Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Continuous-wave radar

Continuous-wave radar (CW radar) is a type of radar system that continuously transmits a stable frequency radio signal and detects targets by analyzing the Doppler shift in the reflected echoes, enabling precise measurement of radial velocity without the need for pulsed transmissions.^[1] Unlike pulsed radar systems, which alternate between transmission and reception to determine range via time delay, unmodulated CW radar cannot directly measure range due to the continuous nature of its signal, though variants like frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) radar address this by varying the transmitted frequency to resolve both range and velocity.^[2] The Doppler shift in CW radar is given by \Delta f = \frac{2v}{\lambda}, where v is the radial velocity and \lambda is the wavelength, allowing for instantaneous speed detection, such as approximately 30 Hz per 1 mph at X-band frequencies (10 GHz).^[1] The fundamental principle of CW radar relies on separate transmit and receive antennas to avoid direct signal leakage, with the received echo mixed against the transmitted signal to produce a beat frequency proportional to the target's motion.^[2] This simplicity results in advantages including no minimum detectable range, low power requirements (as peak power equals average power), and high accuracy for velocity measurements, often resolving speeds to within \lambda/16.^[2] However, limitations include vulnerability to clutter from stationary objects without advanced processing and restricted range resolution in basic forms, making it unsuitable for long-distance surveillance without modulation techniques.^[1] CW radar systems typically operate in microwave bands, such as S-band (2-4 GHz) or K-band (24-26 GHz), to balance resolution and atmospheric penetration.^[2] The development of CW radar traces back to early 20th-century experiments at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), where in 1922, researchers Albert Hoyt Taylor and Leo Clifford Young achieved the first detection of ships using CW transmissions at 60 MHz over 3 miles on the Potomac River.^[3] By 1930, NRL advanced CW techniques to detect aircraft via Doppler effects at frequencies up to 65 MHz, laying groundwork for modern applications before shifting focus to pulsed systems in the mid-1930s.^[3] Today, CW radar is widely applied in non-military contexts like police speed guns for traffic enforcement, automotive adaptive cruise control, and motion sensors for security and industrial monitoring.^[1] In military uses, it supports proximity fuzes, radar altimeters for low-altitude flight, and target velocity tracking in cluttered environments.^[1] Emerging integrations with FMCW enable compact, low-cost systems for vital sign detection, such as heart rate monitoring in biomedical settings.^[2]

Principles of Operation

Basic Signal Processing

Continuous-wave (CW) radar is a radar system that transmits a continuous radiofrequency (RF) signal with constant amplitude and frequency, and detects targets by mixing the received echoes with the transmitted signal to extract information from the phase or frequency differences caused by the propagation delay.^[4] This approach contrasts with pulsed radar by avoiding interruptions in transmission, enabling simpler hardware but requiring careful management of signal leakage from transmitter to receiver. The transmitter in a CW radar generates the continuous wave using stable oscillators to produce a sinusoidal RF signal at the desired carrier frequency. Historically, vacuum tube devices such as klystrons were employed for high-power applications due to their ability to generate coherent CW signals with outputs up to several kilowatts.^[5] In modern systems, solid-state oscillators, including Gunn diodes and GaAs field-effect transistors (FETs), have become prevalent for their compactness, reliability, and lower power consumption, typically operating in the microwave bands from X-band (8-12 GHz) to millimeter-wave frequencies.^[6] The transmitted signal can be represented as E_t(t) = E_0 \exp(j \omega t), where E_0 is the amplitude, \omega = 2\pi f is the angular frequency, and f is the carrier frequency.^[4] CW radar receivers employ either homodyne or heterodyne architectures to process the weak echo signals, which are typically attenuated by 100 dB or more compared to the transmitted power. In the homodyne architecture, the received signal is directly mixed with a portion of the transmitted signal serving as the local oscillator (LO), producing a baseband output without frequency downconversion to an intermediate frequency (IF). This setup simplifies the design by eliminating the need for a separate LO, as the mixer output is E_m(t) = E_r(t) \cdot E_t^*(t), yielding a low-frequency signal proportional to the phase difference. However, homodyne receivers are susceptible to direct transmitter leakage, which can saturate the mixer and degrade performance through low-frequency flicker noise.^[4] The signal flow involves the antenna receiving the echo, passing through a low-noise amplifier (LNA), then to the mixer, followed by baseband amplification and filtering, often implemented in a single integrated circuit for short-range applications.^[7] In contrast, the heterodyne architecture uses a separate local oscillator tuned to a frequency offset from the carrier, typically producing an IF in the range of 30-70 MHz for easier amplification and filtering. The received signal is mixed with the LO to generate the IF signal, which retains the phase information but shifts the spectrum away from DC, mitigating flicker noise and improving dynamic range by up to 30 dB over homodyne designs.^[4] The signal flow includes the LNA, mixer with LO, IF amplifier, and demodulator; this configuration is preferred for high-sensitivity applications like long-range surveillance, though it requires phase-locking the LO to the transmitter for coherent detection. Balanced mixers are commonly used in both architectures to suppress LO feedthrough and improve isolation.^[8] The basic mixing process begins with the received echo signal, which experiences a round-trip propagation delay \tau to a target at range R, where \tau = 2R/c and c is the speed of light. Assuming a point target with radar cross-section \sigma, the received electric field can be modeled in complex notation as

E_r(t) = E_0 \exp\left[j\left(\omega t - 2\pi f \tau + \phi\right)\right],

where \phi represents any additional phase offset from the target or system.^[4] Mixing this with the transmitted signal E_t(t) = E_0 \exp(j \omega t) in a homodyne receiver yields a baseband output

E_b(t) \propto \exp\left[-j(2\pi f \tau - \phi)\right],

which is a constant-amplitude phasor whose argument encodes the delay-induced phase shift. In heterodyne mixing, the LO E_{LO}(t) = \exp[j(\omega + \omega_{IF}) t] shifts the output to

E_{IF}(t) \propto \exp\left[j(\omega_{IF} t - 2\pi f \tau + \phi)\right],

allowing subsequent demodulation to recover the phase.^[7] The phase shift due to the propagation delay is derived from the time delay in the argument of the exponential: the term -2\pi f \tau corresponds to \phi = -2\pi f (2R/c), since \tau = 2R/c. Substituting f = \omega / (2\pi) and c = f \lambda (where \lambda is the wavelength), this simplifies to

\phi = -\frac{4\pi R}{\lambda},

representing the round-trip phase accumulation for a stationary target. This derivation assumes a lossless path and isotropic scattering; in practice, multipath effects may introduce additional phase variations. For detection, the mixer output is low-pass filtered to remove sum-frequency components, resulting in a DC or low-frequency signal whose amplitude and phase are analyzed for target presence.^[4] Noise considerations are critical in CW radar receivers, as the continuous reception exposes the system to thermal noise, limiting the minimum detectable signal. The primary noise source is thermal noise from the receiver's front-end components, characterized by the noise power N = k T B F, where k is Boltzmann's constant ($1.38 \times 10^{-23} J/K), T is the effective noise temperature (typically 290 K), B is the receiver bandwidth, and F is the noise figure (often 3-10 dB for LNAs). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the receiver input is then

\text{SNR} = \frac{P_r}{k T B F},

where P_r is the received power given by the radar equation P_r = \frac{P_t G_t G_r \lambda^2 \sigma}{(4\pi)^3 R^4} for monostatic operation (G_t = G_r = G). For reliable detection, an SNR of at least 10-13 dB is required, depending on the false alarm rate; CW systems achieve this through narrowband filtering (e.g., B \approx 1 Hz for slow-moving targets) and integration over time. Heterodyne architectures generally exhibit lower F due to IF filtering, enhancing SNR by isolating the signal from baseband noise.^[4]

Doppler Velocity Measurement

In continuous-wave (CW) radar, the Doppler effect manifests as a frequency shift in the received echo signal due to the relative radial motion between the transmitter, the target, and the receiver, enabling velocity measurement without requiring range resolution. This shift occurs because the moving target compresses or stretches the wavefronts of the incident electromagnetic wave during reflection, altering the frequency observed at the receiver compared to the transmitted frequency.^[9] The principle, first described by Christian Doppler in 1842 to explain color shifts in binary star systems, was adapted for radar applications in the 1940s during World War II to detect moving aircraft amid ground clutter.^[10] The Doppler frequency f_d is derived from the phase change in the received signal caused by the changing round-trip path length to the target. Consider a transmitted signal at frequency f_0 with wavelength \lambda = c / f_0, where c is the speed of light. For a target at initial range R moving with velocity v (positive towards the radar), the radial velocity component is v_r = v \cos \theta (where \theta is the angle between the velocity vector and the line of sight, with v_r > 0 for approaching). The range at time t is R(t) = R - v_r t. The round-trip phase is \phi(t) = -\frac{4 \pi}{\lambda} R(t), so the instantaneous frequency is f_r(t) = f_0 + \frac{1}{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{dt}. Thus, f_r(t) = f_0 + \frac{2 v_r f_0}{c}, and the Doppler shift is f_d = f_r - f_0 = \frac{2 v_r f_0}{c}, where the factor of 2 accounts for the two-way path, and the non-relativistic approximation holds for v \ll c.^[11]^[12] This yields the radial velocity v_r = \frac{c f_d}{2 f_0}.^[9] To extract f_d from the beat signal (the mixed output of transmitted and received signals), spectrum analysis is performed using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) on samples collected over an observation time T. The FFT resolves multiple targets as distinct peaks in frequency bins, with radial velocity resolution \Delta v_r = \frac{c \Delta f}{2 f_0} where \Delta f = 1/T is the frequency resolution.^[13] In unmodulated CW radar, the unambiguous Doppler frequency range (folding frequency f_a) is determined by the Nyquist limit of the sampling rate, analogous to the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) in pulsed systems, ensuring no aliasing for expected velocities; velocities exceeding this fold back into lower bins, requiring prior knowledge or multiple measurements for resolution. Practical implementation often employs quadrature detection with in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) channels to demodulate the beat signal, preserving phase information and resolving the direction of motion: positive f_d for approaching targets (I leads Q by 90°) and negative for receding (Q leads I). This is achieved by splitting the intermediate frequency (IF) signal and mixing with local oscillators phase-shifted by 90°, followed by low-pass filtering and digitization.^[14] A representative application is in police speed guns operating at X-band frequencies around 10.5 GHz using unmodulated CW radar, where the measured f_d directly computes vehicle speed via v = \frac{c f_d}{2 f_0} assuming \theta \approx 0, achieving accuracies within 1-2 km/h for typical highway velocities up to 200 km/h.^[15]

Types of Continuous-Wave Radar

Unmodulated CW Radar

Unmodulated continuous-wave (CW) radar transmits a continuous electromagnetic signal at a fixed carrier frequency without any pulsing or modulation, relying solely on the Doppler effect to detect motion. The system operates by mixing the transmitted signal with the reflected echo from a target, producing a beat frequency that corresponds directly to the Doppler shift caused by the target's relative velocity. For stationary objects, this results in a zero beat frequency, as there is no frequency shift in the return signal. This simplicity makes unmodulated CW radar particularly suited for velocity-only measurements, where range information is not required.^[16] In operation, the radar continuously emits power, achieving a 100% duty cycle that enhances sensitivity for detecting low-velocity targets compared to pulsed systems. The beat signal, typically in the audio or low intermediate frequency range, is processed to extract velocity information, with the Doppler shift proportional to the target's speed toward or away from the radar. Early implementations often output this as an audible tone, where the pitch varied with velocity, allowing operators to interpret speeds qualitatively. Modern systems employ digital filtering to isolate specific Doppler tones from noise and clutter.^[17] Key applications of unmodulated CW radar include speed measurement for traffic enforcement, where it has been deployed since the 1950s to monitor vehicle velocities without needing range data. For instance, early traffic radars mounted in police vehicles used this technology to enforce speed limits by detecting Doppler shifts from passing cars. Another unique use is in wind profiling, where ground-based CW Doppler radars measure vertical wind velocities by observing shifts in echoes from atmospheric turbulence, providing continuous profiles of wind speed and direction up to several kilometers altitude.^[15]^[18]^[19] The advantages of unmodulated CW radar stem from its low complexity and cost, requiring minimal hardware such as a simple oscillator, mixer, and amplifier, which enables compact, low-power designs suitable for portable or battery-operated systems. It avoids range ambiguities inherent in pulsed radars and supports continuous transmission for improved signal-to-noise ratios in velocity detection. However, limitations include the inability to measure target range, as all echoes arrive simultaneously regardless of distance, and high susceptibility to stationary clutter, since all non-moving objects produce a zero beat frequency that can mask slow-moving targets. Additionally, distinguishing multiple targets with similar velocities is challenging without advanced processing, as their Doppler tones overlap.^[17] Signal processing in unmodulated CW radar focuses on isolating the Doppler beat frequency through bandpass filtering to reject direct transmitter leakage and low-frequency clutter, followed by frequency analysis techniques like Fourier transforms to resolve velocity spectra. In early audio-based systems, the beat signal was amplified for auditory detection, but contemporary low-cost modules use analog-to-digital conversion and digital signal processing for precise tone extraction and velocity computation.^[20]^[21] Example systems include the early CW Doppler radars developed at the MIT Radiation Laboratory during the 1940s, which pioneered velocity measurement for military applications and laid the groundwork for postwar civilian uses. Modern implementations feature low-cost K-band Doppler modules, such as those used in traffic surveillance, which employ unmodulated CW signals for vehicle speed detection and classification based on micro-Doppler signatures from rotating parts like wheels.^[22]^[23]^[21]

Frequency-Modulated CW Radar

Frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar utilizes a continuous transmission where the frequency varies over time, forming a chirp signal that sweeps linearly or nonlinearly across a defined bandwidth. This modulation pattern, often implemented as a repeating ramp, enables the radar to determine target range by exploiting the time delay of the received echo, while also preserving the capability for Doppler-based velocity measurement. Unlike fixed-frequency CW radar, the frequency variation introduces a beat signal whose characteristics encode both distance and motion information. The core principle relies on mixing the transmitted chirp with the delayed received signal to produce an intermediate-frequency (IF) beat signal. For a linear sawtooth sweep, the transmitted frequency increases monotonically as f_{tx}(t) = f_0 + \frac{\Delta f}{T} t, where f_0 is the starting frequency, \Delta f is the sweep bandwidth, and T is the sweep duration. The echo from a stationary target at range R arrives after a round-trip delay \tau = \frac{2R}{c}, yielding f_{rx}(t) = f_0 + \frac{\Delta f}{T} (t - \tau). The mixer output, after low-pass filtering, results in a beat frequency f_b = f_{tx}(t) - f_{rx}(t) = \frac{\Delta f}{T} \tau = \frac{2 R \Delta f}{c T}. Solving for range gives R = \frac{f_b c T}{2 \Delta f}. For a triangular sweep, which includes both up-ramp and down-ramp segments, the beat frequencies differ due to the reversal in sweep direction and Doppler effect. The up-sweep beat f_{bu} = \frac{2 \Delta f R}{c T} - f_d and down-sweep beat f_{bd} = \frac{2 \Delta f R}{c T} + f_d, where f_d = \frac{2v}{\lambda} is the Doppler shift, v is the radial velocity, and \lambda = \frac{c}{f_0} is the wavelength. These allow range to be computed as R = \frac{c T (f_{bu} + f_{bd})}{8 \Delta f} and velocity as v = \frac{\lambda (f_{bd} - f_{bu})}{4}, effectively decoupling the two parameters and mitigating velocity-induced range bias in unidirectional sweeps.^[16] The range resolution \Delta R in FMCW radar is fundamentally limited by the sweep bandwidth B = \Delta f, expressed as \Delta R = \frac{c}{2 B}. This relationship stems from the ability to resolve two closely spaced targets whose beat frequencies differ by at least the inverse of the observation time, akin to the time-bandwidth product in Fourier analysis; wider bandwidths yield finer resolution, enabling sub-meter accuracy with multi-GHz sweeps in modern systems. To jointly estimate range and velocity for multiple targets, the beat signal is sampled and processed via a two-dimensional fast Fourier transform (2D-FFT). The first FFT, applied along the chirp duration, isolates range bins from the beat frequency spectrum. A subsequent FFT across consecutive chirps in each range bin analyzes the phase progression \Delta \phi to extract the Doppler frequency f_d = \left( \frac{\Delta \phi}{T} \right) \times \left( \frac{f_0}{2\pi} \right), populating a range-velocity matrix that maps target positions and speeds. This approach resolves the inherent coupling between range and Doppler effects observed in single-sweep processing.^[16]^[24] Sweep types are selected based on application needs: sawtooth modulation suits unidirectional scenarios with minimal velocity bias for stationary or slow-moving targets, as it simplifies hardware but couples range and Doppler. Triangular sweeps, by contrast, provide bidirectional modulation to cancel linear velocity bias through up- and down-ramp differencing, at the cost of halved effective bandwidth per direction and increased sweep time. Nonlinear sweeps, such as exponential or piecewise linear, may be used for specific ambiguity mitigation or power efficiency, though linear variants dominate due to their analytical simplicity.^[24] FMCW systems exhibit ambiguities in range and velocity estimation tied to modulation parameters. Range ambiguity arises from the sweep rate \frac{\Delta f}{T}; if the beat frequency exceeds half the sampling rate, aliasing folds distant targets into nearer bins, limiting unambiguous range to approximately R_u = \frac{c T f_s}{4 \Delta f}, where f_s is the ADC sampling frequency—slower sweeps extend R_u but degrade velocity resolution. Velocity ambiguity stems from the sweep repetition rate \frac{1}{T}, analogous to pulse repetition frequency in pulsed radar; the unambiguous Doppler span is |f_d| < \frac{1}{2T}, yielding maximum velocity v_u = \frac{c}{4 f_0 T} to avoid phase wrapping across chirps, with higher repetition rates expanding v_u at the expense of maximum range.^[16] In contemporary implementations, FMCW radars leverage digital techniques for precision and flexibility. Direct digital synthesizers (DDS) generate the chirp waveform by phase-accumulating a frequency profile, offering programmable sweeps with low phase noise and rapid reconfiguration, often integrated with phase-locked loops (PLLs) for RF upconversion. The beat signal is digitized using high-speed analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), typically at rates exceeding 100 MSPS to capture wideband chirps, enabling subsequent digital signal processing like 2D-FFT on field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) or system-on-chips (SoCs) for real-time range-velocity mapping. These components facilitate compact, low-cost designs prevalent in automotive and short-range sensing.^[24]^[25]

System Configurations

Monostatic and Bistatic Setups

In continuous-wave (CW) radar systems, the monostatic configuration employs a single antenna or closely spaced antennas for both transmission and reception, with a circulator or transmit-receive switch providing isolation between the transmitter and receiver to prevent direct signal coupling. The round-trip propagation delay for a target at range R is given by \tau = \frac{2R}{c}, where c is the speed of light, enabling range determination through modulation techniques despite the lack of pulse timing in unmodulated CW setups.^[26] This setup simplifies hardware integration and ensures identical transmit and receive patterns, but it is susceptible to transmit leakage overwhelming the receiver, necessitating careful isolation measures.^[27] In contrast, the bistatic configuration separates the transmitter and receiver at distinct sites, often by distances comparable to the target range, resulting in targets lying on an elliptical locus defined by constant sum of distances from the transmitter and receiver foci. The received power in bistatic CW radar follows the range equation P_r = \frac{P_t G_t G_r \lambda^2 \sigma_b}{(4\pi)^3 R_t^2 R_r^2}, where P_t is transmit power, G_t and G_r are transmitter and receiver gains, \lambda is wavelength, \sigma_b is the bistatic radar cross-section, and R_t, R_r are transmitter-target and receiver-target ranges, respectively; this differs from monostatic by replacing the fourth-power range dependence with separate squared terms.^[28] The Doppler shift for a target moving at velocity v is f_d = \frac{2 v f_0}{c} \frac{(\cos \alpha + \cos \beta)}{2}, where f_0 is the carrier frequency, and \alpha, \beta are the angles between the velocity vector and the lines to the transmitter and receiver, respectively, incorporating a geometry factor that reduces sensitivity compared to monostatic cases for non-radial motion.^[29] Monostatic setups offer advantages in compactness and cost for applications requiring colocation, such as automotive radars where frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) sensors on vehicles use shared antennas for adaptive cruise control and collision avoidance, achieving reliable short-range detection up to 200 meters. However, the leakage risk limits dynamic range, potentially masking weak echoes. Bistatic configurations enhance stealth by allowing passive receivers that emit no signals, reducing detectability, and enable wider coverage areas through optimized site placement, as seen in historical early warning networks like the Fluttar bistatic gap-fillers extending the Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line for Arctic surveillance during the Cold War.^[30] Drawbacks include increased synchronization challenges and parallax effects that can degrade resolution unless geometry is precisely accounted for.^[28] Geometry significantly impacts bistatic performance, with the bistatic radar cross-section \sigma_b varying based on the bistatic angle between transmitter, target, and receiver, often peaking in forward-scatter geometries but dropping in near-monostatic alignments. Hybrid multistatic networks extend bistatic principles by coordinating multiple transmitters and receivers for improved coverage and ambiguity resolution, though they introduce complexity in data fusion.^[31]

Monopulse Configurations

Monopulse configurations in continuous-wave (CW) radar enable high angular accuracy by simultaneously comparing signals from multiple antenna beams, generating sum (Σ) and difference (Δ) channels to detect target off-boresight angles without mechanical scanning. This technique derives angle error signals from amplitude or phase differences in the received CW signals, allowing precise direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation in real time.^[32] In CW adaptations, hybrid couplers or waveguide bridges combine signals from displaced antenna elements—such as in four-horn feeds—to form the required channels, with Doppler processing often integrated to select targets based on velocity. Amplitude-comparison monopulse relies on signal strength ratios, while phase-comparison uses phase shifts between channels, both processed continuously to maintain coherence.^[33]^[32] Angle estimation employs the monopulse ratio r = \frac{\Delta}{\Sigma}, yielding the target angle \theta \approx k \cdot r, where k is a calibration constant based on the antenna's pattern slope. This approach achieves resolution approximately \frac{\lambda}{D} (wavelength over aperture diameter), independent of target range, with root-mean-square error \sigma_\theta \approx \frac{2.2 \theta_B}{\sqrt{\text{SNR}}} (\theta_B as half-power beamwidth, SNR as signal-to-noise ratio).^[32] Common configurations distinguish one-dimensional setups, focusing on azimuth or elevation via paired beams, from two-dimensional variants using four-quadrant antennas for joint estimation; all operate simultaneously per pulse equivalent in CW, outperforming sequential lobing in speed and accuracy.^[32] These systems find use in precision tracking and missile seekers, exemplified by the X-band CW monopulse semi-active radar homing in the MIM-23 Hawk missile, operational since the early 1960s for low-to-medium altitude intercepts.^[34] CW monopulse faces challenges in preserving phase coherence amid continuous transmission, alongside integration with frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) for concurrent range-angle-velocity measurement, where channel mismatches can introduce errors.^[35] Historically, monopulse evolved from post-World War II pulsed radar innovations and was applied to CW in the 1950s, enhancing interference immunity and tracking in systems like early illuminators.^[32]

Leakage Mitigation Methods

In continuous-wave (CW) radar systems, particularly monostatic frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) configurations, direct transmitter-to-receiver leakage, also known as coupling or feedthrough, poses a major issue by introducing a strong zero-delay signal that overwhelms weak echoes from nearby targets. This leakage manifests as a DC component or low-frequency content after mixing, leading to receiver saturation and dynamic range compression that obscures close-range detections.^[36] ^[37] One established mitigation approach is the null technique, which employs adaptive nulling to destructively interfere with the leakage signal. This involves generating a cancellation vector using an auxiliary antenna or a controllable phase shifter to match the amplitude and phase of the incoming leakage, effectively nulling it at the receiver input. Such methods have been demonstrated in phase-coded CW (PRC CW) radars, where adaptive algorithms continuously adjust the null to track variations in the leakage path.^[38] ^[39] Filtering techniques provide another layer of defense by suppressing the leakage after downconversion. High-pass filters or notch filters placed post-mixing remove the DC and low-frequency components associated with zero-delay leakage, preserving higher-frequency beat signals from actual targets. In modern digital systems, infinite impulse response (IIR) or finite impulse response (FIR) filters implement this digitally, offering tunable rejection while minimizing distortion to the desired spectrum; for instance, notch filters in beam-switched CW radars achieve sharp attenuation near zero frequency limited only by high-pass cutoff characteristics. ^[40] The frequency-modulated interrupted CW (FMICW) method addresses leakage through periodic transmitter gating, creating duty-cycled operation (e.g., 50% on-time) that allows quiet receive windows free of direct transmission. During off periods, echoes can be sampled without interference, effectively eliminating zero-delay saturation while maintaining FMCW range resolution. This technique is particularly valuable in automotive radars, where it prevents receiver overload from structural coupling in compact monostatic setups. Additional strategies include polarization isolation, which exploits orthogonal polarizations between transmit and receive antennas to reduce coupling by 20-30 dB in practice, and frequency offset in heterodyne architectures, where a deliberate local oscillator shift moves the leakage away from the baseband, mitigating DC offsets and phase noise spread. The magnitude of leakage is quantified as L = |S_{21}|^2 [P_t](/page/Power), where S_{21} is the coupling coefficient between transmit and receive ports, and P_t is the transmit power; effective mitigation aims to keep L well below the receiver noise floor, often targeting 60-80 dB isolation.^[41] ^[42] ^[37]

