Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Beam diameter

The beam diameter is the transverse width of a , such as a laser beam, measured perpendicular to its of and typically defined as twice the beam , where the radius represents the from the center to the point at which the beam's intensity drops to a specific fraction (often 1/e² or approximately 13.5%) of its peak value. This parameter is fundamental in for characterizing beam geometry, propagation behavior, and interaction with optical components. In laser systems, beam diameter is crucial for assessing beam quality and performance, influencing factors like focusability, , and . Several standardized definitions exist to quantify it precisely, accommodating different beam profiles: These definitions are selected based on application needs, such as precision manufacturing, medical procedures, or safety assessments like nominal ocular hazard distance (NOHD), where accurate beam sizing prevents thermal damage. Beam diameter typically ranges from micrometers to millimeters at the laser output, depending on the source (e.g., 0.5–1 mm for helium-neon lasers, 2.5–5 mm for diode lasers), and it expands with distance due to diffraction, governed by the beam waist and divergence angle. Tools like beam profilers enable direct measurement, often incorporating noise reduction and background subtraction for reliability.

Core Concepts

Physical Basis of Beam Diameter

The beam diameter characterizes the transverse spatial extent of an electromagnetic beam's profile, representing the width over which the beam's energy is primarily distributed perpendicular to its direction of propagation. In coherent optical beams, such as those produced by lasers, this profile is fundamentally Gaussian, with the electric field amplitude varying as \exp(-r^2 / w^2), where r is the radial distance from the beam and w is the beam radius defined at the $1/e^2 points. This Gaussian form arises from solutions to the paraxial , which approximates the for beams propagating nearly parallel to the , ensuring minimal losses over propagation distances. Central to the physical basis is the model, which describes how the beam evolves along its propagation axis z. The beam reaches its minimum diameter, known as the beam waist w_0, at the , beyond which it diverges due to . The beam radius w(z) at any axial position is given by w(z) = w_0 \sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{z}{z_R} \right)^2}, where z_R = \pi w_0^2 / \lambda is the Rayleigh range, defining the distance over which the beam area remains roughly constant before significant spreading occurs, and \lambda is the . Beam divergence, quantified as the far-field half-angle \theta \approx \lambda / (\pi w_0), quantifies this spreading and is inversely proportional to the waist size, highlighting the trade-off between focus tightness and propagation stability. These relations stem from the beam's complex curvature and structure, including the Gouy phase shift, which totals \pi radians over the full propagation distance from far field to far field due to transverse confinement. The foundational principles of beam diameter trace their origins to 19th-century , where Georges Gouy identified anomalous shifts in focused waves in 1890, laying groundwork for understanding diffraction-limited propagation. However, the modern conceptualization gained prominence with the invention of the in 1960 by , which produced highly coherent Gaussian-mode outputs and necessitated precise models for beam characterization in applications like precision cutting and . This development transformed beam diameter from a theoretical construct into a critical parameter for engineering light-matter interactions.

Factors Influencing Beam Propagation

The of a beam's diameter is fundamentally governed by , which causes the beam to spread over distance due to the wave nature of , with the extent of spreading proportional to the and inversely related to the initial beam waist. In free space, this diffraction-limited broadening is described for Gaussian beams, where higher-order modes or imperfections increase the effective . Absorption in the propagation medium reduces beam without directly altering the but can indirectly affect perceived width through diminished signal strength in measurements. , however, contributes to beam broadening by redirecting photons away from the primary path, particularly in aerosols or particulate-laden atmospheres, where dominates for wavelengths comparable to particle sizes. In clear atmospheric conditions, molecular like adds minimal broadening but accumulates over long paths. Properties of the propagation medium, such as variations in , significantly influence beam diameter; a uniform index primarily affects , but gradients—arising from , , or fluctuations—induce beam bending and . Atmospheric , characterized by refractive index fluctuations, exacerbates this through effects like beam wander and , leading to an effective increase in beam diameter by factors dependent on the turbulence strength C_n^2. In high-intensity beams, nonlinear optical effects emerge, where the Kerr nonlinearity induces a intensity-dependent refractive index change, causing self-focusing that reduces the beam diameter until balanced by or formation. This self-focusing, first theoretically described in the early , can collapse the beam to catastrophic intensities if power exceeds the critical threshold, altering propagation dynamics in media like or plasmas. The beam quality factor M^2 qualitatively modulates these influences, with M^2 = 1 for diffraction-limited beams yielding minimal broadening in free space, while M^2 > 1 accelerates , as seen in multimode outputs where the effective waist expands faster than in single-mode fibers. In , total internal reflection confines the beam, suppressing -induced broadening and maintaining near-constant diameter over long distances, unlike free-space where environmental factors dominate unchecked spreading. For example, a -delivered beam with low M^2 preserves focusability upon exit, whereas free-space beams degrade more rapidly due to cumulative and .

Definitions and Metrics

Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM)

The (FWHM) is defined as the distance between the two points on a beam's transverse profile where the intensity equals half of its peak value, providing a measure of the beam's effective at the central . This metric is particularly robust for characterizing beam diameters in both Gaussian and non-Gaussian profiles, such as distributions commonly encountered in lines or multimode outputs. For a , the FWHM relates directly to the standard 1/e² beam radius w by the \mathrm{FWHM} \approx 1.177 w, derived from the intensity profile I(r) = I_0 \exp(-2 r^2 / w^2), where the half-maximum occurs at r = w \sqrt{(\ln 2)/2}. This relation allows straightforward conversion between common size conventions in laser optics. In astronomy, FWHM quantifies the primary size or , directly influencing the and in observations, as seen in submillimeter arrays where it defines the effective diameter. Similarly, in , the FWHM of a or determines instrumental resolution, with R = \lambda / \Delta\lambda where \Delta\lambda is the FWHM, enabling precise analysis of emission features in astronomical and settings. A key advantage of FWHM is its ease of measurement using direct intensity thresholding, making it intuitive and applicable to irregular or clipped beam profiles without requiring complex statistical analysis. However, it is insensitive to low-intensity tails in the beam profile, potentially underestimating the total energy spread or effective size for non-Gaussian beams with significant peripheral content.

1/e² Width

The 1/e² width refers to the beam diameter measured at points where the drops to $1/e^2 \approx 0.135 (or about 13.5%) of the peak . This metric is particularly standard for characterizing Gaussian laser beams, as it aligns with the natural mathematical form of their transverse distribution. For an ideal Gaussian beam, the radial profile is described by the equation I(r) = I_0 \exp\left(-2 \frac{r^2}{w^2}\right), where I_0 is the on-axis peak , r is the radial distance from the beam axis, and w is the beam radius at the 1/e² level. The corresponding diameter is then d = 2w. This definition facilitates precise modeling of beam propagation, as the 1/e² contour captures approximately 86.5% of the total beam within the circle of radius w. The enclosed within a radius R is derived from integrating the over the circular area:
P(R) = P \left[ 1 - \exp\left( -\frac{2R^2}{w(z)^2} \right) \right],
where P is the total , obtained as P = \frac{\pi w(z)^2 I_0}{2}. Setting R = w(z) yields P(R)/P = 1 - e^{-2} \approx 0.865, confirming the 86.5% containment. The full 1/e² beamwidth is thus d = 2 w(z), with w(z) = w_0 \sqrt{1 + (z/z_R)^2}, where w_0 is the radius and z_R = \pi w_0^2 / \lambda is the range.
The 1/e² width became a standardized in the laser industry during the 1970s, reflecting the growing adoption of theory in practical applications. It directly informs key performance indicators, such as the beam parameter product w_0 \theta, where w_0 is the beam waist radius (at 1/e²) and \theta is the far-field half-angle; for a diffraction-limited , this product equals \lambda / \pi, with \lambda being the . This relation underscores the metric's role in assessing beam quality and focusing ability. Despite its ubiquity, the 1/e² width assumes a perfect Gaussian profile and thus has limitations when applied to multimode beams, where higher-order modes introduce deviations from the ideal shape, leading to inaccurate size estimates. In such cases, alternative metrics may be necessary to capture the full beam structure. The 1/e² width offers simplicity in characterizing fundamental-mode Gaussian beams, directly tying to the spot size parameter w(z) for propagation modeling. However, it has limitations for non-Gaussian profiles, such as multimode or distorted beams, where the $1/e^2 intensity contour does not reliably enclose 86% of the energy due to deviations from the assumed Gaussian shape.

Second-Moment Width (D4σ)

The second-moment width, denoted as D_{4\sigma}, provides a statistically rigorous for the of a laser by leveraging the variance of the distribution across the entire transverse profile. This approach treats the beam as a weighted by local intensity, where the second moment captures the spread of energy without assuming a specific shape. Formally, D_{4\sigma} = 4 \sqrt{\langle r^2 \rangle}, with \langle r^2 \rangle = \frac{\int r^2 I(r,\theta) \, r \, dr \, d\theta}{\int I(r,\theta) \, r \, dr \, d\theta} representing the intensity-weighted mean squared radial distance from the , integrated over the full two-dimensional plane. This derivation arises from the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation \sigma = \sqrt{\langle r^2 \rangle - \langle r \rangle^2}, which simplifies to \sqrt{\langle r^2 \rangle} for a centered beam (\langle r \rangle = 0), yielding the full width as $4\sigma. For an ideal with profile I(r) = I_0 \exp(-2r^2 / w^2), D_{4\sigma} exactly matches the $1/e^2 width $2w, where w is the Gaussian radius. The (ISO) 11146 partially incorporates this metric in its methods for beam width determination, emphasizing its use in propagation ratio calculations like the M^2 factor for quality assessment. It proves particularly advantageous for noisy or asymmetric beams, as the moment-based averages over the complete content, reducing to outliers or irregularities that could skew threshold-dependent measures. Computing D_{4\sigma} necessitates two-dimensional of the captured profile, often obtained via array detectors like cameras in beam profilers, with preprocessing to subtract background noise and define a encompassing at least three times the expected diameter. This ensures accurate location and evaluation, though it demands higher computational resources compared to simpler thresholding techniques.

