Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Internet.org

Internet.org was a initiative launched by in 2013 to provide free access to selected basic internet services for people in developing countries lacking affordable data plans, through zero-rating partnerships with mobile operators. The program bundled curated websites focused on utilities like information, , , and local services, aiming to onboard users to digital platforms and eventually encourage paid full-internet subscriptions. It expanded to over 20 countries, including launches in the , , and initially , where it reached millions by offering zero-data-cost entry points. Rebranded as Free Basics in September 2015 amid backlash, the platform opened participation to more developers while maintaining a limited set of approved services to ensure low-bandwidth compatibility and operator viability. Early metrics indicated accelerated user growth, with new subscribers joining networks over 50% faster post-launch and more than half upgrading to paid data within months. However, the initiative drew significant for functioning as a "walled ," restricting to non-partnered sites and thereby discriminating against content in violation of principles. In , where it initially proliferated, regulators banned the service in February 2016 following a Telecom Regulatory Authority ruling prohibiting differential data pricing based on application type, prioritizing open internet equality over subsidized models. Proponents viewed it as a pragmatic bridge to connectivity in low-income areas, while critics, including advocates, argued it entrenched Facebook's market dominance and limited informational diversity, influencing subsequent policy debates on globally.

History

Launch and Early Development

Internet.org was publicly announced on August 20, 2013, by CEO as a collaborative effort to provide to the approximately five billion people worldwide who lacked reliable connectivity at the time. The initiative's founding partners—, , , , , and —committed to joint projects aimed at reducing connectivity barriers through innovations such as lower-cost smartphones, data compression technologies, more efficient network infrastructure, and sustainable business models tailored to developing markets. These efforts emphasized technical optimizations to minimize data usage and device requirements, with the explicit goal of enabling affordable, localized services without relying solely on subsidies. In its initial phase, Internet.org prioritized partnerships with mobile network operators to deliver "Free Basics," a zero-rated platform granting users free access to a curated set of essential websites and services, including , , and local utilities, without data charges. The first pilot rollout occurred in in July 2014, in collaboration with operators MTN and Airtel, marking the program's transition from conceptual framework to operational deployment in . This launch targeted regions with low penetration and high prepaid mobile usage, where early metrics showed rapid adoption among first-time users, though limited to basic services to control costs and bandwidth. Subsequent early expansions in late 2014 extended to (October) and (November), partnering with operators like Airtel to refine service bundles based on local needs, such as , and job resources. By mid-, these efforts had engaged over a dozen operators across 17 countries, with developing tools like a partner portal to streamline operator and service integration. Development focused on empirical testing of usage patterns, revealing that zero-rated access drove initial engagement but required careful selection of lightweight, high-utility content to avoid overwhelming limited networks.

Global Expansion and Rebranding

Following its announcement in August 2013, Internet.org began operations with partnerships in select developing countries to provide zero-rated access to basic services via mobile networks. Initial rollouts targeted regions with low internet penetration, starting with pilots in and expanding to and . By March 2015, the program was active in six countries, with ambitions to reach 100 nations within a year through collaborations with local mobile operators. Expansion accelerated in 2015, incorporating more content providers and services to increase user adoption. In May 2015, Facebook announced enhancements allowing greater choice in free basic services, aiming to broaden availability across continents including and . By late 2015, the initiative had launched in nearly 30 countries, with further growth in regions like , , and , though it encountered criticism over service selection and implications in multiple locations. In September 2015, amid ongoing debates about its scope and openness, rebranded the core app and mobile site from Internet.org to Free Basics to emphasize that it offered limited, zero-rated services rather than full . The change, announced on September 24, 2015, also introduced support for encryption and clarified distinctions from broader connectivity efforts. This sought to address misconceptions and enhance transparency, while the overarching Internet.org platform continued under its original name for related projects.

Infrastructure and Technology Initiatives

Facebook's Connectivity Lab, established as part of the broader Internet.org initiative, developed experimental technologies to extend internet coverage to remote and underserved areas lacking cellular infrastructure. Key projects included the Aquila solar-powered drone, designed to operate as an atmospheric satellite beaming high-speed internet signals over large areas, and complementary efforts involving low-Earth orbit satellites and free-space optical communication via lasers for inter-device connectivity. These technologies aimed to serve populations beyond the reach of traditional cell towers, with initial announcements in March 2014 highlighting drones, satellites, and lasers as means to deliver broadband to billions. The project, specifically, involved autonomous drones with wingspans comparable to 737s, powered by solar cells and capable of sustained flight at 60,000 feet to provide coverage equivalent to a cell tower but over hundreds of square kilometers. Testing began in 2016 in the UK and , with a successful 96-minute autonomous flight demonstrating precision landing and data transmission. However, the initiative faced technical hurdles, including regulatory approvals for and spectrum use, leading to discontinue development in June 2018 and pivot resources toward partnerships with existing providers like those for low-Earth orbit constellations. The broader division, encompassing these efforts, was absorbed back into Meta's core operations by December 2022, effectively ending proprietary hardware development. Parallel to aerial technologies, Internet.org supported the Express Wi-Fi program, launched in 2016 to deploy affordable community hotspots in partnership with local entrepreneurs, mobile operators, and ISPs in developing regions. This initiative provided certified hardware, billing platforms, and technical support to enable low-cost access points, often in rural or urban underserved areas, with hotspots managed via a dedicated app for user setup, payments, and issue reporting. By 2018, Express Wi-Fi operated in countries including , , , , and , targeting fast, reliable connections at rates as low as a few cents per session through micro-entrepreneur models. The program was discontinued in February 2022 as shifted focus away from direct infrastructure deployment. These initiatives complemented Internet.org's model by addressing foundational access barriers, though their scale remained limited compared to the project's ambitions, with actual deployments reaching millions rather than billions due to logistical, economic, and partnership dependencies.

Regulatory Setbacks and Program Evolution

In response to early criticisms regarding and potential gatekeeping, rebranded Internet.org as Free Basics in September 2015, emphasizing limited access to a broader range of partner-approved websites and services rather than a comprehensive platform. This shift aimed to address concerns about 's control over service selection by allowing third-party developers to apply for inclusion, though approval processes remained opaque and partner-dependent. The program's most significant regulatory setback occurred in , a priority market with over a billion potential users. In December 2015, the (TRAI) temporarily suspended Free Basics operations following complaints of violations, prompting partners like to halt service. On February 8, 2016, TRAI formalized a ban through the Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, which prohibited differential data pricing that favored specific content, effectively blocking Free Basics nationwide as it exempted selected services from charges while imposing costs on others. This ruling, upheld despite Facebook's mobilization of 16 million supportive messages to TRAI, marked a pivotal defeat, stalling expansion in India's nascent where Free Basics had reached millions. Similar challenges emerged elsewhere, though less conclusively. Chile's explicit ban on zero-rating practices predated and indirectly constrained such models, while debates in and restrictions in countries like the and on discriminatory tariffs limited scalability without outright prohibitions on Free Basics specifically. Post-India, the program evolved by prioritizing regions with permissive regulations, such as parts of and , where it expanded partnerships but faced persistent scrutiny over data privacy and market distortion—concerns TRAI had highlighted in India regarding incentives for operators to favor zero-rated traffic over full internet investments. By 2018, Free Basics had connected over 100 million users globally but saw diminished momentum, with Facebook pivoting toward complementary efforts like Express hotspots to circumvent zero-rating bans while maintaining access-focused rhetoric.

Program Mechanics

Zero-Rating and Service Selection

Zero-rating in Internet.org, later rebranded as Free Basics, involved partnerships between and mobile network operators (MNOs) to exempt data traffic for a curated set of online services from users' data allowances, allowing without incurring charges. This relied on MNOs configuring their networks to recognize and zero-rate traffic directed to a specialized operated by , which compressed and optimized content to minimize usage. Launched in , the service enabled users in participating countries to access approved websites via this proxy without costs, with operators like Reliance in and others globally agreeing to waive fees for such traffic. Service selection for was managed through Facebook's review process, where developers submitted websites for inclusion on the Free Basics platform, subject to technical and content guidelines aimed at low-data utility services. Eligible services had to exclude resource-intensive features such as , high-resolution images, video, or encryption to ensure compatibility with feature phones and limited networks, while prioritizing "basic" applications in categories like , , and local information without commercial advertising. By September 2015, over 60 services had been added across 19 countries, including partners like and the , selected for their alignment with developmental goals rather than broad openness. The selection process emphasized partnerships with content providers deemed essential for connectivity in underserved areas, but it required integration with Facebook's infrastructure for zero-rating eligibility, limiting inclusion to approved entities and excluding general web browsing. Developers underwent a submission and review by Facebook, focusing on compliance with data-light standards and non-commercial intent, though critics noted the opaque curation favored Facebook's ecosystem. This approach resulted in a walled-garden experience, with zero-rated access confined to the platform's index rather than the full internet.

User Access and Technical Implementation

Users on participating mobile networks access Free Basics by opening a standard browser and navigating to a zero-rated entry point, such as 0.facebook.com or a carrier-specific , which loads a of approved services without incurring charges. This zero- is enabled through bilateral agreements between and mobile network operators (MNOs), where operators exempt traffic destined for Free Basics domains from users' allowances. No dedicated app is required for core access, though some implementations include lightweight apps for enhanced navigation in low-bandwidth environments. Technically, the service relies on a to optimize delivery and enforce . User requests are intercepted by the MNO and routed to Facebook-operated servers, which compress content, strip non-essential elements like heavy images or videos, and forward simplified HTTP responses to approved websites. This layer ensures compatibility with feature phones and low-end smartphones by limiting features such as full execution or unrestricted in early deployments, though later updates introduced partial support for encrypted connections via tools like . Origin servers for partnered content must adhere to Free Basics technical guidelines, including lightweight design under 100 KB per page and avoidance of dynamic scripting that could evade optimization. The also handles caching to reduce and usage, with policies prioritizing static assets from high-traffic sites, though measurements indicate variable due to path inflation between MNOs and proxies, often adding 50-100 ms in round-trip times. Operators implement at the network level by whitelisting ranges or domains associated with the proxies, preventing data metering for that traffic while blocking or charging for non-approved destinations. This setup creates a controlled "walled garden" effect, as unapproved sites trigger data charges or access denial, limiting seamless exploration.

Participants and Partnerships

Facebook's Leadership and Motivations

Mark , founder and CEO of , spearheaded the launch of Internet.org on August 20, 2013, positioning it as a collaborative effort with companies including , , , , , and to address global barriers. Zuckerberg personally announced the initiative, releasing a whitepaper outlining its framework and committing significant resources, including executive time and engineering efforts, to its development over subsequent years. Under his leadership, the project emphasized partnerships with mobile operators to implement —offering free access to curated basic services—to target the estimated 4.5 billion people offline at the time, primarily in developing regions. Facebook's stated motivations centered on expanding as a foundational goal, with Zuckerberg framing as a "human right" essential for economic opportunity, education, and social inclusion. The initiative aimed to reduce data costs through technological efficiencies, such as data-compressing apps and low-bandwidth infrastructure, while fostering a "" model that aligned philanthropic aims with scalable innovation. Zuckerberg articulated a vision of empowering individuals worldwide via communication, arguing that broader access would redistribute global influence and enable grassroots change, drawing on Facebook's core mission to "give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected." From a business perspective, Internet.org aligned with 's growth imperatives by onboarding new users in underserved markets, where initial free access to -integrated services could drive long-term engagement and ad potential. Zuckerberg defended the approach against early critiques, insisting it prioritized utility over profit exclusivity, though the selective service bundle—prioritizing and partners—functioned as a gateway to full adoption, potentially capturing before competitors. This dual emphasis on and expansion reflected Zuckerberg's broader of leveraging for societal scale while sustaining dominance, as evidenced by sustained advocacy at events like 's F8 conference.

Mobile Operators and Collaborators

Internet.org, rebranded as Free Basics, established non-exclusive partnerships with mobile network operators (MNOs) worldwide to deliver zero-rated access to selected services, whereby operators waived charges for Free Basics traffic to attract low-income users. These collaborations enabled operators to bundle Free Basics into their offerings, often as a gateway service to encourage eventual upgrades to paid plans, with indicating that such partnerships increased new user onboarding by over 50% on average. Initially focused on select regions, the program opened to any interested MNO in July 2015, broadening participation beyond early tech-centric alliances. Key early implementations involved , starting with a launch in in 2014, where provided the network infrastructure for free access. This expanded significantly in November 2015 through a partnership with , rolling out Free Basics to 17 countries including , , , , , and others, leveraging Airtel's extensive sub-Saharan footprint. also collaborated in , integrating Free Basics post-regulatory hurdles in 2017. Other notable MNO partners included in Asian markets, contributing to distribution across multiple countries. By May 2018, Free Basics had secured agreements with 81 MNOs operating in more than 50 countries, primarily in , , and , facilitating access for millions via local carriers. In alone, 22 operators offered the service across nations such as (with Airtel), Kenya, , , , , and by late 2016. These partnerships emphasized mutual incentives: MNOs gained subscriber growth and revenue from , while expanded its platform's reach without direct costs. However, not all major carriers participated; for instance, declined involvement in 2014, citing strategic misalignments.

Content Providers and Third-Party Involvement

Content providers for Internet.org, rebranded as Free Basics, consisted of third-party developers and organizations whose websites were approved for zero-rated access, focusing on utility services like health, education, jobs, and local news to serve underserved users. These providers submitted their sites through the Internet.org Platform, adhering to strict technical criteria including low bandwidth consumption (no video, VoIP, or large images over 200 KB), mobile optimization, and compliance with local laws. Approval involved review by to ensure sites delivered basic, non-commercial value without competing directly with paid data services, though providers retained control over content while agreeing to potential proxying and URL modifications for efficient delivery. By May 2015, the opened to broader third-party participation beyond initial partners, enabling hundreds of sites globally. Specific examples included the Wikimedia Foundation's , offering free encyclopedic access in multiple languages; health-focused services like for parenting advice, MAMA for maternal support reaching 3.4 million users, and MeraDoctor for consultations in ; and informational tools such as SmartBusiness for economic data, which saw a 5x increase in searches in . Other notable providers encompassed for weather updates, for select content in supported regions, and educational resources like . By September 2015, over 60 services were active across 19 countries in , , and . Third-party involvement extended to localized partners, such as job portals and government services in participating nations, but selection remained curated by , prioritizing non-entertainment content to align with the program's goal of basic connectivity rather than full . Providers benefited from expanded reach without user data costs, though integration required adapting to Free Basics' compressed format, which sometimes limited functionality compared to standard versions.

Controversies

Net Neutrality and Open Internet Debates

Facebook's Internet.org initiative, rebranded as Free Basics, sparked significant debates over by offering zero-rated —free usage—to a curated selection of websites and services, while charging for others. Proponents, including Facebook executives, contended that this model served as an "on-ramp" to connectivity for underserved populations in developing countries, arguing it did not discriminate against paid but rather subsidized basic to promote broader adoption without undermining the open 's principles. emphasized in public statements that Free Basics expanded overall usage, with users transitioning to paid plans after initial exposure, positioning it as complementary to rather than a violation. Critics, including digital rights organizations like the (), asserted that inherently breaches by privileging Facebook-approved content, creating a "walled garden" that stifles competition and innovation for non-partner developers. They argued that this selective access distorts user behavior, funneling traffic toward dominant platforms and disadvantaging smaller or local services unable to afford partnership fees or meet Facebook's technical criteria, potentially entrenching monopolistic control over information flows. A 2017 Global Voices analysis highlighted how Free Basics prioritized Western corporate content, exacerbating digital exclusion by limiting exposure to diverse, non-subsidized resources and violating equal treatment of packets. further noted that empirical evidence from deployments showed users remaining confined to limited services, contradicting claims of seamless graduation to full internet access. The controversy peaked in , where the (TRAI) prohibited differential pricing, including , on February 8, 2016, effectively banning Free Basics nationwide. TRAI's ruling, influenced by widespread public campaigns and over a million petition signatures, held that such practices undermined by allowing operators to favor specific applications, regardless of exemptions sought by . This decision contrasted with quieter expansions in , where Free Basics operated without equivalent regulatory pushback, underscoring varying global interpretations of open internet principles. In Europe, the 2015 regulations permitted limited but faced ongoing scrutiny for similar reasons, with advocates warning of loopholes enabling content prioritization.

Country-Specific Regulatory Challenges

In India, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) issued the Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations on February 8, 2016, explicitly banning service providers from offering or charging differential tariffs for data access based on content, effectively prohibiting Free Basics. This followed a public consultation process initiated in 2015 amid debates over net neutrality, where TRAI determined that zero-rating plans like Free Basics distorted competition by privileging select content providers while limiting user choice to curated services. Prior to the final ruling, TRAI had suspended Free Basics operations with Reliance Communications in December 2015 pending policy resolution. In , the National Telecom Regulatory Authority imposed a ban on Free Basics in late , citing violations of fair competition principles and concerns that zero-rated access could undermine open internet standards by favoring Facebook-partnered content over local alternatives. The decision aligned with broader regional scrutiny of initiatives perceived to entrench dominant platforms, though later permitted limited under stricter oversight to balance access goals with regulatory equity. Other countries encountered hurdles without outright bans; for instance, in , the National Telecommunications Agency (ANATEL) reviewed Free Basics amid net neutrality discussions but allowed conditional operations, requiring transparency in partnerships to mitigate anti-competitive risks. Regulatory resistance in these cases often stemmed from empirical evidence of market distortion, where reduced incentives for users to access non-partnered sites, as documented in TRAI's analysis of data usage patterns favoring walled gardens.

Data Privacy and Security Issues

Critics raised significant concerns about data privacy and security in Internet.org's initial implementation, particularly due to the platform's prohibition on protocols like TLS, which left user data transmitted over the service vulnerable to by intermediaries, including governments or malicious actors. This restriction stemmed from the program's design to optimize for low-bandwidth environments in developing regions, where many users accessed services via feature phones lacking robust security features, exacerbating risks in countries with weak data protection laws. In response to backlash, updated Free Basics (the rebranded service launched in 2015) to support encryption, implementing certificate pinning to verify connections and reduce man-in-the-middle attacks, though this fell short of . acknowledged this as an improvement that hindered bulk surveillance by state actors but noted persistent vulnerabilities, as traffic routed through 's proxies allowed potential inspection and modification of content to enforce zero-rating restrictions. analyses confirmed that these proxies stripped resource-intensive like images and videos, inherently requiring that could user behavior patterns. Ongoing privacy issues centered on Facebook's data collection practices, where Free Basics users' interactions—despite limited site access—fed into the company's systems, gathering on demographics, interests, and usage in underserved markets without equivalent alternatives for . Independent research highlighted how compensated partners with user data as an economic incentive, raising fears of in regions where literacy on policies was low, potentially enabling or third-party sharing under Facebook's broader policies. Partnerships with mobile operators further amplified risks, as telcos in authoritarian-leaning countries could access aggregated logs, blending commercial with oversight absent stringent safeguards. Empirical studies of Free Basics deployments, such as in and , found no evidence of acute breaches but underscored systemic flaws: users unaware of data flows contributed to Facebook's global , distorting market incentives toward data extraction over . These critiques, voiced by digital rights groups, emphasized that while technical mitigations addressed some vulnerabilities post-, the program's architecture inherently prioritized connectivity at the expense of user autonomy, with protections lagging behind full-internet equivalents.

Anti-Competitive Practices and Market Distortion

Critics of Internet.org, rebranded as Free Basics in 2015, contended that its mechanism—exempting data charges for a curated selection of websites while charging for others—conferred undue competitive advantages to and its approved partners, thereby distorting content markets in developing countries. This structure incentivized providers to seek inclusion in the limited free tier, often controlled by 's approval process, while excluding rivals and imposing full data costs on non-partnered services, which reduced their visibility and usage among cost-sensitive users. A 2016 World Bank analysis highlighted such zero-rated services as a market distortion, describing them as "the antithesis of " by favoring specific content bundles over open competition, potentially entrenching dominant platforms through subsidized access that bypassed standard pricing signals. In low-penetration markets, this was argued to amplify network effects, enabling to consolidate user bases and data flows disproportionately, as free access funneled traffic toward its ecosystem and select partners like or , sidelining local or independent developers unable to negotiate inclusion. Country-specific implementations underscored these distortions; in , where the program launched in , over 100 tech firms withdrew participation by April , citing fears that the gated access model would stifle innovation and favor multinational incumbents over domestic startups. Regulatory bodies, including India's TRAI in its February 2016 prohibition of differential data pricing, implicitly addressed these concerns by banning practices that fragmented the into tiered, non-neutral access, preventing the entrenchment of curated "walled gardens." Similar critiques emerged in and , where was viewed as predatory in nascent digital economies, prioritizing Western corporate content and hindering diverse market entry.

Impact and Assessment

Achievements in User Reach and Access

Free Basics, the primary service under Internet.org launched in 2015, expanded to provide zero-rated access to a curated set of basic websites and services in partnership with over 50 mobile operators across developing regions. By late 2016, it had connected approximately 50 million users to these services, primarily in areas with limited infrastructure. This figure grew to nearly 100 million people by April 2018, many of whom gained their initial exposure to online resources such as health information, job listings, weather updates, and local news without incurring data costs. The program's reach extended to over 60 countries, with significant penetration in (32 countries at peak), , and , targeting underserved populations where mobile penetration outpaced affordable data plans. In these markets, Free Basics facilitated access to more than 1,500 partner services by , enabling users to engage with utility-focused content that supported daily needs like agricultural advice and educational materials. Partnerships with local operators reduced , as evidenced by accelerated user onboarding in regions where full subscriptions remained cost-prohibitive for low-income households. Empirical from operator collaborations indicate that Free Basics contributed to incremental connectivity, with users often transitioning to paid plans after initial exposure, though the service's model directly accounted for millions of first-time sessions in remote areas. By providing unrestricted access within its —unlike broader plans burdened by metered pricing—it achieved measurable uptake among populations below the affordability threshold, as reported in deployment metrics from 2015 to 2018.

Critiques of Effectiveness and Long-Term Viability

Critics have questioned the effectiveness of Internet.org, rebranded as Free Basics in 2015, in delivering meaningful , arguing that its zero-rated model restricted users to a curated set of lightweight websites and services, often dominated by Facebook's own platforms, rather than fostering open exploration. Empirical analysis of traffic patterns in countries like and showed that while Free Basics generated significant usage—up to 1.5 GB per user per month in some cases—the majority involved low-bandwidth activities such as and basic news, with limited diversity in content providers and minimal evidence of users transitioning to paid full-internet plans. This walled-garden approach, per network measurements, failed to build or habits conducive to broader , potentially entrenching exclusion by substituting comprehensive access with a subsidized subset. Performance data further highlighted practical shortcomings: Free Basics services exhibited 4-12 times higher and throttled throughput (e.g., capped at 150 Kbps via proxies), compared to paid equivalents, due to intermediary inefficiencies and operator-imposed limits, rendering experiences frustrating for even simple tasks like loading or dynamic . In rural and low-income settings targeted by the , these technical barriers compounded limitations, with studies noting that 40% of requests originated from capable smartphones ill-suited to the platform's assumptions of minimal JavaScript support. Such inefficiencies reduced perceived value, as users encountered frequent failures in delivery, including proxy-induced caching violations that ignored site policies against storage. On economic outcomes, a panel study across 15 Sub-Saharan African countries using difference-in-differences methods found Free Basics associated with a net negative effect on , attributing this to distorted incentives where subsidized access prioritized consumption over productive uses like job searching or skill-building, without heterogeneous benefits by firm size or sector. Broader assessments, including from researchers, indicate scant empirical support for claims of accelerated connectivity; instead, usage often remained confined to entertainment, with no clear causal link to overall penetration growth, as zero-rating may disincentivize infrastructure investments by operators. Long-term viability proved elusive, as regulatory bans in major markets like (effective April 2016 via Regulatory order) halted expansion, citing violations of equal-access principles, while quiet withdrawals from countries including , , and by 2018 stemmed from inadequate adaptation to local needs and failure to mitigate harms like spread. The model's reliance on carrier partnerships and content approvals created fragility, with low partner retention—fewer than 100 services approved globally by 2017—and persistent critiques of cultural irrelevance, such as overemphasis on Western-centric sites amid sparse local language options, undermining sustainability in diverse contexts. Ultimately, these factors contributed to the program's stagnation, with redirecting resources to alternatives like Express by the late , reflecting causal barriers to scalable, equitable deployment.

Economic Incentives and Causal Outcomes

Facebook's Free Basics program, formerly Internet.org, operated on a model where the company subsidized costs for access to a curated set of websites and services, primarily its own platforms, through partnerships with mobile network operators in developing countries. This arrangement incentivized operators to offer the service at no charge to users, as Facebook compensated them for the , enabling telcos to attract price-sensitive customers who might otherwise forgo subscriptions altogether and potentially upgrade to paid plans after initial exposure. For Facebook, the primary economic driver was user acquisition in low-ARPU markets, where free access funneled new users into its ecosystem, fostering dependency and enabling future as incomes rose and affordability improved; by 2016, Free Basics had reached tens of millions in countries like and parts of before regulatory pushback. Causal outcomes of these incentives revealed trade-offs between short-term access gains and longer-term market distortions. In , where Free Basics rolled out extensively from 2015 onward, a quasi-experimental using rollout timing as an found an overall negative impact on local employment, with no significant heterogeneous effects across firm sizes or sectors, suggesting that subsidized access to dominant platforms crowded out broader economic activity rather than spurring it. Operators experienced mixed revenue effects: while zero-rating boosted subscriber numbers—evidenced by increased mobile penetration in partnered regions—it sometimes reduced incentives for network investment if users remained confined to , limiting overall data consumption growth. On , the program's structure causally favored incumbents like , as smaller local providers lacked the scale to negotiate similar deals, potentially stifling innovation in emerging digital economies; OECD analysis of schemes indicates that such practices can enhance immediate usage but distort markets by raising barriers for non-subsidized rivals, particularly in low- developing contexts where effects amplify first-mover advantages. Empirical from partnered countries showed initial spikes in platform engagement but limited spillover to full adoption or diverse economic , with critiques noting that the incentives aligned more with platform reinforcement than equitable growth. Pro-market assessments, however, argue that efficiently allocates resources in affordability-constrained settings, improving consumer surplus without net harm to investment when exists among operators.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Access granted: Facebook's free basics in Africa - Stanford PACS
    Apr 25, 2020 · Part I traces Free Basics' history from the 2013 launch of the Internet.org initiative to the India ban in early 2016. Against the prevalent ...
  2. [2]
    Free Basics Platform - Meta for Developers
    Free Basics makes the internet accessible to more people by providing them access to a range of free basic services like news, maternal health, travel, local ...Missing: project | Show results with:project
  3. [3]
    We just launched Internet.org in Bangladesh on the Robi network ...
    May 11, 2015 · We just launched Internet.org in Bangladesh on the Robi network! It's another step towards connecting the world. Bangladesh has more than ...
  4. [4]
    Mark Zuckerberg - We just launched Internet.org in India - Facebook
    Feb 9, 2015 · We just launched Internet.org in India -- giving people in six Indian states access to free basic internet services for health, education, jobs and ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    One Year In: Internet.org Free Basic Services - About Meta
    Jul 26, 2015 · Internet.org brings new users onto mobile networks on average over 50% faster after launching free basic services, and more than half of the ...
  6. [6]
    Facebook's Free Basics: More Open, Better Security, but Still a ...
    Sep 30, 2015 · Facebook announced changes and clarifications to its zero-rating program formerly known as Internet.org. It's re-branded the service “Free Basics,” but the ...
  7. [7]
    India Bans Facebook's Basics App to Support Net Neutrality - WIRED
    Feb 8, 2016 · India's telecom regulator has blocked the company's Free Basics service as part of a ruling that supports net neutrality.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  8. [8]
    India puts brakes on Facebook's Free Basics scheme - BBC News
    Dec 23, 2015 · India's telecoms regulator has put Facebook's "free mobile data" scheme on hold following claims it breaches net neutrality principles.
  9. [9]
    Facebook Loses a Battle in India Over Its Free Basics Program
    Feb 8, 2016 · India has banned free mobile programs that allow Internet access only to certain services, a strategy employed by Facebook with its Free ...
  10. [10]
    Internet.org – Free access or digital prison? - DW Akademie
    Aug 17, 2015 · Internet.org is a Facebook program that enables free mobile access to a selection of web services in emerging markets.
  11. [11]
    Internet governance as 'ideology in practice' – India's 'Free Basics ...
    Sep 30, 2016 · The ruling on net neutrality in India, as it has been hailed, may be path breaking; but its normative boundaries suggest a common sense about ...
  12. [12]
    Technology Leaders Launch Partnership to Make Internet Access ...
    Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, today announced the launch of internet.org, a global partnership with the ...
  13. [13]
    Facebook And 6 Phone Companies Launch Internet.org To Bring ...
    Aug 20, 2013 · Facebook has just announced a partnership with Samsung, Ericsson, MediaTek, Nokia, Opera, and Qualcomm to launch Internet.org, a project ...
  14. [14]
    Technology leaders launch partnership to make internet access ...
    Aug 20, 2013 · The founding members of Internet.org –Facebook, Ericsson, MediaTek, Nokia, Opera, Qualcomm and Samsung – will develop joint projects, share ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  15. [15]
    What we've learned from one year of Internet.org
    Jul 28, 2015 · And the initiative has taken off from its initial launch in Zambia to include a dozen mobile operators and 17 partner countries (including ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Facebook's Internet.Org App Launches In Kenya - Just Don't Call It ...
    Nov 13, 2014 · In Kenya, it reached an agreement with Bharti Airtel, a leading telecommunications services provider with over 300 million customers in 20 ...
  17. [17]
    Tech Giants Launch Internet.org, A Global Plan To Widen Access
    all of them companies that ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  18. [18]
    Internet.org hopes to reach 100 countries in a year, up from six now
    Mar 3, 2015 · Internet.org, which already offers free Internet service in six countries, has ambitious plans to connect to 100 countries.<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Earlier today we announced we're expanding Internet.org to give ...
    May 4, 2015 · You will connect 4 billion people to build community and build lives. Internet for free to every single person in the world. It is the Right ...
  20. [20]
    Facebook's Internet.Org Hits Global Flak - MIT Technology Review
    May 18, 2015 · The new controversy comes after a recent furor in which more than a million people signed a petition asking India's telecom authority to ban ...
  21. [21]
    Facebook's Internet.org Rebranded as 'Free Basics' - PCMag
    Sep 25, 2015 · Facebook's Internet.org Rebranded as 'Free Basics'. September 25 ... name of its apps to Free Basics. "We want to make it clear that the ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  22. [22]
    Facebook changes name of Internet.org app and mobile website to ...
    Sep 24, 2015 · Facebook says it's changing the name of its controversial Internet.org app and mobile website to Free Basics by Facebook.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  23. [23]
    Facebook renames Internet.org app to 'Free Basics,' adds new ...
    Sep 26, 2015 · The company announced on Thursday that it has renamed the app and mobile website to “Free Basics by Facebook” in an effort to distinguish it from other ...
  24. [24]
    In our effort to connect the whole world with Internet. org, we've been ...
    Mar 27, 2014 · We're sharing some details of the work Facebook's Connectivity Lab is doing to build drones, satellites and lasers to deliver the internet to everyone.
  25. [25]
    Facebook Will Use Drones, Lasers to 'Deliver the Internet to Everyone'
    Mar 27, 2014 · Facebook will use "drones, satellites and lasers" to achieve its dream of bringing Internet connectivity to everyone in the world.<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Facebook abandons plans to build drones for delivering internet
    Jun 26, 2018 · Facebook is shutting down its Aquila project, which was designing drones for delivering internet from the sky.
  27. [27]
    Facebook Cancels Program to Deliver Internet by Aquila Drones
    Facebook's plans to beam high-speed Internet from enormous solar-powered drones in the stratosphere appear to be in disarray.
  28. [28]
    Meta unplugs Connectivity division, home of satellite and drone ...
    Dec 12, 2022 · Meta has quietly re-absorbed its "Connectivity" division into the main company, after sunsetting its satellites and laser drones.
  29. [29]
    Express Wi-Fi: Fast and affordable Wi-Fi - Engineering at Meta
    Aug 28, 2018 · A program that enables local entrepreneurs, internet service providers, and mobile network operators to offer fast, affordable internet access in local ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    A look at Facebook's efforts to expand Wi-Fi in developing countries
    Aug 28, 2018 · Express Wi-Fi started in 2015, and is currently available in five countries: India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Tanzania. Facebook provides ...
  31. [31]
    Meta Shutters Low-Cost Express Wi-Fi Program in Developing ...
    Feb 1, 2022 · Meta this week announced plans to end its Express Wi-Fi program. Launched in 2016 with the aim of helping connect underserved communities, ...
  32. [32]
    What Happened to Facebook's Grand Plan to Wire the World?
    May 17, 2018 · In the months that followed, Facebook changed the app's name from Internet.org to Free Basics in an attempt to mitigate the impression that ...
  33. [33]
    Spotlight on India's Internet: Facebook's Free Basics or Basic Failure?
    Mar 28, 2016 · Seeing the rising concern over the Internet.org plan, Facebook changed their campaign, replacing Internet.org with Free Basics in September 2015 ...
  34. [34]
    The inside story of Facebook's biggest setback - The Guardian
    May 12, 2016 · By now Internet.org had been rechristened Free Basics. The meeting was about how Facebook could help everyone there, one of the attendees ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Indian Regulator Temporarily Suspends Facebook's Free Basics
    Dec 23, 2015 · Now Reliance Communications, one of Facebook's partners, has agreed to temporarily halt Free Basics on its network after receiving a request ...Missing: setbacks | Show results with:setbacks
  36. [36]
    India introduces net neutrality rules barring Facebook's free Internet
    Feb 8, 2016 · India introduced rules on Monday to prevent Internet service providers from having different pricing policies for accessing different parts ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    India blocks Zuckerberg's free net app - BBC News
    Feb 8, 2016 · India's telecoms regulator blocks Facebook's limited free internet service as part of a ruling in favour of net neutrality.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Zero-rating in Emerging Economies
    Feb 9, 2017 · Free Basics is presented as a solution to allow users who have never been online to use Facebook. Flex or other zero-rated content, and if they ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Assessing the Quality of Facebook's Free Basics Service
    The Free Basics platform is open to include any web service that meets the stated technical requirements (e.g., absence of JavaScript, high resolution images, ...
  40. [40]
    Participation Guidelines - Free Basics - Meta for Developers
    This document will help you configure your website and submit it for review to be listed within Free Basics.Missing: selection | Show results with:selection
  41. [41]
    Update to Internet.org Free Basic Services - About Meta
    Sep 24, 2015 · More than 60 new services are available across the 19 countries where free basic services are available, and the Internet.org Platform is ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  42. [42]
    Internet.org Platform raises new questions on the debate about Zero ...
    May 4, 2015 · In addition, websites must be properly integrated with Internet.org to allow zero rating and therefore can't require JavaScript or SSL/TLS/HTTPS ...
  43. [43]
    Internet.org Is Not Neutral, Not Secure, and Not the Internet
    May 18, 2015 · That proxy server allows the sites to be “zero rated” by participating mobile phone operators; allows the automatic stripping out of content ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Deconstructing Facebook's Free Basics Program
    ABSTRACT. Free Basics is a Facebook initiative to provide zero-rated web services in developing countries. The program has grown rapidly to 60+ countries in ...
  45. [45]
    Technical Guidelines - Free Basics - Meta for Developers
    Your mobile website(s) must meet certain technical conditions created by the Free Basics proxy. Specifically, mobile websites should work in the absence of:Missing: access | Show results with:access
  46. [46]
    Implementing a secure web-based proxy service for Discover
    May 5, 2020 · To allow the proxy service to access this server-side cookie jar, Free Basics leverages two client-side cookies: The datr cookie, a browser ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] An Empirical Analysis of Facebook's Free Basics Program
    Jun 9, 2017 · We isolate the root causes to network path inflation and bandwidth limits from both Facebook proxies and/or cellular providers.
  48. [48]
    Architecture of Free Basics Service by Facebook - ResearchGate
    1, the Free Basics administration includes three autonomous service suppliers: (I) the cellular company that agrees to convey information for any Free Basics ...
  49. [49]
    Facebook's internet.org initiative aims to connect 'the next 5 billion ...
    Aug 21, 2013 · Facebook may be reaching 1.15 billion people a month, but the social network has grander ambitions to connect many more people.
  50. [50]
    Mark Zuckerberg: Internet connectivity is a human right - Marketplace
    Aug 21, 2013 · Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is forming a coalition with the goal of bringing Internet access to more people, especially in the developing world.
  51. [51]
    Facebook Leads an Effort to Lower Barriers to Internet Access
    Aug 20, 2013 · With Internet.org, he is laying out a philosophy that tries to pair humanitarian goals with the profit motive. Advertisement. SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Inside Facebook's Ambitious Plan to Connect the Whole World
    Jan 19, 2016 · In the months since Internet.org's launch, Facebook had trained most of its resources on the things it could achieve right away—making software ...
  53. [53]
    Mark Zuckerberg defends Facebook's motives in free internet project ...
    Dec 28, 2015 · Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has vigorously defended his company's motives for rolling out free basic internet services across India.
  54. [54]
    Mark Zuckerberg champions Internet.org at F8 but remains silent on ...
    Of all of Mark Zuckerberg's aspirations for Facebook, the loftiest one remains providing internet to parts of the world where it isn't available.
  55. [55]
    Announcing the Internet.org Platform - About Meta
    May 4, 2015 · The Internet.org Platform aims to give people valuable free services that they can use to discover the entire wealth of online services.
  56. [56]
    Facebook says there's money to be made bringing Internet to the ...
    Jul 27, 2015 · Internet.org brings new users onto mobile networks on average over 50% faster after launching free basic services, and more than half of the ...
  57. [57]
    One year later, Internet.org opens to more mobile operators - CNET
    Jul 27, 2015 · Any mobile operator can now partner with the Facebook-backed initiative to expand Internet access around the world.Missing: early | Show results with:early
  58. [58]
    Free Basics - ICANNWiki
    Free Basics, originally known as Internet.org, is a global initiative led by Facebook to bring Internet connectivity to "diverse, local communities".
  59. [59]
    Facebook partners with Airtel Africa to bring Free Basics to 17 ... - TNW
    Nov 18, 2015 · The move is in partnership with telco Airtel Africa. The countries that will get Free Basics are Burkina Faso,Chad, Gabon, Madagascar, Niger, ...
  60. [60]
    Internet.org - Wikipedia
    The app delivering these services was renamed Free Basics in September 2015. As of April 2018, 100 million people were using internet.org.
  61. [61]
    The peaks and valleys of Internet.org - Yahoo News Singapore
    Nov 16, 2015 · Additionally, Norwegian telecom giant Telenor has become a massive distribution partner across Asia and various other global telecommunication ...
  62. [62]
    Facebook's Free Basics program ended quietly in Myanmar last year
    May 1, 2018 · It is now available in more than 50 countries with 81 mobile operator partners around the world. Today, more than 1,500 services are available ...Missing: collaborating | Show results with:collaborating
  63. [63]
    Facebook's Controversial 'Free Basics' Project Spreads to 47 ...
    Nov 28, 2016 · In Africa, 22 mobile-phone operators were offering the service in South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, Senegal, Zambia, Rwanda, and Guinea ...
  64. [64]
    América Móvil declines Facebook's call to join Internet.org
    Feb 28, 2014 · Don't expect América Móvil to join Facebook's highly touted Internet.org initiative. Despite Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's pleas for global ...Missing: collaboration | Show results with:collaboration
  65. [65]
    Facebook's Free Basics a New Form Of Colonization - Medium
    Apr 2, 2018 · Facebook started Internet.org on August 20, 2013, where Facebook along with several other companies planned to offer some of the developing ...
  66. [66]
    What U.S. Policy Makers Need to Know About Free Basics
    Oct 26, 2016 · Launched in July 2014 as part of Facebook's international initiative to connect “the next billion” to the Internet in developing countries, the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
    Mark Zuckerberg Continues to Be Baffled By Criticism of Free ...
    Dec 29, 2015 · Free Basics does not allow for access to the entire Internet, so it is a “walled garden.” The program will partner with any telecom or ...
  69. [69]
    Zero Rating: What It Is and Why You Should Care
    Feb 18, 2016 · Zero rating limits users to a narrow experience of the Internet, and disincentivizes them from venturing beyond those services that are provided for free.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  70. [70]
    'It's digital colonialism': how Facebook's free internet service has ...
    Jul 27, 2017 · Free Basics, built for developing markets, focuses on 'western corporate content' and violates net neutrality principles, researchers say.
  71. [71]
    Facebook's Free Basics violates net neutrality and isn't ... - The Verge
    Jul 27, 2017 · A report released today by activist group Global Voices found that not only does Facebook's Free Basics violate net neutrality principles, it's not even very ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    India deals blow to Facebook in people-powered 'net neutrality' row
    Feb 8, 2016 · Indian regulator outlaws differential pricing for data packages, blocking Facebook's Free Basics service that 'arguably disadvantage small ...
  74. [74]
    India's Telecom Regulator Bans Facebook's Controversial Free Basics
    Feb 8, 2016 · India's telecom regulator Telecom Authority of India (TRAI) has banned differential pricing in the country, thus ending zero-rated and free ...
  75. [75]
    Access granted: Facebook's free basics in Africa - Stanford PACS
    Public attention focused on its ban in India following nationwide protests about net neutrality. In Africa, however, Free Basics expanded without much public ...
  76. [76]
    Net neutrality and zero-rating - Digital Watch Observatory
    Opponents argue that zero-rating prioritises certain services over others, and therefore challenges the net neutrality principle while harming market ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] REGULATIONS, 2016 CHAPTER I - TRAI
    Feb 8, 2016 · - (1)These regulations may be called the. Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 (2 of. 2016). . (2)They ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    TRAI rules in favour of Net neutrality - The Hindu
    Feb 8, 2016 · "No service provider shall offer or charge discriminatory tariffs for data services on the basis of content," says TRAI.
  79. [79]
    Facebook fights for free Internet in India, global test-case - Reuters
    Dec 30, 2015 · The TRAI has asked Facebook and Reliance Communications to suspend Free Basics until a final policy decision is made next month.
  80. [80]
    Free Basics hits roadblocks in India and Egypt - Developing Telecoms
    Jan 5, 2016 · Facebook's Free Basics continues to be beset by problems, with Egypt imposing a ban on the service while Indian tech companies balk over ...
  81. [81]
    Why TRAI backed net neutrality—and killed Facebook's Free Basics ...
    On Feb. 08, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) ruled against discriminatory access to data services, fully backed net neutrality—and effectively ...
  82. [82]
    Data Points: Privacy & Data Security Blog - Moore & Van Allen
    Jun 8, 2015 · Internet.org Platform, however, does not allow developers to use encryption – the process of encoding messages or information in such a way that ...
  83. [83]
    Open Letter to Mark Zuckerberg Regarding Internet.org, Net ...
    Security: The current implementation of Internet.org threatens the security of users. The May 4 update to the program prohibits the use of TLS (Transport Layer ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  84. [84]
    Facebook's Free Basics Doesn't Connect You to the Global Internet
    Jul 27, 2017 · Our research confirms that Free Basics grants Facebook access to unique streams of data about the habits and interests of users in developing countries.Missing: selection criteria
  85. [85]
    What are the strongest arguments against Facebook's Free Basics ...
    Feb 8, 2016 · Privacy concerns: Internet monopolies are being paid with data because personal data forms the essential currency of the online economy. Data ...
  86. [86]
    (PDF) An Empirical Analysis of Facebook's Free Basics
    In this paper we analyze Facebook's Free Basics program, which provides free Internet access to a restricted set of web services. As the program grows to 60+ ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] the effects of zero rating | oecd
    Internet.org also attracted criticism with opponents of the scheme saying it was anti- competitive given that it resulted in some services being unmetered while ...
  88. [88]
    Facebook's Web of Tiers - The Baffler
    May 6, 2015 · ... anti-competitive practices. As one Indian activist group explained, “Internet.org is not open, and despite its name, is not the Internet.
  89. [89]
    Why activists are fighting Facebook, T-Mobile over zero-rating.
    Feb 8, 2016 · As Grossman points out, the greatest threat to consumers might lie in the anti-competitive effects of combining data caps and zero-rating ...
  90. [90]
    Facebook's Free Basics could distort markets: World Bank - Mint
    Jan 15, 2016 · Report says the recent trend to develop such services 'would appear to be the antithesis of net neutrality and a distortion of markets'
  91. [91]
    Facebook is no charity, and the 'free' in Free Basics comes at a price
    Jan 11, 2016 · By offering free access Free Basics disrupts the market, allowing Facebook to gain a monopoly that can benefit from the network effects of a ...
  92. [92]
    Indian companies withdraw from Facebook's Internet.org - BBC News
    Apr 16, 2015 · A group of Indian technology and internet companies have pulled out of Facebook's Internet.org initiative, fearing it threatens the principle of net neutrality.
  93. [93]
    How 'Zero-Rating' Offers Threaten Net-Neutrality In The Developing ...
    Feb 18, 2019 · 'Zero-Rating'— the commercial practice whereby an internet service provider (ISP) doesn't count the use of an app or service against your ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Free Basics - Facebook
    For those unaware, Free Basics is a free Internet access platform by Facebook that has been available in over 60 countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
  95. [95]
    Facebook's Internet.org claims 50 Million users in Q4 2016
    Feb 2, 2017 · A significant amount of Facebook's 396 million Daily Active Users (DAUs) in Asia Pacific region are logging onto Facebook via Internet.org, ...
  96. [96]
    Facebook's Internet.org has connected almost 100M to the 'internet'
    Apr 25, 2018 · Internet.org uses its Free Basics app with access to low-bandwidth services and Express Wi-Fi hotspots operated by local merchants to give ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Facebook's ongoing scramble for Africa
    Sep 29, 2020 · By the end of 2016, Facebook reported that Free Basics – along with other Facebook connectivity projects – had contributed to bringing online 40 ...
  98. [98]
    After harsh criticism, Facebook quietly pulls services ... - The Outline
    May 1, 2018 · In early 2016, the Indian government banned Free Basics in the nation, citing a violation of net neutrality. It was a major setback for Facebook ...
  99. [99]
    Facebook has connected 40M people with Internet.org - TechCrunch
    Nov 2, 2016 · The company even said Internet.org contributed to monthly user growth, which accelerated from 3.63 percent to 4.67 percent growth since last ...Missing: active | Show results with:active
  100. [100]
    Access granted: Facebook's free basics in Africa - Sage Journals
    Apr 22, 2020 · In May 2010, 50 mobile operators launched it in 45 countries, including DRC, Rwanda, Uganda, and Ivory Coast (Mims, 2012). Facebook hoped to ...Missing: collaborating | Show results with:collaborating
  101. [101]
    An Empirical Analysis of Facebook's Free Basics - ACM Digital Library
    An Empirical Analysis of Facebook's Free Basics. Authors: Siddharth Singh ... The impacts of emerging mobile data services in developing countries. http ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  102. [102]
    The Effect of Facebook Free Basics on Entrepreneurship and Employment
    ### Summary of Main Findings on Free Basics Impact
  103. [103]
    Why Facebook failed with Free Basics - TechCrunch
    Apr 5, 2016 · Companies like Amazon and Uber have learned that many of the cultural and business assumptions from markets like the U.S. don't apply in India.
  104. [104]
    Facebook Makes the Case for "Free Basics" Internet Access
    Oct 12, 2016 · Facebook is lobbying the White House for the government's blessing to offer its “Free Basics” service in the United States, according to a ...
  105. [105]
    The effects of zero rating - OECD
    Jul 15, 2019 · The report looks at the economics of zero rating and issues such as the effects of zero rating on competition and innovation. It also compares ...
  106. [106]
    Mobile Zero Rating: The Economics and Innovation Behind Free Data
    May 23, 2016 · Zero rating should be welcomed as a sign of healthy product differentiation that better allocates scarce resources while improving customer value.Missing: effects | Show results with:effects