Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Financial asset

A financial asset is any asset that is cash, an equity instrument of another entity, a contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity, a contractual right to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under potentially favorable conditions, or a contract that may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments under specific conditions.^[1] These assets derive their value from contractual rights or ownership claims rather than physical properties, distinguishing them from tangible assets like real estate or commodities.^[2] Common examples include bank deposits, stocks, bonds, loans receivable, and derivatives, which form the backbone of modern financial systems.^[1] Financial assets are classified based on accounting standards such as IFRS 9, which categorizes them into three main groups depending on the entity's business model and the asset's cash flow characteristics: those measured at amortized cost (e.g., debt instruments such as loans held within a business model to collect contractual cash flows), at fair value through other comprehensive income (e.g., certain debt securities and equity investments not held for trading), and at fair value through profit or loss (e.g., trading securities and derivatives).^[3] In economic terms, the International Monetary Fund's Monetary and Financial Statistics Manual further classifies them into broader categories like monetary gold and special drawing rights, currency and deposits, debt securities, loans, equity and investment fund shares, insurance and pension entitlements, financial derivatives, and other accounts receivable/payable, emphasizing their role in creditor-debtor relationships.^[2] This classification aids in assessing liquidity, risk, and valuation, with assets valued at fair value, amortized cost, or historical cost depending on the standard applied.^[3] Financial assets play a pivotal role in the economy by facilitating the transfer of funds from savers to borrowers, promoting capital allocation, investment, and economic growth.^[2] They enable liquidity provision, risk diversification through instruments like derivatives, and efficient resource distribution across sectors, as tracked in national accounts and balance of payments statistics.^[4] In global financial systems, these assets underpin banking, investment, and international trade, with their management influencing monetary policy and financial stability.^[2]

Fundamentals

Definition

A financial asset is defined as any asset that constitutes cash, an equity instrument of another entity, a contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity, a contractual right to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are potentially favorable to the holder, or certain contracts settled in the entity's own equity instruments.^[1] This definition, established under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 32, emphasizes the contractual nature of these assets, distinguishing them from non-financial assets like physical property that lack such monetary claims.^[1] The term "financial asset" emerged in the evolution of accounting standards during the 20th century, with foundational concepts developed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the 1980s through its conceptual framework, particularly Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6 (CON 6) issued in 1985, which outlined elements of financial statements including assets with financial characteristics.^[5] In the 1990s, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), succeeding the International Accounting Standards Committee, formalized the precise definition in IAS 32, originally issued in 1995, to address the growing complexity of financial instruments in global markets.^[6] Legally, financial assets are recognized as intangible property in common law jurisdictions, representing property interests enforceable through contractual and statutory mechanisms; for example, Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in the United States governs investment securities and defines "financial asset," in the context of indirect holding systems, as an interest in securities or similar obligations held in a securities account.^[7] Broader examples under accounting standards include cash, equity instruments like stocks, and contractual rights to future cash flows, such as those from loans or receivables.^[1]

Key Characteristics

Financial assets are primarily defined by their liquidity, which refers to the ease with which they can be converted into cash at or near their fair market value without causing substantial price disruption.^[8] This characteristic distinguishes them from less liquid assets like real estate, enabling holders to access funds promptly in response to financial needs or opportunities.^[9] High liquidity is particularly evident in actively traded markets, where bid-ask spreads remain narrow, supporting efficient price discovery and portfolio management.^[10] A core feature of financial assets is their transferability and negotiability, allowing ownership to be readily passed between parties through standardized processes.^[9] Many are held in dematerialized form via electronic registries, eliminating physical certificates and streamlining transactions; for instance, the Depository Trust Company in the United States, established in 1973, facilitates this for a wide range of securities.^[11] This electronic infrastructure enhances security, reduces costs, and supports global trading by enabling instantaneous book-entry transfers.^[12] Financial assets offer potential for income generation, typically through periodic payments such as interest on debt instruments or dividends from equity holdings, as well as capital gains realized upon sale at a higher value than acquisition.^[13] These returns compensate investors for the opportunity cost of capital and associated risks, with yields varying based on the asset's structure and market conditions.^[14] However, the realization of such income is not guaranteed and depends on the issuer's performance and contractual terms.^[15] These assets exhibit volatility, reflecting fluctuations in their market prices driven by issuer creditworthiness—such as the risk of default—and broader macroeconomic factors like interest rate changes, inflation, and economic growth.^[16] This market dependence can amplify returns but also introduces uncertainty, as external shocks propagate through interconnected financial systems.^[17] In standardized forms like bonds and stocks, fungibility ensures that individual units are interchangeable and equivalent, promoting liquidity and simplifying exchange in secondary markets.

Types

Equity-Based Assets

Equity-based assets represent ownership interests in a business entity, providing holders with a claim on the entity's assets and earnings after all other obligations are met. These assets are primarily issued by corporations to raise capital and are traded in public markets, forming a cornerstone of modern capital allocation. Unlike debt instruments that offer fixed payments, equity-based assets entitle owners to variable returns based on the entity's performance, aligning investor interests with long-term growth. Common stocks, also known as ordinary shares, constitute the foundational form of equity-based assets, granting shareholders residual claims on the company's assets upon liquidation and a pro-rata share of profits through dividends. This structure positions common stockholders at the bottom of the capital hierarchy, meaning they receive distributions only after creditors, bondholders, and preferred stockholders are satisfied. For instance, in a bankruptcy scenario, common stockholders may recover little or nothing, underscoring their high-risk, high-reward profile. The issuance of common stock allows companies to access equity financing without incurring debt, as evidenced by the proliferation of stock offerings in U.S. markets since the early 19th century. Preferred stocks offer a hybrid position between equity and debt, providing fixed dividend payments before common stockholders receive any, while still representing ownership equity. These shares typically lack voting rights but include features such as cumulative dividends, where missed payments accrue and must be paid before common dividends, versus non-cumulative dividends that do not carry over if skipped. Conversion features allow preferred stockholders to exchange their shares for common stock at a predetermined ratio, offering potential upside participation in company growth. Preferred stocks appeal to investors seeking more stability than common shares, often issued by utilities or financial firms to meet regulatory capital needs. The economic implications of equity-based assets include unlimited upside potential through capital appreciation and dividends, but no guaranteed returns, exposing holders to full business risk. This variability incentivizes efficient management, as poor performance directly erodes share value, while success amplifies returns. Voting rights associated with common stock enable participation in corporate governance, such as electing board members or approving major transactions, fostering accountability in publicly traded firms. In contrast to debt assets' fixed claims, equity's residual nature ties investor fortunes to enterprise value creation. A prominent global example is equities listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), which trace their origins to the 1792 Buttonwood Agreement, when 24 brokers formalized trading rules under a buttonwood tree on Wall Street, establishing the framework for organized U.S. capital markets.^[18] Today, NYSE-listed equities, such as those of blue-chip companies like IBM or Coca-Cola, facilitate trillions in annual trading volume, channeling savings into productive investments worldwide. This marketplace has evolved to include electronic trading while retaining its role in democratizing ownership. Hybrid equity instruments, such as warrants and rights offerings, extend ownership opportunities beyond standard shares. Warrants grant the right, but not the obligation, to purchase common stock at a fixed price within a specified period, often issued alongside bonds to sweeten deals for investors. Rights offerings allow existing shareholders to buy additional shares at a discount during capital raises, preserving their proportional ownership and preventing dilution. These tools enhance flexibility in equity financing, commonly used by growth-stage companies to fund expansion without immediate full dilution.

Debt and Fixed-Income Assets

Debt and fixed-income assets represent a category of financial instruments where the issuer promises to make fixed or determinable payments to the holder, typically in the form of periodic interest and repayment of principal at maturity, granting the holder creditor rights superior to equity holders in the event of liquidation.^[19] Bonds and debentures are primary examples, functioning as debt obligations where the issuer commits to repay the principal amount (face value) along with interest payments, known as coupons, at predetermined intervals. Debentures, in particular, are unsecured bonds backed solely by the issuer's general creditworthiness rather than specific collateral. These assets encompass various types tailored to different issuers and purposes. Government securities, such as U.S. Treasury bonds, have been issued since 1790 as part of the federal government's efforts to consolidate Revolutionary War debts, providing low-risk options backed by the full faith and credit of the issuing sovereign.^[20] Corporate bonds are debt securities issued by private and public corporations to finance operations or expansions, often secured by assets like property liens (mortgage bonds) or other financial instruments (collateral trust bonds).^[21] Municipal bonds, or "munis," are issued by states, cities, counties, and other local governmental entities to fund public projects and obligations, frequently offering tax advantages to investors.^[22] A key metric for evaluating these assets is the yield to maturity (YTM), which represents the internal rate of return (IRR) on the bond's expected cash flows, assuming it is held until maturity and coupons are reinvested at the same rate; it accounts for the bond's current market price, coupon payments, and principal repayment.^[23] YTM is calculated as the discount rate that equates the present value of future cash flows to the bond's price, providing a comprehensive measure of total return.^[24] Credit ratings assess the issuer's ability to meet these obligations, with agencies like Moody's employing a scale from Aaa (highest quality, lowest default risk) to C (lowest quality, highest default risk), where higher-rated bonds command lower yields due to reduced default risk premiums demanded by investors.^[25] Convertible bonds introduce a hybrid element, functioning primarily as fixed-income debt with periodic interest payments but including an embedded option allowing the holder to convert the bond into a predetermined number of shares of the issuer's equity at specified times, blending debt security with potential equity upside while classified as debt until conversion occurs.^[2] This feature typically results in lower coupon rates compared to non-convertible bonds, as the conversion privilege compensates investors for the credit risk.^[26]

Derivative Instruments

Derivative instruments are financial contracts whose value is derived from one or more underlying financial assets, such as equities, bonds, or commodities. These instruments allow parties to manage exposure to price fluctuations without necessarily owning the underlying asset. Common types include forwards, futures, options, and swaps, each serving distinct roles in financial markets. Forwards and futures contracts are agreements to buy or sell an asset at a predetermined price on a future date. A forward contract is a customized, over-the-counter agreement between two parties, tailored to specific terms like quantity and delivery date. In contrast, futures contracts are standardized versions traded on organized exchanges, with uniform specifications for contract size, quality, and expiration to facilitate liquidity and reduce counterparty risk. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) pioneered financial futures in 1972 by introducing contracts on currencies, interest rates, and bonds, marking a shift from commodity-focused trading to broader financial applications.^[27]^[28]^[29] Options contracts grant the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an underlying asset at a specified strike price by or on an expiration date. A call option provides the right to buy the asset, while a put option provides the right to sell it. The payoff for a call option at expiration is given by \max(S - K, 0), where S is the spot price of the underlying asset and K is the strike price; for a put, it is \max(K - S, 0). These structures enable asymmetric risk profiles, where the buyer's maximum loss is limited to the premium paid, unlike the potentially unlimited gain.^[30]^[31] Swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange sequences of cash flows over time, typically based on a notional principal amount that is not exchanged. An interest rate swap involves swapping fixed-rate payments for floating-rate ones, or vice versa, to manage interest rate exposure. Currency swaps extend this by exchanging principal and interest payments in different currencies, often to hedge foreign exchange risk or access cheaper funding. The notional principal serves as the basis for calculating payments but remains off-balance-sheet.^[32]^[33] Derivative instruments serve multiple purposes, including hedging to mitigate price risks, speculation to profit from anticipated movements, and arbitrage to exploit pricing inefficiencies across markets. For hedging, an oil producer might sell futures contracts to lock in a sale price, protecting against declines; during the volatile period following the 1973 oil crisis, such contracts helped stabilize revenues amid supply disruptions and price surges. Speculators, conversely, take positions to bet on directional changes, while arbitrageurs ensure price alignment between related markets.^[34]^[35]^[36]^[37] Settlement of derivative contracts occurs either through physical delivery or cash settlement. Physical delivery requires the actual transfer of the underlying asset at expiration, common in commodity futures like oil, ensuring convergence between futures and spot prices. Cash settlement, prevalent in financial derivatives such as stock index futures, involves a monetary payment based on the difference between the contract price and the settlement price, avoiding logistical challenges of delivery.^[38]^[39]

Other Financial Assets

Cash and cash equivalents represent the most liquid forms of financial assets, encompassing physical currency, demand deposits with banks, and short-term investments that can be converted to cash with minimal risk of value change. These equivalents are typically defined as highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less, such as Treasury bills maturing within 90 days, money market funds, and commercial paper. They play a critical role in meeting immediate liquidity needs for individuals and institutions, often included in balance sheet current assets under accounting standards like ASC 230.^[40]^[41] Certificates of deposit (CDs) are time deposits issued by banks or credit unions, offering a fixed interest rate over a predetermined period, usually ranging from a few months to several years, and insured up to specified limits by entities like the FDIC. As short-term instruments, CDs provide depositors with predictable returns and low credit risk due to their backing by the issuing institution, making them suitable for conservative liquidity strategies. Commercial paper, conversely, consists of unsecured promissory notes issued by corporations to finance short-term operational needs, with maturities typically between 1 and 270 days and denominations often exceeding $100,000. These instruments are sold at a discount to face value and redeemed at maturity, appealing to investors seeking higher yields than government securities while maintaining relatively low default risk for high-rated issuers.^[42]^[43]^[44] Structured products, such as asset-backed securities (ABS), pool underlying assets like loans or receivables to create securities with cash flows derived from those assets, offering investors exposure to diversified income streams. A prominent example is mortgage-backed securities (MBS), first introduced by the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) in 1968 to enhance liquidity in the housing market by securitizing federally guaranteed mortgages. These securities, often guaranteed by government agencies, provide regular principal and interest payments backed by the underlying mortgage pool, distinguishing them from traditional debt through their asset-specific collateralization.^[45]^[46] Repurchase agreements (repos) function as short-term collateralized loans, where one party sells securities—typically high-quality government bonds—to another with an agreement to repurchase them at a slightly higher price on a specified future date, often overnight or within days. The difference in price represents implicit interest, and the collateral mitigates counterparty risk, making repos a staple in money markets for managing daily liquidity surpluses or deficits among banks and institutions.^[47]^[48] Collectively, these other financial assets exhibit high liquidity and low risk profiles, enabling efficient liquidity management by allowing quick conversion to cash with minimal price volatility. Some structured products may overlap with hybrid debt characteristics, blending fixed-income features with embedded options. Their primary utility lies in preserving capital while supporting short-term funding and treasury operations across financial systems.^[49]^[50]

Valuation

Fundamental Principles

The valuation of financial assets revolves around the distinction between intrinsic value, which represents the fundamental worth based on an asset's underlying economic characteristics, and market price, which reflects the price at which the asset trades in the marketplace.^[51] Intrinsic value is often estimated through fundamental analysis of expected cash flows, risks, and growth prospects, while market price may deviate due to investor sentiment, liquidity, or information asymmetries. The efficient market hypothesis (EMH), as articulated by Eugene Fama, posits that market prices incorporate available information, leading to three forms of efficiency: weak form, where prices reflect all past market data; semi-strong form, incorporating all publicly available information; and strong form, encompassing even private information.^[51] Under EMH, deviations between intrinsic value and market price should be minimal in efficient markets, though empirical evidence shows varying degrees of efficiency across asset classes.^[51] A core principle for estimating intrinsic value is the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach, which calculates the present value of an asset's expected future cash flows, discounted at a rate reflecting the time value of money and risk.^[52] This method, pioneered in modern form by Joel Dean in capital budgeting contexts, assumes that an asset's value derives from the cash it generates over its life, adjusted for the opportunity cost of capital.^[52] Projections of future cash flows may vary by asset type, such as dividends for equities or interest payments for bonds, but the DCF framework provides a unified theoretical basis for valuation across financial instruments. The foundational concept underpinning DCF is the time value of money, which recognizes that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future due to its potential earning capacity. This is illustrated by the simple interest formula for future value:

A = P(1 + rt)

where A is the amount at maturity, P is the principal, r is the annual interest rate, and t is the time in years.^[53] For initial recognition of financial assets, cost-based valuation is commonly applied, recording the asset at its acquisition cost, which includes the purchase price plus directly attributable transaction costs.^[3] This approach provides an objective starting point, particularly when fair value is not readily determinable, and serves as the basis for subsequent amortization or impairment assessments. In contrast, the market approach to valuation relies on observable prices from comparable transactions, adjusting for differences in size, risk, or market conditions to estimate value.^[54] This method assumes that similar assets in active markets command similar prices, drawing on recent sales data to infer fair value without relying solely on internal cash flow projections.^[55]

Pricing Models and Techniques

The pricing of financial assets relies on quantitative models that account for underlying stochastic processes, market dynamics, and risk factors. For derivative instruments, particularly options, the Black-Scholes model provides a foundational closed-form solution for European-style options, assuming the underlying asset price follows a geometric Brownian motion with lognormal distribution and no dividend payments.^[56] The call option price C is given by

C = S N(d_1) - K e^{-rt} N(d_2),

where S is the current stock price, K is the strike price, r is the risk-free rate, t is time to maturity, N(\cdot) is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution, d_1 = \frac{\ln(S/K) + (r + \sigma^2/2)t}{\sigma \sqrt{t}}, and d_2 = d_1 - \sigma \sqrt{t} with \sigma as volatility.^[56] This model derives the price through a risk-neutral hedging argument, ensuring no-arbitrage conditions.^[56] For American options, which allow early exercise, the binomial option pricing model offers a discrete-time approximation suitable for lattice-based computation.^[57] Developed by Cox, Ross, and Rubinstein, the model constructs a recombining binomial tree where the underlying asset price evolves upward by factor u = e^{\sigma \sqrt{\Delta t}} or downward by d = e^{-\sigma \sqrt{\Delta t}} over each time step \Delta t = t/n, with n steps to maturity.^[57] At the terminal nodes, option values are the intrinsic payoffs (e.g., \max(S_T - K, 0) for calls). Working backward, at each node, the option value is the risk-neutral expected value discounted at the risk-free rate: f = e^{-r \Delta t} [p f_u + (1-p) f_d], where p = \frac{e^{r \Delta t} - d}{u - d} is the risk-neutral probability.^[57] For American options, early exercise is checked by comparing the continuation value to the intrinsic value at each node, selecting the maximum.^[57] As n increases, the binomial model converges to the Black-Scholes solution.^[57] Bond pricing incorporates yield curve modeling to discount future cash flows accurately. The Nelson-Siegel model parametrizes the spot rate curve y(\tau) for maturity \tau as

y(\tau) = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \left( \frac{1 - e^{-\lambda \tau}}{\lambda \tau} \right) + \beta_2 \left( \frac{1 - e^{-\lambda \tau}}{\lambda \tau} - e^{-\lambda \tau} \right),

where \beta_0 is the long-term level, \beta_1 captures the short-term slope, \beta_2 the curvature, and \lambda controls the decay rate.^[58] This parsimonious form fits observed yield curve shapes (monotonic, humped, or inverted) using least-squares estimation on market data.^[58] Once fitted, bond prices are computed as the present value of coupons and principal discounted along the curve. Sensitivity to interest rate changes is quantified via duration and convexity: Macaulay duration measures the weighted average time to cash flows, D = \frac{\sum t PV(CF_t)}{P}, where P is the bond price and PV(CF_t) the present value of cash flow at time t.^[59] Modified duration approximates percentage price change as -D \Delta y / (1 + y), while convexity C = \frac{1}{P} \frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial y^2} captures second-order effects for larger yield shifts, improving approximation accuracy: \Delta P / P \approx -D \Delta y + \frac{1}{2} C (\Delta y)^2.^[59] Path-dependent derivatives, such as Asian or barrier options, require simulation-based pricing due to their non-closed-form nature. Monte Carlo simulations generate numerous paths for the underlying asset under the risk-neutral measure, typically following geometric Brownian motion dS = r S dt + \sigma S dW, discretized via Euler scheme: S_{t+1} = S_t e^{(r - \sigma^2/2) \Delta t + \sigma \sqrt{\Delta t} Z}, with Z \sim N(0,1).^[60] For each path, the payoff is computed based on the path's characteristics (e.g., average price for Asian options), discounted to present value, and averaged across simulations to estimate the price, with variance reduction techniques like antithetic variates enhancing efficiency.^[60] This method excels for high-dimensional or complex payoffs where lattice approaches become computationally infeasible.^[60] Credit risk adjustments to asset pricing, particularly for corporate debt or credit derivatives, employ structural models like the Merton framework, treating equity as a call option on firm assets. In this model, default occurs if asset value V falls below debt face value D at maturity T; the debt value is B = V N(-d_1) + D e^{-rT} N(d_2), adapting Black-Scholes with V as underlying, \sigma_V as asset volatility, yielding a credit spread s = -\frac{1}{T} \ln \left( \frac{B}{D e^{-rT}} \right). Parameters are inferred from equity data, assuming lognormal asset dynamics. This approach quantifies default probability as N(-d_2) and integrates into broader pricing for risky assets.

Accounting Treatment

Under IFRS

Under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), financial assets are recognized when an entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument, as outlined in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.^[3] This standard, which replaced significant portions of IAS 39 effective January 1, 2018, governs the classification, measurement, impairment, derecognition, and hedge accounting for financial assets to ensure they reflect economic reality and provide relevant information to users of financial statements.^[61] Disclosure requirements under IFRS 7 complement these by mandating information on the significance of financial instruments and the nature and extent of risks arising from them. Classification of financial assets under IFRS 9, building on IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation, depends on both the entity's business model for managing the assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the instrument.^[62] Assets are categorized into three main groups: amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), or fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL).^[63] For classification at amortized cost or FVOCI, the asset must pass the solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI) test, meaning its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.^[61] The business model test assesses whether the asset is held to collect contractual cash flows (amortized cost), held both to collect cash flows and for sale (FVOCI), or managed on a fair value basis (FVTPL). Equity instruments not held for trading may be irrevocably elected for FVOCI at initial recognition, with no recycling of gains or losses to profit or loss upon derecognition. Measurement follows the classification: financial assets at amortized cost are measured using the effective interest method, reflecting the initial amount less principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortization of any difference between the initial and maturity amounts, and adjusted for impairment.^[61] FVOCI debt instruments are measured at fair value, with interest income, expected credit losses, and foreign exchange gains or losses recognized in profit or loss, while other fair value changes accumulate in other comprehensive income.^[62] FVTPL assets, including most derivatives and those failing the SPPI or business model tests, are measured at fair value with changes recognized in profit or loss, unless designated to avoid accounting mismatches.^[63] Impairment of financial assets under IFRS 9 employs a forward-looking expected credit loss (ECL) model, replacing the incurred loss model of IAS 39, to recognize credit losses earlier.^[64] The model operates in three stages based on changes in credit risk since initial recognition: Stage 1 applies 12-month ECL to performing assets where credit risk has not increased significantly, representing expected losses from default events possible within 12 months; Stage 2 shifts to lifetime ECL for assets with significant credit deterioration but no objective evidence of impairment; and Stage 3 uses lifetime ECL for credit-impaired assets, with interest revenue based on the net carrying amount.^[65] ECL calculations incorporate forward-looking information, such as macroeconomic factors, and apply to amortized cost and FVOCI debt instruments, as well as certain loan commitments and financial guarantees. Derecognition of financial assets occurs when the contractual rights to cash flows expire or are transferred, with the entity evaluating if it has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.^[61] If substantially all risks and rewards are transferred, the asset is derecognized and any difference between carrying amount and consideration received is recognized in profit or loss; if retained, the asset remains on the balance sheet with continuing involvement recognized.^[66] In cases neither substantially transferred nor retained, derecognition depends on whether control—defined as the ability to unilaterally sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party—has passed to the transferee. Hedge accounting under IFRS 9 aligns more closely with risk management practices by simplifying effectiveness testing compared to IAS 39. To qualify, a hedging relationship must meet criteria including an economic relationship between the hedged item and hedging instrument, where the effect of credit risk does not dominate value changes, and no ineffective portion is recognized in profit or loss if the hedge is highly effective. Prospective assessment of effectiveness is required at inception and ongoing, using methods like dollar-offset or regression analysis, but without the strict 80-125% retrospective threshold of prior standards; instead, it focuses on whether the hedge ratio reflects the entity's risk management strategy.^[67] Types include fair value hedges (changes in fair value of hedged items recognized in profit or loss), cash flow hedges (effective portion in other comprehensive income), and net investment hedges.^[61] In response to the 2008 financial crisis, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued amendments to IAS 39 on October 13, 2008, permitting rare reclassifications of non-derivative financial assets out of the fair value through profit or loss category to other categories if they met specific criteria, such as no longer being held for sale, to mitigate procyclical effects and excessive volatility in reported earnings.^[68] These changes, effective July 1, 2008, emphasized maintaining fair value principles while providing flexibility during market disruptions, paving the way for the broader reforms in IFRS 9 that reinforced fair value measurement for most financial assets to enhance transparency.^[69] In May 2024, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 on classification and measurement, effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026, which clarify the application of the SPPI test to financial assets with terms that could change the timing or amount of contractual cash flows, such as those involving electronic payment systems, and enhance related disclosures.^[3]

Under US GAAP

Under US GAAP, financial assets are accounted for primarily under the Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), with key guidance in Topics 320, 326, 820, and 810. These standards emphasize classification based on management intent and business strategy, measurement at fair value or amortized cost, impairment assessments, and consolidation criteria for certain entities.^[70]^[71]^[72]^[73] ASC 320, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities, requires entities to classify debt securities and certain equity securities into one of three categories: trading, available-for-sale (AFS), or held-to-maturity (HTM). Trading securities, intended to be sold in the near term or actively managed for short-term profit, are measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings. AFS securities, not classified as trading or HTM, are also measured at fair value, but unrealized gains and losses are reported in other comprehensive income until realized. HTM securities, those with positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, are measured at amortized cost, provided they are not impaired.^[70] Equity securities without readily determinable fair values may elect the measurement alternative under ASC 321, but those with quoted prices follow fair value accounting similar to trading securities.^[74] For impairment, ASC 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, introduced the current expected credit losses (CECL) model in Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Under CECL, entities must estimate and recognize lifetime expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost, such as loans, HTM debt securities, and certain off-balance-sheet exposures, using relevant information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts. This forward-looking approach replaces the prior incurred loss model, requiring an allowance for credit losses to be deducted from the asset's amortized cost basis on the balance sheet, with provisions recorded in earnings. For AFS debt securities, credit losses are recognized through an allowance rather than direct write-downs, while noncredit losses remain in other comprehensive income.^[71]^[75] Recent amendments include ASU 2025-05 (July 2025), which provides a practical expedient allowing entities to estimate credit losses for certain accounts receivable and contract assets using historical loss rates adjusted for current conditions and forecasts, without considering future customer-specific changes if the receivable is short-term, effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025; and ASU 2025-08 (November 2025), which introduces specific guidance for accounting purchased seasoned loans under CECL by permitting the use of the seller's historical credit loss experience, effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026.^[76]^[77] Fair value measurements, when required under ASC 320 or other topics, follow ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, which establishes a three-level hierarchy to prioritize inputs. Level 1 inputs use unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, such as exchange-traded stocks. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, or other observable data like interest rates. Level 3 inputs rely on unobservable data, such as entity-specific assumptions for illiquid assets, and require enhanced disclosures about valuation techniques and sensitivity. This hierarchy ensures consistency and transparency in fair value reporting across financial statements.^[72] Consolidation of financial assets involving variable interest entities (VIEs) is governed by ASC 810, Consolidation. An entity must consolidate a VIE if it is the primary beneficiary, determined by having both the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE. This guidance, updated in ASU 2015-02, applies to interests in entities like securitization vehicles or joint ventures where voting rights are not substantive. Financial assets within consolidated VIEs are reported on the balance sheet, with disclosures about risks and restrictions.^[78] Following the 2008 financial crisis, the FASB issued several updates to enhance transparency and partially align US GAAP with international standards, including Statement 166 (transfers of financial assets) and Statement 167 (VIE amendments, now in ASC 810), effective in 2009 and 2010, respectively, which improved off-balance-sheet disclosures and consolidation requirements. ASU 2016-01 simplified equity investments by eliminating the AFS category for non-derivative equities, requiring fair value through earnings, while ASU 2016-13's CECL addressed forward-looking impairments, though US GAAP retains distinct classification criteria compared to IFRS's business model and cash flow tests.^[79]^[73]^[80]

Risks and Regulation

Primary Risks

Financial assets are exposed to a range of inherent risks that can erode their value or lead to significant losses for investors and institutions. These primary risks arise from market dynamics, counterparty behavior, liquidity constraints, operational failures, and broader systemic interconnections, each capable of amplifying vulnerabilities across asset classes such as equities, bonds, and derivatives. Understanding these risks is essential for assessing the stability and reliability of financial portfolios. Market risk refers to the potential for losses due to adverse changes in market prices, including fluctuations in interest rates, equity prices, foreign exchange rates, and commodity prices. For instance, interest rate risk affects fixed-income securities like bonds, where rising rates inversely impact bond prices, as evidenced by the sharp yield increases in 2022 that led to widespread declines in bond values. Equity market risk is highlighted by events like the 1987 Black Monday crash, where the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted 22.6% in a single day due to program trading and portfolio insurance strategies exacerbating volatility. This risk is quantified through measures like Value at Risk (VaR), which estimates potential losses over a given time horizon at a specific confidence level. Credit risk encompasses the possibility that a borrower or counterparty fails to meet their contractual obligations, resulting in default and financial loss. It is commonly assessed using metrics such as the probability of default (PD), which estimates the likelihood of a borrower defaulting within a specified period, and loss given default (LGD), which measures the portion of exposure that cannot be recovered post-default. For example, in corporate bonds, credit risk materializes when issuers like energy firms face downgrades during commodity price slumps, as seen in the 2014-2016 oil price collapse affecting high-yield debt. Regulatory frameworks like Basel III emphasize these metrics to ensure banks hold adequate capital against credit exposures in assets like loans and securities. Liquidity risk arises when an asset cannot be sold or converted to cash quickly without incurring a substantial price concession, particularly during periods of market stress. This risk is pronounced in less traded assets, such as certain mortgage-backed securities, where bid-ask spreads widen dramatically. The 2008 subprime mortgage crisis exemplified this, as liquidity dried up in asset-backed markets, forcing institutions like Lehman Brothers to accept fire-sale prices or default, with the ABX index for subprime securities dropping over 80% in months. Illiquid markets can cascade into broader disruptions, underscoring how asset-specific traits like complexity can heighten this vulnerability. Operational risk involves losses stemming from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems, or external events that disrupt the handling of financial assets. This includes errors in trade execution, IT system failures, or fraud, often measured by frameworks that categorize impacts on capital reserves. A notable case is the January 2021 outage at Robinhood, where a surge in trading volume during the GameStop frenzy overwhelmed the platform, preventing users from accessing accounts and leading to regulatory scrutiny and lawsuits. Such incidents highlight how technological dependencies in modern trading can expose assets to non-market disruptions. Systemic risk describes the potential for distress in one financial institution or market to propagate through interconnections, threatening the stability of the entire financial system. It often manifests as contagion, where failures in key assets or entities trigger chain reactions, as observed in the 2008 crisis when the collapse of Lehman Brothers' holdings in mortgage-related assets led to global credit freezes and equity market routs. This risk is amplified by leverage and derivatives exposures, with bodies like the Financial Stability Board monitoring indicators such as interconnectedness metrics to gauge systemic threats.

Regulatory Frameworks

Regulatory frameworks for financial assets encompass international and national standards designed to promote market stability, transparency, and investor protection by addressing risks such as credit exposure, market volatility, and systemic threats.^[81] These frameworks establish prudential requirements, disclosure obligations, and oversight mechanisms to mitigate the inherent risks in holding and trading financial assets, ensuring that institutions maintain adequate safeguards against potential failures.^[82] The Basel III accords, introduced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2010, represent a cornerstone of global banking regulation by enhancing capital adequacy standards in response to the 2007-2009 financial crisis.^[83] Specifically, Basel III mandates minimum capital requirements calculated against risk-weighted assets (RWAs), including a 4.5% Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio, a 6% Tier 1 capital ratio, and an 8% total capital ratio, with additional buffers to absorb losses on riskier assets like derivatives and securitizations.^[83] These risk weights assign higher capital charges to assets with greater credit, market, and operational risks, thereby compelling banks to hold more resilient capital buffers for financial assets.^[81] In the United States, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 introduced sweeping reforms to oversee derivatives and curb excessive risk-taking by financial institutions.^[84] Key provisions include requirements for centralized clearing and transparent trading of over-the-counter derivatives through registered clearinghouses and swap execution facilities, reducing counterparty risks in these financial assets.^[84] The Act's Volcker Rule, implemented under Section 619, prohibits banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading of certain financial instruments and limits their investments in hedge funds or private equity funds, aiming to separate commercial banking from high-risk speculative activities.^[85] The European Union's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), effective from January 2018, builds on earlier directives to foster greater transparency and integrity in trading financial assets across EU member states.^[86] It imposes pre- and post-trade transparency obligations on trading venues, such as multilateral trading facilities and organized trading platforms, requiring real-time reporting of quotes and transactions for shares, bonds, and derivatives to prevent market abuse.^[86] MiFID II also strengthens investor safeguards through enhanced product governance rules, ensuring that financial instruments are suitable for clients and by mandating independent investment advice where conflicts of interest may arise.^[86] U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations, including Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) adopted in August 2000, promote equitable access to material information about publicly traded financial assets.^[87] Reg FD requires issuers to disclose any material nonpublic information simultaneously to all investors via public channels, such as press releases or SEC filings, rather than selectively to analysts or select groups, thereby leveling the playing field and curbing insider trading advantages.^[87] The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has provided foundational global principles for securities regulation since the 1990s, with its core Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation first comprehensively outlined in 1998 and revised in subsequent years.^[82] These 38 principles, grouped into categories like self-regulation, licensing, and market intermediation, emphasize three primary objectives: protecting investors from misleading practices, ensuring markets are fair, efficient, and transparent, and reducing systemic risk through robust oversight of financial assets trading.^[82] IOSCO principles guide national regulators in implementing consistent standards for disclosure, inspection, and enforcement related to securities and derivatives.^[88]

References

[1]
[PDF] IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation | IFRS Foundation
The contractual right of the holder and obligation of the writer meet the definition of a financial asset and a financial liability, respectively. The financial ...
[2]
[PDF] Chapter 4. Classification of Financial Assets and Liabilities
DEFINITION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES. 4.5. Financial assets are economic assets1 that are financial instruments. Financial assets consist of claims ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 specifies how an entity should classify and measure financial assets, financial liabilities, and some contracts to buy or sell non-financial items.
[4]
Financial assets | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
Financial assets include bank loans, direct investments, and official private holdings of debt and equity securities and other instruments.Missing: authoritative sources
[5]
https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?pageId=/reference-library/superseded-standards/summary-of-statement-no-6.html
[6]
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation - IFRS Foundation
For presentation, financial instruments are classified into financial assets, financial liabilities and equity instruments. Differentiation between a financial ...
[7]
Financial Asset Definition and Liquid vs. Illiquid Types - Investopedia
A financial asset is a liquid asset that gets its value from a contractual right or ownership claim. Cash, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and bank deposits ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[8]
4. Classification of Financial Assets and Liabilities in - IMF eLibrary
This chapter describes the principal characteristics of financial assets and liabilities, and their classification by type of financial instrument
[9]
[PDF] Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring ...
As outlined by these characteristics, the test of whether liquid assets are of “high quality” is that, by way of sale or repo, their liquidity-generating ...
[10]
1970s - DTCC
In the 1970s, the DTC was created, the Institutional Delivery (ID) System was introduced, and the Continuous Net Settlement system was launched.
[11]
[PDF] CPSS Publications - The Depository Trust Company
The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a securities depository and provides settlement services, acting as a custodian of securities.
[12]
Capital Gains vs. Investment Income: Key Differences Explained
Key Takeaways · Capital gains occur when an investment is sold for more than its purchase price, while investment income includes dividends and interest.
[13]
Topic no. 409, Capital gains and losses | Internal Revenue Service
Sep 12, 2025 · Capital gains/losses occur when selling assets. A gain is when selling for more than the adjusted basis, and a loss when selling for less. ...Missing: financial | Show results with:financial
[14]
Investment Income taxes | Schwab
Most investment income is taxable, including capital gains, dividends, and interest. Tax rates vary based on tax bracket, investment type, and holding period. ...
[15]
[PDF] Chapter 3: Financial Asset Price Volatility: A Source of Instability?
Financial asset price volatility, while reflecting risk, can cause instability, especially with sudden increases, though it doesn't always imply instability.
[16]
[PDF] Macroeconomic and Financial Risks: A Tale of Mean and Volatility
Aug 18, 2021 · This paper studies the joint distribution of GDP growth and credit spreads, finding cyclical co-movement in uncertainty and risk driven by two ...
[17]
Municipal Bonds | Investor.gov
Municipal bonds (or “munis” for short) are debt securities issued by states, cities, counties and other governmental entities to fund day-to-day obligations.
[18]
Alexander Hamilton (1789-1795) | U.S. Department of the Treasury
He introduced plans for the First Bank of the United States, established in 1791 which was designed to be the financial agent of the Treasury Department. The ...
[19]
Bonds - FAQs | Investor.gov
What types of bonds are there? · 1. Corporate bonds are debt securities issued by private and public corporations. · 2. Municipal bonds, called “munis,” are debt ...Corporate Bonds · Municipal Bonds · High-yield Corporate Bonds · Savings Bonds
[20]
What are Municipal Bonds - SEC.gov
Jun 5, 2024 · Municipal bonds (or “munis” for short) are debt securities issued by states, cities, counties and other governmental entities to fund day-to-day obligations.
[21]
[PDF] Yield to Maturity - NYU Stern
Compare the two formulas for the 1.5-year. 8.5%-coupon bond: The yield of 5.4704% is a kind of average of the discount rates 5.54%, 5.45%, and. 5.47%.
[22]
[PDF] Chapter 6: Valuing Bonds
1) Yield to maturity = special name of internal rate of return (IRR) on a bond. => discount rate that sets present value of promised bond payments equal to.
[23]
[PDF] Chapter 13. The Bond Market 1. Bond Basics 1.1.The Indenture 1.2 ...
annually. Yield to maturity: Considered the current income as well as ... The lowest yields are paid by bonds with the highest credit ratings, such as ...
[24]
[PDF] An Analysis of Convertible Bond Issuance: Design Features, Market ...
Convertible bonds are a hybrid security with debt and equity attributes. These securities contain a conversion provision which allows the owner to convert the ...
[25]
Chicago Mercantile Exchange: Overview, History & How It's Regulated
Sep 26, 2025 · In 1969, it added financial futures and currency contracts, followed by the first interest rate, bond, and futures contracts in 1972.1. The ...
[26]
[PDF] Futures Markets: Economic - Scott Irwin
Futures contracts are standardized forward contracts, and futures markets are the organized trading of those contracts. All corn futures contracts, for ...
[27]
Event Contracts Are a Step Too Far for Derivatives Regulation
These standardized contracts came to be called “futures,” as distinct from the tailored bilateral agreements for future delivery of an asset referred to as “ ...
[28]
[PDF] Chapter 2 - An Introduction to Forwards and Options
This chapter introduces forwards and options. Long forward payoff is spot price minus forward price. Call option payoff is max[0, spot price - strike price]. ...
[29]
Put Option: What It Is, How It Works, and How To Trade - Investopedia
The price for selling the asset is called the strike price, and the deadline for selling it is called the expiration date. Put options only have value if the ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
[30]
Understanding Interest Rate Swaps: Types and Real-World Example
An interest rate swap involves exchanging one stream of future interest payments for another using a specified principal amount. The most common types of ...What Is an Interest Rate Swap? · Types · Example
[31]
Currency Swap Basics - Investopedia
A currency swap involves two parties that exchange a notional principal with one another in order to gain exposure to a desired currency.Setting up the Currency Swap · Advantages of the Currency...
[32]
[PDF] DERIVATIVES - Bauer College of Business
Hedgers use derivatives to reduce risk exposure. For instance, a refiner can lock in costs and revenues (i.e., lock in.
[33]
[PDF] Mathematics of Finance - UCSD Math
There are two main uses of derivatives, namely, speculation and hedging. For example, the buyer of a call option on a stock is leveraging his/her investment.
[34]
[PDF] Introduction
Hedging, Speculation, and Arbitrage. ○ Hedge funds trade derivatives for all ... derivatives for hedging or arbitrage, but then switches to speculation ...
[35]
[PDF] who is in the oil futures market
Aug 26, 2009 · For example, an oil producer can hedge against declines in oil price by selling oil futures contracts (taking a short position) on the exchange ...
[36]
What Is Physical Delivery? Definition and How It Works in Trading
Derivatives contracts are either cash-settled or physically delivered on the expiry date of the contract. When a contract is cash-settled, the net cash position ...
[37]
Understanding Cash Settlement: Methods, Benefits, and Real-World ...
Learn about cash settlements in futures and options contracts, how they simplify trades by avoiding physical delivery, and their advantages for liquidity ...
[38]
6.5 Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash - PwC Viewpoint
Mar 10, 2024 · Items commonly considered cash equivalents include short-term treasury bills, commercial paper, and money market funds. Although what ...
[39]
4.1 Definition of Cash and Cash Equivalents - DART – Deloitte
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that have both of the following characteristics.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[40]
Certificates of deposit (CDs) | Fixed income investment | Fidelity
Certificates of deposit, or CDs, are fixed income investments that generally pay a set rate of interest over a fixed time period. Learn more here.Why Buy Bonds & CDs at Fidelity · CD Ladders · Structured Products
[41]
Commercial Paper: Definition, Advantages, and Example
Commercial paper is an unsecured, short-term debt instrument issued by corporations that need to raise capital for short-term needs.What Is Commercial Paper? · Understanding Commercial... · Terms · Buyers
[42]
Commercial paper markets: a survey
Introduction. Commercial paper is a type of fixed-maturity unsecured short-term negotiable debt issued generally in bearer form and primarily by non-banks.
[43]
Our History - Ginnie Mae
Mar 14, 2021 · To combat this, in 1970, Ginnie Mae developed the very first mortgage-backed security (MBS), which allowed for many loans to be pooled and ...
[44]
[PDF] The Origins and Evolution of the Market for Mortgage-Backed ...
Aug 19, 2011 · The first mortgage-backed security (MBS) was issued in 1968. Thereafter, the MBS market grew rapidly with outstanding issu- ances exceeding ...
[45]
Repo and Reverse Repo Agreements
Each repo transaction is economically similar to a loan collateralized by securities, and temporarily increases the supply of reserve balances in the banking ...
[46]
Repurchase Agreements Explained: Benefits, Examples, and ...
A repurchase agreement is a contract to sell securities, usually government bonds, and repurchase them back shortly after at a slightly higher price.Example · Types · Near and Far Legs in Repo... · Why the Repo Rate Is Important
[47]
LCR30 - High-quality liquid assets - Bank for International Settlements
Jun 5, 2020 · Fundamental characteristics Low risk: assets that are less risky tend to have higher liquidity. High credit standing of the issuer and a low ...
[48]
Market Liquidity: Definitions and Implications - Federal Reserve Board
Mar 5, 2007 · An asset's liquidity is defined by its ability to be transformed into another asset without loss of value.
[49]
Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work
EUGENE F. FAMA**. I. INTRODUCTION. THE PRIMARY ROLE ... is called "efficient." This paper reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on the efficient.
[50]
[PDF] The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method Applied to Valuation
Joel Dean introduced the DCF approach as the right tool for valuing financial assets, also ... valuation approach to other financial assets. Upon further ...Missing: principle citation
[51]
7.2 Time Value of Money (TVM) Basics - Principles of Finance
Mar 24, 2022 · In this formula, the number of times we multiply by ( 1 + r ) ( 1 + r ) depends entirely on the number of years the money will remain in the ...
[52]
4.4 Valuation approaches, techniques, and methods
The three main valuation approaches are the market, income, and cost approaches. Techniques include mark-to-cost, mark-to-market, and mark-to-model.
[53]
[PDF] Market Approach or Comparables - Cornerstone Research
The key to implementing the comparables approach is to identify similar assets with observable values, and use an appropriate valuation ratio and control for ...
[54]
[PDF] Fischer Black and Myron Scholes Source: The Journal of Political Eco
Author(s): Fischer Black and Myron Scholes. Source: The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1973), pp. 637-654. Published by: The ...Missing: citation | Show results with:citation
[55]
[PDF] Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach† - Unisalento
This paper presents a simple discrete-time model for valuing options. The fundamental economic principles of option pricing by arbitrage methods are ...
[56]
Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curves - jstor
paper introduces a parametrically par- simonious model for yield curves that has the ability to represent the shapes generally associated with yield curves: ...
[57]
[PDF] The ABCs of Modified Bond Duration and WXYZs of Bond Convexity
Macaulay Duration (Macaulay, 1938) and Modified Duration are the standard measures of an option-free bond's sensitivity to a change in its yield-to-maturity.<|control11|><|separator|>
[58]
[PDF] options: a monte carlo approach - Ressources actuarielles
This paper develops a Monte Carlo simulation method for solving option valuation problems. The method simulates the process generating the returns on the ...
[59]
https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=finance-faculty-publications
[60]
Classification of Financial Assets & Liabilities (IFRS 9)
Jan 6, 2025 · Categories of financial assets and financial liabilities, entity's business model, SPPI test, and more about IFRS 9 classification criteria.
[61]
[PDF] Classification of financial instruments under IFRS 9 - EY
May 9, 2015 · IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (IFRS 9 or the Standard) introduces a new classification model for financial assets that is more principles-based.
[62]
[PDF] IFRS 9 and expected loss provisioning - Executive Summary
Stage 1 – When a loan is originated or purchased, ECLs resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months are recognised (12-month ECL) ...
[63]
Impairment of Financial Assets (IFRS 9)
Jun 20, 2025 · Incorporating the expected proceeds from recovery sales into the ECL measurement is appropriate for assets in all three stages of the ECL model.General approach · Measurement of expected... · Impact of expected credit...<|control11|><|separator|>
[64]
Derecognition of Financial Assets (IFRS 9)
Feb 7, 2024 · Derecognition of financial assets under IFRS 9, transfers of all risks and rewards, pass through transfers and other points.
[65]
Hedge Accounting (IFRS 9)
Jun 21, 2025 · IFRS 9 references the 'hypothetical derivative' method as a potential way to measure hedge effectiveness in more complex situations.Qualifying criteria for hedge... · Hedge effectiveness · Fair value hedges<|control11|><|separator|>
[66]
Reclassification of Financial Assets (Amendments to IAS 39 ... - IFRS
The amendments to IAS 39, effective 1 July 2008, allow reclassifications for IFRS companies, previously rare under GAAP, to reduce differences between IFRSs ...
[67]
IAS 39/IFRS 7 – Reclassification of financial assets - IAS Plus
The IASB issued Reclassification of Financial Assets (Amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 7) on 13 October 2008. Following the issue of the amendments, constituents ...
[68]
Summary of Statement No. 115 - FASB
Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity securities or trading securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and ...Missing: 320 assets<|separator|>
[69]
UPDATE 2016-13—FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS—CREDIT LOSSES ...
UPDATE 2016-13—FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS—CREDIT LOSSES (TOPIC 326): MEASUREMENT OF CREDIT LOSSES ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS.Missing: assets | Show results with:assets<|separator|>
[70]
Summary of Statement No. 157 - FASB
This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures ...
[71]
Summary of Statement No. 167 - FASB
This Statement amends Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise's variable interest or interests ...Missing: GAAP | Show results with:GAAP
[72]
https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?pageId=/reference-library/superseded-standards/summary-of-statement-no-157.html&bcpath=tff
[73]
FASB Issues New Guidance on Accounting for Credit Losses
Jun 16, 2016 · The ASU requires an organization to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical ...
[74]
https://www.fasb.org/page/document?pdf=ASU%25202020-01%252C0.pdf&title=Investments%25E2%2580%94Equity%2520Securities%2520%28Topic%2520321%29%252C%2520Investments%25E2%2580%94Equity%2520Securities%2520%28Topic%2520321%29%252C%2520and%2520Derivatives%2520and%2520Hedging%2520%28Topic%2520815%29:%2520Clarifications%2520to%2520the%2520Interactions%2520between%2520Topic%2520321%252C%2520Investments%25E2%2580%94Equity%2520Securities%252C%2520and%2520Topic%2520820%252C%2520Fair%2520Value%2520Measurement
[75]
Summary of Statement No. 166 - FASB
This Statement is designed to provide a short-term solution to address inconsistencies in practice in the context of the existing concepts in Statement 140.Missing: GAAP | Show results with:GAAP
[76]
Accounting Standards Updates Issued - FASB
Update 2016-01—Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Issued In 2015.
[77]
Basel III: international regulatory framework for banks
Basel III is an internationally agreed set of measures developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in response to the financial crisis of 2007-09.Missing: weights | Show results with:weights
[78]
[PDF] IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation
The protection of investors;2. • Ensuring that markets are fair, efficient and transparent;. • The reduction of systemic risk. The 30 principles need to be ...
[79]
[PDF] Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and ...
Dec 1, 2010 · minimum requirements in relation to risk-weighted assets (RWAs):. –. 3.5% Common Equity Tier 1/RWAs;. –. 4.5% Tier 1 capital/RWAs, and. –. 8.0 ...
[80]
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
It requires more transparent trading and clearing of derivatives and, through the so-called "Volcker Rule," prohibits insured depository institutions, like ...
[81]
Volcker Rule - Federal Reserve Board
The Volcker rule generally prohibits banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading or investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private equity funds.Missing: 2010 derivatives
[82]
Better regulated and transparent financial markets | EUR-Lex
The directive creates a new legal framework that better regulates investment and trading activities on financial markets and enhances investor protection. KEY ...
[83]
Final Rule: Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading - SEC.gov
This regulation will place all analysts on equal footing with respect to competition for access to material information. Thus, it will allow analysts to ...Missing: equitable | Show results with:equitable
[84]
IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation and the ...
The IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation sets out 38 Principles of securities regulation, which are based upon three Objectives of ...