Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mating system

A mating system in refers to the patterns of acquisition, association, and reproductive strategies within a of sexually reproducing , encompassing the number, duration, and exclusivity of mating partnerships between individuals. These systems are fundamentally shaped by evolutionary processes, including and parental investment asymmetries, and are influenced by ecological factors such as resource availability and predation risk. Mating systems vary across taxa, including plants (e.g., selfing versus ) and microorganisms (e.g., ). In animals, four primary mating systems are recognized: , where one male and one form a , often for cooperative offspring care; , in which a single male mates with multiple females; , where a mates with multiple males; and , involving multiple partners for both sexes without stable bonds. The evolution of mating systems is driven by the need to maximize , with variance in the number of mates between sexes playing a central role in . For instance, in polygynous systems, males often compete intensely for access to females, leading to and skewed among males, as observed in like and lions where dominant males sire most . In contrast, is rarer and typically occurs in environments where females benefit from multiple male partners for , such as in the , where males incubate eggs while females defend territories. Promiscuous systems, common in , promote but can increase risks of sexually transmitted diseases and . Even in apparently monogamous like albatrosses, genetic analyses reveal frequent extra-pair copulations, with over 50% of in some populations sired by non-pair males, highlighting the complexity of observed versus genetic mating patterns. Mating systems profoundly impact population genetics, social structures, and conservation efforts, as they determine gene flow, inbreeding levels, and vulnerability to environmental changes. Ecological pressures, including habitat structure and mate density, further modulate these systems; for example, in ungulates like moose, males form temporary tending bonds with estrous females in open habitats to guard against rivals, while monogamous pair territories predominate in resource-poor environments like those of dik-diks. Advances in molecular techniques, such as DNA microsatellite analysis, have revolutionized the study of mating systems by uncovering hidden paternity and facilitating evolutionary models of mate choice and conflict.

General concepts

Definition and overview

A mating system refers to the ensemble of behaviors, morphological structures, and physiological strategies that organisms employ to locate, attract, and form reproductive partnerships for , ultimately influencing the genetic composition of subsequent generations. This framework encompasses the patterns of association and the tactics use to maximize reproductive output within ecological constraints. The concept of mating systems originated in the field of , with laying its foundational ideas in his 1871 work The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, where he explored as a driver of and across taxa. The term was more formally defined and analyzed in and during the late 20th century, notably through Gordon H. Orians' 1969 paper on the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals, which linked them to environmental and fitness considerations, and Stephen T. Emlen and Lewis W. Oring's 1977 synthesis, which integrated ecological factors like resource distribution with dynamics. Central components of mating systems include , where individuals select partners based on traits signaling genetic quality or resource provision; intrasexual competition, involving rivalry for access to mates; and pair bonding, the temporary or prolonged associations that facilitate transfer and sometimes . Reproductive success within these systems is often quantified by lifetime reproductive success (LRS), defined as the total number of offspring an individual produces that survive to independence over its lifespan, serving as a key metric of evolutionary fitness. Unlike , which generates genetically identical clones and limits variation to mutations alone, mating systems in promote , thereby enhancing offspring diversity and enabling adaptation to changing environments while masking deleterious recessive mutations through heterozygosity. For instance, simultaneous hermaphroditism in certain allows individuals to function as both during , facilitating reciprocal exchange and increasing reproductive flexibility without separate sexes.

Classification of mating systems

Mating systems in animals are broadly classified based on the patterns of pairing, exclusivity, and multiplicity of mates, encompassing social behaviors observed directly and genetic outcomes verified through parentage. The primary categories include , (subdivided into , , and ), and , with additional alternative strategies that deviate from dominant patterns. These classifications stem from ecological and behavioral frameworks that emphasize mate access and defense. Monogamy refers to a system where one associates with one , often forming long-term bonds that may involve cooperative behaviors such as maintenance or biparental care. Social monogamy describes the observable behavioral pairing, while genetic monogamy confirms that all within the pair are sired by the social male, with no extra-pair paternity. In many species, social monogamy does not always align with genetic monogamy due to covert copulations. Polygamy involves individuals mating with multiple partners, typically structured by sex-specific resource control or parental roles. , the most prevalent polygamous system among vertebrates, occurs when one male mates with multiple females, often by defending resources like territories or food sources that attract females. inverts this dynamic, with one female mating with multiple males, commonly in contexts where males invest heavily in offspring care, allowing the female to distribute matings. features both sexes engaging in multiple partnerships simultaneously, leading to complex paternity within broods. Promiscuity characterizes systems without exclusive pair bonds, where both sexes mate multiply with various partners, often facilitated by aggregation sites lacking material benefits to females. A representative example is lekking in birds, where males cluster to perform displays, enabling polygynous outcomes as females visit to select mates based on visual or acoustic signals. Alternative mating strategies, such as those employed by sneaker males, allow subordinate individuals to gain fertilizations by exploiting dominant pairings, often through female mimicry or opportunistic intrusions during spawning. These tactics are prevalent in species with intense male-male competition, providing a conditional alternative to territorial defense. Hybrid forms of mating systems include sequential versus simultaneous polygamy, where sequential systems involve changing partners across breeding seasons (e.g., serial ), while simultaneous ones feature concurrent multiple mates. Systems may also be facultative, varying with environmental conditions or individual status, or , rigidly determined by genetic, morphological, or ecological constraints. Distinguishing social from genetic mating systems relies on genetic paternity analysis, such as DNA fingerprinting or microsatellite genotyping, which identifies actual sires of offspring and uncovers discrepancies like extra-pair fertilizations in apparently monogamous pairs. This molecular approach has revealed that genetic polygamy often underlies social in approximately 75% of studied socially monogamous bird species.

Evolutionary and genetic aspects

Selective pressures

Selective pressures on mating systems arise primarily from and , which together shape the evolution of reproductive strategies across . operates through two main mechanisms: intrasexual competition, where individuals of the same vie for access to , often leading to traits like or weaponry in males; and intersexual choice, where one selects based on desirable traits, favoring signals of genetic quality or resources. These processes intensify when varies more among one , typically males, due to differences in production and investment. , in contrast, imposes survival costs on behaviors, such as expenditure or increased vulnerability during mate searching, balancing the benefits of against risks to . Bateman's principle, derived from experiments on fruit flies, posits that variance in is generally greater in males than in females because males can potentially fertilize multiple females while female fertility is more limited by resources for egg production. This disparity drives the evolution of polygynous systems, where males seek multiple mates to maximize fitness. The variance in mating success depends on factors such as the and levels of , with male-biased operational ratios amplifying competition. Supporting this, parental investment theory explains how asymmetries in gamete costs—small, cheap versus large, costly eggs—lead to the with higher (usually females) being more selective in , while the less-investing competes more intensely. This framework, formalized by Trivers, predicts that initial parental effort creates sex-role differences that reinforce choosiness and . Environmental factors further modulate these pressures by influencing resource availability and sex ratios. For instance, clumped resource distributions favor by allowing dominant individuals to monopolize multiple mates in resource-rich patches, as seen in models of habitat structure. The (OSR), defined as the number of available fertilizable s per male (or vice versa), critically affects competition intensity; a male-biased OSR heightens male-male , while female-biased OSR may promote female choice or . Mating strategies also involve trade-offs between benefits like securing high-quality genes and costs such as predation risk during mate searching, where conspicuous displays or prolonged pursuits elevate mortality for the searching sex, often males. These costs constrain the of elaborate traits, ensuring that mating systems align with ecological constraints for net gains.

Genetic consequences

Mating systems profoundly influence the genetic architecture of populations through their effects on and outbreeding. , which occurs when closely related individuals mate, increases homozygosity at loci harboring deleterious recessive alleles, leading to —a reduction in due to the expression of these harmful traits. The magnitude of this depression increases with the F, the probability that two alleles at a locus are identical by descent, as higher F amplifies the expression of deleterious recessive alleles, with B representing the underlying from such alleles across loci. This relationship highlights how higher inbreeding coefficients amplify the impact of genetic load, resulting in lower survival, fertility, and overall viability in . In contrast, outbreeding—mating between unrelated individuals—promotes heterozygosity and can yield outbreeding enhancement, where exhibit superior through or hybrid vigor, often due to masking of deleterious recessives and novel gene combinations that improve traits like growth rate and disease resistance. Different mating systems variably affect within populations. Promiscuous systems, characterized by multiple partners, elevate heterozygosity by introducing diverse alleles into genomes, thereby enhancing genetic variability and reducing the fixation of deleterious mutations. For instance, in species with high levels of multiple paternity, such as certain mammals, this increased diversity buffers against environmental stochasticity and bolsters adaptive potential. Conversely, monogamous systems, where individuals pair exclusively, tend to lower overall heterozygosity by limiting and , though they stabilize pedigrees by maintaining consistent relatedness structures across generations, which can facilitate and reduce variance in . Multiple mating also shapes the of sexually transmitted by altering transmission dynamics and selective pressures on . In promiscuous systems, frequent partner changes facilitate rapid STI spread, accelerating pathogen toward higher as the reproductive rate of the parasite increases relative to host , per models invoking the of antagonistic coevolution. This arms-race dynamic pressures hosts to evolve defenses, but the heightened transmission in multi-partner contexts can exacerbate , as seen in theoretical and empirical studies of parasite-host interactions where mating multiplicity intensifies selective conflicts. Polygynous mating systems, where one male mates with multiple females, carry implications for by altering local relatedness patterns. In such systems, females often form kin groups with elevated average relatedness—sometimes twice that of random pairings—due to shared male ancestry and limited male dispersal, which can lower the costs of and promote cooperative behaviors among female relatives. Empirical quantification of mating system genetic consequences relies on molecular tools like markers, which detect parentage mismatches to estimate extra-pair paternity (EPP) rates. EPP is calculated as \text{EPP} = \left( \frac{\text{number of non-parental [offspring](/page/Offspring)}}{\text{total number of [offspring](/page/Offspring)}} \right) \times 100, revealing the prevalence of in ostensibly monogamous pairs and its contributions to ; for example, analyses across avian species have documented EPP in up to 75% of sampled populations, informing models of heterozygosity and .

In plants

Breeding systems

In plants, breeding systems primarily revolve around the balance between self-fertilization (selfing) and cross-fertilization (), which determine and . Selfing occurs when from the same plant fertilizes its ovules, leading to homozygous offspring, while outcrossing involves transfer between genetically distinct individuals, promoting heterozygosity. These systems are shaped by floral and genetic controls, with —where male and female reproductive organs are on separate plants—enforcing outcrossing by eliminating self-fertilization entirely. , featuring separate male and female flowers on the same plant, allows potential selfing but often favors outcrossing through temporal or spatial separation of flower sexes. In contrast, hermaphroditic plants, which have both male and female organs in the same flower, can self-fertilize unless mechanisms like prevent it. Self-incompatibility (SI) is a key genetic barrier to selfing in many hermaphroditic species, rejecting self- or from close relatives to enforce . There are two primary SI types: gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI), where growth is inhibited in the if the S-haplotype matches one in the pistil, determined by the haploid ; and sporophytic self-incompatibility (SSI), where recognition occurs on the pistil surface via proteins encoded by the diploid , often leading to before tube emergence. GSI is more common in families like , while SSI predominates in , with both systems relying on multiallelic S-loci for specificity. These mechanisms evolved multiple times independently, enhancing genetic variability by avoiding . The evolution of plant breeding systems often involves transitions between selfing and , with mixed mating systems—combining both strategies—common in many species to balance reproductive assurance and . Selfing evolves from ancestors via loss of or shifts in floral traits, but inbreeding depression typically limits its fixation, favoring intermediate rates in variable environments. Baker's law posits that selfing is favored in colonizing species, as self-compatible individuals can establish populations from single propagules without mates, a pattern observed in island floras and invasive . For instance, annual like exhibit high selfing rates, often exceeding 99%, providing assured reproduction in sparse habitats despite reduced . Outcrossing rates in plant populations are quantified using genetic markers to estimate the proportion of from cross-pollination, typically t = (observed heterozygosity − expected under complete selfing) / (expected under random ), derived from progeny arrays or population fixation indices. This metric, often ranging from 0 (complete selfing) to 1 (complete ), reveals fine-scale variation; for example, A. thaliana populations show t values around 0.01–0.03, underscoring its predominantly selfing nature. Such estimates highlight how breeding systems adapt to ecological pressures, with selfing conferring advantages in reproduction certainty at the cost of evolutionary potential.

Pollination and mating strategies

Pollination in encompasses a range of syndromes that describe convergent floral traits adapted to specific vectors for transfer, broadly categorized into abiotic and mechanisms. Abiotic relies on physical agents without animal intermediaries; anemophily, or wind , is common in grasses and , featuring lightweight , feathery stigmas, and inconspicuous flowers lacking scents or colors to attract pollinators. Hydrophily, water-mediated , occurs in species like eelgrasses (), where floats or is transported submerged to reach ovules. In contrast, involves animals and dominates in angiosperms, with (insect ) exemplified by orchids (Orchidaceae), which display vibrant colors, scents, and specialized structures like landing platforms to entice bees or moths. (bird ) and chiropterophily ( ) feature tubular flowers with copious , as seen in fuchsias for hummingbirds or agaves for s, respectively. Plant mating strategies often incorporate temporal and spatial mechanisms to promote while minimizing . Dichogamy, the maturation of male and female reproductive organs at different times within a flower, includes protandry—where anthers shed before the becomes receptive—and protogyny, where the is receptive first. These adaptations reduce , or within-plant , by staggering sexual phases. Herkogamy provides spatial barriers, such as elongated styles or anther- separation, preventing from contacting the flower's own , as documented in experimental manipulations of marker genes in various hermaphroditic species. Together, these strategies enhance cross-pollination efficiency, particularly in self-incompatible plants. To attract biotic pollinators, plants employ rewards or . Legitimate rewards include , a sugary solution produced in floral nectaries, and excess offered as food, as in sunflowers (), which provide both to draw diverse . Deceptive strategies, prevalent in over 10,000 species, involve without rewards; food deception mimics nectar-rich flowers, while sexual deception uses floral scents and shapes resembling female to lure males, as in bee orchids (Ophrys), where pollinators attempt , transferring pollinia in the process. This promotes by ensuring pollinators visit multiple plants without learning to avoid the . Geitonogamy, the transfer of between flowers on the same plant, poses risks of partial despite intent, leading to reduced seed set and fitness via . In clonal or multi-flowered like paniculata, increases selfing rates, exacerbating deleterious effects comparable to . Mechanisms like dichogamy and herkogamy mitigate these risks by limiting self- deposition, though dense inflorescences can still facilitate it. Global warming has induced phenological shifts in pollination systems, often creating mismatches between flowering times and pollinator activity. Studies from the 2020s reveal that plants advance flowering earlier than pollinators in northern latitudes, intensifying secondary extinction risks for specialist-dependent species; for instance, a 2025 analysis across boreal ecosystems found increased asynchrony, with plants blooming up to 10 days ahead of insect emergences. A global synthesis of data up to 2023 confirms that warming drives uneven responses, with biotic-pollinated plants facing greater disruptions than abiotic ones. These shifts underscore the vulnerability of biotic syndromes to climate change.

In animals

Social mating systems

Social mating systems in animals encompass the behavioral strategies and social structures that facilitate mate acquisition and pairing, ranging from long-term pair bonds to competitive aggregations. These systems are shaped by ecological pressures, such as resource distribution and , influencing how individuals interact during breeding seasons. In many species, social structures determine access to mates, with males often competing through displays, territorial defense, or opportunistic tactics to maximize reproductive opportunities. Observations of these behaviors reveal patterns where social pairings do not always align with genetic outcomes, highlighting the complexity of dynamics. Social monogamy involves the formation of stable s between one male and one female, typically for a breeding season or longer, where partners share territories and defend against intruders. Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) exemplify this system, as mated pairs cohabitate, engage in mutual grooming, and jointly rear , with pair bond formation linked to oxytocin release during . Despite these social bonds, extra-pair copulations () occur frequently, leading to multiple paternity in litters; genetic analyses show that up to 25-30% of in wild populations result from EPC, indicating that social monogamy does not equate to genetic . This discrepancy arises as females may seek additional mates for genetic benefits while maintaining pair bonds for . Polygamous behaviors, particularly , feature one male mating with multiple females, often through the establishment of harems or defense of key resources. In northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), dominant males, known as beachmasters, form harems of up to 100 females on breeding beaches, aggressively repelling rivals through prolonged fights that can last hours and cause severe injuries. is highly skewed, with fewer than 30% of males achieving any matings and a small number accounting for over 70% of copulations across seasons. Resource defense polygyny occurs when males guard territories containing food, shelter, or nesting sites attractive to females; for instance, in guanacos (Lama guanicoe), males defend territories containing water sources in arid environments, attracting multiple females and limiting access by competitors. Promiscuous mating systems lack stable pairs, with individuals multiply without long-term bonds, often involving explosive breeding aggregations. Lekking is a classic example, where males gather in communal display areas, or leks, to perform rituals without providing resources, leaving to females. (Centrocercus urophasianus) males strut on leks at dawn, inflating yellow air sacs and vibrating tail feathers in elaborate displays to attract females, who visit briefly to copulate with preferred males before departing to nest alone. Success varies, with central lek positions correlating to higher rates due to visibility. Scramble competition involves males racing to locate and intercept receptive females in dispersed habitats, as seen in thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus), where males roam widely during estrus peaks, engaging in chases and brief consortships to secure fertilizations amid high . Social polyandry, though rarer, involves females forming bonds with multiple males, often where males provide most . In like the (Jacana spinosa), females defend large territories and mate with several males who each incubate eggs and care for young in separate nests, allowing the female to focus on additional matings and territory maintenance. This system is adaptive in resource-rich but high-predation environments, enhancing female reproductive output. Alternative mating tactics allow males within a to employ different strategies based on size, age, or condition, often pitting "bourgeois" (territorial) approaches against "parasitic" (sneaking) ones. Bourgeois males invest in nest-building or territorial defense to attract and guard females, while parasitic males, typically smaller or younger, exploit these efforts by sneaking copulations. In sunfish ( macrochirus), parental (bourgeois) males construct and fan nests, providing care, whereas satellite males mimic female appearance to infiltrate nests and parasitize spawnings, achieving up to 20-30% of fertilizations in some colonies. These tactics coexist conditionally, with parasitic success depending on bourgeois density and female tolerance. To study these social interactions, ethologists employ observational methods like focal animal sampling, where a single individual's behaviors, such as consortships (temporary male-female associations for ), are recorded continuously over set periods to quantify mating frequencies and durations. Developed by Altmann, this technique minimizes bias by focusing on predefined events, enabling precise measurement of pair bonds or competitive encounters in wild populations.

and mating

Parental care in animals encompasses a range of post-mating behaviors that enhance offspring survival, often shaped by the underlying mating system and influencing its evolutionary stability. In most mammals, uniparental care is provided primarily by females due to the demands of and , representing the ancestral state in this group. Biparental care, involving contributions from both parents such as , feeding, and protection, predominates in over 90% of bird , where males participate in all behaviors except egg-laying. , though rarer, occurs in like , where males carry developing embryos in a brood pouch, and in a small subset of mammals (3-5% of ) that exhibit social . Mating systems and parental care exhibit clear trade-offs, as investment in offspring care competes with opportunities for additional matings. High levels of paternal care strongly correlate with monogamous mating systems, where males benefit from exclusive access to a mate and shared investment in offspring, reducing the risks of cuckoldry. In contrast, polygynous systems, common in many mammals and some birds, are associated with minimal or absent paternal care, allowing males to maximize mating success across multiple females at the expense of direct offspring investment. These trade-offs are modulated by offspring development: altricial young, born helpless and requiring intensive feeding and brooding (e.g., in songbirds and most mammals), demand greater biparental effort compared to precocial offspring, which are mobile and self-feeding shortly after birth (e.g., in ducks and ungulates) and thus need less prolonged care. Certain mating systems introduce risks to offspring survival that further link care patterns to . In polygynous multi-male groups, such as prides, incoming males often commit to eliminate unrelated cubs, accelerating female estrus and allowing the killers to sire their own offspring; this behavior underscores the selective pressure for females to seek protective coalitions or mating alliances. Hormonally, plays a key role in facilitating and , particularly in socially monogamous like prairie voles, where central administration of vasopressin promotes partner preference and pup retrieval, while antagonists disrupt these behaviors. Environmental factors can modulate these dynamics, as seen in shorebirds where seasonal emerges in response to varying care demands; females may with multiple males across seasons, leaving males to provide sole and brood care in resource-scarce or high-predation environments, thereby optimizing survival under fluctuating conditions.

In humans

mating systems are characterized by a complex interplay of biological predispositions and cultural norms, with emerging as the predominant pattern in contemporary societies. involves individuals forming successive pair bonds over time, often formalized through , rather than lifelong or concurrent multiple partnerships. This system allows for and , reflecting adaptability to changing social and economic conditions. In contrast to strict lifelong , accounts for the majority of relationships in industrialized nations, where individuals typically enter multiple committed partnerships across their lifespan. Historically, anthropological data indicate that —where males have multiple female partners—was prevalent in approximately 85% of human societies documented in ethnographies. George P. Murdock's Ethnographic Atlas, which surveyed 1,231 societies, classified 186 as monogamous, 453 with occasional , and 588 with more frequent , highlighting polygyny's dominance in pre-modern contexts, particularly among and pastoralist groups where resource accumulation enabled multiple unions. The transition toward monogamous norms intensified after the advent of around 10,000 BCE, as settled farming societies developed systems and property rights that favored stable pair bonds to ensure paternal investment and lineage continuity, reducing the feasibility of widespread in many regions. Cultural influences further shaped these systems, with norms such as payments in South Asian societies or bridewealth in African contexts reinforcing pair bonding while occasionally permitting polygynous arrangements among elites. Biologically, females' —lacking visible fertility cues unlike many —promotes extended pair bonding by encouraging continuous sexual receptivity and , thereby reducing male uncertainty about paternity and fostering long-term investment in . This evolutionary adaptation likely facilitated the shift from promiscuous multimale mating in ancestral hominids to social , as it incentivized males to remain with a single partner to guard against cuckoldry. Hormonally, oxytocin plays a key role in establishing and maintaining these bonds; released during and , it enhances , , and attachment between partners, supporting the emotional foundations of pair bonds observed in relationships. In modern Western countries, serial monogamy is underscored by high divorce rates, with approximately 40-50% of marriages ending in dissolution, as seen in the United States where the crude divorce rate was approximately 2.4 per 1,000 population as of 2022-2024, often followed by . This pattern reflects greater individual , economic for women, and shifting societal values toward personal fulfillment over enduring unions. Concurrently, —consensual involving multiple romantic partners—has gained visibility in the , with surveys indicating that about 1 in 9 U.S. adults have engaged in such arrangements and 1 in 6 express interest, driven by digital communities and evolving attitudes toward intimacy. Health implications of varied mating strategies include elevated risks of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in contexts of multiple partners; for instance, shows that behaviors like concurrent sexual partnerships significantly increase transmission rates, with male-to-male contact accounting for approximately 86% of new infections among males in the U.S. in 2022.

In microorganisms

In bacteria

In bacteria, mating systems are analogous to (HGT) mechanisms, which enable the exchange of genetic material between cells without , facilitating and . Unlike eukaryotic , bacterial HGT occurs through three primary pathways: conjugation, , and . These processes allow bacteria to acquire new genes, such as those conferring antibiotic resistance, from donor cells or the environment, promoting in prokaryotic populations. Conjugation involves direct cell-to-cell contact mediated by conjugative plasmids, such as the F-plasmid in Escherichia coli, where a donor cell (F+) transfers a single-stranded DNA copy of the plasmid to a recipient cell (F-) via a specialized structure called the sex pilus. The sex pilus, a flexible filament composed of pilin proteins, establishes a stable mating bridge that facilitates DNA transfer, with the process requiring specific tra genes on the plasmid for pilus assembly, DNA processing, and export. This mechanism is highly efficient under favorable conditions, with conjugation frequency typically around 10^{-5} transconjugants per donor cell per generation in E. coli. Transformation entails the uptake of free extracellular DNA from the environment by competent recipient cells, a process regulated by competence genes that enable DNA binding, transport, and integration into the genome via homologous recombination. Common in species like Streptococcus pneumoniae and Bacillus subtilis, transformation allows bacteria to scavenge genetic material from lysed cells, though success depends on environmental factors like nutrient availability and DNA concentration. Transduction, meanwhile, is phage-mediated, where bacteriophages accidentally package host DNA during infection and deliver it to a new host upon subsequent infection; generalized transduction transfers random bacterial DNA fragments, while specialized transduction involves specific genes adjacent to prophage integration sites. Both transformation and transduction contribute to HGT but occur at lower frequencies than conjugation in many natural settings. Bacteria lack defined like those in eukaryotes, but compatibility in HGT, particularly conjugation, is influenced by restriction-modification () systems, which act as innate immune barriers to foreign . systems consist of restriction endonucleases that cleave unmethylated incoming and methyltransferases that protect the host by ; mismatched patterns between donor and recipient reduce transfer efficiency by degrading transferred plasmids, thereby limiting interstrain . For instance, type I and type II systems can decrease conjugation rates by orders of magnitude if the recipient lacks the donor's modification pattern. Evolutionarily, bacterial HGT plays a critical role in disseminating adaptive traits, most notably antibiotic resistance genes, which spread rapidly across populations via conjugative plasmids carrying integrons or transposons. This has accelerated the global rise of multidrug-resistant pathogens, with conjugation being the dominant mechanism in clinical and environmental settings. Recent 2020s studies using CRISPR-Cas systems have enhanced understanding of conjugation efficiency; for example, CRISPR-based delivery via conjugative plasmids has achieved over 99.9% targeting of resistance genes in E. coli gut models. More recent 2023–2025 studies have explored CRISPR-Cas9 interference to block conjugation in , achieving near-complete inhibition models.

In archaea and protists

In , sexual reproduction is absent, with no evidence of true or syngamy observed across the domain. Instead, exchange occurs primarily through mechanisms, such as conjugation mediated by integrated conjugative elements (ICEs) or s, which are relatively rare compared to bacterial systems. A prominent example is in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus islandicus, where the integrated conjugative pM164 facilitates high-frequency chromosomal transfer, achieving recombination rates of approximately 10^{-3} for near the integration site, driven by the essential traG in a unidirectional process akin to bacterial Hfr conjugation. This localized recombination enhances without canonical sexual cycles. Additionally, metagenomic analyses of ammonia-oxidizing , such as Candidatus Nitrosopumilus limneticus in European lakes, reveal rates comparable to mutation rates, with recombination-to-mutation ratios (r/m) around 0.86 in certain subclades, indicating a moderate role in diversification despite predominantly clonal propagation. Protists exhibit a diversity of mating systems reflecting their position as early eukaryotes, ranging from —where gametes are morphologically identical in size—to and oogamy, where gametes differ in size and motility, often linked to that prevent self-fertilization. In the green alga , a model , two (MT+ and MT-) ensure ; flagellated gametes of opposite types fuse via agglutinins, leading to formation without gamete size dimorphism. This system highlights the evolutionary transition toward and oogamy seen in related volvocine , where larger, non-motile eggs and smaller evolve to optimize in multicellular forms. Syngamy, the fusion of nuclei, followed by , is a key feature in many sexual cycles, particularly in . In Paramecium tetraurelia, conjugation involves two complementary pairing, triggering in the transcriptionally silent to produce haploid gametic nuclei; these are exchanged between partners, and reciprocal fusions (syngamy) restore diploidy, generating a new while the macronucleus is resorbed and regenerated. This process recombines alleles and rejuvenates the cell line, with relying on conserved eukaryotic machinery but adapted to the ciliate's nuclear dimorphism. Illustrative examples underscore these dynamics in pathogenic protists. In Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite, the alternates between haploid stages in humans—where clonal replication dominates—and a brief diploid phase in the ; microgametes () and macrogametes () undergo anisogamous fusion (syngamy) to form a diploid , followed by in the oocyst to yield haploid sporozoites, facilitating at rates up to 50% in natural transmissions. Such cycles contrast with the non-meiotic gene exchange in , emphasizing protists' eukaryotic heritage in mating.

In viruses

In viruses, genetic occurs through mechanisms analogous to , where co-infection of a by multiple genomes allows for the mixing of genetic material, generating without behavioral interactions. This process requires simultaneous by at least two distinct viral strains within the same , enabling the of genetic segments during replication. For DNA viruses, such as herpesviruses and adenoviruses, genetic mixing primarily happens via , where similar sequences from co-infecting genomes align and portions, producing chimeric progeny. This recombination is facilitated by or enzymes and can repair damaged genomes or create variants with altered . In contrast, segmented RNA viruses like employ reassortment, where entire genome segments are swapped between co-infecting strains, rapidly assembling novel combinations without breaking RNA strands. For instance, A viruses, with eight RNA segments, frequently reassort in or animal hosts, leading to progeny with mixed parental origins. Co-infection is a prerequisite for these events, as seen in human immunodeficiency virus (), where superinfection—an individual already infected with one HIV strain acquires a second—allows recombination between divergent subtypes within the same cell. This can generate recombinant forms that evade immune responses or acquire , highlighting how viral "mating" depends on host-level opportunities. Analogous to mate in cellular organisms, viral genetic is under selection for functional compatibility; for example, reassortant viruses succeed only if segments like and genes interact effectively, often requiring matching signals or protein interfaces to ensure viable replication. Representative examples include severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (), where recombination events during the 2020–2022 period contributed to variant emergence; genomic analyses identified over 600 recombination breakpoints across sequenced isolates, with approximately 2.7% of genomes showing recombinant ancestry, potentially enhancing transmissibility in co-infected individuals; more recent studies as of report over 2,000 recombination events inferred from 16 million genomes. In , reassortment has driven major pandemics, such as the 1957 H2N2 and 1968 H3N2 outbreaks, where avian-human segment swaps created highly transmissible strains, and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic from triple reassortment in swine. Seasonally, reassortment occurs frequently in circulating influenza A viruses, with phylogenetic studies estimating 56% of natural isolates as reassortants, though effective transmission of novel combinations is limited by compatibility constraints. These processes accelerate , often outpacing mutation alone due to RNA viruses' high error rates, and underscore the role of genetic mixing in pandemic emergence.

References

  1. [1]
    Mating Systems – Molecular Ecology & Evolution: An Introduction
    Four main types of mating systems are generally recognized in animals: monogamy, polygyny, polyandry, and promiscuity.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Evolution of Mating Systems: Outcrossing versus Selfing
    Animal mating systems are characterized by different patterns of parental investment in offspring and variation in the extent to which sexual selection shapes ...
  3. [3]
    Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and ...
    Apr 15, 2020 · Ungulates exhibit diverse mating systems that range from monogamous pair territories to highly polygynous leks. We review mating systems and ...
  4. [4]
    Mating Systems in Sexual Animals | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
    A mating system describes how males and females pair when choosing a mate. Males and females differ greatly in the investment each makes to reproduce.Variance In Mating Success... · Types Of Mating Systems · Monogamy
  5. [5]
    https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2300
  6. [6]
    On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
    On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals. Gordon H. Orians ... Copyright 1969 University of Chicago. PDF download · Sign up for new issue alerts.
  7. [7]
    Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems
    ORIANS, G.H., ON EVOLUTION OF MATING SYSTEMS IN BIRDS AND MAMMALS, AMERICAN NATURALIST 103: 589 (1969). Web of Science · Google Scholar. ORING, L.W. ...
  8. [8]
    Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting ...
    1. Introduction - T. H. Clutton-Brock · 2. Lifetime Reproductive Success in Drosophila · 3. Sources of Variation in Lifetime Reproductive Success in a ...
  9. [9]
    https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/sexual-reproduction-and-the-evolution-of-sex-824/
  10. [10]
    Strategic ejaculation in simultaneously hermaphroditic land snails
    Dec 5, 2013 · The mating process of E. quaesita consists of courtship behavior and copulation. Two snails that are sexually aroused show courtship behavior, ...
  11. [11]
    Review Lecture: Mammalian mating systems - Journals
    Abstract. Male mammals show a diverse array of mating bonds, including obligate monogamy, unimale and group polygyny and promiscuity.
  12. [12]
    DNA fingerprinting in zoology: past, present, future
    Feb 3, 2014 · The technology has been used to determine the sex of individuals, as well as paternity/maternity and close kinship.
  13. [13]
    Animal Mating Systems - Klug - Major Reference Works
    Aug 15, 2011 · There are three classic polygamous mating systems: polygyny (a male mates with more than one female), polyandry (a female mates with more than ...
  14. [14]
    Mating systems in birds - ScienceDirect.com
    Oct 24, 2022 · Because social relationships (pair bonds) are brief or non-existent, lekking has also been considered a promiscuous system, not a polygynous one ...
  15. [15]
    (PDF) Parental Investment and Sexual Selection - ResearchGate
    PDF | On Jan 1, 1972, RL Trivers published Parental Investment and Sexual Selection | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate.
  16. [16]
    The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders - ScienceDirect
    These data demonstrate that mate choice is costly to females. Finally, mating females are at twice the risk of predation than are single females.
  17. [17]
    A systematic review of phenotypic responses to between-population ...
    Jun 26, 2013 · Our study demonstrates consistent effects of trait type on responses to intraspecific outbreeding, and indicates the potential for outbreeding depression in ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Is promiscuity the key? Multiple paternity in the garden dormouse ...
    Apr 10, 2024 · Many mammals have a promiscuous mating system with multiple sired litters. Promiscuity can increase the genetic variability, reduce the risk of inbreeding.
  19. [19]
    On some genetic consequences of social structure, mating systems ...
    Quantifying Inbreeding and Outbreeding in Social Systems. We found that the genotype proportions deviated from HW expectations (i.e., random mating) toward ...
  20. [20]
    Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
    Over 40 years ago, Van Valen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis, which emphasized the primacy of biotic conflict over abiotic forces in driving selection.
  21. [21]
    Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
    Dec 22, 2014 · Over 40 years ago, Van Valen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis, which emphasized the primacy of biotic conflict over abiotic forces in driving selection.
  22. [22]
    Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the ... - NIH
    Jun 9, 2015 · The average index of relatedness between polygynous females sharing a breeding territory was twice as high as in pairs consisting of randomly ...
  23. [23]
    Extra‐pair paternity in birds - PMC - NIH
    A comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for analysis of parentage and kinship in a cooperatively breeding bird. Molecular ...
  24. [24]
    Understanding plant reproductive diversity - PMC - PubMed Central
    The three major evolutionary transitions in plant reproductive systems discussed in this article—the evolution of selfing from outcrossing, dioecy from ...
  25. [25]
    The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility - NIH
    SI is a genetically controlled pollen-pistil recognition system that provides a barrier to fertilization by self and self-related pollen in hermaphrodite ( ...
  26. [26]
    Self-(In)compatibility Systems: Target Traits for Crop-Production ...
    Self-incompatibility (SI) mechanisms prevent self-fertilization in flowering plants based on specific discrimination between self- and non-self pollen.Abstract · Introduction · Applications to Crop... · Future Prospects<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Molecular insights into self-incompatibility systems: From evolution ...
    Feb 12, 2024 · Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci., 8 (2003), pp. 598-605. View PDF ...
  28. [28]
    Review Evolution of Plant Breeding Systems - ScienceDirect.com
    Sep 5, 2006 · The mode of pollination affects the selection on outcrossing versus selfing, and as explained above, many ecologically plausible situations can ...
  29. [29]
    The evolution of plant reproductive systems: how often are ...
    Aug 22, 2013 · The future search for examples of the evolution of outcrossing from selfing might profitably examine plant radiations on islands. (c) Evolution ...
  30. [30]
    The scope of Baker's law - New Phytologist Foundation - Wiley
    Jul 20, 2015 · Baker's law refers to the tendency for species that establish on islands by long-distance dispersal to show an increased capacity for self- ...
  31. [31]
    Heterozygosity levels and estimation of self‐fertilization in an ...
    Nov 20, 2020 · With this estimate of FIS, the proportion of self-fertilization in a mixed-mating system can then be estimated as S = 2FIS/(1 + FIS) (Jarne & ...
  32. [32]
    The predominantly selfing plant Arabidopsis thaliana experienced a ...
    Feb 7, 2012 · A. thaliana is a self-compatible, predominantly selfing plant with an outcrossing rate estimated at approximately 1 to 3% [24–26]. It has a ...
  33. [33]
    Pollination syndromes in the 21st century: where do we stand and ...
    Jul 7, 2020 · Pollination syndromes, recurring suites of floral traits appearing in connection with specific functional pollinator groups, have served for decades to ...Introduction · II. A critical review of the... · III. Merianieae as a case study...
  34. [34]
    Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing ... - NIH
    The results from experiments with marker genes and floral manipulations provide evidence for the function of herkogamy and dichogamy in reducing self- ...
  35. [35]
    Pollination by sexual deception - ScienceDirect.com
    Jun 5, 2023 · Sexually deceptive plants secure pollination via sexual mimicry, which offers the false promise of a mating opportunity to potential pollinators ...
  36. [36]
    Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids
    We suggest that floral deception is particularly beneficial, because of its promotion of outcrossing, when pollinators are abundant, but that when pollinators ...
  37. [37]
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTOGAMY AND GEITONOGAMY TO SELF ...
    Feb 1, 2000 · Selfing occurs mostly through geitonogamy and is associated with strong inbreeding depression, it seems disadvantageous.
  38. [38]
    Climate change intensifies plant-pollinator mismatch and increases ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · Climate change intensifies plant-pollinator mismatch and increases secondary extinction risk for plants in northern latitudes · Downloads.
  39. [39]
    Untangling the Complexity of Climate Change Effects on Plant ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · Climate change is shifting flowering and animal activity times across ecosystems, potentially increasing the risk of plant–pollinator mismatches ...3. Results · 3.2. Plant Responses To... · 4. Discussion
  40. [40]
    Parenting in Animals - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Animal parenting varies, including uniparental female care, shared care, and biparental care. Some animals show no care, while others have unique care systems.
  41. [41]
    Synchronised provisioning at the nest: parental coordination over ...
    Dec 19, 2013 · Parental care is common in birds, with bi-parental care occurring in more than 90% of species, and expected to evolve whenever the benefits of ...
  42. [42]
    Mating Systems - Ecology - Oxford Bibliographies
    Aug 30, 2016 · Paternal care can shift the advantage to a monogamous system. In addition, parental care can dramatically alter patterns of selection on the ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Paternal care and litter size coevolution in mammals - PMC
    Apr 27, 2016 · A key cost of parental care for males is a likely trade-off with investment in pursuing additional mating opportunities [6,9,10]. Hence male ...
  44. [44]
    Altricial-Precocial Spectrum & Social Complexity in Mammals/Birds
    Jan 18, 2017 · Altricial young, in contrast, are initially incapable of moving around on their own and require extensive parental care, like brooding or food ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Infanticide as Sexual Conflict: Coevolution of Male Strategies and ...
    One of the earliest recognized forms of sexual conflict was infanticide by males, which imposes serious costs on female reproductive success.
  46. [46]
    Voles and vasopressin: a review of molecular, cellular ... - PubMed
    Vasopressin (VP) is implicated in pair bonding and male parental care in voles. VP administration induces these behaviors, while its antagonist diminishes them.
  47. [47]
    A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous ...
    Oct 7, 1993 · We now demonstrate that central AVP is both necessary and sufficient for selective aggression and partner preference formation, two critical features of pair ...
  48. [48]
    The evolution of parental care in shorebirds: life histories, ecology ...
    Parental care is expected to evolve according to a trade-off between the benefits of increased survival of offspring and costs of.
  49. [49]
    Are We Monogamous? A Review of the Evolution of Pair-Bonding in ...
    Jul 16, 2019 · While a simple classification would be useful for cross-species comparisons, monogamous, polyandrous, and polygynous marriage systems exist ...
  50. [50]
    Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny - NIH
    Jul 18, 2018 · In general, agricultural populations show reduced rates of polygyny and increased rates of monogamy relative to other subsistence systems. See ...
  51. [51]
    Oxytocin and Social Relationships: From Attachment to Bond ...
    Oxytocin (OT) plays an important role in the development of the capacity to form social bonds, the mediation of the positive aspects of early-life nurturing.
  52. [52]
    Marriages and Divorces - Our World in Data
    How is the institution of marriage changing? What percentage of marriages end in divorce? Explore global data on marriages and divorces.In many countries, marriage... · Single parenting is common...
  53. [53]
    A scoping review of research on polyamory and consensual non ...
    Nov 27, 2023 · A recent national sample of single adults in the United States found that 1 in 9 people had engaged in polyamory, 1 in 6 people desired to ...
  54. [54]
    Horizontal Gene Transfer - PMC - NIH
    Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is the movement of genetic information between organisms, a process that includes the spread of antibiotic resistance genes ...Definition And Background · Figure 1 · Examples In Human Biology...
  55. [55]
    In vitro conjugation kinetics of AmpC, broad spectrum and extended ...
    May 25, 2020 · In this study, the highest conjugation frequency of 1.04 × 10− 5 transconjugants/donor occurred when E. coli 10,682 was co-incubated for 4 h ...
  56. [56]
    Mechanisms of Horizontal Gene Transfer in Bacteria - PMC - NIH
    Sep 6, 2018 · Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) plays an important role in bacterial evolution. It is well accepted that DNA is pulled/pushed into recipient ...
  57. [57]
    Regulation of genetic flux between bacteria by restriction ... - PNAS
    May 2, 2016 · Restriction–modification (R-M) systems are often regarded as bacteria's innate immune systems, protecting cells from infection by mobile genetic ...Missing: mating | Show results with:mating
  58. [58]
    Restriction-modification systems have shaped the evolution and ...
    Restriction-modification systems (R-M systems) are by far the most abundant bacterial defense system and therefore represent one of the key barriers to plasmid ...Missing: mating | Show results with:mating
  59. [59]
    Horizontal Gene Transfer Mediated Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance
    Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) allows bacteria to exchange their genetic materials (including antibiotic resistance genes, ARGs) among diverse species (Le Roux ...
  60. [60]
    High‐efficiency delivery of CRISPR‐Cas9 by engineered probiotics ...
    Oct 19, 2021 · A potent conjugative delivery vehicle for CRISPR‐cas9 that can eliminate > 99.9% of targeted antibiotic‐resistant Escherichia coli in the mouse gut microbiota ...Results · Dna Delivery System... · Highly Efficient Dna...
  61. [61]
    Recombination in viruses: Mechanisms, methods of study, and ...
    Recombination occurs when at least two viral genomes co-infect the same host cell and exchange genetic segments. Different types of viral recombination are ...
  62. [62]
    RECOMBINATION OF VIRUSES - PMC - PubMed Central
    Homologous recombination occurs between two DNA sequences that are the same or very similar in the region of crossovers. Homologous recombination probably ...
  63. [63]
    It's in the mix: Reassortment of segmented viral genomes - PMC
    Sep 13, 2018 · Segmentation of viral genomes allows exchange of intact genes between related viruses when they coinfect the same cell.
  64. [64]
    Immune-driven recombination and loss of control after HIV ... - NIH
    HIV superinfection may also enable recombination between two different strains (17), which could facilitate evasion of host immune responses. Recent data ...
  65. [65]
    Frequency and Implications of HIV Superinfection - PMC
    HIV superinfection (HIV-SI) occurs when an HIV-infected individual becomes re-infected with a new phylogenetically distinct viral HIV strain.
  66. [66]
    Triple reassortment increases compatibility among viral ...
    Oct 7, 2021 · Compatibility among the IAV ribonucleoprotein (RNP) genes affects viral replication efficiency and can limit the emergence of novel reassortants ...
  67. [67]
    Recombination in Coronaviruses, with a Focus on SARS-CoV-2 - NIH
    They identified 606 recombination events by investigating a 1.6M sample tree, showing that approximately 2.7% of sequenced SARS-CoV-2 genomes have recombinant ...
  68. [68]
    Influenza A virus reassortment is strain dependent - PMC - NIH
    In the case of human seasonal influenza, every season there is a large collection of co-circulating lineages [6–9] that can reassort [7–10], creating novel ...
  69. [69]
    Genetic reassortment in pandemic and interpandemic influenza ...
    The human influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968 were caused by reassortant viruses that possessed internal gene segments from avian and human strains.