Performance Characteristics

Advantages over Pulsed Radar

Continuous-wave (CW) radar systems offer significant simplicity in design compared to pulsed radar, as they eliminate the need for high-power pulsers, switches, and timing circuits required to generate and manage intermittent pulses. Instead, CW radar transmits a continuous low-power signal, often in the milliwatt range, avoiding the kilowatt-level peak powers typical of pulsed systems. This results in lower manufacturing costs and greater portability, making CW radar suitable for compact implementations.^[43]^[44]^[45] A key advantage lies in the 100% duty cycle of CW radar, which contrasts sharply with the low duty cycles (often less than 1%, or τ/T ≈ 0.001 where τ is pulse width and T is pulse repetition interval) of pulsed radar. For equivalent average transmit power, this full utilization of transmission time enhances signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by approximately 20–30 dB, as the continuous signal allows for longer coherent integration without the energy loss inherent in pulsed operation. Power efficiency is thus η = 1 for CW radar versus η = τ/T for pulsed systems, enabling better detection performance with reduced overall power demands.^[46]^[47]^[48] CW radar provides superior velocity resolution through pure Doppler processing, free from the range migration errors that affect pulsed systems during long integrations. This allows for fine velocity discrimination via extended observation times, limited only by integration length rather than pulse timing constraints. Additionally, modulated CW signals exhibit low probability of intercept (LPI) properties, resembling spread-spectrum techniques that make detection by adversaries more difficult than the distinct pulses of traditional radar. The instantaneous response of CW radar, with no blind ranges near the transmitter, further suits it for close-in target tracking without the minimum range limitations of pulsed designs.^[43]^[44]^[48] In recent developments, CW radar's low-power continuous operation facilitates seamless integration with millimeter-wave frequencies, enabling compact, high-resolution sensors for applications requiring minimal size and power, such as automotive systems.^[45]

Limitations and Challenges

One significant limitation of unmodulated continuous-wave (CW) radar is its inability to measure range or detect stationary targets, as it relies solely on the Doppler effect for velocity estimation, rendering range information inherently ambiguous without additional modulation schemes.^[16] To overcome this, frequency or phase modulation must be introduced, which increases system complexity by requiring precise control of the transmitted waveform and subsequent signal processing to resolve both range and velocity. Transmitter-receiver leakage in CW radar systems leads to receiver saturation, where the strong leaked signal overwhelms weaker target echoes, thereby reducing the system's dynamic range and potentially generating ghost targets at zero range that mask genuine detections.^[49] This saturation effect limits the radar's ability to detect low-reflectivity targets in proximity, as the leaked signal's sideband noise can drown out the desired returns, necessitating careful isolation techniques to maintain operational integrity.^[50] In dense environments, CW radar faces challenges in multi-target resolution due to Doppler ambiguities, where high relative velocities cause aliasing in the frequency spectrum, complicating the separation of individual targets.^[51] For frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) variants, range-velocity coupling further exacerbates this, as Doppler shifts alter the beat frequency, leading to erroneous range estimates unless resolved through advanced processing. A key quantitative constraint is the maximum unambiguous velocity v_{\max} = \frac{\lambda}{4 T_c}, where \lambda = \frac{c}{f_0} is the wavelength and T_c is the chirp repetition interval, arising from aliasing in the Doppler measurement; velocities exceeding this limit wrap around, introducing ambiguities.^[52] Bandwidth allocation presents a trade-off in CW radar design: narrowband operation suffices for precise velocity measurements via Doppler but fails to provide range resolution, while wideband modulation enables range discrimination at the cost of increased spectral occupancy and potential interference in regulated frequency bands.^[13] Clutter from stationary objects produces zero-Doppler returns that mask slow-moving targets, particularly in Doppler-limited CW systems, while multipath propagation in urban settings generates false echoes that degrade overall detection reliability.^[53] Compared to pulsed radar, CW systems operate with low peak power due to continuous transmission constraints, restricting their maximum detection range and making them less suitable for long-distance applications where high instantaneous power is advantageous.^[54] Various mitigation approaches, such as those outlined in leakage mitigation methods, can address some of these challenges, though they often introduce additional hardware or processing overhead.^[55]

Applications

Automotive and Transportation

In advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar operating at 77 GHz is integral to features like adaptive cruise control (ACC), where it measures relative velocity and range to preceding vehicles for automatic speed regulation. This technology also supports collision avoidance by detecting obstacles up to 200 meters ahead with high resolution, enabling emergency braking and lane change assistance in real-time. Automotive radars provide robust performance in diverse conditions, with velocity detection up to 300 km/h and range accuracy better than 5 cm, as implemented in systems from manufacturers like Texas Instruments.^[56]^[57]^[58] A key advancement in the 2020s is 4D imaging radar using mm-wave frequencies, which adds elevation angle measurement to traditional range, azimuth, and Doppler velocity data, creating high-resolution point clouds or voxel maps for precise environmental mapping. This capability enhances pedestrian detection in urban settings by distinguishing targets in three dimensions plus motion, improving safety in autonomous driving scenarios even under occlusion. Surveys highlight its robustness against weather interference compared to optical sensors, with applications in generating dense 4D images for object classification and trajectory prediction.^[59]^[60]^[61] For traffic monitoring, unmodulated CW Doppler radars serve as the basis for handheld speed guns used by law enforcement to measure vehicle velocities via the Doppler shift, offering non-contact detection accurate to within 1 km/h at ranges up to 1 km. On highways, CW radar-based flow sensors track multilane traffic volume, occupancy, and speeds continuously, supporting congestion management without invasive infrastructure. Bistatic configurations extend coverage for wide-area surveillance, using separate transmit and receive sites to monitor evasive or fast-moving targets across larger zones.^[62]^[63] The automotive radar market expanded from approximately USD 3.5 billion in 2020 to over USD 5.4 billion by 2023, driven by integration into electric vehicles (EVs) for enhanced safety and autonomy features; notable examples include Bosch's 77 GHz long-range radar modules for ACC and Autoliv's mid-range sensors for blind-spot detection. Projections indicate shipment of more than 200 million units annually by 2030, fueled by regulatory mandates for ADAS and the rise of Level 4 autonomous systems, where radars provide essential all-weather sensing for highway piloting.^[64]^[65] Unique challenges in automotive deployment include resilience to harsh environments, such as vibrations from road travel and adverse weather like rain or fog, which can degrade signal quality despite radar's inherent robustness. Multi-sensor fusion with LiDAR and cameras addresses these by combining radar's velocity data with visual and 3D mapping for comprehensive perception, though alignment and computational demands remain hurdles.^[66]^[67]^[68] Recent advancements leverage multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna arrays to achieve angular resolutions as fine as 0.25 degrees, enabling separation of closely spaced targets like vehicles in dense traffic. Artificial intelligence techniques, including self-supervised learning on radar point clouds, further enhance clutter rejection by filtering environmental noise and improving target classification accuracy in cluttered scenes. These innovations support higher-fidelity sensing for Level 4 autonomy without increasing hardware costs significantly.^[69]^[70]^[71]

Military and Surveillance

Continuous-wave (CW) radar plays a critical role in military missile guidance systems, particularly through semi-active radar homing (SARH) mechanisms where the launching platform emits a CW signal to illuminate the target, allowing the missile to home in on the reflected energy. For instance, the AIM-7 Sparrow missile, a medium-range air-to-air weapon, relies on this CW illumination from the fighter's fire-control radar during its terminal phase to achieve precise targeting, with upgrades enhancing its all-weather performance against airborne threats.^[72]^[73] In ground-based surveillance applications, CW radar enables effective border patrol and drone detection by exploiting Doppler shifts to distinguish moving targets from clutter, providing continuous monitoring over extended perimeters without the range ambiguities of pulsed systems. Systems like those developed by Weibel Scientific utilize X-band CW frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) technology to track low, slow, and small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), including micro-drones, at ranges sufficient for tactical response in contested borders. Similarly, Blighter Surveillance Systems' ground-based radars employ Doppler processing in CW modes for perimeter security, detecting intrusions such as drones via their velocity signatures in real-time.^[74]^[75] Airborne CW radar configurations support velocity search modes akin to those in AWACS platforms, prioritizing Doppler-based target discrimination to identify high-speed threats while avoiding the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) ambiguities that limit low-PRF pulsed radars in cluttered environments. This approach allows for unambiguous velocity measurements across a wide dynamic range, facilitating rapid threat assessment in airborne early warning scenarios where platform motion introduces additional Doppler challenges.^[76] CW radar's low probability of intercept (LPI) and electronic countermeasure (ECM) resistance stem from its continuous, low-power emissions, with FMCW variants spreading energy across frequencies to evade detection and jamming, making them suitable for military operations requiring stealthy fire control. Monopulse CW techniques further enhance angular accuracy in fire-control systems, enabling precise tracking under ECM conditions by using simultaneous lobe comparisons to reject noise and interference.^[77]^[78] Historically, CW radar found early military use in Cold War-era systems like the Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line's gap-filler radars, where the AN/FPS-23 employed continuous-wave Doppler processing to detect low-flying aircraft intruding between primary surveillance sites, filling coverage gaps in Arctic defense networks. Although World War II German radar efforts, such as the Würzburg series, primarily focused on pulsed designs for gun-laying, they laid groundwork for later CW adaptations in surveillance roles.^[79] In recent developments of the 2020s, CW radar addresses hypersonic tracking challenges by leveraging high-resolution Doppler for velocity estimation of Mach 5+ targets, where traditional pulsed systems struggle with rapid range-rate changes, as seen in advanced microwave photonic radars capable of simultaneous multi-missile engagement. Passive bistatic CW configurations, utilizing illuminators of opportunity like civilian broadcasts or enemy radars, enhance covert surveillance by avoiding dedicated transmitters, allowing military forces to monitor stealthy threats without emitting detectable signals.^[80]^[81]^[82] Integration of CW radar with electronic warfare (EW) systems promotes spectrum dominance by embedding Doppler processing into multi-function EW platforms, enabling simultaneous sensing, jamming resistance, and signal exploitation to control the electromagnetic environment in joint operations. For example, modern EW suites like those from ASELSAN combine CW radar elements with spectrum management for real-time threat adaptation, ensuring operational superiority in dense signal contested spaces.^[83]^[84]

Biomedical and Scientific Uses

Continuous-wave (CW) radar enables non-contact detection of vital signs such as heart rate and respiration by capturing micro-Doppler signatures from subtle chest movements caused by cardiopulmonary activity.^[85] Systems operating at frequencies like 24 GHz have demonstrated high accuracy in isolating these micro-motions, achieving heart rate detection errors below 5 beats per minute in controlled settings.^[86] This approach leverages the phase shift in the reflected signal from thoracic vibrations, typically on the order of millimeters, to extract respiratory rates ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 Hz and cardiac rates from 0.8 to 2 Hz.^[87] A notable recent development is the VitRad system, a low-cost CW Doppler radar introduced in 2022, featuring 3D-printed horn antennas operating at 5.8 GHz for remote vital sign monitoring.^[88] Designed for accessibility in resource-limited environments, VitRad achieves respiration rate detection with a mean absolute error of 1.2 breaths per minute and supports applications like contactless screening during the COVID-19 pandemic, where it facilitated non-invasive triage in healthcare settings.^[89] Such systems highlight CW radar's potential for scalable, portable health monitoring without physical sensors.^[90] In broader biomedical applications, frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) radar variants are employed for gait analysis and fall detection, particularly in elderly care. By analyzing range-Doppler maps, these systems quantify stride variability and detect anomalous motion patterns indicative of falls, with detection accuracies exceeding 95% in indoor environments.^[91] For instance, multi-channel FMCW radars track step-time fluctuations to assess fall risk, integrating velocity profiles from leg micro-motions to differentiate normal walking from instability.^[92] This non-intrusive method supports continuous monitoring in assisted living facilities, reducing response times to incidents.^[93] Beyond biomedicine, CW radar contributes to scientific research in astronomy through planetary radar systems, such as those at the former Arecibo Observatory, which utilized CW modes for high-resolution imaging of near-Earth asteroids and planetary surfaces.^[94] Operating in the S-band, Arecibo's CW radar achieved range resolutions down to 10 meters, enabling detailed characterization of over 100 asteroids annually before its decommissioning in 2020.^[95] In atmospheric science, FM-CW radars profile boundary layer structures, resolving vertical reflectivity with 2.5-meter precision to study turbulence and precipitation formation.^[96] These instruments also support radio acoustic sounding, measuring sound velocity profiles by detecting acoustic wave scattering in the troposphere.^[97] Advancements from 2020 to 2025 have integrated machine learning with CW radar for enhanced analysis of subtle motions, including emotion recognition via respiratory and micro-facial signatures. Algorithms like support vector machines and random forests classify emotions from radar-captured signals with accuracies up to 85%, distinguishing states such as stress or relaxation based on breathing variability.^[98] For example, millimeter-wave CW systems combined with convolutional neural networks detect facial expression dynamics for real-time behavioral assessment.^[99] These developments extend to wearable prototypes, though regulatory hurdles persist.^[100] Despite these progresses, biomedical CW radar faces challenges including biocompatibility concerns for prolonged exposure, extremely low echo signals on the picowatt scale from biological tissues, and strict regulatory limits imposed by the FCC on transmit power to prevent interference.^[101] Power constraints, often below 1 mW effective isotropic radiated power in the 5-24 GHz bands, limit detection range to a few meters, necessitating advanced signal processing to mitigate noise.^[102] Additionally, ensuring safe operation near human subjects requires adherence to exposure guidelines, which can compromise sensitivity in dynamic environments.^[103]

Historical Development

Early Innovations

The origins of continuous-wave (CW) radar trace back to early 20th-century experiments demonstrating the reflection of radio waves from metallic objects. In 1904, German engineer Christian Hülsmeyer invented the telemobiloscope, a device that transmitted continuous electromagnetic waves to detect ships in foggy conditions up to 3 kilometers away by observing changes in received signal strength, marking the first practical application of radar-like principles for collision avoidance, though it did not incorporate Doppler processing for velocity measurement.^[104] This unmodulated CW system represented a foundational precursor, relying on simple bistatic configuration without range resolution. During the 1920s and 1930s, advancements in CW techniques for direction finding and detection emerged, influenced by radio communication research. Concurrently, at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), researchers Leo C. Young, Lawrence A. Hyland, and Albert H. Taylor achieved the first aircraft detection with CW radio in 1930, observing a Doppler-induced beat frequency from a passing Navy biplane at 1.6 kilometers, confirming reflections from moving targets.^[3] By 1932, their improved CW setup detected low-flying aircraft up to 80 kilometers distant using beat-frequency oscillators to measure radial velocity.^[105] Key contributions from individual inventors solidified CW radar's theoretical and practical basis. Robert M. Page, a physicist at NRL, co-developed early CW systems and received U.S. Patent 1,981,884 in 1934 for a "system for detecting objects by radio," which utilized CW transmission and Doppler beat detection to identify moving vessels or aircraft without pulse modulation.^[3] In 1940, the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC) formalized Doppler applications in radar through initial reports evaluating CW techniques for velocity discrimination, emphasizing their utility in cluttered environments over pulsed systems.^[106] The following year, the MIT Radiation Laboratory (Rad Lab), established under NDRC auspices, advanced CW Doppler processing in 1941, integrating it into prototype systems for moving target indication and fire control, leveraging microwave frequencies enabled by the British cavity magnetron.^[22] World War II accelerated CW radar innovations, particularly for velocity measurement in military contexts. British early developments included experimental CW radar demonstrations, which preceded the pulsed Chain Home early warning system for air defense.^[107] In the U.S., the SCR-584 fire-control radar, developed at MIT Rad Lab and deployed in 1942, featured conical scan tracking for precise anti-aircraft gun laying, achieving approximately 65-kilometer detection ranges.^[108] Post-war declassification in 1945–1946 released technical details of these CW systems, spurring civilian applications like traffic enforcement.^[3]

Post-WWII Advancements and Modern Era

Following World War II, continuous-wave (CW) radar systems saw significant integration into military applications during the Cold War era. Immediately post-WWII, CW radar found application in proximity fuzes for artillery shells, using Doppler to detect target approach velocity, as seen in the U.S. Mark 32 VT fuze deployed in 1943.^[3] In the 1950s, CW technology was incorporated into missile guidance systems, notably the MIM-23 Hawk surface-to-air missile, which achieved initial operational capability in 1959 and utilized a CW illuminator for semi-active homing to enhance target tracking against low-altitude threats.^[34] This marked a key advancement in CW radar's role in air defense, enabling precise illumination and homing without the need for onboard active radar in the missile. Concurrently, frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) variants experienced a notable re-invention in 1959, building on earlier concepts to improve range resolution for potential automotive applications, though widespread adoption lagged until later decades.^[109] The 1960s and 1970s further solidified CW radar's military utility, with refinements in Doppler processing for velocity measurement in guidance systems, while civilian explorations began in altimetry and proximity sensing. By the 1980s, the advent of digital signal processing (DSP) revolutionized FMCW implementations, allowing for efficient beat-frequency analysis and improved signal-to-noise ratios in cluttered environments.^[110] This digital shift enabled real-time processing of complex waveforms, paving the way for more compact and reliable systems. In parallel, the 1990s saw a pivotal move to millimeter-wave frequencies for automotive use, with the 76-77 GHz band allocated internationally for short-range radar sensors around 1995-1998, facilitating higher resolution and smaller antennas for collision avoidance.^[111] The first commercial 77 GHz FMCW radars emerged in 1998, driven by advancements in gallium arsenide monolithic microwave integrated circuits.^[112] Entering the 2000s, regulatory milestones accelerated CW radar proliferation. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 2002 established rules for ultra-wideband (UWB) operations, including low-power CW and FMCW systems in the 22-29 GHz band for vehicular radars, enabling interference-resistant deployments without dedicated spectrum licensing.^[113] This was supplemented by 2005 refinements to UWB emission limits, further supporting short-range, low-power applications. In Europe, mandates under Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, effective from 2022 and expanded by 2024, required advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) incorporating radar for features like autonomous emergency braking, boosting CW adoption in vehicles.^[114] The 2010s ushered in a boom for 4D imaging radars, which extend traditional 3D (range, velocity, azimuth) capabilities to include elevation for enhanced object classification in autonomous driving. A prime example is Continental's ARS548 sensor, introduced around 2020, operating at 77 GHz with MIMO arrays for up to 300-meter detection range and angular resolutions below 1 degree, supporting Level 3+ autonomy.^[115] Phased-array integrations in FMCW systems advanced rapidly, with 2024 IEEE research demonstrating hybrid phased-MIMO architectures that reduce RF chains while achieving sub-degree beam steering for multi-target scenarios.^[116] Post-COVID-19, biomedical applications surged, leveraging non-contact FMCW radars for vital signs monitoring; for instance, 60-77 GHz systems enabled remote respiration and heart rate detection in healthcare settings, with studies showing over 95% accuracy in breathing pattern analysis for infection screening.^[117] Market growth reflected these innovations, evolving from niche military uses to a projected global CW radar market exceeding $14 billion by 2030, primarily fueled by autonomous vehicle demands and spectrum coexistence with 5G networks through interference mitigation techniques like dynamic frequency hopping.^[118] Looking ahead to 2025 and beyond, emerging trends include quantum-enhanced CW radars, which leverage entangled photons for superior stealth target detection in noisy environments, offering up to 6 dB sensitivity gains over classical systems.^[119] Additionally, AI-driven processing for multi-target tracking in FMCW radars has gained traction, with algorithms like stacked ensemble learning resolving ambiguities in vital signs monitoring and urban clutter, achieving robust localization for 5+ simultaneous targets.^[117]

