Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sensor array

A sensor array is a configuration of multiple sensors spatially arranged in a specific geometric pattern—such as linear, circular, or planar—to simultaneously detect and process signals from wavefields, including acoustic, electromagnetic, or mechanical phenomena, enabling the extraction of parameters like direction of arrival, source location, and signal characteristics through fused temporal and spatial data.^[1]^[2] Sensor arrays operate on fundamental principles of signal processing and sensing integration, where individual sensors (often termed sensels or elements) capture localized measurements that are combined using techniques like beamforming, subspace methods (e.g., MUSIC algorithm), or pattern recognition to enhance resolution, suppress noise, and resolve multiple sources beyond the limits of single-sensor systems.^[1]^[3] In signal processing contexts, arrays leverage array geometry and covariance matrices to model plane waves and estimate parameters such as delays and angles, while in chemical or tactile applications, they generate unique response patterns from diverse sensing technologies like piezoresistive, capacitive, or triboelectric elements for analyte identification or force mapping.^[2]^[4] Common configurations include uniform linear arrays (ULAs) for one-dimensional scanning, uniform circular arrays (UCAs) for 360-degree coverage, and matrix arrays (N-by-M) for two-dimensional surfaces.^[2]^[3] The field of sensor arrays originated in mid-20th-century advancements in radar and sonar systems, evolving from early spatial filtering and time-delay estimation techniques to sophisticated parametric approaches, with key milestones including the Maximum Entropy method in 1967 and subspace-based algorithms like MUSIC in the 1970s–1980s that dramatically improved parameter estimation accuracy.^[1] Since the early 2000s, developments have addressed challenges like model mismatches, non-uniform noise, and array imperfections through techniques such as compressive sensing and robust estimation for real-world uncertainties.^[5] Recent systematic reviews highlight over 360 studies from 2016 to mid-2025, emphasizing emerging technologies such as flexible electronic skins and bioimpedance arrays for multifunctional sensing.^[3] Sensor arrays find widespread applications across disciplines, including radar and sonar for target localization and interference suppression, wireless communications for spatial diversity and beam steering, medical imaging and diagnostics for precise waveform estimation, seismology for source detection, and environmental monitoring via chemical arrays for gas or liquid analyte identification.^[1]^[2] In human-machine interfaces, tactile sensor arrays enable gesture recognition and pressure mapping for robotics and wearables, while acoustic arrays support real-time sound source localization in smart devices.^[3] These systems continue to advance with integration into IoT and AI-driven platforms, offering scalable solutions for complex signal environments.^[4]

Fundamentals

Signal Model

The signal model in sensor arrays provides the mathematical framework for describing how incident signals from sources interact with the array elements, enabling subsequent processing for tasks such as direction finding and beamforming. This model typically assumes that signals propagate as waves and are captured by multiple sensors, with the array output represented as a vector of observations. Fundamental to this is the plane wave assumption, where incoming wavefronts are approximated as planar, implying that the source is sufficiently distant from the array such that the wavefront curvature is negligible across the array aperture. This far-field approximation holds when the source distance r exceeds approximately $2D^2 / [\lambda](/page/Lambda), where D is the array diameter and \lambda is the signal wavelength; in contrast, near-field scenarios involve spherical wavefronts with range-dependent phase variations, requiring more complex modeling that accounts for both angle and distance.^[6] For narrowband signals, where the bandwidth is small relative to the center frequency, the model simplifies significantly. The signal at each sensor experiences a phase shift due to the propagation delay from the source direction. For a uniform linear array (ULA) with M sensors spaced by distance d, the steering vector \mathbf{a}(\theta) capturing these phase shifts for a plane wave arriving from angle \theta (measured from the array broadside) is given by

\mathbf{a}(\theta) = \left[ 1, e^{j k d \sin\theta}, \dots, e^{j k (M-1) d \sin\theta} \right]^T,

where k = 2\pi / \lambda is the wavenumber.^[6]^[7] This vector normalizes the response such that the first element has zero phase. The array snapshot, or observation vector \mathbf{x}(t) at time t, then follows the model \mathbf{x}(t) = \mathbf{a}(\theta) s(t) + \mathbf{n}(t), where s(t) is the complex envelope of the source signal and \mathbf{n}(t) represents additive noise.^[6] Noise and interference are commonly modeled as additive zero-mean complex Gaussian processes, independent across snapshots but potentially spatially correlated across sensors, with covariance matrix \mathbf{R}_n = E[\mathbf{n}(t) \mathbf{n}^H(t)]. For simplicity, white Gaussian noise assumes \mathbf{R}_n = \sigma^2 \mathbf{I}, where \sigma^2 is the noise variance and \mathbf{I} is the identity matrix, reflecting uncorrelated sensor noise.^[6]^[7] Wideband signals, with significant bandwidth relative to the center frequency, require extensions to the narrowband model, as phase shifts become frequency-dependent. The signal is often decomposed into narrowband frequency bins via Fourier transform, with a steering vector \mathbf{a}(\theta, \omega) for each frequency \omega, leading to a frequency-domain snapshot model \mathbf{X}(\omega) = \mathbf{A}(\theta, \omega) S(\omega) + \mathbf{N}(\omega), where \mathbf{A} collects steering vectors across frequencies. This allows processing via frequency-domain beamforming while preserving the plane wave assumption in the far field.^[7]

Array Response

The array response, or steering vector, \mathbf{a}(\theta), describes how an incident plane wave from direction \theta propagates across the sensor elements, forming the basis for the array's spatial filtering capabilities. For a uniform linear array (ULA) of M omnidirectional sensors spaced d = \lambda/2 apart along the x-axis, where \lambda is the signal wavelength, the received signal at the m-th sensor experiences a phase delay \tau_m = (m-1) d \sin\theta / c, with c the speed of propagation. This leads to the steering vector \mathbf{a}(\theta) = [1, e^{j\pi \sin\theta}, e^{j2\pi \sin\theta}, \dots, e^{j(M-1)\pi \sin\theta}]^T, capturing the relative phase shifts that translate the incident wavefront into the array output vector \mathbf{x}(t) = \mathbf{a}(\theta) s(t) + \mathbf{n}(t), where s(t) is the source signal and \mathbf{n}(t) is noise.^[8] The beampattern B(\theta) = |\mathbf{w}^H \mathbf{a}(\theta)|^2 quantifies the array's directional sensitivity, where \mathbf{w} is the applied weight vector and \mathbf{w}^H its Hermitian transpose, representing the squared magnitude of the array's response to a unit-amplitude plane wave from angle \theta. This pattern illustrates how the array amplifies signals from desired directions while attenuating others, serving as a fundamental tool for analyzing spatial selectivity in beamforming applications.^[9] In the spatial domain, the array's resolution is determined by the mainlobe width of the beampattern, which is inversely proportional to the array aperture and typically approximated as $4 / (M N) for coprime sensor arrays achieving equivalent resolution to an M N-element ULA with fewer sensors. Sidelobes, representing unwanted secondary responses, arise from the finite number of elements and uniform weighting, often reaching peak levels around -13 dB in ULAs, which can degrade weak signal detection unless mitigated by extended geometries that reduce sidelobe height at the cost of additional sensors.^[10] The covariance matrix \mathbf{R} = E[\mathbf{x} \mathbf{x}^H] = \mathbf{a} \mathbf{a}^H \sigma_s^2 + \sigma_n^2 \mathbf{I} encapsulates the second-order statistics of the array output for a single source, where \sigma_s^2 and \sigma_n^2 are the signal and noise powers, respectively, and \mathbf{I} is the identity matrix; it is estimated via sample averaging over snapshots to enable subspace methods for direction finding. Covariance matching techniques provide efficient estimators that match the theoretical structure while approaching maximum likelihood performance at lower computational cost.^[11] Mutual coupling between closely spaced sensors distorts the array manifold by altering embedded element patterns and input impedances, introducing correlated noise and deviations in the steering vector that can create nulls or ill-conditioning in the response, particularly in dense arrays with spacing less than \lambda/2. Imperfections such as sensor position errors further exacerbate these effects, reducing effective aperture and efficiency, as seen in finite arrays where edge scattering amplifies distortions unless compensated by advanced modeling like beam coupling factors.^[12]

Design Principles

Geometry and Configurations

The geometry of a sensor array refers to the spatial arrangement of its elements, which fundamentally influences key performance metrics such as angular resolution, field of view, and sensitivity to interference. Common configurations include the uniform linear array (ULA), uniform circular array (UCA), uniform rectangular array (URA), and sparse or non-uniform arrays, each tailored to specific sensing requirements in applications like radar, sonar, and medical imaging.^[13]^[7] In a ULA, sensors are positioned at equal intervals along a straight line, typically with a fixed number of elements to balance cost and performance; this simplicity facilitates analytical processing but limits coverage to one dimension.^[14] The UCA places elements equidistantly on a circular aperture, enabling 360-degree azimuthal coverage with reduced sensitivity to direction-of-arrival estimation errors in non-linear scenarios.^[15] URAs arrange elements in a grid on a planar surface, extending ULA principles to two dimensions for improved elevation and azimuth resolution in imaging systems.^[16] Sparse or non-uniform arrays, by contrast, intentionally irregularize spacing to minimize the number of sensors while preserving a large effective aperture, often achieving higher degrees of freedom for source localization with fewer elements than dense counterparts.^[17]^[18] Element spacing trade-offs are central to array design, as excessive separation can degrade performance through unwanted artifacts. Specifically, inter-element distances greater than half the signal wavelength (d > \lambda/2) introduce grating lobes—secondary peaks in the array's response pattern that mimic the main lobe and cause spatial aliasing, complicating signal discrimination.^[19]^[20] To mitigate this, standard practice constrains spacing to d \leq \lambda/2, ensuring unambiguous direction finding, though this increases hardware costs for wideband or large-aperture systems.^[21] The effective aperture, defined as the physical span over which signals are coherently combined, directly relates to directivity; for linear arrays, it scales proportionally with the total array length, yielding narrower beams and higher resolution as aperture size grows.^[22] This relationship underscores the value of extended geometries, where directivity D approximates $2L/\lambda for a linear array of length L, emphasizing aperture efficiency in resource-constrained designs.^[23] Two-dimensional extensions, such as planar URAs, support simultaneous azimuth and elevation estimation by distributing elements across a flat surface, enhancing coverage for applications like surveillance.^[24] Volumetric arrays further generalize this to three dimensions, stacking layers of sensors to capture full spherical wavefronts, though they demand advanced fabrication to manage complexity and mutual coupling.^[25]^[26] Compared to dense configurations like ULAs or URAs, sparse arrays excel in snapshot efficiency—the ability to resolve multiple sources using fewer temporal samples—by exploiting non-uniform placements to expand virtual degrees of freedom (DOF). Dense arrays typically limit DOF to the number of physical sensors N, restricting source estimation to under N targets, whereas sparse designs can achieve O(N^2) DOF through coarray concepts, enabling robust performance in underdetermined scenarios with reduced computational load.^[27]^[28] This trade-off favors sparse geometries in high-resolution tasks, albeit at the potential cost of elevated sidelobe levels if not optimized.^[29]

Sensor Selection and Calibration

Sensor selection in sensor arrays is guided by key performance parameters that ensure compatibility with the intended application and signal characteristics. Primary criteria include sensitivity, which determines the minimum detectable signal level; bandwidth, defining the frequency range over which the sensor operates effectively; and dynamic range, specifying the span between the weakest and strongest signals without distortion or saturation.^[30] These factors must align with the signal type, such as selecting microphones for acoustic arrays to capture pressure variations in air or water, or antennas for radio frequency (RF) arrays to handle electromagnetic waves.^[30] Mismatches in these criteria can degrade overall array resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), making careful selection essential for applications like sonar or radar. Calibration techniques are critical to compensate for inherent imperfections in sensor arrays, ensuring uniform response across elements. Amplitude and phase matching involves estimating and correcting gain and phase discrepancies using methods like cross-spectral measurements in a diffuse field, where the sample covariance matrix recovers complex gains through least-square optimization.^[31] Gain equalization addresses variations in sensor amplitudes via low-rank matrix approximations or proximal algorithms, while self-calibration methods enable on-site adjustments without external references by jointly estimating array parameters and source signals. These approaches, often formulated as non-convex problems solved iteratively, improve accuracy in over-sampled configurations and are validated through numerical simulations showing reduced estimation errors.^[32] Error sources in sensor arrays primarily stem from sensor mismatch, such as gain and phase inconsistencies between elements, environmental factors like temperature fluctuations affecting transducer directivity, and long-term drift due to material aging or thermal expansion.^[33] Mitigation strategies include pre-distortion, where element-specific responses are incorporated into the array design to counteract mismatches upfront, and adaptive calibration, which dynamically adjusts parameters using modal matching frameworks to handle variations in real-time.^[33] These techniques enhance array robustness against imperfections, with drift addressed through periodic recalibration based on environmental monitoring.^[34] Proper calibration significantly impacts array gain and overall robustness by minimizing performance degradation from errors. Uncalibrated mismatches can reduce direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation accuracy and lower effective array gain by up to several dB, particularly in noisy environments, while calibrated arrays achieve near-ideal SNR improvements and maintain beamforming integrity.^[35] For instance, the Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System (SURTASS) is a towed hydrophone array used in sonar to locate submarines by exploiting time-of-arrival differences for direction finding and improved signal-to-noise ratio, enabling detection of quieter sources in underwater acoustics.^[36]

Types of Sensor Arrays

Antenna Arrays

Antenna arrays consist of multiple electromagnetic sensors, typically antennas, arranged in a specific geometry to detect and process radio frequency (RF) or microwave signals. These arrays function as sensor arrays by exploiting the phase and amplitude differences of incoming electromagnetic waves across elements to enhance signal directionality, resolution, and sensitivity. Unlike single antennas, arrays enable spatial filtering and beamforming, which are crucial for applications requiring precise control over signal reception or transmission. In radar systems, antenna arrays provide high-resolution imaging and target tracking by forming narrow beams that can be steered electronically without mechanical movement. For instance, phased array radars use these capabilities to detect aircraft or missiles at long ranges with rapid scanning. Wireless communications benefit from antenna arrays through multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) configurations, which increase data throughput and reliability in 5G and beyond networks by supporting spatial multiplexing. In radio astronomy, large-scale antenna arrays like the Very Large Array (VLA) synthesize high-resolution images of celestial sources by interferometrically combining signals from distributed elements. Phased arrays represent a key subclass of antenna arrays, where electronic steering is achieved by adjusting the phase of signals fed to or received from each element using phase shifters. This allows rapid beam repositioning in milliseconds, enabling agile operation in dynamic environments. The phase shift for the nth element is typically given by \theta_n = -k \mathbf{d}_n \cdot \mathbf{u}, where k is the wave number, \mathbf{d}_n is the position vector of the element, and \mathbf{u} is the steering direction unit vector, facilitating precise control over the array's radiation pattern. Polarization handling in antenna arrays is essential due to the vector nature of electromagnetic fields, where waves can be linearly, circularly, or elliptically polarized. Dual-polarized elements, such as crossed dipoles or patch antennas, allow simultaneous reception of orthogonal polarizations, enabling the extraction of full polarization information for improved target discrimination in radar or mitigation of fading in communications. Vector sensor models treat each array element as capturing both electric field components, modeled as \mathbf{E} = E_h \hat{h} + E_v \hat{v}, where \hat{h} and \hat{v} are horizontal and vertical polarization basis vectors, supporting advanced processing like polarization diversity. A prominent example is the active electronically scanned array (AESA), which integrates transmit/receive modules at each element for independent amplification and phase control, enhancing power efficiency and reliability in military radar systems. AESAs, such as those in the AN/APG-81 radar on the F-35 aircraft, offer multi-functionality, including simultaneous air-to-air and air-to-ground modes with electronic scanning angles up to ±60 degrees. These arrays have revolutionized defense applications by providing jam-resistant operation and graceful degradation if individual elements fail. Antenna arrays face unique challenges at high frequencies, including increased ohmic losses in feed networks that degrade efficiency, particularly above 10 GHz where skin effect dominates. Element pattern effects, such as mutual coupling between closely spaced antennas, distort the overall array factor and introduce grating lobes, necessitating careful spacing (typically λ/2) and decoupling techniques like metamaterials. These issues demand advanced materials, such as gallium nitride (GaN) for low-loss amplifiers, to maintain performance in millimeter-wave regimes.

Acoustic Arrays

Acoustic arrays consist of multiple pressure or velocity sensors designed to detect and process sound waves in both underwater and airborne environments, enabling enhanced spatial resolution and directionality through beamforming techniques.^[37] These arrays are particularly suited for applications requiring precise localization of acoustic sources, such as in sonar systems for naval defense, where they facilitate passive detection of underwater targets by capturing low-frequency noise signatures.^[38] In medical ultrasound imaging, acoustic arrays form phased arrays that steer and focus beams to produce high-resolution images of internal structures, improving diagnostic accuracy for conditions like tumors or vascular issues.^[39] For audio processing in airborne settings, microphone arrays employ beamforming to suppress noise and enhance speech recognition in environments like conference rooms or hands-free devices, achieving robust performance in distant speech scenarios.^[40] Hydrophones, used primarily in underwater acoustic arrays, commonly rely on piezoelectric materials that convert mechanical pressure from sound waves into electrical signals, offering high sensitivity and compact design for frequencies up to several megahertz.^[41] In contrast, fiber-optic hydrophones utilize interferometric principles to detect phase shifts in light caused by acoustic-induced strain on optical fibers, providing immunity to electromagnetic interference and suitability for high-temperature or harsh underwater conditions.^[42] Microphones for airborne arrays similarly include piezoelectric types for their responsiveness to air pressure variations, while fiber-optic variants are emerging for specialized applications requiring electrical isolation, though piezoelectric remains dominant due to cost-effectiveness and bandwidth.^[43] A representative example is the towed array sonar system, which deploys a linear hydrophone array trailed behind a submarine or surface vessel to detect acoustic emissions from enemy submarines at ranges exceeding 50 kilometers, leveraging the array's length for improved signal-to-noise ratios in passive mode.^[44] In short-range acoustic applications like ultrasound imaging, near-field effects dominate due to the proximity of sources within one wavelength, necessitating specialized beamforming to account for spherical wavefront curvature and minimize sidelobes that could distort images.^[45] This contrasts with far-field assumptions in longer-range sonar, where plane-wave approximations suffice, though general array geometry principles from design fundamentals influence both. Acoustic propagation in media such as water or air introduces challenges like frequency-dependent attenuation, with the absorption coefficient approximately proportional to the square of the frequency, which reduces signal amplitude more severely at higher frequencies—and multipath propagation from reflections off surfaces or thermoclines, leading to intersymbol interference and requiring equalization in array processing.^[46] These effects limit effective range in underwater environments to tens of kilometers for low-frequency arrays, underscoring the need for adaptive signal processing to maintain performance.^[47]

Other Sensor Arrays

Seismic sensor arrays typically employ geophone configurations to detect ground vibrations for earthquake monitoring and subsurface imaging in oil exploration. These arrays consist of multiple geophones—electromechanical velocity sensors that convert seismic waves into electrical signals—arranged in linear, orthogonal, or two-dimensional grids to enhance signal-to-noise ratios and spatial resolution. In exploration seismology, standard setups involve deploying 10,000 to 30,000 geophones over several square kilometers, with receiver lines spaced 200 meters apart and geophones positioned 25 meters apart, enabling high-density 3D surveys that generate up to 1 petabyte of data for imaging hydrocarbon reservoirs. For earthquake monitoring, nodal sensors, which integrate geophones with autonomous data loggers and GPS, form large-N arrays; for instance, deployments of 5,300 nodes over 100 km² in urban areas like Long Beach, California, have detected 1.81 million seismic events, improving catalog completeness and source characterization. Wireless geophone networks, such as the RT3 system supporting over 250,000 channels via time-division multiple access protocols, have revolutionized land acquisition by eliminating cables, facilitating rapid deployment in remote or rugged terrains.^[48]^[49]^[48] Optical and photonic sensor arrays utilize grids of photodetectors, such as charge-coupled devices (CCDs) or specialized arrays like InGaAs/InP, to capture light fields for high-resolution imaging applications. CCD arrays, often arranged in two-dimensional matrices, form the basis of digital cameras and serve as focal plane arrays in optical systems, where pixels convert incident photons into charge packets for spatial mapping of images. In lidar systems, photonic arrays enable three-dimensional ranging by timing backscattered laser pulses; a notable example is a 64×64 InGaAs/InP single-photon avalanche diode array with 50 µm pixel pitch and >15% detection efficiency at 1064 nm, achieving 1 ns temporal resolution for imaging up to 6 km with a 3.2×3.2 mrad field of view. Electron-multiplying CCDs (EMCCDs) enhance low-light performance in lidar by amplifying signals through impact ionization, supporting 667 ns sampling for 100 m spatial resolution in space-based instruments. These configurations prioritize dense pixel integration to minimize aliasing and maximize dynamic range in photon-limited environments.^[50]^[51]^[50] Biomedical sensor arrays, particularly electroencephalography (EEG) electrode arrays, map brain electrical activity by deploying multiple electrodes on the scalp to record voltage fluctuations from neuronal populations. Standard configurations follow the 10-20 international system, with 19 to 256 electrodes arranged in symmetrical grids to cover cortical regions, enabling source localization of brain signals with sub-centimeter accuracy when optimized. Optimal designs minimize localization error using the Cramér-Rao bound; for instance, a 64-channel optically pumped magnetometer (OPM) array outperforms traditional magnetometers for eccentric sources, while hybrid OPM-EEG setups with 100 OPMs and 60 EEG electrodes reduce errors for deep radial sources by integrating vectorial magnetic and scalar electric measurements. These arrays facilitate non-invasive brain-computer interfaces and diagnostics, with flexible high-density variants (up to 1,000 channels) improving signal fidelity for motor cortex mapping and seizure detection. Advances in microfabrication allow implantable variants, such as electrocorticography grids, to record local field potentials directly from the cortical surface with higher spatial resolution than scalp EEG.^[52]^[53]^[53] Chemical sensor arrays underpin electronic noses, which mimic biological olfaction by using multisensor platforms to detect and classify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in gases. These arrays typically comprise 4 to 32 heterogeneous sensors—such as metal oxide semiconductors (MOX), electrochemical, or conductimetric types—each with partial selectivity to produce unique response patterns for pattern recognition algorithms like principal component analysis or neural networks. Seminal work in 1982 by Persaud and Dodd introduced MOX arrays for odor discrimination, while Stetter et al.'s 1980s electrochemical arrays enabled portable toxic gas detection, incorporating virtual sensors to expand dimensionality. In gas detection applications, such as environmental monitoring or food quality assessment, arrays achieve >90% classification accuracy for mixtures like ammonia or VOCs from spoiled produce, with sampling systems ensuring reproducible headspace analysis. Modern iterations integrate low-power microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) for compact, real-time deployment in portable devices.^[54]^[54]^[54] Tactile sensor arrays consist of multiple force-sensitive elements arranged in grids to map pressure, shear, and contact patterns on surfaces, enabling touch-based sensing in robotics, prosthetics, and wearables. These arrays often use technologies such as piezoresistive, capacitive, or piezoelectric sensors to detect normal and tangential forces with spatial resolutions down to 0.1 mm. For example, flexible large-scale arrays with 64×64 elements achieve high sensitivity for grasping and manipulation tasks in robotic hands. Applications include gesture recognition, object manipulation, and human-robot interaction, where pattern recognition algorithms process the spatial data for intuitive control.^[55] Quantum sensor arrays leverage defect centers or superconducting elements for ultrasensitive measurements of magnetic fields, temperature, or strain at nanoscale resolutions, with post-2020 advances enabling scalable parallel operation. Nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center arrays in diamond, formed by implanting nitrogen atoms adjacent to lattice vacancies, serve as spin-based magnetometers; ensembles achieve 0.5 nT/√Hz sensitivity for biomedical imaging like nanoscale MRI. Recent hybrid integrations transfer NV-embedded diamond membranes onto silicon nitride or lithium niobate photonic chips via pick-and-place techniques with 38 nm accuracy, yielding compact devices with 32 μT/√Hz sensitivity in 200 µm footprints and Q-factors up to 1.8×10⁵ for enhanced readout. Scalable platforms addressing over 100 individual NV centers simultaneously, using reconfigurable optical addressing akin to atomic tweezers, enable spin-resolved coherence measurements and detection of pairwise spin correlations for quantum simulation and single-molecule nuclear magnetic resonance. Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) arrays, employing Josephson junctions in thin films, extend quantum sensing to cryogenic environments; post-2020 developments include multi-channel setups for far-infrared detection with noise-equivalent powers below 10^{-18} W/√Hz, supporting astronomical observations and biomagnetic mapping. These arrays prioritize cryogenic compatibility and multiplexing to surpass classical limits in quantum metrology.^[56]^[56]^[57]^[58]^[59]

Beamforming Techniques

Delay-and-Sum Beamforming

Delay-and-sum beamforming is the simplest and most fundamental time-domain technique for processing signals from a sensor array, designed to enhance signals arriving from a specific direction of interest, known as the look direction \theta_0. The core principle involves compensating for the differential time delays (or equivalently, phase shifts in the narrowband case) that signals experience when propagating from the source to each sensor in the array. By applying precise delays to align the signals coherently and then summing them, constructive interference occurs for the desired direction, while signals from other directions experience partial or complete destructive interference. This method assumes far-field plane-wave propagation and relies on the array's geometry to compute the required delays.^[60] In implementation, the weight vector \mathbf{w} for the delay-and-sum beamformer is set equal to the array's steering vector \mathbf{a}(\theta_0), which encapsulates the phase shifts corresponding to the look direction. The beamformer output is then given by y(t) = \mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}(t), where \mathbf{x}(t) is the vector of instantaneous sensor signals. For broadband signals, this is typically performed in the time domain using tapped delay lines; however, an efficient frequency-domain equivalent can be achieved by applying the fast Fourier transform (FFT) to the sensor signals, multiplying by frequency-dependent phase shifts, and then inverse transforming the sum. This approach maintains the alignment across frequencies while reducing computational complexity for real-time applications.^[61]^[62] The primary advantages of delay-and-sum beamforming lie in its simplicity and lack of need for training data or iterative optimization, making it computationally efficient and robust to modeling errors in the array response. It requires no prior knowledge of noise or interference statistics, enabling straightforward deployment in various sensor array systems. However, its disadvantages include limited ability to reject interference from directions other than the look direction, as the fixed weights do not adapt to suppress unwanted signals, leading to potential leakage through sidelobes. In white noise environments, the array gain—defined as the improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)—achieves a maximum of $10 \log_{10} M dB for an array of M sensors, assuming uncorrelated noise across elements and perfect alignment.^[60]^[63]

Spectrum-Based Beamforming

Spectrum-based beamforming encompasses frequency-domain techniques for estimating the spatial power spectrum from sensor array observations, leveraging the array covariance matrix to map signal power across potential directions of arrival. These methods treat the array output as a multidimensional random field and apply spectral analysis to identify peaks corresponding to signal sources, offering a straightforward extension of temporal spectral estimation to spatial domains. Unlike time-domain alignment approaches, spectrum-based methods operate directly on the second-order statistics of the received signals, enabling robust direction finding even in noisy environments when the array geometry supports adequate spatial sampling. The Bartlett beamformer represents the canonical spectrum-based approach, computing the spatial spectrum as

P(\theta) = \mathbf{a}^H(\theta) \mathbf{R} \mathbf{a}(\theta),

where \mathbf{a}(\theta) denotes the steering vector for direction \theta, \mathbf{R} is the sample covariance matrix of the array snapshots, and ^H indicates the Hermitian transpose. This formulation yields an estimate of the power incident from direction \theta by projecting the covariance onto the presumed signal subspace defined by the steering vector, with peaks in P(\theta) indicating likely source locations. The method assumes uncorrelated noise across sensors and is data-independent, relying solely on the empirical covariance without optimization. To analyze the underlying structure, the covariance \mathbf{R} undergoes eigenvalue decomposition \mathbf{R} = \mathbf{V} \mathbf{\Lambda} \mathbf{V}^H, partitioning the eigenvalues into a signal-plus-noise subspace (larger eigenvalues capturing source energy) and a noise-only subspace (smaller, approximately equal eigenvalues reflecting isotropic noise variance), which elucidates how the spectrum integrates both components.^[64]^[65]^[64] Resolution in the Bartlett beamformer is fundamentally constrained by the array's aperture, following the Rayleigh criterion: two sources are distinguishable if their angular separation exceeds the mainlobe half-power beamwidth, roughly \theta \approx \lambda / D radians, where \lambda is the signal wavelength and D is the array diameter. Larger apertures enhance resolution by narrowing the beam pattern, but practical limits arise from finite sensor count and sidelobe interference, often requiring arrays spanning multiple wavelengths for sub-degree accuracy in applications like radar or sonar. For wideband signals spanning significant frequency ranges, efficient implementation involves short-time Fourier transform (STFT) decomposition into narrowband bins, followed by per-bin Bartlett processing via FFT-accelerated steering vector computations, reducing complexity from O(N^3) to O(N \log N) per snapshot for N sensors and beams. This frequency-domain partitioning preserves spectral integrity while accommodating dispersion across bands.^[66]^[67] Despite its simplicity, the Bartlett beamformer exhibits sensitivity to model mismatches, particularly coherent sources where signal correlations inflate off-diagonal covariance terms, distorting the spatial spectrum and degrading resolution below the Rayleigh limit. In such scenarios, the assumption of uncorrelated arrivals fails, leading to merged peaks and elevated sidelobes, as the method lacks mechanisms to decorrelate or suppress interference. This vulnerability underscores the need for careful preprocessing, such as spatial smoothing, in multipath-prone environments like underwater acoustics or urban radar.^[65]

Adaptive and Parametric Beamformers

Adaptive beamformers dynamically adjust the array weights based on estimated signal statistics to suppress interference and noise while preserving the signal of interest, offering superior performance over conventional fixed-beam methods in non-stationary environments. These techniques rely on the sample covariance matrix derived from array snapshots, enabling data-driven optimization for direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation and beamforming in the presence of jammers or multipath. Parametric beamformers further enhance resolution by imposing structured models on the signal sources, such as assuming uncorrelated narrowband sources, to estimate parameters like DOAs via statistical inference. The minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer, originally proposed by Capon,^[68] minimizes the array output power subject to a unity gain constraint in the presumed signal direction, effectively nulling interferers. The optimal weight vector is given by

\mathbf{w} = \frac{\mathbf{R}^{-1} \mathbf{a}(\theta_0)}{\mathbf{a}^H(\theta_0) \mathbf{R}^{-1} \mathbf{a}(\theta_0)},

where \mathbf{R} denotes the spatial covariance matrix of the received signals, \mathbf{a}(\theta_0) is the steering vector toward the desired direction \theta_0, and ^H indicates the Hermitian transpose. This formulation achieves narrow mainlobes and deep nulls, providing high resolution for closely spaced sources compared to delay-and-sum approaches. Subspace-based methods like the multiple signal classification (MUSIC) algorithm extend adaptive beamforming for super-resolution DOA estimation by decomposing the covariance matrix into signal and noise subspaces via eigendecomposition. MUSIC constructs a pseudospectrum

P_{\text{MUSIC}}(\theta) = \frac{1}{\mathbf{a}^H(\theta) \mathbf{E}_n \mathbf{E}_n^H \mathbf{a}(\theta)},

where \mathbf{E}_n comprises the noise eigenvectors; sharp peaks in P_{\text{MUSIC}}(\theta) reveal source locations with resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit, assuming the number of sources is known and less than the number of sensors. This method excels in low-signal-to-noise ratio scenarios but requires accurate subspace separation.^[69] The sparse asymptotic minimum variance (SAMV) beamformer builds on MVDR principles by incorporating sparsity constraints to model sparse source distributions, yielding better sidelobe suppression and robustness to off-grid DOAs. It iteratively solves a regularized quadratic optimization problem that enforces a sum-to-one constraint on the power spectrum and penalizes non-sparse components, asymptotically approaching the Cramér-Rao lower bound for DOA estimation under Gaussian noise assumptions. SAMV is particularly effective for arrays with limited snapshots, reducing ambiguity in cluttered environments. Parametric beamformers employ maximum likelihood (ML) estimation to jointly infer source parameters, assuming a probabilistic model for the signals such as uncorrelated Gaussian sources incident on the array. The ML estimator maximizes the likelihood function of the observed data given the steering vectors and noise covariance, often yielding closed-form solutions for DOAs via nonlinear optimization or stochastic expectation-maximization. These methods provide optimal performance under model match but can degrade with model mismatches, such as correlated sources or non-Gaussian noise.^[70] A key challenge in adaptive and parametric beamformers is the ill-conditioning of the sample covariance matrix \mathbf{R} due to finite training data or steering vector errors, leading to performance degradation. Diagonal loading addresses this by regularizing \mathbf{R} as \mathbf{R} + \epsilon \mathbf{I}, where \epsilon is a positive loading factor and \mathbf{I} is the identity matrix; this enhances invertibility and robustness against mismatches, with \epsilon often set proportional to the noise power or array size. Originally analyzed for covariance estimation errors, diagonal loading balances bias and variance in weight computation without requiring prior knowledge of interferers.

Applications and Advances

Key Applications

Sensor arrays find widespread application in radar and sonar systems for target detection and tracking, where phased antenna arrays enhance spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio by coherently combining signals from multiple elements to locate and follow moving objects in complex environments. In radar, such as in air traffic control or military surveillance, arrays enable precise bearing estimation and velocity measurement through beam steering, allowing detection of targets at ranges exceeding hundreds of kilometers. Similarly, in sonar for underwater applications like submarine navigation, hydrophone arrays process acoustic signals to track marine vessels or marine life, improving localization accuracy in noisy oceanic conditions. In wireless communications, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) configurations of sensor arrays, particularly massive MIMO setups, support beamforming to enhance capacity in 5G and 6G networks by directing signals toward users, thereby increasing spectral efficiency and throughput in dense urban deployments. These arrays mitigate interference and extend coverage in millimeter-wave bands, enabling data rates up to gigabits per second while supporting thousands of simultaneous connections in cellular base stations. For instance, in 6G prototypes, extra-large MIMO arrays focus beams spatially to boost signal strength, addressing path loss in high-frequency operations. Ultrasound sensor arrays are pivotal in medical imaging for generating three-dimensional visualizations, with two-dimensional transducer arrays electronically steering beams to capture volumetric data of internal organs without invasive procedures.^[71] In cardiology and obstetrics, these arrays produce real-time 3D images by synthesizing echoes from a matrix of elements, aiding in the diagnosis of abnormalities like heart valve defects or fetal development with sub-millimeter resolution.^[72] The design allows for dynamic focusing across depths, improving contrast and detail in soft tissue imaging compared to traditional 2D scans.^[73] Seismic sensor arrays contribute to environmental monitoring through earthquake early warning systems, deploying geophone networks to detect P-waves and rapidly estimate epicenter location and magnitude for timely alerts. In systems like ShakeAlert, distributed arrays across tectonic regions process seismic data to provide seconds of warning before destructive S-waves arrive, enabling automated shutdowns in infrastructure such as power grids or transportation. Fiber-optic variants enhance coverage by turning existing cables into dense sensor lines, improving detection sensitivity in remote or urban areas prone to seismic hazards.^[74] Microphone arrays enable noise reduction in smart devices like voice assistants and hearing aids, using multi-element configurations to spatially filter signals and suppress ambient interference while preserving desired audio sources. In consumer electronics such as smartphones or smart speakers, beamforming with these arrays directs sensitivity toward the user, achieving up to 10-15 dB noise attenuation in reverberant environments for clearer speech recognition.^[75] Adaptive processing in distributed setups further enhances performance in dynamic settings, like conference calls, by tracking speaker positions and canceling directional noise.

Recent Developments

Recent advancements in sensor arrays have increasingly incorporated artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques to enhance direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation, particularly achieving super-resolution beyond classical methods like MUSIC. Deep learning models, such as Vision Transformers (ViT) and Siamese Neural Networks (SNN), address challenges in low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) environments and limited snapshot scenarios by leveraging transfer learning to adapt from simulated ideal arrays to real-world imperfections, including sensor errors and mutual coupling. These approaches enable high-resolution DOA estimation with sparse linear arrays, improving accuracy in dynamic applications like automotive radar while reducing the need for extensive real-world training data. For instance, SNNs with sparse augmentation layers have demonstrated superior feature embedding and angular resolution compared to traditional subspace methods, even with single snapshots.^[76]^[77] Metamaterials and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) have emerged as transformative elements for creating dynamic sensor arrays, allowing programmable control over wave propagation for enhanced sensing capabilities. RIS, composed of tunable metasurfaces, enable real-time reconfiguration of array patterns, improving beam steering and environmental adaptability in 6G and beyond systems. Recent surveys highlight their integration into sensing applications, where they facilitate channel estimation and beam training to support large-scale, dynamic arrays with minimal hardware adjustments. This technology extends array functionality by manipulating electromagnetic waves for tasks like integrated sensing and communication, offering unprecedented flexibility in urban and non-terrestrial environments.^[78] Quantum sensor arrays based on nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond have advanced precision magnetometry, achieving sensitivities suitable for biomedical and geophysical applications. Hybrid diamond photonics integrations, such as on-chip micro-ring resonators and CMOS-compatible designs, have enabled nanoscale sensing with resolutions down to 1.0 μT/√Hz, while ensemble NV centers reach 210 fT/√Hz for broader field mapping. Fiber-integrated portable magnetometers incorporating these arrays have demonstrated ≈344 pT/√Hz sensitivity in compact footprints, facilitating scalable quantum sensing networks. These developments, post-2023, leverage pick-and-place fabrication and all-optical excitation to support massively multiplexed arrays for high-fidelity magnetic field imaging.^[56] Wideband sensor arrays have benefited from compressive sensing (CS) techniques to design sparse configurations, significantly reducing hardware costs by minimizing the number of active elements while maintaining high-resolution performance. CS-based optimization for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) arrays synthesizes sparse layouts that suppress sidelobes and grating lobes, enabling efficient wideband near-field imaging with fewer sensors compared to uniform arrays. For DOA estimation, generalized coprime array structures combined with CS and chaotic sensing matrices compress measurement dimensions—e.g., from 16 to 8 vectors—lowering RF chain requirements and computational load without sacrificing accuracy in wideband signals. These methods have proven effective in millimeter-wave applications, achieving larger effective apertures and faster synthesis times.^[79]^[80] Sustainability in sensor arrays has driven innovations in low-power designs for Internet of Things (IoT) networks, emphasizing energy-efficient architectures to support large-scale deployments. Low-power microcontrollers with dynamic voltage scaling, sleep modes, and energy harvesting from ambient sources like solar or vibration enable prolonged operation in sensor array networks. Protocols such as LoRaWAN and Bluetooth Low Energy facilitate mesh or star topologies for distributed arrays, reducing overall power consumption by 15-20% in industrial monitoring scenarios. These designs promote eco-friendly IoT ecosystems by minimizing battery reliance and enabling scalable, adaptive data aggregation in sustainable energy applications.^[81]

References

[1]
[PDF] Sensor Array Signal Processing: Two Decades Later* - DSpace@MIT
Jan 1, 1995 · The quintessential goal of sensor array signal processing is to couple temporal and spatial information, captured by sampling a wavefield with a ...
[2]
[PDF] SENSOR ARRAY SIGNAL PROCESSING - DSP-Book
The main goal of array signal processing is to deduce the following information through an analysis of wavefields: • (a) Source localization as in radar, sonar, ...
[3]
Sensor Arrays: A Comprehensive Systematic Review - PMC
Aug 15, 2025 · Sensor arrays are arrangements of sensors that follow a certain pattern, usually in a row–column distribution.
[4]
Recent Progress in Sensor Arrays: From Construction Principles of ...
Feb 27, 2023 · To construct a sensor array, the multiple sensing elements are undoubtedly indispensable units that will selectively interact with targets to ...
[5]
[PDF] Optimum Array Processing - Semantic Scholar
Optimum Array Processing. Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. Harry L. Van Trees. WILEY-. INTERSCIENCE. A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC ...
[6]
[PDF] Chapter 02: Sensor Array Systems - DSP-Book
Beam steering assumes a plane wave model but stacking does not require this assumption. As shown in (2.14) the stacked output is directly proportional to ...
[7]
[PDF] Direction of Arrival Estimation: A Tutorial Survey of Classical and ...
Aug 8, 2025 · We focus on narrowband signal processing using uniform linear arrays, presenting step-by-step math- ematical derivations with geometric ...<|separator|>
[8]
Beampattern Design
- **Definition of Beampattern**: In sensor array processing, the beampattern describes the directional response of an array, representing the power gain as a function of angle. It is defined as:
[9]
Extending coprime sensor arrays to achieve the peak side lobe ...
Sep 27, 2014 · In general, shadings that result in narrower main lobes (better resolution) have higher peak side lobes (poorer ability to detect weak signals) ...
[10]
Covariance Matching Estimation Techniques for Array Signal ...
Covariance matching is an alternative to maximum likelihood estimation, providing the same large sample properties often at a lower computational cost. Herein, ...
[11]
A review on array mutual coupling analysis
Summary of each segment:
[12]
Array Geometries and Analysis - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks
Common array types include uniform linear arrays, uniform rectangular arrays, and uniform circular arrays. You can also build arrays with arbitrary geometries ...
[13]
phased.ULA - Uniform linear array - MATLAB - MathWorks
Plot grating lobe diagram of array ... Because the array spacing is less than one-half wavelength, there are no grating lobes in the visible region of space.
[14]
Uniform linear array (ULA) and uniform circular array (UCA)...
The two ingredients for the model are an approximation for uniform linear and circular arrays to avoid numerical integrals and a closed-form expression for the ...
[15]
Geometric structures of three types of antenna arrays: (a) ULA, (b)...
If the AEs are equidistantly distributed, the corresponding arrays are called uniform linear array (ULA), uniform rectangular array (URA), and uniform circular ...
[16]
[PDF] Sparse Array Selection Across Arbitrary Sensor Geometries ... - arXiv
Numerical experiments with uniform rectangular and circular arrays demonstrate enhanced performance of TL-CNN on the target model than the CNN trained with ...
[17]
[PDF] Hourglass Arrays, and Other Novel 2D Sparse Arrays with Reduced ...
Some well-known 2D array geometries include uniform rectangular arrays (URA), uniform circular arrays (UCA), and hexangonal arrays, in which elements are.
[18]
Microwaves101 | Grating Lobes - Microwave Encyclopedia
A grating lobe occurs when you steer too far with a phased array and the main beam reappears on the wrong side. Elements must be spaced properly in order to ...
[19]
Array Processing - Beamforming & Direction Finding
Beamforming is generally seen as a method of beam steering, where gain is provided in a specific, desired direction- relative to the array's front-, with ...
[20]
Design of a Grating Lobes-Free Architecture for Distributed Sensor ...
Oct 13, 2025 · ... spacing dshould be smaller than λ/2 to avoid the grating lobes. The. constraint d≤λ/2 greatly limits the application of array radar system.
[21]
[PDF] Approximations to Directivity for Linear, Planar, and Volumetric ...
Jul 25, 1997 · For both cases, the effective aperture includes the physical array size plus half the array's interelement spacing at each end. In the free ...
[22]
[PDF] Phased Array Antennas - QSL.net
The effective area is related to the antenna directivity D: Ae = (λ2*D)/4π. • Aperture Efficiency. - Aperture Efficiency (ea) of an antenna ...
[23]
2D‐DOA estimation performance using split vertical linear and ...
May 19, 2016 · Well-known planar arrays include two orthogonal uniform linear arrays, L shaped array7, uniform rectangular array (URA)6, and a uniform circular ...
[24]
Experimental 3-D Ultrasound Imaging with 2-D Sparse Arrays using ...
Jun 14, 2018 · In this paper, we experimentally compare the performance of a fully wired 1024-element (32 × 32) array, assumed as reference, to that of a 256-element random ...
[25]
[PDF] Sparse Phased Array Antennas on Planar and ... - CDC Stacks
The cost-effective solution to this problem is by using sparse arrays, i.e. a reduced number of elements that undersample the aperture. These sparse arrays have ...<|separator|>
[26]
(PDF) Comparison of Sparse Sensor Array Configurations with ...
Sparse arrays such as nested arrays, super nested arrays, and coprime arrays have large degrees of freedom (DOFs). They can estimate large number of sources ...Missing: efficiency | Show results with:efficiency
[27]
A Review of Sparse Sensor Arrays for Two-Dimensional Direction-of ...
Jul 6, 2021 · Comparison between physical sensors and achievable degrees of freedom for sparse array geometries. where {1 : 2 : N − 1} = {1, 1 + 2, 1 + 4 ...
[28]
Sparse planar arrays for azimuth and elevation using experimental ...
Jan 7, 2021 · Sparse arrays are special geometrical arrangements of sensors which overcome some of the drawbacks associated with dense uniform arrays and ...
[29]
Sensor Array Design for Complex Sensing Tasks - Annual Reviews
Jun 24, 2015 · The matrix of sensitivity values, S, for a sensor array specifies the geometric transform that maps locations in the sample space to ...
[30]
Gain and phase calibration of sensor arrays from ambient noise by ...
Feb 23, 2023 · Classically, gain calibration is done on a single element either by the reciprocity or the comparison method (Rossing, 2014).Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
[31]
[PDF] Multisource Self-Calibration for Sensor Arrays
Abstract—Calibration of a sensor array is more involved if the antennas have direction dependent gains and multiple calibrator.Missing: equalization | Show results with:equalization
[32]
The impact of sensor mismatch errors on the robustness of circular ...
The impact of sensor mismatch errors on the robustness of circular directional differential microphone arrays · March 2025 · Applied Acoustics 232(5):110583.
[33]
Enhancing Reliability in Redundant Homogeneous Sensor Arrays ...
Jun 20, 2025 · Amplitude imbalance arises when the amplitudes of the sine and cosine signals are unequal, often caused by material heterogeneity or circuit ...<|separator|>
[34]
Robust DOA estimation in the presence of mis-calibrated sensors
In this paper, we consider robust direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation for an array that contains mis-calibrated sensors with unknown gain and phaseMissing: impact | Show results with:impact
[35]
Hydrophone Arrays - Discovery of Sound in the Sea
Dec 19, 2018 · The increased signal-to-noise ratio allows sounds that normally couldn't be detected by a single hydrophone to be heard. If a hydrophone array ...
[36]
Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: next-generation ...
In the near field, some artifacts were observable extending out from the array to a depth of 2 cm.
[37]
Towed Array Sonar Systems (TASS) - Ocean Science & Technology
Sep 15, 2025 · They detect acoustic emissions without emitting any sound, making them ideal for covert operations such as anti-submarine warfare (ASW). These ...Types of Towed Array Sonar... · Key Components... · Applications of Towed Array...
[38]
A Review of Acoustic Impedance Matching Techniques for ...
Phased Array Transducers. Ultrasonic arrays are used in sonar and medical imaging due to their acoustic beam focusing and steering capabilities [386,387].
[39]
Microphone Array Processing for Distant Speech Recognition
Oct 18, 2012 · This contribution provides a tutorial overview of DSR systems based on microphone arrays. In particular, we present recent work on acoustic beam ...
[40]
What is a Hydrophone? - AZoSensors
Mar 24, 2025 · Hydrophone technology utilizes piezoelectric materials to monitor underwater noise, converting sound waves into electrical signals for ...
[41]
[PDF] A Review Paper on Hydrophones - IJERT
Optical fiber sensors can be used to bear up high temperatures. The advantage of optical fiber hydrophone is that it can be used to determine temperature and ...
[42]
Piezoelectric and fibre-optic hydrophones | Request PDF
This paper shows that fibre-tip sensors are an alternative to common hydrophone techniques. They can open up new possibilities for measurement problems for ...
[43]
A Comprehensive Review of an Underwater Towing Cable Array
This paper reviews, organizes, and analyzes the outspread process of towing cable arrays, drawing on relevant models, case studies, and structural features.
[44]
A sidelobe suppressing near-field beamforming approach for ...
May 1, 2015 · A method is proposed to suppress sidelobe level for near-field beamforming in ultrasound array imaging. An optimization problem is ...
[45]
[PDF] Acoustic Communication - Milica Stojanovic
Frequency-dependent attenuation, multipath propagation, and low speed of sound (about 1500 m/s) which results in a severe Doppler effect, make the ...
[46]
A review on underwater beamforming: Techniques, challenges, and ...
Sep 25, 2025 · Multipath propagation, caused by reflections off surfaces and objects leads to signal interference and distortion. Additionally, acoustic ...
[47]
Wireless Geophone Networks for Land Seismic Data Acquisition
Jul 30, 2021 · This paper gives a general overview of land seismic data acquisition and also presents a current and retrospective review of the state-of-the-art wireless ...
[48]
Big Data Seismology - Arrowsmith - 2022 - AGU Publications - Wiley
Apr 23, 2022 · Seismic nodal sensors are an extension of geophones that, as described in the previous section, have been used in exploration seismology since ...
[49]
Development of a near-infrared single-photon 3D imaging LiDAR ...
PDF | A near-infrared single-photon lidar system, equipped with a 64×64 resolution array and a Risley prism scanner, has been engineered for daytime.
[50]
Electron-Multiplying CCD for Lidar Applications - Photonics Spectra
The L3Vision CCD was designed for possible use as the detector in a space-based lidar instrument with a 667-ns temporal sampling window to yield 100-m spatial ...
[51]
A review of electrodes for the electrical brain signal recording
Sep 21, 2017 · In this paper, we provide an overview of electrodes for recording the electrical brain signal. The noninvasive electrodes are primarily used to capture ...
[52]
Optimal design of on‐scalp electromagnetic sensor arrays for brain ...
In this article, we present an optimal array design strategy focussed on minimising the brain source localisation error.
[53]
(PDF) Understanding Chemical Sensors and ... - ResearchGate
Aug 10, 2025 · In this review, we emphasize sensors, instrumentation, and applications aspects of electronic nose technology.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[54]
Recent progress in hybrid diamond photonics for quantum ... - Nature
May 8, 2025 · This review discusses recent progress and challenges in the hybrid integration of diamond color centers on cutting-edge photonic platforms.
[55]
CIQC Researchers Demonstrate Scalable Parallel Quantum ...
Sep 29, 2025 · CIQC Researchers Demonstrate Scalable Parallel Quantum Sensing with Over 100 NV Centers. We are thrilled to share that a new study from the ...Missing: superconducting advances 2020
[56]
Advancements in research and current applications of "quantum ...
This paper reviews and summarizes the principles, types, processes, system structures, and current research status of SQUIDs while anticipating future ...<|separator|>
[57]
New Superconducting Sensor Arrays Will Enable Future Far-Infrared ...
Oct 18, 2022 · An SMD-sponsored team has taken major steps towards providing the new detector arrays needed for future far-infrared space missions.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[58]
Introduction
### Summary of Delay-and-Sum Beamforming from the Document
[59]
Beamforming & DOA | PySDR: A Guide to SDR and DSP using Python
Beamforming is a signal processing operation used with antenna arrays to create a spatial filter; it filters out signals from all directions except the desired ...
[60]
Beamforming Overview - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks
The delay-and-sum beamformer can be implemented in the frequency domain or in the time domain. When the signal is narrowband, time delay becomes a phase shift ...
[61]
None
### Summary of Delay-and-Sum Beamforming from https://www.bksv.com/doc/bv0056.pdf
[62]
[PDF] High-Resolution Frequency-Wavenumber Spectrum Analysis
Abstract-The output of an array bfoensors is considered to be a homogeneous random field. In this case there is a spectral representa- tion for this field, ...
[63]
[PDF] Riemannian Covariance Fitting for Direction-of-Arrival Estimation
Apr 4, 2024 · ANALYSIS OF THE CB BEAMFORMER. A. Fadings and Sidelobes of the Spatial Spectrum. Consider the Conventional Beamformer PCB(θ) = aH θ¯Raθ ...
[64]
[PDF] Capon and Bartlett Beamforming: Threshold Effect in Direction-of ...
May 16, 2005 · This difference is historically referred to as signal model mismatch [18]. and its ipresence often limits achievable performance. Accounting for ...
[65]
[PDF] Evaluating array resolution | Norsonic
Fig. 1. Rayleigh criterion for resolution of two waves of equal strength and equal frequency. The mainlobe peak of the beampattern for one wave falls.
[66]
[PDF] All-Digital Wideband Space-Frequency Beamforming for the SKA ...
We present a new structure for wideband space-frequency beamforming and beamsteering that maximizes detectability of cosmic signals over the array operational ...
[67]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1008.4051
[68]
Exact and Large Sample Maximum Likelihood Techniques for ...
Sensor array signal processing deals with the problem of extracting information from a collection of measurements obtained from sensors distributed in space.
[69]
A Review on Real-Time 3D Ultrasound Imaging Technology - PMC
In this article, previous and the latest work on designing a real-time or near real-time 3D ultrasound imaging system are reviewed.
[70]
Stretchable ultrasonic transducer arrays for three-dimensional ...
Mar 23, 2018 · Ultrasonic imaging has been implemented as a powerful tool for noninvasive subsurface inspections of both structural and biological media.
[71]
Ultrasonic transducers for medical diagnostic imaging - PMC
The 2D array transducer can generate real-time 3D ultrasound images through volumetric steering of the ultrasound beam. Since the 2D array transducer consists ...Missing: visualization | Show results with:visualization
[72]
Fiber Optic Seismology for Earthquake Hazards Research ...
Fiber-optic cables are used as seismic sensors, increasing spatial data density and enabling high-fidelity wavefield data processing for earthquake research.
[73]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6208471/
[74]
A Data-centric Supervised Transfer Learning Framework for DOA Estimation with Array Imperfections
**Summary of arXiv:2504.13394**
[75]
Advancing Single-Snapshot DOA Estimation with Siamese Neural Networks for Sparse Linear Arrays
**Summary of Abstract: Deep Learning Super-Resolution DOA Estimation**
[76]
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for 6G and Beyond: A Comprehensive Survey from Theory to Deployment
**Summary of RIS for Dynamic Sensor Arrays or Sensing Applications**
[77]
Compressive Sensing Based Sparse MIMO Array Synthesis for ...
This paper proposes a convex optimization model for the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) array design based on the compressive sensing (CS) approach. We ...
[78]
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19526
[79]
(PDF) Design and Deployment of Low-Power IoT Sensor Networks ...
Apr 24, 2025 · The results highlight the potential for scalable IoT-based energy monitoring solutions to support sustainable industrial practices. ResearchGate ...Missing: arrays | Show results with:arrays