Knife-Edge Width

The knife-edge width serves as a practical for beam diameter, determined from the lateral distance traversed by a sharp edge during a scan that reduces the transmitted from 90% to 10% of its total value. This metric captures the effective extent of the beam's cross-section based on occlusion, providing a robust estimate that bridges theoretical profiles with experimental measurements and often approximates the (FWHM) for near-Gaussian beams. For a intensity profile I(r) = I_0 \exp\left(-2 r^2 / w^2 \right), where w denotes the 1/e² radius, the knife-edge width d_\mathrm{KE} relates to w through the cumulative power distribution, yielding the approximation d_\mathrm{KE} \approx 1.28 w. This relation arises from solving the integrals describing the occluded power fractions at the 10% and 90% thresholds, with the positions occurring at approximately \pm 0.64 w from the center. The technique emerged in early laser laboratories during the , coinciding with the initial development and characterization of coherent sources, and was refined in subsequent studies for precise measurements down to micrometer scales. Key error sources include at the knife edge, which introduces fringe patterns and non-monotonic variations in the measured power curve, potentially biasing the width estimate by several percent depending on beam wavelength and edge quality. Variants of the knife-edge approach encompass the basic linear scan for one-dimensional profiling and hybrid implementations that integrate data with direct , such as shadowgraphy on a detector array, to enhance resolution and mitigate artifacts while enabling full two-dimensional mapping.

D86 Width

The D86 width serves as an energy-containment metric particularly suited for multimode or irregular laser beams, where traditional intensity-based definitions may falter due to non-uniform profiles. It is defined as the of a circle centered on the beam's that encloses 86% of the total beam , making it a versatile measure for assessing effective beam size in applications requiring precise power distribution knowledge. This width is determined through cumulative , starting from the beam and expanding radially outward until the integrated power reaches the 86% threshold, based on the two-dimensional . For Gaussian beams, the D86 width aligns precisely with the (1/e²) beamwidth, as the enclosed power within this is approximately 86.5%, derived from the radial power distribution P(r). This equivalence stems from the Gaussian intensity profile I(r) = I_0 exp(-2 r² / w²), where the of P(r) over the area confirms the fraction without needing profile-specific adjustments. The metric's formulation involving P(r) allows it to generalize beyond ideal Gaussians, providing a consistent enclosure-based for arbitrary shapes. The D86 width has been widely used in and high-power systems since the 1990s, offering robustness for multimode outputs and distorted profiles common in these domains, where power enclosure directly impacts coupling efficiency and thermal management. For elliptic or non-circular beams, ISO 11146 incorporates adaptations by defining D86 widths along the axes, enabling separate characterization of asymmetric profiles while maintaining the 86% enclosure criterion. Knife-edge scanning can approximate the D86 width by integrating successive power measurements across the beam.

Measurement Techniques

Knife-Edge Scanning Methods

Knife-edge scanning methods involve translating a sharp, opaque razor edge across the path of a laser beam while monitoring the transmitted power with a photodetector, such as a photodiode, to infer the beam's transverse intensity profile. The edge is typically mounted on a precision translation stage, and the beam is aligned perpendicular to the scanning direction to ensure a clean occlusion. As the edge progressively blocks portions of the beam, the detected power decreases from the full unblocked value to near zero, providing a cumulative distribution of the beam's power along the scan axis. This technique is particularly suited for determining beam diameters in one dimension, often repeated in orthogonal directions for full characterization. For Gaussian beams, the transmitted power data is fitted to an error function model to extract the beam width. The normalized transmitted power P_{\text{trans}} as a function of edge position x is given by \frac{P_{\text{trans}}(x)}{P_0} = \frac{1 + \erf\left( \frac{x - x_0}{\sigma} \right)}{2}, where P_0 is the total beam power, x_0 is the beam center, \erf is the error function, and \sigma is a scale parameter related to the beam's standard deviation. The beam width, such as the 1/e² diameter, is then derived from \sigma (specifically, the 1/e² radius w = \sigma \sqrt{2}), enabling precise quantification of the profile. Nonlinear least-squares fitting algorithms are commonly applied to the measured power curve for optimal parameter estimation. Calibration is essential to account for diffraction effects at the knife edge, which can introduce systematic errors by scattering light around the edge and altering the detected transmission. For beam sizes much larger than the wavelength (e.g., D \gg \lambda), diffraction typically contributes less than 5% error in width measurements if the detector collects light with sufficient numerical aperture, such as \tan \theta = 5\lambda / D to capture over 98% of the diffracted light. Historical development began in the mid-1970s with manual scanning using chopper-driven edges and oscilloscope readouts for micron-scale beams, evolving to automated systems by the 1980s with motorized stages and digital data acquisition for improved repeatability and speed. Early implementations demonstrated sub-wavelength precision, better than \lambda/8, laying the foundation for standardized beam metrology. The method offers advantages including low cost (requiring only basic mechanical and optical components) and suitability for in-situ measurements in optical setups without disturbing alignment. It excels for stable, continuous-wave beams where scanning speeds match detector response times. However, limitations arise with high-power or fast-pulsed beams, where edge damage, thermal effects, or insufficient can degrade accuracy, necessitating robust materials and high-bandwidth detectors. The knife-edge width, defined as the distance over which drops from 84% to 16% of maximum, aligns closely with second-moment metrics for Gaussian profiles under conditions.

