Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Full scale

In electronics, instrumentation, and signal processing, full scale denotes the maximum range or amplitude that a device, sensor, or system is designed to measure, output, or represent accurately.^[1] Known as full scale output (FSO) or full scale range, it represents the span from the minimum to the maximum value the instrument can handle, such as the highest voltage or pressure reading before saturation or error exceeds specifications.^[1] Accuracy in these systems is often specified as a percentage of full scale (e.g., ±1% FS),^[2] ensuring reliable performance across the entire operational spectrum, which is critical for applications in automation, testing, data acquisition, and digital signal processing such as analog-to-digital conversion.

Core Concepts

Definition and Scope

In electronics and signal processing, full scale refers to the maximum amplitude—such as voltage, current, or mechanical deflection—that a system can accurately represent or measure without introducing distortion or clipping.^[3] This concept establishes the operational limits of devices, ensuring signals remain within the system's dynamic range for faithful reproduction or analysis.^[4] The term originated in analog instruments, particularly with the development of moving-coil meters like voltmeters and ammeters based on the D'Arsonval galvanometer design patented in 1882, where full scale deflection (FSD) described the maximum pointer excursion across the instrument's scale, proportional to the input quantity.^[5]^[6] Building on galvanometer principles first demonstrated in 1820, these instruments standardized measurement practices, with FSD serving as a calibration benchmark for accuracy and sensitivity.^[5] By the mid-20th century, following the emergence of digital electronics in the 1950s, the notion of full scale extended to digital contexts, denoting the peak value in quantized representations without overflow.^[7] Full scale applies broadly across domains, including electronics for analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and digital-to-analog converters (DACs), where it defines the input or output span; signal processing for maintaining signal integrity; audio engineering, where it represents the maximum digital level (0 dBFS) before clipping; and instrumentation, such as oscilloscopes, where it equates to the full vertical screen height (typically 8 divisions) for displaying waveform amplitudes.^[3]^[8]^[9] The full scale range (FSR) quantifies this span as the difference between the maximum and minimum representable values:

\text{FSR} = V_{\max} - V_{\min}

For instance, in a unipolar 0-10 V system, FSR = 10 V, providing the baseline for resolution calculations in ADCs and DACs.^[3]^[4]

Analog vs. Digital Distinctions

In analog systems, full scale refers to the continuous range of signal amplitude that can be handled without distortion, ultimately limited by the physical characteristics of components such as operational amplifiers (op-amps). For audio applications, op-amps are typically powered by ±15 V supplies, allowing a maximum output voltage swing approaching but not exceeding these rails, often around ±13 V to ±14 V depending on the device and load conditions.^[10] To prevent saturation and clipping, analog designs incorporate headroom, defined as the margin between the nominal operating level (e.g., +4 dBu in professional audio) and the maximum undistorted level (e.g., +24 dBu), providing approximately 20 dB of overhead for transient peaks.^[11] In contrast, digital full scale represents the discrete maximum value achievable within the system's bit depth, such as $2^n - 1 for an unsigned n-bit integer representation or the highest representable code in signed formats. This range introduces quantization steps, where the full scale is commonly normalized to 1.0 in floating-point systems or 0 dBFS (decibels relative to full scale) in fixed-point audio processing, ensuring signals do not exceed this limit to avoid overflow.^[12] The key differences between analog and digital full scale implementations lie in their handling of resolution and noise. Analog full scale offers theoretically infinite resolution within its continuous limits but is vulnerable to environmental noise and component imperfections, such as thermal noise in amplifiers. Digital full scale provides finite resolution due to quantization but ensures perfect repeatability and immunity to analog degradation once digitized. A fundamental aspect of digital quantization is the associated noise, modeled as uniform over the full scale range (FSR); its standard deviation is given by

\sigma_q = \frac{\mathrm{FSR}}{2^{n+1} \sqrt{3}}

for an n-bit quantizer assuming a uniform error distribution, which quantifies the irreducible error floor.^[13] These distinctions lead to distinct trade-offs in system design: analog full scale emphasizes linearity and smooth amplitude response, relying on careful component selection to maintain fidelity up to the physical limits, whereas digital full scale prioritizes predictable behavior, with overflow typically resulting in clipping (hard limiting to the maximum value) or wrapping (modulo arithmetic in integer formats), which can introduce harsh artifacts if not managed.^[12]

