Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cyrix 6x86

The 6x86 is a family of 32-bit x86-compatible superscalar microprocessors developed by the fabless company Corporation and introduced in 1996 as a direct competitor to Intel's processors. Featuring a 64-bit internal data path, an integrated 80-bit (FPU), and 16 KB of unified L1 write-back cache, the 6x86 supported Socket 5 and Super Socket 7 interfaces with clock speeds ranging from 80 MHz to 333 MHz. It employed advanced features such as branch prediction and to enhance performance, while using a "Pentium Rating" (PR) marketing system to equate its capabilities to Intel's offerings, such as the PR166+ model operating at 133 MHz. Cyrix announced the 6x86, codenamed , in October 1995, with the first production models like the PR120+ at 100 MHz shipping in early 1996; the chips were fabricated on a 0.65 μm process by partners including and SGS-Thomson Microelectronics. Designed from scratch rather than reverse-engineered from 's architecture, the 6x86 combined RISC and CISC elements for efficient x86 handling, excelling in workloads but underperforming in floating-point tasks due to its FPU limitations, which notably impacted early 3D gaming like . The family expanded to include the low-voltage 6x86L variant for power-sensitive applications and the 6x86MX (codenamed ) and its enhanced MII versions, released in 1997, which added Intel MMX multimedia extensions, quadrupled the L1 to 64 KB (including a 256-byte line cache), and supported higher clocks up to 233 MHz on later 0.25 μm shrinks. Despite its budget appeal and strong value in non-floating-point applications, the 6x86 faced challenges from incomplete Pentium instruction set compatibility, high heat output, and compatibility issues with some motherboards, contributing to Cyrix's acquisition by in 1997 and eventual rebranding under . The processors played a key role in the 1990s x86 market by providing affordable upgrades for 486-era systems, helping to democratize before Cyrix shifted focus to embedded and mobile designs.

Development and History

Origins and Announcement

Cyrix Corporation was established in 1988 as a fabless company by engineers Jerry Rogers and Tom Brightman, initially specializing in high-performance x87 math coprocessors compatible with Intel's 286 and 386 processors to provide cost-effective alternatives in the x86 ecosystem. The company aimed to challenge Intel's market dominance by developing x86-compatible chips that offered competitive performance without requiring full-scale fabrication facilities of their own. The 6x86 processor line stemmed from Cyrix's goal to deliver Pentium-level performance at a lower , emphasizing with existing Socket 5 motherboards to enable straightforward upgrades from 486-based systems. This design approach focused on superscalar execution to boost processing efficiency, allowing the chip to run standard PC software while targeting budget-conscious OEMs and consumers seeking enhanced capabilities without new hardware investments. Cyrix formally announced the 6x86 on October 6, 1995, introducing the initial model as the PR120+ variant clocked at 100 MHz and priced at $450 in quantities of 1,000 units. The processor was positioned as outperforming Intel's 100 MHz in integer tasks, with claims of up to 2.5 times the performance of a 486 in Windows environments, marking 's first full-fledged entry into the sixth-generation x86 market. As a fabless designer, partnered with Microelectronics and SGS-Thomson Microelectronics for initial fabrication of the 6x86 using a 0.65 μm process, under a five-year agreement established in September 1993 that also covered prior 486 and 5x86 chips. This collaboration enabled rapid production scaling while leveraging their manufacturing expertise to meet demand for the Socket 5-compatible CPU.

Company Acquisitions and Discontinuation

In July 1997, announced its acquisition of Corporation in a stock-swap deal valued at approximately $550 million, with the merger completed later that year on November 17. This move integrated Cyrix's CPU division into National's operations, aiming to combine Cyrix's x86 processor expertise—particularly the 6x86 line—with National's strengths in analog and mixed-signal technologies to develop system-on-a-chip solutions for low-cost and appliances. However, National's primary interest lay in and applications rather than high-performance desktop processors, leading to a strategic pivot away from aggressive competition in the mainstream x86 market. By mid-1999, decided to divest its struggling unit amid ongoing losses from price wars and compatibility challenges in the segment. On June 30, 1999, signed a to acquire 's assets for $167 million, with the deal finalized on September 10, 1999. Under VIA, the focus shifted further toward embedded systems, mobile processors, and integration with VIA's chipset portfolio, including merging designs with those from to create low-power C3-series chips. This transition marked the end of independent development for high-end 6x86 variants, as VIA prioritized cost-effective solutions over performance. Production of the 6x86 family, including its MX and MII enhancements, wound down between 2001 and 2003 as VIA phased out the line in favor of newer architectures. Key factors included the industry's rapid shift to Socket 370 platforms and superior competitors like AMD's and Intel's , which outpaced Cyrix in performance and ecosystem support. Manufacturing scalability issues at foundries like further hampered yields and cost competitiveness. Overall, Cyrix produced an estimated 5-6 million 6x86 units across licensees, capturing a peak of around 7% before declining due to intensified rivalry and ongoing fixes for compatibility problems.

Technical Architecture

Core Design Features

The Cyrix 6x86 features a superscalar with dual pipelines, known as the X and Y pipelines, enabling the execution of up to two instructions per clock in parallel. This design incorporates superpipelining across seven stages per pipeline—Instruction Fetch (IF), Decode 1 (ID1), Decode 2 (ID2), Calculation 1 (AC1), Calculation 2 (AC2), Execute (EX), and Write-Back (WB)—to reduce execution stalls and facilitate higher clock speeds. The core supports the full x86 instruction set, encompassing both 16-bit (x86-16) and 32-bit () modes, along with an integrated 80-bit (FPU) compatible with the instruction set and IEEE-754 standard. It provides partial compatibility with Intel's architecture, including support for Pentium bus cycles and signals on the Socket 5 interface, while ensuring seamless operation with x86 operating systems and software such as , , and UNIX variants. However, early implementations of the 6x86 lack MMX instruction support, which was incorporated in subsequent enhancements like the 6x86MX. To enhance efficiency in mixed code environments, the includes a branch prediction unit with a 256-entry, 4-way set-associative Branch Target Buffer (BTB) and an 8-entry return stack, enabling and minimizing branch-related penalties in both 16-bit and 32-bit applications. Dynamic instruction scheduling is achieved through out-of-order completion after the EX stage, supported by , data forwarding, and bypassing mechanisms, which allow faster instructions to retire without disrupting overall program flow. Additionally, the core utilizes internal clock multipliers of 2x or 3x relative to the external bus clock, configurable via the CLKMUL pin, to achieve performance gains on Socket 5 motherboards while maintaining compatibility with existing systems.

Cache System and Pipelining

The Cyrix 6x86 features a 16 KB unified Level 1 (L1) that serves both and , organized as a 4-way set-associative with 32-byte lines and a dual-ported design to enable simultaneous code fetches and operations across its integer pipelines or . This unified structure, employing a replacement , supports write-back policies for modified lines and write-through for shared lines, with flushes triggered by the FLUSH# signal to write back dirty before invalidation. Complementing the main is a 256-byte fully associative line acting as a prefetch , which holds eight 32-byte lines filled from the unified to accelerate sequential fetches and bypass the larger on hits. The processor lacks an on-chip Level 2 () cache, relying instead on external motherboard-based secondary caching for additional , while its 64-bit external data bus facilitates efficient data transfers, including burst modes such as the compatible "one-plus-four" sequence or linear burst for line fills involving four 64-bit transfers. is handled by a (TLB) comprising a direct-mapped 128-entry main TLB for 4 page translations, augmented by a four-entry fully associative Directory Table Entry (DTE) cache and additional segment-level caches to minimize walks and support x86 virtual addressing without excessive thrashing. In later variants like the 6x86MX and , the subsystem was enhanced to a 64 KB L1 configuration, with separate and for improved hit rates and . The pipelining architecture employs dual independent 7-stage integer pipelines (X and Y), each comprising fetch (IF), two decode stages (ID1 and ID2), two address calculation stages (AC1 and AC2), execution (EX), and write-back (), enabling superscalar execution of up to two while processing in-order through the EX stage and allowing out-of-order completion thereafter. This superpipelined design, with seven stages per pipeline versus the Pentium's five, reduces per-stage clock constraints to support higher core frequencies up to 150 MHz, incorporating , forwarding, and a 256-entry Branch Target Buffer for to mitigate branch penalties. These optimizations contribute to efficient integer throughput by overlapping fetch, decode, and execution phases across the dual units.

Models and Variants

Original 6x86 (M1)

The original Cyrix 6x86, codenamed , was released in early 1996, with the initial model operating at a core clock speed of 100 MHz and a rating of 120+. Subsequent variants reached up to 133 MHz core speed with a 166+ rating, using a 2x clock multiplier on bus speeds from 50 MHz to 66 MHz. Manufactured on a 0.65 μm process by and SGS-Thomson, the processor contained approximately 3 million transistors. The chip utilized a 296-pin staggered (SPGA) package compatible with Socket 5 motherboards, operating at a 3.3 V core voltage with 5 V I/O tolerance. Full compatibility often required updates on Socket 5 or 7 systems, as the processor initially identified itself as a 486-class CPU, potentially limiting recognition of its Pentium-level capabilities without adjustments. It featured a baseline superscalar, superpipelined architecture with dual integer pipelines, an 80-bit , and a 16 KB unified L1 write-back cache, serving as the foundation for later 6x86 variants. Lacking support for Intel's MMX instruction set, the 6x86 was optimized for integer-heavy workloads prevalent in office productivity software and general 16/32-bit applications of the era, such as Windows 95 and DOS-based programs. Its dense design contributed to significant heat dissipation challenges, with reports of potential system instability from overheating under load; Cyrix recommended active cooling solutions like heatsinks with fans to mitigate thermal issues.

Low-Power 6x86L

The 6x86L, introduced in January 1997, represented a power-optimized iteration of the original 6x86 , specifically engineered to mitigate thermal challenges associated with earlier models. Available initially at clock speeds of 100 MHz (PR120+ rating), it scaled up to 150 MHz (PR200+ rating) in subsequent releases through April 1997, utilizing a 296-pin staggered (SPGA) package compatible with motherboards. Manufactured on a 0.35 μm five-metal-layer process with approximately 3 million transistors and a die size of 169 mm², the 6x86L employed a split voltage scheme—2.8 V for the core and 3.3 V for I/O pins—to facilitate efficient power delivery via dual-plane regulators. This variant maintained the core superscalar architecture of the 6x86, including its 16 KB unified L1 and execution strengths, while incorporating modifications for reduced energy use, such as clock throttling to dynamically adjust based on workload demands. Enhanced features, including low-power suspend mode, stop-clock capability, and support for (SMM), further enabled idle states with minimal dissipation, making it well-suited for emerging mobile and low-heat desktop applications like battery-powered laptops. Compared to the standard 6x86, the 6x86L achieved a 25% or greater reduction in power draw through these optimizations and the lower core voltage, without altering the fundamental instruction set or structure. Despite its innovations, the 6x86L saw a brief production lifecycle, primarily as an interim solution for power-constrained systems before the transition to the multimedia-enhanced 6x86MX in mid-1997. Early adopters included configurations, with the first systems featuring the processor appearing in April 1997, underscoring its role in bridging Cyrix's Pentium-era offerings toward more integrated platforms. also produced licensed versions under the same branding, leveraging shared fabrication to ensure availability during this period.

Enhanced 6x86MX and MII

The Cyrix 6x86MX, introduced in late May 1997 and available by early June, represented a significant upgrade to the original 6x86 lineup, targeting multimedia applications with enhanced features for Socket 7 systems. Operating at core clock speeds of 133 MHz to over 200 MHz, it carried PR ratings from PR200+ to PR300+, positioning it as competitive with Intel's Pentium MMX processors in integer and multimedia workloads. A key addition was full support for Intel's MMX instruction set, enabling optimized performance in video decoding and graphics tasks, while the on-chip L1 cache was expanded to 64 KB of unified write-back memory (quadrupling the original 16 KB), improving data throughput and reducing latency. Building on the MX foundation, the MII (based on the M2 core), debuted in April 1998, with initial shipments following in May, and pushed clock speeds higher to a maximum of around 285 MHz while adopting a more refined 0.25 μm manufacturing process for better efficiency and heat management. This variant integrated an L2 controller to interface with external secondary up to 1 MB, allowing configurable synchronous or asynchronous operation to boost overall system performance in memory-intensive scenarios. Like its predecessor, the MII retained the 64 KB L1 and MMX support, but incorporated architectural tweaks such as an enhanced 384-entry L2 TLB for faster handling. Both the 6x86MX and MII maintained full compatibility with the interface, supporting speeds up to 100 MHz in Super Socket 7 configurations, which enabled higher effective bandwidth compared to standard 66 MHz setups. PR ratings extended up to PR333+ for certain 200 MHz core variants and higher for later models, reflecting Cyrix's emphasis on perceived performance equivalence to chips despite actual clock differences. To address early 6x86 compatibility issues, such as incomplete Pentium instruction support, the MX and MII added features like a (TSC) for the RDTSC instruction and refined CPUID reporting, ensuring smoother operation with /NT and other x86 software. However, scaling beyond 285 MHz proved challenging due to the limitations of Cyrix's 0.25 μm process and fab partnerships, which lagged behind competitors' transitions to 0.18 μm, constraining yield and power efficiency at higher frequencies.

Performance Characteristics

Integer and Benchmark Results

The Cyrix 6x86 exhibited strong performance relative to its contemporaries, particularly in workloads involving office productivity and system-level tasks. In Ziff-Davis System (SI) benchmarks, which emphasize CPU throughput, the 150 MHz 6x86 (PR200+) scored 1020.4, outperforming the 200 MHz Pentium's 632.0 by approximately 61%, highlighting the 6x86's architectural advantages in execution such as dual pipelines and branch prediction. Similarly, the 133 MHz 6x86 (PR166+) achieved 907.0 in SI, surpassing the 166 MHz Pentium's 525.8 by about 72%. These results underscore the 6x86's efficiency in -heavy operations like data compression and basic database processing. Cyrix's PR rating system provided a standardized measure of this integer dominance, derived from Ziff-Davis Winstone 96 benchmarks across 13 Windows applications in categories including business graphics, database, , and word processing. Conducted by MicroDesign Resources on identically configured systems, the compared 6x86 scores to equivalents; for instance, the 100 MHz 6x86 scored 71.7 in Winstone 96, closely matching the 120 MHz 's 70.9 and demonstrating per-MHz superiority in mixed tasks. The 150 MHz 6x86 (PR200+) earned a Winstone 96 score of 91.6, edging out the 200 MHz 's 89.0 and equating its office application performance to that speed grade. In comparisons with rivals, the 6x86 generally led in benchmarks against the , which trailed the by about 7% in integer performance per clock while matching or slightly exceeding it in some database operations. Against the NexGen Nx586, the 6x86 showed advantages in tasks like , benefiting from its more mature superscalar design that allowed higher throughput in 16/32-bit code mixes, though both outperformed the clock-for-clock in non-floating-point workloads. Overclocking extended the 6x86's integer capabilities, with the 100 MHz model often reaching 150 MHz on compatible motherboards using the 3x multiplier and 50 MHz bus, yielding performance gains of 15-20% in benchmarks like Norton SI due to improved thermal management in later steppings. Success rates improved with 2.7V or 3.7V cores, though stability required enhanced cooling.

Floating-Point and Compatibility Challenges

The 6x86's represented a significant weakness compared to contemporary processors, as it was essentially a modified version of the older 80387 design integrated on-chip. While this FPU offered 2-4 times the performance of the 80486's external , it lacked the advanced pipelining and parallel execution capabilities of the 's dedicated FPU, resulting in high and inefficiency for floating-point operations. This architectural simplicity made the 6x86 particularly unsuited for workloads involving intensive floating-point calculations, such as scientific simulations or graphics rendering. Early 6x86 models suffered from notable software compatibility issues, often being misdetected by operating systems and applications as an Intel 80486-class processor due to incomplete support for the 's instruction set extensions and CPUID reporting. This led to crashes in applications utilizing for graphics acceleration, as the software assumed a more capable FPU for floating-point transformations. In gaming, these limitations were starkly evident; for instance, the 6x86 struggled with id Software's , achieving maximum frame rates of around 15 FPS at standard resolutions, which was 30-40% lower than comparable systems running the same software-accelerated title. Subsequent revisions and the enhanced 6x86MX variant addressed some of these shortcomings through improved FPU emulation software and Cyrix-specific drivers that better aligned the processor with -compatible code paths, reducing crash frequency in DirectX-dependent applications. However, full compatibility often still required these proprietary patches, and the underlying FPU hardware remained a . Additionally, the 6x86's 0.65 μm contributed to higher power draw and heat generation than Intel's more refined 0.35 μm , leading to throttling during prolonged floating-point workloads that stressed the inefficient unit. Cyrix recommended enhanced cooling solutions to mitigate these issues, but overheating persisted as a common complaint in FP-heavy scenarios.

Market and Legacy

Competition and Reception

The Cyrix 6x86 captured a modest but notable portion of the x86 CPU market in the late , estimated at around 3% by revenue in and aiming for up to 10% through partnerships with manufacturers like . It gained traction in the budget PC segment, where it was integrated into affordable systems targeting home and small business users, often pricing complete Cyrix-based PCs 20-30% lower than equivalent configurations—for instance, a 6x86MX PR233 system sold for approximately $400 less than a comparable setup. This value proposition helped Cyrix challenge 's dominance in entry-level markets, though its overall share remained limited compared to 's 88% and AMD's 5%. Reception of the 6x86 was mixed, with praise for its cost-effectiveness in business applications like and workloads, where it often outperformed Intel's MMX in integer-heavy tasks such as office productivity suites. However, it faced significant criticism in due to (FPU) weaknesses, particularly evident in titles like , where it underperformed compared to the Pentium MMX. Reviewers noted that while the chip excelled in business benchmarks like Winstone 97 (outperforming a Pentium MMX-166 by 8–13%), its gaming shortcomings alienated enthusiasts and highlighted architectural limitations. The 6x86 engaged in fierce rivalry with the and , positioning itself as a alternative with performance ratings (PR) that controversially claimed equivalence to higher-clocked chips, such as labeling a 133 MHz model as PR166+ to suggest Pentium-level speed. These PR ratings ignited marketing disputes, as competitors like and accused of misleading consumers by overemphasizing integer gains while downplaying FPU deficits, fueling a broader "CPU wars" in industry publications. Despite edges in some business metrics, the K6's balanced performance and the Pentium MMX's superior support ultimately overshadowed the 6x86 in direct comparisons. In retro computing communities as of the , the 6x86 enjoys renewed interest among enthusiasts for overclocking projects, with vintage builds leveraging its affordability and upgrade potential from 486-era systems, often praised for enabling high-performance retro gaming rigs without modern hardware costs. Throughout the , pursued multiple lawsuits against , primarily targeting its x86-compatible processors as unauthorized clones of 's designs. A prominent case began in 1992 when sued in federal court, alleging infringement of patents related to the 486 architecture. This dispute was settled in 1994 through mutual dismissal of claims, with dropping its concurrent antitrust allegations against , though no broad cross-licensing agreement was immediately established. Additional litigation followed, including 's 1993 suit over U.S. No. 4,914,588 ('338 patent) concerning pipelining, which courts partially invalidated in 's favor by 1994, limiting 's enforcement scope. In response, Cyrix filed a significant countersuit against on May 13, 1997, in collaboration with (DEC), which lodged a parallel action on the same day. Cyrix accused of infringing its patents, focusing on technologies for bus interfaces and used in the and processors. DEC's suit targeted similar products for infringing 10 of its own patents on related bus and caching innovations, dating from 1988 to 1996. These actions stemmed from 's alleged unauthorized use of licensed technologies originally developed by Cyrix and DEC. The 1997 lawsuits culminated in settlements that favored cross-licensing arrangements. and resolved their dispute in February 1998, dismissing all claims without disclosed financial terms, but extending Semiconductor's existing broad patent cross-license with to cover following its July 1997 acquisition by for $550 million in stock. Similarly, and DEC settled in October 1997 for $700 million, including Intel's purchase of DEC's semiconductor assets and a 10-year cross-license. While achieved partial victories, such as court rulings narrowing 's patent assertions, the protracted legal battles imposed substantial costs, contributing to 's merger with to leverage its patent protections and stabilize operations. These disputes profoundly shaped the by normalizing cross-licensing as a mechanism for resolving conflicts among competitors. The settlements reinforced second-sourcing practices, allowing firms like and to produce compatible processors under licensed terms, but they also exposed the formidable legal barriers erected by Intel's aggressive enforcement, which deterred smaller challengers and consolidated market power among licensees like that held earlier agreements dating to the 1980s.

References

  1. [1]
    Cyrix: Gone But Not Forgotten | TechSpot
    Jul 4, 2024 · In 1996, Cyrix unveiled the 6x86 (M1) processor, which was expected to be yet another drop-in replacement for older Intel CPUs on Socket 5 and ...
  2. [2]
    Cyrix 6x86 family - CPU-World
    Cyrix 6x86 processor is a x86 compatible superscalar microprocessor with 64-bit internal architecture, 80-bit Floating Point Unit, 16 KB write-back cache.
  3. [3]
    A Brief History of CPUs: 31 Awesome Years of x86 - PC Gamer
    Apr 14, 2009 · Formerly called the M1, the Cyrix 6x86 was both pin- and voltage-compatible with Intel's Pentium processor. However, it wasn't a reverse- ...
  4. [4]
    Cyrix 6x86 PR120+ '?' - thandor.net
    The first Cyrix 6x86 CPU that Cyrix released was the 120+ running at 100MHz. It was announced in October 1995. To put it in timeframe: the fastest x86 CPU ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] technical brief - Ardent Tool of Capitalism
    The 6x86MX™ design quadruples the internal cache size to 64-KBytes, triples the TLB size, and increases the frequency scalability to 200 MHz and.
  6. [6]
    Cyrix - Computer Hope
    Nov 12, 2023 · Founded in 1988, Cyrix Corporation, was a manufacturer of computer processor solutions. The company became a subsidiary of National Semiconductor in November ...
  7. [7]
    Cyrix 6x86 Processor Brief - Alaska.net
    The Cyrix 6x86 processor achieves top performance through the use of two optimized superpipelined integer units and an on-chip FPU. The integer and floating ...
  8. [8]
    CYRIX CLAIMS ITS 100MHZ 6X86 CLONE IS THE FASTEST
    Oct 9, 1995 · The 100MHz 6×86 is available now and costs $450 for 1,000-up. It will be fabricated by IBM Corp and SGS-Thomson Microelectronics NV. Email ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Cyrix launches chip to compete with Intel's Pentium
    Oct 10, 1995 · Published: 12:00am, 10 Oct 1995. CHIP maker Cyrix has released a microprocessor which the company hopes will go head to head with Intel's ...
  10. [10]
    CPU History - The CPU Museum - Life Cycle of the CPU
    IBM and Cyrix announced a five-year agreement in (Sept 1993) calling for IBM to manufacture Cyrix's 486, 5x86, and 6x86 MPUs.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] IBM and Cyrix Ink Five-Year Pact - CECS
    May 9, 1994 · IBM has been making Cyrix's 486 chips in an 0.8- micron, two-level-metal process. The two companies are now modifying the designs for a ...Missing: 6x86 | Show results with:6x86
  12. [12]
    National Semiconductor and Cyrix Announce Agreement to Merge
    In connection with the merger agreement, Cyrix has granted an option to National to acquire up to 19.9 percent of the outstanding Cyrix common stock, ...Missing: $240 | Show results with:$240
  13. [13]
    National Semiconductor and Cyrix Merger Approved by ... - EE Times
    In the transaction, Cyrix became a wholly owned subsidiary of National Semiconductor, and each outstanding share of Cyrix common stock was converted into the ...
  14. [14]
    National Semiconductor to Sell Cyrix Unit - The New York Times
    Jul 1, 1999 · The companies did not disclose the price for Cyrix, which National bought for $560 million in 1997. The unit, based in Richardson, Tex ...Missing: $240 | Show results with:$240
  15. [15]
    Via Technologies to acquire Cyrix - EE Times
    Jun 30, 1999 · and National Semiconductor Corp. have signed a letter of intent for Via, a Taiwan chip set vendor, to purchase Cyrix Corp., National's X86 PC ...Missing: division transfer
  16. [16]
    National completes Cyrix sale to Via - EDN Network
    Sep 10, 1999 · –National Semiconductor Corp here today said it has completed the sale of its Cyrix PC microprocessor business to Via Technologies Inc. of ...
  17. [17]
    News Burst: Via buys Cyrix for $167m - ZDNET
    Aug 3, 1999 · The agreement between Taiwan's fastest growing maker of chipsets and National Semiconductor was formally signed Tuesday.
  18. [18]
    Via takes on Intel with Cyrix buy - CNET
    Taiwan's Via Technologies and Silicon Valley's National Semiconductor today announced that Via will acquire National's Cyrix chip business.Missing: transfer | Show results with:transfer
  19. [19]
    Cyrix III - Wikipedia
    Cyrix III is an x86-compatible Socket 370 CPU. VIA Technologies launched the processor in February 2000. VIA had purchased both Centaur Technology and Cyrix ...Missing: 2001-2003 Athlon
  20. [20]
    VIA Cyrix III and C3 CPUs - The Silicon Underground
    Jan 6, 2025 · The VIA Cyrix III was a Socket 370 CPU available from 2001 to 2002. Its successor, the VIA C3, was available until 2006.Missing: 6x86 2001-2003
  21. [21]
    No buyers for Cyrix? - Forbes
    Jun 8, 1999 · A month after National Semiconductor announced it was getting rid of Cyrix--there are still no takers.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Cyrix, IBM Push 6x86 to 133 MHz - CECS
    Feb 12, 1996 · Despite an announcement that the. 6x86 was shipping last October, very few 6x86-based PCs have yet been delivered. Cyrix and IBM say the ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Slot vs. Socket Battle Heats Up: 1/26/98 - Ardent Tool of Capitalism
    Jan 26, 1998 · Cyrix has already produced samples of 0.25-micron 6x86MX proces- ... 2 million 6x86MXs, giving them a combined market share of about 7%.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Cyrix 6x86™ Processor Technical Brief - DOS Days
    Architectural Benefits. The 6x86 processor incorporates sixth-generation architectural innovations to overcome bottlenecks and achieve breakthrough performance.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] 6x86_ALL.pdf - Index of /
    The IBM 6x86 CPU achieves top performance levels through the use of two optimized superpipelined integer units and an on-chip floating point unit. The ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] 6x86 PROCESSOR - Ardent Tool of Capitalism
    32-bit software applications, the 6x86 processor is fully compatible with the x86 instruction set and delivers industry-leading performance running Windows.Missing: scheduling | Show results with:scheduling
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 6x86 PROCESSOR - DOS Days
    The 6x86 CPU is superscalar in that it contains two separate pipelines that allow multiple instructions to be processed at the same time. The use of advanced ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] 6x86 PROCESSOR - DOS Days
    Mar 1, 1996 · These design innovations eliminate many data dependencies and resource conflicts to achieve high performance when executing existing 16-bit and ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Cyrix Doubles 6x86 Performance with M2 - CECS
    Oct 28, 1996 · As in the 6x86, the cache is four- way set-associative, has a 32-byte line size, and can perform two accesses per clock cycle. A more subtle ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Cyrix 6x86(MX) & MII - CPU MUSEUM
    The Cyrix 6x86 (codename M1) is a sixth-generation, 32-bit x86-compatible microprocessor designed by Cyrix and manufactured by IBM and SGS-Thomson.
  33. [33]
    Olympus MIC-D: Integrated Circuit Gallery - Cyrix 6x86 Microprocessor
    The Cyrix 6x86 and 6x86L (low voltage) processors feature 16-kilobyte unified cache memories while the 6x86MX model has a 64-kilobyte cache. Utilizing doubling ...
  34. [34]
    Cyrix 6x86(TM) Processor - Frequently Asked Questions
    ### Summary of Cyrix 6x86 M1 Specs from FAQ
  35. [35]
    Testers Claim Cyrix 6x86 Chips May Overheat - HPCwire
    Aug 23, 1996 · The article observed that no overheating problems have been reported for identical chips from IBM Microelectronics Inc., which provides the ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
  36. [36]
    586/686 Processors Chart - PC Hardware Links
    (?) - mobile chip. April 18, 2000 - {$85}, 321 pins 450MHz (100x4.5) 2.0v/3.3v ... (Cyrix 6x86L PR166+), 296 pins. PR166 {133MHz (66x2.0)} 3.3v to 2.8v/3.3 ...
  37. [37]
    Cyrix 6x86L-P200+GP / 6x86L-PR200+GP - CPU-World
    Cyrix 6x86L-P200+GP specifications ; Frequency ? 150 MHz (rated 200) ; Package, 296-pin Staggered Ceramic Pin Grid Array 1.952" x 1.952" (4.96 cm x 4.96 cm).Missing: low- variant introduction date
  38. [38]
    cpu-collection.de >> by Manufacturer >> cyrix >> 6x86
    October 6, 1995. L1 Cache: 16 KB. CPU Code: 6x68 ... Yes, in April 1996 a Cyrix press release announced "Cyrix Introduces the World's Fastest Windows 95 PCs".
  39. [39]
    The Ultimate 686 Benchmark Comparison - Page 7 \ VOGONS
    May 10, 2020 · I believe Cyrix and Nexgen both used similar IBM manufacturing processes at one point, though I think Cyrix got in earlier with the .65 micron ...Cyrix/ST/IBM Aiming for the stars! - VOGONSCyrix appreciation thread - Page 7 \ VOGONSMore results from www.vogons.orgMissing: fabrication | Show results with:fabrication<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    CPUs - DOS Days
    The Cyrix 6x86 is not 100% instruction-set-compatible with the Intel Pentium. As such, the CPU reports itself as a 486 and has the CPUID instruction disabled.
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Cyrix MII Processor Enhanced High Performance CPU - DOS Days
    Apr 13, 1998 · For maximum performance, the M II CPU contains two caches, a large unified 64 KByte. 4-way set associative write-back cache and a small high- ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Overview of the Cyrix M2 Microprocessor - Ardent Tool of Capitalism
    Calculates 2 addresses per clock. • Scoreboard checks and register renaming. • TLB translation and cache access. • Register file access. • ...
  44. [44]
    Cyrix and IBM 6x86MX 6x86L and MII Chip ID guide - The CPU Shack
    Cyrix CPUs were produced on .35, .30, .25 and .18 micron processes. Quite often a single PR will be made in no less then 3 process technologies and 2 ...Missing: manufacturing partnership 0.8
  45. [45]
    Cyrix 6x86 Performance Benchmarks - Alaska.net
    6x86 Processor Performance Benchmarks. The following performance test results use industry standard benchmark and application test suites. Windows® application ...Missing: WinMark | Show results with:WinMark
  46. [46]
    A Performance Indicator for the 6x86 Processor - Cyrix - Alaska.net
    This more advanced architecture means, for example, that the 6x86 processor with a clock speed of 133 MHz actually outperforms the 166 MHz Pentium processor ( ...Missing: PR120+ | Show results with:PR120+
  47. [47]
    Fastest CPUs - DOS Days
    For raw integer performance, the top score goes to the Cyrix 6x86L 150 MHz. The best for floating-point performance is the Pentium P54C-200 MHz, coming in ...Missing: PR120+ | Show results with:PR120+<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    NexGen Processor - halfhill.com
    NexGen, AMD, and Cyrix all claim their 586-class chips will outperform a Pentium at the same clock. That's why NexGen has decided to deemphasize clock speeds as ...Missing: 6x86 | Show results with:6x86
  49. [49]
    DirectX 8: Cannot Install on a Computer That Uses a Cyrix 686
    ... support the CPUID command or the processor is detected as a 486-class processor. Non-Pentium class processors are unsupported by DirectX 8 and later.
  50. [50]
    A Year Ago Today: Cyrix plays down overheating | ZDNET
    Aug 19, 1997 · "The 6x86 is a fast part and it does draw more heat than the Pentium," said Paul Norman, Cyrix regional manager for central Europe. "We bundle ...Missing: dissipation issues