Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Contingency fund

A contingency fund is a reserve of financial resources set aside by individuals, organizations, or governments to address unexpected expenses or emergencies arising from unforeseen events. Its primary purpose is to provide a buffer against financial disruptions, such as cost overruns in projects or sudden needs, thereby enabling proactive without resorting to borrowing or asset . In project and budgetary contexts, it functions as a fiscal tool to account for uncertainties in estimates, often calculated as a of base costs based on identified risks. For depository institutions and businesses, maintaining such funds is critical for funding plans that simulate scenarios, ensuring operational amid or economic shocks. While the optimal size varies by context—drawing from empirical assessments of historical variances and probabilistic modeling—failure to adequately provision can amplify vulnerabilities, as evidenced by liquidity crises underscoring the need for robust reserves.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

A contingency fund is a designated reserve of financial resources allocated to address unforeseen expenses, emergencies, or risks that may arise beyond normal budgeting or planning, thereby mitigating potential disruptions to or operations. This fund serves as a against uncertainties such as economic downturns, delays, or sudden costs, distinct from routine operational budgets, and is typically drawn upon only when specified materialize. In practice, the composition and purpose of a contingency fund vary by context: in , it covers individual emergencies like medical bills or job loss; in business or , it accounts for identified risks such as cost overruns or issues, often calculated as a of the base estimate (e.g., 5-10% for projects). Unlike management reserves, which address unknown-unknown risks, contingency funds target quantifiable uncertainties documented in risk registers, ensuring targeted allocation without inflating costs unnecessarily.

Core Purposes and Principles

The primary purpose of a contingency fund is to serve as a financial against unforeseen events, such as economic downturns, operational disruptions, or emergent expenses, thereby maintaining and averting the need for high-cost emergency borrowing. In management frameworks, these funds enable institutions to withstand stress scenarios by providing immediate access to resources, as evidenced by regulatory guidelines emphasizing preparedness for contingent demands beyond normal operations. For projects and businesses, the fund absorbs variances in costs or timelines arising from identified uncertainties, with studies showing that risk-adjusted allocations improve overall objective fulfillment by reducing exposure to unmitigated losses. A foundational principle is the systematic assessment of potential risks through and scenario to quantify reserve needs, ensuring the fund is neither insufficient nor excessively large. Funds are typically maintained in highly liquid, low-volatility instruments to facilitate rapid deployment without risks, and their size is calibrated to historical data or probabilistic models—often 5-10% of total budgets in projects based on empirical variance . Periodic replenishment and review align the fund with updated risk profiles, incorporating alternative funding sources like credit lines as backstops to enhance . This structure promotes fiscal prudence by prioritizing downside protection over speculative returns, grounded in the recognition that incomplete foresight necessitates reserves to preserve amid real-world volatilities.

Types and Applications

Personal Finance

In , a contingency fund, often termed an emergency fund, consists of readily accessible cash reserves designated exclusively for unforeseen financial shocks such as job loss, major medical expenses, or urgent home repairs, rather than routine or . This fund serves as a buffer against crises, enabling individuals to avoid high-interest or asset during disruptions. Financial experts recommend accumulating three to six months' worth of essential living expenses, calculated by tallying necessities like , utilities, , transportation, and minimum payments, then multiplying the monthly total by the target duration. Beginners may start with a smaller initial target of $1,000 to cover minor emergencies before scaling up, with adjustments for factors like single-income , irregular earnings, or dependents, potentially extending to nine to twelve months. As of 2025, median U.S. expenses imply an average target around $33,000 for six months, though individual needs vary widely based on location and lifestyle. The fund should be held in highly liquid, low-risk vehicles such as high-yield savings accounts, funds, or certificates of deposit with short maturities to ensure quick access without principal loss or penalties, while earning modest interest to combat . To establish it, individuals can automate transfers from , reduce non-essential spending, or redirect windfalls like tax refunds, prioritizing replenishment after any withdrawals to maintain . Empirical data underscores its value: a 2025 Bankrate survey found 73% of saving less for emergencies amid and high rates, correlating with heightened reliance on cards averaging balances over $6,000. Vanguard research links at least $2,000 in reserves to 21% higher financial scores, reducing stress from shocks, while [Federal Reserve](/page/Federal Reserve) data shows households with three months' savings report greater stability. Inadequate buffers increase hardship withdrawal risks by 13-fold from retirement accounts, per policy analyses.

Business and Projects

In business operations, a contingency fund serves as a reserved pool of capital to address unforeseen financial disruptions, such as interruptions, regulatory changes, or shortfalls, enabling continuity without resorting to or asset . Typically calculated as 3-6% of annual operating expenses or equivalent to 3-6 months of essential costs, this fund is maintained separately from to preserve during crises like the 2020-2021 global supply disruptions that increased costs for many firms by 10-20%. In , contingency reserves specifically target identified risks through , forming part of the cost baseline rather than the overall project budget, distinct from management reserves allocated for unidentified "unknown unknowns." Per standards from the (), these reserves—often 5-15% of the estimated project cost—are derived from risk registers, probabilistic modeling (e.g., simulations), and historical data, ensuring coverage for variances in scope, schedule, or resources without inflating baseline estimates. For instance, in construction projects, contingencies address site-specific uncertainties like instability, with deployment requiring formal to prevent misuse for non-risk items. Effective management involves periodic reviews and adjustments; unused portions are returned to the sponsor upon project completion, promoting fiscal discipline and accurate forecasting in subsequent endeavors. This approach, rooted in integration, has been shown to reduce cost overruns by up to 20% in high-risk projects when reserves are calibrated via reserve analysis techniques.

Government and Public Sector

In the public sector, contingency funds function as dedicated reserves to address unforeseen expenditures, revenue shortfalls, or emergencies without disrupting core services or necessitating immediate tax increases or borrowing. These funds are typically governed by statutory frameworks that dictate accumulation from budget surpluses, investment in low-risk assets, and conditional drawdowns linked to economic indicators such as declarations or thresholds. Unlike personal or business reserves, government variants emphasize macroeconomic stabilization, with indicating that states or nations with larger balances—often 5-15% of annual expenditures—experience shallower fiscal deficits during downturns, as seen in U.S. states during the 2020 where reserves mitigated 20-30% of revenue losses in high-balance jurisdictions. In the United States, subnational governments predominantly utilize "rainy day funds" as contingency mechanisms, with 49 states maintaining such reserves as of fiscal year 2024 (excluding , which reported zero balance). Combined balances totaled $349.9 billion at the end of fiscal 2024, down from a peak of $437 billion in but still equating to approximately 11.6% of state expenditures and sufficient to cover 20 weeks of operating costs on average. Projections for fiscal 2025 forecast maintenance or modest growth in most states, driven by post-pandemic revenue rebounds, though spending pressures from and education could erode gains. At the federal level, while no generalized contingency fund exists, sector-specific reserves like the Federal Highway Administration's contingency allocations for major projects—calculated via probabilistic risk models to cover 10-20% cost escalations—exemplify targeted applications, ensuring project completion amid delays or overruns. Similarly, the U.S. Department of holds at least $6 billion in contingency appropriations for programs like benefits during disruptions such as government shutdowns. Internationally, the United Kingdom's Contingencies Fund, authorized under the 1970 Act, provides short-term advances up to 2% of the prior year's total supply estimates for urgent services or excess departmental spending pending ary appropriation. In 2023-24, it financed provisional payments totaling millions of pounds, repayable upon supplemental estimates, thereby averting service interruptions from timing mismatches in budgeting. principles across jurisdictions prioritize conservative sizing—often derived from historical —and replenishment mandates post-drawdown to rebuild , with oversight by legislative bodies to curb discretionary abuse. These mechanisms causally reduce procyclical , as reserves enable countercyclical spending that dampens economic , per analyses of sovereign balance sheets in advanced economies.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Examples