Representation Methods

Binary Integer Formats

In binary integer formats, full scale represents the maximum amplitude that can be encoded within the fixed number of bits, determining the dynamic range and quantization levels in systems like digital audio and embedded processing. These formats use fixed-point arithmetic, where the value is scaled relative to the full scale range (FSR), typically without an explicit decimal point.^[14] Signed integers commonly employ two's complement representation, allowing both positive and negative values symmetric around zero. For an n-bit signed integer, the range spans from -2^{n-1} to $2^{n-1} - 1, providing $2^{n-1} - 1 positive values, zero, and $2^{n-1} negative values.^[15] For example, in 16-bit audio, this corresponds to -32,768 to 32,767, where the negative extreme (-32,768) lacks a direct positive counterpart (+32,768), creating slight asymmetry.^[15] This format is prevalent in pulse-code modulation (PCM) for digital audio due to its efficient arithmetic operations in signal processing.^[15] Unsigned binary formats, in contrast, encode only non-negative values from 0 to $2^n - 1, with full scale defined as the maximum code $2^n - 1. These are used in applications like digital imaging, where pixel intensities range from black (0) to white ($2^n - 1) in n-bit grayscale or color channels, and in pulse-width modulation (PWM) for control systems, where the duty cycle scales from 0% to 100% corresponding to the full unsigned range.^[16] In digital audio systems using these formats, full scale is normalized to 0 dBFS (decibels relative to full scale), serving as the reference for peak levels. For instance, in PCM audio, a sine wave normalized to full scale has peaks at the maximum positive code without exceeding it, ensuring no clipping while maximizing dynamic range; levels above 0 dBFS result in hard limiting.^[17]^[18] During analog-to-digital conversion (ADC), the quantization process maps the analog input to a digital value using the equation:

\text{Digital value} = \round\left( \frac{\text{Analog input}}{\text{FSR}} \times (2^n - 1) \right)

where FSR is the full-scale range of the input signal, and the result is rounded to the nearest integer code from 0 to $2^n - 1 for unsigned or adjusted for signed representations.^[14] This scaling ensures uniform quantization steps of FSR / $2^n, with the full scale code representing the upper limit of the input range minus one least significant bit (LSB).^[14] Floating-point formats offer greater dynamic range through exponentiation but are less common in fixed-precision integer systems like these.^[14]

Floating-Point Formats

Floating-point formats represent numbers using a sign bit, an exponent, and a mantissa, enabling a wide dynamic range that is particularly valuable for defining full scale in applications requiring high precision and scalability, such as professional audio and scientific computing.^[19] In these systems, full scale is typically normalized to ±1.0, where the mantissa provides the fractional precision and the exponent scales the value exponentially.^[20] This normalization contrasts with binary integer formats by allowing values far beyond a fixed bit-depth limit without immediate overflow.^[21] The IEEE 754 standard defines the most widely adopted floating-point formats, including single precision (32 bits: 1 sign bit, 8 exponent bits, 23 mantissa bits) and double precision (64 bits: 1 sign bit, 11 exponent bits, 52 mantissa bits).^[19] In both, full scale is normalized to ±1.0 for the significand (implicit leading 1 plus mantissa fraction), with the exponent enabling representation up to approximately 3.4 × 10^{38} in single precision before overflow to infinity.^[19] Double precision extends this to about 1.8 × 10^{308}, providing even greater headroom for computations involving extreme scales.^[19] In professional audio, 32-bit floating-point formats adhere to this normalization, with full scale at ±1.0 corresponding to 0 dBFS and offering a dynamic range of approximately 1524 dB due to the exponent's flexibility.^[20] Denormalized numbers, which occur when the exponent is zero and lack the implicit leading 1, allow precise representation of sub-full-scale values near zero, avoiding abrupt underflow and supporting subtle signal details in mixing and effects processing.^[20]^[19] A key advantage of floating-point over fixed-point integer representations is the extended headroom, which prevents clipping during multi-stage signal processing by automatically scaling intermediate results without loss of precision.^[21]^[22] This is essential in cascaded operations, such as audio filtering or scientific simulations, where accumulated gains could otherwise exceed fixed ranges.^[21] The value of a normalized floating-point number in single precision is given by:

(-1)^{s} \times 1.m \times 2^{e - 127}

where s is the sign bit (0 or 1), m is the 23-bit mantissa interpreted as a fraction (0 ≤ m < 1), and e is the biased 8-bit exponent (1 ≤ e ≤ 254 for normalized numbers).^[19] However, limitations arise from the finite mantissa bits, leading to rounding errors near full scale where the precision of the least significant bits diminishes relative to the magnitude.^[19] These errors, bounded by 0.5 units in the last place (ulp), can accumulate in iterative computations, potentially affecting accuracy in high-dynamic-range scenarios despite the format's overall robustness.^[19]

Signal Processing Applications

Analog-to-Digital Conversion

In analog-to-digital conversion (ADC), the full-scale range (FSR) defines the maximum input voltage span that the converter can accurately digitize, typically matched to the reference voltage V_{REF} to optimize dynamic range and resolution. For instance, a unipolar ADC might operate over a 0-5 V FSR when V_{REF} = 5 V, where the input signal amplitude is scaled such that the full-scale input corresponds to the maximum digital code output. This matching ensures that the analog input fully utilizes the ADC's quantization levels without clipping, directly influencing the precision of the digital representation.^[23]^[24] Oversampling techniques enhance ADC performance by sampling the input signal at a rate higher than the Nyquist frequency, spreading quantization noise across a wider bandwidth and allowing digital filtering to reduce in-band noise. This process increases the effective resolution by a factor of \sqrt{\text{oversampling ratio}}, effectively improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) without requiring additional hardware bits. For example, an oversampling ratio of 4 can yield approximately 1 extra effective bit of resolution in the signal band after decimation.^[25]^[26] The Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem governs ADC operation by requiring a sampling rate at least twice the highest frequency component of the input signal (f_s \geq 2 f_{\max}) to prevent aliasing, where higher-frequency components fold back into the baseband and distort the digitized signal. Full scale plays a critical role here, as it determines the overall dynamic range (DR) of the ADC, given by the formula DR = 6.02n + 1.76 dB for an ideal n-bit converter processing a full-scale sine wave, where the quantization noise limits the achievable DR.^[13] In pipeline ADCs, the full-scale input is processed stage-by-stage, with each stage generating a few bits and amplifying the residue for the next, mapping the analog input to digital codes via sub-ranging quantization where the overall FSR aligns with the reference to produce thermometer or binary codes per stage. Successive approximation register (SAR) ADCs, conversely, employ a binary search algorithm using a capacitive digital-to-analog converter (DAC) to iteratively compare the input against fractions of the FSR, converging on the closest digital code in n steps for an n-bit resolution. For a 12-bit SAR or pipeline ADC with an FSR of 10 V, the least significant bit (LSB) step size is $10 / 2^{12} = 2.44 mV, representing the smallest distinguishable voltage increment across the full scale.^[27]^[28] To maintain signal integrity within the full-scale range, anti-aliasing filters—typically low-pass filters with a cutoff near the Nyquist frequency—are essential before the ADC input, attenuating frequencies above f_s / 2 to prevent them from aliasing (or folding) into the lower band and corrupting the digitized representation. These filters ensure that out-of-band signals do not overload the ADC's dynamic range or introduce spurious components within the FSR.

Digital-to-Analog Conversion

In digital-to-analog conversion, the full scale output represents the maximum analog voltage or current that a DAC can produce, corresponding to the digital input code at its highest value, such as all 1s in binary (code $2^n - 1 for an n-bit converter). This output is typically just below the full-scale range (FSR), defined as the span from the minimum to maximum analog level, often equal to the reference voltage V_{ref} in unipolar configurations. For instance, in a 12-bit DAC with a 4.096 V reference, the full scale code 4095 yields an output of 4.096 V, assuming ideal conditions without offset or gain errors. The relationship is given by the equation for the analog output in zero-order hold DACs:

