Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Infibulation

Infibulation, also known as Type III female genital mutilation (FGM), is a procedure that involves the narrowing of the vaginal opening through the cutting and repositioning of the or , with or without excision of the , followed by the creation of a seal using thorns, , or stitching, typically leaving a small opening for and menstrual . This practice, rooted in cultural traditions aimed at ensuring premarital and fidelity, is most prevalent in northeastern , including countries such as , , , , and , where it accounts for a significant portion of FGM cases, and to a lesser extent in parts of and . Globally, while over 230 million women and girls have undergone some form of FGM, infibulation represents the most severe variant, concentrated in specific ethnic groups and persisting despite international condemnation as a violation with no medical benefits. Infibulation causes immediate risks including hemorrhage, , and , as well as long-term complications such as , urinary and menstrual difficulties, , , and increased maternal and neonatal mortality during ; psychological effects include , anxiety, and , substantiated by epidemiological studies across affected regions. Efforts to eradicate it, including legal bans and programs, have shown modest declines in prevalence over decades, though enforcement remains challenging due to entrenched social norms.

Definition and Terminology

Female Infibulation


Female infibulation constitutes Type III female genital mutilation (FGM), as delineated by the (WHO). This procedure encompasses the narrowing of the vaginal opening achieved by cutting and repositioning the , or the , with or without removal of the (), followed by the apposition of the to form a covering seal, typically preserving a minute aperture for urinary and menstrual discharge.
In contrast to Type I FGM, limited to partial or total excision of the clitoral and/or , and Type II FGM, involving partial or total removal of the and with or without but without subsequent sealing, Type III is distinguished by the deliberate constriction and occlusion of the vaginal vestibule.
The designation "infibulation" derives from the Latin infibulare, signifying "to clasp or fasten," compounded from in- ("on") and fibula ("brooch" or "clasp"), evoking the suturing mechanism that mimics securing with a pin.

Male Infibulation

Male infibulation refers to the practice of piercing the , or , and securing it with a clasp, , (pin), or suture to restrict penile erection and . This method physically prevents the foreskin from retracting, thereby limiting , and was historically applied to control sexuality in specific contexts such as among slaves, young performers, or for enforcement. In and , preputial infibulation was documented as a means to secure the during physical activities or performances, believed to prevent distraction or . athletes and singers reportedly used clasps or strings to draw the downward and close the , evolving into surgical piercing in practice to preserve vocal quality by averting sexual activity, which was thought to impair . satirist referenced fibulae used on male slaves to prohibit intercourse with female slaves, while medical texts by authors like described the procedure involving two perforations in the linked by a clasp. The practice largely faded in after but reemerged in the as a punitive measure in institutions to curb among boys and the mentally ill, often alongside or as an to . By the , it had become obsolete in medical contexts due to ethical concerns and inefficacy. Today, male infibulation persists rarely in niche genital piercing communities or practices, lacking any widespread cultural or ritual significance.

Historical Development

Ancient Origins

The earliest documented evidence of female infibulation appears in ancient mummified remains, with some scholars identifying scarring consistent with the procedure dating back to approximately the 5th century BCE. A papyrus from 163 BCE, housed in the , further supports the practice among women, potentially linked to efforts to control sexuality and prevent in slaves or lower-status females within polygynous or hierarchical social structures. While direct archaeological confirmation of infibulation in Nubian rites remains sparse, interactions with , including enslavement and cultural exchange, suggest possible transmission of such genital modifications as tribal markers for group identity or fidelity enforcement in resource-scarce environments. Male infibulation, involving piercing of the to insert a clasp or ring preventing retraction and , is attested in and contexts primarily among athletes, singers, and gladiators to conserve vital energy and , aligning with humoral theories positing fluid loss as debilitating. sources describe gladiators undergoing the procedure by drawing the over the and securing it, a practice aimed at maintaining physical vigor for combat rather than sexual control, though it echoed broader Greco- concerns with and performance enhancement in competitive or servile roles. These applications likely derived from earlier Mediterranean customs, where such modifications served practical functions in societies valuing restrained sexuality for elite or labor-intensive pursuits, distinct from punitive or identificatory motives in female cases.

Medieval and Early Modern Spread

The practice of female infibulation expanded during the medieval Islamic expansions into , particularly through Arab conquests and trade routes along the and from the onward, where pre-existing regional customs among Nubian and Cushitic groups were adopted and reinforced by incoming settlers and merchants. Historical records indicate that infibulation, involving the narrowing of the vaginal opening after excision, was not a universal Islamic requirement but became entrenched among specific ethnic communities via these interactions, such as in the of (1504–1821), where it served as a marker of in patrilineal societies. This spread correlated with the growth of Islamic sultanates but followed ethnic patterns, remaining absent in many Muslim populations elsewhere, underscoring tribal customs over doctrinal mandates. In the (16th–19th centuries), the slave trade further disseminated female infibulation, as infibulated women from and the were trafficked as concubines to Arabian and markets, with the procedure facilitating transport by reducing hygiene issues and enforcing docility. and traveler observations from this era, including those in Sudanese riverine kingdoms, noted its prevalence among groups like the Shilluk and Dinka, tied to marriage eligibility rather than religious texts, with rates approaching universality in some locales by the . points to reinforcement through networks and economic incentives in slave systems, not proselytization, as the practice persisted selectively despite Islamic scholarly debates on its excessiveness. Male infibulation, involving piercing to prevent or preserve vocal qualities, declined sharply in post-Roman after the , supplanted by Christian prohibitions on non-therapeutic genital alterations and the erosion of gladiatorial and performative traditions that had sustained it. In the (14th–19th centuries), while full dominated for palace eunuchs sourced from slaves, fragmentary accounts suggest limited persistence of infibulation-like restraints in provincial slave management to control laborers, though it yielded to more invasive methods amid expanding black slave imports exceeding 2 million by 1800. This regional variation highlights practical utility in coercive systems over ideological spread, with fading in due to legal and ecclesiastical shifts emphasizing natural bodily form.

Modern Persistence

In Sudan, British colonial authorities mounted campaigns from 1920 to 1949 to eradicate pharaonic , a form of infibulation, but faced widespread cultural resistance that rendered these efforts largely ineffective, allowing the practice to endure into the post-colonial era. Following in , infibulation entrenched further in regions like northern , where it persisted as a marker of ethnic and communal identity despite external influences. In , post-independence from onward, infibulation—the most prevalent type of —maintained near-universal adherence, with surveys indicating over 98% prevalence among women aged 15-49 as late as , reflecting continuity in clan-based traditions amid civil unrest and migration. Similarly, in , independence in did not disrupt the practice; by the early , 89% of women aged 15-49 had undergone female genital mutilation, including infibulation among groups like the Bambara and Peul, sustained by familial and social imperatives. Globalization and urbanization have introduced some shifts, such as marginally faster prevalence declines in urban settings relative to rural areas, yet core infibulation techniques—narrowing the vaginal opening via suturing—remain unaltered in high-prevalence zones due to intergenerational transmission and resistance to modification. The World Health Organization reports that more than 230 million girls and women alive as of 2025 have undergone female genital mutilation, with infibulation predominant in parts of , evidencing the practice's against modern pressures. Male infibulation, involving foreskin constriction or piercing, has neared extinction globally by the late 20th century, persisting only in rare, undocumented ritual forms among isolated Southeast Asian indigenous communities, supplanted by standard circumcision or abandoned entirely.

Procedures and Techniques

Female Infibulation Methods

Female infibulation, designated as Type III female genital mutilation by the World Health Organization, entails the partial or total removal of the clitoris (clitoridectomy) and the labia minora, accompanied by incision into the labia majora. The raw edges of the labia are then approximated and secured, either through stitching with thread or silk, insertion of thorns or skewers to hold the tissue in place, or by binding the girl's legs together for several weeks to promote scar formation and narrowing of the vaginal opening to a small aperture, typically 2-5 mm in diameter, sufficient for urination and menstrual flow. This procedure is executed without anesthesia, utilizing rudimentary tools such as razors, knives, scissors, or shards of glass. The is generally performed on prepubescent girls aged 5 to 12 years by designated traditional circumcisers, often elderly women or midwives within the possessing rather than formal medical training. Post-procedure care involves of the lower body to facilitate of the incised tissues into a continuous band of , forming a neovestibule that effectively seals the . Regional variations in technique influence the degree of occlusion and anatomical alteration; for instance, in , the practice frequently incorporates extensive excision of the clitoral glans and both sets of , resulting in a tighter seal compared to some implementations in , where the emphasis may prioritize labial apposition with variable clitoral involvement. Subsequent to initial healing, defibulation—a partial reopening of the cicatrized —is conducted to permit penile during consummation of , while fuller excision occurs during parturition to accommodate , often followed by reinfibulation to restore the seal. These interventions replicate elements of the primary method, employing similar cutting tools and manual approximation without anesthesia.

Male Infibulation Methods

Male infibulation involves piercing the to insert a clasp or ring that mechanically restricts retraction, thereby inhibiting and . The procedure typically entails creating two small holes in the near the tip, through which a metal —a clasp resembling a —or a ring is threaded and locked to secure the over the . This method, distinct from excision or tying devices like the , was employed in and on athletes, singers, and slaves to preserve vocal quality or physical vigor by preventing sexual distraction. In ancient practice, the was drawn forward over the , pierced transversely, and fastened with a to induce artificial , ensuring the remained closed. Gladiators underwent this to maintain strength, while performers used it to safeguard their voices from strain associated with sexual activity. The could be temporary for reversible restriction or more permanent, though removal required unlocking or cutting. Non-sterile ancient techniques, performed without or antiseptics, frequently resulted in complications such as local , hemorrhage, and due to pressure from the clasp. irritation or improper piercing could lead to adhesions or ulceration of the . In rare modern contexts, such as certain subcultures, analogous techniques involve sterile piercing of the followed by rings or barbells to achieve similar restrictive effects, often for aesthetic or control purposes, though true infibulation with locking clasps remains uncommon outside . Victorian-era revivals used metal devices for prevention, echoing ancient mechanical restraint but with rudimentary hygiene improvements.

Geographical Distribution and Prevalence

Primary Regions in Africa

Infibulation, the most severe form of female genital mutilation (Type III), is predominantly practiced in the , where it accounts for the majority of FGM cases among pastoralist ethnic groups such as the , who span multiple national borders including , eastern , , and northern . In , FGM prevalence reaches 98% among women aged 15–49, with infibulation comprising over 80% of procedures according to national health surveys. Similarly, reports 93% overall FGM prevalence, predominantly Type III among and Afar communities. In , 87% of women aged 15–49 have undergone FGM, with infibulation rates exceeding 80% in northern regions among and Beja ethnic groups, though southern areas show lower adherence. These patterns reflect clan-based transmission rather than strict national boundaries, with clans maintaining near-universal practice across frontiers. In Ethiopia, overall FGM prevalence stands at 65% nationally, but infibulation dominates in eastern pastoralist zones inhabited by (over 90% Type III) and Afar (87% infibulation) ethnic groups, based on 2024 surveys of adolescent girls.00248-9/fulltext) exhibits 83% FGM prevalence, largely infibulation among Tigrinya and other highland groups bordering and . Extending into the transition zone, ’s northern prevalence sustains the core zone, while in , FGM affects 89% of women, but infibulation remains rare (under 5%), with Type I and II excision predominant among Fulani pastoralists; modified infibulation occurs sporadically in some Fulani subgroups but lacks widespread empirical confirmation. Prevalence of infibulation declines markedly southward from the , transitioning to less invasive FGM types (e.g., Type II excision) in central and eastern African pastoralist societies like the Maasai or Samburu, where rates drop below 30% and Type III is exceptional. Male infibulation, involving penile suturing, is negligible in modern , persisting only as historical echoes in isolated pastoralist rituals without documented contemporary prevalence .

Middle East and Diaspora Communities

Infibulation persists in limited pockets within Yemen, particularly among communities in coastal governorates such as Al-Hudaydah and Al-Mahrah, where it is performed as a cultural rite often in infancy or early childhood, though Type II excision remains more widespread. In Oman, female genital cutting, including infibulated forms, continues in certain rural and tribal groups despite lacking national prevalence data, with practices tied to traditional notions of purity and marriageability. Overall, World Health Organization data indicate that female genital mutilation rates, encompassing infibulation, affect fewer than 5% of women in most Middle Eastern countries outside high-prevalence African borders, with Yemen reporting around 19-23% for any form based on household surveys from 2010-2020. Through , infibulation has extended to communities in , notably among populations in the and , where an estimated 100,000-200,000 women and girls from practicing origins reside, sustaining the procedure underground via informal networks to evade bans enacted in the UK since 1985 and Sweden since 1982. These communities, often maintaining ties to traditions, report clandestine performances during visits to origin countries or by traveling practitioners, with from 2018-2023 documenting continued support in 10-20% of affected migrant households despite declining approval rates post-migration. Male infibulation, involving penile piercing or suturing to restrict intercourse, appears rare in contemporary Middle Eastern contexts but featured historically in the Arabian slave trade from the 7th to 19th centuries, applied to male captives transported across the to enforce in harems or labor roles, as evidenced in and records of management practices. This method, distinct from full , aimed at preserving workforce utility while curbing reproduction, though empirical accounts remain sparse and primarily derived from traveler narratives rather than systematic tallies. Modern instances are negligible, confined to anecdotal or ritualistic echoes in isolated groups.

Current Global Statistics

As of January 2025, the estimates that more than 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), including infibulation (type III), primarily in 30 countries across , the , and . Infibulation, involving the narrowing of the vaginal opening through stitching or sealing, constitutes the predominant form of FGM in high-prevalence countries such as (over 90% of women aged 15-49 affected, mostly type III per Demographic and Health Surveys), (98% prevalence among women 15-49, with the majority infibulated), , , and parts of and . Global data specific to infibulation alone are limited, as most surveys aggregate FGM types, but reports indicate it accounts for a substantial share in eastern and northeastern African "infibulation belts," with no reliable worldwide total exceeding regional aggregates from these nations. In , where infibulation is concentrated, a 2023 meta-analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) data reported a pooled FGM prevalence of 22.9% (95% CI: 16.2-29.6%) among daughters aged 0-14 years across 27 countries, with type III forms elevated in practicing communities. UNICEF's 2024 tracking, drawing from DHS in 15 high-burden countries, shows over 144 million affected women and girls continent-wide, with infibulation rates exceeding 80% of FGM cases in and based on self-reported data. These figures derive from nationally representative household surveys emphasizing women aged 15-49 recalling experiences and daughters' status, though underreporting and migration complicate estimates. Recent DHS analyses reveal a slight decline in infibulation in urban areas (e.g., 5-10% drop in cities like , , from 2016-2021 surveys) attributed to and , contrasted by stagnation or minimal change in rural settings where cultural norms persist. Male infibulation, historically documented but not a contemporary , shows near-zero globally per available ethnographic and health data, with no systematic tracking in major surveys like DHS or reports. Ongoing UNICEF and UNFPA monitoring via DHS underscores reliance on these sources for verifiable metrics, cautioning against unverified estimates due to variability in self-reporting.

Cultural and Social Contexts

Rationales for Practice

In communities where female infibulation is practiced, such as among certain ethnic groups in , , , and , the procedure is rationalized by participants as a safeguard for and a deterrent to . Practitioners report that it curbs female and physically restricts , thereby preventing and ensuring until . This is viewed as enhancing a woman's prospects, as unmodified females are often deemed unmarriageable or by community standards. The practice is also linked to beliefs in aesthetic and hygienic superiority, with infibulated genitalia considered cleaner, more beautiful, and less prone to odors or infections compared to unmodified forms. In patrilineal societies emphasizing male inheritance, infibulation is stated to promote and thereby bolster paternity certainty, aligning with cultural imperatives for verifiable descent lines. Male infibulation, historically documented in ancient Greco-Roman contexts, was rationalized as a method to restrain sexual activity among slaves, preventing intercourse that could lead to unauthorized offspring or distractions from labor duties. For priests and religious functionaries, it enforced to maintain purity and focus on obligations. Among warriors and athletes, the procedure was applied to warriors and trainers to avert sexual indulgence that might impair physical discipline or combat readiness.

Role in Social Structures

Infibulation functions as a mechanism to enforce premarital and postmarital among females in patrilineal societies, securing male confidence in paternity essential for directing and resources to biological rather than potential cuckolders. In polygynous systems common among practicing groups in and , where men may maintain multiple wives, the procedure minimizes risks of that could dilute lineage-specific wealth transmission, as uninfibulated women are often deemed unsuitable for within endogamous networks. This aligns with broader anthropological observations that such modifications consolidate family alliances by signaling female "purity" to prospective in-laws, thereby facilitating bridewealth exchanges and kinship ties. Performed typically between ages 5 and 12, infibulation constitutes a collective initiating girls into womanhood, embedding them in communal rituals that affirm ethnic identity and group cohesion against outsiders. Ethnographic accounts from Sudanese and communities describe the process as a transformative ordeal, often involving , instruction in marital duties, and reintegration celebrations that publicly validate the girl's eligibility for adult roles and social reciprocity within the . These ceremonies reinforce intergenerational continuity, with elder women overseeing the cutting to transmit cultural norms of belonging, distinguishing infibulated insiders from uninitiated or foreign females ineligible for full participation in kin-based solidarity networks. The practice exhibits marked gender asymmetry, with female infibulation imposing irreversible narrowing of the birth canal to constrain sexual access and —far exceeding circumcision's scope—due to the evolutionary and economic imperatives of paternal in high-dependency within resource-scarce, agrarian contexts. In these patrilocal setups, where women's mobility post-marriage transfers reproductive control to husbands' , the procedure asymmetrically prioritizes verifiable maternity over paternity ambiguity, reflecting systemic power dynamics that vest men with authority over to perpetuate descent lines amid polygyny's competitive mating. Anthropological analyses trace this disparity to pre-agricultural shifts toward intensive , where ensuring female became critical for lineage survival, unlike counterparts whose modifications serve signaling rather than enclosure functions.

Health and Physiological Effects

Purported Benefits

In communities practicing female infibulation, proponents claim it enhances personal hygiene by minimizing vaginal secretions and odors, thereby promoting cleanliness in arid environments where is scarce. This belief persists despite lacking empirical support, as infibulation seals the vaginal opening, potentially exacerbating rather than alleviating sanitary issues. Cultural rationales often emphasize control of female sexuality, asserting that infibulation preserves , discourages premarital relations, and ensures marital by reducing and . Some men increased sexual from the narrowed orifice created by the , viewing it as a means to tighten . These claims tie into broader social harmony, where the practice is said to uphold family honor, prevent from perceived unchastity, and facilitate eligibility in markets. Male infibulation, rarer and historically documented in contexts like ancient piercings or bindings to curb , has been rationalized in select warrior or ascetic traditions as conserving vital energy for labor, , or focus, though such assertions lack substantiation in contemporary records. No rigorous empirical studies verify medical benefits for either form; organizations like the state explicitly that infibulation confers no health advantages and instead inflicts harm. Peer-reviewed analyses confirm the absence of physiological gains, attributing persistence to entrenched cultural norms rather than evidence-based utility.

Empirical Harms and Complications

Immediate complications of infibulation, a severe form of Type III female genital mutilation involving excision of the and with suturing to narrow the vaginal opening, include excessive hemorrhage from vascular damage during the procedure, and other wound s due to non-sterile instruments, and urinary from swelling and obstruction. These risks are heightened in traditional settings without or antibiotics, with rates reported in up to 25% of cases in some cohorts. Mortality from immediate hemorrhage or , though underreported, has been estimated at approximately 0.5-2% per procedure in high-prevalence areas based on clinical reviews. Long-term physical sequelae encompass chronic from neuromas and , recurrent urinary tract infections and incontinence due to urethral distortion, and vesicovaginal fistulas exacerbated by obstructed voiding. Obstetric complications are pronounced, with infibulated women facing 2-3 times higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage, perineal tears, and extended labor durations in longitudinal studies from and ; cesarean delivery rates increase by 30-55% to mitigate these. manifests as and reduced lubrication from infibulation scarring, with systematic reviews indicating diminished orgasmic capacity in 60-80% of affected women compared to uninfibulated controls. Psychological harms include elevated rates of (PTSD), with prevalence of 20-40% among survivors in community-based studies from infibulation-prevalent regions, alongside anxiety and depressive disorders linked to procedural trauma and . Longitudinal data from Ethiopian cohorts show persistent somatic symptoms and quality-of-life impairments persisting decades post-procedure. Male infibulation, historically practiced in and among Roman slaves via penile piercing or suturing to enforce , resulted in complications such as urethral strictures, chronic scarring, and erectile dysfunction from corporal , as documented in classical medical texts and sparse forensic analyses of preserved remains. Modern instances remain exceedingly rare, limiting contemporary empirical data, though analogous penile binding practices correlate with similar tissue necrosis and functional impairments.

Debates and Viewpoints

Cultural Defense Arguments

Proponents within practicing communities, particularly in Somalia where infibulation predominates, defend the procedure as a cornerstone of ethnic and religious identity, with surveys revealing widespread endorsement among women. According to data from the FGM/C Research Initiative, 72% of Somali women aged 15-49 believe female genital mutilation, including infibulation, constitutes a religious requirement, reflecting deep-rooted communal approval that sustains the practice across generations. This support underscores arguments that infibulation serves as a rite of passage affirming social belonging and moral purity within kinship structures. Advocates emphasize tradition and communal , positing that external impositions undermine . In some instances, adult women elect reinfibulation after to restore the sealed state achieved in infancy, framing such choices as exercises of personal akin to voluntary body alterations elsewhere. Cultural relativists draw parallels to Western practices like genital piercings or tattoos, which involve irreversible modifications for aesthetic or identity reasons without equivalent global condemnation, arguing that selective moral outrage reveals ethnocentric biases rather than universal principles. Anti-colonial perspectives portray international bans on infibulation as extensions of dominance, prioritizing foreign over . Postcolonial analyses contend that campaigns against the practice echo historical efforts to "civilize" non-Western , disregarding how communities perceive infibulation as adaptive to local social ecologies of and . Such defenses, articulated by anthropologists and local voices, insist that genuine change must originate internally, lest prohibitions exacerbate resistance by framing as victimhood under external scrutiny.

Human Rights and Health Criticisms

Infibulation constitutes a profound violation of bodily , as it involves irreversible surgical alteration of female genitalia without the of the individual, typically performed on prepubescent girls. This practice infringes upon core principles enshrined in international instruments, including the right to physical and mental under Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (), which obligates states to protect children from harmful traditional practices affecting health. The United Nations General Assembly's 2012 resolution explicitly condemns female genital mutilation (FGM), including infibulation, as a violation of human dignity and fundamental freedoms, emphasizing its incompatibility with universal rights to life, security, and non-discrimination. From a health perspective, infibulation yields no demonstrable benefits and inflicts severe, evidence-based harms that underscore its status as a form of endangerment. The (WHO) classifies all FGM types, with infibulation (Type III) carrying the highest risk profile, including immediate complications such as excessive bleeding, , and , alongside long-term issues like chronic pelvic infections, scarring, and heightened maternal mortality from obstructed labor. Systematic reviews of clinical data reveal complication rates exceeding 50% in infibulated women, encompassing , risks, and formation, with no empirical studies identifying hygienic, sexual, or social advantages to counter these outcomes. These documented physiological and psychological sequelae—such as post-traumatic stress and diminished —provide causal grounds for viewing infibulation as a non-therapeutic intervention that exacerbates vulnerability rather than conferring protection. Critics highlight infibulation's role in perpetuating gender asymmetry, as it selectively targets females to enforce and marital fidelity through genital sealing, imposing functional impairments absent in male genital modifications like , which do not typically involve tissue apposition or narrowing. This disparity manifests as institutionalized control over female sexuality, contravening equality norms under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and reinforcing patriarchal structures without reciprocal male burdens of equivalent severity. Empirical analyses of global practices confirm that such female-specific mutilations correlate with broader indicators of gender-based violence, justifying interventions grounded in verifiable harm disparities rather than cultural equivalence.

Comparisons to Male Genital Modifications

Male circumcision, the surgical removal of the from the , is a widespread practice performed on approximately one-third of males globally, with near-universal prevalence among Muslim (around 99%) and Jewish populations, and a newborn rate of about 58% as of recent data. Randomized controlled trials in high-HIV-prevalence settings, including studies in , , and , demonstrated that male circumcision reduces heterosexual acquisition risk by 51-60% in men, with protective effects persisting up to seven years post-procedure. Additional empirical evidence links it to lower rates of urinary tract infections in infancy, , and certain sexually transmitted infections like human papillomavirus. In contrast, infibulation—a type III form of genital mutilation involving , excision of the and majora, and of the labia to narrow or seal the vaginal opening—lacks any documented health benefits and is associated exclusively with short- and long-term harms, including hemorrhage, , , urinary and menstrual difficulties, obstructed labor, and increased maternal and risks. Anatomically, male circumcision removes a fold of skin (the ) that protects the but does not fundamentally alter penile erectile, urinary, or sensory functions, whereas infibulation excises the —the primary site of female sexual pleasure and —and constructs a barrier that impedes natural vaginal function, often requiring repeated cutting for or . These disparities in procedure, evidence profile, and physiological impact underpin differing societal and legal treatments: circumcision remains routine and medically endorsed in contexts like the U.S. and religious communities for its net benefits, while infibulation faces universal condemnation and under international frameworks due to its demonstrable harm without offsetting gains. Although some commentators invoke parallels to critique perceived inconsistencies in genital modification norms, peer-reviewed analyses emphasize that equating the two overlooks the absence of empirical benefits for infibulation and its greater invasiveness relative to anatomy.

National Laws and Enforcement

As of , at least 51 countries where female genital mutilation (FGM), including infibulation, is practiced have enacted specific national laws prohibiting the procedure. These laws typically impose criminal penalties ranging from fines and imprisonment up to 20 years, with some jurisdictions providing for life sentences in cases resulting in death or severe harm. Enforcement varies widely, with conviction rates remaining low globally; for instance, in , only four FGM-related convictions were recorded nationwide in 2018 despite a 2004 ban. In the , FGM was first criminalized under the Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985, which carried a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment, later strengthened by the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 to include up to 14 years and for acts committed abroad. The first conviction under UK law occurred in February 2019, when a woman was found guilty of performing FGM on her three-year-old daughter and sentenced to 11 years in prison. provisions aim to address "vacation cutting" among communities, allowing prosecution of UK nationals or residents for FGM performed overseas, though successful cases remain rare due to evidentiary challenges. Enforcement in high-prevalence countries is often inconsistent. Somalia's provisional constitution banned FGM in 2012, yet compliance is minimal amid clan-based social structures, armed conflict, and weak state institutions, with infibulation rates exceeding 98% among women aged 15-49 as of 2020. In , the 2016 explicitly prohibits FGM with penalties up to for deaths, but prosecutions are infrequent, hampered by community resistance and lack of reporting mechanisms. Overall, while bans exist in over half of practicing countries, actual deterrence is limited by underreporting, cultural normalization, and resource constraints in judicial systems. In contrast, male circumcision faces no comparable criminal restrictions in most nations, remaining a routine medical or religious practice without mandatory reporting or penalties for non-therapeutic procedures on minors.

Global Campaigns and Outcomes

The , , and initiated coordinated global efforts against female genital mutilation (FGM), including infibulation, in the 1990s, shifting from health-focused advocacy to broader frameworks. A landmark joint statement in explicitly classified FGM as a violation of , emphasizing its lack of health benefits and long-term harms. These initiatives expanded into the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on the Elimination of FGM, launched in , which has operated across 17 high-prevalence countries to promote community declarations of abandonment through and dialogue. The International Day of Zero Tolerance for FGM, observed annually on since its formal UN recognition, serves as a key platform for global awareness, mobilizing governments, NGOs, and communities to intensify anti-FGM messaging. Sponsored by the UN, the day originated from earlier NGO campaigns and has facilitated events, policy advocacy, and media drives aimed at accelerating change. Reported outcomes of these campaigns include partial successes in attitude shifts, with the Joint Programme claiming contributions to preventing FGM in targeted communities via over 15 million community members reached through sensitization by 2021. However, empirical metrics reveal limited global efficacy: estimates indicate over 230 million girls and women affected as of 2024, a 15% rise from prior figures, driven by outpacing declines in some areas. has attributed averting FGM for millions to program interventions, though independent verification of net prevention remains challenged by underreporting and rising absolute numbers. Intensified campaigns have elicited backlash, including heightened secrecy and resistance, as communities perceive external pressures as cultural impositions, leading to practices and pushes to repeal bans, such as in in 2024. This reaction underscores causal limitations of top-down approaches, where coercion correlates with evasion rather than abandonment in low-capacity contexts. Alternatives emphasizing and facilitation over show promise for sustainable cultural shifts, as community-led dialogues addressing social norms have yielded higher compliance in resource-constrained settings by building internal consensus rather than enforcing external prohibitions. Such strategies prioritize empowering local leaders and girls' to disrupt intergenerational transmission, aligning with evidence that voluntary norm change outperforms punitive measures in entrenched practices.

Prevalence Updates Post-2020

A 2024 UNICEF analysis updated global FGM estimates to over 230 million affected girls and women, reflecting a 15% increase—or 30 million additional cases—compared to 2016 figures, driven largely by population growth in endemic regions rather than rising rates. Africa accounts for the majority, with more than 144 million cases concentrated in sub-Saharan countries where infibulation (Type III FGM) predominates in nations like Somalia, Sudan, and Djibouti. This stagnation in prevalence rates persists despite international campaigns, as evidenced by a 2024 meta-analysis of 155 African studies reporting a pooled FGM prevalence of 56.4% among adult women, showing minimal decline from pre-2020 levels. The exacerbated challenges, disrupting surveys, health interventions, and community outreach from 2020 to 2022, which delayed updated national data in high- areas. In , where infibulation comprises nearly all FGM cases, the 2020 Demographic and Health Survey indicated % prevalence among women aged 15–49, with subsequent 2023–2024 reports confirming no significant post-pandemic reduction amid ongoing civil instability. Similarly, a 2023 pooled estimate for FGM among girls aged 0–14 in stood at 22.9%, signaling continued intergenerational transmission of Type III procedures in core practicing communities. Among diasporas in , medicalized infibulation has emerged as a concerning adaptation, with 2023–2025 evidence documenting persistence in migrant groups despite legal bans; for instance, NHS data recorded 37,615 FGM-affected women and girls accessing services cumulatively through March 2024, including Type III cases often performed clandestinely by healthcare providers to evade detection. A 2025 report expanded FGM documentation to 94 countries, highlighting underreported medicalized forms in settings among and Sudanese communities. Male infibulation, historically rare and culturally distinct, shows no post-2020 prevalence shifts, remaining negligible outside isolated traditional contexts.

Emerging Challenges and Resistance

One emerging challenge to eradicating infibulation is its increasing , where trained professionals perform the procedure in clinical settings to mitigate immediate risks such as hemorrhage, , and associated with traditional practitioners. This shift, observed in high-prevalence regions like parts of and where infibulation predominates, has risen from less than 1% of procedures by health workers in the to over 20% in some countries by the 2010s, ostensibly improving hygiene and . However, critics argue that medicalization fails to address long-term complications like , urinary issues, and , while lending institutional legitimacy to the practice and potentially increasing its acceptance among educated families. The explicitly opposes this approach, stating it violates girls' rights to physical integrity and perpetuates harm under the guise of . Community resistance further impedes decline, often rooted in entrenched social norms reinforced by economic instability and conflict. In , where infibulation accounts for a significant portion of female genital mutilation cases and national exceeds 85% among women aged 15-49, recent crises including jihadist insurgencies and have deepened adherence to traditional practices as mechanisms for . Local advocates report strong pushback from elders and religious leaders who view abandonment efforts as cultural erosion, with no national law enacted as of 2020 despite UN expert calls, allowing and revival in rural areas. Similar patterns emerge in other Sahelian contexts, where fatwas or informal religious endorsements occasionally frame infibulation as compatible with Islamic purity norms, countering global anti-FGM campaigns. Projections indicate infibulation's persistence absent structural economic shifts, such as and gains, which correlate with prevalence drops in econometric models from datasets. In authoritarian regimes with weak institutional reform, traditional practices like infibulation endure due to low enforcement costs and social equilibrium benefits for in-group , with models estimating stagnation or slight increases in isolated communities without . Emerging discourses in settings occasionally invoke adult "" to reframe less severe cuttings, but for infibulation's irreversible narrowing, such remains marginal and unsubstantiated by , as the procedure's design targets prepubescent girls to enforce premarital controls.

References

  1. [1]
    Types of female genital mutilation - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female ...
  2. [2]
    Female Genital Mutilation: Health Consequences and ...
    Jul 10, 2018 · Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a procedure performed on women in developing countries and is underreported; it involves cutting or ...
  3. [3]
    Female genital mutilation - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Jan 31, 2025 · More than 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM) in 30 countries in Africa, the Middle East ...
  4. [4]
    Female Genital Mutilation in Ethiopia's Afar Region
    Results. The survey found that FGM remains practically universal (97% of sampled adolescent girls), and infibulation remains the norm (87% of girls) ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    The global prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting
    Sep 1, 2022 · This systematic review aimed to examine FGM/C prevalence and types, by World Health Organization (WHO) region and country.Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  6. [6]
    Exploring the health complications of female genital mutilation ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a harmful practice that affects an estimated 230 million women and girls. Previous research indicates ...
  7. [7]
    Mental and sexual health outcomes associated with FGM/C in Africa
    Jan 10, 2023 · The global magnitude of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is estimated to be over 200 million girls and women distributed across over 30 ...
  8. [8]
    Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital ...
    Nov 25, 2017 · Introduction Female genital mutilation (FGM) harms women's health and well-being and is widely considered a violation of human rights.
  9. [9]
    Prevalence of female genital mutilation and associated factors ...
    Jan 12, 2024 · This study included 155 primary studies conducted on the prevalence and/or factors associated with FGM in Africa. The pooled prevalence of FGM was 56.4% (95%CI ...
  10. [10]
    Female Genital Mutilation Type III - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    FGM Type III, or infibulation, is defined as the clitoridectomy with removal of the labia minora and majora, combined with the narrowing of the vaginal opening ...
  11. [11]
    Fig. 5.14, [FGM/C type III. Often referred...]. - Female Genital ... - NCBI
    Often referred to as infibulation. Narrowing of the vaginal opening with the creation of a covering seal. The seal is formed by cutting and appositioning the ...Missing: classification | Show results with:classification<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Infibulation - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    ... Latin infibulatus, past participle of infibulare "to close with a clasp," from in- "on" (from PIE root *en "in") + fibula "a clasp, pin" (from PIE root ...
  13. [13]
    INFIBULATION Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Etymology. Latin infibulare to fasten the labia majora or prepuce with stitches or a clasp, from in- + fibula clasp, fibula ; First Known Use. 1798, in the ...
  14. [14]
    (PDF) Preputial infibulation: From ancient medicine to modern ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Infibulation of the prepuce was also employed as a means of controlling male sexuality. Prepucial infibulation as a surgical method ...
  15. [15]
    The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital ...
    This study examines the evolution of Greek and Roman medical conceptualizations of preputial aesthetics, utilizing evidence found in classical medical texts.
  16. [16]
    The Challenge of Female Genital Mutilation - Iris Publishers
    Jan 24, 2019 · The excision of the females probably consisted in the clitoris and labia minora [5]. Female circumcision is believed to have originated in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] A Historical Study of Ancient Civilizations and their Influence on ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · Egyptian mummies showed women infibulated and this was supported by a Greek Papyrus in the British Museum dated 163 BC.Missing: remains | Show results with:remains
  18. [18]
    Masturbation, Sodomy, Mirrors and Bestiality in Ancient Rome
    “Roman gladiators also were frequently infibulated in order to preserve their vigour. The operation was performed by having the prepuce drawn over the glans ...
  19. [19]
    Western History of Male Infibulation (Piercing of the Foreskin) - BME
    Aug 8, 2008 · Male infibulation involves pulling the foreskin of the penis over the glans and piercing the foreskin through both sides, vertically or ...
  20. [20]
    Clitoridectomy and Infibulation - Cultural Survival
    Feb 17, 2010 · As Islam spread into Egypt during the Arab conquest of North Africa, the practices of clitoridectomy and infibulation were picked up and ...Missing: medieval early
  21. [21]
    The Relationship between Female Circumcision and the Religion
    While Islam was spreading among the Animist tribes of Africa, the tradition of female circumcision influenced some schools of Islam through mutual interactions.
  22. [22]
    Female Genital Mutilation in Sudan - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Feb 14, 2018 · Female genital mutilation or female circumcision (FGM) is a serious health problem in Sudan. This procedure is harmful to women and causes ...Missing: expansion 7th-
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Female Genital Cutting and the Slave Trade - IFS
    May 12, 2025 · 2.2 The origins of infibulation. The practice of infibulation has ancient roots but the exact origin and motives behind its adoption are ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Towards a solution concerning female genital mutilation? - Journal.fi
    One can almost safely conclude that female genital cutting is a pre-Islamic practice which the early Muslim community adopted—perhaps because the social forces ...
  25. [25]
    CASTRATION - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    During the Qajar period the declining availability of white male slaves led to a decrease in the practice of castration, as the black eunuchs who continued ...Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation
  26. [26]
    History of Circumcision from the Earliest Times to the Present
    The ancients not only infibulated their gladiators to restrain them from venery, but they also subjected their chanters and singers to the same ordeal, as it ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] legislating against culture - efforts to end pharaonic circumcision in ...
    Between 1920 and 1949 the British-led colonial government in Sudan embarked on a largely unsuccessful campaign to stop the practice of 'female circumcision' ...
  28. [28]
    Efforts to end Pharaonic circumcision in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan
    Between 1920 and 1949 the British-led colonial government in Sudan embarked on a largely unsuccessful campaign to stop the practice of 'female circumcision ...
  29. [29]
    The Movement against Clitoridectomy and Infibulation in Sudan - jstor
    popular resistance to the British and to their attempts to outlaw the entrenched custom. Resistance to the government ban did not require rebel- lion. Since ...
  30. [30]
    Prevalence and factors associated with female genital mutilation ...
    Nov 5, 2024 · According to the Somalia Demographic Health Survey 2020 (SDHS 2020), circumcision among women aged 15–49 is high, at 99%, indicating Somalia has ...
  31. [31]
    Somalia - state.gov
    The most common form of female genital mutilation (FGM) or female genital cutting (FGC) practiced in Somalia is Type III (commonly referred to as infibulation)
  32. [32]
    a situation analysis of female genital mutilation in Mali | ODI
    Mar 19, 2023 · This study offers a situation analysis of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C in Mali), a country where 89% of females aged 15 to 49 ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Female Genital Mutilation in Mali: Insights from a statistical analysis
    Demographic data are from the United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World. Population Prospects 2019, Online edition, ...
  34. [34]
    Faster decline in FGM is observed in urban compared to rural areas ...
    In 2015, UN member states committed to eliminate female genital mutilation (FGM) by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Agenda. To reach this goal, ...
  35. [35]
    Male genital mutilation: an adaptation to sexual conflict - ScienceDirect
    This 'sexual conflict' hypothesis predicts that MGM should be associated with polygyny, particularly when co-wives reside far apart, and that MGM should reduce ...Missing: ancient | Show results with:ancient
  36. [36]
    The unbroken chain of female genital mutilation: a qualitative ... - NIH
    Jan 3, 2024 · This practice is majorly prevalent in Sudan, as it is estimated that over 12 million Sudanese women are circumcised. This study uncovers rural females' ...
  37. [37]
    Female genital mutilation in Djibouti - PMC - NIH
    The practice of female genital mutilation (we will use the latest definition adopted by WHO/UNFP: female genital mutilation/cutting or FGM/C) is still ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  38. [38]
    Preputial infibulation: from ancient medicine to modern genital piercing
    Oct 27, 2003 · Procedures to prevent the eversion of the foreskin have been in use since antiquity for various reasons. Beginning in ancient Rome as a ...
  39. [39]
    Infibulation | Sacred Texts Archive
    Roman gladiators also were frequently infibulated in order to preserve their vigour. The operation was performed by having the prepuce drawn over the glans.Missing: male | Show results with:male<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Preputial infibulation: from ancient medicine to modern genital piercing
    MeSH terms. Circumcision, Male / history*; Cosmetic Techniques / history; Greek World / history; History, 15th Century; History, 16th Century; History, ...
  41. [41]
    Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Statistics - UNICEF Data
    Female genital mutilation (FGM) refers to “all procedures involving partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female ...
  42. [42]
    Africa | FGM/C Research Initiative
    These ethnic communities often spread across country borders. For example, Somali communities practice FGM/C in Somalia as well as in Kenya (especially the ...
  43. [43]
    Female Genital Mutilation in Mali | UNICEF
    Feb 6, 2022 · In Mali, nearly eight million girls and women have undergone FGM. Fewer than one in five girls and women in Mali think FGM should stop.Missing: Fulani | Show results with:Fulani
  44. [44]
    [PDF] country profile: - fgm in mali - Orchid Project
    Sep 9, 2014 · 28 Too Many is an anti-female genital mutilation. (FGM) charity, created to end FGM in the 28. African countries where it is practised and in.
  45. [45]
    The origin of infibulation in Somalia: An ethological hypothesis
    Pastoral life in Somalia is characterized by a) the raising of herds of large animals (cattle, camels, zebus) and small animals (sheep, goats) which live ...
  46. [46]
    Prevalence and drivers of female genital mutilation/cutting in three ...
    Jul 17, 2023 · Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), a violation of human rights, remains common in the coastal areas of Yemen. This study aimed to ...
  47. [47]
    Oman - Orchid Project
    Apr 22, 2019 · Estimated prevalence among girls and women. There are no national statistics on the prevalence of female genital cutting (FGC) in Oman.
  48. [48]
    Addressing female genital mutilation in Europe: a scoping review of ...
    Feb 8, 2018 · Public and policy attention to female genital mutilation (FGM) in diaspora communities has increased in Europe, but research remains limited ...
  49. [49]
    UK Somalis 'racially profiled' over FGM - BBC
    Jan 12, 2020 · Parents are wrongly being arrested and having their children taken into care due to the stigma around female genital mutilation (FGM), ...
  50. [50]
    Investigating Factors Associated with Migration and Cultural ... - NIH
    A growing body of evidence indicates a significant decrease in support for female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) within post-migration communities in ...
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    Female Genital Mutilation: A global concern - UNICEF DATA
    Mar 7, 2024 · The report reveals that over 230 million girls and women worldwide have undergone FGM – a 15 per cent increase, or 30 million more girls and women.Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation
  53. [53]
    Prevalence of female genital mutilation and associated factors ...
    Sep 12, 2023 · The pooled prevalence of FGM among daughters aged 0–14 years in sub-Saharan Africa was found to be 22.9% (95% CI: 16.2–29.6).
  54. [54]
    Female genital mutilation | United Nations Population Fund
    Feb 3, 2025 · Female genital mutilation, a practice that involves altering or injuring the female genitalia for non-medical reasons, is internationally recognized as a ...Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation
  55. [55]
    Female genital mutilation (FGM) frequently asked questions
    Feb 6, 2025 · How does female genital mutilation affect the health of women and girls? What are the consequences for childbirth? Is there a link between ...How does female genital... · Why are there different terms...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Female Genital Cutting in the Demographic and Health Surveys
    “Virginity” refers to answers that say, for example, that FGC protects a girl's virginity, prevents her from becoming promiscuous, and prevents immoral behavior ...
  57. [57]
    Beliefs & Issues - Female Genital Mutilation and New Zealand
    FGM is believed to safeguard the morality of women, preserve their virginity, prevent them from being oversexed, and save them from temptation and disgrace.
  58. [58]
    Full article: What makes a woman? Understanding the reasons for ...
    Aug 27, 2022 · This study presents the reasons for, and circumstances of, female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) in Indonesia, Ethiopia and Kenya.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Tracing Change in Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting through Social ...
    Feb 11, 2020 · By serving to signal fidelity, it is argued that FGM/C increases paternity certainty, and thus improves marriage prospects. In settings ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Applying anthropology to female genital mutilation/cutting - OSF
    Paternity certainty, marriageability, identity and social influence seem ... “Female Infibulation.” Studia Ethnographica Upsaliensia 20:95–122. Wilson ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] On the Origins of Restricting Women's Promiscuity - Anke Becker
    Oct 3, 2022 · This paper studies the origins and function of customs and norms that intend to keep women from being promiscuous. Using large-scale survey ...
  62. [62]
    Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: The Secret World of Women as ...
    Efforts aimed at the abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in the communities where it is deeply rooted have extensively considered and ...
  63. [63]
    It's a woman's thing: gender roles sustaining the practice of female ...
    Mar 1, 2021 · In polygamous households, tensions can arise if one woman has not circumcised her daughters while her co-wives have circumcised her daughters. ...Missing: asymmetry | Show results with:asymmetry<|control11|><|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [PDF] The normal and the aberrant in female genital cutting - HAU
    For the issue has far less to do with how men oppress women than with how a system of gender-asymmetric values and constraints is internalized by both, with.
  65. [65]
    A Tradition in Transition: Factors Perpetuating and Hindering ... - NIH
    Understanding the forces underpinning female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a necessary first step to prevent the continuation of a practice that is ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Key Influences on a Continued ...
    The most severe form, Type. III is often referred to as “infibulation” and occurs by ... The purported benefits for men center around the idea that girls who have ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Fact Sheet No.23, Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health ...
    These harmful traditional practices include female genital mutilation (FGM); forced feeding of women; early marriage; the various taboos or practices which ...
  68. [68]
    FGM Type 3 in Pregnancy | UKOSS - NPEU - University of Oxford
    Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is commonly performed in parts of Africa, Asia and the Middle East; there are no identifiable health benefits associated with ...
  69. [69]
    Health risks of female genital mutilation
    FGM has no health benefits, and it harms girls and women in many ways. The practice involves removing and injuring healthy and normal female genital tissue.
  70. [70]
    Health Consequences of the Female Genital Mutilation
    It was suggested that FGM had various physical, obstetric, sexual, and psychological consequences. Women with FGM experienced mental disturbances.
  71. [71]
    New study highlights multiple long-term health complications from ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · ... post-traumatic stress disorder. There is a critical need to ensure ... urinary tract infections and difficulty urinating; and painful sexual ...Missing: infibulation dysfunction
  72. [72]
    The Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
    Various forms of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) have been performed for millennia and continue to be prevalent in parts of Africa.
  73. [73]
    Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes
    Objective Worldwide, an estimated 125 million girls and women live with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). We aimed to systematically review the ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits<|control11|><|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Full article: What is currently known about female genital mutilation ...
    Additional complications include fistulas, pelvic organ prolapse, somatic symptoms, and urinary tract infections. The impact of FGM and incontinence on quality ...
  75. [75]
    Mental health outcomes and post-traumatic stress disorder ... - Nature
    Jun 3, 2025 · Furthermore, comorbid psychiatric conditions, including depression, affective disorders, anxiety disorders, somatization disorder and PTSD, are ...
  76. [76]
    Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of Historical Treatments With a Focus ...
    Jul 23, 2015 · The objective of this article is to explore historical options for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, with particular emphasis on the development and ...Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation
  77. [77]
    Penile fibrosis—still scarring urologists today: a narrative review - PMC
    Jan 23, 2024 · In this review article, we provide a review of penile fibrosis, discuss current medical and surgical management and summarize preventative strategies.
  78. [78]
    Somalia | FGM/C Research Initiative
    The prevalence of FGM among women aged 15–49 in Somalia is 99.2%. 72% of women believe that FGM is a requirement of their religion.
  79. [79]
    Medicalization of female genital mutilation/cutting - ScienceDirect.com
    Medicalization of FGM/C is proposed by some health professionals to reduce the incidence of its complications.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  80. [80]
    theorizing 'African' female genital cutting and - 'Western' body ... - jstor
    argue that 'changes in the practice of clitoridectomy and infibulation in Africa must be initiated and carried out by members of those African cultures in.
  81. [81]
    Is Anti-FGM Legislation Cultural Imperialism? Interrogating Kenya's ...
    Aug 15, 2022 · Postcolonial feminists and anthropologists have criticised anti-female genital mutilation (FGM) ... Kamau argued that a sexual reassignment ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Rethinking Female Genital Cutting through Postcolonial lens
    Feb 5, 2024 · It has been argued by some of the scholars that elongation does not constitute “mutilation” due to its studied benefits to women's sexual health ...Missing: rationales | Show results with:rationales
  83. [83]
    Sources of international human rights law on Female Genital ...
    Feb 25, 2011 · FGM is a violation of the human rights of women and girls as recognized in numerous international and regional human rights instruments.Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation
  84. [84]
    United Nations bans female genital mutilation - UN Women
    Dec 20, 2012 · The United Nations General Assembly today unanimously passed a resolution banning the practice of Female Genital Mutilation.Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation
  85. [85]
    Genital Cutting as Gender Oppression: Time to Revisit the WHO ...
    there are sharp differences between infibulation, the most extreme form of female genital mutilation, and the less invasive form of male circumcision that ...Abstract · Introduction · Mapping Inconsistencies · Genital Cutting and Gender...
  86. [86]
    Full article: 'Male circumcision' and 'female genital mutilation'
    Cutting of female genitalia is unlawful in many countries and condemned by a number of organisations and medical associations such as the United Nations ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources<|control11|><|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Male circumcision: 1 in 3 globally but almost universal in Muslim and ...
    Mar 8, 2016 · One-third of males aged 15 and above are circumcised but male circumcision is almost universal in countries where the Muslim and Jewish faith are commonplace.
  88. [88]
    Circumcision by Country 2025 - World Population Review
    According to a CDC study, male circumcision rates in the United States for newborns decreased between 1979 and 2010 from 64.5% to 58.3%. It is estimated that ...Circumcision Rates Around... · Countries and Territories in...
  89. [89]
    Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trial of Male Circumcision for ...
    Oct 25, 2005 · Infections were 60% fewer in the treatment group, which seems to indicate that circumcised men are much less likely to become infected with HIV when having sex ...
  90. [90]
    Efficacy of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision to Prevent HIV ...
    May 28, 2024 · Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) reduces the risk for HIV infection by about 60% ...
  91. [91]
    Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks - NIH
    There is substantial evidence that circumcision protects males from HIV infection, penile carcinoma, urinary tract infections, and ulcerative sexually ...
  92. [92]
    Greater Benefits of Infant Circumcision - Johns Hopkins Medicine
    Oct 15, 2012 · The scientific evidence of female genital cutting indicates only harm and no health benefits. In male circumcision, the anatomy and ...
  93. [93]
    Commentary: Do the Benefits of Male Circumcision ... - Frontiers
    ... circumcision”) is inappropriate since the latter confers no benefits to health, and especially in its more extreme forms only harms. Given the benefits of ...
  94. [94]
    Evidence and Ethics on: Circumcision
    There are no known health benefits from FGC and significant harms. Researchers are not looking for any evidence of health benefits (a reduced risk of infection ...
  95. [95]
    Female genital mutilation and male circumcision - Dove Medical Press
    Oct 3, 2015 · I propose an ethical framework for evaluating such alterations that is based upon considerations of bodily autonomy and informed consent, rather than sex or ...
  96. [96]
    National laws on FGM - CoP FGM-MGF %
    92 countries are known to practice FGM and that only 55% of them (51 countries) have specifically prohibited FGM under their national laws.
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Legal Frameworks on Female Genital Mutilation - UNFPA WCARO
    Oct 24, 2017 · Female genital mutilation (FGM) has been internationally recognized as a violation of the rights, health and integrity of women and girls. FGM ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Ethiopia
    26 In 2018, in the whole Ethiopia, there have been 13 arrests, 9 cases brought to court, and 4 FGM related convictions/sanctions. In the period 2015-2017 ...
  99. [99]
    Criminalising Female Genital Mutilation - Oxford Academic
    FGM was first made a specific criminal offence in the UK under the Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985 (the 1985 Act) with a maximum penalty of five ...
  100. [100]
    In UK First, Court Convicts Mother Of Female Genital Mutilation - NPR
    Feb 1, 2019 · A sentencing hearing is scheduled for March 8. FGM was outlawed in the UK in 1985 after passing the Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act, ...
  101. [101]
    THE LAW - FGM AWARE
    In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the practice is illegal under the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003. It is also against the law to take a girl abroad ...
  102. [102]
    Somalia's legislative journey to end female genital mutilation - Unicef
    Jun 3, 2025 · With nearly 99% of Somali women and girls aged 15 to 49 having undergone some form of FGM, the issue is not just a health crisis, it is a deeply ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] SOMALIA: THE LAW AND FGM
    76.4% of women aged 15–49 believe that FGM should continue. Source of data: Directorate of National Statistics, Federal Government of Somalia (2020) The Somali ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] GUINEA: THE LAW AND FGM
    Chapter V, Section II: Female Genital Mutilation of the Criminal Code 2016 provides a definition ... Evidence suggests that, despite the law, prosecutions against ...
  105. [105]
    African countries urged to toughen laws on female genital mutilation
    Sep 13, 2018 · But laws in the 22 countries which have banned FGM are mostly inadequate and seldom enforced, campaigners said, adding that prosecutions ...
  106. [106]
    I. Laws/Enforcement in Countries where FGM is Commonly Practiced
    Most anti-FGM groups are refocusing their energies at the state and local government level. Edo State banned this practice in 1999. Persons convicted under the ...
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: - UNICEF Data
    Notes: Bans outlawing FGM/C were passed in some African countries, including Kenya and Sudan, during colonial rule. This table includes only legislation ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Eliminating Female genital mutilation - UN.org.
    In 1997, the World Health Organization (WHO), the. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and the. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) issued a Joint ...
  109. [109]
    International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation
    Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the ...
  110. [110]
    International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation 2024
    The International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) observed every year on February 6th marks an important day for the world community.
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation - Unicef
    Jun 8, 2022 · More than 200 million girls and women have been subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM). As a gendered harmful practice, FGM is a ...Missing: metrics | Show results with:metrics
  112. [112]
    The Gambia is debating whether to repeal its ban on female genital ...
    Mar 22, 2024 · Her website is DianeJoyceCole.com. female genital mutilation · The Gambia · female circumcision · female genital cutting.
  113. [113]
    FGM survivors: 'It happens on US soil, but it happens in secret' | US ...
    Campaign groups and FGM survivors warn that despite legislation against FGM, thousands of American girls are still at risk.
  114. [114]
    Coercion versus facilitation: Context and the implementation of anti ...
    Dec 3, 2021 · A common policy response to female genital mutilation/cutting (“FGM/C”) is the enactment of criminal prohibitions. The implementation of such ...Missing: alternatives | Show results with:alternatives
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Prevent or Respond to ...
    This study was funded through the UNFPA–UNICEF Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation: Accelerating Change, which is generously ...Missing: verification | Show results with:verification
  116. [116]
    Female Genital Mutilation, Annual Report - April 2023 to March 2024
    Sep 24, 2024 · 37,615 women and girls who had undergone Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) have been seen at NHS services in England since April 2015, ...
  117. [117]
    New report finds female genital mutilation/cutting in 94 countries
    Feb 25, 2025 · A new report has collated evidence of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) in 94 countries, revealing how this harmful practice exists in more communities ...Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation
  118. [118]
    Debating medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C)
    Nov 1, 2019 · The purpose of this paper is to discuss the arguments associated with the medicalization of FGM/C, a trend that could undermine the achievement of Sustainable ...
  119. [119]
    [PDF] THE MEDICALIZATION OF FGM IN KENYA, SOMALIA, ETHIOPIA ...
    Jun 15, 2021 · The UNICEF Eastern and Southern African. Regional Office (ESARO) commissioned Child. Frontiers to develop a compendium of promising.
  120. [120]
    Medicalization of female genital mutilation. Harm reduction or ...
    Moreover, rather than helping end the practice, they argue that medicalizing FGM will only entrench the practice and cause more harm to women. This article ...
  121. [121]
    [PDF] Global strategy to stop health-care providers from performing female ...
    Health professionals who perform female genital mutilation (FGM) are violating girls' and women's right to life, right to physical integrity, and right to ...
  122. [122]
    Female genital mutilation in Mali: The fight to end a deadly tradition
    Feb 3, 2025 · In Mali, where 89% of women have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), advocates like Siaka Traoré are fighting to end this deadly ...Missing: persistence | Show results with:persistence
  123. [123]
    Mali: Failure to criminalise FGM a violation of women's fundamental ...
    Jun 24, 2020 · GENEVA (24 June 2020) Mali's failure to criminalise female genital mutilation (FGM), allowing the inhuman practice to continue with impunity ...Missing: infibulation | Show results with:infibulation<|separator|>
  124. [124]
    The socioeconomic dynamics of trends in female genital mutilation ...
    Background The majority of women who undergo female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) live in Africa. Although the UN Sustainable Development Goals call ...Missing: shifts | Show results with:shifts
  125. [125]
    Regime Stability and the Persistence of Traditional Practices
    I examine why the harmful tradition of female genital mutilation (FGM) persists in certain countries but in others it has been eradicated.Missing: projections | Show results with:projections
  126. [126]
    Female genital mutilation: trends, economic burden of delay and ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · The practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) is a health and social problem. Millions of girls and women have undergone FGM or will soon, ...Missing: choice | Show results with:choice