Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Disinfectant

A disinfectant is a chemical substance or mixture of substances that destroys or irreversibly inactivates harmful microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, on inanimate surfaces or objects, though it does not necessarily kill bacterial spores.^[1] Unlike sterilants, which eliminate all forms of microbial life including spores, disinfectants target vegetative cells and are widely applied in healthcare settings, food processing, water treatment, and household cleaning to reduce infection risks and maintain hygiene standards.^[2] Their efficacy depends on factors such as concentration, contact time, pH, and the presence of organic matter, with regulatory bodies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) establishing guidelines for safe and effective use.^[3] Disinfectants are categorized by their chemical composition and antimicrobial spectrum, with common types including alcohols, halogens, aldehydes, and quaternary ammonium compounds (quats).^[2] Alcohols, such as ethanol and isopropanol at 60-90% concentrations, provide rapid broad-spectrum activity against bacteria, viruses, and fungi by disrupting cell membranes but evaporate quickly and lack persistent effects.^[2] Chlorine-based agents like sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) are potent oxidizers effective against a wide range of pathogens, commonly used for surface disinfection and water treatment due to their low cost and sporicidal potential at higher concentrations.^[3] Aldehydes, including glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde, offer high-level disinfection for medical instruments by alkylating proteins and nucleic acids, though their toxicity limits use to controlled environments.^[2] Quats, such as benzalkonium chloride, are cationic surfactants valued for their low toxicity and residual activity on non-porous surfaces, making them suitable for general cleaning in hospitals and homes.^[2] The concept of disinfection has ancient roots, with empirical methods like fumigation using sulfur or herbal smokes and chemical applications of mercury, copper, or acids employed to control odors and diseases before the germ theory was established.^[4] Significant advancements occurred in the 19th century following Louis Pasteur's and Robert Koch's demonstrations of microbial causation of disease, leading to the introduction of carbolic acid (phenol) by Joseph Lister for surgical antisepsis in 1867 and the development of chlorine-based disinfectants for water purification.^[2] Today, ongoing research focuses on novel agents like peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide for enhanced safety and environmental compatibility, addressing challenges such as antimicrobial resistance and byproduct formation in disinfection processes. As of 2025, research emphasizes green disinfectants, including hypochlorous acid and botanical agents, to mitigate environmental impact and emerging resistance.^[3]^[5]^[6]

Definitions and Classifications

Core Definition

A disinfectant is a chemical or physical agent used to reduce the number of harmful microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi, on inanimate surfaces or objects to levels considered safe for public health, without necessarily eliminating all microbial life or bacterial spores.^[7] This process targets pathogenic microbes that can cause infections, focusing on inactivation or destruction to prevent disease transmission in environments like healthcare facilities, households, and public spaces.^[8] The concept of disinfection emerged in the 19th century, pioneered by Ignaz Semmelweis and Joseph Lister, who laid foundational principles for controlling microbial contamination through antiseptic practices that evolved into modern disinfection.^[9] Semmelweis, in the 1840s, demonstrated that handwashing with chlorinated solutions drastically reduced puerperal fever mortality in maternity wards, attributing infections to transferable contaminants rather than miasma.^[10] Building on this and Louis Pasteur's germ theory, Lister introduced carbolic acid (phenol) in the 1860s for wound dressings and surgical environments, marking the shift toward systematic microbial control on non-living materials.^[11] Disinfectants are specifically intended for non-living surfaces and objects, distinguishing them from antiseptics applied to skin or mucous membranes, as their formulations may be too harsh for living tissues.^[8] They primarily address vegetative forms of bacteria, enveloped and non-enveloped viruses, and fungi, though efficacy against resistant structures like bacterial spores varies by agent and requires higher-level processes.^[12]

Levels of Disinfection

Disinfectants are classified into levels based on their spectrum of antimicrobial activity and efficacy against different microorganisms, a system originally proposed by Dr. Earle H. Spaulding in 1968 and adopted by health authorities such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).^[13] This hierarchical approach—low-level, intermediate-level, and high-level disinfection—guides the selection of disinfectants for specific applications, ensuring adequate microbial reduction without unnecessary overkill.^[8] The classification emphasizes the degree of risk associated with the item being disinfected, aligning with the Spaulding scheme for critical, semicritical, and noncritical medical devices.^[13] Low-level disinfection targets vegetative bacteria, some enveloped viruses, and some fungi, but it is ineffective against bacterial spores, mycobacteria, or non-enveloped viruses.^[8] Quaternary ammonium compounds (quats) are representative examples, commonly used for noncritical surfaces like floors and bedrails in healthcare settings.^[3] This level achieves at least a 99.999% (5-log) reduction in susceptible pathogens under standard conditions.^[8] Intermediate-level disinfection provides broader efficacy, destroying mycobacteria (such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis), vegetative bacteria, most viruses (both enveloped and non-enveloped), and most fungi, though it does not reliably inactivate bacterial spores.^[8] Phenolic compounds and iodophors exemplify this category, suitable for semicritical items like endoscopes that contact mucous membranes.^[3] The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designates hospital disinfectants with tuberculocidal claims as intermediate-level, requiring efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis, plus Mycobacterium tuberculosis. High-level disinfection eliminates all microorganisms except high numbers of bacterial spores, achieving near-sterilization for practical purposes.^[8] Glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid are typical agents, applied to semicritical devices such as respiratory therapy equipment to ensure destruction of resistant pathogens like non-enveloped viruses and mycobacteria.^[3] This level requires validated protocols to confirm sporicidal limitations under heavy bioburden.^[13] Sterilants extend high-level disinfection by fully inactivating all microbial forms, including bacterial spores, through prolonged exposure or enhanced conditions, distinguishing them as complete microbial killers rather than partial ones.^[8] For instance, glutaraldehyde used beyond standard high-level contact times functions as a sterilant for critical items entering sterile tissues.^[3] This differentiation underscores that true sterilization demands methods proven to achieve a 6-log or greater reduction in spores.^[13] Regulatory testing by the EPA categorizes disinfectants into hospital-grade (broad-spectrum for healthcare use, including intermediate-level tuberculocides), general-purpose or household-grade (limited to basic bacteria like S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, suitable for non-medical surfaces), and instrument-grade (high-level for medical devices, often requiring mycobactericidal and virucidal claims).^[14] Hospital-grade products undergo stringent AOAC International use-dilution and carrier tests to verify efficacy.^[1] The achieved level of disinfection is influenced by several factors, including contact time (typically 10 minutes for low- and intermediate-level, longer for high-level), disinfectant concentration (must align with label dilutions), and organic load (presence of blood, soil, or biofilms reduces efficacy by 50-90% if not pre-cleaned).^[3] Temperature and pH also modulate activity, with optimal ranges specified on EPA-registered labels to ensure reliable performance.^[8] Disinfectants are antimicrobial agents designed specifically for application to inanimate objects and surfaces to reduce or eliminate pathogenic microorganisms, distinguishing them from antiseptics, which are formulated for use on living tissues such as skin or mucous membranes and exhibit lower toxicity to avoid harming host cells.^[8]^[2] For instance, povidone-iodine serves as an antiseptic for wound care due to its selective action on microbes while minimizing tissue damage.^[2] In contrast to sanitizers, which primarily reduce microbial populations on surfaces—often to a safe level of 99.999% (5-log reduction) for bacteria on food-contact areas without guaranteed virucidal activity—disinfectants undergo stricter testing to achieve broader and more potent elimination of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and sometimes spores.^[15]^[7]^[16]^[17] Sterilants differ from disinfectants by aiming for complete eradication of all microbial life, including resistant bacterial spores, and are typically reserved for critical medical devices that enter sterile body areas, whereas disinfectants target most pathogens but may leave low numbers of spores intact unless used in high-level formulations with extended exposure.^[13]^[18] High-level disinfectants can overlap with sterilants when applied for prolonged periods, such as 3–12 hours, to enhance sporicidal effects.^[8] Disinfectants are generally bactericidal, meaning they kill microorganisms outright, in contrast to bacteriostatic agents that merely inhibit growth and require host defenses for clearance; this cidal action ensures irreversible inactivation on treated surfaces.^[3]^[19] Regulatory frameworks in the United States further delineate these agents: the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees disinfectants and sanitizers as antimicrobial pesticides for non-critical environmental surfaces, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates antiseptics for topical human use and liquid chemical sterilants or high-level disinfectants for medical devices.^[20]^[15]^[21]

Mechanisms and Effectiveness

Modes of Action

Disinfectants primarily inactivate microorganisms by targeting essential cellular components through biochemical disruption. A fundamental mechanism is the denaturation of proteins, which alters their three-dimensional structure and impairs the function of enzymes and structural elements critical for cellular integrity and metabolism. This process often occurs as disinfectants interact with amino acid side chains, leading to unfolding and loss of biological activity.^[12] Enzyme inactivation represents a specific subset of protein denaturation, where disinfectants bind to or modify active sites, thereby halting enzymatic reactions vital for energy production, DNA synthesis, and other metabolic pathways. Cell membrane disruption is another key mode of action, involving the penetration or solubilization of the lipid bilayer, which increases permeability and results in the leakage of ions, metabolites, and other intracellular contents, ultimately causing osmotic lysis and cell death.^[12]^[7] Damage to nucleic acids, such as DNA and RNA, is achieved through oxidation, which generates reactive oxygen species that cleave phosphodiester bonds, or alkylation, which adds alkyl groups to bases and inhibits replication and transcription processes. At higher concentrations, disinfectants can induce coagulation of cellular proteins, forming insoluble aggregates that rigidify the cytoplasm and prevent normal physiological functions.^[12]^[3] The effectiveness of these mechanisms is modulated by environmental factors, including pH, which influences the ionization state of both the disinfectant and microbial targets; temperature, which accelerates reaction rates but may also promote microbial resistance; and surface type, where organic matter or biofilms can adsorb disinfectants and reduce contact with microbes. Disinfectants vary in their antimicrobial spectrum, with broad-spectrum agents affecting a wide array of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa, whereas narrow-spectrum ones may preferentially target Gram-positive bacteria, as Gram-negative bacteria often exhibit greater resistance due to their outer membrane, which limits penetration of disinfectants.^[22]^[12] For instance, alcohols exemplify rapid protein denaturation and membrane disruption as their core actions.^[3]

Testing and Measurement Methods

The efficacy of disinfectants is assessed through standardized laboratory protocols that quantify microbial reduction under controlled conditions, ensuring reproducible results for regulatory approval and product labeling. These methods primarily evaluate bactericidal, virucidal, fungicidal, and sporicidal activity against specific challenge organisms, with outcomes determining the disinfectant's classification into levels such as high, intermediate, or low based on the achieved microbial kill.^[3] One widely adopted protocol is the AOAC Use-Dilution Method, a carrier-based test that simulates practical application on hard, non-porous surfaces. In this method, stainless steel penicylinders (carriers) are inoculated with a high titer of test microorganisms, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or Salmonella enterica, dried, and then immersed in the diluted disinfectant for a specified contact time, typically 10 minutes. After exposure, carriers are neutralized, and surviving microbes are recovered and enumerated via plating; efficacy is determined by the proportion of carriers showing no growth, with a passing criterion of no more than one positive carrier out of 60 replicates per lot. This test measures log reduction in viable cells, where a 5-log reduction corresponds to a 99.999% kill rate, establishing the disinfectant's ability to achieve high-level disinfection against vegetative bacteria.^[23]^[24] Suspension tests complement carrier methods by assessing activity in liquid media, providing insights into intrinsic biocidal potential without surface interference. For bactericidal activity, protocols like EN 1276 involve suspending test organisms in a diluent with the disinfectant for defined exposure times (e.g., 1-60 minutes), followed by neutralization and viable counting to calculate reduction factors. Virucidal suspension tests, such as EN 14476 or ASTM E1052, use enveloped or non-enveloped viruses (e.g., poliovirus or adenovirus) in proteinaceous interferents, requiring at least a 4-log reduction for claims against specific viral families. These phase 1 tests establish baseline activity before advancing to surface or field simulations.^[25]^[26] Log kill values serve as a key metric across these tests, expressing microbial inactivation logarithmically to capture the scale of reduction efficiently. A 1-log reduction eliminates 90% of the population, escalating to 5-log (99.999% kill) or 6-log (99.9999% kill) for stringent applications like hospital-grade disinfectants; for instance, EPA protocols mandate 5-log reductions against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in use-dilution tests for general bactericidal claims, while tuberculocidal claims require specific testing such as AOAC 965.12 against Mycobacterium bovis BCG, often achieving a 5-log reduction.^[27]^[28] Testing incorporates variables like organic soil load and contact time to mimic real conditions, as these influence performance. Organic loads, simulated with fetal bovine serum or skim milk (e.g., 5% load in EPA guidelines), can shield microbes and reduce efficacy by up to 2-3 logs, necessitating "dirty" condition variants in protocols. Contact time, the minimum duration for microbial inactivation (e.g., 5-10 minutes), must be validated, as shorter exposures often yield incomplete kills, particularly for non-enveloped viruses.^[22]^[29] Regulatory frameworks enforce these methods for market authorization. In the United States, the EPA requires AOAC-compliant testing for antimicrobial pesticide registration under FIFRA, including use-dilution for bacteria and suspension assays for viruses, with passing data submitted for product labels specifying kill claims. In Europe, the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) mandates CEN EN standards, such as EN 13624 for fungicidal activity and EN 14348 for mycobactericidal, often requiring both suspension and carrier tests under clean and soiled conditions for efficacy dossiers.^[30]^[31] Despite standardization, laboratory tests have limitations in predicting real-world efficacy, as controlled setups overlook variables like biofilms, surface topography, humidity fluctuations, and improper application, potentially overestimating performance by 1-2 logs in field scenarios. Validation through site-specific trials is recommended to bridge this gap, though not routinely required by regulators.^[32]

Physical and Chemical Properties

General Properties

Disinfectants exhibit a range of physicochemical properties that influence their handling, application, and overall performance in microbial inactivation. Solubility is a key characteristic, with most disinfectants formulated to be highly soluble in water or aqueous solutions to facilitate even distribution and contact with surfaces or media; for instance, many are miscible in water at typical use concentrations, enabling dilution for practical use. Volatility varies significantly, affecting evaporation rates and potential for airborne exposure—some disinfectants are non-volatile liquids or solids, while others, like certain gaseous agents, require containment to prevent loss. Odor profiles also differ, from strong, pungent smells that signal presence and pose sensory irritation risks to relatively odorless formulations designed for user comfort in enclosed spaces. These properties collectively determine the suitability of a disinfectant for specific environments, balancing efficacy with safety considerations.^[33]^[34] The activity of disinfectants is highly concentration-dependent, where efficacy peaks within defined ranges and diminishes outside them due to insufficient molecular interactions or dilution effects. Optimal concentrations ensure rapid microbial kill rates while avoiding waste or toxicity; for example, reductions below certain thresholds, such as 50% for some agents, sharply decrease bactericidal action, whereas levels above 90% may not yield proportional benefits and could increase material risks. This dependency necessitates precise formulation and dosing to achieve desired log reductions in microbial load without compromising safety.^[3]^[35] Incompatibility with materials is a critical property, as many disinfectants can corrode metals, degrade plastics, or etch surfaces at higher concentrations or prolonged exposures. For instance, oxidative agents may pit stainless steel or aluminum, leading to structural weakening in equipment, while requiring compatible storage and application tools like resistant polymers. Shelf life is typically limited by degradation factors such as exposure to light, which accelerates photolytic breakdown, or heat, which promotes thermal decomposition and loss of active ingredients; storage in cool, dark conditions can extend usability to months or years, depending on the formulation.^[3]^[36]^[37] Surface tension and wetting ability are essential for penetration into crevices, biofilms, or porous materials, with lower surface tension values (often below 40 dynes/cm) promoting better spreading and contact. Many formulations incorporate surfactants to reduce interfacial tension, enhancing emulsion formation and microbial envelope disruption; this property is particularly vital for uneven or hydrophobic surfaces, ensuring comprehensive coverage without beading. Stability factors, such as pH and temperature sensitivity, further modulate these traits during storage and use.^[38]

Stability and Formulation Factors

Formulation of disinfectants often incorporates additives such as surfactants to improve wetting, penetration into biofilms, and overall cleaning efficacy alongside antimicrobial action.^[35] Cationic surfactants, in particular, can enhance the activity of quaternary ammonium compounds (quats) by facilitating contact with microbial surfaces, while non-ionic surfactants aid in emulsifying oils and soils without interfering with the active ingredients.^[7] These additives are selected based on compatibility with the primary disinfectant to avoid reducing potency or causing precipitation.^[39] Buffering agents are commonly added to maintain an optimal pH range that preserves the stability and activity of the disinfectant.^[35] For example, hypochlorous acid-based disinfectants perform best at a pH of 5 to 7 for antimicrobial efficacy, where buffering maintains the proportion of undissociated hypochlorous acid, the most active species, while preventing shifts to less effective forms.^[3] In formulations of peracetic acid or glutaraldehyde, buffers such as phosphates or citrates stabilize the solution against pH fluctuations during storage or use, ensuring consistent microbicidal performance.^[40] Degradation pathways for disinfectants include hydrolysis and photolysis, which can compromise efficacy over time.^[41] Hydrolysis occurs when water molecules react with the active compound, breaking chemical bonds; for instance, in alkaline conditions, hypochlorite ions undergo hydrolysis to form less active chlorate or chloride.^[42] Photolysis, triggered by exposure to ultraviolet or visible light, generates reactive species that degrade the disinfectant, as seen in free available chlorine solutions where sunlight accelerates breakdown into chloride ions and oxygen.^[43] These pathways are influenced by environmental factors like temperature and pH, prompting formulators to incorporate stabilizers such as chelating agents to mitigate oxidative or hydrolytic losses.^[41] Compatibility issues arise when mixing disinfectants, particularly avoiding combinations of quats with anionic surfactants, which form insoluble ionic complexes that precipitate and inactivate the antimicrobial agent.^[44] This interaction reduces the bioavailability of quats by binding them to negatively charged surfaces or molecules, such as those in soaps or detergents, thereby diminishing germicidal efficacy.^[45] Formulators address this by using non-ionic or cationic compatibles in multi-component products, ensuring the mixture retains synergistic cleaning and disinfection properties without antagonism.^[46] Packaging plays a critical role in protecting light-sensitive disinfectants from photodegradation, with opaque or amber containers recommended for agents like hydrogen peroxide and chlorine compounds.^[47] These materials block UV and visible light wavelengths that initiate photolysis, extending shelf life; for example, sodium hypochlorite solutions stored in clear bottles degrade significantly faster under light exposure compared to those in opaque packaging.^[48] Additionally, airtight, corrosion-resistant containers prevent volatile loss and interaction with atmospheric moisture, maintaining formulation integrity during transport and storage.^[49]

Chemical Disinfectant Types

Alcohols and Aldehydes

Alcohols, particularly ethanol and isopropanol, serve as widely used disinfectants due to their ability to rapidly denature and coagulate microbial proteins, disrupting cell membranes and leading to cell death.^[50] This mechanism primarily affects vegetative bacteria, fungi, and enveloped viruses by causing irreversible damage to their structural components.^[51] For optimal efficacy, concentrations of 60-90% are recommended, as lower levels fail to penetrate microbial cells effectively while higher concentrations evaporate too quickly to sustain contact.^[52] However, alcohols exhibit rapid evaporation, which limits their prolonged action on surfaces, and they are generally ineffective against bacterial spores and non-enveloped viruses due to the protective nature of spore coats and the stability of non-enveloped viral capsids.^[53] Key advantages include their fast-acting nature, making them suitable for quick disinfection tasks, though disadvantages such as flammability and potential skin irritation necessitate careful handling.^[54] Aldehydes, including formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, function as potent high-level disinfectants through alkylation reactions that cross-link proteins, nucleic acids, and other cellular components, thereby inhibiting microbial replication and causing cell death.^[55] Glutaraldehyde is typically employed in 2% aqueous solutions for its broad-spectrum activity, while formaldehyde is used at similar or slightly higher concentrations, such as 2-4%, though its sporicidal action is slower compared to glutaraldehyde.^[3] These agents are notably sporicidal, effectively penetrating and destroying bacterial spores, which distinguishes them from many other chemical disinfectants.^[56] A significant concern with aldehydes is their tissue fixation properties; both formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde can harden and preserve biological tissues by forming stable cross-links, posing risks of incomplete removal or damage when used on medical instruments with residual organic matter.^[57] Their advantages lie in comprehensive antimicrobial efficacy, but drawbacks include strong irritant effects on skin, eyes, and respiratory systems, requiring use in well-ventilated areas.^[58]

Oxidizing Agents and Peroxides

Oxidizing agents and peroxides represent a major class of chemical disinfectants that exert their antimicrobial effects through the generation of reactive oxygen species, leading to oxidative damage in microbial cells. These compounds are valued for their broad-spectrum activity against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and in some cases, spores, making them suitable for intermediate- to high-level disinfection in various settings. Unlike denaturing agents that primarily disrupt protein structure through coagulation, oxidizing disinfectants target cellular components via electron transfer and radical formation, resulting in irreversible oxidation.^[3]^[12] Chlorine compounds, particularly hypochlorite solutions such as sodium hypochlorite (commonly known as bleach), are among the most widely used oxidizing disinfectants due to their low cost and potent broad-spectrum activity. Household bleach typically contains 5-6% sodium hypochlorite, which is diluted to 0.05-0.5% available chlorine (500-5000 ppm) for various disinfection purposes, depending on the application, effective against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, and fungi. Efficacy is highly pH-dependent, with hypochlorous acid (HOCl) predominating at pH 5-7.5 for optimal antimicrobial action, while at higher pH levels, the less active hypochlorite ion (OCl⁻) forms, reducing effectiveness.^[3]^[59]^[60] Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) functions as both an intermediate-level disinfectant at lower concentrations and a high-level disinfectant when formulated as accelerated hydrogen peroxide (AHP) systems. For surface disinfection, 3-6% solutions are commonly applied, providing rapid kill times against vegetative bacteria, viruses, and fungi, while 7% AHP is used for high-level applications such as endoscope reprocessing. Upon decomposition, hydrogen peroxide breaks down into water and oxygen, leaving no harmful residues, which enhances its suitability for medical environments. Its activity is broad but variable against bacterial spores, often requiring higher concentrations or longer exposure for sporicidal effects.^[3]^[61]^[62] Peracetic acid (PAA), a peracid derived from acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide, offers rapid antimicrobial action and is classified as a high-level disinfectant capable of sporicidal activity. It acts quickly, inactivating bacteria and viruses within 1 minute and spores within 30 minutes at concentrations around 0.2-0.35%, while decomposing into acetic acid, water, and oxygen to produce no persistent residues. However, PAA is inherently unstable, with diluted solutions losing efficacy over days unless stabilized, limiting its shelf life in liquid form.^[63]^[64]^[3] The primary mechanism of these oxidizing agents involves the production of hydroxyl free radicals (•OH) and other reactive oxygen species that inflict oxidative damage on microbial targets. These radicals attack unsaturated lipids in cell membranes, initiating peroxidation chains that compromise membrane integrity; they also oxidize sulfhydryl groups in proteins, denaturing enzymes and structural components essential for cellular function. For chlorine compounds, HOCl penetrates cells to oxidize critical amino acids and nucleic acids, while H₂O₂ and PAA generate radicals that similarly disrupt proteins and lipids, with PAA's higher oxidation potential enhancing its reactivity against resistant forms.^[12]^[3]^[65] Regarding efficacy against biofilms and spores, oxidizing agents demonstrate variable but often superior performance compared to non-oxidative disinfectants due to their penetrating oxidative power. Chlorine-based solutions, such as HOCl at 50-200 ppm, can reduce biofilm-embedded bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa by 2-4 log₁₀ CFU, depending on conditions, outperforming OCl⁻ forms in penetrating the extracellular matrix. Hydrogen peroxide at 3-7.5% eradicates biofilms in dental unit waterlines, achieving >4 log reduction, though spore inactivation (e.g., Clostridium difficile) requires 7-35% concentrations for complete kill. Peracetic acid excels against spores, with 0.35% solutions yielding >6 log reduction of Bacillus spores in 10-15 minutes, and it disrupts biofilms through rapid oxidation of matrix components.^[60]^[66]^[61]^[63]

Phenolics and Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

Phenolics are a class of organic disinfectants derived from phenol, such as o-phenylphenol and ortho-benzyl-para-chlorophenol, which exert their antimicrobial effects primarily by disrupting microbial cell membranes and denaturing proteins.^[3] These compounds penetrate the lipid layers of bacterial and fungal cells, leading to leakage of cellular contents and inactivation of essential enzymes, resulting in cell death.^[54] Phenolics demonstrate broad-spectrum activity against vegetative bacteria, fungi, and lipid-enveloped viruses, but they are generally ineffective against bacterial spores and non-enveloped viruses.^[3] Their persistent nature allows for prolonged residual activity on surfaces, making them suitable for environmental disinfection in healthcare settings.^[12] One key advantage of phenolics is their relatively low toxicity to humans at typical use concentrations, with minimal skin irritation compared to pure phenol, though prolonged exposure can cause dermatitis.^[54] However, their spectrum is limited by reduced efficacy in the presence of organic soil, and some gram-negative bacteria exhibit tolerance due to outer membrane barriers that hinder penetration.^[12] Published studies indicate that phenolic formulations at concentrations of 0.5% to 3% achieve bactericidal effects within minutes against common pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.^[3] Quaternary ammonium compounds (quats), such as benzalkonium chloride and didecyldimethylammonium chloride, function as cationic surfactants that bind electrostatically to the negatively charged surfaces of microbial cells, disrupting the phospholipid bilayer and causing cytoplasmic leakage.^[3] Typically used at concentrations of 0.1% to 0.2%, quats are classified as low-level disinfectants effective against most vegetative bacteria, some fungi, and lipid-containing viruses, but they show poor activity against mycobacteria, bacterial endospores, and non-enveloped viruses.^[12] Their mechanism relies on the positive charge of the quaternary nitrogen, which facilitates adsorption onto cell walls, but this interaction is antagonized by anionic substances like soap or detergents, rendering quats ineffective in soiled environments.^[3] Resistance to quats has been documented, particularly in gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas species, which can develop efflux pumps that expel the compounds, reducing susceptibility over time with repeated exposure.^[12] Advantages include low mammalian toxicity and the ability to provide residual antimicrobial effects on treated surfaces for hours, supporting their use in non-critical medical device disinfection.^[3] Disadvantages encompass a narrow spectrum of activity and diminished performance in hard water or organic matter, necessitating clean surfaces prior to application.^[54] Evaluation of quat efficacy often involves use-dilution tests to confirm log reductions in microbial counts under simulated conditions.^[3]

Inorganic Compounds and Metals

Inorganic compounds and metals serve as effective disinfectants due to their ability to disrupt microbial cellular processes through oxidation or ion binding, often applied in water treatment, surface disinfection, and medical settings.^[3] Halogens, such as iodine and chlorine derivatives, exemplify these inorganic agents by releasing reactive species that oxidize microbial proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, leading to cell death.^[12] This oxidative mechanism is particularly potent against bacteria, viruses, and fungi, with efficacy depending on concentration, contact time, and environmental pH.^[67] Iodine-based disinfectants, including povidone-iodine complexes, are widely used for surface and skin disinfection due to their broad-spectrum activity and reduced staining compared to elemental iodine.^[3] Povidone-iodine releases free iodine that penetrates microbial cells and oxidizes essential sulfhydryl groups in enzymes, inhibiting metabolic functions.^[12] In water treatment, iodine tablets provide portable disinfection for emergency scenarios, achieving log reductions in pathogens like Giardia at concentrations of 5-10 mg/L within 30 minutes.^[67] Chlorine dioxide gas, another halogen-derived compound, acts similarly by oxidizing amino acids and disrupting cell membranes, offering advantages in gaseous form for large-scale air and surface decontamination without residue formation.^[68] It is employed in water treatment facilities to inactivate Cryptosporidium oocysts at doses of 0.5-2 mg/L, minimizing harmful byproducts like trihalomethanes.^[69] Acidic inorganic and related compounds provide milder disinfection alternatives to quaternary ammonium salts, particularly in food processing and household applications where biocompatibility is key.^[7] Citric acid, often used at 1-5% concentrations, lowers pH to disrupt microbial enzyme activity and cell wall integrity, serving as an effective agent against Salmonella and Listeria on surfaces.^[70] Its mechanism involves protonation of cellular components, leading to metabolic inhibition without the persistence of harsher chemicals, and it is commonly blended with hydrochloric acid for enhanced cleaning in industrial settings.^[71] Metals like silver and copper exert antimicrobial effects via the oligodynamic action, where low concentrations of ions (as little as 0.1-1 µg/mL for silver) bind to microbial proteins and DNA, denaturing enzymes and preventing replication.^[72] Silver ions, released from nanoparticles or impregnated surfaces, target thiol groups in proteins, disrupting respiration and causing oxidative stress in bacteria such as E. coli.^[73] This makes silver suitable for water filters in point-of-use systems, reducing coliforms by over 99% in treated volumes up to 1,000 liters.^[74] Copper surfaces, conversely, provide contact killing through ion release that damages cell membranes and generates reactive oxygen species, inactivating pathogens like MRSA within minutes of exposure.^[75] In water treatment, copper-silver ionization systems maintain residual disinfection in distribution lines, controlling biofilm formation at ion levels of 0.2-0.4 mg/L.^[12] These metal-based approaches are integrated into plumbing and healthcare environments for sustained antimicrobial protection.^[76]

Alternative Disinfection Methods

Air and Surface Disinfectants

Air and surface disinfectants encompass aerosolized chemical agents designed to target microbial contaminants in airborne and large-area environments, such as rooms and open spaces, through dispersion methods like mists and vapors. These formulations, including alcohol-based mists and hydrogen peroxide vapors, enable no-touch application to reduce contact transmission risks. Alcohol mists, typically ethanol or isopropanol solutions, rapidly inactivate enveloped viruses and bacteria by denaturing proteins and disrupting lipid membranes upon contact with airborne particles or surfaces.^[77] Hydrogen peroxide vapors, often generated from aqueous solutions of 5-35% via dry fog or vaporization to achieve air concentrations of typically 1-10 mg/L (30-300 ppm), provide broad-spectrum sporicidal activity by oxidizing cellular components, effectively decontaminating enclosed spaces without leaving residues.^[78]^[62] The efficacy of these aerosolized agents is demonstrated through significant reductions in microbial loads; for instance, a 30-second spray of an alcohol-based air sanitizer can achieve a 3.0 log10 reduction (99.9%) in viable Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae within minutes via aerosol dispersion. Hydrogen peroxide vapor systems have shown up to 6-log reductions in bacterial spores and viruses on surfaces and in air, outperforming manual wiping in hard-to-reach areas.^[79]^[80] Dry-fogged hydrogen peroxide, in particular, rapidly lowers room bioburden, with studies reporting near-complete inactivation of resistant pathogens in under 30 minutes.^[81] Integration of ultraviolet (UV) light with chemical fogging enhances disinfection outcomes by combining oxidative chemical action with UV-induced DNA damage. Hybrid systems using hydrogen peroxide fog followed by UV-C exposure achieve greater than 99.99% reduction in surface pathogens compared to either method alone, addressing shadowed areas where fog alone may underperform.^[82] Efficacy of air and surface disinfectants is commonly measured using air sampling techniques that quantify colony-forming units (CFUs) before and after application. Slit-to-agar samplers or impaction devices collect airborne microbes onto agar plates, allowing enumeration of bacterial and fungal colonies to assess log reductions; for example, post-disinfection samples often show CFU counts dropping from thousands to below detectable limits in controlled chambers.^[83] These metrics correlate with environmental factors like temperature, where higher disinfection temperatures enhance colony count reductions by 2-4 logs.^[84] Challenges in aerosol disinfection include particle settling, which can limit airborne persistence and reduce contact time with microbes, leading to incomplete inactivation on lower surfaces. Ventilation effects further complicate efficacy, as high airflow rates dilute aerosol concentrations and promote rapid particle dispersal, potentially lowering microbial kill rates by up to 50% in poorly sealed rooms.^[85]^[86] Following the 2020 emergence of SARS-CoV-2, research has intensified on aerosolized disinfectants for viral aerosols, with ethanol and hydrogen peroxide formulations confirmed to inactivate the virus on surfaces and in air within 1-5 minutes at standard concentrations.^[87] This has led to updated guidelines emphasizing vapor and mist systems for high-risk indoor settings to mitigate airborne transmission.^[88]

Electrostatic and Physical Techniques

Electrostatic sprayers utilize an electric charge to enhance the delivery of disinfectant solutions, allowing charged droplets to adhere to surfaces through electrostatic attraction. This physical augmentation enables wrap-around coverage, where droplets are drawn to all sides of objects, including undersides and shadowed areas that traditional spraying might miss. Developed initially for agricultural applications, this technology has been adapted for disinfection in healthcare, public spaces, and industrial settings to improve uniformity and reduce waste.^[89] The efficiency of electrostatic sprayers stems from their ability to achieve superior deposition compared to conventional methods, often resulting in more even distribution of the disinfectant. Studies have demonstrated that these systems can reduce the required application volume by up to 50% while maintaining or exceeding the efficacy of full-volume sprays, as the charged particles minimize overspray and runoff. This makes them particularly useful for large-scale surface disinfection, where traditional sprayers may require 2-3 times more product to achieve comparable coverage on complex geometries.^[89]^[90] These sprayers are commonly integrated with chemical disinfectants such as quaternary ammonium compounds (quats) or hydrogen peroxide-based solutions, which are compatible with electrostatic delivery and approved for use against pathogens like SARS-CoV-2. Evidence from decontamination studies shows that electrostatic application of sporicidal disinfectants can rapidly reduce microbial loads on surfaces, with deposition efficiencies supporting contact times as short as 1-5 minutes for effective kill rates.^[91]^[92] Despite their advantages, electrostatic sprayers have limitations, including higher upfront equipment costs compared to manual sprayers and the requirement for surfaces to be conductive or grounded to optimize charge attraction. Additionally, operator training is essential to ensure proper calibration and avoid issues like droplet coalescence in humid environments. These factors can limit adoption in resource-constrained settings, though their overall impact on reducing disinfectant use by 30-50% in controlled studies underscores their value for efficient physical augmentation of disinfection processes.^[93]^[89]

Emerging Non-Chemical Approaches

Emerging non-chemical approaches to disinfection leverage physical and biological principles to inactivate pathogens without relying on traditional chemical agents, offering potential advantages in reducing residue and resistance development. These methods include ultraviolet (UV) radiation, plasma technologies, and engineered surfaces, which have gained attention for their efficacy in air, surface, and water treatment. Recent research emphasizes their integration into practical applications, though challenges like scalability and safety persist. UV-C light, particularly at a wavelength of 254 nm, inactivates microorganisms by inducing DNA damage through the formation of pyrimidine dimers, preventing replication and leading to cell death.^[94] Typical dosages range from 6 to 100 mJ/cm² to achieve multi-log reductions in pathogens, with far-UVC variants (200-230 nm) showing promise for safer environmental exposure without harming human cells.^[95] As of 2025, far-UVC light (222 nm) has demonstrated effective reduction of airborne pathogens in occupied indoor environments without harming humans.^[96] This high-level disinfection technique is increasingly explored for room air and surface decontamination in healthcare settings.^[97] Cold plasma, a partially ionized gas generated at near-atmospheric conditions, produces reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) that disrupt bacterial membranes, cause oxidative damage, and etch cell walls for broad-spectrum inactivation.^[98] Unlike thermal plasmas, cold variants operate at low temperatures, making them suitable for heat-sensitive materials. Studies highlight its effectiveness against biofilms and viruses through synergistic physical and chemical interactions from the ionized gas.^[99] Recent studies also explore cold atmospheric plasma-aerosol systems for disinfecting heat-sensitive medical devices.^[100] Ozone generators create ozone (O3) gas via electrical discharge or UV excitation, allowing diffusion into hard-to-reach areas for microbial oxidation and envelope disruption.^[101] While effective against viruses like SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces and in aerosols, ozone poses significant health risks, including respiratory irritation and lung damage at concentrations above 0.1 ppm, necessitating controlled use in unoccupied spaces.^[102] Antimicrobial surfaces incorporating photocatalytic titanium dioxide (TiO2) activate under UV light to generate hydroxyl radicals and other reactive species, which degrade bacterial cell walls and inhibit biofilm formation.^[103] This self-cleaning mechanism targets a wide range of pathogens without ongoing energy input beyond illumination, with applications in hospital fixtures and public touchpoints.^[104] Post-2020 advances include nanofiber filters electrospun from materials like polycarbonate, which combine high filtration efficiency (>99% for particulates) with inherent antibacterial properties via nanoscale topography that pierces microbial cells.^[105] These filters enhance air disinfection in masks and HVAC systems. Additionally, bacteriophage applications remain in research stages, using virus-specific phages to lyse target bacteria in environmental settings like wastewater, showing efficacy against multidrug-resistant strains without broad ecological disruption.^[106]

Applications and Uses

Healthcare and Medical Settings

In healthcare settings such as hospitals and clinics, disinfectants play a critical role in preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) by targeting environmental surfaces, medical devices, and during outbreak responses. Surface disinfection protocols emphasize the use of EPA-registered products from List K, which are validated for efficacy against Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) spores, a major cause of HAIs in patient-care areas.^[107]^[108] These protocols involve cleaning surfaces with detergent followed by application of a sporicidal disinfectant, such as bleach-based solutions, to achieve at least a 99.9% reduction in viable spores on hard, non-porous surfaces.^[109] For reprocessing heat-sensitive medical devices like endoscopes, high-level disinfection is standard, utilizing chemical agents such as ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) at 0.55% concentration. OPA provides broad-spectrum activity against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and mycobacteria, with a typical immersion time of 12 minutes at 20°C, often replacing glutaraldehyde due to faster action and lower toxicity profile.^[110]^[111] Automated endoscope reprocessors integrate OPA for consistent delivery, ensuring compliance with FDA-cleared labeling for reusable devices. Hand hygiene in healthcare integrates disinfectants primarily through alcohol-based hand rubs containing 60-95% ethanol or isopropanol, which serve as the first-line antiseptic for routine decontamination when hands are not visibly soiled.^[112] These rubs complement surface disinfection by reducing transient microbial flora on healthcare personnel hands, with application involving rubbing until dry (approximately 20 seconds) to achieve log reductions in pathogens.^[113] During outbreak responses, such as the 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease epidemic, chlorine-based disinfectants like 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solutions are employed for environmental decontamination of high-risk areas, including patient rooms and waste management, to inactivate the virus on surfaces and equipment.^[114] This approach ensures rapid viral inactivation while adhering to personal protective equipment protocols. Compliance with CDC guidelines for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities has been shown to reduce HAI rates by supporting consistent environmental cleaning and device reprocessing, with epidemiologic evidence indicating that disinfectant use outperforms detergent-only cleaning in lowering transmission risks to patients and staff.^[109]^[115] Facilities monitor adherence through audits and efficacy testing, prioritizing products with demonstrated activity against priority pathogens to maintain infection control efficacy.

Household and Commercial Cleaning

In household and commercial cleaning, disinfectants are widely used in forms such as wipes, sprays, and liquid solutions to eliminate pathogens on non-porous surfaces like countertops, floors, and fixtures. Common products include bleach-based wipes, such as Clorox Disinfecting Wipes, which utilize sodium hypochlorite for broad-spectrum activity, and spray formulations like Lysol Disinfectant Spray, often containing quaternary ammonium compounds (quats) or phenolic blends for ease of application in homes and offices.^[116]^[117] These products are designed for everyday use, targeting bacteria, viruses, and fungi encountered in domestic environments, with pre-moistened wipes offering convenience for quick disinfection without additional tools.^[118] Label claims like "kills 99.9% of germs" are prevalent on household disinfectants and are substantiated through EPA-registered testing protocols that assess efficacy against specific low-level pathogens, such as vegetative bacteria and certain enveloped viruses, under controlled conditions like the AOAC Use-Dilution Method.^[119]^[120] Unlike healthcare settings, where disinfectants must undergo more rigorous evaluations for intermediate- or high-level activity against resistant microbes like mycobacteria or spores, household products face less stringent requirements focused on general surface sanitation rather than clinical sterility.^[121]^[122] Effective use of these disinfectants requires proper dilution and adherence to contact time, as specified on product labels, to ensure microbial kill rates. For instance, household bleach solutions should be diluted to 500-800 ppm available chlorine (a 1:100 dilution, approximately 2 tablespoons per gallon of water) and left on surfaces for at least 1 minute, though optimal efficacy often demands 5-10 minutes without wiping.^[123]^[118] Sprays and wipes similarly need sufficient wetting of the surface, with reapplication if drying occurs prematurely, to achieve the claimed disinfection levels.^[124] Post-2020 market trends reflect heightened consumer demand for eco-friendly disinfectants, driven by pandemic awareness and sustainability concerns, leading to growth in biobased and plant-derived formulations that minimize environmental persistence while maintaining efficacy.^[5] The global biobased disinfectant segment, including options like those certified by the EPA's Safer Choice program, is projected to expand at a 7% CAGR through 2031, as manufacturers shift toward biodegradable wipes and low-VOC sprays to appeal to environmentally conscious households and commercial spaces.^[125]^[126]

Industrial and Environmental Applications

In industrial water treatment processes, chlorination remains a primary method for disinfection, where a residual chlorine concentration of 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L is typically maintained in distribution systems to prevent microbial regrowth and ensure safety.^[127] This residual level balances effective pathogen inactivation with minimal byproduct formation, as recommended by regulatory guidelines for potable and process water.^[128] Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation serves as a chemical-free alternative to chlorination, inactivating microorganisms through DNA damage without producing harmful disinfection byproducts, making it suitable for high-volume industrial applications like cooling towers and boiler feedwater.^[129] Inorganic compounds, such as chlorine gas and hypochlorites, are foundational in these water treatment protocols for their broad-spectrum efficacy.^[130] In food processing facilities, ozone and peracids like peracetic acid are widely applied for disinfecting equipment surfaces and processing areas to control bacterial contamination without leaving residues that could affect product quality.^[131] Ozone, generated on-site, penetrates biofilms and oxidizes organic matter effectively on conveyor belts and storage tanks, earning FDA approval for direct food contact applications.^[132] Peracetic acid, a potent oxidizer, is used in no-rinse sanitizers at concentrations around 100-200 ppm, rapidly degrading to acetic acid and water, which supports its role in sanitizing cutting boards and packaging lines while complying with food safety standards.^[133] For wastewater treatment in industrial settings, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) employ hydroxyl radicals generated from combinations like ozone and hydrogen peroxide or UV and Fenton reagents to disinfect effluents and degrade recalcitrant pollutants.^[134] These processes achieve over 90% removal of organic contaminants in municipal and industrial wastewater, providing a robust alternative to traditional chlorination by mineralizing pollutants into harmless byproducts like CO2 and water.^[135] In agriculture, copper sulfate solutions at 5-10% concentration are routinely used in livestock footbaths to disinfect hooves and prevent infections such as digital dermatitis, with routine changes to maintain efficacy.^[136] Sustainable industrial practices increasingly emphasize reducing chemical disinfectant use to mitigate climate impacts, incorporating alternatives like UV and ozone that lower energy demands and greenhouse gas emissions from chemical production and transport.^[137] For instance, shifting to on-site generated ozone in water and wastewater systems can cut chemical logistics by up to 50%, decreasing the carbon footprint associated with manufacturing and disposal of traditional agents.^[138] These approaches align with broader environmental goals by minimizing persistent chemical releases into ecosystems.^[139]

Health, Safety, and Regulatory Aspects

Toxicity and Exposure Risks

Disinfectants pose significant health risks to humans through various exposure pathways, primarily affecting the respiratory system, skin, and mucous membranes. Acute effects often manifest as immediate irritation upon contact or inhalation. For instance, aldehydes such as glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde, commonly used in high-level disinfection, can cause respiratory tract irritation, including coughing, shortness of breath, and nasal congestion, particularly in occupational settings like healthcare facilities.^[140]^[141] Similarly, acid-based disinfectants, including peracetic acid and hypochlorous acid derivatives, may lead to skin burns, erythema, and dermatitis upon dermal contact, with severity depending on concentration and exposure duration.^[142]^[143] Chronic exposure to certain disinfectants carries more severe long-term health implications. Formaldehyde, a widely used disinfectant and sterilant, is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a Group 1 carcinogen, meaning it is carcinogenic to humans, with sufficient evidence linking it to nasopharyngeal cancer and leukemia from occupational inhalation exposure.^[144] Prolonged low-level exposure to aldehydes has also been associated with the development of asthma-like respiratory conditions and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in workers handling these chemicals regularly.^[3]^[145] Certain populations are at heightened risk from disinfectant exposure due to physiological vulnerabilities. Asthmatics may experience exacerbated symptoms, including wheezing and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, from inhalation of irritant vapors like those from quaternary ammonium compounds or aldehydes during cleaning tasks.^[146] Pregnant workers face additional concerns, as prenatal occupational exposure to disinfectants has been linked to increased risks of asthma and eczema in offspring, potentially through maternal inhalation or dermal absorption affecting fetal development.^[147]^[148] Exposure to disinfectants occurs primarily through three routes: inhalation of vapors or aerosols, which is the most common in spray applications and accounts for a significant portion of reported incidents; dermal contact during handling or spills, leading to absorption through the skin; and ingestion, often accidental in household or industrial settings, which can result in severe gastrointestinal effects.^[149]^[150] To mitigate these risks, appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and engineering controls are essential during disinfectant use and handling. Gloves, such as nitrile or rubber varieties, are recommended to prevent dermal exposure, while adequate ventilation systems or respirators help reduce inhalation hazards in enclosed spaces.^[109]^[151] Production processes involving concentrated disinfectants may introduce similar hazards, underscoring the need for consistent safety measures across the supply chain.^[152]

Environmental and Resistance Concerns

Disinfectants can have significant environmental impacts due to the persistence of their byproducts in aquatic systems. Chlorine-based disinfectants, commonly used in water treatment, react with organic matter to form disinfection byproducts (DBPs) such as trihalomethanes (THMs), which are stable and persist in water bodies, potentially harming aquatic flora and fauna by disrupting microbial communities and plankton dynamics.^[153] These THMs can accumulate in sediments and groundwater, contributing to long-term ecological contamination even after initial disinfection processes.^[154] Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), widely employed as surface disinfectants, pose risks of bioaccumulation in sewage treatment systems and receiving waters. Wastewater treatment processes often fail to fully remove QACs, leading to their buildup in biosolids, effluents, and surface waters, where they can adsorb to sediments and bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms, exerting ecotoxicological effects on invertebrates and fish populations.^[155] Studies using in vitro–in vivo extrapolation models have demonstrated varying bioaccumulation potentials for QACs with different alkyl chain lengths (C8–C18), highlighting their environmental persistence in sewage-impacted ecosystems.^[156] Microbial resistance to disinfectants represents a growing concern, as bacteria can develop adaptive mechanisms that reduce disinfectant efficacy and potentially contribute to broader antimicrobial resistance. Efflux pumps, such as the AcrAB system in Escherichia coli, actively expel biocides like triclosan from bacterial cells, conferring reduced susceptibility and enabling survival at sublethal concentrations.^[157] Triclosan, once common in consumer products, was banned by the U.S. FDA in over-the-counter antibacterial soaps in 2016 due to insufficient evidence of benefits over plain soap and risks of fostering resistance via such mechanisms.^[158] To mitigate selection pressure for resistant strains, strategies like rotating disinfectants—alternating between chemical classes such as chlorine, QACs, and alcohols—have been recommended to disrupt adaptation and maintain efficacy in high-use settings like healthcare facilities.^[159] As of 2025, research has intensified on biocide resistance, with studies showing increasing rates among WHO priority pathogens and ESKAPE bacteria, exacerbated by widespread disinfectant use during the COVID-19 pandemic, further linking biocide tolerance to antibiotic cross-resistance and threatening infection control efforts.^[160] Regulatory efforts continue to address these environmental and resistance issues through restrictions on problematic disinfectants. Under the EU REACH regulation, phenol and certain phenolic compounds used in biocidal products are subject to Annex XVII restrictions limiting their concentrations in mixtures to prevent environmental release and bioaccumulation.^[161] As of 2025, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has maintained and updated these restrictions in alignment with ongoing evaluations of biocides, emphasizing reduced use of phenolics in non-essential applications to curb ecological risks.^[162]

Standards and Production Guidelines

In the United States, the regulation of disinfectants is divided between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on their intended use and classification. The EPA regulates most disinfectants as antimicrobial pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), requiring registration for products intended to kill or inactivate microorganisms on inanimate environmental surfaces, such as hard, non-porous surfaces in healthcare, household, or industrial settings.^[20] In contrast, the FDA oversees disinfectants classified as drugs or medical devices, particularly high-level disinfectants and chemical sterilants used on critical or semicritical medical devices, such as endoscopes, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).^[20] This dichotomy ensures that surface-acting products meet pesticide efficacy and safety standards through EPA, while those contacting human tissues or invasive devices adhere to FDA's drug/device requirements for biocompatibility and sterility.^[111] Production of disinfectants follows quality assurance protocols tailored to their regulatory category, with emphasis on purity, consistency, and contamination prevention. For medical-grade disinfectants regulated by the FDA, such as those used in sterile processing, manufacturers must comply with Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) outlined in 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211, which mandate validated processes, microbial monitoring of disinfectants and detergents, and storage in clean containers to avoid cross-contamination.^[163] EPA-registered disinfectants, treated as pesticides, require production in registered establishments under FIFRA, with quality control measures including batch testing for active ingredient concentration and stability to ensure purity and efficacy during manufacturing. These standards collectively prioritize traceability, raw material sourcing, and environmental controls to maintain product integrity.^[164] Labeling for disinfectants is strictly governed to inform users of safe and effective application, with EPA requirements applying to pesticide-registered products. Labels must specify the contact time—the minimum duration surfaces must remain wet for the product to achieve claimed antimicrobial kill rates, typically ranging from 1 to 10 minutes depending on the target pathogens.^[165] Efficacy claims, such as "hospital-grade disinfectant" or kills against specific bacteria and viruses, must be substantiated through EPA-approved testing protocols and listed on the label's Directions for Use section.^[166] Signal words like "DANGER," "WARNING," or "CAUTION" are required on the front panel based on the product's acute toxicity category, with "DANGER" indicating the highest risk level to alert users to potential hazards from ingestion, inhalation, or skin contact.^[166] FDA-regulated disinfectants follow similar labeling under 21 CFR Part 801 for devices, emphasizing use instructions and precautions.^[111] Internationally, the World Health Organization (WHO) provides guidelines integrated into good manufacturing practices (GMP) for disinfectants, particularly in pharmaceutical and healthcare contexts, recommending microbial monitoring, validated dilution procedures, and separation of cleaning from disinfection steps to prevent contamination in sterile production environments.^[167] For equipment like washer-disinfectors used in reprocessing medical devices, ISO 15883-1 establishes general performance requirements, including thermal and chemical disinfection validation, cycle monitoring, and efficacy testing against microorganisms to ensure reliable cleaning and disinfection outcomes.^[168] These standards promote harmonized global practices, with ISO 15883 series extending to specific applications like thermal disinfection in Part 2.^[169] Following the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory bodies have pursued harmonization in viral efficacy claims for disinfectants to accelerate approvals without compromising safety. The EPA introduced interim guidance in 2024 for adding virucidal claims to sanitizers and disinfectants, allowing extrapolation from harder-to-kill surrogate viruses like feline calicivirus for SARS-CoV-2, streamlining registration for emerging pathogens through the Emerging Viral Pathogens Guidance.^[170] This aligns with international efforts, such as WHO recommendations for rapid disinfectant validation against enveloped viruses, fostering global consistency in testing methods for viral claims while referencing standardized protocols like those in OCSPP 810.2200 for product performance.^[1]

References

[1]
Selected EPA-Registered Disinfectants
Sep 11, 2025 · A disinfectant is a substance, or mixture of substances that destroys or irreversibly inactivates bacteria, fungi and viruses, but not ...Pesticide Registration · Claims Against Candida auris · Bloodborne Pathogens
[2]
Disinfectants - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Mar 9, 2025 · [1] Biocides such as alcohol, iodine, and chlorine have been used for many years. This activity describes some of the most commonly used ...
[3]
Chemical Disinfectants | Infection Control - CDC
Nov 28, 2023 · Chemical disinfectants include alcohol, chlorine compounds (like hypochlorites), and formaldehyde, which are used in healthcare settings.
[4]
History of disinfection from early times until the end of the 18th century
The author describes and analyses the methods of disinfection in use until the end of the 18th century, ie before the scientific demonstration of the role of ...
[5]
[PDF] Disinfection 101 - The Center for Food Security and Public Health
Jul 5, 2022 · Disinfection destroys or irreversibly inactivates most pathogens (e.g., bacteria, viruses and fungi) on surfaces (i.e., inanimate objects).* It ...Missing: scope | Show results with:scope
[6]
Introduction, Methods, Definition of Terms | Infection Control - CDC
Nov 28, 2023 · Low-level disinfectants can kill most vegetative bacteria, some fungi, and some viruses in a practical period of time (≤10 minutes).
[7]
Louis Pasteur (1822–1895), Ignaz Semmelweis (1818–1865 ... - NIH
Jun 17, 2024 · Lister, studying the works of Pasteur, realized that inflammation and effusion were phenomena analogous to that of fermentation, due to ...
[8]
Ignaz Semmelweis and the Fight Against Puerperal Fever - PMC - NIH
Oct 17, 2024 · Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis (1818-1865) revolutionized medical practice through his introduction of antiseptic procedures.
[9]
Joseph Lister (1827-1912): A Pioneer of Antiseptic Surgery - PMC
Dec 21, 2022 · Joseph Lister helped introduce germ theory and laid the foundation for the use of antiseptics in the practice of medicine and surgery. Today, ...Missing: Semmelweis | Show results with:Semmelweis
[10]
[PDF] Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities ...
Hydrogen peroxide is active against a wide range of microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, fungi, viruses, and spores 78, 654. A 0.5% accelerated ...
[11]
Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance - PMC
Alcohols exhibit rapid broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against vegetative bacteria (including mycobacteria), viruses, and fungi but are not sporicidal.
[12]
A Rational Approach to Disinfection and Sterilization | Infection Control
Nov 28, 2023 · High-level disinfection traditionally is defined as complete elimination of all microorganisms in or on an instrument, except for small numbers ...
[13]
Antimicrobial Performance Evaluation Program | US EPA
Jun 26, 2025 · EPA classifies disinfectants into the following three classes: hospital disinfectants, broad-spectrum (general) disinfectants, and limited ...
[14]
What's the difference between products that disinfect, sanitize, and ...
Oct 8, 2025 · Sanitizers and disinfectants are two types of antimicrobial pesticides. Surface disinfectant products are subject to more rigorous EPA testing requirements.
[15]
Cooperative Extension: Insect Pests, Ticks and Plant Diseases
What's the difference? · Sanitizers. These chemicals reduce the number of microorganisms on surfaces, often including food contact surfaces. · Disinfectants.
[16]
Sterilization, Disinfection, and Decontamination
Decontamination makes items safe to handle. Sterilization kills all microorganisms. Disinfection eliminates most pathogens, but not all. Antisepsis inhibits or ...
[17]
Biology 250: Disinfection an Antisepsis Handout - SIUE
Disinfectants are for nonliving surfaces, while antiseptics are for living surfaces. Disinfectants are often bactericidal, and antiseptics are often ...
[18]
Regulatory Framework for Disinfectants and Sterilants - CDC
Nov 28, 2023 · Under the agreement, FDA regulates liquid chemical sterilants used on critical and semicritical devices, and EPA regulates disinfectants used on ...
[19]
Content and Format of 510(k) Submissions for Liquid Chemical ...
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) no longer regulates such sterilants/high level disinfectants. The FDA now has sole regulatory jurisdiction over liquid ...
[20]
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Disinfection and Sterilization - CDC
Nov 28, 2023 · The activity of germicides against microorganisms depends on a number of factors, some of which are intrinsic qualities of the organism, others of which are ...Missing: biochemical | Show results with:biochemical
[21]
[PDF] AOAC Use Dilution Method for Testing Disinfectants MB-05
Jan 17, 2020 · Application. The methodology described in this SOP is used to evaluate the performance of both dilutable and ready to use liquid disinfectants.
[22]
AOAC Use Dilution Test (AOAC 955.14; 955.15; 964.02)
The AOAC Use-Dilution Test is a “high-level” test for disinfectants, meaning that an antimicrobial solution must have appreciable biocidal activity on a ...
[23]
Evaluating the Virucidal Activity of Disinfectants According to ... - NIH
Mar 24, 2021 · Phase 1 (suspension) tests are performed to determine whether a chemical disinfectant or antiseptic has bactericidal, fungicidal, yeasticidal ...
[24]
Virucidal Efficacy Testing | Microchem Laboratory
Suspension-Based Tests · ASTM E1052 – Standard Test Method for Efficacy of Antimicrobial Agents Against Viruses in Suspension · EN 14476 – Chemical Disinfectants ...
[25]
Log & Percent Reductions in Microbiology & Antimicrobial Testing
Simply speaking, taking the log value of a large number, such as the ... 5 log reduction = 99.999% reduction; 6 log reduction = 99.9999% reduction. As ...
[26]
Does Organic Soil Impact Efficacy? - Microchem Laboratory
A total of 60 carriers were tested per concentration at a contact time of 5 minutes. The data shows soil load definitely affects antimicrobial efficacy. In our ...
[27]
Antimicrobial Testing Methods & Procedures Developed by ... - EPA
Sep 16, 2025 · EPA developed antimicrobial testing methods and standard operating procedures to measure the effectiveness of hard surface disinfectants.<|control11|><|separator|>
[28]
Suspension Test And Carrier Test For Disinfectants According To ...
Jun 30, 2017 · Suspension tests as the name suggests, measure the effectiveness of a disinfectant in inactivating specified test microorganisms within a given ...
[29]
Top 10 Challenges In Disinfectant Efficacy Testing - Prewel Labs
Oct 26, 2024 · A disinfectant that works well in a controlled lab environment may underperform in a real-world setting where temperature and humidity fluctuate ...
[30]
DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTANT BY-PRODUCTS - INCHEM
Physical and chemical properties of commonly used disinfectants and inorganic disinfectant by-products Chemicala Eo (V)b Oxidation number lambamax (nm)c e ...
[31]
The Chemistry of Disinfectants in Water: Reactions and Products
It is highly soluble; therefore, it is not recoverable by the analytical methods that were routinely used during NORS, which involve purging volatile compounds ...
[32]
Back to Basics: Choosing the Appropriate Surface Disinfectant - PMC
This review has the purpose to briefly describe the organisms, the kind of risk associated with them, and the main classes of antimicrobials for surfaces.
[33]
[PDF] Selection and Use of Chemical Disinfectants
Hazardous Characteristics of Chemical Disinfectants. Disinfectant. Significant Characteristics. Liquid. Effective. Shelf Life. >1week1. Corr. Flam. Residue.Missing: solubility incompatibility tension
[34]
[PDF] Water Treatment Manual: Disinfection
thereby affecting the storage life and decreasing concentrations with time. This degradation accelerates in higher temperatures and in the presence of ...
[35]
[PDF] Basic Principle of Disinfectant - ResearchGate
surface tension and possess detergent and emulsifying properties. Quaternary ammonium compounds are the active ingredients in disinfectants and sanitizers ...
[36]
What's In Your Disinfectant and Why It Matters - CloroxPro
May 25, 2021 · Disinfectants contain active ingredients like bleach or quats, solvents, surfactants, additives, and fragrances. Active ingredients kill ...
[37]
US5389685A - Stabilizer disinfectant formulation - Google Patents
... formulation does affect, and indeed buffer, the pH of the formulation. Generally the pH range of the formulated color stable product is about 6.5 to about 8.5.
[38]
Issues Surrounding the Stability of Hypochlorous Acid as a Surface ...
Apr 15, 2024 · Formulation optimization, including pH adjustment and the addition of buffering agents, can improve stability and shelf life. Researchers ...
[39]
Experimental and computational study of hydrolysis and photolysis ...
May 10, 2021 · Hydrolysis is an important degradation pathway for organic pollutants in the environment, besides photolysis or redox reactions (de MeloPlese et ...
[40]
Disinfection Byproducts Confirmed over 50 Years: Systematic ...
Oct 13, 2025 · Research on water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) over the past 50 years has unveiled more than 700 DBPs, many of which pose unrecognized risks ...
[41]
Degradation of natural organic matter and disinfection byproducts ...
Jul 1, 2023 · This study demonstrates that solar photolysis of FAC may significantly impact the formation of DBPs in surface water due to extensive use of disinfectants ...
[42]
Mixtures of quaternary ammonium compounds and anionic organic ...
Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) and anionic surfactants can form ionic pairs. It was assumed that the formation of ionic pairs between QACs and surfactants ...
[43]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135423004566
[44]
Interaction between antimicrobial quaternary compounds and ...
It is believed that anionic surfactants with a stronger ionic charge serve to deactivate the antimicrobial efficacy of quaternary ammonium compounds whereas ...
[45]
Choosing the Best Bottles for Chemical Storage
Jan 24, 2024 · Light sensitivity: If the chemical is light-sensitive, amber or opaque bottles should be used to protect the contents from light degradation.<|control11|><|separator|>
[46]
[PDF] Isopropanol 1 TR 2014.pdf - Agricultural Marketing Service
Feb 3, 2014 · Hydrolysis. Stable to hydrolysis. Photodegradation. Isopropanol is subject to oxidation in air by hydroxyl radical attack; direct photolysis is ...
[47]
[PDF] Guidance for Industry on Container Closure Systems for ... - FDA
Not every drug product is susceptible to degradation by all of these factors. Not all drug products are light sensitive. Not all tablets are subject to loss.
[48]
Alcohol Sanitizer - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
The efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizers is dependent on the technique of application and its usage. Even though there are no strict guidelines, most ...Missing: optimal | Show results with:optimal
[49]
Ethanol - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Aug 11, 2024 · Ethanol is also effective against viruses and can be combined with other alcohols to achieve a powerful synergistic effect against various ...
[50]
Alcohol-based hand sanitizer – composition, proper use and ... - NIH
For optimum bactericidal and viricidal activity of ABHS, alcohol concentration of 60%-95% by volume is recommended. Alcohol has broad-spectrum effectiveness ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
Hand sanitizers: A review of ingredients, mechanisms of action ...
Jun 18, 2020 · ALCOHOL MECHANISM OF ACTION AGAINST VIRUSES In fact, high concentration of ethanol has shown to be highly effective against enveloped viruses12 ...
[52]
Disinfectants In Interventional Practices - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Mar 11, 2021 · Alcohols work as disinfectants primarily through the denaturation of microbial proteins. This mechanism of action is supported by a variety of ...Missing: isopropanol optimal
[53]
Mechanisms of action of microbicides commonly used in infection ...
Jul 3, 2024 · This review focuses on the mechanism(s) of action of chemical microbicides commonly used in infection prevention and control.
[54]
Current and emergent strategies for disinfection of hospital ... - NIH
The aldehyde-based disinfectants disrupt proteins and nucleic acids by alkylation and have antimicrobial activity against spores, bacteria, viruses and fungi.
[55]
Review of Disinfection and Sterilization – Back to the Basics - NIH
The basic mechanism of ethanol is denaturation and coagulation of proteins [13]. The hydroxyl group (-OH), which is the basic structure of alcohols, binds ...
[56]
Antimicrobial biocides in the healthcare environment: efficacy ...
The toxicity of some biocides has been particularly well described, eg, the high-level disinfectant glutaraldehyde, the use of which has been associated with ...
[57]
Mechanisms of actions of sodium hypochlorite in cleaning ... - PubMed
The effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite in the cleaning and disinfection processes depends on the concentration of available chlorine and the pH of the ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[58]
The efficacy of chlorine-based disinfectants against planktonic and ...
Nov 4, 2021 · This study investigated the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity of three chlorine-based disinfectants (hypochlorite ions [OCl - ], hypochlorous acid [HOCl] ...
[59]
Antimicrobial Activity of Hydrogen Peroxide for Application in Food ...
Hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) is a well-known agent with a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and viruses.
[60]
Use of Hydrogen Peroxide Vapour for Microbiological Disinfection in ...
This review finds hydrogen peroxide vapour to be very close to an ideal disinfectant due to its proven efficacy against a wide range of microorganisms.
[61]
Biocidal and Sporicidal Efficacy of Pathoster ... - PubMed Central
Aug 1, 2016 · Peracetic acid has an excellent sterilizing action after short-time contact, it is a strong oxidant, and its oxidation potential is higher than ...
[62]
Efficacy studies on peracetic acid against pathogenic microorganisms
PAA rapidly inactivates pathogenic bacteria within 1 min and inactivates mycobacteria and fungi within 10 min and sterilises spores within 30 min.
[63]
Mode of action of hydrogen peroxide and other oxidizing agents
Aug 16, 2010 · Very strong oxidizing agents that can result in localized free radical formation may oxidize the protein backbone, primarily by hydrogen ...
[64]
Evaluation of Antimicrobial-Antibiofilm Activity of a Hydrogen ...
This study has proven the utility of the hydrogen peroxide disinfection system in eradicating biofilm from dental unit waterlines.
[65]
[PDF] Treatment methods and performance
Bromine and iodine are halogens, like chlorine, and they are well-known biocides. Iodine is commonly used for short-term applications, such as by travellers ...
[66]
[PDF] Six-Year Review 3 Technical Support Document for Disinfectants ...
Dec 1, 2016 · This document is not a regulation. It is not legally enforceable and does not confer legal rights or impose legal obligations on any party, ...
[67]
[PDF] 2. CHEMISTRY OF DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTANT BY ...
Physical and chemical properties of commonly used disinfectants and inorganic disinfectant by-products. Chemicala. Eo (V)b. Oxidation number of Cl or Br. 8max ...Missing: odor | Show results with:odor
[68]
[PDF] Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Citric Acid/Hydrochloric Acid Blend ...
However, they also noted that acetic acid (pH 3.8), lactic acid (pH 2.5), and citric acid (2.9) were more effective than HCl at inhibiting Salmonella on chicken ...
[69]
Basic Elements of Equipment Cleaning and Sanitizing in Food ...
Basic steps include: rinse, clean, rinse, then sanitize. Cleaning removes food soil, and sanitizing reduces microorganisms to safe levels.
[70]
Antimicrobial Activity of Silver-Treated Bacteria against Other Multi ...
Furthermore, silver is bactericidal at minute concentrations, exhibiting an “oligodynamic” effect through the presence of toxic metal ions [10]. Through ...
[71]
[PDF] Investigation of Silver Biocide as a Disinfection Technology for ...
An ideal biocide or water disinfectant should have no adverse effect on humans, prevent microbial growth, biofilm formation, and microbial- induced corrosion in ...
[72]
[PDF] Lehigh Preserve Institutional Repository
Silver is a promising disinfectant for use in a wide-range of water treatment applications, from small, point-of-use to large community-based distribution ...
[73]
Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants - PMC
It has been widely accepted that antibacterial ability of metals and alloys comes mainly from the released metal ions, including Ag+, Cu2+ and Zn2 ...
[74]
[PDF] Overview of Spray Aerosols for Disinfection Against Airborne and ...
Jan 19, 2021 · Ethanol and isopropanol have shown high efficacy for destroying Covid-19 when used as sprays and as sanitizers without consequential negative ...
[75]
No-Touch Automated Disinfection System Based on Hydrogen ...
Apr 17, 2022 · This study evaluated the effectiveness of a no-touch disinfection system that aerosolizes 5% hydrogen peroxide and 10% ethyl alcohol.<|separator|>
[76]
The Determination of the Rapid and Effective Activity of an Air ...
Oct 16, 2024 · A 30-s spray of the air sanitizer reduced infectious S. aureus and K. pneumoniae titers by 3.0 log10 (99.9%) in 3.2 ± 0.3 min and 1.2 ± 0.0 min, ...Missing: mists | Show results with:mists
[77]
Efficacy, efficiency and safety aspects of hydrogen peroxide vapour ...
Hydrogen peroxide is an effective sporicidal biocide, and several vapour/aerosol hydrogen-peroxide-based room disinfection technologies have emerged.Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
[78]
Assessment of dry-fogged hydrogen peroxide as an “untact” room ...
Jul 26, 2025 · This study evaluates the efficacy of dry-fogged hydrogen peroxide (dHP) as an “untact” room disinfection automation system (URDAS) for rapid ...
[79]
Enhanced disinfection with hybrid hydrogen peroxide fogging ... - NIH
Sep 29, 2022 · The results presented emphasize HHP fogging achieves more efficacious disinfection of room surfaces than manual cleaning and UV light ...
[80]
The Determination of the Rapid and Effective Activity of an Air ...
Oct 16, 2024 · An initial 2-min air sample was collected from the chamber using a slit-to-agar sampler containing 150-mm Petri plates, with Trypticase soy agar ...
[81]
Disinfection efficiency of hospital infectious disease wards with ...
Nov 5, 2020 · The results showed that the bacteria and fungi colony counts were strongly correlated with the temperature. Both disinfectants reduced the ...
[82]
Ventilation and air cleaning to limit aerosol particle concentrations in ...
It can be assumed that aerosol particle concentrations should be kept low in order to minimize the potential risk of airborne virus transmission. This paper ...
[83]
Effects of mechanical ventilation and portable air cleaner on aerosol ...
Aerosol accumulation may occur in dental treatment rooms with poor ventilation. Addition of PAC with a HEPA filter significantly reduced aerosol accumulation.
[84]
Disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2: A Review - PMC - PubMed Central
Owing to the increasing demand to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2, ethanol, isopropanol, and n-propanol are commonly applied as disinfectants, as summarized ...
[85]
Disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review - PMC
Several household and hospital disinfection agents and ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation were effective for inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 on environmental surfaces.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[86]
From agriculture to COVID disinfection, technology developed at ...
May 28, 2021 · Based on the science, farmers could dispense 50% less chemicals with electrostatic sprayers and still achieve the same pest-control results.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[87]
EPA Researchers Evaluate Electrostatic Sprayers for Disinfectant ...
Jul 13, 2021 · EPA researchers found that this attribute may be both an advantage and disadvantage: an electrostatic sprayer may use less disinfectant to cover a surface area.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[88]
A Guide On What Chemical To Use In Electrostatic Sprayers - EMist
Effective Disinfectants for Electrostatic Sprayers · Hypochlorous Acid: Safety and Efficacy · Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: Broad Spectrum Use · Peroxide-Based ...
[89]
Evaluation of an electrostatic spray disinfectant technology for rapid ...
Jun 6, 2020 · Here, we tested the effectiveness of a novel spray disinfectant technology that uses an electrostatic sprayer to apply a sporicidal disinfectant ...
[90]
Evaluating Electrostatic Sprayers for Disinfectant Application | US EPA
Jan 21, 2025 · The purpose of this research is to evaluate spray parameters for several different types of sprayers and foggers.
[91]
Ultraviolet C irradiation: an alternative antimicrobial approach to ...
Studies did find that UVC at the effective antimicrobial doses can cause DNA damage to mammalian cells to some extent. However, at that same time, it has ...Missing: cm² | Show results with:cm²
[92]
The impact of far-UVC radiation (200–230 nm) on pathogens, cells ...
Feb 16, 2021 · A dose of 100 mJ/cm2 should reduce most pathogens in most media by several orders of magnitude without harming human skin or eyes.
[93]
[PDF] Environmental Control for Tuberculosis - CDC
... 254 nm is 6 mJ/cm2 in an 8 h period. ... This is referred to as a germicidal lamp because almost 95% of the UV radia- tion produced is near 254 nm in the UV-C ...<|separator|>
[94]
Cold Plasma as a Revolutionary Antimicrobial Modality
Sep 14, 2025 · Its unique mechanisms generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, disruption of bacterial membranes, oxidative damage to ...
[95]
Cold plasma reactive species: Generation, properties, and ...
Mar 30, 2023 · This review explores the possibility of using different feed gases to alter species composition and emphasizes that all reactive species are equally involved ...
[96]
Ozone based inactivation and disinfection in the pandemic time and ...
Dec 7, 2022 · Ozone-based inactivation and disinfection techniques have been shown to effectively kill SARS-CoV-2 in water, aerosols and on solid surface.
[97]
What are ionizers and other ozone generating air cleaners? | US EPA
While indirect ozone production is of concern, there is even greater concern with the direct, and purposeful introduction of a lung irritant into indoor air.Missing: O3 diffusion
[98]
Understanding the antimicrobial mechanism of TiO2-based ... - Nature
Feb 19, 2014 · Rather, the photocatalytic action triggers the decreased expression of a large array of genes/proteins specific for regulatory, signalling and ...
[99]
Photocatalytic TiO2 nanomaterials as potential antimicrobial and ...
Under the influence of UV irradiation, TiO2 based photocatalysts produce highly oxidizing free radicals that are known to have bactericidal and antiviral action ...
[100]
Polycarbonate Nanofiber Filters with Enhanced Efficiency and ... - NIH
Feb 8, 2025 · The polycarbonate nanofiber filters have enhanced air filtration efficiency, reaching 100% in thicker filters, and antibacterial properties, ...
[101]
Can Bacteriophages Be Effectively Utilized for Disinfection in Animal ...
Mar 16, 2025 · This systematic review explores the efficacy of bacteriophages as a novel and environmentally sustainable approach to controlling multi-resistant and non- ...
[102]
EPA's Registered Antimicrobial Products Effective Against ...
Feb 3, 2025 · EPA has reviewed required laboratory testing data demonstrating that these products kill Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) spores.Missing: instrument | Show results with:instrument
[103]
C. diff: Facts for Clinicians - CDC
Mar 5, 2024 · Use EPA-registered disinfectants (List K) in patient-care areas, as appropriate. Background. C. diff is a spore-forming, Gram-positive ...
[104]
Recommendations for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare ...
Dec 7, 2023 · Indications for Sterilization, High-Level Disinfection, and Low-Level Disinfection. Indications for sterilization and disinfection: by ID ...C. Recommendations · 6. Disinfectant Fogging · 19. Quality Control
[105]
Disinfection of Healthcare Equipment | Infection Control - CDC
Nov 28, 2023 · The FDA-cleared labels for high-level disinfection with >2% glutaraldehyde at 25°C range from 20-90 minutes, depending upon the product based on ...
[106]
FDA-Cleared Sterilants and High Level Disinfectants with General ...
Nov 30, 2023 · On this page is a table of FDA-cleared liquid chemical sterilants and high level disinfectants, last updated December 2023.
[107]
About Hand Hygiene for Patients in Healthcare Settings - CDC
Feb 27, 2024 · An alcohol-based hand sanitizer is the preferred method for cleaning your hands when they are not visibly dirty.
[108]
CDC's Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe ...
Apr 12, 2024 · Ensure that healthcare personnel perform hand hygiene with soap and water when hands are visibly soiled. Ensure that supplies necessary for ...
[109]
https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/disinfection-sterilization/summary-recommendations.html
[110]
Table 3: Epidemiologic evidence associated with the use of surface ...
Dec 19, 2023 · Disinfectants are more effective than detergents in reducing ... reduce the risk of infections among healthcare workers, patients, and visitors.
[111]
Best Disinfectants of 2025: Sprays, Wipes and More | NBC Select
Apr 7, 2025 · Clorox Disinfecting Wipes. Best disinfecting wipes. Clorox Disinfecting Wipes. $11.48. $14.99 ; Lysol Disinfectant Spray. Best disinfecting mist.
[112]
Lysol Disinfectant Sprays kill 99.9% of the viruses and bacteria your ...
Find disinfecting and sanitizing sprays for hard and soft surfaces. Disinfectants sprays can help prevent the spread of viruses, coronavirus, and more.
[113]
When and How to Clean and Disinfect Your Home - CDC
Jan 31, 2025 · Definitions · Cleaning removes most germs, dirt, and impurities from surfaces. Clean with water, soap, and scrubbing. · Sanitizing reduces germs ...
[114]
Guidance for Products Adding Residual Efficacy Claims | US EPA
Sep 11, 2025 · The following are example acceptable product label claims: “Kills 99.9% of [insert microorganism/s] within 1-2 hours of exposure when used ...
[115]
What does "Kills 99.9% Germs" Label mean? - Microbe Investigations
Mar 21, 2022 · The use of the phrase “kills 99.9 or 99.99 percent of germs” is a common marketing claim used by hand sanitizer/ disinfectant manufacturers to ...
[116]
Differentiating Between Traditional and 'Hospital Grade' Disinfectants
Jan 5, 2024 · Traditional cleaners are usually quat-based, whereas the term “hospital grade” implies that the disinfectant has undergone rigorous testing and meets stringent ...
[117]
Chemical disinfection in healthcare settings: critical aspects for the ...
In the U.S., manufacture and sale of disinfectants (referred to as antimicrobial pesticide products) are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ...
[118]
Cleaning and Disinfecting with Bleach - CDC
Apr 24, 2024 · If instructions are not available, leave the diluted bleach solution on the surface for at least 1 minute before removing or wiping. This is ...
[119]
Why Contact Time Matters: How to Disinfect & Save Money | CloroxPro
Oct 31, 2023 · The best practice for disinfection is to spray the surface sufficiently to make it visibly wet and reapply disinfectant if the surface starts to dry early.
[120]
Current progress, opportunities and challenges of developing green ...
Unprecedented market opportunity for green disinfectants in post-pandemic period. •. Conceptual understanding of green disinfectant by adapting green product ...
[121]
Biobased Disinfectant Market Size, Share, and Forecast - 2031
Biobased Disinfectant Market size to reach US$ 8.1 Bn by 2031, with a CAGR of 7.0%. The global market is segmented by category, product type, end-use.
[122]
The Best Surface Cleaners and Disinfectants - The New York Times
Dec 13, 2024 · Biokleen Spray & Wipe All-Purpose Cleaner rids surfaces of grime and comes with the EPA's Safer Choice certification.
[123]
[PDF] Maintaining a Disinfectant Residual | Distribution System Water Quality
Chlorine residuals improved, rising above 0.1 mg/L. Page 2. Keep the Distribution System Clean and Add Booster. Disinfection if Needed.
[124]
Disinfection Requirements Rule - Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
The previous minimum residual was 0.2 mg/L. The minimum residual for water systems with 4-log disinfection of groundwater (GW) sources has not changed.
[125]
Alternative Wastewater Disinfectant Research | US EPA
Mar 6, 2025 · EPA research explores alternative disinfectants like PAA, often combined with UV or chlorination, to reduce energy use, costs, and harmful ...
[126]
Common Water Disinfectants and How to Use Them
Common Water Disinfectants and How to Use Them · Sodium hypochlorite · Calcium hypochlorite · Chlorine gas · Chloramines · Chlorine dioxide · Ozone · Ultraviolet light ...
[127]
[PDF] 2025 Technical Report - Ozone - Handling
Mar 24, 2025 · We found no evidence of food-grade ozone. 678 contaminated by heavy metals or any other contaminants subject to FDA tolerances or action levels.
[128]
Small Entity Compliance Guide: Bottled Water and Residual ... - FDA
The allowable level established by FDA for chlorine in bottled water is 4.0 mg/l (as Cl2) (21 CFR 165.110(b)(4)(H)). What analytical methods are used for ...
[129]
Peracetic Acid in the Fresh Food Industry
Jun 13, 2014 · Peracetic acid blends have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved as sanitizer on food contact surfaces (21 CFR ...
[130]
Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Wastewater Treatment
Sep 18, 2015 · Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) use hydroxyl or sulfate radicals to remove organic and inorganic pollutants in wastewater, primarily for ...
[131]
Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have shown tremendous promise in water purification and treatment, including for the destruction of naturally occurring ...Author Information · References
[132]
Update on Footbaths for Dairy Cattle
Copper sulfate at 5 to 10% has been the most common disinfectant used in footbaths. Substituting a cleaning agent for copper sulfate on some days will reduce ...
[133]
Resolving the “health vs environment” dilemma with sustainable ...
Jan 9, 2023 · Physical methods, particularly UV irradiation, also provide sustainable disinfection with minimal health and environmental impacts.
[134]
Identifying Greener Cleaning Products | US EPA
Using green cleaning products can help to reduce the human health and environmental concerns that comes along with cleaning. Ecolabels are a good tool to help ...
[135]
Occurrence, effects, and ecological risks of chemicals in sanitizers ...
Chemicals incorporated in sanitizers and disinfectants are present in the environment, and a large portion are toxic to fish, algae, and daphnia.
[136]
Subacute Pulmonary Toxicity of Glutaraldehyde Aerosols in a ... - NIH
Inhalation exposure to GA is known to cause respiratory irritation and sensitization in animals and humans. To reproduce some of the known in vivo effects ...
[137]
HEALTH EFFECTS - Toxicological Profile for Glutaraldehyde - NCBI
1976). Occupational exposure to glutaraldehyde has been commonly associated with symptoms of respiratory tract irritation, particularly in medical facilities ...
[138]
[PDF] Effects of Skin Contact with Chemicals - CDC
A chemical burn can result from a brief exposure to a corrosive substance. Corrosive substances include strong alkaline (basic) materials or acids. Skin ...
[139]
Dermatologic reactions to disinfectant use during the COVID-19 ...
Oct 2, 2020 · Skin irritation, erythema, scaling, and roughness may occur with repeated application of 0.1% to 0.2% of peracetic acid (PA). Acute skin ...
[140]
Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk - NCI
Jun 10, 2011 · The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies formaldehyde as a human carcinogen (2). In 2011, the National Toxicology ...
[141]
Association of Occupational Exposure to Disinfectants With ... - NIH
Oct 18, 2019 · This study's findings suggest that regular use of chemical disinfectants among nurses may be a risk factor for developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
[142]
The Use of Household Cleaning Sprays and Adult Asthma - NIH
Common, nonprofessional use of household cleaning products in spray form is associated with new-onset asthma in adults. There is growing evidence that cleaning ...
[143]
Prenatal occupational disinfectant exposure and childhood allergies
Mar 28, 2022 · Disinfectant use by pregnant women may be a risk factor for asthma and eczema in offspring. As disinfectants are an effective tool in the ...
[144]
Association between maternal occupational exposure to cleaning ...
Apr 19, 2023 · We hypothesize that maternal exposure to cleaning chemicals during pregnancy will be associated with increased risk of asthma and wheeze at age ...
[145]
Cleaning and Disinfectant Chemical Exposures and Temporal ...
Apr 24, 2020 · Inhalation represented the largest percentage increase from 2019 to 2020 among all exposure routes, with an increase of 35.3% (from 4,713 to 6, ...
[146]
Exposure Assessment Tools by Chemical Classes - Pesticides - EPA
Apr 1, 2025 · Exposure to a particular pesticide may occur through multiple exposure routes (oral, dermal, and inhalation) depending on the type and use of ...
[147]
[PDF] Protecting Workers Who Use Cleaning Chemicals - OSHA
• Personal protective equipment required for using the cleaning product, such as gloves, safety goggles and respirators; and. • How to obtain and use hazard ...
[148]
When and How to Clean and Disinfect a Facility - CDC
Apr 16, 2024 · After you apply the disinfectant to the surface, leave the disinfectant on the surface long enough to kill the germs. This is called the ...
[149]
Environmental impacts of the widespread use of chlorine-based ...
DBPs can be harmful to the flora and fauna of the receiving water body and may have adverse effects on microorganisms and plankton present in these ...
[150]
USGS OFR 02-89: Fate of Disinfection By-Products in the Subsurface
Dec 28, 2016 · These chemicals oxidize organic matter present and reduce odor and color of the water, but in the process produce disinfection by-products ( ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[151]
Clinical and Environmental Harms of Quaternary Ammonium ...
May 13, 2025 · Despite their widespread use, QAC-based disinfectants are not instantaneous in action and require prolonged surface contact to be effective.
[152]
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: Bioaccumulation Potentials in ...
In this study, bioaccumulation potentials of 18 QACs with alkyl chain lengths of C8-C18 were determined in the in vitro–in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) model.
[153]
Triclosan: An Update on Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms
May 2, 2019 · ... banned antiseptic products containing TCS since September 2016 [19]. ... resistance to TCS due to overexpressed acrAB multidrug efflux pump [58].
[154]
Federal Register :: Safety and Effectiveness of Consumer Antiseptics
Sep 6, 2016 · (Response 37) We agree that currently there is no evidence of bacterial resistance to actual-use concentrations of triclosan. However ...
[155]
[PDF] Exploratory Use of Microaerosol Decontamination Technology ...
The relationship between microbial resistance to antibiotics and germicides is still being debated; however, regular rotation of disinfectants to prevent an ...
[156]
Phenol - Substance Information - ECHA - European Union
The old C&L Inventory will be updated daily until 30th Sept 2025. Note that ... Restriction list (Annex XVII to REACH) - indicates if the substance is ...
[157]
Restrictions - Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs
This last amendment set 1 July 2025 ... The restriction on dichloromethane in paint strippers contained in entry 59 of Annex XVII to REACH allows EU countries to ...Missing: phenols phenolic disinfectants
[158]
[PDF] Current Good Manufacturing Practice - Guidance for Human Drug ...
sporicidal and other sterile disinfectants and lint-free sterile wipes (see § 211.42). Procedures. 344 must describe the methods and schedule for cleaning ...
[159]
[PDF] fda-epa-disinfectants.pdf - Alston & Bird
Apr 13, 2020 · Even pesticides imported from overseas must be produced in an EPA-registered establishment, and your shipment importing the product into the.
[160]
Pesticide Labeling Questions & Answers | US EPA
An antimicrobial sanitizer label contains directions for use on food-contact surfaces that require a one-minute contact time although the data requirement for ...
[161]
[PDF] US EPA - Label Review Manual
Dec 12, 2024 · The phrase “Restricted Use Pesticide” on the front panel must meet the minimum type size requirements of the human hazard signal words. 40 ...
[162]
[PDF] Annex 6 WHO good manufacturing practices for sterile ...
WHO GMP for sterile products includes clean areas with airlocks, separate areas for operations, and sterility testing as the last control measure.
[163]
ISO 15883-1:2024 - Washer-disinfectors — Part 1
In stock 2–5 day deliveryThis document specifies general performance requirements for washer-disinfectors (WD) and washer-disinfector accessories that are intended to be used for ...
[164]
ISO 15883-2:2024 - Washer-disinfectors — Part 2
In stock 2–5 day deliveryISO 15883-2:2024 specifies requirements for washer-disinfectors for cleaning and thermal disinfection of reusable critical and semi-critical medical devices.
[165]
[PDF] Interim Guidance for the Evaluation of Products for Claims Against ...
Oct 10, 2024 · To add a virucidal claim to either a disinfectant or a sanitizer, utilize “EPA's Product Performance Test Guidelines; OCSPP 810.2200: ...Missing: post- harmonization