Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Musqueam First Nation

The Musqueam First Nation, known in the hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ language as xʷməθkʷəy̓əm, is a band government representing people whose traditional centers on the estuary in the of , . Archaeological evidence indicates continuous human occupation in the area for over 4,000 years, with the band's ancestors relying on the estuary's resources for sustenance and cultural practices. As of 2025, the Nation has approximately 1,500 registered members, many residing on the Musqueam No. 2 in , from which it administers governance, economic activities, and negotiations with provincial and federal authorities. The band pursues financial self-sufficiency primarily through real estate development on reserve lands and litigation to enforce treaty-like obligations and aboriginal rights. Musqueam has achieved prominence in Canadian via key decisions, including Guerin v. (1984), where the Court ruled that holds a fiduciary duty to when managing surrendered reserve lands, stemming from a disputed lease of band property to a on terms less favorable than authorized. This case, along with others involving rights and , underscores ongoing tensions over resource allocation and government accountability, though the Nation's reserve lands represent a fraction of its asserted traditional amid unresolved claims to broader areas now urbanized.

Etymology

Name Origins

The name Musqueam is an anglicized rendering of the hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ term xʷməθkʷəy̓əm, which denotes the people or place associated with the growth of məθkʷəy̓, a native flowering sedge ( lyngbyei) abundant in the marshy tidal zones of the estuary. This etymology reflects the band's deep historical ties to the local , where the plant's proliferation in environments shaped settlement patterns and resource use for millennia. Musqueam oral traditions, transmitted across generations, explain the name's origin as identifying the people from the locale dominated by məθkʷəy̓ growth, underscoring a causal link between environmental features and cultural self-designation in societies. The plant, often glossed as "river grass" or "small net grass" in English approximations, was utilized for mats, baskets, and other practical items, embedding it further in daily life and identity. Alternative transliterations like Xʔmuzkʔiʔəm appear in early records, but xʷməθkʷəy̓əm aligns with standardized hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ orthography adopted by the community.

History

Pre-Colonial Period

The ancestors of the Musqueam First Nation, hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓-speaking members of the peoples, occupied the estuary and delta region for over 4,000 years prior to European contact, as demonstrated by archaeological evidence including stone tools, fishing implements, and burial sites, corroborated by oral histories. Their traditional territory encompassed the lower area, including key sites in the present-day vicinity, where they maintained a society adapted to the rich estuarine environment. A central pre-colonial settlement was the village of c̓əsnaʔəm (also known as dhƛ̓ucay̓ or ), which functioned as a trading hub and residential center for millennia, with continuous occupation evidenced by extensive middens and remains. Excavations have uncovered over 1,500 artifacts such as bone, stone, and shell tools, reflecting advanced craftsmanship and diverse subsistence activities including processing and tool-making. Longhouses served multifaceted roles in residence, political decision-making, economic exchange, and ceremonial practices, underscoring a structured . Subsistence centered on exploiting seasonal abundances, with salmon fishing via weirs and traps forming the economic backbone, augmented by hunting, shellfish gathering, and berry collection; trade extended these resources through networks exchanging dried fish, obsidian, and cedar products. Cultural continuity is preserved in sχwəy̓əm̓ transformation narratives dating back over 8,000 years, alongside skills in basketry from cedar and mountain goat wool weaving, which denoted status and utility in daily and ceremonial contexts. Sustainable practices, evident in resource management artifacts, supported a thriving community interconnected with the landscape.

European Contact and Colonial Impacts

The first documented European contact with the Musqueam people occurred in 1791, when Spanish explorer José María Narváez navigated into the , part of their traditional territory along the delta. This was followed in 1792 by British Captain George Vancouver's expedition, which charted the region and engaged in initial trade, with Musqueam exchanging and furs for European metal tools, beads, and cloth. Such encounters introduced novel goods that supplemented traditional economies based on , hunting, and intertribal trade, though they remained sporadic until the early 19th century. In 1808, explorer Simon Fraser landed at a Musqueam site and sought to establish relations but was firmly turned away by local leaders, reflecting wariness toward inland fur traders encroaching from the east. Sustained interaction intensified in 1827 with the Hudson's Bay Company's founding of on the , approximately 40 kilometers upstream from Musqueam villages; this post facilitated regular barter of furs and fish for blankets, guns, and hardware, drawing Musqueam into the network while exposing them to escalating European presence. Introduced diseases wrought the most immediate and severe impacts, with smallpox epidemics—originating via maritime trade routes—striking the Northwest Coast multiple times post-contact. Outbreaks in the 1770s–1780s and especially 1862, the latter spreading from to the mainland via infected individuals and lacking access for most groups, inflicted mortality rates often exceeding 50% on susceptible populations like the , including Musqueam communities. These pandemics, compounded by and other pathogens, triggered demographic collapse, disrupted social structures, and weakened resistance to territorial pressures, as survivor labor shifted toward trade dependencies amid labor shortages. The 1858 Fraser Canyon Gold Rush exacerbated these strains, funneling over 30,000 prospectors and settlers into the lower , where unregulated mining and encampments polluted waters, depleted salmon runs, and confined Musqueam to shrinking access of ancestral fishing weirs and village sites without negotiated land cessions or compensation. British Columbia's colonial administration, under governors like James Douglas initially and later Trutch, asserted Crown sovereignty over unceded lands without comprehensive treaties—unlike limited Vancouver Island agreements—prioritizing settlement over Indigenous title recognition, which fragmented Musqueam resource bases and precipitated conflicts over fisheries vital to their sustenance. This era's causal chain—disease-induced depopulation enabling unchecked expansion—fundamentally eroded self-sufficiency, fostering reliance on wage labor and colonial economies by the late 19th century.

Reserve Era and 20th Century Developments

The reserve lands allocated to the Musqueam First Nation were established in the late under the provisions of Canada's , confining the band to small parcels that comprised only about 0.2 percent of their traditional territory of approximately 144,888 hectares. These allocations, often reverting to pre-existing village sites, reflected colonial policies that preempted or granted much of the surrounding land to non-Indigenous , with justifying the limited acreage on the erroneous premise that the Musqueam population was declining toward . By , census records documented the Musqueam alongside related groups, indicating formal reserve recognition had occurred by that time. The Royal Commission on Indian Affairs, jointly appointed by federal and provincial governments in , further scrutinized and largely confirmed these reserve boundaries during site visits, solidifying the constrained land base amid ongoing settler expansion. Throughout the 20th century, the Musqueam maintained cultural continuity and adapted to reserve life despite systemic pressures, including the desecration of sacred sites like the Marpole Midden—a major ancestral village and burial ground—by archaeologists in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. A pivotal event was the lease of 162 acres of reserve land in Vancouver's Shaughnessy neighborhood to the Shaughnessy Golf and Country Club for 75 years, arranged by the federal government without disclosing unfavorable terms to the band council, which had approved a surrender under the . Discovery of the discrepancies in 1970 prompted a in 1975, culminating in the 1984 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Guerin v. The Queen, which affirmed the Crown's fiduciary duty to Indigenous bands in managing surrendered lands and awarded Musqueam compensation, reshaping Aboriginal law by recognizing enforceable rights beyond mere wardship. In the 1970s, amid federal land claims policies, the Musqueam formally reasserted through the 1976 Musqueam Declaration, signed by leadership and members, emphasizing over their territory and challenging state narratives of extinguished rights. This period marked growing activism, with the band leveraging legal precedents like Guerin to preserve identity and pursue claims, demonstrating resilience against assimilationist forces such as residential schools and economic marginalization on reserves. By century's end, these efforts laid groundwork for future negotiations, though reserve lands remained limited to roughly 273 hectares across sites like Musqueam No. 2 and No. 4.

