Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Zap Energy


Zap Energy, Inc. is an founded in as a spin-off from research, developing compact reactors using sheared-flow-stabilized technology. Headquartered in , with operations in and , the company was co-founded by Benj Conway (CEO), Brian A. Nelson (CTO), and Uri Shumlak (Chief Science Officer), who leverage decades of academic work on Z-pinch stabilization through plasma velocity shear rather than . This approach aims to enable low-cost, scalable plants by driving electric currents through flowing to compress and confine it, avoiding the complex magnets and cryogenic systems common in designs.
Key devices include the (Fusion Z-pinch Experiment), which has produced over 10,000 neutron-yielding plasmas by 2024, demonstrating ion temperatures exceeding 37 million degrees in a compact setup. In 2024, Zap launched the Century test platform, a high-repetition-rate system with liquid-metal cooling, achieving DOE-certified milestones including sustained three-hour operations and, by 2025, 39 kilowatt average power output at 12 pulses per minute—representing a twenty-fold advance in enabling technologies. The firm has raised over $330 million in funding, including a $130 million round in 2024 from investors like and Investment Group, to scale toward a . While empirical results confirm stable, high-temperature pinches and reactions, net energy gain remains a critical unsolved challenge, with progress validated through direct neutron measurements and diagnostics rather than simulations alone.

Corporate Background

Founding and Leadership

Zap Energy was established in 2017 as a for-profit company focused on developing fusion technology, emerging as a from research conducted at the (UW). The firm was co-founded by entrepreneur Benj Conway, plasma physicist Uri Shumlak, and fusion engineer Brian A. Nelson, who brought complementary expertise in business development, scientific innovation, and technical implementation. Initial efforts built on academic experiments demonstrating sheared-flow stabilization in Z-pinches, aiming to achieve net energy gain without the complex magnets used in competing approaches. Benj Conway serves as CEO and president, having co-founded the company to commercialize the technology; his background includes early career service as a in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office across and the , following studies in medicine at (first-class honors), and . Brian A. Nelson, , holds a PhD in and from the University of Wisconsin-Madison (1987) and served as a retired research professor emeritus at UW, where he contributed to prototype development like the device. Shumlak, chief science officer, earned a PhD in from the (1992), worked at the Air Force Phillips Laboratory, and joined UW in 1994 as a professor, becoming a Fellow of the for pioneering sheared-flow stabilization concepts central to Zap's approach. The leadership team oversees operations from headquarters in , emphasizing scalable, low-cost fusion systems.

Facilities and Operations

Zap Energy maintains its headquarters in , at 2300 Merrill Creek Parkway, with primary facilities in the greater area. The company operates two main facilities near dedicated to experimentation and engineering, supplemented by a smaller presence in , , for specialized operations. As of September 2025, Zap Energy employs 150 personnel across these sites, comprising engineers, physicists, and support staff focused on advancing sheared-flow-stabilized technology. Operations emphasize iterative prototyping and high-repetition-rate testing, with facilities equipped for systems, diagnostics, and direct energy conversion subsystems. Key activities include the operation of the Century demonstration platform, a fully integrated for plant-relevant components, which began producing shots in October 2024. By September 2025, Century achieved a repetition rate of 12 shots per minute, simulating power plant pulsing while validating flowing and yield measurements. Earlier efforts at these facilities centered on the device series, scaling from benchtop experiments to meter-scale pinches for verification exceeding 37 million degrees in April 2024. These operations prioritize compact, magnet-free confinement to enable cost-effective , with ongoing tests addressing longevity and handling under repetitive conditions.

Technological Approach

Z-Pinch Fusion Principles

The configuration achieves confinement and heating for by driving a large axial through a cylindrical column, which generates an azimuthal according to Ampère's law. This current interacts with the self-induced to produce a radial inward (J × B), compressing the radially and dynamically raising its density and temperature to thermonuclear levels. The process typically involves pulsed currents ranging from hundreds of kiloamperes to megaamperes applied over microseconds, leading to implosion velocities that form a dense, hot core capable of sustaining reactions, such as deuterium-tritium yielding 17.6 MeV per event alongside a nucleus and . Key advantages of the include its high-β nature, where pressure approaches or equals magnetic pressure, enabling efficient use of magnetic forces without external field coils or inertial drivers like lasers. This simplicity supports compact geometries and potential scalability for power production, as the self-generated fields directly couple electrical input to dynamics. conditions require central temperatures exceeding 10 keV (roughly 100 million ) and densities on the order of 10^{20}-10^{22} ions per cm³ in the pinch core, conditions historically approached in pulsed experiments but challenged by rapid instability growth. In Zap Energy's approach, the plasma is initialized via gas puff injection between coaxial electrodes, with the current pulse ionizing and accelerating the gas into a filamentary structure that pinches upon peak current. The resulting compression heats the plasma primarily through ohmic heating and adiabatic processes, aiming for neutron yields and energy gains measurable via diagnostics like neutron cameras and Thomson scattering. While early Z-pinch efforts demonstrated fusion neutrons in the 1950s, modern implementations seek repetitive operation at high repetition rates for net energy production.

Sheared-Flow Stabilization Mechanism

The addresses the primary limitation of conventional : rapid growth of magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities, such as the m=0 sausage mode and m=1 kink mode, which disrupt confinement within microseconds. In Zap Energy's approach, axial flows with shear are introduced to suppress these instabilities, enabling longer-lived plasmas suitable for . This relies on theoretical predictions from extended MHD models, where shear exceeding a —approximately v_z / a > 0.1 k V_A, with v_z as axial velocity, a as shear scale length, k as axial wavenumber, and V_A as Alfvén speed—renders instability growth rates negative or oscillatory due to phase mixing and the Hall effect. Implementation involves a that injects and ionizes fuel gas (e.g., ), accelerating the axially into a pinch assembly region to form a flowing approximately 50–100 cm long and 0.6–1 cm in radius. The resulting velocity profile features higher core flows (~10^5 m/s) decreasing toward the edge (~4×10^4 m/s), yielding a of about 1.9×10^7 s^{-2}. Magnetic compression from the axial current then heats the , while the sheared flow maintains gross stability without external fields or liners. Experimental validation stems from the ZaP Flow Z-pinch apparatus, a precursor to Zap Energy's devices, which demonstrated quiescent stability periods of 31–46 μs—equivalent to over 700 instability growth times (τ_g ≈ 24 ns)—with reduced m=1 mode fluctuations measured via azimuthal magnetic probes and . In Zap's device, this mechanism has sustained plasmas long enough to produce thermonuclear neutrons, confirming fusion-relevant conditions like temperatures exceeding 1 keV. Zap's ongoing Century device scales this to higher currents (up to megamperes) and repetition rates, preserving the for commercial viability.

Development History

Academic Origins

The sheared-flow-stabilized Z-pinch concept underpinning Zap Energy originated in theoretical and experimental plasma physics research at the University of Washington (UW), led by professor Uri Shumlak starting in the 1990s. Shumlak, who joined UW's Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, focused on addressing longstanding magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities that had historically limited Z-pinch viability for fusion, proposing sheared axial plasma flows to induce phase mixing and suppress sausage and kink modes through differential radial velocities. This approach built on classical Z-pinch principles dating to the mid-20th century but innovated by leveraging internal plasma dynamics rather than external fields or liners for stabilization. Experimental validation began with the ZaP Flow apparatus, operational at UW from approximately 1998 to 2012, which injected gas flows to generate sheared velocities and demonstrated pinch plasmas stable for over 700 times the Alfvén time—the theoretical growth timescale for MHD instabilities. Subsequent iterations, including the ZaP-HD (high-energy-density) device, scaled parameters toward fusion conditions, incorporating collaborations with (LLNL) to refine stability diagnostics and modeling. These efforts established for prolonged confinement without reliance on complex magnetic coils, contrasting with approaches. The research progressed to the (Fusion Z-Pinch Experiment) platform around 2016-2017, achieving initial deuteron-deuteron neutron yields and temperatures exceeding 1 keV, confirming thermonuclear conditions in a compact, electrode-driven geometry. 's results, including sustained neutron production over multiple Alfvén times, directly informed Zap Energy's 2017 spinout from the UW team, with Shumlak and technologist Brian A. transitioning key expertise to the company alongside entrepreneur Benj Conway. This academic foundation emphasized simplicity and scalability, prioritizing direct empirical demonstration over simulation-heavy validation prevalent in other paradigms.

Prototype Development (2017-2022)

Zap Energy, established in 2017 as a spin-off from research on sheared-flow-stabilized es, initiated prototype development with the device to demonstrate stable confinement without external magnets. The company secured initial funding through the U.S. Department of Energy's program, enabling construction and testing of early prototypes aimed at achieving high-temperature via pulsed currents up to hundreds of kiloamperes. By 2018, Zap Energy generated its first plasmas in the device, marking the onset of iterative to optimize design, systems, and sheared-flow dynamics for extended pinch lifetimes. Development focused on scaling plasma currents while mitigating instabilities, with experiments confirming sheared-flow stabilization extended plasma durations beyond conventional es, reaching milliseconds in length. In April 2019, researchers reported a in Z-pinch performance, achieving plasma conditions conducive to fusion-relevant densities and temperatures in compact setups. Through 2020-2021, Zap advanced multiple iterations, incorporating improved diagnostics for measuring ion temperatures exceeding 1 keV and refining assembly to handle repetitive pulsing at rates toward 1 Hz. These efforts culminated in demonstrations of thermonuclear fusion in , with confirming production from deuterium-deuterium reactions in March 2022, validating the approach's potential for net energy gain. In June 2022, Zap achieved first in -Q, its fourth-generation designed for conditions with targeted currents of 600 , alongside raising $160 million in Series C funding to support further scaling. This period established the feasibility of modular, low-cost hardware, with devices operating at gaps of approximately 50 cm and pinch radii under 1 cm, paving the way for higher-power testing.

Recent Advances (2023-2025)

In 2023, Zap Energy was selected for the U.S. Department of Energy's Milestone-Based Development , receiving $5 million to advance the design of a based on sheared-flow-stabilized technology. The company's and FuZE-Q prototype devices collectively produced over 5,574 neutron-yielding plasmas, demonstrating operational reliability in repetitive pulsed experiments. By , Zap Energy commissioned the Century platform, a high-repetition-rate test system incorporating liquid-metal cooling for sustained operations toward power plant demonstration. This milestone coincided with $130 million in new funding from investors including and to scale pulsed-power and electrode technologies. Experimental progress included achieving plasma temperatures of 1-3 keV, generating over 10,000 total plasmas across platforms, and enhancing neutron yields through refined sheared-flow stabilization. In early 2025, the Department of Energy certified a key endurance milestone for Century, validating three hours of continuous operation with 1,080 shots at 0.1 Hz repetition rate in a liquid-cooled configuration without component failure. Zap Energy reported isotropic emissions from these plasmas, signaling uniform thermal conditions rather than anisotropic beam-target reactions, which supports stability for net-energy scaling. By September 2025, Century reached 39 kilowatts of average power output at 12 shots per minute (0.2 Hz), marking a twenty-fold advancement in repetition-rate and power-handling capabilities essential for reactors. These results, detailed in peer-reviewed analyses of the platform's 100-kW-scale repetitive operations, underscore progress in mitigating instabilities via multi-electrode control and flow dynamics.

Engineering and Testing

Device Configurations (FuZE and Century)

The (Fusion Z-pinch Experiment) device utilizes a electrode geometry with electrodes, featuring a 50 cm long pinch assembly region and a pinch radius of 0.3 cm. is formed by injecting a gas mixture, such as 20% and 80% , which is ionized and accelerated through the electrode gap to establish sheared axial flows. The system drives currents exceeding 600 kA via a capacitor bank, achieving peak currents around 530 kA. An upgraded version, -Q, commissioned in 2022, employs a simplified two- configuration paired with an enhanced capacitor bank for improved performance. The Century device represents a scaled test platform for repetitive operation, configured as a 100 kW-scale sheared-flow-stabilized system with a vertically oriented chamber modeled directly after the design. It maintains a two-electrode setup but incorporates cooling for electrodes to enable high-power handling and sustained pulsing. Unlike , which uses deuterated fuels for studies, Century operates with protium (regular ) to prioritize testing of repetition rates, cathode durability, and heat extraction without reactions. systems support rates up to 0.2 Hz (12 shots per minute), demonstrated in September 2025, building on a February 2025 milestone of 1,080 continuous shots over three hours at 0.1 Hz. Key differences between and Century lie in operational focus and engineering: emphasizes single-shot or low-repetition diagnostics and temperature records, while Century integrates power plant-relevant features like high repetition and thermal management for eventual commercial scaling. Both share the core two-electrode, linear architecture to minimize complexity compared to multi-electrode predecessors like ZaP.

Pulsed Power and Repetition Rates

Zap Energy's pulsed power systems deliver megaampere-level currents to drive the Z-pinch plasma compression, with each pulse lasting 100–200 microseconds. These systems, which form the largest component of the fusion architecture, incorporate in-house designed pulsed transformers to achieve higher currents and performance compared to prior generations. The first-generation 100 kW power supply (100kWPS-01) has been tested for repeatability and durability, emphasizing insulation, cooling, and topology to withstand billions of shots over a device's lifetime. Early prototypes like operated at low repetition rates, limiting their assessment of high-duty-cycle performance and component endurance. In contrast, the Century platform integrates high-average-power repetitive , targeting nominal rates of 0.1–0.3 Hz to simulate power plant conditions. Demonstrated milestones include 1,000 consecutive pulses at 0.1 Hz (one every 10 seconds) without failure and sustained operation exceeding 100 shots at 0.2 Hz, equivalent to 12 pulses per minute. These rates enable average powers of 30–100 kW during prolonged integrated testing, incorporating loads, liquid metal walls, and resilient electrodes. Future scaling aims for repetition rates supporting hundreds of pulses per minute to achieve baseload output, with hundreds of thousands of daily required for commercial viability. Challenges in high-frequency pulsing include managing loads, , and system synchronization, addressed through iterative engineering of capacitors, switches, and transformers. This repetitive capability is essential for validating the sheared-flow-stabilized under conditions mimicking a net-energy-producing .

Diagnostic and Measurement Techniques

Zap Energy utilizes neutron diagnostics to quantify fusion neutron yields and assess isotropy, providing evidence of thermonuclear reactions in their FuZE and FuZE-Q devices. Plastic scintillator detectors, operated in pulse-counting mode with calibration, measure absolute D-D neutron yields, recording up to 2 × 10^5 neutrons per discharge in initial tests and scaling to over 5 × 10^9 neutrons in recent FuZE-Q shots. Activation detectors, including silver and indium foils, capture neutrons via threshold reactions to yield integrated production rates, enabling comparison with modeled thermonuclear outputs. Multiple scintillator detectors arrayed azimuthally around the pinch axis evaluate neutron energy spectra and angular distribution; 2024 measurements confirmed near-isotropic emission (within 10% deviation) at 2.45 MeV, distinguishing volume-distributed fusion from anisotropic beam-target mechanisms. Thomson scattering serves as a primary optical diagnostic for local (T_e), (n_e), and in the column. A system probes the sheared-flow region, yielding T_e up to 600 eV and n_e around 10^{18} cm^{-3}, with profiles temporally resolved to 10 . These data, spatially correlated with sources via filtered camera , demonstrate T_e elevations exceeding 1 keV during peak , aligning simulations with observed inferred from yields. Total yield integrates as a volume-averaged performance proxy, benchmarking stagnation conditions against metrics like nTτ exceeding 10^{21} keV s/m^3 in optimized discharges. Complementary techniques include fast-ion loss probes and diagnostics to monitor sheared-flow velocities and current profiles, though and data dominate validation of fusion-relevant parameters. temperatures, derived from time-of-flight analysis, reach 3-5 keV, distinct from measurements to highlight non-equilibrium dynamics. These diagnostics, cross-verified against resistive MHD models, underscore the role of flow stabilization in sustaining pinch conditions for milliseconds.

Scientific Achievements

Plasma Temperature Records

In its FuZE device, Zap Energy achieved electron temperatures ranging from 1 to 3 keV—equivalent to 11 to 37 million —measured via optical , with observations taken on the device's axis approximately 20 cm downstream from the . These temperatures, reported in April 2024 and published in , coincide with regions exhibiting reactions, as evidenced by yields exceeding 10^8 neutrons per pulse, and represent the highest electron temperatures documented in a compact system lacking central mechanisms or external magnetic compression. Prior experiments on FuZE established electron temperatures exceeding 2 keV using Thomson scattering, alongside ion temperatures surpassing 2.5 keV, the latter derived from spectroscopic analysis of Doppler broadening in spectral lines. These ion temperature measurements, first reported in 2021 with subsequent confirmations through 2023, provide a lower bound informed by equilibrium assumptions between electron and ion populations, and were achieved during high-performance pinches reaching currents over 500 kA. Earlier prototypes, such as ZaP-HD, recorded ion temperatures up to 0.8 keV under optimized conditions with pinch currents around 150 kA. These temperature records underscore the efficacy of sheared-flow stabilization in sustaining hot, dense plasmas without traditional confinement aids, though direct diagnostics remain challenging due to reliance on indirect inference from spectra or in dynamic pinch environments. No comparable temperature milestones have been publicly detailed for the Century , which prioritizes repetitive operation over peak thermal performance.

Neutron Yield and Isotropy

In sheared-flow-stabilized experiments on Zap Energy's device, deuterium-deuterium (D-D) yields have scaled with , reaching up to approximately 10^{10} s per at currents exceeding 600 , consistent with expectations for thermonuclear rates under measured temperatures above 2.5 keV. Earlier operations at lower voltages, such as -25 yielding average currents of 370 , produced yields around 4 \times 10^7 s per discharge. Sustained production has been observed over durations of about 10 microseconds, spanning thousands of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) times, indicating quasi-steady-state conditions conducive to extended reactivity. Neutron energy measurements provide evidence of thermal behavior, with the majority of yield emitted isotropically during peak phases, distinguishing it from anisotropic beam-target reactions common in unstable pinches. Time-resolved diagnostics on , upgraded for higher resolution, confirmed at elevated voltages—four times prior levels—resulting in doubled currents and enhanced yields, aligning with Maxwellian distributions expected for stable, hot . These findings, detailed in a 2025 publication, validate the sheared-flow stabilization's role in suppressing instabilities that would otherwise produce directional streams, supporting scalability toward higher-energy D-T . Ongoing tests on the FuZE-Q device extend these measurements to greater energies, with preliminary results showing maintained .

Endurance and Power Milestones

In February 2025, the U.S. Department of certified a key endurance milestone for Zap Energy's Century platform, which sustained continuous operations for three hours while delivering 1,080 plasma shots at a repetition rate of 0.1 Hz. This demonstration validated the system's and electrode durability under prolonged cycling, essential for plant viability. By September 2025, Century advanced to higher repetition rates, achieving 12 shots per minute—equivalent to 0.2 Hz—while attaining 39 kilowatts of average power output. This marked a twenty-fold improvement over prior enabling technologies in power handling and stability, leveraging liquid-metal-cooled electrodes to manage heat loads. The platform, designed as the world's first 100-kilowatt-scale repetitive sheared-flow system, integrates high-voltage generation, plasma formation, and thermal management to simulate power plant conditions. Earlier prototypes like contributed foundational endurance data, with over thousands of Z-pinch plasmas generated in 2023 alone, enabling iterative improvements in shot reliability and system uptime. These milestones underscore progress toward commercial-scale operation, though full power plant endurance—requiring megawatt-level outputs at 1 Hz or higher—remains a scaling challenge ahead.

Challenges and Criticisms

Technical Instabilities and Limitations

Traditional configurations suffer from magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities, primarily the m=0 sausage mode, which constricts the column, and the m=1 kink mode, which displaces it azimuthally, leading to rapid disruption of confinement within microseconds. These instabilities arise from current-driven forces in the self-generated azimuthal , limiting lifetimes and preventing sustained conditions. Zap Energy's sheared-flow stabilization mitigates these by introducing axial velocity gradients that suppress growth, achieving global stability for periods 700–2000 times longer than the theoretical growth time for static Z-pinches. Experimental results on the device demonstrate quiescent phases lasting approximately 2 μs with densities around 10^{22} m^{-3}, during which deuterium-deuterium neutrons are produced at rates up to 10^7 per μs. However, this stability is temporary; gross and instabilities emerge at the end of the quiescent period, terminating the pinch and constraining confinement time. Whole-device modeling of highlights additional limitations, as axisymmetric 2D simulations overpredict neutron yields by a factor of ~300% due to the inability to capture non-axisymmetric m=1 modes, which require analysis for accurate representation. The sausage mode is partially controlled by tailoring and profiles along with , but this imposes constraints on achievable gradients, capping performance. Furthermore, phenomena like blowby and endwall flux rebound complicate boundary conditions and reduce efficiency, necessitating enhanced viscous and thermal diffusivities in models. Electrode durability presents a related operational limitation, as the sheared-flow exposes to extreme fluxes, particle bombardment, and irradiation during high- pulses. The , being continuously replenished, faces erosion that could degrade performance over repeated shots, while integrity is challenged by attachments and , potentially exacerbating instabilities if distorts. These factors collectively the of and repetition rates needed for energy gain.

Scaling and Economic Hurdles

Scaling the sheared-flow-stabilized to plants requires overcoming substantial technical obstacles, particularly in achieving stable confinement at higher currents and repetition rates necessary for net energy production. Historical Z-pinch experiments have demonstrated rapid instabilities, and while Zap Energy's approach mitigates these through velocity shear, extending pinch durations and lengths beyond the current ~50 cm laboratory scales to meter-class devices demands validation of theoretical laws under increased energy inputs, where modeling complexities intensify. Electrode durability emerges as a critical limitation, with high-current operation causing erosion that curtails device lifetime; experiments on the FuZE platform highlight the need for advanced materials to support the high duty cycles projected for generation, potentially requiring millions of pulses annually. Pulsed power systems represent another scaling barrier, as transitioning from single-shot to repetitive operation at rates exceeding 100 Hz—demonstrated modestly at 0.2 Hz on the Century device with 39 kW average power—necessitates innovations in compact, high-voltage capacitors and switches capable of handling megajoule-level deliveries without excessive downtime or failure. The Century platform, operational since June 2024, tests sub-scale components like walls for heat management but operates with rather than fuels, underscoring the gap to deuterium-tritium plasmas at gigawatt thermal outputs. Economically, deuterium-tritium fuel dependency poses hurdles due to tritium's and , approximately $30,000 per gram as of 2022, which could elevate operational expenses unless self-sufficiency via breeding blankets is realized—a process reliant on achieving sufficient yields for , yet unproven at Zap's current performance levels. Although the absence of superconducting magnets promises capital expenditures far below projects like ITER's $20-25 billion per GW, the bespoke development of durable electrodes, high-rep-rate power supplies, and tritium handling infrastructure still demands substantial investment, with Zap having raised $327 million by late 2024 but facing the prospect of billions for pilot plants targeting 200 MW electrical output. Broader economic viability hinges on attaining levelized costs competitive with power's projected $0.04/kWh by 2030, amid critiques that fusion's timelines delay contributions to near-term decarbonization.

Broader Fusion Skepticism

Skepticism toward as a viable commercial source persists due to decades of unmet promises despite substantial investments exceeding $50 billion globally since the . Proponents have repeatedly forecasted practical deployment within 20-30 years, yet as of 2024, no device has demonstrated sustained net production at a scale suitable for grid integration, with often described as perpetually "20 years away." This pattern, observed in major programs like the , which faces delays pushing first plasma to 2025 and full deuterium-tritium operation beyond 2035 amid cost overruns from €5 billion to over €20 billion, underscores systemic challenges in translating laboratory milestones into engineering reality. Fundamental technical hurdles amplify doubts, including the absence of a self-sustaining fuel cycle, as natural reserves cannot supply the needed for breeding in reactors without external supplementation that scales poorly. Fusion's , far exceeding that in reactors, accelerates material degradation, requiring divertors and blankets that withstand 14 MeV neutrons while maintaining , a feat unproven at power-plant levels. Moreover, even ignition achievements, such as the Ignition Facility's 2022 demonstration of Q>1 in inertial confinement, demand recirculating power multiples of 10-30 times the output to account for inefficiencies in drivers and conversion systems, rendering net electrical gain elusive without continuous operation absent in pulsed approaches. Economic viability remains contested, with analyses indicating that fusion's capital costs could exceed $10-20 billion per gigawatt of capacity, dwarfing renewables and necessitating values above 10-20 for competitiveness, far beyond current records. Private ventures, including configurations, face amplified scrutiny for accelerating timelines to the , as warned by former communications director Cowley, who in 2024 cautioned against "deceptive hype" that risks eroding public trust akin to past claims. Consensus among experts, including former science advisor , projects commercialization no earlier than 2050, contingent on resolving instabilities, heat exhaust, and self-sufficiency—issues inherent to confinement methods regardless of innovation. This realism tempers enthusiasm, prioritizing empirical validation over speculative abundance narratives.

Business and Funding

Investment Rounds and Capital

Zap Energy has raised a total of $327 million in equity funding across its investment rounds as of September 2024, enabling the development and scaling of its sheared-flow fusion prototypes. The company's first major round was a Series A in August 2020, which secured $6.5 million from investors including Technology Ventures, Lowercarbon Capital, and the Grantham Foundation. This funding supported early experimentation with the device and validation of . In May 2021, Zap Energy closed a $27.5 million Series B round, drawing participation from prior backers and new strategic investors to fund engineering advancements and team expansion. The oversubscribed Series C followed in June 2022, raising $160 million led by Lowercarbon Capital, with key participants including Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Ventures, and DCVC; these proceeds financed the construction of the FuZE-Q prototype and initial power production milestones. Zap Energy's latest Series D round, closed in September 2024, attracted $130 million led by , featuring new investors such as BAM Elevate, , , and the , alongside returning backers; this capital targets demonstration of a net-energy prototype and design.
RoundDateAmount RaisedNotable Investors
Series AAugust 2020$6.5 million Technology Ventures, ,
Series BMay 2021$27.5 millionExisting backers and strategic participants
Series CJune 2022$160 million (lead), Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Ventures, DCVC
Series DSeptember 2024$130 million (lead), BAM Elevate, ,

Key Investors and Partnerships

In September 2024, Zap Energy closed a $130 million Series D funding round led by LLC to support operations of its demonstration power plant system. New investors in this round included BAM Elevate, (associated with ), Mizuho Financial Group, and Plynth Energy. Existing backers participating encompassed , Breakthrough Energy Ventures (backed by ), Technology Ventures, DCVC, Energy Impact Partners, Lowercarbon Capital, Ventures, and The Engine. Earlier funding included a Series C round in 2022 led by Lowercarbon Capital, with participation from Breakthrough Energy Ventures, DCVC, Shell Ventures, and other venture firms such as Valor Equity Partners. These investments reflect interest from energy majors (Chevron, Shell), climate-focused funds (Lowercarbon Capital, Breakthrough Energy Ventures), and general technology investors (DCVC, Addition), totaling over $330 million raised by mid-2025. Key partnerships include technical collaborations with U.S. Department of Energy's through funded Fusion Capability Teams in the BETHE and Fusion Diagnostics programs, aiding prototype development and diagnostics. , as a Series D , positions itself as a strategic to foster collaborations between Zap Energy and industrial entities for and market expansion. A September 2024 U.S.-UAE joint statement highlighted bilateral investment cooperation in Zap Energy as part of broader advanced technology ties, though specifics on operational partnerships remain limited.

Future Prospects

Commercialization Roadmap

Zap Energy's commercialization roadmap prioritizes demonstrating net energy gain (Q > 1), where output exceeds input, as a foundational milestone before scaling to power generation. This involves precise measurement of properties, including temperature, density, and neutron yield, to calculate the and validate gain on experimental devices like . The company published a detailed in 2023 for such assessments, emphasizing empirical verification through neutron diagnostics and energy balance audits to build credibility for subsequent engineering phases. Progression from gain demonstration shifts to high-repetition-rate operations and heat extraction, addressed by the Century , a liquid-metal-cooled test system that began operations in October 2024. Century integrates durability enhancements and rapid pulsing to simulate power plant conditions, targeting sustained yields with wall-plug . This , supported by $130 million in new funding, serves as a to prototype reactors by testing integrated systems like power conversion and cooling under realistic duty cycles. The overall path leverages the sheared-flow-stabilized Z-pinch's inherent —via increased current, pinch length, and advanced fuels—to achieve gigawatt-class output in compact modules, potentially requiring less than $1 billion in capital per plant compared to multi-billion-dollar alternatives. Zap Energy anticipates a plant operational within a decade from , accelerated by DOE Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program awards in and funding for demo systems. Modular design facilitates factory production and grid integration, though full hinges on resolving rates exceeding 1 Hz and neutron-resistant materials.

Comparative Advantages and Risks

Zap Energy's sheared-flow-stabilized approach provides comparative advantages in simplicity and cost over magnetic confinement devices such as tokamaks, which necessitate large-scale superconducting magnets, cryogenic cooling systems, and intricate vacuum vessels to maintain . The configuration leverages self-generated from axial currents, achieving unity —a measure of magnetic —without external coils, resulting in a compact, amenable to and lower . Relative to (ICF) methods, which demand high-energy lasers or particle beams to implode fuel targets, the eschews such drivers, potentially reducing operational complexity and energy input requirements for ignition. Sheared-flow stabilization, induced by differential plasma velocities, extends confinement times beyond traditional Z-pinches, enabling pulsed operation toward engineering breakeven on laboratory-scale devices like FuZE, with projections for scalable current densities up to 100 in future prototypes. This physics-based approach contrasts with the empirical scaling challenges in tokamaks, where disruptions and edge-localized modes demand advanced control systems, and offers a pathway to generation without the facility-scale infrastructure of ICF facilities like the . Notwithstanding these strengths, Z-pinch systems, including Zap's, inherit risks from inherent plasma instabilities such as and modes, which sheared-flow mitigates but has demonstrated only in short-pulse regimes as of experiments. erosion from high-current arcs and neutral gas injection poses material durability challenges, necessitating advanced coatings and handling for repetitive operation, unlike the non-contact confinement in . Scaling to continuous or high-duty-cycle net gain remains unverified, with uncertainties in multi-physics coupling—encompassing flow , resistivity, and —potentially limiting performance compared to more mature programs that have achieved longer confinement times. Broader risks include competition from established low-carbon alternatives like advanced or renewables, where Z-pinch's pulsed nature may complicate grid integration without proven baseload viability.

References

  1. [1]
    About - Zap Energy
    Zap Energy is building a seriously cheap, compact, scalable fusion energy technology with potentially the shortest path to commercially viable fusion.
  2. [2]
    Benj Conway - CEO + Co-Founder of Zap Energy - LinkedIn
    Benj co-founded Zap Energy with Uri Shumlak and Brian Nelson. Experience. Zap Energy Graphic. CEO and Co-Founder. Zap Energy. May 2017 - Present 8 years 6 ...
  3. [3]
    Zap Energy - 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors
    Jul 29, 2025 · Zap Energy is a series D company based in Everett (United States), founded in 2017 by Benjamin Conway, Brian Nelson and Uri Shumlak.
  4. [4]
    Zap Energy - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Zap Energy's fusion technology stabilizes plasma using sheared flows rather than magnetic fields. Driving electric current through the flow creates the ...
  5. [5]
    ARPA-E Investor Update Vol. 2: Zap Energy's Z-Pinch Fusion ...
    Jul 14, 2022 · Zap Energy was founded in 2017 as a spinout from the FuZE (Fusion Z-pinch Experiment) research team at the University of Washington. Prior ...
  6. [6]
    How It Works - Zap Energy
    With their small footprint, lack of emissions and on-demand operations, Zap Energy fusion plants could be located almost anywhere.
  7. [7]
    Zap Energy: Fusion power. No magnets required.
    Zap Energy is building a low-cost, compact and scalable Z-pinch fusion energy system that confines and compresses plasma without the need for expensive and ...Careers · How It Works · About · Newsroom
  8. [8]
    2023 by the Numbers - Zap Energy
    FuZE and FuZE-Q — have generated more than 5,574 neutron-producing plasmas (as of last count).
  9. [9]
    2024 in Review - Zap Energy
    Dec 17, 2024 · Our fusion devices FuZE and FuZE-Q have already produced over 10,000 plasmas in 2024 – nearly double their 2023 output. Both devices also ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Zap Energy achieves 37-million-degree temperatures in a compact ...
    Apr 23, 2024 · Zap Energy is building a low-cost, compact and scalable fusion energy platform that confines and compresses plasma without the need for expensive and complex ...
  11. [11]
    Zap Energy attracts $130M in fresh capital as demo power plant ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · Zap Energy has begun operations of Century, its new high-rep-rate, liquid-metal-cooled fusion test platform, and closed $130 million of fresh capital.
  12. [12]
    DOE Certifies Zap Energy Fusion Technology Milestone
    Feb 25, 2025 · Zap Energy has 150 team members in Seattle and San Diego and is backed by leading financial and strategic investors.
  13. [13]
    Lightning Strikes 12 Times Per Minute on Zap Energy's Century ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · Achievement of 39 kilowatt average power operations marks twenty-fold progress in enabling technologies for Z-pinch fusion power plant.
  14. [14]
    Research - Zap Energy
    Sheared flow stabilization experiments in the ZaP flow Z pinch. U. Shumlak, B. A. Nelson, R. P. Golingo, S. L. Jackson, and E. A. Crawford. Physics of Plasmas ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  15. [15]
    University of Washington spinoff, Zap Energy, on track to power the ...
    Apr 22, 2021 · Brian A. Nelson, Chief Technology Officer and Co-founder of Zap Energy, received his PhD in Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics at the ...
  16. [16]
    Zap Energy - Great Place To Work
    Co-founded by Benj Conway, Brian A. Nelson, and Uri Shumlak in 2017 ... Insights and leadership from our CEO. icon Team · Meet the people who make it ...
  17. [17]
    Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z-Pinch, Simplifying Fusion Energy
    Zap Energy was founded in 2017 by entrepreneur Benj Conway, plasma scientist Uri Shumlak, and fusion technologist Brian A. Nelson, based on research Shumlak and ...
  18. [18]
    Benj Conway - CEO & Co-Founder @ Zap Energy - Crunchbase
    Benj Conway is CEO, President and Co-Founder of Zap Energy. He studied medicine at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, and University College, Oxford.
  19. [19]
    Zap - Lowercarbon Capital
    BENJ CONWAY CEO & CO-FOUNDER ... Benj spent his early career at the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office working across Asia and the Middle East as a diplomat.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  20. [20]
    Zap Energy - Profiles & Contacts
    CEO & Co-Founder. Uri Shumlak Logo. Uri Shumlak. Chief Science Officer & Co-Founder. University of California Berkeley, Nuclear Engineering. Board Member and ...Missing: leadership | Show results with:leadership
  21. [21]
    Zap Energy - CB Insights
    Zap Energy was founded in 2017. Where is Zap Energy's headquarters? Zap Energy's headquarters is located at 2300 Merrill Creek Parkway, Everett. What is Zap ...
  22. [22]
    Zap Energy Website Privacy Policy
    Jun 25, 2024 · Zap Energy has two main facilities near Seattle and is backed by leading financial and strategic investors.About Zap Energy · How We Share Your... · Your Options And Rights...Missing: headquarters | Show results with:headquarters
  23. [23]
    Zap Energy attracts $130M in fresh capital as demo power plant ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · Zap Energy has 150 employees in Seattle and San Diego and is backed by leading financial and strategic investors. Learn more at zapenergy.com.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  24. [24]
    Inside Zap: Fusion pioneer tries to build 'a star in a jar' to ... - GeekWire
    Sep 30, 2025 · Its reactor chamber is about the size of a hot water heater and doesn't require ultra-complex magnets and lasers. “It's this so-called self- ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  25. [25]
    Zap starts up demo fusion power plant system - World Nuclear News
    Oct 10, 2024 · Fusion power developer Zap Energy, based near Seattle, has begun operations of Century, its first fully-integrated demonstration of three major plant-relevant ...Missing: facility details
  26. [26]
    Zap Energy achieves 37-million-degree temperatures in a compact device
    No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    The Zap Energy approach to commercial fusion - AIP Publishing
    Sep 18, 2023 · Zap Energy is a private fusion energy company developing the sheared-flow-stabilized (SFS) Z-pinch concept for commercial energy production.Missing: staff | Show results with:staff
  28. [28]
    Magnetic-Confinement Fusion Without the Magnets - IEEE Spectrum
    Dec 27, 2021 · Zap Energy's Z-pinch design generates magnetic fields without using complex magnetic coils. Zap Energy's approach, which it calls sheared-flow ...
  29. [29]
    The Z-pinch approach to fusion
    Mar 22, 2023 · A technique known as a sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch keeps the hot, dense plasma stable so that fusion can happen efficiently and repeatedly.
  30. [30]
    Z-pinch fusion | Journal of Applied Physics - AIP Publishing
    The Z-pinch configuration offers the promise of a compact fusion device owing to its simple geometry, unity beta, and absence of external magnetic field coils.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Sheared Flow Stabilization of the Z-Pinch - arXiv
    Since both sheared axial and azimuthal flow can reduce the growth of z-pinch instabilities, this evokes the possibility of combining azimuthal and axial flow to ...
  32. [32]
    A 'moving stream': Zap Energy's novel approach to stabilizing fusion
    May 8, 2023 · An innovative approach that treats the plasma within a fusion core as a moving stream rather than a static cloud.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Sheared flow stabilization experiments in the ZaP flow Z pinch
    The diagnostics on the ZaP experiment are designed to measure plasma evolution, equilibrium including flow, and stability. A. Formation of a Z pinch with ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Flow Z-Pinch Lab | at the University of Washington - UW Sites
    The research project investigates the concept of using sheared axial flows to provide complete stability without adversely affecting the advantageous properties ...
  35. [35]
    LLNL scientists confirm thermonuclear fusion in a sheared-flow Z ...
    Mar 7, 2022 · LLNL physicists has proven the existence of neutrons produced through thermonuclear reactions from a sheared-flow stabilized Z-pinch device.
  36. [36]
    A history of the Z pinch: Magnetic compression without magnets
    Mar 22, 2023 · A crushed lightning rod from a kerosene refinery was first used to describe the physics of a Z pinch in 1905.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Extreme Ultraviolet Light Production from a ZaP Flow Z-Pinch Xenon ...
    Each shot activating all 9 gas puff valves of the Flow Z-Pinch experiment uses approximately 10 torr liters of gas, and with a pressure of 801 psig in the ...
  38. [38]
    Flow Z-pinch plasma production on the FuZE experiment
    Nov 3, 2020 · Experimental investigation of shear-flow-stabilized (SFS) Z pinches14,17,18 began on the ZaP experiment at the University of Washington.
  39. [39]
    Zap Energy: a Public-Private Partnership Success Story - ADS
    The sheared-flow-stabilized (SFS) Z-pinch concept, developed at University of Washington with LLNL collaborators, is now on a path to commercialization at ...
  40. [40]
    The Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z-Pinch Approach to Fusion Energy
    Feb 8, 2023 · The Fusion Z-pinch Experiment (FuZE) employs high power-handling electrodes, flexible gas injection, and independently-switched capacitor bank modules.
  41. [41]
    Uncommon Thinkers: Zap's Uri Shumlak wrestles with fusion energy ...
    Nov 12, 2024 · Uri Shumlak, co-founder of Zap Energy and professor in the University of Washington's Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    With first plasmas in next-generation fusion device and fresh capital ...
    Jun 22, 2022 · Zap Energy is building a low-cost, compact and scalable fusion energy platform that confines and compresses plasma without the need for expensive and complex ...
  45. [45]
    DOE award to Zap Energy for fusion pilot plant design
    May 31, 2023 · The DOE's Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program aims to 'help bring fusion toward technical and commercial viability.'
  46. [46]
    Zap Energy lands $5M federal grant and 'vote of confidence' in ...
    May 31, 2023 · May 31, 2023. Zap Energy lands $5M federal grant and 'vote of confidence' in pursuit of fusion power. Zap Energy's inclusion in the Department ...
  47. [47]
    The right kind of neutrons - Zap Energy
    Feb 3, 2025 · The right neutrons for Zap are isotropic, meaning they have the same energy in all directions, indicating thermal fusion, which is stable and ...
  48. [48]
    Full article: Century: Zap Energy's 100-kW-Scale Repetitive Sheared ...
    Zap Energy is developing the sheared-flow-stabilized (SFS) Z-pinch concept for commercial applications. The SFS Z-pinch relies on plasma self-organization, ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Z-pinch fusion - OSTI.GOV
    The Fusion Z-pinch Experiment (FuZE) was designed using coaxial electrodes in a geometry similar to the ZaP device and represents the next progression in the ...
  50. [50]
    Engineering high-frequency fusion - Zap Energy
    Nov 20, 2023 · The power supply that pulses current into the Z pinch is the largest component of the fusion energy system being developed by Zap. ‍ High energy ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Lightning Strikes 12 Times Per Minute on Zap Energy's Century ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · Zap Energy has 150 team members in Seattle and San Diego and is backed by leading financial and strategic investors. SOURCE Zap Energy Inc ...
  52. [52]
    and spatially-resolved neutron production in a sheared-flow ...
    Absolute yields of up to 2 × 10 5 neutrons per discharge are measured with calibrated plastic scintillator detectors operating in pulse-counting mode. Neutron ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  53. [53]
    Neutron Diagnostic Instrumentations for the Fuze Device - IEEE Xplore
    Both detection systems are diagnostics for D-D neutrons on Zap Energy's FuZE Shear-Flow-Stabilized Z-Pinch device. Currently two types of activation detectors ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  54. [54]
    Time-resolved measurement of neutron energy isotropy in a ...
    Ramp up of the current causes the plasma to accelerate and flow into the formation section and form a flowing Z pinch. The coordinate system is defined as ...
  55. [55]
    Operation and results of a Thomson scattering diagnostic on the ...
    A Thomson scattering diagnostic previously fielded on the FuZE device at Zap Energy has been used to measure electron temperature, density, and pressure ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  56. [56]
    Elevated Electron Temperature Coincident with Observed Fusion ...
    We present here elevated electron temperature results spatially and temporally coincident with the plasma neutron source.
  57. [57]
    Advancements in Z-pinch fusion: New insights from plasma pressure ...
    Jul 11, 2024 · The sheared-flow-stabilized Z-pinch configuration uses electric currents to generate magnetic fields that assemble and compress a flowing ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Fusion Gain and Triple Product for the Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z ...
    The triple product of density, temperature, and energy confinement time n ⁢ T ⁢ 𝜏 is often used as a proxy measure to compare the performance of various fusion ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Whole Device Modeling of the FuZE Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z Pinch
    Jan 18, 2024 · The FuZE sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch at Zap Energy is simulated using whole-device modeling employing an axisymmetric resistive magnetohydrodynamic ...
  60. [60]
    Whole device modeling of the fuze sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch
    Apr 30, 2024 · The FuZE sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch at Zap Energy is simulated using whole-device modeling employing an axisymmetric resistive magnetohydrodynamic ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    The Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z-Pinch Approach to Fusion Energy
    ... Zap Energy Inc. ... We've recently achieved record pinch currents, > 600 kA, electron temperature> 2 keV, ion temperature> 2.5 keVand neutron yield> 2e8/pulse.
  65. [65]
    Time-resolved measurement of neutron energy isotropy in a ... - arXiv
    Aug 9, 2024 · The FuZE device operated at -25~kV charge voltage has resulted in average plasma currents of 370~kA and D-D fusion neutron yields of 4\times10^7 ...Missing: Zap | Show results with:Zap<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Sustained Neutron Production from a Sheared-Flow Stabilized Pinch
    The sheared-flow stabilized Z pinch has demonstrated long-lived plasmas with fusion-relevant parameters. We present the first experimental results demonstrating ...Missing: Uri | Show results with:Uri<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Zap Energy's nuclear device brings US closer to limitless energy
    Feb 4, 2025 · Armed with a BA in History (Honors) from St. Stephen's College, Delhi University, and a PG diploma in Journalism from the Indian Institute ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    [PDF] THE ZAP FLOW Z-PINCH: PLASMA FLOW SHEAR AND STABILITY
