Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gauge factor

The gauge factor, denoted as GF, is a dimensionless measure of the sensitivity of a strain gauge, defined as the ratio of the fractional change in the gauge's electrical resistance to the mechanical strain it experiences.^[1] Mathematically, it is expressed by the formula GF = \frac{\Delta R / R}{\varepsilon}, where \Delta R is the change in resistance, R is the initial resistance, and \varepsilon is the axial strain.^[2] In practice, the gauge factor quantifies how effectively a strain gauge converts mechanical deformation into a measurable electrical signal, making it essential for accurate strain measurement in engineering applications.^[1] For conventional metallic and foil strain gauges, the typical value is approximately 2, reflecting a balanced sensitivity suitable for most structural and load-sensing tasks.^[2] In contrast, semiconductor strain gauges exhibit much higher gauge factors, often reaching up to 200, due to their pronounced piezoresistive effect, which enhances sensitivity but introduces challenges like nonlinearity and temperature dependence.^[3] The gauge factor plays a critical role in Wheatstone bridge circuits, where it directly influences the output voltage proportional to strain, enabling applications in stress analysis, vibration monitoring, and transducer design.^[2] Factors such as temperature variations can affect its value, necessitating compensated designs for reliable performance across environments.^[1] Overall, advancements in gauge factor optimization continue to improve the precision and versatility of strain-based sensing technologies.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

The gauge factor (GF), also known as the strain factor, is defined as the ratio of the fractional change in electrical resistance (ΔR/R) of a material to the mechanical strain (ε) applied to it. This dimensionless quantity measures the sensitivity of a strain-sensing element, such as a strain gauge, in converting mechanical deformation into a detectable electrical signal, enabling precise quantification of stress and strain in engineering applications.^[1]^[4] The concept of the gauge factor emerged from the independent invention of the bonded resistance strain gauge in 1938 by Edward E. Simmons at the California Institute of Technology and Arthur C. Ruge at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Both approaches relied on changes in the electrical resistance of fine metallic wires bonded to the test specimen, primarily due to dimensional effects (length elongation and cross-sectional reduction) under strain, augmented by the piezoresistive effect in metals. These developments, patented in 1944, formalized the gauge factor as a key performance metric for strain measurement devices.^[5]^[6]^[7] As a dimensionless parameter, the gauge factor has typical values of approximately 2 for metallic strain gauges, reflecting their reliance on geometric effects like length elongation and cross-sectional reduction. In contrast, semiconductor-based gauges exhibit much higher values, ranging from 50 to 200, due to pronounced piezoresistive contributions that amplify resistance changes beyond mere dimensional shifts. These ranges establish the gauge factor's central role in evaluating the effectiveness of strain gauges across material types.^[8]^[3]

Basic Formula

The gauge factor (GF), also denoted as S or k, is defined by the fundamental relation

GF = \frac{\Delta R / R}{\varepsilon},

where \Delta R is the change in electrical resistance of the strain gauge, R is the initial (unstrained) resistance, and \varepsilon = \Delta L / L is the axial strain, representing the fractional change in length \Delta L relative to the original length L.^[8]^[2] This dimensionless quantity quantifies the sensitivity of the gauge's resistance to mechanical deformation. Rearranging the formula gives \Delta R / R = GF \cdot \varepsilon, which directly relates the relative resistance change to the applied strain. For a typical metallic strain gauge with GF = 2, a strain of 0.1% (or \varepsilon = 0.001) produces a 0.2% change in resistance, illustrating how the gauge factor scales the output signal.^[2]^[9] As an example, consider a common 120 Ω strain gauge with GF = 2 subjected to 500 microstrain (\varepsilon = 500 \times 10^{-6}). The resulting change in resistance is \Delta R = GF \cdot \varepsilon \cdot R = 2 \cdot 500 \times 10^{-6} \cdot 120 \approx 0.12 Ω, a measurable variation in practical circuits.^[8] A higher gauge factor corresponds to greater sensitivity, meaning larger resistance changes for the same strain level, which enhances detection of small deformations but may introduce challenges in linearity or stability.^[2]^[10]

Physical Principles

Dimensional Effects

When a conductor experiences axial strain, its resistance changes due to alterations in its geometry, independent of any variations in material resistivity. The primary dimensional effect arises from the elongation of the conductor's length, which directly increases resistance according to the relation R = \rho L / A, where L is length and A is cross-sectional area.^[11] This is compounded by the Poisson effect, in which the material undergoes lateral contraction perpendicular to the direction of strain, reducing the cross-sectional area and thereby further increasing resistance.^[12] The Poisson effect is quantified by Poisson's ratio \nu, defined as the negative ratio of transverse strain to axial strain, typically around 0.3 for common metals such as steel or constantan.^[12] The contribution to the gauge factor from these dimensional changes can be derived from the fractional change in resistance, \Delta R / R, relative to the axial strain \epsilon. For small strains, neglecting higher-order terms and resistivity changes, this geometric component approximates $1 + 2\nu.^[11] With \nu \approx 0.3 for metals, this yields a value of about 1.6, meaning the resistance changes by roughly 1.6 times the applied strain solely due to geometry.^[13] For instance, in a thin wire under tensile strain, the length increases proportionally to \epsilon, while the diameter decreases by \nu \epsilon, narrowing the cross-section and amplifying the resistance rise.^[11] This dimensional principle formed the basis of early strain gauge designs, such as Edward E. Simmons' 1938 bonded wire strain gauge, which relied on the resistance variation in a fine wire affixed to a specimen to detect mechanical deformation.^[14] In practice, the total gauge factor combines this geometric term with material-specific piezoresistive effects.^[12]

Piezoresistive Effect

The piezoresistive effect describes the alteration in a material's electrical resistivity (ρ) induced by applied mechanical stress (σ), distinct from changes due to geometric deformation. This phenomenon arises primarily from intrinsic modifications within the material's electronic structure and is most significant in semiconductors like silicon and germanium, where stress can cause substantial resistivity variations.^[15]^[16] The piezoresistive coefficient, denoted as π, quantifies this effect and is defined as π = (Δρ/ρ) / σ, where Δρ/ρ represents the relative change in resistivity. This coefficient relates to the overall gauge factor (GF) through the expression GF = 1 + 2ν + (Δρ/ρ)/ε, with ν as Poisson's ratio and ε as strain; here, the term (Δρ/ρ)/ε captures the piezoresistive contribution beyond the baseline dimensional effects of 1 + 2ν. In practice, π is a tensor with components (e.g., π11, π12, π44) that depend on the crystal orientation and doping type in semiconductors.^[17] At the microscopic level, the piezoresistive effect in semiconductors stems from strain-induced alterations to the band structure of the crystal lattice. Mechanical stress distorts the lattice, shifting energy bands and modifying the effective masses of charge carriers, which in turn affects both carrier mobility (μ) and density (n) via changes in scattering rates and band overlap. For instance, in n-type silicon, longitudinal stress can increase electron mobility along the strain direction, while transverse stress may decrease it, leading to anisotropic resistivity changes. These mechanisms were first systematically characterized in germanium and silicon under uniaxial tension.^[16]^[18] The piezoresistive contribution significantly amplifies the gauge factor in semiconductors compared to metals. In metals, it adds only about 0.4 to the GF, resulting in total values near 2 primarily from dimensional changes. In contrast, doped semiconductors exhibit piezoresistive terms ranging from 50 to 200, enabling much higher sensitivities for strain sensing.^[17]

Types of Strain Gauges and Gauge Factors

Metallic Strain Gauges

Metallic strain gauges are constructed from metallic alloys and represent the most common type used in general-purpose strain measurement applications. These gauges operate primarily through changes in electrical resistance due to mechanical deformation, with the resistance variation dominated by dimensional changes in the gauge's geometry rather than significant alterations in material resistivity. The two primary subtypes are wire-wound and foil gauges, where wire-wound designs consist of fine metallic wires coiled into a grid pattern and bonded to an insulating substrate, serving as the earliest form of metallic strain gauges.^[19] Foil gauges, which have largely supplanted wire-wound types due to their compact size and manufacturing efficiency, feature a thin metallic foil etched into a serpentine grid pattern and laminated onto a flexible insulating backing, such as polyimide, to ensure adhesion to the test surface and protect the sensitive element.^[19]^[20] Common alloys for metallic strain gauges include constantan (a copper-nickel alloy) for standard applications and Karma (a nickel-chromium alloy) for enhanced stability in varying environmental conditions.^[21] The gauge factor (GF) for these metallic gauges typically ranges from 2.0 to 2.1, with constantan exhibiting a GF of approximately 2.1 ± 0.1 and Karma around 2.03 ± 0.17.^[22] This value arises mainly from dimensional effects, approximated by the term $1 + 2\nu (where \nu is Poisson's ratio, yielding about 1.6 for typical metals with \nu \approx 0.3), augmented by a small piezoresistive contribution from minor changes in resistivity under strain.^[22] Metallic strain gauges offer key advantages, including a highly linear resistance response to applied strain over a wide range, making them suitable for precise, repeatable measurements without significant nonlinearity errors.^[23] Additionally, they provide good temperature stability, operating reliably up to 200°C when using polyimide backings and appropriate adhesives, with minimal drift in gauge factor within this range.^[24] The grid pattern in foil designs further enhances sensitivity by maximizing the effective length of the resistive element exposed to strain while minimizing transverse effects.^[20]

Semiconductor Strain Gauges

Semiconductor strain gauges utilize the piezoresistive effect in semiconducting materials to achieve significantly higher sensitivity compared to metallic types, where resistance changes are primarily driven by dimensional variations. These gauges are typically fabricated from doped silicon, either p-type or n-type, or germanium, with doping levels tailored to enhance the piezoresistive response.^[25]^[17] The piezoresistive effect, first systematically measured in these materials, causes substantial alterations in electrical resistivity under mechanical strain due to changes in carrier mobility and concentration.^[25] Common configurations include diffused resistors or thin-film implants directly on silicon wafers, often arranged in Wheatstone bridge circuits—such as half-bridge or full-bridge setups—to amplify output signals and provide inherent compensation for common-mode effects.^[17]^[26] In bridge configurations, multiple gauge elements are oriented to respond to longitudinal, transverse, or shear strains, enabling precise measurement in integrated microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).^[27] The gauge factor (GF) for semiconductor strain gauges typically ranges from 50 to 200, far exceeding that of metallic gauges, owing to the dominance of the piezoresistive term over geometric effects. For instance, longitudinal GF values can reach up to 150 in <100>-oriented silicon.^[17] This high sensitivity allows detection of minute strains, making them ideal for applications requiring fine resolution.^[27] Despite their advantages, semiconductor strain gauges exhibit notable drawbacks, including nonlinearity in the resistance-strain relationship beyond 0.1% strain, high sensitivity to temperature variations that can alter doping and mobility, and inherent fragility due to the brittle nature of silicon and germanium.^[17] These limitations necessitate careful design considerations, such as protective encapsulation, to ensure reliability in practical use.^[27]

Factors Influencing Gauge Factor

Temperature Effects

Temperature variations significantly influence the performance of strain gauges by inducing changes in both resistance and apparent strain, necessitating compensation to ensure accurate measurements. The primary mechanisms include thermal expansion mismatch between the gauge material and the substrate, which generates an apparent strain due to differential expansion coefficients, and the temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR), which alters the gauge's resistance independently of mechanical strain. For instance, the TCR causes resistance to increase with temperature in metallic alloys, while in semiconductors, it often leads to a decrease due to enhanced carrier mobility. These effects modify the baseline gauge factor, defined as the ratio of relative resistance change to applied strain, by introducing thermal contributions that can mimic or mask true strain signals.^[28] In metallic strain gauges, the gauge factor typically exhibits a slight negative temperature dependence, decreasing by approximately 0.01% to 0.02% per °C over common operating ranges, as observed in alloys like Constantan and Karma. Semiconductors, leveraging the piezoresistive effect, experience more substantial impacts, with gauge factors often declining by 20-50% or more over temperature rises from 25°C to 200°C, primarily due to temperature-induced variations in charge carrier concentration and mobility. For example, in n-type silicon carbide, the gauge factor can halve as temperature increases, amplifying errors in high-temperature environments.^[29] Without correction, these shifts can lead to significant inaccuracies; an uncompensated metallic gauge on a steel substrate might register up to 1000 microstrain (0.1%) of false strain over a 100°C rise, attributable to combined TCR and expansion effects.^[28]^[30] To mitigate these temperature-induced errors, several compensation strategies are employed. Self-temperature-compensated alloys, such as Karma (with a gauge factor around 2.1), are designed with compositions that match the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of specific substrates, minimizing apparent strain across -20°C to 205°C. In Wheatstone bridge configurations, a dummy gauge—identical but unstrained and subjected to the same temperature—cancels out common-mode thermal effects on resistance. Additionally, software-based corrections, often using polynomial fits derived from calibration data, adjust readings post-measurement for residual variations. Recent advancements include anisotropic composite substrates fabricated via micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology to further reduce temperature effects in flexible gauges (as of 2024).^[31]^[28]^[32]^[33] These methods ensure reliable strain detection, particularly in applications involving thermal gradients.

Material and Geometry Considerations

The gauge factor in strain gauges is significantly influenced by the intrinsic material properties of the sensing element, including its elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, and resistivity. The elastic modulus quantifies the material's stiffness, facilitating efficient strain transfer from the test specimen to the gauge; mismatches between the gauge and substrate moduli can lead to inaccuracies, with higher modulus values in the gauge promoting better coupling and measurement fidelity.^[34] Poisson's ratio, typically around 0.3 for metallic grids, governs the transverse contraction relative to longitudinal extension, thereby amplifying the dimensional contribution to resistance change—a higher value elevates this effect, as seen in the nominal gauge factor assumption of ν = 0.285 for standard calculations.^[34]^[12] Resistivity, inherent to the alloy (e.g., constantan with low temperature sensitivity), modulates the baseline resistance and its variation under deformation, where materials with stable resistivity ensure consistent gauge factor performance across applications.^[34] Gauge geometry, encompassing grid length, width, and pattern, further shapes the effective sensitivity and response characteristics. Shorter grid lengths (e.g., ≤3 mm) enhance resolution for localized strain fields near stress concentrations, such as notches, but elevate transverse sensitivity (typically 0-10%), necessitating corrections for off-axis effects.^[12]^[34] Narrower widths minimize averaging over strain gradients perpendicular to the primary axis, improving precision in non-uniform fields, while wider designs aid heat dissipation and stability on low-conductivity substrates at the cost of reduced spatial acuity.^[35] Serpentine or meander patterns extend the effective sensing length within a compact footprint, boosting overall resistance change and sensitivity to longitudinal strain without altering the intrinsic material gauge factor, as the elongated path amplifies deformation-induced variations.^[34]^[36] Design trade-offs arise in balancing performance attributes, particularly with foil thickness and material anisotropy. Thinner foil constructions and flexible backings (e.g., polyimide) enhance surface conformance on curved or irregular geometries, enabling accurate strain capture where rigid gauges would fail, but they compromise mechanical durability, increasing susceptibility to fatigue and damage under high cyclic loads or vibrations.^[37]^[38] Anisotropic materials, such as single-crystal silicon, permit gauge factor optimization through precise orientation alignment, maximizing longitudinal sensitivity while minimizing transverse effects for targeted applications like transverse versus longitudinal strain discrimination.^[34]^[39] Overall, selecting materials and geometries involves prioritizing conformance and sensitivity against durability, often guided by rosette patterns or alignment to principal strain directions for multi-axial scenarios.^[35]^[34]

Measurement and Calibration

Determining Gauge Factor

The gauge factor of a strain gauge is determined experimentally through calibration techniques that apply a known mechanical strain to the device and measure the resulting change in electrical resistance. Common methods include the cantilever beam test and tensile testing using specialized machines. In the cantilever beam test, the strain gauge is bonded to a beam specimen, and a known load is applied at the free end to induce deflection, thereby creating a measurable uniaxial strain field along the beam's length. The resistance change is recorded, allowing computation of the gauge factor based on the applied strain derived from beam deflection theory.^[40] Similarly, tensile testing machines apply controlled uniaxial tension to a test specimen with the bonded gauge, using an extensometer or crosshead displacement to quantify the strain accurately.^[41] The standard calibration procedure involves bonding the strain gauge to a suitable test specimen, such as a metal bar or beam, using an appropriate adhesive to ensure intimate contact and minimize installation errors. Uniaxial strain, typically on the order of 1000 microstrain, is then applied incrementally while monitoring the resistance change (\Delta R) relative to the initial resistance (R) via a Wheatstone bridge circuit, which provides high sensitivity to small resistance variations. The gauge factor (GF) is calculated as

\text{GF} = \frac{\Delta R / R}{\epsilon},

where \epsilon is the applied strain; this process is repeated across multiple strain levels to account for linearity and establish a reliable value through statistical averaging.^[42] Standardized protocols, such as ASTM E251, guide the verification of gauge factor for metallic bonded resistance strain gauges, emphasizing mechanical testing methods like those described and requiring statistical data treatment due to the destructive nature of full calibration. This standard ensures accuracy typically within ±1% for the gauge factor by specifying procedures for resistance measurement and strain application, with transverse sensitivity corrections to avoid errors exceeding 10%.^[43] Manufacturer-specified gauge factors may exhibit variability in practical use, necessitating on-site calibration, as bonding effects such as adhesive creep, glue line thickness, or gauge misalignment can alter the effective sensitivity by up to 1% or more. These installation-induced variations arise from factors like curing conditions and material stiffening, underscoring the importance of experimental verification post-bonding to achieve precise performance.^[42]^[43]

Practical Considerations

In the practical application of strain gauges, proper installation is crucial to ensure accurate strain transfer and reliable gauge factor performance. Surface preparation involves cleaning the substrate to remove contaminants and roughening it slightly for better adhesion, while adhesive bonding—commonly using cyanoacrylate for quick setups or epoxy for durable bonds—must be applied uniformly to avoid air pockets that could compromise the gauge's sensitivity. Misalignment during attachment, such as angular errors exceeding 5 degrees, can significantly reduce the effective gauge factor by altering the strain direction relative to the gauge grid. Common error sources in operational use include hysteresis, which typically remains below 0.1% of full scale in well-designed metallic gauges, arising from material viscoelasticity during loading-unloading cycles. Fatigue degradation occurs over repeated strain cycles, potentially lowering the gauge factor by up to 10% after 10^5 cycles in high-stress environments, while environmental factors like moisture ingress or mechanical vibration can introduce noise or accelerate corrosion, reducing accuracy by 1-5%. Temperature compensation techniques, such as using dummy gauges in a Wheatstone bridge, are often implemented to mitigate thermal drift as a key practical challenge. Maintenance practices for strain gauges emphasize periodic recalibration every 6-12 months under controlled conditions to verify gauge factor stability, alongside protective measures like silicone or polyurethane coatings to shield against humidity and chemicals. For metallic strain gauges, typical operational lifespan ranges from 10^6 to 10^8 cycles before significant performance degradation, necessitating replacement in long-term monitoring setups. When selecting a strain gauge, the gauge factor should be matched to the anticipated strain range—typically 2 for foil gauges in low-strain applications (up to 1000 microstrain)—to prevent saturation or nonlinearity, ensuring the output voltage remains within the measurement system's dynamic range without requiring excessive amplification.

Applications

Structural Health Monitoring

Strain gauges play a crucial role in structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil and mechanical structures, where their gauge factor determines the sensitivity to strain deformations for ensuring safety and integrity. These devices are applied to monitor critical infrastructure such as bridges, dams, and aircraft wings, capturing minute changes in structural strain to predict potential failures. For example, vibrating wire strain gauges are embedded directly in concrete during construction to enable long-term strain tracking in dams and bridge foundations.^[44]^[45]^[46] The primary benefit of gauge factor-based measurements in SHM is the real-time detection of cracks or overload conditions through observed resistance changes in the gauge, which directly correlate to strain levels via the proportionality constant of the gauge factor. These systems are typically integrated with data loggers to record and analyze strain data continuously, allowing engineers to assess structural performance under environmental loads like wind, traffic, or seismic activity without invasive inspections.^[47]^[48] A prominent case example involves the monitoring of the Golden Gate Bridge, where strain gauges have been deployed to measure stress in structural elements, contributing to maintenance decisions that extend the bridge's lifespan.^[49] Recent advancements in SHM incorporate wireless sensor networks utilizing low-power high-sensitivity strain gauges, which offer gauge factors ranging from 50 to 200 for enhanced sensitivity in remote applications, such as distributed monitoring across large structures like aircraft wings. These networks reduce wiring complexity and enable battery-operated deployment for extended periods, facilitating proactive integrity assessments in hard-to-access areas.^[50]^[51]^[52]

Sensor Technology

In pressure sensors, the deflection of a thin diaphragm under applied pressure induces mechanical strain in attached semiconductor strain gauges, which exhibit gauge factors exceeding 100 due to the piezoresistive effect, enabling high sensitivity; this strain alters the gauges' resistance, which is converted to a measurable voltage output via a Wheatstone bridge circuit.^[27]^[53]^[54] Load cells incorporate multiple strain gauges configured in a full-bridge arrangement to detect differential strains from applied loads, compensating for common-mode effects and achieving accuracies better than 0.01% of full scale; foil-type gauges, valued for their stability and cost-effectiveness, are widely used in applications such as truck scales for weighing heavy vehicles.^[55]^[56]^[57] Torque sensors employ rosette patterns of strain gauges, typically consisting of three gauges oriented at 0°, 45°, and 90° or 120° intervals, to exploit directional variations in strain and gauge factor for accurately measuring shear strains induced by twisting forces.^[58] Similar rosette configurations are utilized in acceleration sensors, where inertial forces produce directional strains on a proof mass, allowing precise detection of dynamic motions.^[59] Advancements in miniaturization have enabled microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors that integrate silicon strain gauges directly onto deformable silicon structures, such as diaphragms or cantilevers, to create compact devices with gauge factors around 100–150; these are essential in automotive applications like tire pressure monitoring and in biomedical contexts, including implantable sensors for monitoring physiological pressures. As of 2025, ongoing developments include AI integration for real-time predictive analysis using these high-gauge-factor sensors.^[60]^[54]^[61]^[62]

References

[1]
[PDF] Strain Gauge Measurement – A Tutorial
Gauge factor is defined as the ratio of fractional change in electrical resistance to the fractional change in length (strain): The Gauge Factor for metallic ...
[2]
[PDF] Stress, Strain, and Strain Gages - Penn State Mechanical Engineering
Oct 24, 2013 · The strain gage factor is S = 2.0, and the supply voltage to the Wheatstone bridge is Vs = 5.00 V. The bridge is balanced when no load is ...
[3]
[PDF] Strain Measurement - Yu Qiao
Due to the high piezoresistance coefficient, the semiconductor strain gauge exhibits a very high gauge factor, as high as 200 for some gauges! • They also have ...
[4]
Gauge Factor - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The gauge factor is the sensitivity of the strain gauge which is normally around 2 [87]. Every strain gauge has a calibration factor to translate the resistance ...
[5]
[PDF] Immo s - and train Ga e
Filed with the 1944 patent application for a "Material. Testing Apparatus," this draw- ing shows the impact testing device and several versions of. Simmons's ...
[6]
Strain gauge - US2350972A - Google Patents
EUGE ATTORNE Patented June 6, 1944 UNITED STATES I PATENT OFFiCE STRAIN GAUGE Arthur C. Ruge, Cambridge, Mass. Application September 16, 1939, Serial No ...
[7]
Strain gauges: function, application and advantages | Kistler US
The strain gauge was invented in 1938, the year in which Edward E. Simmons and Arthur C. Ruge, each working independently, took decisive steps to develop the ...
[8]
[PDF] Strain Gauge Measurement – A Tutorial
A strain gauge with a gauge factor GF = 2 will exhibit a change in electrical resistance of only 2•(500 × 10–6) = 0.1%. For a 120 Ω gauge, this is a change of ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[9]
Measuring Breathing Patterns through Strain Gauges | BMEG442
Apr 6, 2017 · Gauge factor: 2. Assumption: Common metallic strain gauges have a GF = 2. Length: 50 mm. Assumption: This is a large gauge size since strains ...
[10]
[PDF] ME 354, MECHANICS OF MATERIALS LABORATORY NOTES on ...
where ∆Rg is the change in resistance, Fg is the gage factor, Rg is the initial gage resistance, and εm is the strain in the strain gage. Thus, a resistance ...Missing: "strain
[11]
[PDF] derivation of gauge factor
Page 1. DERIVATION OF GAUGE FACTOR. The gauge factor is defined as the unit change in resistance per unit change in length. It is denoted as K or S. It is ...
[12]
[PDF] PRACTICAL STRAIN GAGE MEASUREMENTS - OMEGA Engineering
Gage factor is expressed in equation form as: It should be noted that the change in resistance with strain is not due solely to the dimensional changes in the ...
[13]
Strain Gauge Factor Derivation - eeeguide.com
The Strain Gauge Factor Derivation is an example of a passive transducer that uses the variation in electrical resistance. Types of Strain Gauge Factor.
[14]
[PDF] Strain gauge technology.
BRIEF HISTORY. The bonded electrical resistance strain gauge in the basic form known today was first used in the USA in 1938 Simmons at the California Institute.<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
Piezoresistance Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The piezoresistance effect is a significant change in resistance of a strained semiconductor, mainly due to changes in resistivity, not geometric dimensions.
[16]
Piezoresistance Effect in Germanium and Silicon | Phys. Rev.
Uniaxial tension causes a change of resistivity in silicon and germanium of both n and p types. The complete tensor piezoresistance has been determined ...
[17]
Review: Semiconductor Piezoresistance for Microsystems - PMC - NIH
Piezoresistive sensors, early MEMS devices, use the effect of stress on doped silicon and germanium. They are used for pressure, accelerometers, and strain ...
[18]
Piezoresistive Effect Definition - COMSOL
Oct 31, 2014 · The piezoresistive effect describes the change in electrical resistance that occurs when an external force is applied to a semiconductor.
[19]
Principles, Types and Configurations of Strain Gauges - IQS Directory
Edward E. Simmons and Arthur C. Ruge independently developed practical resistance strain gauges in 1938, enabling accurate measurement of microstrain and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[20]
[PDF] Student Manual for Strain Gage Technology - Intertechnology
2.2 Backing Materials. Conventional foil strain gage construction involves a photo- etched metal foil pattern mounted on a plastic backing or carri- er. The ...
[21]
https://www.mflstraingauges.com/strain-gauges.html
[22]
Linear Strain Gauges - BCM Sensor
BCM SENSOR linear strain gauges are specially developed for manufacturing precision force transducers which employ bending beam working principle.Missing: wound etched 2.0-2.1
[23]
https://www.ni.com/en/shop/data-acquisition/sensor-fundamentals/measuring-strain-with-strain-gages.html
[24]
What is a Strain Gauge? - NMB Technologies
MinebeaMitsumi's polyimide foil strain gauges, for instance, are able to handle temperatures from -50°C to 200°C when heat-curing adhesives are used with heat- ...
[25]
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.94.42
[26]
Semiconductor strain gauges - Haptica Srl
Our Semiconductor Strain Gages are predominantly used in half-bridge and full-bridge configurations, which compensate for temperature and deliver highly ...
[27]
Semiconductor Strain Gauge - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Piezoresistive strain gauges. A piezoresistive material is a type of material that changes its electrical resistivity as a result of mechanical stress.
[28]
[PDF] Strain Gage Thermal Output and Gage Factor Variation with ...
TN-504-1. Micro-Measurements. Strain Gage Thermal Output and Gage Factor Variation with Temperature. (αS – αG) = difference in thermal expansion coefficients ...
[29]
Piezoresistive effect in p-type 3C-SiC at high temperatures ... - Nature
Jun 28, 2016 · Consequently, the gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC was calculated to be 28 at room temperature (25 °C), using the equation: GF = (ΔR/R)/ε. The ...
[30]
[PDF] Thermal Output of WK-Type Strain Gauges on Various Materials at ...
Strain gage thermal output. (apparent strain) is one of the largest sources of error associated with the measurement of strain when temperatures.<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
None
### Summary of Temperature Effects on Strain Gauges
[32]
[PDF] An Introduction to Stress Analysis using Strain Gauges
... modulus of elasticity together with that of the strain gage carrier material ... material's modulus of elasticity E and Poisson's ratio v for the material:.
[33]
Strain Gage Patterns, Grid Shapes, and Orientation - SimuTech Group
The gage pattern refers to the shape of the grid, the number and orientation of the grids, the solder tab configuration, and other construction aspects.
[34]
Inkjet-Printed Flexible Strain-Gauge Sensor on Polymer Substrate
Mar 21, 2022 · Serpentine strain-gauge sensors of various thicknesses and widths were fabricated using inkjet printing and oven sintering. The fabricated gauge ...
[35]
[PDF] Strain Gage Selection: Criteria, Procedures, Recommendations
In addition, the high peel strength of the foil on the polyimide backing makes polyimide-backed gages less sensitive to mechanical damage during installation.
[36]
Understanding Strain Gauges in Load Cells (Thin Film vs. Bonded ...
Jul 30, 2019 · In addition to reliability, they offer the most linearity and accuracy of all the strain gage options. One of the primary advantages of thin ...
[37]
Measurement of the gauge factor of carbon fiber and its application ...
The actual piezoresistive behavior of monocrystalline silicon is highly anisotropic, meaning that its gauge factor is dependent on the orientation of the ...
[38]
[PDF] Cantilever Beam and Wheatstone Bridge Background on Strain ...
The strain gage must be calibrated by applying known deflections ΔL and measures the corresponding values of ΔR. A curve fit of this calibration data ...
[39]
[PDF] AE2610 Introduction to Experimental Methods in Aerospace ...
Tensile Testing Specimens: In this experiment, you will measure the strain in a bar using a strain gauge, and the elongation of the bar under load using an ...
[40]
[PDF] Design considerations for strain gage transducers
Gage Factor - The ratio of the relative change in resistance to the relative change in length of a strain gage: A R /R. A L /L. Hysteresis - The maximum ...
[41]
E251 Standard Test Methods for Performance Characteristics of ...
Aug 7, 2020 · 2 Gage factor is the transfer function of a strain gage. It relates resistance change in the strain gage and strain to which it is subjected.
[42]
Vibrating Wire Strain Gauge - RST Instruments Ltd
Out of stockRST Vibrating Wire Strain Gauges are designed to be welded to or embedded in various structures for monitoring strain. RST vibrating wire strain gauges are ...
[43]
Gauge Factor Deviation - HBK
The gauge factor is a proportional factor between the measured strain and the relative change in the bridge that can be measured by a suitable device ...
[44]
Strain Gauge: Types, Features, and Applications in Infrastructure
Strain Gauge or Strain Gage was invented in 1938 by Edward E. Simmons and Arthur C. Ruge. It is one of the significant sensors used in the geotechnical field ...
[45]
[PDF] Overview of Strain Gauge and its Various Applications
The gauge consists of a wire or a foil patterned in a zigzag or grid-like configuration, which undergoes changes in its electrical resistance when subjected to ...<|separator|>
[46]
Strain Measurement - Gantner Instruments
Stretching the gauge makes its conductors longer and thinner, increasing resistance; compression does the opposite. By measuring this resistance change (usually ...
[47]
Structural Health Monitoring of Fatigue Cracks for Steel Bridges with ...
This paper presents a field implementation of the structural health monitoring (SHM) of fatigue cracks for steel bridge structures.
[48]
SSVM: An Ultra-Low-Power Strain Sensing and Visualization ... - MDPI
Mar 22, 2021 · Power-management techniques for wireless sensor networks and similar low-power communication devices based on nonrechargeable batteries.
[49]
Introduction to Strain Gauges for Stress Analysis - Vibration Testing
The gauge factor is a quantitative measure of a strain gauge's sensitivity to strain. It is a ratio of the fractional change in resistance to the fractional ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[50]
Structural health monitoring of aerospace sandwich structures via ...
This paper investigates a strain-based structural health monitoring (SHM) method for damage detection and localization in composite sandwich structures.
[51]
[PDF] Strain, Force, and Pressure Strain Strain Transducers
called the gauge factor. For metal strain gauges, Gf = 2. (An integer!) For semiconductor strain gauges Gf is much higher.
[52]
[PDF] Micromachined Pressure Sensors: Review and Recent Developments
Pressure sensors will be the focus of this paper, starting from metal diaphragm sensors with bonded silicon strain gauges, and moving to present developments of ...
[53]
[PDF] A Summary of Numerous Strain-Gage Load Calibrations on Aircraft ...
Fifteen aircraft structures that were calibrated for flight loads using strain gages are examined. The primary purpose of this paper is to document ...Missing: health | Show results with:health
[54]
Morehouse Precision Load Cell
With accuracies better than 0.01 % of full scale, Morehouse Precision Load Cells are the standard of choice for field measurements in accordance with ASTM E4 ...
[55]
Load cells from the manufacturer - Minebea Intec
The foil of the strain gauges is completely encapsulated in metal, which means that there is no influence of humidity on the measurement result. The ...
[56]
[PDF] Fiber-Optic Strain-Based Deflection and Twist Sensing for a High ...
The torque cannot be measured directly, so strain gage rosettes are used to measure shear strain. Strain rosettes are a group of three individual strain gages ...Missing: gauge acceleration<|control11|><|separator|>
[57]
[PDF] MEMS Graphene Strain Sensor
many different types of sensors: stress, strain, pressure, torque and many other sensors. ... A strain gauge rosette is an arrangement of two or more closely.Missing: acceleration | Show results with:acceleration
[58]
[PDF] Design and Fabrication of a MEMS-Array Pressure Sensor System ...
This thesis describes the design, fabrication and static testing of individual MEMS strain-gauge silicon pressure sensors with amplification circuitry off-wafer ...
[59]
Half-Bridge Silicon Strain Gauges with Arc-Shaped Piezoresistors
Oct 11, 2023 · A new half-bridge silicon strain gauge comprising one arc gauge responding to tangential strain and another linear gauge measuring radial strain was developed.