.3 with transitional plunging or collapsing breakers; and reflective for \xi_0 > 3.3 featuring standing and rhythmic swash oscillations. Beaches with \xi_0 > 3.3 exhibit organized swash patterns, while lower values lead to chaotic energy dissipation influencing sediment mobilization. Wave runup, a critical swash metric, is empirically parameterized by Stockdon et al. (2006) as R_{2\%} = 1.1 \left( 0.35 \beta \sqrt{H_0 L_0} + \sqrt{H_0 L_0 (0.563 \beta^2 + 0.004)} \right), capturing the exceeded by 2% of swashes, incorporating both short-wave (incident) and long-wave (infragravity) contributions. This , derived from measurements across U.S. coasts, improves predictions over models by swash \beta and offshore wave parameters, with root-mean-square errors reduced to approximately 0.2 times \sqrt{H_0 L_0}. Significant swash decomposes into incident S_{inc} = 0.75 \beta \sqrt{H_0 L_0} and infragravity S_{ig} = 0.06 \sqrt{H_0 L_0} components, yielding S = \sqrt{S_{inc}^2 + S_{ig}^2}, reflecting the dominance of infragravity motions on dissipative beaches. Morphological features shaped by swash are quantified through empirical relations tied to conditions. Berm height Z_{\mathrm{berm}} approximates $0.125 H_b^{5/8} (g T^2)^{3/8}, where H_b is the height, linking accretion limits to wave energy and period via of field data. step height follows Z_{\mathrm{step}} = \sqrt{H_b T w_s}, with w_s the settling , empirically fitted to observations of scarp formation under swash , balancing hydrodynamic forcing and gravity-driven slumping. These formulations aid prediction of profile equilibrium, with reflective beaches (\epsilon_b > 20) showing pronounced s and steps versus dissipative ones (\epsilon_b < 2.5) where \epsilon_b = 4\pi^2 H_b / (2 g T^2 \tan^2 \beta) parameterizes swash dominance. Sediment transport in the swash zone employs semi-empirical energetics models, such as Bailard (1981), extending Bagnold's framework to oscillatory flows: bedload Q_b \propto \epsilon_b \frac{\tan \phi}{ (s-1) g d } \langle u_b^3 \rangle and Q_s \propto \epsilon_s \frac{w}{ (s-1) g d } \langle u_w u_b^2 \rangle , where u_b and u_w are bottom horizontal and vertical velocities, \phi friction angle, s , d grain diameter, and \epsilon_{b,s} efficiencies. This predicts net transport directionality, with uprush bedload often exceeding backwash suspension under gravity-biased flows, though infragravity modulation can reverse offshore trends observed in field studies. Validation against tracer experiments confirms the model's utility for net cross-shore fluxes, though local asymmetries require site-specific calibration.

Numerical Simulations

Numerical simulations of swash zone processes employ a range of computational models to resolve hydrodynamics, , and morphodynamic evolution on faces, often coupling fluid flow equations with sediment flux formulations. Depth-integrated non-hydrostatic models, such as SWASH (Simulating WAves till SHore), solve extended to capture wave breaking, runup, and swash motions from offshore to the shoreline, enabling efficient simulations of irregular wave trains and their interaction with varying beach slopes. These models have been validated against data for predicting swash inundation and velocities, with applications demonstrating accuracy in reproducing measured runup heights within 10-15% for dissipative beach conditions. For higher-fidelity representations of and three-dimensional flows, (CFD) approaches based on the Navier-Stokes equations are utilized, particularly in open-source frameworks like . These simulations resolve free-surface flows, wave breaking, and dynamics in the inner and swash zones, incorporating k-ε or () closures to model shear stresses and entrainment. A 2023 study using ® demonstrated its capability to simulate wave-induced currents and under breaking waves, with model outputs aligning with field-measured velocities to within 20% error for steep beaches. Two-phase or multi-phase extensions, such as SEDINTERFOAM, further integrate as a dispersed , accounting for hindered and bedload during uprush and backwash, which has improved predictions of net exchange between and swash zones in benchmark tests. Advances in swash modeling from 2005 to 2015 highlighted the shift toward approaches combining Boussinesq-type equations for non-hydrostatic with volume-of-fluid methods for tracking, addressing limitations in earlier depth-averaged schemes that underestimated bore-driven accelerations. Recent applications, including dam-break flow analogs for extreme swash events, couple variably saturated porous media solvers with surface flow models to quantify infiltration effects on runup and , revealing that subsurface can reduce peak swash velocities by up to 30% on permeable sands. Validation against large-scale experiments, such as those with solitary , confirms these models' ability to predict sediment flux asymmetries, where onshore transport dominates under plunging breakers due to suspension peaks during swash initiation. Ongoing challenges include computational cost for long-term morphodynamics and parameterization of grain-scale processes like avalanching, prompting ensemble simulations to quantify uncertainty in forecasts.

