Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Assisted GNSS

Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS), also known as Assisted GPS (A-GPS) when focused on the GPS constellation, is a hybrid positioning technology that augments standalone Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers with external assistance data from cellular networks, , or the to accelerate signal acquisition, enhance accuracy, and enable operation in environments where direct GNSS signals are weak or unavailable, such as indoors or urban canyons. This assistance typically includes ephemeris, , approximate time, and position data, which reduces the receiver's search space and computational load, shortening the (TTFF) from minutes to seconds. Developed in the late 1990s and early 2000s primarily to meet regulatory requirements for services, A-GNSS originated as a for the U.S. Communications Commission's (FCC) (E911) Phase II mandates, which required wireless carriers to provide accurate caller locations within 50-300 meters for 67-95% of calls by integrating GPS with network-based assistance. Standards for A-GNSS were established around 2000 by organizations like for / networks and 3GPP2 for , enabling widespread deployment in mobile devices and supporting both (UE)-based (where the device computes the position) and UE-assisted (where measurements are sent to a ) modes. By the mid-2000s, A-GNSS had become integral to smartphones, with major carriers implementing it across CDMA, , , and later networks to comply with E911 and similar global regulations. The core mechanism of A-GNSS involves a location server that delivers real-time or predicted assistance data to the via a communication link, allowing it to quickly identify and track satellites without relying solely on faint over-the-air GNSS signals, which have low power (around -160 dBW). Key benefits include dramatically improved TTFF—often under 5 seconds in open areas and up to 30 seconds indoors—higher availability in obstructed settings, and positioning accuracy of 3-10 meters in rural environments or 50-100 meters in /indoor scenarios when combined with methods like advanced forward link (AFLT). These enhancements make A-GNSS particularly valuable for power-constrained devices, as it offloads and reduces energy consumption compared to standalone GNSS. Applications of A-GNSS extend beyond emergency services to include navigation in consumer smartphones, location-based services like geofencing and , vehicular systems for advanced driver-assistance, and integration with (IoT) devices for precise timing and positioning. In modern contexts, such as LTE-Advanced and networks, A-GNSS supports vector tracking loops and multi-constellation GNSS (e.g., GPS, Galileo, ) for even greater robustness, contributing significantly to wireless 911 location technologies as of 2025. Despite challenges like dependency on network coverage and potential concerns from , ongoing advancements continue to refine its performance for diverse global uses.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) is an augmentation technology for Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) that supplies external assistance data to receivers through communication networks, such as cellular or connections, to expedite signal acquisition and computation of the initial position fix. This system integrates GNSS receivers with network infrastructure to overcome the inherent delays in standalone GNSS operations, where devices must independently search for and decode signals. The core purpose of A-GNSS is to mitigate the challenges of slow signal acquisition and high power consumption in standalone GNSS, especially in weak signal environments like urban canyons or indoors, and on resource-constrained devices such as smartphones. In a —where the receiver lacks prior knowledge of satellite positions, time, or location—standalone GNSS can take up to 12.5 minutes to acquire the full and data transmitted at a low 50 bit/s rate from satellites, whereas A-GNSS reduces the (TTFF) to under 10 seconds by delivering this data rapidly via the network. Key components of A-GNSS include a centralized assistance that computes and broadcasts aid data, the GNSS receiver embedded in the that processes both satellite signals and assistance information for positioning, and the bidirectional data link—typically over , , or other wireless protocols—that enables efficient data exchange between the server and device. The impetus for A-GNSS development, particularly Assisted GPS (A-GPS), arose from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) adoption of the (E911) mandate in 1996, which required wireless carriers to deliver caller location data accurate to within 50 meters horizontally for 67% of calls using handset-based solutions like A-GPS, by Phase II implementation in the early .

GNSS Prerequisites

The Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) comprises multiple independent satellite constellations designed to provide positioning, navigation, and timing services worldwide. The primary systems include the ' (GPS), Russia's , the European Union's Galileo, and China's , each consisting of 24 or more satellites in medium Earth orbits at altitudes around 20,000 kilometers. These satellites continuously transmit radio navigation signals in the L-band spectrum, which spans 1-2 GHz, to enable receivers on to determine their location through . For example, GPS operates primarily on the L1 carrier frequency at 1575.42 MHz for civilian signals and L2 at 1227.60 MHz for enhanced accuracy, while Galileo utilizes bands such as E1 (1575.42 MHz) and E5 (1176.45 MHz). Central to GNSS operation are navigational data and measurements that receivers use to compute position. Ephemeris parameters deliver precise and clock for individual , remaining valid for 2 to 4 hours before requiring updates to account for orbital dynamics. In contrast, the provides coarser orbital data for the entire constellation, valid for up to several weeks, aiding initial satellite visibility predictions. fixes rely on pseudoranges, which approximate satellite-to-receiver distances by multiplying the signal propagation time—derived from code phase measurements—by the ; errors arise from satellite clock biases and receiver , necessitating . Atmospheric effects further complicate measurements: ionospheric , caused by free electrons refracting signals (more pronounced at lower frequencies), can introduce up to 10-20 meters of error, while tropospheric from neutral gases add 2-25 meters, both requiring empirical models like the Klobuchar ionospheric for mitigation. The (TTFF) quantifies standalone GNSS performance, categorized by the receiver's stored data at startup. A occurs when no prior information is available, requiring the receiver to acquire signals from all visible satellites, download the full (about 12.5 minutes at 50 bits per second), and for at least four satellites, yielding TTFFs of 30 seconds to 12.5 minutes under open-sky conditions. Warm starts retain recent (valid for 2-4 hours) and approximate time/position but need refresh, reducing TTFF to 20-45 seconds. Hot starts, with retained , , precise time, and recent position/velocity, achieve TTFF in 1-5 seconds by minimizing search space. These durations highlight standalone GNSS limitations in dynamic scenarios. GNSS receivers initiate operation through signal acquisition, correlating received signals against locally generated replicas of the coarse/acquisition (C/A) code—a 1,023-chip sequence repeating every millisecond on L1—to detect presence and estimate code phase delay. Successful acquisition is followed by carrier phase tracking to demodulate navigation data and refine pseudoranges. In urban or indoor settings, challenges intensify due to , where reflected signals interfere with direct paths, causing code distortions and phase errors up to tens of meters, and low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR typically below -130 dBm indoors from through walls). These factors extend acquisition times and degrade reliability, often requiring 10-100 times longer searches than in open skies.

Operation

Assistance Data and Mechanisms

Assistance data in Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) encompasses a range of parameters provided by a network server to augment the GNSS receiver's signal acquisition and processing capabilities. Key types include real-time data, which details precise orbital parameters and clock corrections through navigation models like Keplerian sets; information, offering coarse positions and for long-term ; and Doppler shifts, captured via acquisition assistance such as doppler0 (base velocity) and doppler1 (acceleration) terms. Additionally, precise UTC time is supplied to reduce clock uncertainty from seconds to milliseconds, ionospheric models such as Klobuchar coefficients model atmospheric delays, and location data derived from cell ID or approximate position provides an initial estimate in WGS-84 coordinates. These collectively minimize computational demands on resource-constrained devices. Delivery mechanisms involve the device initiating a location request to the assistance server, typically via for control-plane delivery or IP-based connections for user-plane scenarios, prompting the server to respond with tailored data. The server customizes the assistance based on the device's approximate , obtained from cell tower triangulation or access points, ensuring relevance to visible satellites and local conditions. To accommodate low-bandwidth links, data is compressed using efficient encoding schemes like , reducing overhead while maintaining integrity. In the acquisition process, A-GNSS integrates this data to narrow the search space for (PRN) codes and Doppler frequencies, transforming a broad scan—such as ±10 kHz Doppler uncertainty without aid—into a targeted one of approximately ±100 Hz by leveraging precise time, , and Doppler estimates. This enables high-sensitivity receivers to detect weak signals down to -160 dBm, common in indoor or urban environments, by focusing correlator resources efficiently. Furthermore, assistance includes a list of visible satellites, often reducing the search from all 32 GPS satellites to 4-8 relevant ones based on the reference location, which can cut acquisition time by up to 90%. Hybrid integration with inertial sensors provides an initial estimate to further refine the search window, enhancing robustness in signal-denied scenarios.

