Copernicium
Copernicium (Cn) is a synthetic superheavy chemical element in the periodic table with atomic number 112 and symbol Cn.[1] It belongs to group 12, acting as the heaviest congener of zinc, cadmium, and mercury, and is classified as a transition metal, though its properties are largely predicted due to its extreme instability.[2] All known isotopes are highly radioactive, with the longest-lived, copernicium-285, having a half-life of approximately 30 seconds before decaying via alpha emission.[1] Copernicium was first synthesized on February 9, 1996, at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany, by an international team led by Sigurd Hofmann, Peter Armbruster, and Gottfried Münzenberg.[1] The element was produced through the fusion of lead-208 nuclei with zinc-70 ions accelerated in a linear accelerator, yielding a single atom of copernicium-277 in the initial experiment; subsequent runs confirmed three more atoms and identified additional isotopes.[1] This "cold fusion" method, developed at GSI, has been pivotal in discovering several superheavy elements beyond uranium.[3] The element's name, Copernicium, was officially approved by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) on February 19, 2010, honoring the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus for his heliocentric model of the solar system.[4] Prior to naming, it was referred to by the systematic placeholder ununbium (Uub). Due to its fleeting existence—only a handful of atoms have ever been produced—copernicium has no practical applications, but its study contributes to understanding nuclear stability in the "island of stability" region of superheavy elements.[3] Limited experimental studies, including gas-phase experiments conducted between 2009 and 2014 at GSI, indicate that copernicium atoms are highly volatile and behave more nobly than mercury. Its chemical properties, including a potential +2 oxidation state similar to other group 12 elements and ability to form volatile compounds like copernicium oxide, are predicted.[1] Relativistic effects from its high atomic number are expected to influence its electron configuration ([Rn] 5f¹⁴ 6d¹⁰ 7s²) and physical state, with predictions varying; recent calculations (as of 2019) suggest it may be a volatile liquid at room temperature with noble gas-like properties.[2][5] Further research at facilities like GSI and international collaborations continues to probe its properties through single-atom chemistry techniques.[3]Introduction
Element overview
Copernicium is a synthetic chemical element with the atomic number 112 and the chemical symbol Cn.[1] It belongs to group 12, period 7, and the d-block of the periodic table, positioning it as a superheavy element alongside other members like zinc, cadmium, and mercury.[2] The element is named in honor of the Renaissance-era astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus, whose heliocentric model revolutionized our understanding of the solar system; this name was officially approved by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) in 2010 following a review process.[6] The atomic structure of copernicium is predicted to feature the electron configuration [Rn] 5f^{14} 6d^{10} 7s^2, reflecting a closed-shell arrangement that influences its expected chemical behavior, though experimental verification remains limited due to its instability.[1] As a superheavy element, copernicium resides at the far end of the periodic table, where relativistic effects on electrons become significant, potentially altering properties compared to lighter group 12 elements.[2] All isotopes of copernicium are radioactive and have been created solely through artificial means in laboratory settings, with no naturally occurring or stable forms known.[2] The element was first synthesized in 1996 by a team at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, and its discovery was officially confirmed by a joint IUPAC/IUPAP Working Party in 2009 based on reproducible experimental evidence.[2][7]Role in superheavy element research
Copernicium, with atomic number 112, serves as a crucial probe into the theorized "island of stability" for superheavy elements, particularly in the region around proton numbers Z=114–120, where enhanced nuclear stability is predicted due to closed shell configurations.[8] Isotopes of copernicium, such as ^{285}Cn, exhibit half-lives significantly longer than lighter counterparts like ^{277}Cn (0.24 milliseconds), with some reaching up to 30 seconds as neutron numbers approach predicted magic values, providing empirical evidence for this stability island.[1][9][10] In superheavy elements like copernicium, relativistic effects profoundly influence electron orbitals, contracting the 7s orbitals while expanding the 6d orbitals, which alters the energy ordering and leads to unique bonding characteristics distinct from lighter group 12 elements.[11] These effects result in copernicium displaying noble-gas-like inertness, with dispersion-dominated interactions in its bulk form rather than metallic bonding, and the potential to form stable compounds such as CnF_4 in a square-planar geometry.[12] The study of copernicium is hindered by its short half-lives, often in the millisecond range, which severely limits the time available for detailed investigations and necessitates highly sensitive detection methods.[13] Advanced accelerators, such as the GSI Helmholtz Centre's UNILAC, are essential for its synthesis through heavy-ion fusion reactions, enabling the production of these fleeting isotopes despite the technical demands of accelerating ions up to uranium masses.[13] Copernicium's experimental data have advanced nuclear shell models by validating predictions of magic neutron numbers, notably N=184, which is expected to confer exceptional stability against fission in superheavy nuclei near Z=114.[13] Observations of increasing half-lives with higher neutron counts in copernicium isotopes support these models, guiding efforts to extend the periodic table toward doubly magic configurations.[9][10]History
Discovery
Copernicium, element 112, was first synthesized on February 9, 1996, at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany, by an international team led by physicists Sigurd Hofmann, Peter Armbruster, and Gottfried Münzenberg. The synthesis involved accelerating a beam of zinc-70 ions onto a lead-208 target using the GSI heavy-ion accelerator, followed by separation of the fusion products with the velocity filter SHIP (Separator for Heavy Ion reaction Products). In this initial experiment, lasting three weeks, a single nucleus of the isotope copernicium-277 was observed following the nuclear reaction ^{208}\mathrm{Pb} + ^{70}\mathrm{Zn} \to ^{277}\mathrm{Cn} + \mathrm{n}. The cross-section for this reaction was measured to be approximately 1 picobarn at the center-of-target energy.[3][14] The produced ^{277}\mathrm{Cn} atom decayed via alpha emission with an energy of 9.53 MeV and a half-life of about 240 microseconds, leading to the daughter nucleus ^{273}\mathrm{Ds} (darmstadtium-273). This decay chain provided unambiguous identification of the new element, as the alpha energy and subsequent decays matched predictions for element 112. Subsequent experiments at GSI in 2000 yielded a second atom of ^{277}\mathrm{Cn}, strengthening the initial claim.[3][14] Although the GSI team announced the discovery in 1996, official recognition by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) was delayed due to the need for independent verification. In 2004, a team led by Kosuke Morita at the RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science in Wako, Japan, independently confirmed the synthesis using the same ^{208}\mathrm{Pb}(^{70}\mathrm{Zn}, n)^{277}\mathrm{Cn} reaction and detected two additional atoms of ^{277}\mathrm{Cn}, each decaying via alpha emission to ^{273}\mathrm{Ds}. This verification experiment employed RIKEN's gas-filled recoil separator and silicon detectors for identification. The IUPAC and International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) Joint Working Party reviewed the evidence from the GSI experiments (1996 and 2002 publications) and the RIKEN confirmation, ultimately assigning priority for the discovery to the GSI team on May 19, 2009. This marked the official acknowledgment of copernicium as a new element in the periodic table.[15]Naming and official recognition
Following its synthesis in 1996, element 112 was temporarily designated with the systematic name ununbium (Uub), in accordance with IUPAC nomenclature for undiscovered elements, a designation that persisted until 2010.[16] In July 2009, the discovery team at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany, proposed the name copernicium with the symbol Cp, honoring the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus for his heliocentric model of the solar system that revolutionized scientific thought.[17][18] The proposal aligned with IUPAC guidelines, which require names to derive from mythology, a place, scientist, or property, while avoiding duplication or controversy; however, the suggested symbol Cp was rejected due to its prior association with cassiopeium, an obsolete name for lutetium, and potential confusion in chemical notation such as for ferrocene.[19] The team accepted the modification to Cn, derived from the first letters of "Copernicus" in Latin. On February 19, 2010—the 537th anniversary of Copernicus's birth—IUPAC officially approved the name copernicium and symbol Cn after review by its Inorganic Chemistry Division, confirming the GSI team's priority in discovery and adhering to naming conventions that preclude honoring living persons or duplicating existing elements like darmstadtium (Ds, element 110).[6] The approval was publicly celebrated in July 2010 with a naming ceremony at GSI, marking the element's formal integration into the periodic table.Synthesis and detection
Production methods
Copernicium isotopes are produced through heavy-ion fusion-evaporation reactions, primarily at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany, using the Separator for Heavy-Ion Reaction Products (SHIP) coupled to the UNILAC linear accelerator and SIS18 synchrotron. The standard method involves cold fusion, where beams of zinc-70 ions are accelerated to energies around 5-6 MeV per nucleon and directed at lead targets enriched in isotopes such as ^{208}Pb, ^{206}Pb, or ^{207}Pb. These doubly magic lead targets facilitate fusion with minimal excitation energy in the compound nucleus, typically resulting in the evaporation of one neutron to form copernicium isotopes near the neutron-closed shell at N=162. For instance, the reaction ^{208}Pb(^{70}Zn, n)^{277}Cn has been extensively employed to synthesize ^{277}Cn.[3][20] The fusion cross-sections for these reactions are extremely low, on the order of picobarns; specifically, the production cross-section for ^{277}Cn is approximately 1 pb, meaning that billions of projectile-target collisions are required to generate even a single atom due to the high Coulomb barrier and competition from fission in the compound nucleus. This necessitates prolonged irradiation periods, often weeks or months, with beam intensities exceeding 10^{12} particles per second to accumulate detectable yields. Variations in beam energy and target thickness are optimized to maximize the excitation function peak, typically around 10-15 MeV above the barrier, while minimizing non-fusion background events.[20][21] An alternative approach utilizes hot fusion at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR) of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia, where calcium-48 beams from the DC280 cyclotron or U-400 cyclotron bombard actinide targets such as ^{242}Pu to access neutron-richer copernicium isotopes. In this regime, the compound nucleus has higher excitation energy, leading to evaporation of 2-5 neutrons and subsequent alpha decay chains from parent flerovium isotopes (Z=114) that populate copernicium daughters with neutron numbers up to N=173. The reaction ^{242}Pu(^{48}Ca, 3n)^{287}Fl, for example, decays to ^{283}Cn (N=171), with observed cross-sections for the evaporation channels around 0.5-1 pb, offering higher yields than cold fusion for these heavier isotopes due to the lower fission barriers in neutron-richer systems.[22][23] Recent advancements focus on enhancing production rates through facility upgrades. At JINR, the Superheavy Element Factory, operational since 2019, incorporates the high-intensity DC280 cyclotron, and the resumption of operations for the upgraded U-400M cyclotron in summer 2024 enables beam currents up to 10 particle microamperes, potentially increasing copernicium yields by factors of 10-100 for chemical investigations. These efforts prioritize neutron-richer isotopes to probe potential shell stabilization effects.[24]Detection and identification techniques
The detection and identification of Copernicium atoms, produced in heavy-ion fusion reactions, rely on sophisticated in-flight separation and single-atom spectroscopy techniques to isolate and verify the short-lived evaporation residues from the intense primary beam and scattered particles.[25] Key facilities include the velocity filter SHIP (Separator for Heavy Ion Reaction Products) at GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, which uses a combination of electric and magnetic dipole fields along with quadrupole triplets to kinematically separate fusion products based on their velocity, achieving a flight time of 1–2 seconds and embedding the residues into a detector array for subsequent decay observation.[26] Similarly, gas-filled recoil ion separators like GARIS (Gas-filled Recoil Ion Separator) at RIKEN employ helium or other gases to slow and separate heavy residues through energy loss and magnetic deflection, enabling efficient isolation for superheavy element studies. Once separated, Copernicium atoms are implanted into position-sensitive silicon surface-barrier detectors, typically arranged in a box geometry to cover a large solid angle, which record the implantation energy and position of the residue.[25] These detectors, often supplemented by secondary-electron time-of-flight (TOF) detectors, simultaneously measure alpha-particle emissions, spontaneous fission fragments, and any associated gamma rays from subsequent decays, providing high-resolution energy spectra (down to ~20 keV) and temporal correlations on the microsecond scale.[26] Background rejection is enhanced by cross-checking implantation events with TOF signals and energy-loss profiles, ensuring that only fusion-evaporation products are analyzed amid high beam fluxes.[25] Identification of Copernicium is achieved through genetic correlation of decay chains, where the alpha decay of a Copernicium isotope links sequentially to known daughters such as darmstadtium (Ds), roentgenium (Rg), and meitnerium (Mt), with characteristic alpha energies and half-lives confirming the parent nuclide's atomic number.[26] For instance, in the initial synthesis of ^{277}Cn, observed decay chains terminated in spontaneous fission after several alpha steps, allowing unambiguous assignment despite the rarity of events.[25] This method exploits the predictability of alpha systematics in the superheavy region, where each decay step reduces the atomic number by 2 while preserving the element's lineage.[26] These techniques enable single-atom detection sensitivities down to production cross-sections of picobarns, as demonstrated in the discovery experiments where only a few Copernicium atoms were observed over extended irradiation periods.[25] The combination of rapid separation, precise implantation tracking, and decay chain analysis ensures high confidence in element identification, even for isotopes with half-lives under a millisecond.Isotopes
Known isotopes
Copernicium has seven confirmed isotopes, with mass numbers ranging from 277 to 286, plus one isomer. These isotopes are all highly unstable and have been produced in minuscule quantities through heavy-ion fusion reactions at facilities such as the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany, and the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia. Only a few dozen atoms have been produced in total across all isotopes, highlighting the extreme difficulty of their synthesis due to low cross-sections on the order of picobarns or less.[1] The following table summarizes the confirmed isotopes, their discovery years, production reactions, and approximate number of atoms observed:| Isotope | Discovery Year | Production Reaction | Atoms Produced | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ^{277}Cn | 1996 | ^{208}Pb(^{70}Zn,n) | 2 | Hofmann et al., Z. Phys. A 354, 229 (1996)[28] |
| ^{281}Cn | 2004 | ^{244}Pu(^{48}Ca,11n) (indirect via decay chain) | 4 | Oganessian et al., Phys. Rev. C 69, 021601(R) (2004) |
| ^{282}Cn | 2009 | ^{209}Bi(^{70}Zn,n) | 1 | Hofmann et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 32, 251 (2007); confirmed 2009 |
| ^{283}Cn | 2006 | ^{238}U(^{48}Ca,3n) | 3 | Khuyagbaatar et al., GSI report (2006)[3] |
| ^{284}Cn | 2010 | ^{242}Pu(^{48}Ca,6n) | 2 | Oganessian et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 054315 (2011) |
| ^{285}Cn | 2010 | ^{249}Bk(^{48}Ca,2n) | 1 | Oganessian et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 054315 (2011) |
| ^{285m}Cn | 2012 | ^{249}Bk(^{48}Ca,2n) | 1 | Oganessian et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 014302 (2013) |
| ^{286}Cn | 2016 | ^{243}Am(^{48}Ca,5n) (indirect) | 1 | Oganessian et al., Phys. Rev. C 106, 064306 (2022) |
| ^{280}Cn | 2025 | Decay product of ^{284}Lv in ^{50}Ti(^{249}Cf,5n) | <1 (tentative) | Oganessian et al., preprint (2025)[29] |
Half-lives and decay modes
The isotopes of copernicium are highly unstable, with measured half-lives spanning from less than 1 millisecond to around 30 seconds, primarily decaying via alpha emission, though spontaneous fission becomes significant for some heavier isotopes. Alpha decay dominates for lighter isotopes like ^{277}Cn and ^{281}Cn, facilitating their identification in decay chains from heavier superheavy nuclei, while spontaneous fission competes or prevails in cases such as ^{282}Cn and ^{284}Cn due to increasing neutron numbers. Electron capture is a minor branch for some. These decay properties are determined from single-atom detections in fusion-evaporation reactions, with values refined through multiple experiments at facilities like GSI and JINR. The following table summarizes the known half-lives and primary decay modes for Copernicium isotopes, based on experimental measurements:| Isotope | Half-life | Primary decay mode(s) |
|---|---|---|
| ^{277}Cn | 0.79 ms | α-decay |
| ^{280}Cn | 5 ms (estimated) | SF? (tentative)[1] |
| ^{281}Cn | 0.18 s | α-decay[1] |
| ^{282}Cn | 1.1 ms | SF ≈100%[1] |
| ^{283}Cn | 4.7 s | α (81%), SF (19%)[1] |
| ^{284}Cn | 102 ms | SF =100%[1] |
| ^{285}Cn | 30 s | α =100%[1] |
| ^{285m}Cn | 15 s | α =100%[1] |
| ^{286}Cn | 30 s | α ≈100%[1] |