Laboratory and Field Studies

Laboratory studies of swash processes often employ wave tanks and to isolate variables such as wave type, slope, and characteristics. In a 2022 experiment using a , researchers varied slopes from 1:10 to 1:5 under bore-driven conditions, observing that steeper slopes amplified peak uprush velocities by up to 20% while reducing maximum shoreline due to enhanced and infiltration. These findings underscore the role of slope in modulating swash asymmetry, with steeper profiles promoting offshore-directed during backwash. Further investigations have focused on swash-swash interactions and solitary impacts. A 2024 two-phase numerical validation study in a simulated successive solitary waves, revealing that swash collisions enhance and suspend finer , leading to net onshore under low-energy conditions but on steeper slopes exceeding 1:15. Earlier work from 2015 reviewed small-scale hydrodynamics, demonstrating through controlled bores that infragravity swash dominates sediment flux, with runup heights scaling nonlinearly with incident energy. Such experiments have informed empirical formulations for dune , where swash dynamics under storm-like bores were linked to profile retreat rates of 0.5-1.0 m per event on impermeable beaches. Field studies complement insights by capturing natural variability, including tidal modulation and bar morphology. Observations from barred beaches in a 2013 study quantified infragravity swash reduction by 30-50% due to nearshore , with empirical models correlating bar height to shoreline energy via of pressure sensors. Eulerian velocity measurements during individual swash events on dissipative beaches, collected in using acoustic Doppler velocimeters, revealed peak onshore flows of 1-2 m/s during uprush, transitioning to weaker backwash under dominance, validating predictive models for flow reversal. Recent field campaigns emphasize dynamics and instrumentation advances. The Shaping The Beach project (2018-2023) deployed fluorescent tracers and meters on European coasts, deriving a swash transport parameterization that accounts for acceleration asymmetries, yielding net cross-shore fluxes of 10-100 kg/m per wave under oblique incidence. During two 2023-2024 storms on dune-fronted es, and pressure gauge data documented swash-dune collision regimes, with runup exceeding 2 m triggering slumping and volumes up to 5 m³/m, driven by exfiltration enhancing backwash capacity. Techniques like terrestrial have enabled high-resolution mapping of swash-induced changes, detecting bedform migrations of 0.1-0.5 m over cycles on low-sloping foreshores.

Management and Engineering Applications

Erosion Mitigation Strategies

Beach drainage systems represent a soft approach to mitigate swash-induced by lowering the table in the , thereby reducing the volume of backwash and associated offshore . These systems typically consist of permeable pipes installed 1.0–2.0 meters deep parallel to the shoreline near the mean high water spring level, with pumped out via a to promote infiltration during uprush while diminishing and seaward flow during backwash. and studies indicate that such systems can enhance beach stability under moderate conditions by increasing accretion in sediment-surplus scenarios and limiting where levels exacerbate backwash, though long-term efficacy varies and requires site-specific conditions like permeable sandy es with high tidal influence. Dynamic revetments, constructed from cobble or berms, provide a nature-based alternative that leverages swash asymmetry to self-adjust and dissipate wave energy, preventing backshore without rigid fixation. In these setups, cobbles (typically 2.5–10 inches in diameter) move onshore during uprush and form a stable under repeated swash cycles, absorbing energy that would otherwise erode finer sediments; this adaptability suits high-energy environments where static structures fail. Implementation at Lookout State Park in since 2000, covering 300 meters with an artificial dune, has withstood major storms at a cost of approximately $125,000 per segment—far lower than comparable alternatives—while accumulating overlying sand to reduce overtopping. Similar applications, such as the 330-meter structure at the South Jetty using 33,600 cubic meters of , demonstrate sustained protection through dynamic reshaping, though periodic maintenance (every 10 years) is needed to replenish material lost to offshore transport. Beach nourishment complements these methods by replenishing swash-zone sediments lost to net erosion, widening the profile to buffer against intensified backwash during storms. Projects involve dredging and placing compatible sand, as trialed in Oregon's Beverly Beach area at a cost exceeding $15.5 million, to restore natural dissipative gradients that reduce swash excursion and sediment mobilization. Vegetative stabilization, using species like beach grass on upper swash and dune faces, further aids by binding sediments and trapping wind-blown material, though it offers limited direct protection in high-energy swash zones and depends on successful establishment to avoid exacerbating toe scour. Hard structures like seawalls are generally avoided for swash-dominated erosion due to their tendency to induce passive beach narrowing and intensified local scour, prioritizing instead hybrid soft-hard approaches informed by site hydrodynamics.