Post-2000 Developments

In 2008, the Province of British Columbia entered into the Musqueam Reconciliation, Settlement and Benefits Agreement with the Musqueam Indian Band, providing financial payments totaling approximately $26 million over 10 years and facilitating the acquisition of additional lands to address historical impacts on Musqueam governance and community conditions arising from reserve allocations, including those related to the University of British Columbia's golf course leases. This agreement aimed to support housing, infrastructure, and economic initiatives without resolving broader land claims. The Musqueam Capital Corporation was established in 2012 as the band's arm, replacing the prior economic department and focusing on sustainable , , and community projects to generate revenue for long-term growth. Under its mandate, MCC advanced initiatives such as the leləm̓ on reserve lands, incorporating approximately 500 residential units, commercial spaces, a , childcare facilities, and public amenities under 99-year leaseholds to promote self-sufficiency. In February 2025, signed a revenue-sharing agreement with Musqueam for ground revenues from (YVR), allocating a of funds—estimated to exceed $100 million over the term—to support community development, reflecting recognition of Musqueam's unceded traditional territory encompassing the airport site. This was followed in March 2025 by the initialling of a self-government agreement, marking progress toward re-establishing inherent governance rights through community ratification processes, independent of the framework. Legal challenges persisted, exemplified by the August 2025 British Columbia Supreme Court decision in a multi-nation dispute over a 750-hectare parcel in , including the historic Steveston village site, where claims by the Quw'utsun (Cowichan) Nations were upheld, adversely affecting Musqueam's asserted and fishing rights in the shared estuary after what was described as Canada's longest trial. Musqueam leadership characterized the ruling as devastating, highlighting ongoing jurisdictional conflicts among groups and potential implications for resource access without extinguishing title.

Territory and Land Holdings

Traditional Territory

The traditional territory of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) people centers on the estuary and delta in southwestern , encompassing lands and waters critical for fishing, hunting, and gathering. This region, known historically as stal̕əw̓ for the , supported abundant resources like salmon runs and sedge plants, forming the ecological basis for Musqueam sustenance and culture. Archaeological and oral historical evidence indicates continuous occupation for over 10,000 years, with villages, resource sites, and place names in the hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ language marking key locations such as Second Beach (st̓it̓əwəq̓ʷ) and Jericho Village. The territory extends across what is now much of , including coastal areas reaching , though European settlement and policies like the reduced Musqueam control to a small reserve of approximately 450 acres by the . The name xʷməθkʷəy̓əm derives from the sedge grass məθkʷəy̓, which proliferated in the marshlands, highlighting the intimate connection between the people and their environment; this plant was used for and other traditional purposes. Musqueam asserts over these unceded lands, supported by longstanding use and ongoing legal claims.

Reserves and Modern Holdings

The Musqueam Indian Band holds three primary Indian reserves totaling approximately 254 hectares. Musqueam Indian Reserve No. 2 (IR#2), the band's main population and administrative center, spans 190.4 hectares at the mouth of the Fraser River in southwest Vancouver, adjacent to the University of British Columbia and north of Sea Island. Musqueam Indian Reserve No. 3 (IR#3) covers 6.5 hectares on Sea Island in Richmond, near Vancouver International Airport, and remains largely undeveloped due to flood risks and lack of infrastructure. Musqueam Indian Reserve No. 4 (IR#4) encompasses 57.3 hectares in the District of Delta, east of Canoe Pass, primarily designated for agricultural use with limited residential occupancy consisting of two homes.
ReserveLocationArea (hectares)
IR#2Southwest , mouth190.4
IR#3Sea Island, 6.5
IR#4, east of Canoe Pass57.3
In addition to these reserves, IR#2 has been expanded by 14 hectares through the addition of the Triangle Lands via a 2013 reconciliation agreement with , increasing developable area for community purposes. The band exercises jurisdiction over reserve lands through its Land Code, ratified by members on June 28, 2012, which enables self-governance by opting out of select provisions and establishing internal laws for land use, subdivision, and environmental management. Beyond reserves, the Musqueam Indian Band owns several fee-simple properties acquired for and revenue generation. These include the 59-hectare UBC site, 7-hectare Bridgeport Lands in , the 0.5-hectare Fraser Arms Hotel property in , and a 2.42-hectare former building site. In 2023, the band advanced plans for "leləm̓," a on 21 acres (approximately 8.5 hectares) of owned land near the , focusing on and commercial space to support community growth. These holdings are managed under the band's 2014 Land Use Plan, which prioritizes sustainable economic activities, member (targeting 350-375 units over 22 years primarily on IR#2), and protection of cultural and environmental sites while generating lease revenues exceeding $300,000 annually from reserve lands.

Land Claims and Declarations

The Musqueam Declaration, ratified on June 10, 1976, by Delbert Guerin and the band's five councillors, affirms the band's to its traditional lands, waters, and resources, including the right to live upon, travel over, and harvest from these areas. The declaration explicitly rejects the adequacy of reserve lands established under the , asserting that such allocations failed to fulfill promises or recognize pre-existing title, and calls for the restoration of sufficient traditional resources to sustain the community. It emphasizes , stating the band's intent to manage its affairs independently while upholding responsibilities to future generations. Land claims by the Musqueam have centered on alleged breaches of duties by the Crown in managing reserve lands and resources. In Guerin v. The Queen (1984), the ruled in favor of the Musqueam, finding that the federal government breached its obligation by leasing 162 acres of reserve land to the Shaugnessy Heights Golf Club in 1958 under terms disadvantageous to the band and without adequate band consent or disclosure. The decision established a landmark precedent affirming the Crown's trust-like duty to in dealings with reserve lands, leading to compensation for the Musqueam estimated at over $10 million in a subsequent settlement. More recent claims include a 2013 Reconciliation, Settlement and Benefits Agreement with , which resolved specific historical grievances related to the province's administration of lands and resources, providing economic benefits and capacity funding while affirming Musqueam's ongoing assertion of Aboriginal rights and title over its traditional territory as outlined in its 1993 Statement of Intent to the BC Treaty Commission. In August 2025, a Supreme Court ruling in a protracted trial—described by Musqueam leadership as Canada's longest—adversely affected the band's Aboriginal title and fishing rights in areas overlapping with claims by other nations, prompting internal review and potential appeals. Overlapping title assertions have led to disputes, such as Musqueam's 2025 appeal of a BC decision granting the to approximately 7.5 square kilometers along the Fraser River's south arm, including lands in where Musqueam argued the claims encroached on its established territory and rights. These proceedings highlight tensions in reconciling competing claims without comprehensive , with Musqueam maintaining that its pre-contact occupation and continuous use supersede later assertions by neighboring groups. Ongoing treaty negotiations and a March 2025 self-government agreement initialled with further address governance over claimed lands by recognizing inherent rights, though without resolving underlying title disputes.

Governance

Band Council Structure

The Musqueam Indian Band operates under an elected band council as defined by federal legislation, consisting of one chief and ten councillors responsible for overseeing band governance, policy development, and administration. Councillors receive mandate letters delineating specific focus areas and deliverables to guide their work. Elections for chief and councillors occur every four years, conducted pursuant to the First Nations Elections Act, which replaced the two-year terms under the Indian Act for participating bands to promote stability and long-term planning. The most recent election took place on November 29, 2024, with eligible band members nominating and voting for candidates during community meetings. The council delegates operational responsibilities through five standing committees, established in 2021 with approved and mandates tailored to key areas such as community services, finance, and administration. Each committee includes councillors serving as chairs or members alongside appointed community representatives, including elders and youth, to conduct detailed reviews and recommend actions to the full council for ratification. This structure enables specialized handling of complex issues while maintaining accountability to the elected body.

Leadership and Decision-Making

The Musqueam Indian Band operates under an elected band council structure, consisting of one and ten councillors responsible for overseeing , resource allocation, , and community affairs in accordance with the and the First Nations Elections Act. Elections occur every four years under the First Nations Elections Act, with the most recent held on November 29, 2024, using an electoral officer and process managed through platforms like OneFeather to ensure community participation. As of October 2025, Wayne Sparrow leads the council, supported by ten elected councillors including Allyson Fraser, Gordon Grant, and others such as the Guerin family members who hold hereditary ties within the community. Decision-making is centralized through council resolutions and bylaws, with the chief presiding over meetings and representing the band in negotiations with federal and provincial governments. To distribute responsibilities, the council established a five-committee framework in 2021, assigning each of the ten councillors to committees focused on areas such as , lands, , , and ; these committees receive mandate letters specifying deliverables and report back to the full for approval. This structure facilitates specialized oversight while maintaining collective , often incorporating community consultations via negotiation-oriented models to align with the band's comprehensive community plan. The band council's authority derives from Canadian federal legislation rather than pre-colonial hereditary systems, which historically involved lineage-based leaders among peoples, leading some community members to critique the elected model for disconnecting from traditional practices. Efforts to expand include the initialling of a self-government agreement with on March 7, 2025, which recognizes Musqueam's inherent right to self-government as an Aboriginal right, potentially shifting decision-making towards greater independence from the framework upon ratification. Until implemented, however, decisions remain subject to federal oversight, including ministerial approval for certain bylaws.

Culture and Language

Traditional Practices and Beliefs

The Musqueam people's traditional beliefs, shared with other hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓-speaking Coast Salish groups, posit that all beings possess inherent spirituality, requiring humans to uphold ancestral laws for maintaining balance with the natural environment. These laws mandate seeking permission from the land or resources before harvesting, taking only what is needed for sustenance, and offering thanks through words or actions to honor the interconnected web of life. Oral traditions trace Musqueam origins to the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (first ancestors), supernatural beings who descended from the sky and were transformed by the culture hero qəls into enduring landscape features such as rivers, mountains, and villages, embedding spiritual significance into specific territories like the Fraser River estuary. The hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ language encodes these concepts, with terms like ≈e÷≈e÷ denoting sacred or liminal states of transition between physical and spiritual realms. Central to Musqueam spiritual practices were the acquisition of guardian spirits via vision quests, where individuals isolated themselves in natural settings to receive personal power animals or entities that guided , , and daily conduct. Shamans, as specialized intermediaries, invoked these spirits for community rituals, including and curing illnesses attributed to spiritual imbalances, though such roles emphasized individual power over hierarchical priesthoods. Winter ceremonials, conducted in longhouses that housed extended kin groups of up to 1,000 members, featured spirit dances (syuwel) where initiates publicly manifested their guardian spirits through songs, dances, and dramatic performances, reinforcing social ties and communal renewal during the seasonal darkness. These gatherings, spanning multiple nights, integrated feasts and storytelling under strict protocols to validate rights, names, and inheritances. Additional rites included river and ocean bathing rituals, believed to cleanse and connect participants spiritually to waterways that provided both physical sustenance and sacred power, often accompanied by inherited . The first salmon ceremony marked seasonal abundance with protocols for respectful harvesting and communal sharing, while funerals involved purification rites to guide souls. traditions preserved these practices covertly during the Canadian government's prohibition of Indigenous ceremonies under the from 1884 to 1951, enabling their revival post-ban. Potlatches, though primarily redistributive, incorporated spiritual witnessing of life events like births or adoptions through , , and gift-giving to affirm familial and territorial claims.

hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ Language Revitalization

The hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ language, a dialect of the Downriver Halkomelem branch of Salishan languages, features 36 consonants, including 22 sounds absent from English, such as the glottalized ejectivized alveolar affricate t̕ᶿ. Like many Indigenous languages in British Columbia, it faced severe decline due to historical policies of assimilation, including residential schools, resulting in few fluent speakers remaining primarily among elders as of the early 21st century. Revitalization efforts emphasize community-led documentation and transmission to counter this endangerment. Musqueam established the Musqueam Language and Culture (MLC) department to promote the language's development and daily use, collaborating with the University of British Columbia's and Endangered Languages Program (FNEL) since 1997 to document, teach, and preserve hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ through classes, materials, and elder knowledge. These initiatives include regular UBC-hosted language classes open to the community, culminating in public presentations, such as those held in spring 2024 and December 2024, where learners demonstrate progress in revitalization activities. Additional efforts involve integrating hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ into local , exemplified by the 2022 renaming of Sir Matthew Begbie Elementary School in partnership with the to support and cultural sharing. Community surveys indicate measurable progress: a 2016-2017 Musqueam report found that 53.4% of residents possessed some knowledge of hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓, with the majority able to speak or understand basic words, though higher fluency remains limited. Key contributors include Elder Larry Grant (sʔəyəɬəq), who transitioned from tradeswork to full-time language advocacy after decades, earning a PhD in 2023 for his documentation efforts and serving on cultural committees. Technical advancements, such as customized typography for accurate digital representation, have further aided preservation by enabling consistent rendering of unique orthographic characters. Despite these gains, First Peoples' Cultural Council assessments highlight ongoing challenges, with fluent speaker numbers continuing to decline due to elder attrition, underscoring the urgency of intergenerational transmission.

Symbols

Flag Design and Symbolism

The flag of the Musqueam First Nation consists of a field divided by a central white vertical stripe, or , containing an arrowhead that illustrates a positioned above a net. Designed by renowned Musqueam artist Susan A. Point, the emblem was created as a tribute to the traditional lifestyle of the Musqueam people. The depicted in the flag's central element symbolizes its pivotal role in Musqueam sustenance, economy, and spiritual identity, comparable to the buffalo's significance among Plains nations, as the provided essential protein and was central to seasonal practices in the estuary. The net beneath the represents ancestral , utilizing locally sourced bark for durable, effective traps and weirs that facilitated communal harvests. The background evokes the riverine and marine environments of Musqueam territory, while the white pale likely alludes to the river grasses integral to their xʷməθkʷəy̓əm, denoting "people of the grass" or "place where the sedge grass grows."

Seal and Other Emblems


The official seal of the Musqueam Indian Band consists of a circular design depicting four frogs facing outwards, utilizing green, red, gold, and amber colors. This emblem signifies the band's historical adaptability to terrestrial and aquatic environments within their traditional territory along the Fraser River estuary.
Other emblems encompass the crest, prominently featured in traditional and contemporary Musqueam artwork to represent the salmon's role as a vital source of sustenance, comparable to the in Plains cultures, underscoring its centrality to practices dating back thousands of years. The band's logo illustrates a descending into a net framed by an motif, evoking , , and warrior heritage; it employs on white or grey, or black on white, and is reserved for internal band office materials such as letterhead and signage. These symbols collectively affirm cultural continuity and resource-based identity, with usage requiring band office approval to maintain authenticity.

Economy and Society

Historical Subsistence Economy

The historical subsistence economy of the Musqueam First Nation was predicated on seasonal exploitation of and coastal resources, with —especially —serving as the primary caloric and nutritional foundation, complemented by harvesting, terrestrial hunting, and plant gathering. Archaeological sites in Musqueam territory, such as the c̓əsnaʔəm near modern , demonstrate continuous occupation and resource intensification dating back approximately 4,000 years, evidenced by faunal remains and artifacts indicating year-round access to protein-rich marine species. Oral histories and ethnographic records describe pre-contact abundance, where streams supported walkable crossings during runs, enabling storage through drying and smoking for winter sustenance. Salmon fishing targeted five principal species—sockeye, spring (), coho, chum, and —harvested via gillnets (50-75 fathoms), seines, dip nets, and weirs constructed from stakes, as evidenced by remnants near Canoe Pass potentially predating European contact. Seasonal patterns aligned with runs, peaking August-September for sockeye and in the arms, , and Roberts Bank, with winter (candlefish) gillnetted at sites like Point Grey. Ancient DNA from pre-contact settlements, part of Musqueam territory, identifies as dominant (up to 78% of assemblages) alongside (14%), suggesting selective male-biased harvesting during spawning to preserve populations, a practice corroborated by stable chum abundances over 3,000 years in regional sites. Other like and supplemented catches, processed for food, tools, and trade. Shellfish gathering, integral to women's labor in ethnographic accounts, involved hand-digging clams, mussels, oysters, and cockles from intertidal zones at English Bay, , and Crescent Beach, often in 2-3 week seasonal camps timed to low . These provided reliable protein amid variable fish runs, with pre-contact middens showing heavy reliance on such resources for communal feasts and exchange. Hunting encompassed waterfowl (mallards, pintail ducks, geese) via blinds and decoys on tidal flats during fall-winter migrations, alongside deer and pursued with bows or traps for meat, hides, and ceremonial items. gathering utilized digging sticks for roots and bulbs (e.g., camas), with berries like huckleberries and salal harvested spring-fall for , , and preservation, reflecting a diversified against ecological variability. This integrated system supported sedentary winter villages while enabling summer mobility, fostering population densities atypical for hunter-gatherers due to resource predictability.

Contemporary Economic Ventures

The Musqueam First Nation pursues contemporary primarily through the Musqueam Capital Corporation (MCC), established as the band's dedicated arm for , management, and business partnerships. MCC focuses on leveraging reserve lands and acquired properties to generate revenue for community sustainability, emphasizing profitable ventures aligned with long-term hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ values. This approach has positioned Musqueam among Vancouver-area actively reshaping regional , with developments contributing to supply amid urban growth pressures. A flagship project is the leləm̓ on 21 acres near the , acquired via a provincial settlement. Encompassing four 18-storey highrises, townhouses, mid-rise buildings, a , childcare facilities, spaces, and parks, it supports up to 2,500 residents under 99-year leases, fostering both housing and commercial activity. Broader initiatives include plans for thousands of new homes across Metro holdings, often in partnership with developers, capitalizing on prime locations returned or affirmed through legal settlements. In fisheries, economic opportunities arise from asserted rights under the 1990 R. v. Sparrow ruling, enabling commercial activities such as harvests and species allocation transfers. The band's fisheries program explores direct fish sales and partnerships, including with the Tla'amin Nation, to diversify beyond subsistence while prioritizing stock conservation amid ongoing litigation over allocations. A significant 2025 milestone is the February 24 revenue-sharing agreement with the federal government for (YVR) ground lease proceeds, as YVR occupies unceded Musqueam territory. Providing 1% of annual revenues—marking Canada's first such major infrastructure deal with a First Nation—it supplements income streams, alongside commitments for scholarships, employment positions, and archaeological safeguards, to bolster self-directed growth.

Demographics and Social Challenges

The Musqueam First Nation has a registered population of 1,502 individuals as of September 2025, comprising 668 residing on reserve (332 males and 336 females) and 709 off reserve (324 males and 385 females). Approximately 44% of members live on reserve, reflecting a pattern common among urban-proximate where off-reserve residency enables access to employment and services in nearby . Demographic data indicate a relatively young , with the largest cohort aged 20-29 years, though the 0-9 age group is expanding and projected to surpass it in coming decades due to higher birth rates. distribution is balanced overall, with slight male predominance in younger brackets and female in older ones. Educational attainment shows about 80% of adults aged 20 and over having completed , exceeding some broader averages, while post-secondary attendance stands at 56%, higher than the British Columbia Aboriginal rate of 48% but below the general . Employment levels include roughly 33% in full-time paid work, with an unemployment rate of 12.6%; household is approximately $50,000, lower on reserve at $40,000 compared to $80,000 off reserve and Vancouver's $76,000. Social challenges persist, including health burdens where nearly 48% of community members report chronic illnesses such as allergies, , and anxiety, and 30% experience disabilities like visual or hearing impairments. Housing overcrowding affects about 30% of households, exacerbating family stresses, while community priorities highlight , addictions, dealing, , and assaults as key concerns. Efforts to address abuse and issues emphasize destigmatization and community-led interventions, amid broader patterns of intergenerational from residential schools and colonial policies. These factors contribute to elevated inactivity rates in physical (17% youth, 17% adults, 32% elders) and underscore the need for targeted programs in , , and .

Musqueam Declaration of 1976

The Musqueam Declaration is a formal assertion of and rights issued by the Musqueam Indian Band on June 10, 1976, in , . It was ratified by Chief Delbert Guerin and the band's five elected councillors, representing a collective endorsement by Musqueam leadership and members. The document publicly affirms that the Musqueam hold unextinguished to their traditional lands and possess inherent rights to harvest and manage resources within those territories, emphasizing that such rights derive from ancestral practices predating European contact and have not been surrendered through . The declaration delineates Musqueam traditional territory as encompassing lands, waters, and resources along the from its mouth upstream, including surrounding coastal and inland areas used for fishing, hunting, and gathering, such as fisheries central to their sustenance economy. It declares the intent to exercise these rights by restoring access to sufficient traditional resources for cultural and economic self-sufficiency, while rejecting external impositions that infringe upon them without consent. Key provisions include commitments to , community control over resources, and opposition to developments like urban expansion or industrial activities that diminish Musqueam access, framing such actions as violations of inherent . Issued amid escalating tensions over fishing restrictions and land development in the 1970s, the declaration served as a foundational statement for Musqueam land claims and legal challenges, influencing subsequent negotiations with federal and provincial governments. It underscored the band's position that aboriginal rights, including priority access to fisheries, precede statutory regulations under Canadian law, a principle later tested in cases like R. v. Guerin (). While not a legally binding , it has been referenced in Musqueam submissions for comprehensive claims and as evidence of asserted title in environmental assessments and resource disputes. The document's enduring role is evident in its annual commemoration by the band, marking 49 years in 2025 as a of ongoing for of pre-colonial territorial .

Fishing and Resource Rights Litigation

The Musqueam First Nation's fishing rights litigation gained prominence through R. v. Sparrow, decided by the on May 31, 1990. In 1984, Musqueam member Ronald Sparrow was charged under the Fisheries Act for using a 25-fathom drift net exceeding the 10-fathom limit for food fishing in the , violating departmental guidelines. The Court ruled that the Musqueam retained an Aboriginal right to fish for food, social, and ceremonial purposes, as this right had not been extinguished by pre-1982 legislation or regulations, which were interpreted as regulatory rather than extinguishing. This established the "Sparrow test" for assessing government infringements on Aboriginal rights: whether the limitation is reasonable, pursues a valid legislative objective (e.g., conservation), and respects the right's priority over commercial or sports fishing where possible. The decision prioritized such rights over non-Indigenous interests absent justification, influencing subsequent fisheries policy. Related resource rights litigation includes Guerin v. The Queen, affirmed by the on November 1, 1984. Musqueam leaders sued the federal government after it leased 16 hectares of reserve land for a in 1958 without adequate consultation or disclosure of lease terms, leading to environmental degradation and financial losses. The Court held that the Crown holds reserve lands in fiduciary trust for , imposing a duty of utmost good faith, even absent specific treaties, and awarded Musqueam $10 million in compensation plus interest for the breach. This case underscored limitations on government alienation of reserve resources but did not directly address off-reserve fishing or extraction rights. More recent disputes involve overlapping claims in the watershed. In Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 BCSC 1490, decided August 8, 2025 after a multi-year —the longest in Canadian —the British Columbia Supreme Court granted the Aboriginal title to portions of the Fraser River's south arm and adjacent lands, including submerged beds and associated fishing rights for eulachon and . Musqueam, asserting prior exclusive rights in the area based on historical evidence, intervened and on September 5, 2025, filed a notice of , arguing the decision undermines their and fishing by recognizing shared or Cowichan-dominant access without sufficient evidentiary rebuttal. The ruling applied a flexible interpretation of Aboriginal rights, rejecting rigid species- or season-specific limitations, but Musqueam contends it dilutes their Sparrow-derived priorities amid declining stocks. joined the appeal, highlighting inter-nation tensions over resource allocation.

Recent Court Rulings and Appeals

In Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 BCSC 1490, the British Columbia Supreme Court ruled on August 7, 2025, that the Cowichan Tribes hold Aboriginal title over approximately 1,846 acres of land in the City of Richmond, including areas along the south arm of the Fraser River, and associated fishing rights dating back to pre-contact times. The decision, following Canada's longest civil trial spanning over 300 days of evidence from 2018 to 2024, declared certain Crown and municipal titles in the claim area "defective and invalid" due to the failure to reconcile Indigenous title with subsequent grants, while affirming the Cowichan Tribes' exclusive use and occupation. Musqueam Indian Band, intervening as a defendant to assert its own competing Aboriginal title and fishing rights in the overlapping territory based on historical village sites and resource use, contested the ruling's findings on territorial boundaries and priority. The Musqueam Indian Band described the judgment as "devastating" to its longstanding claims, arguing that archaeological, , and ethnographic evidence presented during the trial demonstrated exclusive Musqueam occupation and rights in the disputed areas, which the court undervalued in favor of Cowichan assertions. On September 5, 2025, Musqueam filed a of in the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn the title grant and protect its interests in the region. Concurrently, the Tsawwassen First Nation, City of Richmond, Province of , and also filed appeals by early September 2025, citing concerns over the scope of the title declaration, its impact on titles affecting hundreds of homeowners, and unresolved inter-nation overlaps. As of 2025, the appeals remain pending, with no hearing dates scheduled, leaving uncertainty for development, property rights, and ongoing treaty negotiations in the .

Controversies

Inter-Nation Land Disputes

The Musqueam First Nation has engaged in disputes with other groups over overlapping territorial claims, particularly in the estuary and surrounding lowlands. A prominent case involves the Hul'qumi'num Treaty Group, comprising the and allied bands (Stz'uminus, Penelakut, Halalt, and Lyackson), which asserted and fishing rights over approximately 7.5 square kilometers in the Steveston area of . In a August 1, 2025, British Columbia Supreme Court ruling following Canada's longest trial (spanning over 200 days of evidence), Justice Christopher Giaschi granted the Hul'qumi'num groups exclusive to this land, citing oral histories and kinship-based resource access under legal orders. Musqueam intervened as a defendant, arguing that the claimed territory falls within their core hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ traditional lands, historically used for , , and village sites, and that the ruling undermines their established Aboriginal . Musqueam leadership described the decision as "devastating," contending it disregards evidence of their exclusive occupation and could extinguish their title through judicial overreach favoring upstream Hul'qumi'num claims, despite geographical and cultural separations between hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ and Hul'qumi'num̓ speakers. On September 5, 2025, Musqueam filed a notice of appeal in the British Columbia Court of Appeal, joined by , emphasizing the need to protect downstream nations' against expansive upstream assertions. Overlapping claims have also arisen with the Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh Nations in urban areas, where historical territorial assertions delayed developments like the project. Despite these tensions, the three nations forged cooperative agreements in 2014 to jointly acquire properties, such as the 52-acre site at 1333 West Georgia Street, setting aside disputes for shared economic ventures under the MST Development Corporation. Such arrangements reflect pragmatic resolutions amid unresolved title uncertainties, though they do not extinguish underlying inter-nation conflicts rooted in pre-contact boundaries defined by , resource use, and ties. These disputes highlight challenges in reconciling oral traditions with modern legal standards, often prioritizing evidentiary volume over exclusivity of occupation.

Governance and Transparency Criticisms

In , a group of Musqueam band members, organized as the Musqueam Membership Movement, occupied the band's administration office starting on May 29 to protest the council's handling of approximately $40 million in funds from and provincial governments, including $20.3 million from a British Columbia reconciliation agreement and $17 million related to 2010 Olympics claims. The protesters alleged , favoring relatives and allies of council members in housing and employment allocations, and a general lack of in fund distribution, despite the band's substantial assets. The council had allocated 50% of the provincial settlement to debt repayment, 40% to band programs, and $1.5 million for per capita distributions of $250 per member, which protesters demanded be increased to $1,000 while criticizing opaque processes. Additional grievances included inadequate band support for addressing toxic housing conditions on the reserve, insufficient for drug and alcohol treatment programs, and refusal to finance a child protection facility, highlighting perceived failures in prioritizing community welfare over administrative priorities. Band Chief Ernie Campbell responded by demanding a public apology from the protesters and emphasizing adherence to established governance procedures under the , while councillor Jordan Point denied the nepotism claims and announced plans for a meeting and vote on fund usage. Tensions escalated when the locked protesters out of the office, leading to the month-long occupation's end without direct negotiations or concessions, resulting in disrupted services and lingering divisions. These events underscored broader critiques of limited democratic oversight in band operations, where elections occur every two years but financial relies on voluntary disclosures amid restricted access to detailed records for members.

Impacts on Broader Society and Development

The Musqueam First Nation's strategic location adjacent to has positioned it as a key player in regional and urban development, with its economic ventures contributing to housing supply amid chronic shortages. Through the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh (MST) Nations partnership, Musqueam has advanced major projects such as the Jericho Lands, described as Canada's largest Indigenous-led housing initiative, which commenced construction in October 2024 following protracted legal disputes. Similarly, the Heather Lands development, announced in September 2024, offers thousands of first-time homebuyers units at 40% below market value, directly alleviating affordability pressures in one of Canada's most expensive housing markets. These efforts have elevated 's , including Musqueam, to become Canada's largest developers by volume, reshaping dynamics and injecting capital into community infrastructure. Beyond housing, Musqueam's collaborations extend to , fostering employment and revenue streams that benefit broader economic activity. A 2023 agreement with secures ongoing engagement, job opportunities for Musqueam members, and , supporting regional transportation hubs that handle millions of passengers annually and underpin British Columbia's trade economy. Such partnerships exemplify how Musqueam's pursuits, formalized in a March 2025 self-government agreement with recognizing inherent rights, enable sustainable without fully supplanting provincial oversight. However, Musqueam's enforcement of and rights through litigation has introduced frictions in broader development timelines and investment certainty. The nation's September 2025 appeal of the BC ruling in Cowichan Tribes v. highlights concerns over declarations of title that could undermine existing land tenures, potentially affecting future projects and private investments across the province. Analogous disputes, such as historical opposition to dredging for bridge expansions due to salmon habitat risks, demonstrate how resource rights assertions can delay vital for urban connectivity and growth. While these actions preserve ecological and cultural integrity—evident in protections for Musqueam heritage sites amid 's expansion—they impose consultation mandates and legal uncertainties that elevate costs for non-Indigenous stakeholders and taxpayers. In societal terms, Musqueam's influence promotes economic empowerment but underscores tensions in reconciling title claims with modern , as seen in critiques of provincial fast-tracking opposed by Musqueam leaders for risking hasty errors over deliberate processes. This dynamic has spurred policy adaptations, including collaborative management agreements for resources that balance economic value for all British Columbians against differing stewardship views. Overall, while fostering inclusive development models, these interactions reveal causal trade-offs: enhanced Indigenous agency often correlates with protracted negotiations that can constrain rapid societal-scale progress in densely populated areas.

References

  1. [1]
    Musqueam Indian Band: Home
    Musqueam Indian Band has over 1300 members who have lived in Vancouver and surrounding areas, including the Fraser River Estuary, for thousands of years.Musqueam TerritoryContactMusqueam's StoryCareersDepartments
  2. [2]
    BC – Musqueam Band - First Nations History
    Archaeological findings and oral histories place the Musqueam people in the Fraser River delta for over 4,000 years. Artifacts such as stone tools, fishing ...
  3. [3]
    Musqueam Indian Band
    Jan 22, 2025 · Population : 1,495 Members. Chief: Chief Wayne Sparrow. Councillor(s): Councillor Allyson Fraser Councillor Gordon W. Grant
  4. [4]
    Musqueam Band: This Land Is My Land - BCBusiness
    Nov 3, 2010 · The Musqueam Indian Band has charted a course for financial self-sufficiency that depends on real estate – and lawsuits. It's hard to miss the ...Missing: notable achievements
  5. [5]
    Guerin v. The Queen, 1984 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1984] 2 SCR 335
    An Indian Band surrendered valuable surplus reserve lands to the Crown for lease to a golf club. The terms obtained by the Crown, however, were much less ...
  6. [6]
    Musqueam Indian Band - Province of British Columbia - Gov.bc.ca
    Jul 27, 2025 · Musqueam Indian Band negotiations statuses, agreements and supporting information relating to consultation.
  7. [7]
    Musqueam Nation | British Columbia Assembly of First Nations
    Musqueam Nation ... Address: 6735 Salish Dr. Vancouver V6N 4C4. Treaty or Tribal Association. Independent.
  8. [8]
    Coast Salish | AMNH
    Before the Vancouver area was colonized, a Musqueam village and trading center called c̓əsnaʔəm flourished there for more than 4,000 years. In both cities, many ...Missing: subsistence pre- colonial
  9. [9]
    c̓əsnaʔəm, the city before the city — MOV | Museum of Vancouver
    An exhibition featuring c̓əsnaʔəm, an important ancestral village of the Musqueam First Nation, be the first story of the Museum's History Galleries.Missing: pre- traditional
  10. [10]
    The Impact of Smallpox on First Nations on the West Coast
    Apr 17, 2017 · The smallpox virus, which came not so much as waves but as tsunamis, decimated the coastal First Nation population not once, but at least twice.
  11. [11]
    Smallpox Epidemic of 1862 among Northwest Coast and Puget ...
    Feb 4, 2003 · This essay describes the 1862 smallpox epidemic among Northwest Coast tribes. It was carried from San Francisco on the steamship Brother Jonathan and arrived ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Musqueam's long history in Richmond
    Mar 20, 2021 · More than 100 years after Musqueam were removed from Steveston and their houses replaced with canneries, little remains to mark their relationship with – and ...
  13. [13]
    Musqueam and Squeamish Tribes (New Westminster Agency area ...
    File consists of the 1876 census records for the Musqueam First Nation ("Muskweam") and reserve communities of the Squamish Nation ("Skwawmish"), ...
  14. [14]
    Historic Timeline | Musqueam Teaching Resource - Ubc
    In 1791 and 1792, our leaders greeted the first Europeans to enter our territory. ... The commissioners visited First Nations throughout British Columbia.
  15. [15]
    Guerin Case | indigenousfoundations
    In 1956, Musqueam held just over 400 acres of reserve land overlooking the Fraser River in Vancouver's prestigious Southlands neighbourhood. At that time, the ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    36 years since the Guerin case | Musqueam Day 2020
    Nov 1, 2020 · In 1957, the Government of Canada leased 162 acres of Musqueam Reserve lands to the Shaughnessy Golf and Country Club for 75 years. This land, ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Guerin Decision - Musqueam Indian Band
    On November 1, 1984, Musqueam won Guerin v. The Queen, the landmark Supreme Court of Canada case regarding the Shaughnessy Golf Course lease.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  18. [18]
    Guerin v. The Queen - SCC Cases - Supreme Court of Canada
    An Indian Band surrendered valuable surplus reserve lands to the Crown for lease to a golf club. The terms obtained by the Crown, however, were much less ...
  19. [19]
    Musqueam Territory
    Musqueam's ancestors have lived in the Fraser River estuary for thousands of years. Learn more about our territory here.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Musqueam Reconciliation, Settlement and Benefits Agreement
    Upon the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Musqueam, the Province will deliver an initial payment to the Musqueam in the amount of $5,000,000.
  21. [21]
    Musqueam Capital Corporation: Homepage
    Musqueam Capital Corporation (MCC) is the economic development arm of the Musqueam Indian Band. MCC is responsible for the development of Musqueam's lands.The Team · Managed Assets · Directors · Contact
  22. [22]
    Musqueam First Nation Builds "leləm̓"
    Properties will be lease-hold with 99 year-long leases. A community centre, child care centre, grocery stores, restaurants, public areas and a park will be ...Missing: infrastructure 2000-2025
  23. [23]
    Canada commits to sharing Vancouver (YVR) airport ground lease ...
    Feb 24, 2025 · Minister Anandasangaree and Musqueam Chief Wayne Sparrow signing an agreement committing Canada to share a percentage of ground lease revenues ...Missing: exchange | Show results with:exchange
  24. [24]
    Musqueam and Canada take a key step forward with self ...
    Mar 7, 2025 · Musqueam has three remaining Indian Reserves totaling 272 hectares with a traditional territory spanning approximately 533,000 hectares, the ...Missing: allocation | Show results with:allocation
  25. [25]
    Canada's longest trial in history ends with devastating decision ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · Chief Delbert Guerin discovered the deception in 1970, and Musqueam sued in 1975. Ultimately, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Musqueam's ...
  26. [26]
    None
    ### Summary of Musqueam’s Ancestral Territory
  27. [27]
    Musqueam's Story - Musqueam Indian Band
    Today, we are a strong, growing community of over 1,300 members. Many of our members live on a small portion of our traditional territory, known as the Musqueam ...Musqueam Territory · Musqueam 101 · Mission, Vision, Values · Place Names Map
  28. [28]
    Reserve/Settlement/Village Detail
    List of First Nations on this Reserve. 550 · Musqueam, 6735 SALISH DRIVE, VANCOUVER, BC, V6N 4C4. Report a problem on this page. Share this page. bitly ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Musqueam Land Use Plan – Approved Dec14
    Jun 16, 2020 · The Musqueam Land Use Plan establishes direction for future land development, guidelines for managing development, and a framework for making ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Musqueam Land Code
    Jun 28, 2012 · The title of this enactment is the Musqueam Indian Band Land Code. 2 ... The Council may, in accordance with this Land Code, adopt a ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Musqueam Declaration
    We, the Musqueam people, hereby declare our intent to exercise our aboriginal rights, to restore to our own use sufficient traditional resources to enable us ...Missing: First | Show results with:First
  32. [32]
    Musqueam Legal History Digital Media Archive
    This legal history digital archive was put together in 2009 by 4th year First Nations Studies student Tanisha Salomons.
  33. [33]
    Musqueam Files Appeal in BC Supreme Court Cowichan Tribes v ...
    Sep 5, 2025 · Musqueam was one of a number of defendants in the trial, specifically arguing against the encroachment of land claims by neighbouring First ...
  34. [34]
    Musqueam to appeal Cowichan Tribes ruling on Aboriginal title - CBC
    Sep 5, 2025 · The ruling last month granted the Cowichan Tribes Aboriginal title over a portion of almost 7½ square kilometres of land they claimed in ...
  35. [35]
    Chief & Council - Musqueam Indian Band
    Musqueam Indian Band Council is comprised of one chief and ten councillors elected by our community to oversee our governance.
  36. [36]
    Governance - Musqueam Indian Band
    Each of the ten councillors and five committees of council received mandate letters that outline specific areas of focus and deliverables.
  37. [37]
    General Election Results | Musqueam Election 2024
    Dec 3, 2024 · Musqueam Indian Band held an election on Friday, November 29, 2024 to elect one (1) chief and ten (10) councillors for the next term of office.
  38. [38]
    Notice of 2024 General Election and Nomination Meeting - Musqueam
    Sep 27, 2024 · Musqueam has called a general election on Friday, November 29. A meeting of eligible Musqueam voters for the purpose of nominating one Chief ...Missing: length | Show results with:length
  39. [39]
    Council Committee Mandates 2021 - Musqueam Indian Band
    Apr 20, 2021 · Musqueam Council approved a new five-committee structure, mandates and terms of reference. Read this post for a summary.
  40. [40]
    Community Services - Musqueam Indian Band
    Each committee is made up of three councillors (including one committee chair) and community members. Much of the hard work of council is performed through ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] MUSQUEAM INDIAN BAND COMMITTEES TERMS OF REFERENCE
    Mar 19, 2021 · Band members are appointed to the Committees by Council and will be reviewed after the first year. If a position on the Committee becomes ...
  42. [42]
    First Nations Elections Act ( SC 2014, c. 5) - Laws.justice.gc.ca
    An Act respecting the election and term of office of chiefs and councillors of certain First Nations and the composition of council of those First Nations.
  43. [43]
    Preliminary Nominations | Musqueam Election 2024
    Oct 25, 2024 · A nomination meeting was held on October 24. View the preliminary list of nominees for Chief and Councillor, find the nomination acceptance ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    First Nation: Musqueam Indian Band - CivicInfo BC
    Elected Officials. Name, Position. Wayne Sparrow, Chief. Allyson Fraser, Councillor. Gordon Grant · Staff. Name, Position, Professional Category(s). Tonni ...
  45. [45]
    Musqueam First Nation Comprehensive Community Plan
    Dec 13, 2023 · Presently, the Musqueam government operates under an elected Band Council ... Community members exercised their agency by selecting council ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Bands | indigenousfoundations - The University of British Columbia
    Structure. Bands are led by band councils comprised of a chief and councilors, who are elected by band members typically every two years under election ...What Is A Band? · Structure · Membership
  47. [47]
    [PDF] A Living Culture - Julie Gordon
    The Musqueam culture is a unique, living culture with a strong community, connected to their territory, and proud of their traditions. They are a unique people.
  48. [48]
    Psychohygienic and therapeutic aspects of the Salish guardian spirit ...
    The author presents contemporary spirit dance initiation as a healing process based on the therapeutic myth of death and rebirth of the neophyte who is made to ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] LOCALIZED RITUALS AND INDIVIDUAL SPIRIT POWERS
    ... Musqueam and Squamish) used to be like one family in the same ... spiritual practices do not exhibit distribution throughout the entire Coast Salish area.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Culture and Politics in the Presentation of Musqueam History
    Musqueam cultural forms like houseposts, dances, and weavings were political expressions of the past, used to identify the community and further land claims.
  51. [51]
    Language - Musqueam Indian Band
    Musqueam's traditional language is called hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓. Due to colonization, there are no longer any fluent hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ speakers.Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Report on the Status of B.C. First Nations Languages 2014
    As expected, the number of fluent speakers is decreasing as our Elders pass. However, as communities make language and culture a priority, we are seeing an ...
  53. [53]
    Musqueam Language and Culture
    The Musqueam Language and Culture (MLC) department works to advance the development and use of the hən̓q̓əmin̓əm language.
  54. [54]
    Language class presentations (UBC FNEL spring 2024) - Musqueam
    Apr 23, 2024 · If you've ever wondered about language classes, this is the perfect event to learn about hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ revitalization in Musqueam. This ...
  55. [55]
    Language Class Presentations (Dec. 2024) - Musqueam
    If you've ever wondered about the UBC hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ classes and language revitalization in Musqueam, this is the perfect event to learn more. This event is ...
  56. [56]
    Musqueam and VSB rename Sir Matthew Begbie Elementary
    Dec 9, 2022 · ... hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ revitalization. Musqueam looks forward to continuing to strengthen our relationship with VSB and schools throughout our ...
  57. [57]
    Congratulations Dr. Larry Grant! - Musqueam Indian Band
    Oct 14, 2023 · Elder Larry Grant (sʔəyəɬəq | 洪禮興) has played a key role in Musqueam's language revitalization. After 44 years as a tradesman, Larry began ...
  58. [58]
    The Revitalizing Power of Indigenous Typography | The Tyee
    Aug 22, 2023 · The revitalizing power of Indigenous typography. Typefaces express sovereignty. Here's how Musqueam found just the right type for its language.<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Report on the Status of B.C. First Nations Languages
    Feb 20, 2023 · Language status, as measured in the reports, primarily focuses on the number of speakers and the level of activity in language revitalization as ...
  60. [60]
    Raising the Musqueam Flag: Acknowledging the past, recognizing ...
    Feb 19, 2019 · The flag was designed by Susan Point, who calls it a “tribute to the ancestral way of life. The salmon, cradled by the cedar net, is shown ...Missing: elements | Show results with:elements
  61. [61]
    [PDF] MUSQUEAM INDIAN BAND - Canada.ca
    Nov 15, 2017 · Indian reserves established, the Indians moved or were moved to reserves, in effect, back to the old villages … In general the authorities ...
  62. [62]
    Aboriginal Fisheries in British Columbia | indigenousfoundations
    When Indigenous people worked for wages in the industrial fishery, they integrated this seasonal employment into their mixed cash-subsistence economies, but ...
  63. [63]
    Archaeology demonstrates sustainable ancestral Coast Salish ...
    Aug 25, 2023 · These results suggest that chum salmon and pink salmon were by far the most abundant salmon species in the Inlet pre-contact compared to Chinook ...Missing: Musqueam | Show results with:Musqueam
  64. [64]
    How Vancouver's First Nations became Canada's biggest real estate ...
    Jul 22, 2024 · Over the past two years, the largest Indigenous-led housing project in Canadian history has started to take shape on a 10.5-acre site near ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  65. [65]
    Indigenous developers to build 25000 new homes in Metro Vancouver
    Jul 15, 2022 · After many years and steep legal bills, the Musqueam First Nation reached a landmark settlement with the B.C. government in 2008, for the return ...
  66. [66]
    Fisheries - Environmental Stewardship & Fisheries - Musqueam
    Engage in economic development by examining fish sale opportunities and other species allocation transfers, creating business partnerships with the Tla'amin and ...Missing: contemporary real gaming
  67. [67]
    Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Fishery Notices
    Further to FN1067, the commercial economic opportunity fishery authorized for the Musqueam First Nation (FN1053) for Sockeye Salmon will close on September ...
  68. [68]
    Musqueam YVR Agreement
    The agreement includes a number of scholarships and new jobs, one per cent of annual revenue share from YVR, identification and protection of archeological ...Missing: sharing | Show results with:sharing
  69. [69]
    Registered Population - First Nation Profiles
    First Nations. Registered Population. Official Name. Musqueam. Number. 550. Registered Population as of September, 2025. Residency, # of People. Registered ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] firstnation - Musqueam Indian Band
    In this section, you can find information about how our community feels about our community objectives, the performance of Chief and Council, Band.Missing: notable achievements controversies<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Musqueam CCP Actions Handbook 2018
    Action 7: Address Abuse and Mental Health Issues. In order to address abuse and mental health issues in our community, we must first destigmatize them.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] musqueam-declaration-1976-low-resolution - The West Wasn't Won
    Musqueam DECLARATION. We, the Musqueam people openly and publicly declare and affirm that we hold aboriginal title to our land, and aboriginal rights to ...
  73. [73]
    Title & Rights - Musqueam Indian Band
    The Title & Rights Division includes four departments that serve to protect and implement Musqueam's inherent rights, as outlined in the Musqueam Declaration ( ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Musqueam Indian Band - Environmental Assessment Office
    Musqueam's registered population as of June 2016 is 1389, of whom 675 live on Musqueam reserve lands. Musqueam has three reserves: Musqueam 2, Musqueam 4, and ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Musqueam CCP overview
    Oct 20, 2014 · 1976 Musqueam Declaration. 5. Page 6. Sparrow Case. 6. ▻ Musqueam took the issues of fishing and aboriginal rights to the Supreme Court of ...
  76. [76]
    Today is the 47th anniversary of the Musqueam Declaration
    Jun 10, 2023 · It was signed on June 10, 1976 by Musqueam members and leadership to declare our inherent rights to our lands, waters, resources and self-governance.
  77. [77]
    R. v. Sparrow - SCC Cases - Décisions de la CSC
    Appellant was charged in 1984 under the Fisheries Act with fishing with a drift net longer than that permitted by the terms of his Band's Indian food fishing ...
  78. [78]
    Sparrow Case | indigenousfoundations
    The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Musqueam's Aboriginal right to fish had not been extinguished prior to the 1982 Constitution and that, as such, Mr.Missing: litigation | Show results with:litigation
  79. [79]
    Cowichan Tribes: Court Affirms Flexible Approach to Aboriginal ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · The court dismissed arguments that the Cowichan Nation had only fished in the south arm of the Fraser River with the permission of Musqueam, ...
  80. [80]
    Cowichan Tribes v Canada (Attorney General), 2025 BCSC 1490
    Oct 1, 2025 · The Court found that the plaintiffs, as the descendants of the historic Cowichan Nation, had established Aboriginal title to part of the claim ...
  81. [81]
    Landmark Decision in Cowichan Tribes Case - JFK Law - Canada
    Sep 11, 2025 · The Court found that the Cowichan Nation has Aboriginal title to roughly half of the claimed lands, referred to as the Cowichan Title Lands.<|separator|>
  82. [82]
  83. [83]
    Tsawwassen First Nation, Musqueam Indian Band appeal Cowichan ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · B.C. Supreme Court recognized five Vancouver Island First Nations' title claim to land along, and fishing in, south arm of Fraser River.
  84. [84]
    What is the Cowichan decision and why is everyone so worked up?
    Sep 9, 2025 · The claim was opposed by the federal and provincial governments (the Crown), VFPA, Richmond, the Musqueam Indian Band (Musqueam) and the ...
  85. [85]
    Bringing Order To Title: How The Cowichan Decision Treats ...
    Sep 1, 2025 · For instance, Cowichan Nation and the Musqueam generally agreed on the operation of Coast Salish law for accessing resources-based, kinship- ...
  86. [86]
    Musqueam slam 'disappointing' ruling on rights and title, but ... - CBC
    Aug 12, 2025 · Chief Wayne Sparrow of the Musqueam said the decision was "surprising and disappointing," noting that the lands in question are "in the heart of ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Tsawwassen First Nation, Musqueam Indian Band appeal Cowichan ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · “Musqueam is extremely disappointed that Cowichan Tribes, Stz'uminus, Penelakut, Halalt and Lyackson would go against our shared Coast Salish ...
  88. [88]
    In Vancouver, Indigenous Communities Get Prime Land, and Power
    Aug 23, 2022 · Besides the Squamish-led project called Senakw, the Musqueam Nation has already built about 40 percent of a 1,250-unit development on 21 acres ...
  89. [89]
    Cooperative land deal opens new chapter for three Metro First Nations
    Mar 27, 2014 · After years of dispute over overlapping land claims, the Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh agreed to set aside differences and acquire ...
  90. [90]
    Accumulation by repossession: Capitalist settler colonialism in ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · Following a 2008 land transfer in fee simple from the province to the Musqueam First Nation ... economic development projects, there are different ...
  91. [91]
    B.C. Indigenous land claims decision leaves British Columbians in ...
    Aug 23, 2025 · The trial delivered lingering uncertainty and heightened risks on the legal status of property.
  92. [92]
    The two faces of Musqueam Nation - The Globe and Mail
    Jun 21, 2008 · As tempers flared, the group alleged corruption, a lack of accountability and nepotism they said rewarded family and friends of those who ...
  93. [93]
    Protest over distribution of band funds ends on Musqueam reserve
    Jun 26, 2008 · They also raised questions about the accountability of the band council, transparency of band business and the distribution of about $40 million ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  94. [94]
    The Jericho Lands give First Nations a say in Vancouver's future. But ...
    Oct 24, 2024 · Construction on what organizers say is Canada's largest Indigenous-led housing project has started in Vancouver after a lengthy court battle.
  95. [95]
    Partnership between MST Nations, Province will help thousands ...
    Sep 19, 2024 · Thousands of first-time home buyers will have the opportunity to purchase a home at an initial 40% below market value at the Heather Lands in Vancouver.
  96. [96]
    Musqueam Indian Band and the Vancouver International Airport
    The Agreement ensures that the relationship between Musqueam and YVR will continue to thrive through employment opportunities, revenue sharing, engagement ...
  97. [97]
    B.C. mega-bridge project ignores the rights of local First Nation
    May 2, 2017 · Near the top of the Musqueam's list of concerns is the potential dredging of the Fraser River for the project, which would significantly affect ...Missing: infrastructure | Show results with:infrastructure
  98. [98]
    xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) heritage and archaeology
    xʷməθkʷəy̓əm are the sovereign managers of their own heritage resources – archaeological sites, named places, spiritual places – a role they have always filled ...Missing: meaning | Show results with:meaning
  99. [99]
    B.C., federal fast-tracking bills 'a step backward,' says First Nations ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · While a challenging economy could affect development timelines, it's not as bad as rushing projects and making mistakes, said Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil- ...Missing: economic 2000-2025
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Musqueam Collaborative Management Agreement - 2017 - Gov.bc.ca
    This agreement is between British Columbia and Musqueam, to satisfy obligations, reduce conflict, and promote collaboration, with Musqueam having lived and ...