Modes of Operation

Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) operates in two primary modes: Mobile Station-Based (MSB) and Mobile Station-Assisted (MSA), which differ fundamentally in where the position computation occurs. In both modes, the mobile device receives assistance data, such as satellite ephemeris, almanac, reference time, and acquisition assistance, from a location server to accelerate satellite signal acquisition and reduce time-to-first-fix. The choice of mode balances factors like computational resources, privacy, and network dependency. In MSB mode, the (device) performs all GNSS signal measurements and position calculations locally. The device uses the received assistance to acquire satellite signals, measure pseudoranges via (solving for the receiver's X, Y, Z coordinates from multiple pseudorange equations), and compute the final position without transmitting raw measurements to the . This approach enables standalone operation after initial assistance, as the device can reuse offline for subsequent fixes. In MSA mode, the device collects GNSS measurements, such as pseudoranges, Doppler shifts, code phases, and signal strengths, and forwards them to the location server for position computation. The server leverages its greater processing power, potentially augmented by additional data like precise orbits or atmospheric models, to solve the positioning equations and return the result to the device. This mode is particularly suited for resource-constrained devices lacking a full GNSS , as it offloads complex calculations. The modes involve distinct trade-offs: MSB preserves user by keeping all raw GNSS data and computed positions on the device, avoiding transmission of sensitive measurements, but demands significant local al resources and , which can limit its use in low-end . Conversely, MSA enables higher positioning accuracy—often approaching sub-meter levels with server-side augmentations—but incurs greater data usage for measurement uploads, increased latency, and potential risks from . Hybrid modes, which selectively combine elements of both (e.g., device-based with optional server ), mitigate these issues by adapting to device capabilities and conditions. Since the 2010s, MSB has become the dominant mode in modern smartphones, driven by advancements in integrated GNSS chipsets that provide sufficient processing power for on-device calculations while prioritizing privacy and efficiency.

Standards

Control Plane Protocols

The in Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) leverages dedicated cellular signaling channels to deliver positioning assistance data, ensuring low-latency transmission without incurring user data charges, as it is integrated directly into the core . This approach utilizes protocols embedded within (RRC) messages or non-access stratum () signaling, enabling seamless coordination between the () and location servers like the evolved serving mobile location center (E-SMLC) or location management function (LMF). In 3GPP2 networks, equivalent functionality is provided by protocols such as IS-801 for A-GPS positioning. Early protocols include the Radio Resource Location Protocol (RRLP), specified in 1999 for and networks to support A-GPS by facilitating the exchange of assistance data such as and information between the and serving mobile location center. In , RRC positioning procedures extend this capability, embedding location measurements and assistance within RRC signaling for enhanced accuracy in environments. The LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP), introduced in 3GPP Release 9 in 2009, advanced this framework for and later , defining message structures for assistance data delivery between the and E-SMLC, with extensions via LPPe (developed by the ) to incorporate support for additional GNSS constellations like and . For , the NR Positioning Protocol A (NRPPa), specified in Release 15, complements LPP by handling assistance from gNBs to the LMF, enabling network-assisted measurements. Evolution across releases has progressively enhanced positioning capabilities; Releases 15 and 16 (finalized in 2018 and 2019, respectively) introduced support for multi-round-trip time (multi-RTT) and downlink time difference of arrival (DL-TDOA) methods within LPP and NRPPa, allowing combined GNSS and cellular measurements for sub-meter accuracy in dense environments. These protocols are mandatory for E911 location compliance in networks, ensuring reliable positioning during voice calls. Sessions can be server-initiated for proactive assistance or device-triggered for on-demand requests, with provisions for multi-constellation support covering GPS, Galileo, , and to optimize global coverage. These mechanisms underpin modes such as MS-assisted () and MS-based (MSB) operations by standardizing assistance delivery.

User Plane Protocols

The Secure User Plane Location (SUPL) protocol, developed by the (OMA), facilitates the delivery of GNSS assistance data over IP-based networks such as the or / connections, allowing devices to obtain location services without relying on the cellular . This user plane approach provides greater flexibility for deployment across diverse network types and reduces costs by leveraging existing IP infrastructure for assistance data exchange. SUPL has evolved through multiple versions to support expanding GNSS constellations and advanced features. SUPL 1.0, released in 2007, focused primarily on GPS-only assistance, establishing the foundational for secure IP-based location services. SUPL 2.0, introduced in 2008, expanded support to include Galileo and constellations, while adding capabilities such as geofencing through area event triggers, periodic location reporting triggers, and billing mechanisms to enable more sophisticated location-based services. SUPL 3.0, approved in 2018, further integrated WLAN and broadband networks for assistance delivery, introduced immediate, periodic, and notified session modes, and extended constellation support to and QZSS, enhancing global coverage and interoperability. Key components of the SUPL framework include the SUPL Agent, a logical entity that initiates location requests and may reside within the SUPL Enabled Terminal (SET) on the user device or externally, and the SUPL Location Platform (SLP), the network-side server that provides the necessary assistance data such as , , and approximate position information. All communications occur over TLS-secured sessions to ensure and . With SUPL 2.0 and later versions, the (TTFF) can be reduced to 1–2 seconds under good signal conditions, significantly improving location acquisition speed compared to standalone GNSS. SUPL supports both MS-Based (MSB) modes, where the device computes its position using assistance data, and MS-Assisted (MSA) modes, where the server performs the computation based on measurements from the device. It is widely used in scenarios like and non-3GPP access networks, enabling location services in environments without traditional cellular signaling. OMA's ongoing maintenance of the SUPL specifications ensures across versions, allowing seamless upgrades and broad adoption.

Applications and Integrations

Traditional Applications

Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) has been integral to mobile devices, exemplified by the introduction of the in 2008, which integrated A-GPS with and cellular positioning for seamless location services. This implementation utilized the Secure User Plane Location (SUPL) protocol to deliver assistance data over IP networks, enabling faster satellite acquisition and position fixes even in challenging environments like urban canyons and indoors. Navigation applications such as benefited significantly, providing users with rapid location-based guidance that reduced time-to-first-fix (TTFF) from minutes to seconds by leveraging network-provided and data. In emergency services, A-GNSS ensures compliance with E911 in the United States and E112 in by supporting hybrid location methods that combine GNSS with cellular identifiers. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Phase II rules, adopted in 2002, mandated wireless carriers to provide location accuracy within 50 meters for 67% of calls and 150 meters for 95% using technologies like A-GPS, which became a cornerstone for meeting these requirements through network-assisted positioning. Real-world deployments have demonstrated A-GNSS facilitating quicker responder dispatch in public safety scenarios. Beyond consumer and safety uses, A-GNSS supports in , particularly for fleet vehicles, where server-assisted GNSS enables real-time monitoring of cargo and equipment movements with reduced power consumption compared to standalone receivers. For instance, in operations, A-GNSS integrates with systems to optimize routes and prevent losses by providing accurate positioning in areas with partial satellite visibility. Location-based services () further extend these capabilities, such as targeted advertising delivered to users near retail zones, often augmented by positioning as a fallback for enhanced indoor reliability. Widespread adoption of A-GNSS accelerated post-2010 with and platforms incorporating support for multi-constellation signals, starting with GPS and integration in 2011 to improve availability and accuracy in diverse environments. This shift enabled broader deployment in smartphones, enhancing and navigation reliability without relying solely on GPS. By the mid-2010s, multi-constellation A-GNSS had become standard in flagship devices, contributing to its ubiquity in everyday mobile applications.

Modern Advancements in 5G and IoT

The integration of Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) with networks has advanced significantly through 3GPP Releases 16 and 17, finalized in 2020 and 2022, which enhance the LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP) for New Radio (NR) to support GNSS assistance in Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN). These releases introduce normative requirements for NTN, enabling seamless GNSS operations over satellite-integrated architectures, such as low-Earth orbit () systems, to extend coverage in remote areas. Hybrid GNSS-5G positioning leverages techniques in NR to achieve sub-meter accuracy by combining cellular signals with measurements, particularly in or obstructed environments where traditional GNSS alone may falter. Recent research from 2023 to 2025 demonstrates that adaptive fusion of GNSS and data can reduce positioning latency to under 100 ms, critical for (V2X) communications and autonomous vehicles, enhancing real-time decision-making in dynamic scenarios. In applications, low-power A-GNSS implementations in (NB-IoT) and Massive IoT enable efficient for devices like smart meters and wearables, minimizing energy consumption while maintaining positioning reliability over extended battery life. The SGP.32 standard, published in 2023, facilitates remote provisioning of profiles for IoT devices, allowing dynamic updates to GNSS assistance data without physical intervention, which streamlines deployment in large-scale networks. Hybrid satellite-IoT systems, such as those using Iridium's NTN with GNSS, combine terrestrial with satellite backhaul to provide uninterrupted positioning for global asset monitoring, particularly in or polar regions. Ongoing advancements in Release 18, initiated in 2024, explore AI-assisted GNSS signal acquisition to optimize search and lock times in challenging conditions, potentially reducing computational overhead in resource-constrained devices. Emerging 2025 trends emphasize multi-constellation GNSS support integrated with for drones and UAVs, enabling real-time data processing at the network periphery for applications like and delivery services. For emergency services, 5G-enhanced A-GPS using NR Positioning Protocol Annex (NRPPa) improves power efficiency in location reporting, with 2025 research showing reductions in assistance time compared to legacy systems.

Performance Considerations

Advantages

Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) significantly enhances positioning performance compared to standalone GNSS systems, particularly in terms of (TTFF). In challenging urban environments such as lobbies and underpasses, A-GNSS reduces TTFF from over 90 seconds to under 10 seconds in indoor settings and from more than 300 seconds to around 16 seconds in obstructed outdoor areas, meeting regulatory requirements like the FCC's 30-second threshold for emergency services. This improvement stems from network-provided assistance data, including ephemerides and approximate device location, which accelerates signal acquisition without relying solely on weak broadcasts. Accuracy also improves in environments prone to signal blockage, such as urban canyons and indoors, where A-GNSS leverages reference location aiding to lower geometric dilution of precision (GDOP) values—reducing them from "fair" levels above 3 to "excellent" below 3—and boosts carrier-to-noise density (C/N0) ratios by 10-12 dB-Hz. These gains enable reliable positioning where standalone GNSS often fails due to multipath and obstructions, supporting multi-constellation operation (e.g., GPS and ) without proportional increases in computational load. A-GNSS promotes resource efficiency, making GNSS viable in low-cost, battery-constrained devices by offloading the download of large files from satellites to faster cellular networks, thereby cutting acquisition power needs. In asset tracking applications, this can extend battery life by 2.4 to 4.3 times compared to unassisted modes, as devices spend less time in high-power search states. For users, A-GNSS delivers faster responsiveness in applications like and , with position fixes enabling near-instantaneous updates. In emergency services such as E911, it achieves a 95% success rate for accurate fixes within required response times, enhancing responder efficiency. Overall, A-GNSS significantly boosts GNSS in obstructed areas, reducing data costs for warm and hot starts through efficient assistance data delivery.

Limitations

Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) systems depend on cellular or connectivity to deliver assistance from servers to (), such as satellite ephemerides and approximate position estimates, which can fail in areas without coverage, like remote rural locations or during outages; in such cases, devices must revert to standalone GNSS mode with longer time-to-first-fix (TTFF). This reliance also incurs usage costs on metered cellular plans, potentially increasing operational expenses for frequent positioning requests in resource-constrained applications. Privacy and security risks arise from the transmission of location-related data in A-GNSS, particularly in mode where raw GNSS measurements are sent to the server for position computation, potentially exposing precise user locations to or unauthorized . While protocols like the Secure User Plane Location (OMA SUPL) mitigate these risks through (TLS) encryption and authentication mechanisms, Technical limitations include the finite validity of assistance data, such as broadcast parameters that expire after approximately four hours, requiring periodic refetching to maintain accuracy and potentially degrading performance if updates are delayed. Accuracy can also diminish if the server's initial location estimate for the is imprecise, leading to suboptimal Doppler and code phase assistance that hampers signal acquisition. In congested networks, increased —potentially reaching several seconds—further delays assistance data delivery, prolonging TTFF and reducing reliability. As of 2025, emerging non-terrestrial networks (NTN) introduce additional concerns for A-GNSS in applications, where handover delays between satellite beams, exacerbated by high mobility and propagation latencies, can disrupt assistance data continuity and compromise positioning reliability.

References

  1. [1]
    Receiver Types - Navipedia - GSSC
    Sep 23, 2018 · The definition of assisted-GNSS (A-GNSS) gathers many different concepts, but can be split into two main categories: GNSS assistance ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] [March 14, 2011] WORKING GROUP 4C Technical Options for E9-1 ...
    Mar 14, 2011 · This situation led to the development of so-called assisted GPS (A-GPS) techniques to improve the TTFF and sensitivity. A-GPS was one of the ...Missing: E911 | Show results with:E911
  3. [3]
    Phones - Navipedia - GSSC
    Sep 16, 2018 · A GNSS cell phone is a phone with satellite navigation technology embedded. The features provided to the user depend on the pre-installed or ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] March 6, 2025 FCC FACT SHEET* Improving Wireless 911 Caller ...
    Mar 6, 2025 · ... assisted GPS (A-GPS) as the primary wireless 911 location technology and is used by CMRS providers for approximately 80% of wireless 911.
  5. [5]
    Assisted GNSS (A-GNSS) - u-blox
    Jun 2, 2025 · A cold start (in which the GNSS receiver does not have valid ephemeris data stored in memory) typically takes around 30 seconds in perfect ...
  6. [6]
    What is Assisted GNSS? - everything RF
    Oct 19, 2020 · Assisted GNSS or Augmented GNSS is a type of Global Positioning System, which takes the assistance of mobile network towers to reduce time to fix position or ...
  7. [7]
    Innovation: Faster, Higher, Stronger - GPS World
    Oct 8, 2015 · TIME-TO-FIRST-FIX, commonly known by the initialism TTFF, is the elapsed time between the powering on or starting up of a GNSS receiver and when ...
  8. [8]
    Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)
    Using A-GPS can improve the TTFF down to less than 5 seconds in a cold start, which also greatly reduces power consumption. Predicted GPS: The device ...
  9. [9]
    911 and E911 Services | Federal Communications Commission
    The deployment of E911 requires the development of new technologies and upgrades to local 911 PSAPs, as well as coordination among public safety agencies ...Master PSAP Registry · MLTS 911 Requirements · 911 ReliabilityMissing: Assisted | Show results with:Assisted
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Introduction to GPS and other Global Navigation Satellite Systems
    Jun 7, 2012 · ❑ GLONASS, GALILEO, BEIDOU (COMPASS), QZSS. Page 3. 3 ... ▫ Two L-band carrier frequencies. L1 = 1575.42 MHz L2 = 1227.60 MHz.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] GNSSAlbum - Stanford University
    During this period, GPS broadcast its code division multiple access (CDMA) signals at two frequencies, L1 (1575.42 MHz) and L2 (1227.6 MHz).<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Galileo General Introduction - Navipedia - GSSC
    Jul 10, 2025 · Moreover, Galileo signals are transmitted in four frequency bands (E5a, E5b, E6 and E1), enabling single and dual frequency positioning for ...Missing: L- | Show results with:L-
  13. [13]
    The Navigation Message | GEOG 862 - Dutton Institute - Penn State
    The ephemeris is the satellite coordinate system. It tells the receiver where the satellite is at an instant of time. The clock correction is one of the ways ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Introduction to GNSS and GNSS Data Processing - UNOOSA
    A GPS receiver measures the signal transmission time from the code phase at signal reception time. Pseudorange = (Reception Time – Transmission time) x Speed of ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  15. [15]
    Tropospheric Delay - Navipedia - GSSC
    Jan 13, 2013 · The effect of the troposphere on the GNSS signals appears as an extra delay in the measurement of the signal traveling from the satellite to receiver.
  16. [16]
    The Almanac, Time to First Fix and Satellite Health | GEOG 862
    The period needed to receive the full information is 12.5 minutes. The time to first fix (TTFF) is longest at a cold start, less at warm, and least at hot. A ...Missing: Assisted reduction
  17. [17]
    TTFF - Navipedia - GSSC
    Sep 18, 2014 · The Time To First Fix (TTFF) is a measure of performance of a GNSS receiver that accounts for the time elapsed from the GNSS receiver switch-on until the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Acquisition Strategies of GNSS Receiver - Queen's University Belfast
    Differencing direct line of sight signal from multipath is also an important challenge for the receiver because sometimes no direct signal is available and the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] UCGE Reports Number 20338 - University of Calgary
    1.1 Indoor GNSS signal acquisition and processing challenges. The typical L1 C/A GPS Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) in open sky conditions with a bandwidth of 2 ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Challenges in Indoor Global Navigation Satellite Systems - spcomnav
    Feb 17, 2012 · Multipath propagation is a very deleterious factor indoors, and additional effects such as the near-far appear as well (a detailed description ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] 3GPP TS 36.355 V12.5.0 (2015-12)
    generic assistance data types to the location server for each supported GNSS. -- ASN1START. GNSS-GenericAssistanceDataSupport ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..16)) OF ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 136 355 V9.5.0 (2011-04)
    If GNSS-ID does not indicate "glonass", this field defines the GNSS time of ephemeris in hours of the latest ephemeris set contained by the target device. If ...
  23. [23]
    Comparison of Acquisition Techniques for GNSS Signal Processing ...
    The Doppler uncertainty falls down to only +/-2000Hz with these assumptions, and it can be even lowered by a reduction of the local oscillator drift. Moreover, ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] A-GNSS Performance Test in Various Urban Environments by Using ...
    The acquisition assistance information is provided to reduce the TTFF at the receiver and typically includes a list of visible satellites,. Doppler/code delay ...
  25. [25]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the MSB and MSA modes in A-GNSS as per ETSI TS 136 355 V12.5.0, combining all the information from the provided segments into a concise and dense format. To maximize detail retention, I’ll use a table in CSV format for clarity and comprehensiveness, followed by a narrative summary that integrates additional details not easily captured in the table.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] 5G Positioning for Emergency Calls via Assisted GPS on Mobile ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · Both Mobile. Station Assisted (MSA) and Mobile Station Based (MSB) positioning modes were implemented in the UE. The results showed that the MSB ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 138 305 V17.7.0 (2024-02)
    This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by ETSI 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). The present document may refer to technical ...Missing: LPPe | Show results with:LPPe
  28. [28]
    [PDF] An Overview of 3GPP Positioning Standards - Auburn University
    Positioning Protocols RRLP. RRC. LPP. NRPPa, LPP. TABLE 1. Evolution of Positioning Methods and Protocols in 3GPP Standards. Positioning Cases. Horizontal Error.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 144 031 V11.0.0 (2012-10)
    The present document contains the definition of the Radio Resource LCS Protocol (RRLP) to be used between the ... location (with uncertainty) specified as per ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 125 331 V13.1.0 (2016-03)
    Jul 13, 2018 · This document is a protocol specification for the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Radio Resource Control (RRC), produced by ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 136 355 V9.9.0 (2013-02)
    9. 3GPP TS 36.355 version 9.9.0 Release 9. 1. Scope. The present document contains the definition of the LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP). ... 1.1, July 31, 2009.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 137 355 V17.9.0 (2025-01)
    This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by ETSI 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). The present document may refer to technical ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] TS 138 455 - V15.0.0 - 5G; NG-RAN - ETSI
    [3]. 3GPP TS 38.300: "NR; NR and NG-RAN Overall Description; Stage 2". [4] ... Within 5G RAN, NRPPa protocol uses the services provided by the NGAP protocol.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] The evolution of 5G New Radio positioning technologies - Nokia
    In Rel-16, six different RAT- dependent techniques were introduced: • NR Enhanced cell ID (E-CID). • Downlink time difference of arrival (DL-TDOA). • Uplink ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] The 5G Evolution:3GPP Releases 16-17
    Jan 16, 2020 · The positioning requirements for regulatory (e.g. E911) and commercial applications are described in 3GPP ... control plane positioning for non- ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Secure User Plane Location Requirements - Open Mobile Alliance
    Jun 27, 2008 · This SUPL RD describes the high-level functional requirements for SUPL including SUPL-specific security, interoperability, and privacy. SUPL is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    [PDF] 13 Dec 2018 Open Mobile Alliance OMA-TS-ULP-V3_0-20181213-C
    Dec 13, 2018 · In version 3.0 of SUPL, the following new features and services were added: • Support for LPPe. • Generic SUPL Session. • 3rd Party Relative ...
  38. [38]
    https://www.openmobilealliance.org/release/SUPL/V3_0-20181213-C/OMA-TS-ULP-V3_0-20181213-C.pdf
  39. [39]
    [PDF] First aGPs — now BGPs - Geodesy & Geomatics Engineering
    We conducted both TTFF and accuracy tests. It took less than one second for the PC to accomplish the acqui- sition process. Acquisition time can vary depending ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] UserPlane Location Protocol - Open Mobile Alliance (OMA)
    Oct 28, 2019 · ... [OMA-Template-Spec-20190101-I]. 1. Scope. This document describes the UserPlane Location Protocol (ULP) for SUPL 2.0. ULP is a protocol-level ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] A Comparison of Assisted GPS, WiFi and Cellular Positioning
    Abstract. The 3G iPhone was the first consumer device to provide a seamless integration of three positioning technologies: Assisted GPS (A-GPS), ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Secure User Plane Location Architecture - Open Mobile Alliance
    Apr 17, 2012 · The SUPL architecture depends on [OMA RLP 1.0] or [OMA RLP 1.1]. This document describes the architecture for SUPL 2.0. 4.1 Planned Phases. SUPL ...
  43. [43]
    Tracing the development of GPS geolocation - u-blox
    Jul 14, 2023 · Finally, by the end of 2007, Apple released the first mobile device with assisted GPS location featuring Google Maps. This marked a significant ...
  44. [44]
    Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements - Federal Register
    Nov 18, 2010 · Two years after the Commission adopts new rules, on a county-by-county basis, 67% of Phase II calls must be accurate to within 50 meters in all ...Missing: GNSS E112
  45. [45]
    [PDF] SUMMARY OF E911 PHASE II
    Feb 1, 2002 · This fact sheet summarizes the enhanced 911 (E911) Phase II implementation plans and mandatory conditions adopted by the Commission for five ...Missing: GNSS E112
  46. [46]
    Server-Assisted GPS vs Asset Tracking Device Comparison - Concox
    Nov 6, 2020 · Compare server-assisted GPS and asset tracking devices for fleet positioning accuracy, cost, and infrastructure.
  47. [47]
    GPS: Too power-hungry for small asset tracking solutions? Not - u-blox
    Jul 15, 2021 · In industrial asset tracking applications, managing a large fleet of GPS-enabled asset tags to keep tabs on parcels, boxes, roll cages, ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Location-Based Services (LBS)
    GNSS is the location technology providing the best accuracy in open sky situations, especially in areas with few telecom towers. In indoor situations, Wi-Fi and ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] GNSS inside mobile phones
    In this article, we discuss the archi- tecture of single-die GNSS receiver chips. We also show the performance advan- tage of using multiple constellations,.
  50. [50]
    Just in: 3GPP completes 5G NR Release 17 - Qualcomm
    Mar 23, 2022 · Non-terrestrial networks (NTN): following the Release 16 study, Release 17 introduced 5G NR support for satellite communications. It ...Missing: LPP assistance
  51. [51]
    Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) - 3GPP
    May 14, 2024 · Satellite Access Node (SAN): node providing NR user plane and control plane protocol terminations towards NTN Satellite capable UE, and ...
  52. [52]
    Methodology for Simulating 5G and GNSS High-Accuracy Positioning
    The simulations results indicate that GNSS drives the achievable accuracy of its hybridisation with 5G cmWave, because non-line-of-sight (NLoS) conditions can ...
  53. [53]
    5G in Autonomous Vehicles: Expansion Stats - PatentPC
    Sep 23, 2025 · 5G networks can reduce vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication latency to as low as 1 millisecond. Latency refers to the time it takes for ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] 5G Positioning And Hybridization With GNSS Observations
    Dec 5, 2018 · provide sub-meter accuracy while the addition of 2 BS allows the precise positioning with sub-meter accuracy at. 99th percentile. Figure 18 ...
  55. [55]
    Sequans Introduces Low Power GNSS Positioning Technology on ...
    Dec 9, 2021 · The integrated GNSS solution offers Sequans' IoT customers accurate positioning with lower power consumption, removing the need of an external positioning ...
  56. [56]
    Why NB-IoT is the enabler of mass IoT apps and tracking - Quectel
    1. Cost efficiency. NB-IoT offers the potential to enable tracking, tracing and other IoT apps at very low price points. · 2. Power consumption · 3. Real-time ...
  57. [57]
    What is GSMA SGP.32? Diving into the eSIM IoT standard
    Mar 25, 2024 · GSMA SGP.32 contains the technical specifications for the remote eSIM management of Internet of things (IoT) devices and other types of mobile device ...
  58. [58]
    DT, Iridium extend global IoT coverage with satellite–terrestrial ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · The agreement gives DT roaming access to Iridium NTN Direct, a 3GPP standards-based service that enables NB-IoT direct-to-device connectivity.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] ETSI TR 121 918 V18.0.0 (2025-04)
    The present document provides a summary of each and every 3GPP Release 18 Feature, and more generally of all Work ... the end of GNSS validity duration and a UE ...
  60. [60]
    An Overview of AI in 3GPP's RAN Release 18: Enhancing Next ...
    Mar 25, 2024 · The 3GPP Release-18 study on AI/ML for the NR air interface is a pioneering initiative in the 3GPP's development of wireless communication standards.Published: 25 Mar 2024 · Xingqin Lin · 2. General Ai/ml FrameworkMissing: GNSS acquisition
  61. [61]
    Emerging Trends in GNSS Technology: What to Expect in 2025
    Feb 14, 2025 · The expansion of multi-constellation and multi-frequency GNSS receivers is one of the most exciting trends in 2025.Missing: UAVs | Show results with:UAVs
  62. [62]
    GNSS Modules Improve Accuracy and Implementation - DigiKey
    Dec 19, 2018 · Techniques such as assisted GNSS improve cold start TTFF from around 60 s for first generation GNSS modules to 27 s (for GPS and GLONASS ...
  63. [63]
    Up to 4x battery life: The benefits of assisted GPS in asset tracking
    Mar 23, 2023 · Power consumption evaluation of real-life asset tracking applications shows that the device battery life is on average between 2.4 and 4.3 times ...Missing: cost | Show results with:cost
  64. [64]
    [PDF] A-GNSS Over-the-Air Test Methodology
    Acceptable response time to network. 20.3 seconds. Success rate. 95 successful fixes with the necessary accuracy out of 100 attempts (95%). Position accuracy.<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Location Privacy Challenges and Solutions, Part 1 - Inside GNSS
    Sep 19, 2017 · For A-GNSS, secure architectures exist (L. Wirola et alia), e.g., the Open Mobile Alliance Secure User Plane Location Protocol (OMA SUPL) which ...
  66. [66]
    Self-ephemeris™ | Technology | GPS Receiver Chips & Modules
    Therefore, a warm start requires more time than a hot start. The active ephemeris validity period is usually 4 hours, and, if exceed, the ephemeris data must ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Measuring Latency in Location Based Services
    Relevant areas of investigation include hardware sensor polling rate limitations, sensor drift, network latency and congestion, and operating system/platform ...