Beach Nourishment and Structures

Beach nourishment projects supplement eroded beaches with imported sediment, typically sourced from offshore dredging, to widen the subaerial profile and mitigate wave-induced erosion. In the swash zone, initial placement often results in steeper foreshore slopes, which temporarily enhance swash runup elevations and increase cross-shore sediment transport rates as the profile adjusts toward equilibrium. These changes dissipate wave energy differently than pre-nourishment conditions, with finer sediment fractions potentially winnowed seaward during high-energy events, altering local grain size distribution and bed stability. Equilibrium is typically reached within 1-4 years, though offshore losses can occur, as observed in profiles at Folly Beach, South Carolina, and Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina, where nourishment material migrated subtidally post-placement. Specific applications, such as swash zone construction, aim to optimize nearshore dispersal and morphological . At , a 2012 swash zone berm nourishment led to enhanced profile evolution, with the berm promoting accretion and reducing breaching risks over decadal scales under forcing and sea-level . Similarly, cross-shore swash zone placements, as tested near Burns Small Boat Harbor in 2023, facilitate broader pathways compared to traditional dumping, potentially minimizing longshore imbalances. However, these interventions disrupt natural swash- exchanges, with episodic -driven redistribution dominating post-project adjustments rather than steady accretion. Hard coastal structures like seawalls and s further influence swash dynamics by altering wave reflection and sediment budgets. Seawalls, positioned at the landward edge of the swash zone, reflect incident bores, shortening uprush lengths and elevating swash velocities through interference with backwash, which exacerbates scour and narrows the active swash footprint. Experimental studies confirm this reflection amplifies hydrodynamic forcing in the immediate swash, promoting of the face unless armored. s, perpendicular to shore, interrupt longshore transport, inducing updrift accretion that steepens and widens the swash zone locally while accelerating downdrift , which shallows and destabilizes swash processes there. These effects compound over time, with groin fields altering overall equilibrium profiles and reducing natural swash-mediated recovery.

Environmental Impacts and Trade-offs

The swash zone facilitates cross-shore and longshore , which maintains beach morphology but can exacerbate during high-energy events, leading to loss in intertidal areas. On dissipative beaches, swash processes contribute to net redistribution, with uprush dominating under oblique , potentially resulting in shoreline retreat rates of up to 1-2 meters per year in vulnerable low-gradient coasts. This undermines dune stability and exposes underlying aquifers to saline intrusion, altering freshwater ecosystems inland. Ecologically, the swash zone supports specialized macroinfaunal communities adapted to periodic inundation, serving as a primary foraging ground for shorebirds and through regeneration via suprabenthic . wrack deposited by swash creates microbial hotspots that enhance secondary and , with densities of detritivores reaching 500-1000 individuals per square meter in temperate beaches. However, intensified swash from storm surges can disrupt these assemblages, reducing by 30-50% and impacting food webs for higher trophic levels. In , structures like revetments and breakwaters modify swash hydrodynamics, reducing local uprush energy but inducing downdrift scour and hypoxic conditions from , with dissolved oxygen levels dropping below 2 mg/L in affected bays. , which temporarily widens profiles to dampen swash excursion, protects infrastructure but introduces s such as smothering benthic and requiring 100,000-500,000 cubic meters of sand per project, often sourced from distant that disrupts ecosystems. Hard solutions preserve short-term budgets updrift at the expense of adjacent ecological connectivity, whereas softer approaches like vegetation stabilization may enhance but yield only marginal reductions of 10-20% under extreme waves. These interventions highlight a core : localized human benefits versus broader disruptions to natural swash-driven gradients that sustain coastal and .

References

  1. [1]
    Swash - Coastal Wiki
    May 6, 2025 · Swash motion is a crucial link between the hydrosedimentary processes in the surf zone and the morphology (sand volume, shape) of the backshore.
  2. [2]
    Swash zone dynamics - Coastal Wiki
    Mar 14, 2025 · The swash zone is the land-ocean boundary where waves run up the beach, with supercritical flow and intermittency, and is key for sediment ...Introduction · Characteristics of the swash... · Swash zone hydrodynamics
  3. [3]
    Swash Regime | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
    Jun 16, 2020 · Swash Regime. During a storm, if wave runup is confined to the beach, the beach will erode and the sand will be stored offshore.
  4. [4]
    A laboratory study of the effect of varying beach slopes on bore ...
    Oct 12, 2022 · The area between the maximum runup and rundown of waves is known as the swash zone, where multiple dynamic processes occur (Zhu and Dodd, 2020).
  5. [5]
    A review of practical models of sand transport in the swash zone
    The sand transport processes in the swash zone are governed by beach morphology and hydrodynamics including swash flow velocities (e.g. Jensen et al., 2003 ...
  6. [6]
    Infragravity waves - Coastal Wiki
    Apr 21, 2025 · Infragravity waves are generally small in the open sea, they can reach up to a few meters in height close to the coast and thus dominate the water motion.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Observations of nearshore infragravity wave dynamics under high ...
    Apr 15, 2017 · Unlike sea-swell waves, which break and become saturated in the surf zone (Thornton and Guza, 1982), infragravity wave height has been observed ...
  8. [8]
    Observations and predictions of fluid velocities in the surf and swash ...
    Nov 13, 2002 · In the swash zone, infragravity waves contribute substantially to the total velocity variance and asymmetry. Shoreward of the outer swash zone, ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Shoreline dissipation of infragravity waves - ScienceDirect.com
    Jan 1, 2014 · During the breaking of the sea and swell waves, the infragravity waves propagate towards the beach as free waves and reflect from the shoreline.
  10. [10]
    Observations of nearshore infragravity waves. Part 1: Seaward and ...
    The coupling of seaward propagating infragravity waves to sea-swell groups always is weak. The results support the existing hypothesis that shoreward.
  11. [11]
    Numerical Assessment of Infragravity Swash Response to Offshore ...
    Aug 8, 2019 · Dotted lines indicate the limit between infragravity and sea-swell bands. The significant total swash Stot and the significant IG swash SIG ...
  12. [12]
    Beach steepness effects on nonlinear infragravity‐wave interactions ...
    Dec 18, 2015 · The numerical model SWASH is used to investigate nonlinear energy transfers between waves for a diverse set of beach profiles and wave ...
  13. [13]
    Analysis of infragravity waves characteristics and energy evaluation ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · Infragravity waves exhibited a stronger correlation with swell than with wind waves, with a correlation coefficient exceeding 0.8. Therefore, ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Observations of turbulence within the surf and swash zone of a field ...
    The Froude-scaled turbulence was largest close to the bed during flow reversal of the wave orbital motion from negative to positive, possibly explained by the ...
  15. [15]
    Swash zone sediment suspension and transport and the importance ...
    Jul 15, 2000 · Our data show this bore-generated turbulence (turbulent kinetic energy) directly influences local sediment suspension.
  16. [16]
    RANS v<SUP>2</SUP>-f simulation of a swash event: Detailed flow ...
    Air is continuously entrapped in the swash front and released at its rear during run-up. A detailed analysis indicates that the flow reversal is initiated near ...
  17. [17]
    Laboratory investigation of turbulence scales of swash flows ...
    The energy cascade with ‑ 1 slope occurs at the flow reversal from the downwash to the uprush at which the broken bore develops. The typical slope ‑ 5 / 3 ...
  18. [18]
    Swash-zone morphodynamics - ScienceDirect.com
    The morphological equivalent of the swash zone is the beachface, which is the relatively steep section of the beach profile extending seaward from the berm to ...
  19. [19]
    Wave run-up - Coastal Wiki
    May 6, 2025 · where \tan \beta \approx \beta is the beach slope and T is the peak wave period. ... typical slopes of 0.01-0.05 that dissipate most ...
  20. [20]
    Examining the relationship between beach-face slope and sediment ...
    But there are sufficient data to show that gravel beaches tend to be steeper than those made of sand, with slopes often exceeding 10° ( ~ tan β > 0.18 ) ( ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Equilibrium Beach Profiles: Characteristics and Applications
    The most often used form is h(y) = Ay2/3 in which h is the water depth at a distance y from the shoreline and A is the sediment-dependent scale parameter.
  22. [22]
    Wave reflection on natural beaches: an equilibrium beach profile ...
    The equilibrium beach profile (EBP) concept has been defined as the final form that the beach profile adopts under constant wave conditions and to a given grain ...
  23. [23]
    Berm development on a monsoon‐influenced microtidal beach ...
    During the onshore migration of the longshore bar and berm development the beach face becomes partially reflective with the surf scaling parameter, εb between 2 ...
  24. [24]
    Shoreface profile - Coastal Wiki
    Apr 20, 2025 · Several field studies have been performed to relate beach profiles to different combinations of the Dean parameter \Omega and the relative tidal ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Morphodynamics of reflective and dissipative beach and inshore ...
    Reflective systems are characterized by steep, linear beach faces, well-developed berms and beach cusps, and surging breakers with high runup and minimum setup; ...
  26. [26]
    Beach-face slope dataset for Australia - ESSD Copernicus
    Mar 25, 2022 · The dataset covers 13 200 km of sandy coast and provides an estimate of the beach-face slope every 100 m alongshore accompanied by an easy-to- ...
  27. [27]
    Beach-face evolution in the swash zone - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · We investigate swash on an erodible beach using the one-dimensional shallow-water equations fully coupled to a bed-evolution (Exner) ...
  28. [28]
    Observations of morphological change and sediment transport on a ...
    Typical morphological features associated with swash motion include the berm, beach step and beach cusps. Berms are ubiquitous features on gravel beaches ...
  29. [29]
    Definitions of coastal terms - Coastal Wiki
    Nov 17, 2024 · Dissipative and reflective beaches (also Dissipative and reflective coasts). Dissipative beaches have typically gentle coastal profiles; they ...
  30. [30]
    Beach Basics - Coastal Care
    Berms form during quiet weather, as sand moves in from offshore. Thus a berm is a depositional feature, one that indicates that the beach has been gaining ...
  31. [31]
    Swash zone sediment transport, step dynamics and morphological ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The step was better developed during the falling tide than the rising tide and, through its control on the swash hydro- and sediment dynamics, ...
  32. [32]
    The role of tides in beach cusp development - AGU Journals - Wiley
    Apr 10, 2004 · Beach cusps are swash zone morphological features with lunate bays and horns that protrude offshore, often forming a repeating pattern along ...
  33. [33]
    Beach-cusp formation - ScienceDirect.com
    Measured spacings of cusps, ranging in size from less than 1 m to more than 12 m, agree well with computed spacings due to either zero-mode subharmonic or zero ...
  34. [34]
    Morphodynamic modelling of beach cusp formation
    Sep 15, 2021 · Cusps are frequently characterised by their spacing, which is thought to be determined by the wavelength of edge waves (Guza and Inman, 1975) ...
  35. [35]
    Beach Cusps - Coastal Wiki
    Oct 7, 2022 · The model simulating beach cusp formation is a radical simplification of the complicated processes that operates in the swash zone, and many of ...Missing: wavelength | Show results with:wavelength
  36. [36]
    Test of self‐organization in beach cusp formation - AGU Publications
    Mar 29, 2003 · Three signatures of self-organization were observed in all experiments. First, time lags between swash front motions in beach cusp bays and ...
  37. [37]
    Morphological evolution of beach cusps and associated swash ...
    Beach cusps are rhythmic shoreline features formed by swash action. They are characterised by steep-gradient, seaward-pointing cusp horns and gentle-gradient, ...
  38. [38]
    Beach-cusp formation - USGS Publications Warehouse
    Abstract. Field experiments on beach-cusp formation were undertaken to document how the cuspate form develops and to test the edge-wave hypothesis on the ...Missing: mechanisms peer
  39. [39]
    Beach Cusps as Self-Organized Patterns - Science
    A model that couples local flow acceleration and alongshore surface gradient is sufficient to produce uniformly spaced beach cusps.
  40. [40]
    On beach cusp formation | Journal of Fluid Mechanics
    Feb 1, 2008 · It is found that cusp horns can grow by a positive feedback mechanism stemming from decreased (increased) backwash on positive (negative) bed ...
  41. [41]
    Morphodynamic modelling of beach cusp formation: the role of wave ...
    Dec 23, 2020 · Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet. ... Variations in cusp spacings of beach cusp systems have been examined ...
  42. [42]
    organization model for beach cusp formation and development
    Sep 15, 2000 · These findings support the hypothesis that self-organization is a robust mechanism for beach cusp formation. 1. Introduction. The need for a ...
  43. [43]
    Hydrodynamics and Cross-Shore Sediment Transport in the Swash ...
    Apr 28, 2000 · Studies of swash-zone hydrodynamics have included run-up measurements using electrical resistance and capacitance devices, as well as cameras.
  44. [44]
    Cross‐shore sediment transport on natural beaches and its relation ...
    Mar 2, 2007 · The pattern consists of net onshore transport in the swash zone, offshore transport in the surf zone, and onshore transport in the shoaling zone ...
  45. [45]
    Longshore sediment transport and foreshore change in the swash ...
    Apr 1, 2017 · Swash is the primary mechanism for longshore sediment transport on estuarine beaches. · Wave heights, longshore swash velocities and sediment ...
  46. [46]
    (PDF) Importance of the Swash Longshore Sediment Transport in ...
    Mar 23, 2016 · This paper discusses the effect of the longshore sediment transport in the swash zone on the evolution of the shore line. The beach evolution ...
  47. [47]
    A HYBRID MODEL OF SWASH-ZONE LONGSHORE SEDIMENT ...
    Jan 30, 2011 · The preliminary results suggest that swash-zone transport can account for a large percentage of the total littoral drift for such beaches.Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  48. [48]
    Field study of sediment transport dynamics in swash zone using ...
    Although sediment transport dynamics in swash zones have been investigated extensively, most of the studies are related to cross-shore sediment transport (e.g. ...
  49. [49]
    a hybrid model of swash-zone longshore sediment transport on ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · The swash, i.e., the part of the beach where the sediment bed is submerged and alternatively exposed, due to uprush and backwash, plays a key ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Recent advances in modeling swash zone dynamics: Influence of ...
    Jul 29, 2008 · The role of the swash zone in influencing the whole nearshore dynamics is reviewed with a focus on the interaction between surf and swash ...
  52. [52]
    Updated Review of Longshore Sediment Transport - MDPI
    Sep 16, 2024 · This review updates the different categories and formulations of the calculation of longshore sediment transport (LST) and summarizes their advantages and ...
  53. [53]
    Sediment transport: Bedload and suspension load
    Mar 4, 2020 · Transport of sediment by bedload involves a traction carpet and a saltation load. To initiate movement fluid forces (drag and uplift) must ...
  54. [54]
    (PDF) Comprehensive study of swash-zone hydrodynamics and ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Sediment loads in the sheet layer are up to 10 times larger than the sediment loads in the lower suspension layer. Simplified sheet flow ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Swash zone sediment transport modes - ScienceDirect.com
    Bedload transport is found to dominate the backwash. The relative proportions of bedload and suspended load change over the tidal cycle, with increasing bedload ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Swash zone sediment suspension and transport and the importance ...
    After flow reversal the mass of water thins in a fashion such that the leading edge does not retreat downslope until most of the water mass has moved sea- ward ...
  57. [57]
    Relative Contributions of Bed Load and Suspended ... - AGU Journals
    Jan 14, 2019 · The net sediment transport rate was partitioned into suspended sediment (SS) and bed load (BL) components to quantify the relative contributions ...
  58. [58]
    Field investigation of sediment transport in the swash zone
    that the conventional separation of sediment transport into bedload and suspended load is not very useful for the swash zone. A number of regression models ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Near‐Bed Sediment Transport During Offshore Bar Migration in ...
    Apr 22, 2022 · ... (bedload transport). Because the technology is based on conductivity, it ... Surf zone turbulence and suspended sediment dynamics—A review.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] The effects of tides on swash statistics on an intermediate beach
    Sep 15, 2010 · The tidal influence in breaking will also control radiation stress gradients which are a function of the wave height gradients, and so long‐ ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Effect of Tide Range on Beach Morphodynamics and Morphology
    It shows that the contribution of swash and surl zone processes decreases as the relative tide range and the con- tribution of shoaling waves increases. Swash ...
  62. [62]
    Tidal Variability of Swash-Zone Sediment Suspension and Transport
    Jul 1, 2009 · Landward of the surf zone, the swash zone represents a narrow region where the runup (uprush) and rundown (backwash) of waves at a variety ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] TIDALLY-DRIVEN BEACH CHANGE: INSIGHTS FROM LONG ...
    Periodic rise and fall of sea level, the tide, is known to affect beach morphological changes through the processes: wave runup infiltration and groundwater ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Modes of Berm and Beachface Recovery Following Storm Reset
    These results suggest the importance of tidal variations in ocean water levels shifting inner surf zone and swash zone processes to drive variability in tide-by ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Lidar observations of the swash zone of a low-tide terraced tropical ...
    Apr 26, 2020 · the breaker type and swash-zone slope are expected to strongly influence swash processes, in particular ... tidal variability on swash-zone ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Subsurface Flow and Moisture Dynamics in Response to Swash ...
    Dec 8, 2017 · The swash zone, defined as that part of the beach between the wave run-down and run-up limits, has been recognized as a very dynamic region in ...
  67. [67]
    (PDF) Morphodynamics of wave-dominated beaches - ResearchGate
    Critically, wave climate and changes in wave regimes are key in driving the coupled cross-shore and longshore behaviour that ultimately explains modal beach ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    (PDF) Surf Zone Hydrodynamics Forced by Oblique, Monochromatic ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · An oblique incident wave angle introduces spatially variability in wave energy along the beach and results in morphologic differences during ...
  69. [69]
    Wave storm dynamics and clustering, and their impacts on beach ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · This study reveals the seasonal and temporal complexities of wave storm-induced beach erosion at Hasaki beach, emphasising the disproportionate ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Morphodynamics of wave-dominated beaches - HAL
    Oct 26, 2022 · Closely associated with such morphological variability are changes in the surf zone processes, such as type of wave breaking, wave energy ...
  71. [71]
    Surf and Swash Zone Dynamics from High-Frequency Observations ...
    This study examines the surf and swash zone dynamics of a microtidal, low-energy, dissipative beach in Kos Island, Greece, using high-frequency optical ...
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    Groundwater Flow and Moisture Dynamics in the Swash Zone ...