References

[1]
Continuous Wave Radar
Principle of Operation. As opposed to pulsed radar systems, continuous wave (CW) radar systems emit electromagnetic radiation at all times. Conventional CW ...Missing: definition authoritative sources
[2]
Radartutorial
### Summary of Continuous Wave Radar from https://www.radartutorial.eu/02.basics/Continuous%20Wave%20Radar.en.html
[3]
NRL History - RADAR - Naval Research Laboratory
Nov 4, 2010 · Through the use of continuous-wave radio transmissions, objects could be detected by sensing the reflection from the target 'beating' with the ...
[4]
None
Below is a merged summary of the key sections from "Introduction to Radar Systems" by Merrill I. Skolnik, consolidating all information from the provided segments into a comprehensive response. To maximize detail and clarity, I will use a table format where appropriate (in CSV style) to organize the dense information, followed by additional narrative details for context. The response retains all mentioned details, including page references, equations, and URLs, while avoiding redundancy where possible.
[5]
Klystron - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Radar: For this application, the traveling-wave tube may be an intermediate or final output stage of a transmitter; power output may be pulsed, continuous-wave, ...
[6]
Gunn oscillator - Radartutorial.eu
A Gunn oscillator uses a Gunn diode and a sliding short circuit, with continuous power up to 65 milliwatts and pulsed outputs up to 200 watts peak.<|control11|><|separator|>
[7]
[PDF] Concepts for Short Range Millimeter-wave Miniaturized Radar ...
The basic ... In FMCW radar signal processing, when there is no doppler shift in the trans- ... Chapter 2, heterodyne and homodyne radar architecture variants of ...
[8]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5725023
[9]
Radar Systems - Doppler Effect - Tutorials Point
Derivation of Doppler Frequency If λ is one wave length, then the number of wave lengths N that are present in a two-way communication path between the Radar ...
[10]
History of Radar - Decatur Electronics
Jan 1, 2021 · His discovery in 1842 was dubbed the Doppler Principle, the concept defining how radar determines speed. Of course there were no radars in that ...
[11]
Doppler Effect - Radartutorial.eu
Derivation of the Doppler-frequency formula ; φ = −, 2r · 2π, φ = phase-difference between the transmitted and the received signal 2r = the distance: the way and ...Missing: f0 theta
[12]
[PDF] Non-Contact Speed Measurement Using Doppler Radar
be seen that the Doppler shift depends on the velocity of the object and the original wave frequency. Fd = 2V (. F0. c. )cos(𝜃). (1). The following apply in ...
[13]
[PDF] Radar Frequencies and Waveforms
For a given range, angle, and/or Doppler, decide if a target is or is not present. Example: Moving target indication (MTI) radar. Estimation. For a given range, ...
[14]
[PDF] QUADRATURE RADAR DEMODULATION TECHNIQUES FOR ...
Quadrature Demodulation for Doppler Radar Motion Detector” IEEE MTT-S. International Microwave Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA, June 2007. [11] M. Zakrzewski, H ...
[15]
[PDF] Speed-Measuring Devices Specifications: Down-the-Road Radar ...
Apr 1, 2016 · 1.4. 46 X-Band Radar - a radar speed-measuring device designed to operate in the frequency band of 10,500 MHz to 10,550 MHz. Each radar device ...Missing: velocity | Show results with:velocity
[16]
[PDF] Principles of Classical and Modern Radar Continuous Wave (CW ...
In a similar fashion to linear-FMCW, the Doppler effect will shift the frequency of the received signals for moving targets. Moving Target. The beat frequency ...
[17]
A Review on Low-Cost Microwave Doppler Radar Systems for ...
Apr 8, 2021 · Continuous-wave (CW) radars have simple architecture, allowing for easier integration and lower power consumption, which makes them appealing ...
[18]
https://www.trafficlogix.com/the-history-of-radar-enforced-speed-limits/
[19]
[PDF] Wind velocity observation with a CW doppler radar - Samuli Siltanen
Abstract—We study the problem of gathering information about wind velocity from continuous-wave clear-air Doppler radar measurements. The radar is assumed ...Missing: unmodulated | Show results with:unmodulated
[20]
Traffic Surveillance using Low Cost Continuous Wave (CW) Doppler ...
Low cost un-modulated continuous wave (CW) radar (CW Doppler radar) can be used to measure the speed of a vehicle. Traditionally, a radar gun, a lidar gun ...
[21]
A Low-cost Vehicle Detection and Classification System based on ...
This paper presents a novel low-cost vehicle detection and classification system which is based on a K-band unmodulated CW radar. This system utilizes time- ...
[22]
MIT Rad Lab - Engineering and Technology History Wiki
Apr 12, 2017 · Engineers and scientists at Rad Lab designed almost half of the radar deployed in World War II and also launched a new era of collaboration between government, ...
[23]
MIT Radiation Lab Series V1 Radar Engineering | PDF - Scribd
Rating 5.0 (2) Doppler detection systems, or “c-w radar” as they are sometimes loosely called, utilize this principle. In fact the doppler effect and c-w radar were from ...
[24]
Radar Basics: How to Build a 24 GHz FMCW Radar System
Jan 24, 2023 · The exact profile and timing can be customized to suit the specific application—for example, sawtooth vs. triangle waveform, or adding ramp ...
[25]
[PDF] PLL Design for FMCW Radar Systems - UC Berkeley EECS
May 15, 2024 · Direct digital synthesizer (DDS) is the most straight- forward way to generate a chirp [29]. It's a quick and easy solution for prototype ...
[26]
[PDF] CONTINUOUS WAVE RADARS–MONOSTATIC, MULTISTATIC ...
back to the radar. The time delay between the transmitted and received signal is equal to τ = 2R/c, where R is the radar-target distance and c is the ...
[27]
[PDF] On Monostatic and Bistatic System Concepts for mm-Wave Radar ...
The detection performance and the signal-to-noise ratio performance are evaluated in two radar measurements. Limitations and suggestions for improvement are.
[28]
Monostatic vs. Bistatic Radar: Key Differences Explained
Explore the fundamental differences between monostatic and bistatic radar systems, including block diagrams and performance equations.
[29]
[PDF] EE3-27: Principles of Classical and Modern Radar Bistatic Radar
β = 180o and fD = 0, no matter what the direction or magnitude of v. Physically this can be understood because at this point the transmitter-to-target range is ...Missing: alpha | Show results with:alpha
[30]
Fluttar DEW-Line Gap-Filler | Advances in Bistatic Radar
Jul 3, 2024 · This chapter disccuses a brief history of the bistatic radar known as Fluttar, developed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory under the sponsorship of ...
[31]
Multistatic Radar - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Multistatic radar is defined as a radar system that utilizes multiple spatially separated antennas to detect and track targets, where the decision-making ...
[32]
[PDF] Monopulse Radar - DTIC
Initially, monopulse radar systems implied pulsed radars which accomplished multichannel reception and were able, in principle, to measure angular coordinates ...
[33]
[PDF] Notes on Amplitude versus Phase Comparison Monopulse ...
Monopulse is a technique for determining the Direction of Arrival (DOA) of a radar echo by comparing the simultaneous signal responses from two or more antenna ...
[34]
Raytheon SAM-A-18/M3/MIM-23 Hawk - Designation-Systems.Net
Nov 7, 2002 · The missile is guided by an X-band CW (Continuous Wave) monopulse semi-active radar seeker, and has an effective engagement range of 2-25 km ...
[35]
Design and simulation of monopulse radar receiver with continuous ...
If Monopulse receiver works with continuous wave, it can be used as a combination of Monopulse and conical scan method to improve the performance of radar ...Missing: configurations | Show results with:configurations
[36]
[PDF] Leakage Mitigation and Internal Delay Compensation in FMCW ...
Abstract—One of the notorious problems of frequency modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar is leakage between the transmitter and the receiver.
[37]
Transmit/receive leakage - Radartutorial.eu
Transmit/receive leakage with a continuous wave radar · Pt = power out of transmitter · Pl = power leaked directly from transmitter to receiver · Pr = power ...Missing: S21 | Show results with:S21
[38]
https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/pdf/10.1049/cp.2009.0338
[39]
Adaptive leakage signal cancellation algorithm in heterodyne ...
The basic principle to cancel leakage signal is to produce a cancelling signal, which has the same amplitude and anti-phase with the leakage signal. Differently ...
[40]
[PDF] A Practical Approach to FMCW Radar Deconvolution in the Sea Ice ...
Oct 23, 2025 · Signal leakage is caused by finite port-to-port isolation, mismatches between receiver components, significant DC offset at the mixer output, ...
[41]
[PDF] High-Isolation Antenna Technique for CubeSat-Borne, Continuous ...
Combining physical-separation and polarization-diversity isolation ... isolation decreases these types of leakage. ... enough isolation for a continuous-waveform ...
[42]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8605523
[43]
Signal processing implementation of low-cost target speed detection ...
Jul 10, 2024 · Continuous Wave (CW) radar has several advantages over other radar systems such as: simplicity, low-cost effective, small size, low power ...
[44]
Radartutorial
### Advantages of CW Radar Compared to Pulsed Radar
[45]
[PDF] Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Radar System at ISM Band ...
Frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar is a technique for obtaining range information from a radar by frequency modulating a continuous signal.
[46]
[PDF] RADAR SYSTEMS - VEMU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Radar is an electromagnetic system for detecting and locating objects by transmitting a waveform and detecting the echo signal. It can see through darkness, ...
[47]
[PDF] Wavelets and Neural Networks for Radar
Continuous-wave radar determines range by measuring the so-called Doppler frequency shift of the reflected signal. The Doppler shift arises from relative motion.
[48]
[PDF] Simulation of Coherent Radar Imaging Using Continuous Wave ...
Sep 21, 2009 · Typically, CW radars have lower peak power and much higher duty cycles than pulsed radars— these parameters can be varied to impact the return.
[49]
Continuous Wave Radar - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The unavoidable leakage between transmitter and receiver means that the weak reflected signal may have to compete with the strong directly received transmission ...
[50]
Continuous wave radar equation with the leakage of transmitted signal
... CW radar equation is modified after analyzing its deficiency. The influence of transmitted signal leakage on the CW radar is reflected in this radar equation.
[51]
[PDF] OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS OF CONTINUOUS WAVE DOPPLER ...
A CW Doppler radar can accurately measure a vehicle's speed. The accuracy of the measurement is limited to only one vehicle travelling in a single lane. After ...
[52]
Decoupling the Doppler Ambiguity Interval From the Maximum ...
Feb 10, 2020 · Classical saw-tooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radars experience a coupling between the maximum unambiguous Doppler-velocity ...
[53]
Multipath Suppression for Continuous Wave Radar via Slepian ...
Jan 1, 2020 · In continuous wave (CW) radar systems, multiple signal copies impinge the receiver simultaneously. Often, undesired multipath and ...
[54]
Fundamentals of radar measurement and signal analysis -- Part 1
Apr 17, 2018 · While unmodulated pulsed radars are relatively simple to implement, they have drawbacks including relatively poor range resolution. To make the ...
[55]
CW Homodyne Transceiver Challenges - IEEE Xplore
The chapter describes the single‐channel system limitations. Since a quadrature receiver system and the two orthonormal output signals enable to measure the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[56]
Automotive mmWave radar sensors | TI.com - Texas Instruments
TI automotive mmWave radar sensors · Highly accurate. Less than 5 cm resolution accuracy, range detection to hundreds of meters and velocity of up to 300 Km/h.
[57]
How Automotive Radars Are Advancing Safety Features - Keysight
Jan 11, 2024 · Automotive radars enable the following ADAS capabilities: adaptive cruise control (ACC); lane change assistance; collision avoidance; emergency ...
[58]
Testing automotive radar for ADAS and autonomous driving
Nov 29, 2024 · Due to its high resolution, 76-77GHz radar is used primarily to detect obstacles 100 to 200 metres ahead of the vehicle. Radar is also used for ...
[59]
4D Millimeter-Wave Radar in Autonomous Driving: A Survey - arXiv
Feb 19, 2024 · 4D mmWave radar measures range, azimuth, elevation, and velocity of targets, and is used in autonomous driving due to its robustness and ...
[60]
Millimeter-wave radar enters the 4D imaging era - Yole Group
Sep 9, 2021 · 4D imaging radar is a breakthrough technology that can extend the function of radar from measuring distance, speed, and horizontal azimuth to range, azimuth, ...Missing: pedestrian | Show results with:pedestrian
[61]
Development of Low-Cost Single-Chip Automotive 4D Millimeter ...
Extensive road testing has demonstrated that the designed radar is capable of reliably measuring dynamic targets such as vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles, ...
[62]
Over-roadway sensors - Federal Highway Administration
Presence-detecting radar sensors can monitor multilane freeway traffic flow and surface street vehicle presence and speed. In these applications, the microwave ...Missing: bistatic | Show results with:bistatic
[63]
Tracking of Evasive Objects Using Bistatic Doppler Radar Operating ...
c o s [ α ( t ) ] = R 1 ( t ) R 2 ( t ) = R 1 ( t ) d 2 + R 1 2 ( t ) . After comparing Equations (12) and (14), the distance R 1 ( t ) can be written as ...
[64]
Automotive Radar Market Size, Share & Trends Report, 2030
The global automotive radar market size was estimated at USD 5.40 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 31.45 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 29.3 ...
[65]
Automotive Radar Market 2025-2045: Robotaxis & Autonomous Cars
The automotive radar market will grow to US$16.3 billion in 2034, representing a 4.8% 10-year CAGR. Forecast Period, 2024 - 2045. Forecast Units, volume (unit ...Missing: Autoliv | Show results with:Autoliv
[66]
A Review of Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving - PMC
Oct 1, 2025 · However, each sensor is limited in isolation—cameras suffer in low light or fog, LiDARs are expensive and sensitive to weather conditions, and ...Missing: harsh | Show results with:harsh
[67]
A review of research on vehicle detection in adverse weather ...
Sep 29, 2025 · Multi-sensor fusion. The sensors commonly used in vehicle detection tasks include visible light cameras, millimeter-wave radar, and LiDAR.Missing: vibration | Show results with:vibration
[68]
(PDF) Comparative Analysis of LiDAR, Radar, and Camera Sensors ...
Oct 30, 2025 · This paper compares the sensors properties based on essential factors: the working principles, key performance indicators, robustness under ...
[69]
High-resolution hybrid TDM-CDM MIMO automotive radar
Simulation results show that an angular resolution of 0.25° was achieved using 12-element transmit and receive arrays, each partitioned into three subarrays.
[70]
A millimeter-wave automotive radar with high angular resolution for ...
Feb 24, 2023 · This paper proposes a technique referred to as an antenna element space pseudo-peak suppressing (APPS) method to resolve angularly close targets.Missing: rejection | Show results with:rejection
[71]
[PDF] Self-Supervised Learning for Enhancing Angular Resolution ... - arXiv
A self-supervised learning framework uses a neural network trained on high-resolution radar data to enhance the angular resolution of smaller, low-cost MIMO ...Missing: rejection | Show results with:rejection
[72]
AIM-7 Sparrow > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
The AIM-7 Sparrow is a radar-guided, air-to-air missile with a high-explosive warhead. The versatile Sparrow has all-weather, all-altitude operational ...
[73]
[PDF] AIM-7 Sparrow - Archived 11/2007 - Forecast International
The AIM-7 Sparrow is a semi-active, radar-homing air-to-air missile with all-weather operational capability. It can also be used against airborne targets from ...
[74]
What is a Drone Detection radar - Counter-UAS - Weibel Scientific
Drone detection radars use X-Band CW-FMCW technology to detect, track, and classify low, slow, small targets, even micro drones, at long distances.Missing: surveillance | Show results with:surveillance
[75]
Blighter Surveillance Systems
World-leading designer and manufacturer of ground based radars for the surveillance across borders, coastlines and aerial threats.Missing: Doppler | Show results with:Doppler
[76]
Low Pulse Repetition Frequency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Low PRF operation is generally used for maximum range detection. It usually requires a high-power transmit power, to receive returns of sufficient power for ...
[77]
[PDF] Detection and Jamming Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) Radars
Frequency Modulation Continuous Wave (FMCW) Radar. Most of the LPI radars use FMCW which is a frequency modulation, pulse compression technique. This is the ...Missing: ECM | Show results with:ECM
[78]
[PDF] FMCW radar jamming techniques and analysis - Calhoun
FMCW radar is a Low Probability of Intercept system. This thesis investigates jamming effectiveness by injecting interfering signals and using a MATLAB model.Missing: fire | Show results with:fire
[79]
DEWLine Background Infomation
The DEW Line “Gap Filler” was the AN/FPS-23 continuous wave “fluttar” (Doppler Effect) radar. (See photo below.) The AN/FPS-23 DEW-Line radar system was ...
[80]
Light-speed radar can track multiple Mach-20 missiles - New Atlas
Jul 12, 2024 · An incredibly accurate laser-based radar system has been announced that would be able to track objects ripping through the sky at over four miles per second.
[81]
China's new interception radar 'can track 10 hypersonic missiles at ...
Jul 7, 2024 · China's new interception radar 'can track 10 hypersonic missiles at Mach 20'. New microwave photonic radar boasts detection range of over 600km ...
[82]
[PDF] A New Illuminator of Opportunity Bistatic Radar Research Project at ...
In this report a new Illuminator of Opportunity / Passive Coherent Location research project being conducted in the Microwave Radar Branch of EWRD.
[83]
Electro Magnetic Spectrum Operation (EMSO) - emsopedia
In other words, Electronic Warfare aims at the Spectrum Dominance in a combat environment. In recent years, Electronic Warfare has included Navigation Warfare ( ...
[84]
ASELSAN to showcase Next-Gen EW Systems at IDEF 2025
Jul 23, 2025 · Unveiled as a highlight at IDEF 2025, the system reflects over five decades of ASELSAN's expertise in radar and electronic warfare integration.
[85]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10759089
[86]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10065416
[87]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5296547
[88]
VitRad: A low-cost continuous wave Doppler radar system with 3D ...
To determine whether such Tx leakage power affects the Desired signal, calculate the received power for transmission power P r = 21 d B m , antenna gain G t = G ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[89]
VitRad: A low-cost continuous wave Doppler radar system with 3D ...
Sep 20, 2022 · A low-cost continuous wave (CW) radar system with 3D-printed high-gain horn antennas called VitRad is proposed for human vital sign detection.
[90]
(PDF) VitRad: A Low-cost Continuous Wave Doppler Radar System ...
Aug 7, 2025 · In this study, a low-cost continuous wave (CW) radar system with 3D-printed high-gain horn antennas called VitRad is proposed for human ...
[91]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9827886
[92]
Overview of Radar-Based Gait Parameter Estimation Techniques for ...
This paper provides an overview of emerging radar-based techniques for gait parameter estimation, especially with emphasis on those relevant to fall risk.
[93]
Fall Direction Detection in Motion State Based on the FMCW Radar
May 24, 2023 · This paper presents a novel method for detecting fall direction during motion using the FMCW radar.
[94]
The Arecibo Observatory's legacy and future radar capabilities
The Arecibo Observatory had the most powerful planetary radar system in the world. · Arecibo supported planetary defense that focuses on near-Earth asteroids and ...
[95]
Arecibo Planetary Radar Observations of Near-Earth Asteroids
We successfully observed 191 near-Earth asteroids using the Arecibo Observatory's S-band planetary radar system from 2017 December through 2019 December.
[96]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/860470
[97]
Radio acoustic sounding of the atmosphere using a FM CW radar
The use of a FM CW radar for the measurement of atmospheric sound velocity profiles is investigated. In contrast to particulate scatterers or clear air ...
[98]
Remote Emotion Recognition Using Continuous-Wave Bio-Radar ...
Feb 22, 2024 · The Bio-Radar is herein presented as a non-contact radar system able to capture vital signs remotely without requiring any physical contact with the subject.
[99]
RF sensing enabled tracking of human facial expressions ... - Nature
Nov 13, 2024 · This study proposes a novel and privacy-preserving human behavior recognition system that utilizes Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar combined ...
[100]
Emotion recognition method using millimetre wave radar based on ...
Jul 22, 2022 · This study proposes a new emotion recognition method, which uses millimetre-wave radar to transmit frequency-modulated continuous wave signals.
[101]
A Review on Recent Advancements of Biomedical Radar for Clinical ...
Doppler radar system uses a direct-conversion, which reduces power consumption compared to other radar systems like frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[102]
Optimal Central Frequency for Non-Contact Vital Sign Detection ...
For frequencies lower than 1 GHz, both uses of UWB and CW radars find it difficult to detect a small heartbeat signal.
[103]
[PDF] Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-57
Jun 29, 2009 · Because MBAN systems would be used indoors, building structures would attenuate MBAN signals and further reduce the likelihood of interference ...
[104]
Historical Overview - Radartutorial.eu
1935 Robert Watson-Watt (later: Sir Robert) suggested that radio waves might be used to detect aircraft at a distance and outlined a means of doing so.
[105]
The History of Radio Astronomy
Radio astronomy was born early in the 20th century. In 1932, a young engineer for Bell Laboratories named Karl G. Jansky tackled a puzzling problem: noisy ...Missing: continuous radar WWII Hülsmeyer
[106]
[PDF] Radar Contact - Air University
became the Army's first operational radar station (fig. 4-5).21. Figure 4-5. SCR-271 radar station in Panama. (Reproduced from Dulany. Terrett, US Army in ...
[107]
[PDF] Summary Technical Report of Division 14, NDRC. Volume 1. Radar
IN THE SFBING of 1941, MIT-RL sent one of its section leaders, K. T. Bainbridge, to Great. Britain to study the British radar development. He returned deeply ...
[108]
The Chain Home Early Warning Radar System: A Case Study in ...
Nov 18, 2019 · The Chain Home Early Warning Radar System played an important role in Great Britain's defense during the 1940 Battle of Britain.Missing: Freya SCR- 584
[109]
The strategic and technological impact of radar in World War II
Jun 22, 2025 · This study provides an in-depth exploration of the evolution of radar, tracing its theoretical underpinnings in electromagnetic science and its subsequent ...Missing: CW | Show results with:CW
[110]
Commemorating the SCR-584 radar, a historical pioneer
The pioneering WWII-era SCR-584 radar developed at the MIT Radiation Laboratory in the 1940s was put to use in Lincoln Laboratory's mid-1950s tests of the ...
[111]
A 1959 re-invention of Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave ...
Aug 25, 2025 · First patent for an FMCW radar was filed in 1928 for altitude measurement from an aircraft. – Bentley, J. O., “Airplane Altitude Indicating ...
[112]
(PDF) FMCW Radar Phase-Processing for Automotive Application
Oct 14, 2016 · In this study, a human-vehicle classification using a feature-based support vector machine (SVM) in a 77-GHz automotive frequency modulated ...
[113]
Towards mmWave Altimetry for UAS: Exploring the Potential of 77 ...
Mar 11, 2024 · The focus of this investigation is to explore the feasibility of mmWave FMCW automotive radars for UAS altimetry. Holistically, in radar ...
[114]
[PDF] Automotive Radar – From Early Developments to Self-Driving Cars
The first 77GHz automotive radars owed much to the development of high frequency seeker heads. They used Gunn diodes to produce the mm-wave signal and used ...
[115]
[PDF] A Comprehensive Overview on UWB Radar - arXiv
In 2002, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) opened up the technology towards non-military applications by allowing the unlicensed use of UWB systems in ...
[116]
47 CFR § 15.515 - Technical requirements for vehicular radar systems.
The UWB bandwidth of a vehicular radar system operating under the provisions of this section shall be contained between 22 GHz and 29 GHz.Missing: CW EU 2023 mandates
[117]
Continental ARS548 RDI imaging millimeter wave radar 4D high ...
30-day returnsContinental ARS548 RDI imaging millimeter wave radar 4D high-precision stereo perception 77GHz long range detection radar. In Stock. SKU: 12000035015935203.Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020
[118]
[PDF] Enhancing mmWave Radar Sensing Using a Phased-MIMO ...
Jun 7, 2024 · Phased-MIMO enhances mmWave radar by combining large phased arrays with few RF chains, using HybRadar, a scalable platform with sub-arrays and ...
[119]
Non-Contact Supervision of COVID-19 Breathing Behaviour with ...
This study uses Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar and Machine Learning (ML) to obtain respiratory information and analyze respiratory signals, ...
[120]
Continuous Wave (CW) Radars - Market Research
Oct 1, 2025 · Global Continuous Wave (CW) Radars Market to Reach US$14.4 Billion by 2030. The global market for Continuous Wave (CW) Radars estimated at ...Missing: 5G coexistence
[121]
Advantage of Quantum radar with intensity fluctuations - ScienceDirect
Oct 22, 2025 · Quantum radar is a powerful tool for detecting weak targets. In theory, quantum radar shows a 6 dB quantum advantage in error probability.