V_{out} = \text{digital code} \times \frac{\text{FSR}}{2^n},

where the full scale code produces (2^n - 1)/2^n \times \text{FSR}, approximately the FSR.^[29]^[30] Reconstruction filters are essential in DACs to convert the stairstep waveform from sample-and-hold or zero-order hold mechanisms into a smooth analog signal, approximating the band-limited interpolation theorem. Common implementations include sinc filters, which ideally perform low-pass filtering at the Nyquist frequency, or linear-phase filters that preserve waveform symmetry while attenuating images above the signal band. However, the abrupt frequency cutoff in these filters can induce the Gibbs phenomenon, manifesting as overshoot and ringing in the time domain, with maximum overshoot reaching about 9% of the full scale amplitude near discontinuities like square wave edges. This effect arises from the truncation of higher harmonics in the Fourier series reconstruction and persists regardless of filter order, though its width narrows with more terms.^[31]^[32] A critical aspect of full scale handling in DACs involves intersample peaks, where the reconstructed analog signal in band-limited content exceeds the digital full scale (0 dBFS) due to interpolation between samples. For high-frequency components near the Nyquist limit, such as an 11 kHz sine wave at a 44.1 kHz sample rate, peaks can surpass digital full scale by up to 3 dB, while in commercial music recordings, observed overs can reach +1.5 dBFS or higher in extreme cases, potentially up to 6 dB in aggregated content with multiple tones. These peaks require dedicated headroom in the DAC's analog output stage—often 3 to 3.5 dB above 0 dBFS—to avoid clipping and intermodulation distortion during reconstruction. High-performance DACs incorporate oversampling and extended dynamic range in their interpolators to accommodate this without compromising signal integrity.^[33]^[34]

Practical Considerations

Clipping and Distortion

Clipping occurs when an audio or imaging signal exceeds the full scale limits of a digital or analog system, resulting in waveform distortion that alters the original content. In digital systems, this manifests as samples being capped at the maximum representable value, such as ±1 in normalized floating-point or the highest bit pattern in fixed-point formats. In analog systems, signals hit the power supply rails, producing similar truncation effects. Hard clipping refers to the abrupt truncation of a signal at full scale, which introduces primarily odd-order harmonics and can approximate square wave distortion. For instance, driving an amplifier into hard clipping generates these odd harmonics regardless of the circuit design, leading to a harsh, gritty timbre. The total harmonic distortion (THD) in hard clipping increases nonlinearly with signal amplitude, as higher clipping levels amplify the contribution of higher-order harmonics. This type of distortion is common in overdriven power amplifiers and digital processors without limiting. Soft clipping, in contrast, employs gradual compression to limit peaks, often using functions like the hyperbolic tangent (tanh) to simulate analog saturation behavior. The tanh function provides a smooth sigmoidal curve that rounds waveform peaks, producing lower-order harmonics that add perceived warmth rather than harshness. This approach reduces the auditory unpleasantness of hard clipping by mimicking the natural overload characteristics of analog tape or tube circuits, making it preferable for creative audio effects. Detection of clipping involves monitoring system-specific indicators to identify overflows before or after they occur. In digital signal processing, overflow flags in hardware or software detect when arithmetic operations exceed representable bounds, signaling potential clipping in real-time. For analog systems, rail hitting is observed when the output voltage reaches the supply limits, often via comparators or oscilloscope visualization. In audio production, intersample clip detection addresses hidden peaks by oversampling the signal at rates like 4x or 8x the original (e.g., 176.4 kHz for 44.1 kHz audio) and scanning for reconstructed values exceeding 0 dBFS, as these can cause downstream distortion in digital-to-analog conversion. The effects of clipping vary by domain but generally degrade perceptual quality. In audio, hard clipping is perceived as harshness or dissonance due to the dominance of odd harmonics, while soft clipping sounds warmer but still introduces unwanted coloration if excessive. In digital imaging, clipping leads to loss of highlight or shadow detail, which can exacerbate banding artifacts in smooth gradients by reducing the effective number of tonal levels available. A key quantitative measure for assessing clipping risk is the crest factor, defined as the ratio of the peak amplitude to the root mean square (RMS) value of the signal:

\text{Crest factor} = \frac{\text{peak}}{\text{RMS}}

High crest factors, common in music (12-20 dB), indicate signals with sharp peaks relative to average energy, increasing the likelihood of clipping without sufficient headroom.

Headroom and Normalization

Headroom refers to the reserved margin above the nominal signal level up to the full scale limit, allowing transient peaks to occur without clipping in digital systems. In digital audio, this is commonly set at +6 dB relative to the nominal level to accommodate unexpected signal excursions while maintaining signal integrity. The effective dynamic range available for the signal is thus reduced by this headroom allocation, as described by the equation:

\text{Effective DR} = \text{full scale DR} - \text{headroom margin}

where full scale DR represents the total dynamic range from the noise floor to 0 dBFS, and the headroom margin is the reserved decibel amount subtracted to ensure headroom for peaks. Normalization involves scaling the audio signal to optimally utilize the available dynamic range up to full scale without exceeding it and causing distortion. Peak normalization adjusts the highest amplitude to approach 0 dBFS, often leaving a small margin to avoid inter-sample peaks, while RMS normalization targets an average level such as -20 dBFS for consistent perceived volume. In broadcast applications, loudness normalization uses integrated loudness metrics like LUFS (Loudness Units relative to Full Scale), with the EBU R128 standard specifying a target of -23 LUFS to ensure uniform playback loudness across programs while preserving dynamic range. Dithering is a technique that adds low-level, uncorrelated noise to the signal prior to quantization, particularly when reducing bit depth, to randomize and mask the audibility of quantization distortion. This process converts harsh, deterministic quantization errors into a benign noise floor, allowing low-level signals to be reproduced linearly and enabling the full dynamic range of the bit depth without distortion. With noise shaping, the effective dynamic range in the audible band can be increased significantly by relocating quantization noise to ultrasonic frequencies.^[35] In practice, dither is applied during export from higher to lower bit depths, such as 24-bit to 16-bit, to maintain audio fidelity without introducing tonal artifacts. In audio mixing workflows, engineers typically allocate 3-6 dB of headroom on the master bus to provide flexibility for subsequent processing and mastering, preventing overload during compression or limiting. Modern standards like EBU R128 expand on earlier practices by integrating loudness normalization with true-peak limiting at -1 dBTP, ensuring headroom accommodates both peak and integrated loudness requirements in distribution chains.

References

[1]
[PDF] Scale
A full-scale drawing is shown the actual size of the object. Other objects are scaled up or down. As most objects drawn to techni- cal specifications are either ...
[2]
Definition of FULL-SCALE
### Definition of Full-Scale
[3]
FSO – Full Scale Output - SensorsONE
The first meaning is that it is the resulting output signal or displayed reading produced when the maximum measurement for a given device is applied. The second ...
[4]
https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/types-of-adcs-and-dacs.html
[5]
Types of ADCs and DACs - Analog Devices
Jul 22, 2002 · Gain error is usually expressed in LSB or as a percent of full-scale range (%FSR), and it can be calibrated out with hardware or in software.Missing: electronics | Show results with:electronics
[6]
Mechanical Meter Movements September 1960 Popular Electronics
Jan 5, 2023 · The meter would conduct only one-third the total current, and its full scale deflection would represent 3 ma. If the shunt were ...
[7]
Galvanometer K-12 Experiments & Background Information for ...
In a preparatory step, the circuit is completed and the resistor adjusted to produce full scale deflection. When an unknown resistor is placed in series in ...
[8]
Understanding Voltage Measurement Accuracy for InfiniiVision ...
To find full scale, multiply the vertical scale setting by 8 (these scopes have 8 divisions). · Example: vertical scale = 1V/div; Full scale = 8 divisions * 1 V/ ...
[9]
Glossary definition of 'Full-scale amplitude' - Prism Sound
For systems where the output is accessible in the digital domain, full scale is defined as the RMS voltage of a 997Hz sine wave whose positive peak value ...Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
[10]
[PDF] CHAPTER 1: OP AMP BASICS - Analog Devices
Even the least expensive devices have typical voltage gains of 100,000. (100dB), while the highest performance precision bipolar and chopper stabilized units.<|separator|>
[11]
Headroom - Sound On Sound
A high quality analogue audio mixer or processor will have a nominal operating level of +4dBu and a clipping point of +24dBu - providing 20dB of headroom.
[12]
[PDF] Mixed-Signal and DSP Design Techniques, Introduction
Signals are physical quantities containing information, analog by nature. Digital signals are formatted into digits, and DSP converts analog to binary for ...
[13]
[PDF] MT-001: Taking the Mystery out of the Infamous Formula,"SNR ...
Once the rms quantization noise voltage is known, the theoretical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is computed. The effects of oversampling on the SNR are also ...Missing: standard deviation
[14]
[PDF] ANALOG-DIGITAL CONVERSION
There is a range of analog input voltage over which the ADC will produce a given output code; this range is the quantization uncertainty and is equal to 1 LSB.
[15]
Number Systems for Digital Audio | Mathematics of the DFT
This appendix discusses number formats used in digital audio. They are divided into linear and logarithmic.
[16]
https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/tas5504
[17]
https://www.aes.org/standards/blog/2020/12/aes17-revision-to-clarify-0dbfs
[18]
[PDF] Technical Document AES TD1004.1.15-10 Recommendation for ...
Oct 19, 2015 · Definitions. dB FS: decibels relative to full scale measured with a standard digital peak meter. Sometimes abbreviated without the space: dBFS. ...
[19]
What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point ...
... IEEE 754 can fail with double-rounding. The most useful of these are the portable algorithms for performing simulated multiple precision arithmetic ...
[20]
32 Bit Floating Point Audio - The Case For Using It - Production Expert
Apr 7, 2025 · 32 bit floating point recordings have unlimited headroom and cannot be unintentionally distorted, once audio signal passes through analogue to digital ...
[21]
Fixed-Point vs. Floating-Point Digital Signal Processing
Dec 2, 2015 · Floating point can support a much wider range of values than fixed point, with the ability to represent very small numbers and very large numbers.
[22]
[PDF] Comparing Fixed- and Floating-Point DSPs - Texas Instruments
Fixed-point DSPs use integer arithmetic, while floating-point DSPs support both integer and real arithmetic, with a greater dynamic range.
[23]
Voltage Reference Scaling Technique Increases ADC Accuracy to ...
FSR (full-scale range) depends from the amplitude of the voltage reference. The input voltage range of the external reference for MAX159, a low power ...
[24]
Reference Voltage for Multiple ADCs - Analog Devices
Jul 4, 2002 · The +2.0V and +1.0V reference voltages set the differential full-scale range of the associated ADCs at 2VP-P. The +2.0V and +1.0V buffers drive ...
[25]
[PDF] Oversampling the ADC12 for Higher Resolution - Texas Instruments
Jul 13, 2006 · Oversampling can achieve resolutions greater than the available bits for an analog-to-digital converter (ADC). An example is shown that uses ...Missing: sqrt( | Show results with:sqrt(
[26]
[PDF] A Glossary of Analog-to-Digital Specifications and Performance ...
For instance, you may find INL defined at ±0.001% of FSR. In this instance ... to the converter full-scale range. SINAD is a critical specification for ...
[27]
Chapter 20: Analog to Digital Conversion
Jan 20, 2021 · So, for an N-bit ADC, there are 2N codes and 1 LSB = FS/2N, where FS is the full-scale analog input voltage. However, ADC operation in the ...
[28]
An Inside Look at High Speed Analog-to-Digital Converter Accuracy
Apr 1, 2015 · Therefore, if the 12-bit ADC has an input full-scale (VFS) of 10 V p-p, then it would have an LSB size of 2.44 mV p-p and an accuracy of ±1.22 ...
[29]
Calculating the Error Budget in Precision Digital-to-Analog ...
Sep 25, 2008 · For example, a 12-bit DAC code 4095 should produce an output of 4.096V with a reference voltage of 4.096V; any deviation from this is an error.
[30]
Digital to Analog Converters - An Introductory Tutorial - Circuit Crush
The full-scale voltage (VFS) of a DAC is the maximum analog level that it can reach when applying the highest binary code (which would be 1111 for a 4-bit DAC).
[31]
Gibbs Effect
When only some of the frequencies are used in the reconstruction, each edge shows overshoot and ringing (decaying oscillations). This overshoot and ringing is ...
[32]
The Mathematics of How Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADC) and ...
Apr 17, 2025 · The sharp frequency cut-off leads to Gibbs phenomenon, causing overshoot and ringing in the time domain.Windowed Sinc Filters: Real-world ...
[33]
Intersample Overs in CD Recordings
### Summary of Intersample Peaks Exceeding Digital Full Scale
[34]
Practical example of intersample peak greater than +6 dBFS
Jun 15, 2020 · All of these intersample peaks that exceed 0 dBFS means that a digital filter needs headroom to properly oversample.Practical example of intersample peak greater than +6 dBFS | Page 2Let's develop an ASR inter-sample test procedure for DACs! | Page 12More results from www.audiosciencereview.comMissing: scale | Show results with:scale