Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Deflategate

Deflategate refers to the 2015 controversy in the (NFL) over allegations that personnel from the deliberately deflated footballs used by the team below the league's inflation standards during the against the on January 18, 2015. NFL rules require game balls to be inflated to between 12.5 and 13.5 pounds per (psi). At , measurements showed 11 of the 12 Patriots footballs at pressures ranging from 10.1 to 11.8 psi, while the four Colts footballs averaged 12.1 psi, prompting accusations of intentional tampering to gain a advantage in . The commissioned an independent led by Theodore Wells, whose May 2015 report concluded it was "more probable than not" that two Patriots equipment staffers had deflated balls with the knowledge and participation of , based on circumstantial evidence including text messages and equipment handling logs. However, the report's statistical analysis has been critiqued for methodological flaws, including failure to adequately account for natural pressure variations predicted by the , which demonstrates that cooling from indoor temperatures around 72°F to outdoor field conditions near 48°F could reduce psi by approximately 1-2 points without human intervention. Empirical reanalyses, such as those from the , indicate the observed pressures in Patriots balls aligned closely with or even exceeded expectations after corrections for measurement gauge errors, suggesting no definitive evidence of deflation beyond environmental effects. NFL Commissioner imposed a four-game suspension on Brady, a $1 million fine on the Patriots, and loss of draft picks, penalties partially upheld through but later vacated by a federal appeals court in 2016 on procedural grounds, allowing Brady to play without further delay. The episode fueled debates on scientific rigor in sports governance, equipment protocol reliability, and potential biases in league investigations, with subsequent studies reinforcing that temperature-induced pressure drops sufficiently explained the data without invoking deliberate misconduct. Despite the sanctions, the Patriots won three weeks later, highlighting the scandal's limited on-field impact amid broader questions about causal evidence for rule violations.

Historical and Regulatory Context

NFL Football Inflation Regulations

The National Football League requires that all balls used in games be inflated to an air pressure between 12.5 and 13.5 pounds per square inch (psi), as specified in Rule 2, Section 1 of the league's Official Playing Rules. This range applies to the 12 footballs provided by each team for offensive plays, with the referee serving as the sole judge of compliance prior to the game. The home team must supply a pump and needles, while the balls remain under the referee's supervision until handed to attendants shortly before kickoff. Prior to the 2015 season, enforcement relied on pre-game visual inspections and occasional spot-checks by officials using handheld gauges, with teams typically preparing and inflating their own balls in locker rooms without standardized documentation. This specification, recommended by ball manufacturer , had been in place since at least the 1970s, though the league provided no public rationale beyond ensuring consistency in ball handling and flight characteristics. Following the 2014 AFC Championship game incident, the NFL revised procedures in July 2015 to enhance oversight: officials now use a league-approved digital inflation gauge to test all game balls approximately two hours before kickoff, recording pressures for each; balls within the 12.5–13.5 psi range are approved without alteration, while those outside are adjusted by officials to exactly 13.0 psi and re-tested for compliance. Teams' equipment staff are prohibited from handling the balls post-inspection until after the game, and halftime spot-checks of a random sample became standard to monitor for tampering or environmental effects. These changes aimed to standardize measurement and reduce opportunities for non-compliance, though critics noted that gauge accuracy and temperature variations could still introduce minor discrepancies of up to 0.25–0.5 psi.

Previous New England Patriots Controversies

The most significant prior controversy involving the occurred in 2007, known as Spygate, when the team was found to have violated rules by videotaping opponents' defensive signals from an unauthorized location. On September 9, 2007, during a Week 1 game against the at , Jets security personnel observed a Patriots sideline employee, later identified as video assistant Matt Walsh, filming the Jets' defensive coaches as they signaled plays from the coaching booth. This practice contravened policies that allowed signal filming only from the coaching booth or stands but prohibited it from the field to prevent real-time decoding advantages. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell swiftly investigated, confirming the violation and imposing severe penalties on September 13, 2007: a $500,000 fine on head coach Bill Belichick—the league's maximum personal penalty—a $250,000 fine on the Patriots organization, and forfeiture of the team's 2008 first-round draft pick, which was traded to the value of the 31st overall selection. Belichick publicly apologized, stating he was "sorry" for the incident, though he maintained that the team had not used the footage during the Jets game itself. The probe uncovered evidence of broader practices, with reports later indicating the Patriots had videotaped signals in approximately 40 games from 2000 to 2007, including potentially during playoff contests. The NFL destroyed requested tapes and notes from the Patriots' possession to avoid further dissemination, a decision that drew criticism for limiting transparency. Patriots management argued that signal-stealing via notes or legal filming was a common industry practice, providing marginal benefits in decoding complex systems, but Goodell emphasized that the sideline filming undermined game integrity by suggesting an intent to gain an unfair edge. No evidence emerged of the videos being reviewed during games, and the Patriots' on-field success— including a 16-0 regular season in —was not directly attributed to the practice by league findings, though it fueled perceptions of systematic rule-bending under Belichick's tenure. Earlier unconfirmed allegations, such as claims of filming the ' 2002 walkthrough, were investigated by the and dismissed for lack of substantiation. These events established a pattern of heightened scrutiny on the Patriots' competitive practices, with opponents like the Jets and Steelers voicing suspicions of ongoing advantages, though no additional formal violations were penalized before the 2014 Deflategate probe.

The 2014 AFC Championship Game

Game Summary and Performance Factors

The 2014 AFC Championship Game, played on January 18, 2015, at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, pitted the New England Patriots against the Indianapolis Colts. The Patriots secured a decisive 45–7 victory, scoring 17 points in the first half to lead 17–7 at halftime before adding 28 unanswered points in the second half. Key scoring plays included an 8-yard touchdown pass from Tom Brady to Shane Vereen in the first quarter, a 5-yard touchdown run by LeGarrette Blount in the second quarter, and the Colts' lone score on a 2-yard run by Boom Herron. The second half featured rapid touchdowns, including a 4-yard pass to Brandon LaFell and a 22-yard scramble by Brady for a touchdown. Tom Brady completed 23 of 35 passes for 288 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception, demonstrating efficiency despite challenging conditions. , the Colts' quarterback, struggled with 12 completions out of 33 attempts for 126 yards, no touchdowns, and two interceptions, as the Patriots' defense recorded four sacks and limited to 238 total yards. The Patriots' rushing attack contributed 161 yards, bolstering their offensive balance. Weather conditions featured skies, winds up to 15 mph, and temperatures around 45–50°F at kickoff, with intensifying in the second half, creating a rain-soaked field and crowd. Such conditions can reduce ball grip for passers and receivers, though the Patriots adapted effectively, with no verified disparity attributable to variations in this summary. The environmental factors aligned with typical January Northeast , potentially influencing ball handling but not hindering New England's dominant execution.

Halftime Ball Pressure Measurements

At halftime of the on January 18, 2015, between the and , officials conducted air pressure measurements on the teams' game balls in the officials' locker room, prompted by complaints from the Colts. rules require footballs to be inflated to between 12.5 and 13.5 pounds per (). Walt Anderson provided two s: the "Logo gauge" (used by official ) and the "non-Logo gauge" (used by Dyrol Prioleau), with the Logo gauge consistently reading approximately 0.3 to 0.45 higher than the non-Logo gauge. The Patriots' 11 footballs, which had been set to an average of 12.5 pre-game using Anderson's personal , were all measured below 12.5 on both at . The Logo readings ranged from 10.50 to 11.85 (average 11.49 ), while the non-Logo readings ranged from 10.90 to 12.30 (average 11.11 ).
Patriots Ball #Logo (psi)Non-Logo (psi)
111.5011.80
210.8511.20
311.1511.50
410.7011.00
511.1011.45
611.6011.95
711.8512.30
811.1011.55
910.9511.35
1010.5010.90
1110.9011.35
In contrast, the four Colts footballs measured, set to approximately 13.0 pre-game, had readings generally within or near the regulatory range. Logo gauge readings ranged from 12.50 to 12.75 (average 12.63 , adjusted to 12.67 excluding an anomalous ball), and non-Logo gauge from 12.15 to 12.95 (average 12.27 adjusted).
Colts Ball #Logo Gauge ()Non-Logo Gauge ()
112.7012.35
212.7512.30
312.5012.95
412.5512.15
These measurements revealed a greater pressure drop in the Patriots' balls compared to the Colts', with averages indicating a decline of about 1.0 to 1.4 for the Patriots versus 0.4 to 0.6 for the Colts, though the process involved potential gauge switching between teams and time constraints limited Colts measurements to four balls. Post-measurement, the Patriots' balls were re-inflated to 13.0 for the second half.

Investigation Trigger and Early Probes

Indianapolis Colts Complaints

The Indianapolis Colts first raised informal concerns about potential underinflation of footballs following their regular-season matchup on November 16, 2014, in which the Patriots defeated the Colts 42–20; equipment staff noted that some Patriots balls appeared softer than expected, prompting the team to alert officials, though no formal measurements were conducted at the time and the issue was not pursued further. These suspicions resurfaced during the AFC Championship Game on January 18, 2015, at Gillette Stadium, where the Patriots defeated the Colts 45–7; early in the first quarter, Colts linebacker D'Qwell Jackson intercepted a pass from quarterback Tom Brady, and upon handling the ball, Colts personnel, including equipment manager Sean Sullivan, observed that it felt noticeably deflated compared to league standards, leading them to immediately notify on-field officials. Referee Walt Anderson, who had pre-game verified all 24 Patriots and 24 Colts footballs as compliant with the NFL's 12.5–13.5 psi inflation rule, was informed of the complaint during the game, prompting the league to instruct officials to impound and measure the Patriots' balls at halftime, where 11 of 12 were found to be below 12.5 psi (averaging 11.45 psi for the gauge used), while Colts balls remained properly inflated. Post-game, Colts officials, including owner and director of equipment operations Mike , publicly reiterated the complaint, emphasizing that the underinflation provided an unfair grip advantage in the cold, wet conditions (game-time temperature around 46°F with precipitation), and confirmed to investigators that the team had proactively raised the issue to prepare for the playoff rematch, viewing it as a pattern warranting scrutiny. The Colts' allegations directly triggered the NFL's formal investigation, announced on January 19, 2015, though critics later noted the team's lopsided loss as a potential motivator for escalating the claim after failing to do so vigorously in .