Beam Profiling with Imaging

Beam profiling with imaging employs camera-based systems to capture two-dimensional spatial distributions of beams, enabling comprehensive mapping of beam diameters across the transverse plane. These systems typically utilize (CCD) or complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor () sensors positioned perpendicular to the beam path, often behind a to the beam onto the . To prevent sensor saturation from high- beams, neutral density (ND) filters are integrated, such as filter wheels offering attenuation levels from 20 dB to 60 dB, ensuring the beam power remains within the camera's (e.g., nanowatts to several watts depending on the model). Specialized software processes the raw data to generate maps, displaying the beam profile in for immediate visualization and analysis. Analysis of the captured images involves pixel-by-pixel evaluation of the intensity distribution to extract beam width metrics. For instance, the (FWHM) is determined by applying thresholding techniques to identify the contour at 50% of the peak value, followed by fitting algorithms (e.g., Gaussian or super-Gaussian models) to interpolate sub-pixel precision and account for . This method allows for robust estimation even in uncontrolled conditions, achieving (e.g., 0.05 pixels) for beams spanning only a few pixels on the . Second-moment widths, as defined elsewhere, can also be computed from the same data for complementary assessments. Sensor introduces errors, typically limiting accuracy to ±2-5% for beam diameter measurements under optimal conditions, with higher precision (±2%) possible using advanced noise-reduction algorithms like Ultracal. Hybrid approaches combine imaging with knife-edge techniques to validate results and mitigate imaging-specific artifacts, such as blooming (charge spillover between pixels) or non-uniform sensor response. In these methods, digital micromirror devices (DMDs) or spatial light modulators simulate a knife-edge by selectively reflecting or blocking portions of the beam before it reaches the camera, allowing sequential power scans to be overlaid with the full 2D image for cross-verification. This fusion enhances reliability for complex or dynamic beams, reducing artifacts by up to 50% compared to pure imaging alone. Post-2000 advancements have focused on capabilities for profiling dynamic or pulsed beams, driven by improvements in sensor technology. High-speed cameras, such as those with frame rates exceeding 1000 Hz and resolutions up to 12.3 megapixels, enable capture of transient profiles with minimal distortion from beam motion. These developments, including lower readout noise and enhanced software for automated fitting, have extended applicability to short-wave wavelengths and industrial monitoring, with typical error rates from sensor noise remaining in the 2-5% range.

Slit and Pinhole Scanning

Slit and pinhole scanning s provide aperture-based techniques for measuring diameters through scanning, offering high for one-dimensional profiles. In the slit method, a narrow fixed-width slit (typically 5–25 μm) is scanned transversely across the beam while monitoring the transmitted power with a detector. For a sufficiently narrow slit, the transmitted power as a function of slit position x is proportional to the local beam intensity I(x), allowing reconstruction of the beam profile by differentiation or direct fitting. This approach is effective for beams larger than the slit width by a factor of about 4–5. For a , the intensity is I(x) \propto \exp\left(-2 \frac{x^2}{w^2}\right), where w is the 1/e² radius; the width is extracted by fitting the measured . An alternative variable-slit-width , with the slit centered on the and width w varied, yields transmitted T(w) = \erf\left( \frac{w}{w_{\text{beam}} \sqrt{2}} \right), from which the can be derived via \frac{dT}{dw} \propto I(w/2). The pinhole variant employs a small circular aperture with diameter much smaller than the beam size to sample local intensity at specific points. By scanning the pinhole across the beam and integrating the transmitted power measurements, a reconstructed intensity profile is obtained, enabling precise determination of the beam diameter. These techniques are well-suited for cleanroom applications involving micrometer-scale beams, such as in semiconductor lithography, where high spatial resolution is critical without introducing contaminants. However, in high-power laser scenarios, the apertures can suffer thermal damage or distortion due to absorbed energy, limiting their use unless power attenuation is applied.

ISO 11146 Compliant Methods

The ISO 11146 series of standards, particularly ISO 11146-1:2021, provides standardized test methods for characterizing widths, angles, and propagation ratios, applicable to both continuous-wave and pulsed , including those from laser diodes and LEDs. This standard emphasizes the second-moment method, which calculates widths based on the variance of the intensity distribution (D4σ width), and truncation-based methods, such as the 86% enclosed energy width (D86), which account for partial occlusion in practical measurements. These approaches ensure consistent quantification of diameters for propagating beams, addressing challenges like and truncation effects in real-world . For elliptic (simple astigmatic) beams, where the intensity distribution differs along the principal axes, ISO 11146-1 requires separate measurements of beam widths in the x and y directions, denoted as w_x and w_y, to capture the beam's asymmetry. The ellipticity ratio ε is defined as the ratio of the smaller to the larger principal width (ε = w_min / w_max), with beams considered effectively circular if ε ≥ 0.87, allowing simplified analysis; otherwise, independent propagation parameters are computed for each axis. This handling is crucial for propagating beams, as astigmatism affects focusability and divergence differently in orthogonal planes, and the standard aligns with related norms like ISO 11145 for consistent terminology. The measurement procedure outlined in ISO 11146 involves multi-plane scanning along the beam propagation axis to determine parameters like the beam quality factor , requiring at least 10 transverse planes with half positioned within one of the and the other half beyond. Data from these planes are fitted to hyperbolic curves for size, location, and , enabling accurate modeling of beam evolution. Compliant methods integrate knife-edge scanning for high-power or precise and camera-based profilers for full 2D profiles, with the standard specifying error tolerances and aperture corrections to ensure reproducibility across instruments. For elliptic beams, orthogonal scans or 2D imaging at each plane yield separate x and y caustics, supporting certification in applications like processing.

