Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

MicroG


MicroG is a reimplementation of , enabling Android applications that depend on proprietary to function on AOSP-based systems without requiring the installation of Google's official proprietary libraries.
The project comprises key components such as GmsCore for emulating core Play Services functionality, UnifiedNlp for network-based services, and optional modules for notifications and other features, all designed with an emphasis on low resource consumption, opt-in usage, and avoidance of unnecessary bloatware under the 2.0 license.
To operate, MicroG necessitates system-level support for signature spoofing, which allows it to masquerade as Google-signed services, facilitating integration into custom ROMs like for microG that aim to deliver a functional experience decoupled from full ecosystem dependency.
Notable for advancing user freedom in mobile operating systems, MicroG has nonetheless drawn scrutiny from security-oriented communities, including developers, who contend that its partial reimplementation omits critical proprietary security validations and may expose users to risks through privileged access and residual connections to servers.

History and Development

Origins and Initial Creation

MicroG was developed by German programmer Marvin Wißfeld as an open-source alternative to Google's proprietary Play Services framework, with initial work beginning in 2015. The project emerged from the need to enable compatibility for Android applications dependent on Google APIs—such as location services, push notifications, and safety net checks—on de-Googled devices running the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) without requiring the installation of closed-source Google Mobile Services. Wißfeld, motivated by personal challenges in running location-based games like Ingress on custom ROMs lacking Google components, focused on reimplementing essential libraries and services to bridge this gap while prioritizing user control and privacy over proprietary tracking mechanisms. The inaugural release of GmsCore, MicroG's central module mimicking Google Play Services, occurred on October 4, 2015, marking the project's public debut via GitHub. Early development emphasized signature spoofing techniques to convince apps of the presence of authentic Google services, a workaround necessitated by Android's reliance on proprietary verification for many features. Wißfeld maintained sole primary development initially, releasing components under free software licenses to foster community adoption on privacy-focused ROMs like LineageOS variants. This foundational effort laid the groundwork for broader ecosystem integration, though it required ongoing patches to counter evolving Google restrictions on API access and device certification.

Key Milestones and Releases

Development of microG originated from the NOGAPPS project initiated by Marvin Wißfeld in 2012, which sought to replace with an open-source alternative. The project formally emerged as microG with the initial release of its core component, GmsCore, on October 4, 2015, enabling basic compatibility for apps reliant on without proprietary libraries. A significant milestone occurred in late 2017 with the launch of for microG, a custom ROM fork of that pre-integrated microG components, facilitating easier adoption on de-Googled devices and expanding its use in privacy-focused distributions. Subsequent releases focused on enhancing coverage and compatibility. For instance, version 0.2.18 in early 2022 improved stability for cloud messaging and location services. By April 2024, version 0.3.7 introduced support for work profiles, Play Feature Delivery, and , broadening enterprise and multimedia app compatibility. In October 2024, version 0.3.10 added app installer functionality via microG Companion for seamless integration with alternative app stores like Aurora Store, alongside live location sharing capabilities. These updates reflect ongoing efforts to counter evolving restrictions, such as enhanced integrity checks, while maintaining under Wißfeld's primary maintenance.

Primary Contributors and Governance

MicroG was initiated and is primarily maintained by Marvin Wißfeld, a software who created the project as a free and open-source reimplementation of 's proprietary libraries. Development began around 2015, with Wißfeld handling core implementation, signature spoofing mechanisms, and compatibility updates to enable broader app support on de-Googled devices. His efforts focus on reducing dependency on services while preserving functionality for third-party applications, as detailed in interviews. The project operates under an informal open-source model hosted on , where Wißfeld serves as the lead maintainer responsible for reviewing and merging contributions. Community involvement includes bug reports, feature requests, and pull requests submitted via the repository's issue tracker and branches, though Wißfeld retains final authority on code integration and release decisions. No formal structure, such as a foundation board or consensus-based , is established; instead, it follows a (BDFL) paradigm common in solo-led projects, prioritizing the maintainer's technical vision over distributed decision-making. Secondary contributions come from occasional collaborators addressing specific modules like location services or push notifications, but the codebase remains dominated by Wißfeld's commits, ensuring consistency in privacy-focused design choices. Funding has included grants from organizations supporting alternatives to proprietary ecosystems, aiding sustained development without corporate oversight. This structure allows rapid iteration but risks dependency on a individual for long-term viability.

Technical Architecture

Core Components and Modules

MicroG's primary module is GmsCore, an open-source reimplementation of the framework that provides essential for app authentication, cloud messaging, and device synchronization without proprietary binaries. Released under the Apache License 2.0, GmsCore handles core tasks such as (FCM) integration and SafetyNet attestation emulation, allowing compatibility with apps designed for 's ecosystem on de-Googled ROMs like . As of version 0.2.28.231657 (circa 2023), it supports partial implementation of over 100 , though full parity remains incomplete due to reverse-engineering challenges. Integrated within GmsCore is the Unified Network Location Provider (UnifiedNlp), a pluggable subsystem for network-based geolocation that intercepts calls to Google's Fused Location Provider. UnifiedNlp relies on independent backends—such as Location Service or Apple Wi-Fi geolocation—for cell tower and Wi-Fi scanning data, enabling offline-capable location fixes without transmitting data to Google servers. This module requires explicit backend selection and permissions granting, with implementations like beaconDB prioritizing privacy by using crowdsourced, anonymized databases. Supporting modules include GsfProxy, which proxies interactions with the Google Services Framework for tasks like app verification and push token registration, and MicroG Companion (or FakeStore), a minimal storefront that spoofs Play Store presence for app downloads and updates. These components are typically installed as systemless overlays via tools like Magisk modules to avoid modifications. GsfProxy, for instance, facilitates legacy sign-ins by mimicking framework responses, though it demands signature spoofing patches in the for seamless operation. Together, these modules form a stack—totaling under 10 MB in typical installations—prioritizing principles over full feature replication.

Mechanism of Signature Spoofing

Signature spoofing in MicroG enables its core component, GmsCore, to impersonate Google Play Services by altering the reported package signature at the Android framework level. Many applications designed for Google Play Services verify the authenticity of the service through signature checks, querying the system's PackageManager to confirm that the com.google.android.gms package is signed with Google's proprietary keys rather than a third-party developer's keys. Without this verification bypass, such applications would reject MicroG as illegitimate, preventing API interactions for services like location resolution or push notifications. The mechanism relies on a system-level patch to the Android operating system, typically integrated into custom ROMs, that intercepts signature queries and substitutes a forged response matching Google's signature for designated packages. This patch modifies core framework components, such as the PackageManagerService or signature validation methods in PackageParser, to return predefined signature data when applications invoke APIs like PackageManager.getPackageInfo() with the GET_SIGNATURES flag for com.google.android.gms. The spoofing is not performed by MicroG itself but by the underlying OS modification, which must whitelist specific packages (e.g., MicroG's GmsCore) to limit exposure; unrestricted implementations could allow arbitrary apps to forge signatures, undermining Android's app integrity model. Custom ROMs like LineageOS for microG or OmniROM include configurable variants of this patch, often toggled via build flags or runtime permissions, ensuring spoofing applies only to privileged or system apps. Implementation requires ROMs with explicit support, as stock and most vendor ROMs enforce strict signature matching to maintain boundaries. MicroG's self-check diagnostic tests spoofing efficacy by attempting to forge its own temporarily and validating the system's response, reporting failures if the patch is absent, incomplete, or restricted to insufficient scopes—such as when recent library updates introduce novel verification paths not covered by older patches. For devices lacking native support, workarounds include root-enabled modules like Magisk or LSPosed that inject spoofing via framework hooks, though these introduce additional privileges and potential instability. This approach preserves compatibility but compromises the causal in Android's scheme, where apps assume unforgeable proofs of origin; critics argue it elevates convenience over verifiable integrity, as spoofed signatures evade bytecode-level attestation while exposing systems to targeted exploits if whitelisting fails.

Differences from Google Play Services

MicroG GmsCore functions as an open-source reimplementation of select APIs, designed to enable third-party applications dependent on those APIs to operate on AOSP-derived ROMs without proprietary software. In contrast, (GMS) comprises a suite of closed-source libraries and services deeply integrated into the ecosystem, often preinstalled on devices certified by , facilitating seamless access to Google's cloud infrastructure, app verification, and data synchronization. MicroG omits much of GMS's proprietary backend reliance, instead providing modular, lightweight components that prioritize compatibility over full replication, resulting in a system that avoids mandatory linkage for core operations. A fundamental technical distinction lies in and mechanisms: MicroG relies on signature spoofing, a system modification that permits its packages to impersonate GMS signatures, tricking applications into accepting MicroG as legitimate without altering app code. Official GMS, being natively signed by , requires no such spoofing and benefits from hardware-backed attestation via features like Android's verified boot. This spoofing enables MicroG deployment on non-Google ROMs but introduces potential security considerations, as it bypasses standard enforced by the Android framework. Privacy profiles diverge sharply; GMS routinely transmits usage data, location history, and device identifiers to Google servers for , personalization, and service optimization, often without granular user beyond basic settings. MicroG, conversely, eschews such by default, implementing services locally where possible—such as offline-capable location via UnifiedNlp—and treating Google connectivity as strictly opt-in, thereby minimizing to external servers. This design aligns with principles under the Apache 2.0 license, contrasting GMS's non-free, opaque codebase that embeds tracking hooks integral to its operation. Resource efficiency represents another contrast: MicroG maintains a minimal footprint, with core components like GmsCore optimized for low CPU, , and usage, absent the ancillary bloatware, daemons, and persistent background processes characteristic of GMS. GMS, embedded with app store integration, automatic s, and ecosystem-wide synchronization, contributes to higher system overhead, particularly on devices with limited . MicroG's allows selective installation of services, further reducing unnecessary load. Compatibility with applications is partial in MicroG due to incomplete coverage; while it emulates essential interfaces for push notifications, maps, and safety checks, advanced or evolving s—such as full Play Integrity for device integrity verification or certain extensions—remain unimplemented or partially supported, leading to functionality gaps in apps performing strict GMS validation. GMS offers comprehensive, up-to-date fidelity, ensuring broad app ecosystem support but at the cost of . Developers attribute these gaps to MicroG's reverse-engineering approach, which cannot fully replicate undocumented or rapidly iterated behaviors without ongoing effort.

Features and Capabilities

Supported Google APIs and Services

MicroG GmsCore reimplements several key Google Play Services APIs, enabling applications designed for proprietary Google functionality to operate on Android Open Source Project (AOSP)-based systems without requiring the full Google Mobile Services suite. This includes support for essential services such as location resolution and push notifications, though coverage is not exhaustive and varies by API maturity. As of version 0.2.8.17785 (released around May 2025), core implementations focus on privacy-preserving alternatives, such as opt-in cloud messaging and network-based location providers, while avoiding proprietary tracking dependencies.
API/ServiceImplementation StatusKey Details
Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM)Fully implementedEnables push notifications for compatible apps via opt-in Google device registration; supports both online and offline queuing.
Fused Location ProviderFully implementedIntegrates with Unified Network Location Provider (UnifiedNlp) for geolocation services, using Mozilla or Apple backends as alternatives to Google servers.
SafetyNet/Play Integrity APIMostly implementedProvides attestation for app integrity checks, though some advanced hardware-backed features may require additional spoofing or fallbacks; partial compatibility with banking and DRM apps.
Exposure NotificationsFully implementedSupports COVID-19 contact tracing APIs, allowing apps to use low-energy Bluetooth scanning without Google server reliance.
Google Maps API v1Fully implementedEnables legacy mapping functionality in apps, with static map rendering and geocoding.
Google Maps API v2Mostly implementedPartial support via Mapbox integration for dynamic maps, but lacks some proprietary rendering optimizations.
Account AuthenticationPartialAllows Google account login and token management for services, but may not cover all OAuth scopes or enterprise features.
These implementations prioritize resource efficiency, with microG consuming less battery, memory, and CPU than official equivalents. App compatibility depends on signature spoofing enablement in the host and proper configuration of microG components like GmsCore and . While many popular apps—such as those using FCM for notifications or fused for GPS—function seamlessly, specialized APIs like full or advanced services remain unsupported or require workarounds.

Integration with Location and Push Notifications

MicroG integrates location services primarily through its Unified Network Location Provider (UnifiedNlp) module, an open-source framework that emulates Google's network location backend while supporting modular third-party backends. UnifiedNlp aggregates and cell tower data from providers such as Mozilla's Service, Nominatim, or custom implementations, enabling network-assisted positioning without direct reliance on Google's proprietary servers. This setup allows applications to access fused location data—combining GPS, network, and passive providers—via standard Android LocationManager APIs, as MicroG spoofs the necessary interfaces. Devices using MicroG, such as those on for microG, can achieve location accuracy comparable to stock in urban environments, provided a compatible backend is installed and granted location permissions. For push notifications, MicroG's GmsCore component includes a GCM/FCM client that proxies requests, enabling apps to register for and receive pushes as if full were present. This requires outbound connections to Google infrastructure, including mtalk.google.com for token registration and message relay, which occurs upon enabling "Device registration" and "Cloud Messaging" in MicroG settings. As of implementations in ROMs like , this supports reliable delivery for apps such as Signal or ProtonMail, with registration verifiable via dialer code ##CHECKIN## or app-specific testers, though delays or failures can arise from incomplete spoofing or network restrictions. Unlike fully de-Googled alternatives like UnifiedPush, MicroG's approach maintains compatibility with the majority of FCM-dependent apps but introduces dependency on Google servers for upstream delivery.

Unified Network Location Provider

The Unified Network Location Provider (UnifiedNlp) is a core module within MicroG's GmsCore that serves as an open-source replacement for Google's proprietary network services, enabling geolocation based on access points, cellular towers, and beacons without requiring connections to servers. It functions as middleware, intercepting Android system calls intended for the Google Network Location Provider and routing them through pluggable backends that perform location lookups, thereby supporting in de-Googled environments. Developed as part of the MicroG project since at least , UnifiedNlp supports versions from 2.3 onward via variant APKs such as NetworkLocation.apk for modern systems and LegacyNetworkLocation.apk for older ones, with often requiring system-level privileges like on pre-Android 6 devices. UnifiedNlp operates by passively scanning available network signals—such as SSIDs, MAC addresses, and signal strengths, alongside cell tower IDs and mobile country codes—and forwarding this data to selected backend plugins for reverse geolocation resolution. These backends query either remote services or local offline databases to estimate coordinates, achieving accuracy typically within 10-100 meters in urban areas depending on signal density and backend quality. Key supported backends include MozillaNlpBackend, which leverages Mozilla's community-sourced location service database covering over 100 countries as of 2023; AppleWifiNlpBackend, utilizing Apple's positioning data scraped from public sources; and local variants like LocalWifiNlpBackend and LocalGsmNlpBackend for fully offline operation using pre-downloaded databases from projects such as OpenWLANMap or OpenCellID. Geocoding for address resolution is handled separately through compatible plugins, ensuring comprehensive location data for apps requesting fused or network-only fixes. In MicroG ecosystems, UnifiedNlp integrates seamlessly with the broader signature spoofing framework to mimic APIs, specifically intercepting calls to com.google.android.gms.location.NetworkLocationProvider and providing equivalent outputs without telemetry to . This allows for rapid initial location fixes to complement GPS (reducing time-to-first-fix from minutes to seconds in signal-poor environments) and maintains functionality indoors or underground where satellite signals are unavailable. As of MicroG releases in , it remains actively maintained under the Apache 2.0 license, with distributions available via repositories, though backend efficacy can vary by region due to database coverage—e.g., Mozilla's service excels in and but lags in rural or developing areas. Users configure backends via the MicroG Settings app, enabling multiple providers for redundancy and fallback, which enhances reliability without compromising the privacy benefits of avoiding 's fused location APIs.

Limitations and Compatibility Issues

Unsupported Features and APIs

MicroG does not provide full implementations for several APIs, resulting in incompatibility with apps dependent on them. Unsupported categories include connectivity, Google Fitness tracking, dynamic font loading, geofencing for location-based triggers, in-app update mechanisms, Nearby Connections for device-to-device communication, and features for wearable devices. These omissions stem from the project's focus on core location, push, and services rather than comprehensive replication of proprietary extensions. Partially supported APIs exhibit functional gaps that limit reliability. For example, integration lacks full protocol support, omits advanced models, Firebase authentication excludes Google Sign-In flows, Google Play Games services miss multiplayer and achievement syncing, the split install service handles basic downloads but not complex expansions, and Google Vision processes only scanning without broader image recognition. Privacy considerations lead to deliberate non-implementation of analytics APIs, Firebase Analytics, and mobile advertising services, preventing and ad targeting that are integral to Google's ecosystem. Further limitations affect security and mapping functionalities: FIDO2/U2F authentication supports only USB and hardware authenticators, excluding software-based or platform-specific methods; Maps API v2 remains incomplete with numerous unimplemented endpoints, prompting recommendations for alternatives like integrations. Recent additions like Play Integrity enable basic integrity checks, but strong hardware-backed attestations often fail without custom modifications or root-level fixes, impacting apps with stringent device verification such as banking or DRM-protected software.

App Detection and Functionality Gaps

Certain applications employ detection mechanisms to verify the presence and authenticity of Google Play Services, including checks for specific API implementations, digital signatures, and integrity verdicts, which MicroG may fail due to its open-source reimplementation lacking proprietary validation paths. For instance, apps querying the Google Play Services version or package signature can report errors if MicroG's spoofing is incomplete, such as when the accompanying FakeStore or Play Store lacks initial signature spoofing permissions, resulting in messages like "Google Play services not found" despite installation. This detection often stems from apps relying on undocumented Google behaviors not fully emulated in MicroG, leading to outright refusal or degraded functionality in cases like registration processes for messaging apps such as Signal. A primary functionality gap arises with the Play Integrity API, which succeeded the deprecated SafetyNet Attestation API in 2023 and enforces three verdict levels—MEETS_BASIC_INTEGRITY, MEETS_DEVICE_INTEGRITY, and MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY—requiring hardware-backed proofs of device unmodified state and app genuineness that MicroG cannot natively satisfy without external modules. As of MicroG version 0.3.6 released in late 2024, partial Play Integrity support was introduced, enabling basic checks in some configurations, but strong integrity verdicts consistently fail, triggering error codes like -100 during API binding and blocking apps dependent on them. This limitation is exacerbated on custom ROMs or rooted devices, where apps cross-reference status or integrity, causing widespread incompatibility without workarounds like Magisk-based Play Integrity Fix modules that emulate passing verdicts but introduce their own risks. Banking and financial applications exemplify severe gaps, as they mandate strong integrity for prevention, often detecting MicroG through failed attestation or auxiliary checks for , Xposed frameworks, or non-standard service implementations, prompting alerts or outright blocks. Community-maintained compatibility lists document variable outcomes: apps like certain European mobile banks (e.g., ) function partially for basic operations but crash on advanced features like QR scanning, while U.S. banking apps frequently reject MicroG setups citing " issues" akin to virtual app environments. Empirical reports from 2024 indicate that even with MicroG updates adding QR support and messaging, persistent gaps in push delivery and device registration hinder full operability, with success rates improving only via device-specific tweaks but remaining unreliable across vendors. Broader app-specific gaps include intermittent failures in location-dependent features, where apps report missing maps or geolocation due to MicroG's reliance on open UnifiedNlp providers rather than Google's fused backend, and media apps encountering restrictions from unverified integrity. These issues underscore MicroG's trade-offs: while enabling many GMS-dependent apps on de-Googled systems, its absence of closed-source attestation paths creates verifiable detection vectors, particularly for security-sensitive software prioritizing Google's ecosystem validation over open alternatives.

Hardware and ROM Dependencies

MicroG's primary dependency lies in the Android ROM's support for signature spoofing, a modification that enables the GmsCore component to impersonate proprietary by altering app signature verification mechanisms. Without this feature, MicroG cannot provide the necessary APIs to apps expecting official Google services, rendering it non-functional on unmodified stock ROMs from manufacturers like or devices. Custom ROMs derived from the (), such as , frequently include signature spoofing by default or via optional patches, allowing seamless integration. For ROMs lacking native support, users must apply patches like NanoDroid or use tools such as Magisk modules (e.g., MinMicroG) to enable spoofing, often requiring root access or custom recovery. Signature spoofing support varies by ROM version and maintainer; for instance, many LineageOS-based builds post-2017 incorporate MicroG-specific spoofing tied to its official , enhancing by limiting spoofing to verified implementations. Older or vendor-locked may necessitate deodexing and manual patching, which can introduce stability risks or void warranties. MicroG is incompatible with ROMs enforcing strict SELinux policies or hardware attestation that detect spoofing, such as those on devices with locked bootloaders. On the hardware front, MicroG imposes no unique requirements beyond standard compatibility, functioning on any device capable of running a supported , including emulators and environments. It relies on underlying for ancillary features like services via UnifiedNlp, which may underperform without GPS or scanning capabilities present in most mid-range and flagship smartphones since 2010. However, core operations remain agnostic to specific chipsets, sensors, or processors, prioritizing software-level over . Compatibility issues can arise on devices with proprietary blobs or that integrate deeply with services, but these are resolvable through ROM selection rather than hardware upgrades.

Integrations in Android Ecosystems

Custom ROM Implementations

Custom ROM implementations of MicroG typically involve integrating its components into the operating system build process, often requiring modifications such as enabling signature spoofing to allow MicroG to masquerade as . This enables compatibility with applications reliant on without incorporating proprietary Google software. Most custom achieve this by including support for signature spoofing natively or via patches, facilitating MicroG's core functionality like location services and push notifications. LineageOS for microG represents a key example, merging the base with MicroG services and the package manager to deliver a de-Googled experience. Released as an unofficial , it supports devices compatible with LineageOS and provides builds up to Android 15, allowing users to access Google-dependent features through open-source alternatives. The ROM bundles MicroG's GmsCore, GsfProxy, and UnifiedNlp, ensuring system-wide integration without closed-source blobs. Other implementations include , which incorporates MicroG in an unprivileged mode since its July 2023 release, positioning it as a non-system app to reduce potential risks associated with privileged access. Developers can also construct ROMs with full MicroG by adding MicroG prebuilt repositories to the build and configuring signature spoofing during compilation. This approach has been documented for extending to devices not officially backed by projects like .

Specific Builds like LineageOS for microG

LineageOS for microG is an unofficial custom ROM that merges LineageOS with microG and F-Droid to deliver a de-Googled Android operating system while maintaining compatibility for applications dependent on Google APIs. This integration enables core functionalities such as push notifications and location services through open-source alternatives, without requiring proprietary Google Mobile Services. Announced on November 6, 2017, the project functions as a fork of LineageOS, implementing only the essential modifications—like enabling signature spoofing—to embed microG system-wide, a feature absent in official LineageOS due to compatibility and policy concerns. Initial releases provided weekly builds for every device officially supported by LineageOS, ensuring broad device coverage from manufacturers including Google Pixel, OnePlus, and Samsung models. By 2025, build cadence shifted to monthly releases, synchronized with LineageOS development cycles, with over-the-air update support for seamless maintenance. The ROM extends compatibility to Treble-enabled devices and platforms, broadening its applicability beyond smartphones. Alternating builds include a Play Integrity patch to evade detection by apps verifying genuine services, addressing common compatibility hurdles in privacy-focused setups. serves as the default app repository, prioritizing distribution and reinforcing the ROM's emphasis on user sovereignty over app ecosystems. Development entered after attaining stable microG-LineageOS synergy, with ongoing repository activity on for build tools and prebuilt components. Downloads as of October 2025 confirm support for versions up to at least 15, with device-specific images available via the project's dedicated server. This build variant remains a primary option for users seeking microG integration without manual post-installation configuration, distinguishing it from standard where microG requires separate, limited installation.

Usage in Privacy-Focused Distributions

MicroG is integrated into various privacy-oriented distributions to provide essential compatibility layers for applications that depend on APIs, such as push notifications, location resolution, and SafetyNet attestation, while avoiding the 's extensive telemetry and data collection. These distributions typically enable system-level signature spoofing—a modification that permits MicroG's components to emulate Google-signed services—allowing broader app functionality on de-Googled devices without compromising the open-source nature of the OS. This approach contrasts with fully alternatives by limiting network requests to endpoints only when necessary for specific features, though it requires users to verify MicroG's self-check status for optimal operation. In /e/OS, MicroG forms the foundational replacement for , enabling core features like UnifiedNlp for network-based location and cloud messaging without direct reliance on Google's servers for all operations; the distribution, forked from , emphasizes this integration to support everyday app usage across a range of devices while blocking trackers by default. Similarly, CalyxOS offers MicroG as an optional, user-installable module via its settings interface, which restores partial Play Services compatibility on supported hardware like and devices, prioritizing reduced data leakage over complete isolation—users must manually enable it post-installation for apps needing geolocation or . iodéOS, another derivative, bundles MicroG to handle push notifications, location services, and SafetyNet compatibility—allowing many banking and payment apps to function by passing device integrity checks—alongside built-in ad and tracker blocking for enhanced privacy; it supports a wide array of devices and positions MicroG as a lightweight alternative that minimizes but does not eliminate interactions for certified app verification. These implementations demonstrate MicroG's role in balancing usability and privacy in custom ROM ecosystems, though distributions like these often recommend combining it with for app sourcing and disabling unnecessary permissions to mitigate residual risks from calls.

Adoption Patterns

User Demographics and Scale

MicroG is predominantly adopted by privacy-conscious Android users who prioritize reducing dependence on Google's proprietary ecosystem, often comprising technically adept individuals willing to engage in device modification such as rooting and flashing custom ROMs. This user base includes open-source software advocates, de-Googling proponents, and those seeking compatibility for Google-dependent apps without full Play Services integration, as evidenced by its integration in privacy-oriented distributions like /e/OS and CalyxOS. Such demographics skew toward younger, male-dominated tech enthusiasts familiar with forums like XDA Developers and Reddit communities focused on custom Android modifications. Adoption scale remains niche relative to the billions of stock Android devices, with no comprehensive public metrics available for MicroG specifically; however, proxies indicate limited but steady use within custom ROM ecosystems. For instance, LineageOS for microG, a dedicated variant embedding MicroG, provides monthly builds for devices mirroring 's supported hardware but lacks disclosed download or active installation figures. Broader , which users may extend with MicroG, tracks active installations in the hundreds of thousands per popular device model, such as over 367,000 for the Motorola moto g7 play as of October 2025, suggesting MicroG's reach is a fraction thereof amid declining custom ROM popularity due to manufacturer updates and hardware restrictions. Growth aligns with de-Googling trends but faces barriers like installation complexity and app compatibility gaps, confining it to a specialized subset rather than mainstream uptake.

Enterprise and Niche Applications

MicroG's adoption in enterprise environments remains limited, primarily due to enterprises' preference for officially certified (GMS) to ensure compatibility with management tools, updates, and features like zero-touch enrollment. Custom implementations risk failing Google's Play Integrity checks, which are often required for corporate app deployments and device provisioning. In niche scenarios, particularly with devices affected by the 2019 U.S. export restrictions barring GMS certification, variants like microG-hw enable business users to maintain compatibility with Google-dependent applications on or HarmonyOS-based hardware. This allows enterprises relying on 's mobile solutions—such as in or sectors—to access features like push notifications and location services without proprietary binaries, though full integration requires manual setup and may not support all protocols. As of June 2025, microG-hw has been documented in Huawei community resources for such hybrid deployments. Other niche applications include developer and testing workflows, where MicroG facilitates professional evaluation of app functionality reliant on in de-Googled environments, balancing compatibility with reduced . For instance, it supports prototyping in open-source ROMs like for microG on sustainable hardware such as devices, appealing to eco-conscious organizations prioritizing principles over proprietary services.

Metrics of Usage and Growth

Precise metrics on MicroG's user base are limited, as its distribution occurs primarily through privacy-focused channels like , custom ROM repositories, and direct releases, which eschew tracking for user anonymity. Adoption is concentrated among enthusiasts of de-Googled distributions, where MicroG enables compatibility for apps reliant on APIs without proprietary components. The project's primary GmsCore repository on serves as a key indicator of interest, amassing 11,193 stars as of recent listings, alongside active maintenance with updates within the past week. Integrations in major ROMs further proxy usage scale. for microG, a dedicated variant, sustains monthly builds for dozens of devices, including legacy branches for end-of-life hardware, demonstrating sustained demand and expansion in device support through 2025. Similarly, /e/OS—a MicroG-inclusive OS—reports around 44,000 monthly accessing its cloud services in late 2024, encompassing both pre-installed devices (over 20,000 sold) and community-flashed installations. Growth trajectories reflect organic expansion within niche ecosystems rather than mass-market surges. Originating in the mid-2010s, MicroG has evolved through community-driven enhancements, with activity—including thousands of issues and pull requests—indicating persistent development and refinement. Its inclusion in privacy advocacy resources and ROM comparisons underscores rising awareness among users prioritizing open-source alternatives, though broader custom adoption (e.g., variants) remains a fraction of the platform's 3.6 billion total users.

Security and Privacy Evaluation

Privacy Benefits Relative to Proprietary Alternatives

MicroG enhances user privacy compared to proprietary by serving as an open-source reimplementation of key , enabling third-party apps to function on de-Googled systems without embedding closed-source components that facilitate extensive . Its codebase, licensed under 2.0, allows independent auditing to confirm the lack of hidden or backdoors inherent in proprietary alternatives, which routinely transmit device identifiers, location data, and usage patterns to Google's servers. A core privacy advantage lies in MicroG's optional authentication model: unlike Google Play Services, which mandate Google account sign-in for features like push notifications, location services, and app verification—thereby linking activities to a centralized user profile—MicroG permits core operations without account registration, preventing automatic synchronization of contacts, calendars, and other data to Google's ecosystem. This decoupling reduces the risk of cross-app tracking and profile building, as no persistent identifier ties device events to a Google-hosted account unless explicitly added by the user. MicroG further mitigates through configurable network interactions; for instance, daily device check-ins and push messaging can be disabled in settings, eliminating periodic pings to endpoints that occur continuously in proprietary implementations for maintenance and analytics. resolution via UnifiedNlp integrates third-party, non- backends, avoiding the fused provider's reliance on Google's vast data aggregation for and cell tower triangulation, which correlates positions with billions of user-submitted samples. While apps may still collect data independently, MicroG's absence of SafetyNet attestation by default curtails remote app behavior enforcement that could indirectly expose usage habits to verification checks. Overall, these mechanisms collectively minimize exposure to surveillance apparatus, prioritizing user control over proprietary convenience.

Identified Vulnerabilities and Risks

Signature spoofing, a core requirement for MicroG's functionality, enables applications to impersonate others by altering package signatures, thereby circumventing Android's standard verification mechanisms that rely on cryptographic signatures to prevent unauthorized substitutions. This feature, implemented via patches like those in for microG, allows MicroG's GmsCore to mimic proprietary but introduces a potential vector for malicious apps to spoof trusted system components if spoofing permissions are improperly granted. Developers argue that risks are confined when spoofing is limited to designated packages, such as MicroG itself, and not extended indiscriminately, as the permission cannot be revoked per-app without user oversight. However, critics contend this fundamentally weakens the security model, which assumes immutable signatures for integrity checks in inter-app communications and updates. No Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) have been publicly assigned to MicroG components as of October 2025, reflecting its niche adoption and lack of widespread enterprise scrutiny compared to proprietary alternatives. Nonetheless, as a partial reimplementation, MicroG may inherit or introduce implementation discrepancies that could lead to unhandled edge cases in safety nets or attestation services, potentially allowing apps to bypass intended restrictions without triggering proprietary equivalents' validations. For instance, reliance on community-maintained UnifiedNlp for location services introduces variability in backend providers, where misconfigurations or unpatched providers might expose geolocation data or enable tracking if fallback to Google services occurs. Privileged installation of MicroG, common in custom ROMs, elevates its components to system-level access, amplifying the impact of any undetected bugs or supply-chain compromises in its open-source repositories, though no such exploits have been documented. Signature spoofing implementations have been refined over time—e.g., via NanoDroid-patcher or Magisk modules attempting non-spoofing workarounds—but these alternatives often fail full , indirectly heightening risks from unverified app behaviors. Users mitigating these through strict app vetting and ROM-specific controls, as recommended by distributions like , report no empirical breaches attributable to MicroG, underscoring that realized risks depend on deployment context rather than inherent flaws.

Mitigation Strategies and Best Practices

Users of MicroG should prioritize installations in unprivileged mode, which confines the components to standard app permissions without system-level privileges, thereby reducing the compared to privileged setups that grant elevated access for enhanced functionality such as precise location services. This approach, while limiting certain features like full geolocation accuracy, aligns with security-focused distributions that implement MicroG without special integrations. To mitigate risks associated with signature spoofing—a mechanism enabling MicroG to impersonate —devices must employ patched ROMs or modules that restrict spoofing permissions exclusively to verified MicroG packages, preventing unauthorized apps from exploiting the feature. Regular updates to MicroG core components and the host operating system address known implementation gaps and potential API vulnerabilities in the reimplementation. Avoid authenticating with personal accounts within MicroG to prevent linkage of activity to identifiable profiles; instead, opt for pseudonymous or no usage, as processes have historically exposed credentials in logs or transmitted data to servers. In MicroG settings, selectively disable unnecessary services like push notifications or cloud messaging to minimize outbound connections, and pair with privacy-enhanced location providers such as UnifiedNlp backends that avoid proprietary geofencing. For broader risk reduction, integrate MicroG within sandboxed environments or secondary user profiles on the device, isolating apps dependent on its services from sensitive data. Community-maintained builds, such as those in for microG, incorporate additional hardening like restricted network access, and users are advised to monitor logs via tools like ADB for anomalous behavior while reporting issues directly to MicroG developers with detailed diagnostics.

Reception and Debates

Endorsements from De-Googling Advocates

MicroG has garnered endorsements from de-Googling proponents for facilitating app compatibility on Google-free environments while minimizing dependencies. In a November 2018 Lifehacker guide authored by Brendan Hesse, MicroG was described as a "promising" open-source to , enabling users to access features like push notifications and location without installing Google's full stack. The /e/ Foundation, founded by Gaël Duval to promote de-Googled mobile operating systems, integrates MicroG into /e/OS—a fork—as a core component for supporting Google-dependent apps with reduced tracking. Duval has publicly supported the project through sponsorship of its lead developer, emphasizing its role in providing essential services like cloud messaging without mandatory linkage. LineageOS for microG, a dedicated variant maintained since 2017, receives backing from de-Googling communities for bundling MicroG natively, allowing seamless operation of apps requiring Play Services equivalents on devices unsupported by official . This integration is highlighted in guides from privacy-oriented sites like , which recommend it for users seeking to "reclaim " by replacing services. Privacy educator Justin Herring of Techlore endorses MicroG in conjunction with de-Googled ROMs, noting in resources and videos that it restores functionality for apps reliant on Google APIs, such as unified push and geolocation, thereby making strict de-Googling viable for everyday use despite not being a perfect privacy solution.

Criticisms from Security Experts

Security experts have criticized MicroG primarily for its reliance on signature spoofing, a mechanism that enables the software to impersonate proprietary Google Play Services by forging app signatures, thereby undermining Android's core package verification system. This feature, necessary for MicroG's compatibility with apps expecting Google's APIs, allows designated components to bypass cryptographic checks intended to prevent app impersonation, potentially enabling malware to exploit the same pathway if permissions are mismanaged or if MicroG itself is compromised. Developers associated with hardened Android distributions, such as GrapheneOS, argue that even restricted implementations of signature spoofing—limited to MicroG in ROMs like CalyxOS or LineageOS for microG—introduce systemic risks, as they deviate from Android's verified boot and app isolation principles, creating a precedent for privilege escalation. Beyond spoofing, MicroG's partial reimplementation of APIs has been faulted for inadequate hardening, including insufficient encryption and authentication for communications with servers and lax local inter-app access controls. maintainers have highlighted that MicroG fails to enforce robust endpoint verification or API boundaries comparable to the proprietary services, exposing users to man-in-the-middle attacks or unauthorized during fallback connections to infrastructure. researcher madaidan has noted that users often overlook these gaps, as MicroG's open-source nature does not guarantee equivalent scrutiny or patching velocity to 's closed ecosystem, with historical precedents like 's own signature mishandling underscoring the complexity of secure implementation. Critics also point to the absence of routine third-party audits for MicroG, contrasting it with Google's services, which benefit from enterprise-level resources despite their drawbacks. This lack of formalized auditing raises concerns about undetected vulnerabilities in MicroG's reverse-engineered components, such as or notification handlers, which may inadvertently leak or fail under adversarial conditions. While proponents mitigate some risks through system-level restrictions, experts like those from maintain that no configuration fully restores the integrity model disrupted by MicroG, advising against its use in high- contexts.

Community Controversies and Responses

Within the open-source Android customization community, a primary controversy surrounding MicroG centers on its security implications, particularly its traditional requirement to operate as a privileged system application with elevated permissions to handle tasks like push notifications and location services. Critics, including developers from projects like GrapheneOS, argue that this setup undermines device hardening by granting MicroG broad access akin to proprietary Google Play Services, potentially exposing users to exploits in its reimplemented code, which lacks the full auditing and hardening of Google's ecosystem. In response, MicroG's lead developer, Marvin Wißfeld, has emphasized that the privileged mode is necessary for compatibility with apps expecting Google APIs, but community efforts such as DivestOS have introduced unprivileged implementations that sandbox MicroG as a regular app, reducing attack surface while maintaining core functionality. Privacy debates have also divided users, with purists contending that MicroG's reliance on Google-hosted services—for instance, Firebase Cloud Messaging for push notifications or Google servers for geolocation fused data—undermines de-Googling goals by necessitating outbound connections that could leak identifiers or usage patterns. Community responses include configurable opt-outs in MicroG settings to disable such features, alongside alternatives like unified push protocols (e.g., via NextPush) that route notifications through independent servers, as promoted in forums like /r/degoogle. Wißfeld has addressed these concerns by noting MicroG's open-source nature allows verification of minimal data transmission, contrasting it with opaque proprietary services, though he acknowledges incomplete coverage of APIs limits full avoidance of Google dependencies. Compatibility failures with apps enforcing Google's Play Integrity API (formerly SafetyNet) represent another flashpoint, as MicroG cannot replicate proprietary cryptographic signatures, leading to blocked access for banking, payment, and DRM-protected applications on devices like those running LineageOS for microG. This has sparked accusations of MicroG promoting a false sense of de-Googling while forcing users into workarounds or app abandonment. Developers have countered by iterating on spoofing mechanisms and advising signature spoofing in ROMs, with projects like CalyxOS integrating MicroG while documenting limitations; however, cross-project tensions persist, as seen in critiques of CalyxOS for downplaying risks relative to sandboxed Play alternatives. Ongoing community patches and forks, such as those enhancing self-check bypasses, demonstrate adaptive responses amid these persistent debates.

Broader Impact

Role in Android Customization Landscape

MicroG serves as a critical enabler in the Android customization ecosystem by reimplementing proprietary (GMS) APIs in an open-source manner, allowing custom ROMs based on the (AOSP) to support applications that depend on GMS without requiring closed-source components. Custom ROM developers and users, who often prioritize device control, privacy, and bloatware reduction, integrate MicroG to bridge compatibility gaps for features such as push notifications via , location services, and safety net attestations. This functionality is particularly vital for ROMs like , where proprietary GApps packages are avoided to maintain an open ecosystem. Dedicated builds such as for microG exemplify MicroG's integration, combining a LineageOS base with MicroG's service core and for app distribution, providing a pre-configured platform that supports versions up to 15 while eschewing logins for core operations. These variants facilitate extensive user customization, including root access via Magisk for modular additions like MicroG overlays, and require and custom recovery installation as prerequisites. Signature spoofing patches, often built into custom ROM kernels or enabled via modules, ensure MicroG's seamless operation by mimicking GMS identities to apps. Beyond pre-built ROMs, MicroG's modular installation methods—such as Magisk-based packages like MinMicroG—extend its utility to arbitrary ROMs, empowering users to retrofit GMS compatibility post- without reflashing entire systems. This flexibility addresses a key pain point in customization: balancing app ecosystem access with independence from Google's proprietary stack, thereby sustaining a vibrant of ROM maintainers and enthusiasts focused on de-Googled yet functional devices. As of 2024, such integrations have proliferated in privacy-oriented distributions, underscoring MicroG's foundational role in diversifying beyond vendor-locked .

Challenges to Google Ecosystem Dominance

MicroG undermines 's ecosystem dominance by offering a and open-source reimplementation of proprietary APIs, allowing Android apps dependent on features like push notifications, geolocation, and safety net verification to function without installing 's closed-source components. This enables custom ROM developers to build de-Googled operating systems based on the Open Source Project (), bypassing 's requirement for devices to bundle Play Services for certification and app compatibility. By supporting signature spoofing and providing alternatives such as UnifiedNlp for location services, MicroG facilitates the operation of popular apps in privacy-focused environments, demonstrating that full reliance on Google's infrastructure is not technically essential for a functional experience. Projects like for microG and /e/OS integrate MicroG to deliver Google-free variants, with reporting approximately 4.3 million active installations as of the latest available statistics, reflecting adoption among users seeking to escape Google's data ecosystem. However, MicroG's challenge remains marginal, as custom ROMs constitute a tiny portion of the user base—less than 0.2% of an estimated 3 billion active devices—due to barriers like technical installation requirements, reduced app compatibility for some services, and Google's strategies to enforce ecosystem lock-in, including stricter Play Integrity API checks and limitations on for newer hardware. These measures, implemented progressively since 2023, aim to deter and uncertified ROMs, underscoring Google's efforts to maintain control amid growing antitrust scrutiny in regions like the .

Future Prospects and Ongoing Challenges

MicroG's future development hinges on its integration with custom Android ROMs, particularly for microG, which received updates supporting Android 15 (LineageOS 22) as of August 2025, including over-the-air builds like lineage-22.2-20250813-microG. In September 2025, the project incorporated patches enhancing Play Integrity API performance, enabling compatibility with apps previously restricted by integrity checks. These advancements, led by maintainer Marvin Wißfeld, suggest potential for sustained viability in de-Googled environments, especially as privacy-focused distributions like /e/OS and continue to bundle or fork MicroG components. However, without a formal roadmap, progress relies on community-driven patches and of , limiting scalability. Persistent challenges include adapting to Google's frequent updates to proprietary services, such as the Play Integrity API, which MicroG developers describe as "really hard to work on" due to opaque implementation and hardware attestation requirements. Achieving strong integrity verdicts often necessitates root-level modules like Play Integrity Fix via Magisk, but these fail reliably on 15 stock ROMs and expose users to detection risks. Signature spoofing, essential for MicroG's operation, remains vulnerable to OEM firmware changes, as seen in 14.2 updates disabling it in July 2025. Push notifications via MicroG's Cloud Messaging proxy continue to falter, with reports of failures on locked devices, app-specific delays, and registration issues persisting into 2025, partly due to reliance on deprecated systems like C2DM. Single-developer maintenance by Wißfeld, while dedicated, strains responsiveness to Android's annual releases and Google's anti-circumvention measures, potentially hindering broader adoption amid rising app dependencies on verified GMS. Alternatives like UnifiedPush offer partial mitigation but require app-level support, underscoring MicroG's trade-offs between functionality and Google's ecosystem lock-in.

References

  1. [1]
    Home · microg/GmsCore Wiki - GitHub
    microG GmsCore is a free software reimplementation of Google's Play Services. It allows applications calling proprietary Google APIs to run on AOSP-based ...
  2. [2]
    LineageOS for microG | LineageOS for microG website.
    The full Android experience without Google Apps. About LineageOS for microG is a custom Android ROM which integrates the following components.
  3. [3]
    Clarification about microG, what is it, is it insecure?
    Feb 7, 2024 · MicroG is a FOSS reimplementation of what Apps think Playservices do. The trouble with this neat statement is that the reality is more complex.<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    microg/GmsCore: Free implementation of Play Services - GitHub
    microG Services is a FLOSS (Free/Libre Open Source Software) framework to allow applications designed for Google Play Services to run on systems
  5. [5]
    microG - What you need to know, A conversation with its developer
    Nov 3, 2020 · microG is a open source, free software re-implementation of Google's proprietary libraries. We've invited it's creator and developer, Marvin Wißfeld, to ...What you need to know, A conversation with its developer : Marvin ...microG - What you need to know, A conversation with its developer ...More results from community.e.foundation
  6. [6]
    r/fossdroid - microG: Android (almost) without Google - our interview ...
    Jan 23, 2020 · The developer mentions his motivation to develop microG so was that he could play Ingress on his ungoogled custom ROM. Ingress was developed by ...Another universal-ish way to install microG on any Android 14 and ...LOS has added internal microG support : r/LineageOS - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Discover microG, and what it is used for - e/OS community
    Aug 19, 2022 · microG is a free, open-source framework mimicking Google Play Services, providing features like push notifications and safety net, while ...
  9. [9]
    microG: Android (almost) without Google - our interview with the ...
    Jan 22, 2020 · microG helps to set up a smartphone without Google. Here is our interview with Marvin Wißfeld the developer of the Google Alternative.
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Discover microG, and what it is used for - Developers Blog - Medium
    Aug 19, 2022 · Created by Marvin Wißfeld and developed since 2015, microG is a software framework that mimics Google services and solves a lot of problems ...
  14. [14]
    Legendary grant recipient: Marvin Wißfeld of MicroG - YouTube
    Oct 14, 2022 · Legendary grant recipient: Marvin Wißfeld of MicroG · Comments. 7. Add a comment... 52:57. Go to channel · Ian Clarke, Creator of Freenet, ...
  15. [15]
    Implementation status
    ### Summary of microG GmsCore Implementation Status (as of May 15, 2025)
  16. [16]
    microg/UnifiedNlp: Alternative network location provider for Android ...
    microG GmsCore project already includes the Unified Network Location Provider. ... It is required to have a rooted system to install on Jelly Bean and older.
  17. [17]
    A simple guide to understand microG - e/OS documentation
    microG is a free and open-source implementation of Google Play Services. It aims to provide a functional replacement for proprietary Google services on Android ...
  18. [18]
    nift4/microg_installer_revived: Install microG GmsCore ... - GitHub
    This is a Magisk module - originally based on Hieu Van's microG Installer - that installs microG GmsCore, GsfProxy and Companion (or Play Store if you want so) ...
  19. [19]
    Signature Spoofing · microg/GmsCore Wiki - GitHub
    Aug 11, 2025 · You need a ROM that supports signature spoofing. Most custom ROMs include support for signature spoofing out of the box, however some ROMs ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  20. [20]
    microG Signature Spoofing and its Security Implications | ~larma/blog
    May 6, 2016 · Signature spoofing allows applications to behave like being signed by a third party. This means that whenever one application asks the operating system for the ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  21. [21]
    system spoofs signature failing on latest microG · Issue #716 - GitHub
    Dec 23, 2024 · This is not a bug, new Google libs have changed the way to check signature so microG now detect that the signature spoofing patch in your ROM is incomplete.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  22. [22]
    I install latest microG have no system spoofs signature in Self-Check
    Dec 6, 2024 · If you are rooted, you can try LSposed module FakeGApps to spoof the siganture of MicroG apps to correct one. Don't know anything about Huawei ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    LineageOS for microG
    ### Summary of LineageOS for microG
  26. [26]
    microG - CalyxOS
    The domain mtalk.google.com is used by microG to receive push notifications for the device. For example, Signal uses these push notifications to know when to ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  27. [27]
    Support for U2F / Fido2 / webauthn? #849 - microg/GmsCore - GitHub
    Jun 24, 2019 · microG currently does not support FIDO2 authentication methods that require a PIN to be entered on the client (if PIN is entered on the ...
  28. [28]
    Implementation of Play Integrity API #2611 - microg/GmsCore - GitHub
    Nov 4, 2024 · microG just add support for the new API, whether it pass or not still depends from the ROM (if it doesn't pass, many times it can be fixed ...
  29. [29]
    Some apps won't recognize microG as Google Play services #615
    Sep 18, 2018 · The root cause for this is that your Play Store (or Fake Store) did not have signature spoofing permission initially, as seen from your screenshots.
  30. [30]
    Apps not recognizing Google Play services - MicroG is installed #225
    Nov 15, 2016 · I'm currently having an issue registering Signal. After I type in my phone number, it says "Signal relies on Google Play services, which is not ...
  31. [31]
    Overview of the Play Integrity API - Android Developers
    Sep 2, 2025 · The Play Integrity API helps you check that user actions and server requests are coming from your genuine app, installed by Google Play, ...Make a standard API request · Setup · Use device recall · Make a classic request<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Play Integrity API error -100 · Issue #2729 · microg/GmsCore - GitHub
    Jan 4, 2025 · Play Integrity check fails to start with error code -100. Using microg v0.3.6. To Reproduce. Use SPIC - Play Integrity Checker; Make Play ...
  33. [33]
    [Guide] Strong integrity with MicroG - 2025 - XDA Forums
    Aug 3, 2025 · Play Integrity API Chercker by Nikolas Spiridakis installed from Aurora Store works for me on a OnePlus Nord N200 with Lineage 22.2 and MicroG ...[MODULE] Play Integrity Fix | Page 155 | XDA Forums[ Detailed Guide ] Play Integrity FIX & Use Banking Apps on Rooted ...More results from xdaforums.comMissing: compatibility | Show results with:compatibility
  34. [34]
    r/MicroG - Reddit
    This subreddit is unofficial and not endorsed by the microG project: https://microg.org/ is the project's official website. Show more. Created Mar 25, 2017. 9 ...Can someone explain what... · MicroG and other google apps · r/MicroG icon · New
  35. [35]
    [LIST] Apps that work or do not work with microG - e/OS community
    Sep 19, 2020 · In this editable list pl share names of apps that work and do not work with microG. (Please copy format of existing lines, using | between columns to keep ...
  36. [36]
    Banking app works on older device with microG but not on newer ...
    May 23, 2024 · At the end uninstall and reinstall the apps that have problems. Some apps may need device registration and cloud messaging to be enabled.Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  37. [37]
    microG: Problems with Apps after last Update - iodé community
    Sep 2, 2023 · I'm having a problem with microG. I've noticed that when I use certain applications they don't show me a map, for example, with the following ...Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
  38. [38]
    How To Guide - How to install microG on any ROM. - XDA Forums
    Oct 18, 2022 · Go to Magisk and install MinMicroG-Standard as a Module. Reboot. Open microG Service Core and ensure all boxes are selected. The most important is signature ...[APP] microG GmsCore - lightweight free software clone of Google ...[GUIDE][Magisk Module] Universal systemless microG installation ...More results from xdaforums.com
  39. [39]
    Installation · microg/GmsCore Wiki - GitHub
    Please review the Prerequisites and Helpful Information before starting installation. All files can be found in the download section or in the microG ...Missing: hardware | Show results with:hardware
  40. [40]
    DivestOS' unprivileged microG implementation - Project Showcase
    Jul 21, 2023 · signature spoofing is behind the toggle and bound to the official microG build certificates and gated with version code and target SDK checks ...
  41. [41]
    build_rom_with_microG.md - GitHub Gist
    Building ROMs with microG integrated · So, you probably already know how to make use of "local_manifests", now add this prebuilt repo for microG to the xml file.
  42. [42]
    LineageOS for microG | XDA Forums
    Nov 6, 2017 · Our ROM is a fork of LineageOS with just the necessary changes to have microG built-in. We ship weekly builds for all the LineageOS supported devices.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  43. [43]
    LineageOS for microG - GitHub
    The full Android experience without Google Apps. LineageOS for microG has 9 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
  44. [44]
    microG downloads
    ... AM. lilac/, —, 10/11/2025, 7:17:03 AM. LineageOS/, —, 10/13/2025, 9:02:25 AM. lisa/, —, 10/16/2025, 4:50:47 AM. lithium/, —, 2/3/2025, 7:51:54 AM. lmi/, —, 10/ ...
  45. [45]
    How to install microG : r/LineageOS - Reddit
    Mar 21, 2024 · You can't install microG as a separate app on an official/stock Lineage install. You need to install a separate ROM that supports microG natively, for which ...LOS has added internal microG support : r/LineageOSwhich is better for security and stability : r/LineageOSMore results from www.reddit.com
  46. [46]
    iodéOS - iodé
    MicroG. MicroG is an open source replacement for Google Play Services, allowing apps to use services such as push notifications and location services. Unlike ...
  47. [47]
    Moving away from big tech: A guide to deGoogling your phone
    Nov 7, 2021 · Ready to reclaim your digital privacy? Learn how to switch to LineageOS and microG, stepping away from big tech and towards greater control over your data.
  48. [48]
    Statistics - LineageOS Changelog
    Last updated: 2025-10-25 15:00. Most active devices. No. Device, Count. 1, Motorola moto g7 play, 367 075. 2, Xiaomi Mi 8, 317 417. 3, Motorola moto g7 plus ...
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    Android Custom ROMs Are a Dying Breed, But Who's to Blame?
    Aug 9, 2024 · A custom ROM can completely transform the appearance, bump the performance, and get rid of bloatware from the UI, which is a major issue in budget devices.
  51. [51]
    [BOUNTY] RCS Support [5000$] #2994 - microg/GmsCore - GitHub
    Aug 1, 2025 · RCS has seen significant adoption, particularly in North America, and recently Apple added support RCS, further increasing its importance as a ...
  52. [52]
    【2025/06/20 updated】FAQ of microG Service ... - HUAWEI Global
    microG-hw is an open-source replacement for Google Play Services, allowing Huawei devices to run apps that rely on Google services. It has been integrated into ...
  53. [53]
    Will LineageOS for microG be upgraded for FP3? - The Industry
    Jul 23, 2024 · LineageOS (21, anyway) now supports signature spoofing for microG, only microG and is pretty secure. So you can use microG pretty well on it.
  54. [54]
    microG's profile - Liberapay
    Stats ... GitHub: microg (microG Project). Mastodon: microg@fosstodon.org (microG Project). Repositories. GmsCore Stars 11193 Updated 1 week ago.
  55. [55]
    How many (active) users has /e/os? - Forum
    Oct 21, 2024 · 20k devices were sold, and 44k MAU on murena.io, but this may include flashed phones. Counting successful downloads is suggested for active  ...Missing: size | Show results with:size
  56. [56]
    Android Usage Statistics (2025) - Global Market Share - DemandSage
    Sep 10, 2025 · Android has 3.6 billion users and 73.9% global market share. Android surpassed 1 billion users just one year after launch and continues to ...Missing: MicroG metrics
  57. [57]
    Helpful Information · microg/GmsCore Wiki - GitHub
    Apr 17, 2025 · Push notifications do not require account registration. You can add an account through the system settings. Some applications might ask you to ...
  58. [58]
    What are the benefits of privileged MicroG over google play services?
    Dec 18, 2023 · microG is minimal overall (as the name suggests) and doesn't include a lot of the tracking/telemetry and other nonsense that Google adds to Play ...
  59. [59]
    Google Network Connections · microg/GmsCore Wiki - GitHub
    Jul 21, 2023 · If you don't need push notifications, you can disable it (and daily device registration) in microG settings to get rid of the corresponding ...
  60. [60]
    Home · microg/GmsCore Wiki - GitHub
    GmsCore is a free software reimplementation of Google's Play Services. It allows applications calling proprietary Google APIs to run on AOSP-based ROMs like ...Gmscore · Overview · Features
  61. [61]
    microG replaces some functions of Google Play Services while ...
    I've said it before and saying it again on here for those that don't know: microG breaks the security model on android and adds in package signature spoofing.
  62. [62]
    What are the security implications of MicroG? · Issue #2480 - GitHub
    Aug 10, 2024 · What are the security implications of MicroG? I think that the signature spoofing requires root but I don't fully understand the attack surface.Missing: risks | Show results with:risks
  63. [63]
    No, microG is a partial reimplementation of *some* of ... - Hacker News
    In order to install microG, your version of Android OS needs support for spoofing the cryptographic signatures of apps. Some OSes like LineageOS and CalyxOS ...
  64. [64]
    CVE security vulnerability database. Security vulnerabilities, exploits ...
    CVEdetails.com now offers much more than just CVEs! Advisories, exploits, RSS feeds and various other vulnerability intelligence features have been added.Browse Vulnerabilities By Date · Vulnerabilities By Types · CVE Help · VendorsMissing: MicroG | Show results with:MicroG
  65. [65]
    MicroG in terms of privacy/security : r/degoogle - Reddit
    Jan 12, 2021 · Basically microg is sending misinformation. Google would not be able to tell who's data it actually was and they would not be able to trace it ...Can microg be hacked? : r/revancedappHow safe is it to connect Google account with MicroG?More results from www.reddit.com
  66. [66]
    [FLASHABLE ZIP][MAGISK MODULE] Install microG without ...
    Aug 2, 2025 · This patch basically allows microG to spoof itself as the official Google Play Services/Play Store app, by spoofing it's own signature as that ...
  67. [67]
    I've installed microG for revanced youtube. Is it safe?
    MicroG for ReVanced runs as an unprivileged app with no special permissions, and operates within the app sandbox, only using granted permissions.Missing: risks mitigate
  68. [68]
    GmsCore leaking Google account password on login · Issue #1567
    Sep 25, 2021 · Open MicroG Settings; Add a Google account; Login with your Google account; Check logcat with adb logcat | grep GmsAuthLoginBrowser. Expected ...
  69. [69]
    I've been using a custom AOSP build with MicroG for a few months ...
    For additional security/privacy, open these apps in a separate/sand boxing browser. For the truly careful, create a separate Android "profile" on the device ...
  70. [70]
    r/MicroG Wiki: The Ultimate Guide to microG - Reddit
    Oct 23, 2024 · This wiki is intended to serve as an unofficial guide to set up an Android phone using microG in order to avoid privacy invasive Google Apps (GApps)
  71. [71]
    The Comprehensive Guide to Quitting Google - Lifehacker
    Nov 8, 2018 · Brendan Hesse. Brendan is a freelance writer and content creator from Portland, OR. He covers tech and gaming for Lifehacker, and has also ...
  72. [72]
    /e/OS & Murena with Gaël Duval - Podcast Projets Libres !
    Jan 28, 2024 · Gaël : So for MicroG it's really sponsorship. The idea is that he can work serenely on the project without worrying about going shopping ...Missing: endorsement | Show results with:endorsement
  73. [73]
    Privacy & Security Resources | Techlore Recommendations
    While MicroG & de-googled ROMs try to maintain the compatability of Google Play Services, they are not perfect. Plexus allows you to check what apps do/don ...
  74. [74]
    MicroG on De-Googled Phones - How it Makes the ... - YouTube
    Jul 13, 2022 · MicroG is a primary ingredient to make de-Googled phones functional for most people ... Report. Comments. 148. I SERIOUSLY admire your expertise ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
  75. [75]
    Android | Madaidan's Insecurities
    Mar 11, 2022 · Unlocking the bootloader in Android is a large security risk. It disables verified boot, a fundamental part of the security model. Verified ...<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    The thing which always makes me hesitant about these projects is ...
    The thing which always makes me hesitant about these projects is that they don't receive frequent security audits and not having an expensive brand behind ...
  77. [77]
    It's really not feasible to run most apps without Google Play APIs ...
    The most problematic issue is the notification API. MicroG runs with elevated permissions to avoid being killed, and so that it can continue listening to socket ...Missing: unsupported limitations
  78. [78]
    microG — What you need to know - Developers Blog
    Nov 3, 2020 · microG is a open source, free software re-implementation of Google's proprietary libraries. We've invited it's creator and developer, Marvin Wißfeld, to ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  79. [79]
    Aurora store not secure? - Privacy Guides Community
    Jul 27, 2024 · Calyx frequently spreads misinformation about sandboxed Google Play and microG. They falsely claim the microG approach avoids running ...
  80. [80]
    Disagree. The reputation of Nick Calyx (worth a look his Wikipedia ...
    Yeah GrapheneOS is security over privacy, Calyx is privacy over security (and has a bit more mainstream appeal with MicroG, supporting push messaging and ...
  81. [81]
    LineageOS Statistics
    - **Total Active Installations**: 4,320,848
  82. [82]
    The days of custom Android ROMs are numbered, and Google is to ...
    Aug 24, 2025 · In 2025 alone, both Google and Samsung may have dealt significant blows to the custom ROM scene. But that's just on the hardware side of things ...
  83. [83]
    Android: Google makes the development of custom ROMs more ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · Google complicates development of custom ROMs such as Lineage for Pixel smartphones. The hardened Android version GrapheneOS is particularly affected.
  84. [84]
    Google is making it harder to leave its ecosystem - Android Police
    Apr 6, 2025 · It makes using alternative app stores or de-Googled Android devices more challenging, since some apps may not work correctly without Google's ...
  85. [85]
    [SHARED] [ROM] [15] [ingot] [OFFICIAL] Solana Saga LineageOS for ...
    Aug 16, 2025 · Solana Saga (ingot) Maintainer: Team microG Project Marvin Wißfeld Berlin Germany LineageOS for microG. ROM lineage-22.2-20250813-microG- ...
  86. [86]
    Micro g stopped working 4th of July 2025 morning also the migrog ...
    Jul 4, 2025 · "The EMUI 14.2.0.215 update on Huawei devices might cause issues with microG, particularly with signature spoofing and app compatibility. Users ...Another universal-ish way to install microG on any Android 14 and ...I've recently updated to Android 15 and the Micro G stopped workingMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: APIs | Show results with:APIs
  87. [87]
    Micro g doesn't show push notifications · Issue #2169 - GitHub
    Feb 3, 2024 · Describe the bug. Apps are registered in micro g, micro g is registering that they got a notification for the apps but no notifications are ...
  88. [88]
    Push notifications not working with microG · Issue #4188 - GitHub
    Jan 23, 2025 · I don't see push notifications from Element X, I do see them from Element; In Settings | Notifications | Advanced settings, Push notification ...
  89. [89]
    Future of MicroG? : r/CalyxOS - Reddit
    Jan 19, 2022 · The last version was released on 23th August 2021, there is no roadmap and not really a sign of life from the project. It seems stuck and it is ...What's the best MicroG version to use? : r/revancedapp - RedditInstalling MicroG from scratch - noob guide - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  90. [90]
    microG - e/OS documentation
    Development status of microG. The development on microG is an ongoing project. We discuss with its maintainer regularly and also support the microG project ...Missing: roadmap | Show results with:roadmap<|separator|>