Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fort Stewart

Fort Stewart is a installation located primarily in Liberty and Bryan counties, southeastern , serving as the primary home station for the 3rd Infantry Division. Encompassing approximately 280,000 acres, it ranks as the largest Army post east of the and functions as the Army's premier power projection platform on the East Coast, responsible for training, equipping, deploying, and sustaining and armored forces. Established in 1940 as Camp Stewart initially for anti-aircraft artillery training amid preparations, the base expanded significantly post-war to support and has since hosted key divisional operations. The installation includes and supports over 16,000 military personnel, alongside thousands of civilian employees and family members residing in more than 3,000 housing units. Fort Stewart's strategic significance stems from its role in rapid deployment capabilities, with units from the 3rd Infantry Division contributing to major U.S. military engagements, including the invasions of in 2003 and subsequent operations. Its expansive training areas enable large-scale live-fire exercises and maneuvers essential for maintaining combat readiness.

Geography

Location and Boundaries


Fort Stewart is located in southeastern , primarily within and Bryan counties, with smaller portions extending into Evans, Long, and Tattnall counties. The installation lies approximately 40 miles southwest of Savannah and directly north of Hinesville, the nearest city. This positioning places it in close proximity to major coastal ports such as the , facilitating efficient access to Atlantic shipping routes for logistical operations. The military reservation spans about 279,270 acres, forming a roughly rectangular area measuring 32 miles by 17 miles, which qualifies it as the largest U.S. east of the . These boundaries encompass diverse land uses, including ranges and impact areas, acquired progressively since the establishment of Camp Stewart in 1940. The 's jurisdictional extent is under federal control, with surrounding civilian areas in Liberty and Bryan counties providing support infrastructure.

Terrain and Facilities

Fort Stewart spans approximately 279,806 acres across parts of six counties in southeastern , featuring predominantly flat, sandy terrain dominated by forests, wiregrass savannas, and extensive wetlands that support diverse ecosystems including blackwater rivers and shrub bogs. These landscapes enable large-scale maneuver training, with over 803 miles of tank trails facilitating armored vehicle operations across pine-dominated uplands and wetland corridors. Key training infrastructure includes 50 direct-fire ranges, 51 indirect-fire ranges, multiple armored fighting vehicle gunnery ranges, small arms ranges, and three live-fire areas designed for exercises. Specialized facilities such as the Multipurpose Training Range (DMPTR) support digitally enhanced large-caliber and platform training, incorporating elements like breakdown areas, latrines, and site improvements for modern war-fighting simulations. The installation also maintains seven major drop zones and helicopter gunnery ranges integrated into the terrain for aviation-maneuver coordination. Support infrastructure encompasses , maintenance depots, and utility systems upgraded to accommodate operations, including enhanced paving, storm drainage, and electrical services for ranges and vehicle areas. Recent developments focus on expanding readiness for armored formations through extended field exercises and updated gunnery infrastructure on existing ranges. Co-located with , Fort Stewart leverages proximate aviation assets for integrated ground-air support without dedicated airfield facilities on base.

Climate and Environment

Climatic Conditions

Fort Stewart lies within a zone (Köppen Cfa), featuring long, hot, and humid summers alongside short, mild winters. Average summer high temperatures reach 92°F (33°C) in , with lows rarely falling below 27°F (-3°C) in winter; annual extremes occasionally exceed 97°F (36°C) or drop below freezing. Relative humidity averages 70-90% year-round, peaking in summer mornings at around 88%. Precipitation totals approximately 50 inches (127 cm) annually, distributed fairly evenly but with peaks during the June-November , often leading to thunderstorms that restrict visibility and maneuverability. These conditions directly influence military training and operations, as high humidity combined with heat elevates (WBGT) indices, heightening risks of and during prolonged outdoor exercises. Data from nearby stations indicate that summer WBGT values frequently exceed safe thresholds for heavy work, necessitating schedule adjustments, hydration protocols, and indoor alternatives; observed warming trends since 1960 have amplified these constraints at installations like Fort Stewart. Frequent afternoon thunderstorms and heavy rains—averaging 3-4 inches monthly in peak periods—can training ranges, delay live-fire maneuvers, and increase on unpaved areas, reducing annual training days by up to 10-20% in wetter years per environmental assessments. The region's vulnerability to tropical cyclones exacerbates operational challenges, with historical events like (2023) causing tree falls and debris that required post-storm clearance, indirectly halting routines, and Tropical Storm Debby (2024) prompting emergency responses despite minimal structural damage. Such storms have disrupted exercises in the past, as seen in regional data where Atlantic hurricanes affect Georgia's coastal plains, forcing evacuations or indoor shifts; NOAA records show Fort Stewart's proximity to Savannah (annual hurricane influences) correlates with 5-10 major events per decade impacting training cycles.

Environmental Management

Fort Stewart's environmental management is guided by the Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP), which integrates compliance with federal laws such as the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Sikes Act to sustain ecosystem health amid intensive military training activities. The installation's 284,000 acres encompass diverse habitats including wetlands and forests, where stewardship efforts address impacts from vehicle maneuvers, live-fire exercises, and infrastructure development. These practices prioritize habitat restoration and regulatory adherence, with prescribed burns conducted annually to mimic natural fire regimes, reducing risks while enhancing forage for and maintaining open understories suitable for training. A core focus is the of seven federally protected species under the ESA, including the (RCW, Dryobates borealis), whose population on the base has grown steadily since monitoring began in 1994 through targeted interventions like artificial cavity inserts and cluster protection zones that restrict disturbance within 0.5-mile radii. Empirical data show RCW rates exceeding regional averages, attributed to enhancements on over 100 clusters, contributing to the recovery of this species alongside others such as the and frosted flatwoods salamander. In 2021, Fort Stewart received the Secretary of the Award for Natural Resources for Large Installations, recognizing these efforts in stabilizing RCW numbers from a low of around 200 birds in the early to sustainable levels today. Wetland management involves a compensatory established to offset losses from training infrastructure, ensuring no net reduction in functional acres as required by the Clean Water Act; this has preserved thousands of acres of and depressional critical for breeding. Soil from firing ranges and maneuver trails is mitigated through vegetative stabilization and traps, though training-induced remains a causal pressure on aquatic habitats, addressed via periodic monitoring and reseeding programs. Munitions-related soil remediation targets legacy contaminants like from historical , with techniques applied in select areas to restore permeability without halting operations. Historical tensions with regulators, such as a 1992 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determination that early management practices jeopardized RCW survival, have shifted to cooperative successes, including joint surveys and modeling that balance with readiness. While official reports emphasize without major violations, independent assessments note ongoing challenges from pollution, including potential leaching from ranges, prompting enhanced under the Sustainability Management System. These measures have yielded documented improvements, such as increased metrics in restored longleaf ecosystems, underscoring causal trade-offs where fire suppression alternatives would degrade both habitats and efficacy.

Military Organization

Major Units and Commands

Fort Stewart hosts the headquarters of the 3rd Infantry Division (3ID), known as the Marne Division, which serves as the installation's primary tenant unit and focuses on providing expeditionary armored forces for decisive action. The division operates under the , emphasizing mechanized capabilities for large-scale combat operations. The 3ID includes two armored brigade combat teams: the 1st Armored (1st ABCT), comprising , armor, and battalions equipped for maneuvers; and the 2nd Armored (2nd ABCT), similarly structured to integrate tanks, Bradleys, and supporting fires for readiness. Division Artillery (DIVARTY) provides centralized command for assets across the brigades, enhancing fires integration. Supporting the division's operational tempo, the 3rd Division Sustainment delivers logistics, maintenance, and supply chain functions to sustain armored formations in contested environments. Additional tenant units, such as elements of the 188th Infantry for support and various and detachments, contribute to overall readiness but remain subordinate to the division's core structure. As of 2025, Fort Stewart supports approximately 21,200 active-duty soldiers alongside civilian personnel, reflecting post-2005 (BRAC) expansions that reinforced the post's armored focus.

Hunter Army Airfield Integration

, located in , approximately 25 miles northeast of Fort Stewart, operates as a subordinate installation under the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Stewart- command structure, enabling seamless aviation support for the broader installation complex. This co-management facilitates coordinated logistics, maintenance, and personnel support between the airfield's rotary-wing operations and Fort Stewart's ground forces, with shared resources such as the Marne Reception Center for inbound processing. The airfield serves as the primary base for the 3rd Combat Aviation Brigade (3rd CAB), 3rd Infantry Division, which equips the brigade with AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, UH-60 Black Hawk utility helicopters, and CH-47 Chinook heavy-lift helicopters for reconnaissance, assault, and transport missions. Subordinate units include the 3rd Squadron, for armed reconnaissance; the 4th Battalion, 3rd Aviation Regiment for assault operations; and the 2nd Battalion, 3rd General Support Aviation Battalion for logistics and sustainment flights. These assets integrate directly with Fort Stewart's armored and brigades, providing and enabling combined-arms maneuvers during training exercises. Facilities at Hunter include multiple runways, hangars, and forward arming and refueling points (FARPs) that support training and rapid aerial insertion of ground troops from Fort Stewart's training areas. The airfield's infrastructure accommodates high-tempo operations, such as equipment transport to external sites for joint exercises, enhancing the 3rd Infantry Division's ability to simulate large-scale combat scenarios with aviation-ground synchronization. Ongoing improvements, including proposed replacements for substandard hangars and , aim to sustain these capabilities amid increasing operational demands. This integration bolsters the division's expeditionary posture by enabling no-notice rapid deployments, as demonstrated in exercises like Swamp Avenger, where aviation assets facilitate quick alongside ground elements for crisis response. The 3rd CAB's fleet supports immediate response packages, allowing for swift movement of forces and equipment to contested environments, thereby extending the operational reach of Fort Stewart-based units without reliance on fixed-wing airlift alone.

Historical Background

Establishment and World War II

Camp Stewart was activated on June 1, 1940, as an anti-aircraft artillery training and firing center in response to emerging threats from aerial bombardment, as evidenced by conflicts where air power had demonstrated decisive capabilities against ground forces and . The site, initially comprising about 5,000 leased acres near , was selected for its expansive terrain suitable for safe live-fire exercises, reflecting a first-principles approach to prioritizing defensive capabilities against high-altitude and fast-moving that outpaced traditional defenses. In November 1940, it was officially designated Camp Stewart in honor of Daniel Stewart, a hero from the region who fought at battles such as Briar Creek. The camp underwent rapid expansion during 1940–1941, acquiring additional lands to support comprehensive training ranges, ultimately encompassing a military reservation of approximately 280,000 acres across seven counties to accommodate maneuvers and simulations of real-world air raids. Personnel began arriving in September 1940, with anti-aircraft commencing in early December and intensifying by January 1941, focusing on gunnery, , and mobile defense tactics essential for countering Axis air superiority tactics observed in and the . By March 1942, following the U.S. entry into the war, the facility had evolved into a major hub for preparing anti-aircraft units, contributing to the rapid buildup of air defense forces that mitigated vulnerabilities exposed in early Pacific campaigns. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on , 1941, accelerated operations at Camp Stewart, transforming it from a pre-war precautionary site into a high-volume ground that underscored the prescience of U.S. investments in anti-aircraft capabilities, as output surged to equip divisions deploying to theaters where posed existential risks to supply lines and troop concentrations. This expansion debunked claims of systemic underpreparation by demonstrating empirical scaling: from initial cadre to outfitting multiple battalions with skills that proved vital in defending Allied shipping and bases, such as during the where trained crews integrated into commands.

Postwar Realignments and Korean War

In the immediate , Camp Stewart served as a separation center for demobilizing soldiers, processing redeployed personnel until its inactivation on September 30, 1945, reflecting the U.S. Army's rapid postwar drawdown from a force of over 8 million to under 1.5 million by 1947. This period marked a pivot from wartime expansion to fiscal and strategic realignment, with the camp's antiaircraft-focused infrastructure deemed surplus amid reduced aerial threats and emphasis on nuclear deterrence. The North Korean invasion of on June 25, 1950, catalyzed the camp's reactivation in August 1950, transforming it into the Third Army Maneuver Area for urgent ground combat training to counter communist mechanized offensives, which had overrun U.S. positions early in the conflict due to inadequate capabilities. Training emphasized infantry-armor integration, leveraging the installation's 280,000 acres of pine forests, swamps, and coastal plains to simulate rugged, mobile warfare conditions akin to the Korean peninsula's terrain, thereby addressing doctrinal gaps exposed by Task Force Smith's rout on July 5, 1950. During the (1950–1953), Camp Stewart supported mobilization of units such as elements of the 7th Infantry Regiment, which earned recognition for actions like the defense at Taejon-ni on April 24, 1951, by honing mechanized tactics that improved unit cohesion and firepower delivery under simulated adverse conditions. The shift prioritized basic and advanced individual training for over 10,000 soldiers annually by 1952, enhancing readiness metrics through iterative field exercises that reduced response times to armored threats, as validated by post-maneuver evaluations. This realignment sustained until armistice, after which the camp's permanent fort status in 1956 formalized its role in armor-centric preparedness.

Cold War Mobilizations

During the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, Fort Stewart served as a primary staging site for the 1st Armored Division, placed on high alert to simulate rapid armored deployment in response to Soviet missile installations in Cuba. President John F. Kennedy visited the installation on November 26, 1962, to address division members and commend their preparations for a potential invasion, underscoring the base's strategic role in contingency operations against Soviet expansionism. In preparation for these mobilizations, the post underwent accelerated infrastructure enhancements to accommodate heavy armored units, including expanded maneuver areas and support facilities for tanks and . Troop levels surged from approximately 3,500 to over 30,000 personnel within two weeks, reflecting the U.S. Army's emphasis on swift force concentration to deter or counter Soviet aggression in the . Following the crisis resolution, Fort Stewart sustained an elevated training posture throughout the , focusing on armored and infantry evolutions designed for high-mobility responses to potential incursions. These activities included simulations of reinforced mechanized assaults, with empirical data indicating sustained peaks in personnel and equipment readiness exceeding 30,000 during periodic alerts, prioritizing verifiable rapid-reaction capabilities over static defenses. Modernization efforts incorporated upgraded tanks and associated logistics, aligning with doctrinal shifts toward combined-arms operations amid ongoing Soviet conventional threats.

Vietnam Era and Transition

During the , Fort Stewart primarily served as a critical training hub for U.S. Army aviation assets supporting operations in , with emerging as one of the Army's principal centers for rotary-wing and fixed-wing pilot instruction. Between the mid-1960s and , the installation trained approximately 11,000 pilots and 4,328 fixed-wing aviators, including 1,400 South Vietnamese personnel, emphasizing airmobile tactics essential for rapid troop insertions and extractions in counterinsurgency environments. These efforts tested and refined helicopter-centric doctrines, such as those employed by units like the 1st Cavalry Division, though logistical challenges—including high maintenance demands on UH-1 Huey and CH-47 Chinook fleets—highlighted vulnerabilities in sustained operations, with data from Army records indicating aircraft readiness rates often below 70% in theater due to environmental wear and supply chain strains. The 3rd Infantry Division, stationed elements of which trained at Fort Stewart, did not deploy brigades en masse to Vietnam, unlike many peer divisions; instead, select battalions, such as the 3rd , 7th Infantry Regiment, were detached and attached to other formations like the 199th Light Brigade, contributing to operations from 1966 onward with limited divisional-level engagement. This piecemeal involvement reflected broader priorities, yielding verifiable division-affiliated casualties in the low hundreds across detached elements, far below the tens of thousands suffered by fully committed divisions like the 1st or 25th , per official after-action reports emphasizing effectiveness in small-unit actions but critiquing over-reliance on air mobility amid dense terrain. Training at Stewart incorporated drills alongside airmobile exercises, balancing skills with conventional armored maneuvers, though postwar analyses noted inefficiencies in transitioning tactics between and European theater preparedness. Following the U.S. withdrawal in , Fort Stewart underwent significant drawdown as part of the Army's shift to the all-volunteer force, reducing personnel from peak Vietnam-era levels of over 10,000 trainees annually to a stabilized cadre focused on over . Doctrinal emphasized rebuilding capabilities, with exercises pivoting from Vietnam-style patrols to NATO-oriented mechanized maneuvers, addressing critiques of prior logistical overstretch—evidenced by Vietnam supply consumption rates exceeding 1 million tons monthly—through streamlined sustainment models. By the mid-1970s, the post's infrastructure supported refocused artillery and armor , preparing for potential Cold War escalations while integrating volunteer recruits, whose retention rates improved to 75% by 1975 compared to draft-era volatility. This transition underscored causal trade-offs in force structure, prioritizing deployable heavy units over expeditionary light infantry amid fiscal constraints.

Post-Cold War Restructuring

Following the in 1991, the U.S. Army implemented widespread force reductions, shrinking active-duty end strength from approximately 780,000 in 1989 to about 480,000 by 1999 as part of post- rationalization efforts aimed at fiscal efficiency and adaptation to reduced conventional threats. At Fort Stewart, this era involved unit realignments rather than outright contraction; the 24th Infantry Division, previously headquartered there, was inactivated on April 25, 1996, with the 3rd Infantry Division reactivated in its place to consolidate capabilities and maintain training infrastructure for armored forces east of the . This transition preserved Fort Stewart's operational footprint while aligning with broader Army modular restructuring, emphasizing versatile, deployable units over static garrisons. The 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process further tested Fort Stewart's viability, with the Department of Defense recommending no closures or significant personnel losses for the installation, thereby retaining its core missions in armored training and rapid-response hosting for the 3rd Infantry Division. BRAC decisions consolidated certain support functions at other sites but spared Fort Stewart major disruptions, yielding efficiency gains through streamlined logistics without net job reductions; local economic analyses post-BRAC confirmed sustained contributions exceeding $2 billion annually from preserved military payroll and operations in . These outcomes reflected empirical prioritization of bases with low environmental liabilities and high training throughput, avoiding the fiscal burdens of relocation. In the 2000s, amid the , Fort Stewart adapted to demands through organizational expansions, reorganizing the 3rd Infantry Division into three Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs) by the mid-2000s to enhance and rapid deployment readiness. This shift prioritized expeditionary forces capable of quick projection against non-state actors, with doctrinal updates focusing on joint and sustainment over massed armored confrontations, enabling faster force packaging for overseas contingencies. Although a proposed fifth BCT was ultimately not assigned, the realignments bolstered Fort Stewart's role in generating deployable units, balancing post-1990s efficiencies with heightened operational tempo.

Operational Roles and Achievements

Key Deployments and Combat Roles

The 3rd Infantry led the U.S. Army's ground maneuver during the initial phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003, crossing into from on March 20 and advancing over 300 miles in three weeks to reach Baghdad's outskirts by April 3. The division's 2nd Brigade executed the first on April 5, when 1-64 Armor—a combined force of approximately 30 tanks, 14 fighting vehicles, and support elements—raided 35 miles through the city's defenses, engaging and destroying elements of the Iraqi Medina while suffering only one tank damaged and no fatalities. A second on April 7 secured key objectives, including the government complex, contributing to the regime's collapse by April 9; these operations highlighted the superior speed, armor protection, and direct-fire lethality of mechanized forces against fortified urban positions, disrupting enemy cohesion without requiring prolonged siege tactics. Following the 2003 invasion, the division conducted multiple rotations to under Operation Iraqi Freedom, including a return deployment in 2004-2005 as part of OIF 3, where its brigades secured lines of communication and conducted operations across a 16,100-square-kilometer south of . Elements also deployed to for , with the 2nd Heavy arriving in 2012 for stability operations and the division headquarters assuming command of U.S. forces there in 2014, followed by brigade rotations in 2017 that supported NATO's . These high-tempo cycles—averaging brigade deployments every 18-24 months—sustained operational readiness, with after-action reviews noting adaptations in that enabled over 260 days of continuous offensive maneuver in 2003 alone, countering claims of force overextension by maintaining equipment availability rates above 90% through modular sustainment innovations. In recent years, the division has contributed to deterrence through participation in Operation Pathways exercises, with the 2nd (Spartan Brigade) engaging in over a multinational events annually, including amphibious and drills that enhance rapid force projection and with allies. These efforts build on post-2003 restructuring, where empirical data from rotations informed training reforms, achieving metrics such as 95% unit cohesion scores and reduced deployment preparation timelines to under 30 days, ensuring sustained armored maneuver capabilities amid global commitments.

Training Doctrine and Innovations

Fort Stewart's training doctrine emphasizes maneuvers across expansive ranges, enabling armored brigades to integrate , armor, , and in realistic scenarios that enhance synchronization and lethality. The installation supports multiple and armored vehicle gunnery ranges, three live-fire areas, and gunnery facilities, facilitating exercises where units conduct force-on-force engagements followed by live-fire validations. This approach, rooted in the 3rd Infantry Division's armored focus, has extended traditional two-week rotations to 45-day exercises incorporating stress shoots and updated gunnery tables, directly correlating with improved crew proficiency and maneuver cohesion as measured by certification standards. Central to this doctrine is the annual Marne Focus exercise, a brigade-level culmination event that replicates peer-threat combat through collective training across battalions. Conducted at Fort Stewart, it combines situational training, force-on-force simulations, and live-fire assaults, validating units for higher-echelon rotations like the National Training Center. For instance, in Marne Focus 2024 and 2025, participating armored brigade combat teams from the executed multi-echelon operations, including HIMARS integration and prisoner-of-war handling, achieving readiness metrics that demonstrate causal gains in unit and decision-making under simulated contested environments. Innovations at Fort Stewart augment live training with simulations and emerging technologies, addressing lessons from recent conflicts. The Digital Multipurpose Training Range incorporates urban clusters, facades, and moving targets for combined arms urban operations, blending live-fire with instrumentation to analyze tactical performance. Augmented reality demonstrations since 2022 have prototyped virtual overlays for maneuver planning, while drone assembly courses train soldiers on multi-rotor systems for reconnaissance and defense, spanning units up to 5 feet in diameter with dual GPS for contested operations. These efforts, housed partly in the Marne Innovation Center opened in 2023, prioritize data-centric common operating pictures to inform multi-domain operations, enabling divisions to fuse physical, cyber, and information domains in command post exercises. Such integrations support the Army's doctrinal shift toward multi-domain task forces, with Fort Stewart's exercises yielding quantifiable readiness for joint, multinational scenarios.

Incidents and Controversies

2025 Shooting Incident

On August 6, 2025, Sgt. Quornelius Samentrio Radford, a 28-year-old assigned to the 2nd , 3rd at Fort Stewart, , allegedly opened fire on five fellow soldiers in a workspace using his personally owned concealed , injuring them with non-life-threatening gunshot wounds. The victims, all coworkers in the same brigade, were hospitalized but survived, with military officials attributing their recovery to prompt medical intervention. Unarmed soldiers in the vicinity immediately tackled and subdued Radford without hesitation, halting the attack within seconds and then providing to the wounded, actions described by Army Secretary Dan Driscoll as having "absolutely saved lives." These responders, numbering at least six, were later honored for their heroism, with some receiving medals for demonstrating the unit's "Dogface resolve" in crisis. Radford's background included reports from fellow soldiers and friends of persistent over a pronounced stutter, which reportedly caused him to withdraw socially but showed no prior signs of violent tendencies. His father claimed Radford had sought a transfer from Fort Stewart due to experiences of , though these allegations remain unverified by official investigations. Minutes before , Radford sent a cryptic text to family members stating, "I just want y'all to know that I love y'all, and I tried my hardest to be the best I could be," suggesting premeditation tied to personal frustrations. One was identified as Radford's intimate , adding an element of interpersonal to potential motives, with Radford having self-reported the relationship in prior documentation. The incident prompted scrutiny of base security protocols, as Radford brought the personal firearm onto the installation undetected, despite Army policies restricting concealed carry to off-duty contexts and requiring secure storage of private weapons. Radford faces military charges including five counts of attempted murder, with additional civilian charges for domestic violence-related offenses stemming from prior incidents. Active shooter events on U.S. military bases remain rare compared to civilian settings, with historical data indicating isolated workplace violence like this—often linked to individual stressors rather than institutional failures—occurs infrequently amid strict access controls and training emphases on rapid response.

Safety and Infrastructure Challenges

Two soldiers assigned to the 3rd Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade died on January 30, 2025, during a nighttime at Fort Stewart when their light medium tactical vehicle rolled over into standing water, leading to an into the circumstances and protocols involved. A 2008 Government Accountability Office audit of Army deployment practices identified systemic gaps in enforcing medical fitness standards, estimating that roughly 10 percent of soldiers with documented conditions potentially requiring duty limitations—such as chronic injuries or illnesses—were nonetheless deployed from the installations reviewed, raising concerns about readiness and risk exposure during high-intensity training and operations. Barracks at Fort Stewart have faced recurring mold infestations and deferred maintenance, contributing to health complaints among residents amid an Army-wide backlog of repairs estimated at over $7.5 billion for basic catch-up alone, driven by competing priorities between operational tempo and facility sustainment funding. In response to mold issues, installation officials distributed approximately 3,000 dehumidifiers to barracks units to reduce humidity and prevent growth. Following training incidents, Fort Stewart's revised its management in early 2025 to emphasize proactive risk mitigation, loss prevention, and a culture of hazard reporting, supplementing broader directives. These updates aim to address empirical gaps in oversight, though persistent resource trade-offs between training rigor and infrastructural upkeep continue to pose challenges to overall unit .

Demographics

Population Statistics

The population of Fort Stewart, designated as a (CDP), was recorded at 8,821 in the , encompassing primarily family housing residents, civilian employees, and some permanent party personnel on the installation. This figure reflects a decline from the 2010 Census count of 11,205 for the CDP, attributable to deployment cycles and unit rotations that temporarily reduce on-base residency as active-duty soldiers are forward-deployed or relocated. Projections estimate the CDP population at approximately 10,424 by 2025, based on a 3.65% annual growth rate driven by post-deployment returns and family relocations rather than broader economic factors. Beyond the CDP boundaries, Fort Stewart supports a larger ecosystem totaling around 48,500 individuals as of 2025, including approximately 21,000 active-duty soldiers from the 3rd Infantry Division, 3,500 civilians and contractors, and nearly 24,000 family members and dependents. This total excludes over 19,000 military retirees in the surrounding communities, who draw on base services but reside off-post, contributing to an extended influence population exceeding 45,000 when accounting for transient training units. Historical trends show similar fluctuations; for instance, active-duty strength dipped during peak and rotations in the 2000s-2010s, correlating with reduced family housing occupancy, before rebounding with the division's post-2014 restructuring and European deterrence missions. These shifts are directly linked to Army force management decisions, such as activations and deactivations, rather than civilian migration patterns.

Community Composition

The community at Fort Stewart comprises active-duty soldiers, dependents, and military retirees, forming a transient yet interconnected centered on the 3rd Infantry Division. Approximately 21,200 full-time soldiers reside or operate from the installation, supported by over 16,000 family members, resulting in a young demographic with a age of 21.6 years reflective of enlistment patterns. This mobility stems from routine () cycles, averaging every two to three years, which prioritize unit readiness but empirically erode family cohesion through repeated disruptions to social networks, schooling, and spousal careers. Studies indicate such moves correlate with elevated mental health risks for children, including higher odds of diagnoses like ADHD, as families adapt to new environments without established support. Racial and ethnic demographics mirror U.S. Army active-duty averages, with non-Hispanic individuals comprising 45.5%, or American 21.4%, and or 21.7% of the local population. These proportions align with Army-wide figures, where enlisted personnel are roughly 40.5% , 25.8% American, and 26.1% as of 2024. Gender imbalance persists due to the force's composition—78.5% male active-duty overall—yielding 56.2% male residents in the Fort Stewart , though family units introduce greater parity among dependents. Military spouses, often numbering in the thousands per , navigate high workforce participation amid PCS-induced barriers, with active-duty unemployment at 8.83% in recent census data—elevated compared to civilian peers due to licensing transfers and job instability. Frequent relocations compound these challenges, fostering in family dynamics but straining long-term professional continuity and household stability. A retiree contingent exceeding 19,000 within the Stewart-Hunter area tempers the active-duty transience, offering institutional knowledge and community anchors that enhance local continuity despite the overarching military tempo. This blend sustains operational culture while mitigating some isolation effects of high-mobility lifestyles.

Education and Support Services

On-Post Education

The on-post education system at Fort Stewart consists of three (DoDEA) elementary schools—Brittin Elementary School, Diamond Elementary School, and Kessler Elementary School—serving military dependents from through grade 6. These schools operate under the DoDEA Americas Southeast District and focus on providing consistent, high-quality instruction tailored to the unique needs of children in military families, including frequent relocations and parental deployments. Enrollment across the three schools totals approximately 1,400 students, with an average student-to-teacher ratio of 13:1, enabling smaller class sizes and individualized attention compared to many systems. DoDEA curricula emphasize core subjects like reading, mathematics, and science, with built-in adaptations for transient populations, such as portable academic records, transition counseling, and supplemental online resources to minimize disruptions from moves or deployments. (grades 7-12) for Fort Stewart dependents occurs off-post in local districts, as no middle or high schools are located on the installation. Performance metrics for DoDEA elementary schools, including those at Fort Stewart, align with system-wide excellence, where students consistently exceed national averages on assessments like the (NAEP); for instance, fourth-grade reading and math scores average 14-25 points higher than peers. These outcomes reflect DoDEA's emphasis on rigorous standards and support for military-specific challenges, though individual school data varies by enrollment fluctuations tied to unit rotations. The schools trace their establishment to the post-World War II expansion of family housing and services at Fort Stewart, accommodating the influx of permanent-party personnel and dependents as the base transitioned from temporary training to a sustained operational hub.

Family and Community Resources

Army Community Service at Fort Stewart provides comprehensive support including confidential counseling, relocation assistance, childcare referrals, readiness programs, and financial planning to enhance family and during transitions and deployments. These services extend to morale-building events and personalized education on family life challenges, with indicating that access to such programs correlates with higher satisfaction and retention rates among service members, as awareness alone boosts intent to remain in service by addressing stressors like separation. Family Readiness Groups, coordinated through units like the 3rd Infantry Division, facilitate peer support, communication during permanent change of station moves, and pre-deployment training to mitigate isolation and logistical strains on spouses and dependents. Mobilization, Deployment, and Stability Support Operations under ACS further equip families with resources for all deployment phases, linking directly to improved unit cohesion and individual coping, as resilient family units demonstrably enhance overall mission readiness and reduce attrition risks tied to prolonged absences. Partnerships with institutions such as enable on-post access to graduate-level courses tailored for military families, featuring flexible short-term formats to align with duty schedules and minimize relocation disruptions since their 2023 memorandum of agreement. High operational at Fort Stewart exacerbates through frequent deployments and extended separations, with Army-wide surveys showing 72% of personnel viewing such demands as imposing unacceptable on work- balance, potentially undermining welfare efforts despite program availability. investments in expanded infrastructure, including enhanced counseling and readiness now standard at installations like Fort Stewart, have yielded measurable gains in metrics, though remains contingent on participation amid persistent pressures.

References

  1. [1]
    https://home.army.mil/stewart/
  2. [2]
    Fort Stewart - New Georgia Encyclopedia
    Almost 16,000 military personnel are currently stationed at the fort, and more than 3,000 civilians are employed by the military. Hunter Army Airfield.Missing: facts size
  3. [3]
    About Fort Stewart & Hunter Army Airfield, Command Data Summary
    Jun 6, 2025 · Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield is the Army's Premier Power Projection Platform on the East Coast. We are responsible for training, equipping, deploying, and ...
  4. [4]
    Fort Stewart | Base Overview & Info | MilitaryINSTALLATIONS
    History. Fort Stewart traces its history back to November 1940, when the Anti-Aircraft Artillery Training Center was officially designated as Camp Stewart, in ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  5. [5]
    Local Information - Fort Stewart, GA
    Fort Stewart is located primarily in Liberty County and Bryan County, Georgia. The nearest city is Hinesville, which is directly south of the base, and has a ...
  6. [6]
    Fort Stewart, Georgia Area Guide - PCSgrades
    Fort Stewart is located in Hinesville, Georgia about 40 miles west of Savannah and covers Liberty, Bryan, Evans, Long, and Tattnall counties.Missing: boundaries | Show results with:boundaries
  7. [7]
    Fort Stewart - Liberty County Chamber of Commerce
    Fort Stewart encompasses 279,270 (32 x 17 miles, including parts of five Georgia counties), is the largest military installation east of the Mississippi River, ...Missing: boundaries size
  8. [8]
    Fort Stewart - Military Bases
    It covers 279,270 acres, which include parts of six counties. The cost of living in the area is moderate. Fort Stewart is easily accessible from Interstates 95 ...Missing: boundaries | Show results with:boundaries
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Fort Stewart, Georgia - DOD DENIX
    Mar 3, 2020 · Fort Stewart occupies approximately 279,271 acres north of the ... Liberty, Long and Tattnall counties, Georgia. The installation is ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Fort Stewart, Georgia (FSGA) - Army Garrisons
    Fort Stewart contains 176,420 acres of floodplains and 85,785 acres of wetlands, and. HAAF contains 5,400 acres and contains 1,413 acres of floodplains and ...
  11. [11]
    Fort Stewart hails several conservation milestones | Article - Army.mil
    Oct 3, 2024 · The longleaf pine forests, wetlands, and wiregrass savannah are brimming with plants and animals, some of which include threatened or endangered ...Missing: terrain | Show results with:terrain
  12. [12]
    Natural resources conservation efforts at Fort Stewart ... - Army.mil
    Mar 15, 2021 · The lands contain some of the most biologically and ecologically diverse areas of Georgia, made up of pine forest, wetlands, blackwater rivers, ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 1 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNITED STATES ARMY DRAFT ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · Fort Stewart (FSGA) (FONSI Figure 1), Georgia, is a 279,806-acre Installation. Management Command (IMCOM)-Readiness installation located ...
  14. [14]
    News - Highlight: Fort Stewart Range Control - DVIDS
    Jun 8, 2022 · Within that acreage, there are 803 miles of tank trails, 50 direct fire ranges, 51 indirect fire ranges and an additional 30 live fire training ...Missing: infrastructure | Show results with:infrastructure
  15. [15]
    Digital Multipurpose Training Range, Fort Stewart
    Supporting facilities included electric service, water, sewer, gas; paving, parking, walks, curbs and gutters, site improvements, demolition of structures on ...Missing: infrastructure | Show results with:infrastructure
  16. [16]
    Digital Multipurpose Training Range Fort Stewart, GA
    The Digital Multipurpose Training Range provides digitally enhanced combat platforms with all constituent elements featured in Force XXI, (digital) war fighting ...
  17. [17]
    Automated Qualification Training Range, Fort Stewart, GA
    Supporting facilities include electric service, water, sewer, gas, rigid and flexible paving (ROAC and down range access), walks, curbs and gutters and storm ...Missing: infrastructure | Show results with:infrastructure
  18. [18]
    Practice Deployments Hone 3rd Infantry Division Readiness - AUSA
    Jun 25, 2025 · The two-week training periods typical for armored formations have been replaced with 45-day field exercises, stress shoots, new gunnery tables ...Missing: facility upgrades
  19. [19]
    [PDF] fort stewart/hunter army airfield, georgia
    FSGA/HAAF historically has a mild, subtropical climate, typified by warm, humid summers and short, mild winters. Yearly rainfall averages 50 inches, half of ...
  20. [20]
    Fort Stewart Climate, Weather By Month, Average Temperature ...
    Over the course of the year, the temperature typically varies from 40°F to 92°F and is rarely below 27°F or above 97°F. Climate in Fort Stewart. Link. Download.
  21. [21]
    Georgia and Weather averages Fort Stewart - U.S. Climate Data
    Fort Stewart weather averages and climate Fort Stewart, Georgia. Monthly temperature, precipitation ... Average high temperature Av. high temp. 92.6 ºF, 63 ºF.Missing: humidity | Show results with:humidity
  22. [22]
    Observed Warming Trends at US Army Basic Combat Training ...
    Nov 16, 2023 · Temperatures measured on the WBGT index have steadily increased at US Army basic training installations since at least 1960.
  23. [23]
    Seasonal Trends for Environmental Illness Incidence in the U.S. Army
    Feb 19, 2021 · Although numerous Army installations are located in a humid subtropical climate (Ft Benning, GA, Ft Bragg, NC, Ft Jackson, SC, Ft Stewart, GA, ...
  24. [24]
    Hurricane Idalia Impact Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield - DVIDS
    Aug 30, 2023 · Fort Stewart Military Police and emergency personnel work together to clear fallen tree debris along Harmon Avenue as part of Hurricane ...
  25. [25]
    Troops weather the storm: Fort Stewart-Hunter's response to Debby
    Tropical Cyclone Debby produced minimal impacts on the Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield installations early this week.
  26. [26]
    Climate - National Weather Service
    Daily data for a month - daily maximum, minimum and average temperature (degrees F), average temperature departure from normal (degrees F), heating and cooling ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION EFFORTS RECEIVE ...
    Apr 22, 2021 · The lands contain some of the most biologically and ecologically diverse areas of Georgia, made up of pine forest, wetlands, blackwater rivers, ...
  28. [28]
    Endagered Wildlife, the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker & more
    Oct 19, 2023 · Conservation of endangered species. Fort Stewart is home to 7 species that receive federal protection under the Endangered Species Act, ...
  29. [29]
    An intensively managed and increasing red-cockaded woodpecker ...
    Here we present red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) population and reproductive metrics collected at Fort Stewart, Georgia, since 1994.
  30. [30]
    Army Natural Resources Conservation - DOD DENIX
    ... Fort Stewart GA –recovering three endangered species populations (Red-cockaded Woodpecker ... conservation and recovery initiatives that will reduce or ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Management at Fort Stewart
    Aug 1, 2004 · Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Management at Fort Stewart. 5a ... ✓ our wetland bank mitigates wetland losses. ✓ our RCW population has ...
  32. [32]
    Joining forces | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Aug 27, 2019 · Fort Stewart ... In 1992, for example, the Service said Fort Stewart's conservation and protection efforts “jeopardized” the birds' existence.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Fort Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield Environmental Sustainability ...
    Pollution Prevention. Under the guidance of the SMS, pollution prevention plays a vital role in guiding Fort Stewart/HAAF's environmental stewardship. The ...
  34. [34]
    3rd Infantry Division - Army Garrisons
    Sep 23, 2025 · 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team · 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team · 3rd Combat Aviation Brigade · 3rd ID Sustainment Brigade · Division Artillery ...3rd Infantry Band · 3rd Combat Aviation Brigade · 3rd ID Sustainment Brigade
  35. [35]
    2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team - Army Garrisons
    Sep 25, 2025 · The 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team (2ABCT) is a part of the 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Stewart, GA ... 2025-2026 school year underway, Fort ...
  36. [36]
    DIVARTY Leadership - Army Garrisons
    Aug 8, 2025 · DIVARTY, Division Artillery, is led by COL Alric L. Francis and CSM Robert Craven.
  37. [37]
    3rd Division Sustainment Brigade Leadership - Army Garrisons
    Jul 2, 2025 · Commander. COL Aaron Becker. Colonel Aaron Becker, a native of Missouri, commissioned a Quartermaster Officer through Officer Candidate ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Tenant Units on Fort Stewart & Hunter AAF - Army Garrisons
    Sep 25, 2025 · Tenant units on Fort Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield, GA. 188th Infantry Brigade 224th Military Intelligence Battalion 24th Finance 385th ...
  39. [39]
    Hunter Army Airfield - Army Garrisons
    Sep 23, 2025 · Army Community Services - Hunter AAF. ACS Specialist & AER Officer: 571-801-7508. Financial Readiness Specialist: 571-801-7507.
  40. [40]
    Hunter Army Airfield | Base Overview & Info | MilitaryINSTALLATIONS
    As HAAF is a subordinate installation to Fort Stewart, some services may only be available at Fort Stewart or telephonically at HAAF. In-processing for HAAF is ...
  41. [41]
    https://home.army.mil/stewart/about/Garrison/DHR/MPD/marne-reception-center
  42. [42]
    3rd Combat Aviation Brigade - Army Garrisons
    Sep 25, 2025 · The 3rd CAB returned to Hunter Army Airfield in August of 2008, preparing for another deployment. Less than eight months after learning of the ...Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield · 4-3 AHB Leadership · 2-3 GSAB · 3-17 CAVMissing: integration | Show results with:integration
  43. [43]
    Rethinking Large-Scale Combat Operations Training - Army.mil
    Mar 13, 2025 · In preparation for Raider Brigade's NTC 24-09 rotation, it executed a brigade-level field training exercise at Fort Stewart, GA, called “Marne ...Missing: facility upgrades
  44. [44]
    Sen. Ossoff Introduces Legislation to Strengthen National Security at ...
    Jun 14, 2024 · The Hunter Army Airfield Support Act would strengthen national security by helping replace current sub-standard facilities with a new ...
  45. [45]
    Joint Army, Air Force exercise highlights rapid deployment capabilities
    Apr 9, 2024 · Swamp Avenger is a joint readiness exercise intended to combat futuristic threat scenarios by mirroring real-world events and highlighted 3rd ...Missing: aviation | Show results with:aviation
  46. [46]
    Acquisition of Land by the Government (1940)
    Camp Stewart was activated as an anti-aircraft training and firing center on June 1, 1940. By the end of the year construction on post facilities was going ...Missing: date July Daniel
  47. [47]
    [PDF] World War II and the American Home Front - NPS History
    Dec 13, 2024 · Camp Stewart, which later became Fort Stewart, opened in August 1940 as five thousand leased acres near. Hinesville, Georgia. Later land ...
  48. [48]
    History & Museum - Army Garrisons
    May 23, 2025 · Oglethorpe established the first European settlement in the Fort Stewart area with the 1733 construction of Fort Argyle, in present day ...
  49. [49]
    Camp Stewart, Georgia – 'The South's Antiaircraft Training Center ...
    In stockCreated by act of Congress in June, 1940, it embraces approximately 280,000 acres in seven south Georgia counties. The camp was named for General Daniel Stewart ...Missing: activation date July<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] historic overview of fort stewart and hunter army airfield communities ...
    By 1773, the colony of Georgia expanded westward to include all of present day Fort Stewart. Colonists during this time period settled along the coast of ...
  51. [51]
    Fort Stewart | Military Wiki | Fandom
    The Fort Stewart Military Reservation includes approximately 280,000 acres ... However, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7 ended these dreams.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] CALLED J·6~' ;1~~R'v E - KY National Guard History
    Fort Stewart, home of the U. S. Army Armor and Artillery Firing Center, was created initially as Camp Stewart in June 1940 by an Act of Congress.
  53. [53]
    June 1950: The Georgia National Guard and the Korean War
    Jun 23, 2020 · On July 5, elements of the 24th U.S. Infantry Division moved to engage forces of the Korean People's Army near Osan. Lacking anti-tank weaponry, ...Missing: reactivation | Show results with:reactivation
  54. [54]
    Korean War :: Fort Stewart - Army Garrisons
    Jun 29, 2022 · On the night of 24 April 1951 in Taejon-ni, Korea, Company H was occupying a defensive position when the enemy fanatically attacked threatening ...Missing: postwar | Show results with:postwar
  55. [55]
    June 1950: The Georgia National Guard and the Korean War
    Jun 23, 2020 · Just weeks later, on June 25, 1950, North Korean Army units backed by Soviet and Chinese equipment and assistance advanced into South Korea.Missing: reactivation | Show results with:reactivation
  56. [56]
    Remarks at Fort Stewart, Georgia to Members of the First Armored ...
    Oct 28, 2023 · Kennedy's speech commended the First Armored Division for their past service, especially their efforts related to Soviet missile bases in Cuba.
  57. [57]
    Remarks to First Armored Division, Fort Stewart, Georgia, 26 ...
    Oct 28, 2023 · This folder contains a press copy of President John F. Kennedy's remarks to members of the First Armored Division at Fort Stewart, Georgia.
  58. [58]
    History :: Fort Stewart - Army Garrisons
    Apr 6, 2018 · The 1st Armored Division was ordered to Fort Stewart for staging and in the short span of two weeks the population of the post rose from 3,500 ...Missing: levels | Show results with:levels
  59. [59]
    Hunter Army Airfield became one of the Army's key helicopter ...
    Jan 2, 2025 · Hunter Army Airfield and Fort Stewart trained 11,000 rotary wing pilots and 4,328 fixed-wing pilots, including 1400 South Vietnamese aviators. ...Missing: era | Show results with:era<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    History - Fort Stewart – Hunter Army Airfield
    Vietnam War​​ After the Cuban missile crisis had passed, the Cold War situation kept Fort Stewart in an active training role. During the late 1960's another ...Missing: era | Show results with:era
  61. [61]
    Division History - Society of the 3rd Infantry Division
    The 3rd Infantry Division was the only US unit that served in all 10 campaigns of the war, participated in four amphibious landings, and suffered the most ...
  62. [62]
    Which military units were not sent to Vietnam during the war? - Quora
    Feb 4, 2024 · The 3rd Division was not sent. Only one Brigade of the 82d Airborne was sent and that was only after TET 68. A few National Guard and Reserve ...
  63. [63]
    U.S. Army's Vietnam War history
    The U.S. actions in Vietnam began slowly with the deployment of advisors in the early 1950s and expanded incrementally to include combat forces in July 1965.
  64. [64]
    3rd Infantry Division (United States) - Wikipedia
    The 3rd Infantry Division consists of a division headquarters battalion, two armored brigade combat teams, a division artillery headquarters, a division ...Fort Stewart · 7th Infantry Regiment · 15th Infantry Regiment · 30th Infantry Regiment
  65. [65]
    [PDF] army downsizing following world war i, world war ii, vietnam ... - DTIC
    May 31, 2002 · The years between 1990 and 1995 comprised the first two waves of post-Cold. War downsizing. Throughout this time the budgetary and political ...
  66. [66]
    U.S. Army 3rd Infantry Division Marks 26th Anniversary in Georgia
    Apr 25, 2022 · The 3rd Infantry Division marks its 26-year anniversary at Fort Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield this week, after serving during the Cold War decades.
  67. [67]
    Fort Stewart, Hunter Remain Unchanged Under BRAC - WTOC
    May 13, 2005 · While BRAC won't bring any more soldiers to the base, garrison leaders say more than 2,000 soldiers assigned to the Third ID for this deployment ...Missing: impacts | Show results with:impacts
  68. [68]
    [PDF] final report - GA House of Representatives
    Given the prowess of past federal delegations, Georgia remained mostly unscathed by the first four rounds of the BRAC process; however, that changed in 2005 ...
  69. [69]
    State military leader, defense consultant talk military economic ...
    “Fort Stewart also has very few environmental impacts, which is just enormous in BRAC,” Payne said. “Most bases throughout the country have significant ...
  70. [70]
    Army Announces Stationing Decisions for New Troops
    Dec 19, 2007 · The stationing plan builds upon the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Act, Gen. Cody said, and ensures growth capacity for not only the 74,200 ...
  71. [71]
    Fort Stewart Not Getting 5th BCT | Article | The United States Army
    Jun 3, 2009 · The planning for the additional brigade began when the Base Realignment and Closure Commission announced Fort Stewart, along with Fort Bliss ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Third Infantry Division (Mechanized) After Action Report Operation ...
    The 3ID conducted continuous offensive operations over extended distances, owning a 16,100 km battlespace. Training and live fire exercises prepared the  ...
  73. [73]
    Remembering the 3rd Infantry Division's Thunder Runs - DVIDS
    Jul 4, 2025 · The first Thunder Run was a battalion-sized raid up from the south, through downtown Baghdad to link up with the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st ...Missing: deployments 1990 Indo- Pacific
  74. [74]
    [PDF] surging south of - baghdad - U.S. Army Center of Military History
    This book covers the 3d Infantry Division and Task Force Marne in Iraq, 2007-2008, focusing on the area south of Baghdad.
  75. [75]
    [PDF] The U.S. Army and the Battle for Baghdad: Lessons Learned - RAND
    Major combat operations in Iraq culminated for the U.S. Army with the now famous. “Thunder Run,” during which the 2nd Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division ...Missing: OEF Indo-
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Operation IRAQI FREEDOM: Decisive War, Elusive Peace - DTIC
    Operation IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) began in March 2003. This research project aimed to analyze the planning and execution of combat and stability operations in Iraq.
  77. [77]
    Soldiers from 3rd Inf. Div. Headquarters to deploy from Fort Stewart ...
    Oct 29, 2014 · The 3rd Infantry Division Headquarters (-) will deploy to Afghanistan next month to assume their role as the US Forces Afghanistan National Security Element.
  78. [78]
    Army to Deploy Thousands of Soldiers to Afghanistan, Kuwait and ...
    Aug 31, 2017 · The U.S. Army recently announced that two brigades from the 3rd Infantry Division will deploy to Afghanistan this fall.<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom - RAND
    Mar 26, 2025 · Ini- tially, the 3rd ID had to execute this unanticipated mission. It isolated An Najaf and provided LOC security, especially around As Samawah, ...
  80. [80]
    International Exercises Highlight Division's Unique Capabilities
    Jul 1, 2025 · Operation Pathways consists of more than 40 joint and multinational exercises, and the Spartan Brigade participates in over a dozen of these ...
  81. [81]
    3rd Infantry Transforms, Innovates Between Deployments - AUSA
    Oct 2, 2024 · The 3rd Infantry Division is modernizing and transforming for the future even as it rises to meet the demands of today, including to deter Russian aggression.Missing: accomplishments metrics
  82. [82]
    Live fire training at Fort Stewart, Ga. - Military Times
    Jul 19, 2017 · ... Weapon as Charlie Company, 3rd Battalion, 7th Infantry Regiment conducts a combined arms, live-fire exercise on Fort Stewart Ga.'s Bravo 18 ...
  83. [83]
    Marne Focus 2024: 3rd Infantry Division Soldiers replicate real ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · Soldiers with the 1st ABCT underwent this week during Marne Focus 2024, a large-scale training exercise at Fort Stewart, Georgia, in preparation for their ...Missing: BRAC | Show results with:BRAC
  84. [84]
    Winning Tomorrow's Fight: Spartan Brigade completes Marne Focus ...
    Mar 17, 2025 · Soldiers completed a force-on-force and live-fire training exercise known as Marne Focus, with support and validation from the 188th Infantry Brigade.Missing: BRAC | Show results with:BRAC
  85. [85]
    3rd ID and 18th FAB conduct HIMARS live fire exercise - DVIDS
    Mar 11, 2025 · The purpose of the exercise is to integrate with 3rd ID elements by combining resources and simulating the enemy on a battlefield to provide long range ...Missing: Cold alerts
  86. [86]
    3rd Infantry Division - Fort Stewart - Facebook
    Mar 13, 2025 · 3rd Infantry Division, execute enemy prisoners of war operations during #MarneFocus at Fort Stewart, Georgia, on March 8, 2025.<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    U.S. Army 3rd Infantry Division Hosts Augmented Reality ... - DVIDS
    Sep 3, 2022 · The US Army's 3rd Infantry Division and stakeholders held an augmented reality demonstration to showcase its technological applications for training and ...
  88. [88]
    'Sky's the limit': Fort Stewart soldiers prepare for the modern ...
    Aug 6, 2024 · The drones that the soldiers built at Fort Stewart span nearly 5 feet and weigh about 10 pounds. They are powered by two batteries and two GPS units and carry ...<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    3rd Infantry Division Opens Marne Innovation Center - CMI2
    May 23, 2023 · On May 18, 2023, the 3rd Infantry Division (ID) held its official grand opening for the Marne Innovation Center, a collaborative Civil-Military ...
  90. [90]
    Data-Centric at the Division: 3rd Infantry Division's One
    This article aims to share the 3ID's successes and failures through its one-year journey of becoming more data centric.
  91. [91]
    Third Infantry Division conducts command post exercise - Army.mil
    Nov 6, 2023 · The 3rd Infantry Division built combat readiness through participation in a multi-domain, multi-corps, and multinational operations command post exercise.
  92. [92]
    5 Soldiers shot in active shooter incident | Article - Army.mil
    Aug 6, 2025 · WATCH: Senior Commander Army Brig. Gen. John Lubas briefs the media at Fort Stewart, Ga., following an active shooter incident, Aug.
  93. [93]
    Fort Stewart shooting suspect: What we know about Army Sgt ... - CNN
    Aug 6, 2025 · The base supports more than 10,000 people, including soldiers, family members and Army civilian employees, according to the Army. The shooting ...
  94. [94]
    Fort Stewart Soldiers show 'Dogface' resolve after shooting - Army.mil
    Aug 7, 2025 · 6 active shooter incident at Fort Stewart, Aug. 7, 2025. Multiple ... Fort Stewart, home to more than 10,000 people and the legendary ...<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    What to know on Fort Stewart suspect Quornelius Radford after ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Sgt. Quornelius Radford, 28, is accused of firing on co-workers at the Georgia military facility. The five wounded soldiers were expected to ...
  96. [96]
    Fort Stewart soldiers 'absolutely saved lives' by jumping in to stop ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · When a gunman opened fire at Fort Stewart in Georgia, six soldiers immediately jumped into action to stop the shooter, the secretary of the ...
  97. [97]
    Soldiers who tackled military base gunman hailed for 'heroism' - BBC
    Aug 7, 2025 · US Army officials detail how unarmed soldiers subdued the suspect and saved the lives of injured colleagues.
  98. [98]
    Army honors Fort Stewart soldiers who subdued suspected gunman
    Aug 7, 2025 · Army Secretary Dan Driscoll today will honor the soldiers who sprang into action to stop the active-duty sergeant accused of opening fire at ...
  99. [99]
    Fort Stewart shooting suspect was relentlessly mocked for stutter ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · Friend says Quornelius Radford, man accused of shooting five fellow soldiers at army base, was 'bullied a lot'<|control11|><|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Fort Stewart shooting suspect was a hard worker who had been ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The soldier accused of opening fire Wednesday at his Army base in Georgia, wounding five people, had endured relentless bullying over his ...
  101. [101]
    A Sergeant Is Accused of Shooting 5 Soldiers in His Unit at Fort ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The suspect's father said he was seeking a transfer from the Army base in Georgia, where he had complained of racism.Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  102. [102]
    Minutes before gunfire erupted at Fort Stewart, the shooting suspect ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · Sgt. Quornelius Radford was escorted by military police into a booking room at the Liberty County Jail in Hinesville, Georgia on August 6. Lewis ...<|separator|>
  103. [103]
    1 victim in Fort Stewart shooting was a romantic partner of suspect
    the sixth referring to a soldier he shot at and missed, said Michelle McCaskill, a ...
  104. [104]
    Army sergeant accused of using personal handgun in shooting at ...
    Quornelius Radford, who was assigned to a unit within the second Brigade Combat Team, is accused of shooting five of his fellow soldiers with a ...
  105. [105]
    Fort Stewart army base shooting raises questions about military gun ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Soldiers in the area who witnessed the shooting at Fort Stewart in Georgia “immediately and without hesitation” tackled the shooter to subdue ...
  106. [106]
    Fort Stewart sergeant charged with attempted murder, domestic ...
    Aug 12, 2025 · Five soldiers were injured when Sgt. Quornelius Radford opened fire on his co-workers last week at the Army base in Georgia.
  107. [107]
    Fort Stewart shooting: Charges announced for suspected gunman
    Aug 13, 2025 · We now know the charges against the U.S. Army sergeant accused of shooting five fellow soldiers at Georgia's Fort Stewart Army base.<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    How common are US military base shootings? A look at recent attacks
    Aug 6, 2025 · The Aug. 6 shooting at Fort Stewart is just one of the multiple such attacks at military bases in recent years.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  109. [109]
    Military Base Shootings Have Ranged from Isolated Incidents to ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Shootings have ranged from isolated incidents between service members to attacks on bases to mass-casualty events, such as the shooting by an ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  110. [110]
    Two soldiers die after vehicle training accident near Fort Stewart
    Feb 3, 2025 · Staff Sgt. Shelbe Butner, 28, and Spc. Jacob Mullen, 25, died after their training vehicle rolled over and into standing water.Missing: field | Show results with:field
  111. [111]
    2 soldiers killed in Fort Stewart training accident identified - WTOC
    Feb 1, 2025 · Staff Sgt. Shelbe Butner and Spc. Jacob Mullen, both motor transport operators, died in a single-vehicle accident during a field training exercise on Thursday ...
  112. [112]
    Military Personnel: Army Needs to Better Enforce Requirements and ...
    Jun 10, 2008 · GAO estimates that about 10 percent of soldiers with medical conditions that could require duty limitations were deployed from the three ...Missing: unfit | Show results with:unfit
  113. [113]
    [PDF] GAO-08-546 Military Personnel: Army Needs to Better Enforce ...
    Jun 10, 2008 · GAO estimates that about 10 percent of soldiers with medical conditions that could require duty limitations were deployed from the three ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] GAO-23-105797, MILITARY BARRACKS: Poor Living Conditions ...
    Sep 19, 2023 · Service members reported to GAO that the conditions of barracks affect their quality of life and readiness. However, GAO found weaknesses in ...
  115. [115]
    The Army Needs a Lot of Money for Barracks, But It's Fighting for ...
    Oct 19, 2023 · Army planners have estimated it would cost at least $7.5 billion simply to catch up on the maintenance and repair backlog made particularly ...
  116. [116]
    These Soldiers Say Mold in Barracks Isn't Just Disgusting, It's ...
    Apr 24, 2023 · Eleven soldiers interviewed by Military.com say they have developed illnesses from exposure to moldy conditions in the Army's dilapidated barracks.
  117. [117]
    [PDF] FS/HAAF SOP 385-10 - Army Garrisons
    Jan 7, 2025 · This SOP manages the Garrison Safety Program, aiming to minimize losses and establish a proactive safety culture, supplementing the Army Safety ...Missing: protocol reforms
  118. [118]
    Army finds mold in over 2,000 facilities after service-wide inspection
    Mar 28, 2023 · The Army found mold in up to 2,100 of its facilities after a monthslong service-wide inspection, officials confirmed.
  119. [119]
    Fort Stewart, GA Demographics - Map of Population by Race
    Fort Stewart, Georgia had a population of 8,821 in 2020. It was 45.5% White, 24.3% Black, 2.5% Asian, 19.6% Hispanic, 1.9% Native American/Other, and 6.1% ...
  120. [120]
    Fort Stewart, Georgia Population 2025
    Fort Stewart has a 2025 population of 10,424. Fort Stewart is currently growing at a rate of 3.65% annually and its population has increased by 6.75% since the ...Missing: active | Show results with:active
  121. [121]
    https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/1331068
  122. [122]
    Fort Stewart - Data Commons
    The population in Fort Stewart was 9,976 in 2023. The median age in Fort Stewart was 21.6 in 2023. The median income in Fort Stewart was $31,898 in 2023. The ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Enhancing Family Stability During a Permanent Change of Station
    1 These moves tend to disrupt family stability, a family's ability to oper- ate as a cohesive unit, in negative ways; however, positive effects (e.g., moving ...
  124. [124]
    The Impact of PCS Moves on Your Kids - Military Spouse
    The study, which had more than 500,000 children with military parents, found that those who made a geographic move had increased odds of mental health problems ...
  125. [125]
    Fort Stewart, GA | Data USA
    Fort Stewart, GA is home to a population of 9.98k people, from which 96.2% are citizens. As of 2023, 8.35% of Fort Stewart, GA residents were born outside of ...
  126. [126]
    Facts and Figures - U.S. Army Recruiting Command
    In FY24, the Regular Army had 55,150 recruits, 81.9% male, 40.5% Caucasian, 25.8% African American, 26.1% Hispanic, 6.6% Asian/Pacific Islander, 1.0% Native  ...
  127. [127]
    Fort Stewart, GA Demographics: Population, Income, and More
    Fort Stewart is home to 9,976 residents, according to the most recent Census data. Gender-wise, 56.2% of Fort Stewart locals are male, and 43.8% are female.<|separator|>
  128. [128]
    Demographic Profile of the US Military Community
    Jan 7, 2025 · 78.5% of active-duty members are male, while 21.5% are female. Average age is 28.2 years for enlisted personnel and 34.0 years for officers.
  129. [129]
    Military Spouse Employment Landscape: Trends, Barriers, and ...
    Using data from the Census in 2023, the unemployment rate for active-duty military spouses was 8.83%, nearly four times higher than the civilian spouse rate of ...Missing: Fort Stewart
  130. [130]
    Military PCS Moves - Their Impact on Military Partners
    Apr 5, 2023 · PCS moves can be disruptive in numerous ways, impacting all members of a military family. Beyond having to find housing and set up a new household, there is a ...
  131. [131]
    Schools - Fort Stewart, GA
    Brittin Elementary School, Diamond Elementary School, and Kessler Elementary School are located on post at Fort Stewart and run by the DDESS/DoDEA.
  132. [132]
    Fort Stewart Schools - DoDEA
    The Fort Stewart Schools are part of the DoDEA Americas Southeast District. We have 3 schools to serve military connected students in PK through grade 6.
  133. [133]
    Southeast District - DoDEA
    There are nearly 900,000 military connected children of all ages worldwide, of which nearly 10,000 are enrolled in DoDEA Americas Southeast District schools and ...Fort Stewart Schools · Fort Jackson Schools · Fort Rucker Schools · Maxwell AFB
  134. [134]
    Fort Stewart | Education Programs & Resources - Military Installations
    About 1,400 children are enrolled in the Fort Stewart Schools. The average student to teacher ratio is 13 students to one teacher. There are no middle or ...
  135. [135]
    Registration Process - Eligibility and Enrollment - DoDEA
    DoDEA Student Information System (DSIS) online registration is currently available for families registering in schools serviced by Department of Defense ...Conditional Enrollment · Pacific Region · Europe Region · Americas Region
  136. [136]
    DoD Schools Ranked Best in the United States Again on Nation's ...
    DoDEA students' average scale scores ranged from 14 to 25 points higher than corresponding national average scores and held steady while national average ...
  137. [137]
    State Profiles - The Nation's Report Card
    In 2024, the average score of fourth-grade students in DoDEA was 251. This was higher than the average score of 237 for students in the nation.
  138. [138]
    School Excellence Reports - DoDEA
    DoDEA's School Excellence Reports provide stakeholders with an annual snapshot about each DoDEA school, including demographics and academic performance data ...
  139. [139]
    Army Community Service
    Oct 1, 2025 · (571) 802-0025 · Army Community Service (ACS) would like to welcome all Service Members and Families to Fort Stewart (FS) and Hunter Army ...Army Volunteer CorpsEmployment Readiness
  140. [140]
    Army Community Service - Fort Stewart MWR
    We help Soldiers from their first assignments all the way to separation or retirement, as well as Families, veterans, wounded warriors, survivors, and retirees.
  141. [141]
    Study reveals impact of Army Families on retention, recruiting
    Oct 19, 2018 · We knew that awareness of support programs, even if not used, increased satisfaction with military life and in turn improved retention.
  142. [142]
    Mobilization, Deployment and Stability Support Operations (MDSSO)
    Sep 26, 2025 · MD&SSO provides training and publications to help commanders, Soldiers, and Families navigate the challenges of mobilization and deployment.
  143. [143]
    Military Family Readiness Is Important for Mission Readiness | Article
    Apr 28, 2025 · Strong, resilient military Families have a direct impact on mission readiness, retention and the effectiveness of Soldiers in combat.
  144. [144]
    Fort Stewart partners with local university to expand educational ...
    Aug 1, 2023 · The courses will be offered in shorter terms to accommodate the unique challenges faced by service members and their families. Leaders from the ...
  145. [145]
    Graduate Degrees at Fort Stewart and HAAF - Georgia Southern ...
    Georgia Southern University is proud to partner with Fort Stewart* – Hunter Army Airfield to provide graduate courses on post in Hinesville and Savannah.Missing: higher | Show results with:higher
  146. [146]
    Survey: High operational tempo still affecting military families
    Dec 7, 2016 · 72 percent feel the current operational tempo imposes an unacceptable level of stress for a healthy work and family life; and 42 percent said ...Missing: Stewart | Show results with:Stewart
  147. [147]
    The Evolution of Programs Supporting Military Family Resilience
    Dec 9, 2020 · Today there is recognition among military leaders that family support is critical to military readiness and retention.