Applications and Standards

Role in Laser Optics

In laser optics, the beam diameter plays a pivotal role in determining the focusing performance of optical systems, as it directly influences the achievable spot size at the . For a , the minimum spot diameter w_0 at the is approximated by w_0 \approx \frac{\lambda f}{\pi w}, where \lambda is the , f is the of the , and w is the input beam radius (half the diameter); thus, a larger beam diameter enables a smaller focused spot size by reducing the effective of the system. This relationship underscores the importance of expanding the beam diameter before focusing to achieve diffraction-limited performance, minimizing aberrations and maximizing at the target. Beam diameter is intrinsically linked to overall beam quality, quantified by the M^2 factor, which measures how closely a laser beam approximates an ideal in terms of propagation characteristics. The M^2 value scales the beam parameter product (beam waist diameter times far-field angle), rendering it invariant under free-space propagation or through lossless optical elements; for an ideal , M^2 = 1, but real beams with larger diameters relative to their divergence often exhibit M^2 > 1, indicating reduced focusability. This invariance ensures that beam diameter specifications guide system design for consistent performance over distance, as deviations in diameter can amplify M^2-induced broadening. In laser , the beam critically affects mode by determining the overlap between the curvature and resonator mirror profiles, as analyzed in the ray matrix formalism. Stable resonators require the beam to align with the cavity geometry to confine higher-order modes and prevent walk-off losses; for instance, in a hemispherical , an optimal beam at the flat mirror maintains confinement within the stability diagram's boundaries. Similarly, in beam delivery , mismatches between the incident beam and optical element apertures lead to clipping and insertion losses, where even a 10% mismatch can introduce up to 1-2% loss due to at edges. Etendue conservation further highlights beam diameter's role in optical throughput, as the product of beam area (proportional to diameter squared) and remains invariant in paraxial systems without losses. A larger beam diameter increases the , allowing higher power throughput in multimode systems but limiting for applications requiring tight focusing; this conservation principle dictates that diameter expansions, such as via telescopes, preserve overall system efficiency while redistributing angular content.

Industrial and Scientific Uses

In industrial , particularly for welding and cutting processes, beam diameters are typically maintained below 1 —often in the range of 50 to 900 µm—to ensure high precision and minimize defects such as incomplete or excessive material . Continuous of beam diameter is essential, as positional tolerances must be less than half the beam diameter to avoid inconsistencies in weld quality or cut edges. For instance, in micro-welding, single-mode lasers produce focused beams with core diameters around 9 µm, enabling intricate joins in and devices without damage. In scientific research, beam diameter plays a critical role in high-precision applications like particle accelerators, where transverse beam sizes are controlled to the micron scale—such as 10–100 µm—for optimal transport and collision efficiency. Similarly, in astronomical , beam diameters are shaped and optimized, often elliptical with axes 1.5 to 2 times larger in one direction, to deliver high-quality guide stars that correct atmospheric for sharper . A notable is in LIDAR systems for and autonomous navigation, where beam diameter directly impacts over distance; smaller initial diameters reduce , maintaining spot sizes under several millimeters at ranges up to kilometers to achieve sub-meter accuracy. However, measurement of beam diameter in harsh environments, such as high-temperature industrial settings exceeding 1000°C during processing, presents challenges including degradation and optical distortions from thermal gradients. Techniques like knife-edge scanning can provide rapid profiling in these conditions, though they require robust, cooled instrumentation to maintain accuracy.

Evolving Standards

The measurement of laser beam diameter began with ad-hoc techniques in the , shortly after the of the in 1960, relying on rudimentary methods such as knife-edge scanning and Ronchi rulings to assess beam profiles without standardized protocols. These early approaches were inconsistent and application-specific, often limited by the lack of precise instrumentation for quantifying beam widths or divergence. By the 1970s and 1980s, the (ANSI) Z136 series emerged to address , with the first edition of ANSI Z136.1 published in 1973 and significant revisions in 1986 incorporating beam diameter as a key parameter for hazard evaluation, such as in calculating nominal ocular hazard distances. The standard has continued to evolve, with the latest edition ANSI Z136.1-2022 providing updated guidance on beam parameters for safe use across applications. The development of comprehensive international standards accelerated in the late , culminating in ISO 11146, which established rigorous methods for width, , and measurements; its initial publication occurred in 1999, with the first edition of ISO 11146-1 specifically for stigmatic and simple astigmatic beams released in 2005. This standard built on prior safety-focused guidelines like ANSI Z136 by providing detailed, reproducible techniques, such as second-moment (D4σ) calculations, to ensure consistency across global applications. Post-2015 updates, including the revision of ISO 11146-1, have extended applicability to advanced scenarios, though gaps persist in addressing beams, where techniques like ion-based profiling are emerging to characterize non-classical light profiles without traditional ISO-compliant tools. Ongoing advancements highlight future trends toward integrating for real-time beam analysis, such as neural networks that automate D4σ measurements from camera images, enabling faster and more adaptive profiling in dynamic environments. For specialized systems like free-electron lasers, where beam diameters often reach sub-micrometer scales with high , emerging protocols are being developed to adapt ISO methods, focusing on emittance and overlap with beams to support next-generation sources. Global harmonization efforts are led by bodies like the (IEC), which maintains safety standards such as IEC 60825-1:2014 (with 2021 amendment) for laser product classification including beam parameters, and , which collaborates on joint ISO/ASTM standards like 52941:2020 for laser beam qualification in additive manufacturing. Additionally, in 2023, the U.S. FDA issued Laser Notice 56, requiring alignment with updated international safety standards by the end of 2024, further emphasizing beam diameter in hazard assessments.

References

  1. [1]
    Beam Radius - RP Photonics
    The beam diameter is generally defined as twice the beam radius – no matter what the particular definition of beam radius is. For Gaussian beams, the FWHM ...Definition of Beam Radius · Definition of Beam Radius for... · Effective Beam Area
  2. [2]
    Fundamentals of Lasers
    ### Summary of Beam Diameter in Laser Fundamentals
  3. [3]
    Laser Beam Measurement Vocabulary - Ophir Optronics
    Beam Width or Beam Diameter. The measured diameter of a laser spot. There are many different ways to measure a beam. The measurement method is determined by the ...
  4. [4]
    The beginner's guide on spot size of laser beam - Gentec-EO
    Jul 10, 2023 · There are three common beam diameter definitions: FWHM, 1/e 2 and D4σ. Here is a quick overview of how they are calculated and how they are related.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] 2.4 Paraxial Wave Equation and Gaussian Beams
    The Gaussian beam is often formulated in terms of the complex beam pa- rameter or q-parameter. The propagation of the beam in free space and later even through ...
  6. [6]
    Gaussian Beams - SPIE
    The equation shows that the beam parameter product (BPP), defined as the product of beam waist radius w0 and the divergence angle, is λ / π and thus ...
  7. [7]
    Physical origin of the Gouy phase shift - Optica Publishing Group
    The Gouy phase shift plays an important role in optics. It explains the phase advance for the secondary Huygens wavelets emanating from a primary wave front.
  8. [8]
    Gouy Phase Shift - RP Photonics
    The Gouy phase shift is an additional phase shift in focused Gaussian beam propagation ... Gouy phase shift [1], discovered by Louis Georges Gouy in 1890:.
  9. [9]
    Laser Beams and Resonators - Optica Publishing Group
    This paper is a review of the theory of laser beams and resonators. Emphasis is placed on formulations and derivations which lead to basic understanding.Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  10. [10]
    Gaussian Beam Propagation
    ### Summary of Gaussian Beam Propagation Content
  11. [11]
    M^2 Factor – M squared, laser beam, quality factor ... - RP Photonics
    The M2 factor (M squared factor), also called beam quality factor or beam propagation factor, is a common measure of the beam quality of a laser beam.Missing: absorption scattering turbulence
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Atmospheric Effects on Laser Propagation '
    This report deals with several of the losses associated with the transmission path including absorption, scattering, and turbulence. The bulk of the work has ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Experiments for Laser Beam Propagation through Optical Turbulence
    Dec 19, 2019 · The three primary atmospheric phenomena that affect optical wave propagation are absorption, scattering, and refractive-index fluctuations—i.e., ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Atmospheric Impact on Laser Beam Propagation - reposiTUm
    The more challenging part is the attenuation due to atmospheric turbulence. The turbu- lent environment leads to an additional broadening of the laser beam ...
  15. [15]
    Self-Focusing of Optical Beams - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · The nonlinear index of refraction is responsible for self-action effects in optical beam propagation, including self-focusing.<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Characterization of Free-space Gaussian Beam Propagation and ...
    Aug 14, 2024 · Absorption and scattering by the constituent gases and particulates of the atmosphere give rise primarily to attenuation of the laser beam [50].Missing: M² | Show results with:M²
  18. [18]
    Gaussian beams - RP Photonics
    Definition: light beams where the electric field profile in a plane perpendicular to the beam axis can be described with a Gaussian function.Propagation of Gaussian Beams · Complex q Parameter · Astigmatic Beams<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    How to Calculate Laser Beam Size - Ophir Photonics
    Feb 1, 2017 · Clear definition, but only about 86% of the laser power is contained within the 1/e2 width.
  20. [20]
    What is Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM)? - StellarNet, Inc.
    Apr 21, 2017 · The full width at half maximum (FWHM) is the width of a line shape at half of its maximum amplitude, as shown below.Missing: beam diameter relation astronomy cons
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Automated Laser Cavity Mirror Alignment & Beam Profiler ...
    sources will come with their own unique advantages and disadvantages which are outlined ... beam diameter in terms of FWHM. Although the second moment width is ...
  22. [22]
    ALMA Basics — ALMA Science Portal at ESO - Eso.org
    The full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of the primary beam is usually taken as the diameter of the field of view of an interferometer; however, note that the ...Missing: spectroscopy | Show results with:spectroscopy<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Spectrographs - NMSU Astronomy
    Note that the fwhm of an unresolved line is dependent upon the observed wavelength in the spectrum. Because the resolution, R, is a constant, the ob- served ...
  24. [24]
    Lasers and optical radiation (EHC 23, 1982) - INCHEM
    ... 1/e or 0.37 of the maximum, whereas the beam diameter is almost always defined at 1/e2 points in the laser industry. FIGURE 8 4.6.2. Beam divergence The ...
  25. [25]
    M² Theoretical Frameworks — laserbeamsize 2.1.0 documentation
    The different definitions have in common that they all reduce to the 1/e²-diameter when applied to an M²=1 fundamental mode beam, but when applied to a mixed ...
  26. [26]
    Beam Width Measurement Methods in Beamwatch - Ophir Optronics
