Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mike Harris

Michael Deane Harris (born January 23, 1945) is a Canadian politician who served as the 22nd from June 26, 1995, to April 14, 2002, and as leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of from 1990 to 2002. Harris rose to prominence by spearheading the "," a policy platform that emphasized fiscal restraint, including sharp reductions in personal income taxes by approximately 30 percent, welfare reforms to encourage employment, and cuts to provincial spending to eliminate a longstanding . These measures contributed to balanced budgets by the late 1990s, the breakup of into competitive entities, and an economic expansion that created over 700,000 jobs during his tenure, transforming from a high-debt province into one with sustained growth. However, his government faced significant backlash for hospital closures and reductions, controversial changes via Bill 160 that centralized control over funding and hiring, and municipal amalgamations such as Toronto's restructuring. Notable controversies included the 1995 Ipperwash standoff, where provincial police fatally shot unarmed protester Dudley George amid a land dispute, with inquiries later examining Harris's reported directive to "get the chippewas out of the park," and the 2000 killing seven, linked by critics to of labs. Despite such events, which drew protests and opposition from left-leaning institutions, empirical outcomes under Harris's causal focus on reduction and market-oriented reforms are defended by proponents as foundational to 's long-term fiscal stability, countering narratives of unmitigated harm often amplified in mainstream accounts.

Early Life and Pre-Political Career

Upbringing and Education

Mike Harris was raised in , where his family engaged in local enterprises, including a ski resort operation managed by his father. He grew up in this northern community, developing an early interest in public service that later manifested in educational roles. Harris pursued postsecondary education starting with one year at (now ) in 1965. He subsequently earned a teaching certificate from North Bay Teachers' College, the forerunner to Nipissing University's Schulich School of Education. Some accounts also note attendance at in during this period. Following certification, Harris taught mathematics to elementary students, including grades seven and eight, at in North Bay for several years before transitioning to family business ventures. This teaching experience informed his initial foray into public office as a school board trustee in 1974.

Business Ventures and Early Professional Experience

Prior to his involvement in , Harris worked as a instructor for two years following high school graduation. In the , he earned a teaching certificate from and served as an elementary school teacher in the North Bay area. Harris later owned and operated and recreation businesses in the Nipissing and Parry Sound regions of , leveraging the area's natural attractions such as lakes and forests for outdoor activities. These ventures aligned with his upbringing in North Bay, where his family had ties to local enterprise, including his father's earlier fishing camp operation. His experience in education and informed his early community roles, such as election to the Nipissing in 1975, before his entry into provincial politics in 1981.

Entry into Provincial Politics

Election as MPP for Nipissing

Mike Harris entered provincial politics in the 1981 Ontario , held on March 19, 1981, when he was elected as the Member of Provincial Parliament () for the riding of Nipissing under the Progressive Conservative banner. This victory marked the defeat of the incumbent MPP, Mike Bolan, who had held the seat since 1975. Harris secured 15,795 votes, representing a margin of approximately 4,871 votes over Bolan. The riding's results reflected the broader provincial outcome, where the Progressive Conservatives, led by Premier , retained a with 70 seats.
CandidatePartyVotes
Mike HarrisProgressive Conservative15,795
Mike Bolan10,924
Art Peltomaa1,774
Harris's win in Nipissing, a resource-dependent riding encompassing North Bay and surrounding areas, aligned with the party's emphasis on economic stability and regional development amid a province-wide voter turnout of about 62%. He would hold the seat through subsequent elections until resigning in 2002.

Initial Roles and Committee Work

Mike Harris was elected to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as the Progressive Conservative MPP for Nipissing in the provincial general election of March 19, 1981, securing 52.4% of the vote against Liberal and New Democratic challengers. As a new member of Premier Bill Davis's majority government, he assumed the role of backbench MPP, focusing on constituency issues in northern Ontario, such as tourism, forestry, and small business development reflective of the riding's economy. Backbenchers like Harris typically participated in standing committees to scrutinize bills, review expenditures, and conduct public hearings, contributing to the government's legislative agenda without executive responsibilities. During this tenure from 1981 to 1985, Harris built relationships within the party, particularly supporting fiscal restraint amid growing internal debates over government spending and economic policy. His alignment with the party's more conservative wing, including endorsement of Frank Miller in the 1985 leadership contest to succeed Davis, positioned him for rapid advancement when Miller formed a minority government on February 8, 1985.

Rise to Party Leadership

1990 Progressive Conservative Leadership Election

The Progressive Conservative Party of conducted its leadership election in 1990 following the resignation of leader Larry Grossman, who had faced internal dissent and the party's ongoing recovery from its provincial election loss. The contest featured two candidates: Mike Harris, the incumbent for Nipissing who advocated for right-wing reforms including tax reductions, spending restraint, welfare overhaul, and a , and Dianne , a moderate "Red Tory" establishment figure emphasizing continuity. Harris, previously viewed as a backbench underdog and criticized in media circles as an unpolished former golf professional from North Bay, assembled a team of young strategists to target grassroots members disillusioned with the party's direction. The voting process employed a one-member-one-vote mechanism among , with results weighted to grant each of Ontario's 130 ridings an equal of , ensuring balanced regional representation. This system, introduced after the 1985 convention to democratize selection, required a candidate to secure over 50% of the total weighted points for victory. Harris prevailed on May 12, 1990, capturing approximately 55% of the weighted vote and majorities in 81 ridings, defeating and positioning the toward a more populist, fiscally conservative orientation. His upset win, achieved despite the party's third-place status in polls, reflected support from suburban and rural members seeking substantive policy shifts over traditional brokerage politics.

Opposition Leader and Policy Development

Mike Harris was elected leader of the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party on May 12, 1990, defeating Dianne Cunningham on the third ballot at the party's leadership convention in . This victory positioned him as amid a shifting political landscape, following the Progressive Conservatives' long dominance that ended with their defeat in the 1985 election. In the September 6, 1990, provincial election, under Harris's leadership, the party placed third with 23 seats, behind the New Democratic Party's majority win and the Liberals, though Harris retained his Nipissing seat. As Opposition Leader from 1990 to 1995, Harris focused on critiquing the NDP government's fiscal policies, including the 1993 Act, which imposed wage restraints and spending cuts on workers, and the expansion of deficits amid economic . He positioned the Progressive Conservatives as advocates for fiscal restraint, contrasting with Rae's interventionist approach, which saw Ontario's rise to over 40% by 1995. Harris's tenure involved rebuilding party support from a low of around 20% in polls, emphasizing accountability and efficiency in government operations. Policy development under Harris marked a deliberate rightward shift from the party's traditional "Big Blue Machine" centrism toward market-oriented reforms. In May 1994, the party released The , a detailed platform document outlining commitments to reduce government size, including cutting the number of ministries and agencies, eliminating 13,000 , and privatizing services like highway maintenance. Core pledges included a 30% cut to personal income tax rates within two years, a 22% reduction in welfare benefits to encourage , and the creation of 725,000 net new over five years through and lower business taxes. These policies drew from economic analyses highlighting 's uncompetitive tax burden, which had risen with 65 tax increases since , and aimed to address chronic deficits exceeding $10 billion annually. The platform's emphasis on "" principles—such as requirements for recipients and performance-based funding—reflected Harris's business background and first-hand observations of northern Ontario's economic struggles. Internal party consultations and policy papers during the opposition years informed these specifics, with Harris consulting economists and business leaders to substantiate claims that tax relief would stimulate growth without net revenue loss, countering NDP assertions of fiscal recklessness. This groundwork transformed the Progressive Conservatives from a distant third-place contender into a viable by , setting the stage for their electoral resurgence.

1995 Election Victory and Common Sense Revolution

Campaign Platform and Key Promises

Harris's campaign platform, dubbed the Common Sense Revolution, was unveiled in 1995 as the Progressive Conservative Party's blueprint for addressing Ontario's fiscal crisis, characterized by a $100 billion provincial debt and double-digit unemployment rates exceeding 10%. The document emphasized reducing government intervention, lowering taxes to stimulate economic activity, and reallocating resources toward job creation while protecting core services like and . It promised to balance the budget within four years without raising taxes, drawing on consultations with over 10,000 Ontarians to frame government as inefficient and in need of radical downsizing. Central to the platform were aggressive tax and spending cuts. It pledged a 30% reduction in provincial personal income es over three years, with half implemented in the first year, aiming to position Ontario's rates as the lowest in and deliver $4,000 in annual savings for a earning $50,000. Non-priority —excluding , classrooms, and —was targeted for a 20% cut over three years, projected to save $6 billion annually, including $3.605 billion in the first year through measures like eliminating 13,000 positions and trimming bureaucracy by $650 million. A "Fair Share" health levy was proposed to generate $400 million for hospitals without increasing overall es. Welfare reform featured prominently, with commitments to reduce benefit rates to 10% above the national average, invest $500 million in and learnfare programs to encourage employment, and achieve a 5% annual drop in caseloads, saving $750 million yearly. Additionally, 170,000 seniors and disabled individuals would transition to a separate , decoupling them from general rolls. Job creation goals included 725,000 net new positions over five years, supported by relief for small businesses ($400 million savings), a five-year freeze on rates, and a 5% cut in Board premiums ($98.5 million relief). Government streamlining extended to reducing the number of MPPs from 130 to 99, saving $1.1 million, and selling non-essential assets like liquor stores and surplus land to retire $80 billion in debt.

Electoral Outcome and Immediate Reforms

The Progressive Conservative Party, led by Mike Harris, won a in the provincial election held on June 8, 1995, marking the first time in over 70 years that a third-place party had surged to victory in a single election. The party captured approximately 45% of the popular vote, defeating the incumbent under , which had governed since 1990 amid economic recession and unpopular policies including a regressive employment equity law and public sector wage freezes. Harris's campaign emphasized fiscal restraint, tax reductions, and deregulation under the banner, resonating with voters frustrated by high taxes and deficits exceeding $100 billion cumulatively under previous administrations. Harris was sworn in as the 22nd on June 26, 1995, and his government immediately prioritized deficit reduction and spending controls to fulfill election commitments. In late summer 1995, the administration enacted a 22% cut to social assistance rates—21.6% for general and approximately 10% for family benefits—effective October 1, 1995, saving an estimated $780 million annually while introducing requirements to promote employment over dependency. These measures targeted what the described as overly generous benefits that discouraged job-seeking, with single employable recipients seeing payments drop from $781 to $520 monthly. The November 29, , provincial , delivered by Finance Minister , outlined $1.8 billion in immediate spending s for the 1995-96 fiscal year, including freezes on wages and a planned of 13,000 positions through attrition and layoffs to streamline . This laid groundwork for the promised 30% phased over two years, starting with initial relief in the 1996 , while aiming for a within four years by curbing non-priority expenditures by 20%. These actions provoked early opposition from unions and social advocates but aligned with the government's causal focus on incentivizing growth over public outlays.

First Term as Premier (1995-1999)

Fiscal and Tax Policies

The fiscal strategy of the Harris administration during its first term centered on deficit elimination and tax relief, inheriting a projected deficit of approximately $11 billion for the 1995-96 fiscal year from the previous NDP government. The government enacted spending restraints across ministries, including workforce reductions of about 13,000 public sector positions and program expenditure controls, to curb outlays while prioritizing core services like health and education. These measures, combined with economic expansion, progressively lowered deficits: from $8.2 billion in 1996-97 to $6.6 billion in 1997-98, and $4.8 billion targeted for 1998-99, culminating in a balanced budget for that year. A cornerstone of the policy was the implementation of a 30% reduction in personal income tax rates, pledged in the 1995 platform and phased in over three years to incentivize and . The initial cuts took effect in the 1996 budget, delivering at least 30% relief to taxpayers earning under $60,000 annually, with broader reductions averaging the promised figure across brackets. Further installments in the 1997 budget completed the phase-in, reducing rates for all filers and marking the largest such cut in history up to that point. By 1998, the government had enacted 69 tax reductions overall, including surtax eliminations and business tax adjustments, though critics attributed subsequent debt growth partly to foregone revenues estimated at $4.8 billion annually by the late 1990s. To institutionalize fiscal discipline, the administration introduced the Balanced Budget Act in December 1998, mandating balanced operating budgets and limiting deficits to capital projects, which helped sustain surpluses into the subsequent term despite ongoing servicing costs. Proponents, including analyses from the , credited the approach with fostering growth that offset some revenue losses through higher collections post-cuts, though public rose from $102 billion in 1996 to over $120 billion by 1999 due to accumulated deficits and investment spending. This framework emphasized supply-side effects, where lower taxes were projected to expand the tax base via job creation and GDP growth, averaging 3-4% annually during the period.

Welfare and Employment Reforms

The Harris government implemented sweeping welfare reforms as a core element of the , prioritizing fiscal restraint and labor market re-entry over long-term dependency. Effective October 1, 1995, general assistance rates were cut by 21.6 percent for most recipients, excluding seniors and those with disabilities, reducing monthly benefits for a single person from approximately $781 to $614 and saving the province around $500 million in the first year. These reductions aligned with campaign pledges to cap spending growth and redirect resources toward job creation, though critics, including advocacy groups, argued they exacerbated hardship amid inflation. In 1997, the Ontario Works Act established the program, consolidating and replacing the prior Family Benefits and General Welfare Assistance systems into a single, conditional framework—the first work-tested model in . OW required able-bodied recipients to enter participation agreements entailing job searches, skills training, subsidized employment, or community work placements, with non-compliance risking benefit suspension or termination; exemptions applied to parents of young children or those with barriers like illness. Simultaneously, the was created to handle long-term cases separately, providing income and employment supports without universal work mandates. These changes shifted from to temporary , with administrative streamlining reducing processing times and via centralized delivery. The reforms yielded measurable reductions in caseloads: from peaks near 780,000 recipients in , social assistance rolls dropped by nearly 400,000 by , reflecting both incentives and a strengthening that added over 600,000 province-wide. Per-recipient spending fell while employment rates among former welfare households rose, with analyses crediting OW's work requirements for transitioning over 100,000 individuals into stable by 2000, though left-leaning sources like the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives highlighted persistent deep for non-exiters. Complementing welfare shifts, employment reforms emphasized deregulation to enhance hiring flexibility and competitiveness. Bill 49, passed in late 1995, amended the (ESA) to permit overtime averaging over multiple weeks, extend probationary periods to 13 weeks, and ease restrictions on temporary help agencies, ostensibly to align with federal norms and spur growth. Bill 7 reformed the in 1997, authorizing employers to hire replacement workers during strikes, which proponents argued balanced power dynamics and minimized economic disruptions from labor disputes. The remained frozen at $6.85 per hour throughout the first term, avoiding cost increases for low-wage employers amid deficit reduction efforts. Further, Bill 8 repealed the 1993 Employment Equity Act in 1995, eliminating government-mandated hiring quotas based on , , or in and designated private firms, on grounds that such measures distorted merit-based decisions without empirically boosting underrepresented employment. These adjustments, coupled with OW's employment linkages, aimed to lower barriers to entry-level work; by 1999, Ontario's private-sector job growth outpaced Canada's average, with welfare-to-work transitions cited as a causal factor in fiscal savings exceeding $2 billion annually on social assistance.

Education System Overhaul

The Harris government's education reforms emphasized , administrative , and fiscal restraint, targeting what it described as bureaucratic excess and poor student outcomes in the pre-1995 system. In June 1996, the Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) was established through , mandating standardized assessments in reading, writing, and mathematics for students in grades 3, 6, 9, and 10 to provide data-driven evaluations of performance and inform adjustments. Administrative streamlining included the Fewer Boards Act of 1997, which amalgamated Ontario's 129 school boards into 72 district boards, consolidating operations across public, separate, English, and French systems to reduce duplication and administrative costs estimated at up to $670 million over five years by eliminating redundant positions and facilities. Notable examples included the merger of seven Toronto-area boards into the single effective January 1, 1998. Funding mechanisms shifted via a new provincial grant formula introduced in the 1997-1998 , replacing locally raised property taxes with per-pupil allocations controlled by the Ministry of Education to ensure equitable distribution and purportedly safeguard classroom expenditures amid overall provincial spending reductions. The government maintained that these changes avoided direct cuts to , but opposition analyses documented provincial transfers declining by over $525 million in the lead-up to the formula's , contributing to larger class sizes and deferred maintenance in some districts. The cornerstone legislation, Bill 160 (Education Quality Improvement Act, 1997), received on November 20, 1997, centralizing authority by empowering the to issue binding guidelines, oversee board financial reporting including mandatory balanced budgets, and regulate performance appraisals. It restructured by redefining units to exclude principals and vice-principals from teacher associations for negotiation purposes, allowed principals to perform teaching duties irrespective of union agreements, and introduced mechanisms like special education tribunals for placement disputes while prohibiting compensation for board consolidations. These measures faced vehement resistance, culminating in coordinated teacher job actions on , 1997, when approximately 126,000 educators from major unions walked out province-wide—the largest such in Canadian history—opposing reduced local autonomy, changes, and funding pressures. Legal challenges followed, including scrutiny of alterations, though most reforms endured. While immediate outcomes included heightened labor tensions and administrative upheaval, proponents credited the framework with laying groundwork for subsequent gains, such as rising rates from 68% in 2004 to 82% by 2011, albeit under later administrations building on the testing regime.

Health Care Restructuring

The Harris government, upon assuming power in June 1995, prioritized fiscal restraint amid a provincial deficit exceeding $100 billion, prompting initial reductions in health care expenditures as part of broader spending cuts to achieve balanced budgets. These measures included a temporary freeze and subsequent trimming of hospital operating budgets to address overcapacity and inefficiency in the system, where acute-care bed utilization rates hovered around 70-80% pre-reform. In April 1996, the government established the independent Health Services Restructuring Commission (HSRC) under the Health Services Restructuring Act, empowering it to mandate closures, mergers, and service reallocations without local , aiming to eliminate duplication, shift resources to community-based care, and reinvest savings into high-priority areas like wait-time reductions. The HSRC's directives facilitated the closure of approximately 28 s province-wide by the late , including 10 in and 3 in , alongside the amalgamation of 44 others and the shutdown of 6 psychiatric facilities, reducing Metro Toronto's count from 39 to 24 public institutions. These changes displaced thousands of beds—particularly and acute-care ones—but were justified by the commission as necessary to curb excess infrastructure from prior expansions, with projected annual savings of up to $400 million redirected toward and long-term facilities. Despite early criticisms of service disruptions and staff layoffs exceeding 10,000, operating expenditures rose from $17.6 billion in 1995-96 to $25.5 billion by 2001-02, reflecting economic growth and reinvestments such as the addition of over 25,000 beds during the Harris tenure, the largest expansion by any government. Empirical assessments post-reform noted improved bed utilization rates approaching 90% in surviving facilities and stabilized wait times for certain procedures, though rural access challenges persisted due to centralized service models; proponents, including analyses from reviews, credit the with contributing to sustainable financing amid elimination, while detractors from groups highlighted transitional strains without disproving long-term fiscal gains.

Ipperwash Crisis and Land Claims Handling

The arose from a long-standing land dispute involving the Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point First Nation, who sought to reclaim approximately 4,500 acres expropriated by the federal government in for a training camp (Camp Ipperwash) during , with assurances of postwar return that were not honored. Following the base's closure in 1993, the adjacent Ipperwash Provincial Park—provincially owned and reopened for public use—was occupied by protesters starting in early September 1995, shortly after Mike Harris assumed office as on June 26, 1995. The occupation escalated tensions, as provincial officials maintained that no valid existed over the park itself, viewing it as unlawful by "squatters" rather than a legitimate assertion of Aboriginal rights, prioritizing public access and safety for nearby residents. Harris's government directed the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) to resolve the standoff swiftly, with Harris testifying in 2006 that he sought an end "as quickly as humanly possible" without specifying tactics, amid reports of local threats and the presence of weapons among some occupiers. On September 6, 1995, OPP officers, including a tactical unit, advanced on the park, resulting in the fatal shooting of unarmed protester Dudley George, 38, by Constable Kenneth Deane, who was later convicted of criminal negligence causing death in 1997 but acquitted on appeal in 1998 after the Crown failed to disclose exculpatory evidence. The government's narrow framing—that the dispute concerned only the federal military lands, not the provincial park—limited negotiation scope and contributed to escalation, as noted in the 2007 Ipperwash Inquiry report, which criticized provincial ministers for injecting political urgency into policing decisions while spreading responsibility among the Harris administration, federal authorities, and OPP leadership. Harris denied allegations of inflammatory remarks, such as a purported directive to remove "the f***ing Indians" from the park, asserting the inquiry cleared him of direct culpability and emphasizing that operational control remained with police. Regarding broader claims, the Harris administration adopted a cautious, litigation-oriented approach amid fiscal , rejecting expansive negotiations that could imply fiscal liabilities exceeding verified claims, as exemplified by promises of public referendums on major settlements like the Algonquin encompassing 1.4 million hectares. This stance, rooted in asserting provincial sovereignty over unproven Aboriginal titles, contrasted with federal comprehensive claims processes and drew criticism from leaders for delaying resolutions, though it aligned with Harris's emphasis on rule-of-law enforcement over accommodation of occupations. The Ipperwash Inquiry recommended establishing a dedicated provincial to expedite resolutions through evidence-based adjudication rather than prolonged protests, a framework partially implemented post-Harris but highlighting systemic negotiation gaps during his tenure. No major provincial settlements occurred under Harris, with disputes like Ipperwash deferred to courts, reflecting a policy prioritizing empirical validation of claims over presumptive concessions.

1999 Re-Election and Second Term (1999-2002)

Continued Economic Policies

In the wake of the 1999 re-election, the Harris government advanced its fiscal agenda by enacting a 20% reduction in the provincial income tax rate, phased in over the subsequent years, which returned an estimated $4 billion annually to taxpayers through lower rates across brackets. This built on the initial 30% cut from the first term, further lowering the combined federal-provincial top marginal rate and stimulating private sector activity amid broader economic expansion. Concurrently, the provincial share of residential property taxes was reduced by 20%, delivering approximately $500 million in annual relief to homeowners and renters, with municipalities required to pass savings to tenants. Fiscal discipline remained central, with the government achieving balanced budgets and posting surpluses, including a projected equilibrium by the 2000-2001 fiscal year followed by debt repayment commitments of $2 billion over the term. Total provincial spending was restrained, with per-person program expenditures declining at an average annual rate of 1.0% when adjusted for inflation, enabling five consecutive balanced budgets despite inherited deficits exceeding $11 billion. Revenues grew from $48 billion in 1995 to $64 billion by 2001, driven by GDP expansion outpacing the national average and job creation surpassing 540,000 net new positions since 1995, attributed to and lower tax burdens fostering investment. Additional measures included halving the rate toward 4.75% by 2006, positioning competitively, and enacting the Taxpayer Protection and Balanced Budget Act in 1999, which mandated referendums for tax hikes over 1% above inflation and prohibited deficits except in emergencies. efforts persisted, notably the 1999 lease of 407 to a private consortium for $3.1 billion upfront, generating one-time revenue to support via the $20 billion SuperBuild Growth Fund while reducing liabilities. These policies sustained Ontario's economic momentum, with provincial GDP rising amid federal funding stabilization and U.S. demand, though critics contended they exacerbated income disparities by favoring higher earners in tax relief distribution.

Walkerton Water Crisis

In May 2000, the town of , experienced a severe outbreak of O157:H7 contamination in its municipal drinking water supply, sickening more than 2,300 residents—nearly half the population of about 5,000—and causing seven deaths from and related complications. The pathogen entered the system via of from a nearby farm into the town's shallow, unfiltered wells following heavy spring rains, exploiting vulnerabilities in wellhead protection and water treatment. Local public utilities manager Stan Koebel and his brother Frank, who operated the treatment plant without formal training or licensing, failed to maintain adequate chlorine residuals, ignored or falsified bacterial test results showing contamination as early as May 15, and delayed notifying health officials despite confirmed E. coli positives by May 17. A was not issued until May 21, after dozens had fallen ill with severe symptoms. Premier Mike Harris, whose Progressive Conservative had implemented cost-cutting reforms since 1995, faced immediate criticism for provincial policies that shifted water system oversight to municipalities via the 1997 "Who Does What" initiative, which downloaded responsibilities without commensurate funding or regulatory upgrades. These measures included closing all four provincial water-testing laboratories in and reducing the Ministry of the Environment's staff and inspection capacity by over 50%, from approximately 1,300 to fewer than 400 employees, limiting proactive enforcement. Harris testified before on June 29, 2001, acknowledging personal accountability as for systemic shortcomings while attributing initial lax standards to the prior NDP . The Walkerton Inquiry, appointed by Harris and chaired by Justice Dennis O'Connor, released its Part 1 report in 2002, attributing the outbreak primarily to the Koebel brothers' "deceit, incompetence, and misconduct," including chronic under-chlorination and cover-ups that violated basic operational protocols. Part 2, focusing on provincial governance, determined that while local failures were direct causes, the government's fiscal eroded oversight capacity and delayed implementation of mandatory operator certification and rigorous standards, creating a "perfect storm" of vulnerabilities across Ontario's decentralized water systems. O'Connor recommended restoring provincial primacy in regulation, establishing independent enforcement, and prohibiting privatization of core water services to prevent recurrence. In response, Harris's government enacted the in 2002, investing $450 million initially in infrastructure and testing, though implementation lagged until after his resignation. The Koebels later pleaded guilty to common nuisance, receiving probation and fines rather than jail time.

Resignation and Succession

On October 16, 2001, Mike Harris announced his intention to resign as and leader of the Progressive Conservative Party following a scheduled for the spring of , citing personal reasons including a desire to spend more time with his family after over two decades in provincial politics. Critics attributed the decision partly to declining public support amid ongoing controversies, such as the handling of public inquiries into crises like Walkerton and perceived policy fatigue after implementing extensive reforms. Harris remained in office to oversee the leadership transition, with the party holding a on March 23, , where candidates including former Finance Minister , , and competed. Ernie Eves, who had served as Deputy Premier since 1999 and previously as Finance Minister under Harris, secured the party leadership on the second ballot, defeating Flaherty. Harris formally resigned as and Member of Provincial Parliament for Nipissing on April 14, 2002, after which Eves was sworn in as Ontario's 23rd on April 15, 2002, marking a seamless handover within the Progressive Conservative government. Eves pledged continuity with Harris's economic policies while promising adjustments to address emerging challenges like energy sector issues, though his tenure would later face electoral defeat in 2003. The succession avoided internal party division, as Eves positioned himself as a pragmatic successor to Harris's "" agenda, maintaining the government's .

Post-Premiership Life

Private Sector Involvement

After resigning as in 2002, Harris transitioned to the , forming a to provide advisory services to corporate clients. He subsequently took on multiple board directorships in finance, technology, and senior care sectors. Harris served as Chairman of the Board for , a major for-profit operator of retirement homes and facilities in , with his involvement beginning around 2007 and continuing through at least 2021. Under his leadership, expanded significantly, becoming one of 's largest private providers, though critics from advocacy groups have linked this growth to policies Harris enacted as that facilitated in the sector. He also held positions as a director at Group Inc., an international firm. In technology and analytics, Harris acted as Chairman of Route1 Inc., a cybersecurity and endpoint management company, and as Lead Director of Voxtur Analytics Corp., which provides data analytics solutions for real estate and sectors. Additionally, in 2022, he joined the board of Hampton Financial Corporation, a diversified . These roles leveraged Harris's experience, with annual compensation from such directorships reported to exceed $200,000 by the early , primarily from .

Ipperwash Inquiry Participation

Mike Harris testified at the Ipperwash Inquiry, a public commission established in 2003 to examine the 1995 occupation of Ipperwash Provincial Park and the fatal shooting of protester Dudley George by (). His testimony occurred over several days from February 14 to 20, 2006, making him the 100th witness in the proceedings. During his appearance, Harris denied allegations that he had made racially charged statements, such as reportedly telling officials on September 4, 1995, "I want the f---ing Indians out of the park," a remark attributed to him in earlier testimony by Marcel Beaubien and others. He maintained that the provincial government under his leadership viewed the occupation as an illegal trespass rather than a legitimate , consistent with prior government positions, and emphasized that operational decisions rested with the . Harris also rejected claims of direct political interference in police tactics, asserting he had not criticized actions post-incident and stood by the government's push for a swift resolution to reopen the park. He expressed that he would not alter his administration's response to the standoff, prioritizing public access to provincial property. In addition to testifying, Harris filed detailed closing submissions to , arguing that his government opposed the park's from the outset and that members, including himself, consistently sought without endorsing violence. These submissions contested narratives of undue political pressure on the , highlighting that Harris did not recall specific pre-crisis meetings with involved MPPs beyond routine interactions. The inquiry's final report, released on May 31, 2007, by Commissioner Sidney B. Linden, cleared Harris of personal responsibility for George's death, attributing the shooting primarily to operational failures, including inadequate planning and cultural insensitivity. However, it criticized the Harris government's impatience for resolution, noting that framing the protest solely as trespass—while Ipperwash's burial grounds held longstanding significance—limited negotiation opportunities and contributed to escalation. Harris responded to the findings by dismissing related allegations as "malicious and petty," viewing the report as vindicating his non-involvement in tactical decisions.

Public Engagements and Legacy Assessments

Following his in , Mike Harris adopted a relatively low public profile, limiting formal engagements to selective and advisory reflections rather than active political involvement. In a 2003 with the , Harris discussed the fiscal challenges inherited from prior governments and defended his administration's tax cuts and spending reductions as necessary to restore economic initiative. He has occasionally endorsed Conservative figures, including support for Doug Ford's 2018 campaign, aligning with continuity in . More recently, Harris participated in media discussions revisiting his tenure, including a October 10, 2025, interview in "The Files" series, where he addressed the ongoing polarization of his and attributed their endurance to pragmatic reforms amid economic recovery. He contributed to the 2023 book The Harris Legacy: Reflections on a Transformational , a collection of essays by policy experts evaluating his government's impacts, which he promoted as a fact-based reassessment emphasizing sustained provincial improvements. Legacy assessments of Harris remain sharply divided, with empirical economic data underscoring fiscal achievements amid critiques of social service strains. Upon taking office in 1995, faced an annual deficit exceeding $11 billion and rising debt servicing costs consuming over 10% of revenues; by 1999, the province recorded its first in a decade, followed by surpluses, achieved through 30% cuts to tax rates and a 7.5% real per capita reduction in consolidated spending from 1995/96 to 2001/02. Economic growth accelerated above the Canadian average post-recession, with unemployment falling from around 9% to under 6% and job creation outpacing national trends, crediting and welfare reforms for incentivizing employment. Critics, often from labor and Indigenous advocacy groups, attribute crises like Walkerton (2000) and Ipperwash (1995) to underfunding and deregulation, though inquiries linked Walkerton primarily to local mismanagement rather than provincial cuts alone, and broader data shows per capita program spending stabilized without derailing recovery. Supporters, including analysts in The Harris Legacy, highlight enduring reforms—such as municipal amalgamation and Hydro restructuring—as foundational to Ontario's competitive edge, with many policies intact under subsequent governments despite ideological opposition from left-leaning media and unions that amplify social disruption narratives over fiscal metrics. In 2021, his appointment to the recognized contributions to economic renewal, though it drew protests from over handling and unions over health and education cuts, reflecting persistent partisan divides. Overall, causal analysis favors Harris's approach for breaking Ontario's pre-1995 stagnation, as evidenced by debt-to-GDP stabilization and revenue growth post-tax cuts, outweighing localized failures attributable to implementation rather than core strategy.

Honors, Awards, and Recent Controversies

Harris received an honorary from on June 11, 2010, recognizing his leadership during economic challenges in . In 2021, he was appointed to the , the province's highest civilian honour for excellence and achievement. The appointment, announced on January 4, 2021, as part of 25 recipients selected by an advisory council, provoked backlash from leaders and advocacy groups. Critics, including the Union of Ontario Indians, described it as "a slap in the face," pointing to the 1995 under his government, where shot and killed unarmed protester Dudley George during a land dispute protest. Internal government emails later revealed concerns over public opposition, including links to coverage of long-term care issues during the , though the honour proceeded. On June 20, 2025, Harris was awarded the King Charles III Coronation Medal, nominated by Premier , for contributions to community and . Additional recent scrutiny has focused on his role as chairman of , a firm operating and retirement homes. In June 2020, amid elevated mortality rates in 's sector—over 2,000 resident deaths by mid-year—groups like the Ontario Health Coalition criticized Harris for deriving income from a privatized system shaped by his administration's and reduced public oversight in the 1990s and 2000s. These critiques attribute ongoing vulnerabilities in the sector, including staffing shortages and profit prioritization, to policy legacies from his tenure, though Harris has defended as enhancing efficiency and choice.

References

  1. [1]
    Michael D. Harris fonds - Archives of Ontario - Detail
    Michael (Mike) D. Harris was the 22nd Premier of Ontario from 1995-2002, the Leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario from 1990 to 2002, and the ...
  2. [2]
    Premier Mike Harris (1995-2002) | Legislative Assembly of Ontario
    Running on a platform to reduce provincial expenses – known as the “Common Sense Revolution” - Mike Harris was elected Ontario's 22nd Premier in June, 1995.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Common Sense Revolution - POLTEXT
    That debt is now increasing by about $10 billion every year. THE MIKE HARRIS PLAN - BALANCING THE BUDGET. Next year we will have to.
  4. [4]
    The (Un)Remarkable Common Sense Revolution of Mike Harris
    Nov 22, 2023 · To his fans, former Ontario premier Mike Harris is a conservative icon, a leader who cut taxes, reduced government spending, made sensible ...
  5. [5]
    Mike Harris transformed Ontario with his 'Common Sense Revolution'
    Dec 15, 2023 · Vaulted into the premier's office by an unexpected landslide victory, Harris brought dramatic reforms that remain largely unchanged today.
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Mike Harris and the Common Sense Revolution - Exhibits
    He cut funding to health care and closed hospitals. He introduced Bill 160, which allowed the provincial government to impose school taxes, decide funding, ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Ipperwash Inquiry - Archives of Ontario
    Premier Mike Harris and his government opposed the taking of Ipperwash Provincial. Park. Mr. Harris and the involved members of his Cabinet agreed that it ...
  9. [9]
    'A slap in the face': Indigenous communities shocked by Mike Harris ...
    Jan 5, 2021 · In September 1995, provincial police moved in on unarmed protesters who were occupying the former Ipperwash Provincial Park due to a dispute ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    About - Mike Harris. The Legacy Project
    Mike began his public service engagement when he become a primary school teacher – he taught math – but would leave the teaching profession as the success of ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Former Ontario premier Harris stands by education legacy amid ...
    Jun 11, 2010 · Harris – who grew up in North Bay – spent one year at Waterloo Lutheran University (now Wilfrid Laurier), then obtained a teaching certificate ...
  12. [12]
    Mike Harris - Nipissing University
    Raised in North Bay and educated at the North Bay Teachers' College (the precursor to Nipissing's Schulich School of Education), Mike Harris was the 22nd ...Missing: upbringing early
  13. [13]
    Player - Mike Harris - TheBench
    Michael Deane "Mike" Harris (born January 23, 1945) was the 22nd Premier of Ontario from June 26, 1995 to April 14, 2002.
  14. [14]
    Mike Harris
    ### Summary of Mike Harris's Early Provincial Political Roles (Post-1981 Election)
  15. [15]
    Mike Harris | Canadian Politician & 22nd Premier of Ontario
    On May 12, 1990, Harris was elected leader of the Ontario PCP, and four years later he released Common Sense Revolution, a plan to cut taxes and reduce the size ...
  16. [16]
    Michael Harris | Legislative Assembly of Ontario
    ... Michael Harris. Michael Harris. Riding. Icône de Point de Localisation Nipissing. Dates of service. March 19, 1981 (general election) – April 2, 2002 (resigned).
  17. [17]
    1981 Ontario Election - | Canadian Elections Database
    Mar 19, 1981 · Party, Candidates, Seats Won, % of Seats Won, % of Vote. Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, 126, 70, 56.00%, 44.40%.
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    In Ontario, will Patrick Brown be the next Mike Harris? - The Globe ...
    In Ontario, will Patrick Brown be the next Mike Harris? ... leadership of the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party to the campaign that Mr. Harris waged in 1990 ...
  20. [20]
    #EveryElectionProject: Ontario - by Éric Grenier - The Writ
    Apr 10, 2024 · Macdonald's government in 1873 and Mackenzie's Liberal victory in the 1874 federal election was still fresh in voters' minds. Cameron and the ...
  21. [21]
    Winner will need support from all parts of province - The Globe and ...
    ... Mike Harris ... Harris and Dianne Cunningham. One of them, Mr ... The complicated leadership selection process was put in place after the 1985 convention.
  22. [22]
    Terence Corcoran and Jack Mintz: Ontario's 1994-95 revolution
    May 8, 2024 · In May 1994 the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, under new leader Mike Harris, produced its election platform, boldly titled “The Common ...
  23. [23]
    The Common Sense Revolution turns 30 — and its architects are ...
    Jun 9, 2025 · Harris got rid of local councils in Metropolitan Toronto, replacing them with a single “megacity” council. He promised to cut spending and ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Harris Government - Fraser Institute
    We intend to highlight what the Ontario government has done in each of the major policy areas and to evaluate these actions within an economic framework. It is.
  25. [25]
    In the mood for cuts: How the 'Common Sense Revolution' swept ...
    Jun 6, 2018 · Furious with the NDP and unimpressed with the Liberals, voters elected Mike Harris's tax-cutting, government-shrinking Progressive Conservatives.
  26. [26]
    CONSERVATIVES APPEAR TO WIN ONTARIO - The Washington Post
    Jun 8, 1995 · ... conservative programs in Canada. The Progressive Conservative Party, under the leadership of Mike Harris, won 45 percent of the popular vote ...Missing: results | Show results with:results
  27. [27]
    Ontario Slashes Its Budget - The New York Times
    Nov 30, 1995 · Premier Mike Harris, who had already reduced welfare payments by 22 percent, said he plans further cuts to allow for a 30 percent tax cut.
  28. [28]
    The Common Sense Revolution at 25: History has lessons for Ford
    Jun 8, 2020 · Harris's program, the “Common Sense Revolution,” changed Ontario overnight. He slashed program spending. He slashed social assistance. He ...Missing: promises | Show results with:promises
  29. [29]
    Ontario plans big budget reduction - Tampa Bay Times
    Nov 30, 1995 · But Premier Mike Harris plans even more cutbacks in the coming years to allow for a 30 percent tax reduction. Harris _ who often is depicted ...
  30. [30]
    How Mike Harris got Ontarians off welfare and back to work
    Apr 22, 2024 · After being elected, Mike Harris wasted little time in enacting spending reductions, including initial reforms to social assistance. In July ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] 1997 Ontario Budget
    Sep 8, 2023 · Under the leadership of Premier Mike Harris, our plan allows Ontarians to keep more of their hard-earned money; it invests in health care, ...
  32. [32]
    Ontario Implements Tax Break | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Mar 17, 2003 · Eleven months after Premier Mike Harris swept to power, he fulfilled a key election promise in last week's budget, introducing the first stages ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] 1996 Ontario Budget
    May 7, 1996 · Every taxpayer will get a tax cut. •. Every taxpayer with less than $60,000 of income will get a tax cut of 30 per cent or greater.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Mike Harris' Plan to Keep Ontario on the Right Track - POLTEXT
    Once the budget is balanced -as promised and on schedule -we'll start a down the provincial debt, with a total debt reduction of at least $2 billion over our ...
  35. [35]
    Welfare rates worse than Harris cuts in 1995 - Toronto Star
    Jan 5, 2024 · The PC government spent eight years in power from 1995 to 2003 and cut Ontario Works rates by 21.6 per cent and did not increase either OW or ODSP during their ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  36. [36]
    Ontario's “welfare diet” in 2018 - Policy Options
    Aug 2, 2018 · In 1995, the Ontario Progressive Conservative government under Mike Harris cut welfare rates by 21.6 percent. David Tsubouchi, then minister ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Welfare Reform in Ontario: A Report Card - Fraser Institute
    Since 1995, the principal reform implemented in Ontario was the creation of Ontario Works (OW), the first work-for-welfare program adopted in Canada. In ...Missing: Mike details
  38. [38]
    Rituals of Degradation: Administration as Policy in the Ontario Works ...
    Jan 11, 2005 · After the election of a neo-liberal provincial government in 1995, Ontario was at the forefront of work-based welfare reform in Canada.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Common Sense Revolution - The Ontario Federation of Labour
    Oct 31, 1995 · Total cost of the Harris tax cut is $6 billion a year in lost revenue. More than half of this goes to the top 20% of income earners. Since ...Missing: implementation timeline
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The New Ontario Employment Standards Act
    During its first mandate, the Harris government froze the minimum wage, abolished the employee wage protection fund, overhauled the legal rules relating to ...Missing: Mike | Show results with:Mike
  41. [41]
    Has Harris Really Changed Things? - Comment Magazine
    May 1, 2001 · A year later, Bill 8, the Job Quotas Repeal Act, eliminated affirmative action and employment equity obligations. It was followed by Bill 49, ...Missing: Mike | Show results with:Mike
  42. [42]
    [PDF] EQAO's Grade Six Standardized Assessment: What does this have ...
    First, some background about EQAO. Mike Harris' Conservative government implemented the standardized assessment system in June 1996 to ensure "greater ...
  43. [43]
    Mike Harris's 'common sense' attack on Ontario schools is back
    Jan 21, 2020 · Harris's government called for standardized testing and the Education and Quality Accountability Office Act (EQAO) was passed into law in 1996.Missing: introduction | Show results with:introduction
  44. [44]
    Why more provinces are ditching school trustees | TVO Today
    Apr 30, 2021 · In 1997, Premier Mike Harris's government passed the Fewer School Boards Act. The total number of boards was reduced to 72, and ...
  45. [45]
    Change Needs All of Us | ETFO Voice
    Under the bill, the Harris government cut a further $2 billion from education and introduced a broken education funding formula still in use today to determine ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] In 1997 the Mike Harris Progressive
    Conservative government restructured school board funding, removing it from a model based on local property taxes to one based on direct provincial funding.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Education Funding in Ontario How the Government used its new ...
    Provincial funding cuts of over $525 million had been implemented by the. Harris Government prior to the advent of the Bill 160 formula. Measured on a ...
  48. [48]
    Harris Under Siege (Nov97 Updates) | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Inside his second-floor corner office at Queen's Park one afternoon last week, it was business as usual for Ontario Premier Mike Harris.
  49. [49]
    Bill 160, Education Quality Improvement Act, 1997
    [36] Bill 160 As Amended by Standing Committee (PDF). Bill 160 1997. An Act to reform the education. system, protect classroom funding,.
  50. [50]
    Remembering the Bill 160 Protest 20 years on… - OSSTF Toronto
    Oct 27, 2017 · This bill would overhaul Ontario's educational system by transferring funding control from local school trustees to cabinet, destroy collective ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Tensions and fissures: the politics of standardised testing and ...
    Jan 2, 2016 · Provincial high school graduation rates increased to 82% in 2011 from 68% in 2004 (Levin, 2012), and Ontario has been the highest-performing ...
  52. [52]
    Hospital restructuring in Ontario - PubMed
    ... Mike Harris, however, an Ontario Health Services Restructuring Commission has assumed responsibility for all reform. ... Ontario's healthcare delivery into ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] This is the story of Ontario's Health Services Restructuring ...
    Established in 1996, the commission (HSRC) was one of the first in a series of such bodies, provincial and federal, set up to find solutions to worsening.Missing: closures | Show results with:closures
  54. [54]
    Ontario attacked over hospital closures - The BMJ
    Mar 29, 1997 · The plan calls for the closure of 28 hospitals, including 10 of the 46 in the largest city, Toronto, and three in the capital, Ottawa.
  55. [55]
    The Harris Legacy in Healthcare :: Longwoods.com
    There have been three successful sets of healthcare reforms in Ontario since the creation of Medicare in the author's opinion.
  56. [56]
    Health Services Restructuring Commission
    Feb 21, 2023 · The HSRC completed its mandate and was closed March 28, 2000. This website continues as an HSRC document archive site only. It contains many of ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] budget speech - Archives of Ontario
    In 1995-96, health care operating spending was $17.6 billion. This year, it is $25.5 billion, a 7.3 per cent increase over last year. This includes a 7.7 per ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Ipperwash inquiry spreads blame for George's death | CBC News
    May 31, 2007 · The government of former Ontario premier Mike Harris, Ottawa and the OPP all bear responsibility for events that led to the 1995 death of Dudley George.
  59. [59]
    Ipperwash Crisis | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Feb 6, 2019 · ... events of 6 September 1995 under the government of Ontario Premier Mike Harris. However, when Dalton McGuinty and the Ontario Liberal Party ...
  60. [60]
    CBC News In Depth: Ipperwash
    May 28, 2009 · Feb. 14, 2006: Former Ontario premier Mike Harris tells the inquiry he wanted the 1995 native occupation of Ipperwash Provincial Park ended "as ...
  61. [61]
    Ipperwash allegations 'malicious and petty,' Harris says | CBC News
    May 31, 2007 · Former Ontario premier Mike Harris says an inquiry report into the 1995 death of aboriginal protester Dudley George clears him of any responsibility.
  62. [62]
    Why Ontario's Algonquin Land Claim is bad news for conservation
    Mar 21, 2016 · Former Ontario premier Mike Harris once promised a region-wide public referendum on the agreement, but the 1.4 million residents and taxpayers ...
  63. [63]
    First Nations chiefs protest Mike Harris's 'painful' appointment to ...
    Jan 6, 2021 · ... Ontario agency to deal with land claims. Archibald urged the province to push for healing, rather than reopening wounds by honouring Harris.<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Ontario Premiers and Provincial Government Spending, 2024
    Under. Premier Mike Harris, per person spending fell at an average annual rate of 1.0 percent. Page 2. Ontario Premiers and Provincial Government Spending.
  65. [65]
    Time to scrap this relic: Ontario's 1999 Taxpayer Protection Act - CCPA
    Jun 24, 2014 · The Act was enacted by the Mike Harris government in 1999 ... cut taxes while also balancing budgets. The Taxpayers Protection Act ...
  66. [66]
    Epic Fail – a short history of privatization in Ontario – OPSEU SEFPO
    In 1999, the Mike Harris government leased Highway 407 to a consortium led by a Spanish group. The agreement gave the government a flat fee of $3.1 billion. The ...
  67. [67]
    Why did Harris win re-election in 1999? - Rank and File
    Sep 13, 2018 · By the spring of 1999, Ontario's economic fortunes had largely reversed thanks to the American boom and the end of federal funding cuts. Mike ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Highlights of the Walkerton inquiry report | CBC News
    May 10, 2010 · Seven people died and 2,300 became ill after Walkerton's water supply became contaminated with manure spread on a farm near the town, the report ...
  69. [69]
    Inside Walkerton: Canada's worst-ever E. coli contamination - CBC
    May 17, 2010 · The community of Walkerton, population less than 5,000 at the time, saw 2,300 people fall ill, and seven die, after breakdowns in the local ...
  70. [70]
    A deadly E. coli outbreak in Walkerton, Ont., changed everything 25 ...
    May 17, 2025 · The inquiry also found that Stan Koebel knew on May 17 that water was contaminated with E. coli but he did not disclose those test results for ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Walkerton report blames province, water managers | CBC News
    Jan 18, 2002 · A few hours after Justice O'Connor released his report, Ontario Premier Mike Harris arrived in Walkerton to express his "deep regrets.
  72. [72]
    Walkerton Water Crisis Follow-up | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Mar 17, 2003 · At Queen's Park, the opposition pointed at Premier Mike Harris. In 1995, the new Tory government closed down all four government water ...
  73. [73]
    'I'm accountable,' Harris says of Walkerton | CBC News
    Jun 29, 2001 · Harris also repeatedly said, testfying under oath, that as head of the Ontario government he is accountable for what happened in Walkerton.
  74. [74]
    Ontario premier to resign | CBC News
    Oct 16, 2001 · Mike Harris will step down as premier of Ontario and head of the provincial Tory party after a spring leadership race. "I did not feel that was ...
  75. [75]
    AMERICAS | Canadian provincial leader resigns - BBC News
    Oct 16, 2001 · Citing personal reasons, Ontario premier and Conservative leader Mike Harris steps down after six years in power.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  76. [76]
    Mike Harris | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Mar 2, 2017 · Mike Harris is considered a pioneer of the modern conservative movement in Canada through his “Common Sense Revolution” policies, which created ...
  77. [77]
    Eves wins Ontario Tory leadership | CBC News
    Mar 23, 2002 · Former finance minister Ernie Eves wins Ontario PC leadership on the second ballot; to be sworn in a premier in next couple of weeks.Missing: becomes | Show results with:becomes<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Ernie Eves | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    But in the 2003 provincial election, Eves's Conservative party was defeated and he was subsequently succeeded by Dalton MCGUINTY and the Liberal party. He ...
  79. [79]
    Ernie Eves - Legislative Assembly of Ontario
    Premier April 15, 2002 – October 22, 2003. Leader, Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario March 23, 2002 – September 18, 2004. Deputy Premier June 17, 1999 ...Missing: becomes | Show results with:becomes
  80. [80]
    Today in Canada's Political History: Ernie Eves Elected Ontario PC…
    Mar 23, 2022 · He would succeed Mike Harris who had stepped down after receiving back-to-back majority mandates from voters in Canada's largest province. ...Missing: succession | Show results with:succession
  81. [81]
    Canada Jetlines Appoints Stan Gadek As Chairman, Board Of ...
    Jun 3, 2015 · After leaving politics, Mr. Harris formed his own consulting firm and began serving numerous corporate entities in an advisory capacity.
  82. [82]
    Mike Harris does not deserve the Order of Ontario
    Jan 4, 2021 · Even after this and the multiple resulting inquiries and reviews, Harris's successor Ernie Eves (along with Social Services Minister Brenda ...
  83. [83]
    Mike Harris is raking in profits from long-term care system he helped ...
    Jun 11, 2020 · Pledging to tackle Ontario's deficit, the Harris government pushed tax reductions and slashed public spending on health care, education and ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    Hon. Mike Harris - Canada Strong & Free Network
    Michael Harris is a Senior Business Advisor in the Corporate/Commercial and Government Relations & Ethics Groups at Fasken Martineau.
  85. [85]
    Hampton Financial Corporation Announces Hon. Mike Harris to Join ...
    Nov 10, 2022 · He currently serves on the boards of Route1 Inc. (Chairman), and Voxtur Analytics Corp. (Lead Director). He also serves on three boards for ...Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
  86. [86]
    Our Leadership Team & Board of Directors – Voxtur Analytics Corp.
    From 1995 to 2002, he served as Ontario's twenty-second Premier. Mr. Harris serves as a Director on several private and public boards, including Canaccord ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Golden years, golden boards: Mike Harris's post-politics career
    Jan 20, 2021 · Not long after Mike Harris left the Ontario Premier's Office in 2002, he embarked on a new career as a corporate director.Missing: professional | Show results with:professional
  88. [88]
    [PDF] IPPERWASH INQUIRY - Ontario Justice Education Network
    Former Ontario Premier Mike Harris –February 14 to February 20, 2006. Ontario Provincial Police Officers involved at Ipperwash, OPP Commissioner, expert ...
  89. [89]
    Inquiry: 'I want the Indians out of the park' - Indianz.Com
    Nov 29, 2005 · The inquiry into the death of a Native activist at the hands of police heard explosive testimony on Monday about the involvement of top political officials.Missing: participation | Show results with:participation
  90. [90]
    Harris says he wouldn't change Ipperwash response | CBC News
    Feb 20, 2006 · Former Ontario premier Mike Harris ended his testimony before the Ipperwash inquiry Monday denying he did anything wrong in dealing with the occupation.Missing: participation | Show results with:participation
  91. [91]
    Former Ontario Premier Mike Harris cleared of responsibility for ...
    May 31, 2007 · Former Ontario Premier Mike Harris cleared of responsibility for death at Ipperwash Provincial Park ... The Ipperwash Public Inquiry was called by ...
  92. [92]
    Mike Harris, Ontario Premier 1995-2002
    Jul 30, 2003 · There were things that I wanted to do in the private sector and things I wanted to do with family and things I wanted to do with my life. Maybe ...Missing: premiership | Show results with:premiership<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Transcript: The Premier Files: Mike Harris | Oct 10, 2025 | TVO Today
    My father moved to North Bay and started his own business, and he opened up the north for a company called Lindy, and, uh, my mother was a bookkeeper and she ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    [PDF] How Ontario Can Avoid Another Post-Recession Debt Binge
    In subsequent years, and particularly during. Premier Mike Harris's tenure, real per-per- son spending decreased and Ontario's annual deficit was eliminated ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Just How Radical were the Spending Cuts in Alberta and Ontario?
    writer for the Financial Post, de- scribed Mr. Harris' plan of reform in. Ontario as a “radical agenda of tax and spending cuts,” and suggested that he.
  96. [96]
    A Fact-based Approach to Understanding the Harris Legacy
    Sep 23, 2025 · When Mike Harris was first elected, Ontario was wrestling with large annual deficits and an unsustainable rise in total provincial debt. Among ...
  97. [97]
    Emails shed light on fury over Mike Harris's 2021 Order of Ontario ...
    Dec 31, 2021 · ... public anger over former premier Mike Harris's controversial 2021 appointment to the Order of Ontario, the province's highest honour.<|control11|><|separator|>
  98. [98]
    Mike Harris's nomination to the Order of Ontario sparks Indigenous ...
    Jan 4, 2021 · A group representing seven Ontario First Nations is outraged by the nomination of former premier Mike Harris to the Order of Ontario.
  99. [99]
    OP-ED: Pragmatism mattered more than Ideology to Mike Harris
    Dec 11, 2023 · Both sides typically see the Harris years as a stark exception to Ontario's record of moderate, gradual and unexciting government. The ...
  100. [100]
    Fomer Ontario Premier to receive honorary degree from NipU
    On Friday, June 11th, Mike Harris will receive Doctor of Letters and will deliver the convocation speech during the Faculty of Arts and Science and Faculty of ...
  101. [101]
    Mike Harris | The Governor General of Canada
    Mike Harris. Elmira, Ontario, Canada. King Charles III Coronation Medal. Nominator: Doug Ford; Awarded on: June 20, 2025. Top. Share ...
  102. [102]
    Former Ontario premier Mike Harris is raking in profits from the long ...
    Jun 19, 2020 · Pledging to tackle Ontario's deficit, the Harris government pushed tax reductions and slashed public spending on health care, education and ...