    Oct 29, 2020 · Swash motion on beaches with heterogeneous sediments leads to capillary barriers and moisture hotspots beneath the beach surface ...
  74. [74]
    Rapid water table fluctuations within the beach face
    To incorporate groundwater infiltration/exfiltration in the description of swash zone sediment transport, it is required that the details of groundwater ...
  75. [75]
    On the role of infiltration and exfiltration in swash zone boundary ...
    Aug 19, 2015 · Model reproduces swash zone hydrodynamics on permeable bed Vorticity is used to investigate the boundary layer evolution in the swash ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] The influence of swash infiltration–exfiltration on beach face ...
    In the swash-zone, this process would tend to enhance uprush transport and decrease backwash transport, i.e. bias the net transport onshore. Schematic ...
  77. [77]
    modelling groundwater effects on swash sediment transport and ...
    A process-based numerical model that simulates the interacting wave motion on the beach, coastal groundwater flow, swash sediment transport and beach profile ...
  78. [78]
    Infiltration and Exfiltration on a Steep Gravel Beach - ASCE Library
    The instantaneous swash flux was used as an indicator of infiltration/exfiltration and was highly asymmetric across the swash zone. A region of strong ...
  79. [79]
    Modelling of Infiltration-Exfiltration Effects of Cross-Shore Sediment ...
    Jan 10, 2018 · The effects on the sediment transport rate due to inclusion of seepage process in the mass of the beach sand in the swash zone are investigated ...
  80. [80]
    Infiltration effects on sediment mobility under waves - ScienceDirect
    The results indicate that infiltration tends to inhibit sediment mobility for a horizontal bed of 0.2-mm quartz sand exposed to moderated wave induced bed shear ...Missing: moisture | Show results with:moisture
  81. [81]
    Subsurface Flow and Moisture Dynamics in Response to Swash ...
    Nov 27, 2017 · Moisture content is also an important control on the transport of particulates through the beach, which may be important carbon sources for ...Missing: mobility | Show results with:mobility
  82. [82]
    Field Study of Beach Water Content as a Guide to Wind Erosion ...
    Wind erosion is strongly governed by water adsorbed onto the surfaces of sedimentary particles and held by capillarity in lenses at interparticle contacts.Literature Review · Results · Literature Cited
  83. [83]
    Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup
    An empirical parameterization for extreme runup, defined by the 2% exceedence value, has been developed for use on natural beaches over a wide range of ...Missing: parameter ε_b
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup
    Incident swash is also best parameterized using a dimensional form of the Iribarren-based expression. Infragravity swash is best modeled dimensionally using ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] SWASH: A robust numerical model for shallow water coastal ... - CORE
    SWASH (Simulating WAves till SHore) is a non-hydrostatic numerical model for simulating surf zone processes in coastal engineering.
  86. [86]
    Advances in numerical modelling of swash zone dynamics
    We present a comprehensive and critical review of work on the numerical modelling of swash zone processes between 2005 and 2015. A wide range of numerical ...
  87. [87]
    Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport in ...
    ... numerical modeling of coastal engineering processes [1,2,3]. The widely used CFD package OpenFOAM® contains a method for solving free-surface Newtonian ...
  88. [88]
    sedinterfoam: a multi-phase numerical model for sediment transport ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · High-fidelity modeling of the physical processes occurring in the swash zone can help in understanding the exchange of sediment between emerged ...
  89. [89]
    A Numerical Study of Dam‐Break Driven Swash and Beach ...
    Aug 21, 2023 · A numerical model that simultaneously resolves free surface and porous media flow for a variably saturated subsurface is presented.
  90. [90]
    Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport Under Solitary Waves in ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · Generally, uprush events carry sediment onshore while the backwash transports sediment seaward. Swash–swash interactions may modify these ...
  91. [91]
    Advances in swash-zone research: Small-scale hydrodynamic and ...
    This review paper focuses on swash-zone hydrodynamic and sediment transport processes. •. Recent advances in swash-zone field, laboratory and numerical modeling ...
  92. [92]
    laboratory study of swash-zone dynamics on dune erosion
    Aug 6, 2025 · PDF | A storm passage results in acute beach erosion and loss of immense amounts of sand from the affected coastlines.
  93. [93]
    An empirical model for infragravity swash on barred beaches
    Results show that nearshore bar systems reduce infragravity swash energy at the shoreline. The amount of swash reduction was found to correlate with both bar ...
  94. [94]
    Eulerian flow velocities in the swash zone: Field data and model ...
    Aug 13, 2004 · This study shows that it is similarly successful in predicting Eulerian flow velocities during individual swash events.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Shaping The Beach: Cross-Shore Sand Transport in the Swash Zone
    Swash processes determine whether sand is stored on the upper beach or is transported offshore, and they thus strongly affect shoreline evolution.
  96. [96]
    Low-grazing angle laser scans of foreshore topography, swash and ...
    Here, we demonstrate a novel technique in which a terrestrial laser scanner is used to continuously measure beach and foreshore topography as well as water ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Beach drainage - Coastal Wiki
    Jun 28, 2025 · The transport of sediment across the beach face is performed by wave uprush and backwash. The uprush moves sand onshore while the backwash ...
  98. [98]
    Laboratory study on a beach drainage system - ScienceDirect
    The Beach Drainage Systems or BDS working principle is based on the concept that by keeping the groundwater level low, back-swash is inhibited by increased ...
  99. [99]
    A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Soft-Engineering Method
    The beach drainage can be included among the soft engineering methods aimed to counteract the shoreline retreat related to the sediment redistribution along ...Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation
  100. [100]
    Dynamic Revetments Provide A Nature-Based Approach to Control ...
    Dynamic revetments, or cobble berms, are a 'design with nature' approach using cobble/gravel to mimic natural beaches, dissipating wave energy and reducing ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Guidebook on Erosion Control Practices of the Oregon Coast
    Erosion control measures discussed include: • Nonstructural: vegetative stabilization, dynamic revetment, beach nourishment, and beach scraping; and. • ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Impacts of Sediment Removal from and Placement in Coastal ...
    Sep 2, 2020 · shoreline erosion and reduced sediment supply, may be worsened by ... Evolution of a swash zone berm nourishment and influence of berm ...
  103. [103]
  104. [104]
    Evaluating Sediment Transport and Morphological Evolution of a ...
    Nov 28, 2023 · This provides a unique opportunity to investigate the feasibility of using unconfined swash zone placement into a shore perpendicular spit as a ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] The Effects of Seawalls on the Beach - City of Bainbridge Island
    Apr 26, 1988 · RUSSELL and INGLIS (1953) used a 16.5-m long tank to examine the effect of a seawall on the beach. They placed a vertical wall in the swash zone ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY ON ROCK SEAWALL ...
    experimental results may not be applicable to stone seawalls in the swash zone. Chapter 4 introduces cross-shore numerical model, CSHORE (Kobayashi 2016).
  107. [107]
    Effects of coastal protection structures in controlling erosion and ...
    Oct 4, 2023 · ... structures like groynes, jetties, revetments, or breakwaters affect beach dynamics. The impacts of these defenses on beach changes are still ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Impacts of Shoreline Armoring on Sediment Dynamics
    Figure 1. Seawalls impact nearshore hydrodynamics in many ways, including wave reflection. Photo Credit Carl Schoch (Homer, Alaska).
  109. [109]
    The swash zone selects functionally specialized assemblages of ...
    Oct 30, 2024 · For each individual, we examined 14 morphological traits for each species, focusing on body size and shape, ability to withstand turbulence by ...
  110. [110]
    Two year study of swash zone suprabenthos of two Galician ...
    The suprabenthos is considered a major food resource for some fish and birds. Moreover, it plays a key role in the food chain and in nutrient regeneration ...
  111. [111]
    The role of inputs of marine wrack and carrion in sandy‐beach ...
    When retained in beach ecosystems, wrack often creates hotspots of microbial metabolism, secondary productivity, biodiversity, and nutrient remineralization.
  112. [112]
    [PDF] Baseline Characterization of Sandy Beach Ecosystems in ...
    Sandy beaches and adjacent surf zones are also important foraging areas for shorebirds and fishes that feed on intertidal invertebrates.
  113. [113]
    Environmental impact of submerged and emerged breakwaters
    Improper breakwater design led to hypoxia and reduced water quality in the coastal areas. The breakwaters created water stagnation, resulting in hypoxic ...
  114. [114]
    Environmental impacts of shore revetment - PMC - NIH
    Revetment implementation is one of the most effective, prominent, and quickest solutions for shoreline erosion control. Unlike soft options which can take years ...4. Impact On Beach... · 6. Impact On Ecology · 7. Impact On Beach...<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Living Shorelines: Impacts of Erosion Control Strategies on Coastal ...
    Beach nourishment in one area can slow erosion rates on neighboring properties when sand fill acts as a source of depositional material as it is transported ...
  116. [116]
    4 Mitigating Eroding Sheltered Shorelines: A Trade Off in Ecosystem ...
    The alteration of a small section of the shoreline via the construction of a single structure to control erosion at a specific site alters the ecosystem ...
  117. [117]
    Ecological tradeoffs of stabilized salt marshes as a shoreline ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Hybrid saltmarsh shorelines constructed with rock sills or oyster reefs have been shown to reduce lateral erosion (Polk and Eulie, 2018;Polk et ...