Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

The Last Messiah

"The Last Messiah" (Den sidste Messias) is a 1933 philosophical essay by Norwegian thinker Peter Wessel Zapffe (1899–1990), originally published in the journal Janus, in which he diagnoses human existence as a tragic error arising from consciousness's overdevelopment, which unveils the universe's indifference and mortality's inevitability, thereby inducing "cosmic panic" that consciousness instinctively suppresses to preserve sanity. Zapffe structures his argument around humanity's biological : unlike other attuned to instinctual , humans possess a surplus that alienates them from , fostering relentless existential dread unless mitigated by four innate remedies—isolation (censoring intrusive thoughts), anchoring (fixation on stable ideologies or routines), distraction (perpetual activity to evade reflection), and (redirecting into creative or symbolic outlets). These mechanisms, operating largely below awareness, enable societal functioning but perpetuate the propagation of suffering by blinding individuals to life's fundamental pointlessness. Central to the essay is the titular "last messiah," a prophetic figure—exemplified by rare intellects who pierce all illusions, akin to ancient archers glimpsing doom at a waterhole—who confronts the ' doom without recourse to , ultimately advocating voluntary infertility as the sole escape from perpetuating conscious torment. Zapffe portrays this messiah not as savior but as tragic herald, descending through generations yet powerless to halt the cycle, underscoring his view that amplifies rather than resolves this . The essay, foundational to Zapffe's broader oeuvre including his 1941 work On the Tragic, has exerted influence on subsequent pessimistic and antinatalist thought, challenging optimistic anthropocentric narratives by prioritizing empirical observation of consciousness's burdensome evolution over consolatory fictions. Its unflinching causal analysis of dread as rooted in biological mismatch remains a provocative of existential , though critiqued for its bleak prescription against human continuance.

Background and Context

Peter Wessel Zapffe's Biography and Philosophical Outlook

Peter Wessel Zapffe was born on December 18, 1899, in Tromsø, Norway, to Fritz Gottlieb Zapffe. His early life was marked by a harsh and violent upbringing in the northern regions, which he later reflected upon in interviews as contributing to his worldview. Zapffe pursued diverse interests, establishing himself as a philosopher, writer, mountaineer, photographer, and early environmental thinker, often described as Norway's first eco-philosopher for his critiques of human overreach into nature. He married twice—first to Bergljot Espolin Johnson on September 6, 1935, in Oslo—but chose not to have children, a decision aligned with his philosophical advocacy against procreation amid life's inherent suffering. Zapffe continued producing works into old age, publishing his final book at 87, and died on October 12, 1990, in Asker, Akershus, Norway, at age 90. Zapffe's philosophical outlook centered on a profound , positing that human has evolved beyond biological necessity, creating a tragic mismatch with the indifferent . This overdevelopment fosters acute of meaninglessness, , and mortality—termed "existential angst" or the "tragic"—which animals evade through instinctual living. Drawing heavily from Schopenhauer's emphasis on life's will-to-live as a source of perpetual striving and , Zapffe extended this to argue that intellectual excess exposes humanity's "nakedness under the ," rendering a paradoxical error of . He engaged Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas but critiqued their affirmative turn toward life-embrace as illusory, favoring instead a Schopenhauerian resignation or denial of the will. In his seminal 1933 essay The Last Messiah, Zapffe formalized this view, asserting that humanity's sole "salvations"—religious, ideological, or cultural—are temporary defense mechanisms like isolation (suppressing dread), anchoring (clinging to absolutes), (busying the mind), and (channeling into art or ). These, he contended, merely postpone confrontation with the absurd, as no ultimate or purpose can reconcile consciousness with cosmic futility; the essay culminates in the figure of a final, enlightened being who recognizes procreation's immorality and opts for . Zapffe's antinatalist imperative followed: given suffering's dominance and awareness's burden, refraining from represents ethical clarity, a stance he embodied personally. His broader corpus, including works on and , reinforced this causal —human expansion defies nature's limits, amplifying tragedy—while rejecting optimistic ideologies as self-deceptive. Zapffe's humor and pursuits served as personal sublimations, underscoring his theory's applicability even to its proponent.

Historical and Intellectual Influences

Peter Wessel Zapffe's essay "The Last Messiah," published in 1933, draws substantially from Arthur Schopenhauer's , which posits life as an endless cycle of striving driven by a blind, insatiable will, rendering existence inherently tragic and suffering inevitable. Zapffe echoes this by framing human consciousness as an evolutionary overdevelopment that reveals the meaninglessness of being, a burden Schopenhauer similarly described as amplifying of futility without purpose. Zapffe's exploration of existential dread and the rejection of salvific illusions also reflects influences from and , with Kierkegaard's emphasis on anxiety in confronting the absurd paralleling Zapffe's view of life's fundamental lack of , though Zapffe dismisses faith-based resolutions as mere self-deception. Nietzsche's critique of life-denying ideologies and warnings about gazing into inform Zapffe's portrayal of messianic figures as temporary anchors against cosmic horror, yet Zapffe extends this into a more unrelenting antinatalist stance absent in Nietzsche's affirmative . The essay's opening fable of a prehistoric hunter's awakening to mortality evokes Plato's , symbolizing the perilous emergence from instinctual ignorance into reflective torment. Zapffe's four defense mechanisms—isolation, anchoring, distraction, and sublimation—bear resemblance to Sigmund Freud's theories of repression, adapting psychoanalytic ideas to explain humanity's collective evasion of existential panic through cultural and psychological barriers. Literarily, Norwegian playwright inspired Zapffe's pivot from law to philosophy in the 1930s, infusing his work with dramatic portrayals of human delusion and tragedy. Biologically, concepts from Jakob von Uexküll's theory shaped Zapffe's eco-philosophical undertones, viewing human environmental reshaping as an extension of consciousness's maladaptive surplus in an indifferent . These strands converge in "The Last Messiah" amid interwar Europe's ideological ferment, where Zapffe anticipated critiques of totalizing systems as futile bulwarks against innate despair.