One of the earliest documented examples of systematic resource reservation for unforeseen events appears in the biblical account of serving as in , dated to approximately the 18th century BCE. Interpreting Pharaoh's dreams foretelling seven years of abundance followed by seven years of , directed the storage of one-fifth of each year's harvest in state granaries, creating a national reserve that not only sustained but also neighboring regions during the scarcity. This centralized approach to buffering against agricultural and economic shocks exemplifies proto-contingency planning, relying on predictive foresight and surplus allocation rather than responses. In the , the aerarium populi Romani, the public treasury housed in the , functioned as a reserve holding revenues and special funds for emergencies, including unanticipated campaigns and state crises from the 6th century BCE onward. Administered by quaestors, it included segregated portions like the aerarium sanctum for specific contingencies such as a 5% on slave manumissions, providing liquidity for irregular expenditures without disrupting core budgets. Under in 6 CE, the aerarium militare was established with initial funding of 170 million sesterces from imperial resources to cover veteran pensions and unforeseen needs, marking a dedicated contingency mechanism for long-term liabilities. Formal contingency funds in the modern sense emerged in the late amid nation-state budgeting. In the United States, requested such a fund in his First Annual Message to on January 8, 1790, to handle unpredictable foreign intercourse expenses, resulting in a July 1790 appropriation of $40,000 for the Contingency Fund for Foreign Intercourse, used for diplomatic and covert operations. This discretionary reserve allowed executive flexibility while maintaining congressional oversight through annual renewals. Early presidents like further exemplified prudent use by impounding and returning unspent portions, such as surplus from contingency allocations, to avoid waste and affirm fiscal restraint.

Evolution in the 20th and 21st Centuries

In the United States, state governments began formalizing rainy day funds—dedicated contingency reserves for economic downturns—in the late 1970s amid recurring fiscal crises and revenue volatility from the 1973-1975 recession. Pennsylvania established the first such fund in 1976, followed by widespread adoption in the 1980s and 1990s, with nearly all states creating budget stabilization funds by the early 2000s to provide counter-cyclical fiscal support. These funds typically capped contributions at a percentage of general revenues during booms and restricted withdrawals to certified recessions, amassing balances equivalent to 5-10% of state budgets by the 2010s, though underfunding persisted in some cases due to political pressures for spending. Internationally, similar mechanisms evolved, such as Norway's Government Pension Fund Global (established 1990) to stabilize oil-dependent revenues, reflecting a shift toward sovereign wealth funds with contingency elements amid commodity price swings. In business and project , contingency planning emerged as a structured in the mid-20th century, influenced by post- industrial and the supply chain disruptions. The contingency approach to management, formalized in the 1960s-1970s through theories emphasizing situational adaptability, integrated reserves for uncertainties into operational strategies, evolving into formalized tools like contingency reserves in project budgeting by the 1980s via standards such as the Project Management Institute's frameworks. By the 21st century, events like the 2001 dot-com bust and prompted enhanced , with regulations such as the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) mandating risk assessments that included funding buffers for operational shocks, leading firms to allocate 5-20% of project costs to contingencies based on risk modeling. For , emergency funds gained prominence in the late as movements post-1970s emphasized liquid savings for 3-6 months of expenses to mitigate job loss or medical shocks, building on Depression-era thrift habits but formalized in advisory . The 2008 recession and subsequent studies highlighted deficiencies, with only about 40% of U.S. households holding adequate buffers by 2010, spurring 21st-century innovations like automated savings apps and employer-sponsored emergency accounts amid rising instability. The accelerated this evolution, boosting average household reserves by 20-30% in affected regions through stimulus and behavioral shifts toward precautionary saving.

Strategies for Establishment and Management

Determining Size and Composition

The size of a contingency fund is typically determined through methodologies that quantify potential uncertainties, such as historical data on cost overruns, volatility in revenues or expenses, and probabilistic modeling of adverse events. In , standards from the () recommend calculating contingency reserves for identified risks using techniques like simulations or expected monetary value (), where reserves equal the sum of probability-weighted impacts of risks, often resulting in 3-10% of the base estimate for moderate-risk projects. Risk-based sizing adjusts upward for high-uncertainty scenarios, with empirical studies showing overruns averaging 10-20% in without such buffers. For , empirical guidelines from financial institutions advocate 3-6 months' worth of essential living expenses as a baseline, scaled by factors like stability, risks, and size; for instance, single-income may target 6-12 months to account for longer durations observed in labor averaging 20-26 weeks post-2008 . This rule derives from analyses of expenditure , where lower earners face higher relative shocks, though probabilistic approaches using opportunity costs of (e.g., forgone returns versus borrowing rates) can refine it to 1-3 months for conservative investors with diversified assets. In government budgeting, size is often set via statutory guidelines or , such as the U.S. Officers (GFOA) recommending unrestricted fund balances of at least 16.7% of annual expenditures (two months) for general funds, replenished within 1-3 years post-drawdown to mitigate revenue cyclicality evidenced in state budgets during recessions like 2008-2009, when shortfalls exceeded 10% in many jurisdictions. Federal major projects under FHWA protocols use contingency funds calibrated to risks, typically 10-20% for , based on historical bid variances and material price indices. Composition prioritizes liquidity and accessibility to ensure rapid deployment without market dependency. Contingency reserves commonly consist of cash or cash equivalents (e.g., money market funds, short-term treasuries) for personal and general use, avoiding illiquid assets like stocks that could depreciate during crises. In projects, reserves blend monetary allocations with time buffers or resource stockpiles, distinguished from management reserves for unknown risks, which remain under senior oversight rather than project-level control per PMI practices. Governments may include diversified instruments like sovereign bonds, but core holdings emphasize unencumbered funds to counter liquidity mismatches, as seen in banking regulations requiring buffers for unforeseen outflows. Empirical evidence from post-crisis audits underscores that non-liquid compositions amplify drawdown delays, increasing effective costs by 5-15% in volatile environments.

Funding and Maintenance

Contingency funds are typically funded through deliberate allocations from operating budgets, surplus revenues, or dedicated savings mechanisms tailored to the entity's scale and risk profile. In project management contexts, initial funding often constitutes 10% to 15% of the total estimated budget to account for uncertainties in scope or costs. For businesses, funding involves regular contributions from profits or cash flows into a segregated account, ensuring liquidity without disrupting core operations. Government entities, such as those managing public infrastructure, draw from annual appropriations or unassigned fund balances to establish reserves, with policies mandating minimum thresholds—often 5% to 25% of operating expenditures—to sustain service delivery amid fiscal volatility. Maintenance strategies emphasize preservation of liquidity and periodic replenishment to counteract depletion from deployments. Funds are held in low-risk, accessible instruments like high-yield savings or short-term treasuries to minimize costs while enabling rapid , as prolonged illiquidity can exacerbate crises. Ongoing contributions, automated where feasible, rebuild balances post-expenditure; for instance, businesses may allocate a fixed of monthly revenues to restore reserves after covering unforeseen events. Regular monitoring—quarterly reviews of usage against predefined triggers—and against scenarios like revenue shortfalls ensure adequacy, with adjustments based on updated risk assessments. In governmental applications, statutory reviews, such as those under U.S. guidelines, mandate annual evaluations to align reserves with evolving threats, preventing erosion from or persistent draws. Failure to maintain discipline risks , where unchecked undermines fiscal prudence, though empirical data from stable entities shows replenished funds correlate with reduced default probabilities during downturns.