NFL's Immediate Response and Data Handling

Following the ' in-game complaints about the inflation levels of footballs during the January 18, 2015, , referee Clete Blakeman's officiating crew conducted halftime pressure checks on the balls in the Patriots' locker room. Measurements using a Strous model revealed that 11 of the 12 Patriots game balls registered between 10.1 and 11.0 pounds per (psi), below the NFL's required minimum of 12.5 psi, while the Colts' four checked balls fell within the 12.5 to 13.5 psi range. The officials re-inflated the Patriots' balls to comply with regulations for the second half, allowing play to resume without further immediate interruption, though no post-second-half re-measurements were performed on that date. The NFL did not publicly disclose the halftime data immediately after the game, opting instead for internal review amid preparations for Super Bowl XLIX on February 1, 2015. On January 19, the league announced it had initiated an investigation into the allegations, drawing parallels to prior Patriots controversies like Spygate. By January 20, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell commissioned an independent probe led by attorney Ted Wells of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, tasking it with examining potential tampering and compliance with equipment rules. The league retained possession of the game balls post-game for forensic analysis but faced subsequent scrutiny over chain-of-custody protocols, as equipment staff had handled the balls after halftime measurements without documented supervision until Wells' team intervened. On , the issued its first public confirmation of the deflation, stating that the Patriots' balls were "significantly deflated" based on the readings, while emphasizing the ongoing Wells investigation would determine intent and responsibility. Goodell addressed the issue at his January 30 state-of-the-league , asserting the league's commitment to factual resolution regardless of , and noting potential penalties even absent proven benefit. This data handling approach—relying on ad hoc gauging without standardized multi-gauge verification or environmental controls—later drew criticism for measurement variability, as psi readings can fluctuate due to temperature and gauge calibration differences under the .

The Wells Report and Scientific Claims

Report Methodology and Conclusions

The Wells Report, prepared by the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP under Theodore V. Wells Jr. at the NFL's direction, employed a methodology centered on document review, personnel interviews, and forensic scientific analysis to assess allegations of football deflation during the January 18, 2015, AFC Championship Game between the New England Patriots and Indianapolis Colts. The investigation included interviews with over 60 individuals, encompassing Patriots staff such as equipment assistants Jim McNally and John Jastremski, quarterback Tom Brady, NFL officials including referee Walt Anderson and supervisors Clete Blakeman and Dyrol Prioleau, and Colts personnel where relevant. Data collection focused on ball handling protocols, text messages between McNally and Jastremski revealing discussions of needle access and ball adjustments, and environmental conditions like field temperature (47.2–50.7°F) and locker room humidity. Pregame pressure checks were conducted by Anderson approximately two hours and 15 minutes before kickoff using two NFL-provided digital gauges: the Logo Gauge and Non-Logo Gauge, with the latter likely primary. Patriots footballs averaged 12.5–12.6 pounds per square inch (psi), with adjustments if below this level, while Colts balls averaged 13.0–13.1 psi; no per-ball records were kept, only verbal confirmations of compliance with the 12.5–13.5 psi rule. At halftime, following Colts complaints, 11 of 12 Patriots footballs and 4 Colts footballs were measured sequentially using both gauges in the officials' locker room. Patriots balls registered averages of 11.07 psi (Non-Logo Gauge) and 11.49 psi (Logo Gauge), ranging 10.5–11.85 psi and 10.9–12.3 psi respectively, all below 12.5 psi. Colts balls averaged 12.15–12.75 psi (Non-Logo) and 12.30–12.95 psi (Logo), within regulation. The Logo Gauge consistently read 0.3–0.45 psi higher than the Non-Logo, a differential validated by post-investigation testing for accuracy across 8–14.5 psi. Scientific evaluation was outsourced to Exponent, a firm, which applied the (PV = nRT) to model expected pressure changes from temperature drops and moisture, assuming constant volume and initial pressures of 12.5 (Patriots) and 13.0 (Colts). Simulations, incorporating game-day weather (air temperature ~48°F, ball interior estimates 67–71°F pregame dropping to equilibrium), predicted natural halftime pressures of 11.32–11.52 for Patriots balls and 11.80–12.00 for Colts, yet observed Patriots drops exceeded this by 0.45–1.02 on average. Experiments replicated deflation: 13 footballs could be deflated by ~0.75 in 61–71 seconds using a needle, aligning with McNally's ~100-second absence with the balls. Rubbing for surface texture added ~0.7 temporarily, and repeated gauging caused negligible ~0.01 loss per measurement. Exponent's Bayesian analysis yielded a of 0.004 (0.4% probability) that the differential drop occurred naturally, factoring variability in starting pressures and conditions but deeming no environmental combination sufficient to explain the discrepancy without intervention. The report concluded it was "more probable than not" (preponderance standard) that Patriots personnel deliberately deflated game balls in violation of NFL rules, with "a high degree of certainty" implicating McNally (who transported and accessed balls) and Jastremski (who handled post-adjustment storage) based on timeline evidence, text exchanges (e.g., references to "deflator" and air release), and absence of alternative explanations. No deflation was found for Colts balls or the kicking ball. Regarding Brady, the report determined it "more probable than not" he was at least generally aware of the practice, inferred from his customized ball preferences, post-AFC game communication spike with Jastremski (110 calls/texts in 25 days vs. prior averages), and destruction of his cellphone hours before his interview, though direct evidence of his orchestration was absent.

Physics of Ball Deflation: Ideal Gas Law and Environmental Factors

The pressure within an football follows the , PV = nRT, where P is , V is the approximately constant volume of the bladder, n is the fixed number of moles of air post-inflation, R is the , and T is temperature in Rankine or . With V and n constant, P \propto T. rules mandate pressures of 12.5 to 13.5 , measured relative to (typically ~14.7 ), so absolute pressure is gauge pressure plus atmospheric. A primary environmental factor affecting pressure is temperature differential between indoor inflation (often 70–75°F) and outdoor game conditions. For the January 18, 2015, AFC Championship Game at Gillette Stadium, field temperature hovered around 50°F. Applying the ideal gas law, a drop from 70°F (530°R) to 50°F (510°R) yields T_2 / T_1 = 510/530 \approx 0.962, predicting a ~3.8% reduction in absolute pressure. For a ball at 12.5 psi gauge (absolute ~27.2 psi), this equates to a gauge drop of approximately 1.0–1.2 psi, accounting for the atmospheric baseline. However, footballs exhibit thermal inertia; internal air equilibrates slowly due to the bladder's insulation, with full stabilization potentially requiring hours rather than the ~2 hours pregame exposure or brief halftime indoor return.
FactorTypical Effect on Gauge Pressure
Temperature drop (20°F, e.g., 70°F to 50°F)~1.0–1.2 psi decrease, assuming equilibrium
Humidity/moisture (20–80% RH)<0.1 psi variation, via minor water vapor addition or volume compression
Time post-exposureGradual pressure recovery indoors; partial at halftime measurements (10–15 minutes)
Halftime pressures of Patriots' balls, reported as low as 10.5–11.2 psi on the non-Logo gauge, prompted Wells Report analysis using the ideal gas law to estimate expected values around 11.3–11.5 psi after accounting for ~48°F effective temperature, concluding an excess drop of ~0.45 psi relative to Colts' balls (which fell ~0.5 psi). The report, prepared by NFL-commissioned firm Exponent, attributed this discrepancy to likely human intervention rather than unmodeled environmental effects like incomplete thermal equilibration or gauge inconsistencies (Logo gauge read ~0.35 psi higher). Critiques from independent physicists emphasize that assuming instant temperature matching overstates natural drops minimally and overlooks measurement errors, with experiments replicating observed variances without deflation. Atmospheric pressure stability during the game (~14.64 psia) had negligible impact. Overall, while temperature drives primary deflation physics, precise quantification in dynamic conditions remains contentious due to transient heat transfer and instrumentation limits.

Critiques of the Report's Science and Evidence Standards

Analysts from the (AEI) examined the Wells Report and concluded it was deeply flawed due to selective use of pressure gauge data and inadequate accounting for measurement errors. The report's analysis applied the non-logo gauge readings to Colts footballs while inconsistently using logo gauge data for some Patriots balls, ignoring a systematic 0.3 to 0.4 difference between the two uncalibrated gauges used by officials on January 18, 2015. The Wells Report's statistical modeling, which estimated a low probability (around 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 100,000) for the observed pressure drops occurring naturally, was criticized for underestimating variability from inaccuracies and transient effects during measurements. Independent statistical reviews, including those by Steve McIntyre, highlighted errors in Exponent's simulations, such as assuming constant ball volumes and failing to model realistic air permeability or handling impacts, which invalidated claims of deliberate . Critiques also pointed to flaws in the evidence chain, including a 90-minute delay between and re-measurement of Patriots balls, during which they were stored in a warm room bag, potentially allowing partial re-equilibration not accounted for in the adjustments. The report dismissed natural deflation explanations despite physics analyses showing that a temperature drop from indoor inflation (~72°F) to game conditions (~47°F) could account for 1-2 losses via the (PV = nRT), without needing tampering. Exponent's experimental drop tests, meant to simulate ball handling, were faulted for using artificial conditions—like dropping from excessive heights and ignoring wet field absorption—that did not replicate NFL gameplay, leading to overstated air loss estimates of up to 3 , far exceeding empirical data from controlled tests. These methodological shortcomings, combined with the absence of direct of deflation equipment or witnesses, rendered the report's scientific standards unreliable according to multiple expert reviews.

Disciplinary Measures and Initial Appeals

NFL-Imposed Sanctions on Brady and Patriots

On May 11, 2015, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell imposed disciplinary measures on the New England Patriots organization following the release of the Wells Report five days earlier, which concluded it was more probable than not that team personnel deliberately deflated game balls and that quarterback Tom Brady was at least generally aware of the rules violations. The Patriots were fined $1 million and forfeited their first-round draft pick in the 2016 NFL Draft as well as a fourth-round pick in the 2017 NFL Draft, penalties justified by the league as addressing the team's non-cooperative equipment staff and broader culture of noncompliance with rules on football inflation. Separately, Brady received a four-game suspension without pay for the first four games of the regular season, along with the loss of up to a $1 million under the NFL's performance pay policy, due to findings of his knowing participation in the and subsequent failure to cooperate fully with the , including the destruction of his cellular phone shortly before his . The league emphasized that the sanctions upheld the integrity of the game, drawing parallels to prior equipment violation penalties but escalating due to the apparent orchestration involving non-employees and Brady's central role. These measures were authorized under Article 46 of the Constitution and Bylaws, which permits the to discipline for conduct detrimental to , and were communicated via letters from executive vice president to Brady and the Patriots, outlining the rationale tied directly to the Wells investigation's evidence of intentional deflation below the required 12.5 pounds per square inch. No criminal charges resulted, as the treated the matter internally as a competitive integrity issue rather than legal malfeasance.

Tom Brady's Public Denials and Appeal Filing

On January 22, 2015, shortly after the , held a where he explicitly denied any knowledge of or involvement in altering pressures, stating, "I didn't alter the ball in any way" and "I have no knowledge of wrongdoing." He emphasized compliance with rules on ball preparation, noting that he personally inflated them to the allowable minimum of 12.5 pounds per () before the game. Following the release of the Wells Report on May 6, 2015, which concluded it was "more probable than not" that Brady was aware of and participated in a scheme to deflate balls, Brady maintained his denials in a May 7, 2015, at . He rejected the report's findings, asserting, "I didn't do anything wrong," and described the deflation allegations as baseless, while criticizing the NFL's handling of the investigation for lacking direct evidence against him. When directly asked if he was a cheater, Brady responded affirmatively that he was not, framing the controversy as an overreach by the league. The announced Brady's four-game suspension on May 11, 2015, citing his role in undermining the game's integrity. In response, the (NFLPA), on Brady's behalf, formally filed an appeal of the suspension on May 14, 2015, requesting a neutral arbitrator rather than Commissioner , whom they argued had a due to his oversight of the investigation. The NFLPA's statement accompanying the filing reiterated Brady's innocence, noting that the penalties were imposed without "clear and convincing evidence" of misconduct. Goodell denied the recusal request on May 22, 2015, opting to hear the appeal himself under the collective bargaining agreement.

Arbitration Process

Hearing Proceedings and Key Testimonies

The arbitration hearing for Tom Brady's appeal of his four-game suspension convened on June 23, 2015, in New York City, with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell presiding as arbitrator under the terms of the NFL-NFLPA collective bargaining agreement, which granted the commissioner authority to hear such appeals.(Berman,%20J.).pdf) The proceedings spanned nearly 10 hours, involved approximately 300 exhibits, and centered on disputes over the Wells Report's findings, Brady's conduct, and evidentiary matters such as phone records. Goodell denied pre-hearing motions by the NFLPA to compel testimony from NFL general counsel Jeffrey Pash and to access certain Paul, Weiss investigative files, limiting the scope of cross-examination on the report's preparation. The NFLPA presented four witnesses: Brady, Theodore Wells (lead investigator for the Wells Report), Troy Vincent (NFL executive vice president of football operations who issued Brady's initial suspension notice), and Edward Snyder (dean of the Yale School of Management). The NFL Management Council called witnesses including NFL executive vice president of law and labor relations Adolpho Birch and others tied to the league's investigative process, though full details of their testimonies were not publicly detailed in the released transcript excerpts. Notably absent were live testimonies from Patriots equipment assistant John Jastremski and Jim McNally (the "official game-day football inspector" implicated in text messages), who had been interviewed during the Wells investigation but were not subpoenaed for the hearing. Brady's testimony under oath formed the core of the NFLPA's , lasting several hours and covering preparation protocols, his interactions with , and responses to the allegations. He described a meticulous process for breaking in and selecting balls, emphasizing personal involvement in testing for feel but denying any directive to alter air pressure below NFL standards of 12.5-13.5 . Brady testified to having "zero" prior knowledge of specific PSI rules until a 2014 against the Jets, when officials enforced measurements for the first time in his , and stated he questioned Jastremski post-Colts game, receiving an unequivocal denial of wrongdoing: "We didn't do it." Regarding his cellphone, destroyed in March 2015 per routine practice upon acquiring a new device, Brady explained providing 10,000 pages of records from other sources and denied any intent to obstruct by withholding data, countering NFL claims of non-cooperation during the Wells inquiry. Wells testified to the methodology and conclusions of his independent , defending the report's finding of a "more probable than not" scheme to deflate balls while acknowledging limitations such as the lack of like needles or deflated balls in possession. Vincent's testimony addressed the rationale for the suspension's severity, linking it to Brady's perceived lack of cooperation and the need to deter equipment violations, as outlined in his May letter. Snyder, called as an expert on , opined on the implications of non-cooperation in investigations, though specifics tied to Brady's case were contested by the NFLPA as overly generalized. The NFL's witnesses reinforced the league's position on Brady's general awareness of the texts between Jastremski and McNally— which included references to him as part of a "Deflator" scheme—and argued that , including post-scandal interactions, supported intent. A partial transcript of the hearing, including Brady's full testimony and excerpts from others, was released by the NFLPA on August 4, 2015, as part of federal court filings challenging Goodell's impending decision. Goodell issued his 20-page on July 28, 2015, upholding the based on the record, citing Brady's destruction of and to cooperate as aggravating factors beyond the Wells Report's conclusions.

Allegations of Conflict of Interest in Arbitration

The (NFLPA) formally requested on June 2, 2015, that Commissioner recuse himself from serving as the hearing officer for Tom Brady's appeal of his four-game suspension, citing an inherent because Goodell had previously approved the underlying disciplinary framework and the Wells Report investigation that precipitated the punishment. Goodell rejected the recusal motion, maintaining that the 2011 collective bargaining agreement (CBA) explicitly granted him authority to designate himself or his designee as the for such appeals under Article 46, which vests the commissioner with "final decision" power on player discipline matters. Brady's legal team, including attorneys Ted Wells (representing the NFL but previously independent) and Jeffrey Kessler for the NFLPA, argued during the appeal process that Goodell's dual role as enforcer of league policy and adjudicator compromised impartiality, particularly given his office's commissioning of the Ted Wells-led investigation into the alleged deflation of Patriots footballs on January 18, 2015, during the AFC Championship Game. This structure, critics contended, deviated from standard notions of neutral arbitration by allowing the same party to both investigate and rule on evidence interpretation, such as the non-production of Brady's cellphone records, which Goodell deemed obstructive in his July 28, 2015, upholding of the suspension. Further allegations surfaced regarding procedural biases in the arbitration, including Goodell's denial of NFLPA motions to compel disclosure of full Paul, Weiss investigative files and witness interview notes, which Brady's side claimed shielded potentially exculpatory material and reinforced the commissioner's aligned interests with league management. Goodell defended these decisions as consistent with confidentiality provisions and the need to protect investigative integrity, rejecting claims of bias by emphasizing that the agreement's terms, negotiated by the NFLPA, permitted such discretion to prevent endless discovery disputes. Despite these challenges, proceeded with Goodell presiding over multi-day hearings in starting June 23, 2015, where testimonies from Brady, equipment staff, and officials were presented, culminating in the suspension's affirmation without alteration.

Federal Court Challenges

U.S. District Court Vacatur of Suspension

On September 3, 2015, United States District Judge of the for the Southern District of issued a ruling vacating the four-game suspension imposed on quarterback by Commissioner . The decision stemmed from a petition filed by the (NFLPA) on July 15, 2015, seeking to vacate Goodell's July 28, 2015, arbitration award that had upheld the suspension under Article 46 of the NFL-NFLPA Agreement (CBA). Berman's 40-page opinion concluded that the arbitration award must be set aside due to "manifest disregard" of the CBA's fundamental fairness requirements and because it was "arbitrary and capricious" in its application. Central to Berman's reasoning was the lack of adequate notice to Brady that his alleged conduct—described by Goodell as "general awareness" of others' ball deflation or failure to prevent it—could result in a four-game suspension without pay. The court observed that the had never previously disciplined a player with a multi-game suspension for equipment-related violations short of cheating, nor for mere awareness of others' actions, rendering Goodell's penalty inconsistent with standards and past league practice. Berman emphasized that Article 46 required "just cause" for such discipline, which included proportionality and consistency, and found Goodell's reliance on non-equivalent precedents (e.g., the Bountygate scandal) unpersuasive. The ruling also highlighted procedural deficiencies in the arbitration, particularly Goodell's denial of Brady's requests to cross-examine witnesses essential to the case, such as NFL Executive Vice President Jeff Pash, who had overseen the independent Wells investigation into the alleged deflation. Berman determined that this exclusion violated the CBA's mandate for a "fundamentally fair" process, as Pash's involvement raised potential credibility issues and Brady had no prior opportunity to question him during the investigation. The judge stated that this denial alone provided sufficient grounds for vacatur, irrespective of other factors. Berman's decision did not address the substantive merits of whether Brady had participated in deflating footballs, focusing instead exclusively on the arbitration's procedural integrity under federal labor law standards for vacating awards. The vacatur took effect immediately, permitting Brady to participate in the without restriction pending the NFL's appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

U.S. Court of Appeals Reinstatement

On April 25, , a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a 2–1 decision reversing U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman's September 2015 order vacating the arbitration award that upheld NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's four-game suspension of quarterback . The panel, consisting of Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs, Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr., and Judge (dissenting), held that the district court had exceeded its narrow authority under the Labor Management Relations Act to review labor arbitration awards, emphasizing the high degree of deference owed to arbitrators in matters. The court remanded the case with instructions to enter an order confirming the award, thereby reinstating Brady's suspension for the first four games of the . The majority rejected each of the three procedural grounds on which Judge Berman had vacated the award. First, it found no merit in claims of inadequate notice or fundamental unfairness, ruling that the NFL's provided clear authority under Article 46 for the to impose discipline for equipment violations, supported by precedents like the 2012 "Bountygate" suspensions. Second, regarding evidentiary issues—including the NFL's reliance on the investigative report (which the parties had agreed to treat as presumptively authentic) and Brady's destruction of his cellphone—the court determined these did not constitute a denial of a fundamentally fair hearing, as arbitrators possess broad discretion over evidence and no rule required live testimony from all witnesses or preservation of all records. Third, the panel dismissed arguments of arbitrator bias, affirming that the explicitly permitted the to serve as the final appellate arbiter in player discipline cases, rejecting any notion of "evident partiality" absent extraordinary circumstances. Overall, the decision underscored that the award "draws its essence" from the and did not exhibit manifest disregard of its terms, the standard for vacatur in labor . Judge dissented in part, arguing for vacatur on the grounds of fundamental unfairness due to the commissioner's exclusion of key witnesses and reliance on unsworn hearsay from the Wells report, as well as the cellphone destruction, which he viewed as undermining the arbitration's integrity despite the CBA's delegation of authority. The and Brady petitioned for an rehearing by the full Second Circuit, contending the panel had applied an overly deferential standard that ignored violations, but this was denied on June 22, 2016. The ruling effectively ended federal challenges short of the , which later declined on January 23, 2017, leaving the suspension intact under the CBA's framework.

Suspension Enforcement and 2016 Season Impact

Brady's Partial Suspension and Preseason Precedent

Following the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's reinstatement of the suspension on April 25, 2016, and the U.S. Supreme Court's denial of certiorari review, accepted the four-game penalty without further legal challenge, allowing enforcement to proceed for the 2016 . The specified that the ban applied exclusively to the first four regular-season contests, permitting Brady full participation in the ' preseason schedule. Brady appeared in three of four preseason games, including a half in the finale against the on September 1, 2016, completing 12 of 20 passes for 97 yards and a in a 17-9 loss. His suspension activated immediately after the preseason, barring him from team facilities, practices, and any football-related interactions with coaches, players, or personnel starting September 3, 2016. Brady trained independently during this period, forfeiting approximately $1 million in game checks for the missed regular-season games against the (September 11), (September 18), Houston Texans (September 22), and (October 2). This structure adhered to established NFL policy, under which player suspensions for integrity violations—such as equipment tampering or conduct detrimental—are calibrated to regular-season games and do not automatically extend to exhibition preseason contests unless the commissioner explicitly includes them, as in cases involving on-field ejections or repeated infractions. Prior precedents, including suspensions of players like in 2014, similarly exempted preseason participation while enforcing regular-season absences, reinforcing that such penalties target competitive regular-season impact without disrupting preparatory phases. Brady's case thus followed this norm, avoiding any commissioner-imposed preseason extension despite the scandal's high profile.

On-Field Consequences and Patriots Performance

The navigated Tom Brady's four-game suspension at the outset of the , with backup starting in his place from Weeks 1 through 4. The team achieved a 3–1 record during this stretch, securing victories over the (23–21 on September 11), (31–24 on September 18), and Houston Texans (27–0 on September 25), but suffering a 16–0 shutout loss to the on October 2. Garoppolo completed 67.5% of his passes for 1,124 yards, 4 touchdowns, and no interceptions across these games, demonstrating sufficient competence to maintain competitiveness despite the absence of the starting . This performance underscored the team's depth at the position, as Garoppolo's efficiency helped mitigate potential disruptions from the suspension. Upon Brady's return in Week 5, the Patriots surged to an 11–1 record in his 12 starts, culminating in an overall regular-season mark of 14–2, the best in the and securing the #1 seed with home-field advantage throughout the . Brady threw for 3,554 yards, 28 touchdowns, and 2 interceptions in those games, contributing to a potent offense that averaged 27.6 league-wide. The appeared to impose negligible long-term on-field detriment, as the early wins preserved momentum, while Brady's rested status—avoiding the physical toll of the season's opening month—may have aided his subsequent dominance. In fact, team insiders and analysts noted heightened motivation from the ordeal, framing it as fuel for their postseason push rather than a handicap. In the playoffs, the Patriots defeated the Texans 34–16 in the divisional round on January 14, 2017, the Steelers 36–17 in the Championship on January 22, and staged a historic 25-point comeback to beat the 34–28 in overtime during on February 5, 2017—the largest deficit overcome in history. Brady earned honors, passing for 466 yards and 2 touchdowns in the final game. Overall, the 2016 campaign exemplified resilience, with the suspension serving more as a temporary inconvenience than a substantive barrier to elite performance, as evidenced by the franchise's fifth title in the Brady-Belichick era.

Media Coverage and Public Discourse

Early Media Frenzy and Bias Claims

The Deflategate controversy erupted into public view on January 19, 2015, one day after the defeated the 45-7 in the on January 18. During the second quarter, Colts personnel raised concerns about the inflation of Patriots-supplied footballs, leading referees to measure 11 of the 12 Patriots balls at halftime, finding them below the NFL's minimum pressure of 12.5 pounds per (psi)—averaging 11.45 psi by one account—while Colts balls measured compliant. reporter Bob Kravitz tweeted that the NFL would investigate potential deflation by the Patriots, igniting rapid speculation across sports media. Outlets like and immediately framed the issue as deliberate tampering, with headlines emphasizing "cheating" and drawing comparisons to the Patriots' 2007 Spygate scandal. The ensuing media coverage escalated into a frenzy dominating airwaves and print in the two weeks before on February 1, 2015. Pundits on networks including and demanded severe penalties, with some calling for Bill Belichick's suspension from the and others questioning Tom Brady's legacy amid unproven links to the deflation. Belichick's press conference, where he discussed ball-handling procedures and denied knowledge of deflation, drew aggressive questioning focused on guilt rather than context like weather effects on levels (game-time temperature around 48°F). Brady's January 23 appearance similarly faced scrutiny, as media amplified anonymous sources and Colts' claims without awaiting forensic analysis. On January 23, the confirmed two officials' measurements showed underinflation but offered no explanation or player attribution, fueling further speculation. This period saw Deflategate eclipse other storylines, with outlets producing daily updates, opinion pieces, and segments portraying the Patriots as serial offenders despite preliminary evidence limited to pressure readings. Claims of emerged concurrently, primarily from Patriots supporters, local outlets, and analysts who argued national coverage exhibited prejudice against the franchise's dynasty—six wins since 2001—and prior success bred resentment. Critics contended that and similar networks rushed to presume guilt, ignoring in evidence like natural deflation from cold exposure (per the , a 20-30 drop possible from warmer prep to conditions) and prioritizing narrative over nuance. For example, early segments were later faulted for factual errors, such as misstating measurement protocols, and for editing content to downplay exculpatory angles, suggesting an anti-Patriots tilt in a league-dependent ecosystem. Patriots-affiliated voices, including team executives, highlighted how overshadowed the Colts' own irregularities (e.g., their 16th ball measuring high) and treated ambiguous data as conclusive, contrasting with slower scrutiny of other teams' infractions. These accusations posited that commercial incentives and regional rivalries amplified unverified claims, though mainstream outlets dismissed them as defensive posturing without systematic self-examination.

Post-Arbitration and Legal Coverage

Media coverage intensified following Commissioner Roger Goodell's July 28, 2015, arbitration decision upholding Tom Brady's four-game suspension, with outlets like providing detailed timelines of the escalating legal dispute and highlighting Brady's legal team's arguments against the 's disciplinary process. Reports emphasized the Players Association's immediate vow to challenge the ruling in federal court, framing it as a test of the agreement's that granted Goodell broad authority. On September 3, 2015, when U.S. District Judge Richard Berman vacated the suspension, citing procedural deficiencies such as inadequate notice and denial of witness testimony, portrayed the outcome as a significant rebuke to the NFL's handling of the case. described Berman's ruling as overturning the suspension due to the league's "arbitrary" process, while noted it as deflating the NFL's punishment and prompting questions about commissioner overreach. Social media reactions, amplified in coverage by outlets like , showed widespread support from fans celebrating Brady's courtroom victory, though some analysts, including in , focused on unresolved evidentiary issues like Brady's cellphone destruction. The NFL's appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit drew sustained attention, with reporting on March 4, 2016, oral arguments where judges scrutinized Brady's attorney on the cellphone evidence, underscoring debates over spoliation and intent. On April 25, 2016, the 2-1 panel decision reinstating the suspension—ruling that Goodell's was properly grounded in the and not exceeding authority—prompted media analyses framing it as a vindication of NFL governance. highlighted how the ruling solidified Goodell's control over player discipline, while detailed Brady's failed bid to play without penalty. Subsequent coverage of Brady's denied rehearing petition and his July 15, 2016, decision to drop further appeals shifted toward retrospectives, with the critiquing the NFLPA's CBA negotiations for enabling such commissioner-led , and marking the saga's end with emphasis on the league's procedural win despite public fatigue. Washington Post op-eds, including from former arbitrators, argued the case exemplified flaws in sports fairness, attributing biases in coverage to varying sympathies for Brady's guilt versus NFL integrity claims. Fan reactions on platforms like , as covered by , expressed disappointment over the reinstatement, reflecting polarized discourse between process-focused defenses and evidence-based skepticism.

Retrospective Analyses and Evolving Narratives

Statistical and scientific retrospectives have challenged the report's conclusion that the probability of the observed pressure drops in the ' footballs occurring naturally was only one in 11,000, arguing that the analysis failed to adequately account for non-random gauge measurements, variable starting pressures, and the ideal gas law's effects from temperature differentials between inflated conditions (approximately 70-75°F indoors) and halftime field temperatures (around 47°F). Independent reviews, including those applying , demonstrated that a drop from 12.5 psi at 70°F to measurements at 45°F could naturally yield end-of-first-half pressures of 11.0-11.5 psi without , aligning with the from both teams' balls, which showed similar proportional declines when adjusted for initial inflation levels. Further critiques emphasized the Wells report's selective handling of evidence, such as applying different gauges inconsistently—the non-Logo gauge (reading 0.6-1.0 psi higher) to Patriots' balls and the Logo gauge to Colts'—and excluding key variables like ball handling history and wet conditions, which could exacerbate natural through moisture absorption and compression. A technical analysis identified errors in the report's non- model, including overstated deflation likelihoods by not simulating full environmental variability, leading peer-reviewed assessments to conclude the statistical inferences were unreliable for proving intent. Post-2015 narratives shifted as legal disclosures revealed withheld interview notes and equipment logs, prompting views that the prioritized over to penalize a dominant amid prior scandals like Spygate. By 2020, retrospectives framed the episode as emblematic of league overreach, with the four-game suspension of disproportionate to ambiguous psi data and lack of direct observation of tampering, especially given Brady's cooperation and the absence of game-altering advantages from marginal underinflation. Five years later, analyses highlighted how initial media emphasis on guilt—fueled by anonymous leaks—evolved into recognition of investigative flaws, including the 's reliance on a non-peer-reviewed report amid accusations of . By the 10-year mark in 2025, public and analytical discourse increasingly portrayed Deflategate as a "witch hunt" against the Patriots' dynasty, with empirical reevaluations underscoring that both teams' balls deflated comparably under physics-governed conditions, and no forensic evidence of needles or deflation devices ever surfaced despite thorough searches. This evolution reflected broader skepticism toward the NFL's integrity processes, as subsequent rule changes on ball handling failed to yield comparable scandals, suggesting the incident was anomalous rather than systemic cheating.

Persistent Controversies and Evidence Disputes

Equipment Attendants' Accounts and "K" Ball Allegations

, an officials' locker room attendant employed by Delta Airlines and working part-time at , and John Jastremski, the ' equipment assistant, were central figures in the handling of the team's game balls prior to the January 18, 2015, against the . McNally's role involved transporting the Patriots' 12 approved game balls from the locker room to the officials' locker room for inspection and inflation checks, a process during which he took the balls into a for approximately 1 minute and 40 seconds, as documented by video. Text messages between McNally and Jastremski, recovered from Jastremski's phone and covering the period from 2014 to early 2015, referenced McNally as "the Deflator" and discussed deflating footballs to a pressure of 12.5 pounds per (), aligning with Tom Brady's stated preference for slightly underinflated balls to improve grip in wet conditions. In interviews conducted as part of the NFL's investigation led by , both attendants denied deflating balls below league standards (12.5–13.5 per NFL Rule 2, Section 1) at Brady's direction or as part of a deliberate scheme, attributing any adjustments to routine practices for player comfort or natural due to cold weather (approximately 50°F at kickoff). However, the Wells Report concluded it was "more probable than not" that McNally had intentionally deflated the balls multiple times, citing the texts' explicit references—such as McNally's October 2014 message about needing to "give them a deflated look"—as inconsistent with their denials and indicative of coordinated tampering. Brady later testified that he questioned Jastremski directly after the allegations surfaced, receiving an assurance that "we didn’t do it," though this verbal account contrasted with the reviewed by investigators. Separate allegations emerged regarding the Patriots' handling of "K balls," which are NFL-provided kicking balls used exclusively for special teams plays (e.g., kickoffs and punts) and marked distinctly from team-supplied offensive game balls to prevent unauthorized use. During pre-game preparations for the , reports indicated that McNally attempted to hand an official an unapproved K ball, which lacked the Patriots' preparation stamps and was intended only for kicking, not offensive plays; officials rejected it upon noticing the discrepancy. This incident, corroborated by multiple sources close to the game operations, raised questions about potential efforts to introduce non-standard equipment into play, though it was not the primary focus of the Wells investigation, which centered on offensive balls measured at (averaging 11.52 for Patriots balls versus 12.50 for Colts balls). The attendants faced indefinite suspension without pay from the on May 11, 2015, following the Wells Report's findings of their likely involvement in the deflation scheme, but were reinstated on September 16, 2015, after the Patriots requested their return amid ongoing over Brady's . Neither attendant provided public beyond the interviews, and their accounts have been scrutinized for inconsistencies between verbal statements and the timestamped texts, which investigators deemed more reliable as contemporaneous records. The K ball episode, while not leading to formal , contributed to perceptions of systemic irregularities in Patriots protocols, echoing prior unreported complaints about McNally's practices dating back years.

Accusations of Falsified or Withheld Data

Critics of the NFL's handling of Deflategate accused the league of leaking inaccurate pressure data to the media shortly after the January 18, 2015, AFC Championship game. Anonymous sources described as senior NFL officials claimed that all 12 Patriots footballs measured between 10.1 and 11.0 pounds per square inch (psi), implying a uniform 2 psi deflation below the required minimum of 12.5 psi, while the four Colts footballs tested above 12.5 psi. This narrative fueled initial perceptions of deliberate tampering, but the May 2015 Wells Report later clarified that the Patriots' balls averaged 11.02 psi using one gauge, with individual readings varying and not all below 12.5 psi on the alternative gauge. The faced accusations of withholding full measurement details and inconsistencies during the . Referees used two s—a logo reading approximately 0.4 lower than the non-logo Stroud —with pregame checks on the logo but halftime measurements potentially mixing s, a fact not fully disclosed initially. Sports analyst reported in February 2022, based on sources including former vice president of game operations , that the league possessed data showing natural deflation consistent with weather conditions but suppressed it to sustain the tampering narrative, including hiding that Exponent consultants found the observed drops explainable without human intervention under certain conditions. Further allegations emerged regarding the destruction or improper handling of physical evidence. The re-inflated the footballs post-measurement without preserving their halftime state for independent verification, preventing forensic analysis of potential deflation methods. During Tom Brady's appeal, his legal team argued the league withheld complete data and communications, including internal discussions on gauge variances, which could have undermined the Wells Report's probability estimates of tampering. Independent analyses, such as a June 2015 study, contended the Wells Report's statistical modeling ignored withheld variables like temperature and calibration, rendering its 99% confidence in artificial deflation overstated. These accusations persisted in retrospective accounts, with Florio's reporting highlighting the NFL's failure to correct early leaks promptly and Goodell's 2022 reaffirmation of disputed claims about uniform halftime using identical pregame gauges. Critics, including Patriots affiliates, viewed such actions as prioritizing narrative control over transparency, though the maintained the evidence supported its findings without admitting falsification.

Broader Questions of NFL Motives and Integrity

The NFL's commissioning of the Wells Report by attorney Ted Wells, announced by Commissioner Roger Goodell on January 23, 2015, raised questions about the investigation's impartiality, as the firm was retained directly by the league to probe allegations against the New England Patriots. Critics, including an analysis by the American Enterprise Institute, argued the report was "deeply flawed" in its statistical methodology and probabilistic conclusions, potentially reflecting bias toward predetermined outcomes favorable to the NFL's narrative of misconduct. Goodell's dual role in authorizing the investigation, imposing sanctions, and upholding Brady's four-game suspension as arbitrator exemplified broader concerns over unchecked commissioner authority under the NFL's integrity of the game policy. This process drew accusations of inherent conflict, with a New York law professor's court filing on December 18, 2015, alleging "unfairness, consistent bias and occasional fraud" infected the NFL's handling from the outset, including selective evidence presentation. Such critiques highlighted how Goodell's decisions, amid prior mishandlings like the Ray Rice domestic violence case where initial punishments were lenient before public backlash, suggested reactive overreach in Deflategate to demonstrate league toughness. Comparisons to other NFL scandals underscored perceived inconsistencies in enforcement, with Deflategate's harsh penalties for a rules violation contrasting lighter treatments in player conduct cases, fueling speculation of motives tied to curbing the Patriots' dominance following Spygate. Some owners viewed the penalties as a "makeup call" for Spygate's relatively mild $250,000 fine and draft pick forfeiture in , despite the earlier scandal's involvement of sideline filming. These disparities prompted questions about whether the prioritized competitive balance or public perception of integrity over uniform application of rules, particularly as the league faced mounting scrutiny from concussion litigation and off-field controversies during Goodell's tenure.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] investigative report concerning footballs used - The Wall Street Journal
    Jan 18, 2015 · ... half of the AFC Championship Game—after the Patriots game balls were re-inflated—improved as compared to his performance in the first half.
  2. [2]
    Key takeaways from Ted Wells report - NFL.com
    May 6, 2015 · » All 11 Patriots balls were inflated back to permissible pressure level. The four Colts balls were not because they were within permissible ...
  3. [3]
    Wells report: Pats employees probably deflated balls, Tom Brady ...
    May 6, 2015 · The NFL has found that it is probable that New England Patriots personnel deliberately deflated balls during the AFC Championship Game in January.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] On the Wells report - American Enterprise Institute
    The only significant result, in fact, indicates that the. Patriots balls were more inflated than the Ideal. Gas Law would imply. By contrast, as shown in table ...
  5. [5]
    The Science of "Deflategate" | Exponent
    Sep 21, 2016 · Second, a simple application of the Ideal Gas Law could explain the Patriots' halftime pressure measurements. Let's now set the record ...
  6. [6]
    Football under pressure: Assessing malfeasance in Deflategate
    Dec 17, 2015 · This article evaluates a key element in the controversy, better known as Deflategate: the statistical analysis in the Wells report.
  7. [7]
    Can Science Solve the Mystery of "Deflategate"? - Scientific American
    Jan 29, 2015 · People have been fumbling over understanding “pounds” taken off the balls versus “pounds per inch of pressure”—the actual weight difference ...
  8. [8]
    Tom Brady has done his time for Deflategate, but the science says ...
    Oct 4, 2016 · Deflategate is over, but the academic debate over the footballs in question rages on. Here's the math that completely exonerates Tom Brady and the Patriots.
  9. [9]
    Can the NFL Measure the Pressure of Footballs Precisely?
    Rule 2 of the Official Playing Rules of the NFL requires footballs used during NFL games must be inflated to between 12.5 and 13.5 psi.
  10. [10]
    2025 NFL Rulebook - NFL Football Operations
    The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to be furnished by the home club, and ...Rule Changes · Playing Field Details · Order of the Rules · Penalty Summary
  11. [11]
    How the NFL tries to ensure footballs are properly inflated - ESPN
    Dec 11, 2016 · Any football inflated within the range of 12.5 PSI to 13.5 PSI is approved and its inflation level untouched. 4. Any football found to be out of ...
  12. [12]
    Game ball procedure revised in wake of Deflategate - Football Zebras
    Jul 28, 2015 · An unprecedented check by the officials of the air pressure at halftime showed that most of the game balls were below the 12½ p.s.i. minimum.Missing: history | Show results with:history<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    NFL nabs New England Patriots in "Spygate" scandal - History.com
    Sep 1, 2021 · On September 9, 2007, the NFL catches the New England Patriots illegally videotaping coaching signals of the New York Jets from an unauthorized location.
  14. [14]
    Timeline of events surrounding Patriots' videotaping scandal
    May 13, 2008 · September 13, 2007:Patriots and coach Bill Belichick were fined a total of $750,000 and lost a 2008 first-dound draft selection. September 12, ...
  15. [15]
    When it all changed: 2007 and the birth of Patriots angst - ESPN
    Aug 9, 2017 · Ten years ago this week, the 2007 New England Patriots took to the ... Spygate or Deflategate scandals. Teams are warier of Belichick's ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Spygate to Deflategate: Inside what split the NFL and Patriots apart
    Sep 8, 2015 · Deflategate is seen by some owners as a "makeup call" over Spygate. From 2000 to 2007, the Patriots videotaped the signals of opposing coaches in 40 games.
  17. [17]
    Examples of How Patriots Have Been Accused of Cheating
    Dec 12, 2019 · From Spygate to Deflategate, malfunctioning headsets and stolen play sheets, NFL teams have long been paranoid about the Patriots cheating.
  18. [18]
    AFC Championship - Indianapolis Colts at New England Patriots
    Jan 18, 2015 · Indianapolis Colts 7 at New England Patriots 45 on January 18th, 2015 - Full team and player stats and box score.
  19. [19]
    Patriots 45-7 Colts (Jan 18, 2015) Game Recap - ESPN
    Jan 19, 2015 · The New England Patriots dominant duo earned a sixth trip to the Super Bowl with a 45-7 wipeout of the Indianapolis Colts in the AFC championship game.
  20. [20]
    Foxborough Weather: Cloudy, overcast, windy for Patriots-Colts AFC ...
    Jan 18, 2015 · It was overcast, windy and warm about three hours before kickoff of the New England Patriots-Indianapolis Colts AFC Championship game.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] investigative report concerning footballs used - ESPN
    May 6, 2015 · Based on these experiments, Exponent concluded that the average pressures recorded for the Patriots game balls during halftime of the AFC.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Deflate-gate: Indianapolis Colts Raised Concerns in November ...
    Nov 16, 2024 · The Indianapolis Colts had raised concerns as far back as November about under-inflated balls supplied by the New England Patriots.
  23. [23]
    11 of 12 Pats footballs underinflated - ESPN
    Jan 21, 2015 · Sources earlier this season told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter that the Colts had concerns about underinflated balls after their regular-season ...
  24. [24]
    A timeline of the Deflategate controversy - Sports Illustrated
    Jan 15, 2016 · The call for an investigation was triggered when Colts linebacker D'Qwell Jackson intercepted a pass from Brady in the second quarter, and the ...
  25. [25]
    NFL Investigates Reports Of Deflated Balls After Patriots Rout Colts
    Jan 19, 2015 · NFL Investigates Reports Of Deflated Balls After Patriots Rout Colts : The Two-Way In wet and slippery conditions, an under-inflated ball could ...
  26. [26]
    NFL: Patriots used under-inflated footballs - CNN
    Jan 23, 2015 · The NFL confirmed the New England Patriots used footballs that didn't meet league specifications in the first half of the AFC championship ...
  27. [27]
    Championship Fallout: On Deflation and Blame - Sports Illustrated
    Jan 20, 2015 · A look at what is known about the NFL's probe into the potential use of deflated footballs in the Patriots-Colts game. Plus readers weigh in ...
  28. [28]
    NFL statement on Deflategate: Patriots footballs were under-inflated ...
    Jan 23, 2015 · NFL statement on Deflategate: Patriots footballs were under-inflated in first half. This article is more than 10 years old. The NFL issued a ...
  29. [29]
    NFL, Goodell sound ready to punt on DeflateGate - New York Post
    “It is an ongoing process that the league and our team are taking very seriously.” The NFL offered no specifics about how deflated the balls ...
  30. [30]
    Deflategate timeline: After 544 days, Tom Brady gives in - ESPN
    Sep 3, 2015 · Presenting a timeline of events following the New England Patriots and QB Tom Brady and the Deflategate investigation.
  31. [31]
    Roger Goodell on NFL's Deflate-gate investigation: 'We want the truth'
    “We want the truth,” Goodell said at his annual news conference two days before the Super Bowl. “That's what I think our fans want. That's what ...
  32. [32]
    Roger Goodell on the state of the NFL: Patriots could be penalized ...
    Jan 30, 2015 · Commissioner Roger Goodell says that even if no competitive advantage was gained, the New England Patriots could face increased penalties if ...
  33. [33]
    NFL conference championship weather forecast: It's all about that rain
    Jan 18, 2015 · Temperatures are not bad for the game as they will be in the low 50s. Packers vs. Seahawks - Sunday 3:05 p.m. ET, FOX FORECAST: Scattered rain ...
  34. [34]
    Tom Brady and the Ideal Gas Law: Physics of Deflategate - Chad Orzel
    Jan 23, 2015 · The product of pressure and volume is proportional to the amount of stuff inside the ball multiplied by the temperature.<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [Video] Deflategate -How Temperature Can Influence Pressure in a ...
    Long story short - the Ideal Gas Law states that for a fixed gas volume, pressure is directly proportional to the temperature of the gas, so if the temperature ...
  36. [36]
    Football physics and the science of Deflategate - Phys.org
    Jan 23, 2015 · The physics principle known as the ideal gas law tells us that a reduction in temperature leads to a reduction in pressure. The pressure of a ...
  37. [37]
    “Deflategate”: Time, Temperature, and Moisture Effects on Football ...
    Sep 1, 2016 · In this paper, we measure and analyze the environmental effects of time, ambient temperature, and moisture on the internal pressure of an NFL football.
  38. [38]
    Early Fumbles in “DeflateGate” | American Physical Society
    Ordinary pressure gauges measure only the pressure in excess of one atmosphere. When plugging the measured air pressure of the footballs into the ideal gas law ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Page 1 of 2 In the 2015 football AFC championship game between ...
    One possibility is that the room in which the footballs were stored was warmer than 68 °F. To reach a 10.5 psig pressure at game conditions, the indoor room ...
  40. [40]
    Deflating 'Deflategate' | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
    Jun 12, 2015 · The Wells report's main finding is that the Patriots balls declined in pressure more than the Colts balls did in the first half of their game, ...Missing: key | Show results with:key<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    American Enterprise Institute finds Wells Report 'deeply flawed'
    Jun 14, 2015 · The Wells report's main finding is that the Patriots balls declined in pressure more than the Colts balls did in the first half of their game, ...
  42. [42]
    Deflategate and Errors in the Wells Report | Climate Audit
    Jun 23, 2015 · The present article extends their work to include analysis of Exponent's simulations and transients, showing that all relevant issues raised in ...
  43. [43]
    On the Wells Report | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
    The Wells report finds that the Patriots footballs declined in pressure significantly more than the Colts balls in the first half of the game.
  44. [44]
    Goodell and Deflategate Science - Climate Audit
    Jul 29, 2015 · My specific interest in the decision was how the scientific issues ... The data collection was so deeply flawed that even Wells and the ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Wells Report called 'deeply flawed' and 'unreliable' | Sports
    Jun 14, 2015 · The American Enterprise Institute has examined the 243-page Ted Wells Report and finds it “deeply flawed” and “unreliable.” Story continues ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  46. [46]
    NFL releases statement on Patriots' violations
    May 11, 2015 · The New England Patriots are fined $1 million and will forfeit the club's first-round selection in the 2016 NFL Draft and the club's fourth-round selection in ...
  47. [47]
    NFL suspends Tom Brady for 4 games - ESPN
    May 11, 2015 · The NFL has suspended Super Bowl MVP Tom Brady without pay for the first four games of the season, fined the New England Patriots $1 million and taken away two ...
  48. [48]
    NFL Suspends Tom Brady For 4 Games Over 'Deflategate' Scandal
    May 11, 2015 · Brady will sit out the first four games of the 2015 regular season without pay, the NFL says, citing "conduct detrimental to the integrity of ...
  49. [49]
    Tom Brady weighs in on 'Deflategate:' 'I didn't alter the ball' | CNN
    Jan 23, 2015 · “I didn't alter the ball in any way,” Brady said at a press conference. “I have no knowledge of wrongdoing.” “I have no explanation,” Belichick ...
  50. [50]
    Transcript of Patriots QB Tom Brady's press conference on ...
    Jan 22, 2015 · Transcript of Patriots QB Tom Brady's press conference on DeflateGate scandal. Tom Brady denies he knew anything was wrong with his footballs.
  51. [51]
    Tom Brady's Past Statements on NFL Deflate-Gate Investigation of ...
    May 7, 2015 · So far, Tom Brady's response to the Deflate-Gate report is dead air. ... He categorically denied wrongdoing. Here is what Brady said that day ...
  52. [52]
    Deflategate quotes, then and now - Sports Illustrated
    May 7, 2015 · A reporter asked Brady a simple question: "Can you answer right now, is Tom Brady a cheater?" Brady chuckled a nervous laugh before responding, ...
  53. [53]
    Tom Brady suspension case timeline - NFL.com
    Jul 15, 2016 · 3:Tom Brady's four-game suspension is nullified by Judge Richard M. Berman. Brady is now eligible to play for the Patriots in Week 1. One of ...
  54. [54]
    Timeline: A rundown of the NFL, Tom Brady 'Deflategate' saga
    Mar 4, 2020 · March 21: In light of the doubts raised about the Deflategate evidence, Kraft asks the NFL to restore the team's draft picks . Goodell denies ...
  55. [55]
    Tom Brady's Deflategate testimony, phone records revealed in ...
    Aug 4, 2015 · But Brady testified he asked equipment assistant John Jastremski whether Jastremski was guilty, and Jastremski's response was unequivocal: “We ...
  56. [56]
    "Deflategate" and Appealing Adverse Arbitral Decisions
    May 9, 2016 · After an extensive hearing involving nearly 10 hours of testimony and approximately 300 exhibits, Commissioner Goodell issued a final decision ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Deflategate: Tom Brady's Battle Against the NFL and Arbitration
    Oct 23, 2018 · testimony of any witnesses whose testimony is necessary for a hearing to be fair.125 He justified his discretion to deny Brady's motion to.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Case 1:15-cv-05916-RMB-JCF Document 28-230 Filed 08 ... - ESPN
    Aug 4, 2015 · NFL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION WITNESSES: THOMAS BRADY. EDWARD SNYDER. TROY VINCENT. THEODORE V. WELLS, JR., ESQ. NFL MANAGEMENT COUNCIL WITNESSES ...
  59. [59]
    Deflategate: Tom Brady was not given ultimatum over cellphone ...
    Aug 5, 2015 · The NFLPA called four witnesses at the appeal hearing: Brady, Wells, NFL executive vice president Troy Vincent and Ted Snyder, dean of the Yale ...
  60. [60]
    Takeaways From Transcript Of Tom Brady's Testimony - CBS Boston
    Aug 4, 2015 · --Brady being so well-coached explains why neither John Jastremski or Jim McNally could have been called as witnesses. There likely wasn't ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Report: Tom Brady testifies under oath at Deflategate appeal hearing
    Jun 23, 2015 · New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady's testimony at his appeal hearing on Tuesday is “under oath.”
  62. [62]
    Every detail of Brady's flat-out Deflategate denial in testimony
    Aug 4, 2015 · Brady said in the June hearing he had “zero” knowledge of what PSI level was required by the NFL until a December game against the Jets when his ...
  63. [63]
    NFL Players Association releases Tom Brady, Ted Wells testimony
    Aug 5, 2015 · The NFLPA called four witnesses at the appeal hearing: Brady, Wells, NFL executive vice president Troy Vincent and Ted Snyder, dean of the Yale ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  64. [64]
    DeflateGate: Brady Appeal Hearing Transcript Released - Pats Pulpit
    Aug 4, 2015 · Brady begins his testimony talking about the ball preparation process in great detail: how they are broken in, how they are chosen and the ...
  65. [65]
    Roger Goodell won't recuse himself in Tom Brady's appeal case
    Jun 2, 2015 · NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has rejected the NFL Players' Association's request that he recuse himself from Tom Brady's appeal case.Missing: allegations | Show results with:allegations
  66. [66]
    The Deflategate Drama: A Win for Arbitration - JAMS
    Oct 8, 2015 · The “Deflategate scandal,” in which the New England Patriots, and in particular their star quarterback, Tom Brady, were accused of deflating footballs beneath ...
  67. [67]
    Airing it out: Carfagna discusses legal battle over 'Deflategate'
    Aug 21, 2015 · Under Article 46 of the CBA, the commissioner has final and binding authority both at the first level of discipline and also on appeal. That's ...Missing: conflict | Show results with:conflict
  68. [68]
    Deflategate appeal: Tom Brady loses no matter what - CNBC
    Jul 31, 2015 · Brady's 54-page challenge to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's ruling upholding the suspension uses some version of the word "fair" over 30 times ...
  69. [69]
    Effect of “Deflategate” on Collective Bargaining Agreements and the ...
    On July 28, 2015, National Football League (NFL) Commissioner Roger Goodell, acting as arbitrator, imposed a four-game suspension against New England ...
  70. [70]
    Expect Big Win for Tom Brady in Deflategate Round II Appeal
    Dec 18, 2015 · Commissioner Goodell's denial of the Players Association's motion to produce the Paul, Weiss investigative files, including notes of witness ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] \\l~~~-f~ :FtLED·:-. q{'J1i~- - New York State - Federal Judicial Council
    Sep 3, 2015 · On May II, 2015, Vincent sent a (separate) "disciplinary decision" letter to Brady, stating: "The Commissioner has authorized me to inform you ...
  72. [72]
    Tom Brady Defeats NFL; Judge Berman Rules To Vacate Four ...
    Sep 3, 2015 · U.S. District Judge Richard Berman issued his decision, ruling to vacate the four-game suspension issued to Brady for his alleged general ...
  73. [73]
    Why Tom Brady, NFLPA beat Roger Goodell in their Deflategate ...
    Sep 3, 2015 · If the NFL is granted a stay, Brady would have to serve his suspension despite being the winner in Judge Berman's decision.
  74. [74]
    Judge vacates Tom Brady's Deflategate suspension - Boston.com
    Sep 3, 2015 · Berman issued a 40-page decision overturning the NFL's suspension of Brady on grounds that NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell violated the league's ...
  75. [75]
    Five things to know about the Tom Brady decision - ESPN
    Sep 3, 2015 · Here are five highlights from U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman's ruling ... Brady's four-game suspension is vacated, effective immediately.
  76. [76]
    NFL Mgmt. Council v. NFL Players Ass'n, No. 15-2801 (2d Cir. 2016)
    The district court vacated the award based on the reasoning that Brady lacked notice that his conduct was prohibited and punishable by suspension, and that the ...
  77. [77]
    Tom Brady's four-game suspension reinstated by court - NFL.com
    Apr 25, 2016 · The US Second Court of Appeals handed down a decision Monday morning that reinstates the four-game suspension of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady.
  78. [78]
    Tom Brady has 4-game suspension upheld, not ready to accept ruling
    Apr 25, 2016 · Tom Brady's four-game suspension relating to the Deflategate scandal was reinstated by a U.S. appeals court ruling Monday.
  79. [79]
    Tom Brady's NFL Suspension Upheld By Federal Appeals Court - NPR
    Apr 25, 2016 · A federal appeals court has reinstated Tom Brady's four-game suspension over his involvement in the "Deflategate" scandal.
  80. [80]
    Giants 17-9 Patriots (Sep 1, 2016) Game Recap - ESPN
    Sep 1, 2016 · With a four-game suspension for his role in the "Deflategate" scandal beginning in just a few days, Brady had an NFL going-away party Thursday ...
  81. [81]
    Tom Brady plays a half in Patriots' preseason finale - Sports Illustrated
    Sep 1, 2016 · Brady begins a four-game suspension Saturday for his role in the use of deflated footballs in the 2014 AFC championship game. The three-time ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  82. [82]
    Here's what Tom Brady can and can't do while he's suspended
    Aug 30, 2016 · Brady can't show up to the Patriots' facility or engage in football-related activities or discussions with teammates.<|separator|>
  83. [83]
  84. [84]
    Tom Brady suspended 4 games by NFL; Patriots lose 2016 first ...
    May 11, 2015 · Tom Brady will miss New England's first four games of the 2015 season for the role he played in Deflategate.
  85. [85]
    2016 New England Patriots Game Log - Pro-Football-Reference.com
    2016 New England Patriots Game Log ; Record: 14-2-0, 1st in AFC East Division (Schedule and Results) ; Coach: Bill Belichick (14-2-0) ; Points For: 441 (27.6/g) ...
  86. [86]
    Patriots Historical 2016 Schedule - New England Patriots
    DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF · Sat 01/14 · 34 - 16 ; CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP · Sun 01/22 · 36 - 17 ; SUPER BOWL · Sun 02/05 · 34 - 28 ; WEEK 1 · Sun 09/11 · 23 - 21 ; WEEK 2 · Sun 09/ ...
  87. [87]
    30 days without Tom Brady - NFL, New England Patriots ... - ESPN
    Oct 2, 2016 · On April 25, a federal appeals court reinstated Brady's suspension for his role in Deflategate, just five days after the Westgate posted point ...
  88. [88]
    2016 New England Patriots Rosters, Stats, Schedule, Team Draftees ...
    Record: 14-2-0, 1st in AFC East Division (Schedule and Results) ; Coach: Bill Belichick (14-2-0) ; Points For: 441 (27.6/g) 3rd of 32 ; Points Against: 250 (15.6/g) ...Next Season · 2015 · Super Bowl LI
  89. [89]
    New England Patriots 2016 Scores, Stats, Schedule, Standings
    The New England Patriots were 14-2 in 2016. They finished 1st in the AFC East and 1st in the AFC. They emerged victorious over the Atlanta Falcons, 34 to 28, ...
  90. [90]
    How will the suspension of Tom Brady affect the Patriots season?
    Jul 13, 2016 · The suspension of Brady will have other effects of note. Brady will avoid the wear-and-tear of the first month of the season and will be better ...
  91. [91]
    Tom Brady suspension fueled Patriots' Super Bowl LI run
    Jan 25, 2017 · A judge upheld the four-game suspension levied against the QB by commissioner Roger Goodell, ensuring that the first quarter of the 2016 season would be played ...
  92. [92]
    Super Bowl LI - New England Patriots vs. Atlanta Falcons
    Feb 5, 2017 · New England Patriots 34 vs. Atlanta Falcons 28 on February 5th, 2017 - Full team and player stats and box score.
  93. [93]
    Super Bowl LI - "28-3" - NFL 100 | NFL.com
    After a Falcons' punt, the Patriots – aided by a spectacular Julian Edelman catch – completed a 91-yard drive with a White TD run and a two-point conversion to ...
  94. [94]
    Super Bowl LI - Official website of the New England Patriots
    The Patriots completed the biggest comeback in team history when they overcame a 25-point deficit to beat Atlanta, 34-28, in overtime in Super Bowl LI.
  95. [95]
    2016 New England Patriots - NFL 100 | NFL.com
    The 2016 Patriots won the Super Bowl after a 14-2 regular season in which they scored 27.6 points per game and held their opponents to a league-low 15.6 points.<|control11|><|separator|>
  96. [96]
    Deflategate Timeline: From the tweet that started it all to denial of ...
    Jul 13, 2016 · 20 highlights from Tom Brady attempting to explain Deflategate. Wells Report: Probable that Brady conspired with staffers to deflate balls ...Missing: public quotes
  97. [97]
    SI's complete coverage of Deflategate - Sports Illustrated
    Jan 21, 2015 · SI's complete coverage of the investigation into the New England Patriots for deflating footballs used in the AFC Championship Game.
  98. [98]
    Deflategate 10 years later: Was it an actual scandal or an absurd ...
    Jan 23, 2025 · At one point, the media frenzy over Deflategate was so intense that there were calls for Belichick to be suspended from the upcoming Super ...Missing: bias | Show results with:bias
  99. [99]
    Why Deflategate Is the Perfect Sports Media Feeding Frenzy
    Why Deflategate Is the Perfect Sports Media Feeding Frenzy. Elias Stein. NFL. September 4, 2015. by Bryan Curtis.Missing: bias | Show results with:bias
  100. [100]
    Patriots fans think ESPN hates their team. Do they have a point?
    Jan 19, 2018 · ESPN's coverage of Deflategate wasn't just filled with errors, it was positively reckless and uninterested in the truth. They decided early that ...
  101. [101]
    ESPN Editing Pro-Patriots Story Is Strongest Example Yet of Its ...
    Sep 10, 2015 · The 10,704-word article lists a series of allegations about what is portrayed as an elaborate cheating scheme that lasted from Bill Belichick's ...Missing: accusations | Show results with:accusations
  102. [102]
    ESPN 'can't be trusted' to cover NFL, showed anti-Patriots bias in ...
    Sep 29, 2015 · ESPN 'can't be trusted' to cover NFL, showed anti-Patriots bias in Deflategate (Report) ... As for ESPN, debates over how certain media outlets ...Missing: accusations | Show results with:accusations<|control11|><|separator|>
  103. [103]
    NEW: NFLPA Releases Statement on Brady Suspension
    Jul 28, 2015 · The NFLPA will appeal this outrageous decision on behalf of Tom Brady. Making it Official. The NFLPA's federal court filing is set to take place ...
  104. [104]
    Tom Brady case: Judge overturns 'deflategate' suspension - BBC
    Sep 3, 2015 · A US judge has overturned a four-game suspension against National Football League (NFL) quarterback Tom Brady, calling the league's disciplinary process " ...
  105. [105]
    Tom Brady's court win takes the air out of the NFL's punishment - PBS
    Sep 3, 2015 · A federal judge overturned the NFL's four-game suspension of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady's over what's become known as “Deflategate.”
  106. [106]
    Tom Brady Deflategate Suspension Overturned: Twitter Reacts to ...
    Sep 3, 2015 · Tom Brady Deflategate Suspension Overturned: Twitter Reacts to Court Ruling ... New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady's four-game suspension ...
  107. [107]
    Legal takeaways from Brady-Goodell Deflategate federal court hearing
    Aug 12, 2015 · There is no debate that Goodell was acting in the capacity of an arbitrator when he upheld Brady's four-game suspension. What Tom Brady's denial ...
  108. [108]
    Deflategate appeal: Judges focus on Tom Brady's cellphone | CNN
    Mar 4, 2016 · Brady's attorney was grilled by judges Thursday in the NFL's appeal to reinstate a four-game suspension on the New England Patriots' superstar quarterback.
  109. [109]
    With Deflategate Ruling, Roger Goodell Is Firmly in Control
    Apr 25, 2016 · Based on the report, Commissioner Roger Goodell suspended Brady for four regular-season games. The Patriots were also fined $1 million and lost ...
  110. [110]
    Patriots QB Tom Brady has Deflategate appeal denied by ... - ESPN
    Jul 13, 2016 · Tom Brady's appeal of his four-game Deflategate suspension was denied by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.Missing: coverage | Show results with:coverage
  111. [111]
    Deflategate post-mortem: It's the NFL players union's fault for giving ...
    Apr 26, 2016 · The players could have insisted that appeals from commissioner rulings be placed before a neutral arbitration panel, or even taken to court.Missing: coverage | Show results with:coverage
  112. [112]
    Tom Brady's "Deflategate" appeal falls flat - CBS News
    Jul 13, 2016 · NEW YORK - A federal appeals court has rejected Tom Brady's attempt to get a new hearing on his "Deflategate" suspension.Missing: media | Show results with:media
  113. [113]
    The case for Tom Brady: An arbitrator's take - The Washington Post
    Jun 10, 2016 · David Evans writes that "Commissioner Goodell's handling of Mr. Brady's case violates longstanding fundamental tenets of a fair arbitration.Missing: coverage | Show results with:coverage
  114. [114]
    [PDF] New Light on the Deflategate Controversy: Critical Technical Errors
    May 31, 2016 · Without the scientific errors in the Exponent Report, it is doubtful there would be any. Deflategate controversy. Unfortunately, the original ...Missing: flaws | Show results with:flaws
  115. [115]
    The Statistical Perspective on DEFLATEGATE - Biostatistics By Design
    Mar 2, 2019 · Looking at the means, you can see that the Colts balls were within the regulatory limits for psi, measuring 12.53 psi on average. The Patriots ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  116. [116]
    Study: NFL's Deflategate report is 'deeply flawed' - Boston.com
    Jun 13, 2015 · A study conducted by the American Enterprise Institute determined NFL-appointed investigator Ted Wells' Deflategate report is “deeply flawed'' ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  117. [117]
    What really happened during Deflategate? Five years later ... - ESPN
    Jan 18, 2020 · The NFL thought it found proof during a surprise and unprecedented inflation check at halftime of the 2014 AFC Championship Game, a 45-7 ...
  118. [118]
    Five years later, appreciating the stupidity of Deflategate - Audacy
    May 11, 2020 · Many say the excessive punishment was due to not punishing the Patriots enough for Spygate. But that's for a different retrospective. In the end ...
  119. [119]
    ESPN Runs Story Pinning DeflateGate Scandal On NFL Instead Of ...
    Jan 22, 2020 · "At worst, Deflategate was a retroactive framing of the league's most successful franchise and a future Hall of Fame quarterback, a clumsy ...Missing: retrospective analysis
  120. [120]
    It's the 10-year anniversary of the #Deflategate game - Yahoo Sports
    Jan 18, 2025 · Ten years ago today, the Patriots blew out the Colts in the AFC Championship. The 45-7 final score quickly became a footnote.
  121. [121]
    Report: Patriots staffer tried to put unapproved 'K ball' in AFC title game
    Feb 17, 2015 · Report: Patriots staffer tried to put unapproved 'K ball' in AFC title game. A New England Patriots staffer tried to hand an official an ...
  122. [122]
    Deflategate's Textgate: Pats staffers' texts paint picture of Brady's role
    May 6, 2015 · Text messages between Patriots locker room attendant Jim McNally and equipment assistant John Jastremski provides a behind-the-scenes look ...
  123. [123]
    'Come on help the deflator': the incriminating Deflategate texts in full
    May 6, 2015 · Texts between two Patriots staff members suggest the pair worked together to deliberately deflate game balls for Tom Brady.
  124. [124]
    Read 6 Text Message Conversations in the Deflategate Report
    May 6, 2015 · The text messages exchanged between Jastremski and McNally provide a colorful (and at times expletive-filled) lens into what has become known as Deflategate.<|separator|>
  125. [125]
    NFL investigator: Direct evidence shows Brady knew about deflated ...
    May 12, 2015 · Wells specifically mentioned two series of text exchanges between officials' locker room attendant Jim McNally and equipment assistant John ...
  126. [126]
    NFL Reinstates 2 Patriots Employees At The Center Of Deflategate
    Sep 16, 2015 · Jastremski, the team's equipment assistant, and McNally, the officials locker room attendant, were accused of deflating footballs below league ...
  127. [127]
    NFL finds Patriots employees probably deflated balls; Tom Brady ...
    May 6, 2015 · The NFL report said "it was more than probable than not" that Jim McNally, the officials' locker room attendant, and John Jastremski, an ...
  128. [128]
    Patriots locker room attendant tried to put unapproved ball into AFC ...
    Feb 17, 2015 · NFL officials put a special mark or stamp on each ball approved for use on offensive possessions, as well as the "K balls" used on special teams ...
  129. [129]
    Patriots Locker Room Attendant Tried to Put Unapproved Ball Into ...
    The "K balls" are used for special teams, and not by the offenses of either team. NFL officials put a special mark or stamp on each ball approved for use on ...
  130. [130]
    NFL lets 2 staffers implicated in 'Deflategate' rejoin Patriots | CNN
    Sep 16, 2015 · The NFL said that John Jastremski and Jim McNally, the two staffers implicated in the Deflategate saga, can rejoin the New England Patriots.
  131. [131]
    Why are some Deflategate text messages being ignored? - FOX Sports
    May 13, 2015 · A lot of the text messages that officials locker room attendant Jim McNally and equipment assistant John Jastremski sent back and forth are open ...
  132. [132]
    Ted Wells responds to 'personal attacks,' defends Deflategate report
    May 12, 2015 · Ted Wells responded to critics of his investigation into the Patriots football controversy in a conference call on Tuesday.<|control11|><|separator|>
  133. [133]
    Deflategate: Former NFL official reported Jim McNally years ago
    Sep 17, 2015 · The Patriots reinstated McNally and John Jastremski, an equipment staffer, on Wednesday. Both were suspended indefinitely without pay for ...
  134. [134]
    New Deflategate revelations paint the NFL in a bad light during ...
    Feb 7, 2022 · That information was ultimately proven to be false and a correction was eventually made in the initial report. In Playmakers, Florio reports ...
  135. [135]
    Roger Goodell Resurrects NFL's Lie About PSI Data Collection In ...
    Feb 9, 2022 · Roger Goodell Resurrects NFL's Lie About PSI Data Collection In 2015, Dodges DeflateGate Question - CBS Boston.
  136. [136]
    New DeflateGate Report Casts Negative Light On NFL For Covering ...
    Feb 6, 2022 · New DeflateGate Report Casts Negative Light On NFL For Covering Up Facts, Leaking False Information. February 6, 2022 / 11:59 PM EST / CBS ...
  137. [137]
    Did the NFL Destroy Key Deflategate Evidence?
    Aug 27, 2015 · Instead, he exposed himself to charges that he appointed himself as arbitrator in order to erect a firewall between his office and such charges.Missing: proceedings testimonies
  138. [138]
    DeflateGate, And The Patriots' False Appearance Of Guilt - WBUR
    Aug 31, 2015 · The Patriots repeatedly requested the true numbers, but the league withheld them, the better to allow the perception of cheating to saturate the common sense.<|control11|><|separator|>
  139. [139]
    New Independent Study Questions Wells Report, Says 'Unlikely ...
    Jun 13, 2015 · American Enterprise Institute released a study that claims the science in the Wells Report was flawed.Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  140. [140]
    Roger Goodell, NFL have credibility, integrity issues - ESPN
    May 17, 2015 · Deflategate and other scandals have revealed the NFL to be a league without integrity run by a commissioner, Roger Goodell, ...
  141. [141]
    Roger Goodell, NFL Blasted For Bias, Dishonesty, Fraud In N.Y. Law ...
    Dec 18, 2015 · The point here: In accusing Brady and the Patriots of lying and cheating, Roger Goodell has lied and cheated his way to reach conclusions. That ...
  142. [142]
    The 6 biggest misconceptions about Deflategate - Boston.com
    May 13, 2015 · The NFL treated the Patriots as a repeat offender and referenced Spygate in its statement regarding the Deflategate punishment. The NFL also ...
  143. [143]
    Roger Goodell at 10 years: Time to put 'players first' - ESPN
    Aug 8, 2016 · In his first 10 years as commissioner, Roger Goodell obsessed over protecting the shield. Now it's time to protect the players, ...