    The probable stabilizing mechanism is radial shear in the axial plasma flow. The axially flowing Z-pinch is generated with a coaxial accelerator coupled to ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Thermonuclear Fusion in an Equilibrium Z Pinch
    Sep 23, 2021 · Gross kink & sausage instabilities appear at the end of the quiescent period. Pulse 40127041. Visible emission images are obtained of the pinch, ...
  70. [70]
    The Zap Energy approach to commercial fusion - AIP Publishing
    Sep 18, 2023 · The m¼ 0 “sausage” instability can be tamed by simply limiting the pressure gradient below the stability threshold.34. Of course, this places ...
  71. [71]
    Electrode durability and sheared-flow-stabilized Z-pinch fusion energy
    Oct 5, 2023 · The sheared-flow-stabilized (SFS) Z-pinch concept is on a path to commercialization at Zap Energy. Recent experiments on the Fusion Z-pinch ...
  72. [72]
    ZAP Energy News - Talk-Polywell.org
    Dec 27, 2021 · Z-pinch scaling is so insane and plasma modeling so difficult the device needs to be built to really know (they do have a model for the plasma ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Zap Energy Hopes to Build a Fusion Power Plant in Under a Decade
    Dec 26, 2023 · In order to generate electricity, Zap Energy plans to use tritium, which is great for fusion but happens to be wildly expensive costing about ...
  74. [74]
    News Archive - Zap Energy
    Fusion company Zap Energy today shared news on progress with its power plant system demo and gave details on the investors of its $130 million round. 10.9.24.
  75. [75]
    Fusion projected cost per KWH vs Solar and storage? - Reddit
    Mar 5, 2024 · A quick google for solar power cost projections turns up numbers like 0.04$ per KWH, for solar by 2030, and 5 cents per KWH for concentrated thermal solar with ...What are the biggest hurdles facing companies like Helion, CFS and ...Will fusion energy really be "cheap" for consumers? - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  76. [76]
    Nuclear Fusion: The State of Play - EUVC | The European VC
    Nov 27, 2024 · Cost: ITER's estimated cost is $20–25 billion per GW, with private companies targeting $2–5 billion for 100–500 MW plants and Levelized Costs of ...
  77. [77]
    Commentary: Fusion skepticism follows a century of genius, fraud ...
    Dec 16, 2022 · Fusion skeptics also delighted in pointing out that decades of research had never managed to achieve a so-called "net-energy gain." Anytime ...
  78. [78]
    What Is the Future of Fusion Energy? | Scientific American
    Jun 1, 2023 · Most experts agree that we're unlikely to be able to generate large-scale energy from nuclear fusion before around 2050.
  79. [79]
    Is the dream of nuclear fusion dead? Why the international ...
    Aug 3, 2024 · Cost overruns, Covid, corrosion of key parts, last-minute redesigns and confrontations with nuclear safety officials triggered delays that mean ...
  80. [80]
    Fusion reactors: Not what they're cracked up to be
    Apr 19, 2017 · To sum up, fusion reactors face some unique problems: a lack of a natural fuel supply (tritium), and large and irreducible electrical energy ...
  81. [81]
    Understanding the promise and peril of fusion power
    Mar 23, 2022 · For fusion to be a practical solution to our energy woes, several multiples of Q will have to be achieved in a continuously operating plant, and ...
  82. [82]
    Understanding the promise and peril of fusion power: Chimera or ...
    Mar 7, 2022 · For fusion to be a practical solution to our energy woes, several multiples of Q will have to be achieved in a continuously operating plant, and ...Missing: failed | Show results with:failed
  83. [83]
    Stop fusion energy hype, says former head of communications at ITER
    Jan 11, 2024 · The former head of communications at ITER has warned that the fusion energy industry is engaging in risky and potentially deceptive hype over the technology.
  84. [84]
    Is Fusion Commercialization in Sight? Not Yet, Says John Holdren
    Apr 3, 2024 · Great progress on nuclear fusion has been made, but commercialization of the technology before 2050 is unlikely, said John Holdren during a ...
  85. [85]
    Zap Energy investors in recent $130M round included Soros Fund ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · Zap Energy recently closed a $130 million funding round, bringing the total to $327 million, according to PitchBook.
  86. [86]
    Zap Energy 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Funding & Investors
    Where is Zap Energy headquartered? Zap Energy is headquartered in Everett, WA. What is the size of Zap Energy? Zap Energy has 150 total employees ...Missing: facilities | Show results with:facilities
  87. [87]
    Zap Energy closes Series A raising $6.5m - FusionXInvest
    Zap Energy has closed it Series A funding round raising $6.5m. Investors included Lowercarbon Capital, Grantham Foundation, and Chevron Technology Ventures, ...
  88. [88]
  89. [89]
    Zap Energy nets $160M Series C to advance its lightning-in-a-bottle ...
    a $160 ...Missing: hurdles | Show results with:hurdles
  90. [90]
    Zap Energy investors in recent $130M round included Soros Fund ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · The company recently closed a $130 million round, according to an SEC filing, bringing the total to $327 million.
  91. [91]
    Zap Energy confirms $130M round, shares progress on its demo ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · Fusion company Zap Energy today shared news on progress with its power plant system demo and gave details on the investors of its $130 million round.
  92. [92]
    Driving industrial competitivene... - Mizuho Financial Group
    Apr 4, 2025 · Through our investment in Zap Energy, Mizuho aims to be a strategic partner bringing about collaboration between Zap Energy and Japanese ...
  93. [93]
    U.S.-UAE Joint Leaders' Statement on Investment in Zap Energy
    Sep 23, 2024 · The leaders affirmed the enduring U.S.-UAE strategic and defense partnership, bolstered areas of deepening cooperation in advanced technology ...Missing: collaborations | Show results with:collaborations
  94. [94]
    Zap Energy charts roadmap for measuring fusion gain
    Jun 5, 2023 · Zap Energy has over one hundred team members in two facilities near Seattle and is backed by leading financial and strategic investors. Visit Zap ...
  95. [95]
    Fusion in Washington- Companies Have Big Plans
    Jun 3, 2025 · In 2023, the company was selected as one of eight commercial ventures to participate in the U.S. Department of Energy's Milestone-Based Fusion ...
  96. [96]
    ARPA-E Investor Update Vol. 23: Zap Energy's Fusion Power Plant ...
    Oct 16, 2024 · On October 9, 2024, ARPA-E awardee Zap Energy announced the commencement of operations for Century, their new high-rep-rate, liquid-metal-cooled fusion test ...
  97. [97]
    Engineering Paradigms for Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z-Pinch Fusion ...
    Jun 12, 2023 · The Z-pinch configuration offers the promise of a compact fusion device owing to its simple geometry, unity beta, and absence of external magnetic field coils.<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    Hot enough, dense enough, for long enough: Fusion's triple product
    May 30, 2023 · Usually that means over 180 million degrees Fahrenheit, far hotter than most stars. That creates the essential conditions where atoms shed ...Missing: FuZE | Show results with:FuZE
  99. [99]
    Electrode Technology Development for the Sheared-Flow Z-Pinch ...
    Like traditional Z-pinch approaches, the SFS Z-pinch drives electrical current through a plasma to create magnetic fields that compress and heat the plasma ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles