Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Wisconsin State Capitol

The State Capitol is the seat of government for the U.S. state of , located in downtown on an between and . Constructed from 1906 to 1917 under the direction of architect in a neoclassical Beaux-Arts style, the building cost $7.2 million and features a distinctive granite dome rising over 265 feet, the only such dome among U.S. state capitols. It houses the bicameral , the governor's offices, and the , serving as the central hub for state legislative and judicial functions. The capitol's incorporates 43 varieties of stone, intricate mosaics, and sculptures by notable artists, contributing to its reputation as one of America's finest state capitols. Its central rotunda spans four stories beneath the dome, adorned with murals and finishes, while the four symmetrical wings provide space for governmental operations. Designated a , the structure underwent a major restoration from 1988 to 2002 to preserve its historical integrity amid ongoing use. Free public tours highlight its grandeur, drawing visitors to explore the legislative chambers and artistic details that reflect Wisconsin's ambitions.

Historical Background

Territorial and Early Capitols

The Wisconsin Territory's first legislative assembly convened on October 25, 1836, in (now in County), utilizing a temporary wooden rented from landowner for the 46-day session that ended December 9. This site, selected by territorial Governor on September 9, 1836, served as a provisional capital amid rapid territorial expansion following the 1836 division from , accommodating 42 laws enacted to establish governance structures. The modest frame building reflected the frontier context, with legislators enduring rudimentary conditions that underscored the need for a more permanent, centrally located seat amid population growth from migration and land speculation. Subsequent sessions shifted temporarily to Burlington in the newly formed Iowa Territory after Congress's 1838 creation of Iowa from Wisconsin's southern portion, accelerating the relocation to Madison, which territorial commissioner James Duane Doty had platted in 1836 as a central hub between growing settlements like Milwaukee and Green Bay. The legislature first met in Madison on November 26, 1838, initially occupying an incomplete stone structure begun in 1837 atop the isthmus, supplemented by a nearby hotel for overflow, as the site's selection prioritized geographic centrality and Doty's promotional land grants over immediate infrastructure readiness. Construction delays persisted due to funding shortages and logistical challenges in a developing region, with the first capitol—designed by architects Abraham O. Williamson, John O'Neil, and A.A. Bird—intended for completion by September 1839 at approximately $40,000 but only partially finished upon territorial use. Wisconsin's admission as a on , 1848, coincided with substantial completion of this initial capitol, a compact edifice that housed legislative, , and judicial functions amid statehood-driven administrative demands. By the , surges—fueled by and —rendered the structure inadequate, prompting the 1857 legislature to authorize expansions and a more robust replacement to accommodate enlarged sessions and offices. The resulting second capitol incorporated additional wings and modernized elements, yet its mixed wooden and stone composition proved vulnerable to fires, including minor incidents that exposed material weaknesses and maintenance lapses in the wooden interiors, highlighting causal risks from outdated amid Wisconsin's industrializing . These developments entrenched 's role through legislative inertia and infrastructural commitments, despite early debates over relocating to burgeoning cities like .

1904 Fire and Prelude to Reconstruction

On the night of February 26, 1904, a ignited in a second-floor of the second Wisconsin State Capitol from a gas flame, rapidly spreading through the wooden interior despite delayed due to inaccessible water connections. The blaze, which burned for approximately 18 hours and required assistance from fire companies, gutted the building's core, destroying legislative chambers, libraries, and irreplaceable documents while causing damages estimated at $800,000 to $1 million; the structure was uninsured, amplifying fiscal pressures. Although the exterior walls largely survived the initial , structural assessments revealed instability from heat-weakened supports and , rendering partial repairs impractical and prompting a for complete and replacement. Governor Robert La Follette, serving from 1901 to 1905, responded decisively by coordinating salvage operations, personally entering the burning edifice to rescue governors' portraits and key records amid ankle-deep slush and debris. The disaster fueled legislative and public contention over relocation, with advocates for moving the capital to , La Crosse, or other sites arguing that 's terrain and prior expansions had outpaced the site's capacity, potentially justifying a fresh start elsewhere to control costs. La Follette countered by championing retention in and a rebuilt capitol of superior scale, positing that the fire underscored the inadequacies of ad hoc additions to the 1850s-era structure, which had ballooned in cost from $60,000 to nearly $900,000 without achieving permanence or efficiency. Legislators, having formed a building in to evaluate options amid recognized , accelerated action post-fire by formalizing the group in to direct reconstruction planning, rejecting temporary fixes or modest expansions that would perpetuate vulnerabilities exposed by the —such as non-fireproof materials and insufficient space for expanding state functions. Early commission deliberations dismissed low-cost repairs, estimated under $1 million, in favor of a monumental edifice with projected expenses surpassing $3 million, driven by causal imperatives for fire-resistant , expanded , and symbolic grandeur to match 's and demographic growth since the additions. This shift from to holistic redesign stemmed from the fire's revelation of systemic flaws: the building's piecemeal evolution had compromised integrity, rendering patchwork solutions fiscally shortsighted and prone to recurrent failure, thus necessitating upfront investment in a unified, enduring replacement.

Site Selection and Planning

The selection of as the site for Wisconsin's state capitol originated in the territorial era amid debates over geographic centrality to foster state cohesion. In October 1836, during the first session of the Wisconsin Territorial Legislature at , lawmakers chose Madison from among competing proposals, including sites near , and other locations like Beloit, prioritizing its position on an between Lakes Mendota and Monona for natural defensibility, aesthetic appeal, and approximate equidistance from population centers in and . This decision reflected first-principles considerations of accessibility and symbolism, as the site's elevation and lake surroundings reduced flood vulnerability compared to riverine alternatives while symbolizing unity in a territory prone to sectional divides between northern lead-mining districts and southern agricultural areas. Land speculator Doty, who owned extensive holdings there, influenced the outcome through promotion and political alliances, acquiring approximately 1,200 acres in spring 1836 with Michigan territorial officials to plat the town. Subsequent surveys in the confirmed the site's suitability, with initial land acquisitions enabling construction of temporary structures by , including ferrying stone from Maple Bluff across to the lakefront edge for strategic positioning. Despite rivalries—such as temporary sessions in (–1838) and partisan pushes for relocation to Beloit or in the early statehood period—Madison's centrality prevailed, as relocating would exacerbate east-west divides and hinder administrative efficiency in a growing . By 1857, amid overcrowding in the initial capitol, the legislature authorized expansion on the existing grounds rather than a site shift, with Madison voters approving $50,000 in bonds to support improvements, effectively confirming the location through empirical assessments of expansion feasibility over alternatives lacking comparable infrastructure. Following the 1904 fire that gutted the second capitol, a 1905 planning commission empirically evaluated the site anew, opting for on the expanded footprint due to its proven stability on a formation—glacial providing solid footing—and low flood risk from lake overflows, as opposed to riskier lowland sites. Geological assessments highlighted the area's for foundational support, while the commission's program emphasized annexing adjacent blocks for future growth, underscoring how continued to counterbalance partisan pressures for that could fragment governance. This approach prioritized causal factors like logistical unity over short-term political gains, ensuring the capitol's role in binding diverse regions without the disruptions of relocation.

Construction and Design

Architectural Competition and Selection

In response to the destruction of the previous capitol by fire in , the in 1906 authorized the Capitol Building Commission to organize a for a replacement, emphasizing fireproof and neoclassical grandeur to reflect the state's progressive-era aspirations. The commission solicited proposals from prominent architectural firms, including & Sons of , Carrère & Hastings, and others, requiring designs in a cross-shaped plan with four equal wings converging on a central dome, inspired by the U.S. Capitol and peer state buildings like those in and . This format prioritized symmetry, expansive legislative chambers for over 130 senators and members, and symbolic elevation through Beaux-Arts elements such as pediments, columns, and sculptural integration. Prominent Chicago architect Daniel H. Burnham served as a judge, evaluating entries for adherence to the program's functional and aesthetic mandates, including reinforced materials to prevent future fires and scalability for state growth. Post's submission prevailed for its balanced proportions, cost-effective yet monumental scale—estimated initially at under $3 million—and superior fulfillment of the cross-wing layout over alternatives deemed either too extravagant or insufficiently imposing. Other bids, such as those favoring Gothic Revival or simpler forms, were rejected primarily for failing to achieve the required visual prominence or economic viability within budget constraints. The selection of Post, a veteran of the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition whose firm specialized in fire-resistant skyscrapers and public monuments, underscored a preference for proven expertise in durable, classically inspired civic architecture. Construction contracts were awarded by late 1906, though Post's death in November 1916 shifted oversight to his sons, Edward P. Post and William S. Post, ensuring fidelity to the original vision amid evolving site challenges.

Building Phases and Engineering Challenges


Construction of the current Wisconsin State Capitol commenced in late 1906 with the , which was completed and occupied by 1909 to accommodate legislative functions. The east wing followed, beginning in 1908 and finishing in 1910, providing space for offices including the governor's reception room. Subsequent phases included the south wing from 1910 to 1913, the central rotunda and dome starting in 1911 and reaching substantial completion by 1915, and the north wing from 1914 to 1917. This sequential wing-by-wing approach allowed continuous government operations while limiting financial exposure through incremental funding via bonds and taxes, culminating in full occupancy by 1917 at a total cost of $7.2 million.
Engineering challenges arose from the site's on a gentle atop glacial deposits in Madison's , necessitating extensive excavation to reach stable hardpan for the foundations and system. The structure's exterior cladding required Bethel white quarried in , involving complex logistics for transporting large blocks over long distances by rail and barge to , as this material was selected for its marble-like whiteness and durability, unique among U.S. domes. The dome itself demanded an innovative internal superstructure to support its massive granite facing, ensuring structural integrity without visible . World War I exacerbated delays through labor and material shortages, postponing the formal dedication from 1917 until 1919, though the building was functionally complete. The phased strategy mitigated disruptions but contributed to extended timelines, with the overall project spanning eleven years amid these constraints.

Materials Sourcing and Cost Management

The exterior of the Wisconsin State Capitol was constructed using Bethel white granite quarried in Vermont, selected for its exceptional whiteness, hardness, and durability, which provided a marble-like appearance while withstanding environmental exposure without imported alternatives. This choice prioritized structural longevity over local materials, as Vermont granite's uniform quality reduced long-term maintenance costs despite higher initial transport expenses from quarries to Madison. Domestic U.S. sourcing avoided pricier European stones, aligning with fiscal conservatism in a taxpayer-funded project completed between 1906 and 1917. Interior elements incorporated marbles from multiple American quarries, including for wainscoting and panels, alongside varieties from , , , , and , to achieve aesthetic variety while leveraging competitive domestic supply chains. , such as Kasota from and Indiana's Bedford variety, clad walls and floors, introducing incidental s from Midwestern sedimentary deposits that evidenced marine life but did not compromise integrity. Regional sourcing minimized shipping premiums compared to overseas imports, though inclusions arose causally from quarrying less-processed, cost-effective stones rather than refined alternatives. Cost management emphasized competitive bidding, with over 500 contractors submitting proposals for 125 distinct work categories, from stonework to electrical systems, fostering price discipline and efficiencies in a phased build. The project concluded at approximately $7.25 million, exceeding early estimates due to scope expansions and material fluctuations, yet historical records indicate no documented or mismanagement in audits, unlike overruns in contemporaneous state projects marred by graft. This overrun reflected realistic adjustments to unforeseen demands rather than fiscal profligacy, with protections upheld through transparent absent the era's common political favoritism.

Architectural and Structural Features

Exterior Design and Symbolism

The Wisconsin State Capitol's exterior embodies Beaux-Arts classicism through a symmetrical Greek cross plan, with four equal five-story wings aligned to the cardinal directions converging on a central rotunda beneath a commanding dome. Each wing culminates in a featuring exuberant columns supporting pediments that incorporate symbolic motifs drawn from Wisconsin's identity, including the state emblematic of and figures representing laborers and natural resources. The facade's uniform construction from Bethel white granite sourced from underscores durability and aesthetic purity, its fine-grained stone selected for whiteness akin to and resistance to environmental degradation, evoking the permanence of state governance. The dome forms the silhouette's focal point, sheathed in 8-inch-thick blocks to create the world's largest such structure, rising 284.4 feet from the ground floor to the apex statue. Its height, calibrated to exceed 284 feet but fall 3.5 inches short of the U.S. Capitol's, reflects deliberate symbolism of state pride tempered by federal precedence. This design conveys resilience through the base's steadfastness against elemental forces, paralleling Wisconsin's historical fortitude in and settlement. The integrated wings symbolize the convergence and balance of governmental powers, while exterior elements like the bronze doors' reliefs and pedimental groupings reinforce themes of and civic rooted in the state's motto "Forward." The crowning "" statue, with its badger-crested helmet, globe, and eagle, further embodies advancement, labor-derived strength, and national cohesion.

Interior Layout and Functional Spaces

The interior layout of the Wisconsin State is organized around a central rotunda measuring 76 feet in diameter, which facilitates vertical circulation via grand staircases and serves as a connecting the building's four symmetrical wings dedicated to legislative, , and judicial functions. This axial , completed by 1917, prioritizes efficient workflow by minimizing inter-branch travel distances compared to the cramped, labyrinthine predecessor capitol destroyed by in , enabling streamlined access to shared spaces like the rotunda for joint assemblies. The wings extend radially from the rotunda, each rising five stories with dedicated floors for offices, committee rooms, and primary chambers, reflecting a deliberate separation of governmental powers while maintaining connectivity. The legislative wing houses the chamber in the north extension and chamber in the south, both featuring walls and dimensions optimized for : the chamber spans approximately 73 feet by 68 feet with a 41-foot to accommodate 99 representatives plus galleries. These spaces incorporate paneling on lower walls for acoustic , with empirical testing during ensuring clear audibility for proceedings without modern . Pre-air-conditioning relied on operable windows, transoms, and exhaust systems integrated into the neoclassical , promoting air circulation across floors to support extended sessions in an era without mechanical cooling. The wing contains the governor's suite and staff offices on upper levels, arranged for administrative efficiency with direct rotunda access, while the judicial wing includes the chamber, designed for seven justices with adjacent library and hearing rooms to expedite case processing. staircases in paired sets ascend from the rotunda's , providing functional vertical transit illuminated by from clerestories and electric fixtures, emphasizing utility over ornamentation to sustain daily governance operations. Overall, the layout's radial symmetry and multi-story compartmentalization reduced congestion evident in prior structures, fostering causal improvements in operational speed through shorter pathways and specialized zoning.

Dome Construction and Comparative Scale

The dome of the Wisconsin State Capitol was erected between 1911 and 1915 as the central feature of the building's reconstruction following the 1904 fire. Engineered with a ribbed steel skeleton framework, it provided the structural integrity necessary to support the immense height and slender profile while distributing gravitational and wind loads effectively through tensile steel members and compressive elements. This innovative design, detailed in contemporary architectural analyses, allowed for a 76-foot base that transitions upward via curved steel girders sheathed in eight-inch-thick Bethel white blocks, the only such granite-clad capitol dome . Atop the dome rises a crowned by an for natural illumination into the rotunda below, with the entire assembly incorporating 2,500 tons of to counterbalance the 1.25 million pounds of cladding. The weight is transferred downward via the building's plan, where the wings act as implicit buttresses to stabilize the against lateral forces, enabling the dome's ambitious verticality without excessive mass at the base. elevators were integrated during to facilitate material hoisting and ongoing access, reflecting practical for in such a lofty edifice. Seismic considerations were minimal at the time, given the Midwest's low activity and the design's inherent from distributed mass and rigid framing. Reaching 284 feet from the ground floor to the finial of the , the dome ranked among the tallest in the U.S. upon completion in 1917, just three feet shorter than the U.S. Capitol's dome and exceeding those of contemporaries like Iowa's (approximately 223 feet to ) and far surpassing the Memorial's modest 118-foot height. This scale demonstrated 's commitment to monumental rivaling federal precedents, with the dome's interior volume exceeding that of the national Capitol, achieved through precise load calculations that optimized material use for height over bulk.

Artistic and Geological Elements

Sculpture Program and Artists

The sculpture program of the Wisconsin State Capitol, executed primarily between 1906 and 1917 as part of the building's construction, emphasized Beaux-Arts principles through allegorical and historical figures carved in and to symbolize state ideals such as strength, resources, and progress. Exterior works adorn , bases, and the dome, with interior elements including entrance statues, focusing on non-partisan representations of liberty, industry, and rather than favoring specific political ideologies. These commissions drew from artists experienced in monumental , prioritizing technical execution and thematic coherence over contemporary debates. Key exterior sculptures include four allegorical statuary groups by Karl Bitter, an Austrian-born sculptor known for World's Fair contributions, depicting virtues like Strength positioned on wing bases. The east and west pediments feature Bitter's reliefs illustrating historical law influences and state resources, while the north pediment by Attilio Piccirilli portrays legislative themes, and the south pediment by Adolph A. Weinman represents Virtues and Traits of Character, including figures embodying justice and labor. Atop the dome stands the gilded bronze statue Wisconsin by Daniel Chester French, a 15-foot-5-inch, three-ton allegorical female figure evoking the state motto "Forward," installed in 1914 at a cost of $20,325 and symbolizing progress sheltered by an eagle. Interior sculptures complement the exterior with works like Vinnie Ream Hoxie's The West at the southwest entrance, modeled in 1866–1868 as a figure representing expansion, and niches housing busts of notable historical figures such as past governors and contributors to Wisconsin's development. The program's total sculptural costs, integrated into the $7.2 million building budget completed in 1917, reflected deliberate selections for enduring craftsmanship, though some depicted figures' legacies have faced modern scrutiny unrelated to the era's artistic intent, which emphasized skill and factual historical roles over ideological alignment. from exposure has necessitated periodic maintenance, preserving the and details amid Madison's climate.

Fossils in Building Materials

The interior and elements of the Wisconsin State Capitol incorporate sedimentary rocks sourced from quarries in the United States and during the building's construction between 1906 and 1917, revealing numerous fossils of ancient marine organisms embedded within the stone. The Kasota , quarried in and used extensively for walls in the grand stair halls and main corridors, preserves fossils such as and gastropods, originating from Ordovician-period marine deposits approximately 450 million years old. Similarly, imported , including Yellow Verona from , contain ammonoids—extinct cephalopods—and other like brachiopods and gastropods, visible in walls, staircases, and floors after the stones were cut and polished on-site. These fossils emerged naturally during fabrication and installation, as the sedimentary layers formed in shallow seas where from decomposed accumulated without subsequent alteration by heat or pressure that might obscure them. Builders preserved the inclusions intact, prioritizing the stone's authentic geological character over uniform aesthetics, despite potential for selective removal; this decision aligns with the era's appreciation for natural materials in . The fossils exert no influence on the building's structural , as they constitute trace remnants within durable matrices tested for load-bearing capacity prior to use. Public and educational interest in these features has prompted guided tours and interpretive programs since at least the mid-20th century, framing the Capitol as an inadvertent paleontological exhibit that illustrates Earth's prehistoric marine ecosystems without dedicated curation. Over 30 varieties of marble and limestone contribute to this diversity, with specimens varying in size from millimeters to several centimeters, enhancing visitor engagement through verifiable, on-site empirical evidence of deep time rather than contrived displays.

Restoration and Preservation

Early 20th-Century Adjustments

Following the completion of the State Capitol in 1917, growing administrative demands soon strained its capacity, as evidenced by overcrowded conditions reported within a decade. In response, the state initiated construction of a separate State Office Building at 1 West Wilson Street in 1931 to house expanding government functions, including additional legislative and executive offices. This marked the first departure from the Capitol as the sole repository for all state operations, prioritizing preservation of the original structure over direct expansions. The Wilson Street project proceeded in phases amid the , with initial segments completed by the mid-1930s and the main tower and connectors added in 1938-1939 at a cost of $1,889,000, reflecting pragmatic fiscal management focused on utility rather than opulence. These adjustments accommodated increased legislative sessions and bureaucratic growth without compromising the Capitol's architectural integrity, underscoring a commitment to functional adaptation over lavish alterations during economic constraints. No major structural modifications, such as seismic reinforcements or extensive interior overhauls, were undertaken in the building itself during this era, as Wisconsin's low seismic risk and the preference for auxiliary facilities minimized invasive work.

1988-1993 Comprehensive Restoration

The comprehensive of the Wisconsin State began in , prompted by structural assessments revealing outdated electrical, heating, and cooling systems, as well as accumulated deterioration from prior incompatible modifications. A Capitol Master Plan, ratified by the Joint Committee on Legislative Organization, outlined a phased approach to modernize operations while restoring the building to its early 20th-century Beaux-Arts appearance, prioritizing preservation of architectural integrity and artwork. The initial pilot project focused on Chamber, where crews cleaned and refurbished surfaces, removed intrusive fluorescent and modern fixtures installed decades earlier, and reinstated historic decorative schemes to enhance acoustic and visual authenticity. Subsequent phases from 1990 to 1993 targeted the north and west wings, closing them sequentially to minimize disruption to legislative functions. Work included repairing granite facades through and application, alongside upgrades to HVAC and electrical to meet contemporary safety standards without altering the exterior profile. During these efforts, restorers uncovered and rehabilitated original elements obscured by later alterations, such as period-appropriate finishes and structural details, contributing to a return of the building's intended grandeur. By 1993, these interventions had stabilized key areas, averting progressive decay that could have escalated repair needs, though the full project extended beyond this period at a total cost exceeding $145 million. The 1988-1993 phases exemplified cost-effective preservation by extending the Capitol's serviceable lifespan through proactive , contrasting with the risks of deferred action on aging and prone to . While the substantial taxpayer investment drew scrutiny for its scale amid competing state priorities, empirical outcomes demonstrated causal benefits: reinforced structural prevented scenarios of accelerated failure observed in neglected historic edifices elsewhere, yielding long-term fiscal returns via avoided emergency interventions and sustained functionality as a .

Modern Maintenance and Fiscal Considerations

The Wisconsin Department of Administration () oversees the ongoing maintenance of the State Capitol building following the 1988-1993 , with operations funded through the state's biennial capital and operating budgets. Capital improvements, including repairs to address weathering and structural integrity, are typically financed via general obligation bonds supported by general fund revenues derived from taxpayer sources. In August 2025, the State Building Commission approved approximately $110.2 million for statewide construction, maintenance, and demolition projects, with allocations benefiting the Capitol among other facilities. Deferred maintenance poses significant challenges, as unaddressed issues in state buildings like the Capitol can lead to life safety risks, operational failures, and escalated future repair costs due to deterioration from factors such as moisture intrusion and climate exposure. Wisconsin faces a statewide deferred maintenance backlog exceeding $13.1 billion as of 2025, prompting gubernatorial recommendations for over $1.2 billion in the 2025-27 All Agency program to mitigate these risks without fully resolving the accumulation driven by competing budget priorities. Dome-specific remedial efforts, including multi-phase moisture barrier enhancements, aim to prolong the facade's service life amid ongoing environmental stresses, though systematic underfunding has been cited as exacerbating long-term fiscal inefficiencies by shifting burdens to more costly interventions. Security enhancements implemented in the , such as expanded protocols including metal detectors and bag checks introduced by mid-2025, have contributed to rising operational demands on the DOA-managed Capitol Police, reflecting broader responses to heightened threats without specified isolated cost figures but within the context of constrained state resources. Fiscal debates center on balancing preservation imperatives against taxpayer-funded bond issuances and potential operating budget cuts, with officials emphasizing that proactive funding averts exponential cost growth from neglect, while over-reliance on debt instruments sustains scrutiny over in maintenance allocations.

Governmental and Symbolic Role

Legislative and Executive Operations

![Wisconsin State Senate chambers](./assets/Secretary_Pompeo_Delivers_Remarks_in_the_Senate_Chamber_of_the_Wisconsin_State_Capitol_(50378281008 ) The houses the bicameral , with the State Senate meeting in chambers located in the north wing and the State convening in the south wing on the third floor. This spatial arrangement supports the bicameral by allowing each chamber to deliberate independently while maintaining proximity for conferences and interactions, which streamlines progression from introduction to passage. Legislative sessions occur biennially, commencing in early January of odd-numbered years with no fixed duration, enabling extended deliberations as needed for complex legislation. Numerous committee hearing rooms, including five round rooms on the second, third, and fourth floors in the northwest and northeast sections, accommodate subcommittee reviews, public hearings, and amendments prior to full chamber votes. Following the adoption of remote participation protocols in 2020 amid the , the legislature incorporated hybrid formats utilizing video technology for sessions and committees, permitting in-person attendance alongside virtual involvement to sustain operations during disruptions. Executive functions center in the east wing, where the governor maintains offices and conducts ceremonial duties such as bill signings in the dedicated conference room. This integration allows for immediate legislative-executive interaction, as enacted bills are delivered directly to the governor for approval or veto, minimizing delays in the governance process. The capitol's design thus causally supports efficient checks and balances by colocating these operations without compromising the separation of legislative and executive deliberations.

Judicial Presence and Ceremonial Functions

The conducts its proceedings in a dedicated hearing room located in the east wing of the State Capitol, where the court has held sessions since the building's completion in 1917. This chamber serves as the primary venue for oral arguments, which are open to the public and typically scheduled during designated sessions throughout the year. The room accommodates the seven justices and is occasionally utilized by the Fourth District Court of Appeals for its hearings. Beyond judicial functions, the State Capitol functions as a ceremonial hub for key state rituals, including gubernatorial inaugurations and the delivery of inaugural addresses. For instance, delivered his second inaugural address in the Capitol on January 3, 2023, marking the formal commencement of his term alongside other elected officials. These events underscore the building's role as neutral ground for oaths of office and official state proceedings, emphasizing continuity in governance without partisan embellishment. State of the State addresses and joint legislative sessions further highlight its utility for addresses to assembled lawmakers and officials. Public access supports the Capitol's ceremonial and educational role, with free guided tours offered daily except on major holidays, drawing over 85,000 visitors in 2024 alone. These tours provide insights into the judicial and ceremonial spaces, reinforcing the building's status as a public symbol of Wisconsin's government while adhering to protocols that limit access during active sessions.

Notable Events and Controversies

Historical Assemblies and Milestones

The Wisconsin State Capitol's current structure, completed in 1917, initially lacked a formal dedication ceremony due to the onset of , with the legislature and other state functions commencing operations amid the wartime context. A key early legislative milestone occurred on June 10, 1919, when the state assembly ratified the 19th Amendment to the U.S. , granting women the right to vote, marking Wisconsin as the first state to do so and reflecting the building's role in advancing electoral reforms through formal sessions. In 1925, U.S. Senator Robert La Follette lay in state in the rotunda, drawing approximately 40,000 mourners in a display of public reverence that underscored the Capitol's function as a site for communal mourning and political legacy, contributing to state cohesion without reported disruptions. During , the Capitol adapted to national efforts, including energy conservation measures such as the permanent removal of the illuminated "W" from the dome, while post-war activities featured a 1950 savings bond drive highlighted by a replica donated by , which remains on display and symbolized fiscal patriotism in assemblies promoting war recovery funding. The building hosted its official on July 7, 1965, led by Warren Knowles following exterior cleaning, affirming its architectural and symbolic maturity after nearly five decades of service. In the , the grounds and chambers became venues for civil rights advocacy, including a 1960 at Capitol Square protesting Southern practices and a 1961 occupation by activists, including members, demanding a state act, which pressured legislative responses with minimal long-term structural damage noted. A 1969 occupation of the Assembly Chamber by Father and protesters lasted about 11 hours, highlighting the site's role in assemblies that advanced policy discourse on equity, though such events occasionally tested security protocols without derailing core governmental operations. These pre-2000 gatherings generally reinforced civic unity, with attendance figures like the 40,000 for La Follette's indicating broad participation in non-partisan milestones.

2011 Union Protests and Occupation Impacts

In February 2011, protests erupted at the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison against Governor Scott Walker's proposed budget repair bill, later enacted as Act 10, which sought to limit collective bargaining rights for most public employees to address a projected $3.6 billion state budget deficit. Demonstrators, primarily public sector unions and supporters, gathered daily, with peak attendance reaching up to 100,000 people opposing the measure's provisions for increased employee contributions to pensions and health insurance alongside bargaining restrictions. The protests occupied the Capitol rotunda continuously from mid-February through early March 2011, involving sleeping bags, signs, and chants that disrupted legislative proceedings, prompting a court order for eviction on March 3 after state officials argued the occupation violated fire codes and sanitation standards. While law enforcement reports characterized the demonstrations as largely peaceful, with fewer than 20 arrests over the period—mostly for minor infractions like trespassing—instances of occurred, including on surfaces and to interior fixtures and exterior grounds from heavy foot traffic and rallies. Initial state estimates in March 2011 pegged repair costs at $7.5 million, primarily for restoration inside the building, but subsequent assessments revised this downward to approximately $270,000 for actual fixes, encompassing $161,000 in interior repairs and $108,500 for lawn and shrub . Cleanup efforts, including removal of debris and sanitation restoration, totaled around $200,000, far below preliminary projections that included potential assessments up to $500,000. Taxpayer-funded security expenses dwarfed physical damages, exceeding $7.8 million for one month alone in overtime, out-of-state reinforcements, and facility fortifications, with the Department of Administration absorbing some costs but ultimately billing the state general fund. Act 10 passed the on March 9, 2011, and took effect on June 29 after signed it into law, exempting only public safety employees from most curbs. Legal challenges followed, with unions arguing violations of equal protection and associational rights, but state and federal courts upheld the law's constitutionality, including a 2014 ruling rejecting claims of unequal treatment for non-exempt workers. By implementing benefit reforms and limits, Act 10 contributed to closing the without broad hikes, yielding estimated savings of over $35 billion through 2025 via reduced personnel costs and sustained service levels, though critics from union-aligned sources contended it eroded worker protections without proportionally addressing fiscal imbalances. Media portrayals varied, with some outlets framing the as a model of akin to historical movements, while others, including comparisons to the U.S. Capitol events, highlighted differences such as the absence of , deaths, or widespread destruction in —yet emphasized the non-trivial taxpayer burden and disruption as evidence against viewing it as victimless . Empirical data on costs underscores causal links between the occupation's scale and fiscal strain on public resources, countering narratives minimizing impacts amid the state's urgent budgetary pressures.

Recent Demonstrations and Security Responses

In November 2020, supporters of President gathered at the Wisconsin State Capitol to protest the results, leading to clashes with counter-protesters on the grounds. Similar demonstrations occurred on , 2020, with converging crowds of and Biden supporters rallying around the Capitol Square. These events reflected heightened tensions over vote certification, though no widespread or structural damage was reported beyond typical rally litter and temporary disruptions to public access. Election skepticism persisted into 2021 and 2022, with an August 6, 2021, "Audit the Vote" drawing thousands to the to demand a forensic of ballots, organized by Republican-aligned groups. On February 15, 2022, hundreds attended a pushing for the recall of 's 2020 electoral votes, featuring speeches by candidates like Tim Ramthun amid claims of irregularities. Such gatherings employed tactics like mass assembly and petitions, mirroring earlier strategies but resulting in minimal arrests and no verified instances of interior occupation or significant property wear beyond cleanup needs. Shifting dynamics emerged in 2025 amid opposition to the administration, with a February 5 decentralized at the attracting hundreds to decry and the Heritage Foundation's policy blueprint, despite Trump's disavowal of ties to it. Subsequent "No Kings" rallies protested perceived , drawing an estimated 15,000 marchers to the on June 14 and up to 20,000 on October 18, with participants voicing concerns over immigration enforcement and health policy. A July 17 "Good Trouble Lives On" event saw around 400 demonstrators at the site, part of nationwide actions invoking civil rights tactics. These left-leaning mobilizations paralleled right-wing election protests in scale and rhetoric, contributing to repeated strains on maintenance from foot traffic and signage residue, though arrests remained low and damages focused on reversible externalities like debris. Security responses evolved post-2011 union protests, with metal detectors temporarily installed at entrances in February 2011 to screen entrants amid , later removed by June after . In response to 2020-2021 threats, including planned armed rallies post-January 6, Capitol windows were boarded up starting , 2021, and augmented perimeter controls to deter intrusions. Ongoing measures include State Capitol Police authority to lock doors during threats and require event bonds for cleanup overtime, with 2025 calls from figures like Assembly Speaker for enhanced protocols amid rising , rejecting full fortification but advocating targeted upgrades. has inflated response burdens, as permissive access policies—intended to uphold free assembly—enable escalatory occupations when unchecked, per critiques from officials balancing and openness. While 2011 protests incurred over $7.8 million in policing alone, recent events have prompted proportional but unitemized annual expenditures in the multimillion range, funded via facilities budgets.

References

  1. [1]
    Capitol Tour - Wisconsin.gov
    The Wisconsin State Capitol is located in the heart of downtown Madison on an isthmus formed by Lake Mendota to the north and Lake Monona to the south.
  2. [2]
    The official website of the Wisconsin State Capitol
    The Capitol rotunda is renovated, including the cleaning of the inner dome's mural and the interior walls. This is accomplished by using an expanded telescope ...
  3. [3]
    History - Wisconsin.gov - Capitol Tour
    It is a two-story, attic-framed building, forty-two feet by twenty-five feet, with a square battlement front. This building is preserved in its original state ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] WISCONSIN STATE CAPITOL - NPGallery
    The massive granite dome of the Wisconsin State Capitol was completed in 1915. It remains the only granite capitol dome in the United States. 18 Two years ...
  5. [5]
    Capitol Tours | Senate District 09 - Wisconsin State Legislature
    In addition to housing both the Wisconsin State Senate and Assembly, the Capitol is home to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the Offices of the Governor and ...
  6. [6]
    Wisconsin State Capitol Building
    The Capitol dome is over 265 feet with a gilded statue, the interior has a granite dome, 43 stone varieties, hand-carved furniture, and glass mosaics.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    DOA Wisconsin State Capitol Building
    Constructed from 1906 to 1917, the facility contains 531,315 GSF of space. It was designed with four equal wings of five (5) stories and a central rotunda and ...
  8. [8]
    Visit the Capitol - Wisconsin State Legislature
    Plan on spending 45-55 minutes for a tour. Groups of ten or more can make an on-line reservation for a tour of the State Capitol or call (608)266-0382.
  9. [9]
    History of First Capitol - Wisconsin Historical Society
    Belmont, the Birthplace of Wisconsin Territorial Government​​ They met from October 25 to December 9, 1836. In that time, they put 42 laws on the books, ...
  10. [10]
    First Capital of the Wisconsin Territory | Belmont WI
    Belmont was the first capitol of the Wisconsin Territory, and the territorial legislature met here for 46 days in 1836. Legislators met in the council house ...
  11. [11]
    Wisconsin Capitols | Wisconsin Historical Society
    The building, measuring 25 feet by 40 feet, was two stories high and was lathed with split oak covered with plaster on the inside, making a very substantial ...
  12. [12]
    How Madison Became the Capital | Wisconsin Historical Society
    Madison was chosen as capital due to Doty's influence, a central location, and the promise of profit, despite initial opposition and poor accommodations.
  13. [13]
    Learn the History of Wisconsin's State Capitol Buildings
    The first state capitol was built under the supervision of James D. Doty and John O'Neill. Construction started in 1837, but it was not finished until 1848.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  14. [14]
    The Story of the Wisconsin State Capitol Fire of 1904
    A gas jet in the closet on the second floor next to the assembly post office set fire to the woodwork at about 2:30 a.m., on February 27.Missing: 1857 expansions<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Capitol Burned - Historic Madison, Inc. of Wisconsin
    Precious minutes were lost when firemen could not find the water connection in the building. At first the fire was not thought to threaten the whole structure, ...
  16. [16]
    This day in history: Madison Capitol fire of 1904 - 608today
    Feb 24, 2023 · After 18 hours, with the help of two firefighting companies from Milwaukee, the fire was put out. It caused ~$1 million in damages and destroyed ...
  17. [17]
    1904 Fire Gutted Capitol, Nearly Cost Madison State Capitol - WPR
    Feb 27, 2017 · 27, 1904, a fire destroyed Wisconsin's state Capitol building and nearly led the state government to another city. The fire began when a gas jet ...
  18. [18]
    Capitol timeline - Wisconsin History Day by Day
    The total cost of the third Capitol, including the additions, is $900,000. 1903: The Legislature appoints a building commission to consider constructing a new ...
  19. [19]
    Did you know Wisconsin's capitol building was not insured when it ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · Despite its state-of-the-art firefighting system, on Feb. 26-27, 1904, the second capitol building in Madison, was destroyed by fire. The first ...Missing: expansions | Show results with:expansions
  20. [20]
    Madison | SAH ARCHIPEDIA
    In the spring of 1836, Doty and Stevens T. Mason, Michigan's governor-elect, purchased 1,200 acres, on which Wisconsin's territorial capital was established in ...
  21. [21]
    Capitol Park Extension - Historic Madison, Inc. of Wisconsin
    In March 1857 the citizens of Madison voted to approve $50,000 in city bonds to enlarge the Capitol. There were justifiable fears that without such an ...
  22. [22]
    geology of the wisconsin state capitol
    In 1904, fire destroyed the second capitol. Construction began on the third, current capitol in 1906 and was completed in 1915. The exterior of the capitol ...
  23. [23]
    Third time's the charm? - Isthmus | Madison, Wisconsin
    Jun 29, 2017 · Construction began in 1907. It was completed in sections. Though there is no official opening date for the building, July 1, 1917 may be viewed ...
  24. [24]
    Historic structure report, Wisconsin State Capitol (6 Volumes)
    ... submissions to the 1906 competition for the Capitol. Burnham's critique of Post's design detailed why it satisfied the commission's program most effectively.
  25. [25]
    Wisconsin Capitol Capped A Storied Career For George B. Post
    Dec 5, 2017 · The structural ideas George B. Post used in early skyscrapers would later play a role in his design for the Wisconsin State Capitol.
  26. [26]
    Top 5 Works by George Browne Post | Stephen Travels
    #1 Wisconsin State Capitol (Madison, Wisconsin). Wisconsin State Capitol ... George B. Post & Sons, made sure it adhered to their father's design. Not ...Missing: selected | Show results with:selected
  27. [27]
    Wisconsin State Capitol - Wikipedia
    Completed in 1917, the building is the fifth to serve as the Wisconsin capitol since the first territorial legislature convened in 1836 and the third ...
  28. [28]
    5 things you might not know about the Capitol | MADISON MAGAZINE
    Mar 17, 2016 · When limestone and marble were cut from quarries in the Midwest, they included fossils that are now found throughout the building. Find a ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Ambition And Fire Fueled The Growing Scale Of Wisconsin's Capitol ...
    Dec 7, 2017 · Ambition And Fire Fueled The Growing Scale Of Wisconsin's Capitol Buildings ... A building intended to serve as a symbol of freedom and democracy ...
  30. [30]
    Wisconsin State Capitol | SAH ARCHIPEDIA
    A commission selected the nationally renowned architect George B. Post of New York City to design a replacement. When the building was completed in 1917, it ...Missing: competition | Show results with:competition
  31. [31]
    CAPITOL SQUARE | Property Record | Wisconsin Historical Society
    Jan 1, 1989 · In 1905, the Capitol Commission established a program for the new building, requiring that it be in the form of a cross, with the four equal ...Missing: proposals | Show results with:proposals
  32. [32]
    Capitol Statue | Wisconsin Alumni Association
    On top of her helmet is the state animal, the badger. French sculpted the15 foot, five inch, three-ton statue in 1914 for a cost of $20,325. For those who don't ...Missing: union | Show results with:union
  33. [33]
    How Sculptors And Muralists Made Wisconsin's Capitol Building ...
    Dec 6, 2017 · The neo-classical style is recognizable by its use of exterior masonry and elements like symmetry, columns, arched windows and lots of ...Missing: 1906 | Show results with:1906
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    [PDF] ARCHITECTVRAL RECORD - USModernist
    DETAIL OF ONE OF THE ENTRANCE PAVILIONS. -WISCONSIN STATE CAPITOL, MADISON. WIS. GEO. B. POST. &. SONS. ARCHITECTS.
  38. [38]
    Wisconsin State Capitol Dome Moisture Repair - Graef, USA
    A multiple-approach remedial scheme to minimize the intrusion of moisture into the exterior dome facade that would extend the service life of the dome ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Top 5 Capitols in the United States | Stephen Travels
    #3 Wisconsin. Wisconsin State Capitol I arrived in Madison at night, with the ... Eight Corinthian columns support a plain pediment on each of the four sides.<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Allegorical Statuary Group | Photograph | Wisconsin Historical Society
    One of four allegorical statuary groups, done by sculptor Karl Bitter, on the exterior of the Wisconsin State Capitol. This one is named Strength.
  41. [41]
    "The West" Statue | Photograph | Wisconsin Historical Society
    "The West" statue at the first floor southwest entrance the Wisconsin State Capitol. Vinnie Ream Hoxie modeled this statue in 1866-1868.Missing: niches | Show results with:niches<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The State Capitol Its Art and Architecture - Wisconsin Historical Society
    Jan 10, 2018 · When the west wing was well underway in 1908, the builders started on the East Wing. This houses the governor's reception room and the ...
  43. [43]
    Capitol quirks - Isthmus | Madison, Wisconsin
    gastropods, brachiopods and ammonoids — embedded in the ...
  44. [44]
    Behind the Scenes at the Wisconsin State Capitol - 608today
    Jan 24, 2022 · The building is home to a series of fossils collected from all over the world. ... limestone + marble floors, ceilings, walls, railings, and more.
  45. [45]
    The Old SOB - Madison Trust for Historic Preservation
    Jul 31, 2020 · The State Office Building at 1 W. Wilson St.—conceived when Art Deco design was widely popular for commercial, institutional and government ...
  46. [46]
    1 West Wilson Street: History of the State Office Building | Wisconsin ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · The center tower and the connector to the east building were constructed in the early 1938 for $1,889,000. Room 736 was added in the late 1950s ...Missing: Capitol 1931
  47. [47]
    Now & Then: Deco Detail - Capitol Neighborhoods, Inc.
    Dec 1, 2014 · The State Office Building is an Art Deco gem. The building at 1 W. Wilson Street–conceived when Art Deco design was widely popular for ...
  48. [48]
    Assembly Chamber before Restoration | Photograph
    Assembly Chamber, in the Wisconsin State Capitol, before restoration in 1988. Above the skylight can be seen long fluorescent light fixtures which are no longer ...
  49. [49]
    Visiting the Madison State Capitol: A Journey Through History
    The current State Capitol, completed in 1917, is the fifth to serve Wisconsin since its first statehouse was erected in Belmont in 1836. The journey from the ...
  50. [50]
    Wisconsin Legislature: 16.842 - Wisconsin Legislative Documents
    16.84(1)(1) Have charge of, operate, maintain and keep in repair the state capitol building, the executive residence, any heating, cooling, and power plants ...
  51. [51]
    DOA Capital Budget - WI DOA - Wisconsin.gov
    2023-25 Capital Budget Agency Requests and Governor's Recommendations · 2023-25 State of Wisconsin Capital Budget Recommendations · 2023 Wisconsin Act 19 ...
  52. [52]
    $$110M approved for Wisconsin projects: State Capitol, UW ... - WXOW
    Aug 7, 2025 · The Building Commission met at the State Fair and approved total of approximately $110.2 million in key projects statewide, according to a press ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] State of Wisconsin Building Commission - WI DOA
    Apr 1, 2025 · Not addressing our deferred maintenance increases risks to life safety and running our building systems to failure. Deferral also drives up the ...
  54. [54]
    Press Release: Gov. Evers Announces Historic Capital Budget ...
    Mar 10, 2025 · The budget includes $4.1B for infrastructure, $1.6B for UW System, $325M for corrections, and $1.2B for the All Agency program, projected to ...
  55. [55]
    Wisconsin lawmakers convene with new security in the state Capitol
    Jun 18, 2025 · Security measures included bag checks and metal detectors for the public entering the Senate gallery. Democratic leaders declined to disclose ...Missing: enhancements 2020 costs
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Wisconsin Capitol Police
    Apr 30, 2024 · In 18 states, including Wisconsin, security in capitol buildings is provided by a law enforcement agency specifically designated for that.Missing: enhancements | Show results with:enhancements
  57. [57]
    The Assembly Chambers - Wisconsin State Legislature
    Republicans sit near the windows and Democrats sit near the chamber doors. The furnishings of the room are all original including the representatives' desks, ...
  58. [58]
    Frequently Asked Questions - Wisconsin State Legislature
    Adjourn? (When is the legislature in session?) The Wisconsin Legislature operates in a biennial (two year) session that lasts from early January of the odd ...How can I find information on a... · When does the legislature...Missing: average | Show results with:average
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Legislative Committees - Wisconsin Legislative Documents
    Legislative committees deliberate bills, work on amendments, introduce legislation, hold investigations, and review executive branch rules. They also vote on ...
  60. [60]
    Rooms | Assembly Sergeant at Arms
    There are five round committee hearing rooms on second, third, and fourth floor in the Northwest and Northeast sections of the Capitol. The Grand Army of the ...
  61. [61]
    Review finds Wisconsin has least active full-time legislature in ...
    Oct 6, 2020 · The Wisconsin Legislature has been the least active full-time state legislative body in the country since states began taking measures to combat the COVID-19 ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The First Virtual Meeting of the Wisconsin State Legislature
    The virtual session lasted fewer than three hours. After adjournment, prompted by Speaker Vos, members in the chamber stood to recognize and applaud the ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    Visiting the Supreme Court - Wisconsin Court System
    Feb 8, 2024 · The Wisconsin Supreme Court Hearing Room is located in the State Capitol Building (external link) in Madison. Visitors are welcome to view the hearing room.
  66. [66]
    Gov. Evers delivers second inaugural address - Spectrum News
    Jan 3, 2023 · Though state government will remain divided, Gov. Evers said the outcome of November's election sent a message.
  67. [67]
    'The People's House': Wisconsin State Capitol tour guide brings ...
    Aug 18, 2025 · In 2024, the Wisconsin State Capitol welcomed more than 85000 visitors on guided tours.
  68. [68]
    The Woman's Suffrage Movement | Wisconsin Historical Society
    Wisconsin became the first state to ratify the 19th amendment on June 10, 1919. The amendment granted suffrage to women in America. The ratification was the ...Missing: ceremony | Show results with:ceremony<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    10 little-known facts about the Wisconsin State Capitol building
    Jun 18, 2017 · ... cost of $7.25 million. A 14-year, $158.8 million renovation and restoration project started in 1988 converted the building to a modern ...
  70. [70]
    Wisconsin State Capitol Finally Dedicated | Photograph
    The capitol was never dedicated after completion in 1917. Forty-eight years later, on July 7, 1965, it was formally dedicated, after it's exterior was ...Missing: President Wilson
  71. [71]
    Madison, Feb. 27, 1960 - Civil Rights comes to the Capitol Square
    Feb 24, 2021 · Madison, February 27, 1960 – the civil rights movement moves to the Capitol Square. The sit-ins challenging segregation at the lunch ...
  72. [72]
    U.S. civil rights activists occupy Wisconsin State Capitol to demand ...
    U.S. civil rights activists occupy Wisconsin State Capitol to demand human rights act, 1961 ; Groups in 1st Segment. Wisconsin NAACP. Governor Nelson. African ...
  73. [73]
    10 years later, Wisconsinites are still divided over Act 10
    Jun 29, 2021 · The legislation signed by former Gov. Scott Walker to address a projected $3.6 billion budget deficit changed Wisconsin's financial and ...
  74. [74]
    Act 10 Savings Top $35 Billion in 2025 - MacIver Institute
    Mar 17, 2025 · The MacIver Institute conservatively estimates it has directly saved Wisconsin taxpayers $35.6 billion through lower taxes and higher service levels.
  75. [75]
    Capitol Protests 2011 Oral History Project - UW-Madison Libraries
    At at its peek, as many as 100,000 protesters opposing the 2011 Wisconsin Act 10 ... Protesters inside the Wisconsin State Capitol building, #BDP000292.
  76. [76]
    Wisconsin Act 10 protests vs. U.S. Capitol riot: 4 key differences
    Jan 8, 2021 · There were fewer than 20 arrests at the Capitol linked to the Act 10 protests during mid-February and March 2011, and none of those arrests were ...
  77. [77]
    Wisconsin Capitol Occupation Ends With Fishy Damage Figures
    Mar 4, 2011 · [S]tate officials said that damage from the demonstration to the marble inside and outside the Capitol would cost an estimated $7.5 million: $6 ...Missing: cleanup | Show results with:cleanup
  78. [78]
    Repairs to Wisconsin Capitol cost about $270K | MPR News
    May 13, 2011 · Huebsch initially estimated during a court case regarding access to the Capitol that the damage to the building would cost $7.5 million to ...Missing: project 1988-1993 benefit
  79. [79]
    Damage From Wis. Protests Will Cost $270K To Fix - CBS News
    May 13, 2011 · Protests at the Wisconsin Capitol over public workers' collective bargaining rights cost more than $7.8 million for police, and damage to ...
  80. [80]
    Post-protest cleanup of Wisconsin Capitol cost $200K, far less than ...
    Apr 4, 2012 · A memo from DOA's historic preservation officer, Dan Stephans, estimated it could cost as much as $500,000 for an estimate of the damage, ...Missing: vandalism | Show results with:vandalism
  81. [81]
    $$7.8 million for Capitol security - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
    May 13, 2011 · Just one month of added security during the massive statehouse demonstrations cost state taxpayers at least $7.8 million to cover the use of ...Missing: reports | Show results with:reports
  82. [82]
    Act 10 Isthmus | Madison, Wisconsin
    The bill was passed into law and became effective as of June 29, 2011. Public employees exempted from the changes to the collective bargaining law include ...Missing: numbers | Show results with:numbers
  83. [83]
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Act 10
    The court also rejected arguments that Act 10 violated the Equal Protection Clause by permitting unrepresented employees to bargain individually for wages ...
  84. [84]
    Anti-vote protesters spread lies and clash with BLM counter protesters
    Nov 8, 2020 · Wisconsin anti-vote protesters supporting President Trump clashed with BLM protesters at a rally on the state Capitol grounds.
  85. [85]
    Biden Supporters Celebrate Victory While Trump Supporters Protest ...
    Nov 7, 2020 · Supporters of President Donald Trump and now President-elect Joe Biden converged on the capitol in Madison Saturday afternoon, ...
  86. [86]
    PHOTOS: A tale of two sides of the Capitol | Politics | captimes.com
    Nov 7, 2020 · Supporters of both the Biden and Trump campaigns gathered around the Wisconsin State Capitol Building to rally and protest, on Saturday, November 7.<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    'Stop the Steal' protest at Wisconsin State Capitol | Reuters Connect
    Nov 8, 2020 · A Biden supporter holds a sign reading "voters decide" at a 'Stop the Steal' protest held by supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump ...
  88. [88]
    'Audit The Vote' Rally Draws Thousands To Wisconsin Capitol - WPR
    Aug 6, 2021 · Thousands of protestors gathered at the state Capitol Friday to call on Republican legislative leaders in Wisconsin to order a forensic ...
  89. [89]
    Ramthun, Brandtjen speak at rally in Capitol pushing recall of ...
    Feb 15, 2022 · Hundreds of people attended a rally at the Wisconsin Capitol to hear gubernatorial candidate Tim Ramthun spread election conspiracy ...
  90. [90]
    Crowd gathered at Wisconsin Capitol seek to overturn the 2020 ...
    Feb 15, 2022 · People gather at a rally supporting the legally impossible act of overturning Wisconsin's 2020 presidential election Tuesday, February 15, ...
  91. [91]
    A decentralized demonstration draws hundreds to Wisconsin Capitol ...
    the Heritage Foundation document that Trump denied any connection to during ...
  92. [92]
    Hundreds protest at Wisconsin State Capitol against Trump, Project ...
    Feb 5, 2025 · Hundreds protested the Trump administration and the conservative policy plan Project 2025 at the Wisconsin State Capitol on Wednesday.
  93. [93]
    Thousands join nationwide 'No Kings' protests against Trump in ...
    Jun 14, 2025 · ... 2025 7:58 pm. Thousands of protesters gathered at the Wisconsin State Capitol to protest President Donald Trump on Saturday. (Henry Redman ...
  94. [94]
    Big turnout for No Kings protests across Wisconsin Saturday
    Oct 18, 2025 · An estimated 20,000 marchers descend on the Capitol in Madison. No Kings march in Madison on Oct. 18, 2025 | Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin ...
  95. [95]
    'Good Trouble Lives On' protests against Trump administration take ...
    Jul 17, 2025 · Protesters opposed to President Donald Trump march Thursday, July 17, 2025, at the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison, Wis.
  96. [96]
    Security questions swirl at the Wisconsin Capitol after armed man ...
    Oct 6, 2023 · Metal detectors were installed at the Capitol in late February 2011 at the height of protests over then-Gov. Scott Walker's proposal that ...
  97. [97]
    Metal Detectors Removed from Wisconsin Capitol | 2011-06-22
    Jun 22, 2011 · Authorities have removed metal detectors from the Wisconsin state Capitol's entrances. Capitol Police set up the detectors at three Capitol ...
  98. [98]
    Wisconsin State Capitol Windows Boarded Up Amid Safety Concerns
    Jan 11, 2021 · This comes as reports say that starting on Sunday and going until Inauguration Day, armed rallies are being planned at all 50 state capitols and ...
  99. [99]
    Minnesota shootings prompt increased security in Wisconsin Capitol
    Jun 16, 2025 · In 2011, Capitol officials installed metal detectors at building entrances on a temporary basis during the massive protests over former Gov.
  100. [100]
    Robin Vos open to letting lawmakers, justices use tax dollars for ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · The GOP Assembly speaker says he's still against turning state the Capitol into an 'armed fortress' amid an uptick in political violence.