Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

ResearchGate


ResearchGate is a Berlin-based commercial social networking platform for scientists and researchers, founded in by physicians and Sören Hofmayer along with computer scientist Horst Fickenscher. Its stated mission is to connect the world of science, accelerate its progress, and make research open to all by facilitating the sharing of publications, , and expertise among users.
The platform enables over 25 million researchers from more than 190 countries to upload and access full-text articles, preprints, and datasets; pose and respond to questions; form collaborations; and track metrics of scientific impact. With a repository exceeding 160 million publication pages, ResearchGate has become one of the largest hubs for academic exchange, promoting while offering tools for career development such as job listings and project matchmaking. Its growth reflects a demand for alternatives to traditional publishing silos, though the site's commercial model relies on , premium features, and partnerships rather than subscription fees. Notable achievements include rapid expansion from a small network to a dominant player in , fostering direct researcher interactions that bypass institutional gatekeepers and enabling faster dissemination of findings. However, ResearchGate has faced significant controversies, particularly over , as publishers including the and sued the platform in 2017 and 2018 for hosting unauthorized copies of paywalled articles, leading to a 2023 settlement that implemented copyright-compliant sharing mechanisms. Additionally, its former ResearchGate Score—a proprietary metric purporting to gauge scientific reputation—was discontinued in 2022 amid widespread criticism for opacity in calculation, vulnerability to gaming, and divergence from established indicators like counts. These issues highlight tensions between ideals and enforcement in academic platforms.

History

Founding and Early Years

ResearchGate was founded in 2008 by , a virologist and pursuing a PhD, along with fellow Sören Hofmayer and Horst Fickenscher. The idea emerged in early 2008 from Madisch and Hofmayer's frustrations with the isolation of academic research during their doctoral work, including difficulties in accessing and sharing scientific knowledge beyond traditional journals. Madisch serves as CEO, Hofmayer as COO, and Fickenscher as CTO. Initial development began informally among friends and colleagues, with Madisch working from Rajiv Gupta's lab in , where Gupta provided early investment support. The platform was designed to connect scientists globally and promote to research, addressing perceived inefficiencies in scientific collaboration and dissemination. ResearchGate officially launched on May 23, 2008, as a enabling researchers to share papers, ask questions, and form connections. In its early years, ResearchGate experienced rapid user growth, reaching 10,000 members by the end of 2008. By , membership surpassed , with notable early examples of international collaboration, such as connections formed by researcher Emmanuel Nnadi. Growth accelerated to 500,000 users in 2010, coinciding with the opening of a office and investment from Capital; by 2011, it had exceeded 1 million members and introduced forums for discussion. These developments established ResearchGate as an emerging hub for academic networking, headquartered in , Germany.

Growth and Key Milestones

ResearchGate demonstrated rapid initial growth following its launch, attracting early adopters among scientists seeking alternatives to traditional models for sharing preprints and datasets. By , the platform secured its first funding round, enabling infrastructure scaling and feature development to support expanding user demands. Subsequent funding bolstered international expansion, with a $52.6 million Series D round in 2017 from investors including , which facilitated server capacity upgrades and efforts amid surging registrations. Overall, the company raised $87.6 million across four rounds by 2025, prioritizing operational over aggressive . User base milestones marked steady ascent: registered members exceeded 17 million by 2020, growing to 25 million by May 2023, spanning researchers from over 190 countries. By March 2024, the platform hosted over 160 million pages and averaged 56 million unique monthly visitors, reflecting deepened engagement in document uploads and networking. This expansion underscored ResearchGate's role in democratizing access, though growth has moderated post-2023 amid competition from open-access repositories.

Recent Developments and Adaptations

In April 2023, retired its Projects feature, which had allowed users to create collaborative workspaces for initiatives, citing internal discussions and a strategic decision to streamline the platform's core functions focused on individual researcher networking and content sharing. This adaptation aimed to redirect resources toward more utilized tools, though it drew mixed user feedback on the loss of group-oriented capabilities. Beginning in 2023, ResearchGate expanded its Home product through partnerships with major publishers, enabling direct syndication of official content—including articles, metrics, and submission information—onto the platform to enhance discoverability and engagement. Notable expansions included agreements with Wiley covering 649 journals in June 2023, in May 2024, and an upgraded Profile feature in August 2023 that improved visibility of journal metrics and calls for papers. These partnerships accelerated in 2024 and 2025, with ResearchGate announcing collaborations covering Sage's 90 journals including and hybrid titles in December 2024, expanding to 595 journals in February 2025, and Trans Tech Publications extending to its full portfolio in June 2025 after initial pilots showed increased article usage. In October 2024, the platform introduced an Agreement Upgrade within Journal Home, allowing publishers to target researchers with relevant funding information for open access publishing, thereby facilitating compliance with institutional mandates and boosting OA adoption rates. In early 2025, ResearchGate implemented policy changes to comments on research items, halting new additions as of and planning to remove all existing comments after , as part of efforts to moderate content and reduce potential misuse, though specifics on the rationale beyond platform maintenance were not detailed publicly. These adaptations reflect ongoing efforts to balance with publisher-integrated resources amid criticisms of unauthorized sharing and platform relevance in a competitive academic networking landscape.

Platform Features

Document Sharing and Access Tools

ResearchGate enables researchers to full-text documents, such as PDFs, directly to their pages, associating them with metadata like title, authors, and . To add a full-text, users navigate to the research item's , select "Add full-text," and the , with the platform supporting formats compatible for viewing and downloading. Uploads require users to confirm they hold necessary rights, as ResearchGate does not verify permissions and holds members responsible for compliance with publisher agreements or laws. Full-text files can be designated as public or private during or after upload. Public full-texts are downloadable by any ResearchGate without restrictions, facilitating open dissemination where legally permissible, such as for open-access publications or author-accepted manuscripts. Private full-texts remain accessible only to the uploading and co-authors, or can be shared selectively via direct messages or requests, avoiding public exposure that might infringe on non-open versions of record. A 2023 settlement between ResearchGate and publishers like ACS and permits private storage of certain version-of-record articles, with sharing allowed upon individual researcher requests. For accessing documents not publicly available, ResearchGate's "Request full-text" tool allows users to send automated notifications to authors, who can respond by attaching the file in a or uploading a version. Requests are fulfilled manually by authors, with no automated delivery, and notifications appear in the platform's messaging system or via . This feature promotes targeted collaboration while respecting potential access barriers, though response rates vary and depend on authors' willingness to share under their agreements. Additional sharing tools include public recommendations, which notify a user's network of relevant content, and private sharing links sent to specific individuals. ResearchGate employs automated checks to detect potential violations, enabling takedowns upon publisher notices, as seen in ongoing efforts to balance sharing with legal compliance. Unauthorized public uploads have prompted litigation, underscoring that while the platform streamlines access, users must prioritize verifiable rights to avoid removals or disputes.

Networking and Collaboration Functions

ResearchGate enables networking through features that allow users to follow researchers, thereby receiving notifications about new publications, updates, and activities from selected profiles. This functionality supports the discovery of potential collaborators by highlighting shared research interests and institutional affiliations. Users can add colleagues to their network by searching profiles or accepting recommendations based on co-authorships and overlapping expertise. Private messaging provides a direct channel for communication, permitting researchers to discuss ongoing work, request , or propose joint initiatives, though access is typically limited to mutual followers to prevent . The platform's section serves as a for posing technical questions, starting discussions, and sharing expertise, fostering informal collaboration across disciplines. In 2020, this feature saw over 160,000 new posts, indicating substantial engagement for knowledge exchange. Collaboration is further supported via Projects, where users outline current research endeavors, including objectives and required skills, to recruit team members and track progress publicly or privately. Groups and topic-following options enable participation in themed communities, such as labs or subject-specific discussions, promoting sustained interaction among researchers with aligned goals. These tools collectively connect over 20 million users across more than 190 countries, emphasizing engagement over institutional hierarchies.

Metrics, Analytics, and Professional Tools

ResearchGate provides researchers with analytics on their profiles and publications, including views, reads, downloads, and citations aggregated from internal tracking and external sources such as Crossref and . These metrics are accessible via the "Your " , allowing users to monitor engagement over time, such as full-text requests and geographic distribution of readership. Unlike traditional , ResearchGate's citation counts may include self-citations and non-peer-reviewed sources, potentially inflating figures compared to databases like or . The platform formerly featured the RG Score, a metric launched around 2012 that combined factors like publication count, , Q&A activity, and follower interactions to gauge researcher reputation. Criticized for opacity, manipulability, and overemphasis on platform-specific behaviors rather than scholarly merit, the RG Score was discontinued in July 2022 following user feedback and academic scrutiny. It was replaced by the Research Interest Score (RI Score), which offers a more transparent breakdown emphasizing publications, questions, answers, and followers, though details on its exact weighting remain partially undisclosed. In terms of professional tools, ResearchGate maintains a dedicated jobs marketplace where users can browse and apply for positions, postdocs, and roles tailored to scientific disciplines, with filters for , experience level, and field. Institutions can utilize recruitment features like Candidate Search to identify and contact potential hires from the platform's 20+ million member database. Additionally, the funding section lists opportunities, fellowships, and calls from agencies worldwide, aiding researchers in discovering and tracking application deadlines without direct platform intermediation. These tools integrate with networking features to facilitate career advancement, though their efficacy depends on user participation and data completeness.

Business Model and Operations

Revenue Streams and Monetization

ResearchGate sustains its operations through services that leverage its network of over 25 million researchers, while keeping core platform access free for individual users. Primary revenue derives from and offerings, such as job postings for academic and industry roles—including postdoc positions—and connections between researchers and suppliers for laboratory equipment. These services enable companies and institutions to target talent and resources efficiently within the . Publishers also contribute to monetization by subscribing to paid features like official journal profiles, which provide dedicated spaces for promoting publications, tracking engagement metrics, and fostering interactions with readers. Introduced as a discretionary service, these subscriptions allow journals to enhance discoverability amid open-access trends, with terms governed by ResearchGate's policies on eligibility and usage. The platform avoids direct advertising to users and does not charge researchers for basic functionalities, aligning with its commitment to accessibility. This model, supported by prior venture funding totaling approximately $87.6 million across five rounds through 2017, prioritizes long-term sustainability over user fees, though specific annual revenue figures remain undisclosed as a private entity.

Funding, Investors, and Financial History

ResearchGate, founded in 2008, secured its first institutional funding through a in September 2010, led by Benchmark Capital with participation from Accel Partners and other early backers; the amount raised was not publicly disclosed. also invested during this early phase, recognizing parallels to high-growth networks like . In 2013, the company raised $35 million in a Series C round co-led by co-founder and Tenaya Capital, bolstering expansion amid growing user adoption. A subsequent growth investment round—closed in November 2015 but announced in February 2017—brought in $52.6 million from investors including the , Investment Partners, Four Rivers Group, and additional commitments from prior backers such as Gates. These rounds brought cumulative venture funding to approximately $100 million by 2017, with key investors spanning venture firms (, Founders Fund, Tenaya Capital, Accel Partners), strategic entities (), financial institutions ( Investment Partners), and high-profile individuals (). Later participants included COI Partners and Ventures. No major equity rounds have been reported since , though ResearchGate received a minor grant of $18,500 in December 2020. The company remains privately held, operating as a for-profit entity without public financial disclosures beyond funding announcements, and has not pursued an IPO or acquisition exit as of 2025.
Funding RoundDate ClosedAmount RaisedKey Investors
Series ASeptember 2010UndisclosedBenchmark Capital (lead), Accel Partners,
Series C2013$35 million (co-lead), Tenaya Capital (co-lead)
Growth Investment (Series D equivalent)November $52.6 million, Investment Partners, Four Rivers Group

Organizational Structure and Global Reach

ResearchGate is structured as a private German , headquartered in at Chausseestraße 20. Founded in 2008 by virologist , physician Sören Hofmayer, and computer scientist Horst Fickenscher, the company maintains a leadership team led by Madisch as co-founder and , with Hofmayer serving as and Fickenscher as . This executive structure oversees operations in a relatively flat, tech-oriented organization typical of digital platforms, emphasizing product development, user engagement, and compliance amid legal challenges from publishers. The company employs approximately 250 staff members as of 2022, distributed across its primary offices in , , and , , , at 350 Townsend Street. While maintaining a core European base, ResearchGate supports remote and hybrid work arrangements to attract global talent in engineering, data science, and research support roles. In terms of global reach, ResearchGate serves over 25 million registered researchers across more than 190 countries, facilitating a worldwide for scientific and sharing. Its platform operates primarily in English but accommodates users from diverse linguistic and institutional backgrounds, with significant adoption in , , and , reflecting its mission to connect the international research community beyond traditional geographic or barriers. This extensive user base, spanning , , and independent researchers, underscores its role as a borderless digital hub, though access and functionality can vary by region due to data regulations like the EU's GDPR.

Impact on Research and Academia

Adoption Statistics and User Engagement

ResearchGate has grown to over 25 million registered users since its founding in , with members spanning more than 190 countries worldwide. This figure, reported consistently across official channels and independent analyses as of 2023–2025, positions the platform as one of the largest social networks, surpassing earlier milestones like 20 million users noted in 2022. Adoption has been driven by its utility for researchers in fields such as , physics, and , though the majority of users originate from and based on platform demographics implied by usage patterns. User engagement manifests through activities like uploading publications, posing questions, and forming collaborations, though comprehensive public metrics on monthly remain limited. In a 2023 announcement, ResearchGate described its 25 million members as actively utilizing the platform for research sharing and discovery, suggesting sustained interaction beyond mere registration. For instance, in , over 1.45 million individual researchers interacted with content from a single major publisher () via the site, generating more than 6.6 million engagements such as views and citations. analytics further indicate robust traffic, with researchgate.net ranking 337th globally in 2025 and attracting visits predominantly from users (65.76%). Despite high registration numbers, critics note potential discrepancies between registered and truly , as platforms like ResearchGate do not routinely disclose metrics such as daily or monthly logins, which could reveal lower rates typical in professional networks. from user studies highlights active participation in networking—e.g., one analysis of platform dynamics observed widespread awareness and utilization of features like the RG Score for impact, though this varies by and user . Overall, reflects researchers' demand for open-access alternatives to traditional journals, with sustained by tools enabling direct peer interaction rather than passive browsing.

Facilitation of Knowledge Dissemination

ResearchGate enables the sharing of full-text outputs, including peer-reviewed articles, preprints, and datasets, which circumvents traditional paywalls and expands to for users lacking institutional subscriptions. This functionality promotes open dissemination by allowing authors to upload documents directly, making them discoverable to a global audience without intermediary costs. The platform hosts over 160 million publication pages as of , facilitating widespread visibility among its user base of approximately 25 million researchers spanning more than 190 countries. Its "Reads" metric tracks full-text views and downloads, providing evidence of engagement; for instance, an analysis of 583 highly cited clinical papers recorded 135,255 reads on ResearchGate, exceeding usage counts in over comparable periods. Empirical studies indicate that publications shared on ResearchGate experience heightened dissemination, with linked to increased usage and a significant positive (P ≤ 0.01) between platform indicators and both citations and reads. This enhanced particularly benefits researchers in under-resourced regions, fostering broader and potential growth through greater exposure.

Effects on Citation Practices and Innovation

ResearchGate has demonstrated a capacity to elevate counts for shared publications by augmenting their among a global network of researchers. A 2020 empirical analysis of highly cited ("hot") papers in clinical medicine indexed in revealed a statistically significant positive between ResearchGate metrics—such as views, downloads, and full-text requests—and subsequent citations received. Specifically, papers with higher engagement on the garnered more citations over time, attributing this to ResearchGate's role in bridging gaps in access to paywalled content and promoting informal dissemination ahead of formal . This effect appears particularly pronounced for early-career researchers or those in under-resourced fields, where platform uploads serve as a repository, drawing citations from diverse audiences not reached through traditional journal routes. However, these dynamics have raised concerns about alterations to citation practices, including potential incentives for strategic behaviors that prioritize platform metrics over substantive scholarly . ResearchGate's internal indicators, like the RG Score, aggregate factors such as reads and recommendations, which a 2024 investigation in the Journal of Informetrics identified as vulnerable to systematic fraud, including artificial inflation via coordinated requests or bot activity. Such manipulations can skew perceived impact, encouraging researchers to upload preliminary or non-peer-reviewed work to boost scores, which may indirectly foster rings or self-promotional citing patterns rather than merit-based acknowledgment. While formal (e.g., in or ) remain the gold standard, reliance on ResearchGate analytics for self-assessment has prompted critiques of diluted rigor in evaluating research influence, potentially eroding trust in emergent norms. Regarding innovation, ResearchGate's amplification of citation flows supports faster idea propagation, enabling iterative advancements by exposing unpublished findings to potential collaborators and critics earlier in the research pipeline. The platform's correlation with heightened citations implies broader diffusion of foundational knowledge, a prerequisite for breakthrough innovations, as evidenced by cases where shared preprints on ResearchGate have spurred follow-on studies in fields like biomedicine. Nonetheless, empirical evidence directly linking ResearchGate usage to measurable innovation outputs—such as patents or novel methodologies—remains limited, with effects likely mediated through ancillary features like Q&A forums and project postings that facilitate serendipitous connections, though these are confounded by self-selection biases among active users. Critics argue that unchecked metric gaming could divert effort from genuine creative pursuits toward visibility optimization, tempering net innovative gains.

Controversies and Criticisms

ResearchGate has faced repeated accusations of facilitating by hosting full-text versions of academic articles without publisher authorization, leading to multiple lawsuits from major publishers including , the (ACS), and . These conflicts arose primarily because users, often authors, uploaded copyrighted journal articles to the platform, bypassing publishers' exclusive distribution rights under agreements that typically transfer to the publishers upon publication. In response to publisher demands, ResearchGate proactively removed approximately 1.7 million articles in December 2017 to address widespread violations identified during disputes with and Wiley. Legal actions intensified in October 2017 when ACS and filed a in against ResearchGate, alleging systematic infringement through the unauthorized reproduction and distribution of thousands of articles, including over 3,143 specific works identified in later filings. A parallel followed in 2018, focusing on 50 initial articles but expanding to claim ResearchGate's business model encouraged mass uploading without verifying permissions, violating law. ResearchGate defended itself by asserting it operated as a neutral hosting platform under safe harbor provisions, but courts rejected this, with a 2022 regional court ruling holding the company liable for infringing content on its site and dismissing claims of for research sharing. Further escalations included additional takedowns, such as 200,000 public files removed in September 2021 amid ongoing pressure from and ACS, reflecting publishers' concerns over lost revenue from subscription-based . Studies examining have found significant non-adherence to publisher policies, with many full-text uploads on ResearchGate exceeding allowed or permissions, underscoring a pattern where author convenience often trumped legal restrictions. These disputes highlighted tensions between advocacy and publishers' protections, with ResearchGate's scale—millions of users sharing content—amplifying infringement risks despite automated detection tools implemented post-litigation. The conflicts culminated in settlements announced in September 2023 between ResearchGate, ACS, and , resolving both and cases through a confidential agreement that introduced a "technical solution" for rights-checking at the point of upload to prevent future violations. Similar resolutions addressed claims from other publishers like , though terms remained undisclosed; the outcomes emphasized ResearchGate's obligation to monitor and remove infringing material proactively, balancing platform utility with legal compliance. No major new lawsuits have been reported as of 2025, but the episode has prompted broader discussions on platform liability in academic sharing ecosystems.

Concerns Over Data Quality and Misuse

ResearchGate has faced criticism for hosting content of varying quality, as it lacks formal or editorial oversight for uploaded publications, allowing unverified preprints, drafts, and self-archived materials to proliferate alongside peer-reviewed works. This has led to instances of inaccurate or manipulated data persisting on the platform, including fabricated figures or in user-uploaded files, which users may cite without cross-verification. A 2024 study identified deliberate in ResearchGate metrics, where users inflate reads, recommendations, comments, and Research Interest (RI) Scores through coordinated bot-like activities or reciprocal endorsements, distorting indicators of scholarly impact and potentially misleading evaluators of research quality. Concerns over profiles exacerbate issues, with reports of "" or automated accounts populating the site to visibility or fabricate collaborations, resulting in unreliable bibliometric data such as erroneous counts or claims. For example, investigations have uncovered clusters of AI-generated "papers" linked to fictitious profiles, which garner artificial and propagate within the network. Critics argue that ResearchGate's algorithmic promotion of such content, based on rather than validity, amplifies low-quality or fraudulent material, undermining its utility as a reliable . Misuse of data on ResearchGate includes unauthorized scraping for training, where open-access papers are harvested without consent, raising risks of perpetuating errors or biases from hosted inaccuracies in downstream applications. Researchers have expressed reluctance to share datasets due to fears of , such as reanalysis out of or commercial that violates original ethical constraints, particularly in sensitive fields like . Additionally, inflated metrics have been misused in academic evaluations, with institutions occasionally relying on RG Scores despite their known manipulability and lack of in calculation, leading to misguided hiring or decisions. Platform responses, such as improved detection algorithms, have been implemented but remain insufficient against sophisticated gaming, as noted by librarians and analysts monitoring the ecosystem.

Ethical and Regulatory Debates

ResearchGate's former RG Score metric, introduced to quantify researcher impact based on publications, citations, reads, and interactions, faced substantial ethical criticism for its opacity and susceptibility to manipulation. Critics argued that the algorithm, which lacked transparent , incentivized behaviors such as self-citation , excessive question-asking to boost scores, and prioritizing quantity over research quality, potentially distorting academic evaluations and career decisions. These concerns raised ethical questions about the platform's role in fostering a gamified that could undermine the of scholarly , with some researchers viewing it as a proprietary tool benefiting ResearchGate's commercial interests rather than advancing objective . In response to mounting scrutiny, ResearchGate discontinued the RG Score in August 2022, replacing it with the Research Interest Score, which focuses on signals like questions and answers but has itself sparked ongoing debates about metric validity and ethical implications for competition. Proponents of such defend them as democratizing evaluation beyond traditional journal-based systems, yet detractors highlight persistent risks of amplification and unequal favoring active users, echoing broader ethical tensions in commodifying reputation. This shift underscores unresolved questions on whether platforms like ResearchGate should influence institutional hiring or funding without standardized, verifiable criteria. Regulatory debates surrounding ResearchGate primarily involve compliance with data protection frameworks, given its headquarters and global user base subject to the EU's (GDPR) since May 2018. The platform collects extensive , including publication uploads and interaction histories, prompting discussions on mechanisms and data minimization to prevent misuse in profiling researchers or third-party analytics. While no major actions against ResearchGate have been publicly documented, analogous scrutiny of platforms highlights vulnerabilities like unauthorized for training, raising calls for enhanced regulatory oversight to balance with rights.

References

  1. [1]
    ResearchGate: Social Network for Scientists| Company profile |
    Nov 3, 2020 · ResearchGate was founded in 2008 by the physicians Dr. Ijad Madisch and Dr. Sören Hofmayer, along with computer specialist Horst Fickenscher.
  2. [2]
    ResearchGate - 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding, Competitors ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · The founders of ResearchGate are Ijad Madisch, Horst Fickenscher and Soren Hofmayer. Here are the details of ResearchGate's key team members:.
  3. [3]
    About Us - ResearchGate
    We started ResearchGate in 2008 to address the problems we saw in the way science is created and shared. Our mission is to connect the world of science and ...Missing: founders | Show results with:founders
  4. [4]
    Login to ResearchGate
    Log in to your ResearchGate account to access 160+ million publication pages and connect with 25+ million researchers.
  5. [5]
    ResearchGate - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Based in Berlin, ResearchGate was founded in 2008. Its mission is to connect the world of science and make research open to all.
  6. [6]
    Celebrating 10 years of ResearchGate
    May 23, 2018 · We started out in 2008 with just a handful of members. Today, 15 million scientists like you connect on the network, collaborate, and share their research.
  7. [7]
    ACS, Elsevier, and ResearchGate resolve litigation, with solution to ...
    Sep 15, 2023 · ACS and Elsevier, members of the Coalition for Responsible Sharing, have agreed to a legal settlement with ResearchGate that ensures copyright-compliant ...
  8. [8]
    Major publishers sue ResearchGate over copyright infringement
    Oct 5, 2018 · Two journal publishers have launched legal proceedings in the United States against academic-networking site ResearchGate for copyright infringement.
  9. [9]
    ResearchGate - PMC - NIH
    Apr 1, 2019 · ResearchGate was founded in Berlin in 2008 by two physicians and a computer scientist. Since its debut, the site has successfully attracted both ...
  10. [10]
    Metrics fraud on ResearchGate - ScienceDirect.com
    RG score. Probably due to growing criticism, RG removed the RG Score from the service in August 2022 and replaced it with the Research Interest (RI) Score.
  11. [11]
    Copyright and ResearchGate
    May 2, 2023 · If you upload or share content in a way that infringes a publisher's rights, the publisher can file a notice claiming copyright infringement.Copyright and ResearchGate · Copyright infringement
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    ResearchGate opens to $52.6m series D -
    Mar 1, 2017 · Germany-based professional platform ResearchGate has collected $52.6m in a series D round backed by luxury consumer goods producer LVMH, ...
  14. [14]
    ResearchGate Statistics and User Count for 2025 - DMR
    How many people use ResearchGate? 20 million users (2022). ResearchGate Revenue Totals. Nothing to report just yet. Please check back soon for updates ...
  15. [15]
    Today we are announcing that #ResearchGate now has 25 million ...
    May 18, 2023 · ResearchGate now has 25 million registered members, and we want to say thank you to all of the world's scientists and researchers who make ResearchGate what it ...
  16. [16]
    Is the academic social networking site ResearchGate still relevant?
    Jan 19, 2024 · Founded in 2008, ResearchGate has millions of global users, most of them researchers. ... 2024. After the deal with MDPI was announced ...
  17. [17]
    Projects have been discontinued. Here's what we learned
    Apr 3, 2023 · On March 31, 2023, we retired the Projects feature and removed all projects from the site. This was a difficult decision, and it required a lot of discussion ...Missing: company | Show results with:company
  18. [18]
    ResearchGate and Wiley expand partnership to encompass majority ...
    Jun 27, 2023 · The partnership expands to include 519 Wiley open access journals, with 649 total, using ResearchGate's Journal Home to syndicate content and ...
  19. [19]
    ResearchGate and PLOS announce new Journal Home partnership
    May 16, 2024 · ResearchGate, the professional network for researchers, and PLOS, a leading nonprofit Open Access publisher, are pleased to announce a new partnership.<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Publisher Solutions | Introducing the improved Journal Profile
    Aug 28, 2023 · We'd like to announce the latest enhancement to our Journal Home product – an upgrade to the Journal Profile on ResearchGate.
  21. [21]
    ResearchGate and Sage Journal Home partnership to cover 90 ...
    Dec 17, 2024 · The renewed agreement will see a diverse selection of Sage's open access and an addition of hybrid journals accessible through Journal Home.
  22. [22]
    ResearchGate and Taylor & Francis expand Journal Home partnership
    Feb 13, 2025 · ResearchGate and Taylor & Francis have expanded their Journal Home partnership, increasing coverage to 595 journals.
  23. [23]
    ResearchGate and Trans Tech Publications expand Journal Home ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · Trans Tech Publications' partnership with ResearchGate began in 2024 with seven journals. These titles quickly experienced increased engagement ...
  24. [24]
    ResearchGate launches Journal Home's Open Access Agreement ...
    Oct 15, 2024 · This new feature enables publisher partners to identify and effectively communicate with relevant researchers about funding for publishing that they are ...
  25. [25]
    Are you aware that ResearchGate is going to erase all comments on ...
    Apr 19, 2025 · As of March 11, 2025 it's no longer possible to add new comments to research items. After May 1, 2025, all existing comments will be removed from research ...
  26. [26]
    How to add research - ResearchGate Help
    Aug 5, 2025 · There are two ways to add research to your profile. You'll find clear instructions on both methods of adding research below.Missing: official | Show results with:official
  27. [27]
    Intellectual Property Policy - ResearchGate
    Jan 8, 2018 · As a member, when you post full-text articles or supplementary materials on ResearchGate, you do not transfer or assign copyright to us. Rather, ...
  28. [28]
    Discovering and requesting research - ResearchGate Help
    Feb 23, 2024 · To add a public full-text to your publication page, making it visible to everyone, select Select and upload file under Add as a public full-text ...
  29. [29]
    How to make content private or remove it - ResearchGate Help
    Apr 14, 2023 · How do I make my full-text private? · Go to the Research tab on your profile · Click the Manage file visibility option underneath Research items ...
  30. [30]
    Hi, Can anyone explain the difference between add public file and ...
    Jun 10, 2023 · Uploading a file as a private file means that the content is only accessible to specific individuals or groups chosen by the uploader.
  31. [31]
    ResearchGate litigation settled – Copyright & Information Policy
    Sep 23, 2023 · ResearchGate and ACS & Elsevier have settled the copyright lawsuits the publishers filed in Germany and the US. The gist of the settlement ...
  32. [32]
    Updates, requests, and messages - ResearchGate Help
    Mar 13, 2025 · How do I view and respond to full-text requests? To see the full-text requests you've received, click on the speech bubble icon at the top-right ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    What to do when there is 'full-text request' in ResearchGate.net
    Apr 4, 2017 · First off: Receiving these requests means that people want to read your work. In nearly any academic scenario, this is a good thing. Embrace it, and help them!When can/can't I upload full-text to researchgate?How should I respond to full text requests from other researchers I ...More results from academia.stackexchange.com
  34. [34]
    Recommending and sharing content - ResearchGate Help
    Feb 23, 2024 · Recommending is a public way to recommend content to your peers and network, while sharing is private and is used when you want to share content with specific ...
  35. [35]
    Copyright checks on ResearchGate
    Feb 7, 2025 · Our copyright check system is a tool for copyright owners to manage the sharing of their copyrighted material on ResearchGate.
  36. [36]
    ResearchGate: Publishers Take Formal Steps to Force Copyright ...
    Oct 6, 2017 · ResearchGate provides links to the SHERPA/ROMEO database and provides the color designation for each journal to facilitate sharing policies.
  37. [37]
    Following researchers - ResearchGate Help
    Jan 21, 2025 · To follow a researcher, go to their profile and click the Follow button on the right-hand side of their profile. You can also click the Follow ...
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Contacting other researchers - ResearchGate Help
    Feb 7, 2025 · You can use the private message function to keep in touch with relevant researchers, let them know what you're working on, share interesting research and ...
  40. [40]
    What is Q&A? - ResearchGate Help
    Apr 14, 2023 · Q&A is where you can ask research-related questions and get them answered by other specialists. It's also the best place for you to share your knowledge.Missing: feature | Show results with:feature
  41. [41]
    7 things you can do to improve your Q&A posts, get ... - ResearchGate
    Jun 14, 2021 · The Q&A feed is one of the oldest and most active features of our platform. In 2020 alone, our members created more than 160,000 new Q&A ...
  42. [42]
    ResearchGate - Journal of the Medical Library Association
    Site members can follow other researchers and their work, identify colleagues and coworkers such as lab personnel, and share details of current projects. One ...
  43. [43]
    How to create private or public groups in researchgate?
    Nov 4, 2012 · According to RG, a lab is a group of scientists, led by a senior researcher, who conduct experiments and research together on a specific topic.How can I join the group? - ResearchGateWorking in Groups!!!! - ResearchGateMore results from www.researchgate.net
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
  46. [46]
    ResearchGate Score: Good Example of a Bad Metric
    Dec 11, 2015 · ResearchGate seems to have reacted to the criticisms surrounding the RG Score. In September, theyintroduced a new metric named “Reads ...
  47. [47]
    Why we're removing the RG Score (and what's next) - ResearchGate
    Mar 29, 2022 · Why we're removing the RG Score (and what's next). At the start of this year, we announced the decision to remove the RG Score after July 2022.
  48. [48]
    The Use of the H-index and Research Interest Score as Indices for ...
    Since the discontinuation of the RG score in August of 2022, ResearchGate has launched the RI score as a more intuitive and transparent means of measuring one's ...
  49. [49]
    ResearchGate
    **Summary of Networking Features on ResearchGate (from https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us):**
  50. [50]
    How Candidate Search can help you take control of your hiring
    Sep 29, 2020 · Candidate Search is ResearchGate's active sourcing tool that allows recruiters to filter through our pool of over 20 million members, find their ideal ...Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
  51. [51]
    Journals on ResearchGate
    Apr 7, 2025 · We've integrated journals into the ResearchGate network to help you stay connected to the right research, people, and resources.
  52. [52]
    Journal Subscription Terms - ResearchGate Help
    Aug 21, 2025 · Through the Platform we offer a paid subscription service (“Journal Subscription Service”) to eligible journals selected in our sole discretion ...Missing: premium | Show results with:premium
  53. [53]
    ResearchGate Stock Price, Funding, Valuation ... - CB Insights
    ResearchGate has raised $87.6M over 5 rounds. ResearchGate's latest funding round was a Series D for $52.6M on February 28, 2017.
  54. [54]
    Series A - ResearchGate - 2010-09-14 - Crunchbase Funding ...
    Benchmark Benchmark focuses on early-stage venture investing in mobile, marketplaces, social, infrastructure, and enterprise software.
  55. [55]
    ResearchGate Closes Series A Funding for Social Media Site for ...
    Sep 8, 2010 · The Series A round was led by Benchmark Capital, with participation from Accel Partners' Silicon Valley office and prominent investors from the ...
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    ResearchGate opens to $52.6m series D -
    The company has secured $100m to date. It previously closed a $35m series C round in 2013 co-led by Bill Gates and Tenaya Capital, with ...
  58. [58]
    ResearchGate raises $52.6M for its social research network for ...
    Feb 28, 2017 · ResearchGate raises $52.6M for its social research network for scientists. Ingrid Lunden. 3:01 AM PST · February 28, 2017.
  59. [59]
    ResearchGate secures investments from Wellcome Trust, Goldman ...
    Feb 28, 2017 · ResearchGate has completed four rounds of financing from Benchmark, Founders Fund, Bill Gates, Tenaya Capital, Wellcome Trust, Goldman Sachs ...
  60. [60]
    ResearchGate 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Funding & Investors
    When was ResearchGate founded? ResearchGate was founded in 2008. Where is ResearchGate headquartered? ResearchGate is headquartered in Berlin, Germany. What ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  61. [61]
    What is the ResearchGate business model?
    Sep 30, 2012 · ResearchGate is a for-profit enterprise. They have had two rounds of funding and have investors that have previously been involved with Facebook, LinkedIn and ...
  62. [62]
    ResearchGate Company Profile - Office Locations, Competitors ...
    ResearchGate has 5 employees across 3 locations, $87.6 m in total funding, and €5.03 m in annual revenue in FY 2015. See insights on ResearchGate including ...
  63. [63]
    ResearchGate CEO and Key Executive Team - Craft.co
    ResearchGate's Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer is Ijad Madisch. Other executives include Soren Hofmayer, Co-Founder, Chief Strategy Officer; ...
  64. [64]
    Ijad MADISCH | CEO | ResearchGate, Berlin | RG | Research profile
    I'm Ijad, CEO of ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists. In 2008, I co-founded the network that's since grown to 25+ million members worldwide.
  65. [65]
    Science publishers settle lawsuits with ResearchGate - C&EN
    Sep 18, 2023 · The American Chemical Society and Elsevier have reached a legal settlement with the academic social networking site ResearchGate.
  66. [66]
    Remote Brand Designer ( ~$93k, Germany. Our headquarters are in ...
    ResearchGate is hiring a Remote Brand Designer ( ~$93k - $120k, Germany. Our headquarters are in Berlin and we support a hybrid home office/in person ...
  67. [67]
    Privacy Policy - ResearchGate
    Feb 20, 2024 · As a public-facing company, we have a legitimate interest in being able to receive, process, and respond to inquiries. 3.4 Receive ...
  68. [68]
    Press - ResearchGate
    ResearchGate is the professional network for researchers. Over 25 million researchers use researchgate.net to share and discover research, ...
  69. [69]
    ResearchGate
    ResearchGate is the professional network for scientists and researchers. Over 25 million members from all over the world use it to share, discover, and discuss ...
  70. [70]
    Does ResearchGate have a growing credibility problem? - Nature
    Aug 5, 2025 · Hosting an estimated 25 million users, ResearchGate is one of the largest academic networking platforms in the world.Missing: global | Show results with:global
  71. [71]
    the subjectivation of competition on ResearchGate - Oxford Academic
    Dec 15, 2024 · ResearchGate was founded and launched in 2008 as one of the first academic social networks by German scholars Ijad Madisch, Sören Hofmayer and ...
  72. [72]
    Over 25 million researchers use researchgate.net to share and ...
    Feb 14, 2025 · ... 2024 – with 1,450,000 individual researchers engaging with their journals on the ResearchGate platform and producing more than 6,600,000 ...
  73. [73]
    researchgate.net Website Analysis for September 2025 - Similarweb
    researchgate.net is ranked #2 in the Science and Education - Other category and #337 globally in September 2025. Get the full researchgate.net Analytics and ...
  74. [74]
    researchgate.net Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [September 2025]
    On researchgate.net, desktops drive 65.76% of visits, while 34.24% of visitors come from mobile devices. Desktop65.76%.
  75. [75]
    Open access: changing global science publishing - PubMed Central
    Perhaps the best example of such an initiative is ResearchGate, a networking platform for scientists, which encourages sharing raw scientific data and published ...
  76. [76]
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Impact of ResearchGate on Increasing Citations and Usage Counts ...
    Jun 1, 2020 · The purpose of this research was to conduct a comparative study of the impact of. ResearchGate indicators on increasing citation and usage ...
  78. [78]
    Impact of ResearchGate on Increasing Citations and Usage Counts ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Increased number of views of articles in ResearchGate increased the number of citations of papers too. The results showed the significant ...
  79. [79]
    Publishers take ResearchGate to court, alleging massive copyright ...
    Elsevier and the American Chemical Society (ACS) have filed a lawsuit in Germany against ResearchGate, a popular academic networking site, alleging copyright ...<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    Publishers accuse ResearchGate of mass copyright infringement
    Oct 3, 2018 · American Chemical Society and Elsevier are again suing academic networking site ResearchGate in an attempt to stop it distributing copyrighted research papers.
  81. [81]
    ResearchGate Removes 1.7 Million Articles In Copyright Conflict
    Dec 5, 2017 · After fighting publishers like Elsevier and Wiley, ResearchGate was found guilty of copyright infringement and finally removes about 1.7 ...
  82. [82]
    ACS v. ResearchGate - 3,143 articles and a few lessons about their ...
    Nov 8, 2018 · In October, Elsevier and ACS filed a new US copyright infringement lawsuit against ResearchGate [complaint]. Like the German ResearchGate ...
  83. [83]
    Publishers settle copyright infringement lawsuit with ResearchGate
    Sep 18, 2023 · After years of litigation, two prominent scientific publishers have settled copyright infringement lawsuits with the academic social networking site ...
  84. [84]
    ResearchGate pulls 200,000 files from its site, amid publisher pressure
    Oct 4, 2021 · Three years ago, Elsevier and ACS sued ResearchGate for copyright infringement in the US. That case, which followed a similar lawsuit the ...Missing: violations | Show results with:violations<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This study aims to investigate the extent to which ResearchGate members as authors of journal articles comply with publishers' copyright policies.<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    ResearchGate and Copyright Violations
    Authors and publishers have different goals when it comes to the availability of their work, which can result in conflict that manifests itself in copyright ...
  87. [87]
    Publishers settle copyright legal battle with ResearchGate
    Sep 15, 2023 · Leading publishing companies have resolved their lengthy legal dispute with ResearchGate after reaching a “technical solution”. Elseiver and ...Missing: violations | Show results with:violations
  88. [88]
    (PDF) Fake and “ghost” “researchers” populate ResearchGate
    Oct 10, 2025 · Consequently, the bibliometric data of those papers is outdated and inaccurate. Despite requests to both parties to resolve this issue, the ...
  89. [89]
    ResearchGate fails to act on a serious and obvious example of ...
    Aug 15, 2025 · It appeared that all the citations are from fake profiles and most likely AI generated 'papers'!
  90. [90]
    Do any of you actually use ResearchGate professionally? : r/academia
    Aug 4, 2024 · A humorous method of citation-boosting using ResearchGate (RG). Fundamentally, this works because RG postings have little-to-zero barrier to entry.
  91. [91]
    (PDF) What is research data “misuse”? And how can it be prevented ...
    PDF | Despite increasing expectations that researchers and funding agencies release their data for reuse, concerns about data misuse hinder the open.
  92. [92]
    The ResearchGate Score: a good example of a bad metric - LSE Blogs
    Dec 9, 2015 · According to ResearchGate, the academic social networking site, their RG Score is "a new way to measure your scientific reputation".
  93. [93]
    (PDF) Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric
    This paper presents a response to the paper 'A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation'. Following up on arguments ...
  94. [94]
    A Continued Debate on Metrics of a Highly Popular Academic Social ...
    Feb 1, 2025 · RG Scores was met with a deflective response (Appendix 3; Suppl. file). Several criticisms were leveled at the RG ...
  95. [95]
    (PDF) GDPR and challenges of personal data protection
    Aug 6, 2025 · The research addresses key challenges, including data collection practices, privacy risks, regulatory compliance, and AI system vulnerabilities.
  96. [96]
    (PDF) Challenges and Enablers for GDPR Compliance: Systematic ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This research aims to provide a systematic literature review of the challenges and enablers for GDPR compliance and address this gap.