Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Appalachian English

Appalachian English is a group of dialect varieties of American English spoken primarily in the central and southern Appalachian Mountains region, spanning parts of West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, North Carolina, and adjacent areas. This dialect emerged from the settlement patterns of Scots-Irish, English, and German immigrants beginning in the 1730s, who migrated southward along the Appalachian frontier, blending their speech forms with subsequent American innovations. Unlike popular myths portraying it as an unchanged relic of Elizabethan English, empirical linguistic analysis reveals Appalachian English as a dynamic variety incorporating both retained archaic elements—such as certain grammatical structures—and novel features developed in the New World context. Key phonological characteristics include the pin-pen merger, where vowels in words like "pin" and "pen" are pronounced similarly; monophthongization of diphthongs, as in "ride" sounding like "rah'd"; and variable non-rhoticity in some subregions, alongside consistent "-ing" as "-in'" (g-dropping). Grammatically, it features distinctive elements like a-prefixing (e.g., "She's a-goin' to the store"), perfective "done" for completed actions (e.g., "He done finished it"), and existential "they" constructions (e.g., "They's a lot of work to do"), which reflect both Scots-Irish influences and independent evolutions not found uniformly elsewhere in . Lexically, terms like "poke" for or "reckon" for think derive from dialects but many, such as "bald" for a treeless mountaintop, originated in American usage within the region. Sociolinguistic studies highlight English's variation by , , and locality, with working-class speakers retaining more marked features, though the faces in educational and contexts that often undervalue its systematic rules. Research by linguists like Walt Wolfram and Michael Montgomery underscores its role in broader patterns while documenting unique Appalachian innovations, countering isolationist narratives with evidence of ongoing contact and change.

Geographic Distribution and Demographics

Regional Boundaries and Variability

Appalachian English encompasses the central and southern portions of the Appalachian mountain system, extending from parts of southern through , , , , , , , , , , , and into northern Mississippi, comprising approximately 423 counties as defined by the . The core dialect area concentrates in , eastern , western , and eastern , where traditional features persist most robustly due to historical settlement patterns in isolated valleys and plateaus. Boundaries remain imprecise and gradient, as migration—particularly out-migration from rural to urban areas—has diffused features into adjacent regions like the and Midwest, blurring distinctions through dialect leveling. Internal variability manifests across subregions divided roughly into Northern, Middle, and Southern , with Northern encompassing southern and northern , Middle focusing on central and eastern , and Southern covering western , eastern , and northern . These divisions correlate with physiographic features, such as the narrower in the south fostering more uniform variants compared to the broader in central areas, where terrain-induced isolation preserved localized speech patterns longer. Surveys of self-reported usage indicate a perceptual core in central-southern zones, with Northern speakers less likely to identify strongly with traditional forms than Southern counterparts, reflecting differential exposure to external linguistic influences via proximity to non-Appalachian dialects. Empirical mapping from projects like the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States reveals feature distributions as clines rather than discrete borders, with higher incidences of archaic retentions in remote ridge-top communities versus transitional valleys adjacent to lowland dialects. This gradient nature underscores how topographic barriers, such as steep ridges and narrow hollers, historically constrained intercourse between settlements, allowing subregional divergence while modern mobility erodes sharp divides.

Speaker Populations and Socioeconomic Factors

Appalachian English is spoken by an estimated 13 to 25 million individuals across the region, which encompasses parts of states and had a total population of approximately 26.1 million as of 2020. Speakers are disproportionately concentrated in rural counties, where the dialect maintains stronger presence amid lower rates of compared to national averages. These areas exhibit median household incomes of around $64,588, representing 82% of the U.S. figure, alongside persistently higher rates—particularly among those under 25, at 19.2% to 22.1%—correlating with limited economic diversification beyond traditional sectors like and . Dialect retention correlates with socioeconomic isolation, as lower levels—contributing up to 10 percentage points to gaps—preserve linguistic features in communities with reduced to English via or . However, no evidence establishes direct causation between the dialect and ; rather, geographic barriers and historical economic dependencies foster both cultural persistence and independently. Rural speakers face dialect stigma in educational and professional settings, potentially exacerbating mobility challenges, though improvements in regional education and since 2010 have narrowed some disparities without altering core retention patterns in isolated locales. Demographic trends indicate an aging speaker base, with the region's median age reaching 41.3 years by 2023, outpacing youth influx and signaling potential dilution of traditional forms. Heavy out-migration, especially of younger residents from rural counties, has led to declines of up to 18% in some states like between 1990 and 2010, further straining intergenerational transmission. Linguistic surveys reveal variability in and grammatical features across generations, with urban-bound youth showing reduced adherence to markers like monophthongization, attributable to educational and external influences rather than deliberate shift. Projections suggest accelerated depopulation in coalfield areas by 2050, potentially halving some county populations and weakening dialect vitality absent countervailing in-migration.

Phonological Characteristics

Vowel Shifts and Qualities

Appalachian English features prominent monophthongization of the /aɪ/, where words like "ride" are realized as [rɑːd] rather than [raɪd], as evidenced by acoustic analyses measuring trajectories in spectrograms from sociolinguistic interviews in eastern . This process, part of the Southern Vowel Shift's first stage, shows Euclidean distances approaching zero between onset and glide in rooted speakers, with monophthongal tokens reaching 90-100% in pre-voiceless contexts for some individuals. While /aʊ/ exhibits less consistent monophthongization, retaining a al quality starting near [ɑ] and gliding toward a centralized [ʊ]-like in many speakers, variation ties to local identity rather than age or gender. The pin-pen merger, merging /ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasals to [ɪ̃] or [ɛ̃], occurs widely in varieties, aligning with broader ern patterns observed in surveys where production data from hundreds of speakers confirm high incidence in rural inland regions. Acoustic realizations vary between [ɪ] and [ɛ] targets without strong geographic stratification within the , but the merger's prevalence in —evident in Upper Southern subregions—distinguishes it from non-merging dialects to the north. Unlike urban Northern dialects undergoing the Northern Cities Shift, Appalachian English avoids chain shifts involving raised /æ/ or lowered /ɑ/, instead preserving and advancing Southern Vowel Shift stages, including /aɪ/ monophthongization and front vowel reversals, as tracked across generations in Plateau communities via plots from 30 speakers born 1884-1985. This retention of pre-shift Southern qualities, with 100% of studied speakers exhibiting mid-front vowel reversals and emerging /i/-lowering post-1930, underscores varieties' alignment with rural Southern over Northern innovations.

Consonant Patterns and Incidence

Appalachian English features intervocalic of alveolar stops /t/ and /d/, where these consonants are realized as a brief [ɾ] between vowels, as in "" pronounced [ˈsɪɾi] or "ladder" as [ˈlæɾɚ]. This process, common across North American varieties, has been acoustically analyzed in speakers, showing flap realization influenced by and quality, with durations distinguishing flaps from full stops in words like "whatever." Consonant cluster reduction is prevalent, especially in final clusters involving /t/ or /d/, such as /nt/ or /nd/, where the stop is frequently deleted (e.g., "first" as [fɜrs] or "hand" as [hæn]). Field studies report deletion rates of approximately 90% before following consonants and 30% before vowels, higher than in many mainstream varieties, based on conversational data from rural communities. This reduction extends to medial clusters and past-tense -ed endings, distinguishing Appalachian speech from standard forms while aligning with vernacular patterns observed in sociolinguistic corpora. Rhoticity, the pronunciation of /r/ in post-vocalic positions, characterizes most Appalachian varieties, with speakers typically retaining [ɹ] in words like "car" [kɑɹ] or "bird" [bɜɹd], unlike non-rhotic Southern coastal dialects. However, non-rhotic or variably rhotic realizations persist in isolated pockets, particularly among older speakers in certain valleys, where /r/ may be dropped or weakened (e.g., "far" as [fɑː]), contradicting claims of uniform rhoticity across the region. Additional allophonic variations include L-vocalization, where coda /l/ shifts to or [oʊ] (e.g., "" as [koʊ] or "" as [skuw]), more frequent in casual speech and receding among younger urban migrants. Word-medial /z/ before nasals assimilates to or [d͡ʒ] (e.g., "" as [ˈbɪdnəs]), a context-dependent process tied to speech rate, documented in phonetic analyses of natural . These patterns emerge variably by , , and , with field recordings emphasizing their embedding in rapid, conversational contexts rather than isolated .

Grammatical Structures

Pronouns, Demonstratives, and Possessives

In Appalachian English, the third-person singular neuter "it" frequently appears as "" in subject position, especially when stressed or sentence-initial, reflecting h-prothesis from older Scots-Irish and English varieties. This alternation is documented in speech samples from the Southern Appalachians, where "" serves as the nominative form in elicited contexts such as "Hit's rainin' hard today." Demonstratives deviate from Standard American English through the use of objective "them" as a plural form equivalent to "those," often in constructions like "them thar hills" or "Pass me them tools." This feature, traced to 14th-century English precedents and reinforced by Ulster Scots immigration, functions as both determiner and pronoun in informal registers. Sociolinguistic interviews in West Virginia communities reveal its primary alternation with "those" rather than "these," with quantitative analysis indicating higher rates among older speakers—up to consistent use in apparent-time cohorts born before 1950—followed by a sharp intergenerational decline as younger speakers favor standard alternatives amid stigma and leveling. Possessive pronouns exhibit independent forms suffixed with -n in absolute positions, yielding "hisn," "hern," "yourn," "ourn," and "theirn," patterned after the analogy of "" to distinguish from adjectival uses. These occur in disjunctive phrases like "That's hisn, not yourn," but rarely before nouns, as in avoiding "hern book." Elicited data from Smoky Mountain speech corpora confirm their retention in rural, older informants' narratives, though frequency diminishes in structured interviews, signaling conservative vernacular markers tied to historical nasal suffixes in dialects.

Verb Morphology and Syntax

Appalachian English features double modals, constructions combining two verbs such as might could, may can, or might would, which layer modalities for nuanced expression of possibility, permission, or . These occur primarily in informal speech, with might could conveying epistemic possibility alongside , as in "He might could fix it," reflecting a pragmatic softening not fully captured by single modals in . Corpus analysis from the 1.2-billion-word Corpus of North American Spoken English (CoNASE) identifies double modals concentrated in Southern U.S. dialects, including varieties, with naturalistic frequencies showing might can as more common than might could in some datasets, though the latter predominates in older recordings at rates up to 0.5 per 1,000 occurrences. A-prefixing marks progressive aspect on verbs, attaching the prefix a- to present participles, as in "She's a-going to town" or "It was a-raining hard," deriving from adverbial prefixes rather than Scots-Irish or influences as once hypothesized. This construction emphasizes ongoing action and is restricted to dynamic verbs, excluding statives, with syntactic constraints barring it before noun phrases or in non-progressive contexts. Historical evidence traces it to 17th- and 18th-century southern settler speech, preserved in isolation but absent in urbanizing areas, with usage varying by rurality and age in modern surveys. Perfective done functions as an for completed actions, as in "I done went home" or "They done ate already," adding emphasis to past perfect or events beyond standard have-auxiliary forms. Sociolinguistic studies from the document higher frequencies among older speakers, with occurrences dropping from over 20% in elderly rural informants to near zero in younger groups, indicating age-graded decline driven by and exposure. Recent analyses confirm this pattern persists, with perfective done stigmatized and receding in urban-adjacent communities, though retained in conservative rural pockets for emphatic narrative effect.

Nominal Constructions and Adverbs

Appalachian English employs distinctive nominal constructions for quantifying indefinite amounts, often using partitive phrases with nouns as measures of abundance rather than precise counts. Common examples include a heap of, a mess of, and a passel of, which denote large, unspecified quantities in contexts like food preparation or gatherings. For instance, a mess of greens refers to a substantial serving or collection of , while a passel of children indicates a group of unspecified size; these structures derive from older Southern English practices and persist in traditional speech patterns documented in regional linguistic analyses. Certain or nouns in Appalachian English exhibit atypical treatment, where historically plural forms function as singulars, yielding constructions interpretable as double plurals. A documented case is a cattle, used to denote a single animal from a , reflecting a semantic shift that blurs count-mass distinctions and aligns with conservative usages in isolated communities. This pattern underscores a preference for concrete, experiential categorization over standardized grammatical ity, as observed in Smoky Mountain varieties. Adverbs in Appalachian English frequently serve intensification and approximation, particularly in expressing or . The adverb right acts as a versatile equivalent to "very" or "quite," as in right smart (meaning "a considerable amount") or right young (meaning "very young"), with usage rates higher in older rural speakers per sociolinguistic surveys. Similarly, powerful amplifies nouns or adjectives, yielding powerful many for "a great many," emphasizing hyperbolic rooted in Scots-Irish influences. Other forms like tolerable convey moderate intensification ("fairly" or "somewhat"), as in tolerable good, prioritizing contextual nuance over precision. These adverbial strategies facilitate vivid, scalar descriptions tied to everyday measurement and evaluation.

Lexical Inventory

Distinctive Terms and Semantic Fields

Appalachian English maintains a lexicon distinguished by terms rooted in everyday rural existence, many of which preserve older Scots-Irish or Elizabethan English usages while others represent regional innovations adapted to mountainous terrain and agrarian practices. The Dictionary of Southern Appalachian English, drawing from over 10,000 entries compiled from historical records, oral histories, and field data, documents vocabulary that emphasizes practicality over standardization, with frequent retentions like poke—a small bag or sack, derived from Middle English pok via Scots dialects and used for carrying groceries or game—contrasting with innovations tied to local ecology. Usage surveys in the Smoky Mountains indicate poke persists in 70-80% of rural speakers over age 50, declining among younger urban migrants due to commercial standardization. In agricultural semantic fields, terms reflect subsistence farming and preservation techniques suited to the region's climate. Tater hole denotes a dug-out cellar or pit beneath floors for storing potatoes (taters, a phonetic variant of "potatoes") through winter, preventing spoilage in uninsulated homes; this practice, verified in 19th-century farm ledgers from eastern , underscores adaptive storage absent in flatter terrains. Similarly, britches for trousers or overalls, from breeches, often pairs with context-specific modifiers like "tin britches" for rain gear made from metal, highlighting material improvisation in wet Appalachian soils. Kinship and social terms extend plural pronouns innovatively, such as younse (or youns'es), a form of "you all" or "you ones," used as in "younse's young'uns" to denote collective belongings; this evolves from Scots-Irish you uns, with dialect corpora showing 60% frequency in multi-generational households for emphasizing communal ties over individualistic equivalents. Yarb, a dialectal pronunciation of "," applies to wild medicinals like or gathered for remedies, retaining 17th-century (yerb > yarb) and documented in herbalist records from the 1800s as central to healing in isolated hollers. Topographical lexicon captures the rugged landscape, with referring to a sheltered valley or hollow flanked by ridges—distinct from broader Southern "bottoms"—and bald for unforested summits like Roan Mountain's grassy balds, terms retained from settler surveys in the 1700s and used in 90% of navigational descriptions in dialect atlases. These features illustrate retentions versus innovations: while cove echoes Scots topography, bald innovates to describe unique high-elevation meadows, with etymological ties to "bare" landforms verified in geological ethnographies.

Borrowings and Innovations

Appalachian English features lexical borrowings primarily from the Scots-Irish (Ulster Scots) heritage of early settlers, including terms like airish ("chilly" or "cool") and brickle ("brittle" or "fragile"). These reflect the vernacular of 18th-century immigrants from northern and , who comprised a significant portion of the region's initial European population between 1717 and 1775. Other examples include discomfit ("to inconvenience" or "embarrass") and uses of ill to denote bad-tempered behavior, preserving semantic shifts uncommon in English. Direct borrowings from Native American languages remain limited in core vocabulary, despite historical interactions with groups like the ; common influences appear more in place names and medicinal practices than everyday lexicon. One notable adoption is sang, a vernacular shortening for ( quinquefolius), a root harvested in Appalachian forests since at least the late for export to Asian markets via knowledge of its properties. This term, alongside indicators like sang master and sang granny for companion plants aiding location, emerged from 19th-century foraging economies rather than direct linguistic loans. Lexical innovations in Appalachian English often stem from regional topography, agriculture, and industries like coal mining, producing terms adapted to specific contexts absent elsewhere. Examples include bald for a treeless mountaintop and spring house for a structure cooling perishables over a water source, addressing mountainous isolation and self-sufficiency needs. In mining communities, specialized vocabulary developed, such as conveyors for mechanized coal-hauling systems in underground operations, reflecting technological adaptations from the late 19th century onward. Linguistic surveys, including the Dictionary of American Regional English, document these as post-settlement creations, with innovation rates varying by subdomain: higher in occupational lexica (e.g., 20-30% unique mining terms in coal-field subsets per regional corpora) compared to conservative retention of agrarian archaisms. This balance counters isolation myths, showing dynamic evolution influenced by economic shifts like the 1880s coal boom.

Historical Origins and Development

Early Settlement and Scots-Irish Foundations

During the , waves of settlers from , primarily Scots-Irish Protestants, migrated to the American colonies, with over 200,000 arriving between 1710 and 1775, the largest numbers initially landing in . These migrants, facing economic pressures like poor harvests and high rents in Ulster, sought affordable land on the frontier. Historical records indicate that Scots-Irish formed the backbone of early settlement, pushing southward from Pennsylvania into the backcountry regions of , , and beyond. The primary route for this expansion was the Great Valley Road, also known as the , which facilitated movement down the starting in the 1730s and intensifying after 1744. By the late 1750s, these settlers had reached the foothills of the Appalachians in present-day and eastern , establishing communities in isolated valleys and ridges. Genealogical and settlement records from areas like confirm that emigrants constituted the largest proportion of these early inhabitants, outnumbering other groups in key frontier counties. While multi-ethnic elements were present, including settlers in northern valleys and English from coastal areas, Scots-Irish dominance prevailed in the core uplands, shaping the region's demographic and cultural substrate. Their varieties of English, influenced by Lowland Scots and dialects, formed the primary linguistic foundation. Scots-Irish cultural traits, such as strong networks akin to clannishness and a reliance on oral traditions for and music, promoted the intergenerational transmission of speech patterns in these remote communities. These practices, rooted in their Border Scots , emphasized family loyalty and verbal , contributing to the retention of distinctive phonological and lexical features from their origins.

Myths of Isolation and Archaic Preservation

The notion that Appalachian English represents a preserved relic of Elizabethan English, often termed the "time capsule" or "Shakespearean" hypothesis, stems from early 20th-century folklore and romanticized portrayals emphasizing geographic seclusion in the Appalachian Mountains. This view posits that isolation from lowland populations since the 18th century halted linguistic evolution, retaining 16th-century forms like those in Shakespeare's works. However, comparative historical linguistics demonstrates that purported archaic features, such as aorist present participles (e.g., "the house needs cleaned"), occur in Scots-Irish substrates but not uniquely as Elizabethan survivals; they align more closely with post-1700 innovations in Ulster Scots dialects influencing American varieties. Key grammatical constructions, including double modals like "might could" or "may can," exemplify American innovations rather than archaic retentions. These structures, documented in and Southern U.S. English from the late 19th century onward, absent from 16th-century corpora, emerged through contact-induced in colonial American contexts, possibly originating in before regionally. Linguistic atlases, such as the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and (LAMSAS) from surveys conducted 1933–1972, reveal double modals concentrated in the , including , but with isoglosses indicating post-settlement spread rather than isolated preservation. Similarly, quotative "be like" (e.g., "He was like, 'Hello'"), once claimed as a modern intrusion, entered speech via from urban Southern centers in the mid-20th century, contradicting total isolation. Empirical evidence from migration records and settlement patterns refutes strict isolation, showing bidirectional contact with lowland Southern populations through trade routes, seasonal labor, and intermarriage since the early 1800s. For instance, 19th-century census data from eastern and western document population exchanges with and Tidewater regions, facilitating lexical and phonological diffusion, such as shared rhoticity preservation influenced by broader Southern norms rather than medieval British retentions. Diffusion models in dialect geography, applied to (ANAE) data from 1990s fieldwork, confirm Appalachian English participates in U.S.-wide innovations like the Northern Cities peripherally and Southern centrally, features absent in Elizabethan English but developed in 20th-century contexts. These shared post-colonial developments underscore dynamic evolution over static preservation, with isolation serving more as a cultural than a causal mechanism for the dialect's traits.

Evolutionary Changes and Influences

The industrialization of , particularly the boom from the late through the mid-20th century, introduced significant demographic shifts that influenced local English varieties. Migration to coalfields drew workers from diverse regions, including from the between 1870 and 1930, as well as immigrants, fostering dialect contact in company towns and urbanizing areas. This contact contributed to koineization processes, where competing linguistic variants leveled toward shared forms, especially in fringe urban centers like , or , where rural Appalachian speakers interacted with Midland and Southern English influences. Such mixing stabilized certain innovative features while diluting others, as evidenced by diachronic analyses of speech patterns in mixed communities. Diachronic studies reveal ongoing feature loss in Appalachian English, particularly among younger speakers exposed to , , and mobility. The perfective done, used to mark completed actions (e.g., "She done finished"), exhibited higher frequencies in older generations but declined sharply by the early ; for instance, a 1975 study of Appalachian speakers found 26 occurrences among those over 40 versus only 3 among children aged 8-11, while a 2006 West Virginia corpus showed zero instances across 21 speakers aged 15-90+. This generational shift, documented across 50 years of quantitative data, reflects partial standardization rather than total erosion, with some dialects retaining variability amid broader convergence toward General American norms. Urban fringe koineization has further accelerated these changes, blending Appalachian traits with adjacent varieties through commuting and economic integration. In areas like southern Indiana's Appalachian-influenced pockets, verbal -s marking (e.g., "they goes") persists but shows reduced intensity compared to core rural zones, attributable to contact with non-Appalachian migrants post-industrialization. Overall, these evolutionary pressures—migration, urbanization, and cultural exposure—have promoted feature leveling without eliminating the dialect's core distinctiveness, as confirmed by longitudinal sociolinguistic surveys.

Comparisons to Other Dialects

Similarities with Ozark English

Appalachian English and Ozark English exhibit notable similarities stemming from parallel settlement patterns by Scots-Irish immigrants in the 18th and early 19th centuries, with many Ozark settlers migrating westward from regions starting in the late , preserving shared dialectal traits through geographic in mountainous terrains. Both varieties draw heavily from Scots grammatical influences, including existential "they" constructions and specialized uses of "," which distinguish them from surrounding American Englishes. Comparative studies, such as those analyzing data from the Linguistic Atlas projects, confirm these parallels in rural communities, where minimized external leveling influences. Grammatical features overlap significantly, including a-prefixing on present participles (e.g., "a-beggin'"), which appears in narratives from both regions as a stylistic device for emphasis, as documented in Ozark-specific analyses alongside Appalachian patterns. The "liketa" construction, denoting near-misses or avertives (e.g., "He liketa died"), occurs in both dialects, reflecting shared innovative syntax not found as prominently elsewhere. Additional commonalities include completive "done" (e.g., "I done told you"), double modals like "might could," and positive "anymore" for current states, alongside irregular verb forms and variable subject-verb agreement (e.g., "Them boys likes..."). Phonological traits also align, with archaic pronunciations such as "heerd" for "heard," "deef" for "deaf," and "chimley" for "chimney" preserved in both, alongside patterns of vowel shifts and centralization in stressed syllables that deviate from General American norms. These phonetic overlaps, observed in atlas-based comparisons, underscore the dialects' retention of 17th-18th century substrates, particularly Scots-Irish, rather than later innovations. Such shared elements highlight Ozark English as a westward extension of varieties, with minimal divergence due to comparable sociohistorical trajectories.

Divergences from General American and Southern Englishes

Appalachian English retains grammatical features that diverge from the simplifications characteristic of , preserving structures rooted in earlier English varieties rather than adopting standardized forms. Notable examples include a-prefixing on present participles (e.g., "She's a-comin'" instead of "She's coming"), which marks progressive aspect in ways absent from . Double modals, such as "might could" or "used to could," allow nuanced modality expressions not found in General American's single-modal system. Perfective done functions as a marker of completed action (e.g., "He done left" for emphatic past completion), contrasting with 's reliance on tenses without such auxiliaries. These retentions reflect diachronic from 18th-century Scots-Irish and English inputs, rather than synchronic leveling toward . Phonologically, Appalachian English exhibits divergences from General American through heightened monophthongization of /aɪ/ across contexts (e.g., "bite" as [ba:t]), more pervasive than in standardized varieties, alongside consistent pin-pen merger (/ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasals, e.g., "pen" and "pin" pronounced alike). The cot-caught merger varies subregionally, present in northern but absent southward, differing from General American's widespread merger. Compared to broader Southern Englishes, Appalachian varieties intensify elements of the Southern Vowel Shift, such as raising (e.g., "bit" as [bɪɪt]), but retain conservative consonant patterns like intrusive /t/ (e.g., "oncet" for "once") and /h/-retention (e.g., "hain’t" for "ain’t"), which are receding in urban Southern speech. Appalachian English shows less substrate influence from (AAVE) than coastal Southern dialects, attributable to historical demographics: Appalachian counties averaged 5-10% African American populations in the 19th century, versus 30-50% in coastal plantation zones like the , limiting bidirectional feature borrowing. Consequently, Appalachian white varieties lack widespread AAVE hallmarks like habitual "be" (e.g., "She be working") or copula absence rates exceeding 20%, which permeate coastal Southern speech through prolonged contact. Dialect maps from Labov et al. quantify these divergences, placing central within the Southern region but noting subregional metrics like /ey/-/e/ reversal in 9 of 25 Southern speakers concentrated along ridges, and Cartesian vowel distances under 500 Hz between /ey/ and /ay/ indicating monophthongal shifts distinct from General American uniformity. Northern areas diverge further via /o/~/oh/ merger, absent in core Southern lowlands, highlighting a gradient of phonological separation from both standardized General American and homogenized Southern baselines.

Social and Cultural Dimensions

Stereotypes, Media Portrayals, and Empirical Realities

Media portrayals of Appalachian English often invoke the "" stereotype, depicting speakers as uneducated, backward, or prone to violence, with the dialect itself serving as an auditory cue for these traits. In the 1972 film , directed by , rural Georgians speaking a thick Appalachian-influenced are shown as menacing and isolated antagonists, reinforcing associations between the dialect and moral depravity or lawlessness. Similarly, the television series (1962–1971) popularized comedic tropes of naive, poverty-stricken mountaineers relocating to urban , using exaggerated dialect features like a-prefixing ("a-goin'") to highlight cultural clash and simplicity. These representations, while entertaining, trace back to early 20th-century literature and film that caricatured Appalachians as relics of a past, often ignoring the dialect's linguistic complexity. Such stereotypes draw partial empirical grounding from the region's historical and ongoing socioeconomic , though they overstate causation. The ' rugged terrain historically limited transportation and commerce, fostering relative seclusion that preserved features amid slower modernization compared to lowland areas. According to the (ARC) analysis of 2019–2023 data, the region's poverty rate stands at 14.3%, exceeding the national average of 11.6%, with median household income at $64,588 versus $78,538 nationally; rates climb above 25% in many distressed central counties like those in eastern and . retention correlates with these metrics, as reduces educational mobility and exposure to standardized speech, but the language does not cause —rather, both stem from structural factors like extractive industries' decline post-1950s booms and limited infrastructure investment. Cultural responses to these portrayals reflect divergent viewpoints on insularity and heritage. Proponents of Appalachian pride view the dialect as a marker of and distinct identity, emphasizing self-sufficiency and communal ties forged in adversity, with groups like the Appalachian Studies Association advocating reclamation of terms like "" against external mockery. Critics, however, argue that geographic and social insularity has perpetuated cycles of limited opportunity, as seen in higher-than-average rates of family instability and in dialect-strong communities, attributing these not to inherent cultural flaws but to policy neglect and economic extraction—claims echoed in works like J.D. Vance's (2016), which some regional scholars contest for overgeneralizing personal anecdotes as representative. Empirical linguistic surveys confirm dialect vitality persists strongest in these isolated pockets, underscoring a causal link to environment over inherent backwardness.

Perceptions of Prestige, Stigma, and Discrimination

Appalachian English speakers often face perceptions of low in extraregional contexts, where the dialect is stereotyped as indicative of limited or . Linguistic studies document this bias, with Appalachian varieties rated lower on status dimensions in matched-guise experiments compared to . Such attitudes stem from correlations between the dialect and rural socioeconomic conditions, rather than empirical deficits in communicative efficacy, as dialectal grammar and vocabulary enable equivalent expressiveness to standardized forms. In employment settings, this translates to tangible barriers, including reduced hiring opportunities due to accent-based . highlights how accents trigger negative inferences during interviews, prompting speakers to adopt or bi-dialectalism for professional advancement. studies on regional U.S. dialects reveal callback disparities, with non-standard speech yielding 20-30% fewer responses in simulated job applications across sectors like and from 2014 onward. These outcomes reflect urban-centric hiring norms prioritizing phonetic conformity over competence, exacerbating economic disadvantages for migrants. Regional counter-narratives foster pride and legitimacy. On March 26, 2019, the adopted House Joint Resolution 397, declaring Appalachian English a "fully legitimate " meriting respect akin to other American varieties and recommending its historical contextualization in state textbooks. This legislative affirmation underscores internal valuation, driven by rather than external validation, and challenges stigmatizing narratives through institutional endorsement.

Controversies in Classification and Study

Debates on Dialect Boundaries

Early dialectological work by Hans Kurath in his 1949 A Word Geography of the Eastern United States established the South Midland as a distinct region overlapping with Appalachia, delineating boundaries via isoglosses for features like vocabulary (e.g., "lightning bug" vs. "firefly") and pronunciation, separating it from Northern and Southern varieties. These mappings portrayed relatively discrete zones, with the South Midland extending from central Pennsylvania through West Virginia into northern Alabama and Mississippi. Contemporary scholarship challenges such rigid demarcations, advocating models where features exhibit gradual gradients rather than abrupt shifts. For instance, phonological traits like /ai/-monophthongization and the pin-pen merger display clinal distributions, with GIS-enabled analyses of acoustic data from sources like the (Labov et al., 2006) illustrating transitional zones rather than hard lines. Researchers such as Flanigan (2000) argue for extensions into southeastern , while others like Dakin (1966) propose a broader "trans-Appalachian" area, highlighting how settlement patterns foster overlapping influences from Scots-Irish and English substrates. Debates intensify over incorporating urban enclaves, where Appalachian migrants to cities like and exhibit feature retention but undergo leveling toward Midland norms due to demographic mixing. Recent mappings typically exclude these areas from core boundaries, prioritizing rural mountain speech where traditional markers persist with higher frequency, as urban homogenization obscures coherence. For linguistic policy and recognition—such as in educational accommodations or heritage documentation—overly expansive definitions risk diluting English's perceived unity, conflating it with adjacent varieties and undermining arguments for its treatment as a distinct deserving targeted study. Proponents of precise, gradient-aware boundaries emphasize that this approach better captures causal dynamics and empirical variation, avoiding the pitfalls of geographic overreach seen in non-linguistic frameworks like the Appalachian Regional Commission's 420-county designation.

Validity as a Coherent Variety vs. Regional Continuum

Appalachian English has been characterized by linguists as exhibiting both unifying structural features and substantial internal heterogeneity, prompting debate over its status as a dialect versus a marked by gradual transitions. Proponents of its coherence as a emphasize shared syntactic innovations, such as double constructions (e.g., "might could" or "may can"), which occur at elevated frequencies in Appalachian speech compared to surrounding regions and reflect systematic layering rather than random error. These features, alongside phonological traits like a-prefixing (e.g., "going down the road" as "a-going down the road"), demonstrate rule-governed patterns that distinguish Appalachian English from , supporting its classification as a unified with internal logic derived from historical and . Such innovations are not relics of archaic preservation but active grammatical strategies, underscoring the 's systematicity over prescriptivist notions of deficiency. Conversely, evidence of extensive sub-regional variation challenges this unity, with differences in systems, clusters, prosody, and across communities often surpassing shared elements in magnitude. Studies highlight "Appalachian Englishes" in the plural, revealing divergent realizations—such as varying degrees of the pin-pen merger or Southern Shift s—that form gradients rather than sharp boundaries, akin to continua in other contact zones. This internal diversity, influenced by local isolation and migration patterns, suggests a spectrum of forms where peripheral areas blend into adjacent Southern or Midland Englishes, undermining claims of a singular coherent . Empirical assessments, including variationist analyses and geolocated data, indicate partial barriers with non-Appalachian speakers, particularly for dense feature clusters like multiple modals or nonstandard , though overall comprehension remains high due to lexical overlap with varieties. Dialectometric approaches reveal clustering around core innovations but with effects that prioritize regional gradients over categorization, aligning with causal models of variation driven by and leveling rather than alone. Thus, while Appalachian English meets structural criteria for dialecthood through shared rules, its continuum-like diversity tempers assertions of unqualified coherence, favoring a nuanced view of interconnected regional forms.

Contemporary Status and Research

Ongoing Linguistic Shifts and Decline

Research from the Dialect Project indicates that Appalachian English vowel systems are undergoing , with variations in the Southern observed across subregions, including a "stilted" progression in Midland Appalachia that reflects evolving identity choices among speakers. These changes involve systematic adjustments in front and rotations, potentially aligning certain features closer to General American patterns in response to social and demographic influences. Longitudinal acoustic analyses in Appalachian-adjacent areas, such as , reveal cross-generational reductions in traditional Southern Shift characteristics among younger cohorts, with lowered /aɪ/ and raised /ɛ/ nuclei appearing less pronounced. Sociolinguistic studies document declining prominence of features among youth, as adolescents adapt traditional forms to construct modern identities amid exposure to national and standardized education. The Corpus of English in , comprising interviews with diverse age groups, highlights quantitative variation where phonological and grammatical markers like a-prefixing and decrease in frequency with apparent time, signaling intergenerational attenuation. This pattern aligns with broader convergence, though robust baselines persist in informal contexts. Urban-rural divides exacerbate leveling, with urban Appalachian speakers demonstrating accelerated adoption of mainstream variants compared to rural counterparts, who retain dialect markers as emblems of local identity. In , paradigm leveling in morphological variables like past be forms illustrates clashes between vernacular persistence in rural settings and pressures in urbanizing zones, driven by and economic integration. Such dynamics contribute to a regional where rural buffers against rapid homogenization, while urban proximity fosters convergence toward supralocal norms.

Preservation Efforts and Policy Recognitions

In 2019, the Tennessee General Assembly adopted Senate Joint Resolution 227 on March 26, affirming Appalachian English as a "fully legitimate dialect" deserving respect equivalent to other American English varieties and urging its inclusion in Section VI of the biennial Tennessee Blue Book to highlight its historical significance and counter stigmas associating it with lack of education. The resolution traces dialect influences to early settlers, Scots-Irish immigrants, and Native American terms like "pone" for cornbread, positioning it as integral to the region's cultural identity rather than a deviation from standard norms. Grassroots educational programs in communities promote awareness to mitigate and foster bilingual proficiency in local speech alongside English. provides a downloadable week-long unit for grades 6-12, incorporating activities on Appalachian features to build appreciation of linguistic in secondary classrooms. Similarly, teacher training initiatives emphasize modeling while validating Appalachian varieties, as evidenced in studies showing improved dialect-honoring practices reduce alienation. Preservation extends to cultural domains like and music, where Appalachian English persists in performative contexts. Community-led recordings of elder speakers and regional expression dictionaries document fading lexicon for posterity, sustaining oral traditions amid modernization. , rooted in Appalachian folk traditions, embeds dialect elements in lyrics—such as a-prefixing and non-standard verb forms—preserved through venues along Virginia's Crooked Road heritage trail, which spans 300 miles of music sites drawing tourists to authentic mountain performances.

Recent Empirical Studies and Technological Implications

A 2025 study published in American Speech analyzed automatic (ASR) performance on Appalachian English using the DARLA system, revealing dialect bias with higher error rates for Southern Appalachian speech compared to varieties, particularly in vowel recognition influenced by the Southern , where 50.2% of errors in the Southern dataset were attributed to such shifts. Researchers noted that baseline models achieved accuracies of 69.5%, with marginal improvements from hierarchical adaptations, underscoring the need for dialect-inclusive training data to mitigate underperformance in voice-AI applications for Appalachian speakers. Empirical investigations at , drawing from the West Virginia Corpus of English in (WVCEA), have employed approaches to map subregional variations, identifying phonological distinctions such as /ai/ ungliding, /æ/ breaking, and low fronting between Northern and Southern , with individual speaker variability challenging uniform models. These projects, including analyses in Appalachian Englishes in the 21st Century (2022), reveal ongoing flux in features like fronting (/u/, /ʊ/, /o/), stable in some areas but shifting under external influences, informing tools for regional simulation. In speech-language , recent guidance emphasizes distinguishing Appalachian English dialectal traits—such as irregular past tenses ("knowed" for "knew") or —from disorders, as standardized assessments normed on mainstream often yield misleading deficits without dialect adaptations. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association () maintains that no dialectal variety constitutes a pathological form, advocating functional assessments to avoid misdiagnosis, with implications for equitable protocols that preserve rather than enforcing . This approach counters historical overpathologization, supported by sociolinguistic data showing dialect adequacy for effective expression.

References

  1. [1]
    Appalachian English - Margaret E. L. Renwick, Ph.D.
    The dialect is derived from a combination of Scotch-Irish, German, and English communities moving south beginning in the 1730s, and eventually migrating into ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Language | Appalachian English - University of South Carolina
    Most terms identified as Appalachian by the Dictionary of American Regional Eng- lish and other sources were actually born in America (bald “treeless area on a ...
  3. [3]
    A-prefixing | Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in North ...
    A-prefixing is a phenomenon where a prefix, a-, attaches to a verbal form with the suffix -ing, as in the following Appalachian English examples from Wolfram ( ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Investigating Language Variation and Change in Appalachian Dialects
    Dec 18, 2020 · The perfective ​done​(“She done tended the garden”) is an often-overlooked grammatical feature specific to relatively few dialects of American ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Appalachian English They-Existentials - Stanford University
    1 Introduction. The 'expletive' in Appalachian English existential constructions can take different forms: it, as in (1), there, as in (2), and they, ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Christian, Donna Sociolinguistic Variables in Appalachian Dialects ...
    ... overview of the descriptive features of Appalachian English and the implications of this linguistic diversity for education. Chapter One sets forth ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON A ...
    Only in the English of Appalachia has quantified scrutiny and formal analysis of the prefix been undertaken, primarily in the pioneering work of Walt Wolfram ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Appendix: An Inventory of Distinguishing Dialect Features
    Apr 11, 2024 · Appalachian English are found in Wolfram and Christian (1976) and Montgomery and Hall. (2004). Descriptions of African American English (AAE) ...
  9. [9]
    About the Appalachian Region
    Appalachia is made up of 423 counties across 13 states and spans 206,000 square miles, from Southern New York to Northern Mississippi. The region's 26.4 ...Missing: English core
  10. [10]
    Chapter 1: Just What and Where Are Appalachian Englishes?
    Aug 10, 2020 · Discuss why and how proximity to other geographic and/or linguistic regions would have an impact on language use within these states.Missing: boundaries variability
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Talking Appalachian: Voice, Identity, and Community - CORE
    Dec 3, 2013 · The Appalachian Range: The Limits of Language Variation in West ... or geographic boundaries; factors such as migration and settlement pat-.
  12. [12]
    You Ain't from Here, Are You? Subregional Variation and ...
    Aug 1, 2024 · This article examines a three-way subregional distinction between Northern, Middle, and Southern Appalachia based on younger respondents' ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Needed Research on the Englishes of Appalachia - UKnowledge
    Basic lines of demarcation have been noted since colonial times, but researchers involved in the Linguistic. Atlas project first mapped them between 1930 and ...Missing: gradient | Show results with:gradient
  14. [14]
    Investigating Appalachian Englishes: Subregional Variation in the ...
    Apr 1, 2021 · In light of this variability, this article will focus on the results of a large-scale survey of self-reported AppE usage, investigating the ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Needed Research on the Englishes of Appalachia
    While these studies do not focus on the Appalachian element in Ohio dialects, they do expand our awareness of the multiplicity of variation in the state.Missing: topography | Show results with:topography
  17. [17]
    Appalachian Midlands | Welcome to Planet Terry
    Dec 6, 2011 · Typical estimates range from 3 to over 24 ... This region has also retained a large number of words from the Elizabethan English spoken ...
  18. [18]
    Reflections on Appalachian English
    Jan 24, 2024 · This is not surprising as the Appalachian region is a part of 13 states, with a population of 26.1 million as of 2020.
  19. [19]
    Rural Appalachia Compared to the Rest of Rural America
    Median household income in rural Appalachian counties is more than $10,000 below that of households in rural counties in the rest of the country. A greater ...
  20. [20]
    The Chartbook - Appalachian Regional Commission
    Income and Poverty in Appalachia​​ Appalachia's median household income is $64,588 which is 82% of the U.S. figure.
  21. [21]
    Appalachia Sees Higher Incomes, Lower Poverty Rates, and Boosts ...
    Jun 24, 2024 · Poverty rates are highest for Appalachians under 18 (19.2 percent) and ages 18-24 (22.1 percent).
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Socioeconomic Review of Appalachia Then and Now
    Less urbanization causes 10 percentage points of the gap, and lower per capita incomes 7 percentage points. These estimates result from multiplying the national ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Demographic and Socioeconomic Change in Appalachia ...
    Many Appalachia rural counties continue to lose population through heavy out-migration. These demographic trends largely reflect a Page 7 5 continuing lack of ...
  24. [24]
    Dialect Influences Appalachian Students' Experiences in College
    Aug 31, 2015 · An in-depth dialect study from NC State University researchers shows that some students from rural Appalachia feel that their dialects put ...
  25. [25]
    Population and Age in Appalachia
    The region's population is generally aging at the same rate as the nation, with the median age rising to 41.3 years over the 2010-2023 period. However, certain ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Demographic and Socioeconomic Change in Appalachia ...
    The shrinkages of the Appalachian population in Kentucky (18 percent) and Virginia (7 percent) were similar to West Virginia's experience, while the 4 percent ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    "Sounding Appalachian: /ai/ Monophthongization, Rising Pitch ...
    To begin to fill this gap in knowledge about Appalachian English, this dissertation investigates two features from a sociophonetic viewpoint: /aI/ ...Missing: /aɪ/ /aʊ/ acoustic
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Appalachia, Monophthongization, and Intonation - Paul Reed
    ▷ Monophthongization in Appalachian English is System 2. Appalachia ... An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World. English. Number 85 in ...Missing: /aɪ/ /aʊ/
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Phonological Possibilities in Appalachian Englishes - Paul Reed
    One of the features of Appalachian Englishes that is quite characteristic, but less mentioned and studied, is the use of intonation. This aspect is quite sa- ...Missing: gradient | Show results with:gradient
  31. [31]
    Production and perception of the Pin-Pen merger
    Mar 22, 2021 · This study presents the first US-wide survey of the pin-pen merger since Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006). Production and perception data were collected from 277 ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] On the Southern Shift in Appalachian English Terry Lynn Irons 1 ...
    Contemporary sociophonetic research has identified two major vowel shifts in progress in North American English, characterized as the Northern Cities.Missing: spectrographic dialect
  33. [33]
    Flapping before a stressed vowel – whatever! - AIP Publishing
    Jul 12, 2018 · In English, word-internal intervocalic alveolar stops are predominantly flapped ... Appalachian English. The duration of /t/ and the acoustic ...
  34. [34]
    (PDF) Flapping before a stressed vowel: The case of whatever
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... Appalachian English. The duration of /t/ and the acoustic correlates ... flapping is intervocalically preceding an unstressed syllable. While flap ...
  35. [35]
    Flying high above the social radar: Coronal stop deletion in modern ...
    May 16, 2011 · Consonant cluster reduction (CCR) is a slightly different variable. ... Appalachian English, examined CCR and found that Appalachians follow ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Appalachian Dialect Language Tree
    Southern dialects which are non-rhotic (dropping the 'r' sound), Appalachian English is. Page 11. 11 typically rhotic, pronouncing the 'r' clearly at the end of ...
  37. [37]
    Discovering Appalachian English: An Empirical Perspective
    ... rhotic pronunciation of various words and vowel raising. The data ... Colegrove, Emily, "Discovering Appalachian English: An Empirical Perspective" (2023).
  38. [38]
    Appalachian U.S. Dialects: Language of the Mountains
    May 1, 2025 · This area features dialects that sound a little different from northern Appalachian regions, but still carry the same linguistic roots.Missing: subregional | Show results with:subregional
  39. [39]
    Grammar and Syntax of Smoky Mountain English (SME) | Southern ...
    In absolute or disjunctive position (e.g. at the end of a phrase or clause) possessive pronouns formed with -n (hern, hisn, etc.) rather than -s sometimes occur ...
  40. [40]
    Encyclopedia of Appalachia on Language | Southern Appalachian ...
    The dialect features of the English of Appalachia can vary significantly between ethnic groups. As much as researchers have examined variation in the region's ...
  41. [41]
    Demonstrative them | Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in ...
    Aug 4, 2020 · In the United States, usage of them as a demonstrative is widely attested in Appalachian English (AppE), African American English (AAE), and ...
  42. [42]
    them | Southern Appalachian English
    them demonstrative adjective Those. [OED dates this usage from the 14th century; DARE labels this usage “scattered, but chiefly South, South Midland”]. 1774 ...
  43. [43]
    The fall of demonstrative them: Evidence from Appalachia
    Jan 1, 2011 · This paper examines a change to one of the more stereotyped of vernacular dialect features, the use of them in a demonstrative determiner ...
  44. [44]
    Naturalistic Double Modals in North America | American Speech
    Feb 1, 2024 · This study investigates double modals in the Corpus of North American Spoken English (CoNASE), a 1.2-billion-word corpus of time-stamped and geolocated ...
  45. [45]
    The semantics, sociolinguistics, and origins of double modals in ...
    Jan 24, 2024 · First, might could is not the most frequent DM in the corpus, with its overall frequency only around half that of the most common DM, might can.
  46. [46]
    HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON A ...
    Feb 1, 2009 · Variation and Change in Geographically Isolated Communities: Appalachian English and Ozark English . Publication of the American Dialect Society.Missing: definition origins
  47. [47]
    Toward a Description of A-Prefixing in Appalachian English - jstor
    A-PREFIXING IN APPALACHIAN ENGLISH 49. First, a-prefixing is not found with nominals. Although this obvious in nominals preceded by determiners or ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Christian, Donna Center for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, Va ... - ERIC
    This description of Appalachian speech, derived from one part of the final report of a research project on Appalachian. Dialects, is intended as a reference ...
  49. [49]
    Dictionary of Southern Appalachian English - UNC Press
    Jun 28, 2021 · The Dictionary of Southern Appalachian English is a revised and expanded edition of the Weatherford Award–winning Dictionary of Smoky Mountain ...
  50. [50]
    The History of the Appalachian Dialect. - languagehat.com
    Aug 16, 2018 · It is true that Appalachian speech can be quite different from standard American English. This is a dialect that famously uses different vocabulary and ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  51. [51]
    [PDF] ED373565.pdf - ERIC
    The "Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English" is a comprehensive reference work on Appalachian speech, addressing the lack of such a resource, and based on ...
  52. [52]
    34 Appalachian Words You Didn't Know Existed - Visit My Smokies
    'Tater Hole – cold cellar under the cabin floor where foods are stored; Wish Book – Mail-order catalog; Varmint – Wild animal. Try using some of these ...Missing: yarb younse
  53. [53]
    Dictionary of Smoky Mountain and Southern Appalachian English
    This report describes the Dictionary of Smoky Mountain and Southern Appalachian English, a forthcoming work of lexicography based on historical principles.
  54. [54]
    Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English - Montgomery, Michael B.
    Rating 4.8 (10) The first comprehensive work for the region, the Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English records the distinctive and characteristic speech ways of southern ...
  55. [55]
    Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English | Blind Pig and The Acorn
    Jan 27, 2017 · The reference book I use most often for vocabulary tests and other dialect posts is the Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English.
  56. [56]
    sang | Southern Appalachian English - University of South Carolina
    1984 Dykeman and Stokely At Home 57 A chief medicinal herb was an unusual wild plant known as ginseng. Called “sang” in mountain vernacular, its value lay in ...
  57. [57]
    Ginseng, ferns and an ancient dialect - Smoky Mountain News
    Nov 9, 2011 · Two “mystery plants” called “sang master” and “sang granny,” which some plant hunters use as “indicator species” to locate ginseng.
  58. [58]
    Appalachian Word of the Week - Conveyors
    Nov 23, 2016 · This week's word is CONVEYORS. The conveyor is how miners got coal from an underground mine to the coal tipple.
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    Conestoga Wagon · Scots-Irish Migration To Appalachia
    During the 18th century, more than 200,000 Ulster (Northern Irish people) came to America. ... Poor harvests in the early 18th century and high rents reinforced ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] How Scotch-Irish is your English
    More recent research using genealogical records on 18th-century Tennesseans has shown that emigrants from Ulster were by far the largest proportion of them.
  62. [62]
    Great Valley Road - FamilySearch
    Apr 15, 2024 · After 1744, the Great Valley Road was most heavily used by Ulster-Irish immigrants called Scots-Irish in America to spread through most of ...
  63. [63]
    The Royal Colony of North Carolina - The Scots-Irish Settlers
    In the late 1750s, the Scots-Irish came down the Great Wagon Road and settled further west near the base of the Appalachian Mountains in the present-day ...
  64. [64]
    Scots-Irish: Brief History of the Born Fighters Who Settled the ...
    Scots-Irish settled in Appalachia due to rebellion against English/Scottish society, with DNA studies showing genetic links to the Anglo-Scottish border area.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Storytelling in Ireland, Scotland and ...
    The oral tradition for Scots-Irish and Appalachian settlers never lost importance, and the similarities are visible today through a common history. (Webb ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Scottish and Irish Elements of Appalachian Fiddle Music
    The performance practice of Appalachian fiddling share many common traits with the Scottish and Irish traditions. In all three traditions, tunes are played with ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Is Shakespeare Still in the Holler? The Death of a Language Myth
    A myth is a popular belief or tradition that is of only imaginary or unverifiable truth that serves to present the worldview of a given.
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Myths - Appalachian English - University of South Carolina
    The third myth, probably the most fa- miliar of all, follows from the second one: that Appalachian speech preserves a strong Elizabethan element. Although the.
  69. [69]
    The semantics, sociolinguistics, and origins of double modals in ...
    Jan 24, 2024 · In this paper, we analyze double modal use in American English based on a multi-billion-word corpus of geolocated posts from the social media platform Twitter.
  70. [70]
    World Englishes: Volume II: North America 9781474205962 ...
    ... American innovation, although use is predominately within the Scots-Irish ... 'Double modals as single lexical items', American Speech, 64: 195–224 ...
  71. [71]
    Combatting Stereotypes About Appalachian Dialects - Sapiens.org
    Sep 7, 2017 · Far from being "the rude language of the mountains," the diversity of Appalachian dialects reveals a complex history of cultural change.<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    The Legendary Language of the Appalachian "Holler" - JSTOR Daily
    Aug 8, 2018 · The dialect of the Appalachian people is the oldest living English dialect, older than the speech of Shakespeare, closer to the speech of Chaucer.
  73. [73]
    Featured Essay - African Americans in Appalachia
    The coal fields of Central Appalachia were a major destination of African Americans leaving the Deep South during the Great Migration, and between 1870 and 1930 ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    [PDF] The Pace of Change in Appalachian English.
    From a linguistic point of view, why these aspects of Appalachian English would be changing and not others is at present unclear, although they seem to involve ...
  75. [75]
    Appalachian English in southern Indiana? The evidence from verbal -s
    Oct 16, 2007 · In this article, the variable use of verbal -s with (especially, third-person) plural subjects is examined in extreme south-central Indiana.Missing: spectrographic | Show results with:spectrographic
  76. [76]
    Ozark English - Encyclopedia of Arkansas
    Jun 16, 2023 · Like its Appalachian cousin, Ozark English is commonly linked to stereotypes that depict the mountain culture as backward and uneducated.
  77. [77]
    Just How "Old" is Ozarks English? - Springfield-Greene County Library
    However, when one considers grammatical features which are especially distinctive of Appalachian and Ozarks English, the largest number appear to have come from ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] African American Speech in Southern Appalachia
    Aug 9, 2010 · Despite their invisibility in traditional portraits of Appalachia, African Americans have been a part of Southern Appalachian culture since ...
  79. [79]
    A National Map of the Regional Dialects of American English
    Jul 15, 1997 · Map 1 shows four major dialect regions: the Inland North, the South, the West, and the Midland. The first three show a relatively uniform development.Missing: metrics | Show results with:metrics
  80. [80]
    Portraying Appalachia: How the Movies Can Get it Wrong
    Jun 9, 2017 · Appalachians in the movies are often portrayed as being morally and sexually depraved, lawless and violent—all of which shows the region as a ...
  81. [81]
    The Weird History of Hillbilly TV — THE BITTER SOUTHERNER
    Today, Gabe Bullard takes a hard look at the weird history of hillbilly TV, from Andy Griffith to “Duck Dynasty.”<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Isolation as a Linguistic Construct - Appalachian English
    contact and socioeconomic enterprise rather than a bastion of isolated individuals and a slow sequence of economic development as previously depicted in the ...
  83. [83]
    The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2019-2023 ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · This study examines state- and county-level data for the 13 Appalachian states from the 2019-2023 American Community Survey (ACS) and from US Census Bureau ...
  84. [84]
    Appalachian culture and heritage pride - Facebook
    Oct 24, 2021 · They developed a distinctive culture. Appalachians are very independent and very content with the places they live. They are very close to ...Appalachian culture is beautiful, don't let false negative stereotypes ...Are you a 'hillbilly'? The following article is especially ... - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
  85. [85]
    What J.D. Vance Got Wrong About Appalachia in Hillbilly Elegy
    Aug 28, 2025 · Critics from within the region have long argued that Vance perpetuates harmful stereotypes, cherry picks anecdotes to prove preconceived notions ...
  86. [86]
    The development of accent attitudes in the United States
    Jun 1, 2013 · Appalachian English stereotypes ... Voices of America: Accent, antidiscrimination law, and a jurisprudence for the last reconstruction.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] ABSTRACT DUNSTAN, STEPHANY BRETT. The Influence of ...
    ... discrimination, many Appalachian students learn to become bi-dialectal, using “standardized” American English in academic and professional settings and ...
  88. [88]
    In the Thick of Thick Accents: Employment Discrimination and the ...
    Jun 10, 2023 · The article focuses on Appalachian accent discrimination because Appalachians represent a distinct, historically disadvantaged group that unjustly lacks ...
  89. [89]
    How Employment Law Handles Linguistic Profiling - OnLabor
    Jan 26, 2022 · Linguistic profiling can be a major source of invidious discrimination in the workplace. Hiring decisions, promotions, and other key work- ...
  90. [90]
    Tennessee Push Wants State Book to Cover Appalachian Dialect
    Mar 27, 2019 · The resolution counters that Appalachian is a “fully legitimate dialect and most deserving of the respect afforded other dialects of American ...
  91. [91]
    The Latest! | Southern Appalachian English
    ... Corpus. This project entails building a monitor corpus of Appalachian language data featuring audio-aligned transcripts of original interviews with young ...Missing: td | Show results with:td
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Solving Kurath's Puzzle - Appalachian English
    North and the Lower South - Kurath's "Midland" - is not a true unified dialect region, and although a small set of features, the Midland layer, characterizes.
  93. [93]
    Yet Again: The Midland Dialect - jstor
    Its core is known as. APPALACHIAN ENGLISH, although its influence extends beyond the Appala- ... - Kurath's 1949 dialect boundaries. * Davis and Houck's ...
  94. [94]
    3: Appalachian American English (AE) - Social Sci LibreTexts
    Mar 17, 2024 · Appalachian English is the English that is spoken in and around the Appalachian Mountains; think Tennessee, Kentucky, bits of the Carolinas, the southern and ...
  95. [95]
    Appalachian Englishes - ResearchGate
    Appalachian English varieties have been described as some of the most divergent varieties in American English. Vowels, consonants, prosody, grammar, and the ...
  96. [96]
    A Stilted Shift: The Southern Vowel Shift in Midland Appalachia
    Diversity in WV vowels demonstrates diversity among identity choices, and shifting vowel systems factor into the evolution of the Appalachian identity.
  97. [97]
    Cross-generational vowel change in American English - PMC
    This study examines cross-generational changes in the vowel systems in central Ohio, southeastern Wisconsin and western North Carolina.<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    Community Studies of Sociolinguistic Change in Appalachia - ADS
    The project's research questions focus on how traditional dialects have changed and how Appalachian teens alter them to build their own identities in the ...
  99. [99]
    (PDF) (ING): A Vernacular Baseline for English in Appalachia
    This article investigates the (ING) variable in Appalachian speech, explaining both the linguistic and social constraints on variation.Missing: td | Show results with:td
  100. [100]
    Rural Voices in Appalachia: The Shifting Sociolinguistic Reality of ...
    Language differences are found to mark the dialect regions of Appalachia, but some regional characteristics are also adopted as social markers of rurality.
  101. [101]
    A new role for an ancient variable in Appalachia: Paradigm leveling ...
    Apr 29, 2014 · This current study of English in the West Virginia region of Appalachia takes up the variable of past be in order to examine the sociolinguistic ...<|separator|>
  102. [102]
    TN SJR0227 | 2019-2020 | 111th General Assembly - LegiScan
    2019 TN SJR0227 (Summary) Urges Secretary of State to include the Appalachian dialect in Section VI of the Tennessee Blue Book.
  103. [103]
    Tennessee push wants state book to cover Appalachian dialect
    Mar 26, 2019 · The resolution links Appalachian linguistics to early influencers. It says a “pone” of cornbread is borrowed from the Native American language ...
  104. [104]
    Dialects in Schools
    Dec 6, 2018 · Grades 6-12 Appalachian Dialect Unit. Download this week-long unit on Appalachian dialect to teach in your secondary level classroom! Begin by ...Missing: programs | Show results with:programs
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Although teaching teachers to deal with dialect in their students ...
    In essence, these studies provide insights about the Appalachian area and its people and reflect the complexity of language development within the region; thus ...
  106. [106]
    Preserving Appalachian Dialects: A Fight for Cultural Survival
    Efforts to preserve the dialects are growing. Historians and community groups are recording older speakers, compiling dictionaries of regional expressions ...
  107. [107]
    50 Ways to Play Along The Crooked Road, Virginia's Heritage Music ...
    The Crooked Road weaves together 300 miles of picturesque terrain and historic music venues, each resonating with the echoes of bluegrass and old-time country ...
  108. [108]
    Music Heritage
    Traditional mountain music includes lively strains of old-time, bluegrass, ballad singing, blues, and sacred music.
  109. [109]
    Dialect Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition - Duke University Press
    May 1, 2025 · This study aims to contribute to the research on bias in voice-AI by investigating speech recognition performance for Appalachian English.
  110. [110]
    Dialect Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition - ResearchGate
    Aug 9, 2025 · The average accuracy was 69.5% and 71.7% for the baseline and proposed hierarchical models, showing a 2.2% overall improvement. Recent research ...
  111. [111]
    Appalachian Englishes - West Virginia Dialect Project
    Feb 25, 2022 · Appalachian Englishes in the Twenty-First Century provides a complete exploration of English in Appalachia for a broad audience of scholars and educators.
  112. [112]
    Part 2: Appalachian English and Language Diagnosis
    Aug 9, 2022 · Other dialectal differences that may affect standardized language scores include differences in irregular past tense forms ("knowed" for "knew") ...
  113. [113]
  114. [114]