Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Toleration

Toleration refers to the normative or of refraining from prohibiting or interfering with conduct, beliefs, or practices that one disapproves of or finds objectionable, typically under conditions where such restraint is possible without direct to third parties or the . This concept implies a distinction between mere non-interference (negative toleration) and active permission or (positive toleration), often requiring the tolerator to exercise self-restraint despite moral disagreement. Unlike endorsement or indifference, toleration presupposes aversion yet prioritizes coexistence over suppression, serving as a foundational principle in pluralistic societies to manage without descending into . Historically, toleration gained prominence in seventeenth-century amid religious conflicts following the , where thinkers sought to curtail the coercive powers of both state and church over individual conscience. John Locke's A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) articulated a seminal case for religious , arguing that civil exists to secure worldly goods and safety, not to enforce salvation, which lies beyond human enforcement and risks hypocrisy in compelled belief. Locke excluded atheists (due to oath-breaking risks) and those advocating overthrow of , but extended toleration to Protestants, , , and pagans, influencing the in liberal frameworks. This evolved into broader liberal doctrines, emphasizing epistemological limits on knowing absolute truth and instrumental benefits like peace through mutual forbearance, as seen in responses to sectarian violence. Philosophically, justifications for toleration draw from skepticism about imposing disputed goods, the inefficacy of force in genuine persuasion, and reciprocal arrangements in diverse polities, yet it faces inherent tensions such as the "paradox of tolerance" identified by Karl Popper: unlimited toleration invites its own subversion by intolerant forces that exploit openness to dismantle it. Popper argued that a tolerant society must therefore withhold toleration from movements of suppression, using rational argument first but force if necessary to preserve liberty, highlighting causal realism in how unchecked intolerance erodes the conditions enabling toleration itself. In practice, this underscores toleration's contingent boundaries, defined not by subjective offense but by empirical threats to social cooperation and individual rights, distinguishing it from relativism or unconditional pluralism.

Etymology and Conceptual Foundations

Etymology

The English term toleration derives from the Latin noun tolerātiō (accusative tolerātiōnem), meaning "" or "the act of ing," formed from the verb tolerō ("to ," "to endure," or "to suffer"). This root emphasized a passive capacity to withstand discomfort or opposition, often with connotations of restraint rather than endorsement. The word entered Middle French as tolération in the late medieval period, denoting permission granted despite disapproval, before being borrowed into English around 1517–1518 as a term for official allowance of dissenting practices, particularly in religious contexts. Closely related, tolerance appeared in English by the early 15th century via Old French tolerance and Medieval Latin tolerantia, initially signifying physical or mental endurance of hardship before evolving to include forbearance toward beliefs or behaviors. Etymologically, these terms contrast with notions of active approval or indifference; tolerare implies objection overcome by , as in enduring or permitting what one deems erroneous, a nuance preserved in early modern usage amid religious conflicts. This endurance-based origin underscores toleration's historical role as a pragmatic concession rather than a positive .

Definitions and Distinctions

Toleration refers to the deliberate restraint from interfering with or suppressing beliefs, practices, or behaviors that one disapproves of, despite possessing the power to do so. This concept is rooted in ethical and political philosophy, where it functions as permissio negativa mali—a negative permission granted to what is deemed wrong but not sufficiently harmful to warrant prohibition. Philosophers emphasize that genuine toleration presupposes three conditions: objection or disapproval of the tolerated object, the capacity or authority to prevent it, and a principled choice to abstain from interference rather than mere inability or oversight. A key distinction lies between toleration and indifference, as the former requires active moral or cognitive engagement with disliked elements, whereas indifference entails no evaluative judgment or concern whatsoever. Unlike approval, which involves positive endorsement or , toleration maintains disapproval while forgoing coercive measures, preserving the agent's ethical stance against assimilation or endorsement. Toleration also differs from , which implies a lack of objection or even conditional embrace, often extending to respect or appreciation without the tension inherent in toleration's . Philosophical analyses further differentiate toleration from permissiveness, the latter suggesting laxity without principled boundaries or of potential , potentially eroding standards of conduct. While "tolerance" is sometimes used synonymously as a broader of fair permissiveness toward differing views, "toleration" more precisely denotes the act or policy of restraint in specific contexts, often political or institutional, involving asymmetries between a dominant group and dissenters. toleration, grounded in personal or about one's own judgments, contrasts with political toleration, which prioritizes stability or rights-based neutrality to avert . These distinctions underscore toleration's conditional nature, as it does not extend indefinitely but hinges on assessments of or , informing limits in ethical .

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Periods

In ancient Persia, Cyrus the Great's conquest of in 539 BCE marked an early instance of pragmatic religious forbearance, as documented in the , which records the restoration of temples and repatriation of exiled peoples, including allowed to return to and rebuild their sanctuary. This policy stemmed from administrative strategy to stabilize diverse subjects rather than principled tolerance, yet it contrasted with deportations and enabled continuity of local cults under Achaemenid rule. Ancient Greek city-states exhibited limited openness to foreign deities, often integrating them via , as in ' acceptance of or Asclepius worship, but intolerance prevailed against perceived threats to civic order or , exemplified by the execution of in 399 BCE for corrupting youth and disbelief in state gods. Philosophical discourse, such as in Plato's Laws, advocated suppressing heterodox views to preserve social cohesion, reflecting a causal link between religious unity and political stability rather than endorsement of . The extended conditional forbearance to conquered religions, permitting local practices if supplemented by reverence for Roman deities and , as seen in the integration of Egyptian or Syrian cults into the . This pax deorum approach prioritized empire-wide reciprocity over disapproval-free tolerance, leading to suppressions like the 186 BCE scandal or Druid bans under and for subversive rituals. faced sporadic persecutions from Nero's scapegoating in 64 CE to ' 250 CE edict demanding universal sacrifices, due to their exclusive rejecting emperor worship, which Romans viewed as antisocial disloyalty. The in 313 CE, issued by Emperors and , granted legal restitution to Christians and freedom for all to practice their religion without interference, effectively ending empire-wide persecutions and restoring confiscated properties. This shift arose from Constantine's post-Milvian Bridge conversion and political calculus to unify the realm, though it initially applied broadly before Christianity's elevation as via Theodosius I's 380 CE edict, which mandated Nicene orthodoxy and proscribed pagan sacrifices by 391 CE. Subsequent medieval Christian Europe entrenched doctrinal uniformity, with councils like (325 CE) condemning heresies and justifying coercion, as in Justinian's Code (6th century) prescribing death for relapsed heretics, prioritizing salvific truth over permissive diversity. In medieval Islamic polities, non-Muslims classified as dhimmis—primarily Jews and Christians—received protection under the dhimma pact, entailing jizya poll tax in lieu of military service and exemptions from zakat, formalized in pacts attributed to Muhammad and caliphs like Umar (7th century). This status permitted communal autonomy in personal law and worship but imposed restrictions, such as distinctive clothing, bans on proselytism, church repairs without permission, and public bell use, reflecting a hierarchy where tolerance served fiscal and administrative ends amid conquest's realities. Variability occurred: Umayyad Cordoba (8th-11th centuries) fostered relative coexistence via convivencia, yielding intellectual exchanges, yet periodic enforcements under Almohads (12th century) compelled conversions or exiles, underscoring tolerance's contingency on rulers' orthodoxy rather than inherent pluralism. Western medieval Christendom, conversely, saw escalating intolerance post-11th century, with the (1075-1122) and Gregorian Reforms reinforcing papal authority against lay interference, while from 1095 onward targeted Muslims, , and eastern Christians as existential threats. Jewish communities endured expulsions, such as England's 1290 edict under Edward I amid debt defaults and blood libels, and pogroms during the 1348-1351 , attributed to well-poisoning accusations despite papal bulls like Innocent IV's 1247 condemnation of such myths. Theological rationales, drawing from Augustine's coercion of Donatists (5th century), framed limited forbearance as charitable patience toward potential converts, not endorsement of error, with empirical patterns of recurrent violence revealing causal drivers in economic resentments and apocalyptic fervor over abstract toleration.

Early Modern and Enlightenment Era

The Protestant Reformation, beginning with Martin Luther's in 1517, fractured Western Christendom and ignited conflicts such as the (1546–1547) and the (1562–1598), which killed an estimated 3 million people and compelled rulers to adopt pragmatic toleration to avert societal collapse rather than principled pluralism. In this context, France's , promulgated on April 13, 1598, by —a former Huguenot converted to Catholicism—granted Calvinist Protestants () limited rights to public worship in about 100 designated towns, private worship elsewhere, access to universities and hospitals, and eligibility for state offices, while affirming Catholicism as the official religion and prohibiting proselytism. This decree, born of exhaustion from eight wars, represented an early state mechanism for managing diversity but imposed geographic and numerical restrictions, reflecting toleration as a revocable concession to preserve monarchical authority rather than an inalienable right; it endured until Louis XIV's revocation via the in October 1685, which prompted the flight of 200,000–400,000 Huguenots and renewed persecution. Intellectual advancements paralleled these pragmatic measures, with Dutch provinces under the (1579) establishing relative confessional coexistence by prohibiting religious inquiries, influencing expatriate thinkers. John Locke's Epistola de Tolerantia (, 1689), written amid England's and , contended that civil government's end is earthly preservation of life, liberty, and property, not spiritual salvation, rendering coercion of conscience futile since genuine belief arises from internal conviction alone, not external force. Locke thus separated ecclesiastical and magisterial spheres, urging toleration of Protestant dissenters to foster civil peace, but delimited it rigorously: atheists merited none, as their oath-denying undermined social contracts reliant on divine sanction; Roman Catholics warranted exclusion not for doctrinal error but for temporal allegiance to the , which incentivized subversion of sovereign authority, as evidenced by historical plots like the Gunpowder Treason of 1605. This framework, rooted in empirical observation of coercion's inefficacy and causal threats to order, informed England's Toleration Act of 1689, which relieved Nonconformists from but preserved Anglican establishment and barred Unitarians and Catholics. Enlightenment philosophers extended these arguments toward broader rationalism, viewing toleration as consonant with reason's limits in ascertaining ultimate truths. Pierre Bayle, in Philosophical Commentary on These Words of the Scripture, "Compel Them to Come In" (1686), advanced skeptical universalism, asserting that error in good faith demands forbearance since probabilistic knowledge precludes infallible judgment, a position that critiqued orthodox persecution while acknowledging moral diversity's persistence. Voltaire's Traité sur la tolérance (Treatise on Tolerance, 1763), catalyzed by the 1762 judicial murder of Jean Calas—a Toulouse Protestant tortured and broken on the wheel for allegedly killing his Catholic-convert son amid anti-Huguenot mob frenzy—denounced fanaticism's causal role in miscarriages of justice, advocating civil equality and punishment of intolerance as a civic vice, irrespective of private creeds, though he scorned superstition's societal harms and favored deism over revealed religion. Such views, disseminated via salons and correspondence, pressured reforms like the 1787 Edict of Versailles under Louis XVI, which restored some Protestant rights, yet Enlightenment toleration remained bounded by utilitarian calculus: unlimited acceptance risked anarchy from irrationally disruptive sects, as Locke and Voltaire alike prioritized causal stability over abstract equity, evident in exclusions of "enthusiasts" or those flouting reason-based civility. This era's doctrines, forged in confessional strife's crucible, laid foundations for constitutional protections but underscored toleration's conditional nature, contingent on non-aggression toward the polity's temporal ends.

19th Century Liberalization

In the , longstanding religious restrictions began to erode through legislative reforms driven by liberal pressures and pragmatic responses to social unrest. The , enacted on March 24, permitted Roman Catholics to hold seats in , enter most civil and military offices, and vote without sacramental tests, thereby dismantling key remnants that had barred them since the . This measure, prompted by Irish agitation and figures like , also raised property qualifications for Irish voters to mitigate Catholic electoral influence, reflecting a balance between expanded toleration and elite control. Jewish emancipation followed suit in Britain with the Jews Relief Act 1858, which abolished oaths requiring Christian affirmations, enabling Jews like to take parliamentary seats after years of exclusion. Across , this process accelerated amid nationalist consolidations and liberal revolutions; while had emancipated in 1791, German states granted equal civil rights variably from 1812 onward, culminating in full emancipation upon the German Empire's formation in 1871, which standardized protections against discriminatory laws. In , full equality arrived only in 1874 following federal revisions, marking the near-completion of Western European Jewish legal integration by century's end. These legal shifts intertwined with broader , as states progressively detached from authority to foster civil uniformity. In , this manifested in reduced state oversight of religious and the erosion of established privileges, enabling dissenters greater without conversion pressures. examples included Prussian tolerance edicts under Frederick William III in , which relaxed Protestant-Catholic divides, though enforcement varied amid conservative restorations post-1815. Such reforms, often concessions to stability rather than unqualified principle, expanded empirically by correlating with decreased religious persecutions and increased minority representation, yet persisted amid tensions like anti-Catholic riots in 19th-century . Philosophically, John Stuart Mill's (1859) advanced toleration as a utilitarian imperative, arguing that suppression of opinions or practices harms societal progress unless they directly injure others, thereby framing religious dissent as essential to truth-seeking and individual autonomy. Mill critiqued historical intoleration, such as Anglican dominance, as stifling inquiry, positing that diverse beliefs refine understanding through open contestation—a view that influenced liberal policies prioritizing non-coercive coexistence over enforced orthodoxy. This era's liberalization thus reflected causal dynamics of enlightenment rationalism, industrial mobility, and revolutionary precedents, yielding measurable gains in religious freedoms while exposing limits in uneven application across regions.

20th Century Applications and Challenges

In the aftermath of , the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the on December 10, 1948, explicitly promoted toleration as a foundational principle, stating in its preamble that it shall promote "understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups" and in Article 26 that education should foster "understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups." This document represented an international application of Enlightenment-era toleration ideals to postwar reconstruction, aiming to prevent the ethnic and ideological intolerances that fueled and global conflict, though its enforceability relied on state compliance rather than binding law. Domestically, liberal democracies extended legal toleration through antidiscrimination frameworks; in the United States, the prohibited on grounds including , , and , thereby institutionalizing toleration of diverse groups in public and private spheres. Title VII of the Act specifically barred by employers, accommodating practices like observance while limiting undue hardships, which empirically reduced overt workplace exclusions but faced challenges in balancing individual with organizational autonomy. Similar measures in , such as the UK's , applied toleration to immigrant communities, reflecting causal pressures from and labor migration that tested social cohesion without resorting to suppression. Totalitarian regimes posed severe challenges to toleration, rejecting it in favor of ideological conformity; in the , Stalin's from 1936 to 1938 targeted perceived dissenters, resulting in approximately 700,000 executions and millions imprisoned in Gulags, as documented in declassified archives revealing systematic elimination of political, intellectual, and ethnic nonconformists. This suppression extended to religious groups, with the League of Militant Atheists closing over 90% of churches by 1939, illustrating communism's causal incompatibility with toleration due to its monistic view of demanding absolute loyalty. Fascist movements similarly undermined toleration; in Germany's (1919–1933), constitutional guarantees of free speech and assembly allowed the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) to organize legally, gaining 37.3% of the vote in the July 1932 elections despite sporadic bans on propaganda, enabling Adolf Hitler's appointment as on January 30, 1933, after which the of March 23 dismantled parliamentary and imposed racial intolerance. Empirical analysis of Weimar's collapse attributes this to economic instability and amplifying extremist voices, where unchecked toleration of antisemitic and authoritarian ideologies facilitated their dominance, contrasting with 's explicit opposition to liberal in favor of corporatist total control. These cases empirically validated concerns over toleration's vulnerability to groups intent on its abolition, influencing postwar democratic safeguards like Germany's (1949) restricting parties undermining the free order.

Key Philosophical Theories

Lockean Religious Toleration

John Locke's advocacy for religious toleration, articulated primarily in his (first published in English in 1689 following the ), emphasized a strict separation between and to prevent state in matters of . Locke contended that the civil magistrate's jurisdiction extends solely to outward civil interests—such as life, , health, property, and indolency—while the church's domain concerns inward persuasion toward salvation, which cannot be enforced by force. He argued from first principles that true belief arises from rational conviction, not compulsion, rendering religious futile and counterproductive, as it yields only hypocritical conformity rather than genuine piety. Locke's framework required mutual : the refrains from interfering in doctrinal disputes or practices that do not disrupt civil order, while religious societies submit to civil laws and forgo claims to temporal power. This toleration extended to Protestant dissenters in , whom defended against Anglican pressures, positing that diverse sects could coexist peacefully under a neutral government focused on protecting property and contracts rather than . He rejected the notion of a as inherently coercive, insisting that voluntary associations best foster moral and spiritual ends without risking civil discord from enforced uniformity. However, Locke's toleration was not absolute; he explicitly excluded atheists, reasoning that their denial of divine existence undermined oaths, covenants, and social trust essential to , as promises lack binding force without fear of . Similarly, he withheld toleration from Roman Catholics in the English context, citing their doctrinal allegiance to the as a foreign temporal , which posed a credible to national and through potential or divided loyalties. These exceptions reflected Locke's prudential : toleration serves civil stability only insofar as it does not harbor groups whose beliefs inherently conflict with the state's preservation of order and property rights.

Mill's Harm Principle and Limits

John Stuart Mill articulated the in his essay , stating that "the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the of action of any of their number, is self-protection," specifically "to prevent harm to others." This principle posits that individual —encompassing thought, expression, and action—should be tolerated by and the unless it directly causes harm to non-consenting others, distinguishing it from mere offense, , or moral disapproval. Mill emphasized that "his own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant" for interference, rejecting as a basis for limiting toleration. In the context of toleration, the serves as a boundary for permissible , advocating broad for nonconformist behaviors and opinions to foster individual development and societal progress through open . argued that suppressing opinions, even erroneous ones, harms by stunting the pursuit of truth, as collision with error sharpens and verifies correct beliefs; thus, toleration of speech extends to potentially harmful ideas unless they incite direct injury. For actions, toleration applies to experiments in living—such as unconventional lifestyles or voluntary associations—provided they do not infringe on others' equal claims to , countering the "" where social customs enforce uniformity. This framework influenced liberal theories of toleration by prioritizing empirical utility: unrestricted maximizes by allowing diverse pursuits, but only up to the point where causal chains lead to verifiable . Mill delineated explicit limits to the principle, excluding children, whose incapacity for self-government justifies guardianship, and "backward states of society" where populations resemble a "nonage" requiring directive rule until capable of liberty. Harm is narrowly construed as setbacks to others' interests, not subjective displeasure; for instance, Mill permitted state enforcement of contracts to avert fraud-induced harm but opposed absolute enforcement if it enabled permanent self-enslavement, as such would nullify future liberty. In applications like Mormon polygamy, Mill deemed toleration unwarranted not merely for moral offense but because it entrenched male despotism over women and children, causing systemic harm through unequal power dynamics that undermined voluntary consent. Scholarly analyses note that Mill's harm excludes "mere dislike" or indirect effects, requiring evidence of concrete injury, such as violence or deception, to justify intolerance; however, ambiguities persist in defining "harm," with some interpretations expanding it to include psychological or cumulative social costs, though Mill insisted on a threshold of direct, other-regarding impairment. These boundaries reflect Mill's utilitarian calculus, weighing toleration's benefits against empirically demonstrable risks of coercion's greater harms.

Popper's Paradox of Tolerance

The paradox of tolerance, as formulated by Karl Popper in footnote 4 to chapter 7 of volume 1 of his 1945 work The Open Society and Its Enemies, asserts that unlimited tolerance inevitably undermines itself by permitting the intolerant to exploit and dismantle tolerant institutions. Popper wrote: "Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." He qualified this by prioritizing rational discourse: suppression of intolerant views is unwarranted as long as they can be countered through argument and public opinion, but becomes necessary if the intolerant reject reason, forbid their adherents from engaging it, and resort to violence such as "fists or pistols." Popper developed this idea amid , critiquing historicist philosophies (, Hegel, Marx) that he saw as justifying closed societies hostile to individual liberty and ; the serves as a defense mechanism for open societies grounded in piecemeal engineering and rather than utopian blueprints. In this framework, is not an absolute moral good but a conditional policy enabling the free exchange of ideas, which intolerant ideologies—characterized by dogmatism and —threaten by refusing reciprocity. Popper thus advocated claiming, "in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant," but only proportionally: force is justified solely against those who initiate physical or systematically evade debate, preserving the open society's core commitment to non-violent criticism. This formulation distinguishes the from blanket of speech, emphasizing empirical thresholds like observable refusal of rational engagement over preemptive ideological bans. Popper's note underscores causal realism: persists only if actively safeguarded against who exploit it asymmetrically, as evidenced by interwar Europe's vulnerability to fascist and communist movements that preached intolerance while benefiting from democratic freedoms until they seized power. Subsequent interpreters have noted its alignment with self-preservation, though misapplications often ignore Popper's insistence on evidentiary escalation from argument to suppression.

Critiques and Theoretical Limits

Conservative and Realist Objections

Conservative thinkers have long argued that liberal conceptions of toleration, by emphasizing neutrality and individual autonomy, erode the cultural, moral, and institutional foundations necessary for societal stability. , in his Reflections on the Revolution in (1790), contended that genuine toleration presupposes a shared commitment to and ; otherwise, it devolves into indifference toward all beliefs, which undermines the very fabric of . warned that extending toleration to those who reject foundational moral orders—such as atheists or radical skeptics—invites chaos, as it equates profound truths with ephemeral opinions, stating, "That those persons should tolerate all opinions, who think none to be of estimation, is a matter of small merit. Equal neglect is not impartial kindness." This view posits that toleration without boundaries fosters , weakening the prejudices and habits that saw as evolved safeguards against upheaval. Contemporary conservatives like Patrick Deneen extend this critique, asserting in Why Liberalism Failed (2018) that liberalism's toleration regime prioritizes state-enforced neutrality, which depletes communal virtues and local practices essential for human flourishing. Deneen argues that by framing toleration as indifference to traditional norms—such as family structures or religious observances—liberalism inadvertently promotes a homogenized individualism that hollows out intermediate institutions like churches and neighborhoods, leading to social fragmentation evidenced by rising rates of loneliness and family breakdown in Western societies since the mid-20th century. He cites historical data showing that pre-liberal orders balanced toleration with confessional establishments, allowing diversity within a moral framework, whereas modern liberalism's expansive toleration correlates with declining civic participation, as measured by Putnam's longitudinal studies on social capital erosion from 1950 onward. This objection holds that toleration, when unbound by communal goods, does not sustain pluralism but accelerates cultural decay, as seen in empirical trends like the U.S. marriage rate dropping from 72% in 1960 to 50% by 2019. Realist perspectives, drawing from political theorists like , further challenge toleration as a naive abstraction ill-suited to the inherent antagonisms of human affairs. In (1932), Schmitt critiqued liberal toleration for neutralizing politics into endless discussion and compromise, obscuring the friend-enemy distinction that defines sovereign decision-making in crises. He argued that tolerating all views, including those hostile to the polity, invites exploitation by resolute foes, as liberalism's aversion to exclusion renders it indecisive—exemplified historically by Germany's paralysis amid rising extremism in the and , where tolerant institutions failed to decisively counter threats. Schmitt's posits that dynamics demand intolerance toward existential enemies to preserve , a causal mechanism evident in state survival rates: tolerant but weak regimes often succumb to aggressive actors, as in the fall of multiparty systems under fascist pressures pre-World War II. John Gray, echoing this in realist terms, warns that liberal toleration's pursuit of pluralism masks an underlying drive for , which hyper-liberalism dismantles through deconstructive practices, fostering fragility rather than —as observed in Europe's migration crises post-2015, where unchecked toleration strained social cohesion without yielding stable integration. These objections emphasize that toleration, divorced from realist , invites causal vulnerabilities, prioritizing abstract openness over empirical security.

Empirical Failures of Unlimited Toleration

The Weimar Republic's commitment to democratic freedoms, including and enshrined in its 1919 constitution, enabled the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) to organize rallies, publish , and contest elections despite its explicit rejection of parliamentary and advocacy for against political opponents. The party's vote share surged from 810,127 (2.6%) in the May 1928 election to 13,745,000 (37.3%) in the July 1932 election, reflecting exploitation of economic distress and legal participation rather than outright suppression. Following appointment of as chancellor on January 30, 1933, the on February 27 provided pretext for the of February 28, which suspended such as , , and , effectively dismantling democratic protections. The of March 23, 1933, further authorized the government to enact laws without parliamentary approval, consolidating Nazi control and ending multiparty by July 1933 through bans on other parties. In post-Tsarist , the Provisional Government's adherence to principles after the February 1917 , including of socialist agitation and failure to decisively suppress radical factions, permitted to build parallel power structures via soviets and armed militias while criticizing the regime. Despite Bolshevik-led uprisings like the , the government refrained from arresting key leaders such as en masse or banning their publications, allowing reorganization and propaganda efforts that culminated in the October 25–26, 1917, seizure of Petrograd with minimal initial resistance. Post-seizure, dissolved the in January 1918 after it rejected their dominance, initiated the with executions estimated at 50,000–200,000 by 1922, and suppressed dissent through secret police, eradicating the tolerant provisional framework in favor of one-party rule. The 1979 Iranian Revolution illustrates similar dynamics, where Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi's regime, facing domestic unrest, permitted alliances among diverse opposition groups—including Islamists, leftists, and nationalists—without preemptively marginalizing Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's clerical network, which coordinated from exile via cassette tapes and mosques. Protests escalated from 1978, with the Shah's military restraint (e.g., avoiding full crackdowns until late) enabling Khomeini's return on February 1, 1979, and a establishing an on April 1, 1979, with 98.2% approval amid suppressed alternatives. Khomeini's forces then purged rivals, executing over 500 political opponents by 1980 and imposing mandatory and sharia penalties, reversing secular reforms and instituting intolerance toward religious minorities and secularists, with an estimated 3,000–5,000 executions in the 1988 mass killings alone. These cases demonstrate a where legal toleration of groups avowedly committed to overthrowing the tolerant order—through electoral, agitational, or coalitional means—facilitated their ascent, followed by rapid imposition of exclusionary regimes, underscoring the causal vulnerability of unbounded openness to asymmetric exploitation by determined actors. Empirical analyses of such transitions highlight that without mechanisms to curb advocacy for intolerance (e.g., via bans on organization), tolerant systems risk self-undermining, as evidenced by the absence of comparable reversals in more restrictive interwar regimes like Mussolini's prior to 1922.

Modern Applications and Debates

Toleration in Multiculturalism and Immigration

In multicultural societies shaped by large-scale immigration, toleration has been invoked to accommodate cultural practices diverging from norms, such as those emphasizing communal over or . Proponents argue this fosters and harmony, yet empirical outcomes in reveal persistent challenges, including residential and economic marginalization among non-Western immigrants. For instance, in , foreign-born individuals and their descendants, comprising about 20% of the as of 2020, account for 58% of suspects based on data, with overrepresentation in violent offenses like and —nearly two-thirds of convicted rapists being first- or second-generation immigrants. Similar patterns emerge in the , where post-2000s integration failures contributed to ethnic enclaves and heightened gang violence, prompting a policy pivot after high-profile events like the 2002 assassination of politician , who criticized unchecked for eroding values. These issues stem partly from cultural mismatches, as immigrants from Muslim-majority countries often arrive with norms incompatible with host societies' emphasis on and , leading to lower rates. Employment gaps persist: Muslims in face unemployment rates up to twice that of non-Muslims, explained only partially by individual factors like , with cultural attitudes toward roles and contributing to labor exclusion. exacerbates this, forming parallel societies resistant to , as seen in France's banlieues or Sweden's "vulnerable areas" where is contested. Applying Karl Popper's , unlimited toleration of such groups risks societal subversion, as intolerant ideologies—evident in demands for accommodations or suppression of —undermine the tolerant framework enabling itself. In response, several European nations have retreated from multiculturalism toward assimilationist models requiring cultural adaptation. Denmark, once perceived as multicultural by default, implemented "ghetto laws" in 2018 to disperse non-Western immigrant concentrations, mandating Danish language proficiency and values education for residents in designated areas to enforce integration. The Netherlands similarly abandoned multicultural policies post-2004, emphasizing civic integration contracts amid recognition of failed tolerance leading to radicalization. Germany's Chancellor declared multiculturalism "utterly failed" in 2010, citing inadequate absorption of parallel cultures, a view echoed in policy shifts across prioritizing national cohesion over indefinite toleration. These adjustments reflect causal realism: toleration succeeds only when reciprocal, but empirical data on non-assimilating cohorts indicate that enforcing limits preserves liberal orders against erosion by incompatible imports.

Toleration Versus Contemporary Intolerances

In recent decades, classical conceptions of toleration—defined as the reluctant endurance of disliked beliefs or practices without coercive interference—have been challenged by selective applications that prioritize affirmation over mere , often manifesting as demands for ideological . This shift is evident in phenomena like , where public shaming and professional repercussions target individuals for expressing views diverging from progressive orthodoxies, such as skepticism toward certain identity-based policies. Empirical studies indicate that such practices foster , particularly in academic settings, where norms favoring correlate with students' reluctance to voice unpopular opinions. University campuses exemplify this tension, with surveys revealing a rise in acceptance of disruptive tactics, including , to suppress opposing ; a 2025 Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression () report documented an alarming increase in such endorsements among college students, contrasting with historical toleration's emphasis on open . Data from the General Social Survey further show that while self-reported ranks highest among liberals, practical exclusions based on political disagreement exceed those rooted in racial differences, suggesting a asymmetry in enforcing boundaries. In these environments, dissent on topics like differences or merit-based systems often incurs social or institutional penalties, inverting toleration into a tool for silencing perceived threats to equity narratives. Beyond academia, tech platforms and media outlets have amplified this dynamic through policies that disproportionately restrict conservative or heterodox content, as evidenced by deplatformings of figures challenging dominant views on processes or measures between 2020 and 2025. Progressive movements, while advocating , frequently exhibit intolerance toward traditionalist critiques, such as opposition to rapid demographic shifts via , framing them as inherently bigoted rather than debatable positions. This selective intolerance undermines reciprocal , as classical theorists like warned against majoritarian tyrannies that stifle minority ideas under the guise of . Heterodox analyses highlight that ethnic tolerance does not guarantee political , with progressive dominance in institutions enabling viewpoint against conservatives. Critics argue this pattern reflects not mere but structural incentives in left-leaning bastions, where empirical hiring biases and viewpoint suppression perpetuate echo chambers, as quantified by studies showing younger scholars' greater support for cancel mechanisms. Pew Research data on partisan hostility underscore mutual animosity, yet institutional power imbalances— with 62% of Republicans viewing Democrats unfavorably versus reciprocal figures—reveal how professed often serves to entrench ideological monopolies, challenging the causal realism of unlimited in unequal arenas. Ultimately, these contemporary intolerances prioritize harm prevention through preemptive exclusion over enduring disagreement, eroding the empirical foundations of diverse societies built on mutual restraint.

References

  1. [1]
    Toleration - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Feb 23, 2007 · According to it, toleration is a relation between an authority or a majority and a dissenting, “different” minority (or various minorities).The Concept of Toleration and... · The History of Toleration · Justifying Toleration
  2. [2]
    Toleration | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    In seventeenth century Europe, the concept of tolerance was developed as liberal thinkers sought to limit the coercive actions of government and the Church.Historical Development · Epistemological Toleration · Moral Toleration
  3. [3]
    Locke on Toleration by Eric Mack | Online Library of Liberty
    Locke endorses full toleration for all Protestant sects, for Jews, Muslims, and pagans. Nevertheless, there are certain limits on religious liberty. Toleration ...
  4. [4]
    Tolerating Intolerance: The Free Speech Paradox - Quillette
    Aug 31, 2023 · In his footnote, Popper does say that “unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance,” and warns that “if we are not prepared ...
  5. [5]
    toleration - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    Etymology. From Middle French toleration, from Latin tolerātiōnem, accusative singular of tolerātiō, from the verb tolerō (“I tolerate”). Compare tolerance.
  6. [6]
    Toleration - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Tolleration, from Latin toleratio meaning "to endure," originated in the 1510s via French tolération, signifying permission or enduring support.
  7. [7]
    toleration, n. meanings, etymology and more
    OED's earliest evidence for toleration is from around 1517–18. toleration is a borrowing from French. Etymons: French tolération. See etymology. Nearby entries.
  8. [8]
    Tolerance - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    "Early 15c. 'tolerance' originates from Old French and Medieval Latin, meaning endurance or capacity to bear hardship, derived from Latin tolerare, ...
  9. [9]
    tolerance - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    From Middle French tolerance, from Latin tolerantia (“endurance”), from tolerans, present participle of Latin tolerō (“endure”).
  10. [10]
    The Grammarphobia Blog: How tolerant is tolerance?
    Sep 9, 2016 · This is, as you say, at least a step short of acceptance in the usual sense. It also reflects the Latin origin of the word. English borrowed “ ...
  11. [11]
    tolerance - IOW dictionary
    May 15, 2021 · “Tolerance” has Latin origin – the Latin word is tolerantia "a bearing, supporting, endurance." (According to Latdict "ability to bear/endure ...
  12. [12]
    https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1363
  13. [13]
    [PDF] DEFINING TOLERATION - PhilArchive
    Putting the conditions together, we can say an agent tolerates when she intentionally and on principle refrains from interfering with an opposed other (or their ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Tolerance Does Not (Necessarily) Equal Approval - Econlib
    Sep 19, 2022 · Classical tolerance does not mean approval, it does not mean affirmation, it does not mean acceptance – it just means tolerating something.
  15. [15]
    Acceptance vs. Tolerance - Definition and Explanation
    Mar 4, 2024 · While tolerance implies a level of respect and forbearance towards diverse perspectives, it falls short of genuine acceptance. Tolerance may ...
  16. [16]
    The Distinction Between Toleration and Tolerance
    To tolerate something one must find it noxious. ... Toleration, like all liberal values, is not absolute. It must be balanced with other liberal values that ...
  17. [17]
    The Cyrus Cylinder–2600-Year-Old Symbol of Tolerance—on View ...
    Jun 4, 2013 · It marks the establishment of Persian rule in 539 B.C. by Cyrus the Great, with the defeat of Babylon, the restoration of shrines, and the ...
  18. [18]
    The Cyrus Cylinder and Ancient Persia: A New Beginning - About
    ... Cyrus Cylinder continues to be hailed as an international symbol of tolerance and justice. In its first U.S. tour on loan from the British Museum, the Cylinder ...
  19. [19]
    The Limits of Tolerance and Ancient Greek Mythology by Emily Katz ...
    Sep 28, 2017 · The ancient Greeks were open-minded without being tolerant. They didn't devise the world's first-ever democracy by tolerating everything.
  20. [20]
    Religious Toleration in Classical Antiquity | Studies in Church History
    Mar 21, 2016 · Toleration implies disapproval or disagreement coupled with an unwillingness to take action against those who are viewed with disfavour.
  21. [21]
    Religious Tolerance and Persecution in the Roman Empire
    Religious Tolerance and Persecution in the Roman Empire · In what ways were Romans tolerant of religions? · Why did the Romans single out Christians to persecute ...
  22. [22]
    Roman Tolerance? | The Christian Origins of Tolerance
    Jun 3, 2024 · Ancient Rome was reputedly a tolerant political community, especially regarding religious difference. · There is an old view, going back at least ...
  23. [23]
    313 The Edict of Milan | Christian History Magazine
    The so-called Edict of Milan provided for this. It marks the Roman Empire's final abandonment of the policies of persecution of Christians.
  24. [24]
    Edict of Milan | Description, History, & Facts - Britannica
    Oct 2, 2025 · The proclamation, made for the East by Licinius in June 313, granted all persons freedom to worship whatever deity they pleased, assured ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Religious Toleration Before the Enlightenment
    As Christian religious intolerance focused on the persecution of the doctrinally deviant, Christian toleration empha- sized the acceptance of heterodoxy. The ...
  26. [26]
    What Do You Know? Dhimmi, Jewish Legal Status under Muslim Rule
    Nov 30, 2018 · In exchange for the protection of the Islamic state, dhimmis were expected to pay a special tax, called the jizya. A document known as the Pact ...
  27. [27]
    Life as a dhimmi in medieval Islamic Spain | WORLD - WNG.org
    Sep 17, 2016 · It was a brilliant and pioneering triumph of medieval Islamic rhetoric that the word dhimmi, meaning “beneficiary of the contract of protection ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The historical path of religious tolerance and its justification
    Aug 11, 2024 · Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe. ... The Quranic Concept of Religious. Tolerance and its Manifestation in ...
  29. [29]
    Early Medieval Reflections on Religious Toleration and Their Jewish ...
    Apr 7, 2014 · In early medieval Europe, the imperative of religious fidelity played out both culturally and politically, against other considerations, which ...
  30. [30]
    Were Medieval People Racist? IV: Race, Religion, and Travel
    Dec 14, 2017 · Many medieval Europeans were not very tolerant of religious, social, or cultural differences. This can be thought of as 'racism', but a racism organised across ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in ...
    Jan 27, 2009 · In a post-Reformation Europe, according to Kaplan, “Religious tolerance became the paradigmatic, first tolerance in Western history . . .
  32. [32]
    Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern ...
    Early modern Europe had inherited a tradition of Christian thought that legitimized intolerance of false religions, and after the Reformation this intolerance ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    The Edict of Nantes | History Today
    The Edict of Nantes. Signed on 13 April 1598, the Edict of Nantes granted rights to France's Calvinist Protestants, known as Huguenots. Richard Cavendish ...
  34. [34]
    The Edict of Nantes (1598) - Musée protestant
    The edict established civil equality between Catholics and Protestants as well as the conditions necessary for the peaceful coexistence of the two.An act of sovereignty · The clauses of the Edict of... · Events from the signing of the...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] John Locke on Religious Toleration: “Sincerity” and Civil Order
    In the Two Tracts on Government (1660-2), John Locke argued that the toleration of diverse religious practices would inevitably lead to conflict and disorder; ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Locke and the Problem of Toleration
    Parliament passed the Toleration Act in May 1689, granting some liberties to Non-Conformists, i.e. Protestants who dissented from the Church of England (e.g. ...
  37. [37]
    Historians of religious toleration in the early ... - H-Net Reviews
    By the 1680s and 1690s, however, Marshall claims that a small group of émigrés in the Netherlands developed ideas of universal religious toleration, the group ...
  38. [38]
    Some notes on the history of tolerance - Rechtsgeschiedenis Blog
    Jun 25, 2015 · The initial impulse for Voltaire's treatise on tolerance came from his reaction to the case of Jean Calas, a merchant from Toulouse who had ...Missing: context | Show results with:context<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Treatise on Tolerance - Abdorrahman Boroumand Center
    Published in 1763, Voltaire's Treatise on Tolerance, is one of the major Western writings on the necessity of acknowledging the natural right of freedom of ...Missing: context | Show results with:context
  40. [40]
    Introduction: Religious toleration in the Age of Enlightenment
    Jul 4, 2016 · Toleration was, simply, a sign of progress, a requisite of modernity, an essential quality of advanced, rich and peaceful countries. Hundreds of ...
  41. [41]
    Locke and toleration - John William Tate, 2009 - Sage Journals
    Aug 18, 2009 · This article challenges the claim that John Locke's arguments for toleration are fundamentally at odds with any we might now associate with ...
  42. [42]
    The Enlightenment and the Origins of Religious Toleration Lynn ...
    Religious toleration is much touted but not very well understood. In Europe, it first took root in the second half of the sixteenth century as a pragmatic ...
  43. [43]
    Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829 - Legislation.gov.uk
    An Act for the Relief of His Majesty's Roman Catholic Subjects.
  44. [44]
    Catholic Emancipation | British & Irish History, Politics & Religion
    This act admitted Irish and English Roman Catholics to Parliament and to all but a handful of public offices.
  45. [45]
    1829 Catholic Emancipation Act - UK Parliament
    The Catholic Emancipation Act, which allowed Catholics to sit as MPs and take public office, but reduced the number of Irish peasants entitled to vote.
  46. [46]
    Emancipation - Jewish Virtual Library
    In the intervening 90 years, Jewish emancipation became a political and legal fact in all European countries where revolution and liberalism were in the ...The Three Periods in the... · England · Italy · Switzerland
  47. [47]
    Jewish Emancipation in Western Europe
    When Switzerland granted the Jews equal rights in 1874, the process that had begun in Paris almost a century earlier was completed: Jewish emancipation in the ...
  48. [48]
    Secularization and Victorian Religion
    Secularization in nineteenth-century Britain was, first, a political process in which the state slowly relinquished its jurisdiction over the religious beliefs ...
  49. [49]
    How Did The West Get Religious Freedom? - Hoover Institution
    Jun 26, 2018 · Restrictions on religious freedom stayed on the books in many European countries until well into 19th century. But overall, the ...
  50. [50]
    On Liberty by John Stuart Mill - Utilitarianism
    One person will bear with dissent in matters of church government, but not of dogma; another can tolerate everybody, short of a Papist or an Unitarian; another, ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Universal Declaration of Human Rights - UN.org.
    It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United. Nations ...
  52. [52]
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations
    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any ...Universal Declaration of... · History of the Declaration · Drafters of the Declaration
  53. [53]
    Civil Rights Act (1964) | National Archives
    Feb 8, 2022 · It banned discriminatory practices in employment and ended segregation in public places such as swimming pools, libraries, and public schools.
  54. [54]
    Fact Sheet: Religious Discrimination - EEOC
    Jan 15, 1997 · Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion (or lack of ...
  55. [55]
    Great Terror: 1937, Stalin & Russia - History.com
    Mar 15, 2018 · The Great Terror of 1937, also known as the Great Purge, was a brutal political campaign led by Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin to eliminate dissenting members ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Internal Workings of the Soviet Union - Revelations from the Russian ...
    Attacks on Intelligentsia: Suppressing Dissidents​​ The Communist regime considered dissent in the Soviet Union a repudiation of the proletarian struggle and a ...
  57. [57]
    The Weimar fallacy - Radicalism of fools
    Mar 31, 2022 · ... intolerance – to paraphrase the Austrian philosopher Karl Popper – in ... Nazi publications were frequently banned during the Weimar years.
  58. [58]
    Fascism - Authoritarianism, Totalitarianism, Dictatorship | Britannica
    Sep 26, 2025 · In theory, the corporatist model represented a “third way” between capitalism and communism ... 20th-century international relations: Fascism and ...
  59. [59]
    A Letter concerning Toleration and Other Writings
    This volume contains A Letter Concerning Toleration, excerpts of the Third Letter, An Essay on Toleration, and various fragments.
  60. [60]
    John Locke's "A Letter Concerning Toleration" and the Liberal Regime
    Jun 25, 2020 · John Locke's A Letter Concerning Toleration provides rational grounds for both wide toleration and minimal government policing of private associations.
  61. [61]
    Locke on Religious Toleration by Mark Goldie
    John Locke's Letter Concerning Toleration was one of the seventeenth ... atheists and Catholics from toleration. There is no gainsaying that he rejects ...
  62. [62]
    "Locke's Toleration in America" by Craig Walmsley - Canopy Forum
    Oct 15, 2019 · In his Letter Concerning Toleration (1689), Locke argued that 'Church' and 'State' were separate entities, with separate purposes, one having no ...
  63. [63]
    Philosopher John Locke & His Letters Concerning Toleration
    Oct 19, 2017 · He argued that freedom of belief was a God-given, natural right and that regulation of religion should be outside the realm of civil government.
  64. [64]
    LOCKE'S POLITICAL ARGUMENTS FOR TOLERATION - jstor
    In the Letter Concerning Toleration the form of toleration that Locke argued for is characterized by a radical separation of religious and political ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Essential Locke Chapter 7 - Toleration
    John Locke (1689/1983), A Letter Concerning Toleration: 31, 35, 43–44 ... However, Locke did not advocate full toleration for. Catholics and atheists.
  66. [66]
    Tradition and Prudence in Locke's Exceptions to Toleration
    Why did Locke exclude Catholics and atheists from toleration? Not, I ... Keywords. John Locke Religious Toleration Letter on Toleration Religious Freedom ...
  67. [67]
    On Liberty - Econlib
    Feb 5, 2018 · On Liberty. By John Stuart Mill. THE SUBJECT of this Essay is not the ... harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not ...
  68. [68]
    The harm threshold and Mill's harm principle - PMC - PubMed Central
    Nov 18, 2023 · ... harm principle.'' In On Liberty John Stuart Mill argued that ''The only purpose for which power can rightfully be exercised over any member ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  69. [69]
    “Harm” and Mill's Harm Principle* Piers Norris Turner - jstor
    This article addresses the long-standing problem of how to understand Mill's famous harm principle in light of his failure to specify what counts as “harm” ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Mill's Harm Principle: A Study in the Application of 'On Liberty'
    May 12, 2023 · "Mill's Harm Principle: A Study in the Application of On Liberty. ... Mill devoted a full chapter of On Liberty to how these considerations ...Missing: quote | Show results with:quote
  71. [71]
    [PDF] MILL DOES NOT HAVE A HARM PRINCIPLE Daniel Jacobson That ...
    harm principle must combine the narrow focus on liberty of action with the familiar distinction between offense and “genuine” harm. The third example ...Missing: exact quote
  72. [72]
    On the Paradox of Tolerance | Libertarianism.org
    Aug 17, 2017 · But this passage – in a footnote to volume 1 of The Open Society and Its Enemies – isn't his clearest, and it's been grossly abused by both the ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Derechos Humanos: The limits of tolerance: Popper's paradox
    Sep 4, 2023 · Popper states that "unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance... We must therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to ...
  74. [74]
    Yes, You Do Have to Tolerate the Intolerant
    Aug 8, 2024 · Karl Popper introduced the Paradox of Tolerance in footnote 4 to Chapter 7 of his 1945 book The Open Society and Its Enemies, and then barely ...
  75. [75]
    Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)
    That those persons should tolerate all opinions, who think none to be of estimation, is a matter of small merit. Equal neglect is not impartial kindness. The ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Establishment and Toleration in Edmund Burke's Constitution of ...
    ' At the same time, Burke was in the forefront of efforts to achieve a broader toleration for Roman Catholics and other Dissenters from the established church.
  77. [77]
    Returning to Throne and Altar? Integralism, Liberalism, and Toleration
    Apr 27, 2018 · Each argues, in his own distinct way, that the inner logic of liberalism is self-undermining: Deneen tells the story of the Hobbesian secret at ...
  78. [78]
    Patrick Deneen: Liberalism, Toleration and the... - Academics at AMU
    Apr 14, 2015 · Citing the scholarship of Brad Gregory, Deneen argued that the two—the establishment of state churches and the toleration of the plurality of ...
  79. [79]
    Patrick Deneen on the Failure of Liberalism and the Importance of ...
    Jun 14, 2023 · And instinctive tolerance for change, instinctive resistance for change, and how they map so interestingly, on to political tribes. And also ...Missing: toleration | Show results with:toleration
  80. [80]
    Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberal Democracy - Liberal Currents
    Aug 11, 2021 · Schmittians despise liberals for wanting to tolerate others, and then despise them more when they don't live up to the hype. The response of ...
  81. [81]
    Liberalism for Losers: Carl Schmitt's “The Tyranny of Values”
    Feb 20, 2021 · Liberalism, Schmitt argued, depends on systematic neutralizations—fictions by which all individuals and points of view are imagined to be equal, ...
  82. [82]
    The problem of hyper-liberalism | Essay by John Gray
    Mar 30, 2018 · Practices of toleration that used to be seen as essential to freedom are being deconstructed and dismissed as structures of repression, and any ...
  83. [83]
    The limits of liberal toleration (Chapter 2) - Toleration as Recognition
    The most common objections to liberal neutrality raised by its communitarian and perfectionist critics concern, first, its literal meaning and, second, its ...Missing: realist | Show results with:realist
  84. [84]
    The Weimar Republic: The Fragility of Democracy - Facing History
    Aug 2, 2016 · This chapter explores Germany in the years preceding the Nazis' ascension to power by highlighting efforts to turn a fledgling republic into a ...
  85. [85]
    Political Party Platforms in the 1932 German Election - Facing History
    Aug 2, 2016 · In 1928, 800,000 voters supported the Nazi Party; the number jumped ... How could other parties have worked together to keep the Nazis from ...Hard Times Return · Social Democratic Party... · Communist Party Platform
  86. [86]
    Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of the People and...
    The Reichstag Fire Decree of February 1933 restricted individual freedoms, and allowed Hitler's government to overrule state and local laws and overthrow ...
  87. [87]
    The Enabling Law – The Holocaust Explained: Designed for schools
    The Enabling Law gave Hitler power to rule by decree, establishing conditions for dictatorial rule, and passed with 444 votes for and 94 against.
  88. [88]
    How the Bolsheviks Won - Jacobin
    The Bolsheviks' success as the consequence of the Provisional Government's softness toward the radical left; a historical accident or, most frequently, the ...
  89. [89]
    Russia's Provisional Government of 1917
    Aug 8, 2025 · The government blamed the Bolsheviks for the demonstrations and ... Bolshevik Revolution - When Russia Became a Socialist State in 1917.
  90. [90]
    The Provisional Government | History of Western Civilization II
    The provisional government lasted approximately eight months, ceasing when the Bolsheviks seized power after the October Revolution in October 1917. According ...
  91. [91]
    Iranian Revolution of 1979 - Stanford University
    Khomeini's revolution transformed every aspect of Iranian society. The people began to express intolerance toward everything associated with the Shah's regime, ...
  92. [92]
    The Iranian Revolution, 40 Years On: Oppression at Home ... - AIPAC
    Feb 28, 2025 · By the end of 1979, the Islamist regime was firmly and exclusively in control. ... From 1979 to 2009, Iran arrested, imprisoned or executed at ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Intolerance in Western Europe - RAND
    ing intolerance in Western Europe in the context of empirical evidence on high-level trends in intolerant attitudes in Western Europe. Through analysis of ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Evidence from Nazi street brawls in the Weimar Republic - USC Price
    Aug 26, 2024 · Evidence from Nazi street brawls in the Weimar Republic ... But there was nonetheless an uptick in violence as Nazis and leftists clashed.
  95. [95]
    (PDF) Migrants and Crime in Sweden in the Twenty-First Century
    Based on 33 per cent of the population (2017), 58 per cent of those suspect for total crime on reasonable grounds are migrants. Regarding murder, manslaughter ...
  96. [96]
    Nearly two thirds of convicted rapists in Sweden are migrants or ...
    Jan 18, 2025 · Almost two-thirds of those convicted of rape in Sweden are first- or second-generation immigrants.
  97. [97]
    The Netherlands: Death of a Filmmaker Shakes a Nation
    Oct 1, 2005 · Pim Fortuyn, with his popularity at its zenith ... multicultural approach of the past has failed both the Netherlands and its immigrants.
  98. [98]
    "Dutch Disease or European Dilemma: Have Dutch Tolerance and ...
    Since the Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh assassinations, the Dutch political climate has hardened and some critics argue that Dutch tolerance and ...
  99. [99]
    Explaining the Muslim employment gap in Western Europe
    Muslims are less likely to be employed than non-Muslims in Western Europe. Individual-level factors explain less than half of the Muslim employment gap.
  100. [100]
    Europe: Integrating Islam | Council on Foreign Relations
    Overall, Muslims face a number of challenges on integration and assimilation: Poverty and Segregation. Experts say Muslims in Europe are more likely than the EU ...
  101. [101]
    Islamism And Immigration In Germany And The European Context
    Sep 17, 2024 · Failed integration also contributes to a widespread perception of greater criminality. The same debate is playing out across the continent: ...
  102. [102]
    Denmark's uprooting of settled residents from 'ghettos' forms part of ...
    Nov 22, 2024 · Denmark's assimilation program does not stop at the breaking up of low-income, predominantly immigrant neighborhoods. Children born into ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] The retreat of multiculturalism in the Netherlands - DiVA portal
    Since the 1990's, the retreat of multiculturalism has been described as an integration policy trend across European states.
  104. [104]
    Multiculturalism: Success, Failure, and the Future
    This report, part of a Transatlantic Council on Migration series on national identity in the age of migration, challenges the recent rhetoric.
  105. [105]
    Denmark | Multiculturalism Policies in Contemporary Democracies
    Since the early-2000s, Denmark has implemented increasingly restrictive policies pertaining to immigrant integration (Holtug 2013) and criticism of ...
  106. [106]
    Snowflakes, left and right, threaten free speech - The Hill
    Sep 16, 2025 · Survey reveals alarming increase in college students' acceptance of violence to silence opposing views, threatening free speech on campuses.Missing: empirical 2020-2025
  107. [107]
    Examining the Influence of Political Affiliation and Orientation on ...
    Oct 25, 2022 · Using General Social Survey data, the authors find that tolerance is highest among liberals, followed by moderates and conservatives. Regression ...<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    Polarization in America: two possible futures - PMC - PubMed Central
    May 6, 2020 · Polarized Americans are more willing to exclude people with opposing political beliefs than to exclude people of other races [29,30]—a jarring ...
  109. [109]
    We Have Data: Universities Are Discriminating Against Conservatives
    Mar 5, 2021 · My study found that younger scholars are far more likely to support an intolerant "cancel culture" that is driving self-censorship and limiting viewpoint ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  110. [110]
    Ethnic Tolerance Does Not Equal Political Tolerance - HxA
    Jul 3, 2017 · The idea that greater ethnic tolerance leads to freedom from any kind of intolerance has become a self-evidently accepted truth among many ...Missing: movements | Show results with:movements<|control11|><|separator|>
  111. [111]
    As Partisan Hostility Grows, Signs of Frustration With the Two-Party ...
    Aug 9, 2022 · About six-in ten Republicans (62%) and more than half of Democrats (54%) have a very unfavorable view of the other party in Pew Research Center ...