Deployment and Oversight

Deployment of contingency funds requires adherence to predefined criteria to ensure usage aligns with their purpose of addressing unforeseen risks rather than routine expenses or scope expansions. In , funds from contingency reserves—allocated for known risks—are released by the upon verification of risk triggers, such as delays or cost overruns documented in the , while reserves for unknown risks necessitate approval from senior stakeholders or sponsors to maintain fiscal discipline. In government applications, deployment typically demands formal authorization, such as or legislative appropriations, as seen in U.S. federal contingency operations where funds are disbursed for military campaigns only after risk assessments and compliance with regulations. Oversight mechanisms emphasize and through ongoing monitoring, auditing, and reporting protocols. Project teams conduct periodic reviews of reserve usage, documenting expenditures against baselines and returning unspent amounts to avoid inflation of future estimates, with tools like aiding in variance analysis. In public sector contexts, agencies submit quarterly financial reports detailing fund obligations, as required for programs like the (TANF) contingency funds, enabling oversight bodies such as or inspectors general to scrutinize compliance and detect deviations. Best practices include integrating risk registers with financial systems for real-time tracking and conducting post-deployment audits to evaluate effectiveness and inform replenishment strategies, thereby mitigating risks.

Advantages

Financial Stability and Risk Mitigation

Contingency funds enhance by providing a dedicated pool of resources to address unforeseen disruptions, such as revenue shortfalls or unexpected costs, thereby averting the need for emergency debt issuance or forced spending cuts that could exacerbate economic downturns. This liquidity buffer operates on the principle of precautionary saving, where reserves accumulated during prosperous periods are deployed countercyclically to smooth consumption or operations, reducing overall fiscal or . Empirical analysis of state stabilization funds, often termed rainy day funds, indicates that entities with adequate reserves maintain higher total savings balances post-adoption compared to pre-adoption periods or states lacking such mechanisms. For instance, aggregate rainy day fund balances reached $121.8 billion by 2023, reflecting a 58% increase from levels, which enabled many jurisdictions to offset recessionary pressures without immediate measures. In governmental contexts, these funds mitigate risks associated with procyclical fiscal policies, where downturns trigger tax increases or service reductions that deepen recessions. Studies spanning fiscal years 1988 to 2012 reveal that rainy day funds help preserve social programs and avoid sharp expenditure drops, though effectiveness varies by sector; they prove particularly adept at stabilizing social sector outlays while showing limited impact on nonsocial expenditures. During fiscal crises, such as the early slowdown or the , states drawing on rainy day funds weathered revenue shortfalls with fewer cuts to essential services, preserving employment and public investments that support broader economic recovery. This risk mitigation extends to profile preservation, as reliance on reserves lowers borrowing costs and prevents downgrades tied to fiscal distress. For businesses and projects, contingency reserves similarly buffer against operational risks, such as interruptions or cost overruns, by allocating provisions for identified uncertainties beyond baseline budgets. frameworks emphasize that these reserves, typically 5-15% of project costs depending on exposure, enable proactive responses without derailing timelines or profitability. In volatile environments, firms with robust contingency planning demonstrate greater , as reserves facilitate and , reducing the likelihood of or value erosion from unhedged exposures. Overall, across sectors, contingency funds embody a causal against tail risks, empirically correlating with lower in cash flows and expenditures when sized appropriately relative to historical downturn magnitudes.

Empirical Evidence of Effectiveness

Empirical analyses of rainy day funds (RDFs) in U.S. states demonstrate their role in mitigating fiscal during economic downturns. A study examining state RDF balances from 1972 to 2009 found that higher reserves were associated with reduced likelihood of downgrades, with models indicating that a one-standard-deviation increase in RDF size decreased downgrade probability by approximately 10-15%. Similarly, research on RDF impacts during the and recessions showed that states with RDF balances exceeding 5% of expenditures experienced 20-30% smaller spending cuts compared to states with minimal reserves, enabling sustained public services amid revenue drops of up to 15%. Further econometric evidence confirms RDFs' countercyclical effects on budget stabilization. Wei and Denison's 2019 analysis of U.S. states from 1987 to 2015 revealed that RDF accumulations during expansions significantly damped general fund expenditure , with coefficients showing a 1% RDF-to-GDP ratio reducing expenditure swings by 0.2-0.4% in recessions. This stabilization extended to credit markets, where states maintaining RDFs above recommended thresholds (e.g., 8-12% of budgets) exhibited lower bond yield spreads by 10-20 basis points during stress periods, reflecting investor perceptions of enhanced fiscal resilience. Internationally, stabilization-oriented sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), akin to contingency reserves, correlate with reduced fiscal procyclicality. An IMF study of 50 countries from 1980 to 2020 found that nations with SWFs holding stabilization mandates experienced 15-25% less variance in fiscal balances relative to GDP during price shocks, attributed to drawdowns averaging 2-5% of assets that offset revenue declines without proportional spending hikes. In resource-dependent economies, such funds have empirically lowered public debt accumulation by 5-10 percentage points of GDP over boom-bust cycles, though effectiveness hinges on strict deposit rules to prevent depletion in non-emergencies. However, evidence also highlights limitations in specific contexts. Gonzalez and Paqueo's cross-country analysis indicated that RDFs reduced social sector spending by only 10-15% in developing nations, with nonsocial expenditures showing negligible due to political pressures overriding fund protocols during crises. Overall, while RDFs and analogous reserves provide verifiable buffers against acute shocks, their efficacy depends on size adequacy—typically 5-15% of budgets—and of withdrawal constraints, as underfunded or loosely governed funds fail to alter fiscal trajectories meaningfully.

Criticisms and Risks

Opportunity Costs and Inefficiencies

Maintaining contingency funds, such as rainy day funds in state budgets, incurs opportunity costs because these reserves are typically invested in low-yield, cash-like assets to ensure and , limiting their potential for higher returns elsewhere. For example, a 2014 analysis estimates that optimal rainy day fund sizes balance fiscal stress mitigation against these costs, noting that excess reserves could alternatively support tax reductions or expanded public services rather than earning minimal yields. Similarly, an study highlights that bloated rainy day funds impose substantial opportunity costs, as larger shortfalls relative to expenditures amplify the foregone benefits of reallocating those resources during non-crisis periods. These inefficiencies extend to the underutilization of funds during economic expansions, where reserves accumulate without addressing immediate needs like or repayment, potentially eroding real value through if investment returns fail to outpace price increases. Critics argue this static holding pattern diverts capital from productive s, with one assessment indicating that over-reserved funds in states like those analyzed in data represented missed opportunities equivalent to several points of general expenditures. In practice, 21 U.S. states maintained insufficient reserves over 25 years ending around , but inversely, oversized funds in others led to idle balances without proportional risk reduction, underscoring allocative distortions. Empirical models, such as value-at-risk frameworks applied to state finances, further quantify these drawbacks by simulating scenarios where excessive reserves yield diminishing marginal benefits against growing opportunity costs, particularly when funds exceed 5-10% of annual budgets without corresponding reductions. This tension highlights the need for calibrated sizing, as unchecked accumulation can perpetuate fiscal rigidity, constraining adaptive responses to growth opportunities over precautionary hoarding.

Potential for Misuse and Moral Hazard

Contingency funds, particularly government rainy day funds or budget stabilization funds, are susceptible to misuse when policymakers divert reserves for routine or non-emergency expenditures rather than true fiscal shocks. For instance, in Pennsylvania, Governor Josh Shapiro proposed in 2025 tapping the state's rainy day fund to cover proposed spending increases in transportation, public schools, and human services, which critics argued did not constitute emergencies under statutory definitions requiring revenue shortfalls or economic downturns. Similarly, in Washington state, lawmakers in 2022 accessed protected reserves from the Budget Stabilization Account for general budget balancing, bypassing voter-approved restrictions intended to limit withdrawals to economic downturns. Such actions erode the funds' role as buffers against unforeseen crises, as evidenced by historical patterns where states have depleted reserves during balanced-budget periods to avoid tax increases or spending cuts, leaving vulnerabilities exposed during actual recessions like the 2008 financial crisis. The arising from contingency funds incentivizes fiscal imprudence among policymakers, who may pursue expansive spending or optimistic revenue projections knowing a reserve exists to absorb shortfalls. Economic analyses indicate that larger stabilization funds can reduce incentives for prudent budgeting, as officials anticipate using reserves to offset self-inflicted deficits rather than implementing structural reforms. For example, research on U.S. states hypothesizes that sizable rainy day funds create by diminishing the political costs of fiscal imbalances, leading to higher volatility in expenditures during non-crisis periods. This dynamic mirrors broader observations in , where safety nets intended for contingencies paradoxically encourage riskier behavior, such as underfunding preventive measures or overcommitting to entitlements, ultimately amplifying long-term debt burdens when reserves prove insufficient. from state-level data supports this, showing that while funds mitigate immediate shocks, they correlate with slower post-crisis replenishment and repeated drawdowns, underscoring the need for strict statutory withdrawal triggers to counteract these incentives.

Notable Examples and Case Studies

United States

In the , state-level rainy day funds (RDFs), also known as budget stabilization funds, serve as primary contingency mechanisms to address revenue shortfalls during economic downturns, with balances totaling over $100 billion across states by the end of fiscal year 2023. These funds, established variably since the , typically accumulate surpluses during expansions via statutory deposit formulas tied to growth or general fund balances, with withdrawal restrictions often requiring legislative approval or declarations to prevent premature depletion. By design, RDFs aim to smooth cyclical fiscal pressures, as state balanced- requirements preclude deficits, unlike the federal government's borrowing flexibility. A key case study is the (2007-2009), during which states collectively drew down approximately $50 billion from RDFs to offset revenue losses exceeding 11% of general funds in aggregate, enabling many to avoid deeper cuts to , , and public safety—averting an estimated $20 billion or more in combined service reductions and tax hikes across the 2001 and 2008-2009 recessions. States with stronger pre-recession balances, such as (which maintained its Economic Stabilization Fund at over 10% of expenditures), experienced less severe per-capita cuts compared to those with minimal reserves like , where RDF exhaustion led to $20 billion in mid-year adjustments including teacher layoffs and program deferrals. Post-recession rebuilding varied; robust deposit rules in states like allowed replenishment to 5-15% of budgets by 2019, correlating with faster recovery in service levels per empirical analyses of RDF countercyclical impacts. The (2020-2022) provided another illustration, with states depleting about $25 billion from RDFs amid initial revenue plunges of up to 20% in hard-hit areas, supplemented by $500 billion in federal aid via acts like the , which preserved RDF utility for non-federal-matched expenditures such as state employee salaries. For instance, accessed over $5 billion from its RDF to bridge a $10 billion gap in 2020, stabilizing hospital funding and unemployment administration without immediate borrowing, though critics noted that states with RDF caps below 10% of spending faced higher reliance on one-time federal transfers, potentially delaying structural reforms. Balances rebounded sharply post-2021 due to federal stimulus and economic rebound, reaching record medians equivalent to 12% of expenditures by 2023, though fiscal 2024 growth slowed to 7% amid moderating revenues, underscoring RDFs' role in buffering volatility without eliminating the need for prudent spending controls. At the federal level, ad-hoc contingency allocations, such as the $5 billion Emergency Contingency Fund for TANF in 2009, have occasionally mirrored state functions for targeted welfare support during crises, but lack a standing general reserve.

European Union

The 's primary contingency mechanisms within its (MFF) include the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve (SEAR), which integrates the (EUSF) for and the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) for urgent humanitarian needs, alongside a dedicated contingency margin for unforeseen expenditure exceeding budget ceilings. SEAR supports member states and candidate countries in addressing severe or emergencies, with the European Solidarity Reserve component capped at an annual maximum of €1,016 million (in 2018 prices) from 2024 to 2027. The contingency margin, equivalent to approximately 0.03% of the EU's or roughly €4 billion, serves as a last-resort tool to mobilize additional commitments without prior offsets, as activated in 2020 to address budget pressures. During the , the EU deployed SEAR resources extensively; in 2020, the Commission proposed mobilizing nearly €530 million from the EUSF to fund emergency health measures, testing, and surveillance in affected member states including , , and , marking one of the first applications of solidarity funding to a crisis despite its traditional focus on geophysical events. This deployment supplemented broader MFF flexibility instruments, enabling rapid reallocation amid the pandemic's €1.8 trillion economic impact across the bloc, though critics noted the funds' scale remained insufficient relative to national borrowing needs. In response to Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the EU leveraged contingency provisions indirectly through budget flexibility and ad hoc revisions rather than direct SEAR activation, as the conflict prompted geopolitical aid outside traditional disaster categories; the MFF's contingency margin and global margins facilitated €50 billion in extraordinary support via the Ukraine Facility by 2024, including €1 billion annually for the European Peace Facility to cover military aid not feasible under standard rules. SEAR's EAR component supported humanitarian aid for Ukrainian refugees in EU states, disbursing over €200 million by mid-2023 for shelter and integration, while the invasion's energy shocks prompted contingency-like reallocations totaling €20 billion from unallocated margins for crisis mitigation. These measures highlighted the contingency framework's adaptability but exposed limitations, as total flexibility instruments covered under 0.5% of MFF expenditure, constraining responses to hybrid threats like war-induced migration and inflation. For natural disasters, SEAR has financed recoveries such as the 2021 Western European floods, allocating €200 million to , , and the for infrastructure repairs, demonstrating causal effectiveness in reducing fiscal strain on affected regions where damages exceeded 0.5% of national GDP. Overall, while these funds have mitigated acute shocks, their ex-post nature and modest scale—averaging less than 4% of potential crisis costs—underscore reliance on member state co-financing and the need for preemptive reserves to enhance causal against recurring and geopolitical risks.

India

The Contingency Fund of India, constituted under Article 267(1) of the , functions as an imprest account held by the Finance Secretary on behalf of the to cover urgent, unforeseen expenditures that cannot await parliamentary appropriation from the . Advances from the fund require subsequent recoupment through legislative approval, ensuring accountability while enabling rapid response. Established via the Contingency Fund of India Act, 1950, with an initial corpus of ₹50 crore, the fund's size was augmented to ₹500 crore in to better address escalating demands from emergencies like natural calamities. In February 2021, the Union Budget proposed and subsequently approved raising the corpus to ₹30,000 crore through amendments to the Finance Bill, marking a sixtyfold expansion aimed at bolstering fiscal flexibility amid the crisis and potential future shocks. This enhancement, effective from 2021-22, allowed for immediate disbursements without prior budgeting, though expenditures remain subject to post-facto scrutiny by the Comptroller and Auditor General. The fund has been invoked for scenarios including such as floods and cyclones, where delays in standard funding could exacerbate damage, though specific disbursement records are limited to internal government operations rather than public case logs. Parallel to the national fund, each state maintains its own Contingency Fund under Article 267(2), administered by the respective for analogous unforeseen state-level needs, with advances requiring ratification by the . Corpus amounts vary by state fiscal capacity—often in the range of tens to hundreds of crores—and are periodically adjusted via state acts; for example, they supplement State Disaster Response Funds during localized crises but are not the primary mechanism for recurrent hazards like annual monsoons. In practice, state funds prioritize immediate relief in events beyond routine budgeting, such as sudden failures, while integration with central disaster frameworks like the National Disaster Response Fund ensures coordinated escalation for severe calamities. This dual structure underscores India's federated approach to contingency financing, balancing autonomy with central oversight to mitigate risks from asymmetric shocks across regions.

Other International Examples

In , the federal government maintains a Contingency Reserve as part of its annual , representing an allowance for reasonably expected but unidentified expenditure needs, such as or policy implementation delays, typically set at around 0.5% of GDP or AUD 20-25 billion in recent budgets. This reserve cannot fund aspirational policies or general rainy-day savings but is drawn upon only for specific, verifiable emergencies, with any unused portions reverting to reduce deficits or . For instance, in the 2021-22 budget, it totaled AUD 22.5 billion, emphasizing fiscal amid volatile commodity revenues from exports. The operates a Contingencies Fund, a statutory mechanism capped at 2% of the previous fiscal year's supply estimates (approximately GBP 9 billion as of 2023-24), designed to provide short-term financing for urgent public services before parliamentary appropriation. Established under the Contingencies Funds Act 1970 and expanded via the 2020 Act to GBP 17.5 billion during the response, it advances funds repayable upon subsequent legislative approval, preventing unauthorized expenditure while enabling rapid action, such as procurement. Advances must be reconciled within four months, with the fund's balance fluctuating based on inflows and outflows; in 2023-24, it supported emergency outlays totaling GBP 8.2 billion net. Japan incorporates contingency reserves into its supplementary budgets, often allocating yen-denominated funds for economic emergencies, including inflation subsidies and disaster response, with FY2024 provisions reaching 388.1 billion yen for energy bill curbs amid global price shocks. These reserves, drawn from initial budgets without prior specific allocation, totaled over 2 yen in FY2022 for post-pandemic support, though critics note frequent reliance reduces fiscal transparency and encourages over-optimistic initial projections. The reports such funds as buffers against exogenous shocks like the crisis, integrated into broader fiscal investment programs rather than standalone sovereign wealth vehicles.

