Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Filgrastim


Filgrastim is a recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) produced via recombinant DNA technology in Escherichia coli. Marketed by Amgen under the brand name Neupogen, it functions as a hematopoietic growth factor that binds to specific cell surface receptors on hematopoietic cells, thereby stimulating the proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of neutrophils from myeloid committed progenitor cells. Originally developed by Amgen in the 1980s following the identification of endogenous G-CSF, filgrastim entered clinical trials in 1987 and received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1991 as the first commercially available G-CSF therapeutic.
Filgrastim's primary clinical application is to mitigate chemotherapy-induced by shortening its duration and reducing the risk of and associated infections in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing myelosuppressive anticancer therapy. Additional approved indications include accelerating myeloid reconstitution post-bone marrow transplantation, mobilizing autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells for collection, and treating severe chronic , including congenital forms like Kostmann's syndrome. Pivotal clinical trials demonstrated its in decreasing infection rates and hospitalization duration, with systematic reviews confirming significant reductions in incidence compared to or no prophylaxis. Biosimilars have proliferated since the original patent's expiry around 2006, offering comparable , , and profiles in real-world and trial settings. The most frequently reported of filgrastim administration is or musculoskeletal , attributed to rapid expansion and mediated through receptor activation on stromal cells, occurring in up to 20-30% of patients but typically manageable with analgesics. Other potential side effects include , , and rare reactions, though overall tolerability remains high across prophylactic and therapeutic uses. Long-term data from observational studies and registries underscore its role in supportive care, with no evidence of increased secondary risk in standard dosing regimens.

Medical Applications

Approved Indications

Filgrastim, a recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, is approved by the (FDA) to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by , in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a significant incidence of severe with fever. This indication targets chemotherapy-induced neutropenia to mitigate infection risks in cancer patients. It is also indicated to reduce the duration of and the duration of fever following induction or consolidation in patients with (AML). In patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing myeloablative followed by transplantation, filgrastim shortens the period of and associated clinical complications, such as . For mobilization of autologous hematopoietic cells into the peripheral blood for collection by , filgrastim is approved to facilitate harvesting in cancer patients preparing for transplantation. In patients with severe chronic —whether congenital, idiopathic, or cyclic—it reduces the incidence and duration of neutropenia-related sequelae, including infections and fever. Additionally, on March 30, 2015, the FDA approved filgrastim for increasing survival in adult and pediatric patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of in the setting of a radiological or nuclear incident, addressing hematopoietic syndrome of . These approvals stem from clinical trials demonstrating efficacy in recovery and reduction, with initial marketing authorization for Neupogen (filgrastim) granted in 1991.

Administration and Dosage

Filgrastim is administered subcutaneously as a single daily injection, by short intravenous over 15 to 30 minutes, or by continuous intravenous . The first dose should be given no earlier than 24 hours following cytotoxic and at least 24 hours prior to subsequent cycles to avoid interference with chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Dosing is weight-based, typically calculated as micrograms per of body weight, with commercial formulations available in prefilled syringes or vials containing 300 mcg/0.5 mL or 480 mcg/0.8 mL, often rounded to fixed doses of 300 mcg or 480 mcg daily for adults weighing approximately 45-90 kg or greater, respectively. For chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in nonmyeloid malignancies, the recommended starting dosage is 5 mcg/kg once daily, continued until the post-nadir (ANC) exceeds 1.0 × 10^9/L, typically for up to 2 weeks but discontinued if ANC surpasses 10 × 10^9/L. In patients with undergoing induction or consolidation , the same 5 mcg/kg daily regimen applies, with duration guided by ANC recovery beyond the expected . For mobilization of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells, dosing is 10 mcg/kg daily by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion, administered for 4-5 days or until adequate + cell yields are achieved. In severe chronic neutropenia, initial dosages are titrated based on ANC response and require regular : for congenital neutropenia, 6 mcg/kg twice daily subcutaneously; for idiopathic neutropenia, 3.6 mcg/kg daily; and for , 1.2 mcg/kg daily, with adjustments up to 12 mcg/kg daily or higher (rarely ≥100 mcg/kg daily in congenital cases) if ANC remains below 1.5 × 10^9/L. Complete counts, including and platelet counts, should be monitored twice weekly during initial therapy and dose adjustments, then periodically during maintenance to guide and detect potential complications like . Intravenous administration requires dilution in 5% dextrose solution, while subcutaneous use involves no dilution for prefilled syringes. Self-administration subcutaneously is feasible after proper , with sites rotated to avoid .

Pharmacology

Mechanism of Action

Filgrastim is a recombinant methionyl form of human (G-CSF), which selectively binds to the G-CSF receptor (CSF3R), a member of the superfamily, expressed primarily on precursor cells committed to the lineage in the . This high-affinity binding (Kd approximately 1-5 nM) induces receptor dimerization and activates (JAK2), leading to phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins ( and STAT5), as well as recruitment of other pathways including PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK for enhanced cell survival and anti-apoptotic effects. Downstream signaling promotes dose-dependent and of myeloid progenitors into mature s, shortening their transit time from 8-10 days to as little as 1 day and facilitating rapid release into the peripheral circulation. Filgrastim also enhances mature functions, including increased of bacteria, priming of the complex for anion production during respiratory burst, and augmented (ADCC), thereby bolstering host defense against . The receptor-mediated clearance of filgrastim exhibits saturation kinetics, with count inversely correlating with drug (typically 3-4 hours at ), reflecting and lysosomal degradation of the ligand-receptor complex as a regulatory . While G-CSF receptors are detected on non-hematopoietic tissues such as and neurons, their role in filgrastim's therapeutic effects in remains unestablished.

Pharmacokinetics

Filgrastim exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics, characterized by clearance that depends on both drug concentration and count, as the primary elimination pathway involves saturable binding to (G-CSF) receptors on neutrophils and precursor cells, leading to and intracellular degradation. This target-mediated disposition results in faster clearance at higher levels, with minimal contribution from traditional hepatic metabolism or enzymes. Following , filgrastim is rapidly , with ranging from 60% to 70% and peak serum concentrations achieved within 2 to 8 hours; intravenous bypasses and yields immediate systemic . The volume of distribution averages 150 mL/kg (approximately 0.15 L/kg), consistent across healthy volunteers and cancer patients, indicating confinement largely to the compartment with limited tissue penetration beyond sites of receptor expression. Elimination is approximately 3.5 hours in adults with normal counts, extending to around 4.4 hours in neonates and further prolonging in neutropenic states due to reduced receptor availability and diminished -mediated clearance. Overall clearance rates range from 0.5 to 0.7 mL/minute/kg under conditions at therapeutic doses, though nonlinearity manifests as dose-proportional increases in exposure at lower doses where receptor saturation is incomplete. Renal excretion plays a minor role, accounting for only a small fraction of total clearance, with no significant accumulation observed in patients with renal impairment.

Clinical Evidence

Efficacy Data from Trials

In clinical trials for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients with non-myeloid malignancies, such as small cell lung cancer, filgrastim reduced the incidence of from 76% in placebo recipients to 40% (p < 0.001) and the median duration of severe from 6 days to 2 days (p < 0.001) in cycle 1 among 210 patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. A meta-analysis of 15 studies involving 6,521 patients confirmed filgrastim's efficacy in CIN, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.63 (95% CI 0.53–0.75) for incidence across 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and an RR of 0.50 (95% CI 0.37–0.68) for grade 3/4 across 6 studies. These effects also correlated with lower hospitalization rates (52% vs. 69%, p = 0.032) and intravenous antibiotic use (38% vs. 60%, p = 0.003) in the initial cycle. For acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induction and consolidation, a phase 3 double-blind RCT with 521 patients demonstrated filgrastim shortened absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery by 5 days after the first induction course (20 vs. 25 days, p < 0.0001) and reduced fever duration by 1.5 days (p = 0.009), alongside decreased antifungal therapy needs (34% vs. 43%, p = 0.04) and hospital stays (shortened by 5 days in induction 1, p = 0.0001). Similar ANC recovery benefits were observed in subsequent cycles, though no improvements in disease-free or overall survival occurred (median overall survival 12.5 vs. 14.0 months). Meta-analytic data from 6 AML studies (1,554 patients) supported faster ANC recovery but no significant gains in infection rates or survival. In bone marrow transplantation settings, two phase 3 trials (total 98 patients) showed filgrastim at 10 mcg/kg/day reduced median days of severe neutropenia from 23 to 11 days (p = 0.004) in one study and from 21.5 to 10 days (p < 0.001) in another, with febrile neutropenia days dropping from 13.5 to 5 (p < 0.0001) in the latter. For severe chronic neutropenia (SCN), a phase 3 trial in 120 patients raised median ANC from baseline to 7,460/mm³, halving infection incidence and duration over 4 months compared to placebo, with hospitalizations falling from 44 to 28 events (p = 0.0034). In peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization, filgrastim enabled median ANC recovery to ≥500/mm³ in 11 days among 101 patients post-transplant.
IndicationKey Trial OutcomeEffect Size/Statistics
CIN (Small Cell Lung Cancer)Febrile neutropenia incidence40% vs. 76% (p < 0.001)
CIN (Meta-analysis)Febrile neutropenia RR0.63 (95% CI 0.53–0.75)
AMLANC recovery (Induction 1)20 vs. 25 days (p < 0.0001)
BMTSevere neutropenia days11 vs. 23 days (p = 0.004)
SCNHospitalizations (4 months)28 vs. 44 events (p = 0.0034)

Safety Profile and Adverse Effects

Filgrastim administration is associated with bone pain as the most frequently reported adverse effect, occurring in 24% to 44% of patients across various clinical trials depending on the indication, such as 30% in peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization and up to 44% in some supportive care settings. Other common adverse reactions (incidence ≥5% and higher than placebo or comparator) include pyrexia (up to 48% in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy), headache (10% in PBPC mobilization), rash (14% in chemotherapy patients), and fatigue or pain (12-16% across indications). Serious adverse reactions, though less common, include splenic rupture (potentially fatal, with symptoms like left upper abdominal or shoulder pain requiring immediate evaluation), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, characterized by fever and pulmonary infiltrates), and severe allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis (which may recur even after discontinuation of anti-allergic treatment). In patients with severe chronic neutropenia, long-term use has been linked to cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with a registry of 387 congenital neutropenia patients reporting 35 such transformations, though no definitive causal relationship with dose or duration was established. Filgrastim is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity and should be used cautiously in those with sickle cell disease due to risk of crises. Postmarketing surveillance has identified additional rare events, including capillary leak syndrome, aortitis (with fever and abdominal/back pain), leukocytosis, cutaneous vasculitis, and decreased bone density with prolonged use. Monitoring recommendations include regular complete blood counts to avoid excessive leukocytosis (>100,000 cells/mm³, occurring in <5% of bone marrow transplant patients but resolving upon discontinuation) and spleen size assessment via imaging if symptoms arise. Overall, filgrastim demonstrates a favorable short-term safety profile in clinical trials, with adverse event rates comparable to placebo except for expected effects on neutrophil recovery, but long-term data emphasize vigilance for myeloid malignancies in predisposed populations.

Interactions and Contraindications

Drug and Treatment Interactions

Filgrastim has not been subject to comprehensive evaluations of interactions with other drugs. Agents that may potentiate release, such as , warrant cautious co-administration due to the potential for heightened hematopoietic activity leading to exceeding safe thresholds, with counts possibly surpassing 100,000 cells/mm³. Timing of filgrastim administration relative to myelosuppressive treatments is critical to avoid unintended of rapidly proliferating myeloid cells. Filgrastim must not be initiated within 24 hours preceding cytotoxic nor continued through 24 hours following it, as concurrent use has not demonstrated safety or efficacy and may increase vulnerability of stimulated cells to chemotherapeutic agents. This guideline applies particularly to regimens associated with high risk, where filgrastim dosing typically begins at least 24 hours post-. Concurrent radiation therapy poses similar concerns, with filgrastim's safety and efficacy unevaluated in such settings; simultaneous administration alongside chemotherapy and radiation should be avoided to mitigate risks of exacerbated myelosuppression or other toxicities. Although filgrastim is indicated for post-exposure management of radiation-induced myelosuppression in hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome—administered as soon as possible after doses exceeding 2 Gy—this approval addresses therapeutic mitigation rather than prophylactic or concurrent use during planned radiotherapy. Limited evidence suggests potential for increased toxicity in chemoradiation contexts, though definitive causal links remain unestablished.

History and Development

Discovery and Preclinical Studies

Human (G-CSF) was first identified and purified in January 1984 by researchers Karl Welte and Erich Platzer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in , using supernatant from the human urothelial carcinoma cell line 5637 processed through 40 liters of medium and to achieve homogeneity. This purification enabled characterization of G-CSF as a that specifically stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of precursors , building on earlier foundational work in the by Donald Metcalf and colleagues at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, who demonstrated colony formation from mouse cells in response to conditioned media factors. Recombinant production of human G-CSF, specifically filgrastim (a non-glycosylated form), began in 1985 at in , led by Larry Souza, who sequenced the G-CSF gene; expression in followed, yielding the protein used for subsequent testing, distinct from the glycosylated version (lenograstim) produced in mammalian cells by a Japanese group. Preclinical in vitro studies confirmed filgrastim's bioactivity, mirroring native G-CSF in promoting granulocyte colony formation from human cells without significant effects on other hematopoietic lineages. In vivo preclinical evaluations, conducted prior to 1987 clinical trials, involved administering recombinant G-CSF to cynomolgus monkeys, where it accelerated recovery following chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and supported engraftment after transplantation by enhancing and . Additional animal models, including mice and dogs, demonstrated dose-dependent increases in circulating and cellularity, with minimal direct toxicity observed at therapeutic levels, establishing filgrastim's specificity for the neutrophil lineage via receptor binding and downstream signaling. These findings provided causal evidence that recombinant G-CSF could counteract through targeted stimulation of myeloid progenitors, informing its transition to trials.

Regulatory Approvals and Milestones

Filgrastim, marketed under the brand name Neupogen by , received initial approval from the U.S. (FDA) on February 20, 1991, for decreasing the incidence of infection, as manifested by , in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive with an associated significant incidence of severe with fever. This marked the first regulatory approval of a recombinant (G-CSF) for clinical use in the United States. Subsequent FDA approvals expanded filgrastim's indications. In January 1994, it was approved to reduce the duration of following high-dose and transplantation in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies. On December 19, 1994, approval was granted for the treatment of severe chronic , including congenital, idiopathic, and cyclic forms, to reduce the incidence and duration of neutropenia-related infections. Further milestones included 1995 approval for mobilization of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells into peripheral blood for collection by , and 1998 expansion to HIV-infected patients for management. A significant later approval occurred on March 30, 2015, when the FDA authorized filgrastim for increasing survival in adult and pediatric patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation (hematopoietic syndrome of ). In , the originator filgrastim (Neupogen) received marketing authorization from national agencies in the early 1990s, preceding centralized (EMA) procedures for biologics; versions, such as those from Hexal and , gained EMA approval starting February 6, 2009. These approvals relied on comparability data demonstrating similarity in quality, safety, and to the reference product.
MilestoneDateAgencyIndication
Initial approval for chemotherapy-induced February 20, 1991FDAReduction in incidence in nonmyeloid cancer patients
Post-bone transplant January 1994FDADuration reduction in nonmyeloid malignancies
Severe December 19, 1994FDATreatment to reduce risk
(H-ARS)March 30, 2015FDASurvival increase post-myelosuppressive radiation
First (e.g., Filgrastim Hexal)February 6, 2009Same as reference for indications

Biosimilars and Competition

Key Biosimilar Approvals

The () approved the first filgrastim in 2008, marking the initial regulatory recognition of biosimilars for this . Filgrastim Hexal (Hexal AG) and Ratiograstim ( GmbH) received approval on January 17, 2008, followed by Zarzio () on February 6, 2009, establishing early precedents for demonstrating similarity to the reference product Neupogen through comparative physicochemical, biological, and clinical studies. In the United States, the (FDA) approved its first filgrastim , Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz, ), on March 6, 2015, under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) pathway, which requires analytical, nonclinical, and to confirm no clinically meaningful differences from Neupogen. Subsequent FDA approvals included Nivestym (filgrastim-aafi, ) on July 18, 2018; Nyvepria (filgrastim-apgf, ) on June 2, 2020; and Releuko (filgrastim-ayow, Amneal) on May 26, 2022, each supported by totality-of-evidence approaches including pharmacokinetic equivalence and reduced chemotherapy-induced trials. These approvals facilitated market entry for interchangeable or highly similar versions, with authorizing at least seven filgrastim biosimilars by 2024, compared to three in the , reflecting differing regulatory timelines and uptake. Key biosimilars and their initial approvals are summarized below:
Biosimilar NameManufacturerAgencyApproval Date
Filgrastim HexalHexal AGJanuary 17, 2008
Ratiograstimratiopharm GmbHJanuary 17, 2008
ZarzioFebruary 6, 2009
ZarxioFDAMarch 6, 2015
NivestymFDAJuly 18, 2018
NyvepriaFDAJune 2, 2020
ReleukoAmnealFDAMay 26, 2022

Comparative Effectiveness

Clinical trials establishing biosimilar approval for filgrastim, such as those for filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio), have demonstrated non-inferiority to the filgrastim (Neupogen) in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) and incidence of (FN) among patients receiving myelosuppressive . In a phase III randomized non-inferiority study, the mean DSN for filgrastim was 1.45 days compared to 1.47 days for reference filgrastim, with the upper limit of the 95% for the treatment difference falling within predefined non-inferiority margins. Similar results were observed for filgrastim-aafi, where real-world data confirmed comparable recovery rates and FN incidence rates to the originator in solid tumor patients. Real-world evidence supports these findings, with retrospective cohort analyses showing no clinically meaningful differences in effectiveness between reference filgrastim and biosimilars like EP2006 (marketed as Nivestym in the US) for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) prevention and stem cell mobilization. For instance, a US claims database study of commercially insured patients found equivalent rates of FN hospitalization (approximately 5-6% across groups) when using biosimilar versus originator filgrastim as primary prophylaxis. In stem cell transplantation settings, tbo-filgrastim (Granix), approved via an alternative pathway, yielded comparable CD34+ cell mobilization (mean yields of 6-8 × 10^6/kg) and post-transplant neutrophil engraftment times (median 11-12 days) to reference filgrastim, though not classified as a true biosimilar under FDA's 351(k) pathway. Safety profiles align closely, with adverse event rates for , , and remaining low and similar across products (e.g., bone pain incidence of 20-30% in both reference and biosimilar arms). A comparative analysis of filgrastim-sndz and reference filgrastim reported no differences in serious adverse events related to recovery. These outcomes derive from peer-reviewed trials and registries, where met regulatory thresholds for similarity via physicochemical characterization and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic equivalence, underpinning claims of interchangeability in clinical practice.

Economic and Market Impact

Pricing Dynamics

The introduction of filgrastim , beginning with Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz) approved by the FDA on March 6, 2015, marked a pivotal shift in for this (G-CSF). Prior to biosimilar entry, the originator product Neupogen commanded premium prices reflective of biologic manufacturing complexities and lack of competition, with typical patient costs for a cycle ranging from $42,000 to $50,000 as of 2012. Biosimilar competition prompted both originator and biosimilar prices to decline, with each additional biosimilar entrant associated with a 10-13% reduction in the originator's price ratio from 2015 to 2023. This competitive pressure resulted in substantial payer savings, including a 28.1% decrease in annual Part B spending on all filgrastim products compared to 2015 levels, alongside 22.1% reductions in expenditures. spending on Neupogen specifically fell 69% from $47.63 million in 2018 to $14.52 million in 2022, while utilization grew, reflecting market share erosion for the originator. like Zarxio and others achieved 56-86% lower per-vial costs than Neupogen as early as 2015 in select markets, with U.S. analyses showing 11-15% lower effective annual per-patient plan costs for versus the originator. Overall, filgrastim biosimilars have generated nearly $13 billion in U.S. savings since , driven by immediate post-entry drops and sustained , though uptake varies by site of care and reimbursement policies, sometimes limiting full realization of savings in physician offices. These dynamics underscore how biosimilar entry enforces downward pressure on biologics without compromising , as evidenced by equivalent clinical performance, yet originator pricing remains elevated relative to international benchmarks due to U.S.-specific factors like settlements and payer negotiations.

Cost Savings and Access

The introduction of biosimilar filgrastim products, beginning with Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz) approved by the FDA in March 2015 as the first in the United States, has substantially reduced overall spending on filgrastim therapies. In Part B, annual total spending on all filgrastim products declined by 28.1% from 2015 levels, with similar reductions of 5.1% in Part D and 22.1% in , driven by competitive pricing pressures from biosimilars. Biosimilar availability also prompted immediate and sustained decreases in claims payments across filgrastim products, with unit prices for Zarxio in dropping 52% from $0.97 to $0.47 per unit between 2015 and subsequent years. Wholesale acquisition costs (WAC) for supportive care , including filgrastim variants, have been discounted 17-67% relative to the reference product Neupogen, further amplifying market-wide price erosion as additional competitors entered. These price reductions have translated into per-cycle cost savings for prophylactic use in chemotherapy-induced , ranging from $327 for 5-day regimens to $915 for 11-day courses when switching to filgrastim over the originator. Simulation models of converting patients to demonstrate budget-neutral expansions in access to supportive care, allowing reallocations toward high-cost therapies without increasing overall expenditures. In employer-sponsored insurance, effective annual per-patient drug costs were 11-15% lower with like Zarxio or Granix compared to the reference product, enhancing affordability for non-Medicare populations. Improved stems from these savings, which mitigate financial barriers in biologic and expand utilization of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. Biosimilars have lowered patient out-of-pocket costs in certain high-deductible plans following entry, while broader market effects include greater availability in resource-constrained settings and reduced system-level burdens, enabling more patients to receive timely prophylaxis against . However, realization of savings can vary by site of care, with outpatient settings incurring higher median drug costs than offices for equivalent products, underscoring the need for optimized administration pathways to maximize access gains. Overall, filgrastim biosimilars have contributed to projected U.S. savings of tens of billions from biologics competition between 2021 and 2025, with filgrastim exemplifying how such entries enhance equitable without compromising .

Controversies and Criticisms

Risks in Cancer Patients

In cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive , filgrastim administration carries risks of serious adverse events, including (reported in up to 30% of cases), , and rare instances of splenic rupture, which can be fatal. (ARDS) has also been observed, particularly in patients with preexisting pulmonary conditions, with onset typically within days of initiation. These effects stem from filgrastim's of rapidly mobilizing neutrophils, which can organ systems, though incidence rates remain low (e.g., splenic rupture in <1% of cases). A primary controversy involves the potential for filgrastim to increase the risk of (MDS) and (AML) in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies, such as or . Clinical trials and have documented higher incidences of these secondary malignancies in filgrastim-treated groups (e.g., 1-2% vs. lower rates), prompting black-box warnings from regulatory agencies. However, causality remains unestablished, as observational data cannot disentangle effects from intensified dosing enabled by filgrastim's prophylaxis, which may itself elevate leukemogenic risks. No randomized controlled trials demonstrate a direct excess risk attributable to (G-CSF) agents like filgrastim, and preclinical concerns about tumor cell stimulation via G-CSF receptors lack consistent clinical corroboration in solid tumors. Long-term data are limited, with some cohort studies reporting elevated rates of secondary myeloid neoplasms post-G-CSF exposure, but these are confounded by selection for high-risk regimens. In contrast, analyses of healthy donors mobilized with filgrastim show no increased cancer incidence over follow-up periods exceeding a decade, suggesting risks may be context-specific to malignant backgrounds. Filgrastim is contraindicated simultaneously with due to insufficient data on concurrent use, and for cytopenias or marrow abnormalities is recommended. Overall, while filgrastim reduces incidence (by 40-50% in meta-analyses), its risk-benefit profile in cancer warrants individualized assessment, particularly in those with myeloid-sensitive tumors.

Long-Term Safety Debates

Concerns regarding the long-term safety of filgrastim have primarily focused on its potential to increase the risk of secondary hematologic malignancies, such as (MDS) and (AML), particularly in cancer patients receiving it alongside or radiotherapy. A 2019 of patients with who underwent autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation found that filgrastim administration (≥10 doses) was associated with a (HR) of 1.67 (95% CI, 1.10-2.56) for MDS/AML development, independent of other factors. This risk appears specific to filgrastim rather than , with the study authors noting that while by indication (e.g., more intensive prior therapy) could contribute, the pattern suggests a possible direct effect from repeated dosing. In patients with or , regulatory warnings highlight MDS and AML associations when filgrastim is used post- or radiotherapy, though absolute risks remain low and confounded by the underlying treatments' leukemogenic potential. Conversely, randomized trials in (AML) patients have shown no adverse impact on long-term survival or remission rates with filgrastim support during induction , indicating context-dependent effects where it may not exacerbate prognosis in de novo AML. Debate persists on , as preclinical data suggest G-CSF could theoretically promote clonal expansion in mutagenized marrow, but population-level evidence is limited by short follow-up durations and in high-risk cohorts. For healthy peripheral blood donors, long-term data are more reassuring, with multiple prospective studies reporting no elevated incidence of malignancies, autoimmune disorders, or thrombotic events up to 10 years post-filgrastim . A 2024 analysis of unrelated donors found filgrastim exposure did not increase myeloid or lymphoid malignancy rates compared to unexposed donors, though rare events like warrant monitoring. In severe chronic patients on prolonged therapy, vigilance for MDS progression is recommended, but large registries show transformation rates align with the underlying rather than filgrastim alone. Overall, while short-term tolerability is high, ongoing is emphasized due to sparse ultra-long-term (beyond 10 years) empirical data across populations.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] NEUPOGEN (filgrastim) - accessdata.fda.gov
    DESCRIPTION. Filgrastim is a human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)‚ produced by recombinant DNA technology. NEUPOGEN® is the Amgen Inc.
  2. [2]
    NEUPOGEN® (filgrastim) Mechanism of Action
    NEUPOGEN stimulates neutrophil progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation.1-3. NEUPOGEN® speeds up neutrophil maturation, leading to an increased number ...
  3. [3]
    Forty years of human G-CSF: A short history in time - PubMed
    Based on these findings, recombinant G-CSF was developed by Amgen, Thousand Oaks. In 1987, clinical trials began using recombinant G-CSF in cancer patients ...
  4. [4]
    G-CSF Injection - About NEUPOGEN® (filgrastim)
    NEUPOGEN (filgrastim) was the first FDA-approved granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. NEUPOGEN has a strong heritage. Since 1991. Amgen has been a pioneer in ...
  5. [5]
    Filgrastim: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action | DrugBank Online
    Filgrastim is used to reduce the incidence, severity and duration of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy.
  6. [6]
    Filgrastim - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Jul 3, 2023 · Filgrastim is a medication used to manage and treat neutropenia in patients with myelosuppression from chemotherapy or radiation
  7. [7]
    A systematic literature review of the efficacy, effectiveness, and ... - NIH
    The most commonly reported adverse event (AE) with filgrastim was bone pain (RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.29–5.27 in CIN). Additional efficacy and safety outcomes are ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  8. [8]
    Pharmacokinetic profiles of a biosimilar filgrastim and Amgen ...
    Following the patent expiry of Amgen filgrastim in 2006, Hospira has developed a biosimilar version of filgrastim (Hospira filgrastim, Nivestim™), which could ...
  9. [9]
    Comparing the efficacy and side-effects of PDLASTA ... - BMC Cancer
    Apr 23, 2021 · According to numerous studies, the side effects of this drug include splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, osteopenia and osteoporosis, bone pain, ...
  10. [10]
    Efficacy and Safety of Filgrastim and Its Biosimilars to Prevent ...
    Filgrastim was effective and safe in reducing febrile neutropenia and related complications, compared to placebo/no treatment.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  11. [11]
    [PDF] ZARXIO®(filgrastim-sndz) injection, for subcutaneous or intravenous ...
    INDICATIONS AND USAGE --------------------------. ZARXIO is a leukocyte growth factor indicated to. •. Decrease the incidence of infection‚ as manifested by ...
  12. [12]
    FDA Approves Radiation Medical Countermeasure
    On March 30, 2015, FDA approved use of Neupogen (filgrastim) to treat adult and pediatric patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation ( ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] NEUPOGEN (filgrastim) injection, for subcutaneous or intravenous
    The possibility that filgrastim acts as a growth factor for any tumor type cannot be excluded.
  14. [14]
    Filgrastim Dosage Guide + Max Dose, Adjustments - Drugs.com
    Sep 9, 2025 · Initial dose: 5 mcg/kg ONCE a day via subcutaneous injection, short IV infusion (over 15 to 30 minutes) OR continuous IV infusion.
  15. [15]
    filgrastim (Rx) - Medscape Reference
    Dosage · Start at least 24 hours after chemotherapy; do not give within 24 hours before chemotherapy · 5 mcg/kg SC or IV infusion (short 15-30 min or continuous) ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] This label may not be the latest approved by FDA. For current ...
    The single-dose prefilled syringes contain either 300 mcg/0.5 mL or 480 mcg/0.8 mL of filgrastim. The NEUPOGEN drug product has a pH of 4.0. See table below for ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] highlights of prescribing information - accessdata.fda.gov
    Alveolar hemorrhage manifesting as pulmonary infiltrates and hemoptysis requiring hospitalization have been reported in healthy donors treated with filgrastim ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] highlights of prescribing information - accessdata.fda.gov
    Alveolar hemorrhage manifesting as pulmonary infiltrates and hemoptysis requiring hospitalization have been reported in healthy donors treated with filgrastim ...
  19. [19]
    How to Give Yourself an Injection of Filgrastim (Neupogen®) or ...
    Dose – Make sure the dose of the medication matches what your healthcare provider prescribed for you. The dose is listed on the colored dot on the package.How to Give Yourself an Injection · Get the injection ready · Choose an injection site
  20. [20]
    Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Receptor (G-CSFR ...
    JAK-STAT pathway. The major downstream kinases activated by G-CSFR include JAK1, JAK2, TYK2 and SRC family kinases, e.g., LYN, HCK (14–17). Additional ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Reference ID: 5574694 - accessdata.fda.gov
    The possibility that filgrastim acts as a growth factor for any tumor type cannot be excluded.
  22. [22]
    Filgrastim - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The major routes of clearance are by binding to cell surface receptors and being internalized and, to a lesser extent, by renal elimination.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Neulasta, INN- Pegfilgrastim - European Medicines Agency
    Metabolism and excretion​​ Filgrastim is cleared from the circulation by a combination of renal and neutrophil-mediated clearance (neutrophils and their ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] NEUPOGEN (Filgrastim) - accessdata.fda.gov
    NEUPOGEN® has been shown to be safe and effective in accelerating the recovery of neutrophil counts following a variety of chemotherapy regimens. In a phase 3 ...
  25. [25]
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study of ...
    This study has shown that filgrastim is a safe and effective adjunct to the treatment of AML, significantly reducing neutropenia and associated morbidity ...
  26. [26]
    The Safety Profile of Filgrastim and Pegfilgrastim - PMC - NIH
    The adverse event profile of filgrastim includes bone pain, headache, allergic reactions, rash, and splenomegaly, with bone pain the only adverse event that ...
  27. [27]
    Chemoradiation and granulocyte-colony or granulocyte ... - NIH
    Concerns have been raised about potential toxic interactions when colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and chemoradiation are concurrently performed.
  28. [28]
    Forty years of human G‐CSF: A short history in time
    Aug 19, 2024 · Based on these findings, recombinant G-CSF was developed by Amgen, Thousand Oaks. In 1987, clinical trials began using recombinant G-CSF in ...
  29. [29]
    The discovery, development and clinical applications of granulocyte ...
    The story of the discovery, development and applications of G-CSF illustrates many of the best features of modern laboratory and clinical investigation.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] 125553Orig1s000 - accessdata.fda.gov
    Dec 30, 2014 · The dates that are 4 and 12 years after the date of first licensure of Neupogen (filgrastim) are February 20, 1995, and February 20, 2003 ...
  31. [31]
    Filgrastim (Neupogen) | HemOnc.org - A Hematology Oncology Wiki
    Uncertain date: Approved to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving ...
  32. [32]
    FDA Approves New Indication for Neupogen: Chronic Neutropenia
    Neupogen, Amgen's recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) has received FDA approval for use in treating severe chronic ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Search Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals - FDA
    Marketing approved: 1, Generic Name: Filgrastim. Trade Name: Neupogen. Marketing Approval Date: 12/19/1994. Approved Labeled Indication: Treatment of patients ...Missing: history milestones
  34. [34]
    Filgrastim Hexal | European Medicines Agency (EMA)
    The European Commission granted a marketing authorisation valid throughout the EU for Filgrastim Hexal to Hexal AG on 6 February 2009.
  35. [35]
    Regulatory and Clinical Experiences with Biosimilar Filgrastim in the ...
    The filgrastim biosimilar manufactured by Teva received regulatory approval in EU countries in 2008, and a similar biosimilar filgrastim (different ...
  36. [36]
    Biosimilars approved in Europe
    Several of the biosimilars are approved under two brand names, including: ... • two for filgrastim biosimilars: Filgrastim ratiopharm in April 2011 and CT ...
  37. [37]
    Biosimilar Product Information - FDA
    Oct 6, 2025 · This page includes a chart of the approved biosimilar and interchangeable products. The approval of biosimilar products can improve access ...
  38. [38]
    FDA approves first biosimilar ZarxioTM (filgrastim-sndz) from Sandoz
    Sandoz is the first company to receive approval of a biosimilar in the US through the new FDA biosimilars pathway established under BPCIA · Zarxio is approved ...
  39. [39]
    FDA Approves Second Filgrastim Biosimilar - OncLive
    Jul 23, 2018 · The FDA approved filgrastim-aafi (Nivestym), a filgrastim (Neupogen) biosimilar, to prevent and treat side effects associated with cancer treatment.<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Filgrastim Biosimilars in Europe: 15 Years of Real-World Evidence ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · There are 3 filgrastim biosimilars approved by the FDA (Zarxio, Nivestym, and Releuko), and 7 approved by the European Medicines Agency ( ...
  41. [41]
    Ratiograstim | European Medicines Agency (EMA)
    Ratiograstim is a 'biosimilar medicine'. This means that Ratiograstim is similar to a biological medicine that is already authorised in the European Union (EU) ...
  42. [42]
    A phase III, randomized, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy ...
    A phase III, randomized, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of biosimilar filgrastim versus originator filgrastim for chemotherapy-induced ...
  43. [43]
    Effectiveness and Safety of Filgrastim (Neupogen™) versus ...
    Sep 7, 2022 · Filgrastim and filgrastim-aafi had comparable effectiveness and safety as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Filgrastim biosimilar (EP2006): A review of 15 years' post-approval ...
    Since the approval of reference filgrastim (Neupogen®; Amgen) in 1991 (US Food and Administration, 2023), several biosimilars have been approved in Europe ...
  45. [45]
    Real-world comparison of biosimilar filgrastim and reference ...
    Sep 25, 2018 · Conclusions: Biosimilar filgrastim is similar to the reference filgrastim in drug safety and effectiveness. The early adoption and saving ...Missing: trials | Show results with:trials
  46. [46]
    Tbo-Filgrastim versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil ...
    In conclusion, tbo-filgrastim demonstrated similar CD34+ yield compared with filgrastim in mobilization and post-transplantation settings, with no clinically ...
  47. [47]
    Efficacy and Safety of Filgrastim and Its Biosimilars to Prevent ...
    Oct 19, 2021 · Filgrastim was effective and safe in reducing febrile neutropenia and related complications, compared to placebo/no treatment.
  48. [48]
    A Comparison of Brand and Biosimilar Granulocyte-Colony ...
    While filgrastim-sndz and filgrastim have been shown to be highly similar with no clinically meaningful differences in reducing the incidence of febrile ...
  49. [49]
    Lessons from 10 Years with Biosimilar Filgrastim | BioDrugs
    Aug 22, 2019 · Biosimilar filgrastim was approved by the EMA in 2009 and by the FDA in 2015. The submission to the EMA included confirmatory clinical data from ...
  50. [50]
    Full article: The Evolution of Value With Filgrastim in Oncology
    The recombinant G-CSF filgrastim was first approved in 1991, and its value has been evolving ever since. Initial health technology assessments suggested low ...
  51. [51]
    The Price Effects of Biosimilars in the United States - Value in Health
