Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

MultiCam


MultiCam is a camouflage pattern developed by Crye Precision to effectively limit the visual and near-infrared signatures of personnel across diverse physical environments and seasonal variations.
The pattern features a complex arrangement of organic, low-contrast shapes in tan, brown, green, and beige hues, optimized for disrupting human outlines at multiple observation distances while blending into transitional terrains such as woodland edges, arid zones, and urban peripheries.
Originally conceived in 2002 amid U.S. military efforts to improve concealment beyond environment-specific patterns like woodland and desert schemes, MultiCam underwent rigorous testing that demonstrated superior versatility in field trials, leading to its initial adoption by U.S. special operations forces.
In 2010, it became the official U.S. Army combat uniform pattern for operations in Afghanistan, where empirical combat data affirmed its effectiveness in reducing detection rates compared to prior uniforms.
Its influence extended globally, inspiring licensed variants like the British Multi-Terrain Pattern and Australian Multicam adaptations, while the U.S. transitioned to the similar Operational Camouflage Pattern in 2015 to avoid proprietary licensing costs, though MultiCam remains in use by numerous allied militaries and commercial applications for its proven multi-domain performance.

History and Development

Origins at Crye Precision

MultiCam was developed by Crye Precision, a tactical gear manufacturer founded in 2000 by Caleb Crye and Gregg Thompson in , . The pattern's creation began in 2002, driven by the recognition that existing designs, optimized for specific environments like deserts or woodlands, performed poorly in transitional or mixed terrains encountered during modern operations. Crye Precision pursued a first-principles approach, prioritizing empirical analysis of natural visual disruption over pixelated digital formats prevalent in emerging military patterns. The design incorporated organic shapes and a layered palette of seven earth-toned colors—ranging from pale tan to deep green—to mimic foliage, shadows, and ground clutter observed in varied U.S. landscapes, enabling low-observable blending rather than high-contrast disruption. This methodology drew from direct field observations and avoided reliance on simulated or politically driven universal patterns, such as the (UCP) later adopted by the U.S. Army in 2004. Initial prototyping and validation occurred through private company resources, with informal testing across diverse terrains including arid Southwest deserts, Midwestern grasslands, and Northeastern woodlands to verify multi-seasonal efficacy. By 2004, MultiCam achieved commercial availability, marking its entry into the civilian and markets ahead of broader institutional evaluation. This self-funded phase underscored Crye Precision's independence from contracts during core , allowing uncompromised focus on performance metrics over procurement specifications.

Initial Testing and Early Contracts

In the early 2000s, Crye Precision developed the MultiCam pattern through collaborations with U.S. forces, producing uniforms and gear for deployment in Afghanistan's varied mountain, desert, and transitional environments. These addressed limitations of legacy patterns like the three-color (), which struggled with seasonal and elevational changes, by incorporating a multi-layered, gradient-based design that disrupted outlines across light conditions. Field use by special operators from 2004 onward provided initial validation, with operators reporting enhanced concealment during and missions compared to DCU's more rigid color blocks. By 2005–2006, independent evaluations by U.S. Army Special Operations Command units compared MultiCam against alternatives, including the Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP), in simulated and operational scenarios. The tests quantified reduced detection distances—often 20–30% lower in mixed terrains—due to MultiCam's balanced color palette and organic layering, which minimized visual pop against backgrounds shifting from arid rock to sparse vegetation. This data drove refinements, including targeted adjustments to near-infrared (NIR) reflectance to maintain low signatures under night-vision devices, ensuring the pattern's disruption held across spectra without over-reliance on visual mimicry alone. These results spurred early international interest, leading to contracts with Norwegian (FSK) and Danish units by the late 2000s. Their independent trials, mirroring U.S. methodologies, confirmed MultiCam's versatility for European contingents in , where detection rates in photo-simulation studies favored it over national patterns like 's M/98. These agreements marked Crye Precision's first major non-U.S. military deals, emphasizing the pattern's empirical edge in real-world concealment over doctrinally imposed uniformity.

US Army Evaluation and OCP Divergence

In 2009, the US Army's Camouflage Improvement Program conducted extensive field tests evaluating multiple camouflage patterns for effectiveness in Afghan environments, with MultiCam ranking highest in overall concealment across varied terrains and conditions. These results prompted the Department of Defense to authorize MultiCam, re-designated as the , for deploying forces in starting in summer 2010, marking a temporary departure from the ineffective . Despite MultiCam's superior performance in trials demonstrating better versatility than UCP or other candidates, the Army initiated Phase IV of its camouflage effort in 2012, ultimately selecting a modified version of the government-owned W2 —renamed ()—as the basis for a new family of uniforms in . This choice prioritized royalty-free procurement, avoiding licensing fees to Crye Precision for the proprietary MultiCam, over continued use of the empirically validated . The mandated a transition to , phasing out OEF-CP and UCP by October 1, 2019, through a wear-out period ending September 30, 2019. OCP adoption reflected bureaucratic emphasis on cost uniformity for the conventional force, even as data from 2009 tests indicated MultiCam's edge in multi-environment adaptability. Post-2015, special operations units under Special Operations Command retained MultiCam for its operational efficacy in diverse theaters, underscoring a divergence where mission-specific needs trumped service-wide standardization. The Air Force similarly transitioned to by 2021 for interoperability but permitted legacy MultiCam in certain special tactics and expeditionary roles where field-proven concealment outweighed procurement constraints.

Design and Technical Features

Pattern Geometry and Color Composition

The standard MultiCam utilizes a seven-color palette comprising , /, , dark , olive green, dark green, and lime green, layered in to facilitate blending across diverse terrains. The base layer features a horizontal transitioning from to , overprinted with a of dark green, olive green, and lime green forms, topped by irregular opaque dark and -colored shapes distributed non-repetitively. This chromatic composition draws from natural environmental hues, prioritizing low-contrast layering over high-disruption edges to exploit human of volume and shape. Geometrically, MultiCam employs organic, flowing shapes rather than rigid pixels or tiles, with elements arranged in a non-repeating configuration inspired by fractal-like natural patterns for consistent disruption regardless of or . The incorporates predominantly vertical "twiglet" forms to emulate foliage stalks and vertical disruptions, distinguishing it from patterns like that favor broader horizontal branching. These elements break the human outline by mimicking branching vegetation and linear natural features, enhancing concealment in transitional environments without directional bias. The pattern's scale integrates micro-patterns for close-range outline disruption and macro-forms for mid-to-long-range blending, calibrated to human visual resolution across operational distances where fine details resolve into generalized shapes. This multi-scale approach ensures efficacy from near contact to extended engagement ranges, with high-resolution printing preserving detail without pixelation.

Optical and NIR Signature Management

MultiCam employs specialized pigments and dyes to control near-infrared () reflectance, thereby reducing observability under devices that operate primarily in the 700-900 nm wavelength range. These materials are formulated to approximate the average spectral reflectance of diverse natural backgrounds, including foliage and , which typically exhibit variable NIR returns influenced by moisture content and health. This approach ensures the pattern disrupts human outlines while minimizing contrast against environmental averages, as uncontrolled high reflectance can amplify visibility in image-intensified systems. The balanced properties of MultiCam prevent "blooming" artifacts—halo-like glows caused by disparate color under active illumination— a issue more pronounced in high- digital patterns where dark elements absorb while light ones reflect excessively. analyses indicate that in pre-2010 MultiCam fabrics, only two of its seven colors retain distinct visibility at approximately 860 , promoting convergence toward background levels and preserving disruptive geometry without excessive signature elevation. Post-2010 variants show slight increases in contrast for enhanced definition, yet maintain overall low through treatments that limit differentiation to 3 colors. Hyperspectral and NIR evaluations, including those comparing against MARPAT Woodland and UCP, reveal MultiCam's darker average signature in the NIR band aligns more closely with terrain baselines than MARPAT's brighter reflectance, which exceeds foliage norms and heightens detectability under NVGs. Crye Precision has developed MultiCam variants explicitly to further suppress both visual and NIR signatures during operations in multi-environment settings, validated through proprietary testing against standard night vision threats. These physics-based optimizations prioritize causal matching of environmental spectra over simplistic low-reflectance suppression, as absolute NIR absorption can mismatch verdant or transitional terrains where vegetation reflects 40-80% in healthy states.

Material and Printing Specifications

MultiCam fabrics are predominantly produced using nylon-cotton blends, with a standard 50/50 composition providing a of strength, , and tear resistance suitable for tactical applications. Military-grade versions incorporate near-infrared () compliance to reduce visibility under goggles, achieved through specialized dyes and finishes that maintain low reflectance while preserving . Fabric weights vary by end use, typically ranging from 203-238 grams per square meter (approximately 6-7 ounces per ) for durable military uniforms to lighter constructions under 2 ounces per for civilian or lightweight gear, ensuring uniform pattern scaling across substrates without distorting the geometric elements. Printing specifications emphasize durability and fidelity, with licensed reproduction requiring adherence to Crye Precision's protocols to prevent deviations that could compromise concealment performance. Colors are matched directly against approved fabric samples rather than Pantone equivalents, as the multi-layer blending relies on precise visible and spectral properties rather than isolated spot colors. Solvent-based or specialized inks compatible with synthetic blends are employed for fade resistance and adhesion on materials, supporting repeated laundering and field exposure without significant degradation. or frequency-modulated screening techniques may be utilized in adaptations to minimize and moiré effects, preserving the , non-repeating microstructure essential to the pattern's effectiveness, though traditional rotary remains standard for high-volume production.

Performance and Effectiveness

Empirical Concealment Data

In the U.S. Army's Photosimulation Detection Test conducted by the Natick Research, Development, and Engineering Center between 2007 and 2009, MultiCam targets were detected with lower probability than those using the Universal Pattern (UCP) across varied simulated terrains, including transitional woodland-to-desert zones, due to reduced visual contrast and improved blending with heterogeneous backgrounds. The involved over 10,000 observer assessments of digitally altered images, quantifying via metrics such as mean detection time and probability of detection under controlled and conditions standardized to 50-300 meters. This performance edge, estimated at 30-50% longer average detection times for MultiCam relative to UCP in cropland and open environments based on aggregated trial data, arose from the pattern's layered micro- and macro-scale elements that fragmented outlines more effectively than UCP's pixelated uniformity. Subsequent validation in -specific evaluations corroborated these lab findings, with spectral and visual analyses showing MultiCam's color palette better mitigated edge-highlighting cues in arid-transitional settings. MultiCam's concealment derives from deliberate geometric features, including irregular, branching forms and subtle color gradients that elevate entropy, thereby confounding human edge-detection mechanisms reliant on abrupt contrast transitions rather than relying on uniform disruption. Quantitative models of perceived and gradient magnitude confirm that such designs lower target discriminability by 15-25% in moderately complex natural scenes compared to sharper-edged patterns, as measured via observer error rates in psychophysical experiments. These attributes prioritize measurable disruption of form over simplistic averaging of colors, aligning with empirical reductions in detection under both visible and near-infrared .

Field Trials and Comparative Analyses

Field trials of MultiCam during U.S. Command deployments in from 2010 onward validated its effectiveness in transitional terrains blending arid deserts with sparse vegetation. In Phase IV of the U.S. Army's Camouflage Improvement Program, conducted in environments simulating Afghan conditions, MultiCam achieved the highest overall score of 80 out of 100 across multiple terrains, outperforming competitors in concealment metrics such as detection distance and observer identification rates. Operators in after-action reports noted practical advantages over the Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP) in Army Combat Uniforms, including reduced visibility against rocky and vegetated backdrops, though quantitative data on sightings per remained largely anecdotal due to operational security constraints. Comparative analyses highlighted MultiCam's advantages over pixelated patterns like UCP, which exhibited detection rates significantly higher than multi-terrain alternatives in non-desert settings. A U.S. study found UCP concealed soldiers less effectively than Corps patterns, with failure attributed to its rigid structure that poorly disrupted outlines in varied lighting and foliage, leading to adoption rates below effective thresholds in over 70% of tested non-arid scenarios based on aggregated trial outcomes. In contrast, MultiCam's analog-organic forms provided causally superior blending by mimicking natural edge fragmentation, resulting in longer average detection ranges in empirical observer tests across transitional zones. Head-to-head evaluations with revealed MultiCam's edge in arid regions, where CADPAT's greener tones dominated and reduced efficacy in low-vegetation areas, though the patterns matched closely in dense woodland concealment. Against (), MultiCam lagged slightly in pure open desert due to OCP's optimized tan dominance but excelled in vegetated transitional areas, where OCP's horizontal linearity yielded higher visibility in dappled light. These results underscore digital patterns' limitations in rigid , which empirical data links to poorer performance in heterogeneous environments compared to MultiCam's flexible, terrain-agnostic disruption.

Environmental Versatility Metrics

MultiCam's environmental versatility is evidenced by its designation as an "80 percent solution," indicating high concealment efficacy in approximately 80% of operational , including transitional zones blending , arid, and semi-urban landscapes, without requiring pattern substitutions. This metric stems from its layered color palette and organic geometry, which disrupt human across seasonal variations, elevations, and light conditions, as validated through iterative testing and simulations focused on natural blending. In standardized multi-environment evaluations, such as the US Army's Camouflage Improvement Effort, MultiCam achieved top rankings for overall detection avoidance compared to monochrome or single-biome patterns like (UCP), particularly in mixed terrains where it reduced visual signatures by leveraging mid-tone dominance for distance blending and fine details for close-range disruption. These tests, conducted at facilities including Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center, highlighted its probabilistic edge in 70-80% of simulated global biomes, with lower detection probabilities in vegetated and transitional areas versus specialized desert or woodland-only designs. Notwithstanding these strengths, MultiCam exhibits limitations in extreme monochromatic environments; for instance, in pure snowfields or , its baseline earthy tones yield moderate detection rates, prompting the development of the MultiCam variant for enhanced low-light and high-snow efficacy. Similarly, in hyper-arid deserts with minimal , performance dips relative to dedicated arid patterns, though it still outperforms colors by 20-30% in engagement delay metrics from simulator-based observer trials. Overall, its cross-terrain utility prioritizes logistical simplicity over peak specialization, confirming baseline superiority to mono-chrome alternatives in probabilistic modeling of diverse operational scenarios.

Variants and Adaptations

Core MultiCam Pattern

The core MultiCam pattern, developed by Crye Precision and released in , represents the baseline design within the MultiCam camouflage family, serving as the reference for all subsequent derivatives. Intended primarily for temperate zones featuring mixed and arid transitions, it employs a balanced palette of earthy tones to provide effective visual disruption in environments ranging from the arid expanses of the Southwest to semi-arid Middle Eastern terrains. The pattern's consists of , irregular forms including branching elements and overlapping amorphous shapes that emulate foliage and contours, fostering outline breakup without reliance on pixelated or directional motifs. This structure enables a non-tiled, continuous flow across fabric surfaces, minimizing detectable seams in garments or equipment covers. The color composition integrates multiple shades—typically light tans for highlights, darker browns and olives for mid-tones, and subdued greens for depth—to adapt to seasonal and lighting variations in transitional landscapes. Since its establishment as the standard in , the core pattern has underpinned licensed adaptations while maintaining its core utility for operations in diverse but predominantly temperate-arid hybrids, as validated through early military evaluations.

Specialized Environmental Variants

MultiCam's specialized environmental variants preserve the core geometry and layering principles of the original pattern while recalibrating the color palette to address limitations in niche terrains, enabling targeted concealment without requiring entirely new designs. Developed by Crye Precision, these officially licensed adaptations—MultiCam Tropic, Arid, , and —emerged from iterative empirical refinements to the standard palette, focusing on spectral matching for visual and near-infrared () effectiveness in specific ecosystems. Released collectively in November 2013, they represent extensions of the MultiCam family rather than standalone patterns, with color adjustments derived from environmental signature analyses to minimize detection probabilities in transitional or extreme conditions. MultiCam Tropic augments green hues and reduces tan dominance to align with dense foliage and verdant undergrowth prevalent in tropical jungles, enhancing blending in chlorophyll-rich environments where standard MultiCam's arid influences can disrupt harmony. This variant targets operations in high-vegetation zones, such as Pacific island archipelagos or Southeast Asian rainforests, by emphasizing mid-tone greens that mimic leaf litter and shadow patterns under canopy light diffusion. Field tests in woodland and jungle settings have confirmed its superior disruption of human outlines compared to the baseline pattern, with observers noting reduced visibility at distances under 50 meters in overcast, humid conditions. MultiCam Arid employs desaturated tans, light coyotes, and subdued olives to counter the high-contrast, low-vegetation profiles of sandy deserts and rocky wadis, effectively lowering both visual and detectability against sun-bleached substrates. The palette shift prioritizes earth tones that replicate wind-eroded sands and sparse scrub, making it suitable for open arid expanses where standard MultiCam's greener elements stand out under direct sunlight. This adaptation stems from assessments showing improved signature suppression in environments with minimal organic cover, such as Middle Eastern or theaters. MultiCam incorporates predominant whites and cool grays to fracture silhouettes against snowfields and meadows, retaining the disruptive edges for high-altitude or winter operations where thermal contrasts and glare dominate. Similarly, MultiCam Black utilizes intensified darks and neutrals for urban shadows and low-light scenarios, optimizing for , , and nocturnal settings by reducing gleam from artificial illumination. Each variant adjusts color proportions to maintain compatibility with the core design, ensuring modular integration across MultiCam-equipped systems while tailoring to causal environmental disruptors like terrain reflectance and seasonal variance.

Licensed Derivatives and Unauthorized Copies

The British Multi-Terrain Pattern (MTP), introduced by the in 2010, represents a licensed derivative of MultiCam tailored for temperate European environments, incorporating adjusted color hues and subtle elements from the legacy while retaining core geometric shapes and layering principles for multi-environment versatility. This adaptation was authorized through Crye Precision's licensing framework, enabling production by approved printers to maintain proprietary near-infrared () reflectance properties essential for night-vision compatibility. Similarly, the Multicam Camouflage Uniform (AMCU), rolled out progressively from 2014 and standardized across the Australian Defence Force by late 2019, functions as another licensed evolution, with optimized tonal balances for Australasian terrains while adhering to Crye Precision's controlled printing specifications for consistent optical performance. These official variants ensure fidelity to the original's empirical concealment metrics, distinguishing them from non-compliant reproductions through verified material substrates and signatures. Unauthorized copies, particularly those originating from Chinese manufacturers under labels like "Multi-Terrain Camo" or generic "multicam-style" prints, proliferated in global markets from the early onward, often employing substandard dyes and printing techniques that fail to replicate MultiCam's precise NIR suppression, rendering them detectable under tactical sensors despite superficial visual similarity. Such infringements, sold via platforms and surplus outlets, undermined licensed products by eroding market trust, as consumers encountered faded colors and inconsistent pattern scaling after minimal wear. Crye Precision initiated aggressive intellectual property enforcement starting around 2012, filing multiple federal lawsuits against fabric printers and apparel vendors for and violations, including actions against Duro Textiles in 2015 for unauthorized commercial MultiCam reproductions and ongoing cases like the 2023 suit against Concealed Carrier LLC for willful pattern duplication. These efforts, extending through 2020 and beyond, resulted in injunctions, damages awards, and licensing mandates, preserving by compelling defendants to cease production of infringing fabrics and adopt traceable hang-tags for authentic goods. By prioritizing peer-reviewed NIR testing in litigation evidence, Crye demonstrated causal links between poor replication and reduced field effectiveness, deterring widespread counterfeiting and reinforcing the economic viability of licensed derivatives.

Adoption by Militaries and Governments

United States Military Use

The U.S. Command (USSOCOM) adopted MultiCam in the mid-2000s for its forces, recognizing its effectiveness across diverse terrains during early phases of Operations and Iraqi . This , developed by Crye Precision, became the preferred camouflage for USSOCOM units worldwide due to empirical testing showing superior concealment compared to prior patterns like the Marine (MARPAT). USSOCOM has retained MultiCam as its standard operational continuously since then, issuing it in uniforms, , and gear without interruption. In February 2010, the U.S. Army authorized MultiCam—designated Camouflage Pattern (OEF-CP)—for soldiers deploying to , issuing over 100,000 sets initially to replace the Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP), which performed poorly in local environments. This limited adoption extended to conventional Army units in theater through 2014, with OEF-CP providing transitional concealment until the broader service-wide shift. The Army's rollout of the () from July 1, 2015, to September 30, 2019, ended mandatory issuance of OEF-CP MultiCam for new procurements, focusing instead on for all active-duty, Reserve, and soldiers by 2019. Stockpiled OEF-CP items remained in use until depletion, and regulations permitted privately purchased MultiCam gear in certain non-deployed contexts, sustaining its presence among operators preferring its broader environmental adaptability. USSOCOM exempted itself from this transition, continuing exclusive MultiCam procurement and fielding for . As of 2023–2025, no policy reversal has reinstated MultiCam service-wide, though operational holdouts persist via USSOCOM directives and individual acquisitions. Some critiques from field operators highlight 's reduced versatility in lush or high-contrast non-arid settings—such as woodlands or Pacific jungles—prompting unofficial retention of MultiCam in training and private security roles tied to . These preferences underscore MultiCam's enduring appeal despite official standardization on .

United Kingdom and Allied Forces

The British Armed Forces adopted the Multi-Terrain Pattern (MTP) camouflage in 2010 as a replacement for the aging Disruptive Pattern Material (DPM), following operational evaluations in Iraq and Afghanistan that highlighted MultiCam's effectiveness in arid, transitional, and semi-arid environments. Developed by the UK's Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, MTP blends MultiCam's multi-scale disruption and color scheme—featuring seven shades of brown, green, and beige—with faint DPM-like elements for added texture, enabling better concealment across diverse terrains encountered in counter-insurgency operations. Initial issuance targeted personnel deploying on Operation Herrick from March 2010, with comprehensive rollout to all services by 2011, prioritizing adaptability over specialized patterns like the desert MultiCam Black. This shift enhanced interoperability with U.S. and coalition partners employing MultiCam, as the visual similarity minimized friendly identification challenges during joint maneuvers and patrols in shared theaters like , where empirical feedback from troops underscored reduced detection risks in mixed-force scenarios. MTP's design rationale emphasized causal effectiveness in real-world concealment metrics over aesthetic uniformity, drawing directly from field trials that demonstrated superior blending in transitional zones compared to legacy patterns. Among Commonwealth allies, standardized the Australian Multicam Camouflage Uniform (AMCU) from October 2014, a tailored MultiCam variant with adjusted hues for local bushlands while preserving core layering for seamless integration in multinational deployments, such as those alongside U.S. forces in the . New Zealand followed with the New Zealand Multi-Terrain Pattern (NZMTP) in 2019, adapting MTP's MultiCam foundation with localized green emphases to align with joint exercises involving and the , thereby supporting operational synergy in Pacific and expeditionary contexts. Canada's Joint Task Force 2 and other special operations units have utilized original MultiCam since the early 2000s for rotations, favoring it for proven alliance compatibility despite domestic CADPAT preferences, with over 1,000 personnel equipped by 2010 to match U.S. SOF tactics.

European and Other International Adopters

adopted the camouflage pattern, a derivative of MultiCam featuring mottled dark brown, olive green, and tan elements, in 2008 for operations in varied environments including . This choice facilitated interoperability with allies using similar multi-environment patterns, providing cost-effective concealment without developing unique national designs. Hungarian Defence Forces special forces implemented MultiCam on a limited scale prior to 2015, driven by its proven versatility in international deployments. In 2015, introduced the 2015M pattern, a licensed closely resembling MultiCam, for select units to balance proprietary technology access with domestic production capabilities. This approach allowed Hungarian operators to achieve effective visual blending across , arid, and transitional terrains at reduced licensing costs compared to patterns. The Georgian Defense Forces transitioned to a domestic MultiCam variant in the late , replacing prior temperate patterns for standard issue among and special units. Adopted amid alignment efforts and joint missions in , this pattern enhanced operational concealment in diverse light and seasonal conditions, serving as an economical standard for a military integrating Western equipment standards. Romanian special operations units incorporated MultiCam-inspired designs by the mid-2010s, aligning with interoperability requirements for multinational exercises and deployments. In 2017, the introduced a MultiCam-similar pattern with army-specific variants, prioritizing multi-terrain efficacy over custom development to support in transitional environments. Indonesian elite units, including paratroopers, began utilizing locally produced MultiCam variants pre-2020 for and aviation elements operating in terrains. This adoption reflected a preference for MultiCam's broad-spectrum performance as a cost-efficient option amid regional operations, avoiding the expense of terrain-specific patterns while enabling integration with partnered forces.

Recent Global Transitions (2020 Onward)

In August 2025, Ukraine's Ministry of Defense approved the MM-25 camouflage pattern for trial use across the Armed Forces, marking a shift from the pixelated MM-14 design previously employed by and conventional units. This MultiCam-inspired pattern, developed to enhance concealment in diverse environments, prompted of 20,000 uniform sets for testing production scalability and field performance, with no fixed timeline for full replacement announced. The similarly initiated plans in 2024 to from the pattern to Multitarn, a MultiCam derivative optimized for multi-terrain operations, with new equipment integrations starting in 2026 and complete rollout by 2029. This change addresses limitations of Flecktarn's specialized variants by prioritizing a single, adaptable scheme for tactical flexibility in contemporary deployments. Unclassified assessments indicate a broader uptick in MultiCam-like patterns among global since 2020, driven by empirical evidence of superior disruption in transitional zones during conflicts such as those in and the , though specific adoptions remain fragmented by national procurement cycles.

Civilian and Commercial Applications

Hunting and Outdoor Recreation

MultiCam gained traction among U.S. hunters for big game pursuits starting around 2005, particularly for its adaptability in transitional terrains like mixed woodlands, brushlands, and semi-arid regions where static, habitat-specific patterns falter during movement. Its layered organic shapes and subdued palette break up human outlines more effectively across lighting conditions and seasons than traditional leaf-mimicry designs, suiting spot-and-stalk tactics for species such as deer and . User-reported data from forums and tests highlight MultiCam's edge in reducing game detection, with hunters noting shorter alert distances compared to patterns optimized for single environments; general camouflage research supports this by showing patterned disruptions extend target identification times by factors of 2-2.5 seconds against human observers, a for animal in prey . Licensed MultiCam gear from tactical outfitters like incorporates near-infrared (NIR) reflectance control, minimizing glow under trail cameras and low-light optics prevalent in modern , which enhances overall concealment without relying on photorealistic imitation. This NIR compliance, originally for tactical applications, provides versatility over state-tailored alternatives like Realtree, allowing one pattern for multi-state or cross-terrain hunts rather than swapping kits seasonally.

Law Enforcement and Private Security

Law enforcement agencies in the United States, including special weapons and tactics () units, have incorporated MultiCam variants such as MultiCam into their operational gear for missions requiring concealment in low-light urban settings and transitional terrains blending cityscapes with surrounding rural or wooded areas. This adaptation stems from the pattern's layered design, which disrupts outlines effectively against shadowed backgrounds and mixed foliage, distinguishing it from traditional solid black or navy uniforms that offer poorer blending in non-uniform lighting. teams from departments like those in major metropolitan areas have transitioned to these patterns since the mid-2010s to enhance tactical advantage during high-risk warrants, hostage rescues, and perimeter security, where visual separation from standard patrol attire also aids in operational clarity. Private security firms, particularly those engaged in protective services in high-threat regions such as the and , employ standard MultiCam for its proven disruption across arid, semi-urban, and vegetated environments encountered in and defense contracts. Contractors with firms like those succeeding earlier entities such as Academi have favored the pattern for gear interoperability with client military allies and its empirical edge in concealing personnel during static or dynamic response, as validated in field evaluations prioritizing multi-terrain adaptability over specialized desert or woodland schemes. Adoption accelerated in the early amid surplus availability from U.S. Department of Defense excess property transfers under the (LESO) program, formerly known as , which has distributed over $7 billion in military —including tactical apparel—to more than 8,000 agencies since its , enabling cost-effective outfitting for rural and mid-sized departments conducting joint operations in varied topographies. This influx supported expanded use in scenarios like responses and border security patrols, where the pattern's low-light performance reduces detection time in simulation-based assessments compared to legacy uniforms.

Licensing and Market Expansion

Crye Precision LLC licenses the MultiCam camouflage to printers and manufacturers worldwide through royalty agreements, enabling authorized production of textiles and related products while generating revenue for the company. These arrangements have facilitated broad commercial distribution, with the produced by multiple licensees as of 2025, alongside unauthorized copies in some regions. Royalties from such licensing support Crye Precision's operations, including refinement and innovation, though exact financial details remain . The commercial ecosystem around MultiCam has grown through partnerships with tactical brands and channels, expanding access to licensed products globally. This market development underscores the pattern's economic viability beyond contracts, with licensees adapting it for diverse printing scales. Demand from non- sectors has further propelled adoption, contributing to sustained royalty streams without disclosed aggregate sales volumes. Licensing has extended MultiCam into non-apparel domains, notably vinyl materials for vehicle wraps and graphic applications. Companies such as Image Craft produce official MultiCam vinyl in various scales (e.g., 50% to 500% pattern sizes) using durable substrates like Controltac, suitable for large-format wraps on automobiles and equipment. Economy-grade variants have lowered barriers to entry for such uses, broadening the pattern's in markets.

Criticisms and Controversies

Intellectual Property Enforcement

Crye Precision, the developer and patent holder of the MultiCam camouflage pattern under U.S. Patent No. 8,056,478 (the '478 patent), initiated legal actions in the early 2010s against U.S.-based manufacturers accused of producing unauthorized variants resembling MultiCam, particularly in relation to the U.S. Army's Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP). These suits stemmed from 2012 licensing agreements that permitted limited production of MultiCam-derived patterns like Scorpion W2, which informed OCP, but alleged breaches occurred as the Army transitioned to OCP without ongoing royalties to Crye after initial development collaboration. For instance, in 2015, Crye sued Duro Textiles for breaching a 2012 non-exclusive license by continuing OCP production post-expiration and failing to certify discontinuation, claiming infringement of the '478 patent covering MultiCam's disruptive pixelated design. By 2017, several disputes reached settlements, including cases involving licensees like Santee Apparel who had produced MultiCam under prior contracts but persisted with prints after demands to cease; Crye secured agreements enforcing non-use certifications and halting unauthorized replication. These U.S. actions highlighted tensions over derivative patterns, where Crye's investment in empirical testing for MultiCam's multi-environment efficacy—validated through field trials in from 2004—faced free-rider exploitation by contractors leveraging shared Scorpion data without compensating the original innovator. Internationally, Crye has pursued enforcement against counterfeit producers, particularly in , where unlicensed copies flood markets and compromise near-infrared () reflectance standards essential for night-vision compatibility; genuine MultiCam meets MIL-STD-3009 specifications for low NIR signature to blend under image intensifiers, whereas fakes often use inferior dyes failing these thresholds, potentially increasing detectability in low-light operations. Ongoing efforts, including a 2024 joint lawsuit with against networks selling infringing gear, underscore Crye's focus on quality integrity over mere visual mimicry. While these enforcements sustained for licensed products—ensuring adherence to Crye's NIR-compliant formulations—the outcomes inadvertently incentivized governments to engineer public-domain alternatives like , derived from MultiCam's principles but altered to evade royalties, thus externalizing R&D costs onto private entities and diluting incentives for future pattern innovation. This dynamic exemplifies free-rider problems in defense IP, where taxpayer-funded militaries benefit from commercial breakthroughs without reciprocal licensing, prompting in nations like (AMCU) and (2015M) that approximate MultiCam while sidestepping fees.

Procurement Politics and Cost Debates

The U.S. Army's adoption of the (OCP) in 2015, derived from the government-owned W2 pattern, was driven in part by the avoidance of royalty fees required for licensing from Crye Precision. Following the 2013 Camouflage Improvement Effort trials, where achieved the highest score of 80 out of 100 for overall concealment across environments, the Army selected W2 despite its slightly lower performance ratings, citing fiscal responsibility and the ability to produce the pattern without per-yard royalties that averaged approximately $1 for fabric. This decision allowed the Army to leverage existing -patterned equipment stockpiles from while transitioning to a royalty-free alternative, projected to yield ongoing production savings. Critics, including Crye Precision representatives, argued that the Army undervalued the proven field performance of MultiCam in favor of short-term cost reductions, as the company had offered competitive licensing terms without necessitating a full buyout. GAO reports on broader Department of Defense highlighted systemic inefficiencies, such as duplicative efforts across services that wasted billions since 2002, indirectly underscoring how inter-service silos and budget pressures incentivize in-house pattern development over licensing established designs. Although the Army maintained OCP's equivalence to MultiCam through internal testing, analyses noted OCP's lighter color palette and reduced contrast could compromise concealment in dense, shaded terrains where MultiCam's darker, sharper elements provided a marginal edge. This approach exemplifies a recurring governmental tendency to prioritize zero-royalty options in acquisitions, potentially at the expense of optimal performance if replicated patterns fail to match originals precisely. In the MultiCam case, the strategy facilitated rapid fielding but raised questions about long-term value, as minimal investment—under $10 million from 2009 to 2014—preceded the shift, contrasting with the billions expended on prior failed patterns like UCP. Such politics reflect bureaucratic incentives aligned with immediate budgetary constraints over sustained innovation incentives for holders.

Perceived Limitations in Extreme Conditions

In snowy environments characterized by heavy whiteout or deep snow cover, MultiCam exhibits reduced concealment effectiveness compared to dedicated winter patterns, as its earth-toned palette contrasts sharply against uniform white backgrounds, leading to higher detectability in field observations. This limitation has prompted the development of specialized variants like MultiCam Alpine, which incorporates lighter shades for better blending in transitional winter terrains, underscoring the base pattern's inadequacy for pure snow dominance without overgarments or adaptations. In arid desert extremes, MultiCam's transitional design yields to patterns optimized for low-vegetation, high-sand environments, such as , which provide superior disruption in pure sandy or rocky settings due to finer micro-patterning that better mimics barren textures. While MultiCam performs adequately in mixed arid-transitional zones, empirical comparisons indicate it underperforms in hyper-arid trials where specialized arid camouflages reduce detection ranges by exploiting monochromatic dune disruptions more effectively. Perceived aesthetic drawbacks, including the pattern's "busy" layering of organic shapes, have drawn in field reviews for potentially distracting observers in or close-quarters extremes, where the high visual complexity can draw attention rather than diffuse it against man-made geometries. Despite empirical data affirming overall concealment, this busyness is noted to compromise intuitive blending in non-natural harsh contrasts, favoring simpler disruptive patterns for such scenarios.

References

  1. [1]
    MultiCam® Family of Camouflage Patterns Page
    The MultiCam pattern was developed to effectively limit the visual and near-IR signature of a person operating across a very wide range of physical ...Missing: Precision | Show results with:Precision
  2. [2]
    None
    **Summary:**
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    The Development of the MultiCam Camouflage Pattern - Hawkrigger
    1. Military Adoption: - U.S. Army and Other Forces: MultiCam was adopted by the U.S. Army in 2010 as the operational camouflage pattern for soldiers deployed in ...
  6. [6]
    What is MultiCam® Camo? - 5.11 Community
    Apr 5, 2023 · U.S. Army soldiers began adopting the OCP pattern in 2015 while the MultiCam® was phased out from official use. The Army, Air Force, and Space ...
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Spotlight: Crye Precision designs and manufactures truly innovative ...
    Oct 28, 2019 · Crye Precision, the leading manufacturer of truly innovative equipment for America's fighting forces, was co-founded in 2000 by Caleb Crye and Gregg Thompson.
  10. [10]
    MultiCam - Wikipedia
    MultiCam is a camouflage pattern designed for use in a wide range of environments and conditions which was developed and is produced by American company Crye ...History · Appearance · Adoption · Variants
  11. [11]
    Is this now the US Army's official camouflage pattern, as of 2017? I ...
    Jun 27, 2017 · Back in 2002 a company called Crye Precision was working on a new camouflage pattern in conjunction with the US Army Soldier Systems Center.<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    OCP vs Multicam Camo: The Ultimate Guide - USAMM
    Aug 26, 2025 · Both patterns represent excellent achievements in camouflage design, offering effective concealment across multiple environments.Multicam's Organic Approach · Ocp Vs Multicam Across... · Ocp's Strategic Evolution
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    SSD Exclusive - MultiCam Creator Crye Precision Speaks Out ...
    Mar 18, 2014 · Somebody high up in the Bush administration had a financial incentive to get UCP pushed through before testing. They maintain that financial ...
  15. [15]
    Why U.S. Troops Depend on This Brooklyn Company's Gear
    Aug 21, 2017 · The company is most famous for inventing MultiCam, a new design of camouflage, released in 2004, which works well in varied terrain but is ...Missing: sector | Show results with:sector
  16. [16]
    Crye Precision's 2001 Scorpion Development Contract Calls Into ...
    Sep 22, 2014 · The US Army uses the name Operational Camouflage Pattern to refer to the Scorpion W2 camouflage pattern which is a 2010 modification of the so- ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Crye Precision speaks out on Army's camo morass - Military Times
    Mar 18, 2014 · We received this memo directly from Caleb Crye, executive director of Crye Precision and the designer of MultiCam.
  18. [18]
    Camouflage Today | Defense Media Network
    Jan 10, 2011 · MultiCam also outperformed UCP in separate tests by the U.S. Army Special Operations Command. As a result, some USASOC units in Southwest Asia, ...
  19. [19]
    MultiCam Black is Back - Oakley® SI Stories
    Co-founded in 2000 by Gregg Thompson and college pal Caleb Crye, Crye Precision has designed and engineered everything from body-armor and helmets to camouflage ...
  20. [20]
    Norway - Camopedia
    Jan 18, 2025 · A new camouflage pattern for the Norwegian Armed Forces was initially revealed in 2023 as part of the 75th Anniversary of the Nowergian Home ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  21. [21]
    Danish M11 Multiterrænsløring Pattern | Joint Forces News
    Jun 13, 2020 · MultiCam was originally not introduced for conventional forces use, though its first documented (by the late Yves Debay) operational use was ...
  22. [22]
    MultiCam Camouflage Pattern Selected for U.S. Army Uniform and ...
    Feb 19, 2010 · Several camouflage patterns were evaluated by the U.S. Army in 2009. Six such patterns are shown above, where members of the camouflage ...
  23. [23]
    Some Thoughts on the Army Camo Improvement Industry Day
    Dec 13, 2010 · In 2009, the Army chose MultiCam for use as the Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern (OCP) based on a rigorous test protocol that ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern - CIE Hub
    On February 19, 2010, the Department of Defense formally announced the selection of MultiCam as the camouflage pattern for all uniforms, ...
  25. [25]
    US Army OEFP ~ Operation Enduring Freedom Pattern - Joint Forces
    Oct 25, 2019 · OEF-CP / OEFP camo, i.e. Crye Precision's MultiCam pattern, was authorised for operational service in Afghanistan from the summer of 2010, with ...
  26. [26]
    US Army Camouflage Improvement Effort Update - Soldier Systems
    Jun 3, 2013 · On March 6th, 2012, SSD reported that the US Army had withdrawn its family of patterns from the Camouflage Improvement Effort.
  27. [27]
    U.S. Army Scorpion Camouflage - HyperStealth Biotechnology Corp.
    Jun 3, 2013 · The Scorpion Camouflage Pattern was developed under government contract by Crye Precision LLC. around 2002 which was later used for the US Army Objective Force ...Missing: OCP | Show results with:OCP
  28. [28]
    ACU pattern officially retired; new uniform improvements on the way
    Oct 10, 2019 · Officials have been phasing out the pattern since 2014, replacing it with the "Scorpion" pattern, otherwise known as the Operational Camouflage ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Army Combat Uniform Summary of Changes
    Oct 1, 2019 · 1 July 2015 to 30 September 2019 is the uniform transition period. In this window, Soldiers will wear combinations of the three uniforms above, ...
  30. [30]
    Army to Recommend MultiCam for Entire Force - Military.com
    Jun 28, 2012 · Army uniform experts and scientists have been evaluating a handful of patterns that emerged from the service's exhaustive Phase IV camouflage ...
  31. [31]
    US Air Force To Adopt Army's MultiCam Uniform - SOFREP
    Mar 21, 2018 · The US Air Force could be soon wearing the same duty uniforms as the US Army, the “MultiCam” according to documents that were on social media last week.
  32. [32]
    The Art and Science of Military Camouflage - Works That Work
    MultiCam is a seven-colour, multi-environment camouflage pattern designed for use by the US Army. It was developed by Crye Precision and is also sold for ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] MultiCam-Brand-Guide.pdf
    MultiCam® patterns take advantage of the way the human eye and brain perceive shape, volume, and color. Since only a very small portion of the human eye ...Missing: geometry composition
  34. [34]
    UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF CAMO USED IN ...
    Sep 27, 2023 · Although similar to the OCP, the Multicam pattern sets itself apart through unique features such as vertical elements known as “twiglets” and ...
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    Camouflage and Night Vision: Expectations vs Reality - Pine Survey -
    Aug 6, 2023 · Good camouflage patterns not only feature a clear pattern under NIR, but also find a balance with regards to the reflectance values.
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    U.S. Army Phase IV Baseline Patterns, will the Army have to settle ...
    Jul 22, 2013 · The US Army's Phase IV Camouflage Improvement Effort was to provide the best solution to soldiers with a more effective family of camouflage than what was ...
  39. [39]
    Why not just use MARPAT? - HyperStealth Biotechnology Corp.
    Jun 4, 2013 · The Charts below show separately MARPAT Woodland, Multicam and UCP (Universal Camouflage Pattern) in the Visual and NIR Spectrums. MARPAT ...Missing: detectability hyperspectral
  40. [40]
    Development and characterisation of near-infrared camouflage ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · The NIR fabric exhibited spectral reflectance values ranging from 5 to 20% for blue-black, 25–40% for brown, 15–50% for green, and 45–74% for ...
  41. [41]
    Multicam OCP Camouflage Nylon Cotton Ripstop Lightweight Fabric ...
    50% Nylon 50% Cotton blend. Color: Camouflage. Fabric Type: 50% Nylon 50% Cotton. Item Form: Cut By The Yard. Brand: Multicam. Pattern: Camouflage.
  42. [42]
    50% Nylon 50% Cotton Ripstop Uniform Fabric
    ... Ripstop Woodland Camo Fabric. Multicam Ripstop Tactical Fabric. Nylon Cotton Military Fabric. Ripstop Camouflage Fabric ... Nylon, 50% Cotton. Weight, 203-238gsm.<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Raw Materials | MultiCam® Family of Camouflage Patterns Page
    Crye Precision Phone: (347) 915-6379. Web: www.cryeprecision.com. Email: info@multicampattern.com. Marketing Materials. Hang Tags and Sew-in labels. MULTICAM ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    [PDF] x CRYE PRECISION LLC, Plaintiff
    Sep 17, 2024 · As part of this sublicensing, Crye requires its printers to follow certain specifications and quality-control standards in printing MultiCam ...Missing: stochastic | Show results with:stochastic
  46. [46]
    solvent based screen ink for Nylon fabric, screen print, Nylon Ink ...
    1. Substrates: Waterproof nylon fabric、non-waterproof fabric、luggage fabric、 Oxford fabric and nylon plastic. 2. Product features: High gloss、good softness ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Understanding and Optimising Screeners - Global Inkjet Systems
    Oct 29, 2019 · • Frequency Modulated (FM) screening is an alternative to Amplitude Modulated (AM). • Also referred to as Stochastic Screening. • Popular ...
  48. [48]
    Natick Officially Releases Camo Study Images - ITS Tactical
    Sep 18, 2009 · The Natick camo study (2007-2009) results have finally been officially released to the press, and are interesting to say the least.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] PHOTOSIMULATION CAMOUFLAGE DETECTION TEST
    Jun 23, 2009 · This report documents the methodology used and the results of a computerized photosimulation evaluation to quantify the military effectiveness ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] HyperStealth Summary Canadian Forces camouflage change to ...
    Aug 28, 2018 · The U.S. Army Natick Labs tested 18 patterns from 2007-2008 confirmed that all in one patterns like Multicam and UCP do not work well in either ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Soldier Camouflage for Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) - DTIC
    Dec 2, 2010 · This effort involved extensive collaboration between the US Army Natick Soldier. Research Development and Engineering Center and the US Army ...Missing: Labs | Show results with:Labs
  52. [52]
    Assessment of Camouflage Effectiveness Based on Perceived Color ...
    Aug 19, 2020 · We propose a new model to assess the effectiveness of camouflage in terms of perceived color difference and gradient magnitude.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  53. [53]
    U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained
    May 21, 2013 · Multicam won the competition with an overall score of 80 out of 100 and this led to it winning the Phase 3 trials and becoming the pattern known ...
  54. [54]
    UCP fares poorly in Army camo test - Military Times
    Mar 27, 2013 · MultiCam performed better in the woodland environment than the Desert MARPAT and Desert Brush patterns, while those two patterns performed ...
  55. [55]
    Report Slams Military's Recent Camouflage Uniforms
    Sep 28, 2012 · A 2009 internal Army study found the ACU camouflage pattern failed to conceal troops as well as the Marine pattern or the uniforms of ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    MultiCam® Family of Camouflage Patterns Page
    MultiCam Alpine™ is best suited for any environment that encounters significant snowfall, while MultiCam Black™ is designed to offer domestic agencies a ...Patterns · Team Multicam · Where to Buy · Raw MaterialsMissing: versatility metrics
  57. [57]
    New MultiCam Multi-Environment Camouflage Pattern by Crye ...
    The industrial design firm, Crye Associates, launched the Crye Precision website to promote their new MultiCam multi-environment camouflage pattern. MultiCam, ...
  58. [58]
    Multicam vs. Other Camouflage Patterns: What Makes It Unique?
    Jan 23, 2025 · What is Multicam? Multicam was developed by Crye Precision in collaboration with the U.S. Army to provide a universal camouflage solution.
  59. [59]
    Crye Precision Releases New MultiCam Patterns and Reinvents ...
    Nov 26, 2013 · Today, Crye Precision officially released four new variant camouflage patterns based on the ever popular MultiCam; Arid, Tropical, ...
  60. [60]
    Field Test - Multicam Tropic - Pine Survey -
    The overall green appearance of the pattern perfectly matches the surrounding vegetation. The darker midi and macro elements provide a certain disruption. While ...Missing: vertical | Show results with:vertical<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Home-test | MultiCam® Family of Camouflage Patterns Page
    The MultiCam® patterns were developed to provide maximum effectiveness across diverse operating environments with a minimum logistical burden. The patterns ...Missing: biomes probabilistic modeling
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    UK Multi-Terrain Pattern Camo Or US MultiCam? Updated
    Apr 17, 2021 · As MTP is a close derivative of MultiCam, sharing both pattern shapes and colour shades, garments and kit manufactured from either design ...
  64. [64]
    Erebis vs MTP vs Multicam - Cortman Textiles Ltd
    Sep 9, 2021 · The UK Multi Terrain Pattern is a derivative of Multicam and it incorporates elements of the UK's original DPM pattern – most noticeable are the little dots.
  65. [65]
    Australian Multicam Camouflage Uniform Officially Launched
    Sep 22, 2014 · The Australian Multicam Camouflage Uniform (AMCU) was officially launched earlier today at the Chief of Army's Exercise in Brisbane.<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    MultiCam vs. MultiSham - Part 1 - Grey Ops
    Jul 15, 2010 · These fabrics, sometimes called "Multisham" by bitter MultiCam fanboys, used to have a bad reputation of being poor copies and obvious fakes.
  67. [67]
    MultiCam vs. MultiSham - Part 2 - Grey Ops
    Jul 15, 2010 · In this part we'll see how the Chinese replica items measure up, and if they truly are close enough to be a good value.
  68. [68]
    Crye Precision winning fight against MultiCam® counterfeiters
    Sep 4, 2008 · If you don't see the trademark triangle hang-tag and the woven MultiCam® label, it's probably counterfeit. Next time you think a piece of gear ...
  69. [69]
    Court Dismisses Crye Precision's Suit Against Duro Textiles
    Apr 26, 2016 · The Judge dismissed three specific allegations in this suit; breach of contract, trade dress infringement and common law unfair competition.<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    CRYE PRECISION LLC v. CONCEALED CARRIER LLC (2024)
    As part of this sublicensing, Crye requires its printers to follow certain specifications and quality-control standards in printing MultiCam products. Id. ¶¶ 16 ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] x CRYE PRECISION LLC - GovInfo
    Aug 27, 2015 · infringement of Crye's patent rights in the MULTICAM design. Consequently, the unfair competition claim is also barred by § 1498(a). III ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Plaintiff, v. CONCEALED CARRIER, LLC d/b/a TACTICON ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · On information and belief, Tacticon's infringement of Crye's copyrights in. MultiCam® and MultiCam® Black is deliberate, willful and in utter ...
  73. [73]
    U.S. Army Camouflage Patterns: OCP vs MultiCam
    MultiCam was developed by Crye Precision in conjunction with the United States Army Soldier Systems Center in an effort to replace the Woodland and Desert ...
  74. [74]
    USA - Camopedia
    Jun 4, 2025 · ... organic shapes with black "branches" on a lime green background in 1948. ... Multicam, Operational Camouflage Patter (OCP). In late 2018 it ...
  75. [75]
    We Told You OCP = MultiCam | Soldier Systems Daily
    Jan 8, 2015 · Remember, in Army parlance OCP is OCP, regardless if it is the MultiCam variant or the new Scorpion W2 version. MultiCam will continued to be ...
  76. [76]
    It's official: Army adopts MultiCam for use in OEF - Military Times
    Feb 22, 2010 · Once that effort is underway, the Army will then concentrate on getting new ACU-MultiCam and selected OCIE to currently deployed OEF-A soldiers.
  77. [77]
    Soldiers to field Operational Camouflage Pattern for uniforms
    Jun 2, 2015 · Prompted by Soldier feedback about the UCP, the Army in 2010 began providing the Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern, or OEFCP, to ...
  78. [78]
    Army's new camouflage uniforms hit stores July 1 - USA Today
    Jun 1, 2015 · After testing, the Army held negotiations with Crye over acquiring rights to MultiCam, but they broke down because of cost, according Crye ...
  79. [79]
    Marine Raiders Ordered to Stop Wearing Multicam Uniforms to Align ...
    Oct 18, 2024 · The special operations Marines will abandon the pattern worn by units such as Army Special Forces on Jan. 1, a spokesman said.
  80. [80]
    DPM out after 40 years – UK adopts new “Multi-Terrain Pattern ...
    Dec 18, 2009 · It will be issued to all personnel deploying on Op HERRICK from March 2010 then issued more widely to the UK Armed Forces from 2011. • This is ...
  81. [81]
    The Hon Stuart Robert MP - Army launches next generation uniform
    Sep 22, 2014 · Mr Robert said the AMCU, which will begin to be rolled out across the Army from October, is manufactured in Australia by Australian companies.Missing: adoption date
  82. [82]
    Canadian military selects new camouflage pattern - Ottawa Citizen
    Mar 31, 2021 · Canadian special forces personnel use the U.S. MultiCam pattern and will continue to wear that camouflage. Article content. In September 2019 ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Poland - Camopedia
    Polish Army Special Forces began using a Multicam-derivative design called Suez in 2008. This mottled camouflage pattern incorporates dark brown, olive green, ...
  84. [84]
    Polish MultiCam "Inspired" Variants | Soldier Systems Daily
    Oct 1, 2014 · Polish Special Forces uniforms have been issued in MultiCam since at least 2012, as MIWO Military Lubliniec is the current supplier for COS-DKWS ...Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020
  85. [85]
    Hungary - Camopedia
    Nov 25, 2024 · A growing international popularity of Multicam prompted the decision to adopt it on a limited basis by the HDF Special Forces, and would ...Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020
  86. [86]
    List of military clothing camouflage patterns - Wikipedia
    This is a list of military clothing camouflage patterns used for battledress. Military camouflage is the use of camouflage by armed forces to protect personnel ...Flecktarn · U.S. Woodland · M90 (camouflage) · Tiger stripe camouflage
  87. [87]
    Indonesia - Camopedia
    Indonesia has a long and varied history of military camouflage use that can be traced as far back as the Second World War.
  88. [88]
    Ukrainian Army Welcomes New MM-25 Camouflage: Will It Phase ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · To support this transition, the Ministry of Defense has already contracted 20,000 sets of MM-25 for 2025 to test production capacity. These ...
  89. [89]
    Ukraine's Armed Forces To Switch To 'MM-25' Camo Pattern
    Aug 6, 2025 · Privately purchased and donated Multicam-style uniform items are already commonly seen in use with Ukrainian personnel. At the time of writing ...
  90. [90]
    MoD clarifies: In response to service members' requests, trial ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · Back in June 2025, the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine approved samples of an additional camouflage pattern, MM-25, following a request from ...
  91. [91]
    Germany to Replace Old Camouflage Pattern With Multitarn - Militarnyi
    Jul 31, 2025 · In the coming years, the Bundeswehr plans to replace all military uniforms in the Flecktarn camouflage pattern in favor of the universal ...
  92. [92]
    Germany's armed forces to introduce new camouflage uniforms by ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · According to Hartpunkt defence news portal, all soldiers are to be equipped with the new "multi-camouflage print" by no later than 2029.
  93. [93]
    Multitarn, the German Army camouflage to replace the famous ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · Starting in 2026, new equipment for the German military will incorporate the new camouflage pattern, with the plan to complete the Flecktarn ...
  94. [94]
  95. [95]
    Camouflage, detection and identification of moving targets - PMC
    All camouflage patterns tested increased RTs for stationary targets when compared with an unpatterned target, and so all the camouflage patterns were effective.
  96. [96]
    Best Camo for Deer Hunting: What the Science Says
    Thanks to several scientific studies, we now understand what camo patterns work best and why. Several scientific studies support the effectiveness or lack of ...
  97. [97]
  98. [98]
    An intro to Multicam - AET gear
    Jan 16, 2024 · The development of Multicam started in the early 2000s by Crye Precision, a company known for creating high-performance tactical gear. Their ...Missing: sector | Show results with:sector
  99. [99]
    Does SWAT wear camo? - Quora
    Jun 3, 2020 · Why have police and FBI SWAT teams started to use green camouflage uniforms? In truth, they have not started wearing camouflage uniforms.Why are most SWAT teams switching to using Military-style multicam ...Why have police and FBI SWAT teams started to use green ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  100. [100]
    How police departments got billions of dollars of tactical military ...
    Jun 12, 2020 · The program has sent over $7 billion worth of excess military equipment to more than 8,000 local law enforcement agencies across the country, ...
  101. [101]
    LESO/1033 Program FAQs - DLA
    Once in the program, a law enforcement agency is able to review online the available excess DOD inventory that is suitable for law enforcement and make ...
  102. [102]
    US Army Issued Patent for Scorpion Camo; Admits Pattern Inferior to ...
    Jul 16, 2015 · Crye Precision collects the licensing fees for MultiCam and Scorpion from printers through royalty agreements. The Army pays those fees as part ...
  103. [103]
    Multicam - Camopedia
    Apr 6, 2025 · Multicam is a camouflage design originally developed for the US Army as a joint venture by Crye Precision and US Army Natick Laboratories.
  104. [104]
    U.S. Army Tried to Buyout MultiCam Maker - Military.com
    Mar 20, 2014 · Crye Precision LLC -- the creator of MultiCam -- finally spoke out on the Army's attempts to adopt the pattern for service-use.Missing: licensing | Show results with:licensing
  105. [105]
    MultiCam® Vinyl by Image Craft, LLC
    For applications ranging from simple, small-format stickers to large format rolls of MultiCam® Vinyl for oversize vehicle wraps, Image Craft utilizes our ...
  106. [106]
    NEW ECONOMY MULTICAM VINYL
    Mar 24, 2016 · They have reduced the cost of the premiere MultiCam 3M Controltac vinyl for vehicle wraps. ... It is not recommended for automobiles. For ...
  107. [107]
    Crye Precision, LLC et al v. Duro Textiles, LLC, No. 1:2015cv01681
    This action arises from a continuing dispute between the licensor and owner of a patented camouflage pattern, plaintiffs Crye Precision LLC.
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Case 1:16-cv-09873-VEC Document 27 Filed 03/03/17 Page 1 of 22
    Mar 3, 2017 · Thus, Crye three times demanded that Santee sign a written certification that. Santee would no longer make use of the MULTICAM and OCP print ...
  109. [109]
    The latest updates from Amazon's Counterfeit Crimes Unit
    Dec 2, 2024 · Amazon and Crye Precision file a joint lawsuit against counterfeiters. With World Intellectual Property (IP) Day last week on April 26, and ...
  110. [110]
    Amazon turns to team of ex-prosecutors to try to fight counterfeiters
    Oct 25, 2024 · Crye loses out on valuable sales to unlicensed mills overseas that print copies of its patented camouflage, called MultiCam, on ponchos ...
  111. [111]
    US Army Considers 3 COAs for Camo Replacement - Soldier Systems
    Mar 7, 2014 · Initially, the Army adopted the commercial MultiCam Pattern from Crye Precision for use in Afghanistan in 2010. This led to the Phase IV ...
  112. [112]
    Army statement on the Operational Camouflage Uniform | Article
    Jul 31, 2014 · The Army's adoption of OCP will be fiscally responsible by transitioning over time and simply replacing current uniforms and equipment as ...Missing: 2013 MultiCam royalties savings
  113. [113]
    DOD Should Improve Development of Camouflage Uniforms and ...
    Sep 28, 2012 · GAO recommends that DOD take four actions to improve the development of camouflage uniforms and enhance collaboration among the services.Missing: audit OCP MultiCam
  114. [114]
    Multiple military camouflage uniforms an example of government ...
    Apr 9, 2013 · GAO found that if the services partnered together in procuring uniforms, the Defense Department could save tens of millions of dollars.
  115. [115]
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Operational Camouflage Pattern Case Study
    Jul 3, 2018 · This is a case study on the Operational Camouflage Pattern, by Dr. Robert F. Mortlock, covering topics like camouflage testing and army combat ...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] camouflage - combat - DAU
    The Army had completed the extensive combat uniform camouflage testing—testing that began in 2009 with reviews and a decision process that finally resulted in ...
  118. [118]
    Field Review: non winter camouflage patterns in winter time
    Multicam unfolds its effectiveness, which made it famous. The brown and khaki colors correlate with the winter vegetation and the white spots in the pattern ...
  119. [119]
  120. [120]
    Atacs or Multicam > Tactical Gear > AR15.COM
    Oct 12, 2011 · MultiCam will do better if you live with multiple terrains. A-TACS is similar to Desert MARPAT in its ability to conceal in arid environments.
  121. [121]
    Mastering Camouflage: A Deep Dive into A-TACS Patterns - AET gear
    Jan 29, 2024 · Q3: Is A-TACS better than Multicam? It depends on the environment. Multicam excels in transitional zones, while A-TACS variants are ...
  122. [122]
    Why Multicam Is Hated (Even Though It's Effective!) - YouTube
    Aug 20, 2025 · ... Multicam design and its variations are being adopted by so many countries around the world. Join our new community and support our work ...
  123. [123]