References

  1. [1]
    Contingency Fund - Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable
    A contingency fund is a reserve of financial resources set aside by an individual, organization, or government to cover unexpected expenses or emergencies.
  2. [2]
    Financial Plans Contingency Fund Management for Major Projects
    May 10, 2023 · Contingency funding is a fiscal planning tool for managing the risk of cost escalations and covering potential cost estimate shortfalls.
  3. [3]
    What is Contingency Reserve in a Cost Estimate?
    Apr 9, 2017 · Cost contingency is a reserved fund that is added to a base cost estimate to account for cost uncertainty.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Importance of Contingency Funding Plans - Federal Reserve Board
    Jul 28, 2023 · Depository institutions should maintain actionable contingency funding plans that consider a range of possible stress scenarios.1 The events ...
  5. [5]
    Updated Guidance: Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and ...
    Jul 28, 2023 · The events of 2023 have underscored the importance of robust liquidity risk management and contingency funding planning.
  6. [6]
    CONTINGENCY FUND definition | Cambridge English Dictionary
    an amount of money that is kept to pay for something that might possibly happen or cause problems in the future.
  7. [7]
    Contingency - Overview, How It Works, How To Create
    In project management, contingencies normally refer to cost, i.e. funds set aside in reserve to deal with unexpected events. However, they also refer to other ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Contingency - Are you Covered? - PMI
    Oct 22, 2012 · Contingency, an amount of funds added to the base cost estimate to cover estimate uncertainty and risk exposure, is a topic of interest for both project ...
  9. [9]
    Contingency Fund: Meaning, Formula and Importance
    Mar 25, 2025 · A contingency fund is money specifically set aside to cover emergency costs or other unplanned, urgent needs.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  10. [10]
    All you should know about contingency fund - The Economic Times
    May 26, 2025 · A contingency fund is meant to cover unforeseen expenses like job loss and medical emergencies, and should be kept in a bank account or a liquid fund.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Contingency Reserve in Project Management - ProjectManager
    Jun 3, 2025 · A contingency reserve is a specific allocation of time, money or resources set aside within a project budget or schedule to address identified risks.
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Section 6.1 Liquidity and Funds Management - FDIC
    To efficiently support daily operations and provide for contingent liquidity demands, management: • Establishes an appropriate liquidity risk management program ...
  14. [14]
    Achieving Multiple Project Objectives through Contingency ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · To address these problems, contingency fund are included in projects' base estimate. Ford (2002) define cost contingency as an amount ...
  15. [15]
    Contingency Funding Planning | AnalystPrep- FRM Part 2 Study Notes
    Contingency funding planning (CFP) is an essential aspect of a bank's liquidity risk management. It ensures preparedness when facing real-world liquidity ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Overview Seven Critical Elements of a CFP
    Key Principles: Bank management should identify vari- ous traditional and alternative funding sources that could be accessed during a liquidity shock. The bank ...
  17. [17]
    An essential guide to building an emergency fund
    Dec 12, 2024 · An emergency fund is a cash reserve that's specifically set aside for unplanned expenses or financial emergencies.
  18. [18]
    Emergency Fund: Uses and How to Build Yours - Investopedia
    Apr 30, 2025 · Emergency funds are meant to cover things like expenses after a job loss or unexpected medical bills, not impulse spending.
  19. [19]
    Emergency Fund Calculator: How Much Should I Have? - NerdWallet
    Apr 11, 2025 · Three to six months' worth of your current living expenses is a good rule of thumb as the target amount for an emergency fund. This sum acts ...
  20. [20]
    Comprehensive Guide to Building an Emergency Fund - Vanguard
    Over time, you should aim to build three to six months' worth of living expenses in your emergency fund to prepare for potential income shocks. List to do icon ...
  21. [21]
    How much to save for emergencies - Fidelity Investments
    Start by saving $1,000, then aim to save 3 to 6 months' worth of essential expenses by funding your emergency savings, as you would for a bill.
  22. [22]
    When the Unexpected Happens, Be Ready with an Emergency Fund
    Sep 2, 2025 · How Much Should You Keep in Your Emergency Fund? Experts often recommend people save 3-6 months of essential expenses to protect themselves ...
  23. [23]
    Your Household Should Have at Least $33,000 in an Emergency Fund
    Aug 7, 2024 · You should have at least $33,000 saved in your emergency fund to cover six months of expenses in case of a surprise cost or the loss of a job, ...
  24. [24]
    5 Steps to Creating an Emergency Fund - Morgan Stanley
    Dec 19, 2024 · 1. Consider using a basic savings account or money market account. Ideally it can be linked to your checking account. · 2. Look for an account ...
  25. [25]
    Best Places to Keep Your Emergency Fund in 2025 | Thrivent
    Jul 3, 2025 · Have clear objectives. Determine the amount of accessible funds you need based on your circumstances and keep contributing until you reach that ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    Bankrate's 2025 Annual Emergency Savings Report
    Jun 26, 2025 · Nearly 3 in 4 Americans (73 percent) are saving less for emergency expenses due to inflation/rising prices, elevated interest rates or a change ...Americans using emergency... · Higher credit card debt than...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The relationship between emergency savings, financial well-being ...
    findings show that having at least $2,000 in emergency savings is associated with a 21% higher level of financial well-being versus not having any emergency.
  29. [29]
    Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2024
    May 28, 2025 · Statistics Reported by Banks and Other Financial Firms in the United States ... Adults who have 3 months emergency savings. Select demographic.
  30. [30]
    Bridging the Gap: Expanding Workplace Emergency Savings ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · Individuals with no or inadequate emergency savings are 13 times more likely to take a hardship withdrawal from long-term savings accounts than ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Financial Contingency Funds: Why Every Business Needs One - CAP3
    May 5, 2025 · Financial contingency funds in business are reserves that can be used to address unplanned financial issues that may arise.
  32. [32]
    The Critical Role of a Contingency Fund in Business Finance - Finmail
    Feb 23, 2025 · A contingency fund serves as a financial safety net, reserved specifically to address unplanned expenses that may arise from various business disruptions.
  33. [33]
    Why every business needs a contingency fund | Chris Statham ...
    Aug 29, 2025 · A contingency fund is a set amount of money, calculated as a percentage of your operational costs that you keep aside for emergencies. Think of ...
  34. [34]
    Contingency Funds: A Comprehensive Guide - Payset
    May 24, 2024 · A contingency fund is a monetary safety net, covering unexpected expenses in personal finance, business, and government.
  35. [35]
    A model to develop and use risk contingency reserve - PMI
    Oct 25, 2014 · The contingency reserve, which is time and/or money allocated to address identified risks, is a critical part of project risk management. With a ...
  36. [36]
    Contingency Reserve Vs Management Reserve | PM Study Circle
    The contingency reserve manages identified risks, while the management reserve is used for unidentified risks. The contingency reserve is an estimated figure, ...
  37. [37]
    Contingency Funding – Project Management Basics
    A contingency plan typically includes a contingency fund, which is an amount of resources set aside to cover unanticipated costs.
  38. [38]
    What is Construction Contingency? See Tips & Examples
    Oct 3, 2024 · A contingency is a percentage of a project's budget that is set aside for unforeseen expenses. Contingencies act as insurance policies or reserve funding ...
  39. [39]
    How are you allocating and returning contingency reserves?
    Jun 5, 2022 · Most project managers will include some contingency reserves within their budget to offset the negative financial impacts of realized risks.
  40. [40]
    Integration of earned value and risk management using contingency ...
    This paper will demonstrate a simplified approach for integrating risk management into earned value through the use of contingency reserves.
  41. [41]
    Contingencies vs. Management Reserves - ProjectEngineer
    Jan 17, 2025 · Contingencies are amounts placed in the project estimate to account for “known unknowns.” That is, the existence of the cost is known, but the size of it is ...
  42. [42]
    State Reserves Recede From Record High as Fiscal Pressures Mount
    Oct 15, 2025 · By the end of fiscal 2025, rainy day fund balances had reached all-time highs in 32 states. However, just 12 states reached a record in the ...
  43. [43]
    Fiscal Survey of States - Nasbo
    Most states are projected to maintain or increase the size of their rainy day fund balances in dollars in fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2026, though the estimated ...
  44. [44]
    State Rainy Day Fund Growth Slowed in Fiscal 2024
    Mar 27, 2025 · States reported an estimated $349.9 billion at the end of fiscal 2024, a sharp decline from $437 billion the previous year.
  45. [45]
  46. [46]
    Contingencies Fund - Erskine May - UK Parliament
    1 The main circumstances in which the Fund is used are to meet expenditure (other than on new services) in excess of the amount granted in a Vote on Account; to ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Contingencies Fund Account 2023-24 - GOV.UK
    Jul 22, 2024 · The Contingencies Fund is used to finance payments for urgent services in anticipation of provision for those services by Parliament.
  48. [48]
    Fruitful Financial Decisions in the Bible: Joseph Prepares for an ...
    Mar 3, 2021 · Joseph recognizes the need to prepare for uncertainty and difficult times. This is our first recorded example of an emergency fund!
  49. [49]
    Practical financial tips learned from the story of Joseph
    Dec 31, 2022 · Try to keep three to six months' of expenses in the fund, and keep it liquid. The point of this money is not to make you a millionaire; it's to ...
  50. [50]
    Aerarium | Roman Republic, Public Finances, Taxation - Britannica
    It was supplied with funds from taxes (sales, inheritance, and property) collected by the emperor's procurators and was administered by three former praetors. E ...Missing: contingency reserve
  51. [51]
    Aerarium Populi Romani
    It also contained a special reserve (aerarium sanctius) into which was paid the five percent tax on the emancipation of slaves.Missing: contingency | Show results with:contingency
  52. [52]
    Aerārium - Oxford Reference
    The aerarium mīlitārĕ, situated on the Capitol, was founded by Augustus in ad 6 to provide for the pensioning of discharged soldiers. Augustus provided for it a ...
  53. [53]
    Annual Message to Congress (1790): Request for a "Contingency ...
    In his First Annual Message to Congress, Washington requested a contingency fund, or as some members of Congress preferred to call it, a “Secret Service” Fund.
  54. [54]
    The History of Impoundments Before the Impoundment Control Act ...
    Jun 24, 2024 · “Jefferson found it unnecessary on repeated occasions to use all of the money provided in a contingency fund” and “regularly returned the ...
  55. [55]
    Why and How States Should Strengthen Their Rainy Day Funds
    Feb 3, 2011 · This report examines the important role that rainy day funds have played in the last two recessions and discusses the ways in which states can improve them.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Creating a National State Rainy Day Fund - FRASER
    Throughout the 1990s states created budget stabilization (rainy day) funds to help provide counter-cyclical support in their budgeting process.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Estimating the Appropriate Size of State Budget Stabilization Funds
    Rainy day funds (RDFs) are potentially an important countercyclical tool for states to stabilize their budgets and the overall economy during economic downturns ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Governance in the 21st Century | OECD
    Apr 27, 2001 · The theme was “21st Century Governance: Power in the Global Knowledge Econ- omy and Society”. Three main messages emerged from the discussions ...
  59. [59]
    The Contingency Approach In Management - Holistique Training
    Sep 9, 2024 · The roots of the contingency approach can be traced back to the mid-20th century, during a period when management theory was undergoing ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
  60. [60]
    Project Management Evolution Research Directions - PMI
    This paper discusses project management research in its historical perspective and offers some insights into its evolution.
  61. [61]
    Contingency Planning - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Contingency planning is defined as a continuous process that enables an organization to mitigate disruptions and restore normal operations quickly, ...
  62. [62]
    Business Contingency Planning for the New Era - CFO Selections
    Mar 13, 2022 · With the new approach, contingency planning aims to protect essential business processes and also essential personnel. When the pandemic hit, ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    The evolution of emergency savings accounts - SecureSave
    Feb 21, 2024 · The practice of saving for emergencies dates back to prehistoric times, with early agricultural cultures setting aside surplus resources for ...
  64. [64]
    Why Do Households Lack Emergency Savings? The Role of ... - NIH
    May 19, 2020 · Many US households have insufficient savings to cope with income losses, expenditure shocks, and other financial emergencies, yet little research evidence ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Emergency Savings and Financial Security
    Below we explore in-depth how these three categories of consumers—those with no savings available for emergencies, those with some but less than a month of ...
  66. [66]
    How Cost Contingency is Calculated? - Project Control Academy
    Apr 16, 2017 · Contingency is an estimated amount added to the project base estimate to cover the known-unknown risks in the project and to prevent cost overrun.How Cost Contingency Is... · Probabilistic Methods · Range Estimating<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    How to Build an Emergency Fund - Investopedia
    The rule of thumb is that you need to keep between three and six months' worth of household expenses in your emergency fund. To build your fund, you should find ...
  68. [68]
    Using Probability to Set the Size of An Emergency Fund
    Feb 23, 2010 · The cost of the emergency fund if no emergency occurs = (M)(r2 – r1)(1 – p) · The cost of borrowing if the emergency occurs = (M)(rb)(p).
  69. [69]
    Fund Balance Guidelines for the General Fund
    Generally, governments should seek to replenish their fund balances within one to three years of use. Specifically, factors influencing the replenishment time ...
  70. [70]
    Examples and Effective Contingency Plans - Investopedia
    Sep 14, 2025 · To prepare for contingencies, financial managers often recommend keeping ample cash reserves, ensuring strong liquidity during poor sales or ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Contingency vs. Management Reserves
    Mar 1, 2021 · Contingency reserves are under the control of the project manager or subordinate risk owners. • Management reserves are only available to ...
  72. [72]
    Reserves for Contingencies - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A contingency reserve refers to a financial buffer that banks must maintain to manage liquidity risks, ensuring they can meet unexpected outflows while ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Small Business Emergency Fund: What It Is & Why You Need It
    Jul 18, 2025 · A business emergency fund is a savings account that you create and contribute to regularly. The money is set aside in a separate bank account.
  74. [74]
    Fund Balance and Reserve Policies - MRSC
    Apr 30, 2025 · A fund balance and reserve policy establishes minimum levels for designated funds to ensure stable service delivery, meet future needs, and protect against ...
  75. [75]
    Project reserves : a key to managing cost risks - PMI
    Project cost estimators have traditionally included in their calculations contingency amounts to cover the unexpected expenses resulting from uncertain risks.
  76. [76]
    [PDF] volume 12, chapter 23: “contingency operations”
    This chapter promulgates financial policy and procedures for small, medium and large- scale campaign level military contingency operations related to the ...
  77. [77]
    Subpart B—What Are the Requirements for the Contingency Fund?
    (1) A State must meet a Contingency Fund MOE level of 100 percent of historic State expenditures for FY 1994. (2) A State must exceed the Contingency Fund MOE ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] fy 2023 comprehensive oversight plan overseas contingency ...
    Oct 1, 2022 · During this process, the Lead IG agencies develop strategic oversight areas (SOA), identify oversight gaps, and select oversight projects that ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Oversight Procedure 40b – Risk and Contingency Review ...
    Oversight Procedure 40b describes review procedures for project risk management, including a PMOC risk assessment, and a meeting within 3 days.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Selected Agencies Could Improve Contingency Planning for ...
    Jun 1, 2020 · Contingency plans for all selected agencies did not include complete information about (1) flexibilities available to supervisors if furloughed.
  81. [81]
    Rainy Day Funds and State Government Savings
    We find that states with RDFs have higher total balances than states without such funds and also have higher balances after adoption than before adoption.
  82. [82]
    Rainy Day Funds Reach Historic Levels, Leaving States More ...
    Jan 25, 2023 · State rainy day fund balances increased 58 percent over fiscal 2020 levels to reach a new high of $121.8 billion, according to the latest data reported in ...
  83. [83]
    Publication: Social Sector Expenditures and Rainy-Day Funds
    The authors find that rainy-day funds are ineffective in reducing the volatility of nonsocial sector expenditures but are effective in reducing the volatility ...
  84. [84]
    What are state rainy day funds and how do they work?
    The next highest balances were in Texas ($11 billion), Massachusetts ($7 billion), and Georgia ($5 billion). Per NASBO, New Jersey recorded $0 in its state ...
  85. [85]
    How States Can Recession-Proof Their Budgets, Promote Opportunity
    Jan 18, 2023 · Robust rainy day funds help states avoid layoffs and cuts, thereby mitigating the inequitable harms that result from recessions. They're an ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Rainy Day Funds and State Credit Ratings - Brookings Institution
    The results of the models offer strong empirical evidence indicating that 1) higher reserve balances serve as a credit positive, reducing the likelihood of ...
  87. [87]
    A Panel Data Analysis of U.S. State Tax and Expenditure Limits and ...
    Apr 12, 2025 · A study by Wei and Denison (2019) finds that RDFs were effective in stabilizing general fund expenditures during both recessions and economic ...
  88. [88]
    Saving for a Rainy Day: Estimating the Appropriate Size of US State ...
    Abstract. Rainy day funds (RDFs) are potentially an important countercyclical tool for states to stabilize their budgets and the overall economy during economic ...Missing: peer- reviewed outcomes
  89. [89]
    Do Sovereign Wealth Funds Reduce Fiscal Policy Pro-cyclicality ...
    Jun 23, 2023 · Empirical results suggest that countries with stabilization SWFs tend to experience less volatile fiscal policy.
  90. [90]
    [PDF] sovereign wealth funds and macroeconomic stabilization in the ...
    The analysis of this paper suggests that SWFs have a robust stabilizing role against fiscal procyclicality and have also been a strong contributor to the ...
  91. [91]
  92. [92]
    Estimating the needed size of U.S. state budget stabilization funds
    This paper uses a newly constructed dataset to estimate a needed size of the rainy day fund for each of the 50 states. Because not only economic factors but ...Missing: peer- outcomes
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Rainy Day Funds and Value at Risk | Urban Institute
    Introduction. The most recent economic slowdown has painfully exposed the inadequacy of rainy day funds (RDFs). Even with these.<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Raining on Shapiro's Rainy Day Fund Raid
    Sep 20, 2025 · The governor continues to propose deficit spending that will not only wipe out the General Fund but also drain Pennsylvania's Rainy Day Fund.Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
  95. [95]
    Can the 'Rainy Day Fund' balance the budget? - AOL.com
    Sep 16, 2025 · “The Governor's desired spending increases for transportation, public schools, human services, and other line items do not amount to emergencies ...
  96. [96]
    Raiding protected reserve account (BSA) leads to confusion
    May 13, 2022 · Raiding the voter-approved constitutionally protected BSA and continuing to keep the money in an unrestricted shadow account serves no purpose ...
  97. [97]
    Its About Time for a Federal Rainy Day Fund - Publications
    May 10, 2021 · Main Street Depositor Protection Act Would Increase Moral Hazard, Raise Costs for Consumers. October 15, 2025. National Taxpayers Union ...
  98. [98]
    Rainy Day Funds and Value at Risk - ResearchGate
    Cornia and Nelson (2003) hypothesize that the existence of a sizable BSF may create a moral hazard ... day funds are not large enough to eliminate the fiscal ...
  99. [99]
    States Should Improve the Design of Their Rainy Day Funds
    Jun 3, 2021 · Tapping rainy day funds can let states take a more measured budget-balancing approach that preserves spending needed during a recession and ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Rainy Day Fund Strategies - The Volcker Alliance
    This paper builds on the Alliance's grading of state reserve funds and identifying of best practices (both contained in the reports), and subsequent research.
  101. [101]
    How to Effectively Use State Rainy Day Funds
    Mar 12, 2020 · The primary purpose of a rainy day fund is to offset the impact of revenue declines and stabilize a state's fiscal position through economic ups and downs.Missing: inefficiencies contingency
  102. [102]
    In Case of Emergency, Open Block Grant: Part 1 - AEI
    Apr 23, 2025 · For example, during the Great Recession, President Obama signed into law a $5 billion “Emergency Contingency Fund for State TANF Programs,” ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
  103. [103]
    an assessment of the recent reforms of the European Solidarity Fund ...
    Sep 9, 2023 · The Emergency Aid Reserve, similar to the EUSF, is a special instrument outside the multiannual financial framework, designed to provide ...
  104. [104]
    Better braced for disaster: upgrading EU support mechanisms
    Nov 28, 2024 · The main EU fund for climate disaster response is the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve (SEAR). This has brought together two pre-existing ...Missing: contingency | Show results with:contingency
  105. [105]
    European Union Solidarity Fund - Performance
    The European Solidarity Reserve will provide assistance to respond to emergency situations resulting from disasters that are covered by the EUSF. The maximum ...Rationale and design of the... · Implementation and performance
  106. [106]
    Mobilisation of the contingency margin 2020 - European Commission
    Apr 2, 2020 · The contingency margin increases commitment appropriations in the budget of the Union over and above the ceilings of the multiannual ...
  107. [107]
    Special report 18/2025: EU budget flexibility
    the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve (SEAR) comprises (i) the European Solidarity Reserve, which provides funding for major disasters covered by the ...<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    EU Solidarity in action: Commission proposes to mobilise almost ...
    Today, the European Commission is putting forward a package of almost €530 million in additional financial support under the EU Solidarity Fund (EUSF).
  109. [109]
    Timeline - EU response to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine
    EU to use profits from frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine. On 21 May 2024, the Council greenlighted the use of unexpected and extraordinary revenues ...
  110. [110]
    Deal on EU Budget Increase - eucrim
    Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve: €1.5 billion;; Strategic Technology Platform for Europe (STEP): €1.5 billion. The Ukraine Facility will pool the EU's ...
  111. [111]
    EU Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve (SEAR) – Policies - IEA
    The European Union Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve supports EU Member States and accession countries by offering financial support after severe natural ...
  112. [112]
    Making the EU's Multiannual Financial Framework Fit for Purpose in
    Jun 13, 2025 · For the current MFF, these margins are small, totaling €5.5 billion or 0.5 percent of overall expenditure. Their flexibility is even more ...
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Financially Prepared: The Case for Pre-positioned Finance
    The sum of the European Union Solidarity Fund. (EUSF), reserve funds, and contingency funds available to EU MS covers on average less than. 4 percent of total ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Ch.-1 - INTRODUCTION - DEPARTMENT OF Expenditure
    CONTINGENCY FUND OF INDIA RULES. 1. These rules may be called the Contingency Fund of India Rules. 2. The Contingency Fund of India shall be held on behalf ...
  115. [115]
  116. [116]
    Article 267 of Indian Constitution: Contingency Fund - Testbook
    Initial Corpus: Established under the Contingency Fund of India Act, 1950 the fund initially had a corpus of ₹50 crore. · Increase in 2005: The fund's size was ...<|separator|>
  117. [117]
    Govt tweaks spending norms for Contingency Fund - The Hindu
    Jan 26, 2022 · Budget 2021-22 proposed to enhance the Contingency Fund of India from ₹500 crore to ₹30,000 crore through Finance Bill. Updated - January ...
  118. [118]
    What is Contingency Fund of India, Budget ... - Business Standard
    a natural calamity, for instance — and money is required to deal with it ...
  119. [119]
  120. [120]
    Contingency Fund of India - Indian Polity Notes - Prepp
    Article 267 of the Constitution authorizes the Contingency Fund of India which is an imprest with a corpus of Rs. 500 crores. From Rs. 5 crore to Rs. 500 crore, ...
  121. [121]
    Article 267: Contingency Fund - Constitution of India .net
    Article 267 allows Parliament and State legislatures to establish a Contingency Fund for unforeseen expenses, managed by the President or Governor.
  122. [122]
    Notes on Contingency Fund by Unacademy
    A contingency fund is a sum of money set up for use in the event of national or state emergencies such as terrorist attacks, riots, or natural disasters.
  123. [123]
    Consolidated Fund, Contingency Fund & Public Account of India
    Jul 6, 2024 · Amounts determined as per the Contingency Fund of India Act, 1950 are credited to the Contingency Fund of India, from time to time.
  124. [124]
    The Contingency Reserve | pbo - Parliamentary Budget Office
    The Contingency Reserve is an allowance within the Commonwealth budget for events that the government reasonably expects to eventuate but has not allocated to ...
  125. [125]
  126. [126]
    Contingency reserve - Department of Finance
    Contingency reserve. (in relation to budgeting) A provision within the Budget and forward estimates for items that either cannot or should not (generally ...
  127. [127]
    Contingencies Fund account 2024 to 2025 - GOV.UK
    Jun 16, 2025 · The Contingencies Fund account for 2024 to 2025 has been published. From: HM Treasury; Published: 16 June 2025.
  128. [128]
    Japan OKs reserve fund use to curb energy bills amid inflation
    May 27, 2025 · The Japanese government decided Tuesday to allocate 388.1 billion yen ($2.7 billion) from reserve funds for the current fiscal year to subsidize the energy ...Missing: contingency | Show results with:contingency
  129. [129]
    EDITORIAL: Government should stop abusive use of reserve fund
    Mar 24, 2023 · The package, worth more than 2 trillion yen ($15.3 billion), will be financed by contingency reserve funds in the fiscal 2022 budget. To support ...
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Japanese Public Finance Fact Sheet
    (2) Contingency fund for Economic Emergency (including the impact from. -500.0 the Ukraine Crisis). (3) Others. -1,009.8. Total. 13,199.2. Total. 13,199.2.