Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Faithfulness

Faithfulness is the disposition to maintain steadfast adherence to commitments, promises, or principles, manifesting as loyalty, reliability, and trustworthiness across personal, moral, professional, and religious domains.^[1]^[2] In ethical philosophy, it constitutes a core virtue akin to fidelity and constancy, enabling individuals to act consistently in alignment with their word despite temptations or changing circumstances.^[3]^[4] Empirically, faithfulness in romantic relationships correlates with enhanced stability, mutual satisfaction, and reduced infidelity risks, as supported by studies on moral foundations and commitment dynamics.^[5]^[6] Historically, ancient perspectives, such as Plato's linkage of loyalty to ethical decision-making, underscore its role in fostering social trust and moral integrity.^[4] In religious traditions, particularly Christianity, faithfulness extends to devotion toward divine covenants, exemplified by prophetic calls to unwavering obedience and relational fidelity as metaphors for spiritual allegiance.^[7]^[8] These attributes distinguish faithfulness from mere compliance, emphasizing voluntary endurance rooted in integrity rather than external coercion.^[9]

Definitions and Etymology

Linguistic Origins

The noun "faithfulness" derives from Middle English feithfulnesse, formed by adding the suffix -ness (indicating a state or quality) to the adjective faithful.^[10] The earliest attested use appears around 1400, reflecting the quality of being full of faith or loyal.^[10] The adjective faithful originated in Middle English as feithful before 1375, combining feith (a borrowing from Old French feid or feit, meaning faith or trust) with the suffix -ful (from Old English -full, denoting abundance or fullness).^[11] ^[12] The root feith traces to Latin fides, signifying faith, loyalty, trust, or reliance, which itself stems from the Proto-Indo-European root bheidh-, connoting to trust, confide, or persuade.^[13] This etymological lineage underscores a core semantic shift from abstract trust or belief to steadfast adherence, as seen in related terms like fidelity (from Latin fidelitas, loyalty or faithfulness, entering English in the early 15th century via Old French fidélité).^[14] ^[13] In linguistic evolution, the term's connotations expanded in medieval English texts to encompass relational loyalty, influenced by religious and feudal contexts where fides implied dutiful allegiance.^[11]

Core Conceptual Meanings

Faithfulness denotes the quality of steadfast adherence to commitments, vows, or obligations, encompassing loyalty, reliability, and consistency in behavior despite challenges or temptations. This concept derives from the Latin fides, meaning trust or faith, and implies a moral disposition toward truthfulness in one's word and actions.^[15] In essence, it involves maintaining fidelity to persons, causes, or principles through unwavering support and avoidance of betrayal.^[16] In relational contexts, faithfulness primarily signifies exclusive devotion, particularly sexual and emotional monogamy, where one honors exclusivity to a partner as per mutual agreements. This extends beyond mere absence of infidelity to proactive avoidance of compromising situations and cultivation of trust through transparency and prioritization of the bond.^[17] Moral analyses identify key rationales for such fidelity, including rule adherence (e.g., contractual obligations), reciprocal ownership (mutual claims on each other's exclusivity), loyalty as relational integrity, and decency to prevent harm like jealousy or disease transmission.^[5] These elements underscore faithfulness as a deliberate ethical stance rather than passive inaction. Philosophically, faithfulness manifests as a core moral virtue of constancy, enabling firm adherence to truth and duty amid uncertainty, distinct from fleeting allegiance by its enduring nature.^[9] It parallels trust-based commitments in broader human endeavors, where reliability fosters stability in social and personal structures, though it demands discernment to avoid blind loyalty to flawed ends.^[18] Unlike generalized loyalty, which may permit conditional support, faithfulness emphasizes unswerving firmness, often rooted in personal integrity over external enforcement.^[19]

Philosophical and Ethical Foundations

Historical Philosophical Views

In ancient Greek philosophy, Plato's ideal state in The Republic (c. 375 BCE) envisioned communal wives and children for the guardian class, prioritizing collective unity over exclusive marital bonds and thereby de-emphasizing personal faithfulness as a private virtue.^[20] Aristotle (384–322 BCE), critiquing this in Politics (c. 350 BCE), defended private households as natural for procreation and child-rearing, arguing that adultery undermines familial and civic order; he deemed it disgraceful for either spouse to violate fidelity, viewing mutual loyalty as essential to the virtuous wife's honor and the household's stability.^[20]^[21] Roman Stoic philosophers, such as Musonius Rufus (c. 30–100 CE), portrayed marriage as a rational companionship aimed at mutual moral improvement and procreation, insisting on exclusivity to cultivate virtue and prevent licentiousness; Rufus argued that spouses should share all aspects of life faithfully, as base individuals cannot form sympathetic unions without such commitment.^[22]^[23] This emphasis on self-control aligned fidelity with broader Stoic duties to reason and social harmony, though without sacramental overtones. Medieval Christian thinkers integrated classical ideas with theology. Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) outlined three marital goods—offspring (proles), fidelity (fides), and sacrament (sacramentum)—in works like The Excellence of Marriage (c. 401 CE), defining fides as exclusive spousal commitment that curbs lust and honors the vow, rendering extra-marital relations sinful disruptions of natural order.^[20] Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) built on this in Summa Theologiae (1265–1274), interpreting fides as fidelity to the marriage contract's promise of perpetual union, which suits "deed to word" through mutual exclusivity, supports procreation, and fulfills natural law by remedying fornication via the "marriage debt" of conjugal rights.^[24]^[25] In modern philosophy, Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) treated fidelity as a deontological imperative in The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), defining marriage as a civil contract for "lifelong reciprocal possession" of sexual faculties to prevent objectification; infidelity violates the categorical duty to treat partners as autonomous ends, confining legitimate sex to this exclusive bond.^[26]^[27] Later critics like Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) challenged such rigid norms as products of "slave morality," favoring instinctual vitality over contractual loyalty, though he acknowledged marriage's utility for propagation without endorsing universal faithfulness.^[28]

Ethical Arguments For and Against

Arguments in favor of faithfulness in intimate relationships often rest on deontological principles of promise-keeping and the unique ethical significance of sexual exclusivity. Romantic commitments typically involve explicit or implicit pledges of fidelity, and breaching them constitutes a moral wrong by undermining trust and mutual vulnerability inherent in sexual intimacy, which differs from other forms of relational exclusivity due to its embodied and emotional depth.^[29] Philosophers contend that such commitments warrant special moral protection because infidelity exploits the asymmetry of emotional investment, treating a partner's devotion as disposable rather than reciprocal.^[30] Consequentialist defenses further emphasize faithfulness's role in promoting relational stability, with empirical associations showing monogamous partnerships perceived as more trustworthy and morally upright, correlating with higher reported commitment and satisfaction levels compared to non-monogamous arrangements.^[31] From a virtue ethics standpoint, faithfulness cultivates traits like loyalty and self-restraint, essential for long-term interpersonal flourishing, as it aligns personal desires with communal responsibilities such as child-rearing, where dual-parent stability reduces exposure to relational disruptions documented in higher-conflict polyamorous or serially monogamous contexts.^[5] These arguments prioritize causal outcomes: societies enforcing norms of fidelity exhibit lower incidences of family dissolution, with data indicating that paternal investment in monogamous units enhances offspring well-being through consistent resource allocation, contrasting with diffused efforts in multi-partner scenarios.^[32] Opposing views, rooted in individual autonomy and anti-possessive ethics, challenge faithfulness as an unjust restriction on personal liberty, akin to demanding exclusivity in non-sexual domains like friendships, which would be deemed coercive.^[33] Critics argue that mandating sexual monogamy enforces a scarcity model of affection, pathologizing natural inclinations toward variety and thereby infringing on consent by preemptively limiting future options, even if initially agreed upon, as evolving preferences render such pacts presumptively immoral.^[34] Some philosophers extend this to consequentialist critiques, positing that rigid fidelity stifles authentic self-expression and relational experimentation, potentially yielding greater overall happiness through consensual non-monogamy, though empirical support remains contested, with studies showing elevated jealousy and dissolution rates in open arrangements absent strong boundary enforcement.^[35] Libertarian-leaning arguments against faithfulness dismiss exclusivity as a cultural artifact rather than ethical imperative, asserting that moral wrongs arise solely from deception, not the act of seeking multiple partners, provided transparency avoids harm; thus, infidelity's ethical failing, if any, lies in betrayal of agreed terms rather than inherent possessiveness.^[36] This perspective critiques pro-faithfulness stances for conflating pragmatic benefits—like reduced sexually transmitted infection transmission, with rates 2-3 times higher in non-monogamous groups—with normative duties, urging decoupling ethics from biology or sociology.^[37] However, such claims often overlook source biases in advocacy for polyamory, where academic proponents may underemphasize relational inequities observed in longitudinal data favoring monogamous longevity.^[38]