Publication History and Initial Circulation

"Den sidste Messias" ("The Last Messiah"), a philosophical essay by Peter Wessel Zapffe, was first published in 1933 in the Norwegian journal Janus, issue 9, pages 645–665. The piece appeared amid Zapffe's emerging explorations of existential themes, following his legal studies and initial writings on mountaineering and nature. As a contribution to a periodical targeted at Norwegian intellectual audiences, the essay's initial dissemination was restricted to domestic literary and philosophical readers, with no recorded evidence of broad international or mass-market distribution at the time. The original Norwegian text received limited contemporary attention, reflecting Zapffe's niche status as a philosopher outside mainstream academic channels during the interwar period. It was not anthologized or widely reprinted immediately following publication, contributing to its obscurity until posthumous interest in the late 20th century. The first English translation, by Gisle R. Tangenes, appeared over 70 years later in Philosophy Now magazine, issue 45 (March/April 2004), broadening access beyond Scandinavian circles. This delay underscores the essay's gradual emergence from relative isolation in Norwegian periodical literature to recognition in global pessimist philosophy.

Core Arguments of the Essay

The Overdeveloped Consciousness and

In "The Last Messiah," identifies human as an evolutionary overdevelopment, a biological wherein reflective surpasses the requirements for mere , distinguishing humans from other bound by unreflective . Animals, he notes, experience fear only in response to immediate threats like predators or environmental hazards, their suffering limited to personal peril without extending to existential . In contrast, human intellect pierces the veil of , exposing the "tragedy of a species become too lordly to use those around it rationally" and engendering a chronic "cosmic panic" over the futility of life amid inevitable decay and annihilation. Zapffe traces this condition to a primordial awakening of self-awareness: "One night in times long since vanished, man awoke and saw himself. He saw that he was naked under the cosmos, the horror of his own individuality engulfed him." This realization—unfettered by instinct's protective buffer—reveals the self as a transient, isolated entity in an indifferent universe, prompting terror at the body's limits: "this is you and you extend so far, and no farther." He likens the emergence of such consciousness to nature's "hypertrophy," an overreaching akin to the oversized antlers that doomed an extinct deer species, rendering humanity a "too heavily armed" outlier, omnipotent in cognition yet perilously maladapted to its own insights. The thus precipitated involves a profound dissonance: humans, armed with foresight, perceive as a "senseless squandering of organic stuff," where birth propels organisms toward and without cosmic justification. This awareness breeds not merely for the self but for life's continuum, evoking a of betrayal by the evolutionary mechanisms that birthed such burdensome clarity. Zapffe views this overdevelopment as inherently tragic, positioning humanity as a "detour from the beaten track of ," fated to grapple with the horror of unshielded reality unless subconsciously evaded.

Defense Mechanisms Against Awareness

In "The Last Messiah," Zapffe posits that employs innate psychological strategies to suppress of its existential predicament—the mismatch between an overdeveloped for and the indifferent, tragic nature of biological existence—thereby averting "cosmic panic." These defense mechanisms, evolved as adaptive responses, function to delimit and maintain functional survival amid the dread of meaninglessness and inevitable death. Zapffe identifies four principal mechanisms: , , , and , each serving to compartmentalize or redirect potentially overwhelming insights. Isolation involves the deliberate exclusion from conscious thought of any cognition or sentiment deemed incompatible with harmonious adjustment to reality. Zapffe describes it as an "arbitrary dismissal," where individuals or societies reflexively block intrusive reflections on futility, such as the pointlessness of procreation in a universe destined for extinction. This mechanism operates both personally, as in suppressing personal mortality during daily routines, and collectively, as seen in cultural taboos against questioning life's value, ensuring continuity despite underlying dissonance. Anchoring refers to the fixation on stable "points of view" or institutions that provide illusory security and purpose, countering the flux of existence. Examples include adherence to religious doctrines promising afterlife salvation, nationalist ideologies affirming collective destiny, or familial roles that embed individuals in a semblance of enduring significance; these serve as psychological moorings against the void, much as a ship anchors to withstand storms. Zapffe critiques such anchors as self-deceptive, noting their role in perpetuating reproduction by framing biological imperatives as transcendent duties. Distraction, or diversion, entails perpetually captivating the mind with superficial impressions to prevent deeper contemplation of tragedy. Zapffe illustrates this through incessant engagement in sensory or social pursuits—such as work, entertainment, or conversation—that fill consciousness without allowing penetration into existential depths, akin to a constant barrage of stimuli that drowns out silence. In modern contexts, this manifests in the proliferation of media and activities that sustain activity without resolution, effectively postponing confrontation with the human condition's inherent absurdity. Sublimation redirects potentially paralyzing awareness into culturally productive outlets, transforming raw dread into , , or without fully resolving it. Zapffe views this as the most sophisticated mechanism, where insights into life's are aestheticized or intellectualized—evident in tragic or metaphysical systems—yet ultimately serve to reinforce denial by channeling energy away from against the root . While enabling civilizational achievements, sublimation perpetuates the illusion of coping, as creations born of suppressed panic merely ornament the underlying tragedy rather than dismantle it. Collectively, these mechanisms form a "conspiracy against life" by sustaining the through of its superfluity in cosmic terms, with failures leading to or voluntary urges. Zapffe argues their efficacy relies on incomplete , warning that their breakdown in an era of heightened awareness signals the essay's titular "last messiah"—a final, futile redeemer exposing the mechanisms' limits.

The Illusion of Salvation and the Role of Messiahs

In Zapffe's framework, the pursuit of salvation represents a fundamental defense mechanism known as anchoring, whereby individuals or societies construct rigid ideological, religious, or metaphysical frameworks to impose artificial stability on the fluid of conscious . Anchoring functions by "fixation of points within, or of walls around, the liquid fray of ," limiting exposure to the existential arising from humanity's recognition of its cosmic and biological . These anchors—such as doctrines of divine purpose, national destiny, or scientific progress—promise from meaninglessness but ultimately serve as illusions, as they cannot alter the underlying incompatibility between sentience and indifferent nature. Religious and philosophical messiahs historically embody these salvific illusions by offering transcendent anchors that ostensibly resolve the of overdeveloped in an amoral universe. Figures like Christ or , Zapffe contends, articulate visions of or that temporarily alleviate through collective adherence, yet such systems falter when confronted with empirical reality's indifference, leading to recurrent crises of . Messiahs thus play a : as propagators of necessary fictions that sustain despite the ' tragic awareness, but also as harbingers of , since their revelations inevitably expose the constructed nature of their own promises. Historical patterns of rejection—saviors "nailed to trees and stoned on the city squares"—illustrate humanity's instinctive from truths that undermine vital illusions. The concept culminates in the "last Messiah," a hypothetical figure who dispels all salvific pretenses by proclaiming the ultimate futility of , advocating voluntary to halt the perpetuation of conscious : "Know yourselves – be infertile and let the be silent after ye." Unlike prior messiahs, this final revealer emerges not to anchor but to dismantle defenses entirely, recognizing that no or can reconcile with its . Zapffe positions this as an inevitable endpoint, born from the archer at the waterhole—the primordial human whose initiated the dilemma—yet foresees its savage suppression by 's guardians, underscoring the illusory allure of salvation as a biological imperative rather than a viable .

Philosophical Implications

Connections to Pessimism and Antinatalism

In "The Last Messiah," Zapffe articulates a form of by positing that human consciousness, an evolutionary overdevelopment, generates an irreconcilable tension with biological instincts, resulting in chronic existential dread and the recognition of life's inherent meaninglessness. This awareness, absent in other species, exposes individuals to the futility of amid inevitable , decay, and cosmic indifference, rendering human life a tragic error rather than a harmonious . Zapffe illustrates this through parables, such as a hunter immobilized by empathetic into animal , symbolizing how intellect paralyzes vital action and amplifies despair. This pessimistic framework directly informs antinatalist conclusions in the essay, as Zapffe argues that procreation morally compounds the error by imposing conscious on new beings who cannot , perpetuating a cycle of dread without resolution. He rejects optimistic salves like or as mere suppression mechanisms—such as anchoring to myths or distraction through activity—that fail to alter the underlying causal reality of overdeveloped clashing with indifferent . The essay culminates in an explicit call for voluntary : "Know yourselves—be infertile and let the earth be silent after ye," framing non-reproduction as the sole ethical imperative to halt the propagation of aware, suffering entities. Zapffe's integration of and emphasizes empirical observation of widespread human anguish—evident in historical rates and cultural neuroses—over abstract hopes, prioritizing causal of the problematic trait () rather than futile mitigation. While some interpretations debate whether this constitutes prescriptive or descriptive fatalism, the essay's logic aligns suffering's asymmetry with procreative harm, influencing later proponents who cite it as a foundational of existence's value.

Critique of Ideological and Religious Anchors

In "The Last Messiah," identifies anchoring as one of four primary defense mechanisms humans employ to mitigate the existential dread arising from overdeveloped . Anchoring involves tethering awareness to fixed, culturally inherited principles such as , , , and , which provide illusory stability amid cosmic indifference. These anchors, Zapffe argues, artificially constrain the mind's capacity for unfiltered perception, preventing full confrontation with the universe's meaninglessness and humanity's biological mismatch—wherein exceeds adaptive necessity. By substituting empirical with dogmatic certainties, they foster a false sense of purpose, but Zapffe contends this suppression is inherently unstable, as anchors erode under scrutiny from advancing knowledge or personal insight. Religious frameworks exemplify Zapffe's critique, portraying deities, doctrines, and eschatological promises as collective anchors that historically quelled dread by imposing anthropocentric narratives on an uncaring . He describes in or destiny as a developmental halt, where "rests on inherited cultural foundations" rather than evolving to grapple with . Ideologies, similarly, function as secular variants— , absolutes, or utopias—offering communal but failing causally, as they cannot alter the fundamental of conscious in a mechanistic . Zapffe views both as diversions from truth, perpetuating reproduction and societal continuity despite the underlying tragedy, evidenced by their persistence despite scientific disconfirmation, such as undermining literal creation myths. The notion of messiahs underscores Zapffe's dismissal of salvific anchors, positing them as recurrent illusions promising from through transcendent intervention or . Traditional messianic figures, whether prophetic or ideological (e.g., leaders embodying ), reinforce anchoring by redirecting focus to future-oriented hopes, yet Zapffe asserts these collapse into futility, as no external force resolves internal dissonance. The "last messiah," in his , emerges not as a savior but as an awakener who exposes all prior anchors as deceptions, potentially catalyzing voluntary over perpetuation of . This critique aligns with causal , emphasizing that anchors delay but do not preclude the dread's resurgence, as empirical reveals life's stagnation akin to a "stagnant " rather than a vital flow.

Evolutionary and Causal Underpinnings

Zapffe frames in "The Last Messiah" as rooted in a biological anomaly arising from evolutionary processes, where exceeded adaptive necessities, producing an "overabundance of " that estranges individuals from the instinctual harmony observed in other . This manifests as a "break in the very unity of life, a biological , a monstrosity, an , a of the most catastrophic kind," whereby equipped humanity with reflective capacities for environmental mastery, yet inadvertently fostered of cosmic indifference and personal finitude. Unlike animals, which experience life through unmediated drives of , , and submission to , humans confront the "dread of being" upon awakening to their existential —"naked under the , homeless in his own body"—a phylogenetic escalation that Zapffe likens to "aim[ing] too high, and outdon[ing] itself." Causally, this evolutionary overshoot initiates a chain of psychological distress, as heightened intellect reveals life's inherent annihilation—shared by humans and beasts alike, from the "giant elk" to the at large—while amplifying awareness of universal and futility. Zapffe contends that such "cosmic " stems directly from the causal mismatch between biological imperatives for and the reflective that exposes as a "chronic spasm" unfit for continuation, rendering humanity a "... too heavily armed" by its own genius, potent against external threats but self-destructive internally. The persistence of the species despite this arises not from resolution but from innate repressive strategies that curtail full awareness, preserving functionality at the cost of authenticity; without these, Zapffe implies, mass or would have ensued, underscoring the deterministic grip of biological over human endeavor. This perspective aligns with a naturalistic causal , wherein no teleological redeems the aberration, only the inexorable logic of over-evolved traits propelling toward or oblivion.

Reception and Legacy

Early and Mid-20th Century Responses

Upon its publication in the journal Janus in 1933, "Den sidste Messias" elicited limited immediate commentary, primarily confined to philosophical and literary circles in amid the interwar period's focus on and emerging existential currents. The essay's stark portrayal of human consciousness as a tragic overdevelopment, coupled with implicit calls to curtail , clashed with prevailing optimistic narratives of and biological vitality, resulting in muted discourse rather than robust . Zapffe himself engaged in related public writings, such as a 1934 contribution critiquing cultural , but no major refutations or endorsements from prominent intellectuals of the era are documented in contemporary records. In the 1940s, amid Nazi occupation of Norway, Zapffe expanded his arguments from the essay into the 1941 book Om det tragiske, which he defended as a doctoral dissertation—a process complicated by wartime censorship and ideological scrutiny. His personal networks, including mountaineering companion Arne Næss, provided informal avenues for reception; Næss, later founder of deep ecology, engaged with Zapffe's pessimism during joint expeditions in the late 1930s, viewing climbing itself as emblematic of life's inherent meaninglessness, though Næss ultimately diverged toward affirmative environmental ethics rather than Zapffe's antinatalist resignation. This period saw no broad academic uptake, as Zapffe's biologically grounded fatalism contrasted with post-occupation emphases on reconstruction and humanism. By the 1950s, Zapffe's core ideas persisted in niche discourse, influencing precursors to ecological philosophy without garnering mainstream philosophical endorsements or critiques. The essay's unyielding causal analysis of existential defense mechanisms—, distraction, anchoring, and —remained provocative but undebated in international existentialist circles dominated by figures like Sartre and Camus, whose works emphasized with glimmers of absent in Zapffe's framework. A 1969 anthology edited by Guttorm Fløistad reprinted "Den sidste Messias," signaling mid-century archival interest among scholars, yet evoking scant critical analysis until later decades. Overall, early to mid-20th-century responses underscored the essay's marginal status, its radical implications stifling engagement in an era prioritizing societal recovery over metaphysical despair.

Influence on Modern Pessimistic and Existential Thought

Thomas Ligotti's 2010 work The Conspiracy Against the Human Race prominently features Zapffe's essay as a foundational text, interpreting "The Last Messiah" as articulating humanity's tragic overdevelopment of consciousness, which generates inescapable dread of meaninglessness and impermanence, thereby necessitating psychological denial mechanisms to sustain existence. Ligotti extends this to argue that human awareness constitutes a "malignant" evolutionary byproduct, advocating voluntary extinction as the sole ethical resolution, a position he attributes to Zapffe's causal framing of consciousness as maladaptive beyond mere survival needs. Ligotti praised Zapffe's philosophy as "perhaps the most elementary in the history of philosophy," emphasizing its reduction of existential horror to biological mismatch rather than metaphysical abstraction. David Benatar, a leading antinatalist philosopher, echoes Zapffe's in viewing procreation as ethically flawed due to life's preponderance of over , though Benatar grounds this in an argument prioritizing , while Zapffe roots it in the existential burden of hyper-conscious isolation from nature's instinctual harmony. A 2021 contrasts their approaches, noting both deem human existence inherently tragic—Zapffe through evolutionary overreach leading to "Socratic" awareness of futility, and Benatar through empirical in experiential values—but Zapffe's framework more directly informs descriptive critiques of strategies over prescriptive ethics. Benatar contributed a to a 2023 English translation of Zapffe's works, signaling ongoing recognition of the essay's role in substantiating antinatalist against optimistic counterclaims. Zapffe's ideas have permeated modern existential discourse by challenging anthropocentric illusions, influencing thinkers who critique progress narratives as futile buffers against cosmic indifference, as seen in Ligotti's integration with Schopenhauerian will-denial and Cioran's cultural disintegration themes. Unlike Camus's absurd rebellion or Sartre's freedom-creating angst, Zapffe's legacy favors resignation or over , resonating in 21st-century eco-pessimistic variants that frame human expansion as self-defeating given finite resources and inevitable . Recent , such as a Philosophy Now article, positions Zapffe as prescient for politically applying his "biological imperative" against ideological anchors, warning that unaddressed existential overreach exacerbates societal fragility. This influence persists in academic comparisons, where "The Last Messiah" is cited for its empirical grounding in human over abstract ontology, providing a causal lens on why existential therapies often reinforce rather than dismantle denial.

Contemporary Discussions and Applications

In antinatalist philosophy, Zapffe's arguments in "The Last Messiah" have been revived as a foundational critique of procreation, positing that human inevitably generates that outweighs any potential joys, rendering birth ethically questionable. Philosophers such as have echoed this by emphasizing in harm and benefit, though Zapffe's biologically grounded —viewing overdeveloped awareness as an —differs by framing anti-natalism not as a but as a pragmatic response to existential overload. A 2021 analysis contrasts Zapffe's position with Schopenhauer's will-denial and Benatar's , arguing that Zapffe's emphasis on innate defense mechanisms like and anchoring implies biomedical interventions to enhance could mitigate prior to endorsing voluntary extinction. This has informed debates in journals like NanoEthics, where is leveraged to advocate for genetic or cognitive enhancements aimed at reducing the "tragic" burden of . Zapffe's framework of repression mechanisms—categorized as (suppressing dread-inducing facts), anchoring (clinging to ideologies or rituals), (busying the mind), and (channeling angst into art)—finds applications in contemporary psychology and , interpreting widespread mental health issues like anxiety disorders as breakthroughs against societal denial rather than mere pathologies. For instance, these strategies are analyzed in studies of during global crises, where anchoring to optimistic narratives delays confrontation with impermanence. In existential ludology, Zapffe's categories are applied to video games as modern tools, enabling players to simulate control over chaotic realities while evading deeper . Empirical parallels appear in on , which empirically validates cultural "anchors" as buffers against , aligning with Zapffe's causal view of consciousness as maladaptive without such defenses. Environmentally, Zapffe's ideas underpin eco-pessimistic discourses, portraying human expansion as an extension of overdeveloped that desecrates a indifferent to values. As an early conservationist who co-founded Norway's nature protection society in , Zapffe extended "The Last Messiah" to argue that full awareness of ecological finitude reveals humanity's presence as a net detriment, influencing modern critiques of progress. Recent applications link this to climate denialism, framing fossil fuel advocacy or techno-optimism as collective distraction and anchoring against species-level tragedy. Thinkers like have popularized Zapffe in works such as The Conspiracy Against the Human Race (2010), applying his messiah-less cosmology to horror philosophy, where cultural narratives serve as futile shields against cosmic —a theme echoed in analyses of pandemic-era . These discussions persist in forums like the American Philosophical Association, highlighting Zapffe's relevance to anti-natalist amid declining birth rates in industrialized nations, such as Norway's fertility rate of 1.41 in 2023.

Criticisms and Counterperspectives

Challenges from Optimistic and Progress-Oriented Views

Optimists and progress-oriented thinkers challenge Zapffe's thesis in "The Last Messiah" by arguing that human consciousness, far from being an insurmountable biological paradox leading to collective despair, serves as the engine for empirical advancements that reduce suffering and foster flourishing. Cognitive psychologist , in his analysis of historical trends, contends that metrics of human well-being—such as the global decline in from 42% of the population in 1980 to 8.6% in 2018, and the rise in average from 31 years in 1800 to 72 years in 2019—demonstrate the efficacy of reason, science, and humanistic institutions in countering the existential voids Zapffe describes. These improvements, Pinker asserts, stem from principles that replace religious illusions with verifiable progress, rendering Zapffe's prediction of crumbling coping mechanisms empirically unfounded. From an evolutionary standpoint, critics like evolutionary psychologist reframe not as a tragic overdevelopment but as an adaptive that enriches experience and enables cooperative achievements. Humphrey describes as "unnecessarily beautiful," suggesting it amplifies life's value through subjective wonder and , rather than merely exposing . This view posits that Zapffe's emphasis on repression mechanisms overlooks how heightened awareness drives , such as medical and technological breakthroughs that extend healthy lifespans and mitigate natural hardships, thereby transforming potential despair into purposeful . Progress-oriented perspectives further critique Zapffe's fatalism by highlighting how and rational inquiry generate novel forms of meaning without reliance on outdated illusions. For instance, advancements in and environmental management—evidenced by the eradication of in 1980 and a 50% reduction in rates since 1990—illustrate humanity's capacity to engineer solutions to biological and existential constraints. Thinkers in this tradition argue that such causal interventions, grounded in empirical testing rather than metaphysical resignation, refute the inevitability of the "last messiah" by continually expanding the boundaries of tolerable existence. While acknowledging persistent challenges like , these views prioritize data-driven over Zapffe's a priori dismissal of progress, attributing the latter to an overemphasis on subjective unsubstantiated by long-term human .

Empirical and Psychological Critiques

Empirical data from global happiness and well-being surveys challenge Zapffe's portrayal of human consciousness as inherently tragic and paralyzing, revealing widespread reports of despite awareness of mortality and finitude. For instance, the , aggregating Gallup World Poll data from over 150 countries since 2005, shows average life evaluation scores above 5 on a 0-10 scale for most nations, with many respondents attributing satisfaction to relationships, purpose, and achievements—elements Zapffe dismissed as illusory anchors. Similarly, longitudinal studies link perceived meaning in life to higher satisfaction, with meta-analyses indicating moderate to strong positive correlations (r ≈ 0.40-0.50) across diverse populations, suggesting adaptive capacities rather than universal dread. Psychological research on (TMT) provides evidence that mechanisms for coping with existential threats, akin to Zapffe's described defenses, function adaptively to promote and , countering his view of them as mere suppressions doomed to fail. TMT, supported by over 500 empirical studies since the 1980s, demonstrates that —reminders of death—increases adherence to cultural worldviews and pursuits, which buffer anxiety and motivate goal-directed action, such as and , rather than inducing paralysis. Experimental paradigms, including those inducing , show these buffers enhance psychological adjustment without requiring denial of reality, as participants maintain functionality and even report heightened purpose post-reminder. From an evolutionary psychological standpoint, critiques argue that Zapffe's emphasis on over-developed consciousness as maladaptive overlooks its survival benefits, including enhanced foresight, social coordination, and , which underpin human flourishing. Brown and Keefer (2020) contend that anti-natalist conclusions like Zapffe's stem from atypical deficiencies in evolved terror management or attachment systems, as standard human psychology favors pro-natal motivations despite existential awareness; cross-cultural fertility persistence and data affirm this, with global birth rates sustained by intrinsic rewards outweighing abstract calculations. studies further indicate that existential concerns, while triggering transient dread, often catalyze growth through post-traumatic-like processes, with interventions like meaning-centered yielding measurable reductions in anxiety and increases in well-being scores. Critics also highlight potential distortions in Zapffe's framework, where excessive focus on tragedy risks fostering toxic rumination over balanced awareness, empirical patterns showing that moderate confrontation with finitude—via or —builds adaptive without descending into despair, as evidenced by randomized trials on existential therapies reporting effect sizes (d > 0.5) for improved adjustment. These findings collectively suggest human psychology equips individuals for meaningful engagement with , undermining the inevitability of Zapffe's messianic endpoint.

Responses from Traditional Religious Frameworks

Traditional religious frameworks, predominantly Abrahamic traditions, counter the core assertions of "The Last Messiah"—that human consciousness reveals life's inherent meaninglessness and necessitates cessation of procreation—by positing as purposefully ordained by a transcendent , where is transient and subordinate to eternal fulfillment. , for instance, maintains that humans possess intrinsic value as bearers of God's image, with procreation fulfilling the creation mandate to "" ( 1:28), directly opposing voluntary as a defiance of divine intent. Scriptural frames children as "a heritage from the Lord" (:3), blessings amid trials that build character and anticipate eschatological redemption, rendering pessimism a failure to trust in God's sovereignty over chaos. Catholic responses further emphasize that potential goods, including salvation through Christ, outweigh temporal harms, deeming ethically untenable except in sui generis scenarios like Judas's foreknown , which do not generalize to humanity. In , such existential dread is characterized as a spiritual affliction akin to unbelief, with the condemning as rooted in ill omen and weak , urging reliance on Allah's decree where "with hardship [comes] ease" (94:5-6). constitutes a probationary test for (51:56), where procreation aligns with prophetic encouraging marriage and as means to propagate and community resilience against adversity. Theological critiques reject antinatalist premises by attributing evils to human agency and natural order rather than creation itself, affirming reproduction's role in sustaining and earning divine reward. Judaism similarly repudiates antinatalist conclusions through halakhic imperatives like p'eru u'revu (), interpreting existence as a divine endowment for mitzvot observance and (world repair), where despair undermines the covenantal affirmation of life over non-being. Rabbinic tradition views progeny as fulfilling cosmic purpose, countering Zapffe-esque sublimations by grounding meaning in revelation rather than evolutionary maladaptation, with suffering reframed as opportunity for ethical growth and messianic hope. These frameworks collectively privilege divine —empirically unprovable yet experientially validated through communal endurance—over secular deduction, dismissing defense mechanisms as superfluous in light of assured afterlife justice.

References

  1. [1]
    The Last Messiah | Issue 45 - Philosophy Now
    The Last Messiah. The first English version of a classic essay by Peter Wessel Zapffe, originally published in Janus #9, 1933. Translated from the Norwegian ...
  2. [2]
    Essays by Peter Wessel Zapffe - Open Air Philosophy
    Jan 30, 2023 · The Last Messiah. By Peter Wessel Zapffe. This essay from 1933, arguably one of the best Zapffe has written, formed the basis for the ...
  3. [3]
    The Last Messiah - Open Air Philosophy
    Aug 28, 2019 · In The Last Messiah, Zapffe elaborates on the four suppression or defense mechanisms that human nature disposes of: isolation, anchoring, diversion, and ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The Last Messiah I II - Open Air Philosophy
    The Last Messiah. BY PETER WESSEL ZAPFFE. TRANSLATED BY PETER REED & DAVID ROTHENBERG | Reference to original publication: Zapffe, P.W. (1993). The Last Messiah ...
  5. [5]
    Peter Zapfe Family History & Historical Records - MyHeritage
    Peter Wessel Zapffe was born on December 18 1899, in Tromsø Municipality, Norway, to Fritz Gottlieb Zapffe. His occupations were Writer, Philosopher and ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Peter Wessel Zapffe - Open Air Philosophy
    Jan 30, 2023 · Peter Wessel Zapffe (1899–1990) is widely regarded as “Norway's earliest eco-philosopher.” He was the first Norwegian thinker to develop a ...
  7. [7]
    Peter Wessel Zapffe (1899–1990) • FamilySearch
    He married Bergljot Espolin Johnson on 6 September 1935, in Oslo, Norway. He died on 12 October 1990, in Asker, Akershus, Norway, at the age of 90. More ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  8. [8]
    [PDF] THE NORWEGIAN PHILOSOPHER PETER WESSEL ZAPFFE (1899 ...
    His last book was published when he was 87 years old, three years prior to his death at the age of 90. Zapffe married twice, but in line with his pessimistic ...
  9. [9]
    Famous Existentialists: Peter Wessel Zapffe - Jagran Josh
    Dec 27, 2012 · Name: Peter Wessel Zapffe. Born: December 18, 1899. Birthplace: Tromsø, Norway. Died: October 12, 1990. Deathplace: Asker, Norway.
  10. [10]
    A Neglected Philosophical Pessimist — For Our Times? - Daily Nous
    Nov 22, 2016 · Peter Wessel Zapffe (1899–1990), a little-known and even less appreciated Norwegian philosopher, humorist, environmentalist, and mountaineer.
  11. [11]
    On the Genealogy of Morality. The Birth of Pessimism in Zapffe's On ...
    554-555). However, Zapffe emphasizes that here comes the difference with Schopenhauer: “Nietzsche wants to go back to life: he wants salvation from Buddhism and ...
  12. [12]
    A Lesson from the Anti-Natalist Philosophy of P. W. Zapffe
    Mar 27, 2021 · I argue that pessimism counts strongly in favor of pursuing biomedical enhancements (especially welfare enhancements), and that this, in turn, gives pessimists ...
  13. [13]
    Existentialism in Norway: Who Was Peter Wessel Zapffe?
    Mar 13, 2025 · Influenced by Arthur Schopenhauer's pessimism, Zapffe believed human existence was fundamentally tragic. At the end of his essay, the last ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Meaning of Life: Peter Wessel Zapffe on the Human Condition
    Sep 30, 2015 · The present text deals with the question of the meaning of life in the existentialist theory of the Norwegian philosopher Peter Wessel ...
  15. [15]
    The View from Mount Zapffe | Issue 45 - Philosophy Now
    Among its earliest airings was a little essay called 'The Last Messiah' (1933). The piece begins with a fable of a stoneage hunter who, as he leaves his ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Wisdom in the Open Air : The Norwegian Roots of Deep Ecology
    Peter Wessel Zapffe, "Den sidste Messias" was first published in Janus, no. 9 (1933):. 645-65; translation by Sigmund Kval0y with Peter Reed; reprinted by ...Missing: circulation | Show results with:circulation
  17. [17]
    (PDF) Zapffe's The Last Messiah - ResearchGate
    Mar 11, 2025 · ... Janus, 9, 645–665. Permission. for publication on OpenAirPhilosophy generously granted by the University of. Minnesota Press and by Berit og ...
  18. [18]
    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110324242/pdf
  19. [19]
    Issue 45: March/April 2004 - Philosophy Now
    The Last Messiah. The first English version of a classic essay by Peter Wessel Zapffe, originally published in Janus #9, 1933. Translated from the Norwegian by ...Missing: journal | Show results with:journal
  20. [20]
    What You Call Depression I Call the Truth - VICE
    May 28, 2015 · This protection, as Wessel describes it, is composed of four defense mechanisms: isolation, anchoring, distraction, and sublimation. Isolation ...
  21. [21]
    None
    ### Summary of Key Sections from "The Last Messiah" by Peter Wessel Zapffe
  22. [22]
    Norwegian Pessimistic Anti-Natalism | Blog of the APA
    Nov 22, 2022 · ... Zapffe tells the following parable in “The Last Messiah”: One night in long bygone times, man awoke and saw himself. He saw that he was ...
  23. [23]
    Zapffe For A New Political Age | Issue 145 - Philosophy Now
    His antinatalism – the idea that the human race should stop reproducing ... Reading Zapffe's essay The Last Messiah was almost epiphanic – an intense ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] FILOSOFISK SUPPLEMENT
    var Zapffe tidlig ute. I et debattinnlegg fra 1934, med tit- telen ... «Den sidste Messias.» I Kulturelt nødverge, redigert av. Jørgen Haave, 51–62 ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Til John - NTNU Open
    Zapffe, P. W. (1999) Om det tragiske. Falun: Pax Forlag. Zapffe, P. W. (1969) «Den sidste Messias» i Fløistad, G. (red.) Peter Wessel Zapffe. Oslo: Pax. Forlag.
  26. [26]
    The Last Messiah. The unbearable heaviness of being, in… | after us
    Nov 24, 2016 · The key text for Ligotti's Conspiracy is Zapffe's antinatalist manifesto, 'The Last Messiah', a short and peculiar essay from 1933 proposing why life is indeed ...
  27. [27]
    Prelude to Abjection: Thomas Ligotti and Peter Wessel Zapffe
    Jun 20, 2022 · ... Schopenhauer (1788–1860), Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855), and Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) – as well as the literature of Henrik Ibsen ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] A Lesson from the Anti-Natalist Philosophy of P. W. Zapffe
    Feb 10, 2021 · How does Zapffe's argument for anti-natalism com- pare to that of David Benatar? Like Zapffe, Benatar holds a pessimistic view of human life, ...
  29. [29]
    Forward by Thomas Ligotti in new English translation of Peter ...
    Dec 9, 2023 · I have been informed that Thomas Ligotti and David Benatar have written forwards for the upcoming long awaited English translation of ...Peter Wessel Zapffe | THOMAS LIGOTTI ONLINEZAPFFE - THOMAS LIGOTTI ONLINEMore results from www.ligotti.net
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Existential Ludology and Peter Wessel Zapffe Stefano Gualeni ...
    We will focus on Zapffe's presentation, in his essay 'The Last Messiah,' of a clear fourfold categorization of concrete existential tools or coping strategies ...
  31. [31]
    Happiness and Life Satisfaction - Our World in Data
    Self-reported life satisfaction tends to correlate with other measures of well-being—richer and healthier countries tend to have higher average happiness scores ...
  32. [32]
    Perceived meaning of life and satisfaction with life - NIH
    We found strong correlations between happiness and the degree of perceived meaning in life but little correlation with the pursuit of meaning.
  33. [33]
    Terror Management Theory and the COVID-19 Pandemic - PMC
    Terror management theory is focused on the role that awareness of death plays in diverse aspects of life.
  34. [34]
    Anti-natalism from an evolutionary psychological perspective.
    Citation. Brown, F. L., & Keefer, L. A. (2020). Anti-natalism from an evolutionary psychological perspective. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6(3) ...
  35. [35]
    Anti-Natalism from an Evolutionary Psychological Perspective
    Dec 19, 2019 · Cite this article. Brown, F.L., Keefer, L.A. Anti-Natalism from an Evolutionary Psychological Perspective. Evolutionary Psychological Science ...Missing: Keefer | Show results with:Keefer
  36. [36]
    Existential Crisis: How to Cope with Meaninglessness
    Jan 24, 2024 · There are many ways to cope with feelings of existential anxiety or dread and, even better yet, find a purpose to live a more fulfilled life.
  37. [37]
    Excessive Awareness and the Danger of Distorted Philosophies
    Oct 8, 2025 · This article critically examines Peter Wessel Zapffe's pessimistic philosophy and explores the social consequences of uncritical interpretations ...Missing: outlook | Show results with:outlook<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    The FAQs: What (and Why) You Should Know About Anti-Natalism
    Feb 19, 2019 · What is the Christian view of anti-natalism? Because Christianity is pro-natalism, it is inherently anti-anti-natalism. The basis for ...
  39. [39]
    Antinatalism – WELS
    Jan 9, 2020 · A Lutheran response to this position is a scriptural response. The Bible clearly teaches that children are blessings from a loving God (Psalm ...
  40. [40]
    Unless You're Judas, Anti-Natalism Fails | Catholic Answers Magazine
    Sep 1, 2021 · Is it better for all human beings never to be born? That's the postition of anti-natalism. Here's how a Catholic can respond.
  41. [41]
    The Islamic Stance on Pessimism - Belief - Islamic Shariah - Alukah
    Jul 6, 2024 · Pessimism, often tied to superstitions and omens of polytheists, finds disapproval in Islam. Allah highlights this attitude in the Quran.
  42. [42]
    "Is Not Giving Birth a Virtue?" A Theological Critique of Antinatalism ...
    Oct 18, 2025 · The aim of the study is to analyze the intellectual foundations of antinatalism, critically evaluate this approach, and offer a theological ...
  43. [43]
    Islam, Atheism and Anti-natalism: A critical analysis - IDEA Publishers
    Dec 30, 2021 · The study concludes that evils, pains, and sadness are natural product of this world, and these evils are not a part of Allah's (SWT) creations.
  44. [44]
    Judaism and Pronatalism - Beit Polska Blog
    Nov 10, 2022 · Antinatalism, however, is the view that procreation is wrong. Antinatalists argue that humans should abstain from procreation because it is ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique