Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Flaming Creatures

Flaming Creatures is a 43-minute directed, produced, written, photographed, and edited by , released in 1963 and featuring non-professional performers in enacting loosely connected vignettes of humor, eroticism, simulated sexual acts, and violence in a low-tech, rooftop studio setting evoking a . Shot on outdated on the roof of the Windsor Theatre in , the film eschews conventional narrative in favor of tableaux inspired by B-movies and , with performers applying makeup, dancing wildly, and simulating orgiastic scenes amid makeshift effects like an earthquake sequence. Smith described it as a "comedy set in a movie studio," emphasizing its playful disruption of norms through ambiguously sexed "creatures" rather than fixed identities. Premiering on April 29, 1963, at the Cinema in , Flaming Creatures quickly drew police seizure and charges against distributor , who was arrested in March 1964 for screening it, leading to bans in 22 U.S. states and several countries due to its and pseudo-sexual activity. The controversy escalated into a landmark battle, involving congressional hearings and considerations, while defenders like Mekas and hailed it as a liberating on repressive norms, though Smith himself resented how the focus overshadowed its comedic intent, noting that early audiences laughed throughout until critical framing imposed a solemn "sex thing" interpretation. Despite—or because of—such suppression, the film became a cornerstone of underground cinema, influencing explorations of bodily freedom and cinematic anarchy, with its raw, collage-like style using scratchy soundtracks and odd-angle shots challenging Hollywood's polished aesthetics.

Production

Pre-production and Conceptual Origins

Jack developed the concept for Flaming Creatures during 1961 and 1962, building on his earlier work in and within New York's scene. His vision stemmed from a deep fascination with camp aesthetics, , and B-movie exotica, particularly the films of actress , whom he idolized as a muse for artificial glamour and theatrical excess. Smith rejected mainstream cinematic norms, favoring chaotic, improvisational creativity that he associated with a "theater of the ridiculous," emphasizing and rejection of scripted . The project originated as part of Smith's larger, unfinished epic Normal Love, intended as a sprawling fantasy rather than a conventional , with Flaming Creatures emerging as its initial, self-contained segment. Lacking a formal script, preparations centered on loose scenarios derived from Smith's personal obsessions and ad-hoc gatherings, prioritizing spontaneous performer interactions over plotted narrative. Financing was rudimentary and informal, sourced from contributions by friends in the community and scavenged resources, including outdated 16mm obtained illicitly from discount suppliers to minimize costs. assembled a cast of non-professional performers recruited from New York's bohemian and underground circles, including figures like Mario Montez, who embodied 's ideal of drag-infused, gender-fluid personas inspired by archetypes. This approach underscored the film's low-budget, anti-commercial ethos, driven by 's singular artistic imperative rather than institutional support or profit motives.

Filming and Technical Execution

Flaming Creatures was filmed primarily on the roof of the Theater at in , with additional scenes possibly in the adjacent loft rented by performer Dick Preston, during the summer and autumn of over approximately eight weekend afternoons. The production operated on an extremely low budget, relying on scavenged props, costumes assembled from thrift stores and personal wardrobes, and no formal permits or professional crew, which allowed for unscripted improvisation amid the performers' , attire, and simulated sexual activities. Technical execution emphasized minimalism due to resource constraints: employed a borrowed 16mm camera, often in static or fixed positions from elevated or close-range angles, capturing footage on out-of-date stock that produced a characteristic hazy, overexposed quality from inconsistent exposure and natural rooftop lighting without artificial supplements. No synchronized sound was recorded on set; audio elements, including music and effects, were added in by collaborators such as . Smith's directive approach prioritized spontaneity, instructing performers to enact loosely conceived vignettes—such as orgiastic gatherings and hallucinatory tableaux—without rehearsals, yielding a low shooting ratio with only about 15 minutes of outtakes from the final 43-minute runtime. These limitations, including the absence of during and reliance on ambient conditions, underscored the film's raw, documentary-like immediacy while exposing it to practical challenges like variable weather and urban interruptions.

Post-production and Editing

Jack Smith personally edited Flaming Creatures in 1963, employing basic hand-splicing techniques on scavenged, outdated film stocks that contributed to the film's characteristic murky, low-contrast visuals. This process yielded a non-linear, episodic structure comprising loosely connected vignettes, prioritizing experimental montage over conventional narrative progression to evoke a dreamlike quality. The final assembly resulted in a 43-minute with sound integrated directly onto the film, incorporating elements such as performative audio and appropriated snippets, including a reference to an earthquake sequence from the 1944 film Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves. Editing faced challenges from incomplete and degraded footage, stemming from Smith's use of pilfered expired , which limited options for refinement. Smith's aversion to finalizing the work led to ongoing modifications, with the filmmaker reportedly re-splicing reels during projections to adjust sequences on the spot, producing variant versions screened in live settings. This iterative approach reflected a commitment to fluid, performance-like cinema rather than a fixed product, diverging from standard practices.

Content and Form

Narrative Structure and Lack Thereof

Flaming Creatures eschews conventional narrative progression, instead comprising a series of loosely connected vignettes devoid of plot , character arcs, or resolution. The 43-minute unfolds through visual accumulation of improvised gestures, dances, and simulated sexual acts performed by an ensemble of ambiguous "creatures," without reliance on dialogue or synchronized audio to advance any storyline. This structure resists linear summarization, emphasizing discontinuous episodes over coherent storytelling. The film opens with performers gazing directly into the camera, establishing a confrontational that initiates the action without contextual setup. This leads into an early sequence depicting a simulated on figures by multiple participants, framed as a mock-rape that lacks punitive or dramatic consequence. Subsequent vignettes escalate into collective disorder, including a drug-fueled where bodies entwine in ecstatic abandon, culminating in an simulation marked by shaking camera movements and performers collapsing amid feigned seismic . Later segments feature isolated showcases, such as lip-sync performances and of commercial tropes like a heart-shaped advertisement, further underscoring the film's fragmentary, non-sequential nature. These events occur without interconnecting logic, affirming the work's experimental rejection of conventions.

Themes, Imagery, and Aesthetic Approach

Flaming Creatures employs a camp aesthetic heavily influenced by 1940s B-movies, particularly the exotic melodramas starring , manifesting in flamboyant drag excess and gender ambiguity through performers adorned in layered fabrics, heavy makeup, and ambiguous bodily presentations arranged in static tableaux. This approach privileges sensory indulgence over coherent storytelling, drawing from and glamour to evoke a dreamlike fusion of and theatrical artifice. Recurrent imagery centers on and hedonistic , featuring draped white fabrics, feathery floral arrangements, close-ups of fluttering eyes, lips, tangled limbs, and exposed genitalia amid vignettes of revelry that blend humor, violence, and polymorphous sensuality without moral or narrative closure. Settings evoke exotic opulence akin to Arabian Nights fantasies, transitioning into sequences of erotic disarray and simulated riots or earthquakes that underscore raw, unrestrained expression. These motifs reject in favor of a delirious celebration of fluidity in identity and desire, prioritizing visual rhythm and symbolic excess. Technically, the film utilizes grainy 16mm stock, captured with odd angles and close-range shots to heighten intimacy and distortion, while slow-motion effects—derived from overcranked filming—lend a mannered, sensual languor to movements. adopts a collage-like structure, assembling disjointed vignettes and spontaneous cuts to foster a state of aesthetic rather than linear progression, reinforced by a soundtrack that amplifies the anarchic, low-tech immediacy. This DIY methodology, with homemade effects and crumbling sets, underscores the film's commitment to unpolished, hedonistic vitality over polished convention.

Cast and Performers

Flaming Creatures featured an ensemble of non-professional performers drawn from New York's underground bohemian and experimental art circles, selected for their ability to embody Smith's concept of amorphous, gender-blending "creatures" in a setting of collective improvisation rather than scripted roles. These individuals, often weekend participants avoiding daytime job conflicts, contributed to the film's raw authenticity through , posing, and spontaneous interactions, without formal casting calls or credited stardom. Mario Montez, a Puerto Rican performer active in the city's nascent drag and nightlife scenes, stood out as a central figure, adopting exaggerated personas reminiscent of 1940s Hollywood actresses like to accentuate the film's emphasis on performative artifice and interchangeability. Francis Francine, emerging from similar East Village and performance milieus that presaged Warhol's associates, participated as a fluid ensemble member, his background in underground theater informing the non-hierarchical group dynamics. Additional performers included Bick, who engaged in the improvisational elements; Markman, contributing to the collective's unpolished energy; and Arnold Rockwood, part of the broader pool of acquaintances Smith enlisted for their uninhibited presence. The absence of fixed character assignments underscored the performers' roles as extensions of Smith's aesthetic, prioritizing and communal expression over individual billing.

Release and Immediate Aftermath

Premiere Screenings

Flaming Creatures received its initial screenings through underground venues organized by at the Filmmakers' Cinematheque in , beginning in early 1963. These private showings, including sessions in Mekas' attended by European filmmakers such as , , , and others, catered to small groups of artists and cinephiles. The film's theatrical premiere occurred on April 29, 1963, at the Bleecker Street Cinema in , featured on a double bill with ' Blonde Cobra as part of a program curated by Mekas. Audiences at these early public presentations remained limited to enthusiasts, fostering an intimate, exploratory atmosphere for the film's nonlinear, performative style. Susan Sontag, among other intellectuals, experienced the film during its nascent public showings and later characterized it in 1964 as "a great film that is also a great event," highlighting its visceral, event-like potency beyond conventional cinema. By early 1964, screenings expanded to theaters like the Gramercy Arts on February 3 and the New Bowery, where a March 3 presentation drew police intervention, abruptly elevating the film's profile from insular circulation to public controversy.

Initial Public and Media Reactions

Flaming Creatures premiered at a midnight screening on April 29, 1963, at New York's Bleecker Street Cinema, where it drew an audience from the city's film community. , through his Village Voice columns and advertisements for the Film-Makers' Cinematheque, promoted the film as a vital expression of underground cinema, emphasizing its rejection of conventional narrative and embrace of spontaneous, erotic imagery. Susan Sontag, in early endorsements around 1964, lauded the film for its "erotic ontology," arguing it liberated by prioritizing sensory experience over plot development or moral judgment, even defending its and sexual as insufficiently abundant. These views circulated via word-of-mouth and limited press in art scenes, positioning Flaming Creatures as a touchstone for experimental freedom amid its provocative content, including group orgies and performances that shocked some attendees unaccustomed to such explicitness. Initial media mentions in underground outlets like highlighted the film's chaotic energy and defiance of norms, fostering acclaim among filmmakers and critics who saw it as a comedic haunt in a derelict studio, though its raw depictions of and homosexual themes generated unease in broader circles prior to organized opposition. This buzz, driven by repeat screenings at venues like the Tivoli Theater, amplified its reputation as both liberating and transgressive within the pre-censorship experimental milieu.

Legal Controversies

Obscenity Arrests and Seizures

On March 3, 1964, police raided a screening of Flaming Creatures at the New Bowery Theater in , interrupting the showing midway through its third presentation that evening and confiscating the print as obscene contraband. The intervention followed complaints from audience members and officials about the film's explicit depictions of nudity, , and simulated sexual activities, including group orgies and . Jonas Mekas, the film's distributor through the Film-Makers' Cooperative, the theater manager, and two projectionists were arrested at the scene on charges of violating Section 1141 of the New York Penal Law, which criminalized the promotion or possession of obscene materials defined as those appealing to prurient interest, patently offensive, and utterly without redeeming social importance. The four individuals were detained overnight in jail before being released on bail, with the seized print held as evidence by authorities. The seizure marked the first major enforcement action against Flaming Creatures, prompting theater closures and restricting its underground circulation, as venues feared similar raids under prevailing standards. Subsequent confiscations occurred elsewhere in the United States, including in , where police seized and destroyed a copy in , further affirming the film's status as prohibited material amid ongoing distribution attempts. These incidents effectively limited public access, with only limited prints surviving through private networks despite the legal pressures.

Trials and Judicial Rulings

In March 1964, was tried in for violating state obscenity laws by exhibiting Flaming Creatures. Magistrate presided over the non-jury trial, where prosecutors argued the film met the criteria established in (1957), namely appealing to prurient interest, depicting sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacking serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. convicted on March 26, 1964, fining him $100, effectively limiting public screenings in by affirming the film's obscenity status under prevailing standards that prioritized community norms over artistic intent. Mekas appealed the conviction to the , which reversed the lower court's ruling in a summary decision, questioning the rigid application of obscenity tests to experimental works and emphasizing potential First Amendment protections for artistic expression. Further appeals reached the U.S. in v. New York, where Justice dissented alone in favor of reversing the obscenity convictions, arguing the film's experimental nature warranted scrutiny beyond mere prurient appeal. The ultimately dismissed the appeal as in 1968, with five justices concurring, leaving the film's legal status unresolved at the federal level but enabling de facto bans in multiple jurisdictions through upheld local seizures until evolving standards in the 1970s, such as (1973), shifted emphasis toward community standards with provisions for artistic value. The Flaming Creatures case gained renewed attention during Fortas's nomination to replace as . Opponents, including Senator , highlighted Fortas's vote to reverse the conviction, screening excerpts of the film for the Senate Judiciary Committee to underscore perceived leniency on , contributing to the that derailed the nomination on October 1, . This scrutiny exemplified how judicial rulings on cinema intersected with broader political battles over , though lower courts in places like upheld findings into the late 1960s, affirming seizures without conclusively debating the film's merit.

Broader Censorship Implications

The prosecutions stemming from screenings of Flaming Creatures in 1964 exemplified broader tensions in American between First Amendment safeguards for expression and prevailing community standards of decency, positioning the film as a flashpoint for legal challenges to practices in underground cinema. These cases underscored debates over whether explicit sexual content in experimental works warranted protection as art or suppression as prurient material devoid of serious value, influencing subsequent doctrinal shifts like the pandering emphasis in Ginzburg v. (1966). Conservative critics during contemporaneous political skirmishes, such as the 1968 "Fortas Film Festival" orchestrated by senators including Strom Thurmond, portrayed Flaming Creatures as emblematic of moral degeneracy, citing its depictions of transvestite orgies, masturbation, and other sexual perversions as lacking any redeeming social or artistic merit and thus justifying obscenity restrictions to preserve public morals. Opponents argued that tolerating such films eroded societal standards, with screenings for approximately 20 senators amplifying calls for stricter enforcement against materials perceived to promote deviance without countervailing justification. The film's legal entanglements engendered verifiable among theaters and institutions, as fears of police raids prompted venues to decline experimental works with potentially controversial content, thereby constricting distribution channels for underground cinema in the mid-1960s. Incidents including busts at the New Bowery Theater in and subsequent seizures at universities in (1965), (1966), and (1967) illustrated this , driving exhibitors toward private or alternative screenings to evade prosecution under state statutes.

Reception and Critiques

Contemporary Positive Assessments

, in her March 1964 review published in , praised Flaming Creatures as "that rare modern " focused on joy and innocence, derived from motifs of sexual anarchy and erotic fluidity, rather than structured narrative or moral judgment. She highlighted the film's rejection of conventional storytelling, arguing its strength lay in the "directness... of the seeing" and sensory immediacy, which invited viewers into a state of total eroticism unbound by intellectual analysis or representational norms. Sontag contrasted this immersive quality with mainstream cinema's , positioning Smith's work as an exemplar of camp sensibility that celebrated excess and artifice without apology. Jonas Mekas, writing in his "Movie Journal" column for The Village Voice throughout 1963 and 1964, defended Flaming Creatures as visionary experimental that exposed the repressive constraints of bourgeois and commercial standards. He described the as an ecstatic, non-narrative tableau of human poses and improvisations, akin to a loft-based captured in raw, unpolished footage, which challenged viewers to embrace uninhibited expression over polished production values. Mekas' advocacy, including public screenings despite legal risks, framed the work as essential to the New American movement, emphasizing its role in liberating from institutional and narrative tyranny. In publications like Film Culture, contemporaries acclaimed Flaming Creatures for its amateur aesthetics and deliberate excess, which democratized by prioritizing spontaneous and low-budget improvisation over technical proficiency or scripted plots. This approach was seen as a radical assertion of , transforming , excess, and communal revelry into a sensory assault that bypassed elite gatekeeping in . Such endorsements positioned the film as a pivotal artifact of underground vitality, fostering a legacy of experiential that valued erotic anarchy and visual delirium as antidotes to sanitized cultural norms.

Objections on Moral and Artistic Grounds

Critics on grounds contended that Flaming Creatures prioritized visceral shock through its unvarnished portrayals of simulated , , and a chaotic involving ambiguously gendered performers, without discernible ethical or redemptive framework to justify the content as anything beyond prurient indulgence. Such scenes, they argued, exemplified a descent into cultural laxity, where indiscriminate sexuality supplanted disciplined expression, potentially contributing to broader societal erosion of standards by normalizing deviance under the guise of . These objections echoed in early characterizations of the film as "horrifying and abrasive," reflecting a view that its raw fostered revulsion rather than enlightenment. Artistically, formalist detractors dismissed the film's structural disarray—marked by meandering non-narrative sequences, erratic pacing, and absence of thematic —as emblematic of undisciplined amateurism rather than bold experimentation. deficiencies, including frequent out-of-focus imagery, mismatched audio, and rudimentary achieved with scavenged expired , were cited as evidence of sloppiness that failed to elevate the work beyond crude , undermining assertions of genius-level . Reviewers described the result as "tedious" and "incoherent," arguing that the cavorting performers and random acts amounted to an ugly spectacle lacking the craft or required for enduring . This held that true artistry demands rigor, not mere rejection of , positioning Flaming Creatures as a cautionary example of formlessness masquerading as profundity.

Feminist and Ideological Criticisms

Some feminist critics have objected to Flaming Creatures for its depictions of female performers in scenes simulating and orgiastic chaos, interpreting these as objectifying women through a persistent that prioritizes erotic spectacle over meaningful . For example, sequences involving the mock of a female character, intended as , have been read by certain observers as exploitative and potentially misogynistic, failing to empower participants and instead perpetuating tropes of amid undifferentiated play. These objections extend to the film's drag elements and indeterminate gender performances, which some ideological commentators argue reinforce rather than dismantle stereotypes by aestheticizing submission and without narratives of or . Critics in this vein contend that the boundaryless sexuality on display normalizes chaotic, non-consensual dynamics observed in performer interactions—such as improvised physical entanglements lacking clear directorial boundaries—potentially contributing to exploitative environments under the guise of , though of performer harm remains anecdotal and contested.

Legacy

Influence on Underground and Experimental Cinema

Flaming Creatures exerted a direct influence on Andy Warhol's early filmmaking, with Warhol naming it his favorite film during 1964 and 1965. This admiration manifested in Warhol's adoption of techniques pioneered by Jack Smith, such as employing non-professional performers "who happened to be around" rather than trained actors, a method Smith used extensively in Flaming Creatures with its ensemble of drag artists and friends. Performer Mario Montez, who debuted as Dolores Flores in Flaming Creatures, transitioned to Warhol's Factory scene, appearing in thirteen of his films including Chelsea Girls (1966), drawing Warhol's interest through Smith's work. The film's camp excess and sexually ambiguous tableaux shaped subsequent queer experimental cinema, particularly in the aesthetics of excess and drag performance. John Waters, who hailed Smith as "the only true underground filmmaker," incorporated similar frenzied depictions of transvestites and low-budget provocation in films like (1972), echoing Flaming Creatures' chaotic eroticism. This influence extended to broader underground aesthetics, prioritizing raw, improvisational queer expression over narrative coherence. Post-ban distribution challenges solidified Flaming Creatures' role in pioneering independent circuits, as it was handled by the Film-Makers' Cooperative from 1963 to 1968 despite seizures and legal hurdles. These obstacles, including police raids on screenings, compelled filmmakers to rely on private venues, co-operatives, and non-commercial networks, establishing models for evading and sustaining experimental work outside mainstream channels.

Preservation Efforts and Restorations

Following Jack Smith's death on September 25, 1989, preservation initiatives targeted the recovery and repair of Flaming Creatures' surviving 16mm prints, which had been fragmented by obscenity-related seizures in 1964 and subsequent dispersal among private collections and institutions. Jerry Tartaglia, an experimental filmmaker, located the film's camera-original negative—previously presumed lost—in a laboratory around the early 1990s and initiated with estate approval, salvaging degraded footage through cleaning, splicing, and duplication to mitigate and emulsion breakdown common in unrestored analog stock. Anthology Film Archives incorporated a restored print into its Essential Cinema Repertory in the 1990s, prioritizing physical integrity over interpretive fidelity by archiving multiple variants to preserve the film's structural variability, as Smith habitually re-edited sequences live during projections, complicating consensus on a "master" cut. These analog efforts addressed chemical instability, with restorers duplicating irreplaceable elements onto stable polyester-based stock to prevent further loss from and fading. Smith's estate, which inherited his reclusive control over distribution—rooted in his aversion to —delayed systematic access until legal and administrative resolutions in the mid-1990s permitted collaborative work, including Tartaglia's contributions, thereby enabling institutional deposits and preventing total disintegration of the scattered corpus. remastering attempts in the encountered hurdles from the source materials' inconsistencies, such as mismatched takes and sound sync issues, yielding hybrid versions that standardized runtime to approximately 43 minutes for archival scanning while retaining analog imperfections to honor the original's handmade aesthetic.

Contemporary Screenings and Reappraisals

In the , Flaming Creatures received renewed attention through institutional retrospectives, including screenings at P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center, an affiliate of the , as part of the exhibition "Jack : Flaming Creatures," which opened on October 29, 2009, and featured the film alongside Smith's photographs, performances, and . These events underscored the film's enduring appeal within experimental cinema circles, with additional public screenings documented in 2011 amid homages to Smith's oeuvre. A 2018 retrospective at a venue also programmed Flaming Creatures alongside Smith's other works, such as Normal Love, further evidencing periodic revivals in art-house settings. More recent screenings include a , 2023, presentation at the Film Center in , programmed as a standalone 43-minute showing of the 16mm print. In , the Cinemateca Portuguesa-Museu do Cinema in hosted screenings on January 19 and 23, 2024, within the "50 Anos de Abril" cycle exploring revolutionary cinema themes, attracting audiences to the 45-minute program in Sala M. Félix Ribeiro. Such events, often tied to thematic series or artist surveys, confirm persistent niche interest among curators and scholars of , though they remain infrequent and venue-specific. Contemporary distribution through cooperatives like the Film-Makers' Cooperative and limits accessibility to 16mm prints for specialized bookings, with no widespread commercial streaming or releases, reinforcing the film's marginal position outside avant-garde networks. Reappraisals in recent scholarship and festival notes reaffirm its status as a experimental landmark, emphasizing its hallucinatory aesthetics and defiance of norms, yet highlight how its explicit, unscripted depictions—once central to debates—now prompt reflections on historical contexts amid stricter modern standards for performer and explicit content. This balanced view positions Flaming Creatures as a preserved artifact of provocation rather than a universally accessible classic.

References

  1. [1]
    Jack Smith. Flaming Creatures. 1963 - MoMA
    Shot from above or from odd angles at close range, Flaming Creatures is composed of loosely connected vignettes full of humor, eroticism, and violence. We see ...
  2. [2]
    Flaming Creatures - Senses of Cinema
    Jul 19, 2002 · J. Hoberman, “The Big Heat: The Making and Unmaking of Flaming Creatures,” Edward Leffingwell, et al, Flaming Creature: Jack Smith: His Amazing ...
  3. [3]
    https://cup.columbia.edu/book/flaming-creatures/9780231191470
  4. [4]
    Smith, Jack: Travails of an Underground Artist - Senses of Cinema
    May 27, 2022 · Smith was raised in trailer parks in Ohio and Texas and had a life-long fascination for kitsch, camp and trash. Although Flaming Creatures is ...
  5. [5]
    Jack Smith's Technicolor muse: Maria Montez | Movies - The Guardian
    Sep 23, 2011 · In fact, everywhere you look in Smith's canon, there's a reference to Maria Montez. The infamous Flaming Creatures (1963), whose scenes of ...
  6. [6]
    Aesthetic Delirium in Jack Smith's 'Flaming Creatures' | A R T L R K
    Smith's first feature-length film Flaming Creatures (1961) remains his best-known work. Shot in a setting reminiscent of the Arabian Nights.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  7. [7]
    Ronald Tavel, John Vaccaro and Charles Ludlam - Warholstars.org
    The new thing off-Off Broadway is the Theater of the Ridiculous. The founder of the movement is a young playwright named Ronald Tavel, whose works include ...
  8. [8]
    Jack Smith: Normal Love - MoMA
    Made following Smith's infamous feature, Flaming Creatures (1962-63), which caught the unfavorable attention of American censors, Normal Love includes a cast of ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  9. [9]
    [PDF] J. Hoberman. On Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures (and Other Secret ...
    The book recounts the making of Flaming Creatures (on the roof of a Lower East Side theater, with outdated film stock that Smith shoplifted from the discount ...
  10. [10]
    MOMA Pays Homage to Experimental Filmmaker Jack Smith - PBS
    Nov 23, 2011 · Smith shot “Flaming Creatures” on the roof of the Windsor Hotel, gathering performers on the weekends when no one had to work their day jobs.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  11. [11]
    Jack Smith - Flaming Creatures - Warholstars.org
    Smith's controversial film Flaming Creatures was originally conceived as a vehicle for Zazeela. However, Zazeela was in a relationship with La Monte Young at ...
  12. [12]
    Tony Tuesday 4: New York City Underground - 4/24/18 - Hallwalls
    He filmed Flaming Creatures in mid to late 1962. He held shoots during weekends on the roof of the 48th Street Theatre. Dick Preston offered his loft above the ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Fortas Film Festival - Scholarship Archive
    Richard Preston rented a loft apartment over the Windsor and allowed Smith to film on the roof. The cast of Flaming Creatures included Mario. Montez, Francis ...Missing: shot | Show results with:shot
  14. [14]
    Jack Smith - The Downtown Pop Underground
    It was the Theater of the Ridiculous.” Waters even attended New York University briefly, until he was expelled after being busted for marijuana possession ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Jack Smith and His Secret Flix - Moving Image Source
    Flaming Creatures aside, Scotch Tape would be Smith's only completed film-it was placed in distribution with the Film-Makers' Cooperative in 1962 and ...Missing: Big Heat
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Jack Smith - Uzi Parnes
    In filming >Flaming Creatures<,. Smith used out-of-date black-and- white stock. This created an effect that varied the intensity of the lushly composed tableaus ...Missing: scavenged budget
  17. [17]
    https://movingimagesource.us/articles/up-on-the-roof-20120105
  18. [18]
    Jack SMITH - Light Cone
    This includes his three feature length films Flaming Creatures, Normal Love, and No President, as well as the eight shorter works: Jungle Island, Respectable ...
  19. [19]
    https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7312/vere19147-005/html
  20. [20]
    Jack Smith - Flaming Creatures 1962 - The Film-Makers' Cooperative
    Respectable Creatures Jack Smith · Scotch Tape Jack Smith · Overstimulated Jack Smith · Normal Love Jack Smith · Yellow Sequence Jack Smith · I Was A Male Yvonne De ...
  21. [21]
    Jack Smith Papers - Archival Collections - NYU
    Smith created his most well-known film, Flaming Creatures, in 1963. The film was confiscated by the New York Police Department and banned throughout the United ...Missing: cast | Show results with:cast
  22. [22]
    https://www.unseenfilms.net/2018/08/a-retrospective-of-jack-smith-including.html
  23. [23]
    Program 5: Blonde Cobra + Flaming Creatures - Film at Lincoln Center
    Featuring Ken Jacobs's Blonde Cobra and Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures. DIRECTOR. Ken Jacobs, Jack Smith. YEAR. 1963. RUNTIME. 76 minutes. FORMAT. 16mm, 35mm.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures 227 - Smart Night Reading Room
    Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures 227 and some not, and the chorale of flutey shrieks and screams which accompany the group rape of a bosomy young woman, rape ...Missing: financing performers recruitment
  25. [25]
    Jack Smith's theory of visual expression by Adam Charles Hart, p. 1
    The title card for Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures. which premiered on April 29, 1963 in New York City. Jack Smith in Ken Jacobs ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Flaming Creatures + Blonde Cobra | Eye Filmmuseum
    ... rape scene,” and “mock rape.” Savagely funny. Over a period spanning the mid ... Still Flaming creatures Jack Smith US 1963 credit Courtesy of Jack Smith Archive ...