    Mar 4, 2025 · Our results showed a 10% to 13% decrease in the originator price ratio for entry of each additional biosimilar competitor, and a 1.8% decrease ...
  52. [52]
    Uptake and cost of biosimilar filgrastim among Medicare and ...
    Compared with 2015, the annual total spending paid for all filgrastim products decreased by 28.1% for Medicare Part B, 5.1% for Part D, and 22.1% for Medicaid ...
  53. [53]
    Patterns of Medicare Utilization and Spending on Granulocyte ...
    Nov 5, 2024 · Filgrastim: From 2018 to 2022, total spending on Neupogen dropped 69%, from $47.63M to $14.52M. Spending on both Granix and Zarxio showed a 70% ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Cost of filgrastim biosimilars compared to originator filgrastim
    Jun 5, 2015 · This was 56% and 86% cheaper, respectively, than one vial of Neupogen, which cost (Euros 77.53/US$96.65).Missing: history | Show results with:history
  55. [55]
    Patient-Administered Biologic and Biosimilar Filgrastim May Offer ...
    Previous clinical trials have indicated that 8-14 days of filgrastim produce the most optimal results, with 11 injections as the average. However ...
  56. [56]
    Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Drugs After Biosimilar ...
    Mar 29, 2024 · Altogether, biosimilars have produced nearly $13 billion in savings since 2015 and are projected to save between $38 and $124 billion from 2021 ...
  57. [57]
    Site of care potentially limits cost savings from biosimilars - PubMed
    Aug 1, 2021 · Comparing drug costs within the same setting, in the office setting, costs of biosimilar and tbo-filgrastim were $103.61 and $94.07 lower than ...
  58. [58]
    Association between filgrastim biosimilar availability and changes in ...
    In the case of filgrastim, we found that biosimilar availability led to significant immediate and long-term decreases in claims payments for filgrastim products ...Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics
  59. [59]
    Biosimilar Savings among People with Employer-Sponsored ...
    Sep 20, 2022 · The ESI price was 97% higher on average than the Medicare price ($1.38 compared to $0.70). Figure 1 shows the trend in unit prices for both ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Biosimilar Market Report - BiologicsHQ
    Apr 1, 2025 · Across supportive care biosimilars, WAC prices discounted between 17-67% compared to reference products. Amgen, the manufacturer for reference ...
  61. [61]
    Savings From Biosimilar Filgrastim Can Expand Access to High ...
    Dec 5, 2017 · Per-cycle cost savings from utilizing biosimilar filgrastim over filgrastim are $327 (5-day prophylaxis), $457 (7-day), $719 (11-day), and $915 ...
  62. [62]
    Cost-efficiency analysis of conversion to biosimilar filgrastim for ...
    This simulation study demonstrated significant potential cost-savings from biosimilar conversion. These savings provide budget-neutral increased access to
  63. [63]
    Patient-Administered Biosimilar and Follow-On Filgrastim Pose ...
    Aug 13, 2018 · The analysis concluded that the effective annual plan per-patient drug cost was 11% lower for Granix and 15% lower for Zarxio than the cost of ...
  64. [64]
    Beyond Cost: Observations on Clinical and Patient Benefits of ... - NIH
    Jun 5, 2025 · Biosimilars sustain the benefits of biologic therapy whilst also delivering substantial cost savings, thereby increasing the affordability of biologics, and ...
  65. [65]
    Site of Care Potentially Limits Cost Savings From Biosimilars - AJMC
    Aug 23, 2021 · Results: For each filgrastim product, model-adjusted median drug costs were higher in the outpatient hospital setting than for the same drug ...
  66. [66]
    Projected US Savings From Biosimilars, 2021-2025 - AJMC
    Jan 3, 2022 · Projected savings from biosimilars from 2021 to 2025 were $38.4 billion vs conditions as of quarter 4 of 2020 and were driven by new biosimilar entry.
  67. [67]
    Filgrastim | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    Enlarged and ruptured spleens have happened with this drug. Sometimes, ruptured spleens have been deadly. Call your doctor right away if you have left upper ...
  68. [68]
    Filgrastim (injection route) - Side effects & dosage - Mayo Clinic
    Jan 31, 2025 · Adults and children—Dose is based on body weight and must be determined by your doctor. The dose is usually 5 to 10 microgram per kilogram (mcg/ ...
  69. [69]
    Filgrastim (Neupogen®, G-CSF) | OncoLink
    Aug 28, 2025 · Filgrastim is a medication given to raise your white blood cell/neutrophil count. It is also given to prevent or treat neutropenia after ...
  70. [70]
    Current state and future opportunities in granulocyte colony ... - NIH
    Jun 24, 2022 · G-CSF after chemotherapy significantly decreases neutropenia and febrile neutropenia by stimulating granulopoiesis. The initial studies after ...
  71. [71]
    Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and the risk of secondary ...
    May 15, 2003 · There are no controlled trials indicating an excess risk of t-ML among patients treated with G-CSF or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating ...
  72. [72]
    Side effects of using granulocyte-colony stimulating factors as ...
    Higher rates of late secondary myeloid neoplasms were observed with G-CSF. •. Studies on long-term side effects of G-CSF, including on quality of life, are ...
  73. [73]
    Long-term safety of filgrastim (rhG-CSF) administration - PMC - NIH
    Based on limited long-term data from healthy people who have received filgrastim, no long-term risks have been found so far. The low occurrence of leukaemia and ...
  74. [74]
    Cancer incidence in healthy Swedish peripheral blood stem cell ...
    Mar 7, 2022 · In this study of healthy peripheral blood stem cell donors, the cancer incidence was not increased after treatment with G-CSF.
  75. [75]
    NEUPOGEN (filgrastim): Important Safety Information and Indications
    NEUPOGEN is indicated to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving ...
  76. [76]
    Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia after receipt ...
    Apr 1, 2019 · When specific agents were analyzed, an increased risk of MDS/AML was consistently observed with filgrastim (≥10 doses: HR, 1.67; 95% CI ...
  77. [77]
    Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia after receipt ...
    Dec 12, 2018 · ... MDS/AML risk by specific agent (Fig. 2), filgrastim was associated with an overall increased risk of MDS/AML (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.67) ...
  78. [78]
    Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Following ...
    Dec 12, 2018 · We found higher MDS/AML risk among those receiving G-CSF that was specific to the use of filgrastim(≥10 doses), but not pegfilgrastim.
  79. [79]
    Long-term outcomes of peripheral blood stem cell unrelated donors ...
    Aug 13, 2024 · Thrombosis is of concern as a side effect of filgrastim. Administration of filgrastim leads to a potentially prothrombotic state via stimulation ...
  80. [80]
    Long-term risks of hematological malignancy, autoimmune or ...
    Results show that donors who receive filgrastim are likely not at an increased risk of MAT events compared to BM donors who didn't receive it.Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns