Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Michael Apple

Michael W. Apple (born 1942) is an American educational theorist and John Bascom Professor Emeritus of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies at the . His scholarship focuses on the intersections of , power, and culture, particularly how ideologies influence design and school practices. Apple gained prominence through his analysis of how economic and cultural forces shape educational content, most notably in his 1979 book Ideology and Curriculum, which has been revised multiple times and examines the hidden reproduction of social inequalities via schooling. He has critiqued market-oriented reforms, standardized testing, and conservative policies for exacerbating disparities rather than resolving them, arguing that such approaches prioritize efficiency and accountability over equitable . Throughout his over five-decade career, Apple has combined research with , co-authoring works on global educational conflicts and contributing to discussions on teacher autonomy and in . His influence extends internationally, with recognition for advancing critical perspectives that challenge dominant paradigms in educational policy and practice, though these views have drawn debate over their emphasis on structural at the expense of individual or empirical outcomes of reforms.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Formative Influences

Michael W. Apple was born on August 20, 1942, in , into a working-class family whose Jewish grandparents had fled Tsarist-era . His parents, ardent participants in leftist politics, raised him in a "red diaper" environment that emphasized amid the city's , site of major early-20th-century labor strikes involving immigrant workers. This local context of and union organizing shaped his early awareness of class divisions and power dynamics. Apple's formative experiences extended to mandatory military service in the U.S. Army shortly after high school, during which he instructed troops in and . These roles, requiring clear communication of practical skills under structured authority, highlighted for him the potential of to empower individuals in hierarchical settings.

Academic Training

Apple received his degree in from Glassboro State College—now —in 1967. After briefly in public schools in , where he had earlier engaged in civil rights activities including literacy programs, Apple transitioned to graduate studies at . There, he earned a in and in 1968, followed by a in and in 1970. His doctoral research, supervised by Dwayne Huebner, emphasized aesthetic and ethical dimensions of , marking Apple's early engagement with interpretive and critical approaches to educational theory rather than purely technical ones. This period at introduced him to influences from phenomenology and emerging critical traditions, shaping his foundational interest in how functions as a site of ideological .

Professional Career

Teaching Positions and Administrative Roles

Prior to his academic career, Apple taught in elementary and secondary public schools in Paterson and Pitman, New Jersey, following his U.S. Army service in the mid-1960s. During this period, he served as vice president and then president of the local teachers' union. Apple began his university-level teaching in 1969 as an instructor and in the Department of Curriculum and Teaching at , while also serving as a in the Department of and Social Sciences there. In 1970, he joined the University of Wisconsin-Madison as an assistant professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. At Wisconsin-Madison, Apple advanced through the ranks: associate professor from 1973 to 1976, full professor in the Departments of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies from 1976 to 1991, and John Bascom Professor in those departments from 1991 onward. He holds emeritus status in these roles as of 2024, while maintaining active scholarly engagements. Apple has received honorary affiliations internationally, including an honorary doctorate from in 2022 for his contributions to .

Mentorship and Institutional Impact

Apple served as the John Bascom Professor of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison from 1991 until assuming status, a position that positioned him to shape departmental directions in critical approaches to . His long-term faculty role in these departments, recognized with awards such as the 2006 Distinguished Academic Achievement Award from the , contributed to the institutional emphasis on analyzing , power, and cultural politics in and policy studies. The Curriculum and Instruction Department, under such influences, has been described as top-ranked for graduate training in these areas. In his supervisory capacity, Apple mentored graduate students, including direct supervision of doctoral candidates in the and Instruction Department, fostering their development as scholars focused on and . Accounts from former supervisees highlight his role in guiding research that applies to practical educational contexts, emphasizing democratic practices in teaching and learning. This mentorship extended the department's capacity to produce researchers engaged with power dynamics in schooling, though specific numbers of dissertations advised remain undocumented in . Apple extended his institutional influence internationally through advisory and visiting roles, including as World Scholar and at since 2011 and Hallsworth Visiting at the from June 2012. He participated in global debates via lectures, such as his 2017 address questioning the democratic nature of reforms and multiple 2023 presentations on defending across continents. These engagements informed policy discussions in diverse contexts, from to , without formal advisory titles but through scholarly exchange on neoliberal influences in curricula.

Intellectual Contributions

Core Theories on Ideology and Curriculum


In his seminal work Ideology and Curriculum, first published in 1979, W. Apple advanced the thesis that educational curricula serve as instruments for perpetuating class inequalities by selectively validating knowledge aligned with the of dominant social groups. Apple contended that schools function as distributors of "legitimate knowledge," a process that confers cultural authority upon the perspectives and forms associated with economically and politically powerful strata, thereby marginalizing alternative knowledges from subordinate classes. This selection is not neutral but ideologically driven, embedding power dynamics into the very structure of what is taught and valued in .
Apple highlighted the role of the in reinforcing these ideologies through non-explicit means, such as daily pedagogical practices, evaluative norms, and classroom interactions that normalize hierarchical relations and commonsense assumptions about learning. These elements preserve existing structural inequalities by aligning school life with broader societal power distributions, often without overt intent, as routines inculcate values of and akin to those required in capitalist . In U.S. public schooling, for instance, the emphasis on standardized, abstract content in curricula privileges decontextualized skills that mirror middle-class cultural norms, sidelining from working-class communities and thus sustaining economic hierarchies. Building on the correspondence principle—which posits structural parallels between school organization and capitalist workplaces—Apple argued that curricula embody a logic of technical control, preparing students for fragmented labor roles through regimented knowledge dissemination and behavioral conditioning. He extended this analysis via Gramscian concepts of hegemony, viewing the curriculum as a site where dominant ideologies achieve consent rather than mere coercion, dialectically linking cultural selection to economic imperatives in maintaining class reproduction. Power and culture, in Apple's framework, are interwoven with economic relations, enabling schools to control not only behaviors but the very meanings deemed essential to societal functioning.

Views on Democracy, Power, and Cultural Politics in Education

Apple has long advocated for within educational institutions as a counter to the authoritarian hierarchies that dominate traditional schooling. Drawing on John Dewey's emphasis on and collaborative inquiry, Apple integrates a neo-Marxist framework to highlight how such hierarchies serve to perpetuate class domination and ideological conformity rather than genuine civic empowerment. In this view, involves students, teachers, and communities in shared processes, such as curriculum design and , to cultivate critical capacities for contesting power imbalances. He posits that without these practices, risks reinforcing undemocratic trends, where market-driven reforms erode collective agency in favor of standardized, top-down control. Central to Apple's analysis of in is the recognition of as arenas of contested relations, where dominant economic and social forces shape and to maintain interests. He contends that operates not merely through overt but via subtle mechanisms like systems and tracking, which allocate opportunities along class and racial lines while masking their structural origins. Apple emphasizes causal connections between resistance—such as strengthened teacher unions and localized community oversight—and the disruption of these dynamics, arguing that organized labor and parental involvement can redistribute authority away from centralized bureaucracies and corporate influences. This approach underscores his belief in 's potential for egalitarian transformation, provided it aligns with broader social movements challenging capitalist enclosures on public goods. In examining cultural politics, Apple critiques how educational discourses are battlegrounds for hegemonic narratives, with , , and textbooks functioning to normalize neoliberal and conservative ideologies under the guise of neutrality. He argues that cultural politics in schools involve the selective of , where marginalized voices—rooted in working-class, , or immigrant experiences—are sidelined to uphold dominant . For instance, Apple highlights the role of state-mandated curricula in enforcing "official " that aligns with market imperatives, thereby contesting multicultural or critical perspectives as threats to cohesion. This framework reveals education as a site of ongoing struggle, where counter-hegemonic pedagogies can foster cultural democracy by amplifying narratives and interrogating the interests embedded in reforms.

Critiques of Educational Inequality and Reproduction

Apple contends that educational institutions perpetuate social inequalities through mechanisms like tracking and ability grouping, which systematically allocate students from lower socioeconomic and racial minority backgrounds into lower-tier programs, thereby reinforcing and racial hierarchies under the pretense of merit-based differentiation. Empirical from the mid-20th century onward, which Apple references, reveal that tracking correlates strongly with students' family income and rather than cognitive ability, with lower-track placements limiting access to advanced curricula and future opportunities. Standardized testing exacerbates this reproduction by privileging cultural knowledge aligned with dominant groups, yielding outcomes that reflect preexisting disparities: for instance, remains the strongest predictor of test performance, accounting for up to 40% of variance in achievement scores across U.S. districts. Apple argues these tests legitimize by framing results as objective measures of individual merit, obscuring how they embed assumptions from middle-class norms and state ideologies that sustain economic hierarchies. Central to Apple's analysis is the myth of , wherein schools propagate the notion that success stems from personal effort and talent alone, thereby naturalizing unequal outcomes despite evidence of structural causation rooted in unequal starting points. This ideological function causally links educational processes to broader , as meritocratic narratives discourage scrutiny of how family wealth, neighborhood segregation, and inherited determine trajectories more than school inputs. Drawing on reproduction theory traditions, Apple refines earlier formulations by critiquing the in Bowles and Gintis's , which posits a near-perfect between hierarchies and roles without sufficient attention to cultural politics or . Instead, he emphasizes education's contradictory dynamics, where ideological control coexists with fissures enabling resistance, yet causal pathways from and to sustained persist through underexamined state-society alignments.

Major Publications and Works

Seminal Books and Their Arguments

Ideology and Curriculum, first published in 1979 and revised in subsequent editions including 2004, contends that the selection and organization of school knowledge is not ideologically neutral but functions to legitimate dominant cultural and economic interests. Apple maintains that curricula embed and reproduce specific social norms by presenting certain perspectives as commonsense truths, thereby supporting existing power structures through what is designated as official knowledge. Education and Power, originally issued in 1982 with a second edition in 1995, investigates how educational institutions and policies perpetuate unequal power relations rooted in , , and economic dynamics. Apple argues that everyday practices, from selection to administrative decisions, align with broader mechanisms of , limiting challenges to prevailing inequalities despite reform efforts. In Can Education Change Society? (2013), Apple assesses education's capacity for societal transformation amid persistent structural barriers. He posits that while educators and curricula can foster critical awareness and incremental shifts, systemic forces such as economic polarization and policy conservatism often constrain , echoing historical debates like George Counts' 1932 query on whether schools should build a new .

Edited Volumes and Ongoing Scholarship

Apple co-edited The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education in 2010 with Stephen J. Ball and Luis Armando Gandin, a volume that analyzes the field's responses to neoliberal globalization and state interventions in schooling across international contexts. He similarly co-edited The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Education with Wayne Au and Luis Armando Gandin in 2009, compiling contributions on power dynamics, , and transformative pedagogies in global education systems. These handbooks emphasize collaborative scholarship drawing from diverse international scholars to map evolving sociological perspectives on , , and inequality. In 2010, Apple edited Global Crises, , and , which aggregates analyses of how economic downturns, environmental challenges, and social upheavals intersect with educational reforms worldwide, featuring chapters on policy responses in varied national settings. He also co-edited Critical in 2014 with Wayne , a synthesizing critical theories applied to contemporary schooling issues like and marketization. Apple's ongoing scholarship includes contributions to a 2024 special issue on critical in , documenting advances in conceptual and empirical examinations of policy processes amid persistent inequalities. In early 2025, he published reflections marking fifty years of integrated scholarship and activism, assessing the enduring role of critical inquiry in addressing educational power structures. His current research extends to collaborative explorations of post-apocalyptic philosophies and ecological futures, with forthcoming works linking civilizational vulnerabilities to educational adaptations in crisis contexts.

Reception and Influence

Academic and Scholarly Impact

Michael W. Apple's scholarly work has garnered over 21,000 citations as documented on , reflecting its extensive influence across educational research domains. His contributions, particularly in the , have been instrumental in shifting the field away from functionalist paradigms toward critical analyses of power, ideology, and in schooling. This influence is evident in the widespread adoption of his frameworks within , where his emphasis on as a site of ideological contestation has shaped global scholarship on and cultural politics. Apple's role in establishing critical as a robust subfield is marked by his integration of Marxist and neo-Marxist theories into empirical studies of and policy, challenging dominant views of as a neutral meritocratic process. Peer-reviewed works frequently cite his early texts, such as Ideology and Curriculum (1979), as foundational for interrogating how educational practices perpetuate and hierarchies, thereby influencing subsequent generations of researchers in , , and beyond. Recognition of his academic impact includes induction as a of , the International Honor Society in Education, in 2011, an honor bestowed on only a select few scholars worldwide for transformative contributions to the field. In 2022, he received an honorary Doctor of Literature from , acknowledging his pioneering advancements in educational theory and policy studies. These accolades underscore the enduring citation of his oeuvre in peer-reviewed journals and monographs, solidifying his status as a central figure in critical educational studies.

Policy and Practical Applications

Apple's analyses of in education have informed practical applications in , particularly through programs emphasizing critical reflection on power dynamics and cultural politics within curricula. In such initiatives, educators are trained to interrogate how instructional materials and practices may reproduce social inequalities, drawing directly from Apple's framework in works like Ideology and Curriculum. For instance, teacher preparation courses at institutions influenced by — a field to which Apple has substantially contributed—incorporate modules on deconstructing dominant knowledge forms to foster more equitable practices. These applications aim to equip teachers with tools for challenging biased content selection and promoting inclusive pedagogies, as evidenced in global critical pedagogy training outlined in collaborative scholarship. In policy contexts, Apple's emphasis on education's role in and cultural hierarchies has supported equity-oriented , such as efforts to reduce tracking—ability grouping practices critiqued for entrenching disparities along socioeconomic lines. His theoretical contributions have bolstered arguments in U.S. and international debates for heterogeneous grouping and curriculum differentiation that prioritizes over , influencing guidelines in districts seeking to mitigate . Internationally, similar ideas appear in analyses advocating for democratic schooling models that integrate critical to counter market-driven , as Apple has detailed in examinations of contradictions. However, these applications often prioritize ideological over measurable skill-building, aligning with Apple's broader focus on cultural . Empirical outcomes of ideology-infused reforms inspired by such frameworks reveal mixed results, with persistent achievement gaps underscoring limitations. For example, despite widespread adoption of critical reflection in training since the 1990s, U.S. data from 2019–2023 show Black and Hispanic students trailing white peers by 25–30 points in reading and math, suggesting that ideological emphases have not consistently translated to narrowed disparities. Critiques note that while these approaches enhance of inequities, they frequently yield negligible impacts on student performance metrics, as reforms emphasizing over evidence-based interventions correlate with stagnant or widening gaps in under-resourced areas. Apple's own policy analyses highlight these tensions, advocating for that balances critique with pragmatic change amid conservative modernizations.

Criticisms and Controversies

Ideological and Political Critiques

Critics from conservative and libertarian perspectives have challenged Michael Apple's theoretical framework, which draws heavily on Marxist concepts of ideology and , for allegedly prioritizing political over evidence-based instruction, thereby fostering in educational practice. Apple's emphasis on as a site of reproduction and power imbalances is viewed as subordinating neutral transmission to ideological critique, potentially encouraging educators to impose progressive narratives on students rather than cultivating skills grounded in empirical reality. A key accusation is that Apple's systemic focus excuses student underperformance by attributing failures primarily to institutional and capitalist structures, while downplaying individual agency, family dynamics, and cultural behaviors as causal factors. Conservative economists like contend that disparities in , particularly among low-income and minority students, stem more from breakdowns in family structure and personal responsibility than from hidden curricula reproducing , as Apple theorizes; Sowell cites data showing strong correlations between single-parent households and poor educational outcomes across racial groups, independent of school quality. This perspective holds that Apple's approach absolves students and parents of , perpetuating cycles of rather than promoting through rigorous standards and . Apple's anti-capitalist critique of market-oriented reforms, such as and vouchers—which he portrays as exacerbating through competition—is faulted for undermining meritocratic incentives that drive educational improvement. Libertarian-leaning analysts argue this stance ignores empirical successes of such policies, particularly in settings where traditional often lag; for example, a Stanford analysis of over 1.4 million students found urban yielding 28-29 additional days of learning per year in math and reading compared to demographically similar traditional peers, attributing gains to , , and parental choice. Opponents assert that by framing these mechanisms as neoliberal threats, Apple's discourages adoption of proven tools for mobility, favoring egalitarian redistribution over competitive excellence. From a right-leaning vantage, Apple's advocacy for culturally responsive and politicized pedagogies normalizes left-wing biases in curricula, contributing to classrooms where ideological conformity supplants objective scholarship. Commentators note that frameworks influenced by Apple's work on official knowledge and counter-hegemonic education have informed shifts toward identity-focused content, correlating with surveys showing increased perceptions of political indoctrination in K-12 settings; a 2023 Rand Corporation study reported 70% of teachers incorporating topics, often framing historical events through lenses of that align with Apple's cultural but alienate stakeholders seeking apolitical instruction. This is seen as eroding trust in public by embedding assumptions under the guise of .

Empirical and Methodological Challenges

Critics have challenged the empirical foundations of Apple's reproduction theory, which posits that educational structures predominantly perpetuate and cultural inequalities with limited scope for transformative interventions absent systemic overhaul. Randomized controlled trials, such as those evaluating programs, have demonstrated positive effects on for disadvantaged students, including increased college enrollment and graduation rates, suggesting that market-oriented reforms can disrupt reproduction cycles rather than reinforce them. Similarly, the Tennessee STAR experiment, a large-scale randomized study involving over 11,000 students from 1985 to 1989, found that reducing sizes to 13-17 pupils in grades K-3 yielded persistent gains in test scores and long-term outcomes, particularly for minority and low-income students, indicating that targeted structural changes can yield measurable improvements counter to deterministic views of institutional inertia. Methodologically, Apple's framework has been faulted for prioritizing qualitative analyses of and cultural over quantitative assessments of causal impacts and outcomes. This approach often emphasizes interpretive critiques of and power dynamics but underengages with rigorous experimental or econometric evidence, such as longitudinal data on achievement gaps. For instance, while Apple advocates dismantling tracking systems to counter elitist reproduction, empirical reviews of detracking reforms spanning four decades reveal inconsistent benefits: low-ability students show modest gains in some cases, but high-ability students often experience declines, with no overall equalization of outcomes and potential harm to among lower performers. Recent implementations of detracking-aligned policies correlate with stagnating or declining proficiency rates in national assessments like NAEP, where post-2019 data indicate widened gaps and lower averages under diluted standards, underscoring a disconnect between ideological prescriptions and verifiable causal effects. These challenges highlight a broader tension: reproduction theory's emphasis on macro-ideological forces can overlook micro-level variations revealed by empirical methods, such as regression discontinuity designs or instrumental variable analyses, which better isolate policy impacts from confounding socioeconomic factors. Independent reanalyses of foundational studies, including , further qualify overly optimistic extrapolations by showing that benefits diminish without sustained implementation and do not uniformly scale across contexts. Such evidence urges a more falsifiable integration of to test claims of inevitability in educational inequality .

Activism and Public Engagement

Advocacy for Social Justice and Educational Reform

Apple has engaged in long-standing public advocacy for educational reforms emphasizing and , including efforts to develop inclusive that address cultural inequalities and promote diverse perspectives as a means of empowering marginalized students. His involvement dates back to the late , when he began critiquing policies that exacerbate social divisions in schooling, such as vocationalization and , while pushing for teacher-centered approaches to foster democratic participation in education. A key aspect of Apple's reform stance opposes school privatization and market-based mechanisms, which he contends erode public education's role in by prioritizing efficiency over equitable access and teacher autonomy. He has supported teacher-led initiatives against such trends, influencing broader debates on resisting high-stakes , as detailed in works arguing that these measures undermine professional judgment and reinforce inequalities under the guise of . As a former of a teachers' , Apple has aligned with efforts to protect educators' roles in , viewing them as bulwarks against top-down impositions that diminish democratic control in s. Proponents of Apple's positions highlight their potential to empower s and communities through localized, inclusive reforms that prioritize over uniform metrics, potentially leading to more culturally responsive education. However, critics argue that this , particularly its resistance to and , overlooks evidence that such measures have improved student performance, including test scores and outcomes for low-achieving students, as shown in analyses of policies with performance consequences. Additionally, strong union alignment is seen by some as entrenching interests that hinder merit-based reforms, potentially perpetuating inefficiencies in and dismissal despite linking to gains in groups. Apple's framework, while aiming for transformative , has been critiqued for an overly ideological focus that may underestimate practical in data-driven improvements.

Recent Positions and Statements

In November 2024, Apple appeared on the FreshEd podcast to discuss the implications of the for under a potential second administration, emphasizing the need for critical scholarship to counter anticipated conservative reforms in and . Recorded shortly after the , the episode highlighted his ongoing role as an engaging with contemporary policy debates through public scholarship. As a member of , Apple has publicly condemned Israel's policies toward , describing the situation in as "genocidal " and a "textbook Lemkinian " affecting 2.3 million people, whom he characterized as living in a "vast ." These statements, articulated in late November 2024 during a discussion on his five decades of and , reflect his post-retirement commitment to international against what he views as state-sponsored violence. Published in early 2025, the reflections underscore his positioning of as a for resistance against far-right ideologies globally, including historical parallels to U.S. conservative movements since the . Apple has continued critiquing what he terms a decades-long conservative "war on public education," framing recent school board challenges and disputes as extensions of efforts to undermine democratic schooling. In a 2022 analysis, he linked attacks on teachers and curricula to broader strategies dating back 40 years, warning of their potential to exacerbate inequalities. However, contemporaneous data from 2022 midterm elections showed mixed outcomes for parental rights advocates, with conservative candidates securing gains in areas like despite falling short nationally, indicating public pushback against progressive educational initiatives in select districts.

References

  1. [1]
    Michael W. Apple - FreshEd
    Nov 25, 2024 · Michael W. Apple is the John Bascom Professor Emeritus of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  2. [2]
    UW–Madison's Apple is co-author of new book and speaking ...
    Oct 31, 2024 · UW–Madison's Michael W. Apple, the John Bascom Professor Emeritus of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies, ...
  3. [3]
    Michael W. Apple | National Education Policy Center
    Michael W. Apple is a John Bascom Professor of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  4. [4]
    Michael W. Apple - LACIS - University of Wisconsin–Madison
    Michael Apple is John Bascom Professor of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  5. [5]
    Ideology and Curriculum - 4th Edition - Michael Apple - Routledge
    In stock Free delivery4th Edition. Ideology and Curriculum. By Michael Apple, Michael W. Apple Copyright 2019. Paperback $47.99. Hardback $192.00. eBook $44.99. ISBN 9780367023003.
  6. [6]
    Ideology and Curriculum | Michael Apple, Michael W. Apple
    Dec 7, 2018 · Since 1979, Ideology and Curriculum has been a path breaking statement on the relationship between cultural and economic power in education.
  7. [7]
    Sites of Educational Conflict - Michael W. Apple, 2024 - Sage Journals
    Sep 1, 2022 · Apple M. W. (2006). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality (2nd ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar.
  8. [8]
    Five essays by UW–Madison's Apple named among 'Best Reviews ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · In his review of Noam Chomsky's book, Apple questions the belief that education is simply about passing knowledge from one person to another. He ...
  9. [9]
    World Renowned Scholar of Education Michael Apple on Fifty Years ...
    Jan 5, 2025 · A member of the Jewish Voice for Peace and a Jewish American scholar, the UW-Madison sociologist condemns Israel's Genocide in Palestine.
  10. [10]
    World Renowned Scholar of Education Michael Apple on Fifty Years ...
    Jan 6, 2025 · A member of Jewish Voice for Peace and a Ukrainian Jewish American, the UW-Madison sociologist condemns Israel's Genocide in Palestine.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] In the late 1970s, Michael Apple emerged as one of the most ...
    This essay review examines Apple's most recent work. It begins by providing a brief historical account of Marxist educational theory since the late 1970s.
  12. [12]
    Michael W. Apple: Education and Democratic Society
    Nov 12, 2022 · Apple believes that education is the act of politics. He works tirelessly to organize activists, teachers, unions, and oppressed minority groups ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  13. [13]
    MICHAEL W. APPLE 1942– | Taylor & Francis Group
    Apple was born on 20 August 1942 into a working-class family, with parents who were involved ardently in leftist politics.Missing: Jersey | Show results with:Jersey
  14. [14]
    Esteemed educator and alumnus, Dr. Michael Apple '67, donates ...
    Feb 12, 2021 · Dr. Michael W. Apple, a 1967 alumnus who became an internationally celebrated author and educator, has donated the extensive collection of his published ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Michael W. Apple, Ph.D. - University of Wisconsin–Madison
    D. John Bascom Professor. Departments of Curriculum and Instruction and. Educational Policy Studies. University of Wisconsin—Madison. School ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] An Interview with Michael Apple 1
    I was one of the founding members of the Paterson chapter of CORE (Congress of Racial. Equality) and had already done a good deal of activity involving literacy ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Interview with Michael Apple: The biography of a ... - PESA Agora
    Michael received his BA in Education from Glassboro State College, NJ (1966), an MA ... Michael Apple: In order to understand some of the ... community/ies, where ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] In the late 1970s, Michael Apple emerged as one of the most ...
    Under the tutelage of his mentor, Dwayne Huebner,. Apple received his Doctorate in Education from Columbia University in 1970. Today he is considered by many ...
  19. [19]
    Interview with Michael Apple: The biography of a public intellectual
    Feb 13, 2015 · Michael W. Apple is the John Bascom Professor of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies in the Departments of Curriculum ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    UW–Madison professor emeritus conferred honorary doctorate from ...
    Dec 22, 2022 · UW–Madison Professor Emeritus Michael Apple has been awarded an honorary doctorate from University College Dublin (UCD) in Ireland.
  21. [21]
    Michael Apple: Are International Educational Reforms ... - YouTube
    Jul 3, 2017 · Professor Michael Apple gave a lecture on "Are International Educational Reforms Really Democratic?" on the 19th of May 2017 at 4.30 PM in ...
  22. [22]
    UW–Madison's Apple gives multiple international addresses on ...
    Dec 20, 2023 · UW–Madison's Michael Apple over the past several months has delivered multiple presentations across the world about his work defending democratic education.
  23. [23]
    Are International Educational Reforms Really Democratic? - Michael ...
    Professor Apple has written extensively on the politics of educational reform, on the relationship between culture and power, and on education for social ...
  24. [24]
    Michael Apple on Ideology in Curriculum - New Learning Online
    Michael Apple on Ideology in Curriculum. Michael Apple is a Professor of Education at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and a leading theorist of education.
  25. [25]
    Ideology and curriculum / By Michael W. Apple. - University of ...
    On analyzing Hegemony -- Ideology and cultural and economic reproduction -- Economics and control in everyday school life (with Nancy King) -- Curricular ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Essay Review: A Marxist Critique of Michael Apple's ... - PDXScholar
    For example, in Ideology and Curriculum (1979), Apple maintains that Bowles and ... coherent hegemonic ideology of the ruling class, more a deliberate ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Have We Explained the Relationship between Curriculum and ...
    In his article “Curricular Form and the Logic of. Technical Control,” Michael Apple begins his discussion by outlining a corporate strategy known as the “ ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Chapter 1. The Case for Democratic Schools
    As in the example of the mathematics class, however, a democratic curriculum seeks to move beyond the "selective tradition" of knowledge and meanings endorsed ...
  29. [29]
    Apple and Beane on Democratic Schools - New Learning Online
    Finally, they believe that democracy is neither cumbersome nor dangerous, that it can work in societies and it can work in schools. … Those committed to ...
  30. [30]
    The Struggle for Democracy in Education: Lessons from Social ...
    In stockThe Struggle for Democracy in Education extends the insightful arguments Michael W. Apple provided in Can Education Change Society?
  31. [31]
    The Text and Cultural Politics - Michael W. Apple, 1992
    In this article, I discuss ways of approaching texts as embodiments of a larger process of cultural politics. Analyses of them must focus on the complex power ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Michael Apple Ideology And Curriculum
    The curriculum is a reflection and reinforcement of existing power relations. Schools often serve as mechanisms for social control, transmitting the dominant ...
  33. [33]
    Cultural Politics and Education - Teachers College Press
    Michael Apple offers a powerful analysis of current debates and a compelling indictment of rightist proposals for change. Apple presents the causes and effects ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] WCER Working Paper No. 2009-6 Tracking and Inequality - ERIC
    Aug 20, 2009 · Michael W. Apple, Stephen J. Ball ... Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality?
  35. [35]
    [PDF] STANDARDS, MARKETS, AND INEQUALITY Michael W. Apple ...
    This power bloc combines multiple fractions of capital who are committed to neo- liberal marketized solutions to educational problems, neo-conservative ...
  36. [36]
    Unmasking the Ideology of Standardized Testing - jstor
    It is in fact tied to the state in the first place. As part of the state, education, then, must be seen as an important element... - MICHAEL APPLE (1995).
  37. [37]
    The Role of Education in Reinforcing Social Inequalities
    Oct 27, 2022 · In his influential work on education, Michael Apple argues that educational institutions tend to reproduce the existing economic order by ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Interrogating the Relationship Between Schools and Society
    While I have not defended Bowles and Gintis per se, I have vehemently argued elsewhere that those criticisms are based on deep mischaracter- izations and ...
  39. [39]
    Ideology and Curriculum - Michael W. Apple - Google Books
    Title, Ideology and Curriculum Routledge education books ; Author, Michael W. Apple ; Edition, reprint, revised ; Publisher, Psychology Press, 1990 ; ISBN ...Missing: publication | Show results with:publication
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Apple, Michael W. Ideology and Curriculum (3rd edition). New York ...
    Apple, Michael W. Ideology and Curriculum (3rd edition). New York and London: Routledge Falmer, 2004. 234 pp. ISBN 0415949122. JENNIFER ADAIR. Arizona State ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  41. [41]
    Education and Power - Michael W. Apple - Google Books
    Michael Apple articulates his theory on educational institutions and the reproduction of unequal power relations.
  42. [42]
    Education and Power: Apple, Michael W. W. - Amazon.com
    In his seminal volume first published in 1982 Michael Apple articulates his theory on educational institutions and the reproduction of unequal power ...
  43. [43]
    Can Education Change Society?: Apple, Michael W. - Amazon.com
    Book details ; Publication date. November 28, 2012 ; Language. English ; Dimensions. 6 x 0.46 x 9 inches ; Print length. 200 pages ; Publisher, Routledge.
  44. [44]
    Can education change society? : Apple, Michael W., author
    Jul 23, 2023 · Can education change society? by: Apple, Michael W., author. Publication date: 2013. Topics: Education -- Social aspects, Educational sociology.
  45. [45]
    The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education
    Free deliveryThe Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education. Edited By Michael W. Apple, Stephen Ball, Luis Armando Gandin Copyright 2010. Paperback
  46. [46]
    Global Crises, Social Justice, and Education | Michael W. Apple | Tayl
    Dec 16, 2009 · Global Crises, Social Justice, and Education looks into the ways we understand globalization and education by getting specific about what ...Missing: post- apocalyptic ecological
  47. [47]
    Critical Education - 1st Edition - Michael W. Apple - Wayne Au - Routl
    In stock Free deliveryAug 8, 2014 · This new Routledge title answers the need for an authoritative reference work to enable users to map and make sense of critical approaches to education.
  48. [48]
    Critical Policy Analysis: Gains and Challenges - Sage Journals
    Mar 25, 2024 · The special issue documents the conceptual, empirical, and political progress that critical policy analysis in education has made.
  49. [49]
    Interview with Michael Apple: The biography of a public intellectual
    He is one of the foremost educational theorists in the world and a public intellectual and activist-theorist who is deeply committed to empowerment.
  50. [50]
    Michael W. Apple EdD; DL, DH Professor at University of Wisconsin ...
    Michael APPLE, John Bascom Professor of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies | Cited by 21263 | of University of Wisconsin–Madison, ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Michael Apple, Social Theory, Critical Transcendence, and the New ...
    Writing out of the new sociology of education, Apple has developed a coherent program and critical following which has changed the course of educational theory.
  52. [52]
    Michael Apple | SpringerLink
    References. Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar. Apple, M. W. (2000). Official knowledge ...
  53. [53]
    KDP Laureates - Kappa Delta Pi
    Celebration of Teaching and Officer Awards. KDP Laureates. × ... Michael W. Apple. Inducted in 2011. Alfredo Artiles. Inducted in 2017. George Edward Axtelle.
  54. [54]
    Michael Apple - UCD President's Office
    Michael Apple, began his professional career as an elementary and secondary school teacher in 1962 in his native New Jersey. He quickly became involved in ...
  55. [55]
    Year: 2022 - International Division - University of Wisconsin–Madison
    Posted on December 22, 2022. UW–Madison Professor Emeritus Michael Apple has been awarded an honorary doctorate from University College Dublin (UCD) in Ireland.
  56. [56]
    Engaging Critical Pedagogy in Education - Taylor & Francis eBooks
    Aug 2, 2024 · Critical Pedagogy in Education: A Theory in Search of Praxis. ByFida Sanjakdar · ORCID Icon , Michael W. Apple · ORCID Icon. Abstract. part 1|86 ...
  57. [57]
    Engaging Critical Pedagogy in Education: Global Phenomenon ...
    In stockMichael W. Apple is John Bascom Professor Emeritus of Curriculum and Instruction and Educational Policy Studies at the University of Wisconsin, US, and the ...
  58. [58]
    Ideology and Curriculum - USC: Museum of Education
    An introduction to some publications that have shaped the field of education. Ideology and Curriculum by Michael W. Apple (1942–– ) (London: Routledge & Kegan ...
  59. [59]
    The roles of the scholar/activist in education - Michael W Apple, 2016
    May 11, 2016 · I detail nine tasks in which the critical scholar/activist should engage in fulfilling the role of the public intellectual.
  60. [60]
    Charter schools outperform traditional public schools on average ...
    High-quality studies find that charter schools boost achievement by more than their traditional-public-school counterparts.
  61. [61]
    School Choice and “The Truly Disadvantaged” - Education Next
    May 18, 2021 · Our study looks at the impact of using a voucher on college enrollments and on degree attainment. We also estimate effects of just being offered a voucher.
  62. [62]
    The impact of voucher programs: A deep dive into the research
    The research finds consistent, positive impacts on the likelihood that high school students will graduate, that they will enroll in college, and recently and ...
  63. [63]
    The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades
    The Tennessee class size project is a three-phase study designed to determine the effect of smaller class size in the earliest grades on short-term and ...
  64. [64]
    The STAR Experiment and Related Class-Size Studies. NCPEA ...
    The STAR research shows that small classes (15-17 pupils) in kindergarten through third grade (K-3) provide short- and long-term benefits for students, teachers ...
  65. [65]
    Four decades of research on the effects of detracking reform: Where ...
    Aug 31, 2009 · Results Generally speaking, students in detracked groups performed slightly better academically than their equivalent-ability peers in tracked ...
  66. [66]
    The dark side of detracking: Mixed-ability classrooms negatively ...
    Detracking negatively affected self-concept of students with low achievement. •. Detracking can come with unintended side effects. Abstract. The labeling ...
  67. [67]
    Is the equity agenda to blame for falling test scores? - UnHerd
    Sep 11, 2025 · New NAEP data published this week shows a significant drop in the performance of high-school seniors since 2019 in both reading and maths. Long ...Missing: detracking | Show results with:detracking
  68. [68]
    Does detracking promote educational equity? - Brookings Institution
    Oct 4, 2021 · Critics argue that tracking exacerbates inequities by allocating high-status knowledge to some students while denying it to others.
  69. [69]
    Some Findings from an Independent Investigation of the Tennessee ...
    The nonexperimental evidence uniformly indicates no consistent improvements in achievement with class size reductions.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Michael Apple Ideology And Curriculum
    Michael Apple's ideology and curriculum theories remain highly relevant in today's educational landscape, where debates about curriculum content, cultural ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  71. [71]
    revisiting Educating the “right” way: interview with Michael W. Apple
    In the interview, Michael Apple helps us to think and analyze the social context in which we are involved and, as usual, invites us to use a relational approach ...
  72. [72]
    Educating the "right" way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality ...
    In this book Apple explores the 'Conservative restoration' - The rightward turn of a broad-based coalition that is making successful inroads in determining ...
  73. [73]
    Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?
    The leading school reform policy in the United States revolves around strong accountability of schools with consequences for performance.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?
    The leading school reform policy in the United States revolves around strong accountability of schools with consequences for performance.
  75. [75]
    Does test-based accountability improve more than just test scores?
    There is substantial evidence suggesting school accountability has successfully increased student test scores (Carnoy & Loeb, 2002; Dee & Jacob, 2011; Hanushek ...
  76. [76]
    Q&A: Educational Theorist Michael Apple Reviews Republicans' 40 ...
    Apr 8, 2022 · Voucher schools haven't lived up to promises, have become “gated communities for more affluent kids,” drain resources from neighborhood ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  77. [77]
    Conservative activists fall short in Michigan's local school board races
    Nov 10, 2022 · Conservative school board candidates who attacked public schools as incubators of “woke” ideology made inroads in local Michigan elections on Tuesday.
  78. [78]
    'Too hyperbolic'? School board parental rights push falters - AP News
    Nov 14, 2022 · Republican groups that sought to get hundreds of “parents' rights” activists elected to local school boards largely fell short in Tuesday's ...