  27. [27]
    The absurdity of fixation: Jack Smith and Flaming Creatures
    Aug 14, 2016 · More than most other underground films, Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures is valuable both as a film and as a document.
  28. [28]
    Flaming Creatures (1963) - Greatest Films
    Flaming Creatures (1963). In gay film ... the simulated cruel rape of a screaming woman during an earthquake ... the main sequence - a drug-fueled orgy of ...
  29. [29]
    Flaming Creatures / Couch - Mark Webber
    Oct 3, 1999 · FLAMING CREATURES / COUCH Sunday 3 October 1999, at 3:00pm. Dublin Irish Film Centre. Jack Smith, Flaming Creatures, USA, 1962-63, 45 min.Missing: 1963 | Show results with:1963
  30. [30]
    Film-Makers' Cinematheque 2 - Warholstars.org
    Special screenings of Flaming Creatures took place in Mekas' hotel room, attended by European film-makers Jean-Luc Godard, Agnes Varda, Roman Polanski, and Gene ...
  31. [31]
    Flaming Creatures: Jack Smith, Barbara Rubin and the Cinematic ...
    This program marks an evening of works inspired by Flaming Creatures in which images and bodies slide over one another in a tumult of freedom and feeling.
  32. [32]
    Flaming Creatures: Jack Smith, Barbara Rubin and the Cinematic ...
    Jul 16, 2023 · On April 29, 1963, Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures (1962) had its theatrical premiere on a double bill with Ken Jacobs' Blonde Cobra (1963) ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  33. [33]
    Sweet Outrage [SCOTCH TAPE & FLAMING CREATURES]
    Jul 27, 2025 · But Flaming Creatures is mesmerizing and luscious partly because Smith is more interested in emulating various features starring Maria Montez or ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Film-Makers Cinematheque 3 - Warholstars.org
    On February 3, 1964, the Filmmakers' Showcase presented Flaming Creatures and rushes from Normal Love at the Gramercy Arts Theatre.Missing: mansion | Show results with:mansion
  35. [35]
    Remembering Jack Smith and Flaming Creatures
    Sep 14, 2023 · On March 3 1964, the police closed down a screening of Flaming Creatures at the New Bowery Theater, in New York, seizing film rolls and ...Missing: production origins
  36. [36]
    Queer & Now & Then: 1964 - Film Comment
    Apr 22, 2020 · Primal scream: Flaming Creatures, Jack Smith's spectacle of intense queer desire, is one of the most beautiful of all experimental films.
  37. [37]
    “A Comedy Set in a Haunted Movie Studio:” Flaming Creatures (1963)
    Mar 20, 2023 · But was Smith being cheeky as well in his description? I wouldn't say so. Flaming Creatures' comic, child-like, even utopian aspects are ...
  38. [38]
    Flaming Creatures: Jack Smith, Barbara Rubin and the Cinematic ...
    On April 29, 1963, Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures (1962) had its theatrical ... The screening would prove to be a milestone in both the development of the ...
  39. [39]
    Statement - Film Comment
    In the first week of March, 1964, Jonas Mekas and three others were arrested on obscenity charges for screening Jack Smith's Flaming Creatures at the New ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  40. [40]
    The “Flaming” Freedom of Jonas Mekas - Kentucky Scholarship Online
    33. Hoberman, On Jack Smith's “Flaming Creatures,” 43 ... 64. Mekas, Movie Journal, 175. ;. J. Hoberman, “The Big Heat,” Village Voice, 12 November 1991 .Missing: filming | Show results with:filming
  41. [41]
    When Jonas Mekas Went to Jail - The Village Voice
    Jan 23, 2019 · According to an expert in witchcraft, magic, and sorcery, “Flaming Creatures” was an 'excellent film.' The cops didn't think so. ... In the March ...Missing: review | Show results with:review
  42. [42]
    Freedom to Offend: How New York Remade Movie Culture on JSTOR
    ... 1964, at the New Bowery Theatre in the ... arrested four people on the charge of obscenity. The film was Jack Smith'sFlaming Creatures, and those arrested ...Missing: seizures | Show results with:seizures
  43. [43]
    Police Burn “Flaming Creatures” - Fifth Estate Archive
    ... seized copy of “Flaming Creatures”, and $15,000 damages. The Ann Arbor ... obscenity of the film on the basis of the showing of only ten minutes of the ...
  44. [44]
    Flaming Creatures with Blonde Cobra - Berkeley - BAMPFA
    Oct 4, 1994 · Among classics of New American Cinema, Flaming Creatures was the most maudit, and the most frequently seized for obscenity. The setting for ...Missing: confiscations San Francisco
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The Dialectic of Obscenity - UKnowledge
    Richard Preston rented a loft apartment over the Windsor and allowed Smith to film on the roof. Id. at 26–27. The cast of Flaming Creatures included Mario.Missing: shot | Show results with:shot
  46. [46]
    The Prosecution Resets in a 1964 Obscenity Case - The New York ...
    Oct 30, 2015 · In 1964, Gerald Harris successfully prosecuted Jonas Mekas for showing a 43-minute film by Jack Smith called “Flaming Creatures,” which included nudity and sex ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  47. [47]
    Censoring Flaming Creatures - The Downtown Pop Underground
    Flaming Creatures debuted in 1963 and was shown three times in early 1964 at the Gramercy Art Theatre without incident until the police issued a summons ...
  48. [48]
    Yale Law School Holds 'Fortas Film Festival' - The New York Times
    The main feature was "Flaming Creatures," seen last summer by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee during their debate on Justice Fortas's nomination as ...Missing: memo | Show results with:memo
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Susan Sontag - AWS
    Of course, Flaming Creatures is outrageous, and intends to be. Even the very title tells us that. Ad it happens, Flaming Creatures is not pornographic, if ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Flaming Creatures
    Jack Smith: Flaming Creatures, 1963. • Writer, performance artist, actor ... Susan Sontag, in her famous 1964 essay "Notes on. 'Camp' ", emphasises ...
  51. [51]
    Jonas Mekas's Movie Journal - Artforum
    I BEGAN READING Jonas Mekas's Movie Journal column in the Village Voice ... [But] Flaming Creatures will not be shown theatrically because our social-moral-etc.
  52. [52]
    Flaming Creatures on JSTOR
    At the time of the first theatrical screenings of Flaming Creatures in 1963, Jonas Mekas was at the height of his influence in the New York experimental film ...
  53. [53]
    Facebook Objects to 'Flaming Creatures' 55 Years After ... - IndieWire
    Feb 7, 2019 · Jack Smith's "Flaming Creatures" still maintains its power to provoke. Jack Smith's "Flaming Creatures" inspired an obscenity case in 1964, and ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  54. [54]
    TEMPLE OF SCHLOCK: 2013
    Dec 29, 2013 · In my favorite example, TARGET SMUT accuses Jack Smith's queer underground film FLAMING CREATURES of depicting “masturbation of the male organ, ...
  55. [55]
    super8porter / Toronto 49-69 /
    Included was Jack Smith's horrifying and abrasive Flaming Creatures (1962/63) which was banned by the Brussels screening committee. ^^^. One aspect of the New ...
  56. [56]
    How New York Remade Movie Culture by Raymond J. Haberski, Jr
    Feb 2, 2009 · It's an apologia for the censors. Flaming Creatures, which looks chaste on today's screens, is quickly deemed a mediocrity, and Jonas Mekas' ...Missing: decay | Show results with:decay
  57. [57]
    Review of Flaming Creatures (1963) by Scott R - Cinafilm
    Flaming Creatures review by Scott R - For those interested in ... An ugly, tedious, amateurish film, composed of cavorting drag queens, random ...
  58. [58]
    Flaming Creatures | Martin Teller's Movie Reviews
    Mar 4, 2012 · Flaming Creatures. Yesterday I watched Jack Smith romping around ... You could say it's too easy and amateurish, that “Anyone could do that.
  59. [59]
    Jack Smith and the Aesthetics of Camp in an Era of Political ...
    Jun 15, 2011 · Also problematic is the imagery in Flaming Creatures of women partaking in the (simulated) rape of women. Although the few such scenes were ...
  60. [60]
    The Brightest Of The Flaming Creatures: A Tribute To Mario Montez
    Sep 28, 2013 · Born Rene Rivera in Puerto Rico, Montez began his career as Dolores Flores in Jack Smith's iconic dream-like film Flaming Creatures, renaming ...
  61. [61]
    The Notorious Jack Smith: Flaming Creatures and Selected Shorts
    Flaming Creatures (1962–63), 43 mins. ... Yellow Sequence (1963–65), 15 mins. A gold-toned coda to Smith's epic Normal Love project, Yellow Sequence features many ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] John Waters: A Panache for Sleaze - Media Bistro
    This scene shows the influence of Jack Smith, whose 1963 seminal classic Flaming. Creatures features frenzied shots of transvestites in postwar Hollywood.
  63. [63]
    Up on the Roof by J. Hoberman - Moving Image Source
    Jan 5, 2012 · In a letter dated Halloween 1962, Smith wrote Gurin that, although Flaming Creatures was completely shot, "I've been waiting 3 weeks now for it ...
  64. [64]
    https://www.movingimagesource.us/files/jack_smith_and_his_secret_flix.pdf
  65. [65]
    Jack Smith's Hamlet in the Rented World - Artforum
    Tartaglia, an avant-garde filmmaker whose deep involvement with Smith's movies began when he discovered Flaming Creatures' camera original in a laboratory ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    A Series Pays Tribute to Jack Smith's Favorite Films - Hyperallergic
    Nov 23, 2015 · ... print of Smith's monumental work Flaming Creatures (1963), long believed to be lost. Friends cautioned Tartaglia against returning the film ...
  67. [67]
    About - Essential Cinema - Anthology Film Archives
    Scenes From Under Childhood, I-IV, 1969-70. The Weir-Falcon Saga, 1970 ... Flaming Creatures, 1963. No President, 1969. Michael Snow: Wavelength, 1967
  68. [68]
    A Prophet Against Empire: Jerry Tartaglia's Escape from Rented Island
    After his first feature film, the rapturous Flaming Creatures (1963), was banned on charges of obscenity, Smith avoided commodification by perpetually iterating ...
  69. [69]
    Jack Smith's posthumous career - Artforum
    Smith was famous long ago for his scandalous 1963 film Flaming Creatures, and like an insanely protective parent, he took steps to ensure that none of his ...
  70. [70]
    Jack Smith: Flaming Creature - MoMA
    Jack Smith: Flaming Creature ... On October 29, P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center opens Jack Smith: Flaming Creatures, a cross disciplinary retrospective exhibition ...Missing: camera setup
  71. [71]
    A Retrospective of Jack Smith, Including FLAMING CREATURES ...
    Aug 21, 2018 · Following the controversy over Flaming Creatures, Smith never completed another film. Shown in many versions and often edited live in his film ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Chicago's Home for Great Cinema | FLAMING CREATURES
    Sep 11, 2023 · Monday, September 11, 8:30 p.m. | Promptly after the premiere of FLAMING CREATURES ... censorship off our cinema. With Contra/Banned, we ...
  73. [73]
    2024 - Cinemateca - Programação
    Jan 19, 2024 · 19/01/2024, 22h00 | Sala M. Félix Ribeiro. Ciclo 50 Anos de Abril: Que Farei Eu com Esta Espada? Flaming Creatures. de Jack Smith. Estados ...
  74. [74]
    FLAMING CREATURES - Light Cone
    FLAMING CREATURES. by Jack SMITH 1962-1963 / 16mm / b&w / sound / 1 screen / 43' 00. "Jack Smith has graced the anarchic liberation of new American cinema ...Missing: shot stock scavenged budget