Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

LVCMOS

Low-voltage (LVCMOS) is a widely adopted family of standards for low-voltage digital signaling in (CMOS) technology, enabling efficient operation in integrated circuits at reduced power supplies compared to traditional CMOS levels. It encompasses multiple variants defined by the (JEDEC), including LVCMOS12 (1.2 V), LVCMOS15 (1.5 V), LVCMOS18 (1.8 V), LVCMOS25 (2.5 V), and LVCMOS33 (3.3 V), each specifying DC and AC voltage thresholds, overshoot/undershoot tolerances, and compatibility for without requiring reference or termination voltages. These standards, such as JESD8C.01 for 3.3 V LVCMOS/LVTTL compatibility, JESD8-5A.01 for 2.5 V, JESD8-7A for 1.8 V, JESD8-11A.01 for 1.5 V, JESD8-12A.01 for 1.2 V, and related high-speed extensions like JESD8-31 for 1.8 V, ensure reliable interfacing in modern electronics by defining precise logic high (VOH) and low (VOL) levels close to the supply rails (VDD and GND), with exact thresholds varying by voltage level, drive current, and compatibility requirements. LVCMOS interfaces utilize push-pull output buffers and CMOS input buffers, supporting configurable drive strengths (e.g., 2–12 mA) and slew rates (fast, medium, slow) to optimize and power consumption in applications ranging from field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to microcontrollers. This technology is particularly valued for its low power dissipation, making it suitable for battery-powered devices, (IoT) systems, industrial controls, and , where it facilitates voltage-level translation between domains like 3.3 V LVCMOS and 5 V . In high-speed contexts, LVCMOS supports parallel termination and series termination techniques to minimize reflections and in clock distribution and data buses. Overall, LVCMOS's scalability across voltage levels has made it a cornerstone of energy-efficient since the , evolving to meet demands for smaller geometries and lower voltages in semiconductor fabrication.

Introduction

Definition

Low Voltage Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (LVCMOS) is a standard utilized in digital integrated circuits, characterized by operation at reduced supply voltages to support modern processes. This technology represents an evolution from traditional higher-voltage standards, adapting to the demands of advanced fabrication nodes. The core purpose of LVCMOS lies in enabling low-power and high-density implementation within contemporary CMOS processes, where lowering the operating voltage aligns with the progressive shrinkage of geometries to sustain performance while minimizing energy use. By facilitating digital signaling at these scaled dimensions, LVCMOS ensures compatibility with existing paradigms without necessitating fundamental redesigns of circuit architectures. At its basic level, LVCMOS employs a complementary pair of PMOS and NMOS transistors arranged in a for output stages, allowing efficient switching between high and low logic states. This totem-pole structure drives the output directly without the need for differential pairs or external termination, promoting and . A key benefit of this approach is its support for scalability to sub-micron process technologies, avoiding excessive power dissipation that could otherwise arise from voltage-process mismatches.

Historical Development

The development of low-voltage complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (LVCMOS) logic traces its origins to the late 1960s and early 1970s, when early CMOS families, such as the CD4000 series introduced in the late 1960s, were designed with wide supply voltage ranges of 3 V to 18 V, enabling operation at approximately 3.3 V but with limited adoption due to the dominance of faster 5 V transistor-transistor logic (TTL) standards and the slower performance of early CMOS at lower voltages. As process technologies scaled to sub-micron feature sizes in the late , the need for reduced consumption became critical amid rising clock speeds and increasing densities, prompting a shift from 5 V TTL-compatible to lower voltages to mitigate heat generation, , and dynamic governed by the CV²f . This transition was accelerated by the demands of emerging portable and battery-powered electronics, aligning with predictions of exponential density growth. A key milestone occurred in June 1994, when the published JESD8-A, formalizing the 3.3 V interface standard (replacing earlier provisional versions like JESD8 and JESD8-1 from 1993–1994) specifically for 0.5 µm and smaller nodes, defining DC parameters for nominal 3.0 V/3.3 V supplies to ensure compatibility while reducing power in high-speed applications. Subsequent evolution included the 2.5 V LVCMOS standard (JESD8-5) in October 1995 and the 1.8 V standard (JESD8-7) in February 1997, reflecting continued scaling to 0.35 µm and 0.25 µm processes, further enabling low-power mobile devices and high-density integrated circuits by balancing performance, reliability, and energy efficiency.

Standards and Variants

JEDEC Standards

The Joint Electron Device Engineering Council () serves as the primary standards body for LVCMOS, a global organization dedicated to developing open standards for the industry to promote , reliability, and uniformity across manufacturers and devices. By establishing consensus-based specifications, ensures that LVCMOS interfaces can be reliably implemented in digital integrated circuits without proprietary variations that could hinder compatibility. Key documents defining LVCMOS standards include JESD8-A (June 1994) for 3.3 V operation, JESD8-5 (October 1995) and its revision JESD8-5A (June 2006) for 2.5 V, JESD8-7 (February 1997) and JESD8-7A (June 2006) for 1.8 V, JESD8-11 (August 2001) and JESD8-11A.01 (September 2007) for 1.5 V, JESD8-12A (November 2005) and JESD8-12A.01 for 1.2 V, along with high-speed extensions such as JESD8-26 (September 2011) for 1.2 V and JESD8-31 (March 2018) for 1.8 V. These publications provide the foundational specifications for LVCMOS across various supply voltages, evolving from the initial 3.3 V standard to support lower voltages as CMOS processes advanced. The overarching framework in these standards encompasses and input/output levels, tolerances for nominal supply voltages (such as ±0.3 V for 3.3 V systems), and guidelines for overshoot/undershoot to maintain and prevent damage in mixed-voltage environments. This structure facilitates broad adoption by defining minimum requirements for compatibility, allowing multiple vendors to produce interoperable components without extensive redesign. JEDEC's development process for LVCMOS standards involves collaborative committees, such as JC-16 on Interface Technology, conducting iterative reviews and updates to accommodate increasing speeds, power efficiency, and process scaling in sub-micron technologies. Initial standards emerged in the mid-1990s to address the transition from 5 V , with subsequent revisions focusing on lower voltages and high-speed variants; activity has stabilized since the , reflecting maturation in sub-1 V processes, though occasional extensions like JESD8-31 address emerging needs.

Voltage-Specific Specifications

LVCMOS encompasses several variants defined by specific supply voltage levels and tolerances, each standardized under documents to ensure interoperability in digital integrated circuits. The primary variants include 3.3 V with a tolerance of ±0.3 V (normal range 3.0 V to 3.6 V, wide range 2.7 V to 3.6 V), governed by JESD8C.01; 2.5 V ±0.2 V (normal range 2.3 V to 2.7 V, wide range 1.8 V to 2.7 V), per JESD8-5A.01; 1.8 V ±0.15 V (normal range 1.65 V to 1.95 V, wide range 1.2 V to 1.95 V), under JESD8-7A; 1.5 V ±0.1 V (normal range 1.4 V to 1.6 V, wide range 0.9 V to 1.6 V), defined in JESD8-11A.01; 1.2 V ±0.1 V (normal range 1.1 V to 1.3 V, wide range 0.8 V to 1.3 V), specified by JESD8-12A.01; and 1.0 V ±0.1 V (normal range 0.9 V to 1.1 V, wide range 0.7 V to 1.1 V), outlined in JESD8-14A.01. Sub-1 V operations (e.g., 0.9 V, 0.8 V, 0.7 V) often utilize the wide range of the 1.0 V standard or vendor-specific implementations for ultra-low-power applications, without dedicated LVCMOS specifications.
VariantNominal VoltageTolerance (Normal Range)Governing JESD StandardWide Range
LVCMOS 3.3V3.3 V±0.3 V (3.0 V – 3.6 V)JESD8C.012.7 V – 3.6 V
LVCMOS 2.5V2.5 V±0.2 V (2.3 V – 2.7 V)JESD8-5A.011.8 V – 2.7 V
LVCMOS 1.8V1.8 V±0.15 V (1.65 V – 1.95 V)JESD8-7A1.2 V – 1.95 V
LVCMOS 1.5V1.5 V±0.1 V (1.4 V – 1.6 V)JESD8-11A.010.9 V – 1.6 V
LVCMOS 1.2V1.2 V±0.1 V (1.1 V – 1.3 V)JESD8-12A.010.8 V – 1.3 V
LVCMOS 1.0V1.0 V±0.1 V (0.9 V – 1.1 V)JESD8-14A.010.7 V – 1.1 V
The 3.3 V variant maintains legacy compatibility with older and systems, facilitating transitions in mixed-voltage environments. In contrast, the 1.8 V variant is prevalent in memory interfaces, supporting high-speed data transfer in . The 1.2 V variant is optimized for high-density mobile system-on-chips (SoCs), aligning with advanced process nodes like 28 nm to balance performance and power. Sub-1 V levels target ultra-low-power (IoT) devices, minimizing static and dynamic power dissipation. Direct compatibility across LVCMOS variants requires matching supply voltages, as differing levels can lead to issues; level shifters are essential for interfacing between variants like 3.3 V and 1.2 V to prevent damage or unreliable switching. Variant selection is driven by the target process node, with higher voltages suiting mature nodes (e.g., 90 nm and above) and lower voltages (e.g., 1.2 V for 28 nm, sub-1 V for 7 nm and below) enabling scaling for and . Since the , there has been a pronounced shift toward 1.8 V and lower LVCMOS variants to enhance power efficiency, particularly in base stations and accelerators, where reduced supply voltages lower dynamic power (proportional to V²) amid aggressive process scaling. This trend supports the demands of battery-constrained mobile and high-throughput networks, with adoption accelerating post-2015 alongside sub-10 nm nodes.

Electrical Characteristics

Voltage Levels and Thresholds

LVCMOS defines logic states through specific DC voltage thresholds relative to the nominal supply voltage V_{CC}. The input low voltage V_{IL} represents the maximum voltage recognized as a logic 0, typically specified as a minimum of 0 but with a maximum of approximately $0.3 \times V_{CC} for compatibility in scaled implementations. The input high voltage V_{IH} is the minimum voltage for a logic 1, generally $0.7 \times V_{CC}. For outputs, the low-level voltage V_{OL} has a maximum of about $0.1 \times V_{CC}, while the high-level voltage V_{OH} has a minimum of roughly $0.9 \times V_{CC}. These thresholds ensure reliable signal recognition across devices while minimizing power consumption in low-voltage environments. At 3.3 V V_{CC}, the thresholds adopt fixed values for broader compatibility with legacy signaling: V_{IL} maximum of 0.8 V, V_{IH} minimum of 2.0 V, V_{OL} maximum of 0.4 V (at 4 mA sink current), and V_{OH} minimum of 2.4 V (at 4 mA source current). These values scale proportionally for lower supply voltages to maintain similar relative margins. For instance, at 1.8 V V_{CC}, typical thresholds are V_{IL} maximum of 0.45 V, V_{IH} minimum of 1.17 V, V_{OL} maximum of 0.45 V, and V_{OH} minimum of 1.35 V. The following table summarizes representative thresholds for common LVCMOS supply levels:
Supply Voltage (V_{CC})V_{IL} Max (V)V_{IH} Min (V)V_{OL} Max (V)V_{OH} Min (V)
3.3 V0.82.00.42.4
2.5 V0.71.70.42.1
1.8 V0.451.170.451.35
1.2 V0.30.80.30.9
Values at specified output currents (e.g., 4 mA for 3.3 V/2.5 V, 2 mA for 1.8 V/1.2 V per ); low-current specs (e.g., 100 µA) yield tighter V_OL/V_OH. Data derived from JEDEC-compliant specifications for non-terminated digital circuits; actual values may vary slightly by device family and load conditions. Noise margins in LVCMOS, defined as the difference between output and input thresholds (NM_L = V_{IL} - V_{OL}, NM_H = V_{OH} - V_{IH}), decrease at lower supply voltages due to tighter relative tolerances, impacting noise immunity. At 3.3 V, margins are approximately 0.4 V, reducing relatively at lower supply voltages (e.g., about 0.2 V at 1.2 V due to scaling). To enhance robustness against noise, some LVCMOS inputs incorporate optional Schmitt-trigger circuitry, which introduces (typically 0.2–0.5 V) by setting distinct rising and falling thresholds. Overshoot and undershoot specifications limit transient excursions to protect against and ESD damage. Per standards (JESD8C.01), overshoot/undershoot for 3.3 V LVCMOS inputs allows excursions up to V_CC + 2.0 V for ≤20 ns, with additional duration and integral limits to protect against and ESD, ensuring reliable operation in high-speed environments.

Output Drive and Slew Rates

LVCMOS outputs typically employ a using complementary CMOS transistors to and , enabling efficient bidirectional capability. In many implementations, particularly in field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), the output strength is selectable to match load requirements, with common options including 2 mA, 4 mA, 8 mA, 12 mA, and 16 mA for standards like LVCMOS33. This configurability allows designers to optimize for speed versus power, as higher strengths reduce switching times for capacitive loads. The approximate for charging a load can be estimated using the relation t_{\text{rise}} \approx \frac{C_{\text{load}} \times \Delta V}{I_{\text{drive}}}, where C_{\text{load}} is the load , \Delta V is the voltage swing, and I_{\text{drive}} is the output . Slew rates in LVCMOS outputs are often programmable to balance and (). The FAST setting minimizes rise and fall times for high-speed applications, achieving near-instantaneous transitions limited primarily by the drive strength and load. In contrast, SLOW or MEDIUM settings intentionally limit the to 0.5–2 V/ns, reducing by slowing edge transitions and mitigating overshoot or ringing on printed circuit boards (PCBs), with SLOW often serving as the default for general-purpose use. Higher output drive strengths increase dynamic power consumption, as they involve larger transistors with greater , elevating the effective switched in the standard dynamic equation P = C \times V^2 \times f, where C is , V is supply voltage, and f is switching frequency. However, LVCMOS inherently minimizes through its low supply voltages (e.g., 1.2 V to 3.3 V), which quadratically reduce dynamic compared to higher-voltage CMOS families. LVCMOS outputs are generally unterminated due to their low-impedance drive, but for high-speed signals exceeding 100 MHz or long traces, series resistors of 22–33 Ω are recommended at the source to match impedance (typically 50 Ω), preventing reflections and improving .

Applications

In Integrated Circuits

LVCMOS is commonly employed as the default (I/O) standard in application-specific integrated circuits () and system-on-chips (SoCs), where it facilitates efficient interfacing in power-sensitive designs. In microcontrollers based on cores, such as ' Sitara AM62x series operating at 1.8 , LVCMOS provides the primary GPIO and peripheral I/O, supporting reliable signal transmission with minimal overhead. This standard is particularly valued in sensor applications and () interfaces, where its low-voltage operation—typically from 1.2 to 3.3 —enables reduced static and dynamic dissipation, making it ideal for battery-operated or energy-harvesting systems. For instance, in mixed-signal SoCs, LVCMOS I/Os connect digital logic to analog front-ends in sensors, ensuring compatibility while maintaining overall system efficiency. In memory subsystems, LVCMOS is utilized for command, address, and control signals in (SDRAM) and (DDR) interfaces, particularly at voltages up to 1.8 V as defined in standards for low-power DDR (). This application leverages LVCMOS's compatibility with single-ended signaling to simplify board-level integration without requiring differential pairs, thus reducing complexity in designs interfacing with mobile DDR modules. Similarly, LVCMOS drives control signals like , write enable, and read enable in devices, such as NOR and flash, where its robust voltage tolerance supports reliable operation in embedded storage controllers within . The power efficiency of LVCMOS significantly aids life extension in portable by allowing scalable voltage levels that align with process nodes, minimizing leakage and switching currents. This scalability is evident in devices like TI's MSP430FR69xx family, where LVCMOS enables ultra-low-power modes (e.g., <1 µA standby) for extended operation in wearables and meters. Key design considerations for LVCMOS in integrated circuits include voltage level shifting to accommodate mixed-voltage environments on PCBs, where signals may between domains like 1.8 V cores and 3.3 V peripherals. Techniques such as auto-bidirectional translators or dedicated shifters ensure without excessive power draw. Additionally, ESD protection is typically integrated directly into LVCMOS I/O pads using structures like gate-grounded NMOS (GGNMOS) clamps, providing robustness against (HBM) events up to 2 kV in advanced processes. LVCMOS outputs support configurable drive options to optimize slew rates for specific loading conditions.

In Field-Programmable Gate Arrays

Field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) from major vendors extensively support LVCMOS as a versatile single-ended I/O standard for general-purpose interfacing. In (formerly Xilinx) UltraScale architectures, LVCMOS standards spanning 1.2 V (LVCMOS12) to 3.3 V (LVCMOS33) are implemented in high-density (HD) and high-performance (HP) I/O banks, with LVCMOS12, LVCMOS15, and LVCMOS18 available in both bank types, while LVCMOS25 and LVCMOS33 are restricted to HD banks. Similarly, Arria 10 FPGAs support LVCMOS up to 3.3 V, with programmable drive strengths ranging from 4 mA to 24 mA for 3.0 V LVCMOS configurations, and no voltage reference (VREF) pin is required for LVCMOS operation in either vendor's devices due to its non-referenced signaling nature. Configuration of LVCMOS in FPGAs is managed through vendor-specific design tools, allowing precise control over electrical parameters to match application needs. For AMD UltraScale devices, Vivado Design Suite enables setting the IOSTANDARD attribute (e.g., LVCMOS18), DRIVE strength (typically 2–12 mA depending on voltage and bank type), SLEW rate (FAST, SLOW, or MEDIUM in HP banks), and bank voltage (VCCO) pinning to ensure compatibility across multi-voltage domains. In Intel Arria FPGAs, Quartus Prime software facilitates LVCMOS assignment via I/O standards, current strength (e.g., 8–24 mA), and slew rate (fast or slow) options, with bank VCCIO voltages pinned to support the selected standard. LVCMOS finds practical use in FPGAs for prototyping systems and with external peripherals, leveraging its with levels. A representative example is LVCMOS18 at 8 mA unterminated drive for connecting to Mobile devices, enabling efficient data transfer without additional termination in many designs. The integration of LVCMOS in FPGAs offers key advantages through multi-voltage I/O banks, which permit mixing standards like 1.2 V and 3.3 V within the same to diverse components without level shifters. Additionally, power optimization is achieved by selecting low-drive settings (e.g., 2–4 mA) for short internal or low-capacitance signals, reducing dynamic power consumption while maintaining .

Comparisons with Other Logic Families

Versus Standard CMOS

Standard CMOS logic families, historically operating at a supply voltage of 5 V (±0.5 V), differ significantly from LVCMOS in terms of efficiency due to the quadratic relationship between dynamic consumption and supply voltage in CMOS circuits, where P \propto V^2. For a typical transition from 5 V to 3.3 V LVCMOS, this results in approximately a 56% reduction in dynamic dissipation, assuming constant and frequency, as the ratio (3.3/5)^2 \approx 0.44. This savings becomes even more pronounced for lower-voltage LVCMOS variants (e.g., 2.5 V or 1.8 V), potentially exceeding 75% reduction relative to 5 V operation, enabling better suitability for battery-powered and high-density applications. In terms of noise immunity, standard 5 V CMOS provides higher margins, with a minimum high-level input voltage (V_{IH}) of 3.5 V and low-level input voltage (V_{IL}) maximum of 1.5 V, yielding noise margins of about 1.5 V on each side relative to typical output levels. In contrast, 3.3 V has V_{IH} minimum of 2.0 V and V_{IL} maximum of 0.8 V per JESD8-C standards, resulting in noise margins of approximately 0.6 V (low) and 0.8 V (high) minimum, which are reduced compared to 5 V CMOS but sufficient for most applications with the overall lower voltage swing that supports denser integration without excessive . Despite these trade-offs, LVCMOS maintains compatibility with legacy systems through voltage level translators, such as bidirectional buffers that interface 3.3 V signals with 5 V domains. Propagation delays for both families are comparable, typically ranging from 1 to 10 depending on the specific device and loading, with standard often around 5-10 ns and LVCMOS achieving similar or slightly faster times (e.g., 2-5 ns in high-speed variants) due to reduced capacitive loading from lower voltages. This parity in speed allows LVCMOS to support higher operating frequencies in modern designs, as the decreased voltage lowers and enables scaling to sub-micron processes without proportional delay increases. The migration from standard 5 V to LVCMOS accelerated in the post-2000 era, driven by shrinking process nodes and power constraints in portable electronics, effectively phasing out 5 V logic in new designs while preserving via dedicated translators for mixed-voltage systems.

Versus LVTTL and LVDS

LVCMOS differs from LVTTL primarily in its input thresholds and output characteristics, which affect and power efficiency. LVCMOS employs voltage thresholds defined by standards, typically around 30% to 70% of V_CC but with specific fixed values for , such as V_IL max = 0.8 V and V_IH min = 2.0 V for 3.3 V supplies, enabling operation across a range of low voltages like 1.8 V or 3.3 V. In contrast, LVTTL uses fixed TTL-compatible thresholds, such as V_IL maximum of 0.8 V and V_IH minimum of 2.0 V, regardless of the exact supply, along with a higher V_OL maximum of 0.4 V to mimic legacy behavior. These differences result in LVCMOS offering lower static power consumption due to its CMOS-based outputs that draw minimal current when idle, but lower-voltage LVCMOS variants (e.g., 1.8 V) may require level to meet TTL's V_IH min of 2.0 V, while 3.3 V LVCMOS is generally compatible, though are often used for bidirectional interfacing or to prevent from 5 V outputs. Compared to LVDS, LVCMOS is a standard with a full rail-to-rail voltage swing from 0 to V_CC, making it simpler and more cost-effective for general-purpose I/O over short traces where noise margins are sufficient. LVDS, however, operates differentially with a small voltage swing of approximately ±350 mV centered around a common-mode voltage of about 1.2 V, providing superior noise immunity and enabling data rates exceeding 1 Gbps over longer distances or in noisy environments, such as video interfaces or clock distribution. This differential nature of LVDS reduces and supports lower power dissipation, with single-ended LVCMOS consuming roughly 10 times more power than LVDS at equivalent high speeds due to the larger voltage swings and capacitive loading. In practical trade-offs, LVCMOS serves as a universal standard for GPIO pins in microcontrollers and FPGAs, prioritizing ease of implementation and compatibility with a broad ecosystem, while LVTTL persists in legacy board designs requiring interfacing. LVDS excels in high-speed applications like display panels and serial data links, where its low-noise performance justifies the added complexity of routing. On mixed-signal PCBs, LVCMOS, LVTTL, and LVDS often coexist through dedicated buffers or converters, such as FPGA-integrated LVCMOS-to-LVDS drivers, to bridge single-ended and domains without signal degradation.

References

  1. [1]
    LVCMOS - UG861
    Low voltage CMOS (LVCMOS) is a widely used switching standard implemented in CMOS transistors. This standard is defined by JESD8-12A.01, JESD8-11A.01, JESD8-7A ...Missing: electronics | Show results with:electronics
  2. [2]
    [PDF] jesd8c-01.pdf - JEDEC STANDARD
    The specifications in this standard represent a minimum set, or 'base line' set, of interface specifications for LVTTL compatible and LVCMOS compatible circuits ...
  3. [3]
    1.8 V HIGH-SPEED LVCMOS (HS_LVCMOS) INTERFACE - JEDEC
    JESD8-31. This standard defines the dc and ac input levels, output levels, and input overshoot and undershoot specifications for the 1.8 V High-speed LVCMOS ( ...
  4. [4]
    STANDARD FOR DESCRIPTION OF 2.5 V CMOS LOGIC DEVICES
    This standard defines dc interface parameters and test loading for CMOS digital logic family based on 2.5 V (nominal) power supply levels at 2.5 V input ...
  5. [5]
    Single-Ended I/O Standards Specifications - Intel
    For example, to meet the 1.8- V LVCMOS specification (4 mA), you should set the current strength settings to 4 mA. Setting at lower current strength may not ...Missing: electronics | Show results with:electronics
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Texas Instruments Voltage-Level-Translation Devices
    These devices allow for translation between 3.3-V LVTTL/LVCMOS to 5-V CMOS, 2.5-V CMOS to 5-V CMOS, 2.5-V. CMOS to 3.3-V LVTTL/LVCMOS, and vice versa. Device ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Design and Implementation of LVCMOS18 I/O Buffer
    As semiconductor technology has being advanced, Low Voltage Complementary MOS transistor(LVCMOS) power supply voltage and interfacing standards for effective ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    I/O Voltage Standards and Their Role in Ensuring Microcontrollers ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · LVCMOS typically operates in 1.8 V, 2.4 V or 3.3 V and defines specific thresholds for logic highs and lows.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] LVC and LV Low-Voltage CMOS Logic Data Book (Rev. B)
    LVC and LV, both low-voltage CMOS logic families, are just two of TI's wide range of 3.3-V logic solutions. LVC is TI's answer to designers' 3.3-V price/ ...
  11. [11]
    LVCMOS - JEDEC
    JESD8-26. This standard defines the dc and ac input levels, output levels, and input overshoot and undershoot specifications for the 1.2 V High-speed LVCMOS ( ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    [PDF] MT-098: Low Voltage Logic Interfacing - Analog Devices
    Low voltage logic interfacing involves issues with different voltage levels, like 5V TTL and 3.3V LVTTL, which can cause damage or incompatibility.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] ABT Enables Optimal System Design - Texas Instruments
    Since the early 1970s, many different logic-product technologies have ... Designers can use the same LVT logic for the core 3.3-V system partition as for the ...
  16. [16]
    Why 3.3V instead of 3V? - Electrical Engineering - Codidact
    3.3V is a stepping stone on the path of decreasing supply voltages. This came about because of the improvements in chip design and introduction of CMOS.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] CMOS Scaling Trends and Beyond - Duke Computer Science
    Scaling transistors and following Moore's law have served the industry well for more than 50 years in providing integrated circuits.
  18. [18]
    INTERFACE STANDARD FOR NOMINAL 3.0 V/3.3 V ... - JEDEC
    This standard (a replacement of JEDEC Standards No. 8, 8-1, 8-1-A, and 8-A) defines dc interface parameters for a family of digital circuits.
  19. [19]
    JEDEC: Home
    For over 50 years, JEDEC has been the global leader in developing open standards and publications for the microelectronics industry.<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    JEDEC History
    JEDEC began as JETEC in 1944, became JEDEC in 1958, initially assigned part numbers, and now develops standards for the semiconductor industry.Missing: LVCMOS | Show results with:LVCMOS
  21. [21]
    ADDENDUM No. 7 to JESD8 - 1.8 V + -0.15 V (NORMAL RANGE ...
    JESD8-7A. Published: Jun 2006. This standard continues the voltage ... Published JEDEC documents on this website are self-service and searchable ...
  22. [22]
    ADDENDUM No. 11A.01 to JESD8 - 1.5 V + - JEDEC
    01. Published: Sep 2007. This new standard provides specifications that will be used by several companies in new 1.5 V products designed in 0.12- ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] JESD8-12A.01 | JEDEC Standard
    This table briefly describes changes that appear in this standard, JESD8-12A. 01, compared to its predecessor, JESD8-12A (November 2005). These changes were ...
  24. [24]
    1.2 V HIGH-SPEED LVCMOS (HS_LVCMOS) INTERFACE - JEDEC
    JESD8-26. Published: Sep 2011. This standard defines the dc and ac input levels, output levels, and input overshoot and undershoot specifications for the 1.2 ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] JESD8-5A.01 - JEDEC STANDARD
    This table briefly describes changes that appear in this standard, JESD8-5A. 01, compared to its predecessor, JESD8-5A (June 2006). These changes were approved ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] JESD8-7A - JEDEC STANDARD
    This table briefly describes most of the changes made to entries that appear in this standard, JESD8-7A, compared to its predecessor, JESD8-7 (February 1997). ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] JESD8-11A-01.pdf - JEDEC STANDARD
    1, compared to its predecessor, JESD8-11A (November 2005). If the change to a con- cept involves any words added or deleted (excluding deletion of accidentally ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] JESD8-15A - JEDEC STANDARD
    JEDEC standards and publications contain material that has been prepared, reviewed, and approved through the JEDEC Council level and subsequently reviewed and ...
  29. [29]
    Energy Efficient VLSI Design and Implementation on 28nm FPGA
    In design and implementation of energy efficient counter for energy efficient processor, we are using LVCMOS I/O standard in FPGA. CMOS technology is used to ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Voltage Translation Buying Guide (Rev. A) - Texas Instruments
    This allows the device to communicate with advance processors operating at low voltage nodes of 0.7 V, 0.8 V or 0.9 V. The wide VCC range also accommodates the ...
  31. [31]
    CMOS Low-Dropout Voltage Regulator Design Trends: An Overview
    The rapid growth of CMOS technology enables lower power supply operation ... efficient LDO voltage regulator in terms of power dissipation. As power ...
  32. [32]
    5G chips and modules address power efficiency and size
    Sep 18, 2025 · The MT5824 SoC consumes 90% less power (<6 W for 4T4R configurations), reduces bill-of-material costs by 80%, and shrinks the footprint by 70% ...Missing: LVCMOS voltage
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Axcelerator I/O Selection Guide
    2.5V LVCMOS (LVCMOS2) is compliant with JEDEC standard JESD8-5. 1.8V LVCMOS (LVCMOS3) is compliant with JEDEC standard JESD8-7. 1.5V LVCMOS is the projected ...Missing: JESD | Show results with:JESD<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] How to Drive Resistive, Inductive, Capacitive, and Lighting Loads
    Depending on the rise time at power-up, this load output capacitance can cause large inrush currents that are limited only by parasitic resistance and ...
  36. [36]
    2.2.1. Programmable Output Slew Rate Control - Intel
    Oct 29, 2021 · For 1.2 V LVCMOS I/O standard, you can select between fast, medium, and slow slew rate settings. For external memory interface pins ...Missing: EMI | Show results with:EMI
  37. [37]
    [PDF] 6. I/O Features in Cyclone IV Devices - Intel
    Mar 6, 2016 · However, these fast transitions may introduce noise transients in the system. A slower slew rate reduces system noise, but adds a nominal delay ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] "CMOS Power Consumption and CPD Calculation"
    Dynamic power consumption can be limited by reducing supply voltage, switched capacitance, and frequency at which the logic is clocked. Consider TI's low-power ...Missing: LVCMOS | Show results with:LVCMOS
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Drive Strength and LVCMOS Based Dynamic Power Reduction of ...
    This standard is defined by JEDEC. It is available in 4 iostandard. These are: LVCMOS12, LVCMOS15, LVCMOS18 and. LVCMOS25. It supports 2/4/6/ ...
  40. [40]
    Can I drive long PCB traces with an LVCMOS output?
    When using the LVCMOS output settings with long 50 ohm PCB traces or cables, you will need to use the IO's higher output current settings and add an external 33 ...Missing: 22-33 | Show results with:22-33
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    [PDF] AM62Px Sitara™ Processors datasheet (Rev. B) - Texas Instruments
    ... LVCMOS I/O can be configured as GPIO. • 4x Controller Area Network ... Sitara™ processors are a broad family of scalable processors based on Arm® Cortex ...
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Low Power Design For Analog/Mixed-Signal IP - EE Times
    It allows low power high-speed data transfers (480 Mbps) using a source synchronous clocked serial interface. Low power is achieved with 1.2 V LVCMOS signaling ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] JESD209B - JEDEC STANDARD
    JEDEC standards and publications are designed to serve the public interest through eliminating misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Getting started with EZ-USB™ FX20/FX10/FX5N/FX5
    Jun 6, 2025 · Each port contains 16 LVCMOS I/Os and 10 control signals. The LVCMOS receiver interface is backward compatible with the GPIF-II interface in FX3 ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] MSP430FG662x, MSP430FG642x Mixed-Signal Microcontrollers ...
    Aug 8, 2016 · These microcontrollers can reduce overall system cost through high analog integration and enable long battery life by low-power operation.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] MSP430FR697x(1), MSP430FR687x(1), MSP430FR692x(1 ...
    The architecture, combined with seven low-power modes is optimized to achieve extended battery life for example in portable measurement applications. The ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Voltage-Level Translation Guide (Rev. H) - Texas Instruments
    Up-translation from 3 .3-V LVCMOS/. LVTTL to 5-V CMOS levels can be achieved with logic devices from TI's. HCT, AHCT, ACT and AUP families . Devices with Open ...
  50. [50]
    5.8. I/O and High Speed I/O in Arria® 10 Devices Revision History
    Updated the footnote about using a 3.0 V LVTTL /3.0 V LVCMOS I/O standard with a 2.5 V VCCIO voltage to clarify that the input signals that exceed 2.5 V will be ...
  51. [51]
    Output Drive Strength Attributes - UG861
    Dec 23, 2024 · For LVCMOS and LVTTL output buffers, the DRIVE attribute can be used to specify the load that the driver can safely drive to valid logic levels (in mA).
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Vivado Design Suite User Guide: I/O and Clock Planning
    May 4, 2022 · The XPIO includes dedicated logic to support high-speed interfaces with voltage ranges between 1.0V and 1.5V. HDIO and XPIO banks do not have ...
  53. [53]
    7.3.6.1. I/O Standards and Drive Strength for Configuration Pins - Intel
    The default drive strength for dual function configuration I/O pins during configuration is 1.8V at 50 Ω. When you enable the configuration pins, the Quartus® ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] UltraScale Architecture SelectIO Resources User Guide - AMD
    Sep 1, 2022 · This guide covers SelectIO interface resources, logic resources, and high density I/O resources for the UltraScale Architecture.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Utilization of FGPA for Power Improvement Designs - IJIRT
    For example, given that lower reference voltages save power over the life of a system, choosing an I/O offering that supports both. 1.2 V LVCMOS and/or 1.5 V ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Power Supply Design Considerations for Modern FPGAs
    Using soft-start also reduces the current needed to charge the output capacitance of the power supply and will decrease the voltage droop on the input bus ...Missing: LVCMOS | Show results with:LVCMOS
  57. [57]
    [PDF] "Benefits & Issues of Migrating 5-V and 3.3-V Logic to Lower-Voltage ...
    With the reduction of the supply voltage there is also a reduction of the drive capability of the logic circuit. The output stage of a logic circuit in the high ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Selecting the Right Level Translation Solution - Texas Instruments
    Because 5-V TTL and 3-V LVTTL/LVCMOS switching thresholds are equal (see Figure 2), these devices can be used to translate from 3.3 V to 5 V. However ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] An Overview of LVDS Technology - Texas Instruments
    The differential scheme has a tremendous advantage over single-ended schemes as it is less susceptible to common mode noise. Noise coupled onto the interconnect ...Missing: LVCMOS comparison
  60. [60]
    AN-1177: LVDS and M-LVDS Circuit Implementation Guide
    The differential voltage swings around 0 V. Typical LVDS signal levels are shown in Figure 8, together with the differential signal VOD and common-mode voltage ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Applications of Low-Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS) in LED ...
    The low amplitude (~350 mV) of the differential pair in the LVDS SerDes ensures lower power dissipation than 3.3 V LVTTL and LVCMOS single-ended signaling. ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Support Low Voltage I/O Signals into a FPGA, Processor, or ASIC
    The LVDS driver translates LVCMOS or LVTTL single- ended inputs into an LVDS output. The LVDS receiver translates LVDS inputs into single-ended LVCMOS or.Missing: differences thresholds