Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Binary trigger

A binary trigger is a type of replacement trigger mechanism designed for semi-automatic , enabling the discharge of one upon pulling the and a second upon its release, thereby allowing two shots per complete trigger cycle while maintaining semi-automatic function. Developed and patented by Franklin Armory as the Binary Firing System, it originated as an innovation for platforms like the AR-15 to achieve a higher without converting the firearm into a fully automatic under . The mechanism operates using dual sears: in binary mode, the primary sear releases the pull for the first shot, while a secondary sear captures and releases it on reset for the second, with a preventing continuous fire beyond the pull-release sequence. This design distinguishes it from forced-reset triggers, which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has classified as machineguns for enabling multiple shots via a single continuous pull, whereas triggers have been repeatedly approved by the ATF as compliant semi-automatic devices. Federally legal for civilian ownership without registration, triggers enhance speed—potentially doubling the effective rate in trained hands—but require deliberate operator input for each discharge, avoiding the uninterrupted cycling of true automatic fire. Despite their , binary triggers have sparked over public safety, with critics arguing they effectively bypass the intent of restrictions on rapid-fire devices by simulating machinegun-like output, leading to isolated criminal uses and prompting state-level prohibitions. Several states, including , enacted bans on their possession or sale, citing doubled firing rates as a , though a 2025 federal court ruling invalidated Minnesota's measure on procedural grounds, highlighting ongoing tensions between innovation in accessories and regulatory efforts to curb perceived threats. Proponents emphasize empirical distinctions in operation and note that such devices remain absent from comprehensive federal oversight, underscoring debates rooted in rather than outright prohibition.

Definition and Function

Mechanism of Operation

A binary trigger functions by discharging one when the is pulled rearward and a second when the is subsequently released forward, effectively doubling the compared to a standard semi-automatic within each trigger cycle. This operation relies on a trigger group with a biased toward the striking position, a movable between forward and rearward positions, and multiple retention facilities including a primary sear, a semi-automatic , a binary , and a backup . In binary mode—engaged via a three-position selector that also allows safe and semi-automatic settings—pulling the trigger rearward disengages the primary sear, releasing the cocked to strike the and fire the first . The firearm's action then cycles: drives the bolt carrier rearward, extracting the spent , chambering a fresh , and recocking the , which is captured and held by the binary while the trigger remains rearward. Upon release, forward movement disengages the , freeing the to strike the again for the second discharge. The semi-automatic ensures compatibility with standard mode by restraining the after the initial pull without a release , while the backup provides to immobilize the if positioning would otherwise allow unintended release. This sequenced with the distinguishes the mechanism from fire, as each correlates to a manipulation (pull or release) rather than continuous pressure.

Distinction from Automatic Fire

A binary trigger operates by discharging one round upon the initial pull of the trigger and a second round upon its subsequent release, necessitating repeated manual reciprocation of the trigger for continued firing. This mechanism relies on the firearm's semi-automatic action, where each shot—whether initiated by pull or release—requires the or to fully, chambering a new before the next trigger can fire it. In contrast, automatic fire, as defined under U.S. (26 U.S.C. § 5845(b)), enables a to expel multiple rounds with a single, continuous pull of the trigger, utilizing the energy from each discharged cartridge to automatically the action and re-engage the firing mechanism without further trigger manipulation. Thus, while a binary trigger can achieve a higher practical through rapid pull-release cycles—potentially approaching 800-1,000 rounds per minute in skilled hands—it remains mechanically distinct, as sustained firing demands discrete trigger actions rather than passive holding. Legally, this operational difference exempts binary triggers from classification as machine guns under the (NFA) of 1934 and the , which regulate devices capable of "a single function of the " producing more than one . The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has consistently ruled that binary triggers do not meet this criterion, as the release phase constitutes a separate function, preserving their status as semi-automatic fire control groups transferable without NFA registration, taxation, or serialization requirements. Courts have upheld similar distinctions in related cases, emphasizing that automatic weapons require no manual intervention beyond initial depression for multi-shot discharge, whereas binary systems enforce shooter-initiated reset for each additional round. This delineation ensures binary triggers face fewer federal restrictions than true automatic firearms, though state laws may impose additional prohibitions, such as California's outright ban on them since 2017. Despite enabling faster semi-automatic rates, binary triggers do not inherently modify the firearm's cyclic speed, which is governed by or gas system dynamics rather than design alone.

Historical Development

Origins and Invention

The binary trigger, also known as a pull-and-release trigger, was developed by Franklin Armory, a Utah-based firearms manufacturer, as a patented to enhance the in semi-automatic while adhering to regulations prohibiting civilian ownership of new machine guns post-1986. The company's Binary Firing System (BFS) employs dual sears that release the hammer once upon trigger pull and again upon trigger release, ensuring each shot corresponds to a distinct trigger manipulation and thus avoiding classification as automatic fire under the . This design originated from efforts to circumvent the Hughes Amendment to the of 1986, which halted registration of new machine guns for civilians, prompting innovation in trigger s that maximize semi-automatic performance without NFA compliance. Franklin Armory first commercialized the for the AR-15 platform, introducing the BFSIII model in September 2015 as an for standard single-stage triggers. The built on prior semi-automatic trigger principles but innovated by integrating a secondary firing mode selectable via a safety-like switch, allowing users to toggle between conventional semi-automatic operation and mode for rapid follow-up shots. Patent protection for the core mechanism, emphasizing the dual-action sear engagement without continuous trigger depression, enabled Franklin Armory to establish market dominance and defend against imitators. Early prototypes of similar pull-release concepts existed in niche applications, such as and markers, but Franklin Armory's adaptation to centerfire firearms represented the first widespread implementation for live-fire semi-automatic weapons, driven by demand for legal high-volume shooting alternatives amid strict weapon bans. The design's ATF approval as a semi-automatic , rather than a conversion, hinged on its requirement for discrete trigger pulls and releases per , distinguishing it from bump or forced-reset triggers later scrutinized for simulating automatic function.

Commercial Introduction and Popularization

The first commercially available binary trigger was introduced by Franklin Armory in 2015 with their Binary Firing System (BFS) for the AR-15 platform, functioning in a three-position selector: safe, semi-automatic, and binary mode that discharges on both trigger pull and release. This drop-in trigger group complied with federal regulations by maintaining semi-automatic classification, as each shot required distinct trigger actions, distinguishing it from machine guns under the . Franklin Armory secured U.S. patents for the system on April 24, 2018, solidifying their pioneering role after initial market entry. Popularization accelerated in the late as Franklin Armory expanded compatibility to platforms including HK-style rifles by and rimfire rifles in early , broadening appeal among recreational shooters seeking enhanced semi-automatic performance without illegal modifications. The 2018 ATF reclassification and subsequent 2019 ban on bump stocks—devices enabling rapid fire via —drove interest in binary triggers as a legal alternative for achieving comparable rates of fire in compliant firearms. By 2022, handgun variants like the BFSIII for Glock-compatible frames entered the market, further diversifying applications for and competition. Ongoing innovations, such as budget-oriented models like the AR-Essential in 2025 and integrations showcased at events like , have sustained growth, with adoption noted in tactical and sporting contexts for ergonomic advantages over traditional semi-auto triggers. Competitor entries, including Fostech's Echo triggers post-2015, contributed to market maturation but followed Franklin Armory's foundational designs.

Technical Design and Compatibility

Core Components

The core components of a binary trigger system, as implemented in designs like Franklin Armory's Binary Firing System (BFSIII), include a hammer pivotally connected to the trigger frame, which stores energy from the recoil cycle and releases to strike the firing pin upon actuation. This hammer is held in the cocked position by a sear mechanism, which interfaces directly with the trigger element to ensure controlled release. In binary mode, the system's trigger element—typically a pivoting bar or lever—disengages the sear on both the pull and subsequent release phases, allowing two discrete hammer drops per trigger cycle while maintaining semi-automatic operation, as each drop requires a full bolt carrier group cycle to recock the hammer. A critical disconnector assembly prevents unintended multiple discharges by temporarily holding the bar during the firearm's cycle, ensuring the cannot re-engage until the action has fully reset; in designs, this assembly is modified to facilitate the release-phase firing without converting the to . Springs, such as the spring for recocking force and the spring for return tension, are integral to reliability, with systems often requiring tuned springs to handle the doubled firing sequence without premature wear or misfires. The selector component, usually a multi-position , configures the - interaction for safe, semi-automatic, or modes by altering mechanical linkages within the trigger pack. These elements are housed within a trigger frame or pack, which drops into compatible lower receivers (e.g., AR-15 Mil-Spec), using standard pins for pivot and retention. Proprietary iterations, protected under U.S. Patents Nos. 9,952,012 and 9,952,013, incorporate precision-machined linkages to synchronize pull-and-release actions, distinguishing them from standard semi-automatic while adhering to federal definitions of non-automatic fire.

Installation Process and Compatible Platforms

The installation of a binary trigger generally follows the procedure for replacing a standard trigger group in semi-automatic firearms, requiring basic gunsmithing tools such as a 5/32-inch punch, a polymer-headed hammer, and an Allen key for grip assembly. The firearm must first be unloaded, with the upper receiver separated from the lower to access the trigger housing. Factory components—including the trigger, hammer, disconnector, and springs—are removed by drifting out the trigger and hammer pins from left to right using the punch and hammer, taking care to capture small parts like the disconnector spring to prevent loss. The pistol grip and safety selector are then detached, noting the position of the detent and spring for reassembly. The binary trigger assembly, which incorporates additional elements like a secondary sear for the release-phase firing, is installed by first attaching provided trigger pin shoulders or retainers to maintain component alignment. The trigger pack is inserted into the lower , secured with the pin driven in carefully to avoid separating the or trigger bar. The and its are then positioned, ensuring the spring legs rest over the trigger pin shoulders for proper tension, followed by insertion of the hammer pin. An ambidextrous selector, if included, is installed with its secondary lever fixed via hex bolt, and the is reinstalled with the detent . Some models require minor fitting for tight tolerances in the , and manufacturers recommend dry-firing tests in , , and binary modes—such as cocking the , pulling the to fire while held back, recocking on the , and releasing to confirm the second shot—prior to live use. Compatible platforms for binary triggers are limited to specific semi-automatic designs that accommodate drop-in or semi-drop-in trigger groups, with the AR-15 pattern rifle being the most prevalent due to its mil-spec lower receiver dimensions. Models from manufacturers like Franklin Armory support AR-15 platforms in calibers such as 5.56mm, as well as variants, rifles, and select pistol-caliber carbines like the Grand Power SP9. AK-compatible triggers, such as those for Fostech Echo systems, fit standard AK receivers including pistols and compact variants like the . Compatibility requires verifying the trigger's fit with the host firearm's receiver tolerances, as non-standard lowers or milled receivers may necessitate adjustments, and binary triggers are not universally interchangeable across platforms.

Performance Characteristics

Rate of Fire and Ergonomics

Binary triggers facilitate an effective approximately double that of a conventional semi-automatic by discharging one round on pull and one on release, though this is fundamentally limited by the firearm's mechanical cycle time—the duration required for the or to , eject the spent casing, chamber a new round, and return to —preventing rates from exceeding the platform's inherent capabilities. Skilled operators cannot sustain firing faster than the action cycles, as attempting to do so results in "outrunning" the without subsequent discharges until battery is reestablished. In practical testing with the Franklin Armory BFSIII HK-C1 binary installed in an MP5 variant, rates of 500 to 700 rounds per minute were achieved, contingent on the shooter's finger speed and trigger discipline. These figures fall well below those of select-fire machine guns, which mechanically sustain 600 to 1,500 rounds per minute without shooter input dependency. Ergonomically, binary triggers incorporate a three-position selector—typically , semi-automatic, and —allowing mode switching without tools, which users report as reliable and user-friendly for transitions during operation. The trigger pull itself is often described as crisp with a defined break, though some models exhibit minor grit or that may reduce under rapid binary cycling, where the dual-shot sequence demands consistent finger pressure to avoid unintentional doubles or misses. This rapid pull-release rhythm can induce finger fatigue more quickly than standard semi-auto firing, particularly in extended sessions, and challenges anticipation and muzzle , potentially degrading accuracy for less experienced shooters despite minimal inherent loss when executed with . Overall, while adaptable to various platforms like AR-15s and pistols, binary favor short bursts over prolonged suppression, prioritizing volume over sustained .

Reliability and Maintenance Considerations

Binary triggers, due to their dual firing mechanism involving separate for pull and release actions, exhibit greater complexity than conventional semi-automatic triggers, potentially increasing susceptibility to wear and malfunction under prolonged or high-volume use. reviews of models like the Franklin Armory BFSIII have documented consistent performance in controlled testing, with crisp breaks and minimal take-up, but long-term durability can vary based on quality and firing cadence, as excessive rates may outpace in some platforms. Common reliability issues include failure to fire on trigger release, often stemming from improper installation such as misaligned pins or damaged sear springs, which can prevent proper reset of the secondary firing mechanism. Other reported failures encompass follow-down or incomplete release during , exacerbated by overly tense springs that may bind the in rimfire applications. These problems are mitigated through precise assembly per manufacturer guidelines, yet user experiences highlight that binary systems demand stricter adherence to function checks, including verification of safe-to-semi transitions, to avoid unintended discharges. Maintenance requirements exceed those of standard triggers, necessitating periodic replacement of springs—typically every 5,000 to 10,000 rounds depending on usage—to counteract in the dual-sear components, alongside thorough of accumulation in the release after each session. must focus on pivot points and sear interfaces to prevent binding, with disassembly recommended for inspection following exposure to adverse conditions like dust or moisture, as the added amplify vulnerability to compared to simpler designs. Professional servicing is advised for persistent issues, as field adjustments risk compromising the ATF-approved semi-automatic classification. Overall, while empirical data from range testing affirms operational reliability exceeding 99% in properly maintained units, the inherent complexity underscores the need for vigilant upkeep to sustain performance.

Federal Classification by ATF

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) classifies binary triggers as permissible semi-automatic fire control devices under the (NFA), as they do not meet the statutory definition of a outlined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b). This definition specifies a as "any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the ." ATF interprets the binary trigger's operation—firing one round on trigger pull and one on release—as involving two distinct, separate functions of the , rather than a single continuous function that enables automatic fire. ATF has issued multiple classifications approving specific binary trigger models for manufacturers such as Franklin Armory, confirming they do not convert a into an NFA-regulated when installed in compliant semi-automatic platforms. For instance, Franklin Armory's Triggering System has been examined and deemed to function within semi-automatic parameters, requiring user-initiated action for each shot despite the doubled potential. This stance contrasts sharply with ATF's 2021-2022 determinations on forced reset triggers (FRTs), such as the FRT-15, which were reclassified as s for enabling multiple shots via a single continuous pull, leading to actions including notices. triggers avoid this because their design necessitates complete cycle completion (pull and release) for the second shot, preserving the manual intervention required under . No federal regulation or ATF ruling as of October 2025 prohibits the manufacture, sale, or possession of binary triggers for civilian use, provided the host remains semi-automatic and complies with other NFA restrictions (e.g., barrel length). ATF's Firearms Technology Branch routinely evaluates submitted samples, and approvals for binary designs underscore their compliance, though users must ensure proper installation to avoid unintended modifications that could alter functionality. This classification enables binary triggers to be transferred without NFA taxation or registration, distinguishing them from fully automatic devices banned for civilian ownership since the 1986 Firearms Owners' Protection Act amendment.

State-Level Restrictions and Variations

Several states prohibit or restrict binary triggers, often classifying them as trigger activators or rapid-fire devices under assault weapon laws or specific firearm modification statutes, despite their federal semi-automatic status. California bans binary triggers as features that mimic automatic fire under Penal Code § 30515, which prohibits semi-automatic centerfire rifles with devices enabling rates of fire higher than standard semi-automatic operation. outlawed them in 2019 as "rapid fire modification devices" via Senate Bill S1505, part of broader restrictions on attachments that accelerate firing rates. New Jersey criminalizes possession or sale of binary triggers under A5775, defining them as devices affixed to semi-automatic firearms that fire on both pull and release. , , , , and similarly ban them, with retailers like halting sales to Delaware residents due to state prohibitions on such triggers. In and , federal summaries confirm binary triggers fall under restricted or banned categories for increasing firing capability. Minnesota enacted a ban effective January 1, 2025, via House File 5247, amending § 609.67 to deem binary triggers prohibited "trigger activators," with penalties up to 20 years imprisonment and $35,000 fines for possession, even uninstalled. However, on August 18, 2025, a Ramsey County district judge invalidated the ban, ruling it violated the state constitution's single-subject clause for legislation, as it was embedded in a ; this decision halts enforcement pending potential appeals. imposes restrictions effective July 1, 2026, limiting certain trigger modifications. In states without explicit bans, such as , , and , binary triggers remain legal for compliant firearms, though users must verify local ordinances and retailer policies, as some impose voluntary sales limits. Oregon restricts trigger-altering devices unless authorized, potentially encompassing binaries under laws prohibiting full-auto simulations. of mirrors state-level bans by prohibiting such enhancements.

Key Court Rulings and Challenges

Binary triggers have faced no significant federal court challenges regarding their classification under the , as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has reviewed and approved multiple models, determining they function as semi-automatic devices requiring distinct trigger manipulations (pull and release) for each shot, thereby excluding them from definitions. At the state level, binary triggers are prohibited in jurisdictions including , , , , , , , and , often under broader restrictions on rapid-fire devices, though enforcement varies and few cases have reached courts. A prominent challenge arose in , where House File 5247, a 2024 omnibus tax bill exceeding 1,400 pages, included a ban on binary triggers effective January 1, 2025, classifying them as prohibited short-barreled rifles or other restricted items under Minnesota Statutes § 609.67. The Gun Owners Caucus filed suit against Governor on February 12, 2025, in Ramsey County District Court (Caucus v. Walz), arguing the ban violated the state constitution's single-subject clause by embedding firearm restrictions in unrelated tax legislation. On August 18, 2025, Judge J. Marcelo Castro ruled the inclusion unconstitutional, striking down the ban and enjoining its enforcement, while suggesting the entire omnibus bill's validity could be questioned under similar procedural grounds. The state appealed, seeking clarification from higher courts as of October 2, 2025, potentially setting precedent for challenges to omnibus bills containing gun provisions. This ruling highlights procedural vulnerabilities in state-level restrictions rather than substantive Second Amendment arguments, distinguishing binary triggers from federally contested devices like forced-reset triggers.

Applications and Usage

In Recreational Shooting and Competitions

Binary triggers find application in recreational shooting primarily as a means to accelerate the during informal target practice and sessions, enabling shooters to discharge rounds more rapidly without re-engaging the trigger pull for each shot. Users report that the mechanism facilitates quicker controlled pairs and split times, potentially doubling the effective firing rate compared to standard semiautomatic triggers, which can enhance training for rapid engagement while maintaining reasonable for disciplined operators. However, empirical shooter feedback indicates that the added speed demands heightened trigger control to avoid unintended discharges or reduced , with some describing the device as more of a novelty for high-volume range sessions rather than a precision tool. In organized competitions, binary triggers face widespread restrictions under rules from major sanctioning bodies, which prioritize equipment standardization, , and competitive equity. The (USPSA) explicitly prohibits their use in divisions such as Modified, where firing on both pull and release violates provisions against non-standard trigger functions (e.g., rules 5.1.11 and 10.2.13 in provisional guidelines). Similarly, events under (IDPA) and multi-gun formats aligned with USPSA often disallow them, citing concerns over inconsistent firing modes that could confer undue speed advantages or complicate range officer administration. Informal steel challenge or 3-gun matches may tolerate them in limited contexts where speed is emphasized over precision, but participants note minimal competitive edge due to the need for reacquisition between shots and potential risks from reflexive trigger release. Overall, while binary triggers appeal to recreational enthusiasts seeking simulated high-rate fire legally, their exclusion from sanctioned events underscores regulatory emphasis on traditional semiautomatic operation.

Potential Self-Defense Scenarios

In home defense situations involving multiple armed intruders, a binary trigger could theoretically enable faster delivery of paired shots to neutralize immediate threats, potentially reducing the time required to achieve incapacitation under high-stress conditions where precise marksmanship may falter. Proponents argue that the mechanism's design—firing on both pull and release—facilitates instinctive double-tap sequences without altering or sight alignment, which might prove advantageous in close-quarters engagements typical of residential invasions, such as those documented in analyses of defensive gun uses where attackers advance aggressively. However, no verified real-world defensive shootings have been publicly reported attributing successful outcomes specifically to binary triggers, and empirical data on their efficacy remains anecdotal rather than derived from controlled studies or incident databases like those maintained by law enforcement agencies. For scenarios with dynamic threats, such as a escalating to involve vehicle pursuits or barriers, the increased could allow a defender to suppress movement and create opportunities for escape or repositioning, aligning with first-principles of overwhelming to deter aggression. Firearms instructors familiar with binary systems note that disciplined users can maintain acceptable accuracy at short ranges (under 10 yards), common in encounters, by leveraging the trigger's binary action for controlled bursts rather than sustained fire. Yet, critics, including experienced tactical trainers, emphasize that the involuntary second shot on trigger release risks over-penetration through walls or unintended hits on bystanders, exacerbating liability in urban environments where average home defense distances are mere feet and has featured in post-incident investigations. Legal ramifications further complicate deployment in ; while triggers are classified as semi-automatic by the ATF, their use in a justified could invite prosecutorial scrutiny, with some attorneys potentially framing the doubled output as of recklessness, despite no federal prohibition on their defensive application. In jurisdictions with strict post- accountability, such as those requiring justification for every round fired, the mechanism's output might complicate reconstructions, as seen in broader critiques of rapid-fire devices in civilian hands. Overall, while triggers offer theoretical utility in high-threat multiplicity scenarios, prevailing favors standard semi-automatic configurations for due to superior emphasis on deliberate shot placement over volume, supported by paradigms prioritizing accuracy amid adrenaline-induced degradation of fine motor skills.

Advantages and Empirical Assessments

Reported Benefits from User Data

Users report that binary triggers facilitate a higher effective in semi-automatic firearms, firing one round on pull and another on release, which can achieve near full-auto speeds—up to 800-900 rounds per minute in controlled testing—while remaining legally classified as semi-automatic. This mechanism allows shooters to maintain trigger discipline without the mechanical complexity of forced-reset systems, potentially reducing fatigue during sustained fire sequences. In recreational and competitive contexts, participants describe enhanced enjoyment and performance benefits, such as quicker follow-up shots and improved rhythm development, which translate to better under rapid conditions compared to standard . Reviews highlight a crisp trigger break and rapid , contributing to user satisfaction in high-volume sessions, though benefits are most pronounced with proper and ammunition . For self-defense applications, anecdotal user data indicates binary triggers enable faster delivery of multiple rounds on target with minimal accuracy degradation when employed deliberately, outperforming traditional semi-auto setups in simulated defensive scenarios by prioritizing volume over precision in close-quarters engagements. These reports emphasize the device's utility in legal rapid-fire without requiring advanced modifications, though users stress training to mitigate over-reliance on the binary mode.

Lack of Evidence for Increased Criminal Use

Despite their availability as legal, non-NFA devices since the early , binary triggers have not been linked to any measurable increase in firearm-related crime rates in available federal data. The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program, which tracks weapon types in homicides, consistently reports rifles—including those potentially equipped with binary triggers—accounting for only 2-4% of gun murders annually, with no documented spike correlating to binary trigger . Similarly, ATF's National Firearms Commerce and Trafficking Assessment (NFCTA) traces of crime guns emphasize handguns and unmodified semi-automatics as predominant, without isolating binary triggers as a significant factor in recoveries or violence trends. Documented criminal uses remain rare and isolated, often highlighted in advocacy for restrictions but not indicative of systemic patterns. A prominent example is the July 27, 2023, ambush where the perpetrator used an AR-15-style rifle modified with a binary trigger to kill one person and injure two others before being stopped by . Other cited incidents, such as those prompting Minnesota's 2024 binary trigger ban effective January 1, 2025, involve few verified cases amid broader discussions, with critics arguing the measures target lawful owners without evidence of deterrence value. No peer-reviewed studies or longitudinal analyses have established a causal relationship between binary trigger ownership and elevated , in contrast to more prevalent factors like illicit full-auto conversions (e.g., switches), which ATF reports recover far more frequently at crime scenes. Proponents of binary triggers emphasize this evidentiary gap, noting that rate-of-fire enhancements do not appear to drive criminal selection, as most gun crimes involve close-range, concealable handguns rather than rapid-fire rifle configurations requiring greater skill and ammunition. The absence of routine tracking for trigger types in crime data further underscores the lack of empirical support for claims of heightened misuse, with regulatory focus often relying on anecdotal high-profile events rather than aggregate statistics.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Safety and Control Concerns

Critics contend that binary triggers elevate the risk of negligent discharges because they fire a on both trigger pull and release, potentially surprising users unaccustomed to the dual-action mechanism and leading to unintended shots during handling or transitions. This concern is amplified for novice shooters, as mere explanation of the function does not equate to proficient , necessitating specialized to mitigate unplanned firing on release. Proponents counter that users can interrupt the release shot by swiftly removing finger pressure, but detractors argue this relies on reflexive precision under stress, which may falter in high-adrenaline scenarios. Control challenges arise from the doubled firing rate, which demands synchronized manipulation with the firearm's cyclic action, complicating mitigation and sight alignment compared to standard semi-automatic triggers. Inexperienced operators may experience exacerbated muzzle climb and diminished accuracy, as the need to repeatedly cycle pull-release divides attention between trigger management and weapon stabilization, unlike holding a trigger steady in other rapid-fire contexts. Forum discussions among shooters note potential cycling irregularities, such as or interactions disrupting sear reset, further hindering reliable during sustained fire. Mechanical reliability issues have been reported, including instances where binary triggers malfunctioned by discharging rounds even with the safety selector in the "safe" position, underscoring vulnerabilities in design or installation that could bypass standard protocols. Manufacturers like Franklin Armory mandate installation exclusively by certified armorers to avert such hazards from improper assembly, warning of projectile small parts during the process and disclaiming liability for non-professional work. Despite these safeguards, anecdotal accounts describe binary triggers as inviting "unplanned shots," positioning them as unsuitable for precision-oriented or defensive applications without rigorous familiarization. No comprehensive empirical studies quantify elevated accident rates attributable to binary triggers over conventional ones, with available data limited to user anecdotes and isolated malfunction reports rather than systematic incident tracking. Nonetheless, the among safety-focused commentators is that the technology's novelty introduces causal risks tied to in unfamiliar operation, warranting caution in deployment.

Regulatory Pushback and Misconceptions

At the federal level, binary triggers remain legal under the , as affirmed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in examinations distinguishing them from machine guns; unlike automatic weapons, they require discrete trigger pulls and releases for each shot, with no continuous rearward pressure enabling multiple discharges. However, regulatory scrutiny has intensified amid broader efforts to curb rapid-fire devices, including ATF's 2021-2022 reclassification of forced-reset triggers (FRTs) as machine guns—a category distinct from binaries but often conflated in public discourse and enforcement actions—prompting lawsuits that indirectly highlight pushback against enhanced semi-automatic capabilities. State-level restrictions exemplify targeted regulatory opposition, with nine states plus the District of Columbia prohibiting binary triggers as of 2025, often classifying them alongside prohibited modifications despite federal approval; for instance, enacted a via House File 5247 in May 2024, embedding it in a 1,430-page to expedite passage, but a Ramsey struck it down on August 18, 2025, ruling the measure violated the state's single-subject constitutional requirement due to its bundling with unrelated provisions like tax policies. Such maneuvers reflect legislative strategies to impose bans without standalone debate, though judicial reversals underscore procedural vulnerabilities; similar proposals, like North Dakota's 2025 dangerous weapons bill initially including binary restrictions, were amended out amid opposition, illustrating uneven but persistent state-level resistance. Common misconceptions portray binary triggers as equivalent to machine guns, erroneously claiming they enable automatic fire with a single pull, whereas the mechanism demands an affirmative release action—akin to a distinct —for the second shot, preserving semi-automatic under . concerns, amplified by law enforcement and reports of potential accidental discharges during release, often overlook built-in selector modes allowing deactivation to standard semi-automatic operation and the absence of empirical data linking binaries to elevated mishap rates beyond user inexperience; critics in outlets like local statements cite rapid fire as inherently riskier, yet user reports and manufacturer designs emphasize controlled engagement, countering narratives of uncontrolled spraying. Another equates them with criminal proliferation, despite no tracking indicating disproportionate use in offenses, a view propagated in ban advocacy but unsubstantiated by distinguishing trigger types. These misapprehensions, frequently echoed in mainstream reporting without mechanical nuance, fuel regulatory momentum despite binaries' compliance with existing statutes.

Manufacturers and Market

Major Producers

Franklin Armory, established in 2010 in , pioneered commercial binary triggers through its patented Binary Firing System®, which fires one round on trigger pull and another on release while maintaining semi-automatic classification under federal law. The company produces the BFSIII series, including drop-in units for AR-15 platforms (e.g., BFSIII AR-C1), variants, and ACR rifles, with expansions to Glock-compatible kits shipped starting November 13, 2023. Franklin Armory dominates the market, offering over a dozen models priced from approximately $300 to $500, and integrates binary systems into its own AR-15 rifles. FosTech Outdoors manufactures the Echo series as a primary competitor, featuring models like the AR-II for AR-15s and Echo AK-47 triggers that similarly enable dual firing per trigger cycle via a hammer-blocked release mechanism. Introduced around , these triggers emphasize compatibility with mil-spec lowers and are noted for their distinct compared to Franklin's system, with prices ranging from $500 to $800. Other producers remain limited, with no significant market players beyond these two as of 2025; smaller or discontinued efforts, such as early prototypes, have not scaled to comparable production volumes. Retailers like distribute these brands but do not manufacture them.

Cost and Availability Factors

Binary triggers for popular platforms such as AR-15 rifles typically retail between $200 and $500, depending on the model and manufacturer. Entry-level options like the Franklin Armory BFSIII AR-ESSENTIAL start at approximately $200, while premium variants such as the Binary AR-ELITE or specialized AK-platform triggers can exceed $450. Prices for binary triggers compatible with .22-caliber rifles begin around $250, whereas those for Glocks or high-end AR setups may reach $650 or more, influenced by features like ambidextrous safety integration or drop-in installation ease. Availability is primarily constrained by state-level regulations rather than federal prohibitions, as binary triggers remain legal under U.S. federal law when classified as semi-automatic devices firing one round per trigger pull or release. They are banned outright in nine states—California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York—plus the District of Columbia, restricting purchases and possession for residents there. In permissive states, they are readily obtainable through online retailers like Palmetto State Armory or Graf & Sons, or directly from producers such as Franklin Armory, with no widespread supply shortages reported as of 2025. Additional factors include compliance with interstate shipping requirements under the Gun Control Act, which necessitate FFL transfers for certain configurations, and occasional model-specific backorders tied to manufacturing demand spikes following events like SHOT Show releases.

References

  1. [1]
    Binary Triggers Explained | USCCA
    The Binary trigger is Franklin Armory's patented pull-and-release trigger system (Binary Firing System) that fires one round on pull and one round on release.
  2. [2]
    What Is A Binary Trigger - Why Use Them? - Ammo To Go
    Feb 16, 2022 · A binary trigger fires only a single shot per trigger movement (one when pulled to the rear, and one when the trigger is reset).
  3. [3]
    What is a Binary Trigger? | Breach Bang Clear
    Jan 22, 2022 · The AR-15 was the first gun to have a binary trigger. Franklin Armory created the Binary Trigger to get around the NFA and ...
  4. [4]
    What is a Binary Trigger? - The Mag Life - GunMag Warehouse
    Jan 30, 2024 · A binary trigger, however, has two sears. In binary mode, the hammer re-cocks and the disconnector prevents fully automatic fire, just as in semi-auto mode.<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Mythbusters: 5 Falsehoods About Binary Triggers - GUNS Magazine
    The ATF has reviewed and approved numerous Binary triggers, confirming that they comply with the legal standards for semi-automatic firearms.
  6. [6]
    Binary Trigger vs Forced Reset Trigger (FRT) Full Guide
    Feb 26, 2025 · A binary trigger allows you to shoot one shot by squeezing the trigger. This is no different than any other gun trigger. The trigger group and ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Cop Killer Used a Binary Trigger. Here's What to Know About the ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · Some states do ban the purchase of binary triggers specifically or modifications like binary triggers generally. The manufacturer websites ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Ramsey County judge strikes down ban on binary triggers for firearms
    Aug 18, 2025 · A Ramsey County judge struck down a ban on a firearm device that can double the rate of fire, siding with a gun rights group that argued the ...
  10. [10]
    US9952013B2 - Trigger group for semi-automatic firearms
    This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/250,337 filed on Nov. 3, 2015, entitled “BINARY FIRING SYSTEM™ (aka BFS ...
  11. [11]
    Binary Triggers Explained - Firearms Legal Protection
    Oct 15, 2021 · A binary trigger is a replacement trigger that features two modes of firing, semiautomatic and binary or “echo” in the case of one brand.
  12. [12]
    Franklin Armory Binary trigger system | thefirearmblog.com
    Jan 23, 2016 · The rifle is fired and as the bolt goes to the rear, cocking the hammer back into the disconnector. When the trigger is then released, the ...
  13. [13]
    Binary Trigger vs Forced Reset Trigger - 5D Tactical
    Nov 2, 2022 · By legal definition, binary triggers do not mechanically turn AR15's into machine guns as such cannot be regulated by the Gun Control Act or ...
  14. [14]
    Are forced-reset triggers illegal machine guns? ATF and ... - AP News
    Aug 24, 2023 · ATF regulations define a machine gun as a weapon capable of firing multiple shots with a “single pull of the trigger.” Lawyers for some gun ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] BINARY TRIGGERS EXPLAINED - Firearms Legal Protection
    A binary trigger is a replacement trigger with two firing modes: one shot on trigger pull, and another on trigger release, allowing two shots per trigger pull.
  16. [16]
    Binary Triggers...Legal or Not? - IGY6 Gunsmithing LLC
    Jul 21, 2025 · Not a Machine Gun. It's important to note that binary triggers are not considered machine guns under federal law because they require two ...
  17. [17]
    Franklin Armory Releases "Binary Firing System" - Recoil Magazine
    Sep 29, 2015 · The Binary Firing System (BFS) acts like a standard trigger when set on 'Semi' but allows an AR to fire a round both when the trigger is pressed and released ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Binary Triggers: Do They Have A Legitimate Use? - Pro-Gun Millennial
    Aug 13, 2021 · From the very beginning they were created as a way to 'get around' the '86 machine gun registry closing. Since the ATF determined that a trigger ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  19. [19]
    The Magnificent Franklin Armory Binary Firing System
    The mad geniuses at Franklin Armory have contrived a mechanism that allows you to fire your favorite sporting weapon once when you pull the trigger and again ...
  20. [20]
    Franklin Armory Awarded Multiple Trigger Patents - The Firearm Blog
    May 3, 2018 · On April 24th, 2018, the US Patent and Trademark Office awarded two patents to Franklin Armory® for their innovative Binary Firing System™.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  21. [21]
    Franklin Armory BFSIII HK-C1 Binary Trigger Review - Firearms News
    May 12, 2020 · Within the past year Franklin Armory has introduced two new models of their binary trigger, the BFSIII (binary firing system, 3rd generation).
  22. [22]
    BINARY RUGER: Franklin Armory Pulls (And Releases) A 10/22 ...
    Jan 16, 2020 · Franklin has just announced a binary trigger for the Ruger 10/22 platform. Like their eight other triggers, this rimfire version has three positions: safe, ...
  23. [23]
    Franklin Armory Introduces Binary Handgun Trigger
    Jan 18, 2022 · Franklin Armory@ is proud to introduce our first prototype model of the Binary@ firing system for a handgun, the G-S173! The G-S173 BFSIII® ...
  24. [24]
    First Look: Franklin Armory AR-Essential Binary Trigger
    Feb 19, 2025 · Franklin Armory created the new AR Essential Binary trigger to serve as a budget-friendly alternative to its top-of-the line AR Elite Binary trigger.Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  25. [25]
    Binary Trigger AR15 - Franklin Armory
    Triggers ; BFSIII® AR-ESSENTIAL · $199.99 ; Binary® AR-ELITE · $299.99 ; Blemished G-S173 · $429.99 ; Binary® SKR-C1 · $449.99 ; Franklin Armory BFSIII® 22-EZ · $332.99.Franklin Armory BFSIII® 22-EZ · Franklin Armory BFSIII® 22-C1-P · Binary® SKR-C1
  26. [26]
    AR 15 Binary Trigger Parts - Franklin Armory
    Our BFS3 parts collection comes with a variety of parts for your binary trigger system. From trigger springs to trigger houses, we have the BFSIII parts for ...Missing: design | Show results with:design
  27. [27]
    Franklin Armory® BFSIII® PC-C1 Binary® Trigger
    The Binary Firing System GEN 3 (BFSIII) is a 3-position trigger. In position 3, it fires one round on pull and one round on release.Missing: design | Show results with:design
  28. [28]
    AR 15 Trigger | Binary Trigger Systems - Franklin Armory
    Offering the best binary triggers, we manufacture trigger systems ranging from AK 15 Binary Triggers to AK 47 Binary Triggers & everything in between.Franklin Armory BFSIII® 22-EZ · Franklin Armory BFSIII® 22-C1-P · TriggersMissing: design | Show results with:design
  29. [29]
    How to Install the Franklin Armory Binary Trigger for AR-15s
    Feb 27, 2023 · Insert one pin shoulder on either side of the temporary stainless trigger pin that's holding the assembly together. Ensure the flat cut-outs on ...
  30. [30]
    Can i put a Binary Trigger in my standard AR-15 lower?
    May 5, 2021 · Binary triggers are designed to fit most AR-15 lowers, and the installation process is pretty straightforward. Just check the compatibility of ...
  31. [31]
    TFB Armorer's Bench: Franklin Armory 10/22 Binary Trigger Installation
    Sep 18, 2022 · Starting out it is recommended to degrease the spot on the trigger assembly where the Franklin Armory binary trigger sticker needs to go. The ...
  32. [32]
    Best Binary Trigger Choices for 2025: Are They Even Legal?
    Compatibility: Binary triggers are made for specific firearms, like the Franklin Armory BSFIII AR-S1 for ARs and the Fostech Echo AK-47 for AKs. Make sure the ...
  33. [33]
    So I have the Franklin armory binary trigger, but I don't really ... - Reddit
    Oct 12, 2023 · The gun needs to make it back into battery again to be able to fire, so there's a maximum rate of fire you can hit before you outrun it. I'm not ...
  34. [34]
    How accurate is this sentence “a firearm with a binary trigger can ...
    Oct 1, 2018 · It is not accurate . The cyclic rate of the avarage machine gun is 600 -1500 rounds per minute which is 10 round per second at the lowest rate , ...How does the rate of fire of forced-reset triggers compare to ... - QuoraHow fast would a Franklin Armory XO-26 with binary trigger ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  35. [35]
    Review: New Franklin Armory Gen 3 Binary BFS III Trigger
    Sep 1, 2016 · The trigger is crisp and feels good. The binary trigger feels nearly the same. You can feel the break for the second shot as the trigger is released.Missing: ergonomics | Show results with:ergonomics
  36. [36]
    Franklin Armory Binary Firing System (BFS) Trigger Review
    Jan 15, 2016 · I found the selector to work very well, with zero complaints on its function or ergonomics. ... Most everyone I let use the trigger was able to ...
  37. [37]
    Franklin Armory BFSIII Binary Trigger [Review] - Pew Pew Tactical
    Mar 26, 2018 · The Franklin Armory Binary Trigger allows a shooter to simulate full-auto fire without the expense and NFA restrictions of a truly fully-automatic lower.
  38. [38]
    AllOutdoor Review: Franklin Armory BFSIII AR-C1 Binary Trigger
    Jul 7, 2021 · It was stupendously easy to install even with the lack of proper troubleshooting. It proved itself to me at the range with its reliability and ...
  39. [39]
    Binary Triggers Explained - Firearms Legal Protection
    Oct 15, 2021 · A binary trigger is a replacement trigger that features two modes of firing, semiautomatic and binary or “echo” in the case of one brand.
  40. [40]
    Rare Breed Triggers' FRT-15s and Wide-Open Triggers (WOTs ...
    The Warning Notice stated that FRTs had been classified by ATF as machineguns pursuant to the National Firearms Act (NFA), their manufacture was unlawful, and ...
  41. [41]
    ATF Reclassifies Binary Triggers - Class III Forum
    Apr 3, 2022 · The ATF reclassified some forced reset triggers (FRTs) as machineguns, but this does not apply to binary triggers, which function differently.
  42. [42]
    A5775 - NJ Legislature
    This bill establishes a crime of possessing or selling a binary trigger. A “binary trigger” is a device affixed to a semiautomatic firearm.
  43. [43]
    Shipping Restrictions By State | Palmetto State Armory
    Delaware · No Sales of Suppressors/Silencers · No Sales of Automatic Knives · No Binary Triggers · No Rifle or Shotgun Sales to any Resident of Delaware that is ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Maryland Firearms Statutes and Codes - ATF
    (e) "Binary trigger system" means a device that, when installed in or attached to a firearm, fires both when the trigger is pulled and on release of the trigger ...
  46. [46]
    Binary Trigger Ban - Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus
    This law impacts anyone possessing a binary trigger, even if not installed in a firearm. Possession of a binary trigger will be a crime after January 1st, 2025.
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    The Oregon Full Auto AR-15 Trigger Laws
    Jan 19, 2025 · Oregon AR-15 laws are clear: devices that alter the trigger function are prohibited unless you have proper authorization.
  49. [49]
    Texas court case: Are forced-reset triggers illegal machine guns?
    Aug 20, 2023 · The forced-reset triggers so concerned the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives that it ordered the company making them to halt sales.<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Binary Trigger Legal States 2025 - World Population Review
    Yes, there are nine states, along with the District of Columbia, that have banned binary triggers. While these devices are legal on a federal level, that doesn' ...
  51. [51]
    Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus Challenges Binary Trigger Ban in ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · The binary trigger ban, effective January 1, 2025, amends Minnesota Statutes § 609.67, subdivision 1(d), to classify Binary® triggers as “ ...
  52. [52]
    Minnesota seeks court clarification on 'single subject' legislation ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · Contained in the bill is a ban on sales of binary trigger guns, a type of gun that discharges a cartridge during both the backward and forward ...
  53. [53]
    MN Gun Owners Caucus v. Walz (Binary Trigger & Single Subject ...
    Judge Castro ruled on August 18th, 2025, that the passage of the 2024 Omnibus Bill, including the binary trigger ban, violated the single-subject clause of the ...
  54. [54]
    Gunspot Academy | Binary Triggers
    May 16, 2022 · A binary trigger functions much in the same way as a standard semiautomatic trigger. The key difference is that two rounds can be fired with one ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] APPENDIX D6 – Modified Division (Provisional)
    Use of binary triggers (firing once on trigger pull and once on release) is prohibited. 4. For all long guns (R, SG, and PCC), Short Barreled Rifles (SBR's) ...
  56. [56]
    Binary Triggers? - Multi-Gun - Brian Enos's Forums
    Apr 25, 2016 · Binary triggers fire one round on the pull and one on the release. USPSA rules suggest they are prohibited, and IMA rules penalize weapons ...
  57. [57]
    What Is A Binary Trigger? - Wideners Shooting, Hunting & Gun Blog
    Nov 11, 2021 · Put simply, a binary trigger is a type of semiautomatic trigger with two firing modes: semiautomatic and binary.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  58. [58]
    Binary Triggers for home-defense/duty/contractor firearms (Page 1 of ...
    May 10, 2024 · Firearm Discussion and Resources from AR-15, AK-47, Handguns and more ... AR/AK triggers, G-Flex Glock Binary trigger, JSD PR Triggers<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Can I use a binary trigger in self-defense? - Quora
    Oct 8, 2021 · It increases your chances of being prosecuted for an otherwise justified shooting. If you done messed up and shot someone when not justified ...Would a binary trigger equipped AR15 be useful in self-defense/civil ...Have you ever encountered a situation where a firearm with a binary ...More results from www.quora.com
  60. [60]
    Binary trigger and 60rnd drum for home defense? | Page 2
    Aug 8, 2020 · I own a machine gun. I would choose a semiautomatic for self defense 100 times out of 100. Binary trigger even worse since that second shot happens on reset.
  61. [61]
    Binary Triggers vs. Forced Reset Triggers : A Comprehensive Look
    Dec 16, 2024 · Binary triggers fire on both pull and release, while forced reset triggers fire only on pull but reset mechanically.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Part III – Crime Gun Tracing Updates and New Analysis - ATF
    5 Updated trace data reflecting firearms recovered in 2022 and 2023 and traced by July 1, 2024, shows that trace requests increased an additional 13% from. 2021 ...
  63. [63]
    The Fargo shooter used a binary trigger. Here's what to know about ...
    Jul 21, 2023 · ... Criminal Investigation on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, shows the cache ... Here's a look at the device, regulations around binary triggers and how ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  64. [64]
    MN law banning binary triggers to take effect; critics say it won't ...
    Dec 26, 2024 · The law makes owning or possessing a binary trigger a felony, with a punishment of up to 20 years in prison or a fine of up to $35,000, or both.<|control11|><|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Reader Opinion: The truth about binary triggers - Brainerd Dispatch
    Jul 20, 2024 · If used during a crime, it allows a criminal to fire at twice the rate of a standard criminal. Binary triggers also allow a person defending ...Missing: rarity | Show results with:rarity
  66. [66]
    The Second Amendment and the Debate Over Binary Triggers
    Aug 2, 2024 · Critics of binary triggers argue that these devices skirt the spirit of federal law, which prohibits civilian ownership of fully automatic ...
  67. [67]
    Binary Trigger . . . really? - The Firing Line Forums
    Jun 13, 2022 · A normal trigger fires when pressed and resets the hammer when released. A binary trigger fires when pressed and fires when released.
  68. [68]
    In your opinion, how effective would a 'Binary' (pull and release of ...
    Oct 3, 2017 · It is however used in shooting sports. Larry Potterfield explains it and why you would use it. Basically it eliminates flinch from shooting.What is a binary trigger, and why would you need a different ... - QuoraHow do binary triggers work to make semi-automatic guns ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  69. [69]
    Does anyone have experience with binary triggers? Love them, hate ...
    Jan 13, 2023 · They're fun in binary and pretty decent just as semi triggers as well. If you won't miss the money I think you should try one. Or two, or three, or four.Binary triggers, are they a gimmick and are they reliable? - RedditWould you trust a binary trigger? : r/ar15 - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: ergonomics | Show results with:ergonomics
  70. [70]
    Part 1: Dangerous malfunction with the Franklin Armory BFSIII
    Mar 24, 2024 · I have had some serious problems with the Franklin Armory BFSIII binary trigger. Part 2 fixed the issue. Dangerous malfunction with the ...Missing: upkeep | Show results with:upkeep
  71. [71]
    [PDF] AR-Essential Instructions Manual_V1.1.indd - Franklin Armory
    MANUFACTURER WARNING: The Binary Firing System® should only be installed by a Franklin Armory® Certified Armorer. Franklin Armory® will not be responsible for ...
  72. [72]
    Binary trigger WTH! - 6.5 Grendel Forum
    Mar 29, 2018 · Binary triggers invite unplanned shots. I don't believe they are either safe or a tool for a serious rifleman. Clarence ...
  73. [73]
    Franklin Armory Binary Trigger is Still Federally Legal - Firearms News
    Mar 26, 2022 · The ATF letter clearly cements the legitimacy and federal legality of the Franklin Armory® Binary Firing System® trademark.
  74. [74]
    A Comprehensive Guide to Binary Triggers in 2025
    May 1, 2025 · Binary triggers offer a unique firing mode, enabling semi-automatic and binary fire. They enhance the shooter's rate of fire without modifications.
  75. [75]
    Dangerous weapons bill passes without binary trigger provision
    Apr 16, 2025 · Senators voted to remove several provisions, including banning the use of a binary trigger in the commission of a crime. A binary trigger is an ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Binary triggers: Here's what to know about the device that's worrying ...
    Jul 22, 2023 · A binary trigger is a modification that allows a weapon to fire one round when the trigger is pulled and another when it is released – in ...
  77. [77]
    Franklin Armory
    Franklin Armory is a California & Nevada quality based AR-15 manufacturer. We ... Binary® Triggers · Triggers · BFSIII® Installation Service · Binary® Parts.
  78. [78]
    Franklin Armory Ships First Glock Binary Triggers - The Smoking Gun
    Nov 13, 2023 · Originally announced in 2022, Franklin Armory's new Glock binary trigger kit effectively doubles the pistol's rate of fire.
  79. [79]
    Double-Dipping: Best Binary Trigger Buyer's Guide - Gun Digest
    Mar 27, 2023 · A binary trigger can be an easy and legal way to increase your rifle's fire rate, but are they practical or are they only good as range ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  80. [80]
    About Binary Triggers | True Shot Ammo
    May 15, 2024 · Binary trigger essentially refers to a fire control group which allows an end user to increase the potential fire rate of a semi-automatic firearm.
  81. [81]
    Shop Binary Triggers - The Top Brands at Great Prices
    Order your binary trigger system direct from PSA and get the precision, speed, and repeatable pull you've been looking for. Shop Today!
  82. [82]
    Complete Guide to Binary Triggers: Top Picks for Glocks, ARs, and ...
    What is a binary trigger? An aftermarket trigger for semi-automatic guns that allows one round to be fired upon the trigger pull and a single round to be ...
  83. [83]
  84. [84]
    New Triggers of SHOT 2025 Include Glock Triggers - GunsAmerica
    Jan 31, 2025 · These new triggers retail for $200, but their street price will ... Binary Trigger for the FN SCAR, which just launched at SHOT Show 2025.Missing: cost | Show results with:cost