    D4σ (Iterative). The D4σ (Iterative) beam width method uses a second moment approach to compute the width of each one-dimensional beam profile prior to ...
  27. [27]
    A guide on laser beam quality and M2 measurement - Gentec-EO
    Sep 8, 2023 · In this guide, we will introduce you to the concept of laser beam quality measurement with the M2 parameter, which quantifies the laser beam quality, and how ...Missing: broadening | Show results with:broadening
  28. [28]
    Measurement of a Gaussian laser beam diameter through the direct ...
    In the course of this paper, we will describe the mathematical procedure by which knife-edge data are inverted to yield accurate beam diameter values.
  29. [29]
    Measurement of the μm sized radius of Gaussian laser beam using the scanning knife-edge
    - **Definition of Beam Radius Using Knife-Edge**: The article describes a method to measure the micrometer-sized radius of a Gaussian laser beam using the scanning knife-edge technique, though specific equations are not accessible without a subscription.
  30. [30]
    New insights on the knife edge technique of laser beam ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · This work presents a systematic experimental study of the knife-edge technique (KET) for Gaussian beam profiling, with particular focus on the ...Missing: diameter | Show results with:diameter
  31. [31]
    How do you define laser beam size? - Gentec-EO
    Mar 29, 2023 · The D86 beam width is the diameter of a circle that contains 86% of the laser's total power. The D4σ beam width definition is the international ...Missing: Rayleigh | Show results with:Rayleigh
  32. [32]
    When to Use the D86 Beam Width Measurement Method
    Sep 15, 2016 · Rather than using the 1D or 2D profile of the beam to determine the width, the D86 method uses the diameter of a 86.5% power enclosure as the ...Missing: Rayleigh | Show results with:Rayleigh
  33. [33]
    Gaussian Beam Size - Optics Notes
    Jan 22, 2013 · This means that the knife edge traveling distance between the 15.9% and 84.1% power levels is equal to the 1/e2 radius. Alternatively, if one ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    CMOS Camera Beam Profilers - Thorlabs
    An integrated filter wheel with 6 high-quality neutral density (ND) filters allows the profiler to be adapted for use with beam intensities from nanowatts to 1 ...
  36. [36]
    What is a neutral density filter for in laser applications? - Gentec-EO
    May 27, 2020 · An ND filter is a laser beam attenuator. In other words, it is designed to reduce the intensity of the beam without changing its other properties.Missing: setup | Show results with:setup
  37. [37]
    Robust beam width estimation with sub-pixel resolution in uncontrolled imaging conditions
    ### Summary of Pixel-by-Pixel Fitting for Beam Width Extraction in Imaging Profilers
  38. [38]
    A discussion of Laser Beam Profiling and the subject of Accuracy
    ### Summary of Accuracy and Error in Camera-Based Beam Profiling
  39. [39]
    Motion-free hybrid design laser beam propagation analyzer using a ...
    To measure w ( f ) , knife-edge beam profiling using the DMD-based beam profiler is employed [16, 17]. Using software control, each micromirror on the DMD can ...
  40. [40]
    High Speed SWIR Laser Beam Profiling with C-RED Cameras
    In this paper, we demonstrate high-speed laser beam profiling to study the effect of atmospheric turbulence on a laser beam's power distribution.
  41. [41]
    Camera Based Beam Profiler Analysis 2025 and Forecasts 2033
    Rating 4.8 (1,980) Jun 10, 2025 · Furthermore, advancements in camera technology, such as higher resolution and faster frame rates, are enhancing the accuracy and speed of beam ...Missing: 2000 | Show results with:2000
  42. [42]
    High-resolution knife-edge laser beam profiling - ScienceDirect
    The method is equivalent to the slit method but with a variable slit width also on a sub-μm scale. A signal-to-noise ratio of 106 : 1 has been demonstrated ...
  43. [43]
    Simple precision measurements of optical beam sizes
    We present a simple high-precision method to quickly and accurately measure the diameters of Gaussian beams, Airy spots, and central peaks of Bessel beams.<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Diffraction of Hermite–Gaussian beams by a slit
    In this paper we have treated the diffraction of Hermite–Gaussian beams by a slit by using the two-dimensional version of the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld equation of ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] A Method to Determine the Ultrafast Laser Beams Spot Size - arXiv
    4(b) Pinhole scanned laser beam profile at second lens position. 3. Conclusion. We have derived equations for beam waist as a function of variable spot size ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] 3.4 Introduction to Scanning-Slit Profilers
    The scanning slit beam profiler moves two narrow orthogonal slits in front of a linear photo-detector through the beam under analysis.
  47. [47]
    Time-resolved beam profilers can take the heat | Laser Focus World
    There are also several disadvantages of such systems; they cannot work with high-power lasers (the detector would be destroyed) or with pulsed lasers (no ...
  48. [48]
    ISO 11146-1:2021
    In stock 2–5 day deliveryThis document specifies methods for measuring beam widths (diameter), divergence angles and beam propagation ratios of laser beams.Missing: details elliptic second- moment
  49. [49]
    Systematic Error in ISO 11146 Measurements - DataRay Inc.
    May 12, 2016 · In this blog post, we address the systematic error inherent to the measurement of beam width as laid out in the ISO 11146 standard.Missing: diameter | Show results with:diameter<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Laser Beam Metrology for AM-Bench 2022
    The ellipticity drops below the ISO 11146-1:2021 value for treatment as a circular beam (ε ≥ 0.87) only at the extremes of the nominal diameter range of 44 µm ...Missing: moment | Show results with:moment
  51. [51]
    [PDF] INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 11146-1
    ISO 11146-1 is a standard for test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios, specifically for stigmatic and simple ...Missing: truncation | Show results with:truncation
  52. [52]
    Laser beam diagnostics: a new approach to ISO 11146 standard
    Mar 4, 2024 · ISO 11146 standard defines that at least 10 observation planes are mandatory, half of them within one Rayleigh length (zR), the other half ...
  53. [53]
    Beam Quality - RP Photonics
    Some high-power solid-state lasers exhibit a poor beam quality, essentially because strong thermal effects in the laser crystal lead to beam distortions.Missing: D86 history
  54. [54]
    Complete M² Measurement Systems - Thorlabs
    Scanning-slit beam profilers acquire power measurements while sampling segments of the beam along two orthogonal axes, and the beam profile is reconstructed ...Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
  55. [55]
    M² Measurement | DataRay Inc.
    Apr 12, 2016 · Robust, multi-plane beam profiling; Real-time M², divergence, pointing, and focal measurements. Product Details. Automated M² Stage. Product ...Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    Light Collection and Optical System Throughput - Newport
    The concept of optical extent has been widely applied, though under a variety of names. These include etendue, luminosity, light-gathering power and throughput.
  58. [58]
    Essential considerations for laser welding - The Fabricator
    Dec 2, 2020 · Typical welding spot sizes are from 50 to 900 µm in diameter. The allowable positional tolerance must be less than half the beam diameter to ...
  59. [59]
    Fiber Laser Micro Welding: Single Mode or Multi Mode?
    Single mode fiber lasers are typically delivered via fiber with a core diameter of around 9 microns producing a narrow, high intensity beam which can be focused ...
  60. [60]
    X-ray Beam Size Monitor - CLASSE: CesrTA
    The device can measure vertical beam sizes of 10–100 μm on a turn-by-turn, bunch-by-bunch basis at beam energies of ~2GeV. The xBSM images X-rays that emerge ...Missing: diameter scale
  61. [61]
    Beam shaping for laser-based adaptive optics in astronomy
    ... beam diameter is between 1.5 and 2 times larger along x than along y. The beam quality is always worse in the x-axis with GeMS because it corresponds to the ...
  62. [62]
    LiDAR specifications explained - Blickfeld
    A beam sent by LiDAR usually widens or diverges over an increasing distance, and may hit different targets which consequently leads to multiple return at ...
  63. [63]
    Overcoming the Challenges of Measuring High Power NIR Lasers
    While laser power/ energy can be measured by a conventional thermopile sensor with water cooling, other parameters such as Spot Size, Beam shape, Focal position ...Missing: real- | Show results with:real-
  64. [64]
    A History of the Laser: 1960 - 2019 | Features - Photonics Spectra
    May 16, 1960: Theodore H. Maiman, a physicist at Hughes Research Laboratories in Malibu, Calif., constructs the first laser using a cylinder of synthetic ruby ...
  65. [65]
    Measurement of 1-μm diam beams - Optica Publishing Group
    Measurements of beams of ~1 μm in diameter are presented. Three approaches, one using a Ronchi ruling, the other two based on knife-edge scan techniques are ...
  66. [66]
    Evolution of laser safety standards ANSI Z136.1s - AIP Publishing
    Dec 1, 1998 · Today's dreams are the same. Tremendous progress has been made since the early 1960s, and the need for safety standards is still increasing.
  67. [67]
    Laser Safety Sign Changes Cause Confusion - Photonics Spectra
    This is how the laser Z136 committee was formed, and in April 1973 the first “Safe Use of Lasers” standard was published. One result of the standard was the ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    ANSI Laser Safety Standard Historical Development - AIP Publishing
    The ANSI Z136 Development​​ In 1969, an effort was initiated by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) at the request of the U.S. Department of Labor ...
  69. [69]
  70. [70]
    [PDF] ISO 11146-1
    Jan 15, 2005 · This first edition of ISO 11146-1, together with ISO/TR 11146-3 cancels and replaces ISO 11146:1999, the contents of which have been ...
  71. [71]
    Ion-Based Characterization of Laser Beam Profiles for Quantum ...
    In this work, we demonstrate how trapped ions themselves may be used to probe and optimize the laser beams used to drive quantum gate operations. Our technique ...2.2. Four-Photon Stark Shift · 3. Results · 3.2. Beam Intensity Profiles...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Measuring laser beams with a neural network
    Mar 2, 2022 · A deep neural network (NN) is used to simultaneously detect laser beams in images and measure their center coordinates, radii, and angular orientations.
  73. [73]
    The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers | Rev. Mod. Phys.
    Mar 9, 2016 · This paper reviews the physical principles, the theoretical models, and the numerical codes on which x-ray FELs are based.Missing: diameter | Show results with:diameter
  74. [74]
    IEC 60825-1:2014
    IEC 60825-1:2014 is a standard for the safety of laser products emitting radiation from 180 nm to 1 mm, classifying them by hazard and requiring manufacturer ...
  75. [75]
    New ISO/ASTM standard for PBF-LB in aerospace
    Jan 7, 2021 · Developed under ASTM Subcommittee F42.07, Additive Manufacturing Technologies Applications, this standard improves the ability for AM components ...