Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Parasitic capacitance

Parasitic capacitance is the unintended and often unwanted capacitance that arises in electronic circuits due to the physical proximity of conductive elements, such as adjacent wires, traces on a (), or components like vias and ground planes. This phenomenon occurs because any two conductors separated by an form a , and in dense circuit layouts, these incidental capacitances—typically in the picofarad range—emerge without deliberate design. For instance, in integrated circuits (ICs), parasitic capacitance manifests between interconnects, transistors, and substrate layers, influencing and overall device performance. The effects of parasitic capacitance become particularly pronounced in high-frequency applications, where it can cause signal delays, reflections, and between adjacent lines, thereby degrading circuit speed and accuracy. In inductors and magnetic components, it reduces impedance at elevated frequencies, limiting filtering effectiveness and contributing to (EMI). As technology scales down in modern , the relative impact of these parasitics intensifies, potentially restricting operating and increasing power consumption due to added loading on drivers. Measurement techniques, such as time-domain reflectometry (TDR), are commonly employed to quantify these capacitances by analyzing waveform reflections, enabling designers to model and mitigate their influence. Mitigation strategies for parasitic capacitance include optimizing layout spacing, using shielding, and employing with lower constants, which are essential in fields like very-large-scale integration (VLSI) and high-speed digital design. In , techniques like winding optimization in inductors help minimize capacitance between turns or layers to preserve high-frequency performance. Despite these challenges, understanding and accounting for parasitic capacitance remains fundamental to achieving reliable operation in compact, high-performance electronic systems.

Fundamental Concepts

Definition

Parasitic capacitance refers to the unintended and typically unwanted that arises between conductive elements in an , such as wires, traces, or components, due to their physical proximity and geometric arrangement. This effect occurs because nearby conductors separated by an insulating material or air form a capacitor-like structure, allowing to couple between them and store charge unintentionally. Unlike intentional capacitors, which are deliberately designed and placed to store charge for specific functions, parasitic capacitance emerges as an inherent byproduct of the circuit's physical layout and is not part of the intended design. It is measured in farads (F), the SI unit of , though practical values in electronic circuits are much smaller, typically ranging from femtofarads () to picofarads () depending on the scale and proximity of the conductors. To illustrate how parasitic capacitance forms, consider the basic model of two parallel conducting plates separated by a medium, where the C is given by C = \epsilon \frac{A}{d} with \epsilon as the of the medium, A as the overlapping area of the plates, and d as the distance between them; in parasitic cases, these parameters arise from the unintended overlap of between nearby elements rather than deliberate construction.

Physical Basis

Parasitic capacitance originates from the electrostatic interaction between charged in close proximity, where an forms between them, enabling the storage of . When a potential difference is applied, one conductor accumulates positive charge while the other accumulates negative charge of equal magnitude, creating an that opposes further charge separation and defines the as the ratio of stored charge to voltage. This stored energy resides primarily in the within the space between the conductors. The strength of this capacitance depends on the permittivity of the dielectric material separating the conductors, which is given by ε = ε_r ε_0, where ε_0 is the and ε_r is the of the material. Materials with higher ε_r enhance the intensity for a given charge, increasing capacitance; for example, dry air has ε_r ≈ 1.0005, while (SiO_2), commonly used as an in , has ε_r = 3.9. These values illustrate how dielectrics like SiO_2 amplify capacitance compared to or air by a factor of nearly 4. In non-ideal geometries, such as finite-sized or irregular shapes typical in electronic components, the lines do not remain confined strictly between the but extend outward, producing fringing fields that contribute additional beyond the simple parallel-plate approximation. These fringing effects become significant when the conductor separation is comparable to their dimensions, effectively increasing the by integrating field contributions over the extended regions. Although semiconductors involve quantum mechanical descriptions of charge carriers, the formation of parasitic capacitance relies on classical field theory, where electric fields induce —curvature in the energy bands due to regions—leading to charge accumulation or depletion that manifests as capacitance. This arises from solving under electrostatic equilibrium, treating the as a with varying .

Sources in Electronic Systems

In Integrated Circuits

In integrated circuits, parasitic capacitances arise primarily from the physical structure of devices and on-chip interconnects, becoming increasingly significant as transistor dimensions shrink under scaling. Following the , aggressive device miniaturization led to higher densities, but it also amplified parasitic effects, as reduced feature sizes brought conductive regions closer together, elevating capacitance values and complicating performance. This trend intensified beyond the 130 nm node, where traditional scaling rules began to falter due to quantum effects and leakage, necessitating innovations like high-k dielectrics to manage parasitics. A key source of parasitic capacitance within devices is the junction capacitance in diodes and transistors, which originates from the depletion region at p-n junctions. This capacitance, denoted as C_j, behaves like a parallel-plate capacitor where the depletion width W acts as the dielectric thickness, given by the formula
C_j = \frac{\epsilon A}{W},
with \epsilon as the of the , A the junction area, and W the depletion width. The value of W varies with applied bias voltage: it widens under reverse bias, reducing C_j, while narrowing under forward bias, though diffusion capacitance then dominates. In transistors, such as junction transistors (BJTs) and metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), these junction capacitances appear at the base-emitter, base-collector, or source/drain junctions, contributing to switching delays and dynamic power dissipation.
In MOSFETs, another major contributor is the gate-to-channel capacitance, which forms between the gate electrode and the inversion beneath the . This is primarily the C_{ox} = \frac{\epsilon_{ox}}{t_{ox}} per unit area, multiplied by the effective area W L_{eff}, where W is the width, L_{eff} the effective , \epsilon_{ox} the , and t_{ox} the thickness; its value partitions between gate-to-source (C_{gs}) and gate-to-drain (C_{gd}) depending on operating region (e.g., \frac{2}{3} C_{ox} W L_{eff} for C_{gs} in ). Additionally, overlap capacitances occur at the gate edges, where the gate poly-silicon extends beyond the by a distance x_d, yielding C_{gso} = C_{gdo} = C_{ox} W x_d; these fixed parasitics persist across all bias conditions and become relatively more prominent in short- devices. Inter-layer capacitances between metal lines in very-large-scale integration (VLSI) circuits represent a critical on-chip parasitic, arising from the close proximity of stacked interconnect layers separated by inter-metal s. These capacitances include fringing and components, modeled as C_{total} = C_{top} + C_{bot} + 2 C_{adj}, where C_{adj} accounts for adjacent line , influenced by line width, spacing, thickness, and dielectric k. As nodes from 180 nm to 7 nm, higher interconnect density—driven by reduced pitches (e.g., from ~320 nm spacing at 180 nm to sub-50 nm at 7 nm) and more layers (3-6 at 180 nm versus 10+ at 7 nm)—increases these parasitics, though low-k dielectrics (k ≈ 3 versus 3.9 for SiO₂) mitigate some effects; for instance, metal-2 is maintained at approximately 0.2 fF/μm per unit length through the use of low-k dielectrics, but overall rises with density.

In Interconnects and Packaging

In electronic systems, parasitic capacitance in interconnects and packaging manifests prominently between traces on printed circuit boards (PCBs), where adjacent coplanar conductors couple through the surrounding . This capacitance arises from the fringing between traces and can be approximated using models that account for these fields in coplanar geometries, influenced by the of the dielectric medium, the overlapping length of the traces, trace width, and edge-to-edge spacing. Such coupling becomes significant in dense layouts, contributing to overall system parasitics that influence signal propagation. Bond wires and leads in (IC) packages introduce parasitic capacitance alongside their dominant inductive effects, primarily through mutual coupling between parallel wires or between wires and the package . These elements form distributed LC networks where the capacitance, though smaller than (typically on the order of picofarads), interacts with the wire's self- to create resonances that degrade high-speed performance. In wire-bonded packages, optimizing wire length and spacing minimizes this coupled capacitance while addressing . Vias and pads in multi-layer PCBs add further parasitic capacitance due to their interaction with adjacent ground or power planes, forming cylindrical or plate-like capacitors that store charge and slow signal transitions. In high-speed designs like DDR memory interfaces, where data rates exceed several gigabits per second, via capacitance can introduce delays; for instance, through-hole vias in DDR4 layouts contribute up to several picofarads per via, necessitating techniques such as back-drilling to reduce stubs and capacitance. Pad capacitances similarly scale with size and proximity to planes, often requiring controlled geometries to maintain timing margins. Environmental factors, particularly , exacerbate parasitic capacitance in non-hermetic packages by increasing the effective of through . This elevates the \epsilon_r linearly with content, potentially raising values by 10-20% in humid conditions, which alters electrical characteristics and reliability. sealing or conformal coatings mitigate these effects in exposed assemblies.

Effects on Performance

Frequency Limitations

In electronic circuits, parasitic capacitance introduces RC time constants that fundamentally limit the operating frequency by forming low-pass filters. The time constant τ is given by τ = , where R is the in the signal path and C includes the parasitic capacitance; this determines the circuit's response time, with signals attenuating exponentially toward . The cutoff frequency f_c, beyond which the gain drops by 3 , is f_c = 1/(2π), and increased parasitic C directly lowers f_c, reducing in RC networks such as interconnects or loadings. Parasitic capacitances also create poles in the of amplifiers, leading to a of -20 per decade starting at the . Each additional parasitic , often from capacitances like gate-drain in transistors, shifts the downward and can introduce phase shifts that degrade at high . For instance, in multi-stage amplifiers, these poles accumulate, compressing the overall and necessitating compensation techniques to maintain flat up to the desired operating range. In operational amplifiers (op-amps), parasitic capacitance at the input terminals, such as stray capacitance from board traces or device pins, forms an unintended with the source resistance, limiting the amplifier's and high-speed performance. This filter's is approximately f_p = 1/(2π R_s C_p), where R_s is the source resistance and C_p is the parasitic capacitance; for typical values like R_s = 1 kΩ and C_p = 10 , f_p ≈ 16 MHz, beyond which signal attenuation occurs. Such limitations indirectly constrain the in applications requiring rapid voltage transitions, as the filtered input reduces the effective drive for the internal compensation , preventing full utilization of the op-amp's specified (e.g., 10 V/μs in high-speed devices). In RF circuits, parasitic capacitances from elements like gate-source in MOSFETs exacerbate frequency limitations, causing reduction at gigahertz frequencies. Accumulated parasitics in stacked transistor stages of power amplifiers can the in millimeter-wave designs.

Noise and Signal Integrity

Parasitic capacitance contributes significantly to signal degradation through capacitive , where rapid voltage transitions (dV/dt) on an aggressor line induce unwanted pulses on a nearby line via the capacitance between them. This phenomenon is prevalent in densely packed integrated circuits, where interconnects from packaging and on-chip routing serve as primary sources of such parasitics. The peak amplitude in the line can be approximated as \Delta V_\text{noise} \approx \frac{C_\text{par}}{C_\text{load}} \Delta V, where C_\text{par} is the parasitic capacitance, C_\text{load} is the total ground-referenced capacitance of the net, and \Delta V is the voltage swing of the aggressor. This approximation holds under conditions where the aggressor switches much faster than the victim's response time, leading to charge injection that can exceed margins and cause errors if the height surpasses the 's . In switched-capacitor circuits, parasitic capacitance exacerbates charge sharing issues, where unintended charge redistribution occurs between the main sampling and parasitic nodes during switching phases, resulting in voltage droop at the output. This effect is particularly pronounced in sample-and-hold stages or integrators, as the parasitic capacitance at switch junctions or interconnects diverts a portion of the stored charge, reducing the effective signal and introducing nonlinear . For instance, in a basic switched-capacitor inverter, charge sharing losses can be quantified by analyzing steady-state and transient behaviors, leading to drops of several percent in high-resolution analog-to-digital converters unless mitigated. Techniques like Miller capacitance multiplication have been employed to suppress this droop by an , preserving signal fidelity in precision applications. For digital signals, parasitic capacitance increases the total capacitive load on gates and wires, slowing rise and fall times and thereby introducing timing , especially in clock distribution networks where balanced is critical. This arises from RC delays dominated by parasitics, potentially causing hold-time violations or in flip-flops if the clock edges arrive unevenly across the chip. In high-speed VLSI designs, such effects can accumulate along long clock trees, amplifying and reducing the maximum operating frequency without additional buffering. In () contexts, parasitic capacitances in mixed-signal systems function as inadvertent antennas, enhancing susceptibility to external pickup that couples noise into sensitive analog paths. These parasitics, often from or bond-wire connections, lower the impedance at high frequencies, allowing radiated to induce voltages that overwhelm low-level signals and spuriously trigger comparators or amplifiers. This vulnerability is acute in systems-on-chip integrating and analog domains, where unshielded parasitics can amplify by factors related to their effective loop areas, necessitating guard rings or differential shielding for compliance with standards like IEC 61000-4-3.

Specific Phenomena

Miller Effect

The Miller effect describes the apparent multiplication of a parasitic capacitance in inverting amplifiers due to voltage between input and output terminals. In such configurations, the effective capacitance seen at the input is amplified by a factor related to the amplifier's voltage , significantly impacting performance at high frequencies. This effect arises primarily from the gate-drain (or equivalent) parasitic in transistor-based amplifiers, where the output voltage swing inverts and reinforces the voltage across the . The phenomenon was first identified by John M. Miller in his seminal 1920 paper analyzing the of three-electrode amplifiers, where he demonstrated that the load in the plate circuit causes the apparent to become several times larger than the actual inter-electrode . Miller's work showed that this increased input leads to greater power absorption in the input circuit, a finding derived from general theory of impedance dependence on plate load. Originally applied to , the effect extends to modern solid-state devices like transistors, where it manifests similarly in scenarios. To derive the effective input capacitance, consider an inverting amplifier with open-loop voltage gain A_v (taken as positive for magnitude) and a parasitic capacitance C_{gd} between input and output. The voltage across C_{gd} is V_{in} - V_{out} = V_{in} - (-A_v V_{in}) = V_{in}(1 + A_v). The current through C_{gd} contributed to the input is then I_{in} = j \omega C_{gd} V_{in} (1 + A_v), yielding an effective input capacitance of C_{in} = C_{gd} (1 + A_v). This formula highlights how feedback inverts the output voltage, effectively multiplying the capacitance seen at the input by the gain factor. The derivation assumes an ideal amplifier and neglects other parasitics for clarity, but it directly applies to transistor models. A representative example occurs in common-source MOSFET amplifiers, where the inverting gain amplifies the gate-drain parasitic C_{gd}, increasing the total gate capacitance and reducing at high frequencies. For a typical A_v = 10, the effective C_{in} could rise by over an , limiting unless mitigated by design techniques like configurations. This gain-dependent multiplication is distinct from non-feedback parasitics and underscores the Miller effect's role in active circuits.

Coupling in High-Density Designs

In high-density integrated circuits such as system-on-chips (SoCs) and ICs, parasitic capacitance arises from the close proximity of numerous components, exacerbating effects that degrade and performance. coupling is a prominent issue in mixed-signal ICs, where aggressive switching in blocks generates that propagates through the substrate's bulk capacitance to sensitive analog circuits. This coupling occurs primarily via junction capacitances at the drain and source terminals of transistors, allowing high-frequency noise to inject into the substrate and interfere with analog operations like amplifiers or data converters. In advanced technologies, this noise coupling can be significant, necessitating guard rings or deep n-wells for isolation. Through-silicon vias (TSVs) in 3D stacked ICs introduce significant vertical parasitic capacitances due to their penetration through the silicon , signals between stacked dies and the bulk. The capacitance of a cylindrical TSV to the can be approximated as C_{\text{TSV}} \approx \frac{2\pi \epsilon L}{\ln(D/w)}, where \epsilon is the of the , L is the via , D is the of the surrounding shield or interface, and w is the effective thickness; typical values yield 20-100 per via in 45 nm processes. This vertical amplifies in multi-tier stacks, where mutual capacitances between adjacent TSVs can exceed 10 , distorting timing and increasing power dissipation in applications like . Parasitic capacitances in on-chip power grids further complicate high-density designs, as the inductive and capacitive elements of supply lines create voltage droops during transient loads in SoCs. To mitigate these, on-chip decoupling capacitors are essential, providing localized charge reservoirs to stabilize the power delivery ; for instance, metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitors with densities of 1-5 /μm² are integrated to reduce drop in 7 nm nodes. The effective radius of these decaps, often limited to 100-500 μm due to resistance, underscores the need for distributed placement near high-activity logic blocks. Emerging high-density architectures like quantum and neuromorphic chips face amplified parasitic capacitance challenges that directly impact functionality. In superconducting quantum processors, unwanted between qubits introduces , reducing times in designs with qubit densities exceeding 100 per chip as of 2025; for example, parasitic capacitances as low as 1 fF can shift frequencies by MHz, necessitating cryogenic shielding. Similarly, in neuromorphic systems using memristive or synapses, interconnect parasitics degrade synaptic weight accuracy and , with capacitive effects causing signal attenuation in crossbar arrays under 10 nm nodes.

Modeling and Mitigation

Measurement Techniques

Measurement techniques for parasitic capacitance focus on both direct electrical and indirect from signal responses, enabling quantification in integrated circuits, interconnects, and . These methods distinguish parasitic components from intentional capacitances by isolating effects through biasing, frequency sweeps, or time-domain analysis, often requiring de-embedding of parasitics for precision. and approaches target device-level capacitances, while time-domain methods suit distributed structures like traces; validation against simulations ensures reliability across scales. DC methods, such as , are widely used to characterize capacitances in semiconductors, including parasitic elements in diodes and transistors. By applying a swept reverse voltage in the dark or under controlled conditions, the technique measures capacitance variations due to modulation, yielding C-V curves that reveal doping profiles, built-in potentials, and parasitic contributions from surrounding structures. For instance, in p-n , the decreases with increasing reverse bias as the depletion width expands, allowing extraction of total capacitance including parasitics via quasi-static measurements with simple ramp circuitry. AC methods employ vector network analyzers (VNAs) to extract S-parameters over a range, from which parasitic capacitances are derived by converting data to impedance or . In a typical setup, the device under test is biased at zero drain-source voltage and pinched-off gate-source voltage, and S-parameters are measured up to tens of GHz; extrinsic parasitics like gate-to-pad are isolated using cold-FET models. C is then obtained from the imaginary part of the impedance Z, approximated for a simple as Z = \frac{1}{j \omega C}, where \omega is the angular frequency, enabling de-embedding of series inductances and parallel elements for accurate parasitic values on the order of tens of fF. This approach excels in high-frequency applications, such as HEMTs, where traditional LCR meters falter due to inductive effects. Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) provides a non-invasive way to assess parasitic in traces and interconnects by launching a fast step and analyzing reflections from impedance discontinuities. The reflected waveform's and indicate capacitive loading, such as from or stubs; for a shunt in a 50-Ω system, C is calculated by integrating the normalized over time, isolating via from line contributions without disassembly. This method measures in-situ parasitics down to picofarads, aiding analysis in packaged systems. Extracted parasitics are validated by comparing measurements with simulations, where device models incorporate the quantified capacitances to predict circuit behavior, revealing discrepancies due to unmodeled effects. For power MOSFETs in configurations, this comparison confirms gate-drain and drain-source parasitics with errors below 10%, supporting high-frequency switching predictions. However, accuracy limits emerge below 1 fF, where models agree with measurements within 10-20% for microstrip detectors, but fixture parasitics and numerical approximations introduce uncertainties, often requiring advanced field solvers for sub-fF resolution.

Reduction Methods

Layout optimization plays a crucial role in minimizing parasitic capacitance during . Increasing the spacing between adjacent conductors reduces the capacitance by decreasing the interaction between them, which is particularly effective in high-density layouts where fringing fields contribute significantly to overall parasitics. Ground shields, such as patterned metal layers tied to a fixed potential, can further mitigate fringing fields by redirecting lines away from sensitive nodes, thereby lowering the effective in interconnects and active devices. Material selection offers another effective approach to parasitic capacitance reduction, especially in backend-of-line processing. Traditional (SiO₂) inter-layer dielectrics have a (ε_r) of approximately 3.9, but replacing them with low-k materials like porous carbon-doped oxides (SiOCH) can lower ε_r to around 2.2, resulting in up to a 44% reduction in line-to-line and improved signal speed. These materials maintain mechanical integrity while significantly cutting delays in advanced nodes. Circuit-level techniques provide targeted mitigation without altering fabrication processes. configurations stack transistors to isolate output parasitic capacitances from the input stage, reducing the Miller-multiplied and improving in amplifiers and mixers. circuits, by feeding back a signal to the input node, effectively neutralize gate or input parasitic , enhancing high-frequency performance in transimpedance amplifiers. In analog , advanced structures like guard rings—diffused or metal enclosures around sensitive areas—divert substrate coupling currents to , suppressing noise injection and reducing effective parasitic capacitance by up to 50% in mixed-signal environments. These methods collectively enable higher performance in dense, high-speed designs while balancing area and power constraints.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Measuring Parasitic Capacitance and Inductance Using TDR
    Aug 11, 1996 · This article presents a cursory review of transmission lines and the use of TDR to characterize them, and then derives expressions for excess ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Integrated Circuits Parasitic Capacitance Extraction Using Machine ...
    May 31, 2022 · This dissertation provides new solutions for interconnect parasitic capacitance extraction and parasitic-aware routing optimization ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Parasitic Capacitance Cancellation in Filter Inductors
    Winding resistance and core loss lead to parasitic resistance, while parasitic capaci- tance arises from capacitance between winding turns and from winding-to- ...
  4. [4]
    Parasitic Capacitance Mitigation - Technology Licensing Office
    Parasitic capacitance is a significant problem in high-frequency circuits and often limits the operating frequency and bandwidth of electronic components and ...
  5. [5]
    How to Reduce Parasitic Capacitance in a PCB Layout
    Mar 2, 2022 · Parasitic capacitance is the unintentional capacitance (and generally unwanted) that exists between two conductive structures that are separated ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  6. [6]
    What's the Difference Between Stray and Parasitic Capacitance?
    Parasitic Capacitance. This term is often used to describe the unintended capacitance seen in a PCB layout, where the capacitance arises between planes, traces, ...
  7. [7]
    Parasitic Capacitances: Unwanted and Unavoidable Charges ...
    Parasitic capacitance is an unwanted and unavoidable phenomenon that causes electronic components to behave like capacitors due to their proximity.Missing: authoritative sources
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Parallel Plate Capacitor - HyperPhysics Concepts
    The capacitance of flat, parallel metallic plates of area A and separation d is given by the expression above where: k = relative permittivity of the ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  10. [10]
    Electric Fields and Capacitance | Capacitors | Electronics Textbook
    Capacitance is a capacitor's ability to store energy, measured in Farads, and is the intensity of opposition to voltage changes.
  11. [11]
    Relative Permittivity - the Dielectric Constant
    Relative permittivity - εr - and permittivity - ε - for some substances. ... Silicon dioxide, 3.9. Silicon oil, 2.2 - 2.8. Slate, 4. Sodium chloride, 5.6. Soft ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Understanding Parallel Plate Capacitors: A Complete Guide For ...
    Fringing refers to the bending of electric field lines near the edges of the metal plates, which increases effective capacitance slightly beyond ideal flat- ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Calculations of the Fringing Capacitance of Cylindrical Electrodes
    The fringing fields follow curved paths, although boundary conditions require them to meet the electrode surfaces at 90°.
  15. [15]
    The P-N Junction | Solid-state Device Theory | Electronics Textbook
    ### Summary of Classical Theory of Capacitance, Band Bending, and Electric Fields in P-N Junctions
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Semiconductor P-N Junction Space Charge Region Capacitance
    Dec 4, 1992 · The classical capacitance voltage characteristics based on the depletion approxima- tion, is adequate at reverse bias, but introduces errors ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] CMOS Scaling Trends and Beyond - Duke Computer Science
    ... parasitic capacitance (lower active power). This method for scaling MOSFET transistors is generally referred to as “classic” or “traditional” scaling and.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] ECE 340 Lecture 27 : Junction Capacitance
    Oct 29, 2012 · Width of depletion region is increased for reverse bias and increased for forward bias. • Uncompensated charge varies with depletion region ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] EEC 118 Lecture #2: MOSFET Structure and Basic Operation
    – Operates as MOS capacitor (Cg = gate to channel). – Transistor in cutoff ... Oxide Capacitances: Channel. C g,total. (no overlap, x d. = 0). Page 35 ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Lecture 13: Interconnects in CMOS Technology
    A wire has high capacitance to its neighbor. – When the neighbor switches from 1-> 0 or 0->1, the wire tends to switch too. – ...
  21. [21]
    Analysis of Capacitive Coupling and Crosstalk in the PCB of Switch ...
    This paper discusses models and methods for evaluating the parasitic coupling capacitance between the traces of a switch-mode power supply.Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  22. [22]
    Modeling for printed-circuit board simulation - IEEE Spectrum
    For accurate simulation at high frequencies (300-MHz to 10-GHz range), traces must be modeled as transmission lines that have capacitance, inductance, and ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] AN-1205 Electrical Performance of Packages - TI.com
    To obtain package parasitics with wirebonds, add the inductances and resistances for the appropriate wire lengths to the package parasitics provided in the ...
  24. [24]
    PCB Routing Guidelines for DDR4 Memory Devices and Impedance
    Jun 20, 2018 · Follow these DDR4 routing and PCB layout guidelines to ensure signal integrity and correct timing for high speed DDR buses.
  25. [25]
    Parasitic capacitance of PCB circuit board vias - iPCB
    Nov 1, 2021 · The via itself has a parasitic capacitance to the ground. If it is known that the diameter of the isolation hole on the ground layer of the ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Printed Circuit Board Inspection and Quality Control – PCB Failure ...
    • Exposure to humidity impacts PCB materials' dielectric properties. – Dk and Df increase linearly with an increase in the moisture content of the PCB materials ...
  27. [27]
    An In-Package EMC-Based Relative Humidity Sensor - IEEE Xplore
    As the ambient humidity level changes, the hygroscopic material absorbs or releases moisture, which changes the dielectric constant of the sensing element. This ...
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Interconnect coupling noise in CMOS VLSI circuits | Request PDF
    This approximation is not valid for on-chip interconnects where the ratio of coupling capacitance to ground capacitance ... crosstalk noise (see Fig. 2.5) ...
  30. [30]
    Quantifying Charge Sharing Loss in Switched Capacitor Inverters for ...
    Nov 11, 2024 · Charge sharing loss occurs in SPSC inverters when terminated with a capacitive load, and is derived for both steady-state and transient ...
  31. [31]
    A CMOS Miller hold capacitance sample-and-hold circuit to reduce ...
    This paper introduces a Miller capacitance technique in a sample-and-hold circuit to reduce charge sharing and clock feedthrough, achieving a ten times ...
  32. [32]
    Design and verification of clock distribution in VLSI - IEEE Xplore
    The effects of parasitic capacitances and multiple dielectric materials on interconnect RC delays are addressed in [10]. These only serve to increase the ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Miller effect
    Nov 20, 2013 · In electronics, the Miller effect accounts for the increase in the equivalent input capacitance of an inverting voltage amplifier due to ...Missing: parasitic | Show results with:parasitic
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Dependence of the input impedence of a three-electrode vacuum ...
    THREE-ELECTRODE VACUUM TUBE UPON THE. LOAD IN THE PLATE CIRCUIT. By John M. Miller. CONTENTS. Page. I. Introduction. 367. II. General theory of the dependence ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] MOSFET Caps and Miller's Theorem - University of Toronto
    A common example is Cgd in a transistor amplifier. − Miller's theorem can be used to replace Cgd with 2 grounded capacitors ... one at the gate and one at the ...Missing: C_in = A_v)<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] ECE 255, Miller Effect, Etc. - Purdue Engineering
    Apr 26, 2018 · Cin = Cgs + Ceq = Cgs + Cgd(1 + gmR0. L). (2.8) and. R0 sig ... 4This formula is given without derivation in the textbook in equation (10.21).Missing: C_in = A_v)
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Frequency Response of Amplifiers (I) - MIT
    This is called Miller Effect. When a capacitor is located across nodes where there is a voltage gain, its effect on bandwidth is amplified by the voltage gain ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Closed-Form Equations for Through-Silicon Via (TSV) Parasitics in 3 ...
    Compact closed-form equations for calculating resistive, inductive and capacitive parasitic parameters of TSV bundles in 3-D ICs were proposed in this paper.
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    Mitigating multiple frequency-dependent errors in superconducting ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · Quantum crosstalk errors. Quantum crosstalk is caused by unwanted parasitic capacitive coupling between two qubits. Parasitic capacitance ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    Application of junction capacitance measurements to the ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... junction capacitance Cj and parasitic capacitance Cs. The accuracy of the analytical model is then verified using PSPICE simulations, which ...
  43. [43]
    Extraction method for parasitic capacitances and inductances of ...
    A new method to extract parasitic capacitances and inductances for high electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs) is proposed in this paper.
  44. [44]
    Measuring Capacitor Parameters Using Vector Network Analyzers
    Aug 10, 2025 · This paper addresses measurement of capacitor parameters using VNA in broad frequency range. The main attention is focused on the measurement accuracy of ...
  45. [45]
    A Simple Characterization Method for Parasitic Capacitance ...
    Aug 8, 2024 · The extraction accuracy of the parasitic capacitance characterized by the proposed method is as high as 0.92% compared to the datasheet, which ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Capacitance Measurements of Double-Sided Silicon Microstrip ...
    Less than 1 fF/overlap [7] is expected for the ... calculated capacitance assuming parasitic capacitances are in parallel with the device under test).
  47. [47]
    2024 irds executive packaging tutorial—part 1
    Capacitance—The parasitic capacitance associated with the wiring and ... Wire Bonding or Flip-Chip: Depending on the packaging type, wire bonding.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Switched Substrate-Shield Based Low Loss CMOS Inductors for ...
    Abstract—A switched substrate-shield inductor (SSI) topology in bulk CMOS is proposed which minimizes parasitic capacitance.<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Highly reliable carbon doped oxide SiOC:H films with low dielectric ...
    Dielectric constant of as-deposited film is 2.2, which is as low as porous silica films. CF4/O2 plasma was used to etch SiOC:H films. Dielectric constant of ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    65-nm CMOS Dual-Gate Device for Ka-Band Broadband Low-Noise ...
    May 6, 2013 · By using the proposed dual-gate device, the parasitic capacitance and the effective substrate resistance can be reduced. ... cascode configuration ...
  52. [52]
    A 54 dBOmega + 42 dB 10 Gb/s SiGe transimpedance-limiting ...
    The shunt-feedback common-emitter input stage uses a bootstrap technique to neutralize the photodiode parasitic capacitance.
  53. [53]
    Substrate coupling in mixed signal integrated circuits - IEEE Xplore
    The results show that spacing can reduce coupling between the aggressor and ... Also, guard ring can be more efficient than spacing in minimizing coupling.
  54. [54]
    Substrate noise-coupling characterization and efficient suppression ...
    Many methods have been reported regarding the reduction of noise coupling in sil- icon substrate, including the use of diffused guard rings (GRs) [6], SOI.