Biological and Evolutionary Basis

Monogamy in Animal Species

Monogamy in animals is typically categorized as social monogamy, involving pair bonding, cohabitation, and cooperative offspring care, or genetic monogamy, characterized by exclusive mating and low rates of extra-pair paternity.^[39] Social monogamy is far more prevalent than genetic monogamy across species, as genetic analyses reveal frequent extra-pair copulations even in socially paired animals.^[40] True lifelong genetic monogamy remains exceptionally rare, with most species exhibiting some degree of infidelity that undermines strict faithfulness in reproduction.^[41] Among birds, approximately 90% of species practice social monogamy, often tied to biparental care for altricial offspring requiring dual feeding efforts.^[42] However, genetic studies indicate that fewer than 25% of these socially monogamous birds achieve genetic monogamy, with extra-pair fertilizations occurring in up to 86% of examined species.^[41] Examples include species like albatrosses and puffins, where pairs may remain bonded for multiple seasons but males or females seek additional mates, reducing paternity certainty below 100%.^[43] In mammals, social monogamy is uncommon, affecting only 3-9% of the roughly 5,000 species, primarily in rodents, primates, and carnivores where male investment in offspring defense or provisioning offsets female-biased parental effort from lactation.^[40] Unlike birds, mammalian social monogamy correlates more closely with genetic monogamy, though extra-pair mating still occurs at rates of 10-20% in some populations.^[44] Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) exemplify this, forming lifelong pair bonds reinforced by vasopressin and oxytocin pathways, with field observations showing 60-75% of males adopting monogamous tactics involving nest-sharing and paternal care.^[45] Other instances include Eurasian beavers and gray wolves, where territoriality enforces pair exclusivity, yet genetic assays detect occasional multi-pairing.^[46] Evolutionary drivers favor social over genetic monogamy due to constraints like mate scarcity or infanticide risks, but pervasive genetic infidelity suggests that strict reproductive faithfulness evolves only when paternity assurance directly enhances fitness, as in species with high male parental investment.^[47] Recent genomic studies confirm that even paradigmatic monogamous models like voles exhibit alternative mating tactics, with wanderers or cheaters comprising 25-40% of males in natural populations.^[48] This underscores that animal monogamy prioritizes alliance stability over absolute sexual exclusivity.^[49]

Evolutionary Drivers in Humans

Human pair-bonding, a form of faithfulness involving long-term mating partnerships, likely evolved as an adaptive strategy to address the high costs of reproduction in early hominins, where offspring required extended biparental care due to prolonged immaturity and altricial birth.^[50] This transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding is evidenced by fossil records indicating reduced sexual dimorphism in body size—suggesting decreased male-male competition over mates—dating back approximately 2 million years in species like Australopithecus, which correlates with the emergence of provisioning behaviors.^[51] Paternal investment, including resource provisioning and protection, became crucial as human brain sizes increased and weaning times extended, favoring males who committed to fewer partners to maximize offspring survival rather than pursuing multiple matings.^[52] A primary driver was the mitigation of infanticide risk, where unrelated males pose threats to infants sired by competitors; phylogenetic models across primates, including humans, show that social monogamy reduces such risks by enabling mate-guarding, with simulations indicating this pressure accounts for up to 17% of transitions to monogamy in mammalian lineages.^[53] In human evolutionary history, this is supported by comparative data from hunter-gatherer societies and genetic evidence of low historical cuckoldry rates (around 1-2% in modern populations, lower in ancestral contexts), incentivizing male vigilance and female selectivity for faithful partners to ensure paternity certainty and resource allocation to genetic kin.^[54] Ecological factors, such as resource scarcity and low female density in ancestral environments, further promoted monogamy over polygyny, as models demonstrate that biased adult sex ratios—driven by higher male mortality—shift optimal strategies toward pair-bonding to secure mates amid competition.^[55] Neurobiological mechanisms, including oxytocin-mediated bonding analogous to mother-infant attachments, underpin these behaviors, with human studies showing pair bonds enhance cooperative parenting and reduce promiscuity, though serial monogamy persists as a flexible variant allowing renewed investment after offspring independence.^[56] Cross-cultural data reveal that while polygyny occurs in about 85% of societies, monogamy predominates within groups (over 80% of marriages), reflecting these evolved drivers tempered by cultural enforcement rather than strict genetic monogamy.^[54]

Psychological and Relational Dynamics

Individual Psychological Benefits

Faithfulness in romantic relationships, defined as adherence to mutual exclusivity, correlates with enhanced emotional security and reduced incidence of attachment-related distress for individuals. Secure attachment styles, fostered by consistent fidelity, are linked to lower levels of anxiety and depression, as opposed to the insecurity often triggered by breaches of trust.^[57] Infidelity, conversely, precipitates long-term psychological sequelae including grief, diminished self-esteem, and elevated risks of clinical depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms in affected partners, underscoring the protective role of fidelity against such relational traumas.^[58]^[6] Neurobiological mechanisms further support individual benefits, with pair bonding—reinforced by faithfulness—elevating oxytocin levels that promote stress regulation and emotional resilience. Oxytocin facilitates the formation of enduring social bonds, interacting with dopamine pathways to enhance motivation toward a committed partner and buffer against cortisol-driven anxiety.^[59]^[60] Empirical data indicate that individuals in monogamous arrangements report higher overall happiness compared to those in open relationships or experiencing non-consensual non-monogamy, attributing this to greater trust and relational stability.^[61] While meta-analyses reveal comparable relationship satisfaction between consensual non-monogamous and monogamous individuals in self-selected samples, fidelity within expected monogamous contexts mitigates jealousy-induced rumination and fosters self-efficacy through alignment with personal values of loyalty.^[62] This congruence reduces cognitive dissonance and supports mental well-being, particularly for those predisposed to anxious attachment, where fidelity minimizes hypervigilant monitoring of partner behavior.^[63] In polygamous structures, by contrast, participants often exhibit heightened depressive symptoms, highlighting exclusivity's role in averting diluted emotional investments.^[64]

Interpersonal and Familial Impacts

Faithfulness in romantic partnerships correlates with elevated levels of interpersonal trust and relational satisfaction, as evidenced by longitudinal analyses showing that couples prioritizing mutual exclusivity report stronger emotional bonds and reduced conflict compared to those experiencing infidelity.^[65] Lower marital satisfaction, in turn, predicts a higher probability of infidelity, creating a feedback loop where breaches erode trust and exacerbate dissatisfaction.^[66] Infidelity often triggers acute relational distress, including heightened jealousy, communication breakdowns, and diminished intimacy, with affected partners experiencing symptoms akin to post-traumatic stress.^[6] On the familial front, sustained faithfulness contributes to household stability, which empirical data link to improved child developmental outcomes, such as enhanced academic performance and psychological resilience, by minimizing disruptions like parental separation.^[67] Conversely, parental infidelity frequently precipitates divorce or chronic interparental conflict, correlating with adverse effects on offspring, including elevated risks of depression, anxiety, and impaired attachment formation.^[68] Children exposed to such betrayals often internalize mistrust, manifesting in their own adult relationships as hesitancy toward commitment and vulnerability to relational instability.^[69] These patterns underscore how fidelity bolsters family cohesion through consistent role modeling and resource security, whereas infidelity disrupts these foundations, yielding intergenerational ripple effects on emotional security and social functioning.^[70]

Sociological and Cultural Dimensions

Historical Variations Across Societies

In hunter-gatherer societies, which represent the longest phase of human history prior to agriculture around 10,000 BCE, pair-bonding with serial monogamy predominated, with polygyny rare due to resource scarcity and egalitarian structures that limited male wealth accumulation. Anthropological reconstructions using mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of forager groups indicate that early human marriage practices likely emphasized bilateral kinship and flexible residence patterns, fostering relative fidelity within pairs to ensure paternal investment in offspring.^[71] ^[54] Among early agricultural civilizations, polygyny became more prevalent, particularly among elites, as surplus wealth enabled resource hoarding by high-status males. In ancient Mesopotamia from circa 3000 BCE, kings and nobles maintained multiple wives and concubines as markers of power, while commoners adhered to monogamy due to economic constraints. Similar patterns emerged in ancient Egypt, where pharaohs like Ramses II (reigned 1279–1213 BCE) had over 100 children from numerous consorts, though legal monogamy applied to most marriages with fidelity enforced asymmetrically—women risked death for adultery, while men faced milder repercussions.^[72] In classical Greece and Rome (circa 800 BCE–500 CE), socially imposed monogamy distinguished these societies from broader Eurasian norms, prohibiting men from simultaneous multiple wives but tolerating extramarital relations or concubinage for males, provided they did not undermine the primary household. Adultery by women was criminalized harshly, as in Athens where it could justify homicide by the husband, reflecting a double standard rooted in lineage purity and inheritance concerns rather than mutual fidelity. This Greco-Roman monogyny, rare globally, influenced later Western norms but coexisted with tolerated male infidelity.^[73] ^[74] Across pre-modern Asia, variations persisted: Imperial China (from the Zhou dynasty, 1046–256 BCE) permitted concubinage for affluent men alongside one primary wife, with Confucian texts emphasizing wifely fidelity (lian) while excusing male dalliances; in India under Hindu traditions documented in the Manusmriti (circa 200 BCE–200 CE), polygyny was allowable for upper castes to produce heirs, though monogamy prevailed among the masses. In sub-Saharan African societies, polygyny was culturally sanctioned in up to 80% of groups per ethnographic surveys, but actual multiple wives occurred in only 5–22% of cases, confined to wealthy patriarchs, with communal oversight mitigating extreme infidelity through kinship networks.^[75] ^[76] Overall, historical faithfulness norms prioritized female exclusivity to secure paternity across societies, while male non-monogamy correlated with status and ecology—rarer in resource-poor forager bands, more accepted among agrarian elites—yielding de facto monogamy for most despite permissive polygynous allowances in the majority of cultures.^[54] ^[51]

Contemporary Cultural Shifts

In Western societies, marriage rates have declined significantly since the early 2000s, with crude marriage rates in OECD countries falling from an average of 5.1 per 1,000 people in 2000 to 3.8 per 1,000 by 2025, accompanied by rising cohabitation and delayed unions.^[77] ^[78] This shift correlates with cultural emphases on individual autonomy and career priorities over lifelong commitment, reducing the institutional pressures that historically enforced faithfulness within marriage. Divorce rates, while stabilizing post-2010 in many nations (e.g., around 1.8 per 1,000 globally in 2021), remain high, with approximately 40-50% of first marriages in the United States ending in separation, often citing infidelity or incompatibility as factors.^[79] ^[80] Attitudes toward monogamous fidelity have softened among younger cohorts, particularly in the U.S., where General Social Survey (GSS) data indicate a gradual increase in tolerance for extramarital sex since the 1970s, though a majority still view it as morally wrong.^[81] Lifetime infidelity prevalence hovers at 20% for men and 13% for women based on GSS reports from the 2010s, with recent analyses suggesting a decline among men (from 21% in the 1990s to 11% in 2021-2022) but potential rises among women, reflecting gendered shifts in opportunity and norms.^[82] ^[83] These trends align with broader acceptance of serial monogamy, where individuals cycle through exclusive partnerships rather than sustaining one, facilitated by no-fault divorce laws enacted widely since the 1970s. Consensual non-monogamy (CNM), including polyamory and open relationships, has gained visibility through media and self-reporting, with surveys estimating 3-7% of North Americans currently in such arrangements and up to 20% having experimented.^[84] A 2023 YouGov poll found 34% of Americans idealizing non-exclusive relationships, yet CNM remains marginal, with anecdotal reports of high dissolution rates (e.g., 92% for open marriages in one analysis, though empirical verification is limited).^[85] Dating apps, proliferating since the 2010s, exacerbate choice overload, correlating with shorter-term pairings and potentially higher infidelity risks by enabling discreet connections, though some studies find no overall difference in relationship stability compared to offline origins.^[86] These shifts underscore a tension between professed ideals of emotional fidelity and practices favoring flexibility, driven by technological access and cultural individualism, yet empirical outcomes often favor stable monogamy for reported satisfaction and child well-being.^[82]

Religious Perspectives

Abrahamic Traditions

![Medieval illustration of the prophet Hosea raising his hand][float-right] In Judaism, marital faithfulness is enshrined in the Torah's seventh commandment, "You shall not commit adultery" (Exodus 20:14), which prohibits extramarital sexual relations and underscores the exclusivity of the marital bond as a covenant mirroring the relationship between God and Israel.^[87] Adultery was punishable by death under biblical law (Leviticus 20:10), reflecting its severity as a violation of familial and communal integrity, though rabbinic interpretations later emphasized repentance and divorce over execution.^[88] Jewish tradition promotes monogamy as the ideal, with marriage viewed as a sacred union for procreation and companionship, as articulated in Genesis 2:24: "A man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh." Christianity extends the Jewish prohibition on adultery, with Jesus intensifying it in the Sermon on the Mount to include lustful intent: "Anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart" (Matthew 5:28).^[89] The New Testament reinforces monogamy as the divine pattern from creation, as Jesus references Genesis in affirming marriage as a lifelong union between one man and one woman (Matthew 19:4-6), prohibiting divorce except in cases of sexual immorality. Apostolic teachings, such as in 1 Corinthians 7:2, advocate mutual fidelity to avoid temptation: "But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband." Early church fathers, drawing from these texts, condemned polygamy and extramarital relations as incompatible with Christ's teachings on purity. In Islam, the Quran strictly forbids zina, or unlawful sexual intercourse, stating, "And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse. Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way" (Quran 17:32), encompassing adultery and fornication while mandating fidelity within marriage. Marriage is depicted as a protective covenant of mutual rights and tranquility (Quran 30:21), with spouses as garments for one another (Quran 2:187), implying exclusivity despite permission for men to marry up to four wives if treated justly (Quran 4:3). Hadith literature reinforces this, with the Prophet Muhammad emphasizing spousal fulfillment as part of faith's sweetness, warning against betrayal.^[90] Punishments for adultery, such as stoning for married offenders in traditional jurisprudence, highlight fidelity's centrality to social order, though application varies historically and by school of thought.

Eastern and Indigenous Views

In Hinduism, the Manusmriti (Laws of Manu) articulates mutual fidelity as the paramount duty of spouses, stating in verse 9.101 that "mutual fidelity [should] continue until death," serving as the summary of the highest law governing husband and wife.^[91] This text idealizes monogamy for householders to maintain dharma (cosmic order) and family stability, though it permits men limited polygyny in cases of infertility or ritual needs, while strictly prohibiting adultery for women and emphasizing wifely devotion (pativrata).^[92] Such prescriptions reflect a causal emphasis on fidelity to preserve lineage purity and social hierarchy, with empirical historical evidence from Vedic texts showing enforcement through rituals and social sanctions against infidelity. Buddhist teachings address faithfulness through the third precept of the Five Precepts for lay followers, which prohibits kamesu micchacara (sexual misconduct), explicitly including adultery as a violation that generates suffering (dukkha) by harming trust and attachment.^[93] Pali canonical texts, such as the Sigalovada Sutta, counsel householders to avoid extramarital relations to uphold ethical conduct (sila) and relational harmony, viewing infidelity as disruptive to the Eightfold Path's right action.^[94] This stance prioritizes non-harm (ahimsa) over permissive norms, with monastic commentaries reinforcing that consensual adultery still constitutes misconduct if it involves partners under another's protection, such as a married individual. Confucian doctrine frames marital faithfulness within the five cardinal relationships (wulun), particularly the husband-wife bond, where the wife owes obedience and distinction in roles to the husband, fostering loyalty as essential for familial and societal ren (humaneness).^[95] Texts like the Analects and Mencius imply fidelity through emphasis on rectitude (yi) and harmony (he), with historical imperial China enforcing these via legal codes penalizing adultery—punishable by death for women but more lenient for men—to sustain the patriarchal order.^[96] Taoism, by contrast, offers less prescriptive views, prioritizing natural flow (wu wei) in relationships over rigid fidelity, though classical texts like the Tao Te Ching indirectly support loyalty as alignment with the Tao's balance, warning against disruptive desires.^[97] Indigenous perspectives on faithfulness vary widely across cultures, often diverging from strict monogamy. In many pre-colonial Native American societies, such as Plains tribes, polygyny was practiced among leaders and warriors to enhance alliances and economic capacity, with wives expected to remain faithful to the husband while co-wives shared household duties, as documented in ethnographic accounts from the 19th century.^[72] Fidelity here emphasized role-based loyalty rather than exclusivity, with infidelity by wives facing social ostracism or violence, though male multiple partnerships were normalized for status. Similarly, traditional African societies, including West African groups, embraced polygyny as a socioeconomic strategy, where a husband's fidelity to his marital commitments (providing for multiple wives) was valued, but extramarital affairs by men were tolerated if discreet, while women's adultery threatened lineage integrity and incurred severe taboos or punishments.^[98] These practices, rooted in empirical adaptations to resource scarcity and kinship needs, prioritized communal stability over individualistic monogamous ideals.

Empirical Evidence on Outcomes

Studies on Health, Happiness, and Stability

Longitudinal analyses from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study, involving 2,579 adults tracked from 2004–2006 to 2013–2014, demonstrate that spousal infidelity at baseline predicts poorer chronic health outcomes at follow-up, with a standardized effect size of β = 0.06 (p = 0.003) after controlling for demographics and initial health status.^[99] This association persists over time and is amplified among low-income individuals (p adjusted = 0.031) and ethnic minorities (p adjusted = 0.020), suggesting infidelity contributes to sustained physiological stress independent of social support buffers.^[99] Stable marital histories, characterized by long-term fidelity and low disruption, are linked to superior subjective health and life satisfaction compared to unstable partnerships or singlehood, based on sequence analysis of partnership trajectories in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) dataset encompassing 18,256 individuals born 1945–1957.^[100] Divorce without repartnering particularly erodes well-being, with effects most pronounced among lower-educated men, indicating that fidelity sustains health protective factors like emotional security and resource sharing.^[100] Married individuals generally exhibit better overall health metrics, including reduced mortality risk, than their unmarried counterparts, with these advantages accruing from the stability fidelity enables.^[101] Research on marital happiness trajectories reveals that persistently high satisfaction in faithful unions correlates with elevated psychological well-being across the life course, drawing from panel data where initial life happiness strongly predicts sustained marital quality (r > 0.50 in trajectory models).^[102] Couples maintaining fidelity report higher long-term relationship satisfaction than those experiencing infidelity, which elevates distress and accelerates decline, as evidenced in behavioral couple therapy outcomes where infidelity cases enter treatment with significantly higher baseline dysfunction (p < 0.05).^[103] In terms of relational stability, infidelity markedly increases dissolution risk; longitudinal tracking shows prior cheating predicts recurrent infidelity and breakup, with stable faithful marriages demonstrating lower divorce rates and improved happiness trajectories after 20 years for enduring couples.^[104] ^[105] Fidelity thus fosters resilience against external stressors, contrasting with non-fidelity patterns that correlate with chronic instability and reduced longevity in partnerships.^[106]

Infidelity Prevalence and Consequences

Surveys of married individuals in the United States indicate lifetime infidelity rates of approximately 20-25% for physical extramarital affairs, with self-reported figures often underestimating true prevalence due to social desirability bias.^[107] A 2007 meta-analysis of 50 studies reported lifetime infidelity prevalence at 34% for men and 24% for women, though more recent data suggest the gender gap is narrowing, with women driving an increase in reported cheating driven by dissatisfaction and opportunity.^[108] ^[109] Prevalence peaks among those aged 50-59, at 28% for men and 17% for women, and varies by relationship length, with higher rates in longer marriages where emotional disconnection accumulates.^[110] Globally, rates differ by culture, but Western nations show similar patterns, with infidelity more common among cohabiting than married couples.^[111] Infidelity frequently precipitates relationship dissolution, serving as a primary factor in 20-40% of divorces according to analyses of marital breakdown causes.^[112] Among couples experiencing infidelity, divorce rates exceed 50% within five years post-discovery, compounded by eroded trust and intensified conflict.^[113] For the betrayed partner, consequences include acute emotional distress akin to trauma, with elevated risks of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, and lowered self-esteem persisting for years.^[6] ^[58] Physiological impacts are also documented in longitudinal studies, linking discovery of spousal infidelity to long-term chronic health declines, including higher incidences of heart disease, diabetes, migraines, and immune dysregulation via sustained stress responses.^[114] ^[115] The perpetrator faces secondary effects such as guilt-induced mental health strain and social repercussions, though these are less severe than for the victim; overall, infidelity correlates with poorer marital quality and individual well-being even if the relationship survives.^[99] Children of infidelitous unions, particularly post-divorce, exhibit increased behavioral problems, academic underperformance, and future relational instability, underscoring intergenerational causal chains from parental betrayal.^[103] Recovery is possible with therapy, but empirical outcomes show sustained improvements in only a subset of cases, with many couples reporting residual distrust.^[103]

Modern Controversies and Critiques

Debates on Monogamy vs. Non-Monogamy

Proponents of monogamy argue that it aligns with human evolutionary adaptations favoring pair-bonding for biparental investment in offspring, reducing intrasexual competition and promoting societal stability, as evidenced by genetic studies showing low variance in male reproductive success compared to strictly polygynous species.^[54] In contrast, advocates for consensual non-monogamy (CNM), such as polyamory or open relationships, contend that humans exhibit flexible mating strategies, with historical polygyny in approximately 83% of pre-industrial societies suggesting monogamy is a cultural imposition rather than innate.^[116] However, cross-cultural data indicate that enforced monogamy correlates with lower violence and more equitable resource distribution, challenging claims of non-monogamy as a natural default.^[51] Empirical studies on relationship satisfaction yield mixed results, with some meta-analyses reporting no significant differences between monogamous and CNM individuals, potentially due to self-selection biases in CNM samples where participants are more psychologically resilient or ideologically committed.^[117] Other reviews find CNM participants reporting lower overall happiness, attributing this to heightened emotional labor in managing multiple partners.^[118] Jealousy remains a persistent challenge in CNM, contradicting narratives of effortless compersion (joy in partner's other relationships); research shows comparable jealousy levels to monogamy but requiring extensive negotiation, which can exacerbate conflict despite claims of superior communication skills.^[119]^[120] Health outcomes favor monogamy, as CNM practitioners report higher lifetime sexual partners and STI histories; for instance, one study found CNM individuals had more STIs and lower condom consistency than monogamous counterparts.^[121] Estimates suggest 34% of open relationship participants experienced an STI in the prior year, versus lower rates in monogamous groups, due to increased exposure networks despite testing protocols.^[122] Breakup rates provide limited data, with anecdotal reports claiming 92% failure for open marriages, though rigorous longitudinal studies are scarce; available evidence points to elevated dissolution risks in CNM from trust erosion and logistical strains, exceeding monogamous baselines adjusted for selection effects.^[123] Critics of non-monogamy highlight causal risks like amplified infidelity consequences—prevalent in 20-25% of monogamous relationships but structurally embedded in CNM—leading to higher emotional distress and instability for children in such households.^[84] Defenders counter that CNM fosters authenticity and reduces covert cheating, yet peer-reviewed syntheses underscore that while short-term sexual fulfillment may rise, long-term metrics like commitment and stability tilt toward monogamy, informed by selection biases in pro-CNM research often drawn from urban, educated cohorts.^[124] These debates persist amid rising CNM identification (4-5% of U.S. adults), but empirical weight supports monogamy for aggregate well-being absent strong individual predispositions.^[125]

Critiques of Permissive Norms

Critics of permissive sexual norms argue that the post-1960s liberalization of attitudes toward extramarital and non-committed sex has eroded relational commitment and societal stability by diminishing the incentives for faithfulness within monogamous unions. Sociologist Mark Regnerus posits that technologies like the contraceptive pill and online pornography have rendered sex "cheap"—widely available at minimal emotional, temporal, or relational cost—prompting men to prioritize short-term gratification over investment in marriage, which correlates with stagnating marriage rates at around 6.5 per 1,000 people in the U.S. by 2021 and a rise in cohabitation without progression to wedlock.^[126] This dynamic, Regnerus contends, transforms mating markets into low-stakes environments where faithfulness loses value, as evidenced by surveys showing young adults engaging in more sexual partners prior to marriage yet reporting lower marital satisfaction. Empirical data reinforces these concerns, linking permissive premarital behaviors to heightened marital dissolution. A 2024 analysis of longitudinal data from the National Survey of Family Growth and other cohorts revealed that each additional premarital sexual partner increases divorce risk by approximately 5-10% in the first five years of marriage, a pattern persisting even after controlling for demographics, education, and religiosity, suggesting that habitual non-exclusivity undermines long-term pair-bonding fidelity.^[127] Similarly, premarital sexual permissiveness mediates negative outcomes in marital expectations, with permissive individuals exhibiting weaker commitment orientations and higher acceptance of infidelity, per a 2022 study of over 1,000 emerging adults.^[128] Gendered asymmetries amplify these critiques, as women often incur disproportionate costs under permissive regimes. Research indicates that women experience greater psychological regret following casual sex—reported at rates up to 80% in some samples versus 20% for men—correlating with diminished trust and attachment in subsequent relationships, contrary to narratives of unmitigated liberation benefits.^[129] General Social Survey trends from 1972 to 2022 show a parallel decline in reported happiness among women, particularly those with higher partner counts or liberal sexual views, attributing this to mismatched evolutionary predispositions where female selectivity evolved for resource-secure monogamy, disrupted by norms prioritizing autonomy over stability.^[130] Proponents of restrictive norms, drawing on cross-cultural data, argue this fosters broader societal fallout, including elevated single parenthood rates (now 40% of U.S. births) and child welfare deficits tied to paternal absenteeism. Such critiques extend to cultural ramifications, where permissive norms normalize infidelity as a low-consequence choice, eroding social trust and institutional reliance on faithful bonds. Regnerus and others note that this shift parallels rising divorce rates—from 2.2 per 1,000 in 1960 to peaks near 5.3 in 1981—before stabilizing at elevated levels, with no-fault laws exacerbating instability by reducing faithfulness enforcement. While some attribute these trends to economic factors, data-driven analyses emphasize attitudinal permissiveness as a causal vector, as regions with stronger monogamous norms exhibit lower dissolution and higher fertility stability.^[131] These arguments prioritize causal mechanisms rooted in human mating biology over ideological endorsements of unrestricted expression, cautioning that unchecked permissiveness risks perpetuating cycles of relational fragility.

References

[1]
Faith - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 23, 2010 · At its most general 'faith' means much the same as 'trust'. Uses of 'faith' and 'faithfulness' closely parallel 'trust' and 'trustworthiness' ...
[2]
[PDF] Faith, Faithfulness, and Virtue
Jul 1, 2011 · The concept of faith is central in the philosophy of religion, and the concept of virtue is central in ethics.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Robert Audi, Faith, Faithfulness, and Virtue - PhilPapers
This paper approaches the question by contrasting faith with faithfulness, connecting both with trust, and exploring conditions under which each may count as a ...
[4]
[PDF] Loyalty is faithfulness or a devotion to a person or cause. Plato said ...
And by using words like devotion, sincerity, honesty, and trust; a picture of a person who simply does the right thing when confronted with ethical decisions is ...
[5]
A Measure of Moral Reasons for Fidelity and Its Associations ... - MDPI
The main aim of the present research was to identify the moral foundations that motivate fidelity in marital relationships, within the framework of the moral ...
[6]
Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences - PMC
This is a narrative review addressing the topic of romantic infidelity, its causes and its consequences. Love is commonly a source of much pleasure and ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[7]
What does faithfulness involve? - Thinking Faith
May 29, 2013 · As we continue our journey through the Year of Faith, we explore the meaning of faithfulness through the ideas of Blessed John Henry Newman.
[8]
The concept of Faithfulness to in Christianity
Feb 23, 2025 · According to Christianity, faithfulness involves being consistent and trustworthy in actions, particularly in the management of wealth.
[9]
Faithfulness Explained By a Philosophy Genius - Joseph Kreydt
Jul 6, 2023 · “This constancy or fidelity in the true sense of the world is, as we see, a fundamental moral attitude of man.” “He alone will stand firm in ...
[10]
faithfulness, n. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the noun faithfulness is in the Middle English period (1150—1500). OED's earliest evidence for faithfulness is from around 1400, ...
[11]
faithful, adj., n., & adv. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the word faithful is in the Middle English period (1150—1500). OED's earliest evidence for faithful is from before 1375, in William ...
[12]
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faithful
[13]
Fidelity - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Early 15c. from Old French and Latin, "fidelity" means faithfulness, devotion, or adherence to truth, originally rooted in "faith" and trust from PIE ...
[14]
FIDELITY Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Fidelity came to English by way of French in the 15th century, and can ultimately be traced back to the Latin fidēlis, meaning "faithful, loyal, trustworthy." ...
[15]
Fidelity - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms - Vocabulary.com
Fidelity comes from the Latin root fides, which means faith, so fidelity is the state of being faithful. Marital fidelity is faithfulness to your spouse. If you ...
[16]
Conjugal Faithfulness | Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements
Jan 8, 2010 · Faithfulness … the quality of being faithful. A. Fidelity, loyalty (to a superior or friend) … B. Strict adherence to one's pledged word; ...<|separator|>
[17]
17 Ways to Have a Faithful Relationship With Your Partner
Being faithful in love means unwavering commitment, loyalty, and trust toward your partner. It encompasses physical, emotional, and mental fidelity.<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
Faith: Contemporary Perspectives
The idea of faith as a virtue is also discussed. This article focuses on contemporary work on faith, largely since the twentieth century. Historical accounts of ...
[19]
WHAT IS MEANT BY THE FAITHFULNESS OF GOD?
Oct 11, 2019 · Faithfulness has to do with being reliable, fidelity, firmness, stability, trustworthy, trueness to one's word, dependability.
[20]
Marriage and Domestic Partnership
Jul 11, 2009 · Aristotle (384–322 BCE) sharply criticized this proposal as unworkable. On his view, Plato errs in assuming that the natural love for one's own ...Understanding Marriage... · Marriage and Morals · The Politics of Marriage
[21]
Aristotle's Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 1, 2001 · ... marriages ought to be governed by a rule of strict fidelity. Similarly, when he says that murder and theft are always wrong, he does not ...
[22]
Musonius Rufus — Lectures XIII and XIV: On marriage - Figs in Winter
Feb 21, 2022 · Moreover, Musonius argues that two base human beings cannot possibly enter into a good relationship, because they cannot have sympathy of spirit ...
[23]
The Chief End of Marriage - Musonius Rufus - Plough Quarterly
May 25, 2017 · The Stoic philosopher Gaius Musonius Rufus's lecture 'On the Chief End of Marriage' is a remarkable statement by a thinker who stands ...<|separator|>
[24]
Question 49. The marriage goods - Summa Theologiae - New Advent
... [fides] signifies the suiting of deed to word [fiant dicta] by keeping one's promises; for since marriage is a contract it contains a promise whereby this ...
[25]
[PDF] Toward a Virtue Ethics of Marriage: Augustine and Aquinas on ...
The third good of marriage, sacramentum, essentially extends marital fides into a lifelong commitment to one partner. For Augustine, the sacramentum of ...
[26]
Kant on Marriage - Alexander Pruss
Marriage (matrimonium), which is the union of two persons of different sex for life-long reciprocal possession of their sexual faculties.
[27]
Unit 14: Sex and Marriage | Introduction to Philosophy
Kant concludes that sexual activity is permissible only in marriage. Other expressions of the sexual impulse are, for him, morally wrong.<|separator|>
[28]
Nietzsche's Moral and Political Philosophy
Aug 26, 2004 · Nietzsche's moral philosophy is primarily critical in orientation: he attacks morality both for its commitment to untenable descriptive (metaphysical and ...
[29]
Why, and to what extent, is sexual infidelity wrong? - PhilArchive
In this paper, I argue that sexual infidelity is wrong if it involves breaking a commitment to be sexually exclusive, which has special significance in the ...
[30]
Why, and to What Extent, Is Sexual Infidelity Wrong? - McKeever
Jun 30, 2020 · Wasserstrom argues that sexual infidelity is prima facie morally wrong because it involves promise breaking (Wasserstrom 1998). However, a ...Introduction · Why might sexual infidelity be... · Sexual infidelity and the norm...
[31]
A Narrative Review of the Dichotomy Between the Social ... - NIH
Jan 4, 2024 · (2022) found that monogamous partners were perceived as the most trustworthy, moral, committed, and sexually satisfied, whereas CNM partners ...
[32]
The morality of monogamy - Living with Limerence
Nov 6, 2021 · Monogamy is seen as a conservative ideal, but social sanctioning results in less inequality. A compromise of freedom and social stability is ...
[33]
The immorality of monogamy - IAI TV
Feb 13, 2020 · Is monogamy a moral demand to make? Harry Chalmers argues monogamy restricts our loved ones in a way we'd never justify in our other ...
[34]
Is monogamy morally wrong? - New Humanist
Jul 4, 2022 · Celebrated as the ideal form of romance, a growing cadre of philosophers argue that monogamy is actually unethical.
[35]
Opinion: A Moral Defense of Monogamy
Apr 3, 2018 · Her basic argument relies on consent and respect. Polyamory can be ethical, as long as it is not deceptive, rules are well established from the ...
[36]
The Philosophy of Infidelity | The Human Front
Jun 15, 2021 · Infidelity is a violation of exclusivity, but boundaries are unclear and depend on mutual agreement, including what a partner would like to do, ...
[37]
Sexual Infidelity Is Not Clearly Linked with Relationship Satisfaction ...
Apr 3, 2023 · H #2b: Infidelity motivations anger, lack of love, low commitment, sexual dissatisfaction, and neglect will be linked with decreases in ...
[38]
Budding philosopher makes a (qualified) defense of monogamy
Sep 25, 2023 · So, I tried to offer reasons why people might want to be monogamous, such as to preserve a greater amount of intimacy or maybe it just makes ...
[39]
Monogamy without parental care? Social and genetic mating ... - NIH
Feb 11, 2019 · 80% of bird species are now thought to be socially monogamous [19]), the absence of a link between social and genetic mating systems in birds ...
[40]
Genetic Monogamy in Socially Monogamous Mammals Is Primarily ...
Sep 18, 2018 · A recent review of mammalian monogamy reported that 226 species (9%) in 9 orders (35%) were socially monogamous, although socially monogamous ...
[41]
Genetic Monogamy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Less than 25% of all socially monogamous bird species so far studied practice true genetic monogamy, and true genetic monogamy occurs in fact in only 14% of ...
[42]
The biparental care hypothesis for the evolution of monogamy
Dec 20, 2013 · Monogamy is a rare mating system largely restricted to birds; about 90% of avian species are at least socially monogamous (Lack 1968). It occurs ...
[43]
Constrained mate choice in social monogamy and the stress of ...
Many animals, including humans, form socially monogamous pair bonds that last through the course of at least one reproductive event. In birds, over 90 per cent ...
[44]
The Evolution of Social Monogamy in Mammals - Science
In contrast to birds, social monogamy in mammals is usually associated with genetic monogamy, and the incidence of extra-pair mating is gen- erally low in ...
[45]
The prairie vole: an emerging model organism for understanding the ...
Although prairie voles are considered socially monogamous, genetic monogamy in which a male-female pair cohabitate and share exclusive parentage of ...
[46]
[PDF] The Evolution of Social Monogamy in Mammals RESEARCHARTICLE
In contrast to birds, social monogamy in mammals is usually associated with genetic monogamy, and the incidence of extra-pair mating is gen- erally low in ...
[47]
Why do some animals mate with one partner rather than many? A ...
Apr 23, 2018 · Many species show obligate monogamy in relation to mate availability. For example a lizard (Egernia stokesii; Gardner et al., 2002), and two ...<|separator|>
[48]
Dorsal CA1 lesions of the hippocampus impact mating tactics in ...
In the field, prairie voles tend to live in pairs and the majority of male prairie voles (~60–75%) adopt a socially monogamous mating tactic (Getz et al., 1993; ...
[49]
Revisiting what we know about the socially monogamous prairie vole
This review provides an overview of research and theory on alternative mating tactics in prairie voles, and their potential contributions to an integrative ...Introduction · Comparing Mating Systems... · Alternative Mating Tactics...
[50]
Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding
A crucial step in recent theories of human origins is the emergence of strong pair-bonding between males and females accompanied by a dramatic reduction in the ...
[51]
Human Monogamy Has Deep Roots | Scientific American
Mar 1, 2016 · It is entirely possible that our most distant ancestors were monogamous. Fossil evidence, says anthropologist C. Owen Lovejoy of Kent State ...
[52]
Paternal investment and the human mating system - ScienceDirect
Oct 5, 2000 · Human monogamy has long been attributed to our sexual division of labor and a need for paternal investment, given our long period of offspring ...
[53]
Evolution of monogamy in humans the result of infanticide risk
Jul 30, 2013 · The threat of infants being killed by unrelated males is the key driver of monogamy in humans and other primates.<|separator|>
[54]
Are We Monogamous? A Review of the Evolution of Pair-Bonding in ...
Jul 16, 2019 · Yet studies employing genetic methods find that rates of non-paternity are low among humans (~2%) when compared to those of socially monogamous ...
[55]
The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity - Nature
Sep 7, 2016 · The evolution of monogamy and paternal care in humans is often argued to have resulted from the needs of our expensive offspring.
[56]
The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and ...
Jun 12, 2023 · Selection for monogamy likely evolved as a mating strategy for males in situations where breeding females are solitary, female density is low, ...
[57]
Attachment Insecurity and Infidelity in Marriage: Do Studies of Dating ...
Further, the victims and perpetrators of infidelity also frequently experience negative intrapersonal outcomes, such as decreased self-esteem (Shackelford, ...Missing: fidelity | Show results with:fidelity
[58]
Long-Term Psychological Effects of Infidelity: What the Research Says
Oct 29, 2021 · Infidelity can have lasting impacts on partners and children the couple may have. Grief, brain changes, behaviors down the road, and mental health conditions
[59]
Oxytocin and Social Relationships: From Attachment to Bond ...
OT facilitates mating-induced pair bonds in adults through interaction with the mesolimbic dopamine system. Variation in striatal OT receptor density predicts ...
[60]
The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental ...
The presented findings again show that oxytocin can exert beneficial effects on processes thought to promote social bonding. A single oxytocin ...
[61]
Open Relationships, Nonconsensual Nonmonogamy, and ... - NIH
Apr 25, 2018 · Both open relationship and NCNM participants reported lower overall happiness in primary relationships than monogamous participants (ab = − 0.47 ...Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
[62]
Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth: A Meta-Analysis of the ...
Mar 24, 2025 · This meta-analytic review challenges such assumptions by comparing the degree of relationship and sexual satisfaction of monogamous and non-monogamous ...
[63]
The Impact of Romantic Attachment Styles on Jealousy in Young ...
Sep 30, 2023 · The experience of jealousy differs among romantic attachment styles. Attachment-related anxiety is a predictor of intrusive thoughts and behavioral ...Romantic Attachment Style As... · Romantic Jealousy And Its... · Discussion
[64]
The impact of polygamy on women's mental health: a systematic ...
The current state of the research reveals with moderate confidence, a more significant prevalence of mental-health issues in polygynous women as compared to ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[65]
[PDF] Personality, Marital Satisfaction, and Probability of Marital Infidelity
ABSTRACT - Personality and marital satisfaction may help to account for the likelihood of marital infidelity. We hypothesized that people with particularly.
[66]
[PDF] How selected personality factors affect the relationships between ...
Other studies have found that as marital satisfaction decreases, the likelihood of infidelity increases (Atkins, Baucom, & Jacobson, 2001; Glass & Wright, 1985) ...
[67]
Marriage and Child Well-Being: Research and Policy Perspectives
The apparent cumulative effects of family instability on child outcomes were largely a function of early childhood family instability (Cavanaugh & Huston, 2008) ...
[68]
[PDF] The Impact of Infidelity on the Family System Jamie Hammer CPC ...
Nov 26, 2021 · is linked to adverse child outcomes such as poor academic performance, diminished psychological well-being, increased depression, and anxiety.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[69]
(PDF) A Family Affair: Examining the Impact of Parental Infidelity on ...
Oct 28, 2015 · This paper examines the impact of parental infidelity on the family using a structural family therapy (SFT) framework.
[70]
[PDF] Phenomenological Consequences of Girls Witnessing Parental ...
Sep 10, 2025 · When infidelity enters the family sphere, it undermines trust, destabilizes attachment bonds, and creates ripple effects across generations ( ...
[71]
Evolutionary History of Hunter-Gatherer Marriage Practices - PMC
Apr 27, 2011 · The ancestral state of early human marriage is not well known given the lack of conclusive archaeological evidence. Methodology. Comparative ...
[72]
Polygamy, Native Societies, and Spanish Colonists - JSTOR Daily
Apr 19, 2021 · Polygamy also allowed cultures in which captive-taking was common to integrate women and children from rival groups into a household. In 1597, a ...
[73]
[PDF] Monogamy and polygyny in Greece, Rome, and world history
To a modern western audience, the fact that ancient Greeks and Romans were not supposed to be married to more than one person at any given time, ...
[74]
A peculiar institution? Greco–Roman monogamy in global context
Aug 25, 2009 · This approach allows us to situate Greco–Roman practice on a spectrum from traditional polygamy to more recent forms of normative monogyny.
[75]
Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny - NIH
Jul 18, 2018 · Monogamy appears to have become the predominant human mating system with the emergence of highly unequal agricultural populations that ...
[76]
Our Unequal Polygamous Past | Institute for Family Studies
Jun 29, 2021 · It is only in the past 100 years or so that the majority of humanity came to live in societies where polygamy was illegal. The big disadvantage ...
[77]
Marriage Divorce Rates and Statistics (2000–2025)
Marriage rates declined from 5.1 to 3.8 per 1,000 (2000-2025), while divorce rates average 1.8 per 1,000, with varied patterns. 40% of children experience ...Missing: 2010-2025 | Show results with:2010-2025
[78]
Marriages and Divorces - Our World in Data
In many countries, marriages are becoming less common, people are marrying later, unmarried couples are increasingly choosing to live together.
[79]
Understanding Divorce: Global Trends and Key Statistics
Jul 18, 2023 · According to the UN Yearbook, using the data available on global marriage and divorce, the divorce rate in 2021 stood at 1.8. This global trend ...
[80]
2025 Divorce Statistics: Divorce Rate Reasons & Facts
Feb 10, 2025 · The current divorce rate is 2.3 per 1000. About 50% of marriages end in divorce/separation, with 41% of first marriages and 60% of second ...
[81]
[PDF] Americans and Their Sexual Partners - GSS
Studying the trend in attitude toward marital in- fidelity in the annual GSS questionnaire since 1972, there has been a statistically significant increase in.
[82]
Who Cheats More? The Demographics of Infidelity in America
Jan 10, 2018 · In general, men are more likely than women to cheat: 20% of men and 13% of women reported that they've had sex with someone other than their spouse while ...
[83]
Who cheats on their spouse? - Deseret News
Aug 30, 2025 · Infidelity has dropped from 21% of men in the 1990s to 11% in 2021-2022, the most recent time period with good data. On the other hand, ...<|separator|>
[84]
What do we know about consensual non-monogamy? - ScienceDirect
Estimates are that approximately 3–7% of the North American population are currently engaged in consensual non-monogamous arrangements [19] with approximately ...
[85]
How many Americans prefer non-monogamy in relationships?
Feb 21, 2023 · A February 2023 YouGov poll finds that one-third of Americans (34%) describe their ideal relationship as something other than complete monogamy.
[86]
Relationships formed on dating apps are as strong as ... - PsyPost
Nov 28, 2024 · A study found no significant difference in relationship quality between couples who met online or in person, suggesting that dating apps are ...
[87]
Adultery - Jewish Virtual Library
The exclusive loyalty which Israel must give God is analagous to the exclusive fidelity a wife owes her husband. Thus, Israelite religion seized upon the ...In the Biblical Period · As a Metaphor for Idolatry · In Jewish Law
[88]
Jewish Sexuality: The Intimate Component in Love and Marriage
Judaism teaches that the erotic act has wide significance, and that this physical act operates transcendentally. The creation of family and the consecration of ...
[89]
What does the Bible say about an open marriage? - Got Questions
Oct 14, 2022 · God, in His Word, has declared sex outside of marriage to be adultery (Exodus 20:14). A spouse's giving permission to sin does not overrule ...<|separator|>
[90]
Hadith on Marriage: Sweetness of faith to fulfill marital duties
Nov 3, 2021 · A woman will not taste the sweetness of faith until she fulfills the rights of her husband, even if he were to call for her while she is upon a ...
[91]
Full 9th Chapter of Manusmriti
101. 'Let mutual fidelity continue until death,' this may be considered as the summary of the highest law for husband and wife. 102. Let man and woman, united ...
[92]
[PDF] The Sexual Politics of the Manusmriti: A Critical Analysis with Sexual ...
May 3, 2022 · The Manusmriti emphasizes the concept of monogamy, which was considered an ideal way of life for couples. At the same time, if he wishes, it ...Missing: "peer | Show results with:"peer
[93]
[PDF] Remarks on the Third Precept : Adultery and Prostitution in Påli Texts*
When there is a [sexual] approach9 with the ProtectorsI permission, there is no Misconduct for both [man and woman]. So a manIs breaking the Third Precept is ...
[94]
A Disciple of the Buddha Does Not Misuse Sexuality
... precepts, lists everything considered to be sexual misconduct. For monks ... precepts, this precept had the meaning of not committing adultery. However ...
[95]
Marriage and Family in China: Ideology and Practice
In the Confucian moral discourse, children owed filial piety to their parents, and wives owed obedience to their husbands, as two of the Confucian Five ...
[96]
LOYALTY FROM A CONFUCIAN PERSPECTIVE - jstor
texture of each of these notions. Confucians do not believe that their emphasis on family loyalty slights the larger social order. Filial piety, for them, is ...Missing: marital | Show results with:marital<|separator|>
[97]
“The Way” in Relationships - by Anthony “Harpo” Park
Apr 16, 2025 · Taoism reframes loyalty not as a commandment or duty, but as a manifestation of the Way. When partners are aligned with the Tao, loyalty emerges ...
[98]
20th WCP: Polygyny in Africa: A Maleðs Post-Original Sin or ...
First, it is said to cut down on male infidelity and to allow greater sexual equality in terms of extramarital affairs than is the case with monogamy. Secondly, ...
[99]
[PDF] The consequences of spousal infidelity for long-term chronic health
Con- clusion: Partner infidelity has lasting detrimental associations with chronic health that are not mitigated by positive relationships.
[100]
Stable Marital Histories Predict Happiness and Health Across ...
May 13, 2025 · The results show that stable marriages predict greater well-being, compared to single and less stable partnership histories.
[101]
Marriage linked to better health, happiness
Oct 1, 2025 · A new study suggests that marriage might give people a surprising boost in health and happiness. Researchers from the University of Michigan and ...
[102]
Marital Happiness and Psychological Well-Being Across the Life ...
We found three distinct marital happiness trajectories: low, middle, and high happiness. Initial levels of life happiness were strongly associated with ...
[103]
[PDF] Infidelity and Behavioral Couple Therapy: Relationship Outcomes ...
Nov 12, 2012 · Infidelity couples who eventually divorced reported the highest marital instability; however, infidelity couples who remained married did not ...
[104]
Cheating Then and Again | Institute for Family Studies
Sep 26, 2017 · Most studies of infidelity are retrospective and cross-sectional ... relationship studied did not report cheating in the second. The ...
[105]
For Most Couples Who Stay the Course, Marriage Gets Better With ...
Apr 25, 2018 · Specifically, although marital happiness declined slightly in the early years of marriage, it improved after about 20 years for most longtime ...
[106]
(PDF) Marital Happiness, Marital Status, Health, and Longevity
Aug 23, 2018 · This study examined health and longevity across a nationally representative sample of US adults, combining measures of marital status and marital happiness.
[107]
Infidelity in U.S. Marriages: Prevalence and Impact | Affair Healing
Jul 31, 2025 · Research indicates that infidelity is not uncommon in American marriages, though estimates vary by study and how infidelity is defined.
[108]
Infidelity and Its Associated Factors: A Systematic Review
Jun 10, 2019 · Infidelity has been defined as “a violation of a couple's assumed or stated contract regarding emotional and/or sexual exclusivity.”1 The secret ...
[109]
Data point to the real reason married people cheat, and you may be ...
Oct 6, 2024 · Infidelity is on the rise, with women driving the increase, and cheating is often driven by a lack of desire and connection in long-term ...
[110]
2025 Cheating Statistics: Infidelity in Modern Relationships
The likelihood of cheating increases with age, peaking among those aged 50-59, where 28% of men and 17% of women admit to infidelity. This trend suggests that ...
[111]
Infidelity Statistics: US Tops the Cheating Charts while 31% of Affairs ...
Sep 9, 2024 · According to the 2022 General Social Survey (GSS), 20% of men and 13% of women admitted to infidelity. Additionally, 67% of men and 53% of ...
[112]
Is Your Marriage Doomed After an Affair? | Psychology Today
Feb 1, 2022 · American Psychological Association research found that 20-40% of divorces are caused by an affair. The discovery of an affair may trigger a ...
[113]
Stats on infidelity for married couples… : r/survivinginfidelity - Reddit
Jan 10, 2024 · Even without infidelity involved, in the Western world about 50% of marriages fail within five to ten years. With infidelity in the mix, the ...CMV: Women initiating 80% of divorce does not mean they ... - RedditWhat percentage of married couples experience infidelity in their ...More results from www.reddit.com
[114]
The consequences of spousal infidelity for long-term chronic health
Aug 19, 2024 · Objective: Research links low marital quality to poor mental and physical health, but the impact of spousal infidelity on long-term chronic ...
[115]
New infidelity research shows being cheated on is linked to lasting ...
Sep 11, 2024 · Given its prevalence, many researchers have explored its psychological effects, including increased anxiety, depression, and lowered self-esteem ...
[116]
Is Monogamy Unnatural? | Institute for Family Studies
Mar 29, 2016 · Humans are a diverse lot, but before Western imperialism, 83 percent of indigenous societies were polygynous, 16 percent monogamous, and 1 ...
[117]
This meta-analysis found no significant difference in relationship ...
Mar 26, 2025 · This meta-analysis found no significant difference in relationship and sexual satisfaction between monogamous and non-monogamous individuals, ...r/psychology on Reddit: Study suggests that people in consensually ...Where are my poly scholars? New study: Relationship satisfaction ...More results from www.reddit.com
[118]
A scoping review of research on polyamory and consensual non ...
Nov 27, 2023 · A third survey found that as many as 1 in 5 Americans have practiced CNM at some point in their lives (Haupert et al., 2017). People's interest ...
[119]
Jealousy: A comparison of monogamous and consensually non ...
Jan 16, 2024 · Put most simply, jealousy is an emotional experience felt when one detects a threat to a valued relationship. Jealousy is a social emotion that ...
[120]
Polyamory and Jealousy | Psychology Today
Aug 12, 2021 · The idea that polyamorous people don't experience jealousy is a myth. In fact, it's the most common challenge I see in my practice.<|separator|>
[121]
A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices ... - PubMed
The present research compared self-reported STI history, lifetime number of sex partners, and condom use practices among monogamous and CNM partners.
[122]
https://www.stdrapidtestkits.com/blog/post/from-polycules-to-pathogens-the-real-risk-of-stds-in-open-love
[123]
Does Open Marriage Affect Divorce Rates?
May 29, 2022 · While 92% of open marriages fail, success/failure rates are similar to traditional marriages, though jealousy and trust issues may arise.
[124]
[PDF] Consensual Non-Monogamy and Relationship Satisfaction
My hypothesis is that consensual non-monogamous relationships are more satisfying than conventional monogamous relationships. Given the centrality of intimate ...
[125]
3. Views of divorce and open marriages - Pew Research Center
Sep 14, 2023 · Married adults (57%) and those who are divorced, separated or widowed (61%) are more likely than those who are living with a partner (27%) or ...
[126]
Sex is Still Cheap, Marriage is Still Declining: A Response to ...
Oct 25, 2022 · Pornography use—hardly a marital accelerator—shows no sign of slowing. And marriage rates are dropping. Cheap Sex is not a controversial book.<|separator|>
[127]
Re-Examining the Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce - PMC
Premarital sex predicts divorce, but we do not know why. Scholars have attributed the relationship to factors such as differences in beliefs and values, ...Missing: norms | Show results with:norms
[128]
Mediation Effects of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness on the ...
Dec 5, 2022 · The purpose of this study was to investigate the direct and indirect effects of expectations for marital relationships and premarital sexual permissiveness.
[129]
Has the Sexual Revolution Been Good for Women? No
The sexual revolution has made women happier. Granted, happiness is a personal, imponderable thing. But if the sexual revolution has really made women as happy ...
[130]
Victims of the Sexual Revolution, Part 2: The Decline of Happiness ...
Aug 17, 2023 · In this installment, we argue that the decline of marriage is the most critical yet overlooked factor, and why the young liberal woman suffers the most.
[131]
Mapping the New Mating Market: A Review of Cheap Sex
Aug 28, 2017 · In Cheap Sex, Regnerus' thesis is that sex acts have become “cheaper”: more “widely accessible, at lower 'cost' to everyone than ever before ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique