Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Integrative thinking

Integrative thinking is the ability to face constructively the tension of opposing ideas and, instead of choosing one at the expense of the other, generate a creative resolution of the tension in the form of a new idea that contains elements of both opposing models but is superior to both.^[1] This approach contrasts with conventional problem-solving, which often forces trade-offs between mutually exclusive options, by instead embracing complexity to produce innovative outcomes that transcend initial constraints.^[2] The concept was coined by Roger L. Martin, a prominent strategic thinker and former dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto, based on his multiyear study of highly successful leaders.^[2] Martin introduced integrative thinking in his 2007 book, The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win Through Integrative Thinking, where he argued that exemplary leaders do not settle for compromises but actively synthesize conflicting perspectives to forge superior solutions.^[1] This skill is not innate but can be cultivated through deliberate practice, tools, and mindset shifts, making it accessible to individuals across various domains.^[2] Integrative thinking has found wide application in business strategy, leadership development, and education. In organizational contexts, it enables executives to navigate dilemmas such as balancing short-term profits with long-term sustainability or innovation with efficiency.^[1] Martin expanded on practical methodologies for applying the approach in his 2017 co-authored book Creating Great Choices: A Leader's Guide to Integrative Thinking with Jennifer Riel, which provides step-by-step tools like problem formulation and prototyping to generate novel options. In education, the I-Think initiative, originating from the Rotman School, integrates these principles into K-12 curricula to equip students with problem-solving skills for real-world challenges, emphasizing tools like challenge kits and collaborative processes.^[3]

Origins and Historical Context

Early Conceptualization

The concept of integrative thinking originated in 1986 with Graham Douglas, who introduced it as a field within applied mind science defined as the process of integrating intuition, reason, and imagination to create a holistic continuum of strategy, tactics, action, review, and evaluation in problem-solving, thereby synthesizing multiple perspectives without compromise.^[4] Douglas's foundational work in the 1980s was deeply embedded in systems thinking, which he connected to cybernetics and general systems theory by emphasizing self-organizing systems, dynamic interactions, and complexity in human decision-making processes.^[5] These connections allowed for a view of thinking as an interconnected whole, where individual elements like cognition and emotion contribute to emergent solutions rather than isolated analysis.^[6] In his early frameworks, Douglas proposed models that specifically integrated emotional and rational elements, such as reconciling needs and wants through balanced consideration of thoughts, feelings, and actions to achieve creative outcomes in decision-making.^[5] For instance, these models treated problem-solving as a unified process that avoided dualistic separations, drawing on mind science to foster comprehensive mental strategies.^[6] The timeline of pre-2000 developments began in the 1970s with Douglas's professional experience in systems analysis for the Australian Army and government, which laid the groundwork for holistic approaches to complex issues.^[5] Throughout the 1980s, this evolved amid interdisciplinary influences from management studies on governance and organizational dynamics, as well as psychology's explorations in cognitive processes and neuroscience, culminating in the 1986 formalization.^[6] Douglas later refined these ideas in publications like The Revolution of Minds! (1994), which expanded on sustainable human development through integrated mental frameworks.^[7] This initial conceptualization provided a basis for subsequent adaptations, such as Roger Martin's refinement in the 2000s.^[4]

Roger Martin's Development

Roger Martin, serving as Dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto from 1998 to 2013, began formalizing integrative thinking through empirical research in the early 2000s.^[8] In collaboration with Mihnea C. Moldoveanu, who joined the faculty in 1999, Martin co-developed the concept starting around 2000, drawing on their shared interest in advanced cognitive approaches to problem-solving.^[9] Their work built on earlier precursors like Graham Douglas's ideas but shifted focus to practical applications in leadership.^[10] Central to this development was Martin's extensive interviewing process, where he conducted in-depth sessions with over 50 exemplary leaders, some lasting more than eight hours each.^[11] These interviews, featuring figures such as Jack Welch of General Electric, Nandan Nilekani of Infosys, A.G. Lafley of Procter & Gamble, and Isadore Sharp of Four Seasons Hotels, revealed recurring patterns in how these individuals synthesized opposing ideas to generate innovative solutions.^[12]^[11] Through this qualitative analysis, Martin identified key habits of integrative thinkers, which informed the foundational model of the approach. The culmination of this research appeared in Martin's 2007 book, The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win Through Integrative Thinking, published by Harvard Business Press, which popularized the concept globally.^[13] The book incorporates anecdotes from the interviews, such as Nilekani's resolution of tensions in building India's IT infrastructure, to illustrate the power of holding and reconciling opposing models.^[12] Accompanying this was a June 2007 Harvard Business Review article, "How Successful Leaders Think," which outlined the core elements derived from the study and reached a wide professional audience.^[1] To institutionalize integrative thinking, Martin and his colleagues at Rotman launched dedicated educational programs, including the Rotman Integrative Thinking Seminar in the early 2000s and ongoing MBA elective courses like "The Opposable Mind: Approaches to Integrative Thinking."^[14]^[15] These initiatives extended to the I-Think program, which applies the framework in K-12 education and executive training, fostering its adoption beyond academia.^[16] Later, the Desautels Centre for Integrative Thinking was established at Rotman to advance research and pedagogy in the area.^[17]

Core Concepts and Framework

Definition and Characteristics

Integrative thinking is a form of reasoning that enables individuals to constructively face the tensions arising from opposing ideas or models and, rather than selecting one at the expense of the other, generate a creative resolution in the form of a new model that incorporates elements of both but is superior overall.^[1] This approach, observed in highly successful leaders through multiyear studies, involves holding two opposing ideas in mind simultaneously and synthesizing them into an improved outcome that accounts for multiple interdependent variables, such as customer preferences, competitor actions, and operational costs.^[2]^[18] Key characteristics of integrative thinking include embracing complexity by seeking out and managing a broad array of interconnected factors instead of oversimplifying issues; recognizing multi-directional causality, where influences flow in nonlinear ways among elements like market dynamics and internal operations; maintaining a high tolerance for ambiguity to navigate uncertainty without rushing to premature conclusions; and adopting a holistic perspective that addresses problems comprehensively rather than reducing them to isolated components.^[18] These traits allow practitioners to explore possibilities more deeply, fostering innovative resolutions that conventional approaches might overlook. In contrast to trade-off thinking, which typically involves accepting zero-sum compromises by choosing between mutually exclusive options—such as prioritizing cost efficiency over product differentiation—integrative thinking avoids such limitations by proactively creating integrative solutions that enhance value across dimensions.^[1] This distinction underscores the former's emphasis on synthesis over sacrifice, enabling superior outcomes without inherent trade-offs. A hallmark cognitive attitude of integrative thinkers is their capacity to hold opposing ideas in tension without resolving them prematurely, a quality echoed in F. Scott Fitzgerald's observation that "the test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function."^[1] This mindset supports the generative process central to integrative thinking, promoting creativity amid apparent contradictions.

The Integrative Thinking Process

The integrative thinking process, outlined by Roger Martin and Jennifer Riel in their 2017 book Creating Great Choices: A Leader's Guide to Integrative Thinking, provides a structured framework for applying integrative thinking to dilemmas.^[19] This four-step approach enables leaders to move beyond binary choices and develop innovative solutions that integrate the strengths of opposing models.^[20] The process begins with articulating opposing models, where the practitioner clearly defines the problem and identifies two contrasting models or options, detailing their assumptions, causal mechanisms, and consequences to understand the underlying tensions.^[20] Next, examining the models involves deeply analyzing each model by questioning their key features, exploring hidden assumptions, and considering how they might be relaxed or adjusted without losing core functionality. This step highlights opportunities for recombination by identifying what each model does well and where it falls short.^[20] In the third step, generating a new model, the thinker creates a point of intersection by blending elements from both models, drawing on cross-domain analogies, sequencing causal elements innovatively, and formulating a provisional solution that addresses the original tension more effectively. Tools like causal modeling and prototyping aid in visualizing and refining these connections.^[20] Finally, assessing the prototype requires testing the new model through iterative experimentation, gathering feedback, and refining it based on real-world viability. This non-linear, cyclical process encourages ongoing adaptation to ensure the solution is robust and superior to the initial options.^[20] With practice, this framework cultivates the ability to habitually generate integrative solutions across diverse challenges.

Theoretical Underpinnings

Distinctions from Conventional Thinking

Conventional thinking typically involves point-counterpoint debates that result in trade-offs between opposing options, assuming linear causality and relying on siloed analysis of isolated components.^[1] In contrast, integrative thinking rejects such trade-offs as inevitable, instead generating creative resolutions by holding opposing ideas in tension to produce superior models that incorporate the strengths of both without the weaknesses.^[2] This approach views causality as multi-directional and interconnected, allowing for dynamic relationships rather than simplistic, one-way assumptions.^[18] Compared to analytical thinking, which focuses on breaking problems into discrete parts for isolated evaluation—often leading to variable isolation and partial solutions—integrative thinking emphasizes a whole-system perspective.^[1] Integrative thinkers consider a broad array of interdependent variables, integrating them holistically while addressing individual elements, rather than simplifying through exclusion or sequential dissection.^[14] This enables the construction of comprehensive models that capture complexity, avoiding the limitations of part-focused analysis. Integrative thinking extends beyond dialectical approaches, such as thesis-antithesis-synthesis, by creating novel models that transcend mere compromises or reconciliations of opposites.^[1] Rather than settling for a balanced midpoint, it leverages ongoing tension to forge innovative outcomes superior to the originals, often through tools like the SOARA process that facilitate this synthesis.^[2] These distinctions make integrative thinking particularly suited to "wicked problems"—complex, ambiguous issues with no clear or optimal solutions, multiple stakeholders, and evolving variables—where conventional methods falter by forcing suboptimal choices.^[18] In tame problems, which have defined parameters and can be solved through linear analysis, conventional thinking suffices; however, integrative thinking excels in wicked contexts by enabling breakthroughs that evade traditional trade-offs.^[1]

Cognitive and Philosophical Foundations

Integrative thinking aligns with post-formal adult development models, where cognitive maturity enables holding contradictions without premature resolution, fostering higher-order reasoning.^[21] Philosophically, integrative thinking traces roots to Hegelian dialectics, which emphasize thesis-antithesis-synthesis as a method for advancing understanding through oppositional tensions, as articulated in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit.^[22] This dialectical approach informs post-formal thought, promoting transformative integration over mere compromise.^[23] Complementing this, John Dewey's pragmatism underscores experimental inquiry and adaptive problem-solving in complex environments, viewing thought as a tool for reconstructing experience amid uncertainty.^[24] Additionally, complexity theory provides a foundation by favoring emergent, non-linear dynamics over reductionist analysis, encouraging thinkers to embrace multifaceted systems where outcomes arise from interactions rather than isolated parts.^[21] Neurologically, integrative thinking correlates with prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity, particularly in the dorsolateral and ventromedial regions, which facilitate executive functions like conflict monitoring and resolution of opposing information. Post-2010 neuroimaging studies, including functional MRI meta-analyses, show PFC activation during tasks requiring synthesis of conflicting stimuli, supporting the cognitive flexibility essential for integrative processes.^[25] For instance, during creative integration, the PFC integrates inputs from associative networks, enabling the orchestration of intuitive and analytical elements.^[26] In creativity research, integrative thinking aligns with models combining divergent and convergent processes, where divergent thinking generates broad idea exploration and convergent thinking refines them toward viable outcomes. This synergy forms a higher-order integrative phase, as evidenced by measures like the Function Synthesis Task, which assesses creative synthesis beyond isolated divergence or convergence.^[27]

Applications and Case Studies

In Business and Leadership

Integrative thinking has been applied in business contexts to formulate strategies that navigate complex trade-offs, fostering innovation by synthesizing opposing ideas rather than choosing between them.^[1] In strategy development, leaders use it to balance competing priorities such as short-term profitability against long-term sustainability, enabling companies to create novel solutions that address stakeholder conflicts without compromise.^[2] In leadership, Nandan Nilekani, co-founder and former CEO of Infosys, exemplified integrative thinking by scaling the company's global operations while customizing solutions for local markets, diagnosing challenges through probing questions and synthesizing global standards with regional needs to drive growth.^[28] Similarly, Jack Welch, during his tenure as CEO of General Electric, employed integrative thinking in diversification decisions, holding opposing models of business focus and expansion in tension to build a boundaryless organization that integrated diverse units for sustained performance.^[1] Several institutions have adopted integrative thinking tools for product development and innovation. Procter & Gamble integrated it under CEO A.G. Lafley to rethink consumer goods strategies, combining analytical rigor with creative ideation to accelerate new product launches.^[29] IDEO, a design firm, incorporates integrative thinking in its processes to merge user insights with technical constraints, enabling collaborative problem-solving that yields innovative designs.^[20] These applications have led to enhanced decision-making in volatile markets, with evidence showing faster innovation cycles through better synthesis of ideas.^[19] Overall, it supports resilient leadership by turning apparent dilemmas into opportunities for value creation.^[30]

In Education and Other Domains

Integrative thinking has been integrated into educational curricula to equip students with tools for addressing multifaceted challenges. At the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management, the Desautels Centre for Integrative Thinking promotes the development of these skills among students and professionals through programs that emphasize creative problem-solving in complex environments.^[17] The I-Think initiative, stemming from Roger Martin's work at Rotman, extends this approach to K-12 education by providing educators with methodologies and challenge kits that teach students to navigate tensions in real-world problems, such as those related to climate policy.^[3] For instance, courses like RSM340H1S: The Opposable Mind—Approaches to Integrative Thinking at Rotman introduce students to the theory and practice of holding opposing ideas to generate innovative solutions.^[15] In public policy, integrative thinking facilitates the reconciliation of competing goals, such as economic growth and environmental protection in urban planning. A study on deliberative democracy in urban contexts demonstrates how this approach stimulates collaborative decision-making to address complexity, leading to more inclusive policies that integrate diverse stakeholder perspectives.^[31] Similarly, in the arts and design fields, integrative thinking supports creative synthesis by enabling practitioners to merge intuition, reason, and imagination, as explored in interdisciplinary studies where it fosters the development of novel artistic expressions from conflicting elements.^[32] Nonprofit organizations apply integrative thinking to balance mission-driven objectives with financial sustainability, avoiding zero-sum trade-offs. For example, social enterprises use it to innovate solutions that align charitable goals with market demands, as seen in efforts to bridge traditional nonprofit models with business strategies for greater impact.^[33] In healthcare, it underpins patient-centered care models by encouraging providers to synthesize evidence-based practices with holistic patient needs, addressing false dichotomies in global health policy to promote more effective, integrated interventions.^[34] Overall, integrative thinking enhances interdisciplinary collaboration in fields like sustainability studies, where it enlarges learning by cultivating virtues such as openness to complexity, enabling scholars and practitioners to develop comprehensive strategies for environmental challenges.

Criticisms and Future Directions

Limitations and Challenges

Integrative thinking imposes significant cognitive demands, as it requires individuals to simultaneously hold and navigate multiple opposing models and tensions without simplifying or resolving them prematurely. This process can lead to high mental load, overwhelming working memory with interconnected variables and increasing the risk of cognitive overload, particularly when addressing complex problems.^[18] Implementation barriers further complicate the adoption of integrative thinking, as it demands substantial time for deep exploration and diverse teams to surface varied perspectives, which is often infeasible in hierarchical structures or fast-paced settings. In hierarchical organizations, shared leadership efforts toward integrative aims can create tactical vacuums and fragmentation, where operational decisions detach from strategic goals, exacerbating silos and reducing coordination across levels.^[35] Fast-paced environments amplify these issues by limiting the space for nonlinear sequencing of complexity, leading to rushed decisions that overlook interrelationships.^[18] Conceptually, integrative thinking carries risks of superficial integration, where attempts to blend opposing ideas result in shallow compromises rather than robust solutions, potentially failing to drive internal change or sustainable outcomes. Additionally, an overemphasis on creative synthesis may sideline rigorous, data-driven analysis, yielding innovative but ungrounded resolutions that neglect empirical validation.^[18] Cultural factors influence the efficacy of integrative thinking, with evidence from cross-cultural studies indicating reduced effectiveness in contexts characterized by low tolerance for ambiguity. Western groups, often exhibiting a more differentiative cognitive style and higher need for structure, demonstrate lower integrative complexity compared to Middle Eastern or bicultural individuals, who better manage cultural tensions and uncertainty.^[36]^[37] In such low-ambiguity-tolerance cultures, the discomfort of holding unresolved tensions can hinder adoption, limiting the approach's applicability. While tools like the SOARA process can mitigate some cognitive and implementation hurdles, they do not fully eliminate these inherent challenges.^[18]

Empirical Research and Evolving Perspectives

Since Roger Martin's original framework on integrative thinking, post-2010 empirical research has begun to validate its core elements, particularly the capacity for tension-holding in complex decision-making. A 2021 study in cognitive psychology framed practical wisdom (phronesis) as a form of contextual integrative thinking, using structural equation modeling on a battery of scales to confirm that integrative components—such as arbitrating conflicting virtues—predict prosocial moral behavior more effectively than isolated moral reasoning measures.^[38] Similarly, experiments around 2015 and later have linked tension-holding to enhanced creative problem-solving; for instance, a 2022 quasi-experimental study demonstrated that contractive sitting postures facilitate convergent-integrative thinking tasks by improving performance in synthesizing opposing ideas, providing embodied cognition evidence for how physical states support cognitive tension management.^[39] More recent work, such as a 2025 quasi-experimental evaluation of collaborative problem-based learning (CPBL) in higher education, showed significant gains in integrative thinking skills among participants using structured interdisciplinary frameworks, with mixed-methods analysis revealing that facilitator-guided synthesis phases were essential for navigating disciplinary tensions and fostering metacognitive awareness.^[40] These studies collectively affirm integrative thinking's role in creative and moral contexts through controlled experiments and validated instruments, though sample sizes remain modest.^[38]^[39]^[40] Despite these advances, empirical evidence on integrative thinking remains limited by a scarcity of large-scale quantitative data, with most investigations relying on qualitative case studies or small-group experiments rather than population-level analyses. Reviews from 2022 to 2024 highlight this gap, noting that while organizational applications show promise, individual-level measurements lack robust proxies, leading to calls for more rigorous, standardized testing by 2025 to establish causal impacts across diverse contexts. Evolving perspectives increasingly integrate integrative thinking with AI and design thinking to address multifaceted challenges. For example, 2025 research on human-AI collaboration in transdisciplinarity emphasizes AI's role in accelerating data synthesis while humans apply integrative oversight to hold ethical and disciplinary tensions, blending these approaches for holistic problem-solving.^[41] Recent applications extend to global issues like AI ethics, where integrative frameworks help reconcile competing priorities such as innovation speed and societal fairness in development processes.^[42] Future directions prioritize longitudinal studies to assess training efficacy, with 2024–2025 reviews advocating for multi-year trials tracking skill development in real-world settings. Additionally, there is a push for cross-disciplinary models that operationalize integrative thinking through direct assessment tools, bridging gaps in micro-level application and public sector governance.

References

[1]
How Successful Leaders Think
### Extracted Definition
[2]
Integrative Thinking - Roger Martin
I coined the term Integrative Thinking to describe the form of reasoning I observed in my multiyear study of highly successful leaders.
[3]
I-Think
About Integrative Thinking ... I-Think equips students and leaders with the skills and mindsets to navigate tensions and the complexity of real-world problems.Educators · About Us · Challenge Kits · 101 Series
[4]
Integrative Global Ltd
... Integrative Thinking is a field in Applied Mind Science which was originated by Graham Douglas in 1986. He describes Integrative Thinking as the process of ...
[5]
[PDF] Achieving sustainable development: the Integrative Improvement ...
Mar 12, 2009 · Graham Douglas is a pioneer author and consultant in Applied Mind Science in the field of. Integrative Thinking™ and originator of Integrative ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
[PDF] ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE INTEGRATIVE ...
The challenges we face in our economies and societies in our divided unsustainable world are perhaps greater than at any other time.
[7]
The Revolution of Minds! - Graham Douglas - Google Books
Title, The Revolution of Minds! Author, Graham Douglas. Publisher, AIPS, 1994. ISBN, 064620114X, 9780646201146. Length, 221 pages. Subjects.Missing: integrative thinking 1980s
[8]
Roger Martin | Strategy & Design Thinking Pioneer - Thinkers50
Discover the biography of Roger Martin, strategy adviser and integrative‑thinking pioneer, ranked #1 management thinker in 2017 by Thinkers50.
[9]
Moldoveanu Mihnea | Rotman School | University of Toronto
He joined Rotman in 1999 and jointly developed the concept of Integrative Thinking with Roger Martin. He is the author of nine books, including Soft Skills ...
[10]
Diaminds: Decoding the Mental Habits of Successful Thinkers
Mihnea Moldoveanu and Roger Martin, creators of the Integrative Thinking curriculum at the Rotman School of Management, draw upon case studies and ...
[11]
[PDF] Becoming an Integrative Thinker: The Keys to Success
Dec 17, 2007 · After interviewing and studying over 50 highly-successful leaders, the key that I have found is to not ask what these leaders do, but rather ...
[12]
Roger Martin on integrative thinking - Management-Issues
Jun 19, 2008 · ... The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win Through Integrative Thinking" (Harvard Business School Press). In it, Martin, who has been ...
[13]
The Opposable Mind
The opposable mind. In this primer on the problem-solving power of “integrative thinking,” Martin draws on ...
[14]
[PDF] Integrative Thinking - Roger Martin
myself, Rotman Professor of Strate- gic Management and ...
[15]
[PDF] Course Outline - University of Toronto
This course introduces the theory of integrative thinking and asks students to learn and practice the tools associated with it. Explicitly grounded in business ...
[16]
I-Think Initiative - Roger Martin
I-Think works with educators and students to bring integrative thinking, innovation and design into k-12 classrooms, influencing our future leaders.
[17]
Desautels Centre for Integrative Thinking | Rotman School
The Desautels Centre for Integrative Thinking focuses on understanding and cultivating essential skills for 21st-century professionals, especially executives.
[18]
None
### Key Characteristics of Integrative Thinking
[19]
[PDF] Achieving sustainable development: the Integrative Improvement ...
Apr 13, 2009 · This is what learning the SOARA Process of Integrative Thinking™ teaches quickly, economically and permanently. Every organisation needs good ...
[20]
[PDF] INNOVATIVE TRAINING IN THINKING
With practice, applying the SOARA Process of Integrative Thinking™ becomes a habit that empowers people and makes easier our struggle to achieve successful ...
[21]
Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic ... - Frontiers
Mar 20, 2022 · Dual Process Theory is currently a popular theory for explaining why we show bounded rationality in reasoning and decision-making tasks.Missing: foundations | Show results with:foundations
[22]
Divergent and convergent thinking: which tasks led to more creative ...
Nov 5, 2025 · The literature broadly agrees that creative thinking involves both divergent-exploratory and convergent-integrative cognitive processes ...
[23]
Integrative thinking is the key: An evaluation of current research into ...
We argue that the notion of “integrative thinking” should be used instead of post-formal or relativistic-dialectical thinking. Integration can be additive or ...
[24]
Integrative thinking is the key: An evaluation of current research into ...
Aug 10, 2025 · We argue that the notion of “integrative thinking” should be used instead of post-formal or relativistic-dialectical thinking.Missing: 1970s 1980s<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Dialectical Thinking: A Proposed Foundation for a Post-modern ...
Jun 13, 2022 · The way from a modern to a post-modern psychology requires dialectical thinking. Dialectical thinking recognizes the importance of contradiction, change, and ...
[26]
John Dewey - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 1, 2018 · Dewey's “cultural naturalism” (which he favored over “pragmatism” and “instrumentalism”) is a critique and reconstruction of philosophy within ...Dewey's Political Philosophy · Dewey's Moral Philosophy · Dewey's Aesthetics
[27]
Common and specific neural correlates underlying creative ...
Aug 15, 2025 · Meanwhile, brain regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex ... integrative thinking. Think Skills Creat., 22 (2016), pp. 201-211 ...
[28]
The Prefrontal Cortex and Neurological Impairments of Active Thought
Jan 4, 2018 · This article reviews the effects of lesions to the frontal cortex on the ability to carry out active thought, namely, to reason, think ...
[29]
Uniting Divergent and Convergent Thinking with a Novel Integrative ...
May 12, 2025 · Divergent and convergent thinking have dominated creativity research. However, creative thinking constructs may not be limited to just these two ...
[30]
Students Develop Stronger Divergent but Not Convergent Thinking
Oct 3, 2021 · ... divergent thinking and convergent thinking (Guilford, 1950). ... integrative thinking scale (Coleman et al., 2020). First-year students ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Integrative Thinking - I-Think Together
Bring us in for a 1-day Introduction to Integrative Thinking for Leaders to learn how to navigate complex problems with confidence. Begin with an introduction ...
[32]
How Successful Leaders Win Through Integrative Thinking
Dec 4, 2007 · The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win Through Integrative Thinking. By: Roger Martin. If you want to be as successful as Jack Welch, ...
[33]
Rethinking the Rulebook with Integrative Thinking - Lexico
May 16, 2024 · Integrative Thinking is your invitation to be both an artist and an analyst, blending creativity with logic to navigate the complexities of change.
[34]
Creating Great Choices - Roger Martin
Creating Great Choices. Conventional wisdom―and business school curricula ... integrative thinking through their work teaching the concept and its ...
[35]
Solving Problems with Integrative Thinking - Harvard Business Review
Jun 28, 2023 · Integrative thinking is this idea of leveraging the tension of opposing ideas to create a great answer that we can achieve consensus around.
[36]
Using Deliberative Democracy for Better Urban Decision-Making ...
Dec 27, 2020 · This article expands the evidence about integrative thinking by analyzing two case studies that applied the collaborative decision-making ...
[37]
Integrative Thinking, Synthesis, and Creativity in Interdisciplinary ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Using the word "synthesis," in a different sense, this article concentrates on synthesis as an integrative thinking skill. While the development ...
[38]
Beyond 'Evil Capitalists vs. Righteous Social Workers' - NextBillion
May 4, 2018 · The term “integrative thinking” was coined by Harvard Business School professor Roger Martin. It means to bring together two seemingly ...
[39]
The Challenged Interplay of Integrative Aims and Shared Leadership
Mar 11, 2024 · This research provides theory guided analysis on how shared leadership is not automatically in line with integrative aims.
[40]
Hallmarks of integrated thinking
### Summary of Risks and Critiques of Integrated Thinking
[41]
Integrative Cognitive Style in Middle Eastern and Western Groups
A secondary finding revealed higher levels of integrative thinking among Middle Easterners with comparatively low levels of Western education. In sum, findings ...
[42]
[PDF] Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology - Kaiping Peng
Within a cross-cultural context, integrative com- plexity reflects the degree to which people accept the reasonableness of clashing cultural perspectives on how ...
[43]
Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Type of Contextual Integrative ...
Jun 24, 2021 · Although this discourse on contextual integrative thinking may build a helpful bridge between the two traditional discourses, as well as to the ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[44]
Can Sitting Postures Influence the Creative Mind? Positive Effect of ...
May 23, 2022 · The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that sitting in a contractive posture requiring arm flexion to perform a convergent-integrative thinking task ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[45]
Enhancing Integrative Thinking via Collaborative Problem-Based ...
Jul 27, 2025 · Addressing complex challenges requires graduates with integrative thinking, a competency often underdeveloped due to disciplinary silos in higher education.
[46]
(PDF) Delineating the parameters of integrated thinking: A synthetic ...
Mar 15, 2024 · This article aims to delineate the concept of integrated thinking by analysing the similarities and differences between integrated thinking, integrative ...
[47]
Five capacities for human–artificial intelligence collaboration in ...
Jun 10, 2025 · How can transdisciplinary researchers work with artificial intelligence as a genuine collaborator while maintaining integrative thinking? What ...
[48]
Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study - PMC
Jan 23, 2024 · This research examines the concerns and challenges perceived by experts in developing ethical AI that addresses the healthcare context and needs.