Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Promiscuity

Promiscuity refers to the practice of engaging in sexual relations with multiple partners, often on a casual or uncommitted basis, without selectivity or long-term attachment.^[1]^[2] In biological terms, it manifests across species as a mating strategy involving frequent partner changes, but in humans, it intersects with social norms, psychological drives, and health outcomes, frequently carrying a pejorative connotation due to perceived risks and moral judgments.^[3] From an evolutionary perspective, human sexual promiscuity likely originated in ancestral environments characterized by multi-male, multi-female mating systems, with a later transition toward pair-bonding to facilitate biparental care and resource provisioning for offspring.^[4] Empirical data reveal consistent gender disparities, with men reporting an average of 14 lifetime sexual partners compared to 7 for women in large-scale surveys, aligning with reproductive asymmetries where males benefit from quantity in mating opportunities while females prioritize quality.^[5]^[6] These patterns persist cross-culturally, though self-reported figures may understate true behaviors due to social desirability biases, particularly among women.^[7] Promiscuity correlates with elevated health risks, including higher incidence of sexually transmitted infections, as meta-analyses link multiple partners directly to increased pathogen exposure and transmission probability.^[8]^[9] Psychologically, frequent casual encounters are associated with negative sequelae such as emotional regret, depressive symptoms, and diminished marital satisfaction in later life, effects amplified by the absence of relational investment.^[10]^[11] Societally, it provokes controversies over double standards, where female promiscuity historically incurs harsher stigma than male, though contemporary studies indicate evolving judgments that may penalize male excess in casual contexts.^[12]^[13] Despite potential short-term hedonic benefits, long-term data underscore causal links to relational instability and well-being deficits, challenging narratives that frame it solely as liberating.^[14]

Definition and Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Scope

Promiscuity refers to sexual behavior characterized by frequent engagement with multiple partners, often in casual or indiscriminate encounters lacking long-term commitment or emotional exclusivity. This definition encompasses a spectrum of activities, including one-night stands, short-term hookups, and serial partnering with minimal selectivity in partner choice, typically measured by a relatively high lifetime or annual number of sexual partners compared to population norms. Scholarly analyses highlight that precise thresholds vary, but common indicators include exceeding 10 lifetime partners or engaging in unprotected casual sex, distinguishing it from committed non-monogamy.^[15]^[16] The scope of promiscuity is primarily confined to human sexual conduct, though analogous behaviors appear in animal mating systems where individuals, especially females, mate multiply to enhance genetic diversity or resource access. In behavioral science, it excludes structured alternatives like polygyny or polyamory, which involve negotiated exclusivity or selectivity, and focuses instead on opportunistic or low-investment strategies that prioritize quantity over quality of partnerships. Emotional promiscuity, involving non-exclusive romantic attachments, sometimes overlaps but is conceptually distinct unless tied to sexual acts. This framing aligns with evolutionary perspectives where promiscuity serves as a high-risk reproductive tactic, potentially increasing offspring numbers at the cost of parental investment certainty.^[3]^[1]^[17] Quantitatively, studies operationalize promiscuity through self-reported partner counts, with women averaging fewer partners than men in most datasets (e.g., median lifetime partners of 4-7 for women versus 6-10 for men in U.S. surveys), though cultural and reporting biases may understate female rates due to social stigma. The term's application extends beyond mere frequency to imply reduced discernment, such as overlooking health risks or compatibility, broadening its relevance to public health discussions on sexually transmitted infections, where promiscuous networks accelerate disease transmission rates by factors of 2-5 in modeled populations. Definitions remain contested, with some research critiquing vague or moralistic framings that conflate it with empowerment or pathology without empirical grounding.^[18]^[19]

Etymology and Historical Usage

The term promiscuity derives from Latin prōmiscuus, meaning "mixed together" or "indiscriminate," formed from the prefix prō- ("forward, in favor of") and the verb miscēre ("to mix").^[20]^[21] This root emphasized a lack of separation or distinction in composition, originally applied to general mixtures rather than specifically sexual behavior. The related adjective promiscuous entered English around 1600, denoting disorderly or undistinguished groupings, such as "a promiscuous array of books" or heterogeneous crowds.^[22]^[23] The noun promiscuity first appeared in English in 1663, initially describing a state of undifferentiated mixture or propinquity, without sexual implications; for instance, it could refer to crowded or intermingled living conditions.^[24]^[25] By the early 19th century, influenced partly by French promiscuité, the term began shifting toward moral and social contexts, with "promiscuous" acquiring a sexual sense of indiscriminate relations by 1857 and promiscuity following in its modern connotation around 1865.^[20]^[18] This evolution reflected broader Victorian-era concerns with social disorder, where the word's "mixing" metaphor extended to critique unregulated sexual mingling, often laden with disapproval of deviation from monogamous norms.^[3] Prior to this semantic narrowing, English lacked a direct equivalent for the concept in its current form; Elizabethan and Jacobean texts described analogous behaviors using terms like "strumpet," "harlot," or "lewdness," focusing on moral condemnation rather than indiscriminateness.^[26] In 19th-century literature and discourse, promiscuity increasingly denoted sexual irregularity, as observed in works critiquing urban vice or evolutionary theories of mating, marking its transition from neutral descriptiveness to a pejorative label for non-exclusive partnering.^[3] This usage persisted into the 20th century, often contrasting with ideals of restraint, though empirical studies later examined it through behavioral lenses detached from inherent judgment.^[20]

Biological and Evolutionary Foundations

Evolutionary Theories of Promiscuity

Evolutionary theories of promiscuity frame it as an adaptive mating strategy shaped by sexual selection and anisogamy, where males produce numerous low-cost gametes and females fewer high-cost ones, leading to divergent reproductive incentives. Robert Trivers' parental investment theory, proposed in 1972, posits that the greater obligatory investment by females in gestation and offspring care—typically nine months of pregnancy and years of lactation—results in higher selectivity in mate choice to ensure paternal support, while males, facing lower per-offspring costs, gain fitness advantages from multiple matings to maximize gene dissemination.^[27] This asymmetry predicts promiscuity as a male-biased strategy, with empirical support from greater variance in male reproductive success across species, including humans, where historical polygyny and modern genetic paternity studies reveal 1-30% extra-pair paternity rates in pair-bonded societies.^[28] Bateman's principle, derived from 1948 fruit fly experiments, reinforces this by demonstrating that male reproductive success increases linearly with mating partners due to low marginal costs, whereas female success plateaus after few matings owing to resource constraints on offspring production.^[29] In humans, applications of Bateman's gradients from genomic and demographic data show steeper slopes for males, with lifetime partners correlating more strongly to offspring number in men (e.g., in Finnish cohorts, additional partners boost male fertility by 0.2-0.5 offspring equivalents per mate versus negligible gains for women).^[30] These patterns hold despite cultural overlays, as evidenced by cross-species comparisons where moderate human testis size and dimorphism suggest a history of low-to-moderate promiscuity, balancing pair-bonding with opportunistic extra-pair copulations.^[31] Sperm competition theory extends these ideas, arguing that female promiscuity imposes post-copulatory selection on males, favoring ejaculate adaptations like increased sperm numbers or seminal proteins under perceived rival risk. In humans, physiological responses—such as higher sperm counts in men reporting partner infidelity cues—align with this, indicating evolved countermeasures to multi-male mating by females.^[32] For females, promiscuity yields benefits like genetic bet-hedging against poor paternal genes or infertility, with studies in mammals showing offspring from multiple sires exhibiting 10-20% higher survival via diversity or compatibility effects, though human data remain indirect via paternity discordance.^[33] Critiques note that while male promiscuity aligns predictably with Bateman-Trivers logic, female strategies reflect strategic pluralism—combining long-term bonds for biparental care with short-term liaisons for superior genes—challenging strict coyness models but affirming anisogamy's causal primacy over egalitarian assumptions.^[4] Overall, these theories underscore promiscuity's role in resolving ancestral trade-offs between quantity and quality of offspring, with human flexibility evident in transitions from ancestral promiscuity to facultative pair-bonding around 2 million years ago amid encephalization demands.^[34]

Sex Differences in Promiscuous Behavior

In large-scale surveys, men consistently report a higher number of lifetime sexual partners than women. Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), covering 2015–2019, show that among sexually experienced individuals aged 25–49, the median number of opposite-sex partners was 6.3 for men and 4.3 for women.^[35] This gap persists across age groups and survey waves, with men also displaying greater variance in partner counts, resulting in a disproportionate number of men at the extreme high end (e.g., 15 or more partners).^[36] ^[37] These behavioral disparities align with evolutionary predictions rooted in parental investment theory, which holds that the sex facing higher reproductive costs—females, through internal gestation, lactation, and initial offspring care—evolves greater selectivity in mating to ensure partner quality, whereas the lower-investing sex—males—benefits from seeking multiple partners to increase reproductive output. Empirical tests support this: meta-analyses of sexual attitudes and behaviors reveal moderate to large sex differences favoring male promiscuity, including stronger male endorsement of casual sex (effect size d ≈ 0.30) and higher male incidence of behaviors like masturbation (d ≈ 0.96), which correlate with openness to multiple partners.^[38] Updates to these analyses through 2007 confirm the patterns endure, though some attitudes (e.g., masturbation frequency) show slight convergence over time.^[39] Men also express a greater hypothetical desire for multiple partners. In cross-cultural studies, men report idealizing 2–3 times more lifetime or short-term sexual partners than women; for instance, one investigation found men averaging 18 desired partners over a lifetime versus 4–5 for women, reflecting strategic differences in maximizing fitness under asymmetric constraints.^[40] ^[41] Women, conversely, exhibit stronger sexual disgust toward promiscuity in others, particularly male infidelity, which reinforces selectivity.^[42] Discrepancies in self-reported data may partly stem from social desirability bias, with women potentially underreporting due to stigma, yet statistical adjustments—such as capping outliers or cross-validating with behavioral proxies—reduce but do not eliminate the gap, indicating underlying biological and motivational drivers over pure artifact.^[5] These findings from peer-reviewed surveys and experiments hold despite potential underrepresentation of extreme cases in voluntary samples, underscoring robust sex differences in promiscuous tendencies.^[43]

Promiscuity in Non-Human Animals

Promiscuity in non-human animals refers to mating systems where individuals of both sexes mate with multiple partners without forming exclusive pair bonds, a strategy observed across diverse taxa including mammals, birds, and insects.^[44]^[45] This contrasts with monogamy or polygyny, as it involves random or opportunistic pairings that maximize reproductive opportunities amid varying ecological pressures.^[46] Empirical studies document promiscuity in over 133 mammalian species spanning 33 families and nine orders, where both males and females engage in multiple matings (MMM).^[47] In mammals, female promiscuity is prevalent and drives evolutionary adaptations, such as in primates and small rodents where females mate multiply to enhance offspring viability through genetic diversity or post-copulatory selection.^[48]^[49] For instance, in species like the honey possum, highly promiscuous females compel males to develop specialized anatomical traits for sperm competition.^[50] Male mammals often exhibit heightened promiscuity due to lower reproductive costs per mating, but female multiple mating provides benefits like diluted paternity confusion, reducing infanticide risks and improving offspring survival.^[47] Sperm competition, arising from female promiscuity, selects for faster-swimming sperm, as evidenced in cichlid fishes where species with higher female mating rates evolve superior sperm velocity.^[51] Birds display promiscuity even in ostensibly monogamous colonial species, with extra-pair copulations common; for example, in 18 studied species, females pursue multiple mates to optimize genetic quality despite social pairing.^[52] Insects and other invertebrates frequently exhibit extreme promiscuity, with polygynandrous systems where both sexes mate repeatedly, fostering rapid evolutionary responses like enhanced male genitalia or ejaculate traits to outcompete rivals' sperm.^[48] Across taxa, promiscuity correlates with ecological factors such as resource distribution and predation risks, often slowing speciation by homogenizing gene pools through gene flow.^[53] Sex differences persist, with males generally more promiscuous owing to anisogamy—where sperm production vastly outpaces egg investment—yet female promiscuity is adaptive for paternity assurance via superior sires or diversified immunity in offspring.^[54] In cooperatively breeding birds and mammals, female competition for mates can elevate variance in reproductive success, underscoring promiscuity's role in intra-sexual selection.^[55] These patterns, verified through genetic paternity analyses and behavioral observations, highlight promiscuity as a basal strategy shaped by direct fitness gains rather than social constructs.^[47]^[48]

Psychological Motivations and Individual Factors

Core Motivations for Promiscuous Behavior

Promiscuous behavior, characterized by frequent casual sexual encounters with multiple partners, is often driven by enhancement motives, where individuals seek sexual pleasure, gratification, and novelty as primary rewards.^[56] Empirical studies using scales like the Sexual Motivations Scale identify enhancement as a core driver, positively correlated with higher numbers of sexual partners and attitudes favoring uncommitted sex, particularly among those with unrestricted sociosexuality.^[57] Sensation seeking, a trait involving pursuit of intense or novel experiences, further underpins this motivation, with meta-analyses showing its association with risky sexual behaviors and promiscuous attitudes, mediated by boredom susceptibility.^[58]^[59] Coping motives represent another fundamental drive, wherein promiscuity serves to regulate negative emotions such as loneliness, distress, or meaninglessness.^[56] Longitudinal research on adolescents reveals that psychological distress and suicidal ideation predict entry into and persistence in casual sex arrangements like friends-with-benefits, especially among females, suggesting use of such behaviors as maladaptive emotion regulation.^[60] Insecure attachment styles, including anxious-preoccupied and fearful types, correlate with hypersexual or risky promiscuous patterns, as individuals may engage in multiple partnerships to alleviate fears of abandonment or fulfill unmet intimacy needs.^[61]^[62] Sex differences shape these motivations distinctly: males report stronger endorsement of pleasure-oriented drives, with higher ratings for sexual satisfaction and gratification in casual encounters, aligning with evolutionary pressures for mate variety due to lower reproductive costs.^[56] Females, conversely, more frequently cite relational or pressure-based motives, such as seeking intimacy or responding to loneliness, though these often yield negative emotional aftermaths like regret and self-reproach.^[56] Classic experiments confirm this asymmetry, with males far more receptive to casual propositions than females, indicating intrinsic motivational disparities rather than mere cultural artifacts.^[63] Peer pressure and social influences also contribute, particularly in youth, correlating with increased partner counts irrespective of gender.^[57]

Personality Traits and Genetic Influences

Extraversion, a core dimension of the Big Five personality model, exhibits the strongest and most consistent positive correlation with promiscuous behavior, including higher numbers of lifetime sexual partners and preferences for short-term mating, as evidenced in meta-analytic reviews spanning diverse populations.^[64] ^[65] This association holds across genders and world regions, with extraverted individuals more likely to engage in casual sex due to traits like sociability and sensation-seeking.^[66] Low conscientiousness and low agreeableness also predict increased promiscuity and infidelity, reflecting reduced impulse control and concern for relational commitments.^[65] ^[67] Neuroticism shows weaker or inconsistent links, sometimes positively associated with risky sexual behavior but less reliably with partner count.^[66] Unrestricted sociosexual orientation—characterized by willingness for uncommitted sex—mediates many of these trait-promiscuity links, with extraversion facilitating opportunities for encounters and low conscientiousness diminishing restraint against them.^[68] Twin studies indicate moderate to high heritability for sociosexuality and related behaviors, with genetic factors accounting for 24-62% of variance in number of sexual partners and infidelity rates, particularly in women.^[69] Behavior genetic analyses further reveal shared genetic influences between promiscuity and low self-control, suggesting overlapping polygenic bases rather than purely environmental drivers.^[17] These findings persist after controlling for age and sex, underscoring heritable predispositions over learned habits alone. Candidate gene studies, such as those examining dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) variants, have linked specific polymorphisms to higher infidelity and partner counts, implying dopaminergic pathways in reward-seeking contribute to promiscuous tendencies.^[69] However, such molecular associations require replication, as broader genome-wide analyses highlight polygenic scores predicting variance in reproductive behaviors with small but significant effects. Cross-sex genetic correlations suggest promiscuity-related traits evolve under similar selective pressures in males and females, though expression differs by sex due to mating strategies.^[70] Empirical data from large cohorts affirm these patterns, countering narratives emphasizing solely sociocultural causation.

Sociocultural and Historical Dimensions

Cross-Cultural Variations in Promiscuity

Self-reported lifetime sexual partners vary widely across nations, with aggregated global surveys indicating averages of 13-14.5 in countries like Turkey, Australia, New Zealand, and Iceland, compared to 3-4 in India and China. These figures reflect differing tolerances for casual sex, though underreporting is likely higher in conservative contexts due to social stigma.^[71]^[72] Anthropological analyses of over 180 societies document permissive attitudes toward male premarital sex in about 60% of cases, versus 45% for females, with a double standard permitting husbands' extramarital liaisons in roughly 65% of societies while punishing wives severely. Institutionalized female extramarital sex, such as ceremonial wife-sharing, occurs in approximately 40% of societies, often linked to kinship or ritual obligations rather than individual choice. Regional patterns show stricter female chastity norms in Circum-Mediterranean and pastoralist groups, where virginity tests and seclusion enforce restraint, contrasting with more lenient hunter-gatherer societies.^[73] Religious doctrines exert causal influence by promoting restricted mating to enhance paternal certainty and kin investment; higher religiosity correlates with reduced premarital penetration and short-term pairings across cultures. Muslim-majority and traditional Hindu societies report lower promiscuity rates, enforcing premarital abstinence through family oversight and legal penalties, while secular Western and Buddhist-influenced contexts show greater acceptance of casual encounters. For instance, Buddhists exhibit premarital sex rates comparable to Jews but higher than Muslims or Christians in global surveys.^[74]^[75]^[76] Cross-national psychological studies spanning 46-58 countries link extraversion to promiscuity universally, yet cultural individualism amplifies short-term mating in Europe and North America, where Big Five traits predict risky sexual behavior more strongly than in collectivist Asia or Africa. Economic development and gender equality indices inversely correlate with chastity valuation in mate selection, with non-Western nations like Iran and India prioritizing virginity more than Western counterparts. These variations underscore how normative sanctions, rather than innate drives alone, govern promiscuity's expression.^[77]^[78]^[79]

Promiscuity in Historical and Primitive Societies

In small-scale hunter-gatherer societies, mating systems predominantly featured pair-bonding, often in the form of serial monogamy or polygyny at low frequencies (typically 10-20% of men with multiple wives), with extra-pair copulations occurring but not dominating social structure. Genetic studies across human populations indicate average extra-pair paternity (EPP) rates of around 9%, though variation exists; for example, among the Tsimane forager-horticulturalists in Bolivia, EPP reached 48%, with 70% of couples experiencing at least one non-pair offspring, suggesting tolerance for female promiscuity in that context.^[80]^[81] However, in many forager groups like the Hadza, ethnographic observations show premarital sex as common but adultery rare due to male jealousy and sanctions, aligning with low EPP to facilitate paternal investment in offspring survival amid high infant mortality.^[82] Certain tribal societies exhibited cultural accommodations for multiple mating, such as partible paternity among some Amazonian groups (e.g., Mehinaku), where women had sequential partners during pregnancy, and semen from multiple men was believed to contribute to fetal development, potentially reflecting adaptive responses to nutritional stress rather than unchecked promiscuity.^[83] These practices, however, contrast with broader anthropological data emphasizing stable co-residence and paternal care as normative, with promiscuity constrained by resource sharing and conflict avoidance in band-level societies.^[84] Claims of universal prehistoric promiscuity, as in some evolutionary narratives drawing from chimpanzee analogs, overlook human-specific traits like concealed ovulation and alliance-building, which favored pair stability over multi-male mating.^[31] Among historical civilizations, sexual norms permitted greater male promiscuity through institutionalized outlets like prostitution and concubinage, while enforcing female chastity to secure lineage and property transmission. In ancient Rome, elite men frequented brothels (with over 35 registered lupanaria in Pompeii alone by the 1st century CE) and maintained slaves for sexual use, yet adultery laws under Augustus (18 BCE Lex Julia) imposed exile or death on unfaithful wives, indicating regulated rather than rampant libertinism across classes.^[85] Greek city-states similarly stratified behavior: Athenian women of citizen status faced seclusion (gynaeceum) to prevent cuckoldry, with pederasty serving as a controlled outlet for male youth (ages 12-18 mentored by older men), but extramarital affairs risked ostracism or violence, as evidenced in legal speeches like Lysias' orations (4th century BCE). Spartan women, noted by Aristophanes for relative freedom and physical training, acquired a contemporary reputation for promiscuity, yet bore fewer children on average than other Greeks, suggesting selective rather than indiscriminate partnering.^[86] Cross-cultural historical patterns reveal promiscuity as often linked to power asymmetries, with rulers and warriors exempt from norms binding commoners; Mesopotamian texts (e.g., Hammurabi's Code, circa 1750 BCE) punished female adultery with drowning while allowing male plurality. In non-Mediterranean contexts, such as Celtic tribes described by Poseidonius (1st century BCE), communal wife-sharing occurred during raids, but Roman accounts likely exaggerated to justify conquest, as archaeological evidence shows stable homesteads implying pair-based households. Overall, empirical records from inscriptions, laws, and demographics underscore that while casual sex existed—facilitated by festivals or sacred prostitution in temples (e.g., Sumerian high priestesses, 3rd millennium BCE)—societal structures prioritized paternity assurance through virginity pledges, dowry systems, and sanctions, countering modern romanticizations of ancient excess.^[87]

Consequences and Empirical Risks

Physical Health Risks

Promiscuity, involving multiple sexual partners, substantially increases the physical health risks associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by amplifying opportunities for pathogen transmission, even when protective measures like condoms are used inconsistently or imperfectly. Longitudinal and cross-sectional studies confirm a direct correlation between lifetime number of sexual partners and STI prevalence, with higher partner counts serving as a key behavioral risk factor for both bacterial and viral infections. For example, in a study of older adults, elevated lifetime partners were linked to greater lifetime STI exposure, including risks for HIV and human papillomavirus (HPV)-related conditions.^[88] Similarly, multivariate analyses among women show that those with three or more lifetime partners face an adjusted odds ratio of 2.62 (95% CI: 1.73–3.99) for reporting STI symptoms compared to those with one partner, independent of other demographic and behavioral confounders.^[89] This dose-response pattern underscores cumulative exposure as a causal driver, distinct from isolated incidents of unprotected sex.^[90] Bacterial STIs such as Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae pose acute risks, with untreated infections ascending to cause pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in up to 10–15% of cases among women, leading to tubal scarring, infertility, and ectopic pregnancies.^[91] Gonorrhea complications extend to disseminated infection, arthritis, and infertility in both sexes if dissemination occurs. Syphilis, caused by Treponema pallidum, progresses through stages that damage cardiovascular and neurological systems when advanced, with multiple partners facilitating rapid community spread. These infections often remain asymptomatic initially, delaying diagnosis and treatment, thereby heightening complication rates in promiscuous networks.^[92] Viral STIs confer chronic burdens: HPV, prevalent in over 80% of sexually active individuals over time, correlates with lifetime partners and drives cervical, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers, with persistent high-risk strains evading clearance in repeated exposures.^[93] Herpes simplex virus (HSV-2) establishes lifelong latency, with seroprevalence rising proportionally to partner count, causing recurrent outbreaks and neonatal transmission risks during birth. HIV acquisition risk escalates with concurrent or serial partnerships, as each encounter multiplies viral load exposure probabilities, particularly in untreated co-infection scenarios like gonorrhea or chlamydia, which inflame genital mucosa and facilitate entry.^[90] Overall, these risks compound over time, with empirical data from diverse populations affirming promiscuity's role in elevating not just incidence but also downstream morbidities like infertility and oncogenesis.^[91]^[93] Individuals with higher numbers of premarital sexual partners exhibit elevated risks of marital dissolution. Longitudinal analyses of U.S. National Survey of Family Growth data indicate that, compared to individuals with no premarital partners other than their spouse, those with nine or more premarital partners demonstrate the highest divorce hazard ratios, even after controlling for demographic and attitudinal factors.^[94] Similarly, research drawing from the same dataset finds that persons with six or more premarital partners face substantially higher divorce probabilities within five years of marriage, with odds escalating nonlinearly beyond two partners.^[95] These patterns persist across studies, suggesting that prior sexual experience beyond a single partner correlates with diminished long-term relational commitment, independent of selection effects like preexisting attitudes toward marriage.^[96] Promiscuity also links to lower marital satisfaction and heightened infidelity. Empirical reviews report that less sexually promiscuous individuals—defined by fewer lifetime partners—experience greater satisfaction in marriage, while those with extensive premarital histories report higher dissatisfaction and relational strain.^[97] Cross-cultural data from the International Sexuality Description Project associate self-reported promiscuity with personality traits like disagreeableness, which in turn predict infidelity in romantic relationships across 58 cultures.^[98] Exchange theory-based examinations further reveal that premarital promiscuity erodes perceived relational equity, fostering comparisons and dissatisfaction in subsequent monogamous unions.^[99] On a social level, promiscuous behavior contributes to trust erosion and jealousy dynamics within peer and family networks. Behavioral studies among adolescents and young adults identify promiscuity as a vector for relational conflicts, including heightened jealousy and social ostracism in conservative communities, though stigma diminishes in permissive environments.^[100] Broader relational fallout includes emotional promiscuity—frequent non-exclusive attachments—which correlates with attachment insecurity and serial monogamy, perpetuating cycles of instability that strain social support systems.^[1] These outcomes underscore causal pathways where prior multiple partnerships impair pair-bonding mechanisms, leading to fragmented social ties and elevated relational turnover.^[95]

Psychological and Long-Term Effects

Studies indicate that individuals engaging in casual sexual encounters, a form of promiscuous behavior, frequently report negative emotional outcomes, including regret and psychological distress, with women experiencing higher rates of post-encounter depression and anxiety compared to men.^[10] This pattern holds across multiple investigations, where approximately 25-30% of participants describe emotional regret following hookups, often linked to unmet expectations for intimacy or relational commitment.^[10] Longitudinally, a greater number of lifetime sexual partners correlates with elevated risks of substance dependence disorders, particularly among women, as evidenced by a cohort study tracking participants from adolescence to age 32, which found odds ratios increasing with partner count even after controlling for prior mental health and socioeconomic factors.^[101] However, associations with anxiety and depression are less consistent; while some analyses show no direct link to later-onset disorders, others using Mendelian randomization identify causal pathways from early sexual initiation (ages 12-14 with multiple partners) to major depressive symptoms in adulthood.^[101]^[102]^[103] In terms of relational longevity, premarital promiscuity—defined as multiple sexual partners before marriage—predicts reduced marital satisfaction and heightened divorce risk, with data from national surveys revealing that individuals with 10 or more premarital partners face divorce probabilities 33% higher than those with zero or one, persisting after adjustments for selection effects like religiosity or family background.^[104]^[95] Women report particularly diminished happiness and commitment in such unions, potentially due to comparative evaluations of past experiences eroding current pair-bond strength.^[105] These outcomes underscore a broader pattern where higher partner counts precede lower overall life satisfaction and relational stability over decades.^[106]

Perspectives and Debates

Religious and Traditional Views

In Abrahamic traditions, promiscuity—defined as sexual relations outside of marriage—is broadly condemned as a violation of divine law and moral order. Christianity, drawing from biblical texts such as 1 Corinthians 6:18, which instructs believers to "flee from sexual immorality," views extramarital sex as incompatible with holiness and the sanctity of marriage as a lifelong covenant.^[107] Catholic doctrine, as articulated in papal encyclicals like Humanae Vitae (1968), further denounces acts promoting promiscuity, associating them with the erosion of family structures and societal chastity.^[108] Similarly, Islam prohibits zina (unlawful sexual intercourse, encompassing fornication and adultery) through Quranic injunctions, such as Surah An-Nur 24:2, prescribing 100 lashes for unmarried offenders as a deterrent to maintain social purity and divine obedience.^[109] Hadith collections reinforce this by portraying widespread promiscuity as a harbinger of moral decay and eschatological signs.^[110] Judaism, rooted in the Torah's Seventh Commandment against adultery, extends halakhic prohibitions to premarital promiscuity, viewing it as undermining familial lineage and communal integrity.^[111] Eastern religious frameworks similarly prioritize restraint and fidelity to foster spiritual discipline and ethical conduct. Hinduism's scriptures, including the Manusmriti and Dharma Shastras, advocate brahmacharya (celibacy prior to marriage) as essential for purity and dharma, deeming premarital sex a sin that disrupts cosmic order and incurs karmic penalties.^[112] While ancient texts acknowledge rare forms like gandharva vivaha (love-based unions), these were exceptional and not endorsements of casual promiscuity, which later traditions explicitly rejected to preserve caste and marital stability.^[113] Buddhism's third precept, kamesu micchacara veramani (abstaining from sexual misconduct), proscribes adultery, coercion, and relations with protected persons (e.g., minors or those under guardianship), emphasizing consent and non-harm without mandating celibacy for laypersons but warning against attachments that fuel suffering.^[114] Traditional views in pre-modern societies across cultures reinforced monogamous norms to safeguard paternity certainty, kinship ties, and resource allocation, often imposing stricter controls on women to mitigate inheritance disputes and social discord. In agrarian and tribal contexts, promiscuity was stigmatized as a threat to lineage and alliance-building through marriage, with ethnographic records indicating near-universal taboos against extramarital affairs in non-state societies to avert retaliation or communal breakdown. Exceptions, such as ritualized polygyny in some pastoral groups, still bounded sexual access within marital frameworks rather than permitting unbound promiscuity. These perspectives, embedded in customary laws predating modern individualism, prioritized collective welfare over personal gratification, correlating with lower documented rates of partner multiplicity compared to contemporary patterns.

Secular and Modern Cultural Narratives

In the mid-20th century, the sexual revolution advanced a narrative framing promiscuity as a pathway to individual liberation from repressive traditional norms, emphasizing that consensual sexual activity outside marriage enhanced personal fulfillment and autonomy, particularly following the widespread availability of oral contraceptives like the FDA-approved birth control pill in 1960.^[115] This perspective, rooted in secular humanist ideals, argued that decoupling sex from procreation and commitment would dismantle patriarchal controls and foster egalitarian relationships, with surveys showing a marked shift toward permissive attitudes on premarital and casual sex from the 1970s through the 2010s.^[116] Contemporary hookup culture perpetuates this narrative in educational and urban environments, portraying uncommitted sexual encounters as normative for young adults seeking social belonging, self-discovery, and rejection of monogamous constraints viewed as outdated or prudish.^[117] Proponents describe it as a cultural script embedded in peer dynamics and media, where virginity is devalued and casual sex facilitates integration into group norms, though empirical patterns reveal it often prioritizes male-preferred encounters over mutual satisfaction.^[10] Among college students, this framework is reinforced through apps and social rituals, with participants citing empowerment through agency, yet data indicate uneven participation and emotional costs not always acknowledged in the dominant storyline.^[118] Polyamory emerges in modern secular discourse as a structured ethical non-monogamy, positioning multiple consensual romantic and sexual partnerships as a superior alternative to monogamy's alleged artificial scarcity of affection, aligned with evolutionary and psychological claims of innate human non-exclusivity.^[119] Advocates in academic and self-help literature construct it as an identity-driven practice legitimized by transparency and communication, contrasting it with monogamy's cultural imposition and appealing to those in high-education, low-religiosity demographics who report higher lifetime sexual partners.^[120] This narrative often draws on queer theory to essentialize polyamory as spontaneous and liberating, though it remains marginal, practiced by an estimated 4-5% of U.S. adults per recent surveys.^[121] Secular narratives collectively downplay empirical associations between higher partner counts and relational instability or dissatisfaction, instead privileging autonomy narratives that correlate with elevated promiscuity among the highly educated and irreligious, who average 7-10 more lifetime partners than their religious counterparts but report lower happiness.^[120]^[122] These views, disseminated via media and academia, reflect a post-religious ethic prioritizing experiential hedonism over long-term pair-bonding, with origins traceable to 1960s counterculture but amplified in digital eras through platforms normalizing fluid sexuality.^[123]

Key Controversies and Empirical Critiques

Empirical studies have consistently linked higher numbers of premarital sexual partners to elevated divorce risks, with individuals reporting nine or more partners facing the highest odds compared to those with fewer or none outside their eventual spouse.^[104] This pattern holds across genders, contradicting assumptions that greater sexual experience enhances marital compatibility; instead, data from longitudinal surveys indicate that sexual restraint prior to marriage correlates with stronger relational stability and satisfaction.^[95]^[124] A central controversy surrounds the "cheap sex" hypothesis advanced by sociologist Mark Regnerus, positing that technological and cultural shifts—such as contraception, dating apps, and pornography—have drastically lowered the relational "cost" of sex, reducing men's incentives to invest in commitment and exacerbating male disengagement from marriage markets.^[125] Evidence supporting this includes surveys showing 30% of young men's sexual encounters lacking romance or courtship, alongside delayed marriage ages and rising male singlehood rates, though critics argue it overlooks women's agency in these dynamics.^[126]^[127] Critiques of hookup culture highlight its association with adverse mental health outcomes, including heightened depression, anxiety, and regret, particularly among women who report emotional distress more frequently than men post-casual encounters.^[128]^[129] Peer-reviewed analyses reveal that frequent hookups correlate with psychological injury and lower well-being, challenging narratives framing such behaviors as empowering; for instance, emerging adults engaging in casual sex exhibit elevated risks for negative emotional sequelae, independent of prior mental health status.^[14]^[130] Sex differences fuel ongoing debates, with evolutionary and psychological research indicating men's greater tolerance for promiscuity versus women's higher selectivity, rooted in reproductive costs; promiscuous women face social penalties from both sexes, while empirical double standards appear minimal for overt behaviors but manifest in relational preferences.^[12] These asymmetries underpin critiques that modern promiscuity promotion ignores causal mismatches between ancestral mating adaptations and contemporary environments, yielding suboptimal outcomes like unintended pregnancies and relational instability despite widespread access to preventive measures.^[131]

References

[1]
[PDF] The Relationship between Sexual and Emotional Promiscuity and ...
Sexual promiscuity can be defined as the engagement in uncommitted sexual activities, with non-monogamous partners (i.e. one-night stands), and with multiple ...
[2]
(PDF) Sexual Promiscuity - ResearchGate
Jul 7, 2018 · Sexual promiscuity refers to mating with more than one partner in a relatively short-time period (eg, within one estrus cycle).
[3]
Promiscuous words - PMC - PubMed Central
Nov 8, 2013 · Promiscuity is frequently used to describe animal mating behaviour, and especially to describe multiple mating by females.
[4]
Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding
The transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding in a species living in hierarchically organized groups requires a mechanism that would resolve the male's ...
[5]
Why Do Men Report More Opposite-Sex Sexual Partners Than ... - NIH
Jul 25, 2018 · Men reported a mean of 14.14 lifetime partners; women reported 7.12. The gender gap of 7.02 reduced to 5.47 after capping the lifetime partner ...
[6]
[PDF] Discrepancies Between Men and Women in Reporting Number of ...
12.52 female partners over their lifetime, while women had 5.21 male partners ... The GSS questions did not ask about approval by gender of the sexual partners.
[7]
Do Men and Women Have the Same Average Number of Lifetime ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Average numbers of partners during one period are the same (1.67). The cumulated number of partners up to the second age group is higher for men ...
[8]
Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections, and its associated ...
Jul 24, 2024 · According to this meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of STI among students in Ethiopia was 13.6%. Having multiple sexual partners, students ...
[9]
Sexual Partner Characteristics and Sexually Transmitted Diseases ...
The association between sexual partner characteristics and STDs persists when considering the individual's number of sexual partners. But the influence of other ...
[10]
Sexual hook-up culture - American Psychological Association
Feb 1, 2013 · In a large Web-based study of 1,468 undergraduate students, participants reported a variety of consequences: 27.1 percent felt embarrassed, 24.7 ...Missing: promiscuity | Show results with:promiscuity
[11]
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1137&context=etd
[12]
Examining the Sexual Double Standards and Hypocrisy in Partner ...
We found no evidence of traditional sexual double standards for promiscuous or sexually undesirable behavior. There was some evidence for small sexual double ...
[13]
New research finds a sexual double standard against male, but not ...
May 9, 2023 · When seeking casual encounters, women judge promiscuous men more harshly than men judge promiscuous women, according to new research from Norway.
[14]
The Darker Side of Hooking Up | Psychology Today
Jun 18, 2020 · But some research—including results from my own aforementioned study—indicates that a promiscuous lifestyle can be detrimental to mental health.
[15]
(PDF) 'Kind of a Mix Between Kinky and Slutty': Describing ...
Sep 24, 2025 · Abstract. Definitions of promiscuity include a wide range of behaviors, including premarital sexual behaviors, having a high number of lifetime ...
[16]
""What do you mean I'm a slut?!?!" : deconstructing the definitions of ...
The definition of promiscuity has not been clearly and consistently defined within research and varies significantly from person to person.
[17]
Sexual promiscuity & self-control: A behavior genetic explanation to ...
What if self-control and sexual promiscuity represented life history traits shaped across time by the forces of natural selection (Penke et al., 2007, Rushton, ...
[18]
Promiscuity: What This Term Means, Causes, History - Verywell Mind
Jul 7, 2023 · Promiscuity is the act of engaging in sexual relationships with numerous people or of being indiscriminate about who you have sexual relationships with.History · Reasons · The Empowerment of...
[19]
Female Economic Dependence and the Morality of Promiscuity - PMC
In this article, we report two studies which tested predictions about US residents' moral views on promiscuous mating.
[20]
Promiscuity - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Promiscuity originates from Latin promiscuus meaning "mixed, not separated," via French promiscuité; it means an indiscriminate mixture or promiscuous ...
[21]
promiscuity, n. meanings, etymology and more
promiscuity is of multiple origins. A borrowing from Latin, combined with an English element. Probably also partly a borrowing from French.
[22]
Promiscuous - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating c. 1600 from Latin promiscuus, combining pro ("for") + miscere ("to mix"), meaning a disorderly mix or indiscriminate grouping without order.
[23]
PROMISCUOUS Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Oct 9, 2025 · The oldest of these is “composed of all sorts of persons and things” (as in “a promiscuous array of books” or “the promiscuous company at the ...
[24]
PROMISCUITY Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Sep 6, 2025 · The meaning of PROMISCUITY is promiscuous sexual behavior ... Word History. First Known Use. 1663, in the meaning defined at sense 2.
[25]
Promiscuity. : languagehat.com
Dec 27, 2019 · Originally < classical Latin prōmiscuus ([from miscēre to mix]) + –ity suffix. In later use probably reinforced by French promiscuité confused ...
[26]
https://www.frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-10-66
[27]
[PDF] Parental Investment and Sexual Selection - Joel Velasco
By this reasoning one would expect males of monogamous species to retain some psychological traits consistent with promiscuous habits. A male would be selected ...
[28]
Bateman's principles and human sex roles - PMC - PubMed Central
Bateman's principles state: males have greater variance in offspring, greater variance in partners, and a stronger link between reproductive and mating success ...
[29]
A matter of time: Bateman's principles and mating success as count ...
Jul 12, 2023 · Regarding Bateman's third principle, the number of mates is more positively associated with reproductive success for men than women, but this ...
[30]
(PDF) A matter of time: Bateman's principles and mating success as ...
Regarding Bateman's third principle, the number of mates is more positively associated with reproductive success for men than women, but this association is ...
[31]
Are We Monogamous? A Review of the Evolution of Pair-Bonding in ...
Jul 16, 2019 · The lack of exaggerated sexual dimorphism or testis size seems to rule out a history of elevated reproductive skew typical of highly promiscuous ...
[32]
[PDF] Human Sperm Competition: A Comparative Evolutionary Analysis
Aug 13, 2014 · We suggest that researchers employ sperm competition theory to guide future work on oral sex. Remaining issues in human sperm competition.
[33]
Promiscuous mating produces offspring with higher lifetime fitness
Aug 31, 2011 · An evolutionary advantage to female promiscuity may arise from a direct fitness benefit if engaging in multiple mating increases the number ...
[34]
Promiscuity in an evolved pair-bonding system: Mating within and ...
Aug 12, 2005 · Solely promiscuous species may not have mechanisms for partner preference formation, whereas pair-bonding species are likely to have evolved ...
[35]
Key Statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth - CDC
Percentage distribution of sexually experienced women and men 25-49 years of age by number of opposite-sex sexual partners in lifetime. Key Statistics from ...
[36]
Higher variability in the number of sexual partners in males can ...
Nov 7, 2009 · By examining published, empirical data we show that men and women consistently differ in the shape of the distribution of the number of ...Missing: large | Show results with:large
[37]
[PDF] Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States
Mar 11, 2024 · Differences in lifetime partners between men and women in the top 20% and top 5% remained significant across time (see Tables 1 and 2), with men ...
[38]
Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis - PubMed
This meta-analysis surveyed 177 usable sources that reported data on gender differences on 21 different measures of sexual attitudes and behaviors.
[39]
A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences ... - PubMed
In 1993 Oliver and Hyde conducted a meta-analysis on gender differences in sexuality. The current study updated that analysis with current research and methods.
[40]
Evolved sex differences in the number of partners desired ... - PubMed
Buss and Schmitt (1993) showed a pattern of mean difference in the ideal number of sexual partners men and women desired over various time frames.
[41]
The Desired Number of Sexual Partners as a Function of Gender - jstor
The present research investigated gender differences in the ideally desired number of sex partners, examining several different kinds of "ideals." In two ...
[42]
[PDF] Sexual Disgust: An Evolutionary Perspective - UT Psychology Labs
For example, we found the largest sex difference among our six factors of sexual disgust on the Promiscuity factor, which assess attitudes towards non- ...
[43]
Sexual Behaviors in the United States by Lifetime Number of Sex ...
The actual mean number of sex partners in the past 12 months for sexual activity group 5 (40+ lifetime sex partners) is 5.07 for 15- to 19-year-old boys and ...
[44]
10.5 Promiscuity (and Polygynandry) – Introduction to the Evolution ...
In promiscuous species, individuals of both sexes will typically mate with multiple individuals of the opposite sex. Unlike polygyny and polyandry, ...
[45]
Mating Systems in Sexual Animals | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
promiscuity: A mating system where there are no pair bonds. In this case is seems that males and females mate randomly. serial monogamy: A mating system in ...
[46]
Animal Reproductive Strategies | Organismal Biology
Examples include breasts, showy tails and headpieces, and crazier (to us) ... Promiscuity: Promiscuous mating systems occur when each female mates with ...
[47]
Promiscuous females protect their offspring - ScienceDirect.com
Promiscuous females protect their offspring · MMM in mammals. MMM has been reported in 133 species of mammals from 33 families and nine orders (Table 2).
[48]
Sexual selection in females and the evolution of polyandry - PMC
Jan 10, 2023 · Our findings offer support for the idea that sexual selection is widespread in females and to play a key role for the evolution of animal mating systems.
[49]
Mating Systems – Molecular Ecology & Evolution: An Introduction
Four main types of mating systems are generally recognized in animals: monogamy, polygyny, polyandry, and promiscuity.
[50]
Darwin and Bateman thought female animals weren't promiscuous ...
Jan 20, 2025 · In animals like the noolbenger/honey possum, females are highly promiscuous, forcing males to evolve some impressive anatomical changes.
[51]
Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid ...
Jan 27, 2009 · We provide phylogenetically robust evidence that species experiencing greater levels of sperm competition have faster-swimming sperm.
[52]
Promiscuity in Monogamous Colonial Birds | The American Naturalist
Promiscuous behavior by mated colonial monogamous birds of 18 species is examined in the light of the existing theory of energetic investments (Trivers ...
[53]
Promiscuous words | Frontiers in Zoology | Full Text - BioMed Central
8 Kas 2013 · Promiscuity is frequently used to describe animal mating behaviour, and especially to describe multiple mating by females.
[54]
PROMISCUITY AND THE RATE OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION AT ...
Here we investigated whether female mating promiscuity and other social and ecological variables have had a major effect on the rate of molecular evolution in ...
[55]
Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds - NIH
In cooperatively breeding mammals and birds, intra-sexual reproductive competition among females may often render variance in reproductive success higher ...
[56]
Was it Good for You? Gender Differences in Motives and Emotional ...
Feb 11, 2022 · ... sexual double-standard which encourages male promiscuity but dissuades female sexual autonomy. ... consequences following sexual ...
[57]
Motives to Have Sex: Measurement and Correlates With ... - Frontiers
Jul 11, 2021 · Motives for sex can predict different behavior patterns and some of those patterns can have negative consequences for health and well-being ( ...
[58]
Sex differences in sensation-seeking: a meta-analysis - PMC - NIH
Aug 30, 2013 · Men score higher than women on measures of sensation-seeking, defined as a willingness to engage in novel or intense activities.
[59]
Bored stiff: The relationship between meaninglessness, sexual ...
Jan 1, 2021 · We propose that meaninglessness is associated with men's increased endorsement of sensational and uncommitted sex via boredom susceptibility.
[60]
Psychological Well-Being as a Predictor of Casual Sex ... - NIH
Feb 22, 2017 · Psychological characteristics may predispose youths to engage in casual sex relationships and experiences (CSREs).
[61]
Are Insecure Attachment Styles Related to Risky Sexual Behavior ...
Nov 14, 2019 · Insecure attachment styles are related to risky sexual behaviors and the correlation between attachment anxiety and having multiple partners is stronger.
[62]
Hypersexual behavior and attachment styles in a non-clinical sample
Oct 1, 2021 · Hypersexual behavior is related in a causal manner with an insecure attachment style, fearful and preoccupied attachment, particularly.
[63]
Full article: Gender differences in receptivity to sexual invitations
In a seminal study, Clark and Hatfield (1989) found that men were more willing than women to accept casual sexual invitations, whereas no significant gender ...
[64]
The Role of Personality in Sexual and Reproductive Health
Aug 14, 2019 · Findings show that extraversion is the most important personality trait in sexual behavior (number of lifetime sexual partners, involvement in ...
[65]
(PDF) Big Five Traits Related to Short-Term Mating - ResearchGate
Low levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness also related to short-term mating, especially with extra-pair mating. Neuroticism and openness were associated ...
[66]
The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions
Sexual promiscuity, in contrast, was expected to positively relate to extraversion and neuroticism. Analyses across 10 world regions revealed relationship ...
[67]
[PDF] Are Sexual Promiscuity and Relationship Infidelity Linked to ...
It was expected that romantic relationship infidelity would be associated with the personality traits of disagreeableness and a lack of conscientiousness ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[68]
Linking big five personality traits to sexuality and sexual health
This meta-analytic review addresses whether the major dimensions of trait personality relate to components of human sexuality.
[69]
[PDF] Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual ...
Associations between Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene Variation with Both Infidelity and Sexual Promiscuity · Psychology, Biology. PloS one · 2010.
[70]
[PDF] Genetic analysis of human extrapair mating
Promiscuity. Function. Cross-sex correlation. Behaviour genetics. As in other socially monogamous species, pair-bonded humans commonly engage in sex with a ...<|separator|>
[71]
Average Number of Sexual Partners by Country 2025
Average Number of Sexual Partners by Country 2025 ; Turkey. 14.5 ; Australia. 13.3 ; New Zealand. 13.2 ; Iceland. 13.0 ; South Africa. 12.5 ...
[72]
[PDF] Lifetime Sexual Partners
This research aims to understand how many sexual partners men and women have during their lifetimes and before marriage, by geographic location.
[73]
Sexuality - Human Relations Area Files - Yale University
Sep 26, 2019 · This module explores cross-cultural patterns in sexuality and explanations of why sexual attitudes and practice may vary.What influences attitudes and... · Consequences of variation in...
[74]
Why are world religions so concerned with sexual behavior?
Religions are concerned with sexual behavior due to restricted mating strategies, which are linked to religious beliefs and can increase paternal certainty.
[75]
Sexuality and Religious Ethics: Analysis in a Multicultural University ...
Jan 13, 2023 · The results indicate that religion and the degree of religious practice are predictor variables for the decision to have penetrative sex, with ...
[76]
(PDF) On the Varieties of Sexual Experience: Cross-Cultural Links ...
Oct 9, 2025 · It has been discovered that religiosity influences behavior, with choices about sexual behavior being particularly impacted. Both male and ...<|separator|>
[77]
"Sexual Promiscuity, Infidelity and Personality Across Cultures" by ...
Sexual promiscuity, on the other hand, was expected to relate to extraversion across most cultures. Analyses across 58 cultures from 52 nations revealed that ...
[78]
The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions
The cross‐cultural perspective in the study ... Are sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity linked to different personality traits across cultures?
[79]
1.6: Sexuality Around the World - Social Sci LibreTexts
Nov 7, 2022 · A study of 37 countries reported that non-Western societies—like China, Iran, and India—valued chastity highly in a potential mate, while ...
[80]
High rate of extrapair paternity in a human population demonstrates ...
Feb 19, 2020 · We find that the rate of EPP in this population is 48%, with 70% of couples having at least one EPP child. Both men and women were very accurate at detecting ...Missing: hunter- gatherer
[81]
Evolutionary History of Hunter-Gatherer Marriage Practices
Worldwide extra-pair paternity rates have been estimated at around 9% [26], although there is much variation between as well as within populations [27].
[82]
Adult sex ratios and partner scarcity among hunter–gatherers
Polygamy (most often polygyny) occurs in most hunter–gatherer societies, but rates are usually ... coresidence, and extra-pair paternity is likely quite low.
[83]
Partible Paternity: The Evidence of Natural Promiscuity? - Shortform
Oct 9, 2021 · Do cultures that practice partible paternity prove that humans are naturally promiscuous? In their book Sex at Dawn, authors Ryan and Jethá look ...
[84]
Book Review: The Myth of Promiscuity - PMC - PubMed Central
Pair-bonding, not promiscuity, paves the way for the evolution of paternal investment. On a more fundamental level, if humans were and are naturally promiscuous ...
[85]
Promiscuity in Antiquity: Sex in Ancient Rome | History Hit
Males were allowed to sleep around as much as they liked so long as their mistress was unmarried, or, if they were with a boy, he was over a certain age.<|separator|>
[86]
Women in ancient Sparta - Wikipedia
To contemporaries outside of Sparta, Spartan women had a reputation for promiscuity and controlling their husbands. Spartan women could legally own and ...
[87]
What women in ancient times really thought about sex - BBC
Jun 11, 2024 · ... promiscuous "donkey-women" are perhaps the most mysterious. Getty Images Ancient Greek poet Sappho gave powerful expression to female desire ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[88]
Was Celtic society promiscuous? - History Stack Exchange
Sep 18, 2017 · what is a "promiscuous people"? (ancient) example? (I ... promiscuity from a Roman matron. This implies promiscuity, but there ...
[89]
Sociodemographic and behavioural correlates of lifetime number of ...
Mar 4, 2019 · Women from white ethnic backgrounds reported a higher number of lifetime sexual partners than those from other ethnicities. A plausible ...
[90]
Gender relations, sexual behaviour, and risk of ... - BMC Public Health
May 26, 2016 · Sexual violence and number of lifetime partners were the strongest predictors of reporting STIs. Women's sexual empowerment was a significant ...<|separator|>
[91]
Sexual Partnership Patterns as a Behavioral Risk Factor For ...
Sep 2, 1999 · The full extent of men's STD risk is unknown, but at least 13 million—24% of sexually active men aged 18-44—are at direct risk. Levels vary ...
[92]
Sexually transmitted infections and female reproductive health - PMC
Aug 2, 2022 · If untreated, gonococcal infections can result in serious complications such as PID, tubal infertility, ectopic pregnancy and disseminated ...
[93]
About Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) | STI - CDC
Mar 25, 2024 · A sexually transmitted disease (STD) develops because of an STI and the term implies that the infection has led to some symptom of disease.Trichomoniasis · Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) · Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
[94]
The relationship between chronic diseases and number of sexual ...
It is plausible that a greater number of lifetime sexual partners in older adults increases the risk of contracting an STI over the lifespan and subsequently ...
[95]
Re-Examining the Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce
Feb 12, 2023 · Compared to people with no premarital partners other than eventual spouses, those with nine or more partners exhibit the highest divorce risk, ...
[96]
Testing Common Theories on the Relationship Between Premarital ...
Mar 6, 2023 · Our results suggest that none of the commonly theorized explanatory mechanisms can account for the relationship between premarital sex and divorce rates.
[97]
What premarital sex has to do with divorce - Deseret News
Dec 3, 2021 · They found the highest link to divorce among those with six or more premarital partners, then next highest among those with one or two ...
[98]
[PDF] The Association between Promiscuity and Marital Satisfaction - Spark
Less promiscuous individuals are more likely to be satisfied in their marriages, while more promiscuous adults are more likely to have marital dissatisfaction.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical<|separator|>
[99]
(PDF) Are Sexual Promiscuity and Relationship Infidelity Linked to ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Analyses across 58 cultures from 52 nations revealed that romantic relationship infidelity was significantly associated with disagreeableness ...
[100]
[PDF] The Effects of Premarital Sexual Promiscuity on Subsequent Marital ...
Jun 25, 2004 · Using exchange theory concepts, this study empirically examines the relationship between premarital sexual promiscuity and marital sexual ...
[101]
Social and behavioral factors associated with high-risk sexual ...
Many adolescents reported behaviors (e.g., promiscuity or nonuse of condoms) which risked HIV or other sexually transmitted disease infection. Such risky …
[102]
The Relationship Between Multiple Sex Partners and Anxiety ... - NIH
In conclusion, this study examined whether multiple sex partnerships can lead to later mental health problems and found no association with anxiety and ...
[103]
Identifying causal associations between early sexual intercourse or ...
Early sexual intercourse and a greater number of sexual partners have been proved associated with depression. However, the causality of these associations ...
[104]
New study finds a causal link between sexual activity early in life ...
Jul 8, 2023 · When individuals have sexual encounters between 12 and 14 with two or more partners, the risk for later mental illness increases. But the causal ...
[105]
Re-Examining the Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce - PMC
Based on past studies, a number of controls are included to account for potential spuriousness in the relationship between premarital sex and marital stability.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[106]
Does a longer sexual resume affect marriage rates? - ScienceDirect
More recent sex partners are associated with lower marriage odds, but this effect is temporary, not for lifetime partners.
[107]
Number 6 in 2023: The Myth of Sexual Experience
Dec 27, 2023 · Having multiple sexual partners before marriage is strongly associated with lower marital stability. Similar to other studies, we found that ...
[108]
On the Connection between Greed, Theft and Sexual Immorality
Apr 11, 2011 · Never mind that lust and sexual immorality have had devastating effects on marriage and family, that as promiscuity has soared so have divorce ...
[109]
7 Basic Points: A Humanae Vitae Summary - Human Life International
He also calls for all unchaste and indecent images to be removed from the media, which promote an unhealthy and sinful view of sexuality, promiscuity and ...
[110]
Punishment for Extra-marital Relations (Zina) as per the Holy Quran.
For unmarried individuals who engage in extramarital sexual relations (fornication), the Quran prescribes 100 lashes as punishment. This is mentioned in Surah ...
[111]
Hadith on Adultery: Shameless promiscuity sign of the Hour
Feb 10, 2014 · Hadith on Sin: Signs of the Hour are ignorance, adultery · Hadith on Qiyamah: The Day of Resurrection is very, very close · Hadith on Tyranny: ...
[112]
Judaism and Sex: Questions and Answers | My Jewish Learning
traditionally defined as sexual intercourse between a married woman and a man who is not her husband — is forbidden in the seventh of the Ten ...
[113]
Hinduism and Premarital Relationships - Hindu Website
This article presents a historical analysis of premarital sex, caste distinctions, and sexual mores of ancient Hindu communities
[114]
Hinduism and Premarital Sex - Swarajya
Jan 9, 2014 · Gāndharva vivāha and the associated premarital sex found qualified acceptance in Hinduism in ancient times. Only later on it went out of vogue.
[115]
The Third Precept: Refrain from Sexual Misconduct
The third of the five precepts—Buddhist guidelines for an ethical life—is to refrain from sexual misconduct. Lay Buddhists are not expected to be celibate ...
[116]
The Pill and the Sexual Revolution | American Experience - PBS
the family.
[117]
Changes in Americans' attitudes about sex: Reviewing 40 years of ...
May 27, 2015 · Among 18- to 29-year-olds, 47% of Boomers in the early 1970s believed premarital sex was 'not wrong at all,' compared to 50% of GenX'ers in the ...
[118]
What's So Cultural about Hookup Culture? - Lisa Wade, 2017
Mar 22, 2017 · Hookup culture is a cultural phenomenon that endorses and facilitates hookups, with beliefs that virginity is passé and monogamy is prudish, ...Missing: narrative | Show results with:narrative
[119]
Transforming Hookup Culture: A Review of American Hookup
Feb 15, 2017 · The hookup culture monopolizes, but Wade envisions a free marketplace of sexual cultures on campus. “We need a more complex and rich cultural ...Missing: narrative | Show results with:narrative
[120]
The Discursive Construction of Polyamory: Legitimising an ...
Nov 23, 2022 · Essentialising polyamory allows it to be constructed as a natural and spontaneous element of identity and to present monogamy as a cultural ...Introduction · Polyamory As A Liminal... · Valorising Polyamory<|control11|><|separator|>
[121]
Promiscuous America: Smart, Secular, and Somewhat Less Happy
Apr 18, 2018 · The residents of Promiscuous America are less likely to be married and more likely to be divorced, to have cheated, and to watch porn.Missing: narratives | Show results with:narratives
[122]
Monogamy VS Polyamory - Loving More Nonprofit
Oct 29, 2009 · Poly relationships can be secure and a great place to raise kids. Most people come to explore polyamory as an alternative to monogamy, many find ...
[123]
Nine Decades of Promiscuity | Institute for Family Studies
Feb 6, 2018 · Promiscuity hit its modern peak for men born in the 1950s and never rose, but marriage rates continued to fall. If men came to eschew ...
[124]
How Sexual License Destroys Cultures and Civilisations
Jan 13, 2023 · Here are two books that closely examine the worldwide historical link between sexual promiscuity and civilisational collapse.Throughout Time And Space · Outcomes · The Modern West<|separator|>
[125]
Wheatley Institute report: sexual restraint during dating years linked ...
Apr 18, 2023 · These studies conclude that the number of sex partners a person has prior to marriage is one of the strongest predictors of divorce in social ...
[126]
Love, Economics, and Cheap Sex - Public Discourse
Aug 8, 2018 · Regnerus's conclusion is that cheap sex has left American men so chokingly awash in orgasmic experiences that the meaning of maleness itself is under threat.
[127]
Cheap Sex is the “Inconvenient Truth” in the Retreat from Marriage
If the price of becoming marriageable in a world of cheap sex means more studying, more work, less free time, and less sex, the actions of men— ...
[128]
Gender Convergence Over “Cheap Sex” - Tristan Bridges, Jesse M ...
Mar 7, 2019 · If sex is so “cheap,” and if men are as averse to committed relationships as Regnerus argues, we would expect to see men delaying or forgoing ...
[129]
Risky Business: Is There an Association between Casual Sex ... - NIH
... sexually promiscuous. It may be that women who behave against type experience guilt, hence the association between casual sex and mental health. Empirical ...
[130]
Sexual Hookup Culture: A Review - PMC - PubMed Central
Associations between dopamine D4 receptor gene variation with both infidelity and sexual promiscuity. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e14162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone ...
[131]
Confronting the Toll of Hookup Culture | Institute for Family Studies
Apr 23, 2024 · According to the Journal of Sex Research, engaging in hookups and the number of hookup partners are related to greater symptoms of depression ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[132]
Long-Term Health Correlates of Timing of Sexual Debut
Oct 10, 2011 · Early sexual debut is associated with certain long-term negative sexual health outcomes, including increased sexual risk behaviors and